HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-07; City Council; 10754; Rancho Verde!XJP90-5 - RANCHOVERDE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council ADOPT Resolution Nos. 69-273 , 49-27~, %%WR, 90-271, and @-277, APPROVING the Conditional Negative Declaration, CT
89-18/HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23, and SUP 90-5 as modified by the
Planning Commiss-ion.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On June 20, 1990 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and approved, with modifications, the Ranch0 Verde subdivision.
At the hearing several residents from adjoining Olivenhain,
plus the Director of Public Works for the City of Encinitas,
and a resident from Carlsbad spoke in opposition to the
project. At issue was the proposed gated neighborhood with
private street system and "emergencyI' only gate and access
along the eastern edge of the project, which is also the eastern boundary of the City. The opponents requested that the project provide public streets with a direct and unobstructed connection to the City of Encinitas. The opponents stated that the area in Encinitas is served by Lone Jack Road which is a very long Cul-de-sac. If the road became blocked, the residents could be trapped since there is only one way out of the area. They also wanted the connection so that students living in the area could have a more direct access to the future high school.
The Planning Commission modified the project to include public streets thereby eliminating the possibility for a gated neighborhood. However, it did not open the public streets to the City of Encinitas. Instead, the Commission voted to retain an emergency only irrevocable offer of dedication as a connection to the City of Encinitas, which will be gated and passable only by reciprocating emergency services. The 60' offer of dedication is of a size to accommodate a public street should it be appropriate at some future date for a public
through street connection to the City of Encinitas.
The Commission stated that it was sympthetic with Encinitas residents who have been subject of poor traffic planning. It was the Commissionls opinion that Encinitas should extend Lone Jack Road northward to Melrose instead of asking Carlsbad to provide a solution.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. /a, 754
No other issues were raised. The attached Planning Commission Staff Report contains a full analysis of the proposal.
The applicant completed an expanded initial study and included supplemental reports on archaeology, biological resources, Blacktailed Gnatcatcher, soil containments and traffic. Additional support material was provided through reference to
the Wooley Annexation: EIR 82-3 and the La Costa Master Plan: EIR-307. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, staff analyzed the supplemental reports as part of the initial study. It was determined that several impacts of the project had the potential of being significant. However, revisions in the project plans made by the applicant and conditions placed on the project have mitigated the effects to a point where clearly no significant impacts would occur. There is no evidence that the project as revised will have a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
A financing plan is required by the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 prior to final map approval which guarantees funding for facility improvements. Because improvements will be funded by development there will be no fiscal impacts to the City as a result of this project.
EXHIBITS
1. City Council Resolution Nos. $9-273, %-aTd, e-275, yfl-Z.%, and %?-277. 2. Planning Commission Resolutions Nos: 3022, 3023, 3024,
3025 and 3026
3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 6, 1990
w/attachments 4. Planning Commission minutes (partial), June 20, 1990. 5. Correspondence received at Planning Commission Hearing,
June 6, 1990
. . il
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLtlTIO:S NO. 90-273
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COlJNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVINGAMITIGATEDNEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
A 180 LOT TENTATIVE TRA MAP (CT 89-18), HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (HDP 89- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD 89-23), AND A SPECIA:t USE PERMIT (SUP 90-05) ON 216.16 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS. APPLICANT: RANCH0 VERDE CASE NO: CT 89-18/HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23/SUP 90-05
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1 0 the Carlsbad Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 3022 ret ending to the City Council that
the mitigated negative declarat be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Cou 1 of the City of Carlsbad, on
August 7 I blic hearing to consider the
recommendations and heard all sons interested in or opposed to
Hillside Development Permit HDP 8 -35, Tentative Tract Map CT 89-18,
Planned Unit Development PUD 89 Special Use Permit SUP 90-5; and
WHEREAS, a mitigated gative Declaration was issued on
March 29, 1990 and published r public review. All comments
received from that review per were reviewed and appropriate
/conditions were incorporated i e conditions of approval. These
lconditions will be reviewed t a monitoring program set up for
!the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE LVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California
1. are true and correct.
2. That the f conditions of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3022, n file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference nstitute the decision of the City
Council in this matter and the itigated negative declaration is
hereby approved subject to all applicable requirements of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the satisfaction of the conditions
contained in Planning Commission'Resolution No. 3022 as amended by
City Council Resolution No. 90-274.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 7th day
of August I 1990 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Matiaux and Kulchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members Pettine a
ATTEST:
ALETBA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-274
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 180 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (CT 89-18), ON 216.16 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
APPLICANT: RANCH0 VERDE CASE NO: CT 89-18
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1990 the Carlsbad Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 3023 recommending to the City
Council that the Tentative Tract Map CT 89-18 be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
August 7, 1990 held a public hearing to consider the
recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to
Tentative Tract Map CT 89-18; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3023, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council in this matter except as amended
by
1.
2.
the addition of the following conditions:
Within 180 days from August 7, 1990, the date of Ranch0
Verde Tentative Map (CT 89-18) approval, a financial guarantee acceptable to the City Council for construction of
Ranch0 Santa Fe Road improvements will be submitted by the
developer. Unless the guarantee is approved by the City Council within the 180 day period, all processing on the Ranch0 Verde Final Map will cease until such time as it is approved. The time limit may be extended at the. discretion
of the City Council.
Prior to final map approval, the developer shall submit a reclaimed water usage plan for the entire Master Plan area for the approval of the City Engineer. The plan shall be in conformance with the proposed reclaimed water master plans
of the City and Carlsbad Municipal Water District. At
minimum the developer shall install a dual waterline to
_-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
'27
28
serve all irrigated open space to be extended to parkway areas with reclaimed water as it becomes available.
3. A reclaimed water main shall be installed if required by the reclaimed water plan.
4. If the Carlsbad Municipal Water District is in a Stage II or
greater alert, reclaimed water shall be used for all construction related activities such as dust control and grading compaction as directed by the City Engineer.
5. All streets in the project shall be public.
6. Prior to final map, the developer shall make arrangements for a program to the satisfaction of the Planning Director
to include a notice to all prospective purchasers in the
development that the project may be subject to additional traffic from the construction of a street connection to Encinitas through the subdivision at Paseo De1 Oro. A note to that effect shall be placed on the final map. Notice shall be included in the deed for the sale of any lot that access to the City of Encinitas exists through this subdivision at Paseo De1 Oro which may be constructed and placed in service at the discretion of the City Council.
7. The developer shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate a public street with a 60 foot right-of-way and providing for a 40 foot roadway from Paseo de1 Oro easterly to the subdivision boundary to provide for an access road connecting Carlsbad and Encinitas.
8. Prior to Final Map approval, the developer shall provide
security to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the
City Attorney that guarantees the design and construction of the access road identified in Condition No. 7 above.
9. Condition No. 67 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3023 is deleted. There shall be no access at this time to Encinitas.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . . 2
. c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
12
14
15
16
11
1E
19
2c
21
2%
23
24
25
26
2'i
2E
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
!ity Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 7th
.ay of August , 1990 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Mamaux and Kulchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members
,TTEST:
L4-tLtL 74. l!(,m-\
,LETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clvk
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 90-274 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. go-275
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (HDP 89-35), ON 216.16 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- EASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE
CITY OF ENCINITAS. APPLICANT: RANCH0 VERDE CASE NO: HDP 89-35
6 WHEREAS, on June 20, 1990 the Carlsbad Planning
7 Commission adopted Resolution No. 3025 recommending to the City
8 Council that the Hillside Development Permit HDP 89-35 be
9 approved: and
10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
11 August 7 I 1990 held a public hearing to consider the
12 recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to
13 Hillside Development Permit HDP 89-35; and
14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
15 Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
16 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
17 2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
18 Commission in Resolution No. 3025 on file with the City Clerk and
19 I incorporated herein by reference constitute the decision of the
20 City Council in this matter and the Hillside Development Permit
21 HDP 89-35 is hereby approved subject to the satisfaction of such
22 conditions as amended by City Council Resolution No. 90-274.
23 l **
24 l ‘=
26 l **
28
. L -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of 1 the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
2 7th day of August I 1990 by the following vote, to wit: 3 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Mamaux and Kulchin
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members ne and Larson
ATTEST:
ALETBA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City &erk
(SEAL)
19 Ii
20
21
22
23
24.
25
26 Resolution No.
/I
90-275 Page 2 of 2
27
28 II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-276
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD 89-23), ON 216.16 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS.
APPLICANT: RANCH0 VERDE CASE NO: PUD 89-23
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1990 the Carlsbad Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 3024 recommending to the City
Council that the Planned Unit Development PUD 89-23 be approved;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
August 7, 1990 held a public hearing to consider the
recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to
Planned Unit Development PUD 89-23; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3024 on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council as amended to incorporate the
changes to the tentative subdivision map conditions 'for the
project contained in City Council Resolution No. 90-274.
I//
I//
I//
I//
I//
I//
1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
2 7th day of August I 1990 by the following vote, to wit:
3 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Mamaux and Kulchin
4 NOES: None
5 ABSENT:
6
7
8 ATTEST:
g (j&g&
10 ALETHA L.
11 (SEAL)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
24
25
26
2i
2, Resolution No. 90-276 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_-
RESOLUTION NO. 90-277
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP go-OS>, ON 216.16
ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY
CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO.: SUP 90-05
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1990 the Carlsbad Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
3026 recommending to the City Council that the Special Use Permit 90-S be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, onAug;ust 7 , 1990 held a public
hearing to consider the recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to Special
Use Permit SUP 90-S; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the- Planning Commission in Resolution No. 3026
on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of the City
Council in this matter approving Special Use Permit SUP 90-S.
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
a....
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City council of the City
of Carlsbad, California, held on the zhday of August , 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Mamaux and Kulchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members Pettine and Larson
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
i/La3dL J (.I lx ,
ALETHA L. &WI-EN
PC RESO NO. _ -2-
EXMBIT 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNlNG COMMISSION RJSOLU-ITON NO. 3022
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A 180 LOT
SUBDMSION WITH 174 RESIDENTIAL LOTS GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTH EASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO.: CT 8918/PUD 89-23/HDP 89-35/SUP 90-S
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of June 1990, and the
20th day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ex amining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit “ND“,
dated March 29, 1990, and “PII”, dated March 13, 1990, attached hereto and made a part
hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinns Impacts and Mitigation:
1. Although the proposed project could have a @n&ant &ect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added
to the project to a point where clearly no significant effect would occur; and
2. There is no substantial evidence that the project as conditioned may have a significant
effect on the &onme~&
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1c
11
1%
12
14
15
1E
17
1E
1E
2c
21
2:
2:
24
2:
26
2';
2t
3. That the Planning Commissi on finds and determines that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality
Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, the monitoring requirement as specified
in Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and the provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code and that the Planning Co mm&ion has reviewed, considered and evaluated
the information contained in the Declaration.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of Resolutions 3023, 3024, 3025, and 3026 are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. The proposal shall comply with the environmental mitigation monitoring program
indicated on attached Exhibit ‘T’, dated June 6,199O.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden,
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HtiZMII%ER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3022 -2-
CONDITIONALNEGATIVEDECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: RANCH0 VERDE: Located at the southeast comer of the City
of Carlsbad.
APN: 295-031-17, 264-OlO-21,22,23,25; 264-220-71
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 174 single family residential lots on 216.1 gross acres, in the
R-l 25,000 and PC zones.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Conditional Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact
on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on
file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Deparanent within 21 days
of date of issuance.
DATED:
CASE NO:
March 29, 1990
CT 89-18/HDP 89-35/
PUD 89-23/SUP 90-5
MICHAEL J. ~~L&+!LER
Planning Director
APPLICANT: Brighton Homes
PUBLISH DATE: March 29, 1990
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Cartsbad, California 92009-4859 0 (819) 438-l 161
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASBE=MEWF FORM - PART II
BACKGROUND
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 89-18/HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23/SUP 90-5
DATE: March 13. 1990
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CASE NAME: Ranch0 Verde
APPLICANT: Briuhton Homes
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 505 N. Tustin Avenue
DATE EIA FORM PART I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SUBMITTED: October 25, 1989
174 Sinale Familv Residential Lots on 216.1 Gross acres
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, llN0" will be checked to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a sianificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insisnificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings t'YES-sigtfl and "YES-insigl* respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Result'in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause, depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object?
X
X
NO
X
X
X
X
-2-
-.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: yts E w
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, 'shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects?
16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 77 4 s'g
17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services?
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems?
20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
X
X
NO
YE (inslg B NO
X
X
X
X
X
-3-
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
-
NO
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking?
27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans?
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view?
32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
X
X
X
X
X
-4-
33.
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
‘fls E w ? +/Es& NO
Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce ,the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
-5-
-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Physical Environment
The property is not known to have unstable ground conditions or have significant exposure to geologic hazards. The proposed grading on site will significantly alter the existing contours of the hills. the majority of development being A balanced site is being proposed and considered is hilltop versus hillside. valley or Grading quantities proposed are calculated at approximately 6100 cubic yards per disturbed acre. Per the City of Carlsbad Hillside Development Ordinance quantities of less than 8000 cubic yards per acre are acceptable. The project design has incorporated undulation on the manufactured slopes which will reduce visual impacts of the proposed grading and slope planting will reduce erosion.
Blueline streams have been identified within the project boundary. Although the overall subdivision design has been developed to avoid the stream beds, a collector street necessary for the project, Calle Acervo, crosses the stream bed. Mitigation proposed includes the issuance of a section 1601/1603 permit from the California Department of Fish and Game if required by that agency. Any resulting impact to wetlands areas may require the issuance of a 404 permit as determined by the Army Corp of Engineers.
Portions of a 100 year flood plain bisect a north westerly section of the site. A Special Use Permit submitted to and reviewed by the City has indicated that the effect of encroachment into the floodplain will not have significant adverse effects.
Air quality was not identified as a significant impact as a result of this project. Air quality will however be effected by increases in traffic. In recognition of air qualities regional stature CEQA guidelines section 15064(i) states"[i]f an air emission or water discharge meets the existing standard for a particular pollutant, the lead agency may presume that the emission or discharge of the pollutant will not be a significant effect on the environment." Total project emissions do not exceed threshold criteria.
Although implementation of the project will have an effect on consumption of natural resources and use of fuel or energy, projected levels of consumption are within service levels.
Two archeological sites have been identified within the project boundary through the EIR 82-3, for the Wooley Annexation. Field investigation was conducted on May 10, 1989 and as a result of the survey and testing, the information potential of the site was exhausted. The subsequent report was reviewed by the City of Carlsbad Historic Commission which has made recommendations to further document those findings.
-6-
Bioloaical Environment
One State endangered and four sensitive species of plants have been identified on site.
1. San Diego thornmint: California adolphia: State endangered species 2. CNPS list 2 sensitive plant 3. Palmers grapplinghook: CNPS list 2 sensitive plant 4. San Diego marsh-elder: CNPS list 2 sensitive plan 5. Ashy spike-moss: CNPS list 4 sensitive plant
Diegan coastal sage scrub and southern willow scrub are listed with California Department of Fish and Game (ttCDFGtt) as high-priority community types for sensitive plant and animal species.
The majority of the above mentioned plants are found on south or southwest facing slopes. Project design has attempted to minimize the impacts to these areas by designating most hillside areas as open space lots, minimizing grading for pad areas, and concentrating lots to hill tops versus hillsides. A replacement program to revegitate those contiguous areas that are barren should be implemented to further mitigate loss of sensitive plant species.
Two sensitive wildlife species were observed on the project site.
1. The Northern harrier hawk: A species of Special Concern by the CDFG Natural Diversity data Base.
2. The Black-tailed gnatcatcher: A species of special concern by the CDFG Natural Diversity Data Base and a Category 2 species on the Federal Register.
The Northern harrier is threatened by the loss of grassland habitats and the Black-tailed gnatcatcher is threatened by the loss of the Diegan coastal sage scrub. Human encroachment and the future presence of domestic pets (cats and dogs) will also threaten the existence of these sensitive species. Revegitation of habitats could reduce the threat to these species however zoologist Joel Wientraub has indicated that even with the complete retention of all coastal sage scrub the preservation of the Black-tailed gnatcatcher in this location cannot be guaranteed.
Appropriate mitigation is to revegitate habitat areas and minimize encroachment.
New plant species which would be a barrier to the replenishment of existing species are not being proposed. Open space lots will be maintained in a natural condition but could be revegitated with indigenous plant species. Presently no part of the site is being used for agricultural production and has been identified as prime, unique, or important on either the State or local level.
-7-
-
Human Environment
The General Plan and Zoning of the property designate single family residential development at a density ranging from O-1.5 units per acre for the project site. NO variation from this density figure has been proposed. Although the adjacent development land use patterns for contiguous properties in the City of Encinitas require larger individual lots, compatability has not been identified as an issue. Based on gross acreage the project density is .8 units per acre.
Public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services can be provided by the independent agencies under current service level capabilities. Verifications of service availability are on file with the City of Carlsbad.
Noise levels will be increased on-site during construction phases. Mitigations involving time limits on work hours and equipment noise muffling will be implemented. Once occupancy occurs, noise will be generated by automobiles and trucks, human voices, radio and television and household appliances. Maximum noise levels acceptable are governed by the City's municipal code and will be enforced on an individual basis. In addition, the change in land form will alter noise patterns and light reflectiveness. Street lighting and interior lighting will be accomplished through the installation of standard fixtures which meet the city's criteria on spread and intensity.
Hazardous substances are'not a part of this proposal however approximately 4,000 cubic yards of diesel contaminated soil has been identified on-site. Related to the presence of the soil the ground water in the vicinity of the soil contains hydrocarbons above drinking water standards. In addition, approximately two cubic yards of pesticide contaminated soil have been identified. A remediation action plan will be proposed to clean the hydrocarbon contaminated soil and water and remove the pesticide contaminated soil. All soils and water purification plans must be completed prior to construction.
