HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-20; City Council; 10915; Aviara Planning Area 5CITt OF CARLSBAD -
pnrr /x9. 9/s’ TIT1 e. APPROVAL OF A147DWEUNGUNT -YTr - t ' ' -- -TENTATIVFiTRACUAP/PLANNEDUNIT ucrl. nu.
MT& 11/20/90 DEVEL.OPMF.NTFORAVIARAPIaANNlNGAREA5.
DEPT. PLN a-90-9/PuD9a12
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Conditional Negative Declaration, CT 90-9 and PUD 90-12, as approved by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On October 3, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and approved without modification (5-O) the Aviara Planning Area 5 condominium project, which is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road and Batiguitos Drive. The project consists of 147 townhome units to be developed over a 23.8 acre site. All of the units will include a private patio area. In addition, a variety of common recreation amenities are provided throughout the project. The project meets or exceeds all Master Plan Development and Design Standards, as well as the City's Noise Policy No. 17.
In recommending approval of this project, the Planning Commission added a condition of approval which requires that should any of the existing on-site oak trees be lost to development, the applicant shall be required to replace them per specific ratios.
No major issues were identified. Please see the attached staff report to the Planning Commission for specific details regarding the tentative map and planned unit development.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On October 3, 1990 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director on August 30, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
As discussed in the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan, because all required improvements are to be funded by development, no fiscal impacts to the City will result from this 147 dwelling unit condominium project.
-
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. P, 9/g
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
Facilities Zone - 19 Local Facilities Management Plan - 19 Growth Control Point - 7.9 du/ac Net Density - 6.17 du/ac Special Facility Fees - N/A
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3099, 3100 and 3101 3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 3, 1990 4. Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 3, 1990
city of bkbad
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 I
CT 90-09 PUD 90-12
.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3099
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP/PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP A 147 DWELLING UNIT
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT.
APPLICANT: AVIARA - PLANNING AREA 5
CASE NO.: CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of October, 1990,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning
Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A> That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit “ND”, dated August 30, 1990, and “PIT’, dated August 15,
1990, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings and
subject to the following condition:
Findings:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment.
The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed
project.
1 4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
2 impacted by this project.
3 Conditions:
1. Prior to the occupaucy of any of the dwelling uuits, the project applicant shall
construct a 5.0 foot high sound attenuation wall between Alga Road and the
proposed dwell@ uuits 126-129 and 131-134 along this road. The wall shall be
constructed consistent with the recommeudations of the Acoustical Study for
Planuiug Area 5 (Mestre-Greve, 1990). Prior to the occupancy of tits 126-129
and 131-134, the project applicaut shall incorporate all required traffic noise
mitigation measure (ie: mechanical ventilation) into these units as described in the
Acoustical Analysis for Planning Area 5.
9
10
11
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
12
13
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
15
16
17
ABSENT: Commissioners: Erwin and McFadden.
ABSTAIN: None.
18
ATTEST:
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
25
26
.27 PC RESO NO. 3099 -2-
28
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 23.8 acre project site is located at the
southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road
and Batiquitos Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development
to develop 147 condominium units over a 23.8 acre site.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact
on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is
on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public
are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days
of date of issuance.
.
DATED: August 30, 1990
CASE NO: CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
APPLICANT: Aviara Planning Area 5
Planning Director
PUBLISH DATE: August 30, 1990
CDC:tvo
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-l 161
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/445-0613’
Project Title: Aviara Planning Area 5
Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo
Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive Phone: (619) 438- 1161
City: Carlsbad Zip: 92009 County: San Diego
____________________-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT LOCATION:
County: San Diego City/Nearest Camnunity: Carlsbad
Cross Streets: ALga Road/gatiauitos Drive Total Acres: 23.8
Assessorls Parcel No. 215-051-10 Sect ion: Tup. Range: Base:
Within 2 Miles: State Huy #: I-5 Wateruays: Pacific Ocean
Airports: Palanar Railways: Schools:
________-__-__-_____-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOCUKNT TYPE
CEaA: - NOP - Supplement/Subsequent NEPA: OTHER: - Joint Document Early Cons EIR (Prior SCH No.) x Mit Neg Dee y Other - Final Document Draft EIS - Other - Draft EIR z FONSI ______--__-__--____-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LCXAL ACTION TYPE
- General Plan Update - Specific Ptan Rezone - Annexation - General Ptan Amendment Master Plan Prerone - Redevelopment - General Plan Element X PLanned Unit Development z Use Permit - Coastal Permit - Community Plan E Site Plan X Land Division (Subdivision, - Other
Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) ______-_-_-_---_________________________----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEVELWHENT TYPE
- Residential: Units X 147 Acres 23 8 - Water Facilities: Type MGD - Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees - Transportation: Type - Coimaercial: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees Mining: Mineral
- Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres En@ oyees - Power: Type Watts -
- Educational - Waste Treatment: Type Recreational - Hazardous Waste: Type - Other:
_-----__---__--_________________________----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT
X
X
x X
x
Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Duality x
Archaeological/Historical - Coastal Zone x
Drainage/Absorption x -- Economic/Jobs X Fiscal x
Ftocd Plain/Flooding X
Forest Land/Fire Hazard 1
Schools/Universities
Septic Systems
Geologic/Seismic
x
Seuer Capacity
Minerals Soil Erosion/Compection/Grading
Noise Sotid Waste
Population/Housing Balance X Toxic/Hazardous Public Services/FaciLities X
x
Traffic/Circulation
Recreation/Parks Vegetation
X Water Duality
Water Supply/
-.- Ground Water
Wetland/Riparian 7 Wildlife
- Grouth X Landuse Inducing
- Cumulative Effect
- Other
--------------.________________________I.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Lard Use/Zaning/Gemfal PLm Use
RM (Residential Mediun) 6.0 Du/Ac - PC (PLanned Coamunity)
_____-__-_____._________________________-------------------.----------------------.------------------------------------- __-_--_-
Project Description
A Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development to develop 147 condominiun units at the southeast corner of the intersection of
ALga Road and Eatiquitos Drive.
NOTE: CLearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all neu projects. If a SCH n&r already exists for a project (e.g.
from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docunent) please fill it in. Revised October 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAm ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
DATE: August 15, 1990 BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Aviara - Plannina Area 5
2. APPLICANT: McKellar Communities
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5151 Shoreham Place, Suite 200
San Dieno. CA 92122
(619) 587-1355
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: March 1, 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Subdivision Man and Planned Unit Develonment to develop 147
condominium units at the southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road
and Batiauitos Drive.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
-‘: A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings ‘YES-sig” and “YES-insig”
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
.-
PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIR&TLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
YES YES NO big) (insig)
x
x
x
x
x -
x
x
x
x
x
x
-2-
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YE, S w .
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habirat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
NO
x
x
x
x
x
F S NO msig)
x
x
-3-
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
l
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Aher waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
Y7 S sig F S msig)
x
NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
,x
x
x
-4-
-
h4ANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
.
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
F S msig) NO
x
A..-
x
x
-5-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
- This project is a 147 unit (multi-family) subdivision located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Alga
Road and Batiquitos Drive. The project site is 23.8 acres in size and has been previously rough graded .consistent with approved grading plans for CT 85-35. For this environmental analysis, staff conducted several
field trips to the subject property and reviewed the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort Master Plan, EIR 83-
2(A), which already covered this property. Portions of an open space corridor running north to south through
the center of the property are vegetated with chaparral and are under deed restriction to the California Coastal
Commission. Aside from this open space corridor (2.85 acres), the remainder of the property has been rough
graded and no sensitive environmental resources exist upon it. In that: (1) the proposed residential project
is allowed by the underlying Aviara Master Plan and General Plan, (2) it is surrounded by compatible existing
or future land uses including; Alga Road to the north, approved yet unconstructed single family residential
development, to the east and west (Planning Area’s 8 and 4 respectively) and agricultural uses to the south,
(3) the site has been previously rough graded, and (4) the project will not encroach into the deed restricted
chaparral habitat located within an open space corridor in the center of the site, no environmental impacts
are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
P hvsical Environment
1. The project requires minimal grading -- 13,625 cubic yards of cut and 26,802 cubic yards of fil1
material. The imported earth will be from other Master Plan Planning Areas. The site has been
previously rough graded consistent with approved grading plans for CT 85-35. No unstable earth
conditions will be created as the grading plan is required to meet City Engineering standards.
2. The topography of this previously graded site will not be significantly changed from its present graded
state.
3. Excluding the property to the south which is in agricultural use, all other surrounding properties are
currently in a graded but undeveloped state. The project will not result in, or be affected by, erosion
of soils as all necessary drainage and erosion control facilities (desiltation basin) have been or will be
provided to handle runoff from the site.
4. Impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon (i.e. erosion and runoff) will be adequately mitigated as discussed in response to #3 above.
5. The project will have ti incremental impact on air quality (as discussed in EIR 83-2(A)), in that it will
generate 1176 trips/day. However, this impact is not considered significant in itself. Long term
mitigation of air quality impacts will require that dependence upon the automobile be reduced
regionally and statewide.
6. The project has a minimum 20 foot separation between the structures. This design will provide for adequate air movement.
7. The project will not change the course or flow of water as no streams are located in the immediate area and drainage waters will be handled by existing and/or proposed facilities.
-6-
-8.
L
9.
10.
11.
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont’d)
Development of this project will create impervious surfaces onsite which would reduce absorption rates
and incrementally increase surface runoff and runoff velocities. However, to accommodate this
incremental runoff, drainage facilities will be incorporated into the project to divert the runoff to a
master storm drain, thereby mitigating this concern.
Aside from the chaparral habitat located in the central and eastern portions of the property (which will
be maintained in open space), no natural resources exist on this previously graded site.
Implementation of this project will incrementally contribute to the depletion of fossil fuels and other
natural resources during construction and operation. This incremental increase is not considered
significant.
The site is currently disturbed and all identified archaeological, paleontological or historical sites have
been previously mitigated.
Biological Environment
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Excluding the chaparral habitat located within the central portion of the site which will be maintained
in open space (deed restricted) the balance of the site has been disturbed through grading activities.
In accordance, no significant biological resources will be impacted through project development.
No significant impacts to the chaparral habitat located in the central portion of the site are anticipated
in that the landscaping proposed adjacent to this area will be compatible fire-retardant and non-
invasive.
Implementation of the proposed project will not reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop
or affect farmland of state or local importance.
In that all Coastal deed restricted and other native areas on the property will be maintained in open
space, and wrought iron or other types of fencing will be located between these open space areas and
project development, no impacts to wildlife or habitat are anticipated.
In that the on site protected habitat area is linked to other undeveloped open space areas within the
Master Plan and because project fencing will deter domestic pet intrusion into this protected habitat
area, no impacts or barriers to the movement of wildlife is anticipated to occur.
Human Environment
17. Development of this project will be consistent with the General Plan, Master Plan-177
I LCP. The proposed multi-family product type is compatible with adjacent land uses.
18. As discussed in the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan, with the payment of al
all public facilities and services will be available to meet the demands of the project.
’ and the Mello
1 required fees,
-7-
,DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont’d)
19. *
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
See 18 above.
Construction of the project will result in short term and insignificant noise impacts upon the single
family residence located to the south and the approved yet unconstructed residential areas to the east
and west. Otherwise, the project is compatible with surrounding future uses and will not create
significant noise impacts. Alga Road, which is located along the northern property boundary, will
create noise levels in excess of 60 dBA CNEL. However, this noise impact is proposed to be mitigated
through the incorporation of a solid noise barrier (wall) between the road and the adjacent dwelling
units and through the use of other sound attenuation measures (i.e. plexiglass shielded balconies if
proposed, and mechanical ventilation) as specified within the Acoustical Study for this Planning Area.
Lighting utilized onsite will be directed so as to not impact adjacent future views.
Because this is a residential project it will not involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances.
The proposed project density of 6.17 du/acre is well below the density perrnitted upon the site (7.9
du/acre) per the Aviara Master Plan. In view of the reduced density, overall project environmental
effects should be reduced.
The project will provide additional housing units to meet existing demand.
A total of 1176 average daily vehicle trips will be generated by the project which will not significantly
impact the circulation system as discussed in EIR 83-2(A) and LFMP-19.
The demand for parking facilities created by this project will be satisfied onsite. Two garage spaces will
be provided for each unit in addition to 42 guest parking spaces throughout the project.
This project will require improvements to Hummingbird Drive. The project will add 1176 ADT to
Hummingbird Drive and other surrounding streets. This minor increase in traffic is not considered
significant.
The project site is outside of the Airport Influence Area for Palomar Airport.
Three vehicular access points are proposed for the project. These access points are located to not cause
conflicts with their intersection with Hummingbird Drive.
The project will not interfere with emergency response plans.
The project will not obstruct any scenic vista and will create an aesthetically pleasing street scene along
Alga Road, Batiquitos Drive and Hummingbird Drive through the use of adequate structural setbacks,
structural relief and rich landscaping.
-8-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
4
b)
cl
4
4
0
IT)
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
The 147 dwelling units proposed with this project will be completed in several phases.
This project has been designed to comply with all development standards and design guidelines of
the Aviara Master Plan. The proposal creates no significant environmental impacts. In accordance,
no alternate site designs would appear as environmentally superior.
The scale of this proposal (147 dwelling units) is a potentially superior improvement over the
maximum of 189 dwelling units permitted per Master Plan-177.
Any change of land use (except higher density residential permitted per MP-177) upon the subject
property would necessitate a General Plan Amendment and Master Plan Amendment.
Since the site is already rough graded and all public facilities and services will be available to
support this proposed project, development at some future time would not be regarded as an
environmentally preferable alternative.
There are alternative sites for the project; however, they have no environmental advantages, and
this proposal is consistent with the existing land use plans.
The “no project” alternative is not in conformance with the General Plan/Master Plan designation
for the property. Since the site is already graded, this alternative is not environmentally superior.
-9-
DETERMINATION (TO Be Completed By The Planning Department)
.
x
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
p&- yc
Date
/
; /; I
.? ’
.c, i/C . l.> _-
Signature
6 /z&o
Date
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
1. Prior to the occupancy of any of the dwelling units, the project applicant shall construct a 5.0 foot high
sound attenuation wall, as described in the Acoustical Analysis for PA-5 along Alga Road. Prior to the
occupancy of units 126-129 and 131-134, the project applicant shall incorporate all required traffic
noise mitigation measures, as described in the Acoustical Analysis for PA-5 (i.e. mechanical ventilation)
into these units.
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-lO-
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
/.&G&L&
Signakre
-ll-
. . .
8 .
@ a p Ei
3
5 u ii2
. . F d
sg3
:#I !i E&J Q) sap $5g 2 8's 0aY, .E E E
2.3 fj 'F tu L L 0'5 QE 0 .G E E c -= CJ) $ 0.g ii L .f: >oc g; g ap v) L g- .a g"uo
5 x g .f: c 2 .o,B toE Qo2 al Ez r +uo
E ‘Z uf .!z Q !e E $0 >? I
I J! a I
E 6
F -= gE *g e I
I s
i
3 s ‘Z ti .- .* I
t a 3 8 ,o ‘0 .- a’
i? .- c
s h
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3100
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ATENTATIVE
TRACT MAP TO DEVELOP A 147 DWELLING UNtT CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF ALGA ROAD AND BATIQUITOS
DRIVE.
CASE NAME: AVIA&! - PLANNING AREA 5
CASE NO: CT 90-9
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Lots 95, 96, 97 and 98 of the City of Carlsbad Tract 85-35, Phase I - Unit C, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, June 19, 1989, #89-346187
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of October, 1990, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows: -
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 90-9, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
15
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinas:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The project is consistent with Master Plan 177 since the proposed net density of
6.17 du/acre is within the permitted density of 7.9 du/aa=e as qxcified within
Master Plan 177.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council
finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning
Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map
that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the
project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is
satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan
have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The dedication of the 12.4 acre school site at the intersection of Alga Road and
Ambrosia Lane is acceptable as mitigation of the impact to existing Carlsbad
Unified School District school facilities.
The dedication of a 24.25 acre park site at the northern terminus of Ambrosia
Lane satisfies park fee requirements.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be provided
by the City of Carlsbad.
As discussed in the staff report, the project is: (1) consistent with the
development standards of the Aviara Master Plan 177 and the Planned
Development Ordinance; (2) in conformance with the Design Criteria of Master
Plan 177; (3) in compliance with the City’s Noise Policy No. 17 as conditioned;
and (4) is in conformance with the Mello I Local Coastal Program.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
11.
12.
13.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for Residential Development (RM, I&M) on
the General Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 30,
1990, and Recommended for Approval by the Planning Commission on October 3,
1990. In recommending approval of this Mitigated Negative Declaration the
Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all
required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the
significant effects of this project could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee,
or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any’cumulative
impacts created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 19.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for CT 90-9, as shown on Exhibit “A” - ‘Y’, dated August 28,
1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map as approved by the City Council. The Tentative Map shall
reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be submitted
to the City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal,
whichever occurs fkst.
3. A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director
prior to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets
within and adjacent to the project.
