HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-11-14; City Council; 10371; PARK SITE AND FACILITY PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE FINAL REPORT NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK ISSUESI Irl I yr GWHL36AU - AbtNUQ5ILL
AB#
MTG.”L
DEPT.~
/[ j .:3”1 / TITLE; PARK SITE AND FACILITY PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE FINAL REPORT
NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK ISSUES
DEPT, t
CITY A1
CITY MI I I I
n 0 rl -4
4J a
a, a
$4
LCI 0
a, v)
u 3
.d c
E
a, a,
v) v
u k 0 a a,
!-I
a, Az u
a a L1 a
0 ar
0 rd
I+ .rl u C 7 0 U
o\
\ m * 4
\ 4 l-i z 0
U
..
6 e z
111) 0 0
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept the Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee Report on Northwest Quadrant Park Issues and consider recommendations as determined by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Direct staff to continue working with the subcommittee to analyze the possible sites for future recreational development in the northwest quadrant; return to the Commission for a final recommendation to be incorporated in preparation of the capital improvement program for ultimate consideration by the City Council.
ITEM EXPLANATION
During the May 15, 1989, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, the issue of Northwest Quadrant Park Concerns was addressed as an agenda item. A staff report (Exhibit 3) had been prepared in response to several citizen concerns heard during the Commission review of the proposed Parks and Recreation Element revision on September 19, 1988. In addition, the report also addressed northwest quadrant park concerns as heard during Council’s review of Zone 8 of the Local Facil i ties Management P1 an on February 7,
1989.
Several citizens addressed the Commission on May 15, regarding park issues relevant to the northwest quadrant. Mr. Mario Monroy, a representative of a group of concerned citizens in the northwest quadrant, informed the Commission that the group was requesting Council to create an adhoc committee to address their concerns.
The Commission discussed the concerns of the citizens and their desire for an adhoc committee. Commissioners expressed the desire to cooperate with them in an effort to work out the problems of the northwest quadrant.
Subsequently, the Commission unanimously directed the Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee to meet with representatives of the northwest quadrant and return to the Commission with recommendations.
The northwest quadrant citizen’s request to form an adhoc committee to address park issues in the northwest quadrant was considered by the City Council on May 23, 1989. By consensus, the Council determined that the Parks and Recreation Commission should select a subcommittee to work with staff and representatives of the Northwest Quadrant Group to develop a specific five-year plan for parks in the northwest quadrant.
Three members of the Commission’s Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee met weekly, from June 8, 1989, through August 17, 1989, with members of the Northwest Quadrant Group to address their specific concerns. During the course of the Committee meetings, a great deal of information was presented and discussed by staff and Committee members regarding issues relevant to park concerns in the northwest quadrant. Summary reports for each meeting will provide a summarization of topics of discussion, areas of concern, and a general overview of the Committee’s efforts (Exhi bit 2).
L I
W AB# I6,3 .a I
Page 2
At the conclusion of the regularly scheduled Committee meetings, discussion of a final report to the Parks and Recreation Commission, identified six (6) specific issue statements to be addressed. It was agreed by the Committee members that the report format was to address each of the issue statements with opinions of the Committee as a whole. However, it was acknowledged that opinions on each issue may differ and/or be similar in context and would be so stated in the report format.
ISSUE STATEMENTS
Issue No. 1:
Applying the School District property used for recreation towards the City’s Park Standard and including that property within the park inventory.
Issue No. 2:
Accepting the 1989 Parks and Recreation Element.
Issue No. 3:
Park Acquisition/Development plans for the Pine Street school site (replacement plan, reallocation of P.I.L. funds).
Issue No. 4:
To improve upon the number of existing areas for recreational use in the northwest quadrant, the following sites have been identified for possible
buy/sel1/1 ease/trade/devel op or rehabi 1 i tate.
Issue No. 5:
Identify the financing method(s) that will be utilized for the Acquisition or Development of each specific project.
Issue No. 6:
Park Dedication requirements for Zone 8 and 24 (land or money).
The co-chairpersons of the 1) Parks and Recreation Commission Subcommittee and 2) Northwest Quadrant Citizens Group were to meet August 26, 1989, with the opinions of the respective groups to combine and formalize a final report. It was anticipated the final report would be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission during the September meeting.
On August 26, 1989, the Commission Subcommittee’s opinions were prepared and
presented at the joint meeting of co-chairpersons. The Northwest Quadrant Group‘s opinions had not yet been formalized; however, the group‘s representative stated they would be avail able on September 13, 1989. As of the September 18, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, a response fron the Northwest Quadrant Group had yet to be received.
At the September meeting, the Commission unanimously recommended to present the final report on Northwest Quadrant Park Issues during the October meeting for a Commission recommendation for City Council consideration.
W Ib AB# 18)37t
Page 3‘
Uncertain as to the status of a response from the Northwest Quadrant Group, it was further recommended that the report be presented with or without the Northwest Quadrant Groups’ opinions, in order to conclude and resolve these issues in a timely fashion.
On September 19, 1989, the Parks and Recreation Commission Chairperson was notified by the Chairperson of the Northwest Quadrant Group that they would no longer be meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission Subcommittee to formulate a final report to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Chairperson of the Northwest Quadrant Group further indicated they would prepare a separate report for presentation directly to the City Council.
Attached is the final report as prepared by the Park Site and Facil ity P1 anning Subcommittee on the Northwest Quadrant Park Issues (Exhi bit 1). The report was presented during the October 16, 1989, Commission meeting. The Commission’s recommendations regarding each of the six issues have been incorporated within the report format. Members serving on the subcommittee will present their report for City Council consideration.
In response to the initial charge of this committee, as requested by Council, an additional recommendation of the Commission was to direct staff to continue working on the 1990-91 CIP Budget in order to establish a
passed unanimously (7-0).
FISCAL IMPACTS
With the exception of staff time, no other fiscal impact has been identified at this time. Continued Subcommittee efforts would define specific acquisition, development, and maintenance cost related to any park enhancement project recommended within the northwest quadrant.
EXHIBITS
1. Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee final report/NW Quadrant
2. Northwest Quadrant Committee Summary Reports, June 8 - August 17, 1989 3. Northwest Quadrant Concerns Staff Report, dated May 11, 1989
specific five-year plan for parks in the northwest quadrant. The motion
Park Issues, dated October 3, 1989
w m
NORTHWEST QUADRANT
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
PARK ISSUES
October 3, 1985
EXHIBIT 1
On May 23, 1989, the m Council, by consensus, determd that the Parks and Recreation Commission should select a subcommittee to work with staff and representatives of the Northwest Quadrant Group to develop a specific five year plan for parks in the northwest quadrant.
The following, for your consideration, is the final report as prepared by the Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee. The report outlines six (6) issues of concern as identified through committee proceedings and, the Subcommittee’s evaluation of those issues. Based upon the Commission’s recommendation and Council’s action regarding those recommendations, staff will prepare and submit a funding request in the 1990-91 Capital Improvement Budget in order to establ ish a specific five-year plan for parks in the northwest quadrant.
ISSUE NO. 1:
App7ying the Schoo7 District property used for recreation towards the City’s Park
Standard and including that property within the park inventory.
FINDINGS:
Not unlike other cities, Carlsbad has joint use/maintenance agreements for community use of school sites. The City has a vested interest in these areas primarily due to the recreational opportunity that they provide to the community. The principal function of these sites provides much needed active play fields for organized community sports 1 eagues which are scheduled by the Recreation Department on an after school/weekend basis. While it is true these areas are not open to the general public during school hours, school children utilize the fie1 ds and hard court surfaces for physical education cl asses and recess periods during these times.
The City provides financial support for the development, rehabil i tation and/or maintenance of the facilities (Attachment 1). The school district’s financial abil i ty to enhance these areas by providing the current maintenance 1 eve1 and/or development/rehabilitation projects that the City provides is restricted. The opportunity for continued recreational use of school sites by the community is guaranteed under provisions of the Civic Center Act (Attachment 2). In addition, should these sites become avail able for sale, this act would make the purchase of the property available to 1 oca1 governing agencies at 25% of the fair market Val ue.
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
School District property should continue to be counted towards meeting the park standards.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Committee response unavai 1 ab1 e as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion to endorse the PRC Subcommittee’s position that School District propertj should continue to be counted towards meeting the park standards passec unanimously (7 - 0).
1
ISSUE NO. 2: W w
Accepting the 1989 Parks and E7ement.
FINDINGS:
The basis for many decisions and the primary direction for the Parks and Recreation Department's daily operation and future development relies upon the ratification of a working document.
A subcommittee of the Parks and Recreation Commission along with staff support, formulated the proposed document. Weekly meetings were held for several months in order to prepare this document and a1 1 meetings were open to the publ ic. The 1989 Element received unanimous approval during a publ ic hearing at the September '88 Commission meeting in North Carlsbad. The Element again received unanimous approval at the public hearing held in October '88 in South Carlsbad. In addition, the Element has undergone General Plan review, received approval by that committee and will be the subject of publ ic review at the P1 anning Commission in October/November.
The time line for adoption by City Council, of this Element along with all other Elements of the General Plan is anticipated shortly thereafter.
This Element adequately satisfies the need for a general planning tool as existing and future acquisition and development of park facilities identified in the Element meets or exceeds the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
During the formation of this document, the intent was to utilize and implement contemporary concepts and planning strategies as they relate to parks and recreation facilities and programs. Should a change in those contemporary concepts necessitate a revision to this Element, provisions due exist to amend the Element up to three times per year.
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
The 1989 Parks and Recreation Element should be accepted.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Committee response unavailable as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion to endorse the PRC Subcommittee's position that the 1989 Parks anc
Recreation E7ement shou7d be accepted passed unanimous7y (7 - 0).
2
ISSUE NO. 3: m e
Park acguisition/development p7ans for the Pine Street schoo7 site (replacement p7an, rea77ocation of P.I.L. funds).
FINDINGS:
The Element currently identifies the future acquisition/development of the Pine Street school site (5.4 acres). The funding of this project is identified in the current C.I.P. Budget for 1998t utilizing Park-in-Lieu (P.I.L.) monies and Public Facility Fee (P.F.F.) funding.
It has long been the philosophy of the Parks and Recreation Department to pursue this acquisition for a future community park site in the Northwest Quadrant.
During the Northwest Quadrant subcommittee meetings, recent information received
from the school district has indicated the Pine Street school may not become
available for acquisition.
With this in mind, a replacement plan and reallocation of P.I.L. and P.F.F. funds as identified in the C.I.P. budget for the Pine School site may be appropriate. The identification and reallocation of funds for another future community park site, to replace the Pine School concept needs to be readdressed in the 1989 Element. Pine School future acquisition should remain within the element to provide for its future development as a community park should the property become avai 1 ab1 e.
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
The acquisition of the Pine Street school for use as a future park site is uncertain at this time.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Comrni ttee response unavailable as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion to accept the PRC Subcommittee's position that the acquisition of the Pine Street Schoo7 for use as a future community park site is uncertain at this time passed unanimously (7 - 0).
3
W w
ISSUE NO. 4:
To improve upon the number of existing areas for recreational use in the northwest quadrant, the following sites have been identified for possib7e buy/sel l/lease/trade/develop or rehabilitate.
FINDINGS:
After listing a number of sites for consideration to increase the Recreation opportunities in the Northwest Quadrant, committee members prioritized the following sites in order of preference (Attachment 3). (Items listed under each priority are not 1 i sted in order of preference. )
Prioritv #1
Establishment of a trail system.
Priority #2
A. Acquisition and development of property north of Denny’s Restaurant.
B. Hosp Grove potential for park.
Priority #3
A. Property in vicinity of Civic Center (i-e. Community Garden, Parks and Recreation Administration and Maintenance Facility).
B. Future community park (i.e. Pine School).
C. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Valley Jr. High School.
Prioritv #4
A. Acquisition and development of property north of Holiday Park.
B. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Chase Field.
C. Acquire Buena Vista reservoir site.
D. Cannon Lake Development.
4
W
Priority #5
A. Development of bike trails around 1 agoons.
B. Acquire and develop Y.M.C.A. property.
C. Acquire and develop 405 Oak.
D. Develop Maxton Brown extension.
* Subsequent to the priority 1 i sti ng of possible projects, a +lo acre parcel
for park development adjacent to Agua Hedionda Lagoon, east of Bristol Cove, was also suggested.
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
Priority #1
A. Trail System (open space and railroad right-to-way):
The 1989 Parks and Recreation Element addresses the issue of a trail system under Topic #1 "Park Development" policy C.8. "If a network of recreation trail systems is to be established throughout the city, they shall be open to the pub1 ic and provided by developers and privately maintained."
