Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-02-06; City Council; 10480; ZONE 14 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANr AB# 16 +f@ MTG. 2/6/90 DEPT. GM TITLE: DEPl ZONE 14 - LOCAL FAcILTIlEs MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY CITY # * 5 C3 cc a 2 .. 0 z 4 6 $ z 3 0 0 t c+ OF CARLSBAD - AGENCR BILL RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council adopt Resolutj No. 78 -J3 approving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ad( Resolution No. qfl-2'4 approving the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone JTEM EXPIANATION Zone 14 is the tenth property owner-initiated and privately prepared Local Facilii Management Plan to be heard by the City Council. It is the second privately prepared p in the Northeast Quadrant. On January 3, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved this plan as descrik in the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting attached as Exhibit 5. The Zone presently contains only two dwelling units, and there are no approved developmt projects within the Zone. The projected residential buildout of the Zone is 1,122 dwell] units, which is fully in compliance with Proposition E and the Citywide Facilities a Improvements Plan. The Plan is a regulatory document which analyzes all eleven public facilities to determ identified as requiring upgrading in order to accommodate future development in the zo Specifically, the Plan identifies needed improvements to drainage, circulation, schools, seN and water. Therefore, specific conditions of approval have been included in the Plan guarantee that all of the public facility standards will continue to be met through buildouf the Zone. The conditions state that, prior to the first final map or issuance of a grading permit building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 14, a Financing Plan must be approved by City guaranteeing funding for construction of all public facility improvements identified in t Local Facilities Management Plan. Until this financing mechanism has been approved by t City, no development will occur within Zone 14. The complete wording of the conditic is included in the Plan's Executive Summary which is attached as Exhibit No. 3. whether they conform with the adopted performance standards, Several facilities i E"MENTALREvIEw A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on December 6, 1989, indicat that the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 is not anticipated to have any adve impacts on the environment. The Negative Declaration was recommended for approval the Planning Commission on January 3, 1990. 1 1 w e Page Two of Agenda Bill No. /4 .i/f?' The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 will not cause any signific environmental impacts. The Plan is a public facilities planning document that impleme Carlsbad's General Plan. The Plan makes generalized projections as to the demand for i supply of public facilities and outlines the provision of adequate public facilities mncurr with the estimated demands. The Plan recognizes that further environmental review pursui to the California Environmental Quality Act will be required prior to the development of i public or private project that is generally discussed in this plan. FISCAL WAC" Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this Plan. These costs will be recovei through the processing fee established by the City Council. It is anticipated that further sf time will be necessary to monitor this Plan and other zone plans on a yearly basis. 3 implementation of this Plan, however, should help future fiscal planning by estimating t timing of future public facilities and their costs. EXHIBITS 1. City Council Resolution No. $%'-0?.3 2. City Council Resolution No. m-24 3. Executive Summary - Zone 14 4. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2960 and 2961 5. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes dated January 3, 1990 I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 13 w e 90-23 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF CARLSBA CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LOC, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 14. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad did on the 6th d , 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed of February law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the informati submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the C Council considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration includii 14 11 15 16 17 18 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2960 granting Planning Commissic approval of said Negative Declaration; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved by the City Council of the C of Carlsbad, California as follows: \ 19 1) That the above recitations are true and correct. ,' 25 26 27 28 I resolution Planning Commission Resolution No. 2960 includir ~ ~ findings contained therein. I I .... 2 31 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of Fet , 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Lars NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: 1 15 ' I 16 17 ALERbRUTL-rk (SEAL) I.8 I 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ I I -2- , I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 w e RESOLUTION NO. 90-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLp FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 14. WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared f Local Facilities Management Zone 14 in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of tl Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on January 3, 1990 hold a dr noticed public hearing as required by law to consider said plan and at t conclusion of the hearing adopted Resolution No. 2961 making findings a recommending that the Clty Council adopt a plan; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director December 6, 1989 indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan is r anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of February 6, 1990 hc 1 a duly noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and arguments 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1) 2) That the above recitations are true and correct. That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2961 also constitute the findings and conditions the City Council. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 dal January 3, 1990 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated her by reference is hereby approved. Any development occurring wit the boundaries of Zone 14 shall comply with all the terms i conditions of said plan. 3) , 1 2 w a PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Cit , 31 4 5 6 7 Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of Febi 1990, by the following vote, to wit: -' AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larso NOES: None ABSENT: None 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 l6 I.7 Mayor ATTEST: ' *EL. I 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- W EXHIBIT #3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 14 prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The I incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities Improvements Plan. The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the bi out projections for residential and non-residential developr within Zone 14. Build out is the type and amount of land planned for by the City's General Plan. The plan then phases estimates the zone's development on a yearly basis until bi out is reached. Phasing is done to predict future faci: demands. The adequacy of public facilities is analyzed accorf to this demand. The analysis includes an inventory of exis. and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to dem( and a financing plan that establishes