Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-10-17; City Council; 10317; CUP Appeal Hoehn AcuraCT- OF CARLSBAD - AGENr- BILL i I I I E 46#/0, TITLE: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I DEPT. HD.. MTG, 10/17/89 REQUIREMENT TO RELOCATE A SIGN IN CITY ATTY THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 3EPT. PI-N QY- CUP 89-3 - HOEHN ACURA CITY MGRS- RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the Council ADOPT Resolution No. f$?y.?fl , UPHOLDING the Planning Commission decision APPROVING CUP 89-3, including the condition to relocate the proposed sign. ITEM EXPLANATION The applicant is requesting relief from a condition approved by the Planning Commission as a requirement of Conditional Use Permit 89-3 which allowed a second freestanding sign on a single lot in Car Country. The subject sign is currently installed at a location approximately 70 feet from the lot’s northern interior property line and is immediately to the site’s northern driveway. The sign is a monument sign 8 feet high and 10 feet long mounted on a concrete pedestal. The project complies with the sign ordinance, Local Coastal Program, and growth management with two exceptions which include: 1. The sign is located two feet within the public right-of-way; 2. The sign does not meet the sign ordinance requirement of being located 15 feet from the driveway. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project with the condition that the sign be relocated to an approved location. This decision was based on the fact that the sign should comply with City standards and should be located outside the right- of-way. The applicant is requesting relief from the condition because of the cost and effort involved in relocating the sign. Both staff and the Planning Commission are recommending that the City deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to relocate the sign. Should the City Council determine to approve the appeal and grant the applicant’s request, the Council should direct the City Engineer to approve an above-ground encroachment permit. ENVIRONMENTALaREVIEW The project is ministerial in nature and is therefore exempt from CEQA requirements. Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. /< 311 I FISCALaIMPACT The applicant will be required to pay a sign permit fee. EXHIBITS 1. City Council Resolution No. 89-371 2. Letter of Appeal 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated September 6, 1989 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 6, 1989, w/attachments RESOLUTION NO. 89-373 ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF , CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL FOR FROM A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT OCATE A SIGN. on September 6, 1989 the Carlsbad Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 7 approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow a second freestanding sign on a single 1 WHEREAS, the Ci considered an appeal of the Planni to relocate the sign erected without a permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE true and correct. Commission in Resolution No. 2907 ference constitute the findings of - PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council California, on the day of , 1989 by the following \l ABSENT: “\ ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTEN (SEAL) -2- 5556 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD. CA 92008 619 . 438 . 9599 RECEIVEi;i Cl?- Cl "S OFFICE * !34 . 1 ‘I 2: 25 CW OF CARLSBAD September 11, 1989 City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Re: CUP 89-3 Dear Sirs: On September 6, 1989 we were granted a conditional use permit for our Acura monument sign with the condition that the sign be relocated. We would like to appeal the condition that states the sign must be moved. Attached is our check #3091 in the amount of $450.00 to cover the cost of the appeal. iliz&& Business Manager - MINU’& September 6, 1989 PLANNING COMWSSION Page 2 COMMISSIONERS Hall announced that CUP 88-12 var a noticed public and inquired if there was any person in the audience to speak to this item vho could not attend the on September 20. 1989. No person requested to speak, and carried to continue Ervin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schram 5) IoiJ OF THE PLANRINC CGUUISSION NOISE SUBCOI'8lI'lTRR WO~PROGMH a 30 day continuance to the noted that this vould Commissioner tlcPadden counted that like to knov vho the "large landovners” are vhich Rofman's letter mentions. 120, Carl&ad, addressed the CMission and Comities. Motion vas duly made, seconded, and carried to conti ue the Noise Subcmittee Report to October 4, 1989. \ PUBLIC RMuNcV8: 2) CUP 89-3 -HoRHNAcuRA- Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a freestanding sign at the Hoehn Acura Deelership, in Car Country at 5536 Paseo de1 Norte. in the C-2-Q Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 3. \ 1 3 , Gary Wayne, Principal Plsnner , reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a second freestanding sign (on a single lot) advertising the Acura dulership. T?M sign is currently installed vithout a sign permit at a location approximetely 70 fut from the lot’s interior boundary and is adjacent to the site’s northern driveway. Mr. Wayne stated that the sign is a monument sign 8 