The Open Space Committee has prepared a report to City Council regarding this issue. At this time, an open space trail system would best be addressed and administered by an Open Space Committee or Commission, should one be established.
Staff is currently devel oping a plan for a possible 1 inear park located on the railroad right-of-way between Grand Avenue and Tamarack Avenue. SANDAG is taking an active role in land acquisition along the right-of-way. Should development become a reality,
redevelopment funding should be sought for acquisition and/or development and maintenance.
Priority #2
A. Property North of Denny's
The current philosophy for park development is to provide 1 arger community parks and not smaller "mini Parks". The total acreage of this site is approximately 2.5-3.0 acres. If acquisition and devel opment of this site i s recommended, redevel opment funding should be sought and maintenance costs should a1 so be included. Zoning and compatible land use issues will need to be considered as well as the availability of the land for sale.
- 5
W 0
B. Hosp Grove Potential for Park
Twenty-seven (27 acres) of Hosp Grove are currently identified as community park land. The voter mandate for purchase of approximatel) 49 acres of Hosp Grove created a large contiguous parcel of oper space property. A1 though a feasi bil ity study has not been performed to determine the recreational potenti a1 in terms of park devel opment, opportunities for recreation use may well exist. Because this property is owned by the City and i s zoned as open space, thc possi bi 1 i ty of developing Hosp Grove for recreational purposes, coul c
be more readi 1y facil i tated. A source of development funds would need to be further evaluated.
Priori tv #3
A. Property in vicinity of Civic Center (i.e. community garden and Parks and Recreation Administration office and maintenance yard).
While long term use of this property should not exclude the opportunity for recreational development, current uses are significant. The Greenwood property located immediately west of City Hall currently houses the Parks and Recreation Administration and maintenance yard. Future plans for relocation of that facility have not been positively defined. Because this parcel is owned by the City, if the property is vacated, the opportunity for long term lease revenue for this site may outweigh the benefits of providing a "park" on this parcel.
The site of the present community garden, immediately east of the 1 ibrary, currently provides for plots of land which many citizens lease from the City at a nominal fee to enjoy an experience that, without it, would not otherwise be avail able to them (i .e., apartment, condominium, and townhouse owners). This land currently provides a recreational opportunity for citizens to participate in. This property is a1 so owned by the City, and longterm use is unknown. Zoning and compatible 1 and use issue should a1 so be considered.
B. Future Community Park (i.e., Pine School)
Reference issue statement #3. The reality of developing a future community park at the Pine Street school site is not certain at this time. Although development of this park is several years in the future (1998+), consideration and a recommendation should be determined regarding the reallocation of funding to another site which can be more positively identified at this time. However,
development as a community park should not be dismissed. should the pine school site become available in the future,
C. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Valley Junior High School
A1 though the avail abil i ty of this property for purchase is unknown, the potential of the property in terms of developing recreational opportunities would be considered optimum. It has been indicated
e b
w 0
that the school district is interested in the property in order to provide activity fields for the high school and junior high school students. A possible joint venture with the school district for
considered. acquisition/development and/or maintenance and joint use should be
Priori tv A(4
A. Acquisition and development of property north of Hol iday Park
The rational pertaining to the acquisition of this area needs to be further analyzed.
B. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Chase Field
Should the Pine School site become available for community park development, additional land acquisition in that vicinity for park purposes should be considered.
C. Acquire Buena Vista Reservoir site
This property is an asset of the water enterprise fund. It is currently used for City maintenance purposes which would be displaced
compatibility issues would need to be considered. The limited size
of this parcel for park development is not consistent with current park development phi 1 osophy.
should the site be sold or devel oped. Zoning and 1 and use
D. Cannon Lake development
Development of this site is currently identified in the 1989-90
C.I.P. Budget for development in 1994-99. The source of funding for this project is from the P.F.F. In order to move development forward, other capital projects would need to be moved back. City Council establishes the priority for Capital Improvement Projects.
Priority #5
A. Development of Bike Trails around Lagoons
The development of bike trails similar to that of the Aviara
development should, and in a1 1 1 i kel i hood wi 11, be required through development approval s. The revised Macario Canyon Master P1 an identifies a trail system on the south side of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Environmental sensitivity in specific areas of a1 1 1 agoons may hinder such development.
6. Acquire and develop Y.M.C.A. property.
On August 22, 1989, City Council directed staff to negotiate the purchase of this property. Park-in-1 ieu funds will not be used for this purchase. The acquisition will not be used to meet park requirements in the northwest quadrant. The area is intended as Open Space with 1 i ttle or no planned development.
7
w 0
C. Acquire and develop 405 Oak Street -
This property is an asset of the Water Enterprise Fund. It is currently utilized for City maintenance purposes. Acquisition and development would displace that function at this time. Future acquisition should be considered for possible park development in relationship to a railroad right-of-way linear park, should that project come to fruition. It is anticipated there will be competing uses for that property (parking, 1 ow income housing). Redevelopment funding should be considered for acquisition and development.
D. Maxton Brown Extension
This 1.5 acre site is identified in the 1989 Park and Recreation Element for future development. A1 though this site is not currently identified in the C.I.P. budget, it will be included in the 1990-91 C.I.P. The site has limited development possibilities in terms of
options in order to maximize its potential. A funding opportunity which may readily facilitate this development would be the 1988 Park Bond Per Capita Grant Program (approximately $178,000).
traffic concerns. Staff will need to further analyze development
* k 10 acres adjacent to Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
The opportunity to acquire this property and the rationale of park development at this site needs to be further analyzed. If park development is to be considered at this site, park-in-lieu fees and/or park dedication requirements could facilitate its acquisition. Development funds would need to be further evaluated.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Committee response unavailable as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION; (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion to accept the PRC Subcommittee's findings and position and recommend these six (6) priority items follow the normal channels of park and facility development for final recommendation for the sale, acquisition, lease, trade and/or development of suggested sites passed unanimously (7 - 0).
(Normal channels would require staff review with a Commission Subcommittee to identify and scope the initial need and purpose of facility development. Proposed projects would then be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission for approval to be included in the CIP Budget for ultimate consideration by the City Counci7.)
8
rn 4
ISSUE NO. 5:
Identify the financing method(s) that wi?? be uti7ized for the acquisition or deve?opment of each specific project.
FINDINGS:
During the subcommittee proceedings the opportunities and constraints of several funding methods were identified. Possible financing opportunities were presented with the discussion of specific projects (Issue #4). A variety of funding methods (or a combination) exist which could finance additional recreation opportunities in the northwest quadrant. Among those considered to be applicable are :
1.
2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Park-in-Lieu Fees Quimby - Park Land Dedication Requirements B1 ock Grants Reallocation of C.I.P. Monies Redevelopment Funds Pub1 ic Facil ity Fees Special Assessment Districts Speci a1 Bonds Joint Purchase Agreements Park Bond Monies Certificates of Participation
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
Refer to Issue No. 4, Priorities #1 - 5.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Committee response unavailable as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion that the Commission accept the findings of the PRC Subcommittee and endorse the standard operating procedure for the acquisition and development of specific projects passed unanimously 7 - 0. A recommendation was also made to include monies from possible sale or lease of existing sites, as a funding source.
9
rn a
ISSUE NO. 6:
Park dedication requirements for Zone 8 and 24 (land or money).
FINDINGS:
Carlsbad Municipal Code 20.44.060 states, "Whether the City Council requires land
of both, shall be determined by the City Council at the time of approval of the
tentative map. In making that determination, the City Council shall consider the following:
dedication or elects to accept payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination
(a) Park and recreation element of the general plan; (b) Topography, geology, access, and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication; (c) Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication; (d) The feasibility of dedication; (e) Availability of previously acquired park property.
The determination of the City Council as to whether land shall be dedicated, or whether a fee shall be charged, or a combination thereof, shall be final and concl us i ve . I'
PRC SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION:
Staff should recommend dedication requirements of developers (1 and or money) on a case by case basis as current needs are determined.
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMITTEE POSITION:
Committee response unavailable as of October 3, 1989.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (OCTOBER 16, 1989)
A motion to accept the PRG Subcommittee position that staff should recommend dedication requirements of deve7opers (land or money) on a case by case basis as current needs are determined passed unanimous7y (7 - 0).
10
rn 8
b
August 9, 1989
TO : SHIRLEY DAHLQUIST-BURSVOLD
FROM: KEITH BEVERLY
COST FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AT
SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
BUENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - Field Rehab
$40,000 (88-89)
JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOLL - Field Development
$96,000 (84-85 1
MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY 'SCHOOL - Field Rehab
$10,000 (82-83)
VALLEY JR. HIGH SCHOOL - Tennis Courts
$12,000 (88-89)
VALLEY JR HIGH SCHOOL - Field Rehab
$ 3,000 (88-89)
PINE SCHOOL - Sport Lights
$ 5,000 (79-80)
CARLSBAO HICH Sc7HOOL - Tennis Court Lights
$96,000 (88-89)
FL'ERTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PARK
$95,000 (84-85)
LEVANTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARK
$20,000 (77-78)
ATTACHMENT 1
1200 Carlsbad VillaQe Orive Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 (619) 434-2821 """_ __ "." "" " - " - - - -
I
t
rn
Page 2
Shirley Dahlquist-Bursvold
August 9, 1989
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF N.W. QUADRANT SCHOOL SITES
BUENA VISTA
MAGNOLIA
PI NE
TENNIS COURTS
JEFFERSON
VALLEY JR. H. S.
( 2.3ac) $1 1,500
( 4.lac) 20,500
( 2.Oac) 10,000
( 1 Scrts) 10,000
( 2.6) 13,000
(rodent control) 1,200
$66,200
w v
July 24, 1989
TO : MAYOR LEWIS MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST qUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COflHITTEE MEETING 7/2~/89
1. The Committee reviewed population and acreage amounts within each quadrar
of the City. Figures were broken down into each zone within the quadrant! The information was supplied from the Growth Management Program.
2. The Committee members prioritized projects previously suggested at earlic
meeting, the results were as follows:
PRIORITY tl Establishment of a trail system.
PRIORITY 12 A. Acquisition and development of property north of Denny's Restauran
8. Hosp Grove potential for vw&bnal .. devebpw-t; west of 1-5.
\ C'f _*-
PRIORITY #3 A. Property in the vicinity of Civic Center (i.e. Community Garder Parks and Recreation Administration and mainten.ance yard).
B. Fine School. t t' : t : . I ' '. \I$\ ? . . -' 1 c. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Valley Junii
-
High School.
PRIORITY #4 A. Acquisition of property north of Holiday Park. B. Acquisition of property adjacent to Chase Field.
C. Buena Vista reservoir site.
0. Cannon Lake.
PRIORITY is A. Bike trail around 1 agoons.
8. Y.M.C.A. property.
L\ 1 -.\ L/\i , , \$/ "-r" '.:.a
CI _- - - *. .
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager
Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads P1 anning Commission Parks and Recreation Commission
ATTACHMENT 3
# e 9
August 25, 1989
TO : Mayor Lewis Mayor Pro-Tern Kulchin Council Member Mamaux Counci 1 Member Pett i ne Council Member Larson
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COWITTEE MEETING 8/3/f
1. The Scribe Report of the 7/21/89 meeting was amended as follows:
Priority #2 (6) Hosp Grove potential for park
Priority #3 (B) Future Community Park (Pine School area)
Priority #5 - Add (C) 405 Oak Street (D) Maxton Brown Extension
2. Staff reported on the process involved with the format ion of a ma schedule for community use of existing ballfields (both City and Sc District owned). Essentially, representatives of each individual group meet at one time to discuss and agree upon available time for organi zed group.
3. The proposed 1989 Parks and Recreation Element revision, as present( the General Plan Review Committee for review of internal consistency other Elements of the General P1 an, was addressed by commi ttee memt Some committee members were in disagreement with changing of the "supplement" to "meet" in regards to use of school district propert: community recreational needs.
4, Staff presented a breakdown of population densities for the four
different census tracts within Zone 1 of the Northwest Quadrant. statistics were provided by SanDag.
5. Anticipated revenues generated by the transient occupancy tax for f year 89-90 were discussed.
KB : dm
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager Department Heads Planning Commission Parks and Recreati On Commi ss i on
e 8
t.