Increases are expected in human population, the provision of housing and vehicular traffic. Based on 174 single family units, 1740 average daily trips are projected and a population increase of 430 persons at 2.471 per unit. These increases alone are not considered significant. Necessary services can be provided and density projections are within limits set by the General Plan. Through implementation of Local Facilities Management Plan: Zone 11, potential cumulative impacts to services and circulation will be mitigated.
No other impacts have been identified.
-8-
-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) Phased development of the project: constructed in two phases. As proposed the project will be Phasing the project will not ultimately reduce any potential impacts however it will provide time for physical improvements to be completed as needed. Phasing the project also retains those areas which will not be constructed immediately in their present state until time of development. The negative impacts of phasing will be borne predominantly by those who have occupied prior phases.
b) Alternate site designs/Alternate scale of development: The project could be redesigned to avoid all sensitive biological areas. By doing so a result could be a reduction in the number of lots achievable and an increase in development cost per lot which would in turn be passed on to the consumer. The current site design has minimized impacts to biological resources. Reducing the scale of development through reduction in lot sizes could have a similar effect on biological resources.
c) Alternate uses for the site: Of those uses permitted within the designated zoning classification, there are none that would have a significantly lesser impact on the environment. An alternate type of housing product could have similar impacts to traffic, air quality and biology. Green houses and agricultural crops could introduce additional chemicals into the soil and encroach into sensitive habitat areas to a greater degree.
d) Development at a future time: Although development at a later date will allow existing conditions to continue, the ultimate effects on the environment will be the same when development occurs.
e) Alternate sites for the development: By transferring development to an other site many of the same impacts could be identified. There are no other areas within the City limits which have an R-1-25000 zoning and therefore make this property unique for its intended use.
f) No project alternative: Under this scenario, the Project site would continue to sit vacant. This use, while not in conflict with the City's General Plan, would not result in the furtherance of that plan. Housing opportunities and associated economic benefits would be lost or deferred pending ultimate site development. Similarly, under this alternative, existing site conditions would remain. A hazardous materials assessment has identified the presence of soil contaminants (petroleum hydrocarbons and pesticides) on-site. In the absence of the project, these conditions may remain without remediation. As a result, the Itno projecttt alternative is not environmentally superior to the proposed action.
-9-
On September 3, 1989 Dr. Joel Weintraub, a vertebrate zoologist visited the site to document the findings of earlier biological SUZ-W& (see Annendix Q). Based upon that research Dr. Weintraub, in his status report on the black-tailed gnatcatcher, attached hereto as AnDendiX E, examined the viability of potential mitigation measures on existing biological resources, including implementation of the "no project" alternative. He concludes that avoidance of the action:
Would NOT guarantee the survival of the Black- tailed Gnatcatcher in this area. Urbanization is rapidly approaching this parcel and with it will come increased human disturbances including pets. It is likely that if the northern hill containing the best sage parcel were to remain undeveloped, the characteristic sage animals may still disappear from the site.
-lo-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I ,5 ; p--/c
Da&
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)-
1. The impacts to topography and visual aesthetics will be reduced through the incorporation of the following design strategies: (a) Grading for building pads and roadways shall be accomplished in a manner that would maintain the appearance of natural hillsides; (b) innovative and varying siting techniques shall be utilized; (c) to avoid excessive grading, roadways shall follow natural contours where feasible: (d) a landscape plan shall be prepared that satisfies both the need for adequate erosion control and the need for visual enhancement of the manufactured slopes and undeveloped pad areas. Landscaping shall be accomplished as soon as practical after grading activities have been completed; and (3) manufactured slopes shall be of minimal height and contour graded.
2. Erosion control measures shall be incorporated into all grading plans submitted to the City to minimize potential increases in short-term erosion and sediment transport both on-site and downstream. Such measures will be provided in accordance with City requirements, and shall include the timely revegetation of graded areas and the use of temporary control devices (e.g. sediment traps, desilting basins, berm and perimeter sandbagging).
3. In order to mitigate potential impacts on water quality, a street sweeping program shall be implemented on-site for all internal roadways.
all-
-- -
4. The impacts associated with future conforming to the following measures: development can be mitigated by
a) following grading, temporary berms should be constructed on the pad perimeter to collect sediment from each lot; b) all artificial slopes should be landscaped after grading with a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Special emphasis should be placed on utilizing native species, whenever possible; c) the tops of all graded pads should be graded to drain away from all manufactured slopes and supplied with small berms around the edge; d) grading should be scheduled to occur following the annual rainy season, if practical. If roads and down drains cannot be paved prior to the following rainy season, they should be sandbagged, where necessary, during the rainy season in order to minimize erosion and sediment transport; e) wherever necessary energy dissipaters should be included in the design to reduce the velocity of runoff into existing canyons.
5. Major manufactured slopes shall incorporate contour grading techniques to soften visual appearance. These techniques may include horizontal undulation of slopes, variations of slope gradients at various horizontal intervals as well as top and toe of slope, and contour rounding where manufactured slopes meet natural slopes to produce smooth transitions.
6. Applicant shall submit a precise grading plan. Precise plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer and be based on recommendations of a soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Grading plans shall be reviewed by the city Engineer and Planning Department, shall be subject to a grading permit, and shall conform to the terms and conditions imposed under a Hillside Development Permit.
The overall shape, height and grade of any cut and fill slope shall be developed in concert with the existing natural contours and scale of the natural terrain.
During grading a soils engineer and engineering geologist shall provide adequate inspection of the site and specify changes, if necessary.
7. Grading plans shall include an erosion, siltation and dust control plan to be approved by the City Engineer. That plan shall include provisions for mitigation measures, such as temporary irrigation, temporary sedimentation basins and sandbagging and shall include a watering and compaction program. The plan shall ensure that discharge of surface runoff from the site during construction activities shall not result in increased erosion or siltation of existing drainage facilities. A cash bond for proper erosion and fugitive dust control and clean up shall be required.
a. Construction equipment should be stored on the project site during grading activities to eliminate heavy-duty equipment truck trips.
9. All construction vehicles should be equipped with the most modern noise mufflers and all engines should be kept in proper tune.
-12-
10. Grading and other construction activities, including maintenance of construction equipment, the repair and should be restricted to those hours and those days as may be established under the City's Noise Ordinance.
11. TO control fugitive dust during clearing, grading, excavation, earthmoving, or the applicant shall institute a regular watering program of affected areas, or such other dust prevention measures as may be required by the City and the Air Quality Management District, pursuant to District Rule 403 requirements. Water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be utilized to keep all areas subject to vehicular traffic damp enough to prevent fugitive dust.
When in the judgment of the City or the Air Quality Management District, wind conditions create a fugitive dust nuisance such as may occur under Santa Ana wind conditions, applicant shall initiate a watering or other dust suppressant program to minimize wind erosion hazards.
12. The following information shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits:
a) The location of prehistoric sites SDi-8436 and SDi-8437 on the Ranch0 Santa Fe and Encinitas Quadrangles. b) Provide a catalogue for surface and subsurface artifacts. c) Update and record,with the State of California and the City of Carlsbad site record forms for SDi-8436 and SDi-8437 to reflect one prehistoric site at these localities. d) Update the submitted report of May 12, 1989 Report by RECON to reflect the site record change from two prehistoric sites to only one site within the proposed development. e) Label Figure 3 of the May 12, 1989 Report by RECON with the one SDi - number for the site tested and found not to be important. f) Provide site boundary for the site tested and method of determination. Note that the City of Carlsbad' proposed archaeological guidelines will require shovel test pits to determine site boundary.
13. The canyons and other areas not to be impacted directly should be protected from degradation by permanent conservation open space easements. These easements shall be incorporated into the grading and construction plans. Grading of the site should be monitored by a qualified biologist to ensure that impacts to open space areas are minimized.
14. Applicant shall prepare, as a component of applicant's approved landscape
plan, a resource management plan that includes specific standards for revegetation, including willow scrub and coastal sage scrub revegetation guidelines, to ensure the reestablishment of those habitat areas on-site. That management plan shall identify a plan palette, plant arrangement (size and spacing) and planting guidelines. Applicant shall comply with all requirements identified in the resource management plan.
15. Opportunities for habitat replacement and enhancement, consistent with public health and safety considerations, shall be maximized and realized to the greatest extent feasible in an effort to replace lost habitat areas. Replacement and enhancement efforts shall maximize taxonomically similar plant materials to achieve the greatest value to wildlife as cover, food and
-13-
breeding areas.
16. In order to facilitate replacement of willow scrub habitat, the central open space area is proposed as a potential site for habitat replacement. A 0.6 acre expansion to the existing willow scrub habitat in that area is proposed.
17. No structure shall be located, constructed or substantially improved, other than circulation improvements authorized under the approved tract map, on properties which are within watercourse or open space areas unless such structures constitute health and safety or flood control improvements or resource management efforts approved by the City and consistent with the terms and conditions of the Section 1601/1603 permit, if applicable, from the California Department of Fish and Game, and such improvements will not substantially impede the flow of water or result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the loo-year flood discharge.
ia. Applicant shall obtain a Section 1601/1603 permit from the California Department of Fish and Game if required for any proposed alterations to existing natural watercourses on-site and shall comply with any and all permit requirements associated therewith. Applicant, in conjunction with the Department of the Army Corp of Engineers, shall determine whether a 404 permit shall be required for alterations to wetland areas. If applicable, applicant shall obta.in said permit and comply with those conditions imposed therewith.
19. Pursuant to section 1601/1603 of the Fish and Game Code, applicant shall contact the California Department of Fish and Game to determine additional permitting requirements, if any, in compliance with that statute. If a subsequent permit is required form the California Department of Fish and Game, applicant shall undertake and complete those actions required thereunder.
20.
21.
Areas that support populations of San Diego thornmint shall be protected from future impacts (e.g. off-road vehicles, trampling, etc.). An informal consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game shall be conducted prior to project implementation and the results included in the project's open space easement and resource management plan. The consultation shall also formalize a monitoring program which would monitor the protected areas during grading and project construction activities. It shall also include a program to monitor the populations for two years after the project is complete and residences are occupied to assess the success of the protection program. Adjustments to the San Diego thornmint preservation plan shall be made as needed to ensure the continued existence of the populations.
Impacts to the coastal sage scrub communities shall be minimized by monitoring grading in the areas of this habitat by a qualified biologist and by hand clearing fire safety zones instead of with the use of heavy equipment. Compensation for the loss of this habitat type shall be made by revegetating cut and fill slopes with coastal sage scrub species native to the area if approved and consistent with Fire Marshall and fuel modification zone requirements. This revegetation would help replace valuable habitat for the black-tailed gnatcatchers in the area.
-14-
22. Applicant, in discussions with the City, and cordStent with public health and safety, shall consider the incorporation of large diameter drainage conduits under those roadway segments which intersect natural open space areas, to counteract the effects of fragmentation of open space areas caused by those roadways, to enhance wildlife mobility and to eliminate or minimize the attrition of species over time by facilitating dispersal and recolonization.
23. Low-intensity lighting should be used for roadway illumination and security where consistent with public safety. Street lighting plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
24. Development of the site shall conform to those recommendations presented in the "Preliminary Geotechnical Study-- Proposed Ranch0 Verde Residential Development" (GeoSoil, Inc., February 16, 1989).
25. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered and/or sprinkler prior to entering public streets to minimize potential fugitive dust.
26. Applicant shall obtain any and all permits and comply with any informational or noticing requirements as may be required by the City of carlsbad, the San Diego County Department of Health Services, the Air Pollution Control District, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California department of Health Services, the California Department of Transportation, and any other permitting agency having jurisdiction thereupon, for the elimination of contaminated soils, the removal of underground storage tanks, and the remediation of groundwater contaminants, and shall comply with any and all terms and conditions as may be imposed upon applicant by those permitting agencies.
27. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the project site shall be certified by the San Diego County Department of Health Services (Hazardous Materials Management Division) indicating that the site has been effectively mitigated of contaminated soil and groundwater conditions.
28. Prior to the approval of the final tract map the San Diego Gas and Electric Company shall determine that existing facilities are adequate to meet project demands.
29. Incorporate energy conservation measures into parcel-specific design in accordance with energy conservation requirements imposed by the California Energy Commission and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Subdivision plans and architectural and landscape design plans shall promote, to the maximum extent feasible, "passive design" strategies to maximize solar exposure, shading and natural cooling.
30. Applicant shall provide the City with documentation, prepared by a hydrologist or civil engineer, ensuring that proposed improvements to storm drain facilities are adequate to ensure low-velocity flows through natural drainage areas to prevent erosion and preserve the ecological balance of those habitat areas.
-15-
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
- .
The applicant shall construct storm drains coincident with the development of the subdivision map area. These improvements shall be constructed according to final engineering drawings to be approved by the City Engineer.
In conjunction with the recordation of the final tract map, applicant shall dedicate all necessary right-of-way easements for all on-site storm drain facilities to the City or such other entity as may be identified by the City, in a form acceptable by the City or such other entity.
TO reduce erosion and siltation in downstream watercourses, applicant shall explore the use of automatic sprinkler systems, soil-moisture sensing devices, and drip irrigation systems.
During grading and construction, steps shall be waste chemicals, especially lubricants, paints, contained and transported off the site where destroyed or stored.
taken to ensure that all and fuels, are properly they shall be recycled,
Prior to the approval of the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a hydrology study, prepared by a hydrologist, civil engineer or engineering geologist, demonstrating that surface runoff from the subdivided area to off-site parcels does not adversely impact those parcels as a result of proposed activities, and including specific design parameters for project drainage facilities as appropriate to accommodate site-specific demands and in accordance with flow criteria, design standards and construction requirements of the City. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from upflow properties through the subject property to a discharge site as approved by the City.
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE1
-16-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 180 LOT SUBDMSION ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE
CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO.: CT 89-18
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portions of Lots 8, 9, and 15 of the subdivision of Ranch0 Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego
County, June 27, 1898.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of June, 1990, and on the 20th
day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of CT 89-18, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of 1
du’s/acre is within the density range of O-l.5 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated
on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control
point of 1.
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project,
ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project
unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the
requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar
as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Encinitas
Union Elementary School District and San Dieguito High School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions
of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition
to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as
required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s Planned Development Ordinance and
also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for Estate Residential development on the General
Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on March 29, 1990 and
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on June 20, 1990. In
recommending approval of this Conditional Negative Declaration the Planning
Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation
measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project
could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability
of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been
conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 11.
PC RESO NO. 3023 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
13. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for CT 89-18/PUD 89-23, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “F”, dated
June 6, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the
Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be submitted to the City
Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs
first.
3. A 500 scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to
the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within and
adjacent to the project.
4. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless assurances of the availability of
sewer facilities have been given by the Leucadia County Water District in writing. A
note shall be included on the final map as follows, “Note: This subdivision is approved
upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of
the subject property unless the necessary sewer pexmits from the LC.W.D. have been
obtained.
5. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from
time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement
a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the
subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated June 12, 1989, copies of
which are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated by this reference. If the fees
are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval
for this project shall be void.
6. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the final
map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
7. The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part
of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect
at the time of building permit application.
8. Water shall be provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
PC RESO NO. 3023 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 11
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on February 23, 1988,
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future amendments
to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project
are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit
issuance.
Approval of CT 89-18 is granted subject to the approval of HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision and
final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot exceed
the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land use
designation for this development is RL. The Growth Control Point for this designation
is 1 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the General Plan
and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of these
parcels must also include all parcels under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.”
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent kith the City’s street name policy
subject to the Planning Directois approval prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or
building permits, whichever occurs first.
A master plan of the existing onsite trees shall be provided to the Planning Director as
part of the &ta1 grading plan to determine which trees shall be required to be preserved
prior to the issuance of a grading permit or a building permit, whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from
weeds, trash, and debris.
PC RESO NO. 3023 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 48-foot intervals along all
street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The trees shall be of
a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines Manual
and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1 plants
(see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall promote
water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall be
submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been installed as
shown on the approved landscape plans.
Mature trees which are removed shall be replaced one to one with minimum 36” box
specimen. Each case shall be reviewed by the Planning Director.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings
so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or
addresses shall contrast to their background color.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not
be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36” blueline
drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal
Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report
shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the
presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two phased program, on file
in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on
paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department.
PC RESO NO. 3023 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
The applicant shall establish a Homeowner’s Association and corresponding covenants, conditions
and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior
to the issuance of building permits. CC&R’s will not be amended without written consent of the
Planning Director.
All manufactured slopes shall be irrigated and each lot shall have individual systems.
Irrigation systems shah be designed to adapt to a reclaimed water system when that becomes
available.
One tree 15 gallon or larger shall be provided on each residential lot. The trees shall be planted
prior to occupancy of each unit
Approval of this CT 89-18 is for subdivision only. A Site Development Plan shall be approved prior
to the issuance of building permits which addresses building elevations, building footprints, location and orientation; distance between structures; building heighq on site fencing design and
location; CC&R’s design guidelines; Entry gates and signage.
Lots 175-180 shall be dedicated to the Homeowner’s Association and subject to deed restrictions
prohibiting any future development wifh the exception of a future trail system to be determined
by the City. Open Space lots shall be maintained by the Homeowner% Association. These
conditions shall be reflected in the CWS.
prior to approval of the final map the developer shall provide proof to the Planning Director of an
acceptable means for maintaining the open space lots and future trails system and distribute the
cost of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the units within the
subdivision.
The applicant shah be responsrble for implementing the mitigation measures as specified in the
Conditional Negative Declaration and for any fees for such program as established by the City
Council prior to the issuance of building pexmits.
prior to final map recordation, easements for a public trail which runs generally from the north
to the south, and provides the opportunity for connection with the City of Encinitas Trail System
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Enzineerinq:
38. All required fire hydrants, water mains, and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
39. Additional public waterlines and onsite fire hydrants may be required, prior to development of the
project, subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
PC RESO NO. 3023
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
This project has been reviewed for conf~mancy with the grading ordinance and found
to be a project for which a grading plan in conformance with City Standards and Section
11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code must be submitted, approved and grading work
must be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All slopes within this project
shall be graded no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical unless specifically
approved otherwise pursuant to these conditions.