4. This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not
be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that
sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -3-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay
the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as
amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other
ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public
facilities fee dated March 1, 1990, and the agreement to pay the Growth
Management Fee dated December 4, 1987, copies of which are on file with the
City Clerk and are incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this
application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this
project shall be void. s
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated May
25, 1983.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone
19 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on December
22, 1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any
future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law
on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid this approval shah be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of
building permit issuance.
The applicant shall establish a homeowneis association and corresponding
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. The CC&R’s for
Planning Area 5 shall include a provision which prohibits parking vehicles in any
private driveway which measures less than 20 feet from garage door to back of
sidewalk or edge of curb face, whichever is closest to the structure.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Directois approval prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of
grading or building permits, whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shah be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along
all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The
trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the
Planning Department. .
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1 plants (see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special
visual importance or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and
design shah promote water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect
shall be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building foot
print, improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
Mature trees which are removed shall be replaced one to one with minimum 36”
box specimen. Each case shall be reviewed by the Planning Director.
The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons, except at approved by the Planning
Director.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -5-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
1:
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
The number of trees in a residential project shall be equal to or greater than the
number of residential units.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Prior to the occupancy of any residential unit within this project, the Master Plans
recreational vehicle storage area (within Planning Area 23) with all weather access
road to it shall be available for use.
Prior to the occupancy of any of the dwelling units, the project applicant shall
construct a 5 foot high sound attenuation wall between Alga Road and the
proposed dwelling units along Alga Road. The wall shall be constructed consistent
with the recommendations of the Acoustical Study for Planning Area 5 (Me&e
Greve, 1990). Prior to the occupancy of tits 126 - 129 and 131 - 134, the
project applicant shall incorporate all required traffic noise mitigation measures
(ie. mechanical ventilation) into these units, as described in the Acoustical Analysis
for PA-S.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or the recordation of the final map, the
project applicant shall receive a Coastal Development Permit that approves
development that is in substantial conformance with this City approval. The
Coastal Permit shall be required to be submitted to the City Planning Department
for review prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all Coastal Deed Restricted areas (old Lot
22 and 24 as shown on Exhiiit “B” and “C”) shall be staked and flagged to prohibit
encroachment by construction equipment.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
Allunitswhicharesetbackaminim um of 5 feet fkom a private driveway &all be
equipped with an automatic garage door opener.
AU perimeter fences/walls shah be required to be designed consistent with the
materials and style of other Master Plan approved fences/walk
This project is approved subject to the condition that residential water
conservation measwes including water efEc.ient plumbing fktures in conformance
with State and Local Laws and Policies, be incorporated into the projects design.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of residential
building permits, whichever is first, the owner of record of the property within the
boundaries of this tentative tract map shall prepare and record a notice that this
property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from
Palomar Airport in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and
the City Attorney. The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all
sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and
locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director.
This project is approved subject to the condition that should any of the 9 existing
on-site oak trees be lost to development, the applicant (M&elk) or successor in
interest shah be required to replace these oak trees at the following ratios:
Two minimum sized 24” box specimens for each 6” to 23” diameter oak tree, two
minimum sized 24” box specimens and one minimum sized 36” box specimen for
each 24” - 40” diameter oak tree, one minimum sized 36” box specimen and one
minimum sized 48” box specimen for each 41” - 60” diameter oak tree.
Ennineering:
40. This approval is subject to all conditions of approval of Master Plan 177, Carlsbad
Tract 8535 and Zone 19 Local Facility Management Plan, and any amendments
thereto.
41. This project is located within the Mello I Local Coastal Plan. All development
design shah comply with the erosion control requirements of that plan
42. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
43. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private
streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located within the subdivision and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an
equitable manner among the owners of the units within the subdivision. Adequate
provision for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&R’s subject to the
approval of the City Engineer. Except for Batiquitos Drive and Hummingbird Drive
all of the above improvements are considered private.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an
individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R’s.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may
be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming
Master Drainage Plan Update.
The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, if available, in Type I form,
on the subject property in all common areas as approved by the City Engineer.
Reclaimed water, as defined in Section 1305(n) of the California Water Code,
means water which, as a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a direct
beneficial use or controlled use that would not otherwise occur.
No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the
final map, except as approved for model homes.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuance
of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive
approval for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued
a grading permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with
the approved grading plans.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any
clearing or grading of the site.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or
slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the
PC RESO NO. 3100 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either amend
the tentative map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project
site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading
permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the City limits.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shah be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chap 11.06. .
The developer shall construct desiltation/detention basins of a type and size and
at locations as approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall enter into a
desiltation basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond
satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the approval of grading, building permit
of final map whichever occurs first for this project. Each desiltation basin shall be
serviced by an all-weather access/maintenance road. The provisions of this
agreement shall apply to any offsite borrow sites which may be utilized in the
construction of this project as required by the City Engineer.
Rain gutters are to he provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage
device as approved by the City Engineer.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or
installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permits as may be required
by the City Engineer.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets
and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The
offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so
offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances
and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to
be rededicated.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Hummingbird Drive, Batiquitos Drive and
Rock Dove Street shall be waived on the fid map except those points of
connection to private streets or as required for emergency access.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner
shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the
boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and
Landscaping District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the
improvement plancheck process.
Runoff from this project is conveyed to environmentally sensitive areas. The
subdivider shall provide adequate means of eliminating grease and oils from
drainage prior to discharge. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit. Those plans shall
be in conformance with the “waste discharge requirements for storm water and
urban runoff from the County of San Diego.”
The developer shall install street lights along all public and private street frontages
in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
The developer shall install a wheelchair ramp at the public street comer abutting the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to occupancy
of any buildings.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider
has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree to
install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements
shown on the tentative map and the following improvements:
A. Alga Road to major arterial standards or better from Mimosa Street to El
Camino Real to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This obligation may
be shared with other projects having a similar condition to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 24 months of final map
approval.
The Fire Marshal has determined that onsite fire hydrants are required to serve this
project. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the site, the applicant must
submit and receive City and water district approval for appropriate waterline
improvement plans and easements. All improvements shall be designed in
conformance with City and Water District Standards, plancheck and inspection fees
paid and improvement security shall be posted with the Water District.
PC RESO NO. 3100 -lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structural
section of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on
R-value tests. The horizontal design of the private streets are approved as shown
on the Tentative Map. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected
by the City, and the standards improvement plan check and inspection fees shall
be paid prior to approval of the final map for this project.
Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall be designed
consistent with Title 17 of the California Administrative Code. Offsite future
reclaimed water distribution systems should be anticipated by the installation of
adequately sized sleeves at crossing points to minimize street excavation.
The subject property is within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 88-l
(Alga Road). Upon the subdivision of land witbin the district boundaries, the
subdivider may pass through assessments to subsequent owners only if the
subdivider has executed a Special Assessment District Pass-Tbrougb Authorization Agreement. Said agreement contains provisions regarding notice fo potential
buyer of the amount of the assessment and other provisions and requires the
subdivider to have each buyer receive and execute a Notice of Assessment and an
Option Agreement. In the event that the subdivider does not execute the
Authorization Agreement, the assessment on the subject property must be Daid off
in full by the subdivider mior to any subdivision of the land.
As required by State law, prior to the recordation of a final map over any of the
subject property, a segregation of assessments must be completed and recorded for
all subdivided lots. By applying for a segregation of assessments, the subdivider
agrees to pay the fee to cover the costs associated with the segregation. A
segregation is not required if the subdivider pays off the assessment on the subject
property prior to the recordation of the final map. In the event a segregation of
assessments is not recorded and property is subdivided, the W amount of
assessment will appear on the tax bills of a new lot.
This project is approved under the express condition there will be model units.
The grading required for the model units is shown in an exhibit to the tentative
map. The grading for the model units prior to f?nal recordation is author&d
pursuant to the approval of this tentative map. Sewer and water must be provide
to the site. Fire hydrants shall be provided as deemed necessary by the Fire
Max&al. A separate grading permit shall be obtained for the model area.
Standard curb inlets shall be installed on Cinerea Place and Ardeola Drive at their intersections with Hummingbird Drive.
A) The lot configurations as shown on the tentative map are specifically e
approved. This project shall have a total of fourteen (14) lots. New Lot 1
shall be comprised of Lots 16 and 17. New Lot 2 shall be comprised of Lots
PC RESO NO. 3100 -ll-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1,2and4. NewLot3shallbecomprisedofLots5,6and7. NewLot shall be comprised of Lots 8,9 and 10. New Lot 5 shall be comprised of
Lots 11,12 and 13. New Lot 6 shall be comprised of Lots 14 and 15 except
the recreation area. New Lot 7 shall be comprised of Lot 18 and 19 except
the recreation area. New Lot 8 shall be comprised of Lots 20 and 21. Open
Space Lots 23, and 24 shall be renumbered Lots 9 and 10. The lot
configuration as described in tbis condition is included as an attachment.