June 12, 1989
TO : Mayor Lewis
l
Mayor Pro-Tern Kulchin Counci 1 Member Mamaux
Counci 1 Member Pett ine Council Member Larson
FROM : Parks and Recreation Subcomrnittee/Northwest Quadrant Citizen Grc
SUMMARY REPORT NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 6/8/89
1. A complete list of Committee members and staff liaisons are attached,
total of five (5) Northwest Quadrant Committee representatives pl alternatives will be assigned at the next meeting. The chairpersons a1
Parks and Recreation Commission - Shirley Dahlquist-Bursvold Northwest Quadrant - Mario Monroy
Shirley Dahlquist will chair the committee proceedings.
2. All votes taken by this committee will also (if necessary) identify ' minority opinion.
3. Committee procedures were reviewed, discussed and established as attachc
4. The following dates, times and places were established for future commit, meetings:
- June 15, 1989 - Heritage Hall - 7:OO p.m. - June 22, 1989 - Heritage Hall - 7:OO p.m. - June 29, 1989 - Heritage Hall - 7:OO a.m. - July 06, 1989 - Heritage Hall - 7:OO a.m. - Additional meetings are anticipated to be held on consecutive Thursd; at Heritage Hall, 7:OO a.m.
5. Previous action by the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Counl concerning the formation of this committee was reviewed and discussed
6. A goal statement reflecting the purpose of this committee was establis as foll ows:
"To Discuss parks issues related to the Northwest Quadrant Carlsbad for recommendation to and consideration by the Parks Recreation Commission, and for the ultimate consideration by the C
Counci 1 . "
*The committee encourages comments relating to committee proceedings.
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads P1 annina Commission Parks aGd Recreation Commission - 45 EXHIBIT 2
W 8
June 19, 1989
TO : Mayor Lewis
Mayor Pro-Tem Kulchin Council Member Mamaux
Counci 1 Member Pett i ne
Counci 1 Member Larson
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 6/15/89
1. The Summary Report of the 6/8/89 meeting was amended to delete t statement under item #1 that Shirley Dahlquist will chair the committ proceedings. Margaret Brownley was added to the list of N.W. Quadra
Citizens.
2. The procedural guidelines were amended to reflect that the committee wou
only have six voting members. Representatives of the N.W. Quadrant we
identified as Don Jackson, Gini Morito and Mario Monroy. Alternates wi
be Ramona Finilla and Mignon Bowen.
3. The committee toured the following sites in the N.W. Quadrant.
a. b.
d. e. f.
9. h.
i.
k.
C.
j.
Buena Vista School play field
Pi0 Pic0 Park The Community Garden
Parks and Recreation Administration Office Oak Park
Lot adjacent to Fire Station #1
Buena Vista reservoir
Hosp Grove (duck feeding area and desiltation basin)
405 Oak Stt-eet (Utilities and Maintenance yard) Railroad R.O.W.
Pine School and Chase Field
4. The committee reviewed issues for discussion at subsequent meetin! (attached).
5. Next meeting - June, 22, 1989 - Heritage Hall, 7:OO p.m.
c; Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads P1 ann i ng Commi ss i on
Parks and Recreation Commission
. -. 46
" 02
8 * ..
June 27, 1989
TO : MAY OR LEW I S
MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN
COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COFlMITTEE MEETING 6/22/89,!
1. Ramona Finilla was in attendance and served as an alternate in th
,
committee proceedings in lieu of Gini Morito.
2. Committee discussion centered around park definitions and additiona
cities included in the agenda packets. After review of the variou elements, a general consensus of the committee suggested specific issue
for discussion by this committee were identified as:
inf~rmation as outlined in the Parks and Recreation Elements of differen
A. Consider those neighborhoods which have the most serious par
deficiencies as those to receive the highest priority for par
acquisition and development.
B. Consider private park and recreational facilities, schoo playgrounds and other public recreational land as bein
partially acceptable in meeting neighborhood and conlrnunit:
park needs and in satisfying park standards.
3. The committee discussed the formation of a list of prioritized par1
development projects to be presented and discussed at the next meeting.
4. Agenda items for the next meeting will also include:
A. Clarification of the Quimby Act.
6. Conditions and/or restrictions which apply to the site!
previously discussed for possible lease/sale/trade/development~
5. Next meetlng date is Thursday, June 29, 1989 at 7:OO a.m. - Granar)
Building at Magee Park.
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager
Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads Planning Commission
Parks and Recreation Commi ss ion
" 47
-b 02
L’ 8 e
July 3, 1989
TO : MAYOR LEWIS
MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN
COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE
COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 6/29,
1. The Summary Report of June 22, 1989, was unanimously approved,
2. Clarification of the Quimby Act was addressed by staff members.
a. The collectable park acreage as outlined in the Quimby Act s
that the maximum is three (3) acres per 1,000 population, un that standard has been met. Once the three acres per population has been met, the collectable acreage may increase
five (5) acres per 1,000 population.
b. All in-1 ieu fees collected under the ordinance shall be comm
within a five year period after the payment of such fees.
3. Conditions/restrictions of the sale/lease/trade or development oi
fol1 owing property were di scussed.
a. 405 Oak St. (Utilities Maintenance Building) Buena Vista reserv
asset of the Water Enterprise Fund. Sale or lease must benefi water rate user. 405 Oak Street may have competition with possible additional uses.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f,
9.
Pi0 Pic0 Park/Oak Park - both zoned Open Space and purchasec public purposes from the State Highway Surplus Lands. Park-in
funds were used for the purchase and a change in park statu:
require park abandonment procedures.
Community Garden Site - None
Hosp Grove - zoned Open Space, 27 acres dedicated for park purp the remaining acres consist of the voter mandated purchase b, City. Development for park and recreational purposes of Open
Land i s permi ss i bl e.
Fire Station parking lot - none.
1166 Elm Ave, - current Parks and Recreation Administratiol Maintenance yard, no other restrictions.
Harding Street Community Center - may require park abando procedures, State Park Bond funds once used for rehabilitatio
require State Legislative action.
-. 48
L' * W e
h. Car Country Park - conditions for use of public park purposes, n
I require park abandonment procedures.
i. Pine Street
4. The attached list was identified as sites for possible parks l recreational development (refer to next weeks agenda) 8
5. Next meeting date is Thursday, July 6, 1989 at 7:OO a.m. - Granary Build
at Magee Park.
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads Planning Commission Parks and Recreat i on Commi s s i on
I
49
W e
July 10, 1989
TO : MAYOR LEN IS
MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 7/6/89
1. The Summary Report of June 29, 1989 meeting was unanimously approved.
2. The previous weeks suggested list of projects were divided into 1 following categories:
TRAILS:
ti3 htJ'Q(Q 4. Hosp Grove - development a&-aem-to duck feeding area/trails.
12. Railroad Property - lease, acquisition, development.
37. 405 Oak Street (Water District)
13. Zone 8 Area - acquisition, dedication, development.
14. Wetland Area Agua Hedionda Lagoon - acquisition/development.
15. Trail development along Creek area adjacent to Cannon Road.
17. ~Mtlerrdhta-tagoon-and-Hosp-0ruve
18. Maxton Brown trail system &y
19. Alley adjacent to State Street - acquisition/development
20. Sea Wall - count toward park standard
21. Sculpture park - count toward park standard
23. Cannon Lake State property - acquisi tion/development
24. S.D.G. & E. area adjacent to railroad - acquisi tion/developmenl
27. Bike pedestrian trail - around each 1 agoon
31. Connect all trails.
50 - .. 02
W e
> ACQUISITION / DEVELOPMENT
10. Property around Chase Field - acquisition/developnlent.
3. Pine School and bus storage area - acquisition/development.
22. Flower fields across from Valley Junior High School - acquisition/development
34. Acquisition of Adjoining land north of Holiday Park
29. Develop more ballfields and implement a better scheduling system.
6. HUB Park - development.
1. Area north of Denny’s Restaurant, west of 1-5
28. Develop mini park around Jefferson Street
7. Fire Station #1 - tennis court development.
9. Area West of Agua Hedionda Lagoon - acquisition/development.
11. Property north of Harding Street Cornnluni tY Center -
acqui si ti on/devel opmen t .
acquisition/development.
16. Y.M.C.A. - acquisition/development
30. Community Garden - count toward park standard
33. Safe Teen Center
36. Buena Vista Reservoir
ENHANCE EXISTING
2. Pi0 Pic0 Park - add basketball courts.
5. Macario - volleyball center consideration.
6.
0.
32.
25.
26.
38.
39.
$I
HUB Park - development.
Cannon Lake - tennis court development.
Cannon Lake - volleyball center consideration.
Pi0 Pic0 Park - trade/sale/lease
Parks Administration Office and Yard - trade/sale/lease
Oak Street Park (by Shell Station) - trade/sale/lease
Car Country
\lo 5 Q GQOV E -1 03 5 1.
m e
- 3. Items for discussion at next weeks meeting will include:
I a. C.lJ.S.D.'s future plans for the Pine School Site.
b. Report from the Finance Director
c. Quadrant demographics
d. Park abandonment procedures
e. Prioritize list of projects
t
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager
Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads
P1 ann i ng Commi ss i on
Parks and Recreation Commission
5i3
I '" u 04
W
.a
e
July 24, 1989
TO : MAYOR LEWIS MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN
COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUADRANT PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 7/20/E
1. The Committee reviewed population and acreage amounts within each quadr
of the City. Figures were broken duwn into each zone within the quadran
The information was supplied from the Growth Management Program.
2. The Committee members prioritized projects previously suggested at earl
meeting, the results were as follows:
PRIORITY #l Establishment of a trail system.
PRIORITY 12 A. Acquisition and development of property north of Denny's Restaur:
west of 1-5.
E. Hosp Grove potential for w development. Oaw
PRIORITY 13 A. Property in the vicinity of Civic Center (i.e. Community Garc Parks and Recreation Administration and maintenance yard).
C. Acquisition and development of property adjacent to Valley Jur
B. -1. F~va Cbm et\= U OI-Gwu fiq
High School.
PRIORITY #4 A. Acquisition of property north of Holiday Park. E. Acquisition of property adjacent to Chase Field.
C. Buena Vista reservoir site.
0. Cannon Lake.
PRIORITY #5 A. Bike trail' around 1 agoons. - 6. Y.M.C.A. property.
c Yo5 OK d wni CsaCcL I%q-
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads
Parks and Recreation Commission
P1 anni ng Commi s s ion 53
* w a - . . August 9, 1989
TO ; Mayor Lewis
Mayor Pro-Tern Kul ctl i n Counci 1 Member Manlaux
Counci 1 Member Pett i ne
Council Member Larson
I
%J"ARY REPORT OF "3T YUAVHnNr PARK CONCERNS CUMMI1 TEE MEETING 8/3/89 t
1 The Scribe Report of the 7/21/89 meeting was alrlerlded as fol lows:
Priority #2 (B) Hosp Grove potential for park
Priori ty #3
(6) Future Community Park (Pine School area)
Priority #5 - Add
(C) 405 Oak Street
(D) Maxton Brown Extension
2. Staff reported on the process involved with ttre fortllation of a mastel schedule for community use of existing ballfields (both City and Schoo'
District owned). Essentially, representatives of each individual usel
group meet at one time to discuss and agree upon available time for eact organized group.
3. The proposed 1989 Parks and Recreation Element revision, as presented tc
the General Plan Review Committee for review of irlterrtal consistency wit1
other Elements of the General Plan, was addressed by conlrtlittee members.
Some committee members were in disagreement with changing of the worc
"supplement" to "meet" in regards to use of school district property for
community recreational needs.
4. Staff presented a breakdown of population densities for the four (4)
different census tracts within Zone 1 of the Northwest Quadrant. Thc
statistics were provided by SanDag.
5. Anticipated revenues generated by the transient occupawy tax for fiscal
year 89-90 were discussed.
KB: dm
c: Ray Patchett, City Manager
Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager
Department Heads
' Planning Commission
1 Parks and Recreation Commission
54
..I
-a y rn e
August 14, 1989
TO : MAYOR LEWIS
MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN
COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX
COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE
COUNCIL MEMBER. LARSON
WMARY IWWRT OF NORTHWEST QUADRAN1 PARK CONCERNS COMMITTEE MEETING 8/10/89
1. The Scribe Report of the 8/3/89 meeting was unanimously approved.
2. The Committee was addressed by Chris Salanlone, Redevelopment Director Mr. Salamone discussed the operation of the downtown redevelopment agency including the formation process, relation to the City of Carlsbad an
various functions associated with the agency. Funding possibilities wer
discussed in regards to possible park projects in the downtow redevelopment area,
3. Mark Steyaert presented an in progress report of the railroad right
of-way/linear park. Although the right of way may offer potential for connective link (trail) between the three lagoons, a linear par
development between Grand Avenue and Talllarack may be possible. Th
possible re-alignment of Carlsbad Boulevard and the State's developmen
plans for South Carlsbad state beach were also discussed. The study i
continuing.