No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final
map.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing
or grading of the site.
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic plan
shall be submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as
exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed
and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post site
grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering
geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar or similar drafting fihn and shall
become a permanent record.
The grading for this project is defined as “controlled grading” by Section 11.06.170(a)
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the obsenration of
a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing
to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required
reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless an easement is
obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If an easement cannot be obtained
then the project must be amended accordingly.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within
this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and
shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as
approved by the City Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown
and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any
basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional
drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or
approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and
erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall
guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and
bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer.
PC PESO NO. 3023 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2%
23
24
25
26
27
28
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as may be
required by the City Engineer.
Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay
any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming Master Drainage Plan Update.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding drainage
across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements
required for these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall be made by a
certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be without cost to the City
and free and clear of all encumbrances.
Some improvements shown the Tentative map and/or required by these conditions are located
offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has suffkient title or interest to
permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The Subdivider shall
conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider shall install,
or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown
the tentative map and the following improvements to City Standards to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Full street improvements to Calle Acervo within the subdivision boundary.
Half-street plus 12 feet of improvements to Calle Acervo including required transitions
offsite to the north to join existing and offsite to the south to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The
acquisition by the developer of the full 60 feet of public right-of-way including necessary
slope and drainage easements for these offsite improvements is required.
The intersection of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and Caile Acervo, shall be improved to provide
acceleration and deceleration lanes 400 feet in length in each direction along Ranch0 Santa
Fe Road. The acquisition by the developer of the public right-of-way is required.
The traffic signal at the intersection of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and Calle Acervo.
The offsite gravity sewer construction including the acquisition by the developer of the
public sewer easements, westerly to the existing sewer main in Ranch0 Santa Fe Road is
required.
Street signing and striping plans.
All streets within this subdivision shall be public streets, except for the emergency access
easements, and shall be constructured in accordance with City standards.
All required reclaimed water lines as approved in the reclaimed water usage plan for this
project.
PC RESO NO. 3023 -&
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
Improvements listed above shah be constructed within 18 months of final map approval and/or
improvement plan approval, whichever occurs first.
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by
virtue of approval of this tentative map.
The developer shall install street lights along all public street frontages in conformance with City
of Carlsbad Standards.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the
respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
All concrete terrace drains private streets, street lights, storm drains and sidewalks shall be
maintained by the homeowner9 association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual
property owner (if on an individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly
identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CCWs.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable
TV authorities.
The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type I form, on the subject property in all
common areas as approved by the City Eng;ineer.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written
consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the
existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1.
Irrigations systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall be designed consistent with Title
17 of the California Administrative Code. Offsite future reclaimed water distribution systems
should be anticipated by the installation of adequately sized sleeves at crossing points to minimize
street excavation.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of City
Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant.
Said Extension shah be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In approving an
extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions.
The developer shall install wheelchair ramps at all street comers in conformance with City of
Carl&ad Standards prior to occupancy of any buildings.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any lot, a sewer Permit must be issued by the
Leucadia County Water District veri@ing payment of all applicable District fees for that lot
prior to the first final map approval a hydrology study shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This study shall include an analysis of the Enciuitas Creek Drainage Basin from
Zone 11 to Batiquitos Iagoon. This studymustpropose altemative forms of mitigating peak storm
runoff flows to include a possl%le flood attenuation action plan for the entire Encinitas Creek
Drainage Basin.
prior to the recordation of the iinal map the developer shall grant a 30 foot wide emergency access
easement fkom Paseo del Ore easterly to tie subdivision boundary as shown on the tentative map.
This easemeut shall be graded and improved with a 24 foot wide asphalt roadway with an
PC PESO NO. 3023 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
appropriate base and asphalt berms. m emergency access roadway shall be gated at the subdivision boundarywith a %0x? lock Appropriate easements shall be granted by the developer to allow for public use of the private streets on an emergency basis. This provides a temporary
resolution to provide a secondary emergency access to the area served by the hone Jack Road as
requested by the City of Encinitas until a permanent solution to complete this area’s ultimate
circulation can be provided.
This project proposes phasing of final maps and development The approved phasing is as shown
on the tentative map. A condition of the first phase of construction is the construction OE Calle
del Sol; Caminito del Mar to Paseo del Or-o; and Paseo del Or-o to Terraza Pacilica and Terram
Pacifica from Paseo del Oro to Calle Acervo, and CaUe Acenro fkom the site boundary to the noti
to join existing and to the south to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road.
All blasting that may be requked during the site gmding will be done in accordance with City
Policies.
Prior to final map approval the developer shall submit a reclaimed water usage plan for the
approval of the City Rng-ineer. The plan shall be in conformance with the City’s proposed
reclaimed water master plan. At a minimum the developer shall install a dual waterline to serve
all irrigated open space areas with reclaimed water as it becomes available.
lf the City is in a Stage II or greater water aler& reclaimed water shall be used for all construction
related activities such as dust control and grading compaction as directed by the City Engineer.
Prior to building Permit issuance a deed restriction shall be placed on all lots notifying potential
owners that the irrevocable offer of dedication may be used in the future for public street access
to and horn the City of Rncinitas.
The developer shall make an irrevwable offer of dedication for a 60 foot wide public right-of-way
fkom Paseo del Oro easerly to the subdivision boundary over the same area of the 30 foot wide
emergency access easements. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this
project All land so offered shall be without cost to the City and free and clear of all
encumbrances.
Fire Conditions:
74. Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by Fire
Marshal.
75. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed
fire hydrants and onsite roads and dries to the Fire Marshal for approval.
76. An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
77. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
78. Proposed security gate systems shah be provided with “Knox” key operated override switch, as
specified by the Fire Department.
79. Fire retardant roofs shah be required on all structures.
PC PESO NO. 3023 -lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
s
1c
13
12
12
14
1E
1E
17
lf
1:
2c
21
22
2:
24
2f
2t
2':
2t
80.
81.
82.
83.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of
Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other
systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to
construction.
Emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the Vista Montana cul-de-sac. JZxistiug utility access
roads and easements may serve as emergency access if extended to the project and maintained in
serviceable condition in accordance with the unifoxm fire code.
Approvals specifically do not include the proposed enny gates off of Calle Acervo or private streets.
All references to entry gates at CalIe Acervo and references to private streets shall be deleted.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden, Marcus &
Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, chairperson
-BAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3023 -ll-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 174 RESIDENTIAL LOT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO.: PUD 89-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portions of Lots 8, 9, and 15 of the subdivision of Ranch0 Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego
County, June 27, 1898.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of June, 1990, and on the 20th
day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of PUD 89-23, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1. The project is consistent with the Ciqs General Plan since the proposed density of 1
du’s/acre is within the density range of O-1.5 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated
on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control
point of 1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project,
ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project
unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the
requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar
as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Encinitas
School District, and San Dieg-uito High School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions
of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition
to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as
required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s Planned Development Ordinance and
also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for Estate Residential development on the General
Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative
Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on March 29, 1990 and
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on June 20, 1990. In
recommending approval of this Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has
considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any
written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the
environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability
of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been
conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 11.
PC RESO NO. 3024 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2:
2:
24
2E
2e
23
2E
13. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of Planning Commission Resolution numbers 3022, 3023, 3025, 3026 are
incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden,
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3024 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3025
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH EASTERLY
CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO.: HDP 89-35
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portions of Lots 8, 9, and 15 of the subdivision of Ranch0 Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego
County, June 27, 1898,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of June, 1990, and on the 20th
day of June, 1990, consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments,
if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the
Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of HDP 89-35, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1. That Hillside conditions have been properly identified.
2. That undevelopable areas of the project have been identified.
3. That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and permits are
consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements of this chapter.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which are
undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.120 of this code.
5. That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside lands.
6. That the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated
in the Hillside Development Guidelines manual.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of Planning Commission Numbers 3022, 3023, 3024, 3026 are
incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairman Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFadden, Marcus
81 Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3025 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3026
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR
A 180 LOT SUBDMSION WITH 174 RESIDENTIAL LOTS GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTH EASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 VERDE
CASE NO: SUP 90-S
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portions of Lots 8, 9, and 15 of the subdivision of Ranch0 Las Encinitas, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego
County, June 27, 1898.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of June, 1990, and on the 20th
day of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Special Use Permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of SUP 90-5, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1. All permit requirements of Chapter 21.110 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code have been
satisfied.
2. The site is reasonably safe from flooding.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. The site does not adversely affect the carring capacity of amas where the base flood
elevations have heen determined.
Conditions:
1. The approval os SUP 90-S is contingent upon the approval of CT 89-18.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of &.&bad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: SchIehuber, Holmes, McFadden, Marcus
& Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
.- -_ . ..- _~
& I-
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOBMILLE#
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO 3026
!STAFFRElPORT
DATE:
TG:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
JUNE 20, 1990
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 8%WPUD 89-23/HDP 8%35/SUP 90-5 - RANCH0 VERDE - A request for
approval of a 180 lot Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development, Hillside
Development Permit and Special Use Permit for 174 residential lots and 6 open
space lots on 216.16 acres of land in the R-1-25,000, OS and Planned Community
Zones; Local Facilities Management Zone 11 located at the southeasterly comer of
the City adjacent to the City of Encinitas.
L RECOlUMENDA~ON
&
0 7
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3022, recommending
approval of a Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3023, 3024, 3025, and 3826, recommending approval of
CT 89-18, PUD 89-28, HDP 89-35, and SUP 90-5, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
IL BACKGROUND
This application was originally scheduled to be heard on June 6, 1990, however, was continued due
to the lateness of the hour. The following revisions have heen made to the staff report:
Page 1 - (5 line 2, change 79+ acres to 73+ acres;
line 4, change 52+ acres to 46+ acres;
Page 2 - 11 line 7, change Exhibits “13” and “14” to W”, “12A”, and “13”;
q2 line 6, change Exhibit “15” to “14”;
Page 3 - 15 Open Space Compliance, add “yes” to right hand column;
Page 5 - 11 line 5, add “graded”, to read “...cubic yards per graded acre.“;
Page 6 - 14 line 5, change Exhibit “16” to “15”;
Page 8 - Attachments, add 12A,
Reso 3023, pg 6, Condition 37, Delete “A trail connection to the City of Encinitas shall he
provided as determined on the final map.” New Condition 37 “Prior to final map recordation,
easements for a public trail which runs generally from the North to the South, and provides the
opportunity for connection with the City of Encinitas trail system shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director.”
Reso 3023, page 11, add new Condition 81, “Emergency vehicle access shall be provided to
the Vista Montana cul-de-sac. Existing utility access roads and easements may serve as emergency
access if extended to the project and maintained in serviceable condition in accordance with the
uniform fire code.”
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff report dated June 6, 1990, with attachments.
APPLICA ALON COMPLETE DATE:
OCTOBER 25, 1989
DATE: JUNE 6,199O
!STAFFREPORT
.REVlSED w
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SI ‘BJECT: CI 89WI’UD 8%23/HDP 89-35/SUP 90-5 - RANCH0 VERDE - A request for
approval of a 180 lot Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development, Hillside
Development Permit and Special Use Permit for 174 residential lots and 6 open
space lots on 216.16 acres of land in the R-1-25,000; OS and Planned Community
Zones; Local Facilities Management Zone 11 located at the southeasterly corner of
the City adjacent to the City of Encinitas.
L RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3022, recommending
approval of a Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3023, 3024, 3025, and 3026, recommending approval of
CT 89-18, PUD 89-28, HDP 89-35, and SUP 90-5, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
IL PROJECT D ESCRWTIONANDBACKGROUND
The site is located at the southeasterly comer of the City adjacent to the City of Encinitas. The
majority of the 216.16 acre site is hillside of which 27.20 acres are zoned open space and
14.75 acres are Hillside constrained lands. The total net acreage is 174.21 acres. Density proposed
is 1 dwelling per acre and the General Plan range is O-l.5 units per acre for the Residential-Low
(RL) designation.
To the north is the San Dieguito High School site. That school district is well along in planning
stages for that facility. South and east in the City of Encinitas is single family detached housing
on lots that vary from l/2 acre to 8 acres. To the west is an approved subdivision,
CT 85-lO/PUD 81, for 189 single family homes. There is an existing nursery operation onsite
which will be removed. Because of the nursery some hilltop areas have been disturbed, however,
the majority of the site is in a natural condition.
The project proposal is 174 single family lots. All lots are a minimum 25,000 square feet and the
largest home lot is 73,500t. Six open space lots totaling 73+ acres have been created to preserve
hillsides and sensitive vegetation. 27.2 acres of those lots are zoned and General Plan open space.
The remaining 46+ acres are additional open space which will also be maintained by a home
owners association.
Ranch0 Verde is proposed as a gated neighborhood, however, homes are not proposed at this time.
Therefore, building review will be done under the Site Development Plan process at a later date.
This same procedure was implemented for the Viewpoint tract CT 85-34 on Alga near El Camino
Real. The applicant speculates at this time that they will be building out the project and that
homes will be in the range of 4,000 square feet.
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP . .-35/SUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Pape 2
Preliminary designs of the Ranch0 Verde subdivision were submitted to the City of Encinitas for
review and comment. In a letter from Robert Warren, City Engineer for Encinitas, two alternatives
were offered for consideration regarding a connection from Encinitas to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road
in Carlsbad. The first was a public road and the second was a gated emergency access. The
Carlsbad Engineering Department analyzed the alternatives and preferred the emergency access and
transmitted a letter to Encinitas with that finding. Both letters are included as
Exhibits “12”, “12A”, & “13”.
Offsite sewer and road improvements are required for this proposal. A sewer alignment is proposed
as gravity flow from Ranch0 Verde through the approved CT 85-10 (Rice) and proposed
CT 90-3 (Shelly) property to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The intention of designing the system now
is to have a workable design approved should Ranch0 Verde build before either Shelley or Rice.
The alignment passes through future residential and open space and would ultimately be abandoned
and adapted to the street system within the Shelley and Rice properties. (See Exhibit “14”.) The
alternative to avoid the Rice open space is to provide a pump station and run the line in the
future Calle Acervo alignment. This alternate alignment has already been approved as part of the
Rice project. A section of the alignment through the Rice property is in an open space area. If
the sewer is built there will always be a visual indicator that the line runs through it because a road
must be maintained for access to the line. The remainder of the line will be relocated into the
streets when development occurs. From a maintenance and cost standpoint the gravity line vs. the
forced line is preferred. The disadvantage with the gravity line is the necessity of a 12 foot wide
access to that portion which runs through the Rice property open space. Berming and landscaping
adjacent to the maintenance road could help to reduce the visual impact. The road can also be
integrated into an overall trail system which runs through the open space areas of both Rice and
Shelly properties.
The offsite Calle Acervo Road Alignment has been coordinated with the approved CT 85-10 (Rice)
and proposed CT 90-3 (Shelley). Should the Ranch0 Verde project build prior to either Rice or
Shelley the road would be constructed at that time. As the other two projects are ready to build,
they will tie into the established road alignment. If these offsite improvements are not provided
neither sewer nor access will be available to the project site.
The proposed project is subject to the following:
1. Planned Development Ordinance
2. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11
3. La Costa Master Plan
4. Hillside Development Ordinance
5. Interim Open Space Ordinance.
ANALYSIS
DISCUSSION
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
The applicant’s request for a gated neighborhood with private streets requires the processing of a
Planned Unit Development. Also, by using the P.U.D. concept, lot sizes can be reduced beyond
CT 89-18A’UD 89-23/HDE -35/SUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
the minimum to better accommodate site conditions. By doing so, commonly owned open space
lots can be created from the excess land. The common ownership of open space lots is a stronger
tool in preserving those areas and is therefore considered more appropriate than larger individually
owned parcels with open space easements. This approach is more sensitive to the natural
topography by reducing developable area and has the potential for the enhancement of natural
resources.
A 25,000 square foot minimum lot size has been considered appropriate because of the R-1-25,000
zoning designation on the southern portion of the lot and the intent of ‘Estate” lots for that
northerly portion in the La Costa Master Plan area. Because of the estate size of each lot,
recreation facilities and recreational vehicle storage can be provided individually, eliminating the
need for common facilities.
All streets are being developed under Carlsbad public street standards. Their curvalinear design
create visual interest and allow for a circulation system that is in context with the natural terrain.
The collector streets have curb-to-curb widths of 40 feet and cul-de-sacs have 36 feet widths. Both
standards allow for street parking on two sides which in turn can satisfy the guest parking
requirement at a ratio better than one space per unit. The provision of street guest parking is
subject to the approval of the Planning Commission as an option for Planned Developments which
are either single family or duplexes. Trash collection will be done at curb side for individual lots.
Other requirements of compliance are: building setbacks and height separation of buildings and
storage space. Because these issues relate to structures, conditioning the project to go through Site
Development Review will allow the City to evaluate the location, and types of structures prior to
issuance of building permits. Other aspects to be reviewed for approval by site development plan
are design guidelines, fencing program, entry signage, recreational vehicle storage and CC&R’s.
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN: ZONE 11
The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted
performance standards are summarized below:
COMPLIANCE
FACILITY IMPACTS WITH STANDARDS
City Admin Facilities
Library
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution System
6449.9 sq. ft.
344.2 sq. ft.
174 EDU
1.3 acres
N/A
1,740 ADT
Station #6
29.4 acres required
73.5 acres provided
132 Students
174 EDU
38,280 G.P.D.
YeS
YeS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
YeS
YeS
Yes
Yes
The proposal is .21 units below the Growth Control Point.
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP ./35/SUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Page 4
A Local Facilities Management Plan has been adopted for Zone 11. Discretionary approvals can
be granted for projects within this zone however no building or grading permits may be issued until
the performance standards are complied with. The plan proposes mitigation measures to bring
these facilities into compliance, but there is no approved financing plan to guarantee that mitigation
will he available when needed.
This project has been conditioned to comply with all of the mitigation measures of the Local
Facilities Management Plan which qualify it as being in compliance with Growth Management
requirements. However, until a finance plan is approved which can implement those measures no
development will occur.