1. Open Space Lot 22 shall be renumbered Lot 12. The recreation areas
shall be renumbered Lots 11,13 and 14. New Lot 13 shall consist of
a portion of old Lot 19. New Lot 11 shall consist of old Lot 3. New
Lot 14 shall consist of a portion of old Lot 15.
B) The phasing shall be consistent with the lot numbers except:
1. Phase 4 shall include the portion of Ardeola shown in Phase 5.
2. The landscaping for new Lot 9 (old Lot 23) shall be included no later
thanPhase3. .
3. The landscaping for Lot 10 (old Lot 24) shall be included no later
thanPhase6.
4. Phase 1 shall include the construction of reawtion area Lot 13.
5. Phase 2 shall include the landscaping of new open space Lot 12 and
the construction of Recreation Area Lot 11.
6. Phase 6 shall in&de the construction of recreation area Lot 14.
Cl The two open space lots - new Lots 9 and 10 (old Lots 23 and 24) shall be deeded over to the Aviara Master Association con currentwithfinalmap
recordation per the agreement between the developer and Hillman
I?xnperties.
D) The following areas shall be granted as covenant for easements to all
owners of condominium units (not the Homeowner Association). These
covenant for easements shall be conveyed by separate document and
recorded con currentwiththefinalmap.
1. A common area in perpetuity as a covenant running with the land
over the areas shown as old Lots 3 and a portion of Lot 19 new Lots
11,14 and 13 on the tentative map, for landscaping maintenance and
recreational purposes.
2. A common area in perpetuity as a covenant running with the land
over all paved areas and sidewalks, except individual concrete
driveways, for vehicular access, parking, private utilities and
maintenance purposes.
3. A common area in perpetuity as a covenant running with the land
over new Lots 1 through 8 inclusive, for landscaping, access and
maintenance purposes.
PC FESO NO. 3100 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. A common area in perpetuity as a covenant running with the land
over new Lot 12 (old Lot 22) for opeg space purposes.
These covenant for easements shall be binding upon all successors, assigns
and transfers of covenantor. These covenants cannot be quitclaimed without
the approval of the City. Wording to that elkt shall be placed on the
covenants.
El All the above changes shall be shown on the approved tentative map mylar.
76. If the developer chooses to construct out of phase, all improvements required by
previous phases are required.
Fire Conditions:
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed
necessary by the Fire Marshal. .
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of
existing and proposed fire hydrants and on site roads and drives to the Fire
Marshal for approval.
An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational
prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
Proposed emergency access systems shall be provided with “Knox” key operated
override switch, as specified by the Fire Department.
Fire retardant roofs shah be required on all structures.
Brush clearance within this Planning Area shall be maintained according to the
specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. .
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers,
and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to construction.
Water District:
85. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
PC PESO NO. 3100 -13-
86. The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and
1 the City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to
2 preparation of the water system improvements plans.
3 87. The developer will be responsible for all water fees and water deposits plus the
major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit.
4
5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
6 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
7 the following vote, to wit:
8 AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, Marcus
and Hall. 9
10 NOES: None.
11
12
13
14
15
.
ABSENT: Commissioners: Erwin and McFadden.
ABSTAIN: None.
17 I/ ATTEST:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 I/
26
27
28 PC RESO NO. 3100
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
-14-
. -
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 PUD 90-12
14 LOTS TOTAL
1 additional open space lot
3 additional recreation lots
,- -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3101
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ATENTATIVE
TRACT MAP TO DEVELOP A 147 DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF ALGA ROAD AND BATIQUITOS
DRIVE.
CASE NAME: AVIARA - PLANNING AREA 5
CASE NO.: PUD 90-12
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Lots 95, 96, 97 and 98 of the City of Carlsbad Tract 85-35, Phase I - Unit
C, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, June 19, 1989, #89-346187
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of October, 1990, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
E-9 That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of PUD 90-12, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The project is consistent with Master Plan 177 since the proposed net density of 6.17 du/acre is within the permitted density of 7.9 du/acre as specSed within
Master Plan 177.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of
the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
project.
The dedication of the 12.4 acre school site at the intersection of Alga Road and
ambrosia Lane is acceptable as mitigation of the impact to existing Carlsbad
Unified School District school facilities.
The dedication of a 24.25 acre park site at the northern terminus of Ambrosia
Lane satisfies park fee requirements.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s Planned Development Ordinance
and also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
As discussed in the staff repo& the project is: (1) consistent with the
development standards of the Aviara Master Plan 177 and the Planned
Development Ordinance; (2) in conformance with the Design Criteria of Master
Plan 177; (3) in compliance with the City’s Noise Policy No. 17 as conditioned;
and (4) is in conformance with the Mello I Local Coastal Program.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future and existing land
uses since surrounding properties are designated for Residential Development (RM,
RLM) on the General Plan.
PC RESO NO. 3101 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 30,
1990, and Recommended for Approval by the Planning Commission on October 3,
1990. In recommending approval of this Mitigated Negative Declaration the
Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all
required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the
significant effects this project could have on the environment.
12. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee,
or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative
impacts created by the project.
13. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 19.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of approval for CT 90-9 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3100 apply to this approval and are incorporated through this
reference.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3101 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, Marcus
and Hall.
None.
Commissioners: McFadden and Erwin.
None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/tg&dw . n Ii&$-WE@. HOLZMItLER
PC RESO NO. 3101 -4-
STAFF REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
h'PLIc;A. 10N COMPLETE DATE:
MAY 14, 1990
GW 0 2
SUBJECT: CX 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 - Request for a 147
dwelling unit Condominium Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development, on property located within the Aviara Master Plan (PA-S) at
the southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive,
in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
I. RECOMMENDATION
.
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3099
recommending APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning
Director and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3100 and 3101 recommending
APPROVAL of CT 90-9/PUD 90-12, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a 147 dwelling unit Condominium Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Unit Development, located as described above. The subject property is
located within Phase I of the Aviara Master Plan Area which is zoned PC and is under a
Combination General Plan Designation of RLM/RM/OS/RC/N. The specific project site
(Planning Area-S) is designated for a maximum residential density of 7.9 du/acre. The
property is also located within the Coastal Zone (Mello I) and will require a Coastal Permit
issued by the California Coastal Commission.
The proposed Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development would be located on a
23.8 acre site and have a density of 6.17 du/acre. This density is below the site’s
maximum permitted density of 7.9 du/acre.
As shown on Exhibits “F” and “G”, the proposed project would consist of 147 townhome
units to be developed as 3 duplex, 6 triplex, 27 fourplex and 3 fiveplex structures. All of
the structures will be two stories in height (27 feet measured to the tallest roof peak).
Four different plan types are proposed, ranging in size from 1,549 square feet to 2,190
square feet. The architecture of the proposed structures is Classic Mediterranean in style
incorporating simple building mass and gabled roof form, light colored stucco, concrete tile
roofs, corbel fascia, tile shutters and glass block. Roof and facade articulation have been
incorporated into the project to add interest and relief.
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVlKRA PLANNING AREA 5 OCTOBER3,1990
The project site has been planned to preserve the open space corridor (2.85 acres), running
north to south, through the center of the property while providing three distinct project
neighborhoods which take access off of Hummingbird Drive. Each of the neighborhoods
will included a common active recreation area. The recreation areas include the following
amenities: Recreation Area A - spa, decking and barbecue, Recreation Area “B” - spa,
decking and restroom, Recreation Area “c” - pool, spa, decking and restroom. Each of the
dwelling units will include a fenced, exclusive use rearyard ranging from 350 square feet to 1600 square feet in area. In addition, the project includes a minimum forty-foot wide
common open space corridor which provides pedestrian access to the major community
trail system to be constricted within the SDG&E easement located along the site’s
northeastern boundary.
Access to the project site is from Batiquitos Drive to Hummingbird Drive. From Hummingbird Drive 30 - 32 foot wide private streets are proposed to provide access for
each of the three project neighborhoods.
The project site has already been pregraded consistent with the approved grading plans for
Phase I Aviara (CT 85-35). A chaparral dominated open space corridor runs north to south
through the center of the site. The site is surrounded by vacant and graded Planning Areas
7, 4 and 8 to the north, east and west respectively and a single family residence (Dr.
Murphy) and agriculture to the south.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed project conform to the development standards of the Aviara
Master Plan and the Planned Development Ordinance?
2.
3.
Does the proposed project conform to the design criteria of the Aviara Master Plan?
Is the proposed project as designed in compliance with the City’s Noise Policy No. 17?
4. Is the proposed project in compliance with the Mello I Local Coastal Program as implemented through the Aviara Master Plan - 177?
