HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-07-11; City Council; 10118; Settlement AgreementiB# '0; 118
MTG- 7/11/89
IEPT. CA
.,
DEPT. HD.
CITY MGR.
TITLE:
SETTLEMENT OF H&A CONSTRUCTION V. CITY
CASE NO. N36096
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. &?-2%5 approving a settlement of H&A Construction v. City of Carlsbad and authorizing the payment from both the Park Development Fund and the Public Facilities Fee Construction Fund of $113,000 to the Pacific Inland Bank.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The case of H&A Construction v. City of Carlsbad arose out of a grading dispute with the contractor for Stagecoach Park. The Finance Department has been holding $120,360, the remaining balance in the project construction account, pending resolution of this case. The contractor asserted a claim in excess of $300,000 for moving unanticipated large quantities of soil in order to construct
the park. Experts have been retained by both the contractor and the City. A series of settlement conferences have been held. H&A Construction is bankrupt and their claim has been assigned to the Pacific Inland Bank. An overall settlement has been reached with other parties to the construction project paying $10,000 and the City paying $113,000. The settlement has been reviewed by the City Manager and the responsible departments who join in my recommendation that the settlement is a fair resolution of the dispute.
If the Council concurs your action is to adopt Resolution No. f2Ja- which will approve the settlement agreement and authorize the payment of $113,000 from both the Park Development Fund and the Public Facilities Fee Construction Fund tothe Pacific Inland Bank.
EXHIBIT
Resolution No. ~9-a25
'. .
$.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-225
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR SETTLEMENT OF THE LAWSUIT ENTITLED H&A CONSTRUCTION V. CITY
WHEREAS, after recommendation of the City Attorney the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined
that it is in teh City's best interests to settle the case entitled
H&A Construction v. City; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available in the
project reserve account to pay the settlement,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council approves the settlement
agreement attached as Exhibit A and authorizes disbursement of
$113 , 000 from the project reserve accounts number 330-840-1824-3197
and 320-840-1824-3191.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 11th day of July
1989, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Lars01
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, BETTLEMENT AND RELEABE
1. PARTIES
The parties to this Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and
Release are as follows:
(a) H & A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DONALD H. BROOKSHIRE and
PACIFIC INLAND BANK (hereinafter cumulatively referred to as
1VPlaintiffs1') .
(b) CITY OF CARSLBAD, DONALD E. DONOVAN, RAYMOND PATCHETT,
JAMES McLEAN, RICHARD ALLEN, JR., MARK STEYAERT, MARTY ORENYAK and
DAVID BRADSTREET (hereinafter cumulatively referred to as llCitytl) .
(c) RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC. and RONALD PAIGE (hereinafter
cumulatively referred to as I1RSX1l).
(d) RAY LEWIS and LEWIS AND ASSOCIATES (hereinafter
cumulatively referred to as tlLewislg).
(e) GEOCON, INC. (hereinafter referred to as "Geocon") .
(f) RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as
llRicklt).
2. RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into with reference to the following
facts:
(a) On or about April 17, 1987, H t A Construction Company
and Donald Brookshire filed their First Amended Complaint in the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego,
North County branch, Case No. N36096, against the City and Lewis
arising from a claim for extra grading work allegedly performed by
H & A Construction Company during the grading phase of the
construction of Stagecoach Park, 1ocated.in the City of Carslbad,
California. The allegations set forth in that Complaint are
incorporated by this reference into this Agreement.
(b) Thereafter, the City and Lewis answered said amended
complaint, and denied the material allegations of the action and
denied they had any liability.
(c) In addition, the City and Lewis filed cross-complaints
against each other for implied and express indemnity. Furthermore,
the City and Lewis filed cross-complaints for indemnity against
other third parties, including, but not limited to, RSI, Geocon and
Rick
(d) The City, Lewis, RSI, Geocon, and Rick answered those
cross-complaints in which they were served and denied the material
allegations of the cross-complaints and denied they had any
liability arising from the allegations or damages claimed in the
anended complaint or cross-complaints.
(e) On February 21, 1989, Plaintiffs dismissed the fifth and
sixth causes of action of their First Amended Complaint without
prejudice. On March 7, 1989, the attorneys for Plaintiffs
stipulated by letter that Plaintiffs did not seek damages for lost
profits as to any defendant.
(f) On July 15, 1986, the causes of action by H & A
Construction Company and Donald H. Brookshire were assigned in
their entirety to Pacific Inland Bank, which presently is the sole
owner of those claims and causes of action.
(9) Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and any cross-
2
complaints filed in this action shall be collectively referred to
herein as the
3. PO ADHISSION
In making this Agreement, no party is admitting the
sufficiency of any claims, allegations, assertions, contentions or
positions of any other party, or the sufficiency of any defenses
to any such claims, allegations, assertions, contentions or
positions. Each party expressly denies the claims alleged herein.