I
4. Staff discussed a proposed trail systeru with connective links throughou
the City as prepared in conjunction with the Open Space Committee Report
5. The Committee discussed the acquisition of 10 acres of property for par purposes between Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Park Drive, east of Bristol Cove
Questions regarding the use of park dedication requirements for Zone 8 wer
a1 so di scussed.
6. The Committee concluded that one report should be written to discuss th
specific issues relating to the purpose of this Collllrlittee. Difference
of opinion would be addressed on the same report.
cc: Ray Patchett
Frank Mannen
Dept. Heads
Planning Commission
Parks & Recreation Commi ss i on
55
- August 21, 1989
TO: MAYOR LEWIS
8- I
MAYOR PRO-TEM KULCHIN COUNCIL MEMBER MAMAUX COUNCIL MEMBER PETTINE COUNCIL MEMBER LARSON
. SUMMARY REPORT OF NORTHWEST QUAORANT PARK CUNCEHNS COMMITTEE MEETING 8/17/89
1.
2.
4 3.
cc:
The Scribe Report of the 8/10/89 meeting was ariierided to state that (under item #5) the Committee discussed the "dedication" (not acquisition) of +9
acres of property for park purposes . . .
The Committee discussed and formalized specific issue statements to be addressed in the final report by the subcommittee. These issue statements i ncl ude :
a. Applying the School District property used for recreation towards the City's Park Standard and including that property within the park inventory .
b. Accepting the 1989 Parks and Recreation Eletiient.
c. Park acquisition/development plans for the Pine Street school site
(replacement plan (reallocation of P.I.I. funds).
d. To improve upon the number of existing areas for recreational use
in the northwest quadrant, the following sites have been identified for possible buy/sell/lease/trade/develop or rehabil itate:
Trail System (Open Space & R.R. right-of-way)
Property north of Denny's (Acq. & Devel.)
Hosp Grove potential for park (Devel.) Property in vicinity of Civic Center (Devel.)
Property adjacent to Valley Jr. High School (Acq.) Acquire property north of Holiday Park. Acquire property adjacent to Chase Field. Acquire the Buena Vista Reservoir.
Develop Cannon Lake.
Development of bike trail around the lagoons
Acquire and develop Y .M.C.A, property.
Develop Maxton Brown Extension.
e. Identify the financing method(s) that will be utilized for the
f.
acquisition or development of each specific project.
Park dedication requirements for Zone 8 and 24 (land or money).
Committee members discussed a reconiniendat ion that the City Council consider
park land dedication in lieu of fees for the park requirements in Zone 8
and 24 of the Northwest Quadrant.
Ray Patchett
Frank Mannen Dept. Heads Planning Commission Parks & Recreation Commission 56
.. w w
"
'. . 11, 1989
TO : PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM : DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR 9
NORTHWEST QUADRANT CONCERNS
At the September 19, 1988 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting during the public t regarding the 1989 Parks and Recreation Element revision, Mr. Mario Monroy expressed following concerns relating to park planning in the Northwest Quadrant - (Exhibit A) :
C> .,, \ !,, i. ' - -I '** , ? ,, , .~
1. There is little or no planning being done in the Northwest Quadrant in tern land acquisition for park development because the Quadrant is near build OL
2. The financing for park enhancement should be studied further because the
3. A suggestion that increased integration is required between the Redevelopmt
opportunity to acquire land wi17 soon be gone.
the Beach Over7ay Zone and the Parks and Recreation E7ement to ensure that park facilities are planned to meet resident needs.
.. The possibi7ity of creating a pedestrian and bicycle trail connecting the I
5. Development of a five year plan to determine the most effective method to i
throughout the Western part of Carlsbad.
the Park Enhancement program.
6. That the City should only count net usable land and not gross acreage when
preparing a park inventory.
After discussion of these concerns, the Parks and Recreation Commission directed staf review these issues with the Park Site and Facility Planning subcommittee and return Commission with findings and recommendations.
In addition, and with respect to these concerns, Thelma Hayes spoke to the City Counc February 7, 1989, on behalf of a group of citizens living in the Northwest Quadrant ~r that their Quadrant was being ''short changed" in the area of parks, for the fol 1 owin5
- (Exhibit B):
7. The Demographics of the Northwest Quadrant demand that existing and propose
8. The Present method of financing the acquisition and deve7opment of future $
be accessib7e to the citizens.
limited because the Northwest Quadrant is close to build out.
.. 9. School grounds sld not be counted to meet the &Is park standard for following reasons: .
a. The Parks and Recreation Element recommends that agreements with local be used to supplement neighborhood and cormrunity recreationa? needs.
b. School facil ities which are used to meet the public recreational needs
should be counted to meet the park standard of 3 acres per one thousant: population.
avai'lable only 40% or less of the time. Therefare 0n7y ~ne half of th
C. Current agreements with the school district for recreational use of thc facilities cou7d lead to a park deficit if the district decided to sell property in the future.
d. The citizens group fe7t that only land owned by the City shou7d count 1
meeting the adopted park standard.
10. Present City park plans do not recognize the unique nature of the Northwe:
11 * The City needs to identify parcels of land in the Northwest Quadrant that
Quadrant.
used for parks.
After discussion, the City Council acknowledged that staff should review the economi of issues raised by the citizens group; but took no action pending review of the Par Recreation Element. In addition the City Council asked staff to comment on several 1.rk parcels along Pi0 Pic0 Drive that are counted to meet the park standard.
DISCUSSION:
Staff will address the citizens and City Council concerns by:
1. Reviewing the Parks and Recreation Inventory and discussing the economic i
2. Commenting on each issue by stating the present policies which guide the P
3. Listing past and future Parks and Recreation and other public enhancement
not counting certain parcels to meet the standard.
P1 anning process and recommend an action plan.
within the Northwest Quadrant.
INVENTORY - Northwest Ouadrant:
Park Standard:
Community Park 2.5 ac / 1,000 SUA .5 ac / 1,000 Total : 3.0 ac / 1,000 (Required)
SRA - 2.5 ac / 1,000
GRAND TOTAL: 5.5 AC / 1,000
2
.- W 0
._ Inventory:
f a9 B/O EXIST ST0 EXIST +/- ST0 FUTURE + / - Community Park
(4 sites) 63.11 39.58 98.70 69.78
SUA (17 sites) 12.62 38.48 19.74 46.50
OVERALL TOTAL: 75.73 78.06 t 2.33 118.44 116.28 [-2.251
S RA
(5 sites) TOTAL : 63.11 623.30 t560.19 98.70 623.30 t524.60
In analyzing the above data, the City exceeds the 1989 park standard by t2,33
been determined that the City exceeds the SRA standard.
Elimination of school sites and lease property from the current inventory;
(22.4 acres C.U.S.D. t 2.7 acres Leased/Total = 25.1 acres) ; would result in:
acres however, at build out there will be a [-2.251 acre deficit. It has alsl
89 B/O EX I ST STD EXIST +/- STD FUTURE t / - Community Park (4 sites) 63.11 39.58 98.70 69.78
SUA 12.62 13.38 19.74 21.40
75.73 52.96 1-22.771 118.44 91.18 1-27.261
Not counting the school sites or leased properties that are used by the publil
and, jointly maintained for the City recreational purposes, indicates a [-
22.771 park land deficit in 1989 and is projected to be a [-27.261 acre deficit at build out.
In addition to the issue of not counting the school property or leased parcels, the City Council questioned the reasoning for counting Pi0 Picod and Oak Park totaling 1.10 acres. -
These two parcels were dedicated to the City under a State Highway Grant and have been improved and maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department for many years.
The two parcels are passive in nature, offer limited recreational amenities, and are used periodically by the general public. Staff recommends that they continue to be counted in the Parks inventory. In August of 1987, these park sites were approved in the existing inventory by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council.
3
ECONOMIC IMPACT: 0
The following 1989 dollar costs have been projected in making up the park land deficit if the school or leased lands are not counted to meet the existing park standard:
(1989) *Hiqh *Low
Acquisition 22.77 acres $11,385,000 $3,415,500 Development 22.77 acres 2,618,550 2,618,550
$6,034,050
iy )3c;3,55-3
(B/O) *Hish *Low
Acquisition 27.26 acres $13,630,000 $4,089,000 Development 27.26 acres 3,134,900 3,134,900
$16,754,900 $7,215,900
*Land Acquisition estimated (high) $500,000 / ac. *Land acquisition value estimated (low) $150,000 / ac. *Development cost estimates $115,000 / ac.
In summary, the economic impact for the Northwest Quadrant with respect to thl elimination of jointly used school facilities or leased sites to meet the par1 standard would range from 6.1 million to 16.7 million dollars, if additional acqui si ti on were requi red.
In addition, it is projected that by adding the additional land there would bj $147,000 to $176,000 maintenance impact based on 1989 dollar value.
COMMENTS ON CITIZEN CONCERNS:
Listed below are the eleven (11) concerns raised by the Northwest Quadrant citizens group. Staff will comment on the policies regulating park issues an propose an appropriate action pl an for these concerns:
Concern #I
little or no planning is being done in the Northwest Quadrant relating to park land acquisition and/or deve7opment.
Based on the existing park standards (3.0 acres per one thousand) and the current policy of counting City owned land, land leased, or land used by agreements, the 1989 Park inventory exceeds the population standard by + 2.33 acres in the Northwest Quadrant.
4
Relating to advanmark planning in the Northwest adrant, staff has identified the following projects except for item 8, that are currently identified in the approved Capi to1 Improvement program (c. I. P. ) :
1. Crediting 25 acres of the Macario City-wide Community Park to the Northwest Quadrant (98+).
2. Acquisition and development of 7 acres of the Pine Elementary School 3. Develop 6,87 acres of Cannon Lake and improvements to the 1.15 acre Maxton Brown Extension Speci a1 Use Area (98+).
4. Construct a community center/gymnasium (98t).
5. Improvements to Holiday Park (89).
6. Adding a stage and bandshell to Magee Park (89).
7. Park restoration/acquisition, sites to be determined (98t).
8. The City is also considering the feasibility of purchasing the 15 acre Y.M.C.A. site for recreation enhancement (89).
Based on existing park sites and future plans for park land acquisition and development on a city-wide basis, the overall park standard of 3 acres per 1,000 will be achieved. At build out it is projected the developed park land will exceed the current standard by +9.06 acres. Therefore, on a city-wide basis, it has been determined that further acquisition of park land in the Northwest Quadrant may not be necessary.
ACTION PLAN:
Unless current pol icies are revised, it is concluded the 1989 park planning process in the Northwest Quadrant is adequate. An additional 2.25 acres may be necessary to acquire and develop to meet the build out requirement park standard.
Methods of acquisition should be recommended through the normal review process.
Concern #2
Park enhancement financing should be studied further.
Based on the City’s method of acquiring land or funds under the Quimby Act (P.1-L.), development funds from the Public Facility Fee (P.F.F.), (both relating to new development), and, that the City’s overall park goal exceeds the standard; no further acquisition may be necessary in the Northwest Quadrant.
Although there will be a projected [-2.251 acre deficit at build out, it i: estimated there will be approximately 1.7 million dollars of P.I.L. funds available in the Northwest Quadrant for further land acquisition or park restoration projects.
- 3
.- ACTION PLAN: 0 0
Based on current polices the City needs to identify an additional 2.25 acres of park land for acquisition and development by build out. If it is determined that additional parkland is necessary to meet the buildout requirements the question about additiona7 park7and enhancement should be studied further.
It is suggested that the Northwest Quadrant citizens meet with the Parks and Recreation Subcommittee to determine the feasibility of additional parkland.
Concern #3
Suggest more integration needed between the various commissions and beach over7ay zone on park faci7ities.
It is staffs opinion that the various commissions do communicate with each
other, however, we do agree that the mutual concerns facing the Northwest Quadrant park enhancement should be closely viewed by joint meetings and improved communication between citizens, commissions and staff.
ACTION PLAN!
Implement joint meetings between the various commission and concerned citizen as it relates to the Northwest Quadrant park enhancement in an effort to assure community needs are addressed.
Concern #4
There shou7d be a pedestrian and bicycle tria7 connection between the 1 agoons.