LA COSTA MASTER PLAN
Approximately 60 acres of the site are within the La Costa Master Plan, and designated as
southeast neighborhood 22. Processing within the Master Plan area can be done in two ways,
either the standard review process or the La Costa develoDment nlan review process. The standard
review nrocess is subject to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and applicable standards
from the Master Plan. The development plan review process is wholly subject to the Master Plan.
The applicant chose the standard orocess with implementation of the Planned Development
Ordinance.
General development standards of the La Costa Master Plan applicable to southeast neighborhood
22 are as follows:
1. The site is subject to Title 21 Rural Estate Single Family Development Standards with an
option to implement the Planned Development Ordinance.
2. Development should: utilize standard, detached single family housing on 7,500 square feet
and attached single family housing on lots to a minimum of 4,000 square feet with zero lot
lines; utilize turn-in driveways to reduce setbacks and minim& grading.
3. (RL) - 1.0 dwelling unit per acre. The intent of the southeast quadrant of the master plan
is to provide a wide diversity of housing types and lifestyles. Development, specifically along
the periphery of the community on the south and east will emphasize very low density
estate type housing.
Because the Master Plan identifies the Zoning Ordinance as the governing document for this
neighhorhood, it is the intent of the Master Plan which influences development in this area and
not the master plan development standards. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the
Master Plan through its provision of 25,000 square foot lots at a density of one unit per acre.
Although larger lots could be specified as required hy the Residential Estate standards found in the
Zoning Ordinance the effect would he the reduction of permanent common open space. The single
family product and gated streets are also elements which support the intent of Rural Estates.
As homes are proposed, the Site Development Plan process w-ill further allow the Planning
Commission the discretion to review the product mass; placement of structures relative to property
lines and top or toe of slope, and design characteristics which will set the overall tone for the
development.
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP.. +35/SUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Page 5
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
Slope areas have been identified within the residentially zoned portion of the site which exceed
40%, (3.80 acres) and are between 25% and 40%, (21.90 acres). All 40% slopes and l/2 of the
25% - 40% slopes have been excluded from density calculations as undevelopable lands. Of the
216.16 gross acres 131.7 will be disturbed. The estimated grading quantities of balanced cut and
fill are 800,008 cubic yards which is 6,074.41 cubic yards per graded acre. The ordinance
identifies 7,999 cubic yards per acre or less as acceptable quantities.
All but one manufactured slope is less than 30 feet in height. That slope, adjacent to the west side
of the segment of Paseo de1 Oro which separates lot 179 from 180, varies in height from
30 to 39 feet for a length of approximately 120 feet. The slope is created by the need to connect
two parallel hilltops by crossing a ravine with a road. That section of road also serves as the
connection for the emergency access to the City of Encinitas.
Because the emergency connection to Encinitas is generally at this location there is not a great
amount of flexibility in adjusting the height of the road grade. By lowering the road the grade
separation increases which in turn increases the steepness of the access stub. If the connection
location were moved south and the road lowered, that angle would be reduced because the grades
would be closer. However, the access location is established by the irrevocable offer of dedication
on the adjacent property in Encinitas and cannot be moved. A retaining wall could be used at the
base of the manufactured slope, however its use would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance.
If the road was relocated to cross the ravine at another location the result would reduce natural
open space. The reduction would occur from crossing at a wider section of the ravine or traversing
slopes. The situation is unique. The intent of the ordinance is being met and the alternative would
reduce open space. Therefore staff concludes that the excess height can be justified and meets the
intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance to preserve natural hillside to the greatest extent
feasible.
Iv. ENVIRO IQ4ENTALREvIEw
The applicant completed an expanded initial study and included supplemental reports on archeology,
biological resources, Black-tailed Gnatcatcher, soil containments and traffic. Additional support
material was provided through reference to the Wooley Annexation: EIR 82-3 and the La Costa
Master Plan: EIR 307. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, staff analyzed the supplemental
reports as part of the initial study. It was determined that several impacts of the project had the
potential of being significant. However, revisions in the project plans made by the applicant and
conditions placed on the project have mitigated the effects to a point where clearly no significant
impacts would occur. There is no evidence that the project as revised will have a significant effect
on the environment. A summary of the environmental issues follows with a complete discussion
attached to the Conditional Negative Declaration.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The majority of the site is in natural hillsides and developing the site requires alteration to the
natural landforms. Grading quantities of approximately 6,075 cubic yards per disturbed acre are
proposed, which falls below the quantity of 7,999 cubic yards identified in the Hillside Development
Ordinance as being acceptable. A blue line stream is identified onsite and any alteration to such
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP ../-35/!XJP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Page 6
natural water courses are subject to review and mitigation authority of the California Department
of Fish and Game and Department of the Army Corps of Engineers. The requirement for permits
from these agencies has not yet been determined. A condition is included in the resolution of
approval for permits to be obtained from these agencies prior to final map approval. This same
area is within a 100 year floodplain and requires a Special Use Permit issued by the City. An
application was submitted and appropriate studies were conducted and no adverse effects to the
floodplain were determined, therefore staff is recommending approval of the Special Use Permit.
An archeological site has been identified and surveyed. Subsequently a report of findings was
prepared and submitted as part of the expanded initial study. The report was reviewed by the
Carlsbad Historic Commission which found the study to be acceptable however a recommendation
was made that additional written documentation be provided for City files prior to the issuance of
grading permits. The Historic Preservation Commission’s request is included as a mitigation
requirement as part of an overall mitigation program.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Both sensitive plant and bird species have been identified within the project boundaries. San Diego
Thornmint, listed as a State endangered species is located in areas which will not be disturbed. California Adolphia and Ashy Spike-Moss are list 2 and list 4 sensitive species respectively which
are commonly found around Coastal Sage. List 2 plants are species that are rare, endangered, or
threatened in California but are more common elsewhere. List 4 species are those that are
presently being monitored because of current decreases in their population. Palmers Grappling
Hook, a list 2 sensitive species, is found in grassy openings on clay soils. Although these species
are listed as “sensitive”, there are no federal or state preservation or replacement requirements.
These plants will be included in a revegetation program which will strengthen the existing species
population.
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub and Southern Willow Scrub also found on the site are listed as high
priority community types. The significance of these plants is their habitat value, particularly the
Coastal Sage as a habitat for the Black-tailed Gnatcatcher. It is the Coastal Sage “habitat” that will
be impacted the most by the development. Although there are no protection measures required
for the Coastal Sage steps were taken to minimize encroachment into those areas like: reducing
pad size and increasing common open space lots. A revegetation program will also be implemented
to strengthen the undisturbed areas and replenish the disturbed areas where feasible. There will
be some loss of Diegan Coastal Sage, however, with revegetation it will not be significant.
Approximately .20 acres of Willow Scrub will be disturbed through the construction of Calle Acervo.
As a wetland habitat the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) has traditionally
required a replacement ratio which can be as much as 3 acres for each acre which is disturbed.
Suitable on site locations exist which could be used to replace the potential loss of wetland habitat.
(Exhibit “15”) Actual replacement requirements will be determined by the CDFG if a permit is
required. \
The Blacktailed Gnatcatcher and Northern Harrier Hawk, both observed on the site, are species
of special concern. The threat to the birds is the reduction of their respective habitats. Because
the Gnatcatcher is also a Category 2 listed species on the Federal Register there has been a special
focus on preservation of Coastal Sage Habitat for the Gnatcatcher versus grassland habitat for the
Harrier Hawk. The project has been modified to preserve a large percentage of the Coastal Scrub
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP cI, -35/SUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Pa9e 7
areas and revegetation of disturbed areas will further reduce the net loss of Coastal Sage Habitat.
A status report prepared by Dr. Joel Weintraub, an independent vertebrate zoologist, speculates
that regardless of Coastal Sage preservation urban encroachment and the creation of island habitats
will ultimately drive the Blacktailed Gnatcatcher from this general region. He goes on to suggest
a “mitigation bank” which would be a pool of funds used to purchase, survey, or maintain Coastal
Sage areas large enough to support the sage inhabitants.
There have been preliminary discussions regarding a Citywide Preservation Mitigation Plan however
at this time the City has no program under which a mitigation bank can be operated.
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
Implementation of the project will increase population, generate subsequent traffic and require
public services. These impacts are not peculiar to this project but are common for residential
development. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and an EIR was certified at
the time of General Plan adoption which addressed these potential impacts. Nevertheless, the
traffic generated by the project was specifically analyzed for impacts to existing and future road
systems within the City of Carlsbad.
The traffic analysis prepared for this project did not include existing circulation patterns in the City
of Encinitas adjacent to the subject site.
At this time, the City of Encinitas is in the process of studying the Lone Jack Road area circulation
needs. One alternative to satisfy that need is to provide a public road through the Double “L
Horse Ranch in Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The Engineering
Department has reviewed the City of Encinitas’ request to connect the Lone Jack Road area
through to one of the proposed streets in the Ranch0 Verde Tract and it is not acceptable to the
City of Carlsbad. The Ranch0 Verde property is zoned R-l 25,000 and has been proposed for
development as a gated estate community to be served by private streets. Extension of a public
street through the site would be detrimental to the proposed project. In addition the connecting
streets which will serve the Ranch0 Verde project were not designed to accommodate additional
through traffic from Encinitas. Regional circulation needs are addressed in the General Plan with
the improvement of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and Melrose Avenue. With the extension of Melrose
Avenue adequate access will be provided to that northeastern region of Olivenhain.
A second acceptable choice, which has been provided, is emergency access through Ranch0 Verde
to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road from the Double “L” Horse Ranch in Encinitas. This would allow for
emergency access only to the area in the event Lone Jack Road becomes impassible. During
normal times this access would be gated and locked. This provides a temporary resolution for the
City of Encinitas’ desire to provide secondary access to this area until a more permanent
comprehensive solution can be worked out.
The city is in receipt of a letter from a resident of Encinitas who questions the adequacy of the
environmental review performed on the project. His specific interest is in the road connection
from Encinitas to Carlsbad. CEQA requires review of environmental impacts produced by a
project. A traffic analysis was prepared as part of the initial study which studied the effects this
project would have on existing and proposed street systems. No significant impacts were identified.
-,
CT 89-WPUD 89-23/HDP L -3WSUP 90-5
Ranch0 Verde
June 6, 1990
Paee 8
project. A traffic analysis was prepared as part of the initial study which studied the effects this
project would have on existing and proposed street systems. No significant impacts were identified.
If a public street connection to Encinitas was necessary to Ranch0 Verde for adequate circulation
and was proposed as part of the project, that analysis would have taken place. Conversely if
Encinitas were to propose a public road connection to Ranch0 Verde it would be that agency’s
responsibility to assess that road connection’s impacts on contiguous and surrounding properties.
The analysis staff has conducted complies with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Another resident of Encinitas, of the Double “L” Ranch, submitted a letter objecting to a public
road connection from Encinitas to Carlsbad. Attached to the letter was a petition to the City of
Encinitas staff opposing the public road connection with 53 signatures.
SUMMARY
The project is in compliance with the R-1-25,000 La Costa Master Plan, and Open Space Zoning
designations. Proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Hillside Development
Ordinance and the Carlsbad General Plan. Public facilities can be provided in conformance with
the requirements of the Local Facilities Management Plan: Zone 11. Staff therefore recommends
approval of CT 89-18, PUD 89-28, HDP 89-35 and SUP 90-5.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
12A.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3022
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3023
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3024
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3025
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3026
Location Map
Disclosure Statement
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Letter from Scott Demere dated April 16, 1990
Letter from Christopher Lloyd, dated April 25, 1990
Letter from Encinitas dated September 15, 1989
Letter from Encinitas dated January 31, 1990
Letter from Carlsbad dated February 27, 1990
Offsite sewer alignment
Potential wetland mitigation sites
Exhibits “A - F, dated June 6, 1990
CW:lh
April 18, 1990
-
L 3 -- + Ei XC
z
:
B : (I
: I
: -r + 0 C -F + -P 3
.
:: .F
2LE
‘“2
“$
L m -r OS-O v- v) m LcnL n. -r CI
. 2
3$
L m-r OSW
‘f z z n -r CI
c, c
FE v- c,
E% fun. F-W DO
+-, ii -a h
-0
2 WD USE I -rC)mur
35 qB
w-r c s 3-r 0 n, - 5 W’WF- v-0 m - c*- > i--lUJ0 m-r- L SP n v)ncncl
c 6.Yy “V&y-
z c 0
c, E
FL *r c,
Ek mn I-W EL0
2
. z&l -- u w 7 VI
w% n-r w Ofi I-E
c, s
iis! -r u
Ek fan YW nn
I I tim SF > zis CnWWU wEa w L 3+ rn v-r c, 0” VU 0 -C c, &$.i
se-r c 0 v)r+
‘52 3u -r
~~~~’
Oc(v,C rc “3 Sk*-T -rOEa
WSC
u”“i -r -r >+ C-r
e x2; p.(cclT
w r .r m mc, w u -r E E ‘e3.r .
E ‘E g .f L-r 7 m I-L 7wow =n v=
v E-r =wm3~ c, c, II SC
7
. . .
z: 0
.
E z
2
% W
U” VI0 3-22 a0 c3
w co E” mOL 0-r .C 0 =+Me -r -r * -F gE”g
- o’s E - c, .C
ccOLE? WSh w-0 VC, s L a-r +owu
k
Es! .F c,
Et tan f-w nn
0 8-z w L.r E-y -r
G YEW F-WL mEw
5z: tu.r t c, nmt
-z&5: L 0 wwcc
“5 O+ n
ZF w -r ‘3 0
EIF no
. .X Z!U- zl?z . mmc, w u *- E E n.r .
E --z E -5
L SC =1 m -L I= w.0 ii sn us V v-7 us
“eJ& D-6 EOS - zvww OVJZ
3WCI)Ls V E-r
$-,pby
wn2 P& ‘3 Al pu II n-- EU LOW2 II 0 & c;r L 6
-I
w A- f .A * nfcor-E I3 ~8~36
-
L 0
jcr (da0 .f h ‘S
EE; Q)., n
z:=L” O-On
-r u
ES run l-w no
k
FE -r u
ES mn I-W 0-n
t: W
‘2
h
7 >
2 ‘;;; r vl F-2 0 v) -r u
zzLr;;;%“, ‘5; -& 2 ‘; . 2 z
rbwuw WCWUE r rQI a-r c uv) aE w cc -W -womu)n 30 3% 0-r v)
ShWL ‘“.Z,m
o--a m w w UC, WE= LhVWU L wu-I- 0,
““522% -r Lwowar nnvv)zcu
u iG ki n “$ L-r m ou J z 21 z a-cl-
is& 7w no
2 EL oorew
&W “P UWE *w00v-r
‘Z 5 u L = m 0 mu, “2
k.zZ’,2 WC T- WVE PL n SF WYIWX W>YVU - -r 0 *r *r m y h.3 0"' SLEcnYr v) 0 -r w 0 -r
yz-2 ki CJ
-r .r v)YWW u mo-rx L nronvrm UYOtU
~~k(c**
5X4-b E ;; c
g'&y~mi . n muuux r
2gzJa p
3Wul~-t- vE7 n
u u ” ‘f - L .r
XEE:: SF w c-r w on wuu
F&L 0
l II 52
s&l 5 m
x+$ ‘3 0
e En- II :: n-r c-0
L O.$Z ii II 0
qy z w -r m <
;ggg~ 2
-
w m E” -0L ul.r .r 0 cuuu -F .A * *r
gEu$
-ozE - u SF
P I E... Gr2, wu vu s L m-r c 0 wu
FW nn
. .x z!u- 2 2 2 mmr w u *r E E Q.r .
.C m-r L
2’s =c
E ‘E t .f L -r J tu FL r-wow =n us u
--
k 5 $2 ccvnu n W &I 7 E m-t- n OTC, -F -r 2SfE OS03 - .a -
- - 0 VI
0 &E 3 SF- n
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
[Qc'~ , /L.-/C 7 L --,- ' ,jrFf[.c:; 24 *$A ~,,,(/6'L 1. 2 .
/ /,- i' ' ,i' i ~./I'
. ;. ,i ‘;3 /pJ -.. / / Date/ Signature
CW:kd
-17-
- -
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
SITE 4
City of Carlsbad
RANCH0 VERDE
I CT 89-18 HDP 89-35
PUD 89-23 SUP 90-05
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPIJCANT’S STATEMENT OF DlSCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPUCATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMlSSlON OR COMMl7lEE.
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. A&icaht
List the names and addresses of all p8rSOnS having a financial interest in the application.
EWiqhton Carl&ad Associates . . h~tet25Q ta Ana, California 92705
2. owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved,
Brighton Carl&ad Associates
505 North Tustin Avenue, Suite #2!50 Santa Ana, California 92705
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ant
addresses of all individuals owning more than 1096 of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
4.
. . . . aCaliforniaL~tedPartnershiv S05North!l!ustinAvenuer Suite#250
92705 *Toddcunninqham * Ilayid -11
**George-
a California General Partnership . . l-h-lV@. slnt- #2QQ CostaHesa, California 92626 * David Ball *WA-
* Brighton EIaaes If any person Identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names ant
addksS8s of any person serving as officer br director of the non-profltbrganization or as trust88 or b8nefiCiaq
Of th8 trust.
N/A N/A
(Over)
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP 89-35/SUP 90-5
APPLICANT: RANCH0 VERDE
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 180 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR 174 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF ENCINITAS.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PORTIONS OF LOTS 8.9, AND 15 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCH0
LAS ENCINITAS. IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27.1898.
