The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-04-04; City Council; 9958; ZONE CHANGE OF AN 11 ACRE SITE FROM "L-C" |LIMITED CONTROL| TO "O" |OFFICE| LAUREL TREE INVESTMENTS ZC 88-06I I VI cd h a a rd 0 g u m u !i 3 I) -a GI k (d a a, L.r a 0 0 u GI U .rl w w 0 - m h a, C k 0 u 2 h Ti c) s u a a, U U GI k Ti a 4 -rl 0 FI 3 0 u u a, .. 0-l z 03 0 \ - -3 \ -3 L a z 0 0 6 3 him ur GAHLW5AU - ACitN' BILL AB# 77 zr TITLE: DEPT. PLN ZC 88-6 CITY DEP MTG. 4/4/89 FROM "L-C" (LIMITED CONTROL) TO "0" CITY ZONE CHANGE OF AN 11 ACRE SITE (OFFICE) - LAUREL TREE INVESTMENTS RECOMMENDED ACTION: Both the planning staff and Planning Commission recommend that this aci be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be directed to prepare documt APPROVING ZC 88-6 and the Mi ti gated Negative Decl arat i on. ITEM EXPLANATION The 11 acre site is located east of the future alignment of Col'i Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet south of Palomar Airport Road and E of the Sudan Interior Mission. In 1988 the property was the subject of a General Plan and Local Coa: to 0, office. At that time a zone change to 0, Office to implement thc Office General Plan designation was not requested. It was recommended I the future alignment of College Boulevard be used to establish the bounc between office and residential uses. The exact alignment of Coll Boulevard had not been determined at that time. General Plan designati are general, while zoning boundaries must be exact. Staff and the appl ic believed that it would appropriate to wait until the exact alignment College Boulevard had been determined before changing the site's zoning I L-C, Limited Control to 0, Office. The recent finalization of the College Boulevard alignment has createa exact western boundary for the site. Consequently the zone change appropriate at this time and can be supported by staff. The change would consistent with both the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program wh identifies the site for office uses. The change is also consistent with Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport that discourages resident land uses subject to potential noise impacts from Palomar Airport. This item was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission with a mini amount of discussion. For additional details see the attached staff repc ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the pro; on November 4, 1988 (SCH NO. 88110223). The review period for that Negal Declaration closed December 5, 1988. No comments were received from an) the impacted state agencies. The Negative Declaration had one mitigat measure. The measure was to limit access to the site consistent with City's General Plan and Public Works Standards. The applicant has concur with this mitigation measure. Program Amendment to redesignate the site from RLM, Residential Low Met * e 0 Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 7758 FISCAL IMPACT This zone change will provide additional office land use on the edge Carlsbad's industrial district. This will create a need for additic public services. The site was included in the adopted Local Facilit Management Plan for Zone 5. Nonresidential uses and public facility imp; were identified for the subject site. Therefore the pub1 ic facilities fiscal impacts of this proposed zone change have been incorporated within adopted Local Facilities Plan for Zone 5. EXH I B ITS 1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2827 & 2828 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 1, 1989 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2827 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO 0 OFFICE. APPLICANT: LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT CASE NO.: ZC 88-6 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 1st day of March, a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider saic and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considl testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the ir submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declarati NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Comm follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Dei. according to Exhibits "SCH" dated December 5, 1988, "NO" dated 4, 1988 and "PII" dated October 24, 1988, attached hereto an part hereof, based on the following findings: Findinqs: 1. The initial study shows that there is- no substantial evidence project may have a significant unmitigated impact on the envi Through condition of approval of Minor Subdivision No. 785 a College Boulevard has been re1 inquished thus eliminating any r traffic problem. operations . College Avenue and the surrounding street system will be adequatc to handle any traffic that would be generated by the site. There are not sensitive resources located onsite or located SO l significantly impacted by this project. 2. The site has been previously disturbed by agricultural and 3. 