ft. high and 10 ft. long mounted on a cement pedestal. During review, staff discovered that the sign is located approximately 2 ft, inside the City’s right-of-way on Paseo de1 Norte and the sign ordinance requires that the sign be placed 15 ft. from the driveway. Since the sign is already constructed, staff has ret ormanded that the sign be moved to colnply with that requirmt . Otherwise the sign complies with the Local Coastal Program. sign ordinance, and growth managemnt. Ervin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schrasm - MINUTES September 6, 1’989 PLANNING COKMISSION Page 3 co1 Staff recosxaendo approval with the condition that the sign be moved out of the right-of-way. Cowissioner Erwin noted that some verbiage was missing on Condition #5 of the resolution. Mr. Wayne passed out new copies of the resolution with the missing verbiage incorporated. Consnissioner McFadden inquired if a local coastal permit (LCP) is required for signs in that vicinity. Mr. Wayne replied that this parcel is located in the Hello II segment of the Local Coastal Program and that a coastal development permit would be required. Commissioner HcFadden noted that the normal condition was missing which stated that approval is contingent on receipt of a coastal permit. Mr. Wayne replied that a new Condition 119 could be added to the resolution which states that approval is contingent on the receipt of a coastal permit. Commissioner Erwin suggested that Condition 111 is confusing because the exhibit refers to the existing location of the sign. Mr. Weyne concurred. Chairman Hall opened the public testimny and issued the invitation to speak. Gloria Laxson. 5566 Paseo de1 Norte. Carlsbad, representing Hoehn Acura, addressed the CoPrnisrion and requested consideration to allow the sign to remain in its current location since it does not present a safety hazard. She feels that if it is moved it would cause confusion to motorists and could impair traffic flow along Paseo de1 Norte. She feels that a smaller sign would then be needed to indicate the location of the service entrance. Comissioner McFadden inquired how the sign ended up in the right-of-vay. Ms. Laxson replied that an inlet was approved and built to permit a podertrian walkway. Coranissioner Schlehuber requested more infolrution on the safety problem if the sign is relocated to the south. HI. Laxson stated that there is a visibility problem and could be confusing since there would be no driveway where the sign would be located. Coxsaisrionor Ervfn noted that the sign would only be moved 15 ft. Ms. Laxron replied the sign is currently located in an inlet which protects the sign from being hit by a vehicle, and there would be no drivauay at the nov location. Also, a pedostrfan could easily walk into the sign at the nmv location and them is no other place to put the sign without allowing it to infringe on the parking lot. There being no other persons desiring to address the Comiraion on this topic, Chainuan Hall declared the public testimony closed and opened the it- for discussion awng the Colllmirsion abers. Cmiasionor Schlehuber feels that the sign mods to be moved as recoamended by staff. Conmissioners Ikladdm and Erwin concur. \ a IISSIONERS % A- . % / ! : 1 I MINUTES Motion uas duly made. seconded, and carried to adopt Resolution No. 2907 approving CUP 89-3 baaed on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, with the addition of Condition 119 to require a local coastal permit for the new site, and the rewording of Condition tl to add the vords “as modified by Condition 116" after the reference to Exhibit A. DISCUSSION ITENS: DI 89-4 SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNkNCE DRTERNINATION FOR CT 83-k - MARLRGROUGH DRVELOPNENT CORPGRATION - Review of olans modified to addrass Coastal Conrmission for substantial conformance with original approvals of the windsong Shores project. , reviewed the background of the d stated that DI 89-4 is a request by Marlborough to determine that their revised sits plan for CT ssion may only consider those itams that ware Using wall grap cs, Mr. Wayna showed where the area west of a required to ba opened up for greater racmds approval. Comisaioner Erwin inquired the square footage of the ramaining units which ware lost. increased slightly becausa the otprint raufna very similar to the original project. unabla to determine exactly hov much the unit size c unit plans for the City. were incruaad to three-story. access trail. tain the public hoaaovner’s association. would. Coaaaiaaionar Schlahubar inquired about tha contra exargancy access. Hr. Wayne raplied that the accass issue has been satisfied by two 30 ft. mn east and west off Rarbor Drive and which connect existing street structure in the developawrt. Chairman Hall opened the public testimony and issuad the invitation to speak. \ September 6, 1989 PLANNING COMNISSION Page B COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm \ At-fL-,l ATION COMPLETE DATE: br; Auqust 14, 1989 \/ STAFF REPORT 0 2 c DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CUP 89-3 - HOEHN ACURA - Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a freestanding sign at the Hoehn Acura Dealership, in Car Country at 5536 Paseo de1 Norte in the C-2-Q Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 3. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 2907 approving CUP 89-3 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a freestanding sign advertising the Acura dealership. The proposed sign is the second freestanding sign located on the subject site. The Hoehn lot contains the Acura, Oldsmobile and Audi dealerships and is located at the southeastern end of Car Country along Paseo de1 Norte. As a result of the construction of Car Country Drive, the site is now a corner lot with a total of 217 feet of building frontage on Paseo de1 Norte. As shown on Exhibit "B", the proposed 30 square foot Acura sign is approximately 8 feet high and 10 feet long excluding its 3 foot wide base. The sign is currently installed without a sign permit at a location approximately 70 feet from the lot's interior boundary and is adjacent to the site's northern driveway. The sign is mounted on a cement slab which required the removal of a portion of the site's required landscaping within and behind the public right of way. The proposed sign is located approximately 356 feet north of the other pole sign on the site. III. ANALYSIS Plannins Issues 1. Can the findings required for approval of a conditional use permit be made? Specifically: a. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. - 8 CUP 89-3 HOEHN ACURA September 6, 1989 Paoe 2 b. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. C. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained. d. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. 2. Does the proposed sign meet the sign requirements of Specific Plan 19 (A) & (B) and the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Plan (LCP)? 3. Does the proposed sign meet the regulations of Section 21.41 (Sign Ordinance) of the Municipal Code? 4. Does the proposed project comply with the requirements of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3? DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit The proposed project complies with all the findings required for a conditional use permit. The use is desirable for the enhancement of the community because it would provide better identification of the Acura automobile dealership. The size of the property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use since the dealerships are already existing. The proposed use, as conditioned, will have no impact on the existing setbacks. Landscaping will be required around the sign's base. Finally the street system is adequate to serve the auto dealership for which the sign is an accessory structure. Specific Plan/Zoninq Requlations Both Specific Plan 19 and Section 21.41.075 of the zoning ordinance allow more than one freestanding sign on a C-2 lot with the approval of a conditional use permit if the subject area is regulated by a Specific Plan. As required, an additional sign must be compatible with the subject site as well as surrounding development. It also must not create sight distance problems, block views, or result in a proliferation of signs in the area. To ensure that these standards are followed, the sign must adhere to eight conditions. With one exception, these conditions have been met as follows: 1. The sign conforms to the City's and Coastal Commission's height limitation for pole/monument signs. The 8 foot high Acura sign does not exceed the City's 20 foot height limitation nor does it exceed the 8 foot maximum height allowed by the LCP. CUP 89-3 HOEHN ACUR, September 6, 1989 Pase 3 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The freestanding sign permitted by right for the subject site is located at least 50 feet from the interior property line. The existing Oldsmobile pole sign is located 435 feet from the interior property line and 53 feet from the corner of Paseo de1 Norte and Car Country Drive. The proposed sign is not erected within 200 feet of the other freestanding sign on the subject property. The Acura sign is located 356 feet from the existing Oldsmobile pole sign. The proposed sign is oriented so that the primary view is not from Interstate 5. Due to its limited height. the 8 foot Acura sign is primarily visible from Paseo de1 Norte rather than the I-5 freeway. The proposed sign does not exceed the allowed sign area. The Acura sign area of 30 square feet does not exceed the maximum of 55 square feet. At its current location, the proposed sign does n& comply with the requirement that no portion of the sign extends over the public right- of-way or is within fifteen feet of any driveway or corner. The Acura sign encroaches 2 feet into the 12 foot public right-of-way and is located 31 inches from the site's northern driveway. It has been determined that the sign does not interfere with the required Caltrans sight distance at its existing location and therefore should not create a safety problem. However, to comply with the required standards, the sign has been conditioned to be moved back 2 feet to a point behind the public right- of-way and to a point 15 feet south of the northern driveway. This relocation will further reduce any sight distance problems from the driveway. As previously stated, the proposed sign location complies with spacing requirements and does not cause a proliferation of signs, traffic, or safety problems. The issue of proliferation of freestanding signs can be better evaluated by referring to Exhibit "X". This