APN: 255-030-17. 264-010-21.22. 23. 25 Acres 216.16 180 Lots for 174 Units Proposed No. Lots/Units
Land Use Designation RL
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Density Allowed O-l.5 DU/AC Density Proposed 1.0 DUIAC
Existing Zone PC /R-1-25.000 Proposed Zone PC/R-l-25,000
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site PC/R-l-25,OOO/OS RWOS - VACANT, NURSERY
North PC H - VACANT HIGH SCHOOL SITE
South R-R-Z-21.500 ENCINITAS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
East RURAL - 2-8 ACRES ENCINITAS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
West RLM/OS - VACANT
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY - SAN DIEGITO HIGH SCHOOL
Water OLIVENHAIN Sewer LEUCADIA COUNTY EDU’s 174
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date June 12. 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Conditional Mitipated Negative Declaration dated March 29. 1990
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: RANCH0 VERDE - Cl- 89-mT3P 89--P W-S
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 11 m PLAN: RL
ZONING: P0’R-1-2&,Wl
DEVELOPER’S NAME: BRIGWON HQJWS
ADDRESS: 505 N. TI JSTIN AVENI 1E - SIJTTI? 750 - SANTA ANA CA 92705
PHONE NO.: (714\-3999 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 255-010-17, 7.64~370-71, 2f&nl~-71,77,~,75
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 216 ACRES/174
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 644.9
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage =
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 1.3
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
NA
F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
1.740
G. Fire: Sewed by Fire Station No. = 6
H. Open Space: Performance Standard 794
I. Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
137
J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 174
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on sfte plan)
I PI JCADIA CWD
K. Water: Demand in GPD -
L. The project is .21 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
ATTACHMENT 10
April 16,199O
Scott Demere 3574 Lone Jack Road. Encinitas, Ca. 92024
City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad. CA 92009
Re: Ranch0 Verde Case No. CT 89-18/HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23/SUP 90-5 Brighton Homes
Carlsbad Planning Department:
You have conducted an environmental review on the above mentioned project. I am concerned however, that the review was not adequate as it did not take into consideration the potential impact of a public road connection through the project that has been requested by the City of Encinitas.
You are in receipt of a letter from Bob Warren, City Engineer of Encinitas, stating that we need your cooperation in establishing a public secondary access from Lone Jack Road, through this project, to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The 20' private road proposed by this developer would not be adequate for this connection, and a full scale environmental impact report which evaluates the impact of a public road connection through this property should be conducted before issuing a negative declaration on this project.
Accepting the current conditional negative declaration without further environmental assessment of the proposed public road would demonstrate negligence on your part. Since Encinitas is currently conducting hearings on this matter, I would appreciate a prompt reply as to your resolution.
Please include me on the list for public notices on this project in the future. Questions can be directed to me at 756-2299.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation in this matter.
'Scott Demere
ATl&wE#,T I I
APRIL 25, 1990
CHRISTER WESTMAN, ,CITY PLANNER
PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD
*ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
RE:- PROPOSED STREET CONNECTION FROM LONE JACK TO CALLE ACERVO
DEAR GENTLEMEN:
I WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY V OICE MY OBJECTIONS TO USING THE RANCH0
VERDE DEV ELO,PMENT AS A SECONDARY ACCESS OUT OF NORTHERN OLIVENHAIN,
VIA LONE JACK ROAD.
I AM THE OWNER OFTHE LAND BEING PROPOSED BY ENCINITAS AS THE LINK
FROM LONE JACK TO RANCH0 VERDE AND OUT TO VIA ACERVO.
I WOULD LIKE TO QUOTE FROM A LETTER SENT BY LLOYD HUBBS, CARLSBAD
. CITY ENGINEER, TO BOB WARREN CITY ENGINEER OF ENCINITAS: ".?YOUti
REQUEST TO-CONNECT VIA-ONE OF THE--STREETS IN THE PROPOSED-RANCHO"
“‘"VERDE'TRACT-IS-NOT-ACCEPTABLE TO THE RANCH0 VERDE DEVELOPER-OR. ; TO~-THE'-‘C.iTY-/.- --' THE RANCHO-VERDE-‘PROPERTYk/ZONED R-l .25,000 AND
"HAS-BEEN"PROpOSED‘-FOR-DEVELOPMENT 'AS A GATED ESTATE.COMMUNITY---'
~TO-ME--SER-VE-D~-~~~-~~ATE -STREETS-. - -EXTENSION OF A PUBLIC--STREET"' .
* ::THROUGH"THE"sITE"WOULDv'BE"i>~~R~~~~~~~ TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT! , .----- ___ . . ..- IN ADDITION;.THE-CONNECTING-STREETS-WHICH WILL SERVE THE .RANCHO' - ----------'- .--. :TVERDE‘PROJECT WERE NOT DESIGNED TO ACCOMODATE ADDITIONAL-.-THROUGH
TRAFpIC-FROM-ENC-INITAS,;,
THIS LETTER GOES ON TO PROPOSE "THAT A MORE NORTHERLY-ALIGNMENT _ . LINKING-<6NE--SACK-WITH-MELROSE.IS THE ROUTE.PREFERRED BY"THB-@
rPI.ANNERS-OF-CARLSBAD."
PAGE 2 (CONTINUED:)
.
IF'-YOU USE--MY PROPERTY AS 'THE MAIN ROUTE THEN, ALL THE'HOMES"ON
,-LONE--~ACK-R~AD-‘WHICH-ARE-NORTH-OF-THE.'PROPOSED LINK UP'WOULD-BE'
.-rLAND-LOCKED"IN-'CASE OF-EMERGENCY.-*THUS, THIS ROUTE THROUGH MY
PROPERTY IS NOT THE SAFEST AND IS NOT THE ALIGNMENT WHICH PROVIDES --. ~. *-
THE MOST-COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IIj
NORTHERN OLIVENHAIN. _- . .
ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND PETITIONS TO REMOVE THE I.O.D. WHICH
ENCINITAS SOUGHT WHEN I FILED A'SUBDIVISION MAP ON MY PROPERTY.
WE OWN A UNIQUE RANCH WHICH WOULD BE DESTROYED BY A THROUGH ROAD
AND I WILL TAKE ALL LEGAL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT IT FROM
A PUBLIC ROAD BEING PLACED THERE.
THE REQUEST TO SEEK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS ON A ROAD WHICH
ONE ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL MEMBER CALLED "LUDICROUS" AS A SOLUTION
TO LONE JACK TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IS A STALL TACTIC BY A SELFISH
.- MlNORITY OF RESIDENTS ON LONE JACK ROADI THESE u NEIGHBORS u
OF MINE ARE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT PRESERVING THE"RURAL ATMOSPHERE"
OF OLIVENHAIN, YET THEY HAVE NO HESITATION TO DESTROY A 40 YEAR OLD
RANCH JUST SO THEY WON'T HAVE TO BE IMPACTED BY ROADS WHICH
THEIR MOVING TO OLIVENHAIN NOW NECESSITATES.
PLEASE FOLLOW STAFF RECOMENDATIONS AND ALLOW RANCH0 VERDE TO REMAIN
A PRIVATE ROAD, GATED COMMUNITY. I HAVE TOLD ENCINITAS I WOULD ALLC
EMERGENCY ACCESS AVAILABLE MUCH SOONER THAN LATER. DON'T LET
MY SELFISH NEIGHBORS DUMP THEIR TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON CARLSBAD.
WE MUST-SEEK-MORE-COMPREHENSIVE--SOLUTIONS TO REGIONAL-TRAFFIC-P ._.. WC.---- PROBLEMS.
SINCERELY,
- w{
CHRISTOPHER LLOYD
OWNER OF THE DOUBLE L HORSE RANCH
3e;Icsl .-- -..n T1 -,r mF.*l-. rTT Tl~"*f~~l Tlf
,-.
PETITION AGAINST A PUBLIC ROAD AND
AGAINST A PUBLIC IIORSE TRAIL AND BIKEWAY
THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE LLOYD RANCH 2568 LONEJACK.
ATTENTION CITY PLANNING GROUP OF ENCINITAS AND CITY OF ENCINITAS STAFF:
WE THE PEOPLE, ARE OPPOSED TO AN INVASION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE
INVASION OF OUR RIGHT TO PRIVACY ON OUR OWN PROPERTY. TO EVEN THINK
OF PUTTING A PUBLIC ROAD OR A PUBLIC HORSE AND BIKE TRAIL THROUGH THE
CENTER OF SOMEONE'S HOME IS AN EXCESSIVE ABUSE BY THE CITY OF ENCINLTAS;
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
HORSES HAVE TRESPASSED THE LLOYD RANCH BEFORE AND HAVE TOUCHED THE NOSES OF OUR HORSE BABIES WITH THEIR HORSES AND HAVE CONTAMINATED 6 OF OUR WEANLING (BABY) HORSES WITH A FATAL DISEASE CALLED STMNGLES. VETERINARIAN EXPENSES FOR THIS DISEASE IS EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE; NOT TO
MENTION THE FACT THAT ONE OF OUR BABIES ALMOST DIED FROM THIS CONTAMIN- ATION. A PUBLIC TRAIL THROUGH THE CENTER OF THIS PROPERTY WOULD BRING DANGER TO OUR HORSES AND OUR CLIENTS HORSES BECAUSE IT WOULD BE IMF'OSSI TO STOP EVERY HORSERIDER AND ASK THEM FOR PROOF OF VACCINATION RECORDS BEFORE THEY TRESPASSED. THIS IS A HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS AND FATAL DISEASE THAT CAN BE TRANSMITTED BY A CONTAMINATED HORSE TRESPASSING THE PROPERT
OUR CLIENTS THAT BOARD AT OUR PRIVATE FACILITY PAY BOARD IN ORDER TO ENJOY SECURITY AND PRIVACY OF RIDING WHILE PREPARING FOR THEIR HORSE SHOWS. THESE CLIENTS ARE PROFESSIONAL HORSE SHOW PEOPLE AND THEIR HORSES ARE VERY EXPENSIVE WORLD CHAMPION HORSES. TO ALLOW A PUBLIC: TRAIL THROUGH THIS MNCH WOULD ALLOW CONTAMINATION OF THESE VERY EXPENSIVE HORSES AND COULD RUIN THE FUTURE SHOW CAREER OF THESE HORSES AND THEIR CLIENTS COULD LOSE UP TO $75,000. IN THE VALUE OF TltEIR HORSE NOT TO MENTION THAT THIS ILLNESS OR DEATH OF THEIR HORSE COULD COST THE CLIENTS A LIFETIME OF PREPARATION AND THEIR WORLD CHAMPION TITLE!!
HORSERIDERS THAT HAVE TRESPASSED THIS HORSE RANCH BEFORE, HAVE ALSO HAD NO REGARD FOR OTHER PEOPLE"S HORSES AND HAVE IN THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS ALLOWED THEIR DOGS(WH0 TRAIL RIDE WITH THEM) TO CIIASE OUR PREGGAN. MARES IN THE PASTURE AND COULD HAVE CAUSED OUR PREGNANT HORSES TO HAVE A MISCARRIAGE. THIS TOO, COULD HAVE CAUSED THE DEATH OF A VERY EXPENSI BABY HORSE.
A PUBLIC HORSE TRAIL AND BIKE PATH WOULD ALLOW THE PUBLIC TO TRESPASS THROUGH THIS PRIVATE RESIDENCE AT THEIR LEISURE AND THE SECURITY OF OUR HORSE SADDLES AND TACK AND THE SECURITY OF THESE $50,000.-$75,000. HORSES COULD BE IN DANGER. IT IS BAD ENOUGH THAT UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS HAVE TRESSPASSED BEFORE AND HAVE FOR "FUN" LET OPEN 3 GATES ON OUR HORSES IN OUTDOOR PIFE CORTdLS AT LEAST TWICE IN THE FAST. THiS iJOULG MEAN THAT THE SECURITY OF OUR HOME AND OUR PERSONAL IiORSE TACK AND BELONGINGS WOULD BE IN DANGER OF BEING STOLEN 24 HOURS A DAY. WE WOULD HAVE TO HIRE A SECURITY QUARD TO KEEP AN EYE ON ANYONE hilO TRESPASSED OUR PROPERTY 24 HOURS A DAY OR BE AFRAID TO LEAVE OUR HOME.
THIS DANGER OF CONTAMINATION OF STMNGLES AND RHINO ETC. COULD QUITE POSSIBLY SCARE AWAY OUR CLIENTS AND WE WOULD HAVE TO CLOSE DOWN OUR HORSE FACILITY IF IT BECAME NON-INCOME PRODUCING, AND WOULD RUIN THE RURAL LIFESTYLE WHICH IS A VALUABLE ASSET TO THE OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY. THE LLOYDS HAVE RAISED CATTLE AND HORSES FOR NEARLY 45 YEARS.
MOTORCYCLES AND MINIBIKES THAT TRESPASS OUR HORSE RANCH AND RESIDENCE HAVE ALREADY CAUSED(ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS) OUR CLIENTS YOUNG HORSES TO SPOOK WHILE THE TIb'dNERS WERE RIDING AND COULD HAVE CAUSED A IIORSE TRAINER TO BE PARALYZED FROM THE ABRUPT THROUGHING OF THE RIDER.
’ _. : '?ETITION AGAINST E 'UBLIC .ROAD AN!XCAIN'ST P 'UBLIC
'HCRSE &RAIL AND BIKEWAY THRO"&THE CEN’A ,-\ OF THE LLOYD RESIDENCE
AND PRIVATE HORSE RANClI AT 2508 LONE JACK ROAD
;s; ;a<
7)
WE
THE LLOYDS HAVE ALREADY AGREED TO DEDICATE 2 HORSE TRAILS TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS. THE 2 TRAILS ARE ON THE ENTIRE EAST AND WEST PERIMETERS, TOTALING THOUSANDS OF FEET. ONE TFAIL IS ON OUR ENTIRE LONEJACK FRONTAGE
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST WE THE PEOPLE SIGNED BELOW, ARE OPPOSED
TO THIS PUBLIC ROAD AND PUBLIC HORSE TRAIL AND BIKE PATH BECAUSE
IT IS A TOTAL INVASION OF OUR RIGHTS TO PRIVACY ON OUR OWN RESIDENCE
AND IT ROBS US OF ANY RIGHTS WE HAVE AS PROPERTY OWNERS.
THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SIGNED BELOW OPPOSE ANY PUBLIC ROAD OR PUBLIC
HORSE TRAIL THROUGH THE CENTER OF THIS PROPERTY:
gl &D.w,, ,o &A /jJ..&&,- .z$cj.c; /v;*+4///,d>,,/" P&J/ f?f p/, .5$;r L;<l-rJ
. . . PETITION AGAINS'& A PUBLIC.ROAD AGAINST .I PUBLIC
HORSE TRAIL AND BIKEWAY THROUGH THE CENTER OF THk' LLOYD RESIDENCE
AND PRIVATE HORSE RANCH AT 2568 LONE JA.CK ROAD
TTHE LLOYDS mm ALREADY AGREED TO DEDICATE 2 HORSE TRAILS TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS. THE 2 TRAILS ARE ON THE ENTIRE EAST AND ?/EST PERIMETER= TOTALING THOUSANDS OF FEET. ONE TRAIL IS ON OUR ENTIRE LONEJACK FRONT&
7) AND-LAST BUT NOT LEAST WE THE PEOPLE SIGNED BELOW, ARE OPPOSED
TO THIS PUBLIC ROAD AND PUBLIC HORSE TRAIL AND BIKE PATH BECAUSE
IT IS A TOTAL INVASION OF OUR RIGHTS TO PRIVACY ON OUR OWN RESIDENCE
AND IT ROBS US OF ANY RIGHTS WE HAVE AS PROPERTY OWNERS.
WE THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SIGNED BELOW OPPOSE ANY PUBLIC ROAD OR PUBLIC
- .
SEP 1.$ 1289
c;p ;>; <Z,?, ” : 2 y> 7, T
y I, c) s .? ! ,- -’ 5 g . I ,- :*‘.a &II>“ .,,.I -: ,-... :.;Ji;l;,~~.‘,je : i,.- .;t:,-;;mjz>j’ L --,
September 15, 1989 /y.---. ---
Mr. Douglas L. Helming *A' Helming Engineering, Inc. 1919 Apple Street, #N oceanside, CA 92054
Re: 5: --Rancim iLIT& Carlsbad Tentative Map CT 89-18 _
Dear Mr. Helming:
In response to your August 1 submittal to this office of the above Tentative Map, we have completed a preliminary staff review and are able to offer the following comments. Please note that these
comments are offered from an engineering standpoint only and d-not represenche-off-icial;;;ppinions-of&he&ity. __-. -1. ._A.
1. .- .-. The City of Encinitas presently has an,- ,:.'tible$jOffer~f-y Dedication;for a&&&&#ira&-from Lone Jack Road in Olivenhain to a point on the common boundary between Carlsbad and Encinitas at approximately the- ‘,oif,.o.. *.,. kprr7pl'M?m-: The intent of that IOD and of a current alignment study of Lone Jack Road is to ultimately .pr5vide.:%b6ndary:,access to the Olivenhain Valley which is now served only via a "trunk- and-branch" road system. From a city engineering perspective, a publicmiconnection through yrou~p~opijsed~d-~~.~..to'. Ranch0 Santa Fe-Roadjin Carlsbad would make the most sense and would be desirable to complete that public road loop.
2. If-private"roads'%ithin your sudd'i%xirqy are a necessity, a connection to Encinitas could still occur in the form of an l'emergencyBt.secondary access'with an Opticom operated gate for emergency ,,vehicles, Any liability cdncerns would be no
greater, I am sure, than is normal for private, gate-guarded
communities.. However, as opposed to public roads, that
liability would lie with the homeowners association, rather than with the local agency.
3. With respect to the point of connection of such a road from Encinitas, I am including copies of that portion of your map with our IOD plotted. The location is approximate and is based on a review of the topography shown on your Tentative Map; however, it should be accurate enough for these
preliminary purposes. Design of an actual connection, of course, would be based on road standards and criteria of the City of Carlsbad.
/gc727
Mr. Douglas Helming September 15, 1989 page two
Thank you for this opportunity to provide input for the proposed subdivision, and I apologize for the time it has taken to respond. As 1l.m sure you are aware, we are extremely busy here with our rryoungll city and the many issues with which we are currently dealing. However, we welcome such opportunities as you have provided us and hope that our comments will be constructive for you.