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2'7 28 II a e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Schramm, Schlehuber, Erwin, McFadden & Marcus. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. KA& MATTHEW HALL, Chairman CARLSBAD IPLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: P : PLANNING DIRECTOR I PC RES0 NO. 2827 -2- I Exhibi 0 GECRGE Cl e STATE OF CALIFORNIA4F~~CE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1- TENTH STRfR SACR*MeNTO. CA 95814 ! Lance %hulk De City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CX 92009 * Subject: Laurel Tree Investment, Carlsbad (ZCC# ZC-88-61 SCH# 88110223 bar: LIr. Schulte: he State Clearinghouse submitted the above named enviromiental documel selected state agencies for review. The state agency review perid i closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This le acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse r requirmnts for draft environmental dccuments, pursuant to the Calif( Enviromntal Quality kt. Please ccntact Keith Lee at 916/445-0613 if you have my questions rega the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearing1 regardin; this mtter, please use the eiGht4igit State Ckaringhouss r: so that ue my respond 2romptly. Sincerely, -4- 6 Cevid C. !bnenkaq office of Permit Assistance Chief . * Exhibit 0 e 2075 US PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAO, CA 92009-4859 (!Mu of Unrlebnb PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 1000’ SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD ADJACEN EAST OF THE PROPOSED alignment OF COLLEGE BLVD, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C-Q-LIMITED CONTROL WITH A ( OVERLAY to 0-Q-OFFICE WITH A QUALIFIED OVERLAY FOR A ROUGHLY RECTANGULj SIZED PROPERTY. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above c project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Ci Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (dec that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on fi Pl ann i ng Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on fil Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATEO: NOVEMBER 4, 1988 4 h.LVt&$l 12% MICHAEL J. HOLZ ILL CASE NO: ZC 88-6 Planning Director APPLICANT: LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1988 * 0 8 Mait to: State Clearinghouse, ICOO Tenth Street, urn. 121, Sacrrmanto, CA 95814 .- 916/cc5-0613 7 Nollcf OF CdYPLLTl~ AMB ENV1RMMEuTAL DOClJMENl FWl \ s- I SCH I 1- Project Title LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT ZC 88-6. 2. Lead Agency: CI TY OF CARLSBAD 3. Conw Person: LANCE SCUULTE 3.3. Street Address: 207s IAS PACMAS DRIVE 3b. City: CARLSBAO ?IC. County: SAM OIEGO 3d. Zip: 92009 38. Phone: 619-&38-1161 PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: SAM DIEGO La. City/Comunity: CITY OF CARLSBAO Lb.(optional) AsseSsorlS Parcel No. LC. Section: Tup. Range 5a. Cross Streets: Sb. Nearest Comnunity: 6, Uithin 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1.5 b. Airports PALOMAR c. Yaterwrys & For Rural, 7. DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE IO, DEVELOPMENT TYPE CEaA 0' - MOP 02 - Mew Element 02 -Office: Sq. Ft. 02 - Early Cons 03 & Neg Oec 0.4 - Master PLan oii - Oraft EIR 05 - Annexation 06 - Specific Plan 01 - General Plan Update 01 - Residential: Units - 03 - General Plan Amendment Acres Elnpl oyer 03 - Shopping/Commwcirl: Sq. Employem - 04 - Industrial: Sq. Ft, - Acres Supplement/ Subsequent EIR O5 - (if so, prior SCH I 07 - Redevelopment Acres Employees 05 - S?ucr: MGO YEPA 09 x Land Division 06 - ira:er: MGD ) 08 X Rezone TO OFFICE (Subdivision, Parcel Map. Notice of Intent Tract Map, etc.) 07 - iransportation: Type - 08 - Mineral Extraction: Mini Cancel Ag Preserve 09 - Pouer Generation: Yaeta! 06 - 07 - Envir. Assessment/ 10 - Llft Permit FOYSI 08 - Oraft €IS 11 - OTHER '2 - Other Type: 09 - Information Only 1' - Other: 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 0' - Aesthetic/VisuaL 08 - Geologic/Saisrnic 15 - Sewer Capacity 02 - Agricutturrl Land 10 - Other: Final Document 9 TOTAL ACRES: 9.00 10 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 33 - Air Quality '0 - Minerals 17 - 04 - A~ch~~O~OQ~ca~/~~rtor~ca~/ 11 - Noise 18 - Toxic/Harardous 25 - 27 - 28 - 09 - Jobr/Housing Balance 16 - Sei\ Erasion Solid Uaste Traffic/Circulation 26 - Vegetation water auality 'Q - 13 - Schools 20 - 06 - Fire Hazard 1L - Septic Systems 21 - Public Services PaLeontological 12 - 05 - Coastal 07 - F\ooding/Orainagc 12 FUNDING (approx.) Federal S State S Total f 13 PRESEHT LAM0 USE AND ZONIMG: PRESENTLT VACANT. THE GENERAL PLAY L LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM CA PReSEYT ZONING IS LIMITED CONTROL WITH A Q QUALIFIED OVERLAY. 1L PQOJECT 9ESCRIPTION: A ZONE CMAYCE FRO(I LIMITED CONTROL TO OFFICE YlTn A 0 OUALIFlED OVERLA 9 ACRE SITE. 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE Date: 1.