methods of funding ne( facilities. Since the plan is a regulatory document, ( facility section contains conditions to ensure that facili' will conform to the adopted performance standards. Manda' compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the adeq of facilities within Zone 14. Exhibit 1 on page 8 indicates where Zone 14 is within the C Exhibit 2 on page 9 provides a summary of existing faci adequacy for Zone 14 and Exhibit 3 on page 10 provides a sum of facility adequacy at build out of the zone. FINANCE OVERVIEW 1 The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 identifies facility (drainage) which does not currently meet the ado performance standard. As part of this Local Facili Management Plan, an attempt has been made to bring this faci into conformance with the adopted performance standard. Du this time it has become clear that no one financing mechanism satisfy the complex infrastructure requirements of this zon the northeast quadrant. However, a combination of finan techniques can address both the need for upgrading facili enabling them to conform with the adopted performance stand and ensuring conformance of future facilities as develoF occurs. A common set of goals for the financing of the IT facilities can be stated as follows: 1 The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-2 (CC Resolution No. 8797). 1 0 0 1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. Provide for the implementation of financing techniq which consider the financial limitations associa with the high costs of infrastructure construction. 3. Provide for financing options which consider both needs of the city and the property owners. The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identif the various ways that capital improvements could be financ The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carls generally fall into two categories -- those provided developers as a condition of development approvals, and tk provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, Or Ot financing sources. It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects in best possible way. The following describes some of the financ options available. 2. A. Cash/Pav-as-vou-so financinq. The City has used f method of financing to pay for most capi improvements constructed to date. In concept, the City charges the development commu: a series of fees which provide the source of incomc pay for capital projects. When enough cash has ' assembled, the City constructs the next capital pro in order of priority. This method forces the Cit delay construction of various projects until funds been collected. These fees include! 1. Public Facilities Fee 2. Park-In-Lieu Fees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees 4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee 6. Sewer Fees 7. Water Fees Special Districts collect their own various fees. B. Reimbursement Asreements. In certain instance: developer may ask the City to move a project forwai time and to construct a facility before funds have collected. When this occurs, the City could adopl policy of having the interested developer construc' 2 e 0 project based on a reimbursement agreement. The C would pay the developer back for the portion of project that was to be funded by City resources ove period of time. Payments would commence at the t the City had originally scheduled the construction the facility in the Capital Improvement Progr Moving the project forward in time is for the bene of the developer. Therefore, the City's repayn would be limited to the cost of the public portion the project and no interest would accrue to developer. The use of this method of project financ does not eliminate the developer's obligation to City fees. The developer must still pay all City i associated with a development. C. Credit for City Fees. When it is in the put interest to construct certain public facilities earl than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go progi the City can consider giving a developer credit fees that would otherwise be paid, up to the cost the public improvement. These credits would reduce amount of fees payable in future years from a cert development. Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid eliminat of income from capital fees necessary to finance ot projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits: -- Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project. -- Partial Fee Credit - credit over time: In this option, the developer who builds a public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that credit is spread over a series of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for other capital projects while giving the developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement. 3 0 0 D. Debt Financins. A range of debt financing alternatives available to the City. If it is in the public interest push a project ahead and to construct an improvement bef funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If project is being pushed forward for the convenience benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the c of issuance and interest over the life of the debt iss The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to detem the developer's responsibility to support these costs wc be defined as the method of debt financing was chosen. Some of the debt financing vehicles available are sh below: Assessment Districts: Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a develo in the construction of various public improvements that be financed through the use of assessment districts if th is significant public benefit from the improvement. cases where a City contribution is planned, the City may a developer to pay the City contribution. The develo could then be reimbursed at a later date (i.e., in the y that the capital project has been originally scheduled construction) or through a system of credits as descri earlier. Special Benefit Districts: State law allows the formation of a variety of spec benefit districts. These districts may be used to fund ' construction of parks, libraries, police or fire facilitil and street lighting systems to name a few. These distril may be formed by a vote of the property owners who t: assess themselves for the cost of improvements. The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of dl service payments. City participation in a district of tl type is possible to the extent of public improvements tl would have otherwise been the responsibility of the Ci. However, the movement of capital improvements forward- time would require some concession from the developer offsetting interest, debt issue, or other additional cost: Community Facility District: (MellO-ROOS) Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist throi Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facilit: in conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Commun: Facility Districts (CFD's) operate similar to assessmf districts, but provide a more flexible tool for governmenl 4 e a entities to finance a wider range of public infrastructu again through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facilit which may be financed by a Mello-Roos District incl parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraries, pipelines, telephone lines and can be used to elimin special assessment liens. These districts may also operating costs to the extent the services are in addit to those already being provided prior to the formation the district. Revenue Bonds: The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to fina improvements related to utility functions or other C services that generate a fee for service, although ot City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. public improvements are being installed ahead of schedule accommodate a developer, the City would expect the develo to offset many of the costs of such an