If there are any questions, please call me at (619) 944-5070.
A. Warren City Engineer
cc: Morton F. August, Director of Public Works Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, City of Carlsbad
/gc727
City of
Encinitas FEB Oi'lggo
ATTACt-MNT 12A
January 31, 1990
LlO.yci iiddbs, City Zngineer City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859
Re: Lone Jack Road Alignment Study
Dear Lloyd:
As you are aware from our earlier conversation, the City of Encinitas is currently conducting an alignment study on Lone Jack Road. One of the most significant issues identified in the study is the need for a secondary or alternative access into the Lone Jack Area.
Currently, Lone Jack Road exists as an extremely long cul-de-sac having a number of localized streets branching off to serve neighborhood developments. There is a real need to provide some secondary means of ingress or egress to serve the area in the event Lone Jack Road is rendered impassable.
Initial results of the study have identified two feasible routes that would serve the purpose of alternate access. These are identified on the attached sheet as secondary access routes 1 and 3 and are highlighted in yellow. Route 1 would extend Lone Jack Road northerly and northwesterly to an intersection with La Costa Avenue near Calle De Fuente in the City of Carlsbad. Route 3 originates at the intersection of Lone Jack Road and Dove Hollow Road and extends westerly to connect with streets shown on the proposed Ranch0 Verde Tract in Carlsbad.
At their meeting of January 17, 1990; the Encinitas City Council indicated that Route 3 was the preferred alternative and directed staff to contact the City of Carlsbad to negotiate the possibility of making the connection an open or public road. Staff was also instructed to review this alternative on the basis of utilizing it solely for emergency access. At the same time we will continue
SW/jm/CL19-5826wp5 (l-31-90\1)
S- h~~nir;ls Ilc~ulcrar~l. Encinltm. (:;dllimn;t ‘)102-1 (,l’).‘)r.4-il~i(l
b \r .
Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Carlsbad Page Two January 29, 1990
with an environmental and cost/benefit analysis and comparison of both Routes 1 and 3.
We request your cooperation in helping us to maintain our options and ask that you keep us informed of any impending action or development relating to these alternatives. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and your staff at your earliest convenience to further discuss this matter. Please contact either
myself or Steve Worrall, Capital Projects Engineer, at (619) 944- 5070.
Sincerely,
Bob Warren City Engineer
cc: Warren Shafer, City Manager Morton F. August, Director of Public Works Marty Orenyak, City of Carlsbad, Director of Community Development
l
SW/jm/CL19-5826wp5 (l-31-90\1)
$+ LEGEND: J LONE JACK ROADSTUDy FIGU
--
A-- Q SECONDARY AC&& g:i;E S
OOacfOoODDooo AU-ERNATIVE ALIGNMENT ROUTES 45tEdo St
ATTACHMENT 13
.
February 27,199O
Bob Warren
City Engirxxr
. City of E&it=
527 En&&as Eslvd.
Encinitas, CA 9ZO24
PROPOsB)=IUiET CONNECl-ION FROM LONE JACK ROAD TO CALLS ACERVO
In respom s ycllur letter dated January 31,1990, we have reviewed your two alternatives
to provide sgnntdary access to the area served by Lone Jack Road. Our preference is to
provide atms tic, this area via a road along the general alignment of the future Melrose
Avenue asahmarn on our adopted circulation element (attached). This connection would
roughly c!ZcQond to your proposed Route 1; however, instead of connecting with La
Costa Avm tbiis road will most likely connect to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road.
Your reqr@ &I connect via one of the streets in the proposed Ranch0 Verde Tract is not
acceptablem &I Ranch0 Verde Developer or to the City. The Ranch0 Verde property is
zoned R-l ZS@CP and has been proposed for development as a gated estate community to
be served b p&ate streets. Extension of a public street through the site would be
detrimenti b dne proposed project. In addition the connecting streets which will serve
the RancbDVe&e project were not designed to accommodate additional through traffic
from En*
The City c&G&bad is sensitive to your need to provide emergency access to the area in
the event [nJknk Road becomes impassable. We propose to handle this need by having
the developrInr,vide an emergency access point at a mutually acceptable location along
. . the eastemriaclknundaxy. Appropriate easements would be granted to the City which will
allow for p&us;e of the private streets on an emergency basis. During normal times the
access wouklbeg;ated and locked. This proposal provides temporary resolution for your
desire to pnGf& secondary access to this area.
.
2075 Las P&M? Drive l Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 l (619) 438-l 161
Bob Warren
February 27, 1990 Page: 2
In the meantime, we will be glad to work with you on the more permanent solution to
extend Lone Jack or a connecting street north into Carlsbad as described above. The
Fieldstone Company which is the owner of much of the property in this area will soon be
submitting an amendment to the La Costa Master Plan covering this specific area. The City
would very much like to work with Encinitas to develop an alignment and classification for
this proposed roadway as part of the Master Plan amendment process.
If you need further clarification or assistance on this issue, please feel free to give David
Hauser or myself a call.
Respectfully
LLOW B. HUBBS
City Engineer
LBH:DAH:rp
c: City Manager
Community Development Director
Planning Director
Assistant City Engineer
Traffic Engineer
Jim Murray
Chris Lloyd 3~c~~t,c4A4Y~.
Z-I i2L.f 7-a _u
OCEANSlOE
MONROE ST
.
BUENA VISTA
LAGt30N ‘p . . 1:: ’
VISTA
I . CARLSEAD CITY LIMITS
AGUA HEDIONDA
LAGOON
PACIFIC OCEAN \WJ
AVENIDA ENCINAS
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
* N
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RAILROAD
FREEWAY
I I
PRIME ARTERIAL
MAJOR ARTERIAL
SECONDARY ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR STREET
11
-
ATTACHMENT 14
z r z f fi t a ii! P 0
I I I I
.-
TTACHMENT 15
NON-UAtlVC ORAOLLANO
OlOTURlCO - -.,
1 SC: 1 @L*c*-TAILED DNATCATC”;R .
A - ., Ao~rtR~mht~ Ik~ran, ‘.
. ..\,\.’ , ,’ l
C AdOlphIn *.III*,“,Ce’
-‘/
-L, ‘6 1
H L- u~re~grnbllr peml&p . u
ih ha hapwrwm .\.
_---
8 CdWnblln bherbbebnr
Potentid arens of expsnslon to existing VVMow Scrub IIabitat.
MINUTES EXtiWT 4
\ ?
June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 13 COMMISSIONERS
oval of an Amendment to Conditional Use Pe
Zone 3. \ /
7) CT 89-18/HDP 89-35/PUD 89-23/SUP 90-5 - RANCH0 VERDE
A request for approval of a 180 lot Tentative Tract Map
and Planned Unit-Development for 174 residential lots and 6 open space lots on 216.16 acres of land in the
R-1-25,000; OS and La Costa Master Plan Zones; Local Facilities Management Zone 11 located at the southeasterly corner of the City adjacent to the City of
Fncinitas.
Christer Westman, Associate Planner, reviewed the background
of the request and stated that the proposed project is located at the southeasterly corner of the City adjacent to the City of Encinitas. The applicant is requesting approval
for a tentative map for 6 open space lots and 174 single family lots. The application is for subdivision only at this time. Lot sizes range from 25,000 sq. ft. to 73,500 sq. ft. Density proposed is 1 dufac and the General Plan range is O-l.5 du/ac. The project is being proposed as a gated
neighborhood with private streets and a call box. Homes are not being proposed at this time. When the Site Development
Plan is prepared, the Conxnission will have an opportunity to review the architecture and other design aspects.
Mr. Westman stated that the City of Encinitas is currently
conducting a traffic study for the Lone Jack Road area adjacent to this project. The City of Encinitas has requested a public road from Lone Jack Road through the
Ranch0 Verde development, ultimately connecting to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. A second alternative would be emergency access only through private property located in the City of
Encinitas. After study, staff is recommending that this
project remain a gated community with emergency access only (by irrevocable offer of dedication) through the Double L Ranch owned by Christopher Lloyd in the City of Encinitas.
The emergency access would also be gated.
Offsite sewer and road improvements are required for this project which is located in Zone 11. No building permits
would be issued until a financing plan has been approved to take care of the improvements.
The project is proposed as a PUD development. However, all streets are being developed under Carlsbad public street standards of 40 ft. and 36 ft. (cul-de-sacs). These street sizes allow for street parking on two sides to satisfy the
guest parking requirement. All other requirements will come forward with the Site Development Plan when it is presented.
Hall
Holmes Marcus McFadden
Schlehuber
Schramm
-_ -
MINUTES
T
+’ % \ June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 14 \ COMMISSIONERS Q
The project conforms to the requirements of the La Costa Master Plan, the Hillside Ordinance, and the Interim Open
Space Ordinance. Staff recoaxoends approval.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about reference to the trail system in Conditions W35 and 1137 of Resolution No. 3023 (page
6). Mr. Westman replied that the words "as shown on the tentative map" should be deleted from Condition 1135. The
intent of the references was to preserve a location for the proposed trail system.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the phasing of the project. Mr. Westman replied that four phases have been
proposed.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the driveway width and
length for Lot 824. Mr. Westman replied that the lot is not considered a panhandle and must comply with the standard driveway width of 24 ft.
Chairman Schramm opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Ken Meddoclc, Brighton Homes, 505 No. Tustin Avenue 11250,
Santa Ana, applicant , addressed the Commission and gave a slide presentation. He stated that he has been working on this project since 1988. He concurs with the conditions set
forth in the staff report. Mr. Meddock is opposed to a connection to Lone Jack Road.
Terri Zimdars. 3476 Sitio Borde, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that the people in her neighborhood feel there should be a road through Ranch0 Verde. She
presented a petition with 129 signatures in favor of a road.
Henry R. Hague, 1342 Caminito Laura, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and requested consideration be given to the road proposal to Lone Jack Road. He presented a petition with 220 signatures in favor of a road and against the
alternative proposal for gated emergency access.
Morton August, Director of Public Works, City of Encinitas.
527 Encinitas Boulevard. addressed the Commission and introduced their civil engineer, Roger Hocking, who described
the Lone Jack Road area and the three alternatives being proposed for additional access to the residents living in that area. Roger Hocking urged Carlsbad to cooperate with
Encinitas if they expected Encinitas to be cooperative in solving other circulation problems.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the projected ADTs for an additional road serving the Lone Jack area. Mr. Hocking replied that it would depend on whether the road was
tedicated or just an emergency road.
Mr. August returned to the podium and requested consideration by the Conxaission to provide a dedicated street through the Ranch0 Verde project, which appears to be the most viable
solution. He requested the project be continued to allow Encinitas tine to complete additional traffic studies on the
Lone Jack Road area.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if Encinitas no longer believes in gated access roads. Mr. August replied that the gated streets in Fncinitas were installed to correct poor planning by the County before Encinitas became incorporated.
-
MINUTES
June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 15 COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Schlehuber commented that he feels Encinitas should take some action to widen Ranch0 Santa Fe Road south
because he feels a two lane residential road is inadequate to handle the current traffic, let alone future traffic.
Commissioner McFadden inquired how much time Rncinitas would
need to complete the traffic studies. Mr. August feels the
studies could be completed and presented to their City Council by September of this year.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney. commented that there are time constraints on this project. The law requires that final action must be taken by July 25, 1990.
Commissioner Hall commented that it seems illogical to
propose a road without knowing how much traffic will travel the road.
Conxnissioner Holmes inquired if the comment made by Mr. Hocking implied that Encinitas would not cooperate with Carlsbad in future projects unless the Lone Jack Road
situation is resolved to their satisfaction. Mr. August
replied that cooperation on the current situation might help ease some of the tensions between the two cities.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if Mr. August feels a 24 ft.
road will be adequate to handle the traffic from Lone Jack. Mr. August replied that he believes 24 ft. will be more than adequate.
Chairman Schraaxa requested the record show that she had received a petition against the road and horse trail through
the Lloyd Ranch.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:12 p.m.
Bryan Schafer, 3379 Fortuna Ranch, Olivenhain, addressed the
Conxoission and requested that this project not be approved unless a road is provided through the development.
Joe Dottore, 3427 Bumann Road, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and stated that he moved to this area for the rural atmosphere. However, he likes the idea of the road
through Ranch0 Verde because it will provide access to the school that his children attend.
Tom Swanson, 3543 Copper Crest Road, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and stated that he is the Treasurer of the Copper Crest Road Maintenance Association which represents 65 property owners on Copper Crest Road. He requested that
Carlsbad work with Rncfnitas to provide another exit off Lone Jack Road. He feels the only viable solution would be through Ranch0 Verde because there would be no homeowners affected by
the road. If Lone Jack is extended, it would be difficult to widen due to the old oak trees growing in the area, although he feels that any road will have a dramatic effect on the habitat. He thinks a 24 ft. road through the Lloyd Ranch
would be the best solution and it was approved by the Hncinitas City Council more than one year ago.
Connnissioner Hall stated that on the map it looks like extending Lone Jack Road would provide more direct access in and out of the area. Mr. Swanson has lived in his home for 10 years and feels that route would displace too many
--.
MINUTES
June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 16 COMMISSIONERS
homeowners. He likes the idea of a road through Ranch0 Verde
because no homes have been built there yet.
Phil Cohen, 1504 Bella Vista Drive, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and stated that Lone Jack Road is not capable of
handling additional traffic and another access road is very much needed. He feels that north access off Lone Jack Road is not feasible and urged the Conxnissioners to disapprove the Ranch0 Verde project unless they agree to public access
through the development.
Jeff Daniels, 3135 Dusty Trail, Olivenhain, addressed the
Commission and stated that another road in and out of the area is needed. He urged consideration of a road through
Ranch0 Verde.
Dan Shelley, 905 Olive Crest Drive, Olivenhain, addressed the
Commission and stated that he was representing the Rice, Shelley and Weigand properties, the three undeveloped
properties to the west of Ranch0 Verde. He recommended that Condition 1167 of the Rice tentative map should be added for consistency as a condition of the Ranch0 Verde map. He feels that the improvement of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road south of
Olivenhain Road should be included in this map.
Ginger Perkins, 3451 Bumann Road, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and stated that she is a long time resident and has lived through the Melrose on-again, off-again proposals.
The citizens are finally realising that many mistakes have been made about circulation routes and she urged the
Commission to go beyond politics and provide another access road for safety reasons.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Ms. Perkins was opposed to Lone
Jack being extended to Melrose. She replied that there are only two large parcels left in that area which could support a road, one of which is the Lloyd property; all other
parcels have been subdivided. She also feels the consnents on the old oak trees are valid.
Chris Lloyd, 3615 Fortuna Ranch0 Road, Olivenhain, addressed the Commission and stated that he owns 90 acres between Lone Jack Road and Ranch0 Verde. He will not dedicate his
property until this problem is resolved. He has a condition on his tentative map that says if Carlsbad approves a through road, he must dedicate his property. He feels that Helrose
is a more appropriate solution.
Ken Meddock, Brighton Homes, applicant, was given an opportunity to respond to the comments. He sympathises with the people who have purchased homes on Lone Jack Road without any other access. He has been trying to work out a solution with Carlsbad and Encinitas for about 18 months and he
doesn't feel that an additional three months will change anything. He could accept emergency access as well as the trail system access. Mr. Meddock does not think that access
to the high school is a valid argument because the high school is located adjacent to Rncinitas' boundaries. If the argument is valid that there will be very limited traffic, he
believes the access road should follow the approved map which shows a northern route connecting with Melrose.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Schramm declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Conxaission members.
MINUTES
-
Commissioner McFadden inquired if Mr. Meddocb could accept a condition similar to Condition 867 of the Rice project. Mr.
Meddock replied that the Rice property was approved prior to growth management. Improvements to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road are
part of growth management and he feels the safeguards are already there for him to pay his fair share. If necessary, however, he could accept the condition. Gary Wayne,
Assistant Planning Director, stated that this condition is covered under growth management.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if we are requiring 60 ft. street dedications. Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, replied that the applicant has volunteered the 60 ft.
right-of-way dedications. The PUD ordinance only requires 30 ft. streets.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired about the width of the gated emergency access. Mr. Wojcik replied that it is proposed to be a 30 ft. right-of-way with a 24 ft. curb-to-curb asphalt
paved surface. Minimum public street dedications (cul-de-sac) would be a 56 ft. right-of-way with a 36 ft. curb-to-curb.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that Melrose would be a way out
to the Rncinitas problem. He could not accept a Knox gate unless the street dedication was equal to public street standards so that sometime in the future it could be opened
up. if necessary. He could accept the staff reconxaendation if the street could be widened.
Commissioner Marcus feels that Ranch0 Verde is a good project but thinks Lone Jack Road should be extended north. She agrees with Commissioner Schlehuber but she does favor a
gated community.
Cosnnissioner McFadden agrees with Commissioner Schlehuber and would also like to see the wider streets. She thinks this project is too large for gates and she doesn't like the
panhandle lot but she can accept the project. She feels sorry for the Encinitas residents who are suffering as a result of poor County decisions.
Conxaissioner Holmes likes the idea of a gated coaxnunity. He thinks it would be an asset to Carlsbad and likes the large lots. He supports the staff recommendation.
Commissioner Hall sympathizes with the Encinitas residents but feels they are creating more problems instead of looking
for valid solutions. He thinks Encinitas should extend Lone Jack Road to Melrose instead of asking Carlsbad to provide the solution. He is not even in favor of the emergency
access.
Chairman Schrasxa also feels sorry for the Rncinitas residents
but she does not think a 24 ft. street will solve their problem. She agrees with the staff report and could accept emergency access but prefers it to remain just that. She
thinks Encinitas needs to compute the ADTs so they will have a basis to work from in seeking a solution to Lone Jack Road since it is really their responsibility. She would prefer
that the community not be gated due to the number of homes being built. She is sure there are other ways to access the high school and felt that the applicant offered a good solution. She sees no problem with a trail through Ranch0 Verde for pedestrian traffic to the high school.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if the applicant could accept an ungated coxaaunity and a 40 ft. emergency access
June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 17 COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
June 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 18 COMMISSIONERS
road with a Knox gate which might be removed at some later date. Ken Meddock. applicant, replied that he could accept
the 40 ft. width and no gates. He would like to know if the streets become public once the gates are removed.