- \A m a E ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A88E88nENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPETFD BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. ZC-88-6 DATE : October 24. 1988 I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 17941 MITCHELL - IRVINE. CA 92714 - (714) 863-1767 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section I11 - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) us MAYBE 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? - w m - N YES MAY BE 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration b. The creation of objectionable c. Alteration of air movement, - of ambient air quality? - - odors? moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? - - 3, - Water - Will the proposal have significant results in; a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? _I b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow 1 - E - of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface X water in any water body? - e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved X oxygen or turbidity? - rate of flow of ground waters? f. Alteration of the direction or X - g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X -2- 0 0 - YES MsyBE 4. Plant Lifa - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? agricultural crop? Animal Life 9 Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any d. Reduction in acreage of any 5, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existinq fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Lisht and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- e 0 - YES mE - N 9. Natural ReSOUrc es - Will the proposal a. Increase in the rate of use of any have significant results in: natural resources? - - b. Depletion of any nonrenewable - natural resource? 10. Risk of UDset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or - - 12. create a demand for additional housing? - 13. TransDortation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: movement? - a. Generation of additional vehicular b. Effects on existing parking facili- c. Impact upon existing transportation d. Alterations to present patterns of ties, or demand for new parking? - sys terns? - circulation or movement of people and/or goods? - air traffic? -- - e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X - -4- e 0 MAYBE YES - 14. Public services - will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Enerav - Will the proposal have significant results in: or energy? energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel b. Demand upon existing sources of a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- I w W h - YES mu22 I*- Ztheti~ij - Will the praBasai have siynificant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality Of quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeoloaical/Historical/Faleontolouical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the Drowsed xoiect such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a - - - 21. A. The project cannot be phased as it is a chango in zoning. B. No Site Design is proposed. c. No scale of development is proposed. D. Alternative uses would be inconsistent with the General Plan and Local Coastal Plan. E. NO development is proposed at this time. F. Few alternative sites would be as consistent with the General Plan, Local Coast81 Plan and comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport. G. No project would continue the present L-C limitation control zoning. -6- 0 0 - YES MAY BE 22. Mandaton fi ndinus of sianificance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effecty of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x 111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 13F. The proposed Zone Change, minor subdivision and adjustmen could potentially create future traffic hazards unless acc the site is adequrtoly planned for. The proposed miti measure should reduco this potential impact to an insigni level. 22b. The proposod zone change from L-C Limited Control with a Qua Overlay to O-Office/Professional with a Q-Overlay achic short-term goal to zone the property consistent with the G Plan and Local Coastal Program. The projectcs achiavem long term goals cannot be fully assessed without a site pl the property. -7- 0 Iv. DETERMINATION (To Be completed BY The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: - I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect o the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significan effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect this case because the mitigation measures described on an attache( sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL m-88 Date I,lZ/B$ ' Date Plannixg Dik-dctor V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) 1. As determined by the city Engineer, access to thm sit. shall 1 limited consistent with the City of Carlsbad's General Plar ordinances and adopted public works standards. -8- e 0 MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEA SURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING M AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. f, /aP Date' ' -9- $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 l3 14 l5 l6 17 l8 I' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2828 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARL CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM LC, LI CONTROL TO 0, OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LO ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF COLLEGE BOUL APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. APPLICANT: LAUREL TREE INVESTMENTS CASE NO. : ZC 88-6 IHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit All that portion of land designated as "description number 4, acres" as shown and delineated on record of survey map number I filed in the office of the County Recorder, San Diego Coi December 19, 1960, being a portion of lot "G" of Rancho Hedionda, and the County of San Diego in the State of Califov according to the map thereof number 823, filed in the office 0' County Recorder, San Diego County, December 16, 1896. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to th Commi ss i on ; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided b of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 1st day of March, a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider saic and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be he Commission considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cornrr follows: A) B) That based on the evidence presented at the public heal That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC 88-6, based on the findings. //// //// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 L1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e a Findi nqs: 1. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with Carlsbad’s Gener; Local Coastal Program which designates the subject site as Oi 2. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the Comprehensiv Plan for Palomar Airport by 1) being consistent with the City Plan and Local Coastal Program, and 2) by providing a land u compatible with the noise impacts from Palomar Airport. 3. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan. Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 incorporated nonreside use impacts from the subject site. The Zone Change thi consistent with the estimated facilities impacts identified b; Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5. 4. The project presents no unmitigated environmental impacts. As by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2827. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th( Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Schramm, Schlehuber, NOES : None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Erwin, McFadden & Marcus. 4& I fl?7La%w MATTMEW HALL, Chai rman I CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST : MICHAEL J. HOLZNILLEV Planning Director I I PC RES0 NO 2828 -2- I L m ZONINGMAP - I To Palomar Airport c 4CALE VICINITY MAP LE@3vcJ ZtWE DES/GNA7-W P-M - PUNNW /Ni7K/#L X&!!- RE5/!W~/AL -Awt&/w-Me/uh R-/ - S/M F~.ZYH~/~~~f5$?L L-c - L/M/TZii Ca"HOL 9 - P#!L~f/dGa &kE~M&7- OV& m- BL4iff5 0 - OFf/CE City of Garls LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT CO. ZC 88-r . e APPLICATION COMPLETI 4 JANUARY 25. 1989 e & STAFF REPORT OATE : MARCH 1, 1989 TO : PLANNING COMMISSION FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ZC 88-6 LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT COMPANY - A proposed Zone Cha an approximately 11 acre site east of the future alignment of Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet south of Palomar Airpor The site is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 5. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2827 recommending APPR the Mitigated Negative Declaration dated November 4, 1988 issued by the p Director (State Clearinghouse it88116223) ; and adopt Resolution NC recommending APPROVAL of ZC 88-6 based on the findings contained herein I1 * PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The proposed Zone Change is from LC, Limited Control, to 0, Office. The site is located south of Palomar Airport and directly east of th Interior Mission as shown on Attachment 3. The site, shown as parci Exhibit B, is relatively flat and bordered on the east by the bluff Cobblestone Vi11 age (CT 84-32). The extension of College Boulevard s Palomar Airport Road would be on the site’s western border. The site of the proposed Zone Change is currently designated 0-Office unc the City’s General Plan and Local Coastal Program. No development is r with this Zone Change. 111. AHALYSIS P1 anni na Issues 1. Is the project consistent with the City’s General Plan and Local Program? 2. Is the proposed project consistent with the adopted Local Fa1 Management Plan for Zone 5? 