HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-12-13; City Council; 9777; COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE REQUEST - REGIONAL PLANNING;
f-- '
cu
-4 m a 3 c- a,@ A 4 b k2
vi cda
a am um u3 alu Mm .I+ -4 aa
cu ld a
cdc
au
a0
54
bn 00
22
rlk a0
3m a, .I+
u=1 cn
as
mu 0 vi a3 0 uu a0
as a,
c u
-I> IM .d a, MQ
a
50
*rl a, C m *d u
upl H
&I aa, UP us
a ad 3 .I+ mu d 43 -4 0 L)v
Od ucd
E2
$2
%a
co co I @l
I4 I c\I 4
2 s
a 6
5 z 3 0 0
w OF CARLSBAD - AGENe BILL /I
0 AB# q??? TITLE
DEpT. Counci 1
MTG, 12/ 13/88 COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE REQUEST - C REGIONAL PLANNING C
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
To consider an item prepared by Council Member Pettine concerning Re P1 ann i ng .
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Council Member Pettine has prepared a proposal dealing with Regional P1 which is summarized in a memorandum, dated November 28, 1988, to the and Council. This memorandum is attached as Exhibit #l.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time pending City Council action.
EXHIBITS :
1. Memorandum from Council Member Pettine, dated November 28, 1988.
-
a < a 0
November 28, 1988
TO : MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Council Member Mark V. Pettine
SUBJECT! REGIONAL PLANNING
In February, 1986 the City of Carlsbad first endorsed
the concept of regional planning. More recently the
City reaffirmed its support by including regional
planning as one of the City's official goals and objectives. The passage of Proposition C gives the cities of our region the unique opportunity to make this concept a reality.
Three factors will be required in order to successful1 implement Proposition C which as we know is only an advisory measure. First, the elected officials of eac jurisdiction must keep an open mind and fully apprecia that the interests of their jurisdictions are intimate intertwined with the interests of the region. Second,
no jurisdiction should attempt to gain an upperhand
on another. The surest way to defeat the mandate of
Proposition C is to allow this process to degenerate
into "turf wars". Finally, the ultimate proposal to
come from this process must be a reasonable and common
sense approach to land use planning.
Carlsbad has taken the lead in land use planning with
the enactment of our Growth Management ordinance in
1986. We should also continue to take a leadership
role in advancing the important concept of regional
planning. To this end, I am suggesting that our City
endorse the concept contained in the attached
memorandum and submit it for discussion when the Regio
Board holds its first meeting.
I look forward to your comments.
Respectfully submitted, N@ MARK V. PETTINE
Council Member
Attachment
0 e
Paye 2
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL
PUBLIC FACILITIES ADEQUACY PLAN -
A TRI-LEVEL APPROACH
I. LOCAL JURISDICTIONS - Primary Responsibility
A. Each City shall be required to have a public
facilities element as part of their General
Plan.
B. Each City's public facilities element shall
address the following:
1. Performance Standards -- To include but
not be limited to the following areas:
a. Local Circulation
b. Sewer Capacity
c. Water Reclamation
d. Open Space
e. Parks
f. Schools
g. Police and Fire
h. Drainage
2. Required Facilities
3. City Size Projection
4. Concurrent With Need Limitation
C. Control -- Each City shall retain control ove its land use decisions which must be consiste with its own public facilities element.
11. SUB-REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD
A. Composition-- The County will be divided intc five (5) sub-regional planning units. Each
unit will consist of the cities within that
region (i.e. North County, East County, South
Bay, Mid-County, and City of San Diego). Due
to the size of the City of San Diego it will
comprise one planning unit. The County will
have one representative in each sub-regional
planning unit to represent the unincorporated area.
-. I
L e * 0
Page 3
B. Authority of Sub-Regional Planning Board
1. Approve public facilities elements preparc
by each City.
2. General Plan Amendments -- Each City may
of the Sub-Regional Planning Board if it
amend its General Plan subject to approval
can be shown that performance standards
required by that City’s public facilities
element can be met.
3. Voting Procedures -- each City receives
one vote; majority controls.
111. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
A. Composition -- Representatives from each City
plus the County (i.e. SANDAG).
B. Regional Public Facilities Element -- Limited
to issues of regional concern and to include:
1. Performance Standards
a. Air Quality
b. Water Availability
c. Regional Transportation (Regional
Arterials, Transportation Managemen
and Mass Transit)
d. Solid Waste Management
e. Energy
2. Required Facilities
3. Countywide Size Projection
4. Concurrent With Need Limitation
C. Authority -- Limited only to issues of region
concern described above. Authority to delay
development in any region wherein regional facility performance standards are not met.
vote; majority controls unless one-third (1/Z
of the jurisdictions call for a weighted vote
D. Voting Procedures -- Each City receives one