HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-01-15; City Council; 10990; AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 21.44 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST THE PARKING STANDARD FOR LIBRARIES+J
s (d AB # /’ 970 u
a MTG. 1/15/91 aJ u m a, DEPT. PLN
DE
CI1
CI1
TITLE: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 21.44 OF THE
~ CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST THE
PARKING STANDARD FOR LIBRARIES.
aJ r I: 5
5 w aJ $4
a s
M m 4 I m 2
a h
0- m aal
03 3 .: OE $4
.?I :
aJu
UaJ
v
n g .rl urn
ha @‘a,
cdk
7P
aJ a .z:. 2 4JJ-a a aaJaJ 0 M*dU 5 apaJ a 2 aJ+ ha m aJ E(d sa0 5
-dam m a h*d 4 >a I O-ah NCN m a@@ 2 au F.l
q .
u-0 co
@m$ ;
4 Md C -4 c (d U-dh c GUaJ -rl 5k.U a oaw $4 u aa 0
4 4 a 0-l \ \
u) hl 4 c\l \ 1 4 4
z 0
I- o a
d 0 z 3 0 o
-
p/ v CIT~F CARLSBAD - AGEN~~BILL q’
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending t
the City Council APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by Planning Director and INTRODUCE Ordinance No. /r/ d-/38 ,
APPROVING ZCA 90-1.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On October 17, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Resolut
of Intention No. 184, allowing staff to reevaluate the park requirements for libraries. Preliminary research had indica
that the current standard of one space per one hundred
fifty square feet of gross floor area (1:150)
unrealistically restrictive.
On December 5, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Planr Commission Resolution Nos. 3167 and 3168, recommending that parking standard for libraries be changed to one space per hundred square feet of gross floor area (1:200). This stanc
was arrived at for the following reasons:
1. The original standard of 1:150 was not based upon studies of library parking or surveys of ot
jurisdictions.
2. Staff’s recent surveys of jurisdictions in the Wesl United States indicated library parking standards betL
1:200 and 1:600.
3. A periodical search revealed a survey of over libraries throughout the United States by a promii library consultant. His recommendations of parl
standards were from 1:200 and 1:222.
4. The City’s library consultant, David Smith, noted 1 only one jurisdiction in the country had a library parl
standard less than 1:200. He usually recommends parl
between 1:200 and 1:335.
Given the above, both the Planning Commission and staff recommending a library parking standard of 1:200.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director determined that this administra action had no environmental impacts since all subseq
library projects will undergo individual environmental re
and, as such, the Planning Commission has recommended appr of the Negative Declaration issued on October 25, 1990.
e e ?* r>
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. /<, pyo
FISCAL IMPACT
This Zone Code Amendment will have no immediate fiscal impac to the City of Carlsbad. The amount of parking required by t
municipal code for future City libraries would be reduced this revision which could result in reduced costs in providj
required parking.
EXHIBITS
1. City Council Ordinance No. /bk-k$p
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3167 and 3168
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 5, l!
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 5, 1990
I, I,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
e W
NS-138 ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21, CHAPTER
21.44 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE
AMENDMENT OF SECTION 21.44.020(20) ADJUSTING THE
PARKING STANDARDS FOR LIBRARIES
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain s
SECTION I: That Title 21, Chapter 21.44, of the Carlsbad Munic
is amended by the amendment of Section 21.44.020(20) to read as follows:
"(20) Libraries - One space/two hundred square feet of gross flc
EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be effective thirty dq
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance ai
to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after it:
INTRODUCED, AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Ca
Council held on the 15th day of JanuarX 1991, and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of Carlsbad on the 22ndday ofJanuary , 1991, by the following vote, to w
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Larson, Stanton and Nyg
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Council Member Kulchin
AS1 OVED A-0 FORM AND LEGALITY
// 7 1 I'
--. e/ i /~J&)fiz~J 2- -- -/ ~l
VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City $tt $, lk/JhK< tu, /7?
I CLAUDE A. 1% ayor
I, f,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I*
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3167
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE
CODE TO ADJUST PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR
LIBRARIES.