At the suggestion of Mr. Mario Monroy, the Parks and Recreation Commission on September 19, 1988 directed staff and the Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee to study the suggestion of trails to tie the lagoons to the south and north of the City together with access along the railroad right-of-way, and return to the Commission with recommendations.
ACT I ON PLAN :
Although present policy is to encourage developers to provide trail systems, staff is presently preparing the Rail Road right-of-way report and will present it to the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration in July o 1989.
Concern-#5
Suggest that a five year p7an be established to imp7ement the various p7an that effect parks in the Northwest Quadrant.
The City presently has a five year plan in place, The Capitol Improvement Program (C.I.P.). This guide not only identifies the projects, Quadrant, fund source, and the total appropriation in a five year plan, it also projects future park planning to build out.
6
.-
ACT I ON PLAN : 0 0
Unless the current pol icy is revised there is a1 ready a city wide five year development plan in place. It is recommended that staff consider proposing tc the Parks and Recreation Commission, a method in making up the projected 2.25 acres short fall in the Northwest Quadrant in future C. I .P. proposals.
Concern #6
The City shou7d only count net usab7e land for park purposes, not gross acreage.
Prior to the formation and implementation of the Growth Management Program
The City pol icy was to accept gross acreage as it related to dedicated par1 1 and. Examples would be Stagecoach Community Park (riparian area) , Cal avera Hi1 1 s Community Park (natural slopes) j portions of undevelopable
areas in Larwin, Hosp Grove, Cannon Lake and Laguna Riviera. All these
sites except for Cannon Lake were dedicated by the developers per the
Quimby Act and accepted by the City at gross acreage.
The City's new and revised policy as it relates to park dedication require! the developer to dedicate developable park 1 and to meet the Quimby requirements. No longer will the City accept land that is deemed undevel opabl e for recreational use.
ACTION PLAN:
Continue to count previously dedicated park land at gross acreage, and requirc the developers to adhere to the revised dedication guidelines that future dedicated park 1 and is developable.
Concern #7
Demographics demand that existing and future parks be accessible to the
citizens.
The adopted City's acquisition and Community Park development guidelines specify 1 arger but fewer parks. The new parks are to be a minimum of 20 acres where possible and have a service ratio of 1.5 to 2 mi 1 es which woulc meet the needs of approximately 20,000 citizens.
Neighborhood, vest pocket or mini parks are to be the responsibility of each new planning area, developed and maintained under a homeowners association concept.
Under these park development pol i cies, the existing and proposed parks mee the demographic requirements in the Northwest Quadrant. In fact, the park facilities in the Northwest Quadrant far exceed the ratio requirement in comparison to the other three Quadrants throughout Carlsbad.
ACTION PLAN:
Unless the existing park development guidelines are changed, no action is
necessary.
It is suggested that staff incorporate methods to educate the public on the locations and the available use of the existing facilities in the Northwest Quadrant.
7
.I Concern #8 0 a
Present method of financing for acquisition and deve7opment of future parks i the Northwest Quadrant is 7imited due to near bui7d out.
Staff's analysis, based on current planning guidelines and policies indicate that the Northwest Quadrant exceeds the adopted park standard today.
Financing for the remaining projected 2.25 acre buildout deficit will be provided by in-place funding mechanisms from the remaining housing units that will be built in the future. Evaluation indicates there will be no additioni
throughout Carlsbad have a demonstrated need for park development because of existing park land deficiencies.
It may be difficult to expect a city's Growth Management program, to make up
perceive park1 and deficits in an 01 der bui 1 t out part of a city up and beyond
the approved standard.
Under current City planning, as outlined in the 1988-89 five (5) year plan tc
buildout, Capitol Improvement Program, a total of $18,700,000 is earmarked fc park planning in the Northwest Quadrant, utilizing a number of funding source including projected P.I.L. and P.F.F. funds.
The major future development projects are the Pine School acquisition and development, Cannon Lake improvements, Macario Canyon park, a community center/gymnasium, the Senior Center, a number of park rehabilitation project5 and future park acquisition proposals. All these projects are factored into the approved P.I.L. and P.F.F. funding computations.
In addition, the City Council is presently directing staff to analyze the 15 acre Y.M.C.A. parcel for future park and recreation consideration.
parkland required other than what is already planned. Other quadrants
ACTION PLAN:
Unless present policy is changed no action is necessary, however, it is recommended that staff meet with the concerned citizens to review the park plans and, if necessary, propose other means of financing additional park development the Northwest Quadrant.
Concern #9
SchooI grounds shou7d not be counted to meet the City's park standard.
The Previous, and current Parks and Recreation Element incorporate policies which implement agreements with school districts where the City improves and/ or maintains school facilities for use of the general public for recreational
purposes. It has always been the pol icy that those facilities shall be count towards the City's park standard. The proposed 1988 Element recommends to "supplement (augment, incorporate) school district property currently under joint use/maintenance agreements within the parks inventory and apply that acreage towards meeting the park standard. Many rehabilitation projects to school facil i ties have been completed, at City expense, in an effort to provi additional recreation opportunities for the community in all quadrants of the City.
A recent survey conducted by staff of Cities in San Diego and Orange Counties indicate that eight (8) out of fourteen (14) cities (57%), with adopted park standards, count school facilities to meet their park standard (Exhibit C).
8
.- While it is true m school district facilities mawnly be available to the public less than 40% of the time, studies indicate that the majority use of recreation facilities is generally on an after school basis, weekends, holidays and summer vacations. For this reason, staff does not agree that only 50% of the avail able school facility 1 and should be counted to meet Carlsbad's adopted park standard.
In all likelihood, the issue regarding the sale of school property and the negative impact it would create upon the park inventory, will not become a reality. However, if the school property should be considered for sale, staff would recommend the purchase of that land for park purposes. Under stipulations of the Civic Center Act, the land must first be offered for purchase by the City at 25% below fair market value. Funds are being collected in the Northwest Quadrant P.I.L. fund for potential future land acquisition (Exhibit D).
On September 23, 1986 the City Council approved the city wide Facil i ty and Improvement Plan. This plan detailed the parks inventory that included school 1 and.
In November of 1987 the City Council reviewed and approved the parks inventory, again it included county school 1 and to meet the park standard.
Zone 8, Kelly Ranch, Facility Plan was recently approved. The issue of counting school land to meet the park standard was a major consideration The City Council again re-asserted that school 1 and used for recreationai purposes should be counted.
ACTION PLAN:
Count school land used for general recreational purposes to meet the park standard and direct staff to recommend the future purchase of any school land that may come on line.
It is also recommended that the Parks and Recreation Subcommittee meet with the Northwest Quadrant citizens to further evaluate the school land issue.
Concern #10
Present park plans do not recognize the unique nature of the Northwest Quadrant.
Because the Northwest Quadrant is basically build out and that land is ver expensive to purchase, it is difficult to plan additional facilities beyon the approved development plan where there is no additional income stream.
The overall existing city planning in the Northwest Quadrant has considere lagoon enhancement, street scape projects, beach improvements, beach access, park rehabil i tation, open space acquisition (Hosp Grove), down tow redevelopment, Senior complex, future community park construction (Pine school) and Cannon Lake improvements. All of the aforementioned projects take in the uniqueness of the Northwest Quadrant into consideration.
9
In addition, City staff is analyzing surplus propert that could be leased w 7
and/or sold for the purpose of augmenting future parks. staff is a1 so ..
studying the railroad right-of-way for potential public access and recreational use, extending throughout the western part of Carlsbad. The
lend itself to. a unique park amenity, if it is determined feasible to purchase and devel op.
Y,M,G,A, property currently being considered for City acquisition could
ACTION PLAN:
Continue to proceed with the adopted park planning process as outlined in the Capitol Improvement Program and the proposed 1989 Park and Recreation Element.
Recommend that staff meet with the Northwest Quadrant concerned citizens to address their issues, explain the City's plan, and work out a recreational enhancement program that will meet the citizens needs based on current policies and funding mechanisms.
Concern fll
The City needs to identify parcels of land in the Northwest Quadrant that could be used for parks.
Under the present policy the City has planned for park land acquisition by purchasing the 7.0 acres of Pi ne El ementary School in 1998t.
The City is also conducting a feasibility study to purchase 15t acres of the Y.M.C.A. property located across from the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home park.
It is also recommended that the City plan to purchase other school properties used for general recreation purposes when, and if, they become avai 1 ab1 e.
ACTION PLAN:
Based on present park 1 and inventory and future park acquisition plans, no further acquisition is necessary unless, the need is identified, and a source of income is available.
Past and Future Northwest Quadrant Projects
Staff has compiled a list of past and future projects that have or will enhance the Northwest Quadrant. The list includes Parks and Recreation, and other public improvements.
Since 1979, approximately $22,118,000 has been spent for park improvements, another $18,110,000 will be spent for future projects. The combined total is approximately $40,228,000.
The combined past and future total for other enhancement projects is
$17,255,000.
The grand total of all the park and other enhancement projects for the Northwest Quadrant is approximately $57,483,000, (Exhibit E)
10
SUMKARY LAST TEN YEARs. v w
1. Parks and Recreation Improvements $22,118,000
2. Future Parks and Recreation Projects 18,110,000
TOTAL : 40,228,000
3. Other Publ ic Enhancement Improvements 7, 755,000
4. future Publ ic Enhancement Improvements 9,500,000
TOTAL : 17,255,000
GRAND TOTAL ALL PROJECTS: $57,483,000
SUMMARY :
In summary, staff first and foremost acknowledges the concerns represented by the citizens group within the Northwest Quadrant. As Park and Recreation professionals, we appreciate their consciousness relating to the issues addressed within this report. A genuine effort has been, and will continue t be extended, in an attempt to work cooperatively with the citizens in addressing their needs and concerns.
Based on the evaluation of those issues outlined in this report, staff
or exceed the park development standards for the Northwest Quadrant.
Staff does recommend that the city consider methods in making up the Northwes Quadrant 2.25 acre projected short fall at build out.
believes the current policies and actions being implemented by the City, meet
11
.- w
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Northwest Quadrant Citizens Committee meet with the
Parks and Recreation Commission Park Site and Facility Planning Subcommittee to review the City's adopted park plan for the Northwest Quadrant and the concerns as out1 ined by the citizens group. The Park Site and Faci 1 i ty Planning Subcommittee will report back to the Parks and Recreation Commission with their findings and recommendations within sixty (60) days.
It is further recommended that the 1989 proposed Parks and Recreation Element
approved change is to be made to the document it can be done by an addendum at
any time.
Revision be approved as submitted with a condition that if any subsequent
DB: pa
Exhibits: Exhibit "A" - Memo dated 01/17/89, Mario Monroy Exhibit "B" - Memo dated 02/22/89, Thelma Hayes
Exhibit "D" - Memo dated 12/22/88, Civic Center Act Exhibit I1E" - Past & Future NW Quadrant Projects, dated 5/89 Exhibit 'IF" - Revised Park and Recreation Inventory,
Exhibit "C" - Memo dated 05/04/89, Survey
dated 4/20/89
c: Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director Michael Hol zmi 11 er, P1 anni ng Director
Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager
Jim Elliott, Finance Director
12
.- - - .” I
January 17, 1989 .- _. ._
TO : MAY OR -MAYOR PRO TEM
VIA: CITY MANAGER
FROM : Assistant to the City Manager
SUMMARY OF METING WITH MARIO MONROY ON JANUARY 16, 1989
Mr. Monroy requested this meeting to discuss how park facilities were be. addressed in the northwest quadrant of the City.
Specifically, he expressed a concern that more integration is needed to be m; between the Redevelopment Area, the beach overlay zone and the Parks i Recreation Element. He feels a tremendous opportunity exists for the City make each of these plans work together and to ensure that park facilities sel the needs of those residents in the northwest quadrant..
He suggested that careful consideration be given to the Harding Community Ceni once the new Senior Center opens and that facil i ty is no longer used by Seniol
He a1 so inquired as to whether the current buildings located at Hal iday P: should be located el sewhere to increase the useabil i ty of that park.
Mr. Monroy suggested that possibly a five-year plan could be establ ished to SI how each of these various plans that affect parks in the Northwest quadrant COI be integrated and then an action plan hcluded to show how each of these itc will be carried out.
