HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-12-18; City Council; 10957; FairwaysCIT” OF CARLSBAD - AGEND” BILL
HlUSlDE DJiVEUJPMEFiT PFXMlT FOR 132 SINGLE MT& 12/18/90 FAMILY DmACHED HOMJS XNJlH OF CORTE DE IAVEXA, EAS OF
DEPT. i%-bi ALlCANl-E ROAD AND NORTH OF THE LA CXXXA GOLF COURSE.
CX 90-23/PUD !IG23/HDP 90-29 - FAIRWAYS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Mitigated Negative Declaration, CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29, as approved by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map CT 90-23 and related applications to subdivide a 41.09 acre parcel into 149 lots. As proposed the subdivision is comprised of 132 lots for single family homes and 17 common lots. The uses of the common lots are for passive recreation, slope and landscaping maintenance and temporary recreational vehicle storage.
Proposed homes range in size from 1,900 to 2,900 square feet. There are flour floorplans, three of which are two story models and three architectural styles. The project is proposed as a gated neighborhood. There is one main entrance/exit located off of Corte de la Vista. A second entrance which is for emergency access only is located at the easterly end of the site and connects to the terminus of Corte de la Vista. That access will be gated at the Corte de la Vista right-of-way and at the beginning of the access road onsite.
Several persons spoke during the public testimony raising issues they had with the proposal. Those issues were: 1) Views. Existing neighboring residents were concerned with view loss or impairment; 2) Noise. It was stated that additional homes would generate traffic which in turn would create noise from which they are not attenuated; 3) Density. It was stated that the density should be the same as Alicante Hills which is 2.6 du/ac; 4) Access. Alicante Hills residents requested that access be taken off of Alicante Road and not Corte de la Vista: and 5) Other concerns raised included water availability and school impacts.
The Planning Commission discussed the concerns raised with input from staff. It was explained that the location of the access on Corte de la Vista was directed by staff for safety concerns on adjacent properties and because engineering intersection spacing would not allow an access on Alicante Road. Mitigation for noise concerns is not the responsibility of the owners of the Fairways property and the issue of density was determined by the General Plan designation for the property. The density range is from 4-8 dwelling units per acre and the project is proposed at 4 units per acre. However, to address the concerns of views a condition was placed on the project to provide a wall along Alicante Road which would be designed to preserve views from the Spyglass
-.
(I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 10, v-7
Point project across Alicante Road krom the proposal. Planning Commission discussed the remaining issues and determined that staffls review and recommendation was valid and subsequently approved the Fairways (6-O).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A pair of California Gnatcatchers was identified onsite and a mitigation program has been recommended for approval for offsite mitigation. Therefore, after review of the environmental issues, the Planning Director determined that this project, with the implementation of mitigating conditions, will not have a significant impact on the environment and, issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 31, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration Resolution on October 3, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
Facilities Zone 6
Local Facilities Management Plan - Adopted 11/10/87
Growth Control Point 6 Du/Ac.
Net Density 4 Du/Ac.
Special Facility Fees $310.00 Per Unit
1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution~Nos. 3017, 3018, 3019 & 3020 3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 3, 1990 w/attachments 4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes from October 3, 1990
,
btv of ~arlshd
CT 90-23
I PUD 90-23
FAIRWAY HDP 90-29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3017
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR A TENTATIVE MAP, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP A 149 LOT
SINGLE FAMILY SUBDMSION.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of October, 1990,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning
Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit “ND”, dated August 31, 1990, and “PII”, dated August 30,
1990, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findings <
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment, provided that the mitigating
conditions of approval are complied with.
2. The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
3. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed
project.
1
4. 2 There are potentially sensitive resources located onsite however mitigation
measures have been added to the project which will mitigate any impacts to a level
3 of insignificance.
4
5
6
7
8
9
5. That the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, the monitoring
requirement as specified in Public Resources code Section 21081.6 and the
provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the Planning
Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in
the Declaration.
Conditions:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. As mitigation for the loss of 9.7 acres of California Gnatcatcher habitat onsite, the
applicant shall provide for the perpetual preservation offsite of 9.7 acres of habitat
within the area described on attached Figure 2 and 3 and as certified by a qualified
biologist as containing equal or greater habitat value. Prior to recordation of a
final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning
Director, a detailed mitigation plan which includes the following items: (a) a
precise legal description of the area to be preserved, (b) a habitat management
plan, (c) fire management plan, (d) appropriate weed control measures, (e)
appropriate forms of deterrence to access by humans and domestic animals,
including fencing if deemed necessary, and (f) adequate measures assuring
minimization of light and noise impacts to the site. The perpetual preservation of
the mitigation area shall be documented by an open space/conservation easement
incorporating the mitigation plan in favor of the City for recording concurrently
with recordation of the final map.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
PC RJZSO NO. 3017 -2-
. , c
.I ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
II
12
12
14
If
1E
17
1E
1:
2c
21
22
2:
24
2f
2E
21
2E
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
None.
Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
PC RESO NO. 3017 -3-
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Corte de la Vista and north of La Costa Golf
Course.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A residential subdivision of 133 single family lots on 41.09
acres in the residential density - multiple zone.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for ImpIementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from
the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department
within 21 days of date of issuance. t
DATED: AUGUST 31, 1990
CASE NO: CT GO-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29 Planning Director
APPLICANT: THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
CW:kTIl
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Car&bad. California 92009-4859 * (619) 438-l 161
.
. r
EI’MRONMENTAL MPACI. ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-23/HDP 90-29/PUD 90-23
DATE: JULY 23. 1990 BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Fairwavs
2. APPLICANT: Fieldstone Comnanv
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5465 Morehouse Dr, Ste 2.50
San Dieno CA 92121
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED:
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A residential subdivision of 133 single family lots on 41.09 acres
in the residential densitv-multinle zone
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a sipnificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-sig” and “YES-insig”
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
.T , PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontologicaI or historical site,
structure or object?
YES YES big) (insig)
NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-2-
3 _-
: , , BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and inset ts?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
I-KmdANENvlRoNMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECIZY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services?
x
YES YES Wgl (inrig)
NO
x
x
x
x
NO
x
x
-3-
.> . HuMqNENvrRoNMENT
WILL‘THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
YES (si.$l YES NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-4-
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGIWFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES (s&l @id
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
NO
x
x
x
x
-5-
IkSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Phvsical Environment
Because of prior disturbance to the site extensive amounts of remedial grading are required. As proposed the
project design includes 256,000 cubic yards of balanced cut and fill. The Hillside development Ordinance
criteria accepts quantities less than 8000 cubic yards per disturbed acre as reasonable. This project proposes
approximately 6230 cubic yards per acre.
Generally the grading design steps the site down from the north to the south which is in close keeping with
existing conditions.
Effects of the project on erosion, air and water quality, and course or flow of waters will be minimal. Those
slopes which are manufactured and could have the potential to erode will be controlled through slope
planting. Manufactured slopes will not exceed a 2:l ratio or exceed a height of 30 feet. Referencing Section
15064(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines: “[i]f an air emission or water discharge meets the existing standard for a particular pollutant, the Lead Agency may presume that the emission or discharge of the pollutant will
not be a significant effect on the environment.” Total project emissions will not exceed threshold criteria.
Project location precludes potential impacts on the course or flow of marine or fresh waters. A portion of a
100 year flood plain is identified within the westerly project boundary however, alteration to that flood plain
has been avoided through project design. Although natural resources will be used for the construction of the
project, primarily lumber, maintenance and operational uses of resources, water and oil, can not be considered
significant. Water consumption will be ultimately determined by the individual user for domestic and
landscape purposes. Water conserving irrigation could be installed for common areas.
Once the project has been occupied the individual consumption of fuel or energy will be determined by the
user. Active and passive solar design, insulation and the installation of energy saving appliances could provide
a first step mitigation to reduce the need for excessive amounts of energy.
The site has not been identified as having any archaeological, paleontological or historic significance.
Biological Environment
The site was previously disturbed by the creation of larger pads. Since that time there has been some natural
revegitation of the site. -
Vegetation consists predominately of non-native plant species but also includes California Sagebrush and
Broom Baccharis. There are no mature trees within the proposed grading areas. Early site inspections by staff
did not reveal the presence of any designated significant species. Fully developed surrounding conditions have
isolated the site from areas that are more likely to accommodate sensitive plant and animal species typically
found in the Carlsbad area.
However, recent sitings and observations have been made of a pair of nesting California Blacktailed
Gnatcatchers. The Gnatcatcher is a category 12 listed species on the Federal Register and may soon receive
endangered status by that agency.
-6-
* 1
Biological Environment (co&d)
A study was conducted by Bary Jones, Senior Biologist with ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co. It
was concluded that generally the overall wildlife value of the habitat onsite was low and that an offsite
mitigation measure would reduce the impact on the habitat to a level of insignificance. The mitigation
proposed requires a revegitation of coastal sage adjacent to a future high school and residential devleopment.
There are no other identified sensitive species. The introduction of plants and animals usually related to a
residential development will not have detrimental effects or create a barrier to movement of other sensitive
species.
The site has not been identified as agricultural land and has not been used as such.
Human Environment
The site carries a medium density general Plan designation which allows a density range of 4-8 dwelling units
per acre. Zoning on the property is Residential Density - Multiple Zone. The General Plan characterizes
Medium density as small lot single family homes as well as duplexes and town homes. No zone or General
Plan amendments are proposed.
Public utilities and services, such as sewers, schools, police, fire and emergency, can be provided by the
individual responsible agencies. Letters of service availability are on file with the City,
Noise and light levels will increase however not to levels of significance. Noise sources after completion will
be human voices, radio and television, household and maintenance related appliances and automobile and
truck traffic. Construction noise will be short term and acceptable noise levels will be governed by the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Light reflectivity will change due to recontouring and the future existence of residences vs. vacant property.
New light sources will be established by street lamps and individual home exterior and interior lighting. Light sources within the public right-of-way will be subject to City designated standards for intensity.
The use of hazardous substances in significant quantities is not a part of this project, nor is it anticipated that
there will be storage of hazardous and/or volatile materials.
Implementation of the project will not create a need for additional housing however it will have an effect on existing housing in the general vicinity. Those impacts will be primarily economic. The project is not
intended for first time buyer or low to moderate income households.
Traffic will be increased by approximately 1300 average daily trips (ADT). This projection falls within the
service levels of the adjacent existing street system. No new mass transportation routes or facilities are
required by the transit district. Streets and sidewalks have been designed to accommodate foot, bicycle, and automobile traffic without compromising safety.
The project has been designed to follow the general existing topography. As development moves south pad
elevations are lowered. The result reduces the visual effect of the development as seen from lower lying areas
i.e. La Costa Golf Course. Views from the development can also be maximized.
-7-
Human Environment
The proposed architecture is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and buildings will be setback
from the slope tops sufficiently so that the visual impact on the surrounding area is eliminated or significantly
reduced by the slope.
Each lot will have a private yard in excess of a minimum 15’ x 15’ flat area. In addition common open
space/passive recreation lots have been incorporated throughout the site. No common active facilities are
being proposed. Although the site is adjacent to the La Costa golf course there is no reciprocity between the
two. However other public recreation facilities are in close proximity.
-8-
iNAL& OF VTMLE-ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
a) The project is proposed as phased development. Because there are no significant impacts to
circulation or impacts to services there is no environmental advantage to delay development
other than postponing ultimate service needs.
b) Alternate site designs could further reduce visual impacts as seen from adjacent properties.
Because street design generally follows the existing land contours, changing street direction
would require additional grading.
c) If an alternate scale of development were proposed relative impacts would change. A reduction
in the number of units would decrease density below the General Plan designation, increase
purchase price of the units, reduce all secondary impacts such as on traffic and air quality. If
the number of units were increased a different product type would be necessary. Duplexes or
townhomes could be an option. The result could reduce the cost of units however would
increase impacts on generation issues such as traffic and air quality. Clustering the development
at the same density would have generally the same secondary impacts howevere could reduce
impacts to grading and visual (onsite and offsite).
d) The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designate this parcel as suitable for residential
development. Other uses such as Bed and Breakfasts, childcare nurseries and parking lots are
permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. The appropriateness of any of these uses can not be
determined at this time because of the lack of information.
e) Future development rather than now would not appear to have any significant advantage.
Services and facilities are available now.
f) Other sites may be available with the same zoning and general plan designations; however, just
as with the no project alternative it does not preclude development at some other time of a
similar project with similar impacts.
-9-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
x I find that although the proposed project could have a signifkant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
@974&
Date
6/w jw
Date Planning Dire&#
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE~
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-lO-
&‘PLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
7bJY&
Date SignaWe
CW:km
-ll-
APPENDIX P ENvlRC E.NTAL MITIGATION MONlXMNG t -- ‘CKLIST
E 5
2 .C ct
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
r .
- ERC 4 B Environmental The Fairways Project Location and Proposed Mitigation Area
and Energy as Depicted on USGS 7.5’ Enclnitas and Ranch0 Santa Fe Quadrangles
Services Co.
FltiUKK
2
LEGEND
COaStal %qe Scrub
Disturbed Grassland
0 -- Adolphis californiu
Brodiaca orcuttii -- Dudleva blochmaniae szp.
