HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-10; City Council; 10577; ZONE 15 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANw c . 1;
\
* W 8
% E
#I 2 0 F 0 4
i 0 z 3 0 0
CI~F CARLSBAD - AGEND~ILL
A6#=7! TITLE: DE?
CITY MTG- 4/10’90 i3UH ZONE 15 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEPT. GM CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council ad1
Resolution No. fO-rW approving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planni
Director and adopt Resolution No. ?&la,! - approving the Local Facilit
Management Plan for Zone 15.
EM EXPLANATION
Zone 15 is the eleventh property owner-initiated and privately prepared Lo
Facilities Management Plan to be heard by the City Council. It is the third privat
prepared plan in the Northeast Quadrant.
On February 7, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved this plan
described in the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting attached as Exhi
5.
There are 520 existing dwelling units in the Zone and one approved residen
project, CT 82-12, with 740 units. The projected residential buildout of the Zone
3,008 dwelling units, which is fully in compliance with Proposition E and the Citywi
Facilities and Improvements Plan.
The Plan is a regulatory document which analyzes all eleven public facilities
determine whether they conform with the adopted performance standards. Seve
facilities are identified as requiring upgrading in order to accommodate futL
development in the zone. Specifically, the Plan identifies needed improvements
drainage, circulation, sewer, and water. Therefore, specific conditions of appro\
have been included in the Plan to guarantee that all of the public facility standar
will continue to be met through buildout of the Zone.
The conditions state that, prior to the first final map or issuance of a grading perr
or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 15, a Financing Plan must
approved by the City guaranteeing funding for construction of all public facil
improvements identified in the Local Facilities Management Plan. Until this financi
mechanism has been approved by the City, no development will occur within 20
15. The complete wording of the conditions is included in the Plan’s Executi
Summary which is attached as Exhibit 3.
. 4 m e
L Page Two of Agenda Bill No. 1 t? 5 7 7
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on December 6, 19,
indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 is not anticipai
to have any adverse impacts on the environment. The Negative Declaration VI
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1990.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 will not cause any significl
environmental impacts. The Plan is a public facilities planning document tl
implements Carlsbad’s General Plan. The Plan makes generalized projections
to the demand for and supply of public facilities and outlines the provision
adequate public facilities concurrent with the estimated demands. The P
recognizes that further environmental review pursuant to the Califori
Environmental Quality Act will be required prior to the development of any public
private project that is generally discussed in this plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this Plan. These costs will
recovered through the processing fee established by the City Council. It
anticipated that further staff time will be necessary to monitor this Plan and ott
zone plans on a yearly basis. The implementation of this Plan, however, shoi help future fiscal planning by estimating the timing of future public facilities and th
costs.
EXHIBITS
1. City Council Resolution No. qo:&
2.
3.
4.
5.
City Council Resolution No. %-@/,
Executive Summary - Zone 15
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2971 and 2972
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes dated February 7, 1990
,
4:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I_
w
RESOLUTION NO. 9O-IQO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF C
CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LOCAL f
MANAGEMENT PIAN 15.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad did on the loth
, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 1 April
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering al
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitti
and considering any written comments received, the City Council considerec
relating to the Negative Declaration including Planning Commission Resolutiol
granting Planning Commission approval of said Negative Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved by the City Council of 1
Carlsbad, California as follows:
1)
2)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning D
December 6, 1989 was prepared in compliance with the
Environmental Quality Act and Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municil
That there is no substantial evidence that the project as conditl
have a significant effect on the environment.
That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad incorporates
resolution Planning Commission Resolution No. 2971 includin
contained therein.
I
I I 3)
4)
....
....
....
I,
I
4.’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l5
16
17
18
19
e e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ci
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 10th day of April , 19
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and La
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
AL+H?M<TE-rk 1
(SEAL)
I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
e a
- I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 15 was prepared pursuant t
City’s Growth Management Program, and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal (
The lan incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improve1 Plan. P
The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the build out projectior
residential and non-residential development within Zone 15. Build out is the typ(
amount of land use planned for by the City‘s General Plan. The plan then pha
estimates the zone’s development on a yearly basis until build out is reached. Phas done to predict future facilities demands. The adequacy of public facilities is an2
according to this demand. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and pro
facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing for the provision of facilit relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes methods of funding nc facilities. Since the plan is a regulatory document, each facility section contains cond
to ensure that facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards. Man( compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the adequacy of facilities within 15.
Exhibit 1 on page 7 indicates where Zone 15 is located within the City. Exhibit 2 on
8 provides a summary of existing public facilities adequacy for Zone 15. Exhibit 3 on
9 provides a summary of public facilities adequacy through build out for Zone 15.
FINANCE OVERVIEW
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 identifies one facility (Drainage)
currently does not conform with the adopted performance standard without s
mitigation measures.
As a part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt has been made to briI facility into conformance with the adopted performance standard. During this pro(
has become clear that no one financing mechanism can satisfy the complex infrastn requirements of this zone and of the northeast quadrant. However, a combinati
financing techniques can ensure conformance of future facilities as development a
A common set of goals for the financing of the major facilities can be stated as fol
1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are
provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards.