issue as descri above. Tax Increment Bonds: Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can financed through the use of tax increment bonds. I Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for construction of public improvements using this method financing. A developer asking for public improvements to constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agenc ability and willingness to defer other projects. Certificates of Participation: Certain public facilities such as buildings can be finan through Certificates of Participation. This is in effec lease agreement between the City and another agency. developer wishing to push projects forward might consi constructing facilities such as a library or fire stat using this financing tool. The developer may be asked for certain improvements. General Obligation Bonds: The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bo to fund the construction of public improvements. This only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in election. It is unlikely that the City will have ability to use this method of funding public projects wh benefit specific developments. bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of paym 5 0 0 The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements contains the following financing policies: 1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Pul Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultin responsibility of the City to fund, however, priority for funding projects is at the discretior the City Council. 2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program b play a significant role in helping to establ compliance with the adopted performance standai Priority for the funding of projects should go tc fill areas or areas of the City where exist deficiencies exist. 3. Agree to consider assisting developers with crec against future fees, reimbursement agreements, torn assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly the public interest to do so or to rectify puk facility deficiencies and not to induce growth prematurely upgrading public facilities. 4. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangeme will be made based upon the City’s plans for timing certain public facilities. For example, if a develo wanted to put in an improvement that the City had planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify existing deficiency, the City would not consi beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until 5th year, if at all. 5. Recognize that public facility improvements made front or ahead of City plans by developers must prov the facility until the time the City had previou: planned to provide the facility. 6. With the recent reduction in residential densities z overall restriction on residential developmer recognize that it may be necessary to start chargl fees to commercial and industrial land uses in ca: where they are not presently assessed. With t reduction in residential land uses and density, it I be necessary to charge commercial and industrial make up the deficit. the funds necessary to cover annual operating costs 6 I 0 e Financing Summary This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified drainage currently being below the adopted performance standard. '1 plan also identifies when future public facilities may be ne€ as growth occurs to ensure compliance with the ado1 performance standards. A complete financing section is provj at the end of this plan which provides a description of facility improvements to be made, timing of improvements, c estimates, and funding priorities. 7 I I 0 0 City of Oce~~e~ LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT City of Enc 6 OLOCATIOI MrU4Quu 1TIcIa*pcLIII.ca LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Do- a I 0 0 EXHIBIT 2 ZONE 14 EXISTING PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART LFMP 89-14 Conformance with Adopted Facility Performance Standard City Administrative Facilities adopted performance standard. Library Facilities Yes, existing facilities meet adopted performance standard. Wastewater Yes, existing facilities meet Treatment Capacity adopted performance standard. Parks Yes, Park District 2 (northe Yes, existing facilities meet th quadrant) currently meets adopted performance standard. Drainage No, existing drainage facilities not meet the adopted performa standard. circulation Yes, existing circulatj facilities meet the adopl performance standard. Fire Yes, existing fire facilities m the adopted performance standard Open Space Yes, existing open space meets adopted performance standard. Schools Yes, existing school facilit meet the adopted performal standard. Sewer Collection Yes, existing sewer facilities m the adopted performance standard Water Distribution Yes, existing water facilities m the adopted performance standard 9 e 0 EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 14 BUILD OUT PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET LFIQ 89-14 Conformance with Adopted Facility Performance Standard City Administrative Existing facilities will meet t Facilities adopted performance standard u build out. Library Facilities Existing facilities will meet adopted performance standard u build out. Wastewater Existing facilities meet Treatment Capacity adopted performance standard u Parks Park District 2 (northe quadrant) meets the adop performance standard until 1993 2000. Drainage Drainage facilities meet adopted performance standard F the proposed mitigation until bt out. Circulation Circulation facilities meet adopted performance standard F the proposed mitigation until bu out. Fire Fire facilities meet the adop performance standard until bu out. Open Space Open space meets the adopi performance standard until bu out. Schools School facilities meet the adop performance standard with t proposed mitigation until bu: out. 10 0 0 Sewer Collection Sewer facilities meet the adopi performance standard with 1 proposed mitigation until bu out. Water Distribution Water facilities meet the adop. performance standard with 1 proposed mitigation until bu out. 11 0 0 EXHIBIT 4 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 14 IJ3W 89-14 1. All development within Zone 14 shall conform to provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal and to the provisions and conditions of this L Facilities Management Plan. 2. All development within Zone 14 shall be required to pi public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adoptec the City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended from . to time and all other applicable fees. Development in : 14 shall also be responsible for any additional fees tc incorporated into this plan that are found to be neces: to enable facilities to meet the adopted performL standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zont pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4, All development in Zone 14 shall be in conformance with adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adoF by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 14 Local Facilit Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acqui data, to amend conditions and upgrade standards determined through the required monitoring progr Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at time . 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be conformance with an adopted performance standard during yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will immediately brought before the City Council. If the C. Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then future building or development permits shall be issued unl an amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone approved by the City Council which addresses those facil: shortfalls and brings those facilities into conformance w: the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no buildi permits will be allowed unless the performance standards E complied with. 12 e 0 8, Approval of this LFMP does not constitute p environmental review for projects within Zone 14. future projects within Zone 14 shall undergo environmc review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. mitigation measures determined during a proje environmental review shall be complied with in t entirety unless findings of overriding consideration made by the City Council. 9. Approval of this plan does not constitute p discretionary review for projects within Zone 14. future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan establishes the max allowable number of residential units for facili planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee specific residential density. 13 0 a EXHIBIT 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 14 LFMP 89-14 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES No special conditions. LIBRARY FACILITIES No special conditions. WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY The following action shall be pursued jointly by each SE district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capac through the year 2000: A. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly ba to determine actual flow rates and to have an ea warning of capacity problems. PARKS A. All development shall pay Park-in-Lieu Fees and Pub Facility Fees for Park District 2. B. No residential development will be allowed after 1 unless actions have been taken by the City to constr additional park facilities. DRAINAGE A. All future development in Zone 14 will be required construct any future storm drain facilities identif in the current Drainage Master Plan and revir Drainage Master Plan as determined by the C Engineer. Any facilities necessary to accommod( future development must be guaranteed prior to . recordation of any final map, issuance of a grad permit or building permit, for any developml requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 14. 14 e m B. Prior to the recordation of any final map, for specific development within Zone 14, the developers that project are required to: 1, Pay the required drainage area fees established the current Drainage Master Plan and; Execute an agreement to pay any drainage area f established in the forthcoming revised Mas Drainage Plan. 2. C. WATERSHED A 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final m issuance of a grading permit or building perm whichever occurs first within Watershed A of Z 14, the developers are required to financia guarantee the construction of the following st drain facilities: a. A portion of a concrete trapezoidal chan from Zone 14 through Zone 15 and back i Zone 14. 36-inch and 48-inch storm drains Triple box culvert crossing College Boulev and Cannon Road. 2. Prior to recordation of the first final m issuance of a grading or building permit wit Watershed A of Zone 14, the developers required to guarantee the following facilities the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Sediment detention basin to be installed Zone 14 upstream of Rancho Carlsbad Mob Home Park. b. c. b. Restoration or reconstruction approximately 3,500 feet of Calavera L Creek from the above proposed desilt basin El Camino Real bridge to the satisfaction the City Engineer. the sediment detention basin. c. Provide a mechanism for the maintenance Prior to issuance of a building permit wit Watershed A of Zone 14, the sediment detent basin and restoration of Calavera Lake Creek sh 15 0 0 be completed to the satisfaction of the C Engineer. D. WATERSHED B 1. Prior to recordation of the first final m4 issuance of a grading or building permit wit Watershed B of Zone 14, the developers required to guarantee the following storm dr facilities to the satisfaction of the C Engineer: a. Sediment detention basin to be installed Zone 14 upstream of Rancho Carlsbad Mob Home Park. b. Restoration or reconstruction approximately 3,500 feet of Calavera L Creek from the above proposed desilt basin El Camino Real bridge to the satisfaction the City Engineer. c. Provide a mechanism for the maintenance the sediment detention basin. d. Construction of the 42" storm drain n Cannon Road. Prior to issuance of a building permit wit Watershed B of Zone 14, the sediment detent basin and restoration of Calavera Lake Creek sh be completed to the satisfaction of the C Engineer. E. WATERSHED C Prior to the recordation of the first final T[ whichever occurs first within Watershed C of Zone the developers are required to financially guarar the construction of the following storm dr facilities: 1. 54" and 72" storm drain through Zone 14 to issuance of a grading permit or building pem Camino Real and Cannon Road. 2. Sediment detention basin near the intersection El Camino Real and Cannon Road. 16 0 m F. WATERSHED D 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final x issuance of a grading permit or building pem whichever occurs first within Watershed D of 2 14, the developers are required to financia guarantee the construction of the following st drain facilities: a. 42-inch storm drain along El Camino Real. b. 36-inch storm drain along El Camino Real. c. Concrete trapezoidal channel adjacent to S easement. d. Sediment detention basin near El Camino €i and Tamarack Avenue. CIRCULATION A. An on-going monitoring program shall be established evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, demand on circulation facilities. The required tim of improvements is based upon the projected demand development in the zone and the surrounding regi This timing may be modified without amendment to t plan, however, any deletions or additions to improvements will require amending this local plan. B. Prior to the recordation of the first final m issuance of grading permit or building perm whichever occurs first within Zone 14, a comprehens following circulation improvements shall be approved 1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED NOW financing program guaranteeing construction of No improvements are needed. 2. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1991 a. Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad Village Drive from Glasgow to Collc shall be constructed to include the follow. improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-i width to ma] or arterial standards. 17 a 0 2. Construction of four through travel 1 including a fully landscaped median. Estimated Cost - $535,000 ComDletion Date - 1991 b. Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad Villaye Drive from Tamarack to Gla improvements: 1. shall be constructed to include the follo Construction of two additional through tr lanes including a fully landscaped median 2. Installation of a traffic signal at intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive Tamarack Avenue when traffic signals warr, are met as determined by the City Enginee: Estimated Cost - $160,000 ComDletion Date - 1991 c. College Boulevard College Boulevard from Carlsbad Villaqe Drive Lake Boulevard shall be constructed to include following improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of- width to major arterial standards. 2. Construction of four through travel la including a fully landscaped median. 3. Improvement of Carlsbad Village Drive/Coll Boulevard intersection to include i installation of a traffic signal when traf signals warrants are met as determined by City Engineer. Estimated Cost - $3,074,000 Completion Date - 1991 18 0 w 3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1995 a. Cannon Road Cannon Road from El Camino Real to Coll Boulevard shall be constructed to include following improvements: 1. Grading of Cannon Road to ultimate right- 2. Construction of two through lanes includin 3. Intersection improvements to El Camino R way width to major arterial standards. fully landscaped median. and Cannon Road to the satisfaction of City Engineer. 