~lochmancae
0 b havesian~
0 Muilla ckvelandii --
0 Selaqmella cinrrascenr
BIG California Gnatcamer
m ERC 1 N Environmental and Energy
Services Co.
Offsite Mitigation Location for the Fairways
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PL&UNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3018
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A 149 LOT SUBDMSION ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LA VISTA AND
EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA COSTA GOLF
COURSE.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: CT 90-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, according to map thereof filed in the
office of the County Recorder of san Diego County on October
10, 1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of October, 1990,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Comrnission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cornmission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 90-23, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
.
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
-
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of
4.0 du’s/acre is within the density range of 4-8 du’s/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 6.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the San
Marcos School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s Planned Development Ordinance
and also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General
Plan.
Because the project is a Planned Development and is consistent with the open space
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance it contributes to meeting the
open space facility performance standard for LFM Zone 6 at buildout and that
development as approved will not preclude the provision of performance standard
open space at buildout of Zone 6.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -2-
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
14.
_-
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 31, 1990
and recommended for approval by the Plarming Commission on October 3, 1990.
In recommending APPROVAL of this Negative Declaration the Planning Commission
has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures
and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project
could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
Planning Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted for CT 90-23, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “II”, dated October
3, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The tentative map
shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement
plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within
and adjacent to the project.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated
July 11, 1990, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated
by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with
the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule
in effect at the time of building permit application.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated May
25, 1983.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone
6 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on September 2,
1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
PC PESO NO. 3018 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Approval of CT 90-23 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 90-23 and HDP 90-
29.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land
use designation for this development is Residential Medium. The Growth Control
Point for this designation is 6 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the General
Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of
these parcels must also include all parcels under the General Plan and Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.”
The applicant shall establish a homeowner+ association and corresponding
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading
or building permits, whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The developer shah install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along
all private and public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad
standards. The trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree
LiSf.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the
Planning Department.
Treesshal.lbe15gallonorlargerand minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallon.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual
PC RESO NO. 3018 -5-
. .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
importance or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design
shah promote water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
Prior to recordation of a fhal map, the applicant shall submit detailed perimeter
wall and landscaping plans along Alicante Road for lots 3,4,9 and 10. These plans
shall provide for views for the residences across Alicante Road to the maximum
extent possible without compromising the privacy and safety of adjacent residents
within the Fairways project. Said plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes frrst, a soils
report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report
indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two
phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid
PC RESO NO. 3018 -6-
I
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department.
Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of
existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal
for approval.
An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with “Knox” key operated override
switch, as specified by the Fire Department.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall
have posted “No Parking/Fire Lane - Tow Away Zone” pursuant to Section
17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the
City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers,
and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department
for approval prior to construction.
The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the Water District Engineer
and the City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to
preparation of the water system improvement plans.
The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permits.
Existing water lines and easements at the easterly and westerly ends of the project
shall be relocated as necessary.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -7-
. .
. _
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
46. The project irrigation system shall be designed to easily adapt to a reclaimed water
system.
47. The recreatioual vehicle storage area is temporary. When the permanent facility is
completed at Axroyo La Costa the onsite Fairways facility shall be removed and
restored to a landscape open space which may include passive recreation.
48. Design details not spec%cally denoted as a part of this application shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
Engineering Conditions:
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the
final map.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any
clearing or grading of the site.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuance
of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive approval
for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued a grading
permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with the
approved grading plans.
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic
plan be submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar or similar drafting
film and shall become a permanent record.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the developer
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either amend tentative
map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project site in a
manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined
by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading
permit issued for any borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site
PC EIESO NO. 3018 -8-
, - .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chap 11.06.
56. The developer shall place the following notes on the final map:
Geotechnical Caution:
A. Slopes steeper than two parts horizontal to one part vertical exist within the
boundaries of this subdivision.
B. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in
interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from
any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground water
seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or
adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or
maintenance.
57. The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project.
58. Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming
Master Drainage Plan Update.
59. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
sh& be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Alicante Road and Corte de la Vista shall be waived on the final map.
60. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map
in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree to install
and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
61. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of final map
approval, whichever occurs first.
62. All conditions listed above require a right of way permit, traffic control plan and
appropriate securities prior to issuance of any building permit.
63. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
64. The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to approval of final map for this project. The structural section of
all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City, and
the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to
approval of the final map for this project.
65. The developer shall install a wheelchair ramp at the public street corner abutting
the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to occupancy of any buildings.
66. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
67. This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase.
68. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the easements
within the subdivision and all the private streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm
drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the units within the
subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included with the
the tentative map and the following improvements:
k All improvement required to serve this subdivision, as shown on the tentative
I-P.
B.
C.
Relocation of sewer and water facilities as required by the respective districts.
Replacement of half width frontage improvements on Alicante Road and Corte De La Vista found to be defective during the design process and/or
construction period.
A note to this effect shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final map per
the provisions of Sections 66434.2 and 66445 of the Subdivision Map Act.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -lO-
I -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
CC&R’s subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the improvement
plancheck process.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. tn approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The secondary access road at the southeast end of the project shall be gated and
locked in accordance with the requirements of the fire ma&al.
The developer shall offer to dedicate right-of-way, slope and drainage easements for
the future extension of Corte de la Vita and the future realignment of the
emergency access road. Said offer and design shall be to the approval of the City
Engineer. The offer shall be made by certificate on the final map for this project.
All lands so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances and without cost to the City.
Prior to building permit issuance a deed restriction shall be placed on all lots in the
project to notify potential owners that Corte de la Vista may be extended and the
emergency access road realigned.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an
individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R%.
PC RESO NO. 3018 -ll-
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
“PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3018 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNINGCOMhtIISSIONRESOLUTIONNO.3019
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A 149 LOT SUBDMSION ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LA VISTA AND
EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA COSTA GOLF
COURSE.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: PUD 90-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, according to map thereof filed in the
office of the County Recorder of san Diego County on October
10, 1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of October, 1990,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of PUD 90-23, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
,
, .
1 - .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
. . .
. . .
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of
4.0 du’s/acre is within the density range of 4-8 du’s/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 6.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the San
Marcos School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s Planned Development Ordinance
and also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General
Plan.
PC PESO NO. 3019 -2-
L
. 1
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
14.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 31, 1990
and Recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on October 3, 1990.
In recommending approval of this Negative Declaration the Planning Commission
has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures
and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project
could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the Citys Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of Planning Co mm&ion Resolution No. 3018 for CX 90-23 are
applicable to this approval and incorporated through this reference.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
PC RESO NO. 3019 -3-
s f . .
I - .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
None.
Commissioner Erwin.
None. _ . ._._--.I
&@-w
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: _
PC RESO NO. 3019 -4-
. - II I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PUNNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LA
VISTA EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA
COSTA GOLF COURSE.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: HDP 90-29
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to
map thereof filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on October 10,
1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of October, 1990,
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 90-29, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1 .
. I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinas:
1. That those areas of 40% slope have been identified and new slopes onsite will be
designated as open space.
2. That the proposed project is consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements
of the Hillside Ordinance.
3. That the development is consistent with the provisions of Section 2153.230 and
240 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code.
4. That the site has been disturbed by previously approved grading.
5. That remedial grading which is exempted from the provisions of the Hillside
Ordinance is necessary to stabilize the existing conditions for residential
development.
6. That the site is impacted by unusual geotechnical and soils conditions that
necessitate corrective work which results in slopes greater than 30 feet.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted for HDP 90-29, as shown on Exhibits “A” - T-I”, dated October
3, 1990, incorporated by reference and on f!ile in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any
proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval
as determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this
Hillside Development Permit.
All conditions of Planning Co mmission Resolution No. 3018 for CT 90-23 are
applicable to this approval and incorporated through this reference.
The grading as proposed, shall occur substantially as shown on Exhibits “C, D, E”
dated October 3,199O.
PC RESO NO. 3020 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2'i
2E
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 1989, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: A/
Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
None.
Commissioner Erwin.
None.
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
B n I ’ PLANNINQ DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3020 -3-
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
OCTOBER 3,199O
PLANNING COMMISSION 0 1
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
CX 9@23/PUD 90-23A-IDP 90-29 - FAIRWAYS - A request for approval of a 149 lot
Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development Permit
for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 6 located south of Carte de la Vista, east of
Alicante Road and north of the La Costa Golf Course.
I. RECOMMENDATION
STAFFREPORT
APPL,. -I'IONCOMPLETE DATE:
JULY27. 1989
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3017 recommending
APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolution Nos. 3018, 3019 and 3020 recommending APPROVAL of CT 90-23, PUD
90-23 and HDP 90-29, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project site is vacant and has been previously graded into large pads that step down from Corte
de la Vista toward the La Costa Golf Course to the south. 8.15 acres of land have been deducted
from the gross acreage for density calculations. There are sewer and water easements which run
from north to south in the central portion and the westerly end of the site. Single family homes
(Alicante Hills) exist to the north and condominiums (the Jockey Club and Spyglass Point) exist
to the west and northwest.
The project is 149 lots with 132 single family detached homes. Proposed homes range in size from
1,900 to 2,900 square feet. There are four floor-plans, three of which are two story models. The
two story models have three car garages and the single story model has a two car garage. The
Monterey, Mediteranian and Ranch architectural styles are typical for southern California. Materials
include stucco, wood trim, concrete tile roofs, and stone veneer.
The project is proposed as a gated neighborhood. There is one main entrance/exit located off of
Corte de la Vista. A second entrance which is for emergency access only is located at the easterly
end of the site and connects to the terminus of Carte de la Vista. That access will be gated at the
Carte de la Vista right-of-way and at the beginning of the access road onsite.
The property is zoned as residential density-multiple and density is proposed at 4.0 units per acre.
The growth control point is 6 DU’s and the General Plan range is 4-8 dwelling units per acre. This
project is subject to the following:
1. The Planned Development Ordinance.
2. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 6.
3. Hillside Development Ordinance.
.
CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP YL -3 - FAIRWAYS ? - ’ OCTOBER 3, 1990
PAGE 2
III.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ANALYSIS
Does the project comply with the goals and policies of the General Plan?
Is the application of the Planned Development Ordinance justified?
Does the project comply with the development and design standards of the Planned
Development Ordinance?
Does the project satisfy the requirements of Local Facilities Management Zone 6?
Is the proposed grading within acceptable levels as identified in the Hillside Development
Ordinance?
Has the project been reviewed under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality
Act?
General Plan
The land use goal is to provide orderly, functional and compatible development. Medium density
is characterized in the General Plan by small lot single family homes or townhouses, duplexes and
triplexes and low density apartment developments at 4-10 dwelling units per acre. The Fairways
is a small to moderate size lot single family development which can be considered a transitional
residential land use from higher intensity condominiums to larger estate lots.
Planned DeveloDment Ordinance
The Planned Development Ordinance was used to allow for transitional single family lots less than
7,500 square feet and a gated neighborhood design with private streets. Lot sizes range from 4,800
to 15,800 sq. ft. The larger lots include slope areas which account for the difference in lot sizes.
The transitional lot sizes are appropriate because of the single family residential development to
the north and condominium development to the west.
Access to the Fairways is from the primary entry off of Corte de la Vista which includes a turn
around and call box in front of rolling entry gates. The design allows for visitor stacking and
resident through traffic. Special paving and landscaping will be used at the entry to create a project
statement. The interior circulation system is a loop with cul-de-sacs. Curb to curb street widths
are 36’ except for a 600 foot section of street “B” and all of street “G” which are 32’. The 36’ street
width allows for parking on both sides of the street and the 32’ width restricts parking to one side.
Recreational open space is required at 200 sq. ft. per unit which includes private and common
facilities. As a single family detached product, a common active area is not required but common
passive is required. The open space requirements are satisfied by providing usable private yards for
each residence of approximately 15’ x 50’ and greater . In addition to the private yards, 7
community pocket parks totalling 38,490+ square feet are provided throughout the development
which far exceeds the total of 26,600 combined square feet required by the code. Linking the parks
together are sidewalks along the private streets and walking paths within the manufactured slope
which faces the golf course. The walking paths will be improved to serve double duty as drainage
facilities which will inhibit slope erosion.
l CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDI 2.. L9 - FAIRWAYS I . OCTOBER 3,199O
PAGE 3
As developer of the Villages of La Costa, the applicant has requested to provide 2,700 sq. ft. of
recreational vehicle storage offsite within the area designated as Arroyo La Costa. If it is acceptable
to the Planning Commission, an onsite temporary storage area would be provided but removed
when the Arroyo La Costa recreational vehicle storage yard is operational. This provision has been
included in the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan and on the Fairways Site Plan.
Individual storage areas are provided through two and three car garages ranging from 400 to 600
square feet.
All structures have a frontyard setback of at least 20 feet from the back of sidewalk and sideyard
setbacks vary from a 5’ minimum to 15’. Typical building height to the peak of the two story
models is 26 feet. Building configurations comply with the small lot architectural guidelines by
varying roof heights and staggering first and second floors. Building fronts and rears have been
articulated with a variety of materials and architectural elements. Selected side elevations have
been upgraded with additional windows and articulation to take advantage of views and provide
better presentation of side elevations when they are exposed to the street. Guest parking can be
provided either in driveways or on either side of the 36 foot wide private streets when it does not
obstruct driveways. .