CASE NAME: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: ZCA 90-1
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 5th day of
1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Si
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con:
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the .
submitted by staff, and considering any written codents received, th
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
as follows:
A)
I B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, tl
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaratic
to Exhibit "ND", dated October 25, 1990, and "PIE", dated Novemk
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following find
I
Findings:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that t
zone code amendment may have a significant impact on the enviror
As no site specific project is proposed with this amendment, no sensit
will be impacted by this proposal.
2.
...
'I Y' I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I.8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tE
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of Decerr
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners Schlehube
Marcus & Holmes.
NOES: Commissioners: McFadden & Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
1
p-8 J!! vflA*-o?-V/l ) (J/ '/p&/m-
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: 1
cc
PLANNING DIRECTOR
u MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL~R
I I
-2- PC RES0 NO. 3167
rt f,
NEGATiVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REVISION OF CHAPTER 21.44 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIl
CODE TO ADJUST THE PARKING STANDARDS FOR LIBRARIES.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described prc
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Qualitly
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbpd. As a result of
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a si@
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plan
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments frorr
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department w
30 days of date of issuance.
..
DATED: OCTOBER 25, 1990
CASE NO: ZCA 90-1 Planning Director
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1990
Y
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438.
e 1) r8 f,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. ZCA 90-1
DATE: OCTOBEF
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: AMENDMENT OF LIBRARY PARKING STANDARDS
2. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: - 2075 LAS PALMAS DRNE
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(619) 438-1161
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 23, 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REVISION OF CHAPTER 21.44 OF THE CARLSBAD
CODE TO ADJUST PARKING STANDARDS FOR LIBR
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the I
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. F
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposec
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an E
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
any of its aspects may cause a sigruficant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" w
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any
project may cause a sinnificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify fc
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects ca
insimificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" ar
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of t
DrSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
e W v1 fr
PHYSICAL ENVIR0”T
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: E? gg, N
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards? -
unique physical features? - -
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site? __. -
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
2. Appreciably change the topography or any
-
3.
4.
any bay, inlet or lake? - -
ambient air quality? - c 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
6. Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
7.
8.
water, ground water or public water supply?
depletion of any natural resources?
-
9. Substantially increase usage or cause -
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - -
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site, structure or object? - -
-2-
e 0 ', 1,
BIOLOGICAL ENVTRONME"
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: GS E21 NI
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
- plants)? -
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? - - -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other fannland of state or local
importance? -
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat L or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects? - -
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
16.
migration or movement of animals? -
HUMANENVIRONMENT
YES WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: GS (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? - -
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? -
-3 -
e 0 *i 1,
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
E8 h WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
E?
19.
control systems? - -
20. Increase existing noise levels? - -
21.
22.
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? - -
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
-
24.
for additional housing? c
25. Generate substantial additional traffic? - -
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
27.
movement of people and/or goods? - -
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? -
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -
emergency evacuation plans? - -
aesthetically offensive public view? -
existing recreational opportunities? -
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an -
32. Affect the quality or quantity of -
-4-
0 0 *, f,
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
E8 Nl WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: GS
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
rime while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
-
34.
goals? (A short-term impact on the c
- -
35.
36.
either directly or indirectly? - -
-5-
0 0 VZ fr
DISCUSSION OF ENVIR0"TAL WMUATION
The project involves the evaluation and subsequent adjustment of the zoning code goven
parking requirements for libraries. Preliminary research has indicated that the current standai
restrictive. The new standard would consequently relax the present ratio of one space per one 1
and fifty square feet of library space to perhaps one space per two-hundred or two-hundred '
square feet. Since this zone code amendment deals with only a parking development standarl
subsequent library development projects will receive an individual, site-specific environmenta
no environmental impacts are anticipated.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
1 - 4. Since no site-specific project is proposed with this zone code amendments, I:
changes in topography that would result in unstable earth conditions, erosion t
soils, or alteration of deposition patterns will occur. No geological impacts WI
result from this proposal.
5 - 8. As this project is completely administrative and proposes no specific si
development, no affects to air quality or climatological indices are expected. Eac
library project that will be subject to the new parking standards will undergo si
specific environmental review that will evaluate potential impacts to watercours
and the quantity and quality of various water sources.