graphic illustrates the number of lots with dual pole/monument signs as well as their approximate location. At least three of these existing signs appear to be encroaching into the public right-of-way. Although the Specific Plan indicates that additional freestanding signs are allowed with a CUP if more than one dealership is located on a lot, the Ford dealership has 2 freestanding signs advertising a single dealership. There are only four lots with a single freestanding sign. These 4 lots are located at the northern end of Car Country. The pole signs on the two lots adjacent to Cannon Road identify used car dealerships for Chevrolet and Toyota. Both of these dealerships have additional freestanding signs on separate lots. It appears that as more dealerships occur on a lot, more freestanding signs will be requested. The Commission may want to consider the number of freestanding signs appropriate for each property. Local Facilities Manaqement Plan The proposed project complies with the requirements of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3. The Acura sign is an accessory to the existing car dealership and creates no additional demand for public facilities within Zone 3. , CUP 89-3 HOEHN ACUh September 6, 1989 Paqe 4 SUMMARY Overall, the proposed project as conditioned meets the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit and complies with the requirements of the LCP, Specific Plan 19 (A) & (B), the zoning ordinance, and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project is categorically exempt per Section 19.04.090. ATTACHMENTS :: 3. 4. I? 7. 8. 1:: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2907 Location Map Background Data Sheet Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form Exhibit "X" Exhibit "Y" Exhibit "Z" Disclosure Form Reduced Exhibit Exhibit "A" dated September 6, 1989 AH:lh July 21, 1989 AUTO CENTER HOEHN - ACURA CUP 89-3 City of Carlsbad BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CUP 89-3 . APPLICANT: HOEHN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP REQUEST AND LOCATION: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 9 OF CARLSBAD TRACT 72-3 - MAP 7492 APN: 211-060-06 Acres 3.28 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation C-2 Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A Existing Zone C-2 Proposed Zone N/A Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoninq Land Use Site c-2 RRE North PU TS South EA NRR East EA NRR West TC I-5 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District N/A Water N/A Sewer N/A EDU's N/A Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT X Notice of Exemption, issued Julv 21, 1989 E.I.R. Certified, dated Other, CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMHN!F FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: HOEHN ACURA CUP 89-3 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 3 GENERAL PLAN: RRE ZONING: C-2 DEVELOPER'S NAME: HOEHN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP ADDRESS: PO BOX 789 - 5556 PASEO DEL NORTE - CARLSBAD, CA PHONE NO.: 438-9599 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 211-060-06 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 3.28 AC. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: UPON APPROVAL A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. City Administrative Facilities; Demand in Square Footage = Library: Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Parks: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADTs = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire; Served by Fire Station No. = Open Space; Acreage Provided - Schools; (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer; Demand in EDUs - Identify Sub Basin (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water; Demand in GPD N/A N/A N/A N/A = --- N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - N/A - N/A CVUI~I-F .“. . FREE STANDING SIGNS a . c] Out of Right of Way 0 ln Right of Way 0 Proposed 0 1 Hoehn Oldsmobile / GM 0 2 Acura q 3 F.S. Dodge 0 4 Worthington Dodge 0 S Chrysler / VW q 6 Porsche 0 7 Mercedes 0 6 Su baru 0 9 Mitsubishi 0 10 Merkur cl 11 Mercury / Lincoln 0 12 Daihatsu cl 13 Toyota cl 14 Rorick Buick cl 16 Toyota Carlsbad Used Cars cl 16 Weseloh Used Cars 0 17 Weseloh Chevrolet 0 18 Pontiac GMC / Truck I3 19 Mazda cl 20 A-l Dixon Ford 0 21 Ford CANNON RDi I f---- city of barkbad EXHIBIT “Y” EXISTING SlGNAGEi SIZE (SQ. FT.) WALL SIGNS AUDI 35 USED CARS 18 ACURA 64.5 HOEHN MOTORS 7 POLE SIGNS OLDSMOBILE 81 TOTAL EXISTING SIGNAGE: PROPOSED POLE SIGN ACURA 205.5 30 BUILDING FRONTAGE: 217’ x 1.5 sq.ft. = 325.5 sq.ft. Allowable Sign Area 235.5 sq.ft. Requested Sian Area - Z 0 -I ,> ,a !Lll ,Z 2 88 cn W u 3 I- a W u APPLICANT: AGENT: MEMBERS: DISCLOSURE FORM AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.dba HOEHN ACURA Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 5556 Paseo De1 Norte, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Business Address 438-9599 Telephone Number Gloria Laxson - Business Manager Name same as above Business Address Telephone Number Robert A. Hoehn, President 13037 Via Latina, De1 Mar, Ca. Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address venture, corporation, syndication) same as above Business Address 418-9599 481-5395 \. Telephone Number Telephone Number T. Via Latina, De1 Mar, Ca. Name Home Address 5454 Paseo De1 Norte, Carlsbad Business Address 418-4454 %3- oqs.3 Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I /We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we will apply for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development. I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose. I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. HOEHN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. APPLICANT (I I, f I I I I I I (Form A) TO: FROM: RE: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Planning Department PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice CUP 89-S (HOEHN ACURA - APPEAL) for a public hearing before the City Council. Please notice the item for the council meeting of 10/17/89 . Thank you. Assistant City Man- 9128189 Date . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2907 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DEALERSHIP FREESTANDING SIGN ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5556 PASEO DEL NORTE. APPLICANT: HOEHN ACURA CASE NO: CUP 89-3 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of September, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Lot 9 of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 7492, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 30, 1972. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 89-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP 89-3, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findinqs: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located because: a) The use, as conditioned, complies with the requirements of Section 21.41 of the Municipal Code as well as the standards of SP 19 A & B. b) The proposed sign represents no apparent conflict with the General Plan. 1 2 3 4 5 -6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for CUP 89-3, as shown on Exhibit "A", dated September 6, 1989, and incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department and as modified by Condition 6. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 3 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on May 19, 1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. 4. This approval shall become null and void if a sign permit is not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 5. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of 10 years. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, because construction of a sign is considered an accessory use and will not contribute to traffic generation. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since: a) All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. The proposed sign is consistent with Specific Plan 19 A b B which regulates this area of Car Country. PC RESO NO. 2907 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. 7. a. 9. use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 5 years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. The sign shall be moved to the east 2 feet to a point behind the public right-of-way and to a point 15 feet south of the northern driveway within 60 days of this approval. The area around the base of the sign shall be landscaped in accordance with the approved Hoehn Acura landscape plan. Because the sign was constructed without a permit, the sign permit fee shall be doubled in accordance with Section 304(e)2 of the Uniform Building Code. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit that substantially conforms with this approval. . . . . PC RESO NO. 2907 -3- - PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of September, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Erwin, McFadden, Holmes & Marcus. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. MATTHEW HALL, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 2907 -4- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL CUP 89-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, October 17, 1989, to consider the appeal of a Planning Commission condition which requires the relocation of a freestanding sign at the Hoehn Acura Dealership on property generally located in Car Country, at 5536 Paseo De1 Norte, in the C-2-Q Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 3 and more particularly described as: Lot 9 of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 7492, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 30, 1972. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, at or prior to the public hearing. APPELLANT: Hoehn Acura PUBLISH: October 6, 1989 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL e 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSbAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 O/lice of fhe Cify Clerk DATE: SeDtember 11. 1989 TELEPHONE (619) 434-2808 TO: Bobbie Hoder - Planning Dept. FROM: Karen Kundtz - Clerk's Office RE: CUP 89-3 - Hoehn Acura THE ABOVE ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. According to the Municipal Code, appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date that the appeal was filed. (REMINDER: The item will not be noticed in the newspaper until the agenda bill is signed off by s parties.) Please process this item in accordance with the procedures contained in the Agenda Bill Preparation Manual. If you have any questions, please call. The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City Council Meeting of . Signature Date - 5556 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD. CA 92008 619 . 