Mr. Monroy was informed that the Parks and Recreation Element was currently unc revision and was being updated. He was informed that it was being scheduled i public hearing before the Planning Commission in the next few weeks and tl would come for City Council review and approval. He was told that several his suggestions could be brought up and considered as part of the revision the Parks and Recreation Element. He was also informed that staff is currenf working together to ensure the overall coordination of these and other plal
As an additional note, Mr. Monroy suggested that the City look at putting a cl
cut at the Southeast corner of Adams and Tamarack to facilitate pedestr traffic to and from the shopping center at that location. This item has b reviewed by staff and a curb cut at this location is already planned for as p of the intersection signalization improvements scheduled for sometime t summer. n Yo
PHILIP 0. CARTER
s af
c: Council Members ..
Assistant City Manager Parks and Recreation Director Redevelopment Manager P1 anning Director Mario Monroy
13 EXHIBIT A
.- w m ITEh
DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 1989 .
TO : HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: NORTHWEST QUADRANT
Attached for your review and information is a presentation
by Committee Member Hayes at the February 7, 1989, City
Council Meeting. Committee Member Hayes will further
elaborate on this presentation at your February 22nd
meeting. ce,-
CHRIS SAMMONE
CS : ec
Attachment
4
' 14 EXHIBIT B
.. e 0
February 7, 1989
City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, CA 92008
Mayor and City Council:
I am speaking this evening on behalf of a group of citizens who live in the Northwest Quadrant, the oldest part of the
and the place where Carlsbad began.VWe are concerned that quadrant is being short changed in the area of parks as is
shown by the Zone Plan being considered tonight. We have 2 reasons for feeling this way:
The demographics of our quadrant show that 76.5% of its pol lation at build out will be in Zone 1. Within Zone 1, betL the two lagoons, the freeway and the railroad, the 1980 cer shows that this area has 52% families with children under 1 42.6% Hispanics and 74.4% renters. These demographics neec to be evaluated when accesibility of proposed parks is con- sidered. In addition, staff estimates that by the end of 1989 the quadrant will be at 75.1% of the estimated number of units expected by 2013 or approximately build out. The: figures come from Exhibit 39, Page 89 of Zone Plan 8. It follows therefore that only about 25% more Park-in-Lieu anc Public Facilities Fund money will be coming in for the Northwest Quadrant.
0
;-
z 2 I School grounds such as Buena Vista and Pine are included ir
L2 the park inventory. What is wrong with this policy? Firs1 the proposed 1988 Parks and Recreation Element recommends 1 lease arrangements with local schools be used to supplemen1 neighborhood and community recreational needs. Instead th6 school land is counted at 100% of its acreage to fulfill the park requirements of the Growth Management Plan. Thest grounds are available to the public only 40% of the time. this part time use is allowed for in the calculation, the Northwest Quadrant is presently short of parks.
The second problem with- this policy is that the school dis. or the city could terminate this current arrangement for a variety of reasons. If this were to happen, what guarantet is there that the city would have the funds to acquire the; properties as required by the Growth Management Plan? The ments with the school district for shared use are only' temporary solutions to the shortage of parks in the North- west Quadrant. Only land actually owned by the city shoul(
be counted in the park inventory,
;? 5
.* m c
a
6. Present city park plans do not recognize the unique nature of the Northwest Quadrant. We realize that large parceis for parks such as Stagecoach or Calavera Hills are not practical for this area. However we do have an opportunity to create other kinds of parks that make use of our lagoons and unused
city land. The Redevelopment Area also affects kkiS- area. ,.~
The tourists they seek to attract will use city facilities. Therefore the Housing and Redevelopment and Parks and Recrea- tion Commissions need to coordinate their objectives.
In conclusion, we are all aware that the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan will come to the council in about eight weeks. Presently it does not deal with the concerns that we have just raised. Because development is increasing the cost of land and reducing its availability, the city needs to identify parcels now that could be used for parks in the Northwest Quadrant. Therefore when the Element comes before you, we urge you to instruct the Parks and Recreation: to return with a revised longirange park plan for the North- west Quadrant before the adoption of the next Capital Improve ment Budget in July.
Thank you for this opportunity to let you know our concerns. We applaud your request for an inventory of city-owned lands. We are looking forward to participating in the process of developing objectives with the Park and Recreation Depart- ment as we have specific suggestions we would like to make. We have the opportunity is the Northwest Quadrant to create something as unique as the area itself and at the same time fulfill the park requirements. The members of our group are:
- Greg Armstrong Margaret Brownley Ramona Finnila Barbara Hallman Thelma Hayes Don Jackson
Jeanne McFadden Margie Monroy Ario Monroy ‘ Barbara Otwell i Harold Otwell
\, Roy Sanchez
--, \” . ,, $1 , . L f‘ /I/, L. I
- 16
.. w e
May 4, 1989
TO : DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: DEBBIE THORNTON, INTERN
VIA: KEITH BEVERLY, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
JOINT CITY / SCHOOL DISTRICT USE AGREEMENT SURVEY
Attached for your review is a detailed survey conducted on Joint City/School District Use Agreements for recreational purposes. A total of twenty three (23) Cities were surveyed, sixteen (16) Cities in San Diego County and seven (7) Cities in Orange County. Below are the results of this survey:
QUESTIONS IN SURVEY:
Q. Does the City have Joint Use Agreements with the school districts for recreational purposes?
A. 20 OF 23 CITIES SURVEYED HAVE JOINT USE AGREEMENTS WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
Q. Does the City have a required park standard?
A. 14 OF 23 CITIES HAVE REQUIRED PARK STANDARDS.
Q. Is the school district property that is jointly used by the City for
A. 6 OF 14 CITIES WITH REQUIRED PARK STANDARDS, COUNT THE SCHOOL DISTRICl
recreational purposes, counted toward meeting the park standard?
PROPERTY TOWARD MEETING THAT STANDARD (TU0 ADDITIONAL CITIES COUNT
SOME OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY TOWARD THEIR REQUIRED PARK STANDARD).
Q. Who maintains the property?
A. 10 OF 23 CITIES - SCHOOL DISTRICT MAINTAINS.
5 OF 23 CITIES - BOTH CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT MAINTAINS.
3 OF 23 CITIES - CITY MAINTAINS 3 OF 23 CITIES - NON APPLICABLE 2 OF 23 CITIES - USER GROUP MAINTAINS
Q. Have any improvements been made on school district property by the City?
A. 7 OF 23 CITIES HAVE MADE IMPROVMENTS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY.
Attachment: Survey EXHIBIT C
14
w QUESTIONS IN SURVEY: 0 r Q
1. Does the City have Joint Use Agreements with the school districts for
2. Does the City have a required park standard?
3. Is the school district property jointly used by the City for recreational
4. Who maintains the property? 5. Have any improvements been made on school district property by the City?
recreational purposes?
purposes, counted toward meeting the park standard?
...............................................................................
CITY 1 2 3 4 5 ...............................................................................
...............................................................................
CITY 1 2 3 4 5 ...............................................................................
Carl sbad
Chul a Vista
Coronado
Del Mar
El Cajon
Encini tas
Escondido
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
Poway
San Diego
San Marcos
Santee
Vista
Full erton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Laguna Beach
Mission Viejo
Santa Ana
YES YES YES BOTH YES
YES YES YES S.D. NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
\/A
N/A
NO
N/A
NO
NO
NO
N/A
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
N/A
YES
NO
NO
N/A
YES
NO
USER
N/A
BOTH
N/A
S.D.
BOTH
CITY
S.D.
S.D.
S.D.
BOTH
BOTH
S.D.
S.D.
CITY
USER
S.D.
S.D.
N/A
CITY
S.D.
NO
N/A
YES
N/A
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
\/A
YES
NO
18
w
December 22, 1988
TO : Assistant to City Manager
W h - @j
7- e 17J
FROM: City Attorney
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 24
Since we have been discussing the "Civic Center ActVV and the disposal of surplus school property so frequently in connection with the approval of the zone plan and because it is likely to come up again in the future in this quadrant, I am attaching copies of the current version of these laws for your files.
Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
nnh attachment
GL.
RONALD R. BALL
Assistant City Attorney
19
EXHIBIT D
-
UCATION CODE 8 39384
Repealed
4 39381. &de or lease of hirrtoric building to nonprofit organization: conditions .ppmvd of
overning board of a school district may, with the approval of the county board of su~rvisors, ease any building of the district together with the site upon which & buiidhg is located, complying with any other provisions of this article, provided that the CO~Q board of
01s finds that all of the following conditions exist:
e sale or lease is to be made to an incorporated nonprofit tax-exempt community or civic mnnation with a membership comprised predominantly of persons residing in the community in
which the building and site are situated.
county board of rrupemisore
@) The building is not suitable for school purposes.
.,
(Amended by Stats.1986, c. 886, 6 29.)
j 39384. Repealed by Stats.1982. c. 689. p. 2824, 4 2
Rmr to rrpll. 0 39384 was unmded by Stats.1980, c. 16% P. 363, 4 I; Statr.1980. c. 13%. p. 4858. 5 37.2.
*tion of Stau.1982, e. 689, tec note undtr p 39295.
ARTICLE 5. SURPLUS SCHOOL PLAYGROUND, PLAYING FIELD, AND RECREATIONAL PROPERTY El - indiato doletlonr by .mmdnwnt
125 OQ '
20
_____ . -
v
6 39390
0
EDUCATION ca I f’ 39397.
Section
39397.5. I 39398. 39399. 39400. 3940 1. 39402. 39403. 39404.
Public agencies proposing to purchase or lease land: findings; approval. Public agencies; surplus school property purchases; plans; operative date of sec Maintenance by public agencies; uses of land; reacquisition by school district. Law governing. Failure of compliance by school district; validity of transfer or conveyance. Exemption of surplus school sites. Alternative agreements for disposition of property. Limitation on rights of acquisition or lease by public agencies. Excluded school districts.
Article 5 was added by Stats.1980, e. 736, p. 2199, 4 2.
Cm Referenca
orefed uys. raulrcd sale under this article, xe
Sde or lease of surplus property, failure to comply with
§ 39360.3. 7 39390, Legielative intent
The Legislature is concerned that school playgrounds, playing fields and recreational real pro1 will be lost for such uses by the surrounding communities even where those communities in planning process have assumed that such properties would be permanently available for recreat purposes. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this article to allow school distric recover their investment in such surplus property while making it possible for other agencic government to acquire the property and keep it available for playground, playing field or 1
Cror Ref- llbrpr Referwwu
Ruoning of unused school pmperty. see Oovemmmt Schools -5.
Code 6 65852.9. C.J.S. Schodr urd School Districts 5 241 et seq.
5 39391. Application of article
This article shall apply to any school site owned by a school district. which the governing I determines to sell or lease, and with respect to which the following conditions exist:
(a) Either the whole or a portion of the school site consists of land which is used for s’ playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational p-es and open-space land partic1 suited for recreational purposes.
(b) The land described in subdivision (a) has been used for one or more of the purposes spe therein for at least eight years immediately preceding the date of the governing board‘s deter
tion to sell or leaee the school gib.
(c) No other available publicly owned land in the vicinity of the school site is adequate to mea existing and foreweable needs of the community for playground, playing field, or other ou recreational and open-space purposes, as determined by the governing body of the public as which proposes to purchase or lease land from the school district, pursuant to Section 2
(Added by Stata.1980, e. 736, p. 2199, 9 2 Amended by Stats.1981, c. 507, p. 1862, 9 1.)
0 39392. School site governing board
As used in thia article, “school site” means a parcel of land, or two or more contiguous pa which is owned.by a school district. “Governing board” means the governing board of the I district which owns the school site.
(Added by Stats.1980, c. 736, p. 2200, 0 2.)
5 39393. Authorization to sell or lease school sites
The governing board of any school district may sell or le= any school site containing described in Section 39391, and, if the governing board decides to sell or lease such land, it shall in accordance with the provisions of this article.
(Added by Stats.1980, e. 736, p. 2200, 5 2.)
/
r
f-
L
Undrrlh indkatoa chmg.r or additlonr by amm
126
piRj
~ ‘ ‘lllll ‘
w
21
v m
9 39902
"
for nacdy stvdenu xe 5 49554.
Contrvo for - dctiveq. .od vnifcdmclh
EDUCATION (
! CHAPTER 6 MISCEUANEOUS PROVISIONS I Artkk I 2, uw of school R* . , , * . . , , , , . . I * , , , . * , , . . . . , . , . , . . , . . * . . I.. . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ARTICLE 1. APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
5 4OOO4. Repealed by St.ta.1987. e. 1452. 8 311
Q 40005. Renumbered Q 1275 urd amended by Stata.1967, c 1452.5 312
p 40010. Repealed by Stata.1987, c 1452, 0 313
)§ 48012.40013. Repealed by Stat&lSgl, c 1452.44 314.315
ARTICLE 2 USE OF SCHOOL PROPERTY
Section 40040. 40041. 40041.5. 40042. 40043. 40061.