This zone code amendment does not involve any development project and, therefoi will not deplete any natural resources or other forms of energy.
Only a site specific environmental review for a particular library development cot'
identify the existence of a significant archeological, paleontological or historit
structure or object on site. This administrative, non-project specific zone cc
amendment, therefore, has no historical impacts.
c 9 - 10.
11.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
12 - 16. Because this zone code amendment proposes no actual development, and beca.
each library development will be reviewed for possible biologically-related imp;
no impacts to the diversity of flora and fauna condition of ecosystems,
agricultural areas and farmlands are anticipated.
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
17. This amendment to the zoning code does not affect any land use issues. It me-
alters the parking requirement for a specific land use.
The reduction in parking required for library developments will not, in and of it:
affect the supply or demand for any public utilities or services.
18 - 19.
-6-
0 0 .< f,
20 - 22. Since no site-specific development is associated with this zone code amendment, no
site related nuisances such as excessive noise, light and glare, release of hazardous
substances, and explosion will occur.
As this zone code amendment deals only with the parking standards for libraries, ne
impacts to either the density of human population or the housing supply are
expected.
23-24.
25. See #17 below.
26. The new parking standard recommended for the zoning code will be a product o
research into the parking needs of libraries and current library parking situations
As such, this zone code amendment should not create a demand for new parking a
the parking required by the zoning code will be sufficient. The only existing librar
parking lot within the City may be brought into conformance by this zone cod
amendment .
Since this amendment proposal does not propose site specific development, n
impacts to existing transportation systems or waterborne, rail, or air traffic wj
occur. The possibility of a specific library project producing traffic hazards (
interfering with emergency circulation plans will be evaluated on a project-by-proje
basis.
As this zone code amendment involves no physical development, no obstruction 1
scenic vistas or diminishing of existing recreational opportunities are anticipated
See #11 and #12 above.
Since the project does not propose any site specific development and, as shov
above, it does not affect any geological, biological, or cultural resources, neitl
long-term nor cumulative negative environmental impacts will result from tl
action.
27 - 30.
c 31 - 32.
33.
34 - 36.
-7-
0 0 r,
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
A) No development is proposed with this action therefore no phasing or postponement ( development is possible.
B) No site specific development is associated with this proposal therefore discussion alternate site designs, scale of development, uses of site or sites
C) See B above.
D) See B above.
E) See A above.
F) See B above. c
G) The no project alternative would be contrary to that indicates that a previous resear
change in library parking standards is necessary. This may result in unnecessary park
on sites that could accommodate increased library project area or landscaping.
MG:lh
-8-
0 CI '* f,
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sigmficant effect on the environment, and a
DECLARATION will be prepared.
- I find that although the proposed project could have a sigmficant effect on the environmen not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an a
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIR
IMPACT REPORT is required.
44 Signature 1;i 9 /f? 0
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-9-
0 0 d( rr
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
I
-10-
8, r*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
e W
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3168
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT, AMENDING
TITLE 21, CHAPTER 44, SECTION 020, OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL, CODE, TO ADJUST THE PARKING STANDARDS
FOR LIBRARIES.
CASE NAME: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: ZCA 90-1
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 5th day of
1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider sa
and
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said C
considered all factors relating to the Zone Code Amendmeht.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning (
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and subject to the following findings. 1 Findings:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the various elements of
Plan.
The proposed consolidation of parking standards for libraries
substations will not adversely affect parking supplies.
The proposed amendment will provide for an adequate parking supp
library project.
2.
3.
...
a, I.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
l7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* w
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tE
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of Decert
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehube.
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: Commissioners: McFadden & Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING c COMMISSION
ATTEST:
v MICHAEL J. HOLZMI~ER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 3168 -2-
m STAFF REPORT e .f 71
Gtz DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION (3
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: ZCA 90-1 - LIBRARY PARKING STANDARDS - Request for an amendmen
Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to adjust the park
standards for libraries.
1. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commksion Resolution No. 3
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Planning Commisi
Resolution No. 3168 recommending APPROVAL, of ZCA 90-1, based upon the findings
subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
In October, 1956, the City Council adopted the Zoning Ordinance of the City (Ordini
No. 9060) which included parking standards for various uses. The parking required f
library use at that time was one space per two hundred and fifty syuare feet of gross f
area (1:250) with the requirement for library substations being set a one space per
hundred square feet (1:SOO). This standard remained in effect until May of 1986 t
numerous revisions to the parking requirements (Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Muni
Code) were adopted through Ordinance No. 9804. The library parking standard
adjusted to one space per one hundred and fifty square feet (1:150), while the lil
substation was changed to one space per two hundred fifty square feet (1:250), whj
the current status.
Upon researching the 1986 Zone Code Amendment (ZCA 187) to parking standar
became evident that no surveys or parking studies were conducted to arrive at the cu
library standards. Rather the adjusted parking standard was formulated after evalu
of parking at the main library. The 24,600 square foot library (constructed in 1966:
originally parked at a ratio of 1:432. In October, 1985, the main library parking lo
expanded to 99 spaces with a corresponding ratio of 1:250. Although this mc
Ordinance requirements, parking demand still exceeded parking supply. The fact tb
library was in conjunction with the Civic Center could have added to the demands sc
at the time that recommendations were being formulated for Ordinance No. 98
appeared that the existing standard of 1:2SO for library parking was insufficient.
library substation parking standard was also changed in 1986 to be proportionate 1
newly proposed main library standard.
After preliminary research, staff recommended a reevaluation of the library park
Resolution of Intention (ROI 184) presented to the Planning Commission on Octob
1990. This Zone Code Amendment is based upon the analysis of parking at s
-
LfBRARY PARKDNG STANDARDS BYJURISDICTION
CITY SPACES PER SQUARE FE
1 :300 Chula Vista, CA
Corona, CA 1:250
Cowallis, OR 1:600
El Sequndo, CA 1:300
Everett, WA 1:430
Fremont, CA 1:230
Glendale, AZ 1:440
Glendale, CA 1:300
Lacey, WA 1:265
Oceanside, CA 1 :300
Orange, CA 1:250
San Juan Capistrano, CA 1:350
Thousand Oaks, CA 1 :290
% e '< '6
ZCA 90-1 - LIBRARY P NG STANDARDS
DECEMBER 5, 1990
PAGE 3
As evidenced above, most jurisdictions have arrived at a standard between 1:2:
and 1:300. This range was collaborated by a prominent library consultant, Hc
Galvin, in his article in the Librarv Journal, November 15, 1978 entitled "Put
Library Parking Needs". After sampling over one hundred libraries ranging in s
from 2,600 square feet to 105,000 square feet, Galvin concluded that a park
requirement of between 1:200 and 1222 met all parking needs and was
adequate library parking standard.
While it is valuable to sample as many jurisdictions and specific projects as possiF
a consideration of the specific needs of the City of Carlsbad must be made. r
current main library is part of a larger civic center and the new South Carlsl
Library is proposed to include an auditorium and art gallery. Both libraries arc
mixed use developments and, therefore, similar multi-use library projects musl
sampled for an effective comparison. Listed below are several mixed use libr projects and their corresponding parking standards.
Las Vegas Central Library (with Children's Museum), Las Vegas, NV. Total square footage - - 105,000
1:350 - Parking standard -
c
Southdale Area Library (with government offices), Henneph County, MN. Total square footage = 95,000
1:200 - Parking standard -
City of Chula Vista Library (with auditorium), Chula Vista, CA. Total square footage = 64,000
1:200 - Parking standard -
City of Escondido Library (with bookstore and meeting rooms), Escondido, CA Total square footage = 45,000
1:250 - Parking standard -
City of San Bernardino Library (with auditorium/art gallery), San Bernardino Total square footage = 64,000
Parking standard - - 1:300
Considering all of the above references, a logical parking standard for librarj
mixed use projects would be between 1:200 and 1:350. Given the fact
Carlsbad libraries are of superior quality and often draw visitors from outsid
City, the more restrictive ratio of 1:200 seems reasonable. Although this ra more lenient than the current standard of 1:1SO, it is consistent with compe
library projects and is substantiated by experts in the field.