438 . 9599 September 11, 1989 City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Re: CUP 89-3 Dear Sirs: On September 6, 1989 we were granted a conditional use permit for our Acura monument sign with the condition that the sign be relocated. We would like to appeal the condition that states the sign must be moved. Attached is our check #3091 in the amount of $450.00 to cover the cost of the appeal. Sjncerely, Business Manager CITY OF CARLSBAD - . 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFMNIA 92008 -. 438.5821 i.. . . :: * : - ~ ,.,ll. ‘I’ *< c REC’D FROM /!) i;/,.q A.! $6.7 ((’ &+y;& DATE fi‘ I. /b/l / p [ i .) ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT <- L,,‘i~; f” - ,s ’ & ,, hi - : 2 i,’ - d-h I,, ,’ “7 , ,I” ..- I I RECEIPT NO, <.? :::’ !“’ $ ,\; TOTAL 211-021-19 211-021-20 211-021-21 211-021-22 211-021-23 211-021-24 211-021-25 CARLTAS CO 211-021-26 211-060-02 211-060-07 211-060-08 211-060-09 211-060-10 co / [CHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CARLTAS CO 4401 MNCHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CARLTAS CO 4401 MANCHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CARLTAS CO 4401 MANCHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 .J PAUL ECKE SR & PAUL & MAGDALENA POINSETTIA FOUNDATION ECKE P 0 BOX 607 / ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PAUL ECKE SR Ex PAUL & MAGDALENA POINSETTIA FOUNDATION ECKE P 0 BOX 607 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PAUL ECKE SR & PAUL & MAGDALENA POINSETTIA FOUNDATION ECKE C/O CARPENTERS SOUTHERN CALIF A 520 S VIRGIL AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CA 90020 4401 MANCHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CARLTAS CO 4401 MANCHESTER AVENUE, STE 206 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 J AR0 PARTNERS (PTNRSP) I/ P 0 BOX 4549 CARLSAD, CA 92008 J VINCENT R DIXON / 5555 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD NO WILING ADDRESS FOR THIS OWNER 4 AMES B FINNEY JR A' 5445 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 J / CHARLES JR & PATRICIA A WESELOH 1520 HUNSAKER STREET OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 ,. . 600' RADIUS ORDER NO.: 865937-M 211-060-12 211-060-13 211-060-14 211-060-15 211-060-16 211-060-17 211-060-18 211-060-19 210-090-17 210-090-18 210-090-23 ..- 210-090-24 1’ t/ LOUIS V JONES 5424 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 #'RAY R WINTER & RUTH DEALY & DUANE WINTER - 12123 CANDY LANE SARATOGA, CA 95070 A INDIVIDUAL QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1988 AS FILE ; NO. 88-278738 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DONALD D. SHARI', TRUSTOR (TRUSTEES OF THE AMENDED AND RESTA DONALD D. SHARP INTERVIVOS TRUST, DATED APRIL 27, 1987) QUITCLAIM TO STEVEN MERRICK SHARP, AN UNDIVIDED SIX PERCENT (6%) INTERES DONALD D SHARP C/O 5411 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 120 . ../' CARLSBAD, CA 92008 A INDIVIDUAL QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88-278736 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DONALD D. SHARP, TRUSTOR (TRUSTESS OF THE AMENDED AND RESTA DONALD D. SHARP INTERVIVOS TRUST, DATED APRIL 27, 1987) QTJITCLAIM(S) TO STEVEN MERRICK SHARP, AN UNDIVIDED SIX PERCENT (6%) INTERES DONALD D SHARP C/O 5411 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 120 --- CALRBAD, CA 92008 LOUIS V JONES 5424 PASEO DEL NORTE A--- CARLSBAD, CA 92008 \/ROBERT E & MARILYN J TOWNSEND - 588 CAMINO DEL RIO N SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 LOUIS V JONES 5424 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 \j'HOEHN ASSOCIATES / 5566 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD NO MAILING ADDRESS FOR THIS OWNER TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY NO MAILING ADDRESS FOR THIS OWNER ,? Y & BARBARA E WINTER / 745 ROCKY ROAD FULLERTON, CA 92631 RAY & BARBARA WINTER 1745 ROCKY ROAD FULLERTON, CA 92631 - 600' R&DIUS ,, URDER NO.: 865937-M 210-090-25 210-090-26 210-090-27 210-090-28 210-090-29 210-090-30 210-090-31 210-090-36 210-090-37 210-090-45 / COLDWELL BANKER COMMERCIAL GROUP INC C/O GENERAL ACCTG 201 CONTINENTAL BLVD STE 204 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 JAMES & PAMELA HICKS & SALLY & JAMES WALDORF .-- 2910 MANAGUA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ROBERT M & JULIE K A'!ERILL piCHARLES J II & DIANE G MC NARY JOHN & SANDRA E WHITE _. _.- P 0 BOX 2066 RANCH0 SANTA FE, CA 92067 - CARLBAD BOAR0 OF REALTORS 5120 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLBAD, CA 92008 JOHN & MARGARET ORD JOHN 6 GLENNA ANDERSON P 0 BOX 1789 CARLBAD, CA 92008 I' -'NATIONAL ASSN OF MUSIC MERCHANTS INC -/ 5140 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLBAD, CA 92008 NATIONAL ASSN OF MUSIC MERCHANTS INC , 5140 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAD PACIFICA ASSOCIATES I 23046 AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA LA GUNA HILLS, CA 92653 '/ CARLSBAD COMMERCIAL CENTER ASSN INC I C/O COLDWELL BANKER REMS P 0 BOX 919 CARLBAD, CA 92008 J SAN-GAL TRUST THE PLETA TRUST THE 701 B STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101