The concept of the Planned Unit Development is evident by the amenities that have been provided
within the development in the form of open space, enhanced paving and upgraded architectural
elements. A pedestrian circulation system was developed which links project significant open spaces
as destinations to encourage pedestrian movement. Different types of outdoor recreation are
provided on the individual open space “pocket parks” which include tot lot and putting green.
Elements such as a separation planting strip in the driveway and single and double car garage doors
help to break up the “garage door” streetscape.
Local Facilities Management Plan
The subject property is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 6. The impacts on
public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted performance
standards are summarized below:
Compliance
Facility Impacts with standard
City Administrative Facilities
Library
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
~;~o~ace
Sewer Collection System
Water Redistribution System
489.25 sq. ft.
261.09 sq. ft.
132 EDU’s
.97 acres
101.7 CFS
1320 ADTs
Fire Station no. 2 & 6
4.94 acres
24 students
132 EDU’s
29,040 GPD
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The project is 65 dwelling units below the Growth Management allowance.
- . . CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDh , -9 - FAIRWAYS I , OCTOBER 3,199O
PAGE 4
Hillside DeveloDment Ordinance
The site was previously graded into large pads. A geotechnical study was done of the earlier
disturbance and it was determined that extensive amounts of remedial grading is necessary to
stabalize the project for development. The original grading quantity was approximately 384,300
cubic yards which translates to 9353 cubic yards per graded acre. The total estimated amount for
this project is 264,800 cubic yards which will be distributed and recompacted onsite. The total
number of cubic yards graded per acre will be approximately 6730. This figure is below the 7999
cubic yards allowed as acceptable per the Hillside development ordinance.
As part of the Hillside review, a slope analysis was provided by the applicant which identified
percentage of slopes. Those slopes in excess of 40% were excluded from density calculations and
those slopes from 25% to 40% received only half credit for density. The result is 32.94 usable
acres. Some centralized manufactured slopes have been exempted from preservation as areas
previously disturbed by authorized grading. The project design meets the intent of the Hillside
Development Guidelines in that the project pad elevations step down and away from the highest
points at Corte de la Vista and grading quantities are within acceptable levels.
There is an interior slope which exceeds 30 feet as much as 4 feet in height. However, the slope
is broken up by 48” retaining walls which creates three smaller slopes. This occurs below lots 138
through 143. This property is also unique because of its pregraded status, unusual soil conditions
and the need for remedial grading. The project grading design meets the intent of the ordinance
and the Planning Commission may approve the slope heights with a finding that the project site is
impacted by unusual soil conditions that necessitate corrective work.
Retaining walls onsite are held at a maximum of 48”. Where additional height is needed, stepped
walls have been used with landscaped separations. There are four locations where this occurs. The
minimum distance between these double walls is 11 feet. Because the combination retaining walls
require a greater depth to take up the grade the result is closer to a natural slope than either a crib
wall or single retaining wall. Buildings are setback from 15 to 30 feet from the top of slope. The
majority of buildings are at 15 feet. Views of the project will be predominantly from across the golf
course to the south. Views from the toe of slope are obstructed by mature trees which exist on the
golf course and at the toe of slope. With the combination of 15’ - 30’ building setbacks, upgraded
rear elevation detailing and distant vantage points the project complies with the intent and
guidelines for architecture under the Hillside Development Ordinance.
Iv. ENimoNMENTALREvIEw
An initial study was completed to review environmental impacts to the site and surrounding area
as a result of the proposed development. At the rime of the survey no biologically significant
species or habitat were identified. However, since that time a nesting pair of Blacktailed
Gnatcathers has been sited. A study on file with the Planning Department, was prepared pursuant
to the siting by ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co. At the recommendation of the study
biologist a mitigation program was developed which will require that an off site 9.7 acre nesting
habitat be provided. The applicant proposes to use acreage adjacent to the La Costa High School
in the southeast quadrant of the City. That site has been guaranteed by the School District. The
proposed mitigation site has Gnatcatcher habitat which would indicate that it is a suitable location
for mitigation.
- . . CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDI , A9 - FAIRWAYS
, OCTOBER 3,199O
PAGE 5 _
This site was reviewed for environmental issues under another application, CT 82-1.5. That
condominium project was approved and environmental documents were issued. The site was then
graded per those approvals. Under the current review no other significant environmental issues
were identified. With the implementation of this mitigation measure the Planning Director
determined that no significant environmental impacts will result from this project and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration was issued on August 31, 1990. With the inclusion of the Blacktailed
Gnatcatcher habitat Mitigation staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Summary
In summary the proposal: 1) is in conformance with the Planned Development Ordinance and
Design Guidelines; 2) complies with the Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan; and 3) is
consistent with the intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance. Therefore staff recommends
approval of CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. 10.
Planning Commission Resolution 3017
Planning Commission Resolution 3018
Planning Commission Resolution 3019
Planning Commission Resolution 3020
Location Map
Disclosure Form
Background Data Sheet
Local facilities Impacts Assessment form
Letter dated August 29,199O from Eric J. Hall
Exhibits “A” - “II” Dated October 3, 1990.
cw:km
September 7, 1990
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPUCAms STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPUCAnONS I i
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CllY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED
BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITIEE.
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Amlicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interestdf tgfI$vplication. The Fieldstone Company 5465 Morehouse Dr. #250 San Diego,
.
2. owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved,
The Fieldstone Company 5465 Morehouse Drive 11250 San Diego, CA 92121
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ar4
addresses of all individuals owning more than 1096 of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnersh:
ir#z;$F 8=phe, pftntrshg. orp rate Plaza Newport Beach, CA 92660
Keith Johnson,. 5465 Morehouse Dr #250 San Diego, CA 92121
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names an
addresses of any person sewing as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiar
of the trust.
(Over)
+ BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
. , CASENO: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
APPLICANT: FAIRWAYS
REQUEST AND LOCATION: ADDrOd of 149 lot subdivision for 132 single familv homes located
south of Carte de la Vista and east of Alicante Road, north of La Costa golf course
LEGAL, DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of uarcel map no. 11722 in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San
Dieao, according to map thereof filed in the office of the countv recorder of San Dieno Countv on
October 10. 1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records.
APN: 216-130-61
Acres 41.09 ac Proposed No. of Lots/Units 149 lots/132 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation Residential Medium
Density Allowed 4-8 units ner acre Density Proposed 4 units per acre .
Existing Zone Residential De&Xv-MuhinIe Proposed Zone Residential Den&-MuhiuIe
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
zoning Land Use
Site RD-M R&l - Vacant
North RD-M RLM - Single Familv Residential
south PC OS - Golf Course
East PC OS - Vacant
West RD-M RMH - Muhi-Familv
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Saii Marcos Water Carlsbad Sewer Leucadia
EDU’s 132 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date JuIv 11. 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative Declaration, issued
- E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Mitigated Negative Declaration issued August 31. 1990
CW:klll
. .
710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024-3357 619/753-6491
.San. Dlepto
Union High School District
August 29, 1990
Mr. Michael Holzmiller
Planning Director
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: CT 90-23/Fairways
Confirmation of Offsite Environmental Mitigation
Dear Mr. Holzmiller:
We understand the City is requesting Fieldstone/La Costa
Associates guaranty its ability to provide offsite environmental
mitigation for the loss of 9.7 acres of California Gnatcatcher
habitat found on the Fairways site.
On December 8, 1990, San Dieguito Union High School District and
Fieldstone/La Costa Associates entered into an agreement where
the district acquired fee title to approximately 31 acres of land
surrounding the new La Costa High School building site. As part
of that agreement, the district agreed to permit Fieldstone's use
of the area to mitigate effects of Fieldstone's development
activity elsewhere on its La Costa Properties.
Concerning .the Fairways project and the proposed mitigation, we
have reviewed the biologist's map showing a proposed mitigation
area of approximately 9.7 acres along the southerly edge of the
property. A copy of this map is enclosed, and we believe it is
the same map you have reviewed.
The purpose of this letter is to confirm to the City of Carlsbad
that the identification of the proposed mitigation site and its
preservation to conserve the habitat located on it are consistent
with the agreement between the district and Fieldstone. Therefore,
the district guarantees to the City the preservation of that site.
AlSO, the district recognizes that the 9.7 acre site is intended
for the mitigation of the Fairways project (CT 90-23) and cannot
be used for additional gnatcatcher mitigation that may be required
of other projects proposed by the'fieldstone Company or the San
Dieguito Union High School District.
We trust this letter will satisfy your requirements, but if you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours? /
Eric J. Hall, Director
Administrative Services
mh
Enclosure
Cl-I-Y OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGFMENT PROGRAM
IDCAL FAcILlTLEs IMPACTS ASSEssMF,NT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: THE MRWAYS CT 9@23/PLJD 9&2.1/flDP 90-29
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 6 GENERAL P-e
ZONING: R.WlX.NTTAl. DW’WT’Y Ml.Kl3’T.E -
DEVELOPER’S NAME: THE FWRSlXXUE CQMPAW
. ADDRESS: -MOREHOUSE-- CA 9213.1
PHONE NO.: 6J9-.54MQ8l ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.:-1 30-61
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 4L0-i . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire:
Open Space:
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided -
Acreage Required -
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD -
49zisq. ft.
.97acreS
loi.7oCFS
A&&a Costa golf course)
132(lT
-acres
4.94 acres
243udents
,w(Lcadia)
The project is 65 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
MlNUTtj
Meeting of: PLANNING COMMISSION
Time of Meeting: 6:OO p.m. Date of Meeting: October 3, 1990
Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Schramm called the Meeting to order at 6:04 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Holmes.
ROLL CALL:
Present - Chairman Schramm, Commissioners Hall, Holmes, Marcus, McFadden, and Schlehuber
Absent - Commissioner Erwin
Staff Members Present:
Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director
Chris DeCerbo, Senior Planner Michael Grim, Assistant Planner Christer Westman, Associate Planner Jeff Gibson, Associate Planner Bobbie Hoder, Senior Management Analyst Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer David Hauser, Assistant City Engineer Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer Sherri Howard, Associate Engineer
PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES:
Chairman Schramm reviewed the Planning Commission procedures on the overhead for-the benefit of the audience.
COMMENTS FROM THR AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED IN THE AGENDA:
There were no comments from the audience.
MINUTFS:
Chairman Schraaua requested a minor revision to the minutes of September 19, 1990 on page 11, last paragraph, line 1, to replace the word "to" with the word "behind."
The Planning Commission approved the minutes of
September 19, 1990 as corrected.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
1) CT 90-23/PUD 90-23fHDP 90-29 - FAIRWAYS - A request for approval of a 149 lot Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development Permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6 located south of Corte de la Vista, east of Alicante Road and north of the La Costa Golf Course.
Christer Westman, Associate Planner, directed attention to two handouts opposing the Fairways project: (1) a letter
dated June 20, 1990 from Susan and Kevin Hudson, and (2) a letter dated July 3, 1990 from Tim and Marion Manalca representing the Alicante Hills Homeowners Association, both of which will be on file in the Planning Department.
Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm
MINUTti
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Westman reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a 149 lot project to build 132 single family detached homes. The site
is located at the corner of Alicante Road and Corte de la Vista in the La Costa area. The total project site is 41.09 acres and the General Plan designation is residential-medium with a density range of 4-g du's/acre. The growth control point for that plan designation is 6 du's/acre. The zoning on the property is residential density-multiple.
As proposed, the project has 4 du'sfacre and will be used as a transitional project. There are larger estate lots and a lower density project up the hill from the project. However, as you travel through the Fairways westerly, there are several condominium projects that have varying densities.
The project is proposed as a gated community. The gate design is single access off Corte de la Vista and it provides a turnaround area at the entrance. The location of the single access was dictated by staff. The original proposal came in with an access off Alicante Road; however, for traffic safety purposes, staff requested that the entrance be moved to Corte de la Vista.
The project is a single family detached with four floor plans and three different elevations. The architectural styles are Monterey, Mediterranean, and Ranch. There is one single story model and three two-story models. The square footage ranges from 1,900 to 2,900 s.f. Typical building height to the peak of the two story models is 26 ft. and 19 ft. for the single story. Side-yard setbacks throughout the project range from 10 to 30 ft. with the average being 16 ft. There is a minimum 5 ft. requirement for a small lot subdivision for side yard setbacks. Approximately 58% of the project has a 16 ft. or less side yard setback.
Pad elevations on the project step down from Corte de la Vista. The project up the hill is Alicante Hills and the average distance from the pad elevations of Alicante Hills to the pad elevations of the Fairways project is about 45 ft. Most of the units on Corte de la Vista are 30 ft. below street level but a few are at 7 ft. The Spyglass Pointe homeowners requested that the wall along Alicante Road be modified for view preservation. They spoke with the applicant who has agreed to a new condition to revise the perimeter wall plans along Alicante Road for lots 3, 4, 9 and LO subject to review and approval by the Planning Director.
An environmental analysis was done on the project site and there were some Gnatcatcher habitats identified late in the process. An offsite mitigation has been suggested by professional biologists which takes a 9 acre site adjacent to the new high school in La Costa and the recently approved Ranch0 Verde project and identifies those 9 acres as being a habitat preservation site. Staff recommends approval of the project with the mitigated Negative Declaration and the added condition for modification of the perimeter wall along Alicante Road.