5. Is the proposed project consistent with the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management
Plan?
6. Are all conditioned offsite improvements necessary for the development of the
project?
7. Is the proposed project consistent with the Carlsbad Municipal Code?
_-
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - A\dtA PLANNING AREX 5 OCTOBER 3, 1990
PAGE 3
DISCUSSION
MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
As proposed, the project complies with all Planning Area specific development standards
of the Aviara Master Plan and all other development standards of the Planned Development
Ordinance. Specifically, all structures are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Separated by a minimum of 20 feet;
Setback a minimum of 50 feet from Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive;
Setback a minimum of 20 feet from Hummingbird Drive and Rock Dove
Street;
Setback a minimum of 20 feet and 5 feet from fronting private residential
streets and driveways respectively; and s
Setback a minimum of 20 feet from the SDG&E easement.
As discussed earlier, all structures will be below the maximum permitted 35 foot height
limit. All of the units will have a two-car garage with a minimum dimension of 400 square
feet. This will provide the adequate space to fulfil1 the Planned Development Ordinance
storage requirements as well as provide parking for two cars. Adequate guest parking
spaces (32 bay and 14 parallel) will be provided throughout the project.
Each unit will include a minimum 350 square foot (minimum 15’ X 1 S’exclusive use
rear-yard area. In addition, three common active recreation areas (17, 500 sf) and one
common passive recreation area (6,100 sf) will also be provided. With regard to R.V.
parking, staff has conditioned that the Master Plans recreational vehicle parking area
(Planning Area 23), with an all weather access road to it, be available prior to the
occupancy of any residential units within this Planning Area.
MASTER PLAN DESIGN CRITERIA
The proposed pmreject also complies with the Aviara Master Plan design criteria regarding
site design, open space preservation, landscaping, entry treatments, fencing, trails and noise
mitigation. Specifically, the project has been designed to incorporate curvilinear streets
and informal building sitings thereby providing a hilltown appearance. Adequately spaced
units (minimum 20 feet separation) have been sited to provide views of Batiquitos Lagoon,
the project’s internal open space corridor, or the SDG&E easement which will be richly
landscaped by the Aviara Master Association. These open space amenities in association
with the project’s proposed common active and passive recreation areas will function to
open the projects up. The above mentioned design treatments, incorporated with strong
architectural relief features rich project landscaping and enhanced pavement treatments
throughout, function to create a comprehensive, innovative and desirable living
environment. The project as proposed, also preserves the Master Plan delineated open
space corridor (old Lots 22 and 24 as shown on Exhibits “B” and “C”) within the central
portion of the site.
-.
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVLrrRA PLANNING ARF.A 5
OCTOBER 3, 1990
PAGE 4
NOISE POLICY - 17
The project is located within 500 feet of Alga Road and within 3 miles of the McClellan-
Palomar Airport and in accordance, is subject to compliance with the City’s Noise Policy
No. 17. The Noise Policy requires that noise be mitigated to 60 dB(A) five feet inside the
project’s property line at six feet above finished grade and, above the first floor/story if
usable exterior space is provided. In this project, the rear-yards for units 126,127 and 134
along Alga Road would be impacted by traffic noise. As shown in the acoustical study for
the proposed project, (See Attachment “A”) required noise barrier walls which would need
to be constructed at the top of slope along Alga Road in order to reduce rearyard noise
levels to 60 dB(A) would be 5.0 feet tall. Otherwise, the acoustical analysis specifies that
compliance with Noise Policy 17 shall require that mechanical ventilation be required for
units 126-129 and 131-134. All above noise mitigations have been conditioned to be
incorporated into the project. In addition, since the project site is located within 3 miles
of Palomar-McClellan Airport, the owner of the property has been conditioned to record
a notice and post adequate onsite signage, which identifies that the property is subject to
overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport.
MELLO I LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
As proposed, this project is consistent with all policies of the underlying Mello I Local
Coastal Program as implemented through Master Plan - 177. Specifically, all portions of
the property which were placed under open space deed restrictions by the California
Coastal Commission are being preserved in open space.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
The project is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 19 in the southwest quadrant.
At the project dwelling unit count (147 units) the proposed project is 42 dwelling units
below that allowed per Local Facilities Management Zone 19. All public utilities and
services will be available to serve the project.
The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with
adopted performance standards are summarized below:
FACILITY IMPACTS COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD
City Administration
Library
Wastewater
Parks
Drainage
544.85 sq. ft.
290.76 sq. ft.
147 EDU’s 1.08 acres
N/A
Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVmRA PLANNING AREA 5
OCTOBER 3, 1990
PAGE 5
IMPACTS ON PUBLIC FACILITIES KON’T):
FACILITY
Circulation
Fire Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution System
Open Space
IMPACTS
1176 ADT
Station #2 & #4
N/A 147 EDU
32,340 GPD
N/A
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS .
This project has been conditioned to install offsite improvements to Alga Road between
Mimosa Street and El Camino Real. These improvements were initially required by the
Zone 19 and Zone 6 Local Facility Plans at a later date. The construction of the Plaza
Paseo Real commercial project has advanced the timetable for construction of these
improvements to Alga Road. The required offsite improvements are needed now in order
that the project traffic impacts will not result in a failure of the adopted Growth
Management Standards. The Four Seasons Hotel site as well as several other proposed and
approved projects, have been or will be conditioned to participate in all or a portion of the
improvements. Staff is currently working with these developers on a program to equitable
distribute costs of those improvements and to obtain the needed dedications from the
affected property owners.
MUNICIPAL CODE CONSISTENCY
The project proposes four model units. The applicant desires to grade and build these
model units prior to final map approval. Model units prior to final map approval are
allowed pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code 21.06.030. Clearing, grubbing and grading
prior to final map approval are not allowed per the Code. The Planning Commission has
the authority to approve grading prior to final map approval. The applicant has included
a site plan showing the grading necessary and all required improvements associated with
the model units. The site has been previously graded and erosion control requirements are
being complied with. A condition allowing the grading for the model units and associated
improvement prior to final map is a part of the tentative map approval.
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVI&A PLANNING AREA 5
OCTOBER 3, 1990
PAGE 6
Iv. ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project with the implementation of
mitigation measures, will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore,
has issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 30, 1990. The environmental
analysis, along with the field checks by staff identified that because: (1) the project site has
already been reviewed within the Aviara Master Plan EIR 83-2(A); (2) the site has been
previously rough graded; and (3) the project will not encroach into the deed restricted
Chaparral habitat within the central portion of the site, no project specific environmental
impacts are anticipated. However, mitigation measures (ie. sound attenuation wall, and
mechanical ventilation as described in the Acoustical Analysis for PA-S) for traffic noise
impacts from Alga Road shall be required to be incorporated into the project design prior
to the occupancy of any project dwelling units. There were no public comments received
during the public review period for this Mitigated Negative Declaration.
In summary, since the proposed project is: (1) in conformance with the development
standards of the Aviara Master Plan and the Planned Development Ordinance; (2) in
conformance with the Design Criteria of the Aviara Master Plan; (3) in compliance with
the City’s Noise Policy No. 17 as conditioned; and (4) in conformance with the Mello I
Local Coastal Program and Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan, staff recommends
approval of CT 90-9/PUD 90-12.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3099
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3100
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3101
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Attachment “A”, Noise Analysis for Aviara Planning Area 5.
Exhibits “A” - “Y”, dated August 28, 1990
CDD:lh
August 22, 1990
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
APPLICANT: AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5
REQUEST AND LOCATION: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
TO DEVELOP 147 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION
OF ALGA ROAD AND BATIOUITOS DRIVE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 95.96.97 AND 98 OF CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT 85-35, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12411, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 19.1989, # 89-346187
APN: 215-051-10 Acres 23.8 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 147 DU’S
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation COMBINATION DISTRICT - RM/RLM .
Density AIIowed 7.9 DU/AC Density Proposed 6.17 DU/AC
Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
zoninq Land Use
Site PC
North PC
VACANT AND GRADED
VACANT AND GRADED (PA-71
south PC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE & AGRICULTURE
East PC GRADED RESIDENTIAL PADS (PA-41
West PC GRADED RESIDENTIAL PADS (PA-81
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District CARLSBAD Water CARLSBAD Sewer CARLSBAD
EDU’s Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date MARCH 1.1990
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
x Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued AUGUST 30. 1990
- E.I.R. Certified, dated
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPIJCANTS STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPUCATJCNS :
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DlSCREllONARY ACTION ON WE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED
BOARD. COMMISSION OR COMMI-I-KE.
(f lease Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. ADokant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
AVIARA-5, A California Limited Partnership
5151 Shoreham Place, Suite 200
San Dieao. California 92122 e
See Attachment A, Sheets 1 & 2
for ownership detail.