%I 0 ., 4%
ZCA 90-1 - LIBRARY P NG STANDARDS
DECEMBER 5,1990
PAGE 4
2. Necessity of Distinction
During staff's surveys of the various jurisdictions mentioned above, it becz
evident that Carlsbad is the only City that differentiates between libraries ;
library substations for parking standards. Since the functions and programs wit
a main library and a branch library are very similar, it does not seem practica
distinguish between the two. The Library Director has informed staff that neit
the current La Costa Branch Library, nor any other branch library, will be necess
once the new South Carlsbad Library has opened. It therefore does not seem lor
to maintain a separate parking standard for branch libraries (library substatic and, as such, staff is recommending that this parking standard be removed from
Ordinance.
Consistencv with the General Plan
The Land Use Element of the General Plan calls for development to be designed
constructed with sufficient off-street parking and loading facilities. Based upor
comparables detailed above, the proposed parking ratio of 1:200 is consistent
this provision. The Circulation Element states that "joint public-private effor
improve parking and circulation conditions in eltisting dev'eloped areas shod
encouraged." While the proposed parking ratio is less restrictive than the CUI
standard of 1:150, it would still require an additional 25 spaces at the existing 1
library for conformance. On occasion, the parking lot at the main library
forcing an on-street parking demand. Based upon the above data, the pro€
parking standard would provide for sufficient parking supply if the library pa!
lot were brought into conformance thus alleviating this parking overflow. This
Code Amendment is, therefore, consistent with the Circulation Element o
General Plan.
3.
Summary
Staff has polled many jurisdictions as to the required and/or actual parking amoun
many library projects. In addition, a periodical search produced another library pa
poll conducted by a library consultant. Both of these surveys have indicated that a pa
standard of one space per two hundred square feet is restrictive enough to adeqi
accommodate library parking demands. It has also been shown that a zone
amendment to relax the library parking requirements is consistent with the General
Given the above, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the att resolutions thereby recommending approval of ZCA 90-1 to the City Council.
e e *‘a,
ZCA 90-1 - LIBRARY PARKING STANDARDS
DECEMBER 5, 1990
PAGE 5
rv. EWRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this administrative action has no environmer
impacts since all subsequent library projects will undergo individual environmental revie
and, as such, has issued a Negative Declaration on October 25, 1990.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3167
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3168
c MG:km
November 5, 1990
December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4
Plan (CIP) at this time which is the reason for the bond.
When the existing drain is cleaned out, it should take care
of the immediate problem.
Commissioner McFadden inquired when the area will get street
improvements. Mr. Wojcik replied that there is nothing on
the CIP for that street. At the present time, the two
options available for street improvements would be (1) the
existing neighborhood or (2) new developers.
street improvements must wait for CIP funds.
Commissioner Holmes stated that he doesn't believe this
building will win an architectural beauty award but it does
meet all of the ordinances. the metal roof but he can accept that fact that it will
provide a variety to the area.
Commissioner Schlehuber stated that he is not excited about
the metal roof but since the project meets all of the
ordinances, he will probably vote in favor of it.
Commissioner Marcus stated that this is an interesting design
Otherwise,
He does not particularly like
<
, and she can support it. Commissioner McFadden agrees.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he will be voting against the
project because he feels there is a safety issue with the
chimney.
Chairman Schramm can accept the project. She likes the two
front units facing the street because it gives the project a
single family appearance.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Erwin X
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3163 approving the Hall xx
Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Holmes X
Director, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. Marcus X
3164, 3165, and 3166 approving SDP 90-02, CT 90-01, McFadden X
and PUD 90-01 based on the findings and subject to the Schlehuber X conditions contained therein. Schramm X
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 6:42 p.m. and reconvened
at 650 p.m.
4) ZCA 90-1 - LIBRARY PBING STANDARDS - Request for an
amendment to Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code to adjust the parking standards for libraries.
Michael Grim, Assistant Planner, reviewed the background of
the request and stated that ZCA 90-1 is a City request to
adjust the parking standard for libraries and to delete a
separate parking requirement for branch libraries.
current requirement for libraries is one space for 150 s.f.
of gross floor area (1:150) which was adopted in May 1986.
Prior to this date, the requirement was 1:250. Upon researching the ZCA regarding library parking standards, it
became evident,that no surveys or parking studies were
conducted to arrive at the current standard adopted in 1986.