All parties to this Agreement desire to resolve their portions of
the action in order to buy their peace and pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure Section 877, & m., have entered into this
Agreement in good faith and with the desire to forever settle
between them the action and cross-actions and to execute a release
as set forth in Paragraph 7, below.
4. PAYMENT
(a) The total sum to be paid to Plaintiffs is One Hundred
Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000.00). Payment will come from
certain parties as follows:
1. city - $113 , 000.00
2. RSI - 4,000.00
3. Geocon - 4,000.00
4. Rick - 4 , 000.00
(b) No money contribution will be made by Lewis. Lewis
agrees to a mutual dismissal and release with or on behalf of all
remaining parties herein from any and all liabilities relating to
the Action as further specified in paragraphs 5 and 7, below.
3
(c) Upon execution of the Release, settlement checks in the
above amounts will be made payable to: "Pacific Inland Bank and
the John L. Smaha Client Trust Account". Checks will be sent
directly to the law offices of John L. Smaha.
5. PXBMIBBAL
(a) Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, and
the payment of sums as set forth herein, all parties shall cause
to be filed a request for dismissal with prejudice of all actions
and cross-actions filed in this litigation.
(b) Except for payments and waivers as set forth herein and
provided in this Agreement, each of the parties hereto agree to
bear their own costs and attorney's fees with respect to the entire
litigation, including all actions and cross-actions, and each party
hereby waives any statute, rule of court or other law or provision
awarding costs, fees or expenses.
6. EXECUTION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
The parties hereto agree to execute and deliver such
additional documents as are necessary to effectuate the dismissals
with prejudice of the settled litigation and to implement the other
terms of this Agreement.
7. RELEABE
In consideration of the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, each party to this Agreement for itself and its
collective and respective agents, employees, officers,
shareholders, directors, parent, subsidiary and affiliated
corporations, predecessors, successors, attorneys, assigns,
4
partners, other related entities, insurers, sureties and the heirs
and personal representatives of their respective estates
("Affiliated Partiestt) of each party to this Agreement shall and
do hereby relieve, release and discharge all other parties to this
Agreement and their respective Affiliated Parties from any and all
claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, promises, acts,
agreements, costs, expenses (including but not limited to
attorneys' fees), damages, actions and causes of action of
whatsoever kind or nature, including claims of malicious
prosecution, based on, arising out of, or in connection with the
Action, or Stagecoach Park Project which any of the foregoing
parties giving such release may now or hereinafter have or claim
to have against any of the foregoing parties for whose benefit the
release is given, except only those obligations described in this
Agreement. Except, however, the City does not release its claims
relating to any latent defect or express warranties concerning the
work as described or relating to the Action or Stagecoach Park.
Each party agrees to indemnify, defend and hold each released party
herein and their respective Affiliated Parties harmless from and
against any and all liability and/or claims thereof which they may
sustain in connection with any of the above released claims.
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The parties hereto, and each of them, represent and warrant
to each other and agree as follows:
(a) Each of the parties hereto has received independent legal
advice from attorneys of his own choice with respect to the
5
advisability of making the settlement and releases provided for
herein, and with respect to the advisability of executing this
Agreement, and prior to the execution of this Agreement by each
party, that the parties' attorneys reviewed this Agreement to
indicate that said attorneys approved this Agreement as to form and
substance.
(b) In negotiating this Agreement, each party and his
attorney have made various statements and representations to other
parties and their attorneys. Nevertheless, each party specifically
does not rely upon any statements, representations, legal opinions
or promises of any other party in executing this Agreement or in
making the settlement provided for herein, except as is expressly
stated in this Agreement.
(c) There have been no other agreements or understandings
between the parties hereto, except as is set forth in this
Agreement.
(d) Each party, together with his attorney, has made such
investigation of the facts and of the law pertaining to this
settlement and this Agreement, and of all the matters pertaining
thereto, as he deems necessary.
(e) The terms of this Agreement are contractual, not a mere
recital. This Agreement is the result of the negotiation between
the parties, each of whom has participated in the drafting hereof,
through their respective attorneys.
(f) This Agreement has been carefully read by, the contents
thereof are known and understood by, and it is signed freely by
6
each person executing this Agreement,
(9) This Agreement is intended to be final and binding as to
the specific allegations and theories of law as they arise from the
facts of this litigation contained in the amended cornplaint and
cross-complaint between and among the parties hereto, including
their heirs, successors and assigns, and is further intended to be
effective as a full and final accord and satisfaction between and
among the parties hereto. Each party relies on the said finality
of this Agreement as a material factor inducing that party's
execution of this Agreement.