4. Intersection improvements to Coll Boulevard and Cannon Road to the satisfact of the City Engineer. Estimated Cost - $3,450,000 Completion Date - 1995 b. Collese Boulevard College Boulevard from Carlsbad Village Drive Cannon Road shall be constructed to include following improvements: 1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of- width to major arterial standards. 2. Construction of two through travel la including a fully landscaped median. Estimated Cost - $3,773,000 Completion Date - 1995 19 0 4. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2000 a, El Camino Reallcannon Road Intersection improvements to El Camino Real Cannon Road to the satisfaction of the C Engineer. Estimated Cost - $3,500 ComDletion Date - 2000 b. Collese Boulevard/Cannon Road Intersection improvements to College Boulevard Cannon Road to the satisfaction of the C Engineer. Estimated Cost - $1,600 ComDletion Date - 2000 5. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY BUILD OUT a. El Camino Real El Camino Real from Carlsbad Village Drive Cannon Road shall be constructed to include . following improvements: 1. construction of two through travel la including a fully landscaped median to pr arterial standards. 2. Intersection improvements to El Camino R and Carlsbad Village Drive to 1 satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. Intersection improvements to El Camino R( and Tamarack Avenue to the satisfaction the City Engineer. 20 a a 4. Intersection improvements to El Camino RI and Cannon Road to the satisfaction of . City Engineer. Estimated Cost - $2,326,000 Comx>letion Date - 2010 b. Collese Boulevard College Boulevard from Carlsbad Village Drive Cannon Road shall be constructed to include following improvements: 1. Two additional lanes necessary to compl full width improvements to major arter standards. 2. Intersection improvements to collc Boulevard and Cannon Road to the satisfact of the City Engineer. Estimated Cost - $1,391,500 Completion Date - 2010 FIRE No special conditions. OPEN SPACE No special conditions. 21 0 W SCHOOLS Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs fir; in Zone 14, an agreement shall be entered into betwl owner(s) that shall provide for the following: 1. The deeding of an acceptable school site to Carlsbad Unified School District if it is determined the District a school within Zone 14 is warranted. Carlsbad Unified School District and the affected prope 2. A financing plan approved by the City and Carls Unified School District guaranteeing the construct of necessary elementary school facilities in Zone pursuant to condition #l. If any reimbursements and/or school fee credits are to given, the school agreement/financing plan shall providt mechanism to do so. SEWER FACILITIES A. Sewer Basin A Prior to the first final map, issuance of a grad permit or building permit, whichever occurs first any development in Sewer Basin A of Zone 14, financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction the following sewer facilities shall be provided: a. SAHT2C:15I1 sewer main located in future Can Road. b. SAH1, SAH2:2lV1 sewer main located in future Cannon Road east of South Agua Hedionda L Station. c. South Agua Hedionda Lift Station and 24" fo main (Phase I). west of Lift Station connecting to Interceptor. and force main (Phase 11). d. SAH4:21" sewer main located in future Cannon R e. Improvements to South Agua Hedionda Lift Stat 22 0 e B. Sewer Basin B: Prior to the recordation of the first final m issuance of a grading permit or building perm whichever occurs first for any development in Se Basin B of Zone 14, a financing mechanism guarantee construction of Reach NAHTlB shall be provided wh will ensure that adequate funding is available upgrade the NAHTlB sewer line prior to the issuance the 590th sewer EDU within the sewer basin. WATER FACILITIES A. All future development in Zone 14 shall be required provide any water reclamation facilities identified the future Water Reclamation Master Plan as determi by the City Engineer. Any water reclamation facilit necessary to accommodate future development must guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final m issuance of a grading permit or building perm whichever occurs first for any project in Zone 14. B. SERVICE AREA A The following water facilities will be required a: condition to the approval of future development wit Sewer Service A to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. The proposed 8-inch water main in the propo 2. A portion of the proposed 10-inch water main in 3. The proposed 10-inch water main. 4. The proposed 14-inch transmission line extension of Edinburgh Drive. Camino Real. extension of Glasgow Drive. Edinburgh Drive at zone boundary. Drive at zone boundary. 5. The proposed pressure reducing station 6. The proposed pressure reducing station in Glas 23 e e C. SERVICE AREA B The following water facilities will be required a: condition to the approval of future development wit Service Area B to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. A portion of the proposed 10-inch water main in Camino Real. 2. The proposed 10-inch water main. 3. A portion of the proposed 14-inch transmiss line in Cannon Road. 4. The proposed pressure reducing station in Camino Real at future Cannon Road. D. SERVICE AREA C The following water facility will be required as condition to the approval of future development wit Service Area C to the satisfaction of CMWD. 1. A portion of the proposed 14-inch transmiss line in future Cannon Road. E. SERVICE AREA D The following water facility will be required as condition to the approval for future development wit Service Area D to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. A portion of the proposed 14-inch transmiss line in future Cannon Road. F. SERVICE AREA E The following water facilities will be required a! condition to the approval of future development wit Service Area E to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. A portion of the proposed 14-inch transmiss 2. The proposed pressure reducing station south line in future Cannon Road. Reservoir C. 24 e 0 G. SERVICE AREA F The following water facilities will be required i condition to the approval of future development wi Service Area F to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. A 16-inch transmission line in center of Zonc and Zone 15. H. SERVICE AREA G The following water facilities will be required E condition to the approval of future development wi. Service Area G to the satisfaction of CMWD: 1. A proposed 10-inch water main west of I Calavera extending from Zone 15 through Zone and connecting in Zone 7. 2. A proposed 10-inch water main along southeasterly boundary of Service Area G. 25 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2961 A'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 14 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE, AND EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF RANCHO CARLSBAD. APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 14 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of C; and referred to the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting tt Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zon performance standards for public facilities, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiri processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 anc implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citizl Carl sbad, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of January, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to conside request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considerin testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Facilities Mana Plan for Zone 14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissi follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing Commi ssi on recommends APPROVAL of Local Faci 1 i ties Management P1 an 14, based on the following findings and subject to the fol condition: - Findinqs: 1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 is consisten the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the Elements contained in Carlsbad's General Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 is consisten Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Managemen amended by Ordinance No. 8110 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with the a 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 and the cond contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by en that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the a performance standards. 4) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 will control the and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the prc of public facilities and improvements. facilities and services are available in conformance with the a performance standards prior to development occurring. 2) 3) 5) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 will ensure Condition 1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zc dated January 3, 1990, incorporated herein by reference. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... PC RES0 NO. 2961 -2- *I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 e 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P1 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of J; 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTA I N : None. Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Erin, McFadden, Holmes & Marcus. MATTHFW HALL, Chai CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO ATTEST: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 2961 -3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2960 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE, AND EAST EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF RANCHO CARLSBAD. APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of January, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to conside request, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consideri testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the info submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the P Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis foll ows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the P Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Decl according to Exhibit "ND" dated December 6, 1989, and "PII" November 30, 1989, attached hereto and made a part hereof, basec following findings and conditions: I Findinqs: 1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 will not ca significant environmental impacts. The plan is a public fac planning document that implements the existing General Plan. l makes generalized projections as to the demand for and supply 0' facilities, and outlines the provision of adequate public fac concurrent with estimated demands. The plan recognizes that CEQ, will be required prior to mitigation of any public or private that i s general ly di scussed in the pl an. A Negative Decl aration issued on December 6, 1989 and recommended for approval by the I Commission on January 3, 1990. .... **** b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P1 Commission of the-City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of 3; - 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schri Erwin, McFadden, Holmes & Marcus. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI( ATTEST : MICHAEL J. HOmILLw PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RES0 NO. 2960 -2- CALIIULL IYU b NEGATIVE DECLARATlON PROJECT ADDRESSLOCATION: East of El Camino Real and Tamarack Ave~ north of Rancho Carlsbad, south and west of the City of Oceanside. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 14 which paran the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted perform: standards, The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above descr project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environrne Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. i result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not ha significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justifica €or this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plan Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department w1 ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: December 6, 1989 ~l/tl.iCJ,~W~~ 5 .d %,$I.. MICHAEL J. KOLZMILLER CASE NO: LFMP-14 Planning Director APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH DATE: December 6, 1989 BH:af 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1 . Exhibit "PI'I" , .- A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) - CASE NO. LFMP 14 DATE : November 30, 1989 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Local Facilities Manaaement Plan Zone 14 2. APPLICANT: Hofman Plannina Associates 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 238 6 Faradav. Suite 120 Carlsbad. CA 92008 (6191 438-1465 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Mav 24. 1989 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Manasement Plan ENVIRONMENTAL IM PACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment, On the checklist, IqNOq8 will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a sianificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insianificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings flYES-sigql and 18YES-insigq@ respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. m PHYSI P AL ENVIRONMENT YES NC 753 (1ns1g) WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECT-LY OR INDIRECTLY: 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? - 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? - 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? - 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach river or stream or the bed of the ocean or sands, or modification of the channel of a any bay, inlet or lake? - ambient air quality? - movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? - water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? - water, ground water or public water supply? - depletion of any natural resources? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on 6. Result in substantial changes in air 7. Substantially change the course or flow of 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface 9. Substantially increase usage or cause - 10, Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? - -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: - 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants) ? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 14. 15. 16. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? X 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? NO X X X X X NO X -3- 0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 8 YES YES (1ns1gl WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: (s1g) ~ 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housiny? 23. 