Rather, the adjusted parking standard for libraries was
formulated after an evaluation of parking at the main
library.
1:250, however parking demand at that time still exceeded
supply. the Civic Center could have added to the demands so it
The
In 1986, the main library was parked at a ratio of
The fact that the library was in conjunction with
MINUTE 3 0 ,&A*>
y
COMMISSIONERS December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5
appeared that the existing standard of 1:250 for library
parking was insufficient.
A review of 13 jurisdictions identified the most restrictive
parking standard to be located in Fremont, California, at a
ratio of 1:230; the least restrictive was found in Corvallis,
Oregon, at a standard of 1:600. In all cases, the librarians
surveyed stated that there is sufficient onsite parking for
library operations and that their parking standards are
adequate. Staff also surveyed several libraries containing
functions beyond the normal library operation, i.e. museums,
government offices, and meeting rooms. As expected, the
parking standards were more restrictive, with standards from
1:ZOO to 1:350. Finally, staff researched applicable
periodicals and located an article by Hoyt Galvin, a
prominent library consultant. In his article, Galvin
surveyed over 100 libraries of various sizes nationwide.
Included in his survey questionnaire were questions regarding
the actual parking ratio and the librarian's opinion as to
the adequacy of the onsite parking supply. Galvin concluded that a library parking standard of 1:ZOO to 1:222 met all
needs.
Although Galvin's study was conducted in 1978, the traffic
generated by a library has been fairly constant over time.
Using SANDAG generation rates, the traffic generated by
library use has been constant since 1984. Considering all of
the above references, staff believes a logical library
parking standard would be between 1:200 and 1:350. Given the
fact that Carlsbad libraries are of superior quality and
often draw visitors from outside the City, the more
restrictive ratio of 1:ZOO seems reasonable. Although this
ratio is more lenient than the current standard of 1:150, it is consistent with comparable library projects and is
substantiated by experts in the field. Therefore, staff
recommends approval.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Beverly Hills, Mission Viejo,
and Irvine were surveyed. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning
Director, stated that these three cities were not surveyed.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if the parking was adequate at
the mixed use library projects which were surveyed. Mr. Grim
replied that parking was adequate.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how many spaces will actually be
required at the new South Carlsbad branch library.
Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that 427 spaces
would be required at a ratio of 1:150, less a 15% allowance
for mixed use, for a total parking requirement of 363 spaces.
Using a ratio of 1:200, the parking requirement would be 320
spaces.
commissioner McFadden inquired what type of facility is being
proposed for the Barrio. Cliff Lange, Library Director,
replied that the facility planned for the Barrio will be an
Information Center.
part time by the Library. using that Barrio facility will walk to it.
Commissioner Holmes stated that he almost always has trouble
finding a place to park at the main library.
concerned about the handicapped parking.
would like to see a couple more handicapped parking spaces
Gary
The grant being sought is for a
' temporary Outreach program, open minimum hours and staffed
It is presumed that most people
He is primarily
Commissioner Holmes
MINUT& 0 rC*41
y
COMMISSIONERS December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6
provided. Cliff Lange, Library Director, replied that he has
no objection to this proposal.
Chairman Schrm opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Clifford Lange, Library Director, 1250 Carlsbad Village
Drive, addressed the Commission and stated that he supports
the staff recommendation to change the parking standard from
1:150 to 1:200. He and his staff spent a considerable amount
of time researching this issue and he spoke personally to at
least one dozen library directors, State library staff, and
several library consultants. He was unable to find any
library with a parking standard as strict as Carlsbad.
feels our current parking standard is unreasonable and
excessive. As a result, the proposed branch library for
South Carlsbad will have a difficult time finding enough
parking spaces to accommodate the square footage.
requested that Commissioners support the staff request to
adjust the parking standard to a more reasonable ratio in
line with current trends.
David R. Smith, 130 Holly Road, Hopkins, Minnesota, addressed
the Commission and stated that he is a consultant to
libraries. He has been involved with planning for the
proposed South Carlsbad library since July 1989.
involved with planning libraries across the country for 22
years and he has conducted a great many feasibility studies.