(h) Each party hereto agrees that such party will not take
any action that would interfere with the performance of this
Agreement by any other party hereto or which would adversely affect
any of the rights provided for herein.
(i) Each party expressly and completely withdraws any and all
allegations of the amended complaint and cross-complaints on file
herein.
9. RELEASE OF UNKNOWN CLAIMS
(a) The parties hereto specifically and fully waive any right
or benefit available under the provisions of Section 1542 of the
California Civil Code which provides that:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIKE OF
EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY
AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
///
7
The parties hereto understand and acknowledge the significance
and consequences of such specific waiver of Section 1542 and
nevertheless elect to and do release those claims described herein,
known or unknown, which they may have or in the future may have
against any other party hereto and further elect to and assume all
responsibility for those claims described herein, known or unknown,
that they may incur now or in the future except as specifically
provided otherwise in paragraph 7 hereof.
10. @UB8EOUENT ATTORNEYS' FEES
(a) In the event that any aciton, suit or other proceeding
is instituted to remedy, prevent or obtain relief from a breach of
this Agreement, or arising out of a breach of this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall recover all of such party's attorneys' fees
incurred in each and every such action, suit or other proceeding,
including any and all appeals or petitions therefrom.
(b) As is used herein, attorneys' fees shall be deemed to
mean "reasonable attorneys' fees" as is defined in any statute or
rule of law.
11. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall not be modified by any oral
representation made before or after the execution of this
Agreement. All modifications must be in writing and signed by the
parties and each of them.
12 AUTHORITY
The parties hereto, and each of them, represent and warrant
that this Agreement has been or shall be approved by any and all
a
corporate boards of directors, committees, shareholders, partners
or principals whose approval is required to effect this Agreement
and bind the parties, and each of them, to the obligations set
forth herein. The parties hereto, and each of them, agree to fully
defend, indemnify and hold harmless all other parties hereto for
any and all damages, cause, attorneys' fees or other liabilities
or expenses of any nature whatsoever which any such party may
sustain or incur in consequences of any breach of the aforesaid
representation or warranty. Each person or entity executing this
Agreement in a representative capacity is empowered to do so on
behalf of itself or its employees or agents, or former employees
or agents
13, INTEGmTf ON
This agreement constitutes a single, integrated written
contract expressing the entire agreement of the parties hereto
relative to the subject matter hereof. No covenants, agreements,
representations or warranteis of any kind whatsoever have beenmade
by any party hereto, except as is specifically set forth in this
Agreement. All prior discussions and negotiations have been and
this are merged and integrated into, and
Agreement.
14 SEVERABILITY
In the event that any provision o
are superseded by,
this Agreement shou d be
held to be void, voidable or unenforceable, the remaining portions
hereof shall remain in full force and effect.
///
9
15. GOVGRNINQ LAW
This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and be
governed by the laws of the State of California.
16. BEIRS, 8UCCE880RS AND A 88IGN8
This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be
binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto, and each of them. This Agreement is intended to release
and inure to the benefit of each corporate party's present and
former affiliated corporations, predecessors, parent corporations,
subsidiaries, divisions, operating companies, officers, directors,
agents, employees, administrators, representatives, shareholders,
accountants and attorneys, individually as well as in the capacity
indicated. However, except as expressly provided herein, this
Agreement is not for the benefit of any person or entity not a
party hereto or specifically identified as a beneficiary herein,
and is not intended to constitute a third party beneficiary
contract.
17. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more
counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall
be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but
one and the same instrument and Agreement. This Agreement shall
be deemed to be executed on the last day any such counterpart 1s
executed.
///
///
10
-.
18. 8URVIVAL OF WARRANTI E8 AWD REPRESENTATION8
The warranties and representations of this Agreement are
deemed to survive the date of execution hereof.
19. pz PRESENTATIVE CAPACITY
Each person or entity executing this Agreement in a repre-
sentative capacity is empowered to do so on behalf of itself or its
employees or former employees.
2 0 . CONFIDENTIALITY
Each party hereto agrees to use his, her or its best effort
to prevent any involuntary publication or disclosure of any aspect
of this Agreement, or any of the negotiations in connection
therewith, except as required by any court of competent juris-
diction or any statute. Further, there shall be no voluntary
disclosure of any of the negotiations or discussions preceding the
execution of this Agreement, by any party hereto, their attorneys,
agents or employees. The parties may disclose the terms of this
Agreement to their attorneys, accountants and tax advisors,
provided that any party making such a disclosure shall advise the
attorney, accountant or tax advisor of the confidential nature of
the information and shall obtain the Agreement of such attorney,
accountant or tax advisor to keep such information confidential.
The parties may also disclose the terms.of this Agreement upon
written request of any regulatory agency.