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor - vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? - 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - - -4 - - - MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. X 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) X 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRON m ,'TAL EVALUATION 0 The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 is a facili planning document. The intent of the Plan is to establish parame and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when ne as determined by -the City's adopted performance standards. facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally, the developer in maximizing their capital return pa such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher pr housing which affects the availability of low and moderate in housing. However, as real estate value is determined primaril? location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to as the subject property would be developed with either low or mode accomplish this purpose, occasionally locations and costs of PC 1 income housing, It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate in families into other communities, but the existing nature of the ma place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estim is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the spec project, The Zone 14 Local Facilities Management Plan requires comp CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private pro discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -6- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development E& some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning Phased planning will not efficiently or adequately b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. address the need for public facilities. study c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan. e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study, the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -7- 9 e DETERMINATION (TO Be Camp eted By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed-project COULD NOT have a significant effect c the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significan effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect this case because the mitigation measures described on an attachec sheet have been added to the project. Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. x A Conditional Negative I II I?&/@ Ddte Signalture' I: (( -t ;/ *' I, Q ! "l iLi.CfYL* e< L(tb. A%, ' Date Plannin4 Didctor LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -a- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO AND CONCUR CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. - Date Signature BH:af -9- Januazy 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9 condition to correct the window problem to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Hall declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Comission members. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2954 approving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and Adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2955 and 2956 approving CT 89-17 and PUD 89-8, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein with the added condition that the north facing windows on the second floor of the four easterly units be adapted for compatibility with the condominiums to the north, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Commissioner Schlehuber returned to the meeting. 4) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 14 - Request approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 on property located south and west of the City of Oceanside, and east of El Camino Real, north of Rancho Carlsbad. Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, reviewed the background of the request and stated that Zone 14 is located in the northeast quadrant of the City. similarities between Zone 14 and Zone 7 which was recently approved. Zone 14 is approximately 814 acres in size with only two du's at present. Lake Calavera is located in Zone 14 as well as a proposed school site. The future of the zone is entirely residential but there are currently no approved projects within the zone, nor any pending applications. When development applications are received, they will be evaluated in terms of this zone plan. determined to be 1,122 du's (maximum) for this zone. This plan and the buildout projection is in compliance with Proposition E and the growth management program in total. Brian Hunter, Senior Planner, discussed Schools and stated that Zone 14 is located entirely within the boundaries of the Carlsbad Unified School District. Tvo school sites have been reserved in this zone: a K-8 site (formerly proposed for a high school), and a K-6 site. the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 14, the developers and Carlsbad Unified School District will enter into an agreement to ensure construction of those school facilities. Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager, discussed Drainage, Circulation, and Sewer Collection. There are many The buildout figure has been Prior to the recordation of Drainaae - Drainage facilities in Zone 14 must be provided concurrent uith development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A recent hydrology study by Dr. Chang provided much information to enable staff to propose several conditions in Zone 14 which will require actions prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit. The new Drainage Master Plan requires that certain fees be paid and documents must be executed when development occurs to ensure payment of those fees. Also, construction of the desiltation basin and Calavera Creek must ae completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior :o the issuance of any building permits. COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schram a MINUT@ / Circulation - The roads to be impacted by development in Zone 14 will be El Camino Real from Cannon Road north to Elm, Cannon Road within Zone 14, College Boulevard within Zone 14, and Elm, between College and Tamarack, to the City limits on the northerly side. Tamarack which are not impacted at all. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever comes first, a comprehensive financing plan must be approved to guarantee the complete financing of all circulation infrastructure within Zone 14 at an approximate cost of $14 million. There are portions of College and Sewer Collection - There are two sewer sub-basins in this zone, similar to Zone 7: of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever comes first, a comprehensive financing plan must be approved to guarantee the complete financing of that line at an approximate cost of (1) Sub-basin A which is part $2.3 million. (2) Sub-basin B which is part of the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. This trunk line is almost at capacity (590 edu's remaining), and the plan is conditioned that prior to the 590th building permit, a financing plan must be approved to guarantee that adequate funds will be available for the construction of the required sewer collection system. Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, concluded the staff report by stating that the Zone Plan contains approximate costs for necessary facilities and conditions for financing which must be complied with in order for development to occur in the zone. is $22 million (does not include schools). This plan meets all of the requirements of Proposition E and the Citywide Facilities and Management Plan. Staff recommends approval. Commissioner Holmes inquired why Parks were not addressed. He is concerned about the reference to Altamira Park on page 78 when that park does not yet exist. that Altamira Park has been funded in the CIP. Commissioner McPadden inquired about the Safety Center expansion in 1992-93 and wonders whether the 2-acre ball field is still in the plan. 2-acre ball field will be developed at the time the Safety Center is expanded. Commissioner McPadden is concerned about the amount of runoff we receive from Oceanside along the boundary at Lake Boulevard. She inquired if this has been considered and if there is an agreement between Carlsbad and Oceanside for this runoff. Mr. Rideout is not aware of any agreement but stated that Dr. Chang's hydrology study takes the dam into consideration. Commissioner McPadden is concerned about circulation phasing and connnented that she does not like to see 2-lane roads like Cannon Road in the zone plans. Commissioner Schramm inquired why the riparian areas are not included in the constraints map. Mr. Hunter replied that there is no firm boundary yet of the riparian areas. Comissioner Erwin