2.
3.
Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Owner and Applicant are the same as Item No. 1 above and are listed on
Attachment A, Sheets 1 E 2
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ar;
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnershi
interest in the partnership.
See Attachment A, Sheets 1 & 2
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organiration or a trust, list the names an
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficial
of the trust.
None
(Over)
Disclosure Statement Page 2
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boarc -
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes X No If yes, please indicate person(s) One of the consultant team members is
Mr. Toy Lawson of AD1 Planning Associates, a member of the City of
Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Board
Person is defined as: ‘Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal
organization, COfpOfatiCXI, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision. or any other group or combination acting as a unit.’
. (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
._---
t( ye.
AVIARA-5, A Calif&nia Corporation AVIARA-5, A Californig Corporation
General Partner General Partner
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
ATTACHMENT A
AVIARA-5, A California Limited Partnership, consists of the following:
General Partner:
AVIARA-5, A California Corporation. This corporation is 100% owned by
McKellar Communities, A California Corporation.
McKellar Communities, A California Corporation is 100% wholly owned by
McKellar Development of La Jolla, 1250 Prospect Street, Suite 103, La Jolla,
California 92037. The shareholder names and addresses of McKellar Develop-
ment of La Jolla, a California Corporation are as follows:
.
1. Christopher S. McKellar
1899 Spindrift Drive
La Jolla, California 92037
2. William F. Miller, Jr.
16032 Avenida Calma
Ranch0 Santa Fe, CA 92067
3. James A. McKellar
8272 El Paseo Grande
La Jolla, CA 92037
Corporate I.D. Numbers:
McKellar Development of La Jolla 33-0014946
McKellar Communities 33-0373500
AVIARA-5, A California Corporation 33-0396472
Date of Incorporation:
McKellar Development of La Jolla
McKellar Communities
AVIARA-5, A California Corporation
February 8, 1983
June 22, 1989
January 23, 1990
-l-
Disclosure Form (Continued)
IV Limited Partner:
Leighton-Pacific Developments, Inc., A California Corporation
Two Embarcadero Center, #2370
San Francisco, California 94111
Corporate I.D. Number: 94-2992090
Date of Incorporation: July 29, 1985
.
Leighton-Pacific Developments, Inc., A California Corporation, is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Leighton Holdings, Limited, An Australian Publicly Held Company,
472 Pacific Highway, St. Leonards, New South Wales, 2065, Australia.
-2-
-
CITY OF CARLSBALI
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACI’S ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: AWARA - PI.- ARFA !i CT 911-9/PIln 90-12
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RM
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: :
ADDRESS: 5151 SHWHAM PsCXl
PHONE NO.: 619-587-u ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: m.2l.!XSl-l~
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 23.8/AC 147 DIJ’S
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 544.85 .
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage = -1.08
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: - Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
544,&
390.76
N/A
1176
#24
N/A
NA
147
19 B
Water: Demand in GPD - K.
L. The project is 42 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
4TTACHMENT ‘A’
PRELIMINARY NOISE ANALYSIS FOR
AVIARA AREA 5 CITY OF CARLSBAD
Report # 90- 187 July 17, 1990
Prepared For:
McKellar Communities 5151 Shoreham Place Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92122
Prepared By:
Vincent Mestre, P.E. Mike Holritz
MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Newport Center Drive Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7528 (7 14)760-0891
(
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 1
SUMMARY FOR AVIARA AREA 5
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO M’EET CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
Report #90-187 July 17, 1990
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS
The residential units in the project must comply with the City’s 60 CNEL exterior noise standard. Without mitigation, first floor exterior observers along Alga Road would experience a worst case traffic noise level of 60.5 CNJZL at Unit 134. A number of exterior living areas in the project will require mitigation to comply with the 60 CNEL exterior noise standard. Those exterior living areas which will require mitigation are listed below in Table Sl. The data used in the noise barrier analysis is shown in the Appendix.
Table Sl REQUIRED NOISE BARRIER HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS TO MEET EXTERIOR NOISE STANDARD
BARRIER HEIGHT (FT)* UNIT 60 CNEL @ YARD
(Along Alga Road)
134 126,127
* - Denotes height above top of slope
With the noise barriers listed in Table Sl, the exterior noise levels at all first floor exterior living areas in the project will be reduced to below 60 CNEL. The noise barriers shall be located at top of slope. If balconies are planned facing Alga Road, balcony barriers will be needed for some units. The required balcony barrier locations and heights can be addressed in a future study when precise grading plans and architectural drawings become available.
The noise baniers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and have no openings or cracks. The noise barriers may he a wall, berm, or a combination of the two. The wall may be constructed of l/4 inch plate glass, 5/8 inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Wood and other materials may he acceptable if properly designed as noise barriers.
t
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 2
INTERIdR NOISE LEVELS
The project must comply with the City of Carlsbad indoor noise standard. With standard construction practices in California, residential buildings achieve outdoor to indoor noise reductions of at least 20 dB assuming windows are closed. Buildings in the project will be exposed to a maximum noise level of 63.4 CNEL at the second floor of Unit 134. Therefore, the project will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades.
MECHANICAL VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS
Since the noise attenuation of a building falls to about 15 dB with windows open, any buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 60 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed, therefore requiring mechanical ventilation. Mechanical
Table $2 PRELIMINARY MECHANICAL
VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS
.
UNIT NUMBER
126 through 129 131 through 134
-
I
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 * Page 3
PRELIMINARY NOISE ANALYSIS FOR AVAIARA AREA 5 CITY OF CARLSBAD
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to show compliance of Village 5 with the noise related ‘Conditions of Approval placed on the project by the City of Carlsbad. The project calls for the development of multi-family units. This report incorporates the 60 CNEL exterior noise standard recently adopted by the City of Carlsbad. The project is located in the City of Carl&ad, as shown in Exhibit 1. The project site will be impacted by traffic noise from Alga Road. The project is not impacted by railroad or aircraft noise. This study determines the need for any mitigation measures to meet the 60 CNEL exterior noise standard, and addresses the 45 CNEL interior noise standard required by the City of Carlsbad. Mitigation measures that would be required in order to meet 65 CNEL are also included, for comparison only.
2.0 NOISE CRITERIA
The predominant rating scale now used in California for land-use compatibility assessment is the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). CNEL is a 24hour time weighted annual average noise level based on the A-weighted decibel. A-weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the frequency response of the human ear. Time weighting refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain sensitive time periods is penalized for occurring at these times. The evening time period (7 PM to 10 PM) penalizes noises by 5 dB, while nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) noises are penalized by 10 dB. These time periods and penalties were selected to reflect peoples sensitivity to noise as a function of activity.
The City of Carlsbad requires that outdoor living areas not exceed a noise level of 60 CNEL for a six-foot-tall observer located five feet within the property line. In addition, interior noise levels may not exceed 45 CNEL.
The site plan for the project (Exhibit 2) was provided by Hunsaker and Associates (“Site Plan for Aviara Area 5”, T/17/90).
.
L
-.
W )I m y,
I-
CJ
W
7 .O a
n
.
\
Mestre Greve Associates Report#90-187 Page 4
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The noise levels projected in the next section of this report were computed using the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model”, FI-IWA-RD-77-108, December 1978). The FHWA Model uses traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry to compute the “equivalent noise level”. A computer code has been written which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time periods used in CNEL. Weighting these noise levels and summing them results in the CNEL for the traffic projections used CNEL contours are found by iterating over many distances until the distance to 60,65, and 70 CNEL contours are found.
Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier (wall, berm, or combination wall/berm) is the most common way of alleviating traffic noise impacts. The effect of a noise barrier is critically dependent upon the geometry between the noise source, the barrier, and the observer. A noise barrier effect occurs when the “line of sight” between the noise source and the observer is penetrated by the barrier. The greater the penetration, the greater the noise reduction. The FHWA model was also used here in computerized format to determine the required barrier heights.
4.0 ROADWAY NOISE
The future traffic volume for Alga Road was obtained from Dennis Turner at Carlsbad Planning on July 7, 1990. The future average daily traffic volume for Alga Road was taken from the “Carlsbad Transportation Model, 2010 Land Use Assumptions With 2010 Network Assumptions (Calibrated Trip Rates From SR-78 Study), June 23, 1990”. The future average daily traffic volume for Alga Road between El Camino Real and Batiquitos Drive is 19,300. A vehicle speed of 40 miles per hour was utilized. Truck mixes for each of the time periods used in the CNEL calculation are presented in Table 1. These traffic distribution estimates are based upon traffic surveys, and are considered typical for arterials in Southern California.