3. Is the project consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Airport? What are the environmental consequences of the proposed Zone Cha 4. 0 0 ZC 88-6 - Laurel Tree March 1, 1989 PAGE 2 DISCUSSION The project site is currently designated Office under the City's Gene and Local Coastal Program. It has this designation because of the sig bluffs that separate it from residentially designated properties to th The proposed Zone Change to Office would be Consistent with the City 2 Coastal Program's Office designation. The office zoning would provi buffer between the residential areas to the south and the more intense ir uses closer to Palomar Airport Road. The adopted Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 5 incl project site. For identifying public facilities impacts and demands, thl site was estimated to have nonresidential land use impacts. The propc Change to office would be consistent with these buildout projections. all public facility impacts of the Zone Change have been addressed by thc LFMP 5. The site is within the influence area of Palomar Airport. This area i: to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for Palomar Airport. The policies that relate to land use compatibility with airport operations. particular site, those compatibility issues relate to noise impac' proposed Zone Change would assure conformance with the CLUP by provic use that is both consistent with the General Plan and would not create a noise land use compatibility problem. Exhibit "B" documents determination that the project complies with the CLUP. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEY The Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for thl on November 4, 1988, That Negative Declaration was sent to t Clearinghouse for 30 days of public review (SCH %88110223). The revi for the Negative Declaration closed December 5, 1988. No comments were from any of the impacted state agencies. The Negative Oeclaration had one mitigating measure. The measure was access to the site consistent with the City's General Plan and pul standards. Specifically, that mitigation was the elimination of acce site from College Avenue. The applicant has concurred with this m measure. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2827 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2828 3. Location Map 4. 8ackground Data Sheet 5. Disclosure Form 6. Exhibit "A" dated November 17, 1988 7. Exhibit "B" dated January 25, 1989 L8S : af January 26, 1989 b b- ZONING MAP - .I To Palomar Airport -, VICINITY MAP LE@&N/r, a%!e nE5&5NAnM 5CALE 0 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET 0 CASE NO: ZC 88-6 APPLICANT: Laurel Tree Investment ComDany REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Zone Chanse from LC: Limited Control to 0: for an 11 acre site east of the southerlv extension of Collese Blvd. and south of Palomar AirDort Road. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion Qf land desisnatcd as \\description 4, 76.89 Acres" as shown and delineated on record of survey map numbe filed in the office of the County Recorder, San Oiego County, December 19 being a portion of lot "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, and the County of Sa in the State of California, according to the map thereof number 823, f the office of the County Recorder, San Diego County, December 16, 1896. APN: 212-040-22 (Portion) Acres ADDrox. 11 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation O-Office Density A1 1 owed N/A Dens i ty Proposed N/A Existing Zone LC Proposed Zone 0 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zon i nq Land Use Site LC -0 Vacant North PM Vacant South R-1-10,000 Vacant East LC 0 Vacant West LC-0 Sudan Interior Mission Housir PUBLIC FAC I L IT1 ES School District Carl sbad Water Carl sbad Sewer Carl sbad EDU' s Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date September 12, 1' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT X Negative declaration, issued November 4, 1988 E. I.R. Certified, dated Other, 0 0 I DISCLOSURE FORM APPLICANT: LAUPEL T9EE I?l:IEST'IEUT COMPAVY Name Busfness Address Telephone Nbmber (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporatior 17941 MitchpIl, ~rvin~. ~~Iifnrm '2 07711 7lfi 863 1767 AGENT: JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES Name Business Address Telephone Number Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address venture, corporation, syndication) b 97 Jefferson Stl Carlchad. California 920118 619 744 4679 MEMBERS: Dwiqht W. Spiers 730 Temple Placet 17941 Mitchell St-, Irvme (714) 863-1767 (714) 494-9669 Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) l/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development, !/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the propert' subject of this application. l/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in t is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may t as being true and correct until amended. I/We consent to entry for this purpose. LAIJRFL TREE IPIVESTF ay Exhibit 0 0 \ Sun Dicgo NOV 1% ASSOCLXI'1ON OE' I I , qc-1.;; \-I- OF GOVEIW>IENTS -.