Chairman Schramm inquired if there were other requests from Spyglass homeowners other than reduction of the 6 ft. perimeter wall. Mr. Westman was aware of no other concerns.
Commissioner McFadden referred to the conrment made by Eric J. Hall, Director of Administrative Services for the San Dieguito Unified School District, in his letter dated
. - MlNUTi-6
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 COMMISSIONERS
August 29, 1990, that the 9.7 acres is intended for mitigation of the Fairways project and cannot be used for additional Gnatcatcher mitigation. She inquired if this was correct. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that Mr. Hall's letter is correct and it will also be stated in the deed restrictions for the Fairways property.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, commented that Resolution
No. 3017 approves the mitigated Negative Declaration and to avoid any question in the future, he recommended adding words
to the last sentence of Condition 111 on page 2, to read: ,t . ..open space/conservation easement incorporating the
mitigation plan in favor of the City...".
Commissioner McFadden inquired where the 7 ft. pad elevations are located. Christer Westman, Associate Planner, replied that the lots start low at the corner of Alicante and Corte de la Vista at 33 ft. below the street and as the lots move closer to the entrance on Corte de la Vista they reach 18, 17, 16, 14, 7, and 4 ft. (which would be the lot closest to
the entrance). Then, moving easterly, the lot on the other side of the entrance would be 6 ft. rising to 9, 12, 16, 19,
21, and then out into the 30 ft. ranges again. Mr. Westman identified the lots on the overhead map. There are some pad
elevations near the emergency access which are at 90 and 100 ft. above sea level.
Commissioner Holmes referred to page 9 of the EIA which states that the project is a phased development. Page 10 of Resolution No. 3018 states that the project is a single phase. Mr. Westman replied that the phasing refers to buildout. Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer, added that the grading and infrastructure is being built at once but the housing units may be built in phases.
Chairman Schraxxn opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Doug Avis, 6670 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, representing the Fieldstone Company, addressed the Conrmission and stated that originally this site was a dumping ground for the golf course which resulted in a lot of fill dirt that was ultimately graded. The infrastructure went in but the site sat dormant. In 1982. the City approved a 490 unit condominium project on the property. At that time, it had a General Plan designation of lo-20 units per acre. In 1986, the City Council reduced the density to 4-g du's/acre. After meeting with homeowners in the area, Fieldstone placed special emphasis on the following issues:
. Location of the driveway. The road exiting the project must be elevated somewhat in order to be able to drive out of the project. They attempted to put it in a
location opposite the most open space, i.e. Alicante Hills. Mr. Avis produced an exhibit which shows how the
headlights would affect existing homeowners.
Interim RV storage. An interim RV storage site was placed within this project because this project will
come on line prior to Arroyo. The RV storage will
ultimately be moved to Arroyo.
. Gated community. A private gate is being requested because there will be no through traffic, either pedestrian or vehicular.
MlNUTlj ,
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 COMMISSIONERS y
. View blockage. There is a standing verbal agreement
that no building will be higher than 26 ft. They have reduced the height of the block wall and plan to construct certain sections of the wall with a see-through portion (glass or wrought iron) for view preservation.
Mr. Avis showed a 10 minute slide presentation of the Fairways project for the benefit of the Commission and the audience.
Commissioner McFadden inquired how long before the RV storage
will be available in Arroyo. Mr. Avis replied that it would be approximately l-2 years. The Fairways project is located in LFMP Zone 6; however, Arroyo is in LFMP Zones 11 and 12 and there is significant infrastructure which needs to be completed in Zones 11 and 12 before Arroyo can be started.
Commissioner Holmes requested Pat O'Day of O'Day Consultants to answer a question regarding Exhibit H. Section gA, and if elevations were shot across Alicante Road from the Alicante Hills Development. He is especially interested in the elevations of Lots 3, 4, 9, and 10 which back up to Alicante and can be viewed from Spyglass.
Pat O'Day, O'Day Consultants, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that Exhibit H was based on an aerial photograph which is accurate within a couple feet of
elevation. The topo map is constructed and pad elevations are designed based on the aerial. The pad elevations of lots 9, 10, and 11 are 66, 72, and 77 ft with the road height at 78, 84, and 94 ft. -Across the street the pads are from 7-10 ft. below the road.
Commissioner McFadden noted that the pad elevations which Mr. O'Day referred to are for the garages. The living areas are above the garage so four of the homes would block the views.
Reg Kobzi, 7480 Alicante Road, Carlsbad, President of the Spyglass VIII Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission and stated that their area is separate from the
Spyglass development down below. They have paid a $25,000 to $30,000 premium for their views and feel the views will be blocked by the Fairways project. They are concerned that they were never noticed about the Fairways project nor were they contacted by Fieldstone regarding possible mitigation on view blockage. He referred to a letter to Michael Holzmiller dated September 24, 1990 which is on file in the Planning Department. He submitted photographs to the Commission on
which a line was drawn at the 6 ft. level to show how their views will be impacted. Those photographs will be on file in
the Planning Department. The Spyglass VIII Homeowners Association wishes to go on record that they are opposed to the block wall on the Fairways project due to the view blockage. They do not feel the wall is necessary. No other
project in the area, except the Jockey Club, has a wall. The homeowners association is requesting that landscaping be of a low-lying nature in order to protect the views. Their final concern is about noise due to the additional cars traveling on Alicante as a result of this project.
Chairman Schramm inquired if the association could accept a perimeter wall of 5 ft. instead of 6 ft. Mr. Kobzi replied
that they are also opposed to a 5 ft. wall because of the view impacts. The homeowners do not feel a wall is
. MlNUTti
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 COMMISSIONERS y
necessary. No other project in the area, except the Jockey Club, has a wall.
David Berry, 2841 Torry Court, Carlsbad, addressed the Conunission and stated that he is opposed to the Fairway project because he feels the entrance is in a bad location. He would like to see the entrance located in the area of the interim RV storage. He feels that the hilly terrain of Corte de la Vista is dangerous because it is difficult to see oncoming cars.
Jon Coombs, 7348 El Fuerte Street, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he is opposed to the Fairway project because of the additional impact on schools and
would like to know how many children are projected for the elementary school. He is also concerned about: 1) additional traffic at Alicante and Alga; (2) trees which will grow to 80 ft. in 5-10 years and block views; (3) water shortages because everyone must sacrifice their water to accommodate all of the additional building being done by Fieldstone; (4) overall density which should be reduced to that of Alicante Hills to compensate for past mistakes.
Thomas A. Mass, 2851 Torry Court, Carlsbad, representing the Alicante Hills Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission and stated that he is opposed to the Fairway project because of the entrance on Corte de la Vista. He believes that Alicante Road would be more safe because it is
difficult to see oncoming vehicles at the intersection of Alicante and Corte de la Vista unless there is a traffic light. He requested that Commissioners drive that intersection themselves to see the problem firsthand. Further, he opposes the additional traffic caused by more homes being built because it will change the entire character of the area.
Commissioner Hall inquired where Mr. Mass would like to have the entrance located. He replied that it should be moved
back to Alicante between the entrance of the Jockey Club and Corte de la Vista.
Judith A. Field, 2841 Torry Court, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that she is opposed to the Fairway project because she is concerned about the entrance. She agrees with the comments made about the safety concerns. Further, she feels that both the Spyglass and Alicante developments are adversely affected because there is only one exit from the Fairways project. She believes there should be two exits.
Teresa Hilleary, 7488 Alicante Road, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that she is opposed to the Fairway project because she lives in a bottom unit adjacent to Alicante. She will probably be the most affected by the Fairways project because she must already keep her windows closed due to the noise. With an additional 1,000 ADT's, she will have much greater noise impacts. She knows that Fieldstone is aware of a sound problem or they would not be recommending sound attenuation walls. Unfortunately, the sound attenuation walls would not benefit her. vehicles currently turning at the intersection of Alicante and Corte de la Vista, shine their headlights directly into her living room. She is also concerned about roof heights. When
Fieldstone representatives met with her and her neighbors, they were not shown any drawings. She requested that any
structures be built below grade to protect her view, but her
MlNUTtj
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 COMMISSIONERS
biggest objection is the wall and she does not feel a reduction to 5 ft. will make any difference. She would like to see the wall eliminated. She feels that Fieldstone did not do a very good job of connnunicating with the surrounding residents.
Mr. Avis was given time to rebut comments. He feels that view is America's toughest land use issue. He does not know how to deal with the view issue other than try to be sensitive to it. It is impossible to protect 100% of the views. He feels the entry location is also a difficult
issue. He can accept the staff's judgement that Corte de la Vista may be a safer entrance location. He believes the density for Fairways is quite low and as far as school impacts, Fieldstone projects only 24 students will be generated by the project. He sympathixes with Teresa Hilleary's noise problem because her home could not be built without a wall by todays standards.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the street tree designated for Alicante. Mr. Avis replied that street trees would comply with the City ordinances. A detailed landscape
plan will be presented with the final map.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if the reason for the wall is noise. Mr. Avis replied that the wall is being built as a backyard perimeter for the privacy of the homeowners.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Schrannn declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, commented that the Engineering staff should be allowed to comment on the safety issue regarding the entrance on Corte de la Vista.
Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer, stated that staff requested the entrance be moved from Alicante Road to Corte de la Vista for the following reasons:
f Safety. The traffic engineer visited the site and determined the stopping site distance to be 295 ft. coming up the hill approaching the intersection of Alicante and Corte de la Vista. This exceeds the requirement for the posted speed of 35 mph. There are
presently weeds growing in the area which would be removed with the Fairways project and that should
increase the site distance.
. Compliance with City standards. City standards for a secondary arterial require that access be limited to streets where no other public access is available. Therefore, the access on Corte de la Vista would be the preferred location.
Commissioner McFadden requested staff to coarment on the water issue. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that the project meets the City's growth management standards. Those standards require a letter from the water district which states that the project is in compliance. The standard requires a LO-day water storage capacity. Supply is not required to be addressed since it is a regional problem.
Commissioner Schlehuber requested staff to explain growth management as it applies to traffic. Bob Wojcik, Principal
MlNUTtii
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 COMMISSIONERS ’
Engineer, stated that the intersection of Alicante and Alga already has a traffic signal. Growth management requires a level of service of "D" at peak hours which means there would
be some waiting. There is a monitoring system to make sure that level of service is not exceeded. At present, that intersection is not even close to a "D" level at peak hours.
Chairman Schranxn requested staff to show the location of the interim RV storage lot on the overhead. Christer Westman, Associate Planner, stated that the PHD Ordinance requires RV storage based on the number of units. When the Arroyo project is completed, the RV storage will be moved to another location and the interim lot will be converted to a park.
Chairman Schramm requested staff to read the proposed condition for the wall. Christer Westman, Associate Planner, read the proposed condition as follows:
Prior to recordation of a final map, the applicant shall submit detailed perimeter wall plans along Alicante Road for Lots 3, 4, 9 and 10. These plans shall provide for views for the residences across Alicante Road to the maximum extent possible without compromising the privacy and safety of adjacent residents within the Fairways project. Said plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.
Chairman Schramm inquired if this condition would address
trees which block views. Mr. Westman replied that the condition does not address trees and it would require different verbiage.-
Commissioner Schlehuber requested that Mr. Avis comment on the other options along Alicante. Doug Avis, representing Fieldstone, addressed the Commission and stated that some barrier is needed to keep the public out of private rear yards. Barriers are typically wooden but Fieldstone would prefer a theme wall with periodic landscaping.
Chairman Schramm inquired if Fieldstone would agree to wording in the proposed condition to limiting the
landscaping. Mr. Avis replied that the words "and
landscaping" could be added after "perimeter wall" which would be acceptable to Fieldstone.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired how high the view portion of the wall would be. Mr. Avis replied that it would be 2 ft.
Commissioner McFadden inquired why only one driveway was proposed since it seems to make good sense to have two driveways. Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer, stated that the reason for only one entrance is the grade difference of the pad between Corte de la Vista down into the project. Another entrance would exceed the grading limit for dirt removal and it would eliminate two lots.
Commissioner Schlehuber sympathises with the issues which have been presented by the audience. However, he can accept the staff reasoning for the entrance on Corte de la Vista. He feels that this project has been scaled down considerably and is reasonable. He thinks the perimeter fencing is needed and that the 2 ft. view portion will protect the homeowners as well as help to mitigate the view impacts.
Commissioner Marcus commented that this could have been developed at a much greater density and is a nice project on
. -.
. - /QlRu/Aff
. Change Condition No. 46 to read:
“The project irrigation system shall be designed to easily adapt
to a reclaimed water system and when reclaimed water is
available, the project shall connect and use said reclaimed
water system.”
Add to Condition No. 47 the following:
“Prior to final map, the applicant shall bond in an amount to be
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director for the
removal of the recreation vehicle storage area and conversion -
to an open space lot.” Prior to recordation of a final map, the
applicant shall also provide a written agreement from the owner
of the Arroyo La Costa property (CT 88-3) that 2,660 square
feet of R.V. parking will be set aside for use by the homeowners
of the Fairways project in perpetuity. Said agreement shall be
subject to the approval of the Planning Director and City
Attorney.
Change Condition No. 27 to read:
“Prior to recordation of a final map, the applicant shall submit
detailed perimeter wall plans along Aiicante Road for lots 3, 4, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. These plans shall provide for a
view wail for the residences across Alicante Road. The wall
shall be constructed of wrought iron not to exceed 5 feet 4
Inches in height or a combination of wrought iron with a
maximum 2 feet high solid base. Pilasters shall be spaced as
far apart as practical.