is concerned about access to the proposed golf course and wonders if we can expedite the completion of The estimated costs of the required facilities Mr. Carter replied Mr. Rideout replied that the Cannon Road. Mr. Carter replied that there is insufficient January 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 information at this time to answer because the environmental study has just begun. Mr. Holzmiller added that there will probably be access to the golf course via Calavera Hills (Elm and College Avenues) and that a project in Zone 15 will provide additional access off Cannon. Chairman Hall opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Bill Hofman, Hofman & Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, preparers of the zone plan, representing the Robertson's who are the property owners and applicants, addressed the Commission and stated that this is the first developer-driven. in the preparation of the zone plan as well as Pringle & Associates who prepared the traffic study. He remarked on the staff comments and said that: (a) Dr. Chang's report looked at drainage outside of Carlsbad; (b) the constraints map will be updated as new projects come in; at present the constraints maps only designate open space; and (c) Carlsbad Highlands will provide access to the proposed golf course. He requested approval of the zone plan. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Hall declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Resolution No. 2960 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. 2961 recommending approval of Local Facilities Management Plan 14. zone plan to be privately funded which was not He stated that Rick Engineering assisted CONTINUED DISCUSSION ITEM: 5) DI 89-6 - NOISE SUBCOMHITTEE WORK PUN - A review and discussion of the draft City Council Agenda Bill regarding the Planning Commission Noise Subcommittee Report and Administrative Noise Policy to make sure that the revisions to the Administrative Policy adequately reflect the Commission decision on the Policy. Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, reviewed the changes made to the Administrative Noise Policy at the last meeting. Commissioner Schlehuber is satisfied with all items except the measurement above the first floor if usable space is provided (item 2). the State of California and perhaps the nation to adopt a measurement that is above the first floor. The question remains as to what constitutes "usable space." want to discourage a builder who was willing to put in a balcony. trying to count a balcony for recreational requirements which He noted that second story openings to a building were not adequately addressed and does not feel that plexiglass is necessary in this instance. He can live with the situation but he does foresee problems with the definition of exterior usable space. He remarked that we are the first City in He did not He was more concerned about the issue of a builder is not exactly what the Administrative Noise Policy reflects. COMMISSIONER Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehubei Schram a e u. c- February 6, 1990 TO: Mayor Bud Lewis, Councilmembers Ann Kulchin, Mark Pettine, John Mamaux, and Eric Larson FROM: Anne Mauch RE: A.B. 10480(Item 10 on this evening's agenda)--Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 and associated Negative Declaration Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing on this item, I request that this memo be entered into the administrative record. On behalf of FUTURE and concerned residents of Carlsbad, I urge the Council to postpone action on the above captioned documents until the City has completed its task-in-progress of achieving a current and legally adequate General Plan. L Lz44L+- 3425 Ridgecrest Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 t 6 a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LFMP ZONE 14 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will ho a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, Californi at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, February 6, 1990 , to consider approval of a Loc Faci7ities Management Plan on property generally located south and west of t City of Oceanside, and east of El Camino Real, north of Rancho Carlsbad and mo particularly described as: That portion of lots D and E, Map No. 823, Rancho Agua Hedionda, on fi with the County of San Diego. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the pub7 hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to t City of Car7sbad, City Clerk's Office, at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH: January 26, 1990 City of OceansMe CltY 01 Encmas CIIY of Enclnitas "CIIG, I,, ,GU IllltJI""Glllci'lC.U) naau t,lV"v bVUIU UGll u v "11 UCIIU.. "I ms. , makes me very angry," she "That is the truth. It makes 'ery angry. I feel I was used." ,just seems like (the attorney) i't thorough," Zinkovich said. attorney could not be reached rsday. iarles Jr. and Zinkovich said have scanned all newspaper unts and are searching for rds of any agencies that might ! further information on the , In particular, they said they lnterested in Carlsbad Police to pop singers and heavy-metal stands. Fire Department records. y even stopped at Ratcliffs worker's union in San Diego )peal for accounts from work- In the scene that day. 'fcial documents on the case ht be difficult to obtain, ago. rdia Marquez, a records clerk Hal KO I", president of the Spec- the developer, il. {sence becom- tator Corporation. ing a partner in the project. While Speaking Wednesday to revenue bonds might require members of the Oceanside Cham- approval by city voters, other ber of Commerce, Kolker said $1 bonding methods would not. from every ticket sold to perfor- Kolker's comments were part of mances at the outdoor theater the first community presentation would go toward paying off the on the project, which he said bond. Estimates prepared by would feature state-of-the-art consultants hired by his firm sound controls, enough on-site project the staging of 55-65 shows parking to meet all concert a year, ranging from classical demands and conveniently concerts and Broadway musicals located restrooms and concession NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LFMP ZONE 14 use the accident happened so the California Occupational That portion of Lots D and E, Map No. 823, Rancho @a Hedionda, on file with the County If you have any questions, please call the Planning Depart- ment at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates PUBLISH: January 26,1990 Learn Infield & I iition for All Four a :gitL,S MANAGEMENT 0 NOnCE OF PU5UC HEARlNG - , ,< -- ___ . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will holc public hearing at rs, 7200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, to consider approval of a Local Facilit Management Pla located south and west of the City Oceanside, and east of El Camino Real, north of Rancho Carlsbad and mc particularly described as: That portion of Lots D and E, Map No. 823, Rancho Agua Hedionda, on file CIG the County of San Diego. ie-a#&b ---. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 41 .. I30se-persorrs-wi3a.- * oped*- 7 767. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Pian in court, you may be limited raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describc in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or pri to the public hearing. -IC -eSE=- - -tFMP==e14 a- APPLICANT: Uofman Planning Associates PUB LISU: J €iw6f=-a- LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT City of En - c (Form A) m rn TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice Zone 14 - Local Facilities Management Plan for a public hearing before the City Council. Please notice the item for the council meeting of 6. L , . Thank you. 1 /15/90 Assistant City Man-- Date - THIS AGENDA BILL REQUIRES AN 1/8 PAGE AD IN TWO LOCAL NEWSPAPERS.