19. PO AS8IGNMENT
All parties represent and warrant that other than already
referenced in this Agreement, no rights, claims, liabilities or
11
obligations as they may exist in this litigation have been or will
be assigned.
IN WQITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto and their respective
attorneys have each approved and executed this Agreement on the
dates set forth opposite their respective signatures.
authorized representatives or
trustee
DATED: 6 -F6 , 1989
MNALD H. BROOKSHIRE
DATED : , 1989
Authorized representative,
PACIFIC INLAND BANK
DATED : , 1989
DATED: , 1989
DATED: , 1989
by: Authorized representative on behalf of the CITY OF CARLSBAD,
DONALD E. DONOVAN, RAYMOND
PATCHETT, JAMES MCLEAN, RICHARD
ALLEN, JR., MARK STEYAERT, MARTY ORENYAK and DAVID BRADSTREET
by: Authorized representative,
RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC.
RONALD PAIGE
12
-
, .I#. , . .
obligations as they may exist in this litigation have been or will
be assigned.
IN WITNEBB WBZREOI, the parties hereto and their respective
attorneys have each approved and executed this Agreement on the
dates set forth opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: , 1989
by: H & A CONSTRUCTION, or its authorized representative$ or trustee
DATED: , 1989
DATEO: -A ” I 1989
DATED: 4 1989
DATED: , \\1L)LO 27- , 1989
DATED: sw z7 I 1989
DONALD -K%~ROOKSHIRE a
by :
PACIFIC INLAND BANK Authorized representative,
by: Authorized representative on behalf OF the CITY OF CARLSBAD,
DONALD E, DQNOVAN, RAYMOND
ALLEN, 3R. I kIARx: STEYAERT, MARTY ORENYAK and DAVID BRADSTREET
PATCXETT, JAMES MCLEAN, RICHARO
by: Authorized representative ,
7 nn RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC.
$1 jJ-
RONALD PAIGE v
12
DATED: %)C(flP -* , 1989
& ASSOCIATES
DATED , 1989
DATED: , 1989
by: Authorized representative, GEOCON, INC.
DATED: , 1989
by: Authorizedrepresentative, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
Approved as to form and content:
DATED: , 1989 JOHN L. SMAHA & ASSOCIATES
BY: John L. Smaha, Attorney for PLAINTIFFS
DATED: , 1989 DALY & HEFT
BY: NEAL S. MEYERS, Attorney for the CITY
DATED : , 1989 MURTAUGH, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON
BY : BENJAMINTRACHTMAN, Attorney
for RSI
13
DATED : , 1989
DATED: , 1989
Approved as to form 2nd content:
DATED: f 1989
CATED : I 1989
DATE 0 ; I 1989
- - by:
Authorized representative, LEWIS
& ASSOCIATES
-~ RAY LEWIS
by: Authorized representative,
GEOCON, INC.
ENGINEERING COMPANY
JOHN L. SVMA & ASSOCIATES
BY: John L. Smzha, Attorney fcr
PLAIElTI F FS
DALY & HEFT
BY;
NEAL S. MEYERS, Attorney €or the CITY
NL7RTAUGHf NILLER, l<E'IER & NELSOIJ
BY: BENJAMIN TRACHTXAN, Attorney for RSI
13
-- A
DATED: I 1989
DATED: , 1989
DATED: , 1989
DATED: , 1989
Approved as to form and content:
DATED: i, I t~ ICS , 1989
DATED : , 1989
DATED: I 1989
by: Authorizedrepresentative, LEWIS
L ASSOCIATES
RAY LEWIS
-.A - Authorized representative, GEOCON, INC.
by: Authorizedrepresentative, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
JOHN L. Sh 61 A &A 0 ATES
BY :
DALY t HEFT
BY:
NEAL S. MEYERS, Attorney for the CITY
MURTAUGH, MILLER, MEYER b NELSON
BY:
BENJAMINTRACHTMAN, Attorney
for RSI
13
DATED: , 1989 MCINNIS, FITZGEFALD, REES,
SHARKEY & MCINTYRE
BY: ROBERT SCOTT DREHER,
Attorney for GEOCON, INC.
RICK ENGMEERING COMPANY
BY: , Attorney for
RICK ENGINEERIKG -
ZE3fA.N 41 SONMENSCHEIN
BY: LARRY S. ZEMAPI, Attorney for
LEWIS
14
DATED: I 1989 MCINNIS, FITZGERALD, REES I SHARKEY & McINTYRE
BY: ROBERT SCOTT DREHER,
Attorney for GEOCON, INC.
DATED: I 1989
DATED: 2 b 1989
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BY: DENNIS STRYKER, Attorney for
RICK ENGINEERING
14