+,EaAr Suite 524. Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego. California 92101 1619\ 236-5300 November 17, Lance B. Schulte City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 SUBJECT: Development Proposals BP88-13 11; @ and SDP88-12 Dear Mr. Schulte: SANDAG staff has reviewed the subject development proposals. These corn have not been reviewed by SANDAG as the Airport Land Use Commission. Proposals BP88-1311 and ZC88-6 appear to be consistent with the McCl Palomar Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Costa Real MWD parcel, SDPl lies outside the 5O:l approach slope and the clear zone of Runway 24, exce the south corner of the parcel adjacent to El Camino Real. The developmen1 shows this area as a landscaping, which is clearly acceptable. The off-site ent road off El Camino Real lies under the approach slope, but it is below the lei the runway (328 feet), and it atso is clearly acceptable. There appear to be no problems with building structure or other heights. Shou Costa Real MWD propose any high antenna or other structure, higher than the 45 foot height limit, we would wish to review the proposal. Thank you for allowing SANDAG staff to participate in the City's review pr Should you have any questions, please contact Ruth Potter at 236-5342. Sincerely, \..& fv JACKKOERPER Special Projects Director J K:lr MEMBER AGENCIES Cities of Carlsbad Chula Vma Coronado Del Mar El Calon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solara E?Q>~~ s'=+i mrL( -- -* &p,',cpF)v I h, C"" *,?,A,---- - #2C = ............................... ber 5715, filed in the Office of the CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ZONINQ MAP ............................... ............................... I certify under penalty of perjury that the forego correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San [ California on ___the4th--- day of -Mar_ch.1984__ -4 Clerk ~______~- - 'd&$& VICINITV MAP LE-ZNrY 9? g$,@-n- ,*e . au-mY &4eCY.?UL ccw. Imr..murwL -arwrr-- c-1- 9- HYXIMIa5vn& < m Le-uw;rbavrAHL 4 m- - buuffJ nuur/Lb&-a+7aulL4?. titld t~i LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT CO 2C88 8 n ecw ,< . .l ,"I, c ZONINQ MAP *LE VICINITY MAP f€Na 'A? 0€5/6M77~Y29 9 -055% /mv. rnlfiVrUL .ww*wu(I x-/ - YAcizd N-LY,ee2-n& L-c . UM7aZ9 cbv7x% 4 - Qwuf~~Cx~~~mY fm - muff 9 , PN - fx-.tuvm /~YAuL ell1 II Clrlhl zc aa-8 w LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT CO. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carl! California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, March 1, 1989, to consider approv; a Zone Change for approximately 11 acre site east of the future alignmer, College Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet south of Palomar Airport Road. site is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and more particul described as: All that portion of land designated as "description number 4, 76.89 acres'' as shown and delineated on record of survey map number 5715, filed in the office of the County Recorder, San Diego County, December 19, 1960, being a portion of lot "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, and the County of San Diego in the State of California, according to the map thereof number 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder, San Diego County, December 16, 1896. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Plan Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Zone Change in court, you may be limited to raising I notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad ai prior to the public hearing. those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in 4 CASE FILE: ZC 88-6 APPLICANT: LAUREL TREE INVESTMENT COMPANY PUBL ISH : FEBRUARY 17, 1989 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 0 w (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice ZC 88-6 - LAUREL TREE INVESTMENTS for a public hearing before the City Council, Please notice the item for the council meeting of April 4, 1989 Thank you. 3/14/89 - Assistant City Man-- Date .. e e August 15, 1988 PROPERTY OWNER LIST - - I -_ - - __- - - - -- NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS ASSESSORS PARCE I Laurel Tree Investment Co 2 '1 2 - 040 - 2 2 17941 Mitchell Street Irvine, CA 92715 3 Sudan Interior Mission Inc 2 12-040- 23 1400 Flame Tree Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 5 H. Edwin & Mable G. Frazee 2 12-040-34 P.O. Box 1091 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 8 Morgan/Palomar lndustr ial I 212-040-25 800 1V. 1st Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 9 BCS Program L-2 212-040-29 1303 Avacado Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Financial Center 6&7 Richard Kelly & Robert P. Kelly 212-040-37 c/o Robert P. Kelly 2 12 - 040- 38 2770 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008