Provide for the implementation of financing techniques which consid
financial limitations associated with the high costs of infrastn construction.
2.
’ The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-23-86 (CC Resolution No.
1
e 0
3. Provide for financing options which consider the needs of both the Cii the property owners.
The adopted CiWde Facilities and Improvements Plan identified the various way capital improvements could be financed. The capital facilities necessary to support th of Carlsbad generally fall into two categories -- those provided by developers as a con of development approvals, and those provided by the City through a system of fees,
or other financing sources.
It is the City’s responsibility to plan for the construction and maintenance of City pr and to finance these projects in the best possible way. The following describes some ( financing options available.
Cash/Pav-as-vou-Po financing. The City has used this method of financ pay for most capital improvements constructed to date.
In concept, the City charges the development community a series ol
which provide the source of income to pay for capital projects. When er
cash has been assembled, the City constructs the next capital project in
of priority. This method forces the City to delay construction of vi projects until funds have been collected. These fees include:
1. Public Facilities Fee
2. Park-In-Lieu Fees
3. Planned Local Drainage Fees
4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fees 6. Sewer Fees 1 7. Water Fees
Special Districts collect various fees of their own.
Reimbursement Aereements, In certain instances, a developer may as1 City to move a project forward in time and to construct a facility before f
have been collected. When this occurs, the City could adopt the poli
having the interested developer construct the project based o
reimbursement agreement. Over a period of time, the City would reimt
the developer for the portion of the project that was to be funded by
resources. The City would pay the developer back for the portion 0:
project that was to be funded by the City resources over a period of 1
Payments would commence at the time the City had originally schedulec construction of the facility in the Capital Improvement Program. Movink project forward in time is for the benefit of the developer. Therefore,
City‘s repayment would be limited to the cost of the public portion 01 project and no interest would accrue to the developer. The use of
method of project financing does not eliminate the developer’s obligatic
A,
B.
2
0 0
pay City fees. The developer must still pay all City fees associated
development.
Credit for City Fees. When it is in the public interest to construct public facilities earlier than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go pr
the City can consider giving a developer credit for fees that would otl
be paid, up to the cost of the public improvement. These credits reduce the amount of fees payable in future years from a development.
Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid loss of income from capii necessary to finance other projects. Two alternatives exist for fee crc
-- Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer
who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct
100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once
normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project.
Partial Fee Credit / credit over time: In this option, the
developer who builds a public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that
credit is spread over a series of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for
other capital projects while giving the developer credit for the
construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. No interest would accrue to the
developer as a part of this arrangement.
C.
the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as
--
D. Debt Financing, A range of debt financing alternatives is available
City. If it is in the public interest to construct an improvement before
are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If the project is
accelerated for the convenience or benefit of a developer, that dev
should bear the costs of issuance and interest over the life of the deb1 The actual mechanics of a debt issue and determination of the deve
responsibility to support these costs would be defined as the method (
financing is chosen.
Some of the debt financing vehicles available are shown below:
Assessment Districts:
Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a developer 1
construction of various public improvements through the use of asses districts if there is significant public benefit from the improvement. Ir
where a City contribution is planned, the City may ask a developer
3
0 e
i
the City contribution. The developer could then be reimbursed at s date (Le., in the year that the capital project has been originally schedul construction) or through a system of credits as described earlier.
Special Benefit Districts:
State law allows the formation of a variety of special benefit districts. '
districts may be used to fund the construction of parks, libraries, pol
fire facilities, street lighting systems, and similar improvements. '
districts may be formed by a vote of the property owners who then
themselves for the cost of improvements.
The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of debt service payl. city participation in a district of this type is possible to the extent of I improvements that would have othewise been the responsibility of the However, accelerated scheduling of capital improvements shod
accompanied by some concession from the developer to offset costs,
issuance costs, or other additional costs.
Community Facilities District (Mello-Roos):
Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist through Mello-
financing the construction of public facilities in conjunction with develop Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts operate similar to assess
districts but provide a more flexible tool for governmental entities to fii
a wider range of public infrastructure, again through the issuance (
exempt bonds. Facilities which may be financed by a Mello-Roos D include parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraees, gas pipeline!
telephone lines. They can be used to eliminate special assessment
These districts may also pay operating costs to the extent the services a addition to those already being provided prior to the formation of the di!
Revenue Bonds:
The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to finance improvements re to utility functions or other City services that generate a fee for se
although other City functions could support the use of revenue bond public improvements are being installed ahead of schedule to accommt
a developer, the City would expect the developer to offset many of the
of such an issue as described above.
Tax Increment Bonds:
Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can be fina
through the use of tax increment bonds. The Redevelopment Agenq developed a plan for the construction of public improvements using
method of financing. A developer asking for public improvements t
4
0 0
$
constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agency's abilit
willingness to defer other projects,
Certificates of Participation:
Certain public facilities such as buildings can be financed through Cedi
of Participation. This is in effect a lease agreement between the Ci
another agency. A developer wishing to push projects forward might co
The developer may be asked to bear certain costs or to accept credit
of payment for certain improvements.
General Obligation Bonds:
The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bonds to fur construction of public improvements. This can only be done wit
approval of 2/3 of the voters in an election. It is unlikely that the Ci
have the ability to use this method of funding public projects which t; specific developments.
constructing facilities such as a library or fire station using this financin
E. Financing Policies
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan contain following financing policies:
1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public Facilitie! Calculation are the ultimate responsibility of the City to
however, the priority for funding projects is at the discretion ( City Council.
Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program will p significant role in helping to establish compliance with the ad1
performance standards. Priority for the funding of projects shou to in-fill areas or areas of the City where existing deficiencies e
Agree to consider assisting developers with credits against future
reimbursement agreements, forming assessment districts, etc. when it is clearly in the public interest to do so or to rectify F
facilities deficiencies and not to induce growth by premat upgrading public facilities.
Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangements will be I
based upon the City's plans for timing of certain public facilities.
example, if a developer wanted to put in an improvement that the had not planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectif
existing deficiency, the City would not consider beginning to prc
credits or reimbursement until the 5th year, if at all.
2.
3.
4.
5
* e 0
,
5. Recognize that public facility improvements made up front or of City plans by developers must provide the funds necessary tc
annual operating costs for the facility until the time the Cit previously planned to provide the facility.
6. With the recent reduction in residential densities and ( restriction on residential development, recognize that it m
necessary to start charging fees to commercial and industrial lan in cases where they are not presently assessed.
Financing Summaq
This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified one public facility (Drainage)
is currently below the adopted performance standard.
The developers in Zone 15 are proposing to provide mitigation to bring Drainagi conformance with the adopted performance standards. The specific mitigation fc
facility is shown in the corresponding facility section of this plan.
This plan identifies when future public facilities are needed as growth occurs to e compliance with the adopted performance standards. A complete financing sect
provided at the end of this plan which provides a description of the facility improve?
to be made, timing of improvements, cost estimates, and funding priorities.
\
6
* e 0 City of Oceanside
’. .
EXI.116 Location Zoni
m ENG~NEERING “mu COMpLuuy
-7-
1 a 0
\
EXHIBIT 2 ZONE 15 Existing Public Facilities Summary Sheet LFMP 89-15
Conformance with Adopted
Facility Performance Standard
City Administrative Yes, existing facilities meet 1 performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet t
performance standard.
Wastewater Treatment Yes, existing facilities meet t
Capacity adopted performance standa
Parks Yes, Park District 2 (northea currently meets the adopted
standard.
Library
Drainage No, existing drainage facilitie meet the adopted performant
Circulation Yes, existing circulation facili the adopted performance stx
Fire Yes, existing fire facilities me
adopted performance standar
Yes, existing open space meei
adopted performance standarc
Yes, existing school facilities 1
adopted performance standarc
Yes, existing sewer collection
meet the adopted performancc
Yes, existing water distributioi
meet the adopted performancc
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Water Distribution
8
-
0 0
EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 15 Build Out Public Facilities Summary Chart
LFMP 89-15
Conformance with Adopted
Facility Performance Standard
City Administrative Existing and planned facilitie
adopted performance standai
build out.
Library Existing and planned facilitie adopted performance standa
build out.
Wastewater Existing and planned facilitie Treatment Facilities meet the adopted performant through the year 2000.
Park District 2 (northeast) ml
adopted performance standar 1993.
Drainage facilities will meet I performance standard with thj mitigation measures through t
Circulation Circulation facilities will meel
adopted performance standarc
proposed mitigation measures build out.
Existing fire facilities meet the performance standard through
Existing open space meets the
performance standard for exis approved projects. An ongoin
program will assure the open -
performance standard will be 1
through build out.
Existing and planned school fa meet the adopted performancc through build out.
Parks
Drainage
Fire
Open Space
Schools
9
0 0
Conformance with Adopted
Facility Performance Standard
Sewer Collection Sewer facilities meet the adc
performance standard with tl mitigation measures through
Water facilities meet the adc
performance standard with tl
mitigation measures through
Water Distribution
,
10
0 0
EXHIBIT 4 General Conditions for Zone 15
LFMP 89-15
.
1. All development within Zone 15 shall conform to the provisions of Section 23
the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Facilities Management Plan.
2, All development within Zone 15 shall be required to pay a public faciliti pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, a
amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zc shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this pla
are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted perfon standard.
The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 15 pursuant to Subse 3.
21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 15 shall be in conformance with the adopted Cit Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 87
September 23, 1986.
Periodic amendment to the Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan is antici
to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade standa determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plar
be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property 01
at any time. \
If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an ad1
performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the n will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council deter]
that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or development pe
approved by the City Council which addresses those facility shortfalls and t
those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards.
After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be all
unless the performance standards are complied with.
Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for prc
within Zone 15. All future projects within Zone 15 shall undergo envirom
review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation mea determined during a project’s environmental review shall be complied with in entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Cou
5.
6.
shall be issued unless an amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this z(
7.
8.
11
! e 0
,
9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for p within Zone 15. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Ca Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of resic units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any s residential density.
\
12
W e
EXHIBIT 5
Special Conditions For Zone 15 LFMP 89-15
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 15 ant be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 15. These conditic
also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility.
City Administrative Facilities
No special conditions.
Library
No special conditions.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure ad wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000:
Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems.
1.
Parks
A. All development shall pay Park-in-Lieu Fees and Public Facility Fees fo
District 2.
No residential development shall be allowed after 1992 unless actions havc
taken by the City to construct additional park facilities.
B.
Drainage
A. All future development in Zone 15 will be required to construct any future 2
storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan and 1
Drainage Master Plan for each watershed basin as determined by the City En
Any facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guar prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading per
building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 15.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, for any specific project within Zc
the developers of that project are required to:.
1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current DX
Master Plan and;
B.
13
0 0
2. Execute an agreement to pay any drainage area fees established i forthcoming revised Drainage Master Plan.
C. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or bL
financially guarantee Zone 15's proportional share of the following facilities
satisfaction of the City Engineer:
permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 15, the developers are requiI
1.
2.
Sediment detention basin to be installed in Zone 15 upstream of R
Carlsbad Mobile Home Park.
Restoration or reconstruction of approximately 3,500 feet of Calavera
Creek from the proposed detention basin to El Camino Real bridge
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3. Provide a mechanism for the maintenance of the sediment detention
Prior to issuance of a building permit within Zone 15, the sediment detentior and restoration of Calavera Lake Creek shall be installed.
Financing
The cost of the proposed sediment detention basin is estimated to be $86,2. the estimated cost for restoration or reconstruction of Calavera Lake CI
$644,000.
D. WATERSHEDA
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading pel
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed A of Zone
developers are required to financially guarantee the construction following facilities:
a. 54" storm drain from northwestern Zone 15 to future Cannon
Financing
The estimated cost for 54" storm drain is $ 248,400.
E. WATERSHEDB
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading pe
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed B of Zone developers are required to financially guarantee the construction
following facilities:
a. 36" storm drain north of future Cannon Road.
14
e 0
b.
c.
Financing
The estimated cost for the 36" storm drain north of future Cannon Ra
$131,100. The estimated cost for storm drain BJ is $491,280. The estin
the developer of Watershed B.
BJ (48") storm drain south of future Cannon Road.
78" storm drain along future Cannon Road alignment.
cost for the 78" storm drain is $472,500. These facilities are to be fundi
F. WATERSHEDC
No special conditions are required.
G. WATERSHEDD
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading perr building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed D of Zone 1: developers are required to financially guarantee the construction o following facilities:
a. BL (60" - 78") storm drain along future College Boulevard betwe
Camino Real and Agua Hedionda Creek.
30' - 48" storm drain south of Agua Hedionda Creek.
BK (54") storm drain north of Agua Hedionda Creek.
b.
c.
Financing
The cost for the proposed facilities in Watershed D is $453,325. '
facilities are to be funded by the developer of Watershed D.
Circulation
A. An on-going monitoring program shall be established to evaluate the aspe
improvements, development, and demand on circulation facilities. The re(
timing of improvements is based upon the projected demand of development
zone and the surrounding region. This timing may be modified without amen( to this plan, however, any deletions or additions to the improvements will rt
amending this local plan.
Prior to approval of any tentative map adjacent to College Boulevard within
15 the specific alignment for College Boulevard between Cannon Road a
Camino Real must be established. This shall include the necessary environr
B.
15
, e e
b
clearances and required public hearings so that construction of College Boulc can accommodate future development. The funding for the construction of Co
Boulevard will be guaranteed as provided by Condition 2C below.
Prior to recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or bui permit, whichever occurs first, within Zone 15, a financing program guarant construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1990
C.
A. Cannon Road
Cannon Road from Carlsbad Highlands eastern subdivision bour
to El Camino Real shall be constructed to include the follc
improvements:
1. Complete grading of Cannon Road to ultimate right-o
width to four lane major arterial standards;
Construction of median and one through lane in each dire(
Installation of traffic signal at Cannon Road and El Ca Real to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
Intersection improvements at Cannon Road and El Camino
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
2.
3.
4.
2. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1991
A. CannonRoad
Cannon Road from El Camino Real to Paseo Del Norte sh: constructed to include the following:
1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to four
major arterial standards;
Construction of two through travel lanes in each dire
including a fully landscaped median.
2.
Connection to Oceanside is not assumed until 1993 when Cannon Rc 2
assumed to be built to four lane major arterial standards between e;
subdivision boundary and 1-5.
16
e 0
B. Installation of traffic signals at Cannon Road/I-S northbound off Cannon Road/I-5 southbound off ramp, and Cannon Road/Pase Norte intersections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
C. Colleee Boulevard
College Boulevard between El Camino Real and Cannon Roac
be constructed to include the following:
1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to foc major arterial standards;
Construction of median and one through travel lane ii
direction; including a fully landscaped median. 2.
3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1993
A. Cannon Road
Construction of Cannon Road between El Camino Real and e
Cannon Road in Oceanside shall be completed to inch following:
1. Construction of Cannon Road to four lane major i standards I
\ 4. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1995
A. El Carnino Real/Palornar Airport Road
Intersection improvements at El Camino Real and Palornar 1
Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
B. El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue
Intersection improvements at El Camino Real and Chestnut i
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Cannon Road/I-5 northbound off ramp
Intersection improvements at Cannon Road and the 1-5 northboi
ramp to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
C.
17
e 0
D. Cannon Road/I-S southbound off ramp
Intersection improvements at Cannon Road and the 1-5 southboL ramp to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
E. El Camino Real
El Camino Real between Cannon Road and College Boulevar
be widened to include the following:
1. Construction of El Camino Real to six lane prime i
standards; including fully landscaped median.
F. CannonRoad
Cannon Road from Paseo Del Norte to 1-5 shall be widened lanes to include the following:
1. Grading and construction of an additional westboun
approaching 1-5.
5. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED PRIOR TO 1997
A. El Clamino Real
Construction of El Camino Real between College Bouleva Palomar Airport Road shall be completed to include the follc
1. Construction of El Camino Real to six lane prime
standards.
6. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED PRIOR TO 2000
A El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue
Intersection improvements at El Camino Real and Tamarack i to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
B. El Camino Real/Faradav Avenue
Intersection improvements at El Camino Real and Faraday Av the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Rd.
Intersection improvements at El Camino Real and Palomar
Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
C.
18
0 m
D. Cannon Road/I-5 northbound on ramD
Intersection improvements at Cannon Road and the 1-5 northbou ramp to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Cannon Road/I-5 southbound on ram0
Intersection improvements at Cannon Road and the 1-5 southbou ramp to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
E.
F. College Boulevard
College Boulevard between El Camino Real and Cannon Roat be constructed to include the following:
1. Construction of College Boulevard to four lanes major a standards .
7. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED PRIOR TO BUILD OUT
No improvements are needed.
Fire
No special conditions.
Open Space
A. All future development within this zone shall be required to show how it cont
to meeting the open space performance standard above and beyond meeting a1
City standards and development regulations and that the development dc preclude the provision of performance standard open space at build out of 21
Open space compliance will be monitored annually and as individual proje
reviewed within this zone.
B.
C. Prior to the approval of any development within this zone, the Planning C
shall be required to find that the development does not preclude the provi
performance standard open space at build out of Zone 15.
Schools
A Conformance with the adopted school performance standard will be a prerc
of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 15
conditioned to pay school fees in accordance with the requirement of the C Unified School District.
19
a 0
B. If Carlsbad Unified School District determines development in Zone 15 will gen student demand prior to construction of new school facilities, financial provisic temporary facilities on existing school sites will be required.
Sewer District
A. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading perr building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Zone 15, a fin2
mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following sewer facilities sh
provided:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SAHl adjacent to Hidden Valley Road.
SAH2 adjacent to Hidden Valley Road.
Lift Station adjacent to future Cannon Road. SAH3 adjacent to Future Cannon Road.
SAH4 adjacent to Future Cannon Road.
B. Sewer Basin 15A
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading
or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Sewei 154 a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the fol sewer facilities shall be provided:
a. b. SAHT2A adjacent to Future Cannon Road. SAHT2C adjacent to Future Cannon Road.
C. Sewer Basin 15B ,
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading
or building permit, whichever occurs first, for any development in Bas1
a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following facilities shall be provided;
a. b.
c. d.
SAHTlD adjacent to Sunny Creek Rd. SAHTlE adjacent to SUMY Creek Rd. SAHTlF adjacent to future College Boulevard
SAHTlG adjacent to El Camino Real.
Water Distriq
A. All future development in Zone 15 shall be subject to requirements per the
Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer. An
reclamation facilities necessary to accommodate future development II
guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading pe building permit, whichever occurs first for any project in Zone 15.
20
e 0
B. Water facilities for Zone 15 shall be provided at the time of development 1 satisfaction of CMWD.
Prior to or commensurate with installation of Zone 15 water facilities, CMW
determine that sufficient water facilities are in place to serve Zone 15.
All development within Zone 15 shall pay the appropriate water fees establisl
CMWD.
C.
D.
\
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
EXH I 0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2971
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE, EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, AND NORTH OF FARADAY AVENUE. APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 15
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of
1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to con
request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the i
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, tt
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declarat
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cor
follows:
A)
8)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, th
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative 0
according to Exhibit "ND", dated December 6, 1989, and "P
November 30, 1989, attached hereto and made a part hereof, ba fol1 owing findings:
, Findinqs:
i;
21
2o
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 will not
significant environmental impacts. The plan is a public planning document that implements the existing General Plan. ' makes generalized projections as to the demand for and supply
facilities, and outlines the provision of adequate public
concurrent with estimated demands. The plan recognizes that C
is generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declaratioi
issued on December 6, 1989 and recommended for approval by tt Commission on February 7, 1990.
i
will be required prior to mitigation of any public or private pi
....
.*..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of thc
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7’
February, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Chairperson Schramm, Commi ssioners: Schlehub
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners McFadden and Marcus.
ABSTAIN : None.
Hall and Holmes.
.dfi- @!&
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperso
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOnMILLM PLANNING DIRECTOR
I
PC RES0 NO. 2971 -2-
0 Exhibit "ND"
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESSLOCATION: East of El Camino Real, south of Lake Cal
west of the City of Vista, north of Faraday Avenue.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 15 which guar
the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted perfori
standards.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above des
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environr
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad.
result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not 1
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justifi
€or this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the PL
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments €rc
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department
ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: December 6, 1989
CASE NO: LFMP-15 Planning Director
APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates
PUBLISH DATE: December 6, 1989
4k.\d;&%kk2 LL&
MICHAEL J. HOLZMIL ER
BH:af
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 (619) 43E
Exhibit "PI Ill 0 0
EmIROmENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
- CASE NO. LFMP 15
I
November 30, 15 DATE :
RACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Local Facilities Manauement Plan Zone 15
2. APPLICANT: Hofman P1 annincr Associates
3, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2386 Faradav, Suite '
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(6191 438-1465
it. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: July 1 0. 1989
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: T.ocal Facilities Manasement Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires th conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project
significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be
the proposed project and provides the City with information to use a for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report c Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no
evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a signifi on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to in( determination.
* A.n EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is
evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a siunificant ef environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects car insisnificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under t l'YES-siglg and lIYES-insigl* respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the prapased mitigation measu
3ttention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts 5 otherwise be determined significant.
at the end of the form under pISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENT AJi EVALUATION.
m
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
e
"
Y,ES , '"s -\ - NILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (s1g) 31
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants) 3
11. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local importance?
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
16, Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
HUMAN ENVIRONnENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES (s19) (1ns1gI
17. Alter the present or planned land use c
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
of an area?
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? X
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems?
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
-3-
0 0
V MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
YE? "S 19 i YES s1g)
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (I1Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beinqs,
either directly or indirectly?
environment is one which occurs in a
36.
-5-
e 0
+ ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SCC~ AS: ..
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site desi1
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternativ
a) The project 1s a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently or adequately address the need for public facilities.
The project is a public facility information and planning study.
The project is a public facility information and planning study .
d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan.
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the
b)
c)
e) The plan considers phased development.
f) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study, the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project
alternative would therefore cause the most detriment.
-7-
1
,
1
2 :I
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l5
16
I'
l8
19
2o
21
22'
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2972
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 15 ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITY
OF OCEANSIDE, EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, AND NORTH OF FARADAY AVENUE. APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 15
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of
and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility z
performance standards for public facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requil
processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 a
implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the cit
Carlsbad, and
~
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 7th day of Februai I hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consi 1 request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considei I 1 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be hea
1 Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Facilities M2 I
Plan for Zone 15.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commi
follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
0 Q
6) That based on the evidence presented at the public hear Commission recommends APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management P1 15, based on the following findings and subject to the 1 condition:
Findinqs:
1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 is consis the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and t
Elements contained in Carlsbad’s General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 is consis Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Manager amended by Ordinance No. 8110 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with th
1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 and the c contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by that public facilities will be provided in conformance with thc performance standards.
4) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 will control t and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the I of public facilities and improvements.
5) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 will ensur
2)
3)
facilities and services are available in conformance with thi performance standards prior to development occurring. !
18il
19
1 I ...-
j .**.
20
21
****
....
22
23
24
25
I *...
I A***
I :::I I
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
I.8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th
February, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schl ehuber, Err Hall and Holmes. AYES:
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners McFadden and Marcus.
ABSTAIN : None. + &&
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairpers CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
~. ,& - L: Lc -/1 k.&,
MICHAEL J-JHo~MIL~R
4
PLANNING DIRECTOR
I I
,'
PC RES0 NO. 2972 -3-
-_ -
< 0 MINUT&
\
February 7, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chairman Schrannu would like the subcommittee to remain intact
to complete the review process.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 7:23 p.m. and reconvened
at 7:35 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 15 - Request
approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for
Zone 15 on property located south and west of the City of Oceanside, east of El Camino Real, and north of
Faraday Avenue.
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, Growth Management,
Zone 15 is located in the northeastern quadrant of the City,
adjacent to the southern edge of Oceanside, and is primarily
residential. It is the 17th zone plan to be brought forward
to the Planning Comission for consideration and is the final zone to complete the residential buildout of the northeast
quadrant. du's in the zone. The Carlsbad Highlands project has been
approved for 740 du's and there are 1,748 future units possible for a total buildout of 3,008 du's in the zone.
Approximately 60 acres are designated for non-residential
uses and there is one major approved non-residential project in the zone (Sycamore Creek Specific Plan) with an
approximate 653,000 s.f. The total non-residential buildout for the zone will be 835,429 s.f. which is the maximum
allowable; however, this number may never be reached due to
discretionary approvals which will be required.
in complete compliance with Proposition E and the growth
management program.
Brian Hunter, Associate Planner, discussed Schools and stated
that the existing General Plan designates two school sites in
Zone 15: however, the 1989 School Location Plan adopted by Carlsbad Unified School District deletes those two sites. The plan was reviewed with the sites deleted.
Plan Amendment will probably come forward within the next
month. If residential development occurs in this zone prior
to construction of new schools, financing provisions to allow
placement of temporary facilities on existing school sites
will be required. Unified School District.
Steve Jantz. Associate Engineer, discussed Drainage,
Circulation, and Sewer Collection.
reviewed the background of the request and stated that
The zone is 1,227 acres in size with 520 existing
This plan is
The General
That condition came from the Carlsbad
Drainage - There are sone drainage facilities required
to accommodate future development within Zone 15, specifically, development which occurs along the proposed
Cannon Road east of El Camino Real.
approved plans for Zones 7 and 14, prior to future
development along Cannon Road adjacent to the Rancho Carlsbad
Mobile Home Park, construction of a desiltation basin and appropriate creek mitigation must be completed prior to the
issuance of the first building permit in that tributary area.
As with the previously
Circulation - As development occurs. there are certain
facilities which will be required to accommodate that
development.
1990, Cannon Road is proposed to be built east of El Camino
With the first phase of development expected in
4 e MINUB
. \
Real with a two-lane segment, to coincide with the Carlsbad
Highlands development. In 1991, Cannon Road west of El
Camino Real will be required to be completed to its full
width to Interstate 5. At that time, College Boulevard will
be connected between El Camino Real and Cannon Road as a two-lane arterial. In 1993, Cannon Road east of El Camino
Real will be required to be built to four lanes. At this
time, it is expected that Cannon Road will connect with the
City of Oceanside. In 1995, as development continues, El
Camino Real will need to be widened from Cannon to College to
its ultimate width and a portion of Cannon Road adjacent to
Interstate 5 will require an additional lane. In 1997, El
Camino Real will be required to be widened from College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road.
expected that College Boulevard will need to be widened to
its full width between Cannon Road and El Camino Real.
However, if development is slower than anticipated, the
target years could be adjusted. first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building
permit, whichever occurs first within the zone, a comprehensive financing program to guarantee construction of
those circulation facilities must be approved.
In the year 2000, it is
Prior to the approval of the
Sewer Collection - The zone is broken down into two
sewer sub-basins.
utilizing a trunk system which follows along Cannori Road and
the southern portion of the zone will be utilizing a trunk system which will bisect the zone and provide sewer service
to Zone 16 and the northern portion of Zone 18. However, the
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor west of El Camino Real needs to be constructed prior to development in the zone..
Therefore, development using the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will be required to pay its proportionate share
of their demand within that interceptor system. It should be
development in the northeast quadrant.
Don Rideout concluded the staff report by stating that
significant public improvements will be needed to accommodate growth as Zone 15 develops. The financing plan does not
constitute the financial guarantees that are required to
satisfy growth management. Therefore, the zone is conditioned to provide a financing plan, which must be
approved by the City, prior to finaling any map or issuance of any grading or building permits within the zone.
improvements are expected to cost approximately $30 million.
This plan complies with all the requirements of growth
management and staff is recommending approval.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if there is any limit ton the
number of students before temporary facilities will be required. Brian Hunter replied that Carlsbad Unified School
District feels that all existing schools are presently at
capacity. If any residential development occurs in this area
prior to new schools being constructed in Zones 8 or 14,
temporary facilities will be required.
The northern portion of the zone will be
noted that many of the facilities serve this zone as well as
The
Conrmissioner Erwin feels that trailers have a negative impact
and would like to see some provision for school buildings.
Mr. Hunter replied that the school district feels that
temporary facilities are preferred.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired how the abandonment of the
school sites will be done on paper. that the General Plan Amendment will be coming forth within
about 30 days. Commissioner Schlehuber commented that many
Brian Hunter replied
1 e MINUT& . \
February 7, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
prospective buyers purchase homes because a school site has
been designated and he is glad that staff is following
through to reflect this change.
Chairman Schranrm opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Lisa Thomas, 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, of
Hofman Planning Associates, representing Buie Corporation,
Sycamore Creek Company, and George Wimpy b Co., landowners and applicants, addressed the Commission and stated that this
plan had been prepared in conjunction with Manitou
Engineering and Urban Systems Associates, who did the traffic
analysis.
the Carlsbad Unified School District and staff on the schools
issue. happy to answer questions.
Carl Schuck, 4723 Cordoba Way, Carlsbad. representing St.
Thomas More Catholic Church, addressed the Commission and stated that their parish has been in existence for five years
and comprises an area which extends into Zones 14, 15, and 16. They presently worship in the mortuary chapel and are
looking for a permanent home. He has been in contact with
several developers and requested that consideration be given
to church site(s) within Zone 15.
recommendation.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Schramm declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Schlehuber commented that many times churches
are an after thought and they are sometimes difficult to place once an area has been built. He inquired how a church
zone might be established. churches are allowed anywhere in the city with a Conditional
Use Permit.
Conmissioner Schlehuber can accept the staff recommendation.
Commissioner Erwin has no problem with the zone plan except
for the schools. He has lived with the trailers and over-sized classes in South Carlsbad and he doesn't
understand the school district's thinking. He would like to see the zone plan approved with the normal condition to
provide schools as in most other plans.
Chairman Schrarran asked the City Attorney if this could be added or if it is up to the school district.
replied that this decision is up to the Planning Commission
but without knowing why the school district did not feel
permanent construction was necessary makes it a judgement
call. As to the church site situation, a minute motion could be made to bring it back on the agenda for discussion.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the zone plan could be
approved with an "either/or" condition, at the future
discretion of the school district. Mr. Ball replied that it would be better to make a decision after input from the
school district.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if staff knows the motivation of the school district. Mr. Hunter does not know why the
original condition was changed.
She stated that Hofman worked very closely with
They support the staff recommendation and would be
He supports the staff
Brian Hunter replied that
Mr. Ball
Page lo February 7, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
Commissioner Schlehuber has a problem changing the condition
if the school district has already made a decision. He has
been in the portables at the high school and feels they are very adequate classrooms.
than adequate on a temporary basis and the school has to
consider the cost of a permanent building. the staff recommendation.
Chairman Schranrm inquired if trailers would be temporary
structures until a school is built. Mr. Hunter replied that
he thinks the trailers would only be used on a temporary
basis.
recommendation.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Resolution No. 2971 recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Resolution No. 2972 recommending approval of Local
Facilities Management Plan 15.
ADDED ITPIS AND REPORTS:
Mr. Wayne reminded Commissioners abut the one-half day
details.
ADJ0UR"T:
By proper motion, the meeting of February 7, 1990 was
adjourned at 8:04 p.m.
He thinks the trailers are more
He can support
Chairman Schrarnm can support the staff
retreat on March 16, 1990. A memo will be sent with the
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL HOLZMIUER
Planning Director
BETTY BUClCNW
Minutes Clerk
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
COMMISSIONERS
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Schlehube Schramm
Erwin
Hall
Ho lines
Schlehubc
Schramm
0 e UlbL. LW blLY bUU11LI.L rlrluur
4/f0/90
c 29 &-e -& *=-rye -J
TO : Mayor Bud Lewis, Councilmembers Ann Kulchin,
Yark Pettine, John Mamaux, and Eric Larson
FROM: PROJECT FUTURE
DATE: April 10, 1990
*RE: Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan &
Negative Declaration
Future respectfully requests that the City Council
postpone further consideration of the above-captioned
until the following actions have been taken:
1. A legally adequate general plan is adopted; ar
2. An environmental impct report is prepared fol
the project.
QL A l2 L< L’ IC;_ ??q70
Submitted by Anne Mauch, Secretary, Project Future
*Item #6 on 4/10/90 Council Agenda (A.B. 10577)
*
1
2
3
m 0
RESOLUTION NO. 90-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF (
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 15. 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l5
16
17
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepare
Facilities Management Zone 15 in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of th
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on February 7, 1990 t
noticed public hearing as required by law to consider said plan and at the
of the hearing adopted Resolution No. 2972 making findings and recomrn
the City Council adopt a plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning I
December 6,1989 indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan is not
to have any significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of April 10, 1990
noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and arguments of anyc 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
i i to be heard:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council
of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1)
2)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in
No. 2972 also constitute the findings and conditions of the Ci
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 dated f
1990 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by r
hereby approved. Any development occurring within the bot
Zone 15 shall comply with all the terms and conditions of saic
3)
....
8 :- +
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Cit
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 10th day of April , 19<
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Lar,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
In, 1 5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
25
1 A$:AEM<TEN%k$%&lerk G?
(SEAL)
1
1
-2- I
I
i &TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING e
?'-
LFMP ZONE 15
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (Elm Avenue), C
California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, to consider a Local Facilit
east of El Camino Real, and north of Faraday Avenue.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Departm
Management Plan on property generally located south and west of the City of Ocean
438-1161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15 in court, you m
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hea
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of C
City Clerk's Office, at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates
PUBLISH: March 29, 1990 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
city of oceansids
Management Zone 15
c;.,,,
.i , 0 w
(Form A) ?
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
Local Facilities Manaqement Pian - Zone 15
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
3/5/90 Assistant City Man Date
THIS PROJECT REQUIRES AN 1/8 PAGE AD IN TWO LOCAL NEWSPAPERS.
** W W
?
NOnCE OF PUBUC HMING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GWEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a pu
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6;OO p.m
Tuesday, to consider approval of a Local Facilities Management Plat
property generally located south and west of the City of Oceanside, east of El Can
Real, and north of Faraday Avenue.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the pu
hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Depattment at 48-1 16
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limitec
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describe
this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prio
the public hearing.
CASE FILE: LFMP Zone 15
APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates
PUBLISH:
CITY OF CARLSBAD CIN COUNCIL
,' w 7 . + -.
,
City of ocearwide
.. .
City of Encinitas
aMca&3
I have tad approved b;. &e C~I
1, fornia coastal Commission behi
construction can begin.
The council approved .th
contract by a 40 vote. Counci
man Mark Pettine was abaen
from Tuesday’s meeting.
The bridge widening and inter
change improvements are consid
ered to be esstential to accommo
date future development along Palomar Airport Road and Aveni.
Professional Massage Therapy
Duan Bowman, M.T.
A Carlsbad man was injured
Saturday after the shotgun he was cleaning accidentally discharged beside his head, police reported.
Larry H. Brown, 25, of the 6900 block of Whitecap Drive, told policed the shooting was acciden-
tal, and his injuries self-inflicted.
He was treated and released at
Tri-City Medical Center in
LFMP ZONE 15
piece of his em was mi~ing.’’ Faraday Avenue.
Continued from, Page A1
APPLICAN’E Hofman Planning Associates
PUBLISH: March 29,1990
by making signific
tions toward the
organs at both S 4m.m zom 11
Bill Saylor, executive
the Boys and Girls Club
bad, said the 1989 Hall
Bill Hoehn. Each
o receives a plaque
plaques that are sl