40045. 40046. 40047.
t 40088. i
I
short title. Use. of civic center by publie; tmns; conditions and purposes. Mass care and welfare shelters. Management, direction and control; rules and regulations. Groups which may use school facilities without charge; chargea for use by other Use to further program or movement for overthmw of the government by
Determination of intention; statement of information; discretion of board.
Preferential use of donated facilities; speafied Son Diego County elementaq
Missing children; pasting of information in speeified arena of public primary and se
misdemeanor.
Liability far perjury.
districts
schools.
Arhkle 2 wtw addad bg Stuk1989, e. I= p. 582-40 5.
Forme+ Article 2 ma rrpcalcd by Staklm c. 1508, p. 5828,J 4.
040era shorttitie
Thisartidesh.llbelmownandmaybea~~~tbeCmieCenterAct
(Added by stat1.1982, c 1502, p. 5828, 4 5.) =- Fama44awora~bysU1*1982,~15U2.p
(, 'c sa 0 4. sic. Daw, 4 UMl.
4 40041. Ur of civic center by -, term& codilkm .ad pmrpooa
(a)Thanaserriccenterat~.IldevergpPblicsehodf~.ad~~~t
tione, Schaokommunity advisory councib. senior citke-' orgmhtiom, club4 .md ass formed for rtxreational, educational, politic4 economic, artis&, or mod acbnbes of t; school diatricta may engage in supervised mtional adhika, and whe~ .they may I discuss, fmm time to time, as they may desire, any subpets and uestians whKh m their :
pertain to the edu-tiod, politicd eo~nomie, && rind, m J interests of the citizer
a~&nterupontherenasand~~the~~pmper,subpcttotheIn fi)"hegovembgboardofanyschoaldistrictma gnnttheuaeofschoolfocilitiesorg!
requiremenu. ad resbictions set forth m thm UtLlr, for my of the fallming pnrpoaes:
unddbLdlak"ddlarrW8m
wbcle,the citimq parent-teaehera' asmcidona, amp fire gda, boy acollttroops, farmers' '
L communities in which they reside.
152
-
22 w
I~l w1 llI(l [Ill "'Fll~~~l~~l~l I 111 I II 11-
f 1
Ej EDUCATION CODE 0 40042
, (1) Public, literary, scientific, rerreational, educational, or public agency meetings.
(2) The discussion of matters of general or public interest.
(3) The conduct of religious services for tempomy periods, on a onetime or renewable basis, by any church or religious organization which has no suitable meeting place for the conduct of the services, provided the governing board charges the church or religious organization using the school facilities or grounds a fee as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 40043.
(4) Child care or day care programs to provide supervision and activities for children of preschool and elementary school age.
(5) The administration of examinations for the selection of personnel or the instruction of precinct boar$ members by public agencies.
1 1
6) gupervi~ed recreational activities.
W (7) Other purposes deemed appropriate by the governing board.
(Added by Stata.1982, c. 1502, p. 5828, 9 5. Amended by Stats.1984, c. 1659, 4 2; Stata.1985, c. 729, 0 1.)
1982 Lctbl.tlaa. 2. I.&
5828. 5 4. Sce. now, 5 40042. FOrma P KW1 wm repaled by St.ts.1982, f. ISar, P. kt of use yt, whereby rhoot district permitted
univmity to use ccrmn of the district’s facilities for opn- Dcrimtiom: Former 55 5o040,40045 to 4OM8, ehlfted tion of tuition-cbqing summa rhool whose ch and by Stats.1976, c. 1010. 5 2. programs were solely and exclusively opmtd nuintained.
LlbnrYRefaaca ud~byonivaxityprovidcdforopruionofthe
Schools -72. C.J.S. Schools and School Dinricu 48 251, 2J9, 260. mh Of the dirtrict ud haur wu nof vidrtive of ConnArt.9,~6pm4ibitingtnnafcrdmyschoolfrom
public school syrtcm or plwmrmt of my pan d achool
under jurhdicrioa
within the system. W- Tachers Ay’n v. Bard of of autbority 0th tha thoac included
Ed. of Gkadak (1980) 167 C.I.Rpu. 429. 109 C.A.M 738.
summa school eompktely lcpwc ud diniaet fmn my
Notea of Decbbm
L.- 2 PI).nulltfar~ 4
U”e 3 3. U- prrMk vwty 1 Civic Center Act. Suts.1913, p. 853. csmblishing a civic
anta in every public schoolhouac, 8nd vesting the manage-
ment of such center in 8 bard of trustees or bolrd d
1. validity educaticn, authorized a bard of education in in discretion
The statutes including School C. 04 740, 6.750 (repaled; to @t uader Plopec sum d.neing in the school-
sce, now, 98 39245 et scq.; 8152j et scq,), rutbonnns ~IJX a a fbrm of TCframul ~WO McClure v. bard
rhml bwd 10 5-1 the use of school buildin- or pun& of Ed-tion of city of VivlL (1919) 176 P. 711. 38 C.A.
for public. literary, scientific, recratid. or eduutionrl uw). meetings. or for the discussion of matters of gend or
public interest were not unconstituttod as resulting in the ‘* psmt fw .y &version of funds required to k & for pubk scbooi A school distnct cannot require payment of rent for free education to other activities. since wbm the prirmry pur- msetingr panuant to Civic Center Act in school auditorium, pose to bc subserved is legttmate, the expmditure of moneys nor require sponsors of such meetings to compensate district
secured through taxation is legal notwithstanding incidmul for ensumg costs of maintenance and management, but must
uscs are made thereof for otherwise unauthorized purpora. bar burden of such costs. Ellis v. Board of Education of
Goodman v. Board of Education of San Francisco UnifKd San Franciro Unified School Dist. (1946) 164 P.Zd I. 27
School Dlst. (1942) I20 P.2d 665. 48 C.A.2d 731. C.2d 322.
0 40041.5. Mass care and welfare shelters
Notwithstanding Section 40043, the governing board of any school district shall grant the use of school buildings, grounds, and equipment to public agencies, including the American Red Cross, for mas care and welfare shelters during disasters or other emergencies affecting the public health and welfare. The governing board shall cooperate with these agencies in furnishing and maintaining such services as the governing board may deem necessary to meet the needs of the community.
(Added by Stats.1984, c. 1659, 1 3.)
0 40042. Management, direction and control; rules and regulations
govqrning bo“ of the school district which shall promulgate all rules and regulations necessary to Jc
&tOrlrk8 Indk8tr m by Mnndllwm
The management, direction, and control of school facilities under this article is vested in the
pronde, at a mmlmum, for the following:
153 08
I
23
I - L-
NORTHWEST QUADRMT PARKS AND RECREATIBR IMPROVEMENTS:
LOCATION DESCRIPTION - YEAR - FUND $ ,w
GF 5 _ _ Holiday Park Rest room Construction 80 - (Phase 11)
2. Holiday Park Parking - Sidewalks 87-88 PIL 2:
(Phase I)
3. Holiday Park Lights, flagpole 89 PIL (Phase 11)
11
4. Magee Park Park development & 80 PIL & 21 building restoration SG
5. Magee Park Beritage Hall, rehab 84 GF
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16
Magee Park Granary, rehab 86 GF
Magee Park Bandshell 89 CDBG
Hosp Grove Acq. 50 2 ac. aa GF 14,8
Hosp Grove Trail/construction 85 Devel
Maxton Brown Sidewalk curb
(Phase I) improvements
89-90 CDBG
BV Elem. Sch. Turf & sport field 89 CDBG construction SG
CHS Tennis Cts. Lighting installation 89 SG
Swim Complex Construction 82 GF 1,1
Swim complex Deck repair
Chase Field Lighted LL Field
89 GF L Rev. Sharing
80 GF
Chase Field Irrigation, fence 84 CDBG improvement
24 EXHIBIT
LOCATION- . DE E IPTION
-- 17. Chase Field Improvements
18. HSCC AcqJdeveloprnent
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Jefferson Elementary
Pine Elem Sch.
VJHS
Senior Center
Magnolia
Scout House
Kruger House
Beach Access
Beach Access
Beach Access
Boys & Girls
Club
School park improvements
Sport Lights
Tennis Court
surf acing
Acq./development
Park/Sch. devel.
Rehab.
Rehab.
Ocean
Beech St.
Christiansen Wy.
Pool enclosure
25
YEAR w FUND
88-89 PIL CDBG
80 SG
84-85 CDBG
79 GF
89 SG
88-89 RED & TIP
82 GF
85 GF
86 GF
84 Devl .
85 Grant
88 Grant
87-88 CDBG
TOTAL:
u
19
59
9
1
3,8(
I
I
1 I
$ 22,
,-
OTHER PUBLIC ENHANEMENT IMPROVEMENTS: w
LOCATION DESCRIPTION YEAR FUND $
1. BV Lagoon Dredging 85 SG 1C
2. BV Lagoon Island Restoration 89 SG 1:
3. BV Lagoon Parking 89-90 SG
4. Carlsbad Blvd. Bluff top walkway 88 RED & 8t improvements SG
5. Sea Wall Walkway (retention wall) 87-88 SG 4,1(
6. Carlsbad Blvd. Sidewalk/bike lane 89-90 FAV 2,5r
TOTAL: $ 7,:
road improvements
ORTHWEST QUADRANT FUTURE PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS:
LOCATION DESCRIPTION YEAR FUND SA]
1. Macario Development 98 + PFF 7,o:
2. Pine Sch. Acquisition (7.0 ac.) 98 + PIL 2,3r
3. Pine Sch. Development 98 + PFF 8
4. NW Quadrant To be determined 98 + PFF 1,5
5. Cannon Lake Park Development 98 + PFF 7
6. Maxton Brown Park Development 98 + PFF 1 Extension 1.15 ac.
26
W LOCATION DESCRIPTION YEAR FUND u
7. Future Park To be determined 98 + PIL Land acquisition or rehab.
1,70
8. Maxton Brown Improvements (Phase 11)
89-90 CDBG 7
9. Agua Hedionda Pedestrian trail 90 + Devl .
Lagoon improvements
10. YMCA Property Acquisition 89 + N/A 1, la
11. Agua Hedionda Dredging middle lagoon 90 + N/A 2, oc Lagoon
12. Carlsbad Blvd. Turf walkway Bluff Top improvements
89 + N/A 5c
13. Pine Field Improvements 89 + CDBG 5
TOTAL: $ 18,13
OTHER FUTURE PUBLIC ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS:
LOCATION DESCRIPTION YEAR FUND $
1. Carlsbad Blvd. Pedestrian walkway 90 FEDERAL 3,oc GRANT
2. Elm Avenue Street Scape improvements 90 + REDEVL 6.5C
TOTAL: $ 9,5(
27
.- 0 0
- SUMMARY LAST TEN YEARS:
1. Parks and Recreation Improvements
2. Future Parks and Recreation Projects
$22,118,000
18,110,000
TOTAL: 40,228,000
3. Other Pub1 ic Enhancement Improvements 7,755,000
4. Future Public Enhancement Improvements 9,500,000
TOTAL: 17,255,000
GRAND TOTAL ALL PROJECTS: $57,483,000
............................... * *
* - KEY: * * *
* GF - General Fund * * PIL - Park-in-lieu * * SG - State Grants * DEVL - Developer * * CDBG - Block Grants
*
* * * ...............................
5/99
28
,-
.
" "I -D
0 zr
r-D 58 mc
-urn I
" z-l m- 0 E=
i.lO 3-n m zu 4 zg 4.
v, 0 I 0 P
V z X - N
D 0 -
W m 5
u)
0
\ e
N
\ a, (D
rn
I-.
" ~
z zzz dcMc- zz
wOwIIEz=O"n z%-Fi2zg;;;z
50- mss 0
P2
I%
I XG,
%
XI-= z lnD52 ow OD<
v,
QO -z 0 m Or-
r m
m
sm r wm 0
oz
-44 W
m zln zt) -I lno 0 0r 0 c W "I ln
m 5
2 v,
-z GI 0
111111111
L'..'. -
zzzzz =zz=<=z
[I I,
r /I I1 I, 8, /I j !I :I
- r-D4
a0
ralncnnl 7- m7*0-..- cc 4.T< D -.al3-*-u CTr
T
10 r-, awz m m ln 0 z
mrnmo I +mx - IT I zz
Ln-m D> now 1 0 W 0 < 0"" < - al
lclr rn 0 D W OD D d
00 cm -m * Y ln -0 -lw wrn
TCb
" - a3 PC mgmrnc-
orcr+ov C,: -PODDO mmR.*"o mn
mzo "I Y --rn 0 on cna ne Oh co
v)c -. 7 r+i -c 0: 3r
3<
0 4 2. - 5 3. "
CN
n 100 a* -.