Table 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PER TIME OF DAY IN PERCENT OF ADT
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT
Automobile 75.51 12.57 9.34 Medium Truck 1.56 0.09 0.19 Heavy Truck 0.64 0.02 0.08
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 5
.
Using the assumptions presented above, the future noise levels were computed The results are reported here in Table 2 in terms of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These represent the distances from the centerline of the roadway to the contour value shown. Note that the values given in Table 2 do not take into account the effects of intervening topography that may affect the roadway noise exposure. Topographic effects are included in subsequent analyses to determine the actual noise exposure on the project site. In addition, these projections do not include any future vehicle noise reduction assumptions to take into account the effects of legislation requiring quieter vehicles in the future.
Table 2 DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOURS FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
ROADWAY SEGMENT DISTANCE TO CNEL CONTOUR (FT) -7o- -65- do- .
Alga Road 38 81 174
The results in Table 2 and the site plan (Exhibit 2) indicate that some exterior living areas along Alga Road will be exposed to traffic noise levels in excess of 60 CNEL. First floor observers along Alga Road will experience a worst case traffic noise level of 60.5 CNEL at Unit 134.
5.0 EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION
For the exterior living areas which are exposed to noise levels greater than 60 CNEL some form of noise mitigation is required. An effective method of reducing the traffic noise levels to acceptable levels is with a noise barrier. Representative cross-sections along the roadway (see Appendix for analysis data) were analyzed utilizing the FHWA Model to determine the necessary noise barrier locations and heights. The results of the analysis indicate that in order to meet the 60 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers are required for a number of exterior living areas facing Alga Road. Required noise barrier locations and heights to meet the 60 CNEL exterior noise standard are listed (in bold type) in Table 3, and shown in Exhibit 3a. The noise barriers shall be located at top of slope as shown- in Exhibit 3a. For the sake of comparison, required noise barrier locations and heights to meet 65 CNEL are also listed in Table 3, and shown in Exhibit 3b.
.
, \
, .
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 6
Table 3
NOISE BARRIER REQUIREMENTS
BARRIER HEIGHT (FT)* TO MEET UNIT 65 CNEL 60 CNEL STANDARD
(Along Alga Road)
134 5.0 126,127 i:: 5.0
* - Denotes height above top of slope NR - Indicates “No Barrier Required”
.
The frost floor exterior living areas in the project will meet the City of Carlsbad’s 60 CNEL exterior noise standard with the barriers listed (in bold type) in the third column of Table 3, and shown in Exhibit 3a. For comparison only, barrier locations and heights to meet 65 CNEL are listed in the second column of Table 3 and shown in Exhibit 3b.
If second story balconies are planned facing Alga Road, balcony barriers will be needed for some units. The required balcony barrier locations and heights can be addressed in a future study when precise grading plans and architectural drawings become available.
The noise barriers are required to have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and have no openings or cracks. They may be constructed of wood studs with stucco exterior, l/4 inch plate glass, 5/B inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Wood and other materials may be acceptable if properly designed as a noise barrier.
6.0 INTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION
The project must comply with the City of Carlsbad indoor noise standard. With standard construction practices in California, residential buildings achieve outdoor to indoor noise reductions of at least 20 dB assuming windows are closed. Buildings in the project will be exposed to a maximum noise-level of 63.4 CNEL at the second floor of Unit 134. Therefore, the project will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades.
- -
I ,
\
0 4 0 K I
;I
4 (3
:I
1 I
t
0 4 0 K I
4 0 J Q,
1 I
i
Mesh-e Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 7
7.0 MECHANICAL VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS
Since the noise attenuation of a building falls to about 15 dB with windows open, any buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 60 CNEL will meet the 45 CNBL interior noise standard only with windows closed. In order to assume that windows can remain closed to achieve this required attenuation, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per Uniform Building Code.This can be achieved with mechanical ventilation to provide fresh air. The system must supply two air changes per hour to each habitable room including 20?& fresh make-up air obtained directly from the outside. The fresh air inlet duct will be of sound attenuating construction and shaIl consist of a minimum of ten feet of straight or curved duct, or six feet plus one sharp 90 degree bend. M chanical ventilation will fl{ 4 --L
Table 4 PRELIMINARY MECHANICAL VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS
UNIT NUMBER
126 through 129 131 through 134
I ,
b 0 4 2 I I
4 2
” .
Mestre Greve Associates Report # 90- 187 Page 8
APPENDIX DATA USED TO DESIGN NOISE BARRIERS ALONG ALGA ROAD
Road Distance Base Of Dist. To Observer Observer
Lot Elevation To Wall Wall Observer Elevation Height
134 140.7 50 140.7 75 130.7 6
133 747.2 50 141.2 75 730.9 6
132 741.5 50 741.5 76 737.7 6
737 141.9 50 147.9 77 131.3 6
729 142.2 50 142.2 77 131.4 6
128 142.2 50 142.2 77 137.6 6
127 741.9 50 747.9 76 131.8 6
126 141.9 50 141.9 76 132 6
.
.
MINUTES
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 COk
J' a difficult piece of property. She can accept the staff " explanation for the entrance on Corte de la Vista. She w' "1 support the project. ?
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that the Commission mus
Vista or it would create a much greater liability i
the City.
Commissioner McFadden will support the project is a good resolution to a difficult piece of 1 prefer two entrances, both on Corte de la Vis accept the staff recommendation, the view wall condition which has been proposed and the a ional wording to the resolution for the mitigated Negati Declaration. She would like to see setback measurement hown on future plans submitted by Fieldstone.
Commissioner Holmes likes the projec spite of the view problems. The only way to guarantee ew is to have the lot closest to the view. He think excellent solution to a difficult a lot of pluses and will support
Commissioner Hall agrees with t comments which have been made but he, also, would have ed to see two entrances. He does like the entrance on Cor e la Vista and the overall design of the project.
Chairman Schrannn appreciat the mix of single story and two story. She would like to e the proposed condition include landscaping and agrees w the other issues which have been addressed, including th ntrance on Corte de la Vista. She, also, would have lik see a second entrance.
Motion was duly mad seconded, and carried to adopt Planning
Commission Resolut No. 3017 recommending approval of the Negative Declarat issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Planning Commiss Resolution Nos. 3018, 3019 and 3020
recommending a oval of CT 90-23, PUD 90-23, and HDP 90-29,
based on the dings and subject to the conditions contained therein with e following additions: (1) add the words the mitigation plan" to Condition #l of 3017, and (2) add the wall condition and the to the view wall condition.
nning Commission recessed at 7:50 p.m. and reconvened
iii
2)
issioner McFadden became ill and left the meeting at 8:04 Chairman Schramm informed the applicants for items 21, and 4) to question if they would prefer a hearing by the .l Commission. They chose to be heard.
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVIARA PLANNING ARRA 5 - Request for a 147 dwelling unit Condominium Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development on property located within the Aviara Master Plan (PA-S) at the southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
Chris DeCerbo, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a condominium project on a 23.8 acre site in the Aviara
IISSIONERS ’
Hall
Holmes Marcus
McFadden Schlehuber
Schraunn
-_
MINUTES
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9 COMMISSIONERS
Master Plan. The proposed density of 6.17 du's/acre is below the maximum density of 7.9 du's/acre. The proposed project would consist of 147 townhome units to be developed as 3 duplex, 6 triplex, 27 fourplex, and 3 fiveplex structures. All of the structures will be two stores in height with the maximum being 27 ft. measured to the tallest roof peak. Four floor plans are proposed ranging in size from 1,549 s.f. to 2,190 s.f. Access to the project would be off Hummingbird Drive. Each of the units will include a fenced, exclusive use rearyard ranging from 350 s.f. to 1,600 s.f. There will be a common open space corridor which provides pedestrian access to the major community trail system. The site is surrounded by vacant and graded Planning Areas 7, 4 and 8 to the north, east and west respectively and a single family residence and agriculture to the south. The proposed project is in conformance with all standards and staff recommends approval.
Chairman Schrannn opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Bill Kennedy, representing HcKellar Development of La Jolla, 5151 Shoreham Drive, San Diego, CA 92122, addressed the Commission and stated that they agree with the staff recommendations with the exception of Condition 1174 which speaks to the different lot configurations and combines several homeowner lots with recreation and open space lots. He requested that the lots be separated for ease of conveyance for maintenance purposes. Staff has indicated that they would support this request.
Chairman Schramm inquired about the oak tree reserve and the 7 oak trees which were to be relocated, because it does not show up on the map. Mr. Kennedy replied that rather than relocate the 7 trees, 9 oak trees have been preserved in place in the open space area of Area 5 (old lot #95).