Through his work, he has become very familiar with parking
requirements for libraries. He planned two libraries in
Hennipen, Minnesota (Richdale and Southdale), which are
located adjacent to major shopping centers.
Area Library (65,000 s.f.1 was located on a busy thoroughfare
with a lot of strip commercial. His office was located in an
office building (30,000 s.f.) attached to the library
structure. The library/office building had approximately 330 parking spaces and he only saw the parking lot filled on two
or three occasions when there was overflow from the shopping
center.
that portion of the building was turned into municipal courts
and a county service satellite which contained areas to
register motor vehicles and pay property taxes.
standard for that high activity building is currently only
1:200.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr. Smith had ever planned a
library which also housed an auditorium.
Southdale Area Library contained a 200-250 seat auditorium
where children's programs were held but it did not contain a
gallery or museum.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr. Smith had ever planned a
library which housed an auditorium and a movie theatre very
close by. He replied that the Southdale Area Library had a
shopping mall and five-screen theatre located across the
street. The parking standard was around 1:300 and was quite
sufficient.
Commissioner Hall is concerned that the proposed South
Carlsbad Library is going to be a multi-use building. The
post office, theatre, and library are all high use facilities
and will be within very close walking distance. Mr. Smith
replied that much of the staff parking will not be needed in
the evening when the theatre parking is needed.
He
He
He has been
The Southdale
The Southdale library was ultimately relocated and
The parking
He replied that the
Page 7 December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
Commissioner McFadden inquired if the 1:200 standard for
Southdale included any forgiveness for mixed use. Mr. Smith
replied that Southdale used a straight 1:200 standard.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if public transportation has
any bearing on the parking. Mr. Smith replied that the public transportation in that area is not heavily used. A
survey showed that 94% to 96% of library users traveled by
private conveyance.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the population served by
the Southdale Area Library. Mr. Smith replied that the
population was around 200,000.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if Mr. Smith has ever seen a
drive-up drop-off to return books. He replied that he had
seen them but they usually do not work very well.
seen one successful drive-up in Orlando, Florida, which is
used to distribute and return videos.
Commissioner McFadden commented that UCS3 has a drive-up
which works very well.
trade-off for a library with a drive-up. Mr. Smith replied
that the idea of a drive-up was considered in South Carlsbad
but they were not able to accommodate vehicle stacking
efficiently.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Mr. Smith knows Hoyt Galvin.
He replied that he does;
still very active in library consulting.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Mr. Smith has had any
experience with a reduction of ratios when shared parking was
involved.
shared parking in the precise manner that is being applied
here.
Eugene Spindler, 3150 Bristol Street, Suite 250, Costa Mesa,
representing the Carlsbad Retail Associates, developers of
the retail center adjacent to the proposed South Carlsbad
library, addressed the Commission and stated that Carlsbad
Retail Associates supports the staff recommendation for a
parking standard of 1:200.
and feel that the standard is adequate and more than ample
for the site.
parking stalls available and the requirement would be for 320
stalls, so there would be a 30 stall cushion.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr Spindler realizes that the library will be a multi-use building and will also contain a
192-seat auditorium. auditorium but has been advised that it will not be used at
all times. a.m to 2:OO p.m. and the peak time €or the theatre would be
7:OO p.m. to 8:OO p.m. Mr. Spindler does not feel there will
be a conflict.
Commissioner Hall inquired if the post office will create a
problem. Mr. Spindler replied that the majority of shared
parking will be between the library and the shopping center;
the post office is self-contained but does have the right to use a strip of parking along the northern boundary of their
property.
Commissioner Hall inquired who their consultant was. Mr.
Spindler replied that it was Linscott, Law & Greenspan.
He has
She could see giving a parking
Mr. Galvin lives in Iowa and is
He replied that he has not been involved with
They have done extensive studies
Using the 1:200 ratio, there would be 350
He replied that he is aware of the
The peak times for the auditorium would be 11:OO
COMMISSIONERS
c
COMMISSIONERS December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the status of the post
office. Mr. Spindler replied that the site has been
appraised and is now being evaluated by their civil engineer.
Escrow is expected to close by the end of February.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the delivery vehicles will be
parked on the site or someplace else. Mