HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-31; City Council; 10741 Part 1; Arroyo La Costa Master Plan CommunityCITY OF CARLSBAD — AGENDA BILL
•*<U CO
4-1 vO
O, CM
O I
T3 O
tfl Oi
(3 Cn) cd
•> CM
CO vO
•U CM
C I
<U O
PI •>CU .Ha vo
CO CM
43 O4J tTi•H
IS •Oin vo
CM CM
iH II O
C 10ca CMi
CMt-H •>
I 00w in
*Z CM
I •
"O ^v
CO ON. CO
CM CO
H •> 4JI f^ 3c/> in s3!Z CM -Hi a• oco cy> coo <u
& - COvo --^• m
T3 CM COM I Wo o ctTi CO*o aQ) « T3o m G3 m coTS CM ao i cdM O
4J O> COC3 4-1•H . cdCO -HrH O (-1
o o
(3
CO
CO
P.fXpci ctj
OCTi
CO
O
5
<
_J
O
Oo
AB#^4
MTG. 7'/31/90
DEPT..
TITLE: APPROVAL OF VARIOUS DISCRETIONARY
ACTIONS NECESSARY TO APPROVE THE ARROYO
LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY FOR 1076
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES & RELATED FACILITIES
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that
the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. °)0 ~2f6 APPROVING the
Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director;
and Resolution Nos.90?357? .90-361. </D-AS& . 93-A69 . 9£>~A^n .
& qO~&&^> , CERTIFYING EIR 86-2 and
APPROVING GPA/LU 88-1, CT 88-3, PUD 88-4, HDP 88-8, SDP 89-18,
SUP 89-3 and SUP 90-8, and INTRODUCING Ordinance Nos. AS-V&3.
. APPROVING MPA-149(O), MP 88-1 and ZC 88-3.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The applicant is requesting approval of a variety of
applications which cover 529 acres generally located east of El
Camino Real, north of Olivenhain Road, and west of Rancho Santa
Fe Road. The intended applications would establish a cohesive
residential community of 1076 single family units and related
recreational facilities including a common recreation/daycare
center. The development also supplies two school sites, a
potential church site and six miles of trails included within
135 acres of open space. The proposed project, which complies
with all City ordinances and policies, includes the following
discretionary actions:
EIR 86-2 - The Environmental Impact Report was processed
addressing all requested discretionary actions. The EIR
identified short term construction noise and the change in the
visual nature of the area from open space to urban uses as
being significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated to
a level of insignificance. Planning Commission and staff
disagree and recommend that the City Council find that all
project-related impacts can, after mitigation, be reduced to
a level of insignificance. Justification for this
determination is contained on pages 4 and 5 of attached
Exhibit 6.
MPA-149(O) - Amendment to the La Costa Master Plan (MP-149) to
segment out the area previously known as La Costa Southwest
(now Arroyo La Costa) and to place certain restrictions on
remaining future development.
MP 88-1 - A new Master Plan, in compliance with all current
ordinances and standards, for the area previously known as La
Costa Southwest (now Arroyo La Costa) .
GPA/LU 88-1 - A General Plan Amendment to redistribute higher
density land uses into medium residential and low residential
areas to establish the exact location of two school sites, and
to redefine open space within the Master Plan area.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO.
CT 88-3 - A Tentative Map to divide the property into 1,126
lots.
PUD 88-4/HDP 88-8/SDP 88-18 - A Planned Unit Development
Permit and Hillside Development Permit to allow the
construction of 1,076 single family homes, as well as a Site
Development Plan to create a common recreation/daycare
facility.
SUP 89-18 - A Special Use Permit for the construction of road
improvements in the 100 year floodplain.
SUP 90-8 - A Special Use Permit to demonstrate compliance with
the El Camino Real Corridor Standards.
The Planning Commission additionally adopted a Resolution of
Intention to declare the City's intent for a future change in
land use designation on the railroad parcel from Travel
Services/Utility (TS/U) to a residential land use.
More detailed information is included in the attached staff
report to the Planning Commission. Also attached are two
memorandums. The first memorandum is to the City Manager,
dated July 16, 1990, which describes five concerns expressed by
citizens during the project review and the Planning Commission
hearing. The second memorandum, from the Traffic Consultant to
the Planning Director, provides a discussion of the traffic
issues.
The Planning Commission heard the project on June 6, 1990,
revised and/or added several conditions and on June 20, 1990
voted unanimously to approve all aspects of the project.
To provide clarification, minor changes have been made to three
of the conditions. In addition, since the last Planning
Commission hearing one new condition has been added to the
tentative map. This condition requires the applicant to enter
into a third party agreement with an environmental consultant
who, in conjunction with the Planning Department, will then be
responsible for the extensive mitigation monitoring on this
project. All revised conditions are included in the City
Council Resolution for the tentative map.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Master
Plan Amendment because at this time the land uses, locations,
and environmental impacts for the northwest and southeast areas
of La Costa are unknown. The mitigation would require
environmental review and new master plans prior to review of
future development in these areas of La Costa.
PAGE 3 OP AGENDA BILL NO.
An EIR was processed addressing all proposed discretionary
approvals. The report was found by staff and the Planning
Commission to have been prepared in compliance with state and
local regulations. All project-related impacts will be
mitigated to a level of insignificance by the application of
mitigation measures required in the EIR and the amended Zone 12
Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact analysis prepared for the Arroyo La Costa
Master Plan and reviewed by the Finance Department, indicates
the project will have a net zero fiscal impact on the City.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
An amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
12 was processed concurrently with the other applications and
is fully in compliance with Proposition E and all applicable
requirements of the Growth Management Ordinance. Impacts of
the proposed plan are less than those projected in the original
plan.
EXHIBITS
1. City Council Resolution Nos. <?Q-£55 . 90-456 .
9&-A68- .QO-AZCi . qo~£fcQ . 9£-<&b/ . QD-&&3-. &
2. Ordinance Nos. AS -/a 3 . iQS-/ftM . &
3. Memorandum to the City Manager dated July 16, 1990
4. Memorandum to the Planning Director from the
Transportation Planning Consultant, dated July 2, 1990.
5. Planning Commission Resolution Nos: 3039 (EIR 86-2) ; 3049
(MP-149(0), Neg.Dec.); 3028 (MP-149 (0) ) ; 3029 (MP 88-1);
3030 (GPA/LU 88-1) ; 3031 (ZC 88-3) ; 3032 (CT 88-3) ; 3033
(PUD 88-4); 3034 (HDP 88-8); 3035 (SDP 89-18); 3036 (SUP
89-3); and 3037 (SUP 90-8).
6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 16, 1990
w/ attachments .
7. EIR, Master Plan, Amendment to Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone 12, Fiscal Impact Report - (Previously
distributed) .
8. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 16, 1990, June 6,
1990 and June 20, 1990.
9 . Letters received from interested parties .
RESOLUTION NO. 90-255
l"
2
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE
LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO DELETE REFERENCES TO
THE AREA KNOWN AS LA COSTA SOUTHWEST.
CASE NO: MP-149(O)
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
c
Code, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
7 [hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
8 [consider said request; and
9 WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
onsidering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial
tudy, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
bonsidering any written comments received, the Planning
Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated
(Negative Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3049, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration is hereby approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
special
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a $gp»r meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City CJLerk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO.90-256
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT, EIR 86-2, FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY
INCLUDING 1,076 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, A
RECREATION/DAYCARE CENTER, 2 SCHOOL SITES AND 2
POTENTIAL CHURCH SITES ON PROPERTY LOCATED
EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD,
AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
CASE NO: EIR 86-2
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, and considering any written comments
received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Master Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3039, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that the Environmental Impact
Report, EIR 86-2, is certified and approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
special
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a r«^S£$i: meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of Jul^ , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
IS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-257
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN (GPA/LU 88-1, ARROYO LA COSTA)
TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ON PROPERTY LOCATED
EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD,
AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
CASE NO. GPA/LU 88-1
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, the City Council did on July 31, 1990 hold
a duly advertising public hearing to consider an amendment to
the Land Use Element of the General Plan (GPA/LU 88-1) and at
said time received the recommendations, objections, protests
and comments of all interested persons desiring to be heard;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the proposed
change to the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
A. That the above recitations are true and correct.
B. That the findings of the Planning Commission as
set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3030 (GPA/LU
88-1) constitute the findings of the City Council.
C. That the Land Use Element of the General Plan is
amended as follows:
1. GPA/LU 88-1; Change the Land Use Element
designations for property generally located on the east of El
Camino Real, north of Olivenhain Road, and west of Rancho Santa
Fe Road as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, dated July 31,
1990 attached hereto and made a part hereof.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
special
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a i«§§&S£r meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 31st day of July
1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
IS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City\Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-
EXHIBIT A
JULY 31. 1990
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
RLM-3 GENERAL PLAN SUB AREA
B PLANNING AREA
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN City of Carlsbad
ARROYO LA COSTA GPA/LU 88-1
RESOLUTION NO. 90-258
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP FOR 1,076 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON
3 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF
4 RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
CASE NO.: CT 88-3
5 APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
Q WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the municipal
7 code, the planning commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
8 hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
9 consider said request; and
10 WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
11 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
12 desiring to be heard, said commission considered all factors
13 relating to the tentative tract map; and
14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
15 Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
15 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
17 2. That the findings and conditions of the planning
18 commission resolution no. 3032, on file with the city clerk and
19 incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
20 City Council in this matter except as amended by the addition of
21 the following conditions, are hereby approved.
22 Planning commission resolution no. 3032 shall be
23 amended by the addition of the following conditions:
24 Conditions!
25 1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, the
applicant shall enter into a third party agreement with the
26 City to contract with an environmental consultant, paid by
the applicant, to provide a monitoring program for the
27 mitigation measures required by the tentative map and
environmental impact report. The program shall include
28 specific monitoring activities, a reporting system, and
Qisi
. BIONDO, JR.CITY OF CARID VILLAGE DRFORNIA 92008u. ' < _i,_ > CO <£ in co o
^ z 6: •
> P o ^
. CO 01
t oO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
criteria for evaluating the success of the mitigation
measures.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3032, Condition No. 55 shall
be amended to read:
55. During the construction of this project, no construction
equipment, fill dirt, or any other materials shall be
stored on any permanent natural open space area as
designated by the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3032, Condition No. 64 shall
be amended to read:
64. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City
for all public streets and easements required by these
conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall
be made by a certificate on the final map for this project.
All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and
clear of all liens and without cost to the City. Streets
that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3032,
46.c.(3)(e)(3) shall be amended to real:
Condition No.
46.c.(3)(e)(3)Village E, lot 508 - Open Space, Lot 509 -
1 story, Lot 1114 (from Open Space) - 2
story
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3032 shall be further amended
by the addition of the following conditions:
93,
94,
95,
Prior to approval of the final map for Phase I, the
applicant shall redesign the streets and lots within Unit
1 to provide a right turn in right turnout connection onto
Olivenhain Road from proposed Street "A" to the
satisfaction of the city engineer and planning director.
Prior to approval of the final map for Phase I, El Bosque
Avenue shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the city
engineer and fire marshal to provide for the installation
of an electronically operated emergency access gate.
Consideration shall be given to installing the gate along
the eastern right-of-way of street "FF" and construction of
a temporary turnaround adjacent to Lots 52 and 53 for
westbound vehicles unable to pass through the gate.
Prior to approval of the final map for Phase III, the
project shall be redesigned to provide for an
electronically operated emergency access gate to Corte
Carolina along the southerly right-of-way of proposed
street "N-N" to the satisfaction of the city engineer and
fire marshal.
o
"* O w C\J§u. O ™z ° 5 Io fc =! i
£ -o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15u; • < -
s|ig' 16
1 t oO?
< o -17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
96. The developer shall enter into secured agreements for the
installation and removal of the electronic gates at El
Bosque Avenue and Corte Carolina to the satisfaction of the
city engineer and city attorney pursuant to the
requirements of the master plan and these conditions of
approval.
97. Prior to final map approval the developer shall deposit
cash in and amount determined by the city engineer as
necessary to fund the removal of the emergency access gates
installed at the project boundaries at Corte Carolina and
El Bosque Avenue and to fund any necessary restoration of
the area. Prior to final map the developer shall make
arrangements for a program to the satisfaction of the
planning director to include a notice to all prospective
purchasers in the development that the project may be
subject to additional traffic from the opening of the two
gated street connections. A note to that effect shall be
placed on the final map and notice shall be included in the
deeds for the sale of each individual lot.
98. Within 180 days from the date of the Arroyo La Costa
Tentative Map approval, (the effective date of this
resolution)/ a financial guarantee acceptable to the City
Council for construction of Rancho Santa Fe Road
improvements must be provided by the Developer. Unless the
guarantee is approved by the City Council within the 180
day period, all processing on the Arroyo La Costa Final Map
will cease until such time as it is approved. The time
limit may be extended at the discretion of the City
Council.
99. Olivenhain Road shall be improved to a four-lane interim
roadway from El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road
including any necessary offsite transition. The
developer/owner may be eligible for partial reimbursement
from adjacent property owners. A reimbursement agreement
must be approved by the city prior to approval of the final
map for this phase.
100. Exhibit "U-U" shall be amended to show placement of the
solid village wall on the south side of proposed Street N-
N, which is existing calle Barcelona and hereafter called
Calle Barcelona, next to Santa Fe Ridge, as follows:
1. The wall on the east side of Corte Carolina shall be
placed within the public right-of-way of Calle
Barcelona and Corte Carolina, or on private property
if applicable. The wall shall be extended from Calle
Barcelona south along Corte Carolina to a point
approximately one-half of the side lot distance of
2920 Via Ipanema.
2. For those portions of the wall along Calle Barcelona
and located west of Corte Carolina, different
conditions shall apply along the adjacent homes of
Q< §>
. 1 1 s
T g ° §
0" u. CD <"
1^15 5 > O. u Q U-VINCENT FITY ATTORNEY -1200 CARLSBACARLSBAD, CALIO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Illl
Illl
Illl
Illl
Illl
Illl
Illl
Illl
Santa Fe Ridge:
a. 2912 Corte Jardin: the wall shall be entirely
within the public right-of-way of Calle
Barcelona and Corte Carolina; the wall shall be
extended from Calle Barcelona south along Corte
Carolina to a point approximately one-half of
the side lot distance of 2912 Corte Jardin.
b. 2910 Corte Jardin: the wall shall be located
both within the public right-of-way and on 2910
Corte Jardin.
c. 2908 Corte Jardin: the wall shall be located
entirely on 2908 Corte Jardin.
d. 2906 Corte Jardin: the wall shall be located
entirely on 2906 Corte Jardin. The wall shall
further extend southwest to the property line
between 2906 Corte Jardin and 2904 Corte Jardin
at the discretion of the owner of 2906 Corte
Jardin.
All portions of the wall within the public right-of-way are
subject to the applicant obtaining a right-of-way
encroachment permit from the City. Prior to constructing
any portion of the wall within private property, the
applicant and the property owner must enter into an
agreement providing for the wall's construction and
maintenance. All structural maintenance shall be the
responsibility of the Arroyo La Costa Homeowners'
Association. All other maintenance, for example, periodic
painting, shall be shared, with the Arroyo La Costa
Homeowners' Association maintaining those portions of the
wall facing Arroyo La Costa, and individual Santa Fe Ridge
property owners agreeing with the City and maintaining
those portions of the wall facing their properties. Final
plans for all wall construction are subject to approval of
the planning director.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12o
§ 1 | 13
"" O w °o" IL o * 14
Q 0 < < IH
Sf: gi
CO ri O -1C. u Q LL 13u. ' < 3
L_ > CO <5 UJ t/5 Ugi = o 16
2 O S <ItSS
> § § 17
o
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
4th day of September , 1990. by the following vote.
to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Larson and Mamaux
NOES: Council Member Pettine ./^
ABSENT: Council Me*baf KulofJ5.n /j //
1 ///MS // /S
1 /HfrflUi? Ll^^L^f^L/^^etAUDE £. Llfwis, Hay or
ATTEST:
/] /O
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ/ City^lerk
(SEAL)
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST
OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD,
AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
CASE NO: PUD 88-4
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
ode, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
old duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to Planned Unit Development; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3033, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that Planned Unit Development
(PUD 88-4) is hereby approved.
special
meeting of
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
: LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City dlerk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO.90-260
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF
OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE
ROAD.
CASE NO: HDP 88-8
APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Hillside Development Permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3034, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that Hillside Development
Permit (HDP 88-8) is hereby approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
specialPASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a i2S<p£Bfc- meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
3lst day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cl/erk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-261
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN NO. SDP 89-18 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD,
AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
CASE NO: SDP 89-18
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
ode, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
old duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to SDP 89-18.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3035, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that Site Development Plan (SDP
89-18) is hereby approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
special
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a *®pSSir meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clterk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-262
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR A FLOODPLAIN ENCROACHMENT FOR
PROPERTY WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT 88-3, ARROYO LA
COSTA.
CASE NO: SUP 89-3
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Special Use Permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3036, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that Special Use Permit (SUP
89-3) is hereby approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
specialPASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a £&jmffi& meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City
(SEAL)
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamaux
Council Member Pettine
None
WIS, Mayor
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EL CAMINO
REAL SCENIC CORRIDOR ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF
OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE
ROAD.
CASE NO: SUP 90-8
APPLICANT; ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission did, on May 16 and June 6, 1990,
old duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Special Use Permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3037, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the
City Council in this matter and that Special Use Permit
(SUP 90-8) is hereby approved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
special
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a S5fSplHX»K meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
31st day of July , 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson and Mamoux
NOES: Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: None
1AUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cl/erk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
9m
52- mug
KUCb geng 0;::
z>y2 0,ga: mGnQ
,>-a< 5Z-J ouufi zo3s >!is? 60 >2%
no<<
U 8x7
wcno
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 01
ORDINANCE NO. NS-123 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIIJ OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR A MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENT, MPA-149(0), ARROYO IA COSTA, ON
PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AND GENERALLY SOUTH OF PAlLOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD. APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA CASE NO. : MPA-149 (0)
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council of :the City of Carls
California, has reviewed and considered a Master Plan for fu
development of the site; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with
requirements of law the City Council has determined that the pu
interest indicates that said plan be approved; and
WHEREAS, a formal application for amendment has :
submitted by the property owner pursuant to the Carlsbad Munic
Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carl
does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Ordinance No. 9676, amending the adopte
Costa Master Plan, MP-149, on file with the City Clerk
incorporated by reference herein is hereby revised to remove
property subject to MP 88-1 for Arroyo La Costa and all develop]
of such property shall conform to that p:Lan, and MPA-149 (0)
hereby approved.
SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of
Planning Commission in Planning Commissicln Resolution No. :
shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the (
Council with the addition of the following condition:
9.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 0 um
m> mu? $ZCb 13 -,<:"E
5>dZ l=-c - O'o
>-m<
3uum 14 ow
>0<4
ou. 15 s <J
,wm0 ZJ $$$ 16
>Eum
<?% UEY 17
-0 u 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
"1. All development remaining in MP-149 and MP-149 conditioned that the developer form an assessment district Me
Roos Community Facilities District,or provide another financ
mechanism acceptable to the City Council for the Rancho Santa
Road improvements. 11
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thi
days after its adoption, and the City Clerk. shall certify to
adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at 1~
once in the Carlsbad Journal within .fifteen days after
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of
Carlsbad City Council on the 31st day of . July , 15
and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 4th day of September
1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Council Members Lewis, Larson,and Mamaux
NOES : Council Member Pettine
ABSENT : Council Member Kulchin
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
I
~ ATTEST:
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 I
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
e 0
ORDINANCE NO. NS-124 -
AN ORDINANCE OF.THE CITY COTJNCIIJ OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MASTER PLAN
88-1, ARROYO LA COSTA, A MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENIWIN ROAD, AND
WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: MP 88-1
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Califorr
does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsba
California, has reviewed and considered a Master Plan for futL
development of the site; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with t
requirements of law the City Council has determined that t
public interest indicates that said plan he approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Coun.ci1 of the City
Carlsbad does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: The Arroyo La Costa Master Plan, MP 88
dated May 16, 1990 on file with the P:Lanning Director a
incorporated by reference herein, is appro'ved. The Master PI
shall constitute the zoning for this; property and a
development of the property shall conform to the plan.
SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of t
Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution 3029 sha
also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Counci
with the addition of the following conditions:
"1. Upon completion of the Calle Barcelona improvements from El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road to full secondary arterial standards, the emergency access gates installed at the project
boundaries at Corte Carolina and El Bosque Avenue are
to be removed and the road opened for full public
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ZU% yrz ,roc& ,808
OLLV S>S ooea
k"sE ?Gag LL 'el
$Urn0 >ma
YuEd ZOSQ, +81? E25
Go
21
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 e
access. Prior to removal of the gates and opening the road, the City Council shall hold a duly noticed public hearing to take public comments on the issue and to take any action deemed appropriate by the City Council.
2. This master plan for Arroyo La Costa is
conditioned on the developer's formation of an
assessment district, Mello Roos Community Facilities District, or on the provision of alnother financing mechanism acceptable to the City Council for the Rancho Santa Fe Road improvements.n
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effect
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall cert.
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be publid
at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days afl
its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of 1
Carlsbad City Council on the 31st day of July, 1990, i
thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C:
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 4th day of SePtember
1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Council Members Lewis, Larson and Mamaux
NOES : Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin
rL
EWIS, Mayor ATTEST:
-2-
I
I1 m 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
ORDINANCE NO. NS-125-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF
THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CI:-IANGE, ZC 88-
3, ARROYO LA COSTA, FROM R-1-7500 TO PC ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF
RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA CASE NO. : ZC 88-3
7
8
9
10
11
12
00,
Y?? 13 iaag -uus an 3031 constitutes the findings and conditions of the City Cour OLum 14 so45
Ocg'I: >-A=
mGng 15 with the addition of the following:
li '4-1
8 i? d 6 j6 property owner form an assessment district or Mello Roos Commur
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal
is amended by the amendment of a zoning map as shown on the
marked X-3, attached hereto and made a part: hereof.
SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of
swa Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolul
st;%S
Facilities District or provide alternative financing acceptablc q8y
Ill. This rezone is subject to the condition that
days after its adoption, and the City C1er:k shall certify to 19
the City Council for the improvement of Rancho Santa Fe R0ad.I' p2 l7
adoption. 22
once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after 21
ZOSS
Go 18 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thi
2o adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at 1c
23 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of
*4 1) Carlsbad City Council on the 31st day of JUlY I 19
25
26
and thereafter
27 1
28
- U SUJF
<.rOg:
!$if& 0;p 4034
2ceg muou.
6Z-J
zoss q8y c?% Go
m
w>
u. 'Q? +>m< wmv
oaud
I'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14 13 I
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 4)
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 4th day of September
1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Larson and Mamaux
NOES : Council Member Pettine
ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
f = Mayor
ATTEST :
dM& 4r-5- ALE'I'HA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clyrk
P. .-71) EXHIBIT
AREA OF CHANGE
n
r
m >
EXISTING ZONING
I
I I
PROP0
AREA OF CHAINGE
n m
r D
1
SED ZONING City of Cadsbad
I
ARROYO LA COSTA zc 88-3
A
EXHIBIT 3
JULY 16, 1990
TO: RAYMOND PATCHETT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: Planning Director
ISSUES, ARROYO LA COSTA MASTER PLAN
During review of the proposed Arroyo La Costa project several
issues arose. Most of these have been resolved, however, the
following still remain as concerns to citizens in the
surrounding neighborhoods:
40' Open Space
As a condition of the Santa Fe Glens project located adjacent
to the northeast corner of Arroyo La Costa, the applicant on
that project was required to make an irrevocable offer of
dedication for a 40' easement along the south side of Santa Fe
Glens. This offer was never accepted by the City. The
developer for Arroyo La Costa originally proposed to utilize
the 40' easement as rear yards for the new development;
however, agreement was subsequently reached to preserve this
area as open space, maintain fencing on both sides of the
easement, and include a trail connection to Rancho Santa Fe
Road for both existing and future development.
Location of Junior High School
Residents of the Rancho del Ponderosa development object to the
proposed location of the junior high school situated at the
bottom of an existing 40' slope to the north of their
development. They expressed concern regarding light and noise
impacts as well as a potential lowering of property values.
Because this site was selected by the San Dieguito High School
District, the applicant is not able to mitigate these issues
entirely. The applicant has offered to install landscaping and
irrigation on the slope belonging to the existing property
owners. This would be done immediately and maintained by the
developer for a minimum of one year so that substantial growth
could occur before the school is constructed. This is still an
unresolved issue with the property owners from Rancho del
Ponderosa.
Environmental Impact Report
The EIR for this project began in 1988. During the review
period, a number of inaccuracies and inconsistencies were
discovered in the text. For example, some of the technical
reports indicated insignificant impacts, however the summaries
concluded that they were significant. At that time, the
consultant was released from his contract and another firm,
Ponseggi & Associates, was hired to revise the document in
compliance with state and local requirements.
RAYMOND PATCHETT, CITY MANAGER
JULY 16, 1990
PAGE 2
The final EIR is much different than the draft because it has
been revised to reflect the numerous comments made during the
review period. The final EIR, has been made available at the
public library so that all citizens could review the changes
that were made.
At the Planning Commission meeting there were only minor
comments (other than traffic) made regarding environmental
impacts. As previously stated, these impacts have all been
reduced to a level of insignificance.
Santa Fe Ridge Wall
Half width improvements for Calle Barcelona are currently
existing adjacent to the north of the Santa Fe Ridge
development. For sound attenuation and safety protection a
solid wall was required along the south side of proposed Street
N-N next to Santa Fe Ridge. Because Calle Barcelona was
realigned, the developer believes this wall is no longer
necessary. The property owners to the south are not in
agreement on whether they want a block wall, a stucco wall, or
the existing wood fences. As of July 17, 1990, this issue is
not resolved and the solid wall remains as a condition of
exhibit "U - U".
Traffic
Residents from surrounding neighborhoods expressed objections
to four proposed street connections from Arroyo La Costa to
existing neighborhoods. A detailed discussion of this issue is
included in a memorandum, dated July 2, 1990 from the
Transportation Consultant to the Planning Director. This
memorandum is attached to the agenda bill as exhibit 4.
arb
EXHIBIT 4
CITY MEMO
DATE: July 2, 1990
TO: MICHAEL HOLZMILLER, Planning Director
FROM: Marty Bouman, Transportation Planning Consultant
SUBJECT: Arroyo La Costa Traffic Circulation
Issue
Traffic circulation is one of the few remaining Arroyo La Costa issues on which some citizens
disagree with the Planning Commission and staff. Specifically, there are objections to four street
connections from Arroyo La Costa into existing neighborhoods, despite the fact that such
connections were planned and constructed as part of the original neighborhoods. These include:
1. Via - Palenque Way into Spanish Village
2. Via - Segovia Way into La Costa South, Unit 4
* 3. Via - Corte Carolina into Santa Fe Ridge
* 4. Via - El Bosque into Rancho Ponderosa
*Most concern expressed here
The primary reasons expressed by citizens who object to the connections are based on the amount
of traffic to be generated on the connecting street system, and the perceived accident risk resulting
therefrom. Claims have been made that there will be heavy, fast and reckless traffic, endangering
children who have been accustomed to relatively quiet, sometimes dead-end streets. There is also
a fear that drivers from both old and new neighborhoods will form new travel patterns, each
through the other's neighborhood, without regard for courtesy and safety.
Background
In the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, a classification system is utilized which is
basic and fundamental to practically all governmental agencies. At the top are freeways, designed
to carry high speed traffic over long distances with practically no side-friction. At the bottom are
local streets, designed to provide direct access to residences, business or industry. In between is the
"distribution system". Collector streets "collect" traffic from the local streets and deliver it to three
kinds of arterial streets, each with increasingly higher standards, each functioning to distribute
traffic into a regional arterial network. While the total system rarely works perfectly, the concept
is sound and has universal acceptance.
The proposed street configuration for Arroyo La Costa, including the connections into adjacent
neighborhoods, was not designed just for the benefit of future Arroyo La Costa residents, but for
all residents of the area, including those who are now voicing objections. It conforms to the street
hierarchy concept and provides all of the area residents with the traffic distribution system they
need and are entitled to; namely, the ability to travel to and from their homes in any direction over
the shortest and safest possible route.
Arroyo La Costa Traffic Circulation
Page 2
Discussion
The basis for staffs determination on the through street connections relates to four specific areas.
These include the following areas which are individually discussed below.
1. Neighborhood Compatibility
2. City Cul-de-sac Policy
3. Emergency Access
4. Street Widths
5. Social Interaction
6. Travel Distances
1. Neighborhood Compatibility
Under some circumstances it is desirable to separate or isolate one neighborhood from another,
usually when there are conflicting land uses. As an example, there is no great harm in allowing
industrial traffic on commercial streets or vice versa, but sound transportation planning would never
encourage commercial/industrial traffic on residential streets.
In the case at hand, there is total compatibility between old and new residential neighborhoods.
All traffic will be residential-generated. Without doubt, some traffic from "old" will utilize streets
in "new", and vice versa. Those drivers will simply be taking advantage of the best reasonable route
- a service they expect as taxpayers. The amount of such "induced" traffic is simply impossible to
predict. However, there is no reason to think that traffic on any street will exceed the capacity of
a local street (up to 5,000 vehicles daily). The highest "collector route" might reach 1200 vehicles
daily.
Some residents have expressed a fear that there will be regional "shortcut traffic" from completely
outside Rancho del Ponderosa, Santa Fe Ridge, or Arroyo La Costa, looking for ways to bypass
traffic signals on Rancho Santa Fe Road, Olivenhain Road, or El Camino Real. However, the street
layouts in Rancho del Ponderosa, Santa Fe Ridge, and Arroyo La Costa have been deliberately
designed to discourage that. There will be numerous sharp turns, stop signs, and parked cars.
Would-be "short-cutters" would lose time rather than gain it.
2. City Cul-de-sac Policy
To the best of its ability City staff has, over the years, applied a policy dealing with the length of
street and number of homes that may be served by a single street entry, or a single cul-de-sac.
There is sound reason for such a policy. As the number of homes served by a single entry increases,
so does traffic generation and so does the risk of an incident requiring emergency access (to be
discussed later).
Arroyo La Costa Traffic Circulation
Page 3
As for traffic generation, let us use Arroyo La Costa Phase I (in the southwest comer) as an
example. This phase includes 117 homes. These homes will generate about 1200 daily one-way
auto trips (in and out). With just the single access off of Calle Barcelona, virtually all 1200 of
those vehicles would have to pass through the "entry throat", a 500 foot length of street south of
Calle Barcelona. Logically there should be another option; in this case, the opportunity for some
of that traffic to use El Bosque, Los Pinos, etc. to reach Olivenhain Road.
This traffic is just what Rancho del Ponderosa residents object to. Yet, that is the very reason El
Bosque was dead-ended (without cul-de-sac) originally. It is the same good transportation planning
that Rancho del Ponderosa and Santa Fe Ridge residents enjoy with three access points into their
area off of Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road, all interconnecting within their two
subdivisions to provide excellent circulation.
3. Emergency Access
As the size of a dead-end area increases, two risks associated with emergency access become
important. First, the potential for an emergency to occur increases simply as a matter of exposure.
The more homes, the more people, the more cars, the greater the potential for fire, accident, and
serious injury or illness. In such an event, seconds may make the difference between life and death.
Second, sound emergency planning dictates that every residential area have more than one street
access into the area. There is always the possibility that a single entry point may be blocked by an
accident, toxic spill, fire, or natural disaster. In such an event, not only would emergency
equipment be denied access, but residents, too, would be unable to get to or leave their homes.
Residents have suggested that the emergency problem be solved with "crash gates" that will allow
only authorized emergency vehicles to pass. The term "crash gate" is a misnomer. Fire, police, or
ambulance vehicles will not "crash" physical barriers because of the risk of injury and damage. As
an alternative, one possibility is a gate which may be opened by key, radio, or magnetic card.
However, these have not always been reliable due to malfunction or vandalism. Again, valuable
life or death time may be lost.
With the installation of any sort of physical barrier, one scenario can be positively predicted: If the
barrier is built so that an emergency vehicle can get through, the public, seeking a reasonable travel
route, will also force its way through either by vandalism, deliberate destruction, or willful
trespassing. Not only would City emergency forces be confronted with unreasonable delay, they
would take on a hopeless enforcement problem as well.
Finally, there should be an awareness that an emergency does not always involve a "911" red light
and siren response. Citizens often respond to "emergencies" by themselves. A phone call to a
parent that a child has been injured at school is an "emergency". A call that a loved one has been
hospitalized is an "emergency". A neighborhood brush fire requiring a "garden hose brigade" is an
"emergency". When those events occur, an extra mile of travel requiring ten minutes is like an
eternity. The difference may be tragic.
Arroyo La Costa Traffic Circulation
Page 4
4. Street Widths
It has been argued that a portion of the "El Bosque Route", specifically Los Pinos Drive between El
Bosque and La Macarena Drive is only 32 feet wide from curb to curb, as opposed to a
recommended residential street width of 36 to 40 feet. However, such a width is not uncommon
for a "single-loaded" street with homes and a small neighborhood park fronting on one side of the
street only. The other side of the street faces only residential side yards. It has not been necessary
to prohibit parking on that side but if it were done, the street is of adequate width and would
probably be safer than other streets because of the shorter crossing distance and improved visibility.
5. Social Interaction
Arroyo La Costa will have an Elementary School, a Junior High School and a Recreation/Child Care
Center. Perhaps not initially, but surely in the future these facilities will serve residents in existing
neighborhoods to the north and south. There is no single public function that creates more social
interaction, and more need for efficient transportation than schools. Friendships and "dear
neighbors" will evolve. Children will spend the night at homes of school chums, neighbors will
babysit for each other, there will be school plays, open houses, graduation ceremonies, carnivals,
teachers conferences, Little League and Youth Soccer games, Field Days, barbecues, Father-Son and
Mother-Daughter parties, etc., etc; ~ the list is near endless. And virtually all the trips in
connection therewith will be made in the family car.
6. Travel Distances
If the El Bosque and Corte Carolina connections are not made, it is believed that Rancho del
Ponderosa and Sante Fe Ridge residents will experience the greatest inconvenience in being denied
access to Calle Barcelona. It serves as the sole access to the schools and recreation/day care center,
as well as being the secondary arterial which distributes traffic to the regional highway network.
The attached chart of distance comparisons shows the difference in travel distances and traffic
controls between the "short way" and the "long way". Although this has been explained to Rancho
del Ponderosa and Santa Fe Ridge residents, the position of those appearing before the Planning
Commission varied from "Our children won't attend those schools", to "We will walk", to "We don't
mind driving the extra miles".
In my opinion, none of those attitudes are realistic. If indeed all those trips are made "the long
way", it means an extra round-trip difference of 1.5 to 2 miles through two or three major
signalized intersections. It will simply add more cars traveling more miles on an overloaded arterial
system — the very thing we should try to prevent.
Arroyo La Costa Traffic Circulation
Page 5
CONCLUSION
City Traffic Engineer Bob Johnson and I have both been urged by Rancho del Ponderosa and Santa
Fe Ridge residents to change our position by recommending that the streets remain closed, or be
provided with "crash gates". We cannot, in good professional conscience, do that. This is not a
matter of emergency access, it is one of good transportation design and service. These street
connections are needed and we would be performing a disservice to our citizens if we block them,
in whole or in part.
MB:rvo
ARROYO LA COSTA DISTANCE COMPARISONS
(One-Way Travel Distance)
From El Bosque & Los Pinos
To Elementary School
Jr. High School
Day Care/Rec. Center
From Sombrosa & Corte Carolina
To Elementary School
Jr. High School
Day Care/Rec. Center
FEET
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
3,870
4,360
4,690
6,430
3,020
2,690
Around
Via
Olivenhain
El Camino Real
Calle Barcelona
7,870
8,360
8,690
11,220
11,710
12,040
MILES
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
0.73
0.83
0.89
1.22
0.57
0.51
Around
Via
Olivenhain
El Camino Real
Calle Barcelona
1.49
1.58
1.65
2.13
2.22
2.28
DIFFERENCE
Feet
4..000
4,000
4,000
4,790
8,690
9,350
Miles
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.91
1.65
1.77
TRAFFIC CONTROLS
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
Around
Via
Olivenhain
El Camino Real
Calle Barcelona
3 Traf Signals
3 Traf Signals
3 Traf Signals
4 Traf Signals
4 Traf Signals
4 Traf Signals
From Sombrosa & Corte Carolina
To Elementary School
Jr. High School
Day Care/Rec. Center
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
6,430
3,020
2,690
Around
Via
Rancho Santa Fe,
Calle Barcelona
11,300
7,890
7,560
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
1.22
0.57
0.51
Around
Via
Rancho Santa Fe,
Calle Barcelona
2.14
1.49
1.43
Feet
4,870
4,870
4,870
Miles
0.92
0.92
0.92
Direct
Via
Arroyo La
Costa
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
1 Blvd Stop
Around
Via
Rancho Santa Fe,
Calle Barcelona
2 Traf Signals
2 Traf Signals
2 Traf Signals
EXHIBIT 5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3039
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
3 REPORT, EIR 86-2, FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING 1,076 SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLINGS, A RECREATION/DAYCARE CENTER, 2 SCHOOL SITES
4 AND 2 POTENTIAL CHURCH SITES ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EL
CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO
5 SANTA FE ROAD IN THE PC ZONE AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: EIR 86-2
7
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
8
Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the City of
9 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map No. 848, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of said county on June 27, 1898 known as
10 Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11,
255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
., n has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tide 21 of the
14 Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
15 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on the
6th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
17 request; and
18 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20
relating to the Master Plan and;
21
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
23 A) That the FOREGOING recitations are true and correct.
24 B) That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 86-2 will be amended to include the
comments and documents of those testifying at the public hearing and responses thereto
25 hereby found to be in good faith and reason by incorporating a copy of the minutes of
said public hearings into the report.
26
C) That the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Environmental Impact
27
28
Report EIR 86-2 has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, and the provisions of Title 19
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the Planning Commission has reviewed,
2 considered and evaluated the information contained in the report.
3 D) That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 86-2 as so amended and evaluated, and
attached errata sheets dated May 16, 1990 are recommended for acceptance and
4 certification as the final Environmental Impact Report and that the final Environmental
Impact Report as recommended is adequate and provides reasonable information on the
project and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto, including no project.
E) That each and every significant environmental impact identified in the Environmental
Impact Report would be overruled or counterbalanced by changes or alteration in the
project which would mitigate against said adverse impacts or, in certain circumstances,
8 that mitigation of such adverse impacts would not be feasible under the circumstances
and under the economic and social needs objectives and concerns in providing the
9 improvements if the project were to be approved, would be included as conditions of
approval of the project.
Conditions:
1. Refer to CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 for all conditions, mitigation measures, and
monitoring programs applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
13 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
14
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
15
to wit:16
_„ AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Marcus,
McFadden, Holmes & Hall.
18 NOES: None.
19 ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
20 ABSTAIN: None.
21
22
2, SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
24 ATTEST:
25
26 MICHAEL J. HbLZMttLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3039 -2-
May 16, 1990
ARROYO LA COSTA FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
ERRATA
In response to comments received during the public review period
for the Draft EIR numerous revisions and clarifications were made
to the Final EIR. The Final EIR was prepared by a different
consulting firm which was retained by the City after the public
review period for the Draft EIR was over.
During the preparation of the Final EIR, portions of the Project
Summary Matrix pages were not revised to accurately reflect the
conclusions of the Environmental Analysis in the Final EIR.
Portions of the matrix have been revised to reflect the conclusions
of the Final EIR. Revised pages are labeled "revised". All
corrections to the matrix are under the "level of significance"
column except for page xix where the scope of impact for the loss
of habitat was mistakenly identified as cumulative as well as
project specific. There have been no changes to the Environmental
Analysis in the Final EIR or to the conclusions of that analysis.
The only changes on the attached pages pertain to items where the
summary did not accurately reflect the Final EIR document. No
other changes to the matrix have been made.
Executive Summary Page xiii has been revised to correct a
typographic error in the number of units that could be built under
the Master Plan Alternative.
Page 254 of the Final EIR has been revised to correct a
typographical error in the second paragraph changing "elementary"
to "secondary".
Environmental Summary Pages 342 through 344 have been revised to
reflect the conclusions in the Environmental Analysis section of
the Final EIR. Prior to this correction, potential impacts that
can mitigated were incorrectly included in the section that
discusses impacts that cannot be mitigated.
All corrected pages follow. No changes to the Environmental
Analysis in the Final EIR have been made. The only changes are to
the summary pages that are attached and typographical corrections
discussed above.
In addition, three comment letters from the public were not
responded to in the Response to Comments. Responses to those three
letters are attached.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3049
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO
3 THE LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE
AREA KNOWN AS LA COSTA SOUTHWEST.
4 APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: MP 149CO")
5
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of June, 1990, hold a6
17 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
8 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
9 arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
10 considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
•^ relating to the Negative Declaration.
12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
13 follows:
14
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
15
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
16 hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negative Declaration according to
Exhibit "ND", dated February 8, 1990, and "PII", dated January 10, 1990, and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program outlined in Appendix "P" attached hereto and made a part
, g hereof, based on the following findings:
19 Findings:
20 1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant impact on the environment provided that mitigating conditions of approval are
21 complied with.
P?*" 2. The proposed project only deletes references to the area known as La Costa Southwest,
however this does not change the present or planned land uses of the remaining land
area. The proposed amendment will allow for more in-depth analysis to occur on specific
24 area within the overall Master Plan area. A mitigation measure has been included in this
document to ensure that when these areas are developed they comply with current City
25 policies and standards. This mitigation measure requires that a Master Plan and
environmental documentation will be approved prior to the approval of any devleopment
26 permits in the Northwest or Southeast areas of the La Costa Master Plan.
27
28
1 3. The proposal will not affect any transportation systems in the vicinity. The proposal will
2 not generate additional systems in the vicinity. The proposal will not generate additional
vehicular trips over that allowable under the Local Facilities Management Plan Zones.
3 Traffic impact analysis will be conducted at an appropriate time in the future. Since the
proposal is a change in the text and map boundaries, it will not affect parking facilities,
transportation systems or create traffic hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians.
4. The proposal will not affect the public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services. The site is located in Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12. Services will be provided
through the implementation of the zone plans.
7
Conditions:
8
Prior to the approval of any development permits in the Northwest or Southeast areas of
9 the La Costa Master Plan, a Master Plan and environmental documentation shall be
approved for each area. Exempt from this provision are the projects listed below which
are either pending or approved. Should any pending project be withdrawn or denied, the
_ _ property will lose its exempt status.
12 CASE NUMBER CASE NAME STATUS
13 SDP 86-3 Rancho La Costa Plaza APPROVED
CT 86-5 May Properties WITHDRAWN
14 CT 85-15 Park View West APPROVED
CT 85-21 Park View East APPROVED
15 CT 85-9 Vista Santa Fe APPROVED
CT 89-33 Tienda de la Esquina PENDING
16 CT 90-4 Tierra Santa Fe PENDING
CT 89-18 Rancho Verde PENDING
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PC RESO NO. 3049 -2-
28
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Marcus,
McFadden, Holmes & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3049 -3-
28
City of Carlsbad
Department
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Area east of El Camino Real, north of Olivenhain
Road, west of Rancho Santa Fe Road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to La Costa Master Plan (149(N)) deleting
references to the area known as La Costa Southwest.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a
result of said review, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will
not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from
the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department
within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: February 8, 1990
CASE NO: MP-149(O)
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH DATE: February 8, 1990
MICHAEL J. HOL
Planning Director
AML:af
2O75 Las Palrnas Drive Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 (619) 438-1 161
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PQPM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. MP-149fO^
DATE: JANUARY 10. 1990
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: LA COSTA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT
2. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD. CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED:
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AMENDMENT TO LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO ELIMINATE ALL
REFERENCES TO THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the
'ity conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project
may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact
Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This
checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might
be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no
substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a
significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be
checked to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial
evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on
the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration
however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects
can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist
under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures
appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION.
Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts
which would otherwise be determined significant.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(slg) (insig)
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features? X_
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site? X_
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? X.
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality? X_
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? X_
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? X_
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply? X_
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources? X_
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object? X_
-2-
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WI , THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(sig) (Tnsig)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X_
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? X_
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? X_
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(sig) (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? I
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? K_
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? X_
20. Increase existing noise levels? X_
21. Produce new light or glare? X_
-3-
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
W. j THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO(sig) (insig)
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? }
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
27. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
2r Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing? X_
25. Generate substantial additional traffic? X
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking? X_
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? X.
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans? X_
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view? X_
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities? X_
-4-
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
YES YES NO(sig) finsig)
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) X_
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.) X_
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X_
-5-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposal is to amend the La Costa Master Plan (LCMP) by eliminating all
aferences to the southwest portion of the Master Plan. This proposal will
remove all text regarding the southwest section and change the boundaries
of the overall Master Plan accordingly.
The southwest section will be referred to as Arroyo La Costa. This area
will be closely analyzed under a separate Master Plan and associated
Environmental Impact Report.
The remainder of the LCMP will be analyzed in further detail at some future
date, under a separate Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report.
Due to the nature of the proposal and its affect upon the area, the proposal
will not significantly affect the environment.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Earth - The proposal is a change in the text and map boundaries of the La
Costa Master Plan. Geotechnical feasibility evaluation will be conducted
at a future date. An in depth analysis will occur under a separate Master
Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) at the appropriate
time. The proposal will have no impact to earth stability, topography
erosion, deposition or natural resources.
Air - The proposal will not create objectional odors or produce emissions
that will affect the ambient air quality. The proposal is a change in text
and map boundaries, therefore, it will not affect the air quality.
Water - The proposed text change and map revisions will not authorize any
development that could affect the quality or the demand for water. These
issues will be addressed at a future date when detailed development
proposals are analyzed.
Natural Resources - The proposal will not affect on any natural resources.
Previous studies have indicated that there are no natural resources in the
vicinity.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Plant and Animal Life - Since the proposal is a change in text and map
boundaries, it will not alter or affect any biological resources. At the
appropriate time an EIR will be prepared which will specifically address
agriculture, plants, microflora and any animals (birds, land animals, water
animals and insects).
Agriculture - The proposal will not affect any agriculturally designated
land.
-6-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
Use - The change in text and map boundaries will not change the present
or planned land uses of the area. It will, however, allow for more in depth
analysis to occur on specific areas within the overall Master Plan area.
A mitigation measure has been included in this document to ensure that when
these areas are developed they comply with current City policies and
standards. This mitigation measure requires that a Master Plan and
environmental documentation wiil be approved prior to the approval of any
development permits in the Northwest or Southeast areas of the La Costa
Mater Plan.
Utilities - The proposal will not affect the public utilities, schools,
police, fire, emergency or other public services. The site is located in
Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12. Services will be provided through the
implementation of the zone plans.
Noise - An acoustical analysis will be prepared at a future date to ensure
that any projects conform to the current standards at the time of
development. The current proposal has no affect on the site at this time.
Human Health - The proposal will not involve the use of explosive or
hazardous materials.
Light and Glare - The proposal will have no affect on the amount of light
and glare in the vicinity. This issue will be addressed at a future date
with the appropriate EIR.
Housing - The proposal will not alter the density of human population or
affect housing demand more than that which has been approved under the
overall La Costa Master Plan.
Transportation/Circulation - The proposal will not affect any transportation
systems in the vicinity. The proposal will not generate additional
vehicular trips over that allowable under the Local Facilities Management
Plan zones. Traffic impact analysis will be conducted at an appropriate
time in the future. Since the proposal is a change in the text and map
boundaries, it will not affect parking facilities, transportation systems
or create traffic hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians.
Fuel and Energy - Since the proposal is a change in text and map boundaries
only, it has no affect on fuel and energy consumption.
Archeoloaical/Historical/Paleontological - The proposal will not affect any
archeological, historical or paleontological sites. Since the proposal will
only affect the text and map boundaries, the above issues will be addressed
at the appropriate time in the future.
Aesthetics/Recreation - The proposal will not affect the site aesthetically
or affect the quality or quantity of recreational opportunities. These
issues will be addressed at a future date.
-7-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternative scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate
sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) This project is the first phase of an overall review and revision
of the La Costa Master Plan. The northwest and southeast portion
of the Master Plan will be reviewed at some future date.
b) This project is a revision to the approved La Costa Master Plan
to eliminate any reference to the southwest portion of the overall
Master Plan. Site design is not a part of this project. Alternate
site designs will be addressed at a future date under a new Master
Plan and environmental studies.
c) The scale of the project has been determined by the original
Master Plan. The La Costa Master Plan was divided into three
sections: Northwest, southeast and southwest. The project will
allow for a more detailed analysis of the southwest section.
d) This project does not address the uses of the site. It merely
allow for the elimination of all references to the southwest
from the overall Master Plan. Alternate uses for the site will
be addressed at a future date under a new Master Plan and
environmental studies.
e) The proposed Master Plan Amendment does not authorize any
development. It merely deletes any reference tothe southwest
portion of the La Costa Master Plan.
f) The site of the project has been determined by the La Costa
Master Plan. The project will not change the boundaries of the
southwest section but will remove any reference to the
southwest from the overall Master Plan.
g) The no project alternative would leave the existing La Costa
Master Plan in existence for all areas of La Costa. The existing
La Costa Master Plan does not comply with current City ordinances
and policies. The deletion of the southwest area from the La
Costa Master Plan is the first step in bringing this Master Plan
into conformance with current ordinances and standards.
-9-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
_ _ i find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
.1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Signature-/
Date Planning Director
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
Prior to the approval of any development permits in the Northwest or
Southeast areas of the La Costa Master Plan, a Master Plan and environmental
documentation shall be approved for each area. Exempt from this provision
are the projects listed below which are either pending or approved. Should
any pending project be withdrawn or denied, the property will lose its
exempt status.
-10-
CASE NUMBER
SDP 86-3
JT 86-5
CT 85-15
CT 85-21
CT 85-9
CT 89-33
CT §0-14
CT 89-18
CASE NAME
Rancho La Costa Plaza
May Properties
Park View West
Park View East
Vista Santa Fe
Tienda de La Esquina
Tierra Santa Fe
Rancho Verde
APN
223-060-28,29
223-060-31,32
223-060-40
223-060-50,51
255-031-18
255-031-20
255-031-22,23
264-220-71
STATUS
APPROVED
WITHDRAWN
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
PENDING
PENDING
PENDING
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
AML:af
-11-
PROJECT NAME: La Costa Master Plan Amendment FILE NUMBERS: MP 149(0)
APPROVAL DATE:CONDITIONAL NEC. DEC.:
The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project in
order to mitigate identified environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for
each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the
City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Prior to the approval of any development
permits in the Northwest or Southeast
of the La Costa Master Plan, a Master
Plan and environmental documentation shall
be approved for each area. Exempt from this
provision are the projects listed below which
are either pending or approved. Should any
pending project be withdrawn or denied, the
property will lose its exempt status.
Planning Future environmental review
required for subsequent areas _-
master plans z
•»_.
CASE NUMBER
SDP 86-3
CT 86-5
CT 85-15
CT 85-21
CT 85-9
CT 89-33
CT 90-4
CT 89-18
CASE NAME
Rancho La Costa Plaza
May Properties
Park View West
Park View East
Vista Santa Fe
Tienda de la Esquina
Tierra Santa Fe
Rancho Verde
8§
oso
en
o
Explanation of Headings
Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative.
Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure.
Shown on Plans ~ When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated.
Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.
Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.
cx>(£)fD
RD-AppendxP
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3028
1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
2 CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT
ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN
3 ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AND GENERALLY SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN THE PC ZONE AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
4 CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: MPA - 149(0")5
fi WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
17 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map No. 848, filed in the
8 office of the County Recorder of said county on June 27, 1898 known as
Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11,
9 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
10 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
^ WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tide 21 of the
12 Carlsbad Municipal Code and as shown on Exhibit Y-2 attached hereto and made a part hereof;
13 and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on the 6th
15
day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
16
request; and
, Q WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20 relating to the Master Plan and;
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
22 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
23 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
24 APPROVAL of MPA-149(0), based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039, are
2 incorporated herein by reference.
3 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals of the La Costa Master Plan by
maintaining residential land uses and providing development that is compatible with
4 surrounding residential development.
3. The proposed amendment will create a positive impact by creating mechanisms to review
future development in accordance with current policies and ordinances.
4. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on February 8, 1990 and
8 APPROVED by the Planning Commission on June 6, 1990. In approving this Conditional
Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff
9 analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding
the significant effects this project could have on the environment.
10
Conditions:11 -
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
•» 2 mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
14 2. The approval of MP 149(O) is contingent upon approval of MP 88-1.
15 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
16 of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
18 AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden, Marcus
19 & Hall.
20 NOES: None.
21 ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
22 ABSTAIN: None.
23
' SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
4 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
25 ATTEST:
26
27 MICHAEL J. HC5tZMILLERU
PLANNING DIRECTOR
28
PC RESO NO. 3028 -2-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3029
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
2 CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF 1,076 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND SECONDARY FACILITIES
3 ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
4 CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: MP 88-15
g WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
7 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map No. 848, filed in the
8 office of the County Recorder of said county on June 27, 1898 known as
Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11,
9 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
10 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
12 Carlsbad Municipal Code and as shown on Exhibit Y-2 attached hereto and made a part hereof;
13
and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on the
15
6th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said16
_ - request; and
TO WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20 relating to the Master Plan and;
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as foUows:
22 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
23 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
24 APPROVAL of MP 88-1, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
25
Findings:
26
1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039, are
*' incorporated herein by reference.
28
2. The proposed Master Plan implements the General Plan designation of Planned
Community by establishing land uses and maximum development intensities based on a
2 detailed analysis of the opportunities and constraints of the site.
3 3. The alignment of Calle Barcelona is consistent with the location designated in the
Circulation Element.
4
4. The proposed school sites are consistent with the School Location Plan.5
5. The proposed Master Plan provides detailed development standards to properly develop
the site including: setbacks, architectural details, signage, trail system, recreation
facilities, RV storage, open space, landscaping, maintenance, and public facilities.
8 6. The proposed Master Plan ensures that an adequate mix of single family, multiple family
and affordable housing will be provided in La Costa.
9
Conditions:
10
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
•*••*• incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
2. The City of Carlsbad's Housing Element is under review. Preliminary numbers from
SANDAG will place a substantial obligation on Carlsbad to meet the needs of its citizens
14 for low and moderate income housing. Almost certainly new programs will be required
to demonstrate a good faith effort to meet this need. Developers of new communities
15 like Arroyo La Costa must provide for all economic segments of the community and share
in the responsibility for solving this problem. Therefore, prior to final map approval for
any portion of the Master Plan area, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with
the City to provide the Master Plan's proportional share of the City's total obligation for
low and moderate income housing units or to implement whatever programs are adopted
_o by the City Council as part of the Housing Element review should that review be
completed prior to final map approval.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3029 -2-
1
2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
3 of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
4 to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden,
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
8 ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
9 ABSTAIN: None.
10
11
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
12 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
13
14 ATTEST:
15
16 MICHAEL J. HOI
PLANNING DIRECTOR
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3029 -3-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3030
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN
3 AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
4 REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO
SANTA FE ROAD IN THE PC ZONE AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
5 CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: GPA/LU 88-1o
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the General Plan
8 designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit X-2, dated May 16,1990, attached
9 and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Commission; and
10 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment as
provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on
13 the 6th day of June, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
14
request;
15
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
16
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
20 the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
21 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
22 recommends Approval of GPA/LU 88-1, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions.
24 Findings:
25 1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039, are
incorporated herein by reference.
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3030 -1-
2. The elimination of 25 acres of Residential Medium High Density land use and the
redistribution of such land to Residential Low Medium and Medium land uses allows for
2 development that will be more compatible with existing land uses than the current
designation would provide.
3
The proposed amendment wfll not adversely impact the mix of housing types in the City
4 because the applicant is required to enter into an agreement with the City to provide the
Master Plan's proportional share of the City's total obligation for low and moderate
* income housing units or to implement whatever programs are adopted by the City
- Council Housing Element review should that review be completed prior to approval of
the first final map.
7 4. The proposed amendment establishes the exact location of an elementary school and a
8 junior high school.
9 5. The proposed changes in Open Space boundaries are consistent with the City's Interim
Open Space Ordinance for the following reasons:
10
a. The open space area increases by 41.2 acres.
•*••*• b. The proposed change preserves a higher quality of environmental resources and
.. p wildlife habitat than would be possible using the existing designations shown in
the City's Comprehensive Open Space Network Map.
c. The boundary adjustments were made to link two natural open space areas via an
enhanced and revegetated riparian corridor and wildlife habitat. Additional
14 sensitive plant species were also preserved.
d. The adjusted open space is in reasonably close proximity to the existing open
15 space.
e. The proposed project provides a primary trail system through the center of the
project that could be linked to properties both to the east and to the west.
Conditions:
18 1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
19 incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3030 -2-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
2
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
3
to wit:
4
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden,
5 Marcus & Hall.
6 NOES: None.
7 ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
8
ABSTAIN: None.
9
10
11
12 SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
13 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
14 ATTEST:
15
16
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLI
•*•' Planning Director
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3030 -3-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3031
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE
CHANGE FROM R-l-7500 TO PLANNED COMMUNITY ON
3 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL,
NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA
4 FE ROAD.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: ZC 88-3
/•
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
7 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the
8 City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map
No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county on
9 June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19,
255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
10
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
.. 2 WHEREAS, said application for a zone change, as shown on Exhibits Y-l and X-
3, attached and incorporated herein constitutes a request as provided by Tide 21 of die Carlsbad
14 Municipal Code; and
15 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on die 16di day of May, 1990, and on
die 6th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
17 said request; and
18 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20
relating to the Zone Change; and
21
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
24 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
25 B) That based on die evidence presented at the public hearing, die Commission recommends
APPROVAL of ZC 88-3, based on the following findings and subject to die following
26 conditions.
Findings:
28 1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. The proposed change in zoning designation is compatible with the proposed General Plan
Amendment designation of Planned Community and the implementing Master Plan
designation of Open Space.
3. The proposed Open Space use with trail is compatible with the surrounding existing and
proposed single family development.
Conditions
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus & Hall.
None.
Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMI
Planning Director
PC RESO NO 3031 -2-
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
7 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in
8
9
10
- g
19
20
21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3032
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP FOR 1,076 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF
OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD IN THE
PC ZONE AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: CT 88-3 _
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per
map No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said
county on June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-
09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25,
255-041-14.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
12 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
13 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on
15
the 6th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
16
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
23 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
25 APPROVAL of CT 88-3, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
26
27
28
2
3
of points of 3.26.
4
. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
/.
n 2
23
24
25
28
Findings:
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed density of 2.52
dus/acre is within the density range of 4.61 dus/acre specified for the site as indicated
on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control point
proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project,
ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer
service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commission has added
a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map that building permits may not be
issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available,
and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and
the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element
of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The San Dieguito Union High School District has written a letter, dated January 3, 1990,
school facilities will be available to this project.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions
stating that school facilities will be available to this project.
13
The Encinitas Union School District has written a letter, dated April 6, 1988, stating that
14
15
of approval.16 FF
. „ . The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to
pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as
required by the General Plan.
19
8. Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be provided by the
20 Leucadia County Water District.
9. The proposed project is consistent with the City's Planned Development Ordinance and
also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
10- Thfi proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single family residential development on the
General Plan.
11. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -2-
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
2
12. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has been
3 conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan as amended for Zone 12.
4
13. An EIR was prepared for this project and has been recommended for certification by the
Planning Commission. The EIR (EIR 86-2) identified a number of potentially significant
impacts created by this project and possible mitigation measures to reduce these impacts
to a level of insignificance. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the
7
to reduce all impacts to a level of insignificance.
8
14. The intent of all mitigation measures proposed in EIR 86-2 are contained in this
9
contains mitigation measures that have been modified to: conform to City Policies; or,
expanded to more adequately mitigate the impact; or, tied to a specific phase of
construction so that they could be more easily monitored. Application of these measures
mitigates all identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
12
_ .
Planning Conditions
13
1. Approval is granted for CT 88-3, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "CCCC", dated May 16,
14
23
24
25
28
zoning for the property (MP 88-1) and the project has either been revised or conditioned
Resolution by way of either specific conditions of approval or in Attachment A which
1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
15
2. Approval of CT 85-6 and PUD 80 are hereby revoked in their entirety and superseded by
approval of this resolution.
17 3. Development of this project shall comply with all rules, regulations, standards and
requirements as contained in the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan, (MP 88-1), all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of
building permit issuance.
4. Approval of CT 88-3 is contingent upon approval of a Supplement to the 1988 Parks
19
20
Agreement between the City of Carlsbad and BCE Development dated March 3, 1988.
5. Prior to approval of the first final map, all appropriate text changes required by revised
conditions approved by the Planning Commission and City Council shall be attached to
the Master Plan as an errata sheet.
6. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the
tentative map and site plans as approved by the Planning Commission. The tentative map
and site plans shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map plan copies
shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -3-
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
7. A 500 scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to
2 the recordation of each final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within and
adjacent to the project.
8. This project is approved upon the express condition that any final map shall not be
approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service
_ is available to serve the subdivision,o
9. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that
7 sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will
continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on all final
8 maps.
10. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public
facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to
time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth
management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivided
agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated January 16, 1989, a copy of which is on
file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this
13 application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will
be void.
14
11. The applicant shall provide school fees to the San Dieguito High School District as part
15 of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit application. The applicant is obligated under an agreement
with the Encinitas Unified School District, dated February 26, 1974 for the dedication of
- „ school sites in lieu of payment of fees which provides mechanisms for completing these
requirements.
18 12. Water shall be provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
19
13. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may be
20 required as part of the Zone 12 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments
made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
14. Prior to the recordation of any final map, a comprehensive financing plan for all
improvements required by the Local Facilities Management Plan, as amended, for Zone 12
23 shall be submitted and approved by the City Council.
24 15. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are
25 challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -4-
28
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
2 16. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit
3 issuance.
4 17. Approval of CT 88-3 is granted subject to the approval of MP 88-1, GPA/LU 88-1, MP
149(O), ZC 88-3, PUD 88-4, HDP 88-8, SDP 89-11, SUP 89-3, SUP 90-8, and EIR 86-2.5
>. 18. Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the first final map, the applicant shall
present assurance acceptable to the Planning Director that a Master Homeowners
Association will be established and made applicable to the first phase of development.
The Master Homeowners Association shall allow for the annexation of the entire Arroyo
8 La Costa Master Plan as subsequent phases are developed. The Master Homeowners
Association shall provide for representation from all planning areas which become annexed
9 to the Master Association as the project is developed. Members of the Master Association
shall be required to pay a reasonable share of its assessments as approved by the
California Department of Real Estate. The Applicant shall prepare declaration(s) of
restrictions ("CC&Rs") which control the private uses, design, and maintenance for each
area of the Master Plan prior to the development of such area. Owners of homes may be
-,2 members of one or more subassodations. The jurisdiction of each subassodation shall be
generally determined by the Applicant based on geographic proximity and similarities in
housing type, maintenance requirements and other similar concerns. The CC&Rs for the
Master Association shall be approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director; the City
14 shall not participate as a member of the Architectural Review Board. No revisions which
weaken or diminish the rights of the City shall be made to the CC&Rs for the Master
15 Association without the prior written consent of the Planning Director.
19. The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's street name policy
_ „ subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to first final map approval.
-,Q 20. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director
approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and shall minimize impacts
19 on adjacent homes or to the extent feasible.
20 21. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
22 22. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from
23 weeds, trash, and debris.
24 23. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines Manual
and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
25 Department.
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -5-
28
24. Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1 plants
(see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall promote
water conservation.
25. The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessive litter
and/or are too large relative to the lot size. Planter width shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet, not including curb, footings and/or other paving, and parking overhang.
K 26. Prior to final occupancy of each village, a letter from a California licensed landscape
architect shall be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has
been installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
7 27. All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
8
28. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
9 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
29. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
.. _ improvement plans and grading plans.
30. All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and shall
match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
13
31. Mounding shall be used in parking lot landscaping or preliminary plans shall explain why
14 mounding is not possible to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
15 32. The number of trees in a residential project shall be equal to or greater than the number
of residential units.16
- „ 33. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the sign program provided in the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan. In addition all signs
snall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such
signs.
19
34. The project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations subject to the satisfaction of the
20 North County Transit District. Said facilities shall at a minimum include a bench, free
from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench and pole shall be designed
in a manner so as to not detract from the basic architectural theme of the project and said
design shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit
District.
23 35. The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
24 times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
25 36. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not
be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -6-
28
1 37. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24" x 36" blueline drawing.
2
38. Prior to issuance of any building permits for lots covered by a final map, die applicant
3 shall record a covenant over all open space lots within that final map prohibiting any
future residential development of such open space lots and limiting these lots to open
space and recreational uses only. Said open space lots shall be annexed to and
maintained by the Master Homeowners Association as stated in the CC&Rs.
39. There shall be permitted as part of a tentative subdivision map approval for any residential
neighborhood, a model home complex containing up to four (4) product types subject
7 to the provisions of Section 21.60.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The Planning
Director may approve more than four product types subject to adequate agreements
8 guaranteeing the removal of said units should the subdivision map not record within the
time period prescribed by law.
9
40. The CC&Rs for the project shall include a disclosure to all property owners located
adjacent to the school site, the church site, and the said property owners common
_ _ recreation center that may be subject to impacts from these facilities.
41. In the CC&Rs, the applicant shall provide a Notice of Proximity of Planned or Existing
Transportation Corridors as required by Administrative Noise Policy No. 17, dated March
13 4, 1990.
14 42. Trails within Open Space Areas 2 through 8 shall be constructed prior to occupancy of any
units within the first constructed adjacent residential villages. Trails within Open Space
15 Area OS-9 shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the Recreation Center in that area.
All trails within each residential village shall be constructed concurrently with that village.16
- ~ 43. Prior to approval of the first final map the developer shall provide proof to the Planning
Director of an acceptable means for maintaining the open space lots and trails systems as
shown on the tentative map and distribute the cost of such maintenance in an equitable
manner among the owners of the units within the subdivision.
19
44. Prior to approval of the first final map for any phase of this project, the applicant shall
20 enter into an agreement with the City to provide this project's proportional share of the
City's total obligation for low and moderate income housing units or to implement
whatever housing programs are adopted by the City Council as part of the Housing
Element review should that review be completed prior to final map approval.
23 45. Prior to close of escrow for lots immediately adjacent to the Elementary School Site,
disclosure to future homeowners shall be provided by means of a Declaration of Notice
24 to be recorded with the County Recorder's Office making the buyers aware that the homes
are adjacent to a future school site.
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3032 -7-
28
46. In addition to the phasing of public improvements, the miscellaneous improvements listed
below shall adhere to the following phasing program:
2
a. Phase I
3
Phase I shall be limited to the construction of Village I as wells as the
improvements discussed below:
Open Space Lots
Village Units within the Village Lots
7 I 118 2 122
8 Open Space
Areas
9
10
Total 118 4 122
1. The recreational facilities on Lot 121 on the north side of Village I will be
provided concurrent with development.
13
2. Open Space Areas 7 and 8, including trail systems, will be constructed and
14 enhanced concurrent with development.
15 3. Prior to occupancy of the 75th unit in Village I, the recreational vehicle
storage area in OS-8 will be provided and accessed temporarily by an all-
•*•" weather access road.
17 4. A note shall be placed on the Final Map for Phase I to the effect that Lot
No. 1083 of Village I is for the purpose of access to the RV Storage Lot
within OS-8. Such statement shall be included in the CC&Rs.
19
5. The enhanced landscaping along the northern section of El Camino Real
20 shall be installed prior to occupancy of the last unit in Village Q.
6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits in Village Q, a landscape plan
shall be submitted for the northern slope along Village R. Said plan shall
include a heavy landscaped buffer on the slopes and installation of a 6'
23 fence at the base of the slope.
24 7. Village J is reserved as a church site. Construction of a church on this site
will require Planning Commission approval of a Site Development Plan.
25 Any permanent use of this site other than for church purposes, subsidiary
daycare use, or open space will require an amendment to the Arroyo La
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3032 -8-
28
Costa Master Plan.
1
8. The Community Recreational Facilities located on Open Space Lot 9 shall
2 be constructed prior to occupancy of any units within Phase II.
3 9. Prior to recordation of the first Final Map, the applicant shall enter into an
agreement with any willing property owners in Rancho Del Ponderosa to
install landscaping and a 6' fence on the lower portion of the northern
slopes adjacent to Village S. An irrigation system shall also be installed
and connected to existing lines. After a one year time period, maintenance
of said landscaping and irrigation may revert to the individual homeowners
of Rancho Del Ponderosa at the discretion of the applicant.
7
10. The landscape plan submitted for the recreation area in Village I shall
8 include a combination of active play equipment for various age groups.
Such equipment shall be installed prior to occupancy of the last unit in
9 Village I. The area shall be temporarily landscaped prior to occupancy of
the first unit.10
_ _ 11. The enhanced landscaping along the east side of El Camino Real south of
Calle Barcelona shall be installed prior to occupancy of the last unit in
12 Village I.
13 12. Village I shall provide access to the adjacent RV site via an open space lot
in the western portion of the village. The access shall have a lockable,
14 bollard type gate to discourage access to vehicles other than homeowner's
RVs. Residences adjacent to this access lot shall be adequately buffered
15 from noise and light via walls and landscaping within the open
space/access lot. All future residents of Village I shall be made aware by
means of a Declaration of Notice to be recorded with the County Recorder's
- „ Office of the existence of the RV storage area prior to the close of escrow.
13. Prior to the close of escrow on each lot, residents of Village I shall be made
aware by means of a Declaration of Notice to be recorded with the County
19 Recorder's Office that the stub street at the Southwest corner of Village I
will eventually connect to future development that will gain access through
20 Village I.
14. Prior to the close of escrow on each lot, residents of Village I located
p_ adjacent to Village J shall be made aware by means of a Declaration of
Notice to be recorded with the County Recorder's Office that the property
23 to the north has been designated as a potential church site.
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3032 -9-
b. Phase II
2
Phase II shall be limited to the construction of Villages G, H, P, Q as well as
3 improvements discussed below.
Number of Lots/Dwelling Units
Village Units within the Village Lots
Open Space Lots
Village G
Village H
Village P
Village Q
Open Space
Areas
School Sites
Village J
Total
1. The common
94
77
97
72
340
Recreation
3
4
3
1
11
Center will be constructed
97
81
100
73
3
2
1
357
in Open Space Are;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
9.
15
2. The Open Space/Recreation lots located within Villages G, H, P, Q will be
provided concurrent with development.
17 3. The landscaping/enhancement and trail systems of OS-5, OS-6, and OS-9
will be provided.
19 4. The northern slopes of Village H shall be landscaped with additional trees
to mitigate the aesthetic loss of the eucalyptus trees in the north - central
20 area of the site.
5. CC&Rs for the project shall incorporate measures that will control irrigation
in or adjacent to the oak preservation area.22
23 6. The enhanced landscaping along the east side of El Camino Real on the
north side of Calle Barcelona shall be installed prior to occupancy of the
24 east unit in Village Q.
25 7. Prior to occupancy of the last unit in Village H, as mitigation for the
aesthetic loss of die eucalyptus grove onsite, the northerly entrance to
26 Village H, as well as die interior slopes of Village H, shall be enhances widi
additional tree planting.
iC (
8. Prior to die close of escrow on each lot, for lots immediately adjacent to
PC RESO NO. 3032 -10-
the Community Recreation/Daycare Center, disclosure to future
homeowners shall be provided by means of a Declaration of Notice
recorded with the County Recorders office making the buyers aware that
the homes are adjacent to a future Recreation/Daycare site.
9. The southern 16 lots of Village Q are designated as an alternative church
site. If a Site Development Plan for a church is approved in Village J then
these 16 lots shall be developed for residential purposes. A deed restriction
shall be placed over these 16 lots limiting them to use for church purposes
only unless a Site Development Plan for a church is approved on Village
J. This deed restriction shall also prohibit any individual lot being used for
church purposes. It shall state that if this area is used for church purposes,
7 the entire 3.4 acre site must be utilized.
8 10. If the southern portion of this site is developed for church purposes, a Site
Development Plan must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to
the start of construction. The church shall be designed to be compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood and conform to the requirements of the
El Camino Real Scenic Corridor Study. The site design shall incorporate
•i •, a minimum 30 foot wide landscaped buffer to be located on the south site
of the adjacent homes between the residential development and the church.
12 A minimum 30 ft. wide landscaped setback shall be provided along Street
"CM.
13
11. Residents of Village Q located adjacent to the potential church site shall be
14 made aware by means of a Declaration of Notice to be recorded with the
County Recorder's Office that the property to the east has been designated
as a potential church site.
T fi 12. The daycare facility located in OS-9 shall be constructed and completed
prior to occupancy of the last unit in Phase II.
18 13. Prior to recordation of the final map for Phase II, the applicant shall
provide a detailed landscape plan for additional tree planting on Anillo
19 Way.
14. Prior to recordation of the first final map, the applicant shall agree to
designate potential sites for public art as determined by die Arts Manager,
Planning Director, and City Engineer.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3032 -11-
c. Phase III
Phase III shall be limited to the construction of Villages B, C, D, E, F, K, L, M, N,
2 O as well as the improvements discussed below.
3 Open Space Lots
Village Units within the Village
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
provided concurrent with development.
15
2. Prior to the construction of the pedestrian bridge connecting Village OS-9
to die Junior High School site, the applicant shall submit detailed
_ „ architectural drawings for review and approval of the Planning Director.
3. Applicant shall redesign the rear area of lots 501-511 of Village E, and Lots
1012-1029 of Village D to create an open space area between Arroyo La
19 Costa and the existing adjacent of neighborhood. This design shall be
subject to the approval of the Planning Director, and shall be designed with
20 the following criteria in mind:
22
i O
B
C
D
E
F
K
L
M
N
0
Open Space
Areas
Total
1. The Open S]
99
42
62
99
46
61
48
42
71
48
618
pace Lots within Villa
5
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
2
1
21
iges B, C, D, E,
~
104
43
64
102
47
62
50
45
73
49
4
643
F, K, L, M, N, O w
The width of this area should be 40 feet and in no case less than
30 feet.
23 b. In the areas where the open space area is less than 40 feet in width,
there shall be a restriction in the rear lots of Arroyo La Costa
24 adjacent to the open space area of 10 feet. No structure taller than
6 feet may be constructed in this restricted area.
25
The rear fence of the Arroyo La Costa lots shall have a 6 foot wood
26 fence in the rear yard.
27 d. The design of the open space area should not include any sharp
corners, but rather take on a curvilinear shape.
PC RESO NO. 3032 -12-
The open space area should include a trail system which would connect to
both the Arroyo La Costa project through the use of trailheads on open
space lots, and to the adjoining neighborhood through the existing access
2 areas. The trail system should also offer access to Rancho Santa Fe Road at
a location near Camino de las Coches.
3
f . This area will be landscaped in a manner acceptable to the Planning
Director and shall be reflected in the Arroyo La Costa landscape plan.
g. The CC&Rs shall contain a provision allowing fencing only at the
>. northerly property line of the Arroyo La Costa lots.
The site plan for this area shall be modified to rearrange one-story
and two-story homes as follows:
8
Village D, Lot 1013 - 2-story
9 1022 - 1-story
1023 - 1-story
10 1025 - 2-story
1028 - one story
Village E, lot 508 - open space
1114 - 2-story
12
_ , L The location and description of allowed uses of the open space
easement shall be designated on the final map for Phase III.
14 j. The materials for the trail shall be decomposed granite.
15 47. The intent of all mitigation measures proposed in EIR 86-2 are contained in this Resolution
16 by way of either specific conditions of approval or in Attachment A which contains
mitigation measures that have been modified to: conform to City Policies; or, expanded to
17 more adequately mitigate the impact; or, tied to a specific phase of construction so that they
could be more easily monitored. These measures shall be complied with in their entirety
18 at the appropriate time of development. A mitigation monitoring program is provided in
Attachment B.19
Engineering Conditions
CT 48. No grading permit shall be issued for this project prior to recordation of the final map for
Phase I.
22 49. Grading in Phase 2 and Phase 3 prior to final maps shall be limited to grading shown on
23 Exhibit ZZ-1, ZZ-2 and as conditioned. Grading permits for this work shall be required and
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
24
50. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or
25 grading of the site.
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 3032 -13-
51. This project has been reviewed for conformancy with the grading ordinance and found to
be a project for which a grading permit is required. Prior to any building permits being
2 issued for the site, a grading plan in conformance with City Standards and Section 11.06
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, must be submitted, approved and grading work must be
3 completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All slopes within this project shall be
graded no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical unless specifically approved otherwise
pursuant to these conditions.
* 52. The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grading" by Section 11.06.170(a) of
>. the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil
engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure
compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City
Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
8 53. Upon completion of grading for each phase, the developer shall ensure that an "as-graded"
9 geologic plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the
geology as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
10 constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post
site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering
11 geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar or similar drafting film and shall become
a permanent record.
- , 54. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a letter of permission or
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
14 55. During the construction of this project, no construction equipment, fill dirt, or any other
materials shall be stored on any permanent natural open space area as designated by the
Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
16
56. A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit
17 issued for the borrow or disposal site if located offsite but within the city limits.
18 57. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this
project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the
proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the
City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
58. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall
22 construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by
the City Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified
23 on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior
to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities
24 so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope
erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the City Engineer.
25 xhe developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a
period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee their maintenance and
satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable
to the City Engineer.
28
PC RESO NO. 3032 -14-
59. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as
may be required by the City Engineer.
2
60. The developer shall construct desiltation/detention basins of a type and size and at
3 locations as approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall enter into a desiltation
basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond satisfactory to the City
Engineer prior to the approval of grading, building permit or final map whichever occurs
first for this project. Each desiltation basin shall be serviced by an all-weather
access/maintenance road. The provisions of this agreement shall apply to any offsite
borrow sites which may be utilized in the construction of this project as required by the
City Engineer.
7
61. The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding
8 drainage across the adjacent property, if any exists prior to the approval of the final map
for this project.
9
62. All existing storm drains adjacent to the project shall be cleaned and maintained free of
silt and debris by the developer until the adjacent phase is accepted by City Council.
63. Prior to approval of the final map the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City
t° PaY any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming Master Drainage
Plan Update. The owner may be eligible for credit toward drainage fees if he constructs
13 the facilities shown on the Master Drainage Plan Update, subject to the approval of the
City Engineer.
14
64. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
15 easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall
be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be
granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the
- ~ City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
65. Construction traffic shall not be allowed ingress or egress via any existing residential
streets off site.
19
66. The permanent desiltation basin in OS-5 shall be maintained by the Homeowner's
20 Association, unless otherwise accepted by the City.
67. Improvements listed shall be constructed within 12 months of final map approval and/or
improvement plan approval, for that phase or as extended by the City Engineer.
23 68. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized
by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
24
69. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the
25 respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
26 70. Should the developer decide to final map and develop phases out of numerical sequence
with the approved phasing as shown on the tentative map all conditions required of the
preceding phases shall be completed.
28
PC RESO NO. 3032 -15-
71. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and
2 Cable TV authorities.
3 72. The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type I form, on the subject
property in all common areas as approved by the City Engineer.
4
73. Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall be designed consistent
with Title 17 of the California Administrative Code. Offsite future reclaimed water
distribution systems should be anticipated by the installation of adequately sized sleeves
at crossing points to minimize street excavation.
7
74. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four months from the date of City
8 Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the
applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City
9 Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and
may revise existing conditions.
_ _ 75. Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient tide
°r interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of tide or interest.
The subdivider shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
13
76. Prior to approval of die first final map, die owner shall give written consent to die
14 annexation of die area shown witiiin die boundaries of die site plan into die existing City
of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1.
15
Phase I Right-of-Wav
_ „ 77. Olivenhain Road shall be dedicated on die final map by die owner to full half width
Right-of-Way widiin Phase I project boundary based on a centerline to right-of-way width
of 63 feet. If this dedication requires a revision to the lots fronting on Street "A" due to
an alignment change to Olivenhain Road, said revision shall be to the approval of the
19 Planning Director and City Engineer.
20 78. Half width of El Camino Real shall be dedicated by the owner along the Master Plan
frontage and offsite transitions based on a right-of-way width of 126 feet including any
additional right-of-way required at the intersections or as required by the Local Facility
Management Plans and in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards on the final map
for Phase I. An offer of dedications will be made for an additional 20 feet of right-of-
23 way and any necessary slope and drainage easements as required by the City Engineer
immediately east of die required standard dedication for potential future widening of El
24 Camino Real. Prior to final map approval an off site easement will be secured by die
developer for hah* street widening of El Camino Real based on a right-of-way width of
25 126 feet along die railroad property.
26 79. Calle Barcelona shall be dedicated by the owner to full width secondary arterial standards
from El Camino Real through 'C Street. An additional 15' easement on both sides of die**right-of-way will be dedicated for meandering bicycle and pedestrian trails. These
nn dedications shall be made on die final map.
PC RESO NO. 3032 -16-
Phase I Improvements
80. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider
shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law,
improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements to City
Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
a. All streets within Phase I shall be public streets and shall be constructed in
accordance with City Standards.
b. Olivenhain Road shall be improved to a four lane interim along its present
alignment from El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road including any necessary
8 | offsite transition. The developer/owner may be eligible for partial reimbursement
from adjacent property owners. A reimbursement agreement must be approved by
the City prior to approval of the final map for this phase.
c. Full half width improvements based on a right-of-way width of 126 feet shall be
graded and installed for Olivenhain Road within Phase I project boundary. A bond
shall be posted for the half width median improvement of Olivenhain Road
adjacent to Phase I project boundary for the future construction at a time when
required by the City Engineer. If the City Engineer determines that the ultimate
13 six lane improvement will require reconstruction of any portion of this section that
portion may be postponed until the ultimate six lane improvement of Olivenhain
14 Road.
15 d. El Camino Real shall be improved to a hah* street width of 63 feet from Olivenhain
Road to Levante Street including full width landscaped median. The
•*•" developer/owner may be eligible for partial reimbursement from the adjacent
-„ property owners on the west 1/2 width of the median. A reimbursement
agreement must be approved by the City prior to approval of the final map for this
18 phase.
19 e. Any necessary signal modifications shall be installed at the intersection of El
Camino Real and Olivenhain Roads in conjunction with the 4 lane interim
20 improvements. These signal modifications shall be coordinated with all appropriate
agencies.
&JL
f. A traffic signal at El Camino Real and Calle Barcelona shall be installed. This
signal shall be activated upon meeting warrants or as directed by the City
23 Engineer. The developer/owner may be eligible for partial reimbursement from
adjacent property owners on the west side of El Camino Real. A reimbursement
24 agreement must be approved by the City prior to approval of the final map for this
phase.
25
g. Improvements to Calle Barcelona from El Camino Real to Street "C" to its full
26 required width.
h. The secondary connection to El Bosque shall be made prior to occupancy of the
fifty-first unit on Phase I.
PC RESO NO. 3032 -17-
All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing and striping
plans.
2
Prior to the first Final Map approval the alignment of Street "M" in Village P and
3 Streets in Village "M" "A - A", "U - U" and Avenida Leon in Village N shall be
redesigned. This redesign shall replace the angular turns with curve radii to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
k. Prior to building permit issuance a deed restriction shall be placed on all Lots
within Phase I to notify potential owners that Street "B" shall act as access to
future residential development.
7
The developer shall underground all existing overhead utility lines within the
8 boundaries of or on the frontage of the project. Transmission lines in excess of
thirty-four thousand five hundred volts and long-distance and trunk communication
facilities are exempted from this requirement.
m. Prior to the first final map approval a hydrology study shall be completed to the
,, satisfaction of the City Engineer. This study shall include an analysis of the
Encinitas Creek Drainage Basin from Zone 11 to Batiquitos Lagoon. This study
must propose alternate forms of mitigating peak storm runoff flows to include a
possible flood attenuation action plan for the entire Encinitas Creek Drainage
13 Basin.
14 IL Reclaimed water main within Phase I portion of Calle Barcelona and Phase I and
Phase II portions of El Camino Real, shall be installed if required by the reclaimed
water plan.
16 Phase II Right-of-Wav
17 81. Calle Barcelona will be dedicated by the owner to full width secondary arterial standards
13 from 'C Street to Rancho Santa Fe Road. An additional 15' easement will be dedicated
on both sides of the right-of-way for construction of meandering bicycle and pedestrian
19 trails from 'C' Street to Rancho Santa Fe Road. Necessary easements will be dedicated for
the construction of the pedestrian bridge. All easements will be dedicated on the final
20 map and/or prior to final map approval.
Phase II Improvements
22 82. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to
23 the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider
shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law,
24 improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements to City
Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
25
a. All streets within Phase II shall be public streets and shall be constructed in
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3032 -18-
28
b. Calle Barcelona shall be improved to full width secondary arterial standards from
'C Street to most easterly end of Phase II. This improvement shall be constructed
2 prior to occupancy of the first units in Phase II.
3 c. Calle Barcelona shall be graded to full width secondary arterial standards plus 15'
easements from the most easterly end of Phase II to Rancho Santa Fe Road. A 32'
wide pavement shall be installed including all utilities and service lines planned
to be placed under that 32' section. Necessary drainage facilities and pedestrian
path shall be installed from the most easterly end of Phase II to Rancho Santa Fe
Road.
7 d. The full width intersection of Calle Barcelona and Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be
improved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8
e. Any necessary signal modifications shall be installed at the intersection of Calle
9 Barcelona and Rancho Santa Fe Road.
f. The secondary connection to Anillo Way shall be made prior to occupancy of the
_ _ 51st unit in Phase II.
., 2 g. The pedestrian bridge crossing Calle Barcelona shall be designed and bonded for
its construction. Its installation may be delayed until Phase in at the discretion of
13 the City Engineer.
14 h. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing and striping
plans.
15
. Sidewalks along the project frontages of Levante Street and Anillo Way shall be
16 installed.
17 Street light wiring replacement along the project frontages of Levante Street and
Anillo Way shall be installed as required by the City Utilities Director.
19 k. Prior to the final map approval of Phase II a comprehensive traffic analysis shall
be completed by the developer as required by the Zone 12 Local Facilities
20 Management Plan.
Prior to final map approval of Phase II the developer shall determine what portion
or portions of Calle Barcelona will be used by the earth moving equipment for
Phase III. Those portions shall be designed with increased structural sections to
23 the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
24 m. Reclaimed water main within Phase II and Phase III portion of Calle Barcelona and
Rancho Santa Fe Road adjacent to the master plan frontage if required by the
25 reclaimed water plan. Within Phase II, the main may be deferred until Phase III
is constructed if no reclaimed waterline exists along the project frontage.
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -19-
28
n. Prior to final map approval the developer shall submit a reclaimed water usage
plan for die entire master plan area for the approval of the City Engineer. The
2 plan shall be in confonnance with the City's proposed reclaimed water master plan.
At a minimum the developer shall install a dual waterline to serve all irrigated
3 open space and extend parkway areas with reclaimed water as it becomes
available.4
o. If the Water District is in a Stage n or greater water alert, reclaimed water shall
be used for all construction related activities such as dust control and grading
compaction as directed by the City Engineer.
7 Phase III Right-of-Wav
8 83. Prior to Final Map approval an offer of dedication for an easement shall be made by the
Owner for the potential future pedestrian bridge onsite in Open Space Area OS-3.
9
Phase III Improvements
10
84. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider
, 2 shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law,
improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements to City
13 Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
14 a. All streets within Phase III shall be public streets and shall be constructed in
accordance with City Standards.
15
b. Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be reconstructed on the west side along Village 'B' to
eliminate the previously installed right turn lane which is no longer required.
17 c. The pedestrian bridge crossing Calle Barcelona shall be installed prior to occupancy
of the first unit in Villages "K", "L", or "B" or at the discretion of the City Engineer
based on need for safe pedestrian crossing.
19
d. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing and striping
20 plans.
21 e. Calle Barcelona shall be improved to full width secondary arterial standards from
the easterly end of Phase II to Rancho Santa Fe Road including the meandering
pedestrian and bicycle trails within the 15' easements on both sides of right-of-
23
24 f. Prior to approval of the final map for Phase II the developer shall post a bond in
the amount of $100,000 for the design and construction of a traffic signal at the
25 intersection of Calle Barcelona and "D - D" Street. This signal shall be installed
when traffic warrants are met or at the direction of the City Engineer. Said bond
26
PC RESO NO. 3032 -20-
28
may be held by the City until the final occupancy of the last residential unit in the
project. If warrants have not been met at that time then the developer shall be
relieved of this obligation and bonds shall be released.
n
g. Prior to final map approval of Phase III the owner form and join a maintenance
3 district to maintain the desiltation basin and channel on the east side of Rancho
Santa Fe Road. In the event the district cannot be formed in a timely manner as
determined by the City Engineer, the developer shall alternatively enter into an
agreement with the City agreeing to not oppose the formation of said maintained
district.
6 h. Prior to final map and approval of Phase III the developer shall post a bond for
7 an additional one inch of surface course pavement for Calle Barcelona from El
Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road. That surface course shall be installed
8 including new pavement traffic stiping as directed by the City Engineer prior to
Phase III Improvements being accepted by the City Council.
9
Prior to final map approval of Phase III those portions of Mision Estancia West
previously dedicated but no longer needed because of the realignment of Calle
- . Barcelona shall be vacated.
n g j. Prior to final map approval of Phase III the developer shall make every attempt to
enter into a joint use agreement with the owners of the existing desiltation basin
13 on the east side of Rancho Santa Fe Road. If the developer is unable as
determined by the City Engineer, to enter into a joint use agreement with the
14 adjoining property owner, the developer shall install appropriate temporary or
permanent desiltation facilities onsite at the discretion of the City Engineer.
15 Fire
85. Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the
, „ Fire Marshal.
86. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and
proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval.
19
87. An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
20
88. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
22 89. Any Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override
23 switch, as specified by the Fire Department.
24 90. Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures.
25 91. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City
of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3032 -21-
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
92. All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other
systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior
to construction.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Erwin, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J.
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3032 -22-
ATTACHMENT A
ARROYO LA COSTA
MAY 16. 1990
Mitigation Measures
I. LAND USE
1. This project is subject to the review by the California Department of Fish
and Game, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Army Corps of
Engineers and it is acknowledged that changes to the design of the
tentative maps may occur as a result of review by these resource agencies.
Any changes to this tentative map caused by the requirements of these
resource agencies may be administratively approved by the Planning Director
and City Engineer. However, if the Planning Director believes that these
changes merit review by the Planning Commission, they may be presented to
the Planning Commission for a Planning Commission determination of
substantial conformance to the approved Master Plan.
2. Prior to recordation of the second Final Nap, an overall design for the
pedestrian bridge shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the
Planning Director and City Engineer. This design shall comply with all
conditions of approval for the project and shall include the pedestrian
access between the school sites and adjacent residential neighborhoods.
3. Prior to recordation of the first Final Map the Planning Director shall
approve the riparian habitat enhancement implementation program. The
schedule for implementation of this program shall be included in the
enhancement plan.
4. Prior to recordation of the first Final Map the Planning Director shall
approve the location of footpaths/trails within the open space areas. A
qualified biologist shall assist the Planning Director in determining the
location of the footpaths/trails.
5. The applicant shall provide noise mitigation to comply with the mitigation
measures designated in the Administrative Noise Policy approved April 3,
1989. If the Noise Policy is revised and lower CNEL's become acceptable,
the applicant may do a revised noise analysis to comply with these
standards.
6. The applicant shall include a "note" on all building plans specifying the
hours that construction activities may occur. Building permits will not
be issued by the Building Director without this note on the plans. The
City Building Inspector shall stop construction activities on the site
between the hours sunset and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday and sunset
through 8 a.m. on Saturday.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits and when grading and structural
drawings become available, the developer shall submit for review and
approval to the Planning Director detailed acoustical analyses with precise
mitigation measures for the residential areas along El Camino Real,
Olivenhain Road , Rancho Santa Fe Road and Calle Barcelona showing measures
to achieve acceptable indoor (i.e., 45 CNEL) and acceptable outdoor (i.e.,
60 CNEL) noise levels.
8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the Building Director plans based on the acoustical
analyses for the noise barriers required to bring the outdoor noise level
down to 60 CNEL along roadways in the project.
9. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the Planning Director and the
Building Director shall approve all onsite noise barriers. These barriers
shall meet the requirements of ultimate buildout traffic noise reduction.
The location of all noise barriers shall be shown on the overall design
of the project plans to be approved by the Planning Director prior to
approval of each Final Nap.
10. Prior to issuance of any building permits, plans to upgrade building
materials and construction for residential units exposed to outdoor noise
levels in excess of 60 CNEL shall be approved by the Planning Director.
11. Swimming pool hours shall be from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. seven days a week.
tThese hours shall be stated in the CC&Rs.
III. AIR QUALITY
12. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, a note shall be included on all
plans specifying that grading shall be done in compliance with SDAPCD and
CARB standards and requirements and dust control standards in Title 24 of
the California Administrative Code. The City Engineering Department shall
monitor for compliance during all grading operations of the project.
13. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, a note shall be included on all
plans specifying that watering of the grading site take place before and
during grading operations to minimize dust generation a. A water
truck/trucks shall be required to be on site at all times to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineering Department shall
monitor for compliance during all grading operations of project.
14. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the recreation/daycare
center, the developer shall provide secure bicycle facilities for the
center which shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association and so
included in their bylaws. The second Final Nap shall show the location
of the pedestrian bridge which shall be constructed with Phase III or as
directed by the City Engineer.
15. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the project applicant shall submit
a plan for heavy perimeter landscaping (to act as a dust filter) that is
consistent with other or existing landscape plans to the Planning Director
for his approval. The Planning Director may direct project applicant to
spray water on the landscape materials at regular intervals to increase
their filtering capabilities.
16. Prior to each Final Nap recordation, the Planning Director will review
and approve applicant's submitted plans for pedestrian walkways, bike
paths and a grade-separated bike bridge for that map to encourage non-auto
use. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the Planning Director will
approve the construction of these walkways, paths and bridge. During
construction and until project buildout occurs, the project applicant will
assume maintenance of these walkways, paths and bridge, subject to review
by the Planning Director. At the time of project buildout, maintenance
responsibility will default to the Homeowners' Association in accordance
with their established bylaws or a Landscape Maintenance District if
approved by City Council.
IV. EARTH RESOURCES
17. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall perform
a detailed, comprehensive geotechnical evaluation, including subsurface
investigation, and submit the results of this evaluation for the review
and approval of the City Engineer.
18. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall perform
a geotechnical evaluation that shall include: 1) depth and extent of the
alluvium and collumiums; 2) depth of the groundwater table; 3) geometry
and characteristics of onsite landslides; 4) slope stability information;
and 5) engineering characteristics of onsite soils. A report on these
evaluations shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of grading permits.
19. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the City Building Department plans which shall
conform to the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the City's Seismic Design
Standards.
20. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
evidence in the form of building plans to the City Building Department that
the potential peak bedrock acceleration (o.32g) of the Rose Canyon Fault
shall be considered in the design of the day care center and the meeting
hall. The developer shall submit evidence to the Building Department that
the plans have been forward and reviewed for compliance to the proper
governmental agency prior to the issuance of any permits for construction
for these facilities.
21. Prior to the sale of each dwelling unit in the proposed project, each
potential homeowner shall be given a disclosure statement regarding the
onsite seismic potential. This disclosure statement shall be included in
the project's CC&Rs.
22. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit
for review and approval to the City Engineer a plan for erosion control
measures that includes, but is not limited to, hydroseeding with erosion
control vegetation which shall be done on any exposed slopes within 30 days
after grading or as approved by the City Engineer.
23. Prior to the issuance of any grading penults, the developer shall submit
for review and approval by the City Engineer plans for the removal or the
recompaction/buttressing of any onsite landslides.
24. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the City Engineer plans to stabilize cut slopes
in Delmar Formation by buttressing or use of stability fills.
25. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the City Engineer plans for dealing with onsite
deep alluvium which shall be compressed and receive remedial treatment
including removal, recompaction, or in-place densification utilizing
surcharging or dynamic compaction methods.
26. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Building Director plans for building
footings which may be founded in expansive soil. These footings may be
required to be deeper and more heavily reinforced as per the determination
of the Building Director;
OR
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director plans for dealing with
lots within the project which have expansive soil at the surface in that
they shall be capped with non-expansive soil fill.
27. Grading plans shall provide variety in the steepness of slopes and
configuration of pads within the guidelines of the Grading Ordinance. The
rounding and tapering of all manufactured slopes shall be completed to
complement the natural contours of the land.
28. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the City Engineer a grading plan which shall
include, but is not limited to, a complete plan for temporary and permanent
drainage facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris,
and other water pollutants.
29. Prior to recordation of each Final Nap, drainage studies for each phase
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
30. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
appropriate drainage facility designs to insure that flooding hazards are
adequately reduced to an acceptable level to the City Engineer for his
review and approval.
31. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall prepare an
erosion and sedimentation control plan for each proposed development to
address the problem of short-term construction and grading activity which
will be incorporated into each development site's grading and construction
plans and submitted to the City Engineer for his review and approval.
32. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the City Engineer an evaluation of the velocity of
concentrated runoff from the project and proposed erosive velocity control
plans to be incorporated as part of the project design.
33. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Design Engineer shall review
and state that the discharge of surface runoff from the project will be
performed in a manner to assure that increased peak flows from the project
will not increase erosion immediately downstream of the system. This shall
be reviewed and approved by both the Planning Director and the City
Engineer.
34. Prior to issuance of grading permits for each proposed development, the
developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval to the city
Engineer a drainage plan which will minimize any potential impacts from
drainage flows to be altered by each proposed development.
VI. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
35. Prior to recordation of the second Final Nap, the applicant shall implement
the following measures regarding the Oak Preservation area in Village P.
The applicant shall retain the services of a qualified Specimen Tree
Company acceptable to the Planning Director to visit the site in order to
prepare a report that will:
a. Plot the location and size of all trees.
b. Confirm the condition of the trees.
c. Verify the feasibility of transplanting approximately eleven oaks
shown on the plan as transplanted, together with a schedule for
same. If any of these trees cannot be retained they shall be
replaced with a 15-gallon new planting of the species on a 4:1 basis.
The replacement trees shall be planted in clusters under supervision
of a qualified biologist and a qualified landscape professional.
Compliance with this provision shall be monitored by the Planning
Director.
d. Recommend appropriate interim measures to protect and maintain all
of the healthy trees and a time table for removal of the dead Oaks.
e. Recommend any preconstruction measures that are appropriate (i.e.
pruning, etc.).
f. Recommend necessary measures to protect existing trees from harm due
to project construction, grading and drainage.
g. Signs shall be installed after construction is completed explaining
to the public some history about the trees and the methods of
preservation.
Such measures shall include installation of barricades around the trees
during construction; provisions so that existing levels of runoff under
the Oaks would not be altered on a monthly or bimonthly basis, or more
frequently when warranted by construction activities that may affect the
trees.
36. Prior to the Issuance of any grading and/or building permits for any phase,
the applicant shall submit for review and approval to the Planning director
a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for that phase of development.
37. A phased-in maintenance program for maintaining all landscaped areas in
healthy and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash and debris shall
be included in the CC&Rs.
38. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the applicant shall establish
in perpetuity with the City the required natural open space areas onsite.
Future development of these areas shall not be allowed and shall be so
noted on the Final Tract Nap.
39. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the applicant shall submit for
review and approval to the Planning Director plans to preserve the six
sensitive plan species found within the chaparral habitat shown in Exhibit
30, page 152, found in the extreme northwest, extreme southwest and east-
central portions of the site which shall be retained as natural open space
and be so noted on the Final Tract Nap.
OR
If the six sensitive plant species cannot be saved, an offsite mitigation
program for the loss of the six sensitive plant species shall be
established as follows:
(a) A qualified biologist shall locate through field survey a site(s)
containing the six sensitive plan species. The cost for this shall
be the responsibility of the applicant.
(b) Offsite habitat areas chosen need not contain all six species in
that one area.
(c) All offsite habitat areas chosen shall not have been previously
developed and shall contain a viable population that is approximately
equal to the amount of resources present onsite.
(d) Where feasible, offsite habitat areas shall be located adjacent to
existing or proposed permanent open space on park sites.
(e) All offsite habitat areas shall be preserved as permanent open space
in perpetuity. This shall be accomplished in a manner acceptable
to the City Attorney.
(f) Approval of the mitigation program for the offsite habitat area(s)
shall occur prior to issuance of grading permits or final map
approval, whichever comes first.
40. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap, the applicant shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director and to the California
Department of Fish and Game plans to provide buffer areas around the
riparian habitats within the open space designations shown on Exhibit 29
in the west-central portion and extreme western border of the site for
their protection.
41. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the applicant shall submit for
review and approval to the Planning Director and a qualified biologist
plans for designated open space which assure the integrity of these open
space areas.
42. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
evidence to the Planning Director that all areas of open space habitat
preservation have been fenced to preclude disturbance by construction
activities or residents. Maintenance of fencing shall default to the
Homeowners' Association at time of buildout. The fencing shall only be
installed around open space areas that are intended to habitat restoration
and not around those open space areas where trails will be located.
43. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit to
the Building Director plans showing that structures in the vicinity of
chaparral vegetation shall be build with non-combustible roof material as
specified by the Fire Marshall.
44. Prior to recordation of the first Final Map the applicant shall submit
evidence to the Planning Director that Lots 68 and 69 in Village I shall
be designated for open space in order to assure preservation of the habitat
to the north of these lots.
45. Prior to recordation of the second Final Map the applicant shall submit
for review and approval plans to establish in perpetuity the open space
designated in the area of the existing riparian habitat in the west-central
portion of the site and this shall be so noted on the Final Tract Map.
46. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall show
evidence to the City Engineer of a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers
and shall enter into a 1603 agreement with the California Department of
Fish and Game.
47. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the City Engineer a Riparian Restoration Plan
which shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the California department
of Fish and Game in conjunction with the 1603 agreement and the Corps of
Engineers 404 permits.
48. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the City engineer a Riparian Restoration Plan.
If so required as part of the Riparian Restoration Plan, the eight lots
on the southern side of Street J shall be deleted in order to allow use
of this area for planting of willow woodland.
49. Prior to recordation of each Final Map the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the City Engineer a plan for the strict control of
drainage from the project's newly created urban areas. Prior to reaching
downstream riparian habitats, specifically Encinitas Creek and Batiquitos
Lagoon. Urban drainage shall be controlled through the use of velocity
reduction devices and erosion control devices. These erosion and
siltation-control devices shall be in place during all phases of
construction as well as upon completion and occupancy of the development.
Compliance with this provision shall be monitored by the Planning Director.
50. Prior to recordation of the second Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a plan which shall
include, but is not limited to, the retention of the existing oaks onsite.
A qualified biologist shall be responsible for the care of these trees
through all steps of the development process. This biologist shall prepare
care and maintenance programs for the eventual maintainers to these trees.
If any of these trees cannon be retained they shall be replaced with a 15-
gallon new planting of the species on a 4:1 basis, the replacement trees
shall be planted in clusters under supervision of a qualified biologist
and a qualified landscape professional. Compliance with this provision
shall be monitored by the Planning Director.
51. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director landscape plans that
shall include, but are not limited to, provisions to assure that
landscaping materials used to replant cut and fill slopes in the vicinity
of the preserved natural areas do not infest the native chaparral
vegetation. The plant materials to be used must be approved by a biologist
or horticulturist with a background in restoration of upland habitats.
Plan species especially to be avoided are Cortaderia. Pennisetum.
Rhvnchelvtrum. and Cistus.
52. Onsite natural areas shall be adequately maintained in a natural condition
and so stated in the CC&Rs.
53. Prior to the recordation of the first Final Nap, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director landscape plans that shall
include, but are not limited to, provisions to assure that, where feasible,
plan communities shall be conserved by integrating them into the project
design (such as open space corridors), instead of being removed, and/or
by implementing techniques such as transplanting, seed gathering,
reseeding, etc. using indigenous plants.
54. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap, the applicant shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director plans for funding a
drainage maintenance program. Upon completion of construction this
maintenance program shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners
Association (or Landscape Naintenance District) and shall be so stated in
the Association's CC&Rs.
VII. AESTHETICS
55. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a grading plan that
includes, but is not limited to, grading that enhances the natural terrain
and avoids sharp angles.
56. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a statement to serve as
a means to prevent unauthorized grading. This statement shall be placed
on the Final Nap. The statement will require that all grading on
8
Individual parcels, including individual—retaining walls except for
^IIPi^PfrTrW shall be limited
to that shown on the Final Tentative Nap. This statement shall also be
included in the CC&Rs of the Homeowners' Association.
57. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a landscape plan that
includes, but is not limited to, preservation of existing trees where
feasible to prevent erosion and enhance natural scenic beauty and
installation of additional trees and plantings at the discretion of the
Planning Director to screen architectural features and hide cut and fill
from view.
58. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the applicant shall submit for
review and approval to the Planning Director a plan for the underground ing
of all utility lines including, but not limited to, electric, telephone,
street lighting and cable television. Prior to issuance of any grading
or building permits, the applicant shall make the necessary arrangements
with the utility companies for the installation of such facilities and
shall submit a letter to the City as evidence that these arrangements have
been made.
59. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director final designs for
landscaping and building product type that minimize visual impacts on
adjacent parcels with special consideration given to orientation of the
project's residence so as to respect the privacy (i.e. windows and decking)
of adjacent and nearby homes.
60. Prior to recordation of the first ||||il Final Nap the developer shall
submit for review and approval tot |he Planning Director a landscape plan
that includes, but is not limited to, permanently landscaped slopes on the
junior high and elementary school sites that will minimize visual impacts
on adjacent development neighborhoods. This landscaping shall be installed
during the grading of the phase that the school sites are located in.
61. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the Planning Director noise wall/bern plans that
include aesthetically pleasing construction materials and adequate
landscaping materials.
VIII. LIGHT AND GLARE
62. Prior to recordation of each Final Nap, the applicant shall submit for
review and approval to the Planning Director a lighting plan to ensure that
the existing homes north and south of the proposed project will be
buffered, to the extent feasible, from light and will be buffered, to the
extent feasible, from light and glare impacts that could result from
development and traffic headlights at buildout of the site. Such buffering
measures shall include, but are not limited to, provisions for wing walls,
eaves, and other architectural features of proposed units; and slopes,
berms, fencing, and vegetation/landscaping of open space areas.
63. Prior to Final Nap recordation of each phase, the applicant shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a phased landscaping plan
that will Include, but Is not United to, landscaping materials
commensurate with residential occupancy to adequately screen onslte light
and glare Impacts.
64. All outdoor lighting shall be hooded and directed downward to minimize
direct light and glare impacts on public rights-of-way.
65. Low profile fixtures shall be utilized for all outdoor lighting. The
lumen output shall be limited with the maximum amount allowed to be
determined by the City.
66. Prior to Final Nap recordation the applicant shall submit for review and
approval to the Planning Director plans consistent with the lighting plan
to indicate that lighting for tennis courts shall be on timers and will
not be lighted after sunset seven days a week, and plans consistent with
the landscaping plan that will utilize tall trees to screen the tennis
court lighting from adjacent residences.
67. Prior to recordation of the first phase Final Nap the developer shall
submit for review and approval to the Planning Director a lighting plan
that will include, but is not limited to, providing for security lighting
in common areas, schools, trails, the RV storage area, and the sports
complex.
IX. CULTURAL RESOURCES
68. Prior to recordation of the first Final Nap the Planning Director shall
review and approve one of the following options to mitigate the adverse
impact| to site W-923:
Data Recovery; The mitigation of impacts through data recovery shall be
accomplished by implementing a program of extensive excavations and
research outlined in a research design. A preliminary research design for
W-923 was submitted for the mitigation of adverse impacts by ERC to Nr.
Fay Round in 1989, portions of which have been included in Appendix H.
The details of this research design will not be discussed here. However,
in general, the research design includes a representative collection
research objectives and a field strategy for the phased excavation of test
units (one meter) square and backhoe trenches. Forty test units were
recommended by ERC.
69. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall agree
that the initial brushing or removal of vegetation from the project be
monitored and inspected by a qualified archaeologist and a qualified
paleontologist. Compliance with this provision will be monitored by the
Planning Director.
70. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall agree
that all grading activities shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist
10
and a qualified paleontologist to ensure that any of the sites which night
contain significant deposits or artifacts which were not identified during
the evaluation phase can be recovered or analyzed prior to removal from
the site. Compliance with this provision will be monitored by the Planning
Director.
71. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall agree
that any newly discovered deposits will require evaluation of their
significance and that such deposits may require additional mitigation
after their significance is determined by a qualified archaeologist.
Compliance with this provision will be monitored by the Planning Director.
72. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall agree
that the paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or redirect grading in
the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and any
necessary salvage. Compliance with this provision will be monitored by
the City Engineer.
73. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall agree
that all fossils collected shall be donated to an institution with a
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History
Museum. Compliance with this provision shall be monitored by the Planning
Director.
X. PUBLIC SERVICES/UTILITIES
Parks and Recreation
Mitigation measures listed in the Zone 12 LFMP were implemented prior to adoption
of the Plan by the City Council.
74. Prior to the recordation of the ||||| Final Nap, the applicant shall show
evidence of compliance with theParks agreement between the City of
Carlsbad and the La Costa Ranch Company to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
Fire
Mitigation measures listed in the Zone 12 LFMP were implemented prior to adoption
of the Plan by the City Council.
75. Prior to the recordation ||||||||j Final Nap , the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Planning Director a landscape plan that
includes, but is not limited to, the use of fire retardant landscaping
materials onsite per the City's Landscape Guidelines Manual.
76. Prior to recordation of each Final Nap, the applicant shall submit for
review and approval to the Fire Narshal two (2) copies of the site plan
showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads
and drives.
11
77. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant agrees to maintain an
all-weather access road throughout construction to the satisfaction of the
Fire Marshal. Compliance with this provision shall be monitored by the
City Engineer.
78. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
to the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer evidence that all required fire
hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project.
79. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide the Fire
Department with a 500' scale map showing streets (public and private),
street names, fire hydrant locations, and beginning and ending addresses
by block.
80. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall agree to
pay to the Fire Department and/or the City of Carlsbad a fee established
to cover the cost of updating Fire Department response maps.
81. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit for
review and approval to the Building Director building plans that include,
but are not limited to, the requirement that all structures shall have fire
retardant roofs.
82. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall agree
that brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications
contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. Compliance
with this provision shall be monitored by the City Engineer.
83. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
for review and approval to the Fire Marshal the plans and specifications
for all fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic
sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project.
Police
84. Lighting of onsite recreational and open space areas shall be established
in coordination with the City's Police Department, Crime Prevention Unit.
Sewer and Wastewater
8$-. All casements within the proposed project, all the streets, sidewalks,
*+& M«^»^%^ 1 •« ^1%^- £» ^^» *%MM^ ^X»«* •• •* £^+* m t * & m ^ *+ •%•»*• ^*M-J**M> ff »*^» j I j ^ •**%«» I f**+ «%4- ***m -fr •fc^^m^ j •*3 IFT£U1> I Infill,3 y 3IUwTn Hi U III I U*» I I I I* IC3 UIIU aCWCf I ttl» I I I V tt?3' I UV>Vtlt£U HIIZF U III
shall bo maintained by the Homeowners Association.—The developer shall
provide plans for a phase in program concerning maintenance that will
default responsibility from fully residing with the developer initially
to shifting to the Homeowners Association at the time of build out.—This
provision shall bo included in the CC&Rs.—Compliance with this provision
shall bo monitored by the Planning Director.
HI Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit
12
for review and approval to the Building Director plans to provide and
install low flow toilets and showers in each bathroon of each proposed unit
in the proposed project.
Teleohone
86. No mitigation measures are recommended or required.
Natural Resources
87. No mitigation measures are recommended or required.
Transportation and Circulation
88. Prior to total project completion, all improvements listed on Table III
for the year 1995 shall be constructed by the developer to City
specifications. The total cost of these improvements shall be the
responsibility of the developer unless an alternative method of financing
these improvements is approved by the City Council.
89. Prior to any Final Nap recordation, the developer shall submit to the City
Engineer for his approval, a schedule for all road improvements to be
constructed. The improvement schedule shall have all improvements
scheduled for completion prior to the issuance of building permits for the
last phase of construction. The City Engineer shall review the schedule
annually to determine if the building rate for Zone 12 warrants
construction be done prior to when the schedule calls for or later than
the schedule calls for. The City Engineer shall amend the schedule as
necessary.
90. Prior to issuance of building permits for any unit or structure within the
project the developer shall pay all traffic impact fees as established by
City Council in accordance with City Codes in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
13
PROJECT NAME: Arroyo La Costa
APPROVAL DATE:
FILE NUMBERS: CT 88-3/PUD 88-4/MP 88-1
EIR OR CONDITIONAL NEC. DEC.: EIR 86-2
The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate identified
environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation
measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public
Resources Code Section 21081.6).
Land Use
Design for pedestrian bridge Planning/Engineering
Riparian Habitat Enhancement Plan Planning
Footpath locations in Open Space Areas Planning
Noise
Provide Notice of Proximity
Comply with Administrative Noise
Policy, approved 4/3/89
Construction hour limitation
Explanation of Headings
Planning
Planning
Building
Prior to second map
First final map
First final map
In CC&Rs prior to first final map
Prior to issuance of building permits
On building plans
Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure.
Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated.
Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.
Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.
RD-AppendxP
m
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Deot.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
z
O
mz
H
H
sx
I"
H
O
Z
O
0
XmO
TJ rQ) ™~
Cfl «/>n> ^
"^
0
>
H
H
0Ismz
H
CD
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Detailed acoustical analysis
Noise mitigation plan
Upgrade construction plans where
necessary for mitigation
Swimming pool hours Limited from 6 a.m.
9 p.m.
Air Quality
All grading done in compliance with
SDAPCD, GARB, Title 24
Watering of grading site before grading
Provision of secure bicycle facilities
at recreation center and stipulate in CC&Rs
Location of pedestrian bridge
Plans for walkways, bike paths/construction
such
Biology and Landscaping
Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans
in conformance with City Standards
Landscaping along North ECR
Landscape Plan North Slope Village R
Planning
Planning & Building
Building
Planning
Engineering
Engineering
Planning
Engineering
Planning/Engineering
Planning
Planning
Planning
Prior to issuance of building permits
Prior to issuance of building permits
Prior to issuance of building permits
In CC&Rs, prior to second final map
Note on plans prior to grading permit issuance
Note on plans prior to issuance of grading permit
Prior to second final map
Prior to second final map
Prior to each final map, Prior to building permits
Prior to grading permits
Prior to last unit occupancy, Village Q
Prior to building permits for Village Q
mz
73
OZ2mzH
zE
s><
i"0
H
O
73
o
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Landscaping and Irrigation North
slopes adjacent to Village S Planning
Landscape Plan in recreation area for Village I Planning
Enhanced landscaping south ECR Planning
Additional trees north slope of Village H Planning
Heavy perimeter landscaping for dust control Planning
Erosion control hydroseeding of slopes Engineering
Phased landscaping maintenance program Planning
Natural Open Space Areas onsite (preserved) Planning
Preservation plan to save six sensitive plant
species Planning
Buffer areas around riparian habitat
(west and west-central) Planning
Fencing plan to protect open space
(habitat restoration) Planning
Use of non-combustible roof material in
chaparral areas Building
Lots 68 and 69 designated for open space Planning
Designate west-central riparian area as
open space Planning
Prior to recordation of final map
Prior to occupancy of last unit Village I
Prior to occupancy of last unit Village I
Prior to occupancy of last unit Village H
Prior to grading permit
Within 30 days after grading
Included in CC&Rs prior to final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of building permits
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of second final map
m
I
o70
o
mo
too>
co
o
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Applicant must obtain 404 permit and
1603 agreement Planning
Riparian Restoration Plan Planning
Drainage Control Devices Planning
Onsite Oak Preservation Plan Planning
Landscape Plans to ensure protection of
surrounding natural areas Planning
Maintenance of onsite natural area
(stated in CC&Rs) Planning
Landscape Plans to ensure protection of
surrounding natural areas Planning
Maintenance of onsite natural areas
(stated in CC&Rs) Planning
Funding plan for drainage maintenance program Planning
Landscape plan to show tree preservation Planning
Landscape plan to screen slopes at school sites Planning
Miscellaneous
Covenant on Open Space Lots Planning
Disclosure on school, church, recreation sites Planning
Determine means to maintain Open Space Lots
and Trails Planning
Prior to issuance of grading permit
Prior to issuance of grading permit
Prior to recordation of each final map
Prior to recordation of second final map
Prior to recordation of second final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to recordation of first final map
Prior to issuance of building permits
In CC&Rs prior to first final map
Prior to first final map
o73
tn
r>
(D
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Aesthetics
Grading plan shall enhance natural terrain
No unauthorized grading. Grading limited to
that shown on tentative map
Undergrounding of Utilities
Evidence of undergrounding
Landscaping and product types to minimize
visual impacts
Noise walls to be aesthetically pleasing
Light and Glare
Homes buffered from light and glare from
headlights
Landscape plan to screen onsite glare impacts
Tennis court lights, if any, to be screened
Lighting plan submitted for common areas,
trails, RV storage, and recreation center
Earth Resources
Developer to submit to City's Geotechnical
Evaluation
Planning
Planning
Utilities & Maintenance
Utilities & Maintenance
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Prior to each final map
In CC&Rs and on grading plan
Prior to first final map
Prior to building permits
Prior to first final map
Prior to building permits
Prior to building permits
Prior to each final map
Prior to second final map
Prior to second final map
o73
£T>
O
t/1
ua
r
o
Engineering Prior to grading permits
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Building plans will be reviewed and approved
by City for compliance with UBC and
seismic requirement Building
Disclosure of seismic potential shall be
given to potential owners through the CC&Rs Planning
Developer shall submit plans for erosion control
and desiltation Engineering
Developer shall submit grading plans in
conformance with approved tentative map and
all associated Geotechnical and Hydrological
Reports Engineering
Developer shall submit plans for foundation
design based on soil conditions Building
Developer shall submit plans for the installation
of low flow showers and toilets Building
Circulation improvements listed on Table II
for the year 1995 shall be constructed prior
to project buildout. Engineering
A schedule for construction
shall be submitted by developer for these Engineering
Developer shall pay traffic impact fees Engineering
Cultural Resources
Prior to building permits
In CC&Rs prior to first final map
Prior to grading permit
Prior to grading permit
Prior to building permits
Prior to building permits
Prior to release of bonds and last occupancy
Prior to first final map
Prior to building permit issuance
•*-i
o73
en
o
B)(Qn>
Data Recovery Program Planning Prior to issuance of grading permits
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Dept.
Verified
Implementation Remarks
Initial vegetation removal monitored by
biologist and paleontologist
improvements Planning
All grading activities monitored Planning
New deposits may require evaluation and
additional mitigation Planning
Paleonotoligist may divert grading Engineering
All fossils shall be donated Planning
Parks and Recreation
Parks Agreement shall be signed by City and
Developer Planning
Fire
Landscape plan includes fire retardant materials Planning
Site plans shall include existing and proposed
fire hydrants, roads, and drives Fire
FireCompliance with standard fire conditions
Police
Recreation Area and Open Space Areas reviewed Police
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to first final map
Prior to each final map
Prior to grading
Prior to building permits
Prior to first final map
S:
o50
tn
o
-oo>
LOT COVERAGE SUMMARY (Based Upon 50% Building / Lot Coverage)
Gross tot Size Net Lot Size Coverage
Village Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average (Gross Lot)
5/15/90
Coverage
(Net Lot)
B 6,000 s.f.
C 6,000 s.f.
D 7,104 s.f.
E 7,000 S.f.
F 7,906 S.f.
G 6,000 S.f.
H 7,000 S.f.
I 6,000 S.f.
K 6,100 S.f.
L 6,262 s.f.
M 5,500 S.f.
N 5,000 s.f.
0 5,125 S.f.
P 5,075 S.f.
Q 5.000 s.f.
20,210
15,005
22,522
23,029
22,817
14,218
14,112
1 9,755
20,055
13,332
1 6,054
16,426
1 2,757
19,757
17,937
S.f.
SJ.
s.f.
S.f.
S.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
9,429
8,635
10,867
10,933
11,650
8,408
7,669
9,503
9,722
8,691
8,311
7,319
7,539
7,608
7,941
s.f.
S.f.
S.f.
S.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
5,313 s.f.
5,750 s.f.
5,795 s.f.
6,233 s.f.
7,078 s.f.
5,045 s.f.
5,000 S.f.
5,257 s.f.
5,836 s.f.
5,289 s.f.
4,741 s.f.
4,517 s.f.
4,905 s.f.
4,669 s.f.
4.541 s.f.
10,950
12,955
16.728
13,473
15,670
11,491
11,184
11,355
11,817
9,694
9,614
10,552
10,771
10,350
8.841
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
7,505
7,647
8,952
8,341
9,257
7,342
7,020
7,426
7,527
6,993
6,112
6,542
6,544
5,955
6,273
S.f.
S.f.
S.f.
S.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
26%
28%
23%
26%
22%
28%
30%
25%
25%
27%
29%
33%
32%
32%
31%
31%
31%
28%
33%
28%
32%
33%
32%
31%
33%
38%
36%
36%
39%
37%
Project
Wide 6,071 s.f. 17,866 S.f. 8,948 s.f. 5,331 s.f. 11,696 s.f. 7,296 s.f.28%33%
A (o•„' >//~v.\ v..'
Average Distance Between Units
Arroyo
La Costa
Village
Average
Distance Between
Buildings
VILLAGE B
VILLAGE C
VILLAGED
VILLAGE E
VILLAGE F
VILLAGE G
VILLAGE H
VILLAGE 1
VILLAGE K
VILLAGE L
VILLAGE M
VILLAGE N
VILLAGE O
VILLAGER
VILLAGE Q
PROJECT
AVERAGE
17ft.
18ft.
19ft.
18ft.
16ft.
15ft.
18ft.
18ft.
17ft.
17ft.
16ft.
15ft.
16ft.
15ft.
14ft.
17ft.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3033
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
2 OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
3 LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AND IN LFMP
4 ZONE 12.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
5 CASE NO.: PUD 88-4
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
7
Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in
8 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per
map No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said
9 county on June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-
09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25,
10 255-041-14.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
12 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tide 21
13
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on
15
the 6di day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider16
- „ said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20 relating to the Planned Unit Development.
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
22 follows:
23 A) That die above recitations are true and correct.
24
B) That based on the evidence presented at die public hearing, die Commission recommends
25 APPROVAL of PUD 88-4, based on die following findings and subject to die following
conditions:
26
27
28
Findings:
2
1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
3
4 .
also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual because:5
.. a. The proposed project provides adequate open space, recreational amenities, and
optional community facilities.
b. The proposed development is compatible with surrounding residential development
by providing comparable lot sizes and harmonious architectural styles.
8
10
, 2
without disturbance to either future or existing residences.
9
3. The proposed project complies with the Planned Development Ordinance because all
21
24
25
26
2?
28
incorporated herein by reference.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the City's Planned Development Ordinance and
c. The internal street system has been designed for safe and efficient traffic flow
development standards are met in the following manner:
a. The proposed project provides 13.73 acres of passive and active recreation area
(excluding rear yards), which exceeds the required amount by 8.79 acres.
b. The proposed residences provide either a 2 or 3 car garage for private parking.
Adequate guest parking is provided on the proposed public street system.
14
c. Each garage will provide adequate space to comply with the 200 square foot
15 storage requirement.
d. The applicant has provided a recreational vehicle storage area that exceeds the
required size by 3,262 square feet.
e. Each unit has been reviewed to ensure compliance with the Small Lot Planned
Unit Development Architectural Guidelines.
19 Conditions
20
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
2. Approval of PUD 88-4 is granted subject to the approval of CT 88-3/HDP 88-8.
PC RESO NO. 3033 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOI
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3033
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus & Hall.
None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
3 LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD IN THE PC ZONE
4 AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
5 CASE NO.: HDP 88-8
/*
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
7 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the
8 City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map
No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county on
9 June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19,
255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
10
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
.. 2 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tide 21
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14 WHEREAS, die Planning Commission did on die 16th day of May, 1990, and on
15 die 6th of June, 1990, consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
T8 relating to die Planning Commission Determination; and
19 ,NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
20
follows:
21
A) That die foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on die evidence presented at die public hearing, die Commission recommends
APPROVAL of HDP 88-8, based on die following findings and subject to die following
24 conditions:
25 Findings:
26 1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2 are incorporated herein by
reference.
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. The grading amounts of 8,850 cubic yards per acre falls within the acceptable range
required by the City Hillside Development Ordinance after the exemptions have been made
for grading on CaUe Barcelona.
3. The project proposes the use of contoured and undulated slopes, preserves riparian areas,
and enhances views.
4. The proposal of phased grading will better balance cut and fill amounts onsite and the
prevent the hauling of 600,000 cubic yards of earth on City streets.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
2. Approval is granted for HDP 88-8, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits.
Any proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this Hillside
Development Permit.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None. "
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
•"V^vy' \ |
MICHAEL J. HOLZMII
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3034 -2-
1
2
3
4
5 CASE NO: SDP 89-18
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
7 referred to the Planning Commission; and
8
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
9
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
25
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3035
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REOMMMENDING APPROVAL OF
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 89-11 ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF
OLIVENHAIN ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD IN
THE PC ZONE AND IN ZONE 12.
Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on the 6th of June, 1990, consider said
request on property described as:
Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per
map No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said
county on June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-
09, 18 & 19, 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25,
255-041-14.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to SDP 89-18.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
22 the City of Carlsbad as follows:
23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
conditions:
26
27
28
APPROVAL SDP 89-18, based on the following findings and subject to the following
Findings:
1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the recreation/daycare center
is allowed by MP 88-1 which implements the Land Use Element of the General Plan for
this area.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type of development since the site is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the recreation/daycare development.
3. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
7 The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project,
ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
8 determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project
unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the
9 requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar
as they apply to sewer service for this project.
10
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions
of approval.
12 The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to
13 pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as
14 required by the General Plan.
15 6. Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be provided by the
Leucadia County Water District.
16 '
7. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan.
18 This project received environmental review as part of EIR 86-2 and MP 88-1 (Arroyo La
19 Costa). This document determined that there were no significant environmental impacts
associated with the proposed recreation/daycare center. Refer to CT 88-3, Resolution No.
20 3032 for findings and conditions related to the development of the Arroyo La Costa
Master Plan.
21
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
23 requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
24 public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3035 -2-
28
10. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has been
conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 12.
Conditions
4 1. Approval is granted for SDP 89-18, as shown on Exhibit(s) "C-l" - "C-7", dated May 16,
1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
6 The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the site
7 plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The plan shall reflect the conditions of
approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to
8 issuance of building permits or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that
sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will
_ _ continue to be available until time of occupancy.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public
facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to
13 time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth
14 management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivided
agreement to pay the public facuities fee dated January 16, 1989, a copy of which is on
15 fQe with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this
application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will
16 be void.
17 5. Water shall be provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
18 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may be
19 required as part of the Zone 12 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments
made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
20
Uses allowed with this Site Development Plan include a recreation/daycare center only.
The proposal of any other uses shall require approval of an amendment to this Site
00 Development Plan.
KiKi
23 8. Lighting for the tennis courts shall be on timers and hours of operation shall be consistent
with the hours of operation for lights on the tennis courts at Stagecoach Park. The
24 lanscaping plan shall be designed to screen the tennis courts from adjacent residences.
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3035 -3-
28
9. Hours for utilization of the swimming pool may include but are not limited to 6:00 a.m.
to 10:00 p.m.
2
10. Prior to occupancy of the recreation center in Village OS-9, the applicant shall give the
3 City Council the option of entering into an agreement incorporating the following points
for certain public uses of the swimming pool:4
. Public uses shall be limited to those uses sponsored by the City of Carlsbad Parks
and Recreation Department.
6 b. Public use of the pool shall be restricted from weekends, holidays and weekdays
7 after 3:00 PM.
8 c. The City of Carlsbad shall enter into a hold harmless agreement with the
Homeowners' Association and the applicant for any liability that may be incurred
9 associated with public uses.
The Homeowners' Association shall be fairly compensated by the City of Carlsbad
_ _ for any such public uses.
e. Public uses shall be subject to any rules, regulations and policies imposed upon the
project by the State of California Department of Real Estate and upon consent of
13 the City which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
14 The agreement shall contain provisions for equitable dispute resolution for any matters
related to the agreement.
15
11. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are
- „ challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
19
12. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
20 Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit
issuance.21
nn 13. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project
within five years from the date of project approval.
23 14. Approval of SDP 89-18 is granted subject to the approval of MP 88-1, CT 88-3, and PUD
24 88-4.
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3035 -4-
28
15. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates
pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning
2 Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director.
3
16. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in
substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Planning and Building.
6 17. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director
7 approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and minimize any impacts
on adjacent homes or property.
8
18. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In
9 such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the
Planning Director.
10 8
__ 19. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or
building permits, whichever occurs first.
13 20. All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size.
14 21. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from
weeds, trash, and debris.
15
22. Preliminary landscape plans shall be submitted.16
- „ 23. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines Manual
and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
19 24. Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1 plants
(see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
20 or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall promote
water conservation.21
25. The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessive litter
and/or are too large relative to the lot size.
23 26. Planter width shall be a minimum of four (4) feet, not including curb, footings and/or
24 other paving, and parking overhang.
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3035 -5-
28
27. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall be
submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been installed as
2 shown on the approved landscape plans.
3 28. All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
5
29. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
- 30. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
7 31. All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and shall
8 match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
9 32. Mounding shall be used in parking lot landscaping or preliminary plans shall explain why
mounding is not possible to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
10
33. All parking lot trees shall be canopy trees.
•i 2 34. The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons.
13 35. Trees shall be dispersed throughout the parking lot at a ratio of 1 tree per three parking
stalls.
14
36. All signs shall be designed in accordance with the Aroyo La Costa Master Plan, MP 88-
15 l, and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of
such signs.16
_ „ 37. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24" x 36" blueline drawing.
Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development
Permit and signed approved site plan.
19
38. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report
20 shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the
presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two phased program, on file
in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on
paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department.
KtKi
22 39. No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final
map.
24
40. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing
25 or grading of the site.
26
£7 PC RESO NO. 3035 -6-
28
41. This project has been reviewed for conformancy with the grading ordinance and found to
be a project for which a grading permit is required. Prior to any building permits being
issued for the site, a grading plan in confonnance with City Standards and Section 11.06
2 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, must be submitted, approved and grading work must be
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All slopes within this project shall be
3 graded no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical unless specifically approved
otherwise pursuant to these conditions.
4
42. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this
* project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the
proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the
City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
7 43. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
8 prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and
shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as
9 approved by the City Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown
and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any
basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage
facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the
•i 2 City Engineer. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control
measures for a period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee their
maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts
and types suitable to the City Engineer.
14
44. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as
15 may be required by the City Engineer.
45. The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding
_ „ drainage across the adjacent property prior to the approval of the final map for this
project.
T8 46. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the
19 respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
20 47. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and
Cable TV authorities.
21
48. All required fire hydrants, water mains, and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
23 49. The gazebo next to the pool shall be relocated within the property line.
24
50. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to
25 and approved by the Fire Department.
26
27 PC RESO NO. 3035 -7-
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51. Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the
Fire Marshal.
52. An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
53. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
54. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have
posted "No Parking/Fire Lane - Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
55. All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other
systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval
prior to construction.
56. All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the
building and shielding to prevent noise and visual impacts, subject to approval before
issuance of permit.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden,
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3035 -8-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3036
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A FLOOD PLAIN ENCROACHMENT FOR
3 PROPERTY WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT 88-3 ARROYO LA COSTA.
CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
4 CASE NO: SUP 89-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map
No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county on
8 June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19,
255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
9
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
10
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
, p Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on
14 the 6th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
I
15 said request; and
•"•" WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
17 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
T8 relating to the Special Use Permit; and
19
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
20
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
21
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
22 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of SUP 89-3, based on the following findings and subject to the following
24 conditions:
25 Findings:
26 1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference.
27
28
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
2. All permit requirements of Chapter 24.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code have been
satisfied.
3. The site is reasonably safe from flooding.
4. The site does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of areas where the base flood
elevations have been determined.
Conditions
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
2. Approval of SUP 89-3 is granted subject to the approval of CT 88-3.
3. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing
or grading of the site.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Marcus,
McFadden, Holmes & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J.
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3036 -2-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3037
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EL
3 CAMINO REAL SCENIC CORRIDOR ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN
4 ROAD, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD IN THE PC ZONE
AND IN LFMP ZONE 12.
5 CASE NAME: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO: SUP 90-8o
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
8 Those portions of lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per map
9 No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county on
June 27, 1898 known as Assessors Parcel No.'s 255-010-09, 18 & 19,
10 255-022-01, 255-030-09, 10 & 11, 255-031-24 & 25, 255-041-14.
1 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
12 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
13 Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 16th day of May, 1990, and on
15
the 6th day of June, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
16
request; and
, o WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
20 relating to the Special Use Permit; and
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
22 the City of Carlsbad as follows:
23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
25 APPROVAL of SUP 90-8, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
26
Findings:
27
1. All findings of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. Proposed architecture complies with the "Old California/Hispanic" required design theme.
3. The proposed building setback of 220 feet along El Camino Real greatly exceeds the 40
foot requirement
4. Grading in excess of ten feet is required for the installation of Calle Barcelona, a
secondary arterial, designated on the Circulation Element.
5. The open space area along £1 Camino Real will be enhanced with naturalized landscaping
and additional trees.
Conditions
1. All conditions of CT 88-3, Resolution No. 3032 and EIR 86-2, Resolution No. 3039 are
incorporated herein by reference. Refer to these documents for all conditions and
mitigation measures applicable to development of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILtER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3037 -2-
EXHIBIT 6
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
August 29. 1988
STAFF REPORT
REVISEDDATE: JUNE 6, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: EIR 86-2/MPA 149rOVMP 88-1/GPA/LU 88-1/ZC 88-3/CT 88-3/PUD 88A/HDP
88-8/SDP 89-18/SUP 89-3/SUP 9Q-8/ROI 181 ARROYO LA COSTA - Request for
the certification of an Environmental Impact Report and ajpproval of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration.; at«| the Rfequest for approval of a General Plan/Land Use
Amendment, Zone Change, Master Plan Amendment, Master Plan, Tentative Tract
Map, Planned Unit Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, Special Use
Permits, Site Development Plan, and a City| initiated Resolution of Intention and
on property located east of El Camino Real, north of Olivenhain Road, and west
of Rancho Santa Fe Road in the PC Zone and in Zone 12.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 3039 recommending certification of EIR
86-2 and Planning Commission Resolution && 3049 recommending Approval of a Mitigated
Negative Det^fc, and ADOPT Resolution Nos. 3028, 3029, 3030, 3031, 3032, 3033, 3034,
3035, 3036, 3037, recommending Approval of MPA 149(0), MP 88-1, GPA/LU 88-1, ZC 88-3/CT
88-3, PUD 88-4, HDP 88-8, SDP 89-18, SUP 89-3, SUP 90-8 and ROI 181, and based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II.PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a number of discretionary approvals for a 529 acre Master Plan
community located between El Camino Real, Olivenhain Road, and Rancho Santa Fe Road. This
area is currently a part of the La Costa Master Plan (MP-149(G)) and is known as La Costa
Southwest. Through the proposed actions, the applicant is requesting approval to withdraw from
the La Costa Master Plan and form a new Master Plan, known as Arroyo La Costa (MP 88-1).
In addition, the applicant is also proposing a Tentative Map/Planned Unit Development Permit
to allow the construction of 1,076 single family dwellings and accompanying recreational facilities.
To accomplish these actions, the applicant is requesting the following discretionary approvals:
A.
B.
BC.
Certification of an Environmental Impact Report addressing all the discretionary
approvals being requested at this hearing ||p|*C fo? *C* &«&«*•
Cfertirkatioa of a mitigated Iterative Declaration for ftem "C* below,
A Master Plan Amendment to the existing La Costa Master Plan to delete all
references to the area previously known as La Costa Southwest (now Arroyo La
Costa) and to place certain restrictions on remaining future development.
A new Master Plan, in compliance with all current ordinances and standards, for
the area previously known as La Costa Southwest (now Arroyo La Costa).
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 2
Df;. A General Plan Amendment to revise land use designations within the Arroyo La
Costa Master Plan area.
£|. A Zone Change from R-l to P-C for a small area just north of the Arroyo La Costa
Master Plan area to incorporate it into the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan as Open
Space.
E||. A Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development
Permit for the area covered by the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
G|i. A Site Development Plan for the common recreation/daycare facility.
H|. A Special Use Permit for the construction of improvements in the 100-year flood
plain.
J|. A Special Use Permit to demonstrate compliance with the El Camino Real Corridor
Standards.
Jj|. A Resolution of Intention to declare an intent for a future change in the land use
designation on the railroad parcel from Travel Services/Utility (TS/U) to a
residential land use.
Due to the complex nature of the proposed project, all discretionary actions and related planning
issues are discussed individually below and may be found on the following pages:
EIR 86-2 24f
MPA 149(0) 4|
MP 88-1 S|
GPA/LU 88-1 7J
ZC 88-3
CT 88-3/PUD 88-4/HDP 88-8
SDP 89-18
SUP 89-3 2l||
SUP 90-8 22|j
Growth Management 22!1
ROI 181 241
Project Background
The La Costa Master Plan covers approximately 5,282 acres, divided into four areas as follows:
The Developed Area 2888 acres
The Northwest Area 744 acres
The Southeast Area 1121 acres
The Southwest Area 529 acres
See Exhibit X-l, pg. 27, for the location of each of these areas.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 3
Because the overall La Costa Master plan is 17 years old, the document does not adequately
address current environmental concerns nor does it comply with City standards and policies. To
correct these inconsistencies, in 1985 the City Council directed staff to work with the owner of
the undeveloped portions of La Costa to revise and update the La Costa Master Plan. Because
the owners of the undeveloped portions of La Costa are not yet ready to develop all of their
properties, staff and the developer have agreed to first address the Southwest area of the Master
Plan (now called the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan).
To simplify matters, the overall La Costa Master Plan is being amended concurrently with the
preparation of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan and will eliminate all references to the Southwest.
The overall La Costa Master Plan will remain in effect for the Developed, Northwest and
Southeast areas. The only La Costa Master Plan areas which will not be impacted by this revision
are areas not owned by the applicant within the Southeast and Northwest portions of the Master
Plan. These areas that have either approved projects or projects that are pending have been
considered exempt. All other vacant property has been conditioned to comply with the Master
Plan requirements.
It is anticipated that the Southeast portion of the La Costa Master Plan will be the next area
considered for development. When that occurs, a separate Master Plan will be prepared and all
references to that area will be removed from the overall La Costa Master Plan. Although the
Ranchero Estates area was originally included in the "Developed Area" of the overall La Costa
Master Plan, it was subsequently included in the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and
therefore will be incorporated into the Southeast Master Plan. Similar procedures would take
place when the Northwest area is developed. This would have the end result of eliminating the
overall La Costa Master Plan and replacing it with three detailed, up-to-date Master Plans.
The Master Plan includes the area which was previously approved by Tentative Map CT 85-6 and
Planned Development Permit PUD 80 for 789 dwelling units. This project was a mix of multi-
family units and small single family lots. Approval of this project will be revoked and superseded
by the new Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit. Approval of the proposed Master
Plan and related Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit will include a condition that
the previously approved Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit shall be superseded and
therefore revoked.
Project Description
The 529 acre Arroyo La Costa site consists of primarily undeveloped land between El Camino
Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road. Agricultural and urban land uses characterize much of the
surrounding landscape; however, a particularly important natural area, the Green Valley and
Encinitas riparian systems remain adjacent to the site on the west side of El Camino Real.
Elevations are relatively low and relief is minor on the site. The lowest point is along the western
property line at about 64 feet above mean sea level, and the highest point is in the east-central
area at 273 feet. Small, steep slopes occur on sandstone soils in the western portions and in
several of the small ravines. Approximately 60% of the site is covered in grasslands. Small
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 4
Eucalyptus and Oak woodlands are located in the northern portions of the site. A third woodland
feature is the riparian zone in the central valley. The site contains several drainage areas which
are tributary to Green Valley, some of which contain enough moisture to support riparian
vegetation.
The Master Plan consists of 16 residential Villages, 9 Open Space Planning areas, 2 school sites,
and a church site. When built out, the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan will consist of a maximum
1,076 single family homes. These residences will be located on lots that range from 5,000 to over
23,000 square feet in size with the majority of the lots over 7,500 square feet in size. The
minimum size of the flat, usable portion of each lot will be 5,000, 6,000 or 7,000 square feet
depending upon the village in which each lot is located.
Features of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan include a pedestrian/bike trail which will be used
to provide access from the various neighborhoods to a centrally located common recreation/day
care facility. Passive recreational lots will be located in most of the villages to provide open space
as well as access to the trail system. A pedestrian/bike bridge will span Calle Barcelona from a
common recreation/day care center to the nearby junior high school. The trail system has been
designed to provide links to other portions of Carlsbad as well as provide bicycle and pedestrian
circulation within the Master Plan area.
The Master Plan has been designed to preserve the onsite environmental resources which include
the riparian habitat and the oak grove. A portion of the pedestrian/bicycle trail system will be
constructed along each side of the enhanced riparian corridor. The oak grove will be
incorporated into the design of the adjacent village as a natural, passive recreation area.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Certification of an Environmental Impact Report is being requested. The Environmental Impact
Report addresses the environmental impacts associated with the Master Plan and the related
applications. In response to the draft EIR, the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan conceptual land use
plan has gone through substantial revision. In addition a Local Facilities Management Plan,
(Zone 12) which covers required public facilities for this property has been prepared.
Environmental review has been completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
and mitigation measures identified in this EIR and the Zone 12 Plan have been incorporated into
the provisions of the Master Plan.
The EIR Project Summary identifies project impacts as well as appropriate mitigation measures.
It also assesses impacts after the application of the mitigation measures. These measures have
reduced the impacts to a level of insignificance in all cases except for Air Quality Noise and
Aesthetics. These issues are discussed below:
Air Quality Neise
The EIR identifies short term construction pjsj impacts d|gi^!;i;p»$^eti^i as not being
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 5
mitigated to a level of insignificance. Staff disagrees with this position because application of
standard measures to control fugitive dust and emissions Boise &nd regulate WorJk hours during
construction will, as in all other projects in the City, reduce this type of impact to a level of
insignificance.
Aesthetics
The EIR states that the project will change the visual nature of the area from open space to urban
uses which will result in significant adverse impacts. Staff disagrees with this position. Since
annexation into the City, the area has been designated for residential land uses on the General
Plan and Zoning Map. Because the site is surrounded by existing development, leaving the site
as open space is not a feasible solution nor is it consistent with the projected urbanization of the
area. It is staffs position that the proposed residential development is consistent with the planned
land uses and that the project will not create significant adverse impacts, with respect to
aesthetics.
In conclusion, based on the environmental analysis contained in EIR 86-2 plus staffs position on
the issues of air quality |||||| and aesthetics, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission
find that all identified project related impacts can be reduced to a level of insignificance by the
application of mitigation measures and conditions contained in the EIR and the amended Zone
12 plan. Therefore, project approval would not require the decision makers to make findings of
overiding consideration.
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT - (MP 149(O)
Planning: Issues
1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the goals of the La Costa Master Plan?
2. How will the proposed amendment impact development within the La Costa Master Plan
Area?
Discussion
The proposed amendment to the La Costa Master Plan addresses two major revisions as follows:
1. Elimination of any reference to the area previously known as Southwest (Arroyo
La Costa).
2. Stipulation that updated Environmental Impact Reports and new Master Plans be
required prior to future development occurring in the Northwest and Southeast
Areas of La Costa.
The proposed Master Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals of the La Costa Master Plan
because it maintains residential land uses and ensures the provision of a variety of housing types
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 6
within the overall Master Plan area. In the overall Master Plan, the Southwest Area was intended
solely for residential development. The proposed amendment will allow for residential
development that is more compatible with surrounding single family homes. No non-residential
land uses such as commercial, office, nor industrial uses are proposed except for residential
support facilities such as schools, recreation/daycare center and a church.
The proposed amendment will impact development by providing a mechanism for creating up-
to-date master plans for the La Costa area. The existing La Costa Master Plan is out-of-date and
does not address many of the present ordinances and policies. For example, all development is
currently required to process a La Costa Development Plan. Parking standards are less restrictive
and not consistent with the present ordinance, and other ordinances relating to Planned
Development, Growth Management and Hillsides are not addressed. The proposed Arroyo La
Costa Master Plan will correct this situation for the Southwest Area by addressing all current
ordinances and policies. Since it is presently not known what land uses, their locations or their
eavfcojHmHjal impact* will be tmtSJ new taasjsr pIan* are pc$0$e4 & Mdpted Mgattve
declaration was prepared for this amendment. As—disnmed previously under "Project
Background", (page 3), The mitigation would rebuke updated EIRs and new Master Plans will be
required prior to review of future development in the Northwest or Southeast Areas of La Costa.
Each of these Master Plans will also be required to comply with all ordinances and policies in
effect at the time of approval. As discussed in the overall La Costa Master Plan, there are several
properties in these areas that have either been approved or are currently under review. These
projects have been considered exempt from the new Master Plan/EIR requirement but must
comply with all current ordinances and policies. As stated earlier, all other vacant properties have
been conditioned to comply with the Master Plan requirement.
After the approval of the last Master Plan the "Developed Area" (LFMP Zone 6) of La Costa will
no longer be covered by a Master Plan (See page 3, paragraph 3). However, as indicated in the
Citywide Plan, Zone 6 is considered an infill area. Similar to other infill areas of the City,
individual properties are still subject to a number of discretionary reviews including: tentative
tract maps, planned development ordinance, hillside, site development plan, and grading and
building plan check. These review mechanisms will ensure that all the developable areas of La
Costa will be reviewed in accordance with current requirements.
MASTER PLAN fMP 88-1)
Planning Issues
1. Does the Master Plan properly implement the General Plan, Zoning and appropriate
policies governing the site?
2. Are the general development plan and the standards provided in the Master Plan
adequate to properly develop the property?
Discussion
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 7
Upon approval, the Master Plan will become the controlling document for the Southwest Area.
(Exhibit X-4, page 30). It implements the General Plan, Planned Community (PC) zone, by
establishing land uses and maximum development intensities based on a detailed analysis of the
opportunities and constraints of the site. As required by the General Plan, consideration was first
given to potential school sites, existing riparian areas, and the alignment of Circulation Element
roadways (eg. Calle Barcelona). The proposed locations for these uses are consistent with the
School Location Plan, the Open Space Element, and the Circulation Element. As discussed in the
"General Plan Amendment" section, the proposed Master Plan also ensures the provision of multi-
family and affordable housing thereby complying with the Housing Element. Mitigation measures
incorporated into the project also ensure adherence with appropriate ordinances and policies such
as the Hillside Ordinance and the Noise Policy. The location and phasing of all required public
facilities is discussed in the Zone 12 Plan and demonstrate compliance with the Growth
Management Ordinance.
The Arroyo La Costa Master Plan Area is divided into separate planning areas and three phases
as shown on Exhibit X-5, page 31. The land use summary for the property is shown on Exhibit
X-9, page 35. Approximately 135.8 acres (26 percent) of the Master Plan Area is composed of
open space. Otherwise, individual single family neighborhood developments are proposed
throughout the remainder of the property. Each village or planning area is designed to be
compatible with surrounding development and product types. In addition to sites for a church,
elementary school, and junior high school, the Master Plan also provides for several features that
have not been incorporated in previous Master Plans in the City, including:
1. A large, community recreation area rather than individual recreation areas for each
village;
2. An extensive bicycle and pedestrian trail system including a pedestrian bridge across
Calle Barcelona; and
3. A large daycare center incorporated into the community recreation site.
The common recreation/daycare center will be tied to the rest of the Master Plan by an extensive
trail system. This trail system will include the first pedestrian bridge in the City. The bridge will
span Calle Barcelona and link the common recreation/daycare center with the junior high school
site. This trail system has been designed so that it could be connected to a future citywide trail
system. The applicant has provided plans showing how pedestrian bridges could be constructed
at some future date across Rancho Santa Fe Road and El Camino Real to link this trail system
with other parts of the City. These trails were designed in accordance with the recommendations
of the City's Open Space Committee. The details of the trail system are provided in the Open
Space chapter of the Master Plan. During review of the Master Plan the applicant proposed the
formation of a maintenance district for the maintenance of the trail system and pedestrian bridge.
The applicant believes that a maintenance district is necessary for the establishment of a trail
system that links the various neighborhoods of Carlsbad. It is the applicant's position that it
would be difficult for a homeowners' association to maintain a trail system that was open to
persons not residing within the project.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 8
The applicants have indicated that if a citywide maintenance district is not formed they would
prefer to redesign the trail system to serve only the residents of the project. At this time,
however, the applicant (through a proposed Master Homeowners Association (MHOA)) has been
required to provide maintenance in perpetuity for the trail system. If a citywide maintenance
district is formed in the future, the MHOA will have the option of joining.
Details of the common recreation/daycare center will be discussed in the portion of this report
that addresses the Site Development Plan which is being processed concurrently with the Master
Plan.
In addition to the comprehensive development plan, the Master Plan provides the development
standards to adequately develop the property. Normally, a Master Plan is implemented through
subsequent tentative maps or Planned Development Permits; however, because a Tentative Map
and Planned Development Permit are being processed concurrently with the Master Plan a greater
level of detail has been provided than would ordinarily be submitted with a Master Plan. With
these mechanisms the applicant has provided architectural details and individual site designs for
every unit proposed in the Master Plan.
In conclusion, staff believes that the Master Plan implements the General Plan, zoning and all
appropriate policies governing the site. The Master Plan also provides a detailed set of
development standards and ensures that an adequate mixture of single family, multiple family and
affordable housing will be provided in the La Costa area.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - fGPA/LU 88-11
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the maximum number of dwelling units
allowed under the existing General Plan?
2. Will the proposed change in General Plan/Land Use designations from RMH to RM
and RLM adversely impact the mix of housing types in the City?
3. Does the proposed amendment protect the environmental resources of the site?
4. Is the proposed change in Open Space boundaries consistent with the City's Interim
Open Space Ordinance?
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE9
Discussion
Exhibit X-2, page 28, illustrates the existing and proposed General Plan land use designations for
the subject property. The proposed amendment will:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Eliminate four pockets of RMH, Residential Medium High Density (8-15 du/ac).
Total of 25.0 acres.
Increase the amount of RLM, Residential Low Medium (0-4 du/ac) and RM
Residential Medium (4-8) du/ac) within the master plan area. Total of 327.23
acres.
Establish the exact locations of two previously floating school locations.
Redefine the boundaries of Open Space within the Master Plan area.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE COMPARISON FOR
UNDEVELOPED AREAS OF ARROYO LA COSTA MASTER PLAN
Existing Proposed
GtUKtait f$»&
L*tsf.U» -
RLM
RM
RMH
ELEM.
JR. HIGH
OPEN SPACE
TOTAL
Onm
Acres
259.4
105.6
28.0
—
—92.0
49$#
Net
Acres*
213.2
91.1
25.0
m,$.
WtGP**
3.2
6.0
11.5
Mexiauua
M0W&4
FotursDUS
682
547
288
15/7
Aerat
227.2
120.8
—13.3
27.4
96.3
41**,
Acres*
213.75
113.48
0
32?>23
rt**H<D**WWWfir"1
3.2
6.0
Maximum
FutuieDtIS
683
680
0
iW
*Gross acres minus constraints
**Growth Management Control Point
Although the proposed General Plan amendment would allow 1,363 dus, after the subtraction of
179 units for density transfer (previously allowed by Growth Management and discussed in the
LFMP for Zone 12) and 39 units for overbuilding in Rancho del Ponderosa only 1,145 units could
actually be constructed in the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan area. The project is proposing 1,076
dwelling units.
Land Use Impacts
During review of the proposed project it was determined that the subject site was more
appropriate for single family development based on the fact that the Southwest is actually an infill
area and is surrounded on three sides by single family homes. Staff also examined other areas
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 10
of the La Costa Master Plan to determine suitability for multi-family and affordable housing. It
was decided that both the Northwest and Southeast areas were more appropriate for the following
reasons:
1. The Northwest allows closer accessibility to a major employment center;
o _ * pr
3|. Both areas are located closer to designated commercial sites; and
4|. Both the Southeast and Northwest will be closer to full service Community Parks
(Stagecoach, Alga Norte).
The City of Carlsbad's Housing Element Is under review, J^e&Hinary number* from SANE>A<J veil
pla<* a fctemdal obligation on C&efcbad to aieer the »e<afe of its <&&«*»$ fax low mad moderns!
income housing. Almost certainly new programs will be retailed to demonstrate a good faith
effort to meet this need. Developers of new commtinities like Arroyo La Costa must provide for
all ecortosiie ssgrneats of &e ^tamnait? and share & the i^oftsibilty foj #>Jttteg this problem*
Therefore, prior to final map approval for any portion of the Master Plan area, the applicant shall
enter into an agreement mth the Citjr to provide the Master Plait's proportional share of the City/is
total obligation for low and moderate income housing units or to implement whatever programs
ate adopted by the City Council as part of the Housing Element review should that review be
completed prior to final map approval, To guarantee the required variety of housing types, the
project has been conditioned to prepare separate master plans for Northwest and Southeast La
Costa. Each of these master plans will be required to provide multi-family and affordable housing
as defined bv the Citv. Prior to recordation of the Southwest final mspi this will be detailed in
o HT-TQiisirijT Element Agreement11 between the developer smd the City stnd to ensure compliance
this agreement will be recorded as a lien on the developer's Southeast Master Plan property.
Future changes in land use designations to provide multi or affordable housing within the
Northwest or Southeast will not result in an increased gross density in these areas, unless
approved by the City Council. Such an increased density would be possible if the City Council
determined that affordable housing was in the best interests of the City and if the dwelling unit
cap for the Southeast Quadrant were not exceeded.
The following example is included for illustrative purposes only. Hypothetically, the proposed
Housing Element Agreement determines that 200 units of multi-family/affordable housing are
required by the Southwest but must be built in the Southeast. These 200 units could not be
added to the Southeast (Zone 11) buildout number. Instead they would have to be subtracted
from the Southeast buildout number after the requirement for multi-family/affordable housing is
met within that Zone
HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE
1000 - Buildout dus for the Southeast
-200 - Multi/Affordable housing dus required for Southeast
-200 - Multi/Affordable housing dus required for Southwest
600 - Remaining dus available in Southeast.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 11
Basically, in both the Northwest and Southeast, provisions for multi-family/affordable housing
must be determined first. Then other housing types may be considered. This will most likely
result in clustered housing surrounded by large, open space bands again, unless the City Council
allowed an increased density to provide affordable housing. Staff has determined that this
method meets with the requirements of the Housing Element and allows for more compatible
development in the Southwest, Southeast and Northwest areas.
The proposed General Plan Amendment will also establish the location of two schools which
include a junior high school and an elementary school. These were previously shown as floating
sites on the General Plan because, although the school districts knew they needed schools in the
general area, they did not know when or where the schools would be needed. During review of
the Master Plan, school locations were established based on input from representatives of both
the San Dieguito and Encinitas Elementary School Districts. San Dieguito preferred to locate the
junior high school site south of Calle Barcelona because the site could be graded into a level 20+
acre pad that was adjacent to Calle Barcelona and away from the riparian habitat area. Encinitas
preferred an area in the westerly portion of the site because it was farthest away from existing
school sites at Levante Street and Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road. They also wanted to
be separated from the junior high school.
Environmental Resources
The existing General Plan designations do not accurately reflect existing topography or constraints
of this site. Areas shown as open space on the General Plan do not protect the most
environmentally sensitive portions of the site, such as the large riparian habitat in the west-
central portion of the site. It appears that these boundaries were drawn with little or no field
work. The revised open space boundaries are based on extensive field work and detailed
biological surveys of the site. The proposed open space areas will protect and enhance the
existing riparian habitat onsite. This area will serve as a natural open space corridor running
through the project. All of the area west of and within the S.D.G. & E. easement along the
westerly edge of the site will be left in its natural state except for trails and the enhancement of
several eroded areas. As well as preserving several endangered plant species it will serve as a
buffer between El Camino Real and future residences.
Open Space/Interim Ordinance
In December of 1989, the City of Carlsbad adopted an interim ordinance establishing temporary
land use controls to protect open space. The interim ordinance requires that developments
proposing to modify the open space boundaries as shown on the General Plan make four findings.
The proposed project is requesting a modification to the open space boundaries and therefore is
subject to this interim ordinance. The required findings are:
1. The open space area is of equal or greater area; and
2. The open space area is of equal or greater environmental quality; and
3. The boundary modification is made in order to provide an enhancement to an
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 12
environmentally sensitive area; and
4. The adjusted open space is contiguous or within close proximity to the open space
shown on the map.
In addition, the project must not preclude linkage to other designated open space areas.
1. The proposed change in open space boundaries is illustrated on Figures 1 and 2, pages
13 and 14. As can be seen on Figure 1, Existing Open Space, the total area encompasses
94.6 acres. The total area of proposed Open Space shown on Figure 2 includes 135.8 total
acres. The proposed plan will thus provide 41.2 additional acres of open space above that
called for, thereby satisfying the first of the four required findings referred to earlier.
2. The open space areas shown on Figure 1 were established in the mid-1970's, and although
they may have been based to a degree on the environmental resources of the area, their
primary purpose was to accommodate "a string of parks". Key environmental resources,
such as die large riparian area in the west-central part of the property (OS-5 on Exhibit
2) were not shown on the vegetative maps accompanying the original La Costa Master
Plan, and there is no indication that this or other environmentally sensitive areas were
used as major determinants in the overall planning process for this part of La Costa. As
a result, much of the open space shown in Figure 1 may have been useful as linkages
or parkland under the concept of small community parks. However, as explained later in
this section, the environmental quality of most of the open space areas shown in Figure
1 is generally marginal to low.
The proposed open space boundary change will protect the large central riparian habitat
and form the major element of a continuous corridor Unking this area with Canada
Canyon (previously allowed for development). In addition the proposed change will
preserve the existing vegetation under the SDG&E easement and also expand the area to
the north, south, and east to provide a continual link along El Camino Real.
Subsequently, a number of sensitive plant species will be preserved.
The other major areas of disagreement between Figures 1 and 2 involve three long fingers
of open space shown in Figure 1 and not shown in Figure 2. One runs from just below
OS-4 (Figure 2) to the west, encompasses the oak woodland mentioned above, and
terminates at the SDG&E easement just east of El Camino Real. This open space finger
crosses grassland for its entire length, and except for the oak woodland, no sensitive plant
species occur within the designated open space area. Elimination of the open space
designation for this area in favor of the addition of areas described earlier would therefore
be considered environmentally beneficial.
The second area of disagreement between Figure 1 and Figure 2 involves the long east-
west greenbelt running through the center of the property. The original purpose of this
greenbelt was to provide a pedestrian, bicycle and possibly an equestrian trail Unking small
parks within the project area together and providing access to an elementary school site.
LFMP ZONE 12
CM
I
94.6ac
General Plan Open Space
Eilitlno O.P.
Master Plan Open Space
Environmentally Constrained O.S.
(Riparian. w«tland«.floodpl«in.permanent
body ol water.oth«r «nvlr. •••lur*)
TOTAL
Minus Existing Rancho Del Ponderosa O.S.
Arroyo La Costa
Legend
Open Space
The Open Space is a composite of general plan
open space, approved Master Plan open space,
and environmentally constrained areas. The
dimensions are general, and based on the scale of
the map. They are not intended to represent
precise or legal boundaries.
Major Open Space Areas To Be Linked
Potential Pedestrian Crossing
Overpass/Underpass
Potential Primary Trail System
01
Figure 1
Existing 'Comprehensive Open Space Network Map CD mo
FIGURE 2
5/16/90
LFMP ZONE 12
STING DEVELOPMENT
OPEN SPACE
RLM-3 GENERAL PLAN SUB AREA
B PLANNING AREA
LEGEND
Open Space
The Open Space identified is a composite of
proposed general plan open space. Master plan
open space, and environmentally constrained areas.
• • • Primary Trail System
Secondary Trail System
TOTAL
Zone 12
96.3 ac
43.9 ac
0.0 ac
140.2 ac
Arroyo La
96.3 ac
39.5 ac
0.0 ac
135.8 ac
General Plan Open Space
(Proposed G.P.)
Master Plan Open Space
(Calle Barcelona Streetscape-15'
on either side, Open Space Lots)
Environmentally Constrained O.S.
(This Reflects Only Those Areas Not
Preserved within G.P./M.P. O.S.)
•Note: Arroyo La Costa numbers do not include Rancho del Ponderosa Acreage
Proposed "Comprehensive Open Space Network Map"
ARROYO LA COSTA- 14 -
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 15
With regard to the habitat value and environmental quality of this existing greenbelt, a
comparison of the two areas indicate that the existing green belt would save only a small
part of the exisitng riparian area near Rancho Santa Fe Road (OS-3 in Figure 2), and
would cross grassland, chaparral and coastal sage scrub habitat. A small portion of two
sensitive plant species would be saved.
The proposed open space boundary changes will produce a higher quality of environmental
resources and wildlife habitat than would be possible if the area were developed using the
existing open space designations shown on the City's Comprehensive Open Space Network
Map. The proposed plan therefore meets the second requirement of the Interim Open
Space Ordinance (i.e., that the new area be of "equal or greater quality").
3. The third finding of the interim policy is satisfied by the proposed linkage of two natural
open space areas (OS-4 and OS-5) via an enhanced and revegetated riparian corridor and
wildlife habitat. By retaining OS-3, 4, 6, 7, and 8, sensitive plant species and other habitat
were preserved.
4. With regard to proximity, major portions of the east-west greenbelt and trail system shown
in Figure 1 are completely consistent with the linkages shown in Figure 2 (near the
eastern end and in the large riparian area). Furthermore, the linkage and trail
opportunities that were being sought when this greenbelt was originally proposed in 1975
will still exist, although some portions of the primary trail will be moved southerly into
the landscaped buffer areas adjacent to Calle Barcelona. A continuous linkage from east
to west through the center of the project area will thus still remain under the proposed
open space plan.
In addition, because the City's stance on small, neighborhood parks versus larger
community parks has changed since 1975, much of the justification for creating the
greenbelts shown in Figure 1 no longer exist. Given this, and the fact that much of the
open space proposed in Figure 2 closely corresponds, or is in reasonably close proximity
to that shown in Figure 1, leads to the conclusion that the intent of Item 4 of the City's
Interim Open Space Ordinance is being fully met by the proposed plans.
5. The proposed project includes provisions for trails, thus the requirements of Section 2 of
the City's Interim Open Space Ordinance can readily be met. This Section of the
Ordinance is designed to prevent or defer action on any developments which "would
preclude linkage of the larger open space areas shown on the "comprehensive Open Space
Network Map".
As can be seen by comparing Figures 1 and 2, the open space and trail system proposed
for Arroyo La Costa is in full conformance with this requirement. Provision has been
made for a primary trail system through the center of the project which could be linked
to properties both east and west of the boundaries of Arroyo La Costa. Additionally, if
desired, this trail system can also be made to interface with the pedestrian crossing at El
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 16
Camino Real shown in the City's map. In addition to this primary east-west trail system,
a series of secondary trails are also shown in Figure 2.
Therefore, as can be seen from the foregoing discussions, the proposed open space and trail
system for Arroyo La Costa is in full conformance not only with Section 1, Items 1 through 4 of
the City's Interim Open Space Ordinance, but also with Section 2 regarding the linkage of large
open space areas within the City.
ZONE CHANGE (ZC 88-3)
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed zone change in conformance with the site's General Plan
designation?
2. Would the uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change be compatible with the
surrounding land uses?
Discussion
The proposed Zone Change will change the zoning from R-l to PC (Planned Community) on an
8.42 acre parcel, shown on Exhibit X-3, page 29. This area was created as a remainder parcel
when the subdivision to the north was created in the 1970's. The proposed zone change area will
be incorporated into and regulated by the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan.
Both the proposed GPA and the proposed Arroyo La Costa Master Plan designate this finger of
land as Open Space (OS). Because the site is surrounded on three sides by existing single-family
homes it can only be accessed from the south through the Master Plan area. In response to
neighborhood concern, the Master Plan proposes to leave the area (small mesa and arroyo) in its
natural state. One of the trail systems within the Master Plan will terminate in a viewpoint at
the proposed open space. The open space use has been determined to be the most compatible
with existing and future development and the most appropriate for the site.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP/PLANNED DEVW)PMF.NT/HTT.I.SIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT -
CT 88-3/PUD 88-4/HDP 88-8
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed tentative subdivision map satisfy all requirements of the
Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act?
2. Does the proposed project comply with the Master Plan?
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 17
3. Does the proposed residential development meet the standards of the Planned
Development Ordinance?
4. Does the proposed tentative map comply with the requirements for the City's
Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)?
Discussion
Tentative Map
As mentioned earlier, the applicant is requesting approval of a 1,076 unit Tentative Tract Map,
Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development Permit for all of the undeveloped area
within the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan. As explained in the introduction, this tentative map
includes the area that was covered by the previously approved tentative map CT 85-6/PUD 80.
The proposed tentative map conforms with all requirements of the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance,
Subdivision Ordinance, and State Map Act. All lots will front on publicly dedicated streets and
meet minimum lot width and depth requirements. All lots will range in size from 5,000 feet to
over 23,000 square feet in size with the majority of the lots over 7,500 square feet in size.
Primary access to the project will be from the construction of Calle Barcelona, a secondary arterial
identified in the Circulation Element. This 64' wide roadway within an 84' right-of-way will also
have an additional 15' easement on both sides for additional bicycle lanes and meandering
sidewalks. During the EIR process, the applicant redesigned the Tentative Map and alignment of
Calle Barcelona in response to citizen input by the residents of Santa Fe Ridge. Some residents
claimed that although a portion of the street was already built when they bought their homes that
Calle Barcelona was designated as a local street and not a collector. In response, the applicant
redesigned the alignment farther to the north, away from existing residences.
Internal traffic circulation is provided by standard local streets having pavement widths of 48', 40'
and 36'. Pedestrian circulation will be accommodated by standard contiguous sidewalks as well
as a pedestrian bridge over Calle Barcelona, which has been provided for safe access to the junior
high school site. This bridge is being provided for public safety, although the City recognizes that
there is no guarantee all pedestrians will utilize the bridge. Connection to existing developments,
via local streets, will be made at El Bosque Avenue, Corte Carolina, Segovia Way and Palenque
Street. These connectors are being required to improve circulation for the surrounding area, to
provide emergency vehicle access and to meet the City's secondary access policy.
This development will also improve El Camino Real from Levante Street to Olivenhain Road to
three, full, north bound lanes and a full raised and landscaped median. Olivenhain Road will
also be improved to an interim four lanes from El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road. These
improvements will be done with the first phase of development.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 18
Both the Tentative Map and Planned Development comply with the requirements of the Master
Plan. The Master Plan specifies lot size, setbacks, architectural style, amenities, community
identity elements, and a sign program, all of which are implemented in the Tentative Map and
Planned Development Permit.
Planned Development
The proposed project also complies with all requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance.
In regards to parking, all units will have either a two or three car garage with more than
adequate guest parking available on the public streets. Although not required to comply with the
Small Lot Planned Unit Development Architectural Guidelines in all villages, the applicant has
demonstrated compliance with these guidelines throughout the project to provide more varied and
articulated street scenes.
The proposed project exceeds the recreation requirements of the Planned Development (PD)
Ordinance. The PD Ordinance requires that 200 square feet of recreation space be provided for
each dwelling unit. In addition, when lots within a project are less than 7,500 square feet in size
both common and private recreation must be provided. As indicated on the chart below this
project is required to provide a total of 4.94 acres of common and private recreation facilities.
The project has provided 13.73 acres of common recreation area, not including the private rear
yards each home will have. Although each residence has a minimum rear yard of 15' x 15', the
majority of the lots have substantially more.
PASSIVE/ACTIVE RECREATION
Destttptfao
Trails Only:
- 19.000 ft. at 6 ft. width
- 8,400 A. at 8 ft. width
- 6,400 A. (DO) at 8 ft. width
\ A**** ;
2.62
1.54
1.18
Mtxoal 5M
Individual Open Space Lots
Village I: Passive recreation area
Recreatiott/Daycare Facility*
Village P: Oak Preserve
T0&Mt]faR0itfttii&-/toe&(fit'
2.50
1.10
3.29
1.50
'••' I*J5T
•• -• ' Rom>«^ Arm &w^(m*&mi$ 4,94
Ktcrm(t(HtAf«*Svafb»- 8.19 .
fattfrtiBf private reafyet^g}
Notes:
* Excludes driveway and parking area.
**ln addition, each unit provides a minimum 15' x 15' rear yard.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 19
In addition to the rear yards, a common recreation facility (discussed under SDP 89-18), two
passive recreation areas, and 19 individual open space lots have been provided. All of these are
linked with the trail system which is available for walking, jogging, or bicycling.
A common recreation vehicle storage facility is provided per the requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance within Open Space Area OS-8. This area is not counted toward meeting
the Performance Standard Open Space required for either Zone 12 or the Arroyo La Costa Master
Plan. The RV area, located above El Camino Real and buffered on all sides by landscaped berms,
will not be visible to the public traveling on El Camino Real. The proposed project is required
to provide 20 sq. ft. per unit or 21,520 sq. ft. exclusive of driveways or travel lanes. The
applicant has exceeded this requirement by providing 27,442 sq. feet or a surplus of 5,922 square
feet. Because there is a surplus of space available in the RV area, a portion of the site will be
used to provide RV storage for the upcoming Fairways Project (CT 89-6), also owned by the
applicant. With the Fairways requirement of 2,660 square feet for 133 units, there will still be
a surplus of 3,262 square feet remaining.
In summary, the applicant has greatly exceeded the minimum requirements of the PD Ordinance.
Hillside
As proposed, the Tentative Map and Planned Unit Development comply with all the development
and design provisions of the Hillside Ordinance.
Grading is proposed at 8,850 cubic yards per acre. These amounts are "potentially acceptable"
with the Hillside Ordinance. This figure is calculated over the entire Master Plan area with
overall cut and fill grading amounts at 3,824,000 cubic yards. After the allowed exemption for
grading amounts on Calle Barcelona, the grading quantity per acre then falls within the
acceptable range allowed by the Hillside Development Ordinance.
In addition to looking at cubic yards per acre, an analysis was also done of areas with significant
amounts of grading. As can be seen from Exhibit X-6, page 32, there are only three larger areas
where cut or fill amounts exceed 30'. Areas A and B were permitted to allow construction of
roadways which were constrained on both sides by the SDG&E easement or the riparian area.
Area C was a 30' deep canyon created as a result of runoff from Segovia Way. Large amounts
of grading were required for the construction of Calle Barcelona; however, construction for
improvements of Circulation Element roadways are also considered exempt by the Hillside
Ordinance.
In an effort to better balance grading onsite, grading is proposed to correspond to the phasing
of development. Phased grading is permitted by City Ordinance when final maps are phased, (i.e.,
Arroyo La Costa, three phases). Typically, the phased grading boundary will coincide with the
appropriate final map boundary. Where the overall benefits outweigh any possible costs, the
phased grading boundary may extend outside the final map boundary. For the Arroyo La Costa
grading, Phase I and III need to export approximately 300,000 cubic yards of earth each and
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 20
Phase II needs to import the same quantity. The benefit to the city in allowing this phased
grading to extend outside the final map boundary is preventing that 600,000 cubic yards of earth
from being hauled over city streets. Any possible problems will be mitigated by the
implementation of erosion control methods such as desiltation and landscaping. Overall, the
proposed project implements contoured and undulated slopes, enhances views, preserves riparian
areas, and minimizes grading. For these reasons, the project has been determined by staff to be
in compliance with the Hillside regulations.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN fSDP 89-181
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed common recreation/daycare facility comply with the Master Plan?
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a site development plan for a recreation/daycare facility within Open
Space Area OS-9 of the Master Plan. The Master Plan designates this Planning Area for
development with a common recreation/daycare center. To comply with the requirements for
common recreation facilities in a planned development, the developer is taking a somewhat
different approach by providing one large facility to provide active recreation opportunities rather
than smaller, scattered facilities. This larger facility will include the following:
1. A Junior Olympic size swimming pool;
2. A 5,653 square foot recreation building;
3. Three regulation-size tennis courts;
4. A grass play area of approximately 40,480 square feet; and
5. A 5,080 square foot daycare center with fenced play area.
This recreation area will be easily accessible from other parts of the Master Plan area via a
bike/pedestrian trail system. To increase safety, a pedestrian bridge is proposed between the
recreation facility and the Junior High School site on the opposite side of Calle Barcelona. This
will make it possible for children/pedestrians to cross a major street without encountering
automobile traffic although it is acknowledged that not all pedestrians will use the bridge.
In response to concerns for the need for daycare facilities in Carlsbad, a 5,080 square foot daycare
center is being provided in the common recreation facility. This daycare center has been designed
based on input from local daycare operators to ensure an efficient design. Parking for the
recreation center has been calculated in the following manner.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 21
ACTIVITY/USE
*Day Care Center
*Meeting Room
Pool
Playground
Tennis
TOTAL NUMBER
*Please note that
DESCRIPTION
for 92 children
2630 sq. ft.
3645 sq. ft.
4800 sq. ft.
2 courts
OF PARKING SPACES
only the asterisked items are
NO. OF PARKING
STANDARD REQUIRED
l/Employee& 27
1/10 children
1/200 sq. ft. 14
1/5 people/
150 sq. ft.
1/2 children/
300 sq. ft.
2/court
41
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
SPACES
PROVIDED
27
14
25
16
4
86
This Site Development Plan is being processed as an independent application from the Planned
Development Permit. This will allow for independent review of the Site Development Plan in the
event that a modification is requested at a fixture date.
Overall, the large, common recreational center exceeds both in quality and quantity what would
ordinarily be provided in a Planned Unit Development.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 22
SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP 89-3)
Planning Issues
1. Will the proposed development be subject to inundation in a 100 year flood?
2. Will the proposed development within the 100 year flood plain adversely impact other
properties?
3. Will the proposed development adversely impact the riparian habitat within the detention
area?
Discussion
The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit because grading work and
construction/improvements of public roadways are proposed within the Flood Hazard Area, Zone
A and subject to inundation during a 100 year flood.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) establishes Base Flood Elevations (BFE) to
determine flood hazard areas. The BFE corresponds to the highest elevation subject to a 100 year
flood. A 100 year flood is a flood level which has 1% probability of being equaled or exceeded
in a given year. Properties are designated by FEMA to be subject to a 100 year flood when their
lowest grade, or lowest finished floor of a structure, is equal to or less than the BFE.
The proposed grading work will have a minimum finished elevation of 13.6 feet and 7.1 feet
respectively above the 100 year flood elevation for the Flood Hazard Area within the project on
the east side of El Camino Real. It should be noted that the existing elevation of El Camino Real,
along the project frontage, is 1.0 feet above the 100 year flood elevation for the Flood Hazard
Area on the west side of El Camino Real. This difference in elevations is caused by the proposed
grading and detention of flood waters on the east side of El Camino Real. (Exhibit X-8, page 34,
is attached to graphically depict these elevations.)
Although FEMA has not yet established a BFE for the affected area of the Master Plan, the county
of San Diego completed a computer analysis in 1981 that established a 100 year flood elevation
in a critical area west of El Camino Real of 63.4 feet above sea level. Rick Engineering Company
completed a computer analysis in 1988 that established a 100 year flood elevation at the same
critical area of 65.6 feet above sea level. The City has reviewed and approved the later analysis
as it is the most conservative. Using that higher elevation, the lowest point of El Camino Real
is one foot above the flood elevation on the west side of El Camino Real.
Because it is designed to detain the 100 year flood within the project boundary, the proposed
development will not adversely impact other properties. The designed 100 year flood elevation
on the east side is 76.38 feet above sea level. The lowest elevation adjacent to this area is a
proposed public roadway at elevation 83.5. The riparian area would be inundated for a maximum
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 23
duration of 6.5 hours during a 100 year storm. That duration will not cause any significant
damage to the area. In summary, staff believes the proposed project will not have any developed
area inundated in a 100 year flood and would not adversely impact other properties or the
riparian habitat area. The EIR prepared for this project supports these conclusions.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP 90-8)
1. Does the project enhance the scenic qualities of the El Camino Real Corridor consistent
with the corridor's development standards?
Discussion
The westerly edge of the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan falls within Area 5 of the El Camino Real
Scenic Corridor. The El Camino Real Scenic Corridor study requires approval of a Special Use
Permit for all development within 300 feet of the right-of-way of El Camino Real when an
upslope conditions exists. The majority of the western edge of the Master Plan is above El
Camino Real.
The majority of the area within this 300 foot corridor will remain in its natural state. A small
portion of Village Q falls within this 300 foot area. The Special Use Permit is required to assure
compliance with the requirements of the corridor's development standards. The applicable
standards refer to design theme signage, grading, setbacks, street furniture and roof equipment.
The standard designates a design theme of "Old California/Hispanic1'. The architecture of the
units in Village Q will be Contemporary Mediterranean which is compatible with Old California.
If the southern portion of Village Q is utilized for church purposes any church designed in the
area will be required to have an "Old California/Hispanic1' style of architecture.
The recreational vehicle storage area in Open Space Area OS-8 will also be located within the El
Camino Real Scenic Corridor area. This facility will be surrounded by mounding and landscaping
so it will not be visible from El Camino ReaL
The corridor's applicable building setback requirements are 40 feet from the public right-of-way.
There is an open space area which is in excess of 220 feet in width along the entire length of
the western project boundary adjacent to El Camino Real, thereby exceeding the setback
requirements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Planning Issues
1. Will the proposed project be consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance?
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 24
Discussion
The subject property is located within Local Facility Management Zone 12, Southeast Quadrant.
The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted
performance standards are discussed in the Zone 12 plan and are also summarized in the
discussion below. In addition to the conditions placed on the tentative map all requirements of
the Local Facilities Management Plan as amended for Zone 12 must be complied with in their
entirety.
FACILITY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD
City Administrative Facilities - Yes
Library - Yes
Wastewater Treatment - Yes
Parks - See discussion below.
Drainage - See discussion below.
Circulation - See discussion below.
Fire - Yes
Open Space - Yes
Schools - Yes
Sewer Service - Yes
Water Service - Yes
Parks
Prior to the approval of the first final map, the applicant will enter into an agreement dedicating
35 acres of park land and providing financing acceptable to the City for the construction and
operation of Alga Norte Park. The park must be functional by 1993 or the performance standard
will not be met and no further residential development will be allowed in the Southeast Quadrant.
Drainage
A detailed hydrological study must be completed which analyzes the capacity of existing drainage
structures and which proposes mitigation alternatives including a flood attenuation study for the
entire drainage course. The mitigation measures identified in the hydrological study must be
provided concurrent with development so the performance standard will be maintained.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 25
Circulation
The following is a list of the existing Circulation Facilities which are currently operating at an
unacceptable level of service (LOS D).
Location Needed Improvement
Road Segments - Olivenhain Road Widen to 4 lanes from El Camino Real to Rancho
Rancho Santa Fe Road Santa Fe Road
Widen to 4 lanes from La Costa Avenue to
Melrose Avenue
Intersections - La Costa Avenue and 1-5 Construct Interchange
The project has been conditioned in the LFMP to correct these deficiencies. FttttibtittttOft^ $te
tentative m^p has been conditioned such that btnMrtg permits cannot be issued unless all of the
conditions ami mitigations outlined in the Zone 12 Plan have bees implemented. Also, the
tentative map cannot be finailed until City Council has approved a financing plan guaranteeing
compliance with Growth Management.
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION 181
Discussion
A 4.5 acre parcel of land, owned by the Northwestern Pacific Railroad is located adjacent to the
southwest corner of the Arroyo Master Plan. The site is an island of useable land with El Camino
Real at the west, Olivenhain Road at the south, open space at the north, and a 200' SDG&E
easement at the east. As shown on Exhibit X-7, page 33, the site has split general plan
designations of Travel Service/Utility (TS/U) and is zoned Limited Control/Public Utility.
In reviewing the proposed Master Plan it was discovered that this parcel was under different
ownership and was outside the Master Plan boundaries. The proposed Arroyo La Costa Master
Plan addresses and completes all planning issues except for land uses on this parcel.
Although the subject site is partially designated for commercial development, it is constrained by
its topography. Because developable area of the site is 40-50 feet above the roadways, complete
excavation of the site and utilization of high retaining walls would be required to develop the site
with commercial uses. The other issue constraining development of the site is its proximity to
the intersection of two prime arterials. Because the property has only 180 feet of street frontage
on El Camino Real and 150 feet along Olivenhain Road, proper intersection/driveway spacing for
prime arterials could not be maintained. City Standards require 2,600 feet of spacing on each
respective arterial. The only access available to the site will be from a local street (60* wide)
through the proposed single family neighborhood to the east.
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 26
The portion of the site designated for Utility uses was reserved many years ago when there was
some indication that the property would be used for a pump station for a major fuel line;
however, the pump station never developed. The Engineering Department indicates that there
is no longer a necessity for such a pump station and concurs with the Planning Department's
intent to redesignate the entire site for residential development.
After a thorough analysis of the site is complete and the Railroad is allowed to comment, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to process a General Plan Amendment to
redesignate the property to a residential land use. The attached Resolution of Intention is
included as a separate item rather than an action necessary for the approval of the Arroyo La
Costa Master Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. What are the fiscal impacts created by the proposed project?
Discussion
Pursuant to 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, a fiscal impact analysis has been prepared
for the proposed Master Plan. That analysis has been reviewed by the City's Finance Department
which has determined that the proposed development will have a net zero fiscal impact on the
City. Although the analysis is a reasonable effort to determine the fiscal impacts of development,
any report of this type should be accepted only with the knowledge that it is based on a wide
range of assumptions. Many of these assumptions must be accepted based on a sense of
reasonableness rather than fact or defensible research. Although Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission accept the report, this is done with the caveat that the report must be seen
by the Commission as an approximation, as opposed to an exact calculation, of the fiscal impacts
of this project.
Summary
The proposed project is consistent with all policies and ordinances governing the subject site. In
addition, it provides a development plan that is comprehensive, cohesive, and well-integrated with
the surrounding environment. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of all the previously
mentioned actions.
EXHIBIT X-1
Page 27
OLIVENHAIN RD
DEVELOPED
City of Carlsbad
LA COSTA MASTER PLAN MP 149(O)
EXHIBIT X-2
Page 28
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
RLM-3 GENERAL PLAN SUB AREA
B PLANNING AREA
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN City of Carlsbad
ARROYO LA COSTA GPA/LU 88-1
AREA OF CHANGE
R-1
EXHIBIT X-3Page 29
EXISTING ZONING
AREA OF CHANGE
PC
PROPOSED ZONING City of Carlsbad
ARROYO LA COSTA ZC88-3
Spanlah Vlll*g
L« Co»U South
81
ORIGINAL
TJ m
to x
(Q T<D I
O 00
O —
XI
1!
OS-3
'Oedicalion »nd 1/7 wkfth bnfirolo Hancho Smu Fc to bt Included InPhiMZ.
OS-7
<Q
mx
CO
<Q XIen
-Q m» x(D -p
<D i
CO OD
Areas Oi Significant Grading
ARROYO LA COSTA
X
o>
EXHIBIT X-7
Page 33
a I I
RLM-3
B
RLM-4
JUjf<<
RM-2
LCcrsr
u
(U)"
.OS-7
RLM-3 GENERAL PLAN SUB AREA
B PLANNING AREA
City of Carlsbad
SUP 90-8
SDP 89-18
ARROYO LA COSTA ROI 181
DO
ID
O
" O
?cO
CO O
O
CO
LOWEST ADJACENT
PAD ELEVATION
90.0
ELEVATION OF EDGE OF
EL CAMINO REAL
\w^s
LOWEST PROPOSED
ROAD ELEVATION
100-YR FLOOD
ELEVATION WEST OF
EL CAMINO REAL
83.5 100-YR FLOOD
ELEVATION EAST OF
EL CAMNO REAL
76.4
•umIQ•
m
xi
00
ARROYO LA COSTA LAND USE SUMMARY
Planning
AIM
A
General PUn
Designation
RLM
RM
Zone Mid Development Type
tot Standard Review Process
Single Family Detached
(Santa Fe Ridge)
Acres
GJOM Net ..
33.00
10.20
33.00
10.20
Dwelling Units
Urowtn Control
Zone 12-LFMP
EXISTING
EXISTING
fv^H"-7W*:: • S>SSW:->:-::: •:-:•: •:•: '•'••'• '•
0
0
Tentative
Map/PD
131
39
TM/PD
Gross
Density
4.0
3.8
HIM*
EXISTING
EXISTING
Planning Area
DevelopmentStandards
N/A
N/A
SUBTOTAL EXISTING 43.20 43.20 0 170 3.9
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
OS- 1
OS-2
OS-3
OS-4
OS-5
OS-6
OS-7
OS-8
OS-9
RLM
RM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RM
RM
RM
RM
RM
RM
E
J
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-7000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-7000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-7000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
Church Site
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- 1-6000; Single Family Detached
R- -5000; Single Family Detached
R- -5000; Single Family Detached
R- -5000; Single Family Detached
R- -5000; Single Family Detached
R- -5000; Single Family Detached
Elementary School
Junior High School
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Community Recreation Facility
37.39
13.52
19.96
32.45
16.45
25.30
24.10
43.65
7.60
20.90
15.80
15.10
20.06
12.90
26.10
17.30
13.30
27.40
4.00
1.70
4.81
12.18
28.46
21.70
13.44
3.56
6.45
34.34
12.92
18.36
31.15
15.85
25.30
22.35
39.95
6.60
19.85
14.60
13.75
18.86
11.20
25.60
16.55
12.80 *
24.50 *
3.95
1.60
3.96
9.68
19.36
10.05
6.14
1.56
5.60
110
77
59
99
51
81
71
128
21
63
88
83
113
67
153
99
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100
51
63
99
48
94
78
122
0
63
55
56
76
56
106
78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
99
42
62
99
46
94
77
118
0
61
48
42
71
48
97
72
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.8
3.7
3.2
2.7
0.0
2.9
3.0
2.8
3.5
3.7
3.7
4.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
EXISTING
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
p. 131
p. 135
p. 139
p. 144
p. 149
p. 152
p. 156
p. 160
p. 165
p. 169
p. 173
p. 177
p. 181
p. 185
p. 189
p. 193
p. 197
p. 201
N/A
p. 205
p. 209
p. 212
p. 215
p. 219
p. 222
p. 225
p. 229
SUBTOTAL FUTURE 485.58 426.43 1363 1145 1076
TOTAL MASTER PLAN ACREAGE , - '' ' mM 'W$T •• *>
UNIT TRANSFER FROM ZONE 12 TO ZONE 1 1
COMPENSATION FOR OVERBUILT EXISTING**
-179
-39
FUTURE MASTER PLAN -.-'•. •• ': ••••"•••- •• •• ||4$ »4S 1076
TJ
BO
(Q
<D
C*>
01
m
XI
03
XI
(O
Notes: • Since acbool (itei we cootidered conitraincd acreage, they arc not included in the total net acreage for the Master Plan.
** To compensate for Zone 12 project* buik at higher denakica prior to adoption of the Carlsbad Growth Mangcment Program, the number of allowable unit* in the Arroyo La Costa mint be
reduced from the Growth Management build out projection by 39 dwelling unit*. A complete Growth Management build out analysis is contained in the Zone 12 LFMP.
*** The Rancbo Ponderoaa development, confuting of 419 tingle family residential dwelling! on 120 net acre*, i> also within Zone 12. It u not a part of the Arroyo La Costa Mailer Plan.
**** Arroyo La Coda Future Den*ily (Blued on Proposed Tentative Map): Grou - 2.2 du/ac Net - 2.5 du/ac
LOCATION MAP Page 36
Santa Fe
Ridge
City of Carlsbad
ARROYO LA COSTA
EIR 86-2
MP 149(O)
GPA/LU 88
ZC 88-3
MP 88-1
-1
CT 88-3
PUD 88-4
HDP 88-8
SUP 89-3
SDP 89-18
SUP 90-8
LFMP 89-12(A)
ROI 181
ARROYO LA COSTA
JUNE 6, 1990
PAGE 37
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3039, 3049, 3028, 3029, 3030, 3031, 3032, 3033,
3034, 3035, 3036, 3037, and ROI 181.
2. Background Data Sheet
3. Disclosure Form
4. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
5. Master Plan - Exhibit "Z-l" (previously distributed)
6. Amended La Costa Master Plan, Exhibit "Z-2" (previously distributed)
7. 200 Scale Tentative Map, Exhibit "Z-3" (previously distributed)
8. Exhibits "A" - "CCCC", "A-l" - "A-30", "B-l" - "B-18", and "C-l" - "C-7", dated May 16, 1990
AL:kd
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: MPA 149(OVMP 88-1/GPA/LU 88-1/ZC 88-3/CT 88-3/PUD 88-4/HDP 88-8/SDP
89-18/SUP 89-3/SUP 90-8/ROI 181/EIR 86-2
APPLICANT: Arrovo La Costa
REQUEST AND LOCATION: The approval of a Master Plan Amendment. Master Plan. General
Plan/Land Use Amendment. Zone Change. Tentative Tract Map. Planned Unit Development Permit.
Hillside Development Permit. Site Development Plan. Special Use Permits, and for the certification
of an Enviornmental Impact Report on property located east of El Camino Real, north of
Olivenhain Road, and west of Rancho Santa Fe Road in the PC Zone and in Zone 12.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the south half of section 36. township 12 south. Range 4
west. San Bernardino Meridian, together with a portion of fractional sections 1 and 2. township
13 south, range 4 west. San Bernardino Meridian, together with lot 1 and a portion of lots 2. 4.
4. 9. 10 and 11 of Rancho Las Encinitas. Map No. 848. all in the county of San Diego. State of
California.
APN: Listed on attached sheet Acres 528.78 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 1.076
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RLM/RM/RMH/OS
Net General Plan Density Allowed 4.61 Net Tentative Map Density Proposed 2.52
Existing Zone PC/R-1 Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site PC Vacant
North PC/R-1 Single Family Homes
South Encinitas Vacant
East PC Vacant/Schools
West PC Riparian
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Encinitas Union SD. San Dieguito Union HSD
Water Olivenhain Sewer Leucadia CWD
EDU's 1.076 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date January 16. 1989.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
_X E.I.R. Certified, dated May 16. 1990
Other, Prior Compliance. March 29. 1990 - for LFMP Zone 12
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
DISCLOSURE FORM
FIELSTQNE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
14 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, California, 92660
Business Address ~ ~ ~
(714) 851-8313
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
MEMBERS:
Telephone Number
THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY, General Partner
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address
venture, corporation, syndication)
14 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, California, 92660
Business Address
(714) 851-8313
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A Limited Partnership
BY:THE EJEELSTONE COMPANY
Partner
BY
Agent, Owner, Partner
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: AROVD T A TDSTA - MPA 14Q(O)/MP RS-1/aPA/T IT RR-1/7C. RS-VCT K8-3/
pirn «K-4RDP s«-«snp KO.IKSTTP RQ-^STTP on.«T?nT
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 12 GENERAL PLAN: RLM. RM. RMH. OS. E. J
ZONING: PC _
DEVELOPER'S NAMF- The- FiV1H.itr.nff Pnmpany
ADDRESS: S4fi5 Mnrfhnmp Drive, Sniff 950 San DJPgn, TA 07.17.1
PHONE NO.:ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): S7Q
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire:
Open Space:
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided -
SQflfl
9197
7.97
3fl7
MA
14 fiflfi
9 A fi
flR flfi
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer:Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water:
The project is
Demand in GPD
units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS:
216-320-13
255-010-09
255-010-18
255-022-01
255-010-19
255-033-09
255-033-10
255-033-11
255-031-24
255-031-25
255-041-14
255-031-24
255-030-09