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that there is going to be emergency access, it would require an irrevocable offer of dedication all the way to Calle Acervo.
Staff would prefer that they just become public streets. He inquired if the Cormaission wants a 40 ft. street or a 40 ft. dedication. A public street normally requires a 60 ft. dedication with 40 ft. curb-to-curb.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3022 recommending approval of a Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopt Planning Commission
Resolution Nos. 3023, 3024, 3025, and 3026, recommending approval of CT 89-18, PUD 89-28, HDP 89-35, and SUP 90-S.
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, with amendments to (a) eliminate gates except for the Knox gate; (b) that the Knox gate could be removed at some future date if it becomes necessary; (c)
that the road dedications be 60 ft. with 40 ft. curb-to- curb streets; (d) that the reference to tentative map on Condition 1135, Resolution No. 3023 be struck;
(e) that the Planning Department be identified as the monitoring department on the monitoring program for the Conditional Negative Declaration; (f) correct Condition
#53-A, Resolution No. 3023, to read "Ranch0 Santa Fe Road;" and (g) complete the last sentence on Condition #51,
Resolution No. 3023 to read "All land so offered shall be without cost to the City and free and clear of all encumbrances."
Ken Meddoclc, applicant, indicated prior to the vote that he could accept all of the amendments as stated by Commissioner
Schlehuber.
) SDP g9-ll/PUD g9-12/HDP 89-32 - LA CORUNA - Reques a Site Development Plan, Planned Unit Developmen
ide of La Costa Avenue in the RDM ilities Management Zone 6.
de. seconded. and carri 0 continue SDP a9-ii/pm 89-
Chairman Schrawa opened would be unable to atte estimony for persons who ued hearing on July 9,
hat a 3 ft. retaining wall can 60 ft. bank. His bank has sunk
Hall
Holmes Marcus McFadden
Schlehuber Schramm
Hall Holmes Marcus
McFadden Schlehuber Schrarms
,
I
\ city of ~
Encz’nil-as
EXHIBIT 6
WLLF
June 5, 1990
City df Carlsbad PJ.anning Commission
1200 Him Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Planning Commission Consideration of Proposed Ranchb Verde Subdivision (CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP 89-35/SUP 90-5)
Dear Coxnmissioners:
The Carlsbad Planning Commission will consider this pzc;sosed development on June 6. As noted in your stazf rop;)z-t and attachments, the City of Encinitas has been studying lony-range
circxletion alternatives for the 0livsrthai.n comnunity to the sart.
The ihi!,lty to )r,Co,p options open on local cimxiatiun n‘lterratL5ru5 _ recyires that Carlsbad either obtain dedication fcr public accez~, or briefly postpone action on this proposal.
Encbitss is studying three circulation altornativss, txo of which * 7 WC’-1 A'2 ictcrconnect with carlsbad territory to ,rl-ovfide fD?c
iZ~??L2UlAt.7.r3iY i?+CSSSary for aCCas6 ts 6Ch3uL5; and :>th:%r local faci.!,lti.es as weil ‘as -emergency response routes. 3ne of ehc33 ( "Pfw.'t,e 3 " ) v^llid connect . T ., through the Rzncho WarSe ~it~.a. XL
prazsnt r the Zancho Verde project would provide cmerg=,ncy SCC~QC sfily, ,uL%5J:i;:.ing po soiblc general public Q~XSES. I,: 1~ tharQr,re recfub~tdli tha?r. either an Irrdvocablg Officer OY D&i~~~+,j.sr: PI+ -I requir%i 2"r public access co;~~ission-rssalution 3023) , (modify condit.ion $70 in ,;..?-zf?.
or that a three-month coiIt..intJar!c~ :7a
providei ra ailow the alternatives study to b% complutsd. hTirn a cant inm.rz?r,, Encinitas will provide a formal traffic pr?jec,tin!? ~.bi; pstential trips generated by the Route 3 construction, TV sLda in th+ Commis:~iun'~ final decision.
Shmld +.?~e Fibove not be acceptable to the Commission, as an a%tcrnat;vc, Encinitas requests a shorter-term continuance to at leas: Zi73V time for more thorough review of the propossd map, and conEitioi' g70 as presented in draft Commission Resolution 3023. Specifically, Encinitas staff needs time to address the follotiing with Carlsbad staff:
a. Is the location for an emergency access easement shown on the tentative map in fact the appropriate connection point?
CBJ/04/C&21-6631WP5 (6-6-90/l)
527 Encm~tu Boulcmrd, Encrhu. Cdifohn 92024
city of CarTsbad Planning Commission June 5, 1990 Page Two
b. Is a llKnoxn box system the only alternative, or the preferred alternative, compatible with Encinitas emergency service systems?
C. In lieu of public through-access for automobiles, is a pedestrian/bicycle through-access easement needed and possible?
Finally, should none of the above be acceptable to the Commission, ths following changes to condition X70 are requested prior to adoption of Resolution 3023:
Prior to the recordation of the final map the developer shall grant a 30 foot wide emergency access easement in favor of the City of Encinitas and the Encinitas Fire Protection District from Paseo de1 Ore easterly to the subdivision boundary, as shown on the tentative map, subject to approval of the City of Encinitas City Engineer. This easement shall be graded and improved with a minimum 24 foot wide asphalt roadway with an appropriate base and asphalt berms, subject to approval of the City of Encinitas City Enginser. This emergency access roadway shall be gated at the subdivision boundary with a "knox** lock or other appropriate limited access system, subject to the approval of the City of Encinitas City Engineer, Appropriate easements shall be granted by the developer in favor of the City of Encinitas and the Encinitas Fire Protection District to allow for public use of the private streets on an emergency basis.
Taking action on the Rancho Verde project prior to clear definition of circulation alternatives may preclude desireable options for both Encinitas and Carlsbad. It presumes other circulation alternatives, which are not necessarily or desireable.
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
Sincerely,
y Development
CBJ/04/CL21-6631WM (6-6-90/l)
CHRISTOPHER LLOYD
Double L Horse Ranch
2568 Lone Jack Rd.
Olivenhain, ,CA. 92024
June 14, 1990
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad. CA. 92009-4859
RE: Maintaining Ranch0 Verde Streets Private
Dear Commissioners :
My name is Christopher Lloyd. I am writing you concerning the request by
Encinitas for Carlsbad to change the streets of the Ranch0 Verde Project from
private and gated to public. This is a very selfish and short siqhted request
and as the property owner in .Encinitas whose property is most directly and
adversely affected I most vehemently oppose this request. I would like to
give you some background on my property and my perspective on the local
circulation problems of our part of Olivenhain. (see map).
My family owns the 90 acre parcel which lies between Ranch0 Verde and Lone-
Jack road and is being sought by Encinitas as the location of a connecting
through street from Lone Jack road through Ranch0 Verde and out to Calle-
Acervo. I have a final map pending with theCity of Encinitas and will be
building a private road that runs 3000ft west from Lone Jack and terminates
very close to my shared border with Ranch0 Verde. There are (2 1 conditions
of my map which would trigger my dedicating my private road to Encinitas
as a dedicated public road. (1) If I ever develop more than the current subdivision
map proposes and (2 1 If a viable linkup to Carlsbad, i.e. Rancho Verde, comes
into being. -
I will never develop my property further if it means a through street on my
land. My family has been ranching this land for fourty years. We currently
have a beautiful horse facility which I have been running for six years and
my business would be ruined by a public road running literally next to the
facility. Although Encinitas was incorporated to, amomg other things, “Preserve
the rural atmosphere of Olivenhain,” this City has no hesitation to destroy
the last large property which is dedicated to minimizing development and maintaining
rural activities like horsekeeping. A
The enclosed petitions reflects citywide support for preserving my horse ranch
facility as a ranch as opposed to a convenient “short term” solution to our
mutual traffic problems. Please note that the only areas of Encinitas which
did not support me are those homeowners who live along the proposed route
which will hookup Lone Jack to Melrose Avenue.
Enclosed, you will find a copy of a letter written by Carlsbad City Engineer
Lloyd Hubbs to Bob Warren City Engineer of Encinitas. In it he recites
Carlsbads desire to see Encinitas connect Lone J ack road to Melrose as a
more permanent solution to the “secondary access” question in northeastern
Encinitas. In addition Lloyd states that the streets connecting Ranch0 Verde
to Ranch0 Santa Fe road were never designed to accomodate additional through
traffic from Encinitas. Dumping Encinitas’ excess traffic through me onto
Ranch0 Verde is bad planning and Carlsbad seems to recognize this. Please
don’t let Encinitas avoid it’s responsibility to cooperate in finding a permanent
solution to regional traffic problems. Encinitas balks at widening Olivenhain
road, yet much of the traffic which will come through Ranch0 Verde, if you
permit it, will eventually flow onto Olivenhain road.
Finally you will hear the pleadings of many of the residents who live at the
north end of Lone Jack road. They feel that if they can get Carlsbad to
allow through traffic through me via Ranch0 Verde this will relieve them of
all future responsibility for traffic problems which they have helped create
by their moving to this area. They will say that it is better to have the
traffic go where there are no existing homes, i.e. the Lloyds road. Don’t
be fooled, my northerly neighbors are well organized and will do or say just
about anything to be spared through traffic coming by them.
If you were to use my property as the main route then all the homes on Lone
jack which are north of the proposed link up would be land locked in case of an emergency. Thus, this route through my property is not the safest
and is not the alignment which provides the most comprehensive solution to
future development in northern Olivenhain.
In conclusion, I feel that you should not allow Ranch0 Verde’s streetE to be
made public, it is bad and shortsighted planning which is opposed by Carls-
bad’s staff. It is a selfish attempt by my neighbors and Encinitas to avoid
responsibility for regional solutions to our mutual traffic needs. I am trying
to save my ranch and a way of life that means everything to me. Please help
me; leave Ranch0 Verde as proposed.
Sincerely yours,
Christopher Uoyd
Owner of the Double L Horse Ranch
Loraine S. Schibler 3403 Dove Hollow Road Olivenhain, CA 92024
June 18, 1990
Planning Commission City of Carlsbad Planning Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: Ranch0 Verde Subdivision
Dear Commission members:
I urge you to approve the Ranch0 Verde Subdivision as a gated community with no open road access to Olivenhain.
It is my understanding that the City of Encinitas will be requesting your cooperation on a road through this area to provide a second access to the Lone Jack Road area in Olivenhain. I live in this area to the East of Carlsbad. I do not feel a second access is necessary. However, a road in this area would be very convenient. Residents in our area would use this road frequently as it would be a more direct access than is our current route.
My concern is that in the future roads such as Fortuna Ranch Road may connect to the East or North to Elfin Forest or to the De1 Dios Hwy. providing an East-West route from the Coast to Escondido. An open road through this Ranch0 Verde Subdivision could then become an alternative to 680. We certainly do not want outside commuter traffic traversing our quiet residential neighborhoods.
Regional traffic circulation plans have never included a road in this area. Please do not provide one now. What might be a small road now could become a major traffic problem with future development in the area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Moraine S. Schibler
F!C’J 85,’ : XEFUA TELEl,UF I ER 7’01~ _ : 6-ZO-38 LZ:54=M ; 51’3 131 ‘3’;T7-
06../2& ScJ 13: El4 GEHERQL PI-‘?‘5 Il.15 .?P ‘51+; D I EGO
:4u&,g; * 1
302
TO BE READ BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE to,1990
AT THE 6 P.M. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
Susan & Kevin Hudson 7398 Aitiva Place
Carlshad, CA 92009 June 20, 1990
C/O Mr. Gary Wayne
Assistant Planning Director Carlsbad Planning Commission
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Case File: C-I- 89-16/PUD 89-7/HDI’ 89-44 Applicant: Fairway
Publish: May 24, 1990
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
We are strongly opposed to the proposed development of 133 single family homes
U-I 4 1.09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6. There
are many reasons for our opposition, a few of which WC will list here. The primary re5Lson
is that the area is becoming overcrowded. Our streets and highways cannot handle the
collective flow of traffic as it is, not only during peak commute hours, but throughout the:
day. Second, continued deveIopment of the area will decrease water availability. Our water
supply, sewers and waste management facilities arc taxed beyond their limits--there is no
well informed person who can deny those facts. Third, the beautiful area north of the golf
course would be ruined by packing all of these Lracl hames into a tiny area, and the
proposed site, which is sloped, would inrensify the homes’ crowded appearance, The custom
homes which currently surround the golf course on Almaden Way are more uniquely
designed to fit the ambience of the area. This developmenr is simply not s&able for the
area surrounding La Costa Golf Course,
This parcel uf land which c~nnccts BOX Canyon lo the golf course is the only sector
left in the area which is untouched by development. As with most new developments,
spacious yards are nonexistent since the developers cannot reap as much profit off the land.
If this land is developed, countless wildlife wilt be displaced and denied access to the golf
course’s trees and foliage.
Furthermore, how much growth can San Diego County take before we say enouah?
In one year we have seen our daily commute extend from 30 minutes to over an hour each
Page 1 of 2
Cl-‘,’ 2,: .\C,Tl_ CLC~,UP A tr ,Ulil ; m-;LJ-& lz:CSFIl ; 513 ;'L 3'3;+
El6 ,“0&0 - 13:04 GEFEPGL WI’S 1’3s - RP ‘3cit.l ri IEGO
way. We must preserve the quality r)f life in San Diego County so that it &es not become
an unsuitable place for habitation like tis Angeles has become. We are destined to ruin
our quality of life if the Planning Commission allows every developer to wave his wallet and
bud! a subdivision. Let’s begin measuring the success of our community by showing how
well we work with our natural resources, not by how many cars we can pack on the
freeways, or how much water we can drain from the rivers and aquifers for our consumption,
or how much we can pollute the air and water.
the develoDment of this land.
Sincerely,
d *tKcvin and Susan Hudson
Page 2 of 2
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most enviroamentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
NAME ADDRESS
--:.
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Pe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most enviroamentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most environmentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most enviroamentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME i ADDRESS
-
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most environmentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
. . .
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most environmentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
17.
18.
19.
20.
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most environmentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
i
PETITION Re: Ranch0 Verde road access Carlsbad residents Week of 6/13/90
The roadway through the Ranch0 Verde development should be a public road, connecting the Olivenhain area of Encinitas to the City of Carlsbad through the Lloyd property. The Rice and Shelly develop- ments will have a public road running through them, linking Calle Acervo to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The public road through the Ranch0 Verde development is a natural connection and will not affect any established homeowners in Carlsbad or Encinitas. Of all possible routes accessing Lone Jack Road, this is the safest, most cost efficient, most functional, and most environmentally sound. Residents of Carlsbad and Encinitas unite to endorse the public access through Ranch0 Verde.
NAME ADDRESS
14,
15.
16.
17.
PRTITION RE: OLIVENHP-' ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following position0 which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the *area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and' branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area tit the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western Portions of Oliveohain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
a/.
.L ‘*:i,. ‘W, .-.
- PETITION RE: OLIVENHA.- ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas-City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the prea in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that It be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone 'Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These y-a paved, 5' buffer. 8' recreational trail dimensions, would &dequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Helrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western pdrtions nf Qliveahaio ta Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS
,- PETITIORRE: OLIVEBBAI'-TOAD STANDARDS
We. the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it'be reflected In the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack M&d br downgraded to a non-circulation element road. since it would not circulrte traffic and should only serve tt@ residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least eEfect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be l public road through the Lloyd propmrty 8m designated by the City Council 8ore than W
years sgo. There would be no further oecondery acc8sibes at i$e northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Oliveobain to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NflHE ADDRESS
-- PETITION RE: OLIVENHA- ,R- STARDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positiona which affect our area and request that the Enclnitae City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt tllc four points listed below and that lt'be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Rocrd. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Olfueohain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
PETITION RE: OLIVENBA- ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the ,area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road s+nce it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and brsnch dytiiam. These 30’ paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areaa including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Qlivenhein to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD’s should be removed from privately maintained branch roads. ,\
- . NAME ADDRESS
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
-. PETITION RE: DLIVENW-m ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following poEit.ions which affect our area and request that the Encinitaa City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the#area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation el'ement road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAR and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Welrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portion8 of Qlivenhatm to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD'a should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS
1. 345 Gm-n;A i$fiLA /
5.
6.
7.
8.
16.
17.
18.
19.
,. . . . ., ,,,. ., ,. .,.. , ,I I , . a < e, hh -,‘“.,c,,d ,,,.,I I,, I’.#.,
_. PETITION RE: OLIVERHA- ROAD STABWARDS
We, the-undersigned, agree with the following positione which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the prea in which we live and adopt the four points listad below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAR and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at t.he end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees.. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Plivenhain to Carlsbad
or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. .1
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
-- .- PETITION RE: OLIVENH. ROAD STANDARDS
We. the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitaa City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary acce,sa road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Olivenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All IOD'a should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
ADDRESS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
_ PETITION RE: OLIVENW- ROAD STAMDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following poaitione which affect our area and requeat that the Encinitaa City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the,area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. Thia also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning CommisaionOe decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areaa including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither ahould Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western gortiona of Oliuenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All SOD's ahould be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
PETITION RE: OLIVEWlu - ROAD BTAUDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the,area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1. -Road ho downgraded to a non-circulation el'ement road since' it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally Sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the reeidents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This aleo fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. Phe.enly secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. Were would be no further secondary accesses at *he northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Oliueohain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All X00's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS - . /.3/d A...& &&G&W
3.
4.
5.
8.
9.
10.
14.
15.
16.
18.
19.
20. _
-
PETITION RE: OLIVENHA ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, area and request agree with the following positions which affect our that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the G&era1 Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Qlivenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All 100's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS \
PETITION RE: QLIVENHA-- ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following poritions which affec-t our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt tile four points listed below and that it' be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail 'dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to prote?ct these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through ths Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Helrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Qliueohaia to Carlsbad or any other community.
All 100's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME
19.
20.
' PETITION RE: OLIVENUAI""ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following position8 which affect our area and requeat that the Encinitaa City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the prea in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack woul ' be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paveu, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensit,ive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road.‘ At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two year9 ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Helrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Oliuenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
'NAME ADDRESS
14.
15.
16.
17.
- PETITION RE: OT.TVxNRAI - ?OAn STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plan.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Qliveohain to Carlsbad or any other: community.
4. All IOD's should be,removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME/ A ADDRESS
1. - c -32/t CON& iz#dc La. ocrti~AfcfA,u\/ / / nl n 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
c/’ 7.
8.
10.
11.
12. --.
13. -_- _-_- -- .- --- ---- -
14.
15.
18.
19.
20.
- PETITION RE: OLIVERHA?= ROAD STANDARDS
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affect our dreii anti request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes t,, maintain the rural character of the area in which we liva and adn*r ++I- four points listed below and that it<be reflected in the General Plan.
1.
2.
.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element road since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards ,.: 1-i .*.p
To reaffirm the-CAB and Planning Co&ission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of ione Jack Road. At n'o time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas. .
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Olivenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME / /- ADDRESS
16. v
17.
18.
- PETITION RE: OLIVENHI-' ROAD STWDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
We, the undersigned, agree with the following positions which affcxt our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it be reflected in the General Plcrn.
Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element ro& Yince it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the northern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Olivenbain to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
'17.
18.
19.
20.
PETITION RE:' OLIVENllA&N ROAb STANDARDS
we, tr .- undersigned, agree with the foll&ing positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wisht:l; to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt the four points listed below and that it' be reflected in the General I'latr.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lone Jack Road be downyraded to a non-circulation eL&nt rodd since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' buffer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
To reaffirm the CAB and Plan,ning Commission's decision to protccl: the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to protect these areas.
'1'11e only secondary access road will be a public road through ttle LI.oyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the rlorthern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run throucjh our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Oliuenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS -
1.
2.
3.
4.
10. .
12. -.---
13.. "
. 14. -.-.
17. _
18.
19.
20. _ -
PETITION rw : DLIVENHAIN_ROAD STANDAIKIS
We, the .~dersigned, agree with the followraag positions which affect our area and request that the Encinitas City Council respect our wishes to maintain the rural character of the area in which we live and adopt Lht? four points listed below and that it' be reflected in the General L'L;~I~.
1. Lone Jack Road be downgraded to a non-circulation element rodd since it would not circulate traffic and should only serve the residents who live in the community. It would be a 30' road bordered by a foot path and bike path/horse trail, through and along Lone Jack except in environmentally sensitive areas. Lone Jack would be the trunk of the trunk and branch system. These 30' paved, 5' bufEer, 8' recreational trail dimensions, would adequately serve the residents needs, maintain the character of the community and would have the least effect on homeowners and the environment. This also fits accepted safety and security standards
2. To reaffirm the CAB and Planning Commission's decision to protect the environmentally sensitive areas including the tree area at the end of Lone Jack Road. At no time will the road be more than 24' wide thru the trees. Road standards would be adopted to pt-OteCt these areas.
3. The only secondary access road will be a public road through the Lloyd property as designated by the City Council more than two years ago. There would be no further secondary accesses at the rlorthern end of Lone Jack Road. Neither should Melrose Drive run through our community, nor should any other road connect the northern, eastern or western portions of Olivenhain to Carlsbad or any other community.
4. All IOD's should be removed from privately maintained branch roads.
NAME ADDRESS
A. _ 3_d4 - 7-x,? - X'l (;:.;
J2. 2bcr - 2xc1 - s7
3. -- J&f -1723- 7c ,‘ & \ . 4. a&q --2Ti/; - -7 12 _-
5. .&q -274 -- 'Y-,, ' - , DC .*I
6 . 3_f,(-( -2-l.o -_ ;y* :
9 u , .
10. .
11 . . . . . 165. _... -__ _-
13..
. 14. --
15. _
lb.
17. -- -
~LIVENHAIN RD.
vu . j;; ,( x*, 3, i! :: * _: ,“ t #I ‘1.. 1 . - ,’ . : .. 0” ’ - -.,, ‘-
Aprit 1988
We the undersigned agree with the following positions which affect our area and urge the Encinitas City Council, the Encinitas Planning Commission, the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board, and the Olivenhain Town Council to respect our wishes to determine the character of the area in which we live.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Copper Crest, Dove Hollow, Dusty Trail, Lone Hill Roads and Wishbone Way should remain private roads.
Melrose Drive should not run through our community, nor should any other road connect the Northern portion of Olivenhain to Carlsbad, except a road through the Lloyd development where no residents currently live.
If a second access is necessary from Ranch0 Santa Fe Road to Lone Jack Road, it should run through the Lloyd development, and be a 24’ public road with a 40’ ease-
ment.
Lone Jack Road should be 24’ of paved road from the Los Ranch0 Santa Fe develop- ment to the Northern most end of Lone Jack Road.
The trees by the creek at the Northern end of Lone Jack Road should never be dis- turbed.
All roads within the Rheingold project, including Lone Hill Road, should be private with 24’ of paving with 40’ of easement, with no IOD.
No future developments should tie into the Rheingold development to impact the Notthern end of Lone Jack Road.
The emetgendy, break-away gate at the Northern end of Dove Hollow should remain
closed.
Future development outside of incorporated Encinitas should not impact the North- ern end of Lone Jack Road, except for the Perkins property.
No developments within the Northern portion of Olivenhain shall be allowed to have cluster housing or lot averaging.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
;: &-J ’ -6
;:$ -pq bib kd+ &,
..,.
l I :.i c.
24.
26.
27.
28.
-.
18.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
11. --- ciw,lL-;,
12* &$&$a’2 3
13* ~(!hj$$ . 14. \ -Ic/ iw@/cc*
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
I /: hi 1-L p& r&
1.
2.
3#
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
9.
c -a/ . .
/
,&yu ix- r &~c~-oti- L -- I
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
. RW B’i: XEROX TELE’XtPIER 7010 : 6-18-93 t0: 17kM ;
C *
n
619. c20. Ml* Z-1069; % 2
Dear Co~nby Rose homeowner
It is vitally important that all the homeowners along Lone Jack
Road join together to lobby for the most practical, safe and aesthetic road systetr through Olivenhain.
The Planning Commission of Carlsbad will be making a decision
next Wednesday, 6/20, regarding the small section of road
through the Ranch0 Verde development (see map), We want that portion of road to be public. This would link up to the road through the Lloyd Ranch, which should also be public, providing $5 a secondary access connecting Lone Jack to Ran&o Santa Fe Road?
We feel..that if we. do not get approval of @is.zoadwqy, the _ ..-._,__ City of Cerlsbad and that of Encinitas may decide to ex&&z-' tone Jack all .the way to La Costa Avenue, and widen it to as much as 60 feet. This wouLd put a major, noisy traffic route
through the center of our community-- a natural road for garbage
trucks to travel to the San Marcos Landfill and an alternative to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road for busy coarmuters. It would also be the first step towards getting Bighway 680 back in the works, whcih would go just behind Country Rose.
Please read through this petition. Tt will be at the Country
Rose Sales Office on Saturday and Sunday this week. I urge all homeowners (each spouse) to sign it- The people living on Ranch0 Encinitas,, Dove Hollow, Copper Crest, Dusty Trail and along Lone Jack.itself are afso signing it,
We invite you to attend our next planning session for this lobbying efforti at 7:30 Monday evening (6/18) at the Swanson's house-- first house on the right on Copper Crest Road, at the end of Lone Jack.
We all feel that a good showing at the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.qeeting would impress the policy-makers and greatly 'inflt&he 'tie$*'*&&i:tion. The meeting-is .at the. Clarlsbad-.City
Offices, 6 p.m., Wednesday 6/20, They are located just East of I-5, the Elm Street exit.
Thank you so much for helping preserve our community.
Best regards,. .
Terri P, Zin~dars - 753-2459
RC’J BY:xEROX TELECOPIER 7014” ’ 6-l&l ‘10: 18F15*1 ; 619’7’- 94617
.
JUN 88 ‘90 15:32 pLws\IIffi SYSTENS P. a1
24069; # Z
\- ”
t ._. ‘. ?- - I i
-
I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '
CT 89-18/PUD 89-23/HDP 89-35/SUP 90-5
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Ave.),
Carlsbad, CA at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, August 7, 1990, to consider an application for a
Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, Planned Unit Development and Special
Use Permit to develop a 180 lot Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for
174 residential lots and 6 open space lots on 216.16 acres of land in the R-1-25,000;
OS and La Costa Master Plan Zones; Local Facilities Management Zone 11 on property
generally located at the southeasterly corner of the City adjacent to the City of
Encinitas, and more particularly described as:
Portions of Lots 8, 9, and 15 of the subdivision of
Ranch0 Las Encinitas, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof
No. 848, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
said San Diego County on June 27, 1898.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department at
438-1161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Hillside Development Permit/Planned Unit
Development/Special Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior
to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Ranch0 Verde
PUBLISH: July 26, 1 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SITE 4
OWNER'S LIST
1. 255-200-01 CECIL & KATHRYN WRIGHT 3294 AVRNIDA ANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
2. 255-200-02 KENT & PAMELA HAFEMANN 3290 AVENIDA ANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
3. 255-200-03 JAMES & PATRICIA MILLER 3286 AVENIDA ANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA.92008
4. 255-200-04 DONALD & MARSHA GARCZEWSKI 3284 AVENImANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
5. 255-200-05 TIMOTHY & DELIA De LUCA
32161 MILCREEti'ROAD
.# 200 LAGUNA HILLS, CA - 92653
6. 255-200-06 RICHARD & SALLY KLISE
3276 AVRNIDA ANACAPA LA COSTA, CA. 92009
7. 255-200-48 LEONARD HOROWITZ &
EUGENE SALMON
P.O. BOX 834 BELLMORE, NY 11710
a. 255-200-49 MARSHA LUKAVSKY 3279 AVENIDA ANACAPA
CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
9. 255-200-50 CHRISTOPHER &
10. 255-200-51
11. 255-200-52
12. 255-200-53
13. 255-200-54
14. 255-200-55
15 255-031-18
16 223-322-02
17 264-220-21
CAROLYN KEMPSTON 3281 CORTE VERA CRUZ CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
BURTON & PHYLLIS MAZER 3283 CORTE VERA CRUZ CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
ROBERT & KATHRYN ROBERTS 3285 CORTE VERA CRUZ CARLSBAD, CA 92008
FRANK & SUSAN IGO
3287 CORTE VERA CRUZ
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
DONALD & GAIYLE BEASLEY 3289 CORTE VERA CRUZ
CARLSBAD, CA. 92009
LA CRESTA AT COLINAS DE OR0 HOMEOWNER ASSN. C/O HOMES BY POLYGON 3152 REDHILL AVE., STE 100 COSTA MESA, CA. 92626
BERN DONALD L. CO.
23161 MILL CREEK ROAD #200
LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653
FIELDSTONE / LA COSTA ASSOC. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
C/O THE FIELDSTONE CO.
14 CORPORATE PLAZA NEW PORT BEACH, CA. 92660
MANFRED C ELIZABETH DITTMAN 5545 AVENIDA FIESTA LA JOLLA, CA. 92037
18. 244-228-78
19. 264-220-79
20, 264-220-80
21, 264-220-81
22. 264-220-82
23. 264-220-92
24. 264-220-93
25. 264-220-94
26. 264-220-95
L 6i M PARTNERS P.O. BOX. 968 CARDIFF, CA. 92007
GARY & LINDA ROSS 2534 MEADOWMIST OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
MC CAULEY INC CORP.
2526 MEADOWMIST
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
MC CAULEY INC CORP. 2526 MEADOWMIST OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
GREGORY BROWN WILLIAM CRAVEN, JR.
GERALD MCKEOWN
355 SANTA FE DRIVE
ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
WILLIAM SC YVONNE BOTH
3528 LONE JACK ROAD
OLIVENHAIN, CA.92024
DOROTHY WILKINSON
DOUGLAS & ESTER COX C/O DOUGLAS & ESTER COX 1824 STONEBROOK LANE ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
DOUGLAS & ESTER COX 1824 STONEBROOK LANE ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
DOROTHY WILKINSON 14000 SHORT HILL COURT SARATOGA, CA. 95070
.-.
27. 264-240-02
28. 264-161-10
29. 264-161-11
30. 264-161-12
31.
32. 264-161-14
33.
34.
35.
- .
264-161-15
264-161-16
264-162-08
36. 264-162-09
264-161-13
MARGARITA LLOYD
CHRISTOPHER LLOYD C/O SECURITY BANK TRUST DEPT. P.O. BOX 419, KESLEY 14-6 PASADINA, CA. 91102
MICHAEL 6 DEBORAH MYRES
1220 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR. OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
JAY & DEBORAH KRUER 1232 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR.
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
FRANK 81 BARBARAMIYAKE
1240 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR.
ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
RONALD & JOYCE BENINCASA
1248 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR. OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
ROBERT & MARY KNIGHT
1256 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR.
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
DAVID 81 ARIEL LYON
1264 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR.
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
KENNETH RONCHETTI P.O. BOX 474
RANCH0 SANTA FE, CA. 92024
DAVID SMITH & BOARDMAN MIA 1225 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR. OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
HARRY LAWRENCE 1261 RANCH0 ENCINITAS DR. OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
37. 264-151-04
38. 264-151-45
39. 264-151-44
40. 264-151-39
- _ 41. 264-151-19
42. 264-151-20
43. 264-151-21
44. 264-151-22
45. 264-151-25
46. 264-151-29
EDWARD.BALL 2912 LONE JACK ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
ROBERT & DEBORAH HAMILTON 2910 LONE JACK ROAD OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
DAVID h SANDRA COX 2908 LONE JACK ROAD OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
GEOFFREY C PATRICIA DANIELS C/O NORTH STAR REALTY
770 RANCH0 SANTA FE ROAD
SUITE B
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
JOAN COOLEY 2904 LONE JACK ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
CHARLES & CATHARINA SHAFFER 2902 LONE JACK ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
ROGER & ELIZABETH FREEBERG 7819 GAVIOTA CIRCLE CARLSBAD, CA. 92009
HAROLD & BABALA DE MASTERS 1180 VIA DI FELICITA OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
JIH-TA1 & TEH-HWAN WANG 8378 FAUST AVENUE CANOGA PARK, CA. 91304
JOHN & GRETCHEN MITCHELL 1079 C ST. OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
- .
47. 264-151-31 CARMEN &i BERTHA VASQUEZ
1557 CAUDOR STREET LEUCADIA, CA. 92024
48. 264-151-32 ALFRED & BARBARA D ELISEO
1156 VIA DI FELICITA
OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
49. 264-151-33 :THE ROYCOURT GROUP 1205 DESERT ROSE WAY
OLIVENHAIN, CA 92024
50. 264-151-34 FREDRICK & LESLIE FRUMIN 1205 DESERT ROSE WAY ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
51. 264-151-35 JOSEPH VITALE
1002 SUTTER STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92103
52. 264-151-46 NEAL & LOIS DE LAY
2160 EL AMIGO ROAD DEL MAR, CA. 92014
53. 264-151-51 DAVID MILLER
3080 BLENKANE DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
54. 264-010-07 RICE ENTERPRISES
P.O. BOX 4782 SAN CLEMENTE, CA. 92672
55. 264-010-27 MARY PORTER
CAROLYN KUTZKE 1335 DESERT ROSE WAY OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
56. 264-010-29 FLOYD 6 REBECCA SHEETS 1350 DESERT ROSE WAY OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
57. 264-010-30 FRANK 6r FLORENCE ESPARZA 1330 DESERT ROSE WAY OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
58. 264-010-31 KENNETH II LIBERTY 1314 DESERT ROSE WAY OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
- _
59. 264-151-38 GEOFFERY & PATRICIA DANIELS
C/O NORTH STAR REALTY 770 RANCH0 SANTA FE ROAD SUITE B OLIVENHAIN, CA. 92024
60. 264-151-47 DORIS & FREDRICK REVA 770 RANCH0 SANTA FE ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
August 6, 1990
FOR THE INfORMAtION Of THE CITY COUNCIL I
TO:
FROM: Community Development Director
SM recommendations for added conditions to Ranch0 Verde
Since the City Council is scheduled to review the Ranch0 Verde Tentative Map this
evening; Planning, Engineering and Growth Management staff are recommending that
Council place the following conditions upon the Tentative Map:
RANCH0 VERDE
1. Condition the Tentative Map approval to provide that within 180 days
from the date of Ranch0 Verde Tentative Map (CT 89-18) approval,
a financial guarantee acceptable to the City Council for construction
of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road improvements will be submitted. Unless
the guarantee is approved by the City Council within the 780 day
period, all processing on the Ranch0 Verde Final Map will cease
until such time as they are approved. The time limit may be
extended at the discretion of the City Council.
2. A reclaimed water main shall be installed if required by the
reclaimed water plan.
3. Prior to Final Map approval, the developer shall submit a reclaimed
water usage plan for the entire +&&&P~Q area for the approval of
the City Engineer. The plan shall be in conformance with the City’s
proposed reclaimed water master plan. At minimum the developer
shall install a dual waterline to serve a// irrigated open space and
extend parkway areas with reclaimed water as it becomes available.
4. If the Water District is in a Stage II or greater alert, reclaimed water
shall be used for all construction related activities such as dust control and grading compaction as directed by the City Engineer.
August 30, 1990
Brighton Homes
505 N. Tustine Avenue
Suite 250
Santa Ann, CA 92705
Enclosed for your records, please find a copy of the
following *Resolutions , adopted
by the Carlsbad City Council on August 7, 1990 .
*Resolution Nos. 90-273, 90-274, 90-275, 90-276, 90-277
%iii?Lcu~PT
City Clerk
LR:lw
Enclosure (5)
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive - Carlsbad, California 92008 - (619) 434-2808