Commissioner Hall inquired if staff had any comment on the proposed change to Condition 1174. Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer, replied that staff is willing to accept the change and has proposed wording changes to the condition which have been handed out.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Schraaxs declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Holmes requested that the applicant consider replacing the wrought iron with "hot dipped galvanixed iron" because of the close proximity to the ocean. Mr. Kennedy can accept this recommendation but would like the change to be at the approval of the Planning Director since there may be other alternatives which would be even better.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Cormuission Resolution No. 3099 recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Direct01 and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3100 and 3101
recommending approval of CT 9D-g/PHD 90-12, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein,
with the addition of the following: (1) proposed changes to Condition 1174 presented by staff handout; (2) proposed
changes to Condition Nos. 48, 70, and 74 as outlined in staff memo dated October 3, 1990; and (3) a condition which states
the ratio for replacement of the preserved oak trees.
Hall Holmes Marcus Schlehuber Schramm
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 3, 1990, to consider
approval of a 147 dwelling unit condominium Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development on property generally located within the Aviara Master Plan (PA-S) at the
southeast comer of the intersection of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19 and more particularly described as:
Lots 95, 96, 97 and 98 of the City of Carlsbad Tract 85-35,
Phase I -Unit C, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 19, 1989,
#89-346187
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after September 27, 1990. If
you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-l 161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at
or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
APPLICANT: AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 ------m-m -.-.-.%-mm. In-n fin .a,T*n
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
N.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNlY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
HEARING CT 90-9IPUD 9012
NOTICE 1.9 HEREBY GIVEN that the-City Couneilofthe City ofCarls- bad wiil bold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 8~90 P.M., on Tuesday, November 20,1990, to consider an application for a 147 dwelling unit condomi- nium Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development on property generally located within the Aviara Master Plan (PA-51 at the southeast corner of the intersec- tion of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive, in Local Facilities Manage- ment Zone 19 and more particularly
Xsa?iW as; - M.9.I-M-W
Lots 95,98,97 and 98 of the Car& bad Tract 85-35. Phase I Unit C, in the City of Carlsbad, filed in the OMce of the San Diego County Re- corder on June 19.1989. If you have any questions regard- ing this matter, please call the Planning Deparbnent at 438-1161. If YOU challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Unit De- velopment in court. you may be li-
preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
Proof of Pub1
mited to raising OI& thoshissuea you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written eorrespond- ewe delivered to the City of Carl- sbad City Clerk’s OMce at or prior to the public hearing.
Applicant: McKellar Communities CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
AVIAAA PLANNING AREA.5 CT 90-09 PUD, QO- 12 -_ ---
NOVEMBER 8 1990
19-
19-
19-
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali-
fornia on THE 8TH
day of NOVEMBER, 1990
Clerk of the Printer
CJ 5588~ November 8,198O
- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12
.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue),
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, November 20, 1990, to consider an
application for a 147 dwelling unit condominium Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development on property generally located within the Aviara Master Plan (PA-5) at the
southeast corner of the intersection of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19 and more particularly described as:
Lots 95, 96, 97 and 98 of the Carlsbad Tract 85-35,
Phase I Unit C, in the City of Carlsbad, filed in the
Office of the San Diego County Recorder on June 19, 1989.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Unit Development in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: McKellar Communities
PUBLISH: November 8, 1990 :, CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 PUD 90-12
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK ‘S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
CT 90-9/PUD 90-12 - AVIARA - PLANNING AREA 5
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
NOV. 20, 1990 .
Thank you.
1
Assistant City Man--
11 /2/90
Date
i -_
C-J- c\PC\I Pmc2c~-l~ -
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5
1.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
2.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
3.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
4.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
5.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
6.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
7.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
8.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
215-0510I /-
Murphy, Howard F. ..I
400 N. La Costa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215051-05
Murphy, Howard F
400 N. La Costa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215-051-l 13 / Carlsbad Unified School District v
801 Pine Avenue
Cartsbad. CA 92008
215-612-05
Aviara Land Associates J
2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206
Carisbad, CA 92009
215-612ti
Lyon Communities, Inc. i/
4330 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 130
San Diego, CA 92122
215-61247
Lyon Communities, Inc.
4330 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 130
San Diego, CA 92 122
215512-10
Goe. Steven J. and Susan /
17 19 Catalpa Road
Carl&ad, CA 92009
215-512-11
Goetschel, Martin 6, Jr. i/
17 17 Catalpa Road
Cartsbad, CA 92CO9
9.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
10.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
11.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
12.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
13.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
14.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
15.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
16.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
17.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
215512-12
Enyedi, George and Gerda J
17 15 Catalpa Road
Cartsbad. CA 92009
215-512-13
Schulber, Seth and Schulb J’
17 13 Catalpa Road
Co&bad, CA 92009
215512-14 /
Barbour, Elinor L. d
17 11 Catalpa Road
Cartsbad. CA 92009
21551220
Mactavish, Andrew H. and NA /
7206 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215512-21
Hsu, Jang-Yu and Yen-Hwa J
7212 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
21551222
Bullat, David M. and Joan A. J
72 14 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215512-23
Ragland, David 8. J
72 16 Mimosa Driie
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215512-24
Donath, Robert A. J 7220 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
215512-25
Shnable, Paul S. J
7224 Mimosa Driie
Cartsbad, CA 92009
18.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
19.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
20. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
21. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
22.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
23.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
24.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
25.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
26.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
215512-26
McElroy, Gordon L TR J
7226 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215-512-27 J Courson, David M. & Krist
7228 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215-512-28 /
Jessee, William N. and Jess ’
7230 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 920X
21551229 J Seibold, Richard L. and Ruth
7232 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
21551230
Everett, Donald F. J
7234 Mimosa Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
215312-31
J Varney, Michael and Ball, Jennifer M.
7236 Mimosa Drive
Carisbad, CA 92009
215-512-32
Holtaway, Edward P. and Donna J
7238 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
21551233
Faucera, Carmen W. and Karen J
7240 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
213513-05
Hutson, John and Gail J
7205 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92CO9
27.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
28.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
29.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
30.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
31.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
32.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
33.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
34.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
35. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
215513-& / Fortner, Cameron D. and She v
7207 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215513-07
Chen, Yung-Chiu A. J
7209 Mimosa Drive
Carl&ad. CA 92009
215513-08
Truax, Gary and Laurie J
7211 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
215-513-W
’ Farrell, Michael B and Kat J
7213 Mimosa Driie
Cartsbad. CA 92009
215513-10
Richman, Irving M and Rebe J
72 15 Mimosa Drive
Carl&ad, CA 92009
215-513-11
Richman, Irving, M. and Rebe J
72 17 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215513-12
Osberg, Emil A. Jr., and Nancy J
7219 Mimosa Driie
Cartsbad, CA 920X
215-513-13 J
Simo, Mark J.
7221 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad, CA 92009
21551314 J Simo, Mark J.
7223 Mimosa Drive
Co&bad, CA 92009
,-
36.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
37.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
38.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
39. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
40 Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
41. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
42.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
43.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
44.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
215513-15
Lind, Victor J. and Virgini J
7225 Mimosa Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92G09
215-513-16
Johnson, Milburn C. and Mae J
7227 Mimosa Drive
Co&ad, CA 92009
215513-17 /
Mueller, Richard C. v
7229 Mimosa Drive
Carlsbad. CA 92009
215513-18
Evans, John M and Melanie J
7231 Mimosa Drive
Carl&ad, CA 92005)
/
215513-19 J Cook, Erick M and Debra L.
7233 Mimosa Drive
Carlsbad. CA 92009
215513-20
Keesom, Sophia M. J
7235 Mimosa Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
21551321
Schad, Herbert J. J
7237 Mimosa Drive
Carl&ad, CA 92009
215513-22
Jaramillo, Ricardo A. and M.
7241 Mimosa Driie
Carlsbad, CA 92009
215-513-23
. Moran, John A. and Laura M.
7243 Mimosa Diie
Carisbad. CA 92009
45.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
46. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
47.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
48.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
49. Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
Xl.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
51.
Parcel:
Owner:
Address:
21551324 J Paull, David M.
7245 Mimosa Drive
Cartsbad. CA 92009
21559012:21 and 2155903134 (PA81 J Davidson Communities
12520 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
215591-1:29(PA8)
Davidson Communities
12520 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92 130
215-600-01:06and215600-10:27(PA3
Republic Development
180 N. Riverview Drive, Suite 130
Anaheim, CA 92808
215-kOl~l:ll and 215&l-13:47
and 2 15602- 154 (PA 4)
Republic Development
180 N. Rivet-view Drive, Suite 130
Anaheim, CA 92808
215592-10
Aviara Land Associates, Limited
2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206
Cartsbad, CA 92009
215-592-l 1
Aviara Master Association
C/O Hillman Properties West 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206
Carl&ad, CA EC09
,