- . .
FAIRWAYS - PROPOSED REVISED VIEW WALL CONDITlON z&77
Prior to recordation of a final map, the applicant shall submit detailed perimeter wall plans along Alicante Road for lots 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16. These plans shall provide for
views for the residences across Alicante Road to the maximum extent possible without
compromising the privacy and safety of adjacent residents within the Fairways project. Said
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.
. -
.
z
G-- -6 .
lb” I+ bbu,
J 2 -0::
Section -
I Not To Scale
a ‘\ j$F? 5 \ ..1 -2qy b-9 . Q i =G $ -7 L-r ” *- pii-:b- 2- I
p$ $- 8 ; 1;:: ;.’ ,, I '1
* .
:
I . I ! .;
;. . I
iL=A I
. . i .I
: L
‘.’
.: :
.
December 14, 1990
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: Planning Director
SUBJECT: FAIRWAYS AGENDA BILL/DECEMBER 18,199O
In preparing the agenda bill for Fairways, the two items listed below were inadvertently omitted:
Page 8 of the Planning Commission minutes, reflecting the Commission vote and final
discussion.
Letter from Susan and Kevin Hudson.
We have sent sufficient copies to the City Manager for each Council member. Copies are being sent
under separate cover to yourself and City Attorney.
Ms-
Michael J. HoIzmiller
Planning Director
Attach
MINUTE;
\
\ a
October 3, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 COMMISSIONERS
. .
a difficult piece of property. She can accept the staff explanation for the entrance on Corte de la Vista. She will support the project.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that the Commission must accept the staff's recommendation for the entrance on Corte de la
Vista or it uould create a much greater liability issue to the City.
Commissioner McFadden will support the project. She feels it is a good resolution to a difficult piece of land. She would
prefer two entrances, both on Corte de la Vista, but will accept the staff recommendation. She likes the the view wall
condition which has been proposed and the additional wording to the resolution for the mitigated Negative Declaration. She would like to see setback measurements shown on future
plans submitted by Fieldstone.
Commissioner Holmes likes the project in spite of the view
problems. The only way to guarantee a view is to have the lot closest to the view. He thinks this project is an excellent solution to a difficult piece of property. He sees
a lot of pluses and will support it.
Commissioner Hall agrees with the comments which have been
made but he, also, would have liked to see two entrances. He does like the entrance on Corte de la Vista and the overall design of the project.
Chairman Schramm appreciates the mix of single story and two
story. She would like to see the proposed condition include landscaping,and agrees with the other issues which have been
addressed, including the entrance on Corte de la Vista. She, also, would have liked to see a second entrance.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3017 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3018, 3019 and 3020 recommending approval of CT 90-23, PUD 90-23, and HDP 90-29, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein with the following additions: (1) add the words
"incorporating the mitigation plan" to Condition 1/l of Resolution No. 3017, and (2) add the wall condition and the words "and landscaping" to the view wall condition.
Facilities Management Zone 19.
Chris DeCerbo, Senior Planner,
of a condominium project on a 23.8
Hall
Holmes Marcus
McFadden Schlehuber
Schramm
_- - -_ _ _ -. _-7 --. - - _ - r --.--.‘. - _ _I . . )g zq, ,311 , = ::: “32 ;El..E=;L xi ; : 15 I-,,/.’ - .--_ Ski, -.=;- -,-, - I- I: A
TO BE READ BY THE PUNNING COMMISSION ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1990
AT THE 6 P.M. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMWSSION XIEE-I-ING.
Susan 44 Kevin Hudson
7398 Ahiva Place Carlsbad, CA 92009
June 20, 1990
C/O Mr. Gary Wayne
Assistant Planning Director
Carlsbad Planning Commission
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Ciirlsbod, CA 92008
Case File: CT 8946/PUD 89-7/HDP 89-44
Applicant: Fairway
Publish: ,May 24, 1990
Dear Members of the PIanning Commission:
We are strongly opposed to the proposed development of 133 singfe filmily homes
on 4 I .09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6. There
are maq reasons for our opposition, a few of which WC will list here. The primary reason
is ~1~1 the area is becoming overcrowded. Our streets and highways cannot handle the
collective flow of traffic as it is, not only during peak commute hours, bur throughout the
day. Second, continued deveIopment of the area will decrease water availability. Our warer
supply, sewers and waste management facilities are taxed beyond their limits--there is no
well informed person who can deny those facts. Third, the beautiful area north of the golf
cwrse woulJ be ruined by packing all of these tract homes into a tiny area, and the
proposed site, which is sloped, would intensify the homes’ crowded appearance. The custom
homes which currently surround the golf course on Almaden Way are more uniquely
designed to fit the ambience of rhe area. This developmenr is simply not suirahle for the
area surrounding La Costa Golf Course.
This parcel of land which cunnccts Box Canyon to the golf course is the only sect01
left in the area which is untouched by development. As with most new developments,
spacious yards are nonexistent since the developers cannot reap as much profit off the land.
If this land is developed, countless wildlife will be displaced and denied access to the golf
course’s trees and foliage.
Furthermore, how much growth can San Diego County take before we say enounh?
In one year we have seen our daily commure exrend from 30 minutes to over an hour each
Page I of 2
ALICFINTE HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCI&TION
JULY 3, 1990
TO: Carlsbad Planning Commission
SUBJECT: “THE FF\IRWAYS” HOUSING PROJECT
Builder: Fieldstone
We9 the owners of homes in filicante Hills, are very disturbed
about the proposed plan to have the entrance of the new
“Fairways” project located on Corte de la Vista. Each of us
has upwards of half a million dollars invested in our homes -
the primary feature of which is the view aspect facing Corte de
la Vista.
Much of the reason we paid such a high initial price was
because we bought “view” lots. Now9 with the news of this
project from Fieldstone - even before many of us have had time
tn hang the drapes - we find we will be losing a portion of our
view to this endeavor. This has been hard enough to cope wi thr
but tl”w. added to that, we are being asked to accept the noise
and tr-af fit associated with an entrance to a project of 132
home5 - wtbich will represent a minimum of two cars per
househo Id. 7ha noise we will experience from this increased
traffic will crfcct; our day-to-day living in an extremely
negative fashion!
Clur prcperties have a!ready been put in an extremely vulnerable
position a5 it relates to our investment. #l: Werre losing
part of t!le \/iew we paid for: #2: Fieldstone is building houses
of sitnil?r size #?t HALF tile cost of our homes; #3: The
quietnecs of 1 ivir-.g c’n C!?t Se de la Vista - ttte ability to use
avid en joy tire homes. a-, bui I t , from the aspect of the back9
will he TOl-ALLY lost: ! rLEASE! ! You must .f ir*d a way to place
the entra!\ce .for thin project on nlicante Road! ! ! We realise
we canrmk stop proqressr and the Fieldstone I:n. has shown
c,ensi tivi ty t;n pc!r rjc5.i tirqn. - Now, show ~15 that the City of
Cgrlsbad c?n prc-tvide “growth with a tIeart” -Plsasa consider the
38 t Inmecqtrner / t axpayor residents in filicarrte Hills and move tcs
pr-fitE?Ct OlJi’ iIrtl?reStS. k.EF.P COI:TE CE LA VIS r.‘7 THE SMALL OUlE r
STFWT 1 T IS bJf1W. t-Xl!.‘E ‘1-t IE FLfiF1NE.D EN T IVVKE TO f+L I CXN’I E Rar?D !
Tim and Marion Manaka
2803 Torry Court
6 -
*
* - Spyglhsb Point VIII Homeowners Assdu4atlon
7480 Alicante Road
Carisbad, CA 92009
September 24, 1990
Michael J. Holzmiller
Planning Director
City of Cansbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859
RE: FAIRWAYS Tentative Tract Map
CT 89-1 G/PUD 89-7/HDP-44
Dear Mr. Holzmiller:
The Fieldstone Company is proposing to build 120 single family detached homes on 133 lots
on 41 acres. The development is planned as a gated community, to be surrounded by a six foot wall.
The main entrance is proposed to be on Carte de la Vista off Alicante Road.
The members of the Spyglass Point VIII Homeowners Association have the following
concerns regarding the above development:
Six-foot Perimeter Wall
The proposed six foot wall surrounding the Fairways development will be at grade on Alicante
Road, directly across from our condominium homes. A wall of this nature would severely restrict our
views of the La Costa Golf Course and adjacent natural open space. This degradation of open space
views would seriously diminish our property values, for which we paid a premium in 1989. Enclosed is
a series of figures showing our open space views with the proposed six foot wall sketched in place.
Examination of these figures indicates that very little of the existing views would remain if the
proposed wall is placed at grade on Alicante Road.
The necessity for such a wall is not self-evident. Few developments in the surrounding area
have walls that seriously obstruct the public’s views of open space areas. Other developments in
Carlsbad similar to the proposed Fairways development do not have solid walls surrounding them.
Without the wall, open space views are not likely to be harshly degraded (assuming that landscaping
along Alicante Road would involve low shrubs and not new trees). The height of the proposed
buildings is limited to less than 27 feet and the grading plan indicates the roof line is close to grade in
the line of sight of our complex. Therefore, only the proposed perimeter wall will seriously obstruct
the views of open space areas. Alicante Road is a major pedestrian route for joggers, walkers, and
strolling families. The views of open space areas from Alicante Road are an amenity to the entire
neighborhood that would be lost if the proposed wall were erected.
A feasible mitigation measure would be to deny placement of the wall along Alicante Road.
Any structure at grade on Aliiante Road would degrade the public’s view of the La Costa open space, which is the main open space feature of the La Costa community and for which the members of
Spyglass VIII Homeowners Association paid a premium. An alternative mitigation measure would be to
tier the berm along Alfcante Road so that the top of the proposed wall could be placed at or below
grade.
Michael J. Holzmiller
September 24, 1990 Page 2
Location of Maln Entrance
The location of the main gated entrance to the proposed Fairways development is
inappropriately placed. The expected increase in traffic levels associated with this development is
1300 Average Daily Trips. Almost all of this traffic volume would be required to travel up the hill of
Alicante Road and turn right onto Cone de la Vista in order to enter the proposed development. Because Alicante Road is a steep grade at this location, the noise level would be further amplified due
to the need for cars and trucks to accelerate and shift gears while travelling uphill. This increased
traffic past our homes would cause a significant rise in noise levels, especially during the early morning
and evening hours.
An appropriate mitigation measure would be to locate the entrance at the southwest comer of
the development at the base of the hill, directly across from Altiva Place.
Please give your consideration to these important concerns we have presented here. We
look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions, please call me at 431-1544.
Sincerely,
Regis Kobzi c/
President
Spyglass Point VIII Homeowners Association
cc: Sharon Schramm
Tom Emin
Matthew Hall
Robert Holmes
Mary Marcus
Jeanne McFadden
Clarence Schlehuber
Enclosures
.
, -
The following members of the Spyglass Point VIII Homeowners Association
are in full agreement with the contents of the attached letter.
Date
fl,‘i ;‘$- --+
8 ‘If 70 --- ---
d&o - --.-
VI .A z!!
il/ . -yd -----
Signature
9
Printed Name
3.- /-7d .--. p,z-iA?/ --_-____ 7 SF/- qd@& -------- ------
,j*- /! 7 -: - -_----
?-J/-9,, --_---
7-25-m E.&L --- /hulrR Ly?
--- ------_I -I_-
L/52 ./t&&y -- ---
&J; ?,7&J /+&=&?,- ---------
&,~: &~%eT
Address
*ss f)f iCQde?t R0cz.d -------------_
xmAhg& Rd. --------------
-p&y &&, Js==p
------_----_--_ .-
7 cLVlF &c AN’E a- __-----------
7Yw &&v~~ 727, --
. _- ** .
Visual impacts of FAIRWAYS perimeter wall on La Costa open space views.
. . . . c
d h
Visual impacts of FAIRWAYS perimeter wall on La Costa open space views
=
g
b zi E t
EL m
3
2 .Z s
. . _ . . . . 4
,- 22 ZT’, c.d
HIALEAH WEST COAST, INC.
HIALEAH, FLORIDA
JOHN J. BRUNETTI
PRESIDENT
December 11, 1990
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
Re: 132 Single Family Detached Homes on 41.09 Acres
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, City of Carlsbad
Dear Mayor and Council:
As a homeowner, residing at 7360 El Fuerte Street, Carlsbad, and
one who has experienced inconvenience, traffic hazards and a
diminution of the quality of life in this area, I hereby oppose the
further development proposed by this applicant.
The topography of the land makes it impossible to control and
restrict the negative impact such a development would create.
Further, the special qualities of La Costa and its reputation has
already been damaged by the lower than expected value of developments
in the area. This can only lead to a further downgrading of value
and, thus, continued negative impact.
::JJu;&
Presidkt
/km
REPLY TO: 0 P. 0. BOX 158, HIALEAH, FL 33011, AREA CODE (305) 885-8000
0 7360 EL FUERTE CA AREA CODE (619) 438-3506 ST., CARLSBAD, 92008,
r
*
I. II
I
*
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 90-23fPUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly
Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, December 18, 1990,
to consider an application for a tentative map, planned unit development and hillside development permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6 on property generally located south of Corte de la Vista, east of Alicante Road and north of the La Costa Golf Course and more particularly described as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Dlego, according to map thereof filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on October 10, 1981 as file no. 81-322184 of Official Records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter; please call the Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development/Hillside Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice-or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public
hearing.
APPLICANT: Fieldstone Company PUBLISH: December 6, 1990 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
. CT go-23 . PUD 00-23
’ HOP 90-29 FAIRWAYS I
, ‘- A l Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
N.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next - -nc .- ---.*,. --TV.-.!+ _. _ .-. ^~
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING CT SOZQPUD 9KWHDP 96-29
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that theCity CounciloftheCityofCarls- bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1206 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad. California, at 666 P.M., on Tuesday, December 18,lWO. to consider an application for a tentative map, planned unit development and hillside develop ment permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6 on property generally located south of Carte de la Vista, east of Alicante Road and north of La Costa Golf Course and more particularly de- scribed as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to map there- of filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on October lo,1981 as file no. 81-322184 of Offkial Records. If you have any questions regard- ing this matter, please call the Planning Department at 438-1181. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Develop- ment/Hillside Development Permit in court, YOU may be limited to rais- ing only those issues you or some- one else raised at the public hear- ing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public hearing.
precediig the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
Applicant: Fieldstone Company CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL -
DECEMBER 6 19 90
m--.
19-
19- -I
19--
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali-
fomiaon THE hTH
day of DECEMBER, 1990
Clerk of the Printer
w 5864: December 6,1996
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 9&23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly
Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, December 18, 1990,
to consider an application for a tentative map, planned unit development and
hillside development permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of
land in the RDM zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 6 on property generally
located south of Corte de la Vista, east of Alicante Road and north of the La Costa
Golf Course and more particularly described as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, according to map thereof filed in the office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County on October 10, 1981 as file
no. 81-322184 of Official Records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development/Hillside Development
Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public
hearing.
APPLICANT: Fieldstone Company
PUBLISH: December 6, 1990 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
PUD 90-23
FAIRWAYS HDP 90-29
- .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 3, 1990, to consider
approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development
Permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 6 on property generally located south of Carte de la
Vista, east of Ahcante Road and north of the La Costa Golf Course and more particularly
described as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of carlsbd, County of San
Diego, according to map thereof filed in the office of the County Recorder of
san Diego County on October 10, 1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official
records.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after September 27, 1990. If
you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development/Hillside Development
Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the
City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29 APPLICANT: FAIRWAYS
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29 - FAIRWAYS
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
DEC. 18, 1990 .
Thank you.
,
Assistant City Man--
11 I13190 Date
.a..
GLdAM.PDUSE HENKY&MARYwIcHsER 1160 ID4A VISTA DRIVE 2400 ALTISMA WAY #B BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 (zAREmD, CA 92009
WILLIZW&NWCYFAUCETI' DouGLlAs&vruaPp;NI: 4609 SHERIDAN ROAD 2400 ALTISMA WY #E OCEANSIDE, CA 92056 cARz;sBAD, CA 92009
DALE & LAmawEIRICK RENATQfJOANVALEXIO 6131 N. CAMINO DE MXXAEL 2721 SmCORRO LANE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85718-2715 CARtSBAD, CA 92008
DANIELGRuBE RmER& OLIVEJENKINS 2402 ALTISMA MAY #B 2402 ALTISMA WAY #C cARI;sBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92008
CLXES DEWiREE GREGORY GELGANDmAL
2135 WSEO DE LAS ESTREUX 2402 ALTISMA WY #F i3!mNDo BEACH, CA 90277 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
.mYNE TPEED ELIECCiwELIAELMlsSI
3750 STOCKER STREET 2404 ALTISMA WAY #A LOS ANGELES, CA 92008 CARLSAD, CA 92008
MUNIR&ELHAMSHAMIEH RENAlX)&JOANVALEXO 21703 SANTOQUIN DFUVE 2721 SCCCORRO LANE DIAMZND BAR, CA 91765 CARLSBAD, CA 92008
IYARYBAFaEm WILLIAM&LI3DADIXON 1N.SUFFOLKAVENUE 2406 ALtTISMA.WAY #B VENTNOR, NJ. 08406 CAmsB?m, CA 92008
mBEKr&SOPHIEKmPPER sTEvEN&slpHANIEFRAuEL 2406 ALTISMA MAY #D 2406 ALTISMA WY #E CARISBAD, CA 92009 CAIusBAD, CA 92008
MR.CURTISBE!TZ FTAL 2410 ALTISMA WAY #D CARISBAD, CA 92009
JACQUES & TCOLQOKORD 2400 ALTISMA WiY #F CARLSBAD, CA 92009
WILLIAM&cHERyLSHAFFER 2402 ALTISMA MAY #A CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JOE G-
2402 ALT1SMZ-i WZkY #D CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CATHERINE CRISP 2402 ALTISW WAY #G CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NORMA FLORES
2404 ALTISMA WAY #B CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JEET&NANCYHARIG 2404 ALTISMA WAY #E CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HARR?z&FLoRJNELEIFHEIT
2406 ALTISMA WY #C CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JAY 6r NITA FINK 2406 ALTISMA WAY #F C?GUSBAD, CA 92008
’ .
EDwimo!aRILYNmvIN SALNONDTREELANE IRVINE, CA 92714
EDwARD&M?mLYNRAvIN 5ALMoNDTPmLmE IRVINE, CA 92714
FRANK&BmBAPAsANzo
1610 LA K&IA ROAD PASADmA, CA 91105
M7iLLEmGDEBoRAHAIKEN 2412 ALTISMA WY #B
CAFUSBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS. JOSEPHPUSL
1333 SANTA LUISA DFUVE SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
CuKrIs&vIRGrNIABFTz 2410 ALTISMA W?iY #D CARLEWD, CA 92009
DCNALDPALNIERI
2410 ALTISMA WAY #A cA.KLsBAD, CA 92009
KNBEVENDGE 7497 ALTIVA PIXE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LISA GILL &ATlXLABEl'YAFi 7467 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
AImHoNY- 2408 ALTISMA KAY #A CARLSBAD, CA 92009
EDBELLER&LYNMIRSKY 2412 ALTISM7-i WAY #G cARLmAD, CA 92009
JOHN & ROSE NEMETH 6986 EL CAMINO REAL #H RANCHO LA COSTA, CA 92008
PAULMcCLELL?M
2412 ALTISMA W2-W #A CARISBAD, CA 92008
ELIzABETHMILLERET 2410-F ALTISMA WY ciJI?IsBAD, CA 92009
AL
ATamED f JANICEImamd 320 29TH AVENUE OAKLAND, CA 94601
BCEDEVEWPMENTPI7DpEEITIES
33SouTHSMTH~ MINNEWOLIS, MN 55402
JAMES- 5122 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLsBAD, CA 92008
MARKTRAvERE 7469 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS. JOSEPHPUSL
1333 SANTA LUISA DR. SOL?Wi BEACH, C74 92075
JOHNKEUYCONKLIN 2412 #F ALTISIW WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LxwISEBLZCKM3N 2412 ALTISMA WAY #C LA COSTA, CR 92008
JONATHAN&MARTAFIELD
2410 ALTISMA WAY #H cARLaAD, CA 92009
MxcHEL;LEBONFILI
2410 ALTISM?i WAY #E cARTSBAD, CA 92008
FRANCESREA 2410 ALTISMA WAY #B CARLSBAD, CA 92008
cAFaLINEMARYGOODSON
7495 ALTIVA PIACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JAMEsm
5122 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008
cARYw.HuLsTINE 7433 ALTIVA PLACE cYARLsBAD, CA 92009
ALFeD- ILIUEVAPERRY
7437 ALTIVA PLACE 7435 ALTIVA PLACE cI?lRLsBAD, CA 92009 a4RLsBAD, CA 92009
DENNISALANMIDDLETONEI'ALa C.IulBTm!&~RAMM
7405 ALTIVA PLACE 7407 ALTIVA ‘PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JuLIE&NANcY- 7372 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DARIO & HELENQUINZI 4 PETEFt CWPER w3AD BlOA NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10010
BRLJ(XMARTINDOWNS 7386 ALTIVA PLXE LA COSTA, CA 92009
KENNE;THBASSLERETAL 7388 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROBEXTFVANCISWEAVER 7402 ALTIVA PLACE CARLISBAD, CA 92009
MR.&MRS.F'FGNKHOLSTEIN 7404 ALTIVA PLACE CAPISBAD, CA 92009
ERIC EzJAsoN 7408 ALTIVA PUCE CARLSW, CA 92009
ROBlZKl?&AUDREYKUEFLER 82186 HE&IO COURT INDIO, CA 92201
GARYcATALANo,ELAL 7396 ALTIVA PLACE (zJu?LsBAD, CA 92009
MR.&MRS.RENATOvaLERIO
7394 ALTIVA PLACE (2mIsBAD, CA 92009
MAFsANNsMITH 7374 ALTIVA PLACE cAl?umD, CA 92009
MARJORIEM.STEPHlWSON 7378 ALTIVA PIACE cARLsAD, CA 92009
DAvIDcNANcY- 7380 ALTIVA PLACE CARLsm, CA 92009
PXMUCKXXK,ETAL
2588 ALXXWE RCXD CARLSW, CA 92009
ALL1SoNwIEmJEsELAL
7439 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
IQBEKFWZNYEI-AL
7370 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RXHARDbKARENDECKER 7384 ALtTIVA PLACE (l?uulsBAD, CA 92009
PEIERTROST
7400 ALTIVA PLACE cJu?LsBAD, CA 92009
ROBEF?l?J. XXRELLJ
7406 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALAN & ELYSEWTSON 1339 KNOU DRIVE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
KExm&susANHuDsoN
7398 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR.&MRS.JOHNEVANSHEN
7376 ALTIbR PLACE CARLSM, CA 92009
NORM?W&IDAYELNICK
15700 SCUTH 108TH AVENUE ORLAND PARK, IL 60462
_ __ _,...w.,* -..-- . ..-
l *
REiN&PmRICIA~
2578 ALICXVIE ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS. GORDONHEBEKI' 2560 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JE?mPoRTER
7412 ALTIVA PLACE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DANIEL&DIANASHOLUY 7418 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALFONSO MIRANDA 7424 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
THOmSPl3TERsm 7432 ALTIVA PLACE cARI;sBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS. KENNJ3H TOPPI 3968 VOLTAIRE STREET SAN DIEC0, CA 92107
FRANKfPE?mJHEm 7444 ALTIVA PLXE CARLmAD, CA 92009
BRLXE&MARIEHARVEX
7454 ALTIVA PLACE CARTSBAD, CA 92009
REGIS KOBZI, ET AL
2580 ALICANIE RXD CAtiLsBAD, CA 92009
JAMEsSccYrr&PATRIcI?iscoTT
5122 AVENIDA EXINAS CAIiLsBAD, CA 92009
WEI-LI t HWkSHING CHEN
7416 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NICHOLAS HUNTALAS 7422 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JUANFURLER 7428 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
F'RJ33ROBEKCS 7434 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
!zmDRALEvEE,ETAL 7446 ALTIVA PUCE CARLSW, CA 92009
FELIPESWI'OS,FTAL 7448 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ESTELLE- 7456 ALTIVA.PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JAMEsscoIT 5122 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MR.&MRs.HuGHIIE?mlE 1935 E3F!EUA DE MAR RD. #A CAIiLsBAD, CA 92009
MR. 6r MRS. mcco CAPABmco
1817 HUMWCK LANE ENCINITAS, CA 92024
VIma mm 7426 ALTIUA PLACE (z2GulsBAD, CA 92009
IDlu SEAMON
7430 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. & MRS. WILLIAM FOSTER 7436 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JEE?mzcOPPms,ErAL 7440 ALTIVA PLACE cARTsBAD, CA 92009
RICHARD 64 LOIS FxmmBLxm
7450 ALTlX4 PLACE cl?iRTsBAD, CA 92009
llAwIEvoLP1 7458 ALTIVA PLACE -, CA 92009
. . * .
JOHN A. FOLI, ET AL
7462 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSW, CA 92009
THOMASDEFRANCO 7468 ALTIVA PLACE cARLsaD, CA 92009
ALBERT L. ImRm, JR. 7474 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BETHFoFmAN 7480 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
;,;>[;-A >m
1496 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
L.FREDERIcK&EDITHPAm 7488 ALTIVA PLACE CARLLaD, CA 92009
LACOSTAALICANTEVIEWS 3511 CAMINO DEL RIO S #500 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
FIELDS'IONECOMPANY 5465 MOREHOUSE DRIVE 1250 SAN Dm, CA 92121
TERRY & M. L. HOLLINGWRTH 7356 ALTIVA PLACE CARLsm, CA 92008
sHEIIL;Ey ImRTENs 7347 EL FUERTE ST. CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. & MRS. JOSEPH VUZZO 7466 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NANCY A. ZEIBAK, E;T 7470 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
AL
JOSEPH & DENNISE NovosELEK
7476 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SARALEEBOSTCX4 7492 ALTIVA PLACE (IJARLSBAD, CA 92009
DIN0 CAMMAGNO
7498 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
w?iILAcE AADLAND
7486 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALTIVAPLACELTDNO. 2
2903 COKl'E JARDIN CARLSBAD, a 92009
MR. fMRs.MILmIaPIAN 7344 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSW, CA 92009
BEUNYWANG,ETAL 7355 EL l!TJmrE ST eARLsBAD, CA 92009
WAN-TMTSAI,EI'AL 1315 FAIR OAKS AVE. #201 SourH PASADmA, CA 91030
FLQm KUSEL 7464 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALLAN&BARBARAH?mRmAN 7472 ALTIVA PIACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
vIRGIL&ADINAIGN74
7478 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BREIT W. HOFFMAN P.O. BOX 2455 LEUCADIA, CA 92024
MICHAEL4 mRIsKY
7484 ALTIVA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JOHN & GILDADEFRANCO
7490 ALTIVA PLACE cliRLsBAD, CA 92009
JAMESSCCYIT
5122 AVENIDA WINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GENE & M?UEL RODDENB- c/o KESSLER SCHNEIDER & co. 12l21WILSHIRE BLVD #1223 MS ANGELES, CA 90025
MI- & DEBBIEHOLLAEMJGH 7351 EL FuEKrE STREET CARLSBAD, a 92009
YOUNGTSAIJYH, ITCAL 1315 FAIR OAKS BLVD. #201 SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
. .
BCEDWPMWI'PRO~IES 33SomHsIxTHST MINNEMOLIS, MN 55402
cxmJNHARE 7356.EL FUERTE ST #233 P.O. Box 9000
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SONG RAMBXM' 7343 BOLERO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SARKIs&ADIuNEARTINIAN 2809 JACARANDA AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
.UK. JAl?Dm
2917 1dANAGUA PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LACOSTAHOTEL & SPACXXP.
2100 COSTA DEL MAR RCND cAmsBAD, CA 92008
JERFtYPINTER 2564 NAVARRA DR. #lOl CARLSBAD, CA 92009
mBERT&ISABELMAZE,GTAL 2564 NAVARRA DR. #104 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DONGSOOHAN 6 LINDAISLE NEWPQKI' BEACH, CA 92660
JON&KARENcoQMBs
7348 EL FIIEPTE ST LA COSTA, CA 92009
HIALEAHWESTCXY-GTINC 105 E. 2lST ST HIALEAH, FL 33010
KEVIN-S 9663 TIERRA GRANDE #206 SAN DIEGO, CA 92126
ANDRJzs&EvELINvEGA 7352 EL FUEP3E ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GEfXGE&DORMTXAJENKINS 7347 HLERO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
BcEDEvELopMENTPRopEIzTIES 33SoUTrlSIxTHST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
DouGLlAs&MARYFEERloN DANIEL & DEBRA BUCCI 2921 MANAGUA PLACE 2919 MANAGUA PLACE CARCSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALvAH&coNsTANcEFowLER 7340 BOLERO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BCEDEVET&~PRllpEIzTIES 33 SOUTH SIXTH ST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
FIELDSKNE/LACOSTAASSOCIATES A&TINVESTMENTS C/O THE FIELDSTONE WMF%N!Z c/o lcMILLIAN REALTY 14CoRPoRATEP~ 12770 HIGHBLUFF DR. NEWPOIU' BE?CH, CA 92660 DEL MMt, CA 92130
CHRIS- HENPY&vIRL;INIAKALE 2564 NAVARRA DRIVE #102 2564 NAVARBA DRIVE #103 LA COSIIA, CA 92009 CYARLSBAD, CA 92008
KATHERINE s. WILLIAMS REGIN?iBuTLER
2564 NAVARRO DR. #105 1302 MAPLE CTJRLSBAD, CA 92009 SAN M7nE0, CA 94402
CLIvEL.PEmnsEN MR.&ME?s.RIcHARD~ 2564 N7iVARRA DR. #108 7603 THIRD ST. cART.lsBAD, CA 92009 DckJNEy, CA 90241
.
,’ -
’ .
RuTHHELimN 2564 NA" DRIVE #llO CARTSBAD, CA 92009
GLADYS HEmIGM?w
2564 NNARRA Dm #113 IA COSTA, CA 92009
MAGV. INC., 2565 CAMINO DEL RIO SCUTH
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
SANDRAxms SMITH 2564 NAVARPA DRIVE #201 cARLsAD, CA 92009
- 9.V'S & JUDY JOHN=
,:.,:;G XAWiRR7-4 DR. #204 -BAD, CA 92008
JmFFaYKNIGHT
2564 NWARRA DRIVE #207 -, CA 92008
JIMFARIS 3681 MEUMIES DRIVE #29 LAS VEGAS, NV 89103-1846
TILGYDAUBER 835 W. PICCADILLY DFUVE PHOENM, AZ 85013
lcKHAm&RuInLAcY 74121 ASTER DRIVE PAL&l DESERT, CA 92260
HAFWEYG.U3AS~ 2556 NAVARRA DRIVE #B -m, CA 92008
L.DAVIDTAyIxR P.O. Box 1973 RANCH0 SANrA FE, CA 92067
CARlYENO.FAURE
2564 NAVARRA DRIVE #114 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS.DAVlDG. SI'ITNER
2808 UlcIEHNAGA SYIREET fzARLsE?AD, CA 92009
HELENLEWIS
2564 NAVARRA DRIVE #202 CARLSBAD, c?i 92009
OLLIE & DORM'HY T- 3284 DONLEY ST. SAN DIEGO, CA 92117
JOHN & JEAN- 13362 FAIRlTR?T WAY SNTTA AN?& CA 92705
JOHN & CAROL SNOW P.O..BoX 31 DEL MAR, CA 92014
JOHN & HIIDAENGEIMAN
2379 W 236TH ST ToI2BANcE, CA 90501
DAVID&TERISITINER,ETAL 4375 30TH ST. SAN DIM;O, CA 92104 ~
LEWIS&LOFET- Eky D;ioo$C ' I
DAVID M. JOHNSON 2564 NAVARRA # 112 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PAULINABRUBAKER 3106 VISTA BCNITA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CYRILLKKREM
2564 NAVARRA DRIVE C?iRLSBAD, CA 92008
FRANKBEXXAGE
P.O. Box 9127 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109
RONALDCLAY, ETAL
2564 N?i.. DRIVEi CARLsBAD, CA 92008
HANNEIDRE LmzELLo,
2564 NAXARRA DRIVJ? -, CA 92008
J=Qu=Jm -, 2564 NAl??iRRh DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009
#117
#206
CFYSTENACHASE
P.O. BOX 3032 LA COSTA, CA 92009
CARLT.WAGNER E&ARR& D;iooA
I
EDWARD &ANGELAmsSoL
857 S. DICKEL STREET ANAHEIM, CA 92805
DERiKDMURIER
2556 NAVARRA DRIVE #E c?LRLsBAD, CA 92009
STUART & ILENE BmDsKY
$%6E&AM$ D;ioo; 1
THOMAS&JOANNEHEAVIIAND 2556 NAVARRA DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CHARLEsrm 2556N7iVARFtADRIVE #F CAFUSBAD, CA 92009
-&SUSANGIBBQNS
24571 Ix>S SERRANOS DR. LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92677
JACK AILING 2552 NAVARRA DRIVE #C czAR?xw, CA 92009
JOBNFULLINWIDER, ETAL DIANEHALL
Ezy D;ioo; 2552 NAVARRA DRIVE #E
I CARLSBAD, CA 92009
5LT J;Lj HI- JOSEPH & SUSANCNWR
E&ARR& Dtioo; 2558 NAVARRA DRIVE #F
I CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR.&MRS.FREDHUDDLESTON 2558 NAVARRA DR 2552 NAVARRA DR. #D CARLSBAD, CA 92009
A&TVS ROBEKFHARDING,ETAL
c/o r42MILLIAN REALTY 53OlAPPIAN WY 12770 HIcXRLUFF DR. IONG BEACH, CA 90803 DELa M?iR, CA 92130
FXHARD&DORISIYILLS ALBERT RuslIALL 859 NORTH HOLLYWOOD W?.Y #ZOO 7915 VILTiA CAPRI BLIRBANK, CA 91505 LA JOLJA, CA 92037
.
THWASFARR RICHARD- 6735 ETON A= 1346 KATHMAR DRIVE CAmsA PARK, CA 91303 JAcKsm, MI 49203
MARYWARREN LESTER&-sTQpJ(ES 7727 VIA CAFRI 7520 JEFEZ COUKT #D BLmB?mK, CA 91504 CARLSW, CA 92009
BERN7UtD& GwENYrHsTAcEY 2556 NAVARRA DRIVE #G cARI;sBAD, CA 92008
CATBERJXEA.TAYLQR
AMERICAN SAVINGS & LOAN 325 EXMAVENUE #C2 CARLSBAD, CA 92008
wILLIAM&CARoLYANCY 2558 NAVARRA PLACE #B CARLSW, CA 92009
NEW WEST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOP
343 FAST MAIN ST -, CA 95i02#805
STEVEN- 2552 NA- DR. #A CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JOYCE BONNE?U
2558 NAVARPA DR. #D CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PATRICIAPEF?XNE 7505-A JEREZ CCURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
wILLmM&ARLEIGHwmDs 3580 WILSHIRE BLVD. IDS ANGlzEs, CA 90010
HARRY&ROSEWrrr
y6o&oos ?$E.33#l;;
I
9m?lRAY 7520 JEREZ COURT #E CARLSBAD, CA 92009
.
. ’
* .
EUGENE&ELIZABETH~ HOMEFt&ELLENOIRF.BASH SUZANNJ3SCHENKRAU 7520 JEREZ COUFCC #F 7514 JEREZ CCURT #A 7514 JEREZ COURT #B CARL=, CA 92008 cx?~sBm, CA 92008 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MICHAELI & STEPHANIE SACHS MARGAmTcATHEY LEE & ROSALIND OSBORNE 7514 JEmz CouKr #C 7514 JEREZ COURT #D 7539 GIBRALTAR ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CAmsBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SOL & AImErIE GOLD LEoN7mD&ANNCOF!Y, ETAL sExmuR&RxJTHsIM;EL 7537 GIBRALTAR ST. 7535 GIBRALTAR ST. 7533 GIBRALTAR ST. -, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARISBAD, CA 92008
JOSE J. PADILL& NTAASSOCIATES HARRYfMIRIAMYEELl C/O BANK OF AMEFUCA/RH POULSEN 7529 GIBRALTAR ST. C/O CASINO FOOD P.O. BOX 711268 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 1710 WESTERN AVE.
Los ANGELES, CA 90071 LAS VEGAS, NV 89102
. ..ii’i’ c . &I CEILANN Boslm SAMUELLAN- MR.&MRs.cHARLJzssTREFT ;3 ;i! ANIZFUCAN SAVINGS & LmN 7521 GIBRALTAR ST. 7519 GIBRALTAR ST P.O. BOX IRVINJZ, CA 92713-9689 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CARL-, CA 92009
SIDNEY & ANN GRAZI 7517 GIBRALTAR ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009
wAYNE&AMM!zREEDER 1222 T?m 0 SHANTER BAKmSFIELJD, CA 93309
mILYPEAGLE3 7513 GIBRALTAR ST. CARLsBAD, CA 92008
MALIN BUILDING COMPANY SYLVIA sm WALTER EDwARDs 4 HAMeSHIREcouRT 1040 N LAKEi SHORE DRIVE #18A 28441 HIGKRID'X ROAD #203 BEACHKOD, OH 44122 CHICAGO, ILI 60611 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
IACOSTAFIETEEiN FREDERICK&mHIUXBFMD Fa3ERT Ei VIVIAN wILK~?soN 7562 CAMINIm AVOLli 7502 JEREZ COURT 7504 JEREZ CaTw LA JOLLA, CA 92037 CARLSBAD, c?i 92008 LA COSTA, CA 92009
FRANCES&PATRICIACALSEEK MARVIN & EmDPA Ross WILLIAMCDINASTUARI' 1459 s LOFmn ST. 7635 WESTWDD ST. 7510 JEREZ CxluKr Los ANGELES, CA 90023 HOUSTCXV, TX 77071 CARL-, CA 92008
-
.
MIcHAEL&ImRIAGALAIiDo 8639 LINDANTE ST. wkm'-rIER, CA 90603
L3cmrscHuBor 8711 THOUSAND PINES WEST Pm BEACH, FL 33411
JOSEPH KLUDJIAN
5440 TOPAZ LAS VEGAS, NV 89120
PERRY KAYE 5640 COLLINS AVE. #2-C MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140
SHELDoN&sALLYSTuNKEL
7428 VIA DE FORTUNA cmsB?iD, CA 92009
RAYMOND& -ADLER 7410 VTA DE FORlUN?i ~.~LSBAD, CA 92008
LLVIS & HARRIET EPSTEIN 'Z:C N BREAKERS RCW #Hl J%Leii BEACH, FL 33480
JULIUS 64 FRANCES COLENAN C/O KEN E. A & COMPANY P.O. Box 489 sEAGom, TX 75159
PETERFONBERG,ETAL 5452 GLEN LAKES DRIVE #203 II?UAS, TX 75231
TNT GIBRALTARLTD. C/O BARBARA E AHLERS 27131MISSION HILLS DRIVE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675
GEoRGE&cYNTHIAsHuLMAN 7478 VIA DE FORTUNA ~ARLSBAD, CA 92008
SANDRA TENENRAUM P.O. Box 1441 EN-D, CO 80150
SHIRLEY FRUCHTM?iN
5445 N. CITATIa RCAD !KLEDO, OH 43615
LAZARO& P.O. Box
-IA,
ROSEMARY 7408 VIA
CARMENSQ- 777 CA 91006
NANINI DE FORTUNA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALEmDfMARKRosENFIELD P.O. Bcx 10219 NWSTA AUSTIN, l'X 78766
GRE%HEb!BRAKEBIIL 7409 VIA DE FOR'IUN?i (zluasBAD, CA 92009
ELI&ESTmRSHxPIRo 3110 HAWTHORNE ST FLINT, MI 48503
RAMONATUCK
1920 LOS RXLES AVENUE SAN MARINO, CA 91108
HELENE RAY 7276 LUP'ION CIRCLE IX&LAS, TX 75225
wILLIAMowEN,ETAL
7458 VIA DE FORTUN?i C?SLSBAD, CA 92008
B?aBARABRoNsoN 33KXJNTAJXFARMSRD. WEST HARTFORD, CT 06117
RmERT&lxJRAELLIm 7418 VIA DE FOFtTUN?i CAFUSBAD, CA 92008 '
GENE&BEFNADINE- 5601 PREAKNESS CIRCLE PLANO, TX 75075
LECNARD&ELE?iNORBELLINSON 7403 VIA DE FOKIUNA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JIIEmEY& M?iPmNEwEINBERG
1144 RED ROSE LANE V, PA 19085
NANcYNEuMAN 300 NORTH SWALL DRIVE #102 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211
NED&MARGWETGooD JO S LAKE AVENUE #600 PASADENA, CA 91101
WiRREN&IYAFCLLYNSTAF8 1409 CAMINO MEzEN SANTA BARBARA, CA 93111
M?BK&EMILYHAACK 7477 ITKA DE FORTUNA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. KAZUYAMARUYAMA
c/oTARm4INc.,
401 WEST A STREET # 1200
SAN DIEa, CA 92101
TERUO AKIMcyro
c/o TARIAM INC.,
4OlWEST A STREET, #1200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
PAUL & BETIYHENRY
149 WJODWARD DRIVE TULARE, CA 93274
JIERRY&MILDREDrnEL 7467 VIA DE FOFU?JNA cART;SBAD, CA 92008
MR.
c/o 401
MR.
c/o 401
OSAMUFURUYA TARIAM INC. WEST A STREET #1200
DIEGO, CA 92101
HISASH MISAWA TAEUAMINC., WEST A STREET #1200 DIEGO, CA 92101
TAKESHI TAKAHASHI
4180 THE HILL RCNI BONITA, CA 92002
?IARIAMJOCKEYCLUBDEVELOPMENT MR. 401 WEST A STREET #1200 c/o SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 401
HIROYUKI SUZUKI TARIAMINC. WEST A STREET #1200
DIEGO, CA 92101
HENRYLEVTIT RIcHARD&JOANNIF?VING
P.O. BOX 788 7459 AVENIDA DE PALUS
DEL M?iR, CA 92014-0788 cART.sBAD, CA 92008
KONCMJ KOBAYASHI MR. c/o TARIAM INC., C/O 401 WEST A STREET #1200 401
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
RI-&-GRANT 2000 s OCEAN BLVD PALM BEACH, FL 33480
MR.
c/o 401
TAKASHIKAMAMLIPA
-, m-t WEST A STREET #1200 DIEGO, CA 92101
&MRS. HsEG?im TARIAM INC., WEST A STREET #1200
DIECO, CA 92101
LEON & FAY CHAVES
407 LINCOLN ROAD MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139
WILLIAMSAMSON 7469 VIA DE FOEU'UM P.O. BOX 8913
R?iNCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
KENICHI KODAMA
c/o TARIAM INC., 401WEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
TARIAMJOCKEYCLUBDEVEWPNEN'I 401 WEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
SUMIO NODA
c/o T9AKcAM INC., 4OlWEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
MxiAToSH1SAm c/o TARIAM INC., 401 WEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIM;O, CA 92101
TUEODORE&FLoRENcEWEISBERG 7457 AVENII% DE PAL&IS CARISBAD, CA 92008
TARIAMJCCKEYCLUBDEVELOPMENT 4OlWEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
FUMIOKAKU c/o TARIAM INC., 4OlWEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
,. i -
FUMIOKAKU c/o TAFUAM INC., 401WEST A STREET #1200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
JmRY&TERRIsHEammN 7429 AVENIDA DE PALAIS CARTSBAD, CA 92008
DAVIDDIAMCXJD 7417 AVENIDA DE PALAIS CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GUXUA- P.O. Box 879 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740
TAluAM INC., 7404 AVENIDA DE PALAIS
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HENW SILVESTRE, ET AL
7418 AVENIDA DE PALXS P.O. BOX 176 SAN YSIDRO, CA 92073
33XT&KATHYPAYNE 2993 TORRY CCXJRT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SUNG & CHAE LEE 2875 TORRY COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DIAN?iRUDEFtMAN 2861 ToR;IIy COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NICHOLAS f CAROL CELQZZI 155EROOSEVELTIWAD ELMHURST, IL 60126
LARRY&DANAFLEMING 6HAMProN WICEWIX, KS 67277
ALEX & JOSEPHINE STAMATAKIS
419 SHERIDAN ROAD WINNETKA, IL 60093
MAURICE & RUTH E'ITLESON 155 E FXXXVELT EtOAD ELHHURST, IL 60126
MfLToN&LoRRAINELLERNER
7408 AVENIM DE PATiAIS CAIUSBAD, CA 92008
BOB b PAT HERD
517 SHERRY LANE TYLER, TX 75701
AMOS&VEFtCIEJC%WXXJ 2885 'IWRY COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR. &MRS. NORVELf44RTENS 2871 TORRY COUKT cART.sBAD, CA 92009
GARYtDE33RA- 2855 TORRY COUR!l' CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TARIAM mc., 7437 AVENIDA DE PAI.AIS CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALLAN&M?iKILYNwAcHTELI 78 KINGS COUFtT FORT LEE, NJ 07024
JOSEPH&ELIZABETHDEMARCO 930 CumIS PLACE NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ 08902
ANDF!Ew- 7008 EST'R3U-i DE MAR ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DIANNEBIENES 141 BAY COLONY DRIVE FT LAUD-, FL 333oi
HILLSOFMXANTE
C/OCALCOWESTFJNMCIAL 329 s PANCHO SANTA FE ROAD
SAN r+nRCOS, CA 92069
MR.&MFtS.BILLKENSLEY
2881 TORRY COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
WIUIAM&NANCYDIX 2865 'IDRRY COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
THoM?is&JANETMAss 2851 ‘IWRY COUKI’ CARLSBAD, CA 92009
d’ ,
’ r
FORECASTCOFtPOPATI~ MRS. JUDITHFIELD 2845 'IDRRY COURT 2741 TORRY COURT cARz;sBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
EMANuEL&KATHLEENwoLF ERGuN&cHERYLBAKALL 2831 TOW COURT 2825 TORRY COUKF CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DR. & MRS. KJELL E. RUDESTAN MR. t MRS. MATHEW CIMMINO 264 LiANTA MONICA bAY 2811 KBEtY COURT SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROSE A. CORPORATION THEHILTSOFALICANTE 222 SalTH CENTRAL AVENUE #408 C/O CALCO WEST FINANCIAL Los ANGELES, CA 90012 329 s PANCHO SANTE FE ROAD
SAN rd?iRCOS, CA 92069
2.X. & MRS. GERALD FAUCETT MR.&MRs.ANTHoNYALTMAN 2964 SONDRA COUFC 2958 SONma COUKF CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PAUL & SHEILABANK MR. MAlTHEW WENSKO, ET AL 2935 SONDRA COURT 2931 SONDRA CaJRT CAFulsm, CA 92009 ct?iRLsBAD, CA 92009
MARYANNELIZABE'THKINGSLEY 20621 PLUMMEX STREET C!HATS%KNTTH, CA 91311
CITY OF CARLSBAD NOMAILINGADDRESS FORTHIS
HOWARDCOFFEY CUKr&LYNNELLlLINKE
7515 QUINTA STREET 7513 QUINTA STREET cARz;sBAD, CA 92008 c?msBAD, CA 92009
FTmENcx&wILLIAMcuERFsu;D RUSSELL LOWELL 7509 QUINTA L5?mzET 7507 QUINTA STPEET CARLIS-, CA 92009 CARL-, CA 92008
MAX&BlXKYCONGER 2835 'IYXW CCUKr CARLSBAD, CA 92009
OTIS FuNCHFs,mALl 2821 TWRY COUKf' CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CRAIG&J74NETM?B3RLL, 2805 TOPJUT OOUKT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALICANTEHILLSOWERSASSO.
C/O THE DAVIDSON CO. 9555 GENESEE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92121
CRAIDALLENBRWK 2954 SONDRA COURT c?mLsBAD, CA 92009 '
MR. &MRs.ToNYLEEKEEFER 2921 SCNDRA COURT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CITYOFCARLSBAD NOMXLINGADDF!ESSFORTHIS
MIIEs&PHYLLIsPALMER
7511 QUINTA STREET OARLSBAD, CA 92009
MAHER IDRISS 3016 CIEW PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
i ,
MARK H. HEISTERMANN 2586 HEA- CIRCLE PLEASANTON, CA 94566
DAVID&ELLLENAWMS P.O. BOX 1048 SANTA MONICA, CA 90406
ANTHONY&GAILKOMASA
3007 PC'EBU) ST CAIUSBAD, cl 92009
CHRISTINE CORMIFZ 7519 SOLANO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
--L-,TFlIcIA FIwncHm
5313 SOLANO STREET
IA COSTA, CA 92009
mLLIAM & LAURA GQLDBACH 7507 soLAN STREET LA COSTA, CA 92009
RWL?iND&SUZANNEiWILSON
7501 SOLANO STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HARm&MARYSPRmG
7441 so- SI'REET CARLSBAD, CA 92008
ADRIENNE- 6054 IYZRG?iN COURT ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312
RmBLD & CYNmIAYOSHIToMI 3020 CIELO PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
CINDYKIT- 3OllPuEBm ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MR.&MRS.JoHNCCNNELLY 7504 SOLANO STREET RANCH0 LA COSTA, CA 92009
cLAF?x&ERINW 7517 SOLANO ST LA COSTA, CA 92009
PETER&TAEXOCORLESS
7511 SaANo STREET CARL=, CA 92008
SHERMAN 64 SARA FEINSTEIN 332 HEDGDUN HIGHIMD PARK, IL 60035
EEvFmYmNISm,ETAL 5215 S- AVENUE r&s AN-S, CA 90056
HILBERTKANTER 7439 SOLANO fsTRmT CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JACK&DARLENEWILLIAES 7433 SOLANO STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008
RIcHARD&cHERYLMAflTIN 3015 PUEBLO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BUSTER & LILLIAN ImoRE 3009 F'UFBLO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
DAVID&ELI-FLEMING 7506 SOLANO ST LA COSTA, CA 92009
H-&VITAPRICE 7515 soLAN0 ST CARLSBAD, CA 92008
DAVID&BILLIEFARR
7509 soL?iNo STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 '
WALTER& VIoLaT DOLINSKI 7503 SOLANO f3TRmr CARL~BAD, CA 92008
ROBERT&JANICEDAILFY 7443 SOLANO LSTREET cxmz%~~, CA 92008
wIELrAM&E.JEANWEAVER 7437 somo STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CHESTEiR&JANISKoNo 7431 SOLANO +sTREzT CARLSBAD, CA 92008
.
. '
LAwRENcEkANNKRELL JAMES & CARLA GUGINO JEFFREYtcATHERINEmDAN
-7429 SOLAN STREET 7427 SOLANO STREET 7425 SOLANO STREET (xRisBAD, CA 92008 CARISBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAD, CA 92008
STER-EK&CHEFtYLANNDEERING KEITH & ELIzABErHEm 7423 SOLANO STREET 7426 SOLANO Ei!EEET LA COSTA, CA 92009 msBAD, CA 92009
PAuL&FRANCESGRAY 7'4311 SOLANO STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JOHN & JOANNGROSSAINT 7432 SOLANO STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008
THoM?Ls lIlEmTT HASKEL&BRENDAJOSEPH 3004 FANA COURT 3006 RANA COURT ~ARLSBAD, CA 92008 LA cosI!?i, CA 92008
MARVIN&LYNNESCHMIDT 3010 FaNA ComT CARLSBAD, CA 92008
THEODORE & JOY SPFUNK 3012 RANA COURT LA COSTA, CA 92009
WILLIAM WRIGHT 7428 SOLANO STREET LA COSTA, CA 92009
GwJnHOLYN RuFFNJm 3002 PUEBLO STREET LA COSTA, CA 92009
WILLIAMtNANCYsTuTMAN 3008 RANA COURT (2JimsBAD, CA 92009
LINDA HANSON HUBBLE 3014 RANA COURT c2iFusBAD, CA 92009
GEXWD&GWENDOLYNJ?QWERS WILLIAM&WAUSm 3016 PUEBLO E?lXET 3018 PUEBLO STREET LA COS?A, CA 92009 CARSBAD, CA 92008