2.
P" 4
m D
D c D a
+ 2 F
v
rn *NN "c"?""??
R 22zmoclr~ Ul-0
000000 BSPSSX zO"iD0-T-W
rn00c)OO a -u-zrlnw
Ln-!;Pcoo v-
~z"ID0W ;
rn+rnCOO w-=
29 EXHlB
" -i
r D
;c 52
rJ
-I <
I
a 5 m 0
N u1 - 0 - 0 5 0
11
N N
e
D O Y
E <
In rn 0
-
\ e
N
c1
03 (D
.
w IU ru N owwv
ZZZZC
sgszz
urn %9ZB
om<z
XXWWD
"m- -0
AN-+ VWDZ E3 gWrD
Dm7 D
OOOD W om mOzO 0 z E1
m-i z
Dm op
".I
c DCJ
-i 0 4 D I-
E W
w 0
D 0
I" . I- ." mu ,v 8- G7.b-W-ams " ""- " ~
Il ,I IF Il 11 11 a 11 i
+zzm
2. 3 '4 0 ;& m51: =$?'K~~sm,,, m
- LZ"z-9 rmrm EPzl%?rPTgg
z CZZZZZZE
:L5;=xy " z5z = c 7T TJ c 0 v 11 n
r-Wov)ov)c) r-0-i -
-.7 cu - Fy JCT a0 -e rn -3 rrn -.
azo <mzc nrn - 03 0-i Y -R)
~zz~mro P
oizrm m z
-+c~rnzvrm 0
8 r-82'ZAm,, m 3 -. 4r TI roo cu a* rl x0 mm zz
Dm owl
w%-+mm m X
-.
i
XOZZ I
Z<ZL+ -i-i
d
4.
rn <zC) Y io rt
z
z
wlox-ct wl 0
4 wl lorn WP
0 X
z Ir- O 000
737Cwrm
TDWO I< 0 073 0
PDOO
D X z W 73-i X Dm x ww
9::
r-
W z
X
-i 0 -+ %
gl-l-bw e
~-,-~+wmu1omcnow 0ul00+~000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . VNNN-N
z:ssgsgsssss wlmmmwlmmmmwlwl ZO"lD0-
t7rmC)OmmmmOo
c) c)ooo v-
* Wc)WS-O
CA+~COCI
30
,- * 52 z
5
-i <
0
rn 0
II
N
03
?I
R 5 v1 m 0
\ e
N I-. \
W m
zzz mmm
rxw EGz
,325 $OW zzh)
bE:G, muw x1
-
c,w 0
wm m zz -4
?r $
r 0 ut CD DO 0- v
2
$
rn
-I
X
v, -
rf
0 z
h) cI1 e NO WN
V N V 030 x ...
W 0 0 wr 0
J= o
zz mm
0 IW
mm -i m< r mo xm mz z4 -im
v%
b,a
WF -m
or x7 0- om rr 0 -0 D m 7
0 4 - -4 X m
-I ul
~Z 0
P N NO 0
.Tz 03 CI) ox 000
D. c, c
(Ir (Irm
? I
..
s SL m
D 0 v) 0' W
t-F
3 gg?
c)
m z -4
I 'I 'I
rn4
r-
4 -. 7
3-K D rr-0 3 mm avz
04 1-
...
sa o
"
d. o
7 a rl
a. -
A. rt Y
,I ,I /I I1
rvwlnnx m 7 rto -.-
01 < -0- mcymo art
cy -.a8 3-r? " I? v
ID -? - 01 Y -. m
o* z1 3 -. ID0 a-
ma
!
a -4
-4 ?
m w
LLI m
0 D
0-x
CDZmZmDW m
WDOWF Ill
ul+wcoo a
31
a
.-
I
m
8
E
z
-c -4
0 c z m. 0
II
Q,
x. 0
R 5 VI m 0
\ n
N c.. \
(D m
'a m w
v)VW =z<c
WXW
-Do zgs!
5ZE OW=
4 0- mew uw c
-
$EW go??
zm E
Dm
0,'
-g
zw mo W
-4
m4
D
oc >D
4 m 0, D ts cn c
07-
-4
G) It V,gAN 0 v wv, , . . .c v1 v1
-
i%
1
32
mv)m =<=z
-xg
ZZD oz
WLn~
-o+ c>
-9-
U x w-x. ON\
m G6< w. m v)o I
am mJ- o= -45
rn v)
BD .o
Q. c
0
g
v
" m M
I/ /I 7
ro-4
a0 -. 7
(Dm
< - JC 6-0 x
aoz
0-4 34
0
ai ll
0
a
Y r+
I
d. I
4.
-_
d.
r-Wv)v)r)~ m 7 rro -.-
w -z -0- mwmo ar- -0 (D z
wn
I, /I I, I, I, x
D, -.cy .- JrCX r
u' F:
5 2. or+
mo art
F ?I I I
(D r
N v1
i%
ZO"ID0-7
w-2
IIII cn-4wcoo (
.- -
D 4
r
z 0 z l o I -I
,
4 s z rn 0
U
P z
21 rn <
v) m 0
M
1 P
N
\
u)
c
m
." ." coo3
mm mm
b2 %2
xw
urn om
PN "
vm
PW 0
00 D
P m0 =;5: 4:
Pm
E.
4
m+
Op c DO - 0
-I 0 m
"I F' E rn "I
z GY
V e NV) VI V 03c . .> . wow 0 0 OII
-
%- " W v)m E! EZ
c) \x
v) 4m
'p-
ttl
"- Lno-
Cnrnmv) mmmm
0rnn >m
rn =<E% zzzz crrl -4mm
D mr m
r-rn rnx 5s
z2
z"I -I>
4
v) Ln0 OI x0 OP F
9% -u
wx n
-I s D c
c W
0 0
P 0
@
mL.Jww- _e A 1 v r- v* 0
It I1 r 11 /I m - :y :
Cnv1Cnmcnv) I7 I7 m m m r0-4 r-uCnCnnI 7- - v1
-.7< m-lrto--- ci D* -..a 3-R-u -1 CI 7 -0 (Dl
300gCnr %:> VI<*OY
ErZg;:
gTJ3 rDzm0 %Z%0gD g,azDno ClQZ " Cl - 03 mo 0 + Y 4.m 01 z >'
00 :.< 0 ?Q s 5 3. VI 2 g2 A -
ruB m"Ig
z5.95 -<
ElP
-in n
-OD oz1 z
0 z
d. rt 0 -. 0 d 3
rc Y
m c 0- W x4 m-
d.
-.
m
4
P r r
D t P O v
4 s D r-
c -N -WNc "Y?PPL"?N ~OVINOOW
la 0
rooo~ooa
ooo0oo PPPS!2B 20"lDO~T~Y)
W-ICnw
Z-XW>-O P7-4-W
rn+;PCOO me
33
.I SS"
II I1 II
0 WJMO
L w-03 mmj:
"Z 0oc
l"r4 DDu
c;o cnm mv,
>c 0
-2
%E Dm
D
m A >
v) 4
U D
a A
P
II 7 OCnvl T"
\ zp
"c., :to: 000
000 "- orno \c
v) D- c- D v
Iu
tn
$; \ t.
w 0 0 0 -
v)
D 3
Y
XJ (D <
v) ID P-
\ P
N 4 \ m Lo
-I.
0
c U
D r
-4
z 0
-rl
c) c
m A
WJ
-0 x 0 <
CJ m U
W -<
G,
U
Y
Y
z? zc 4 I
x D z R m x m
-4 z
"
Y z
r 0
c 0 m
v)
E3 E m F I-
z 0
z c
C.(
* 2
-4 I ZI "I
X B
m -=
W 5 = z
I-
W m ;F1 3: H g
u) W >
w
Q, a
w P
t. "
4 or
Q,
ul P
w +
U v1 0 4
w w
w
4 W
N a
0
c.l
QI U 0,
.b tn
U
+
bd " w w a
w a7
P ms ">
$3
z=
-I% .-Lr - -4
0-4 v
-I--
-4c om=
?Z
:pE $k
t. VlvlIO NCnEn
UNO cnaJm
...
-+- mm-4 ONW
QlPO paul-4
...
vu
-
c1 w P
a
P
"
c.
v
PW OUiW a44
UPN CnmrD
...
h)N OI+P "4
POP CnNW
...
PW "P wow
03wm -0-
...
+++ I mNm
QIPN
.. */m L
v)
D m
vl t.
w P
q ul
w 0
N +
a - ol
w 0 U
0 P
0
ul U
w 0
n
w c"
4 P U
m
%
N 0
b in P
h
..
U
-4"
-4c om=
?.z
zzz
4& WN
fnc-rP WWO
wow POP
...
-+-
03NO
0-03
w ...
W
W -E
-
P N
aJ
U
*
c.
Y
Wc., lUNO W" ..' Pao Cn"
?I. ?
44 mlo m
ww W" NWIO
-0- WON
...
k$ +
+-OD
In
> XI
w 0
Iu 0
0, ul 0
tn v1
+ or
m c1
g
- IO
P P
0
cn v1 0
VI ul
Ln +
-4 w
w w
34
*
- w
*
fu
0 07
..
w
W
om2
F.z
-4"
"IC
+E ;uQL &PO
0?? Ill
-L- k1CT-Z . I. .
vu zp
-
w w *
-4 U vl
W
a+- ululco
WOP wrp-
...
IO- wol-
NOW m0Vl
...
4mw IOU
WON moul
...
I;$ Wac'
v) W D
N P
4 0
N W
w
W 0
+ W 0 Tu
0, 0
ul fu
w w
0
w N 4
w 0
+ w -4 a
a w
m
*
A
Lo
m - CD
-
u
om=
F3
-I"
-4c
N a+ $2
fu o(* z ... coco- cnL ol
-I" :p 03 *z
v
h
N 0
cr, -b w
"
v
m-Vl WON
CnPW idNW
...
SI. 5
N 010 s
mcn m-w
-03- Q1OO-l
...
I++ +
wram
v) W D
m W
w w
m N W
w 0
+
cn ul
0
c-., IO
rp 03
U 0
0
01 N w
w 0
+ Ul N P
or 0
<
I
t
{
4
RCELLANEOUS LANDSCAPEpPEN SPAIkEAS
1
LANDSCAPED AREA CITY HALL/LIBRARY
SAFETY CENTER
PACOMAR TRIANGLE
TAMARACK TRIANGLE
POINSETTIA BRIDGE
BIENVENIDA CIRCLE
405 OAK FIRE STATIONS (5)
LAS FLORES TRIANGLE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA
CAROL PLACE
POLLY LANE
BEACH ACCESSES 1166 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE SPINNAKER HILLS BANK TAMARACK SEWER PLANT SANTA FE CORRIDORS ELM BANKS (EAST OF EL CAMINO) ELM CRIBWALL
OPEN SPACE AREAS SPINNAKER POINT EASEMENT
WOODBINE BANKS
CADENCIA (REAR LOT)
LEVANTE CANYON
HOSP GROVE SAN MARCOS CANYON LAGUNA RIVIERA BANK
RIGHT OF WAYS:
RIGHT OF WAYS
ACRES 4.0
18.0 3.5
3.0 .5 .2 .1 2.0 .2
2.5 .1 .1
.5
4.0 4.0
.2 2.0
TOTAL : 48.3
2.2
- 1.2
TOTAL :
- ACRES
10.00
14.00 3 .OO 13 .OO
49.55
20.00 3 .OO 112.55
ACRES MILES
TOTAL : 121.2 72 -
MEDIANS [LANDSCAPED)
CAR COUNTRY
POINSETTIA AVENIDA ENCINAS PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
COLLEGE
EL- CAMINO (NORTH/SOUTH) ALGA RD. .
ALT I SMA MELROSE RANCHO SANTE FE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL:
ACRES .5
1.9
1 .o
4.0
6.0
4.0 .2 1 .o - 2.0 20.4
.a
302.55
MILES -26 1 .oo
.40
.56 2.08
3.12
2.08
.115
-52 1.04 11 -25
11/04/88 35
.- W
LEGEND * CO"UNITY PARK * FUTURE COMMUNlTy PARK
0 SPEUALUSEAREA
0 FunJF?EspEclALUSEAREA
8 SpEClM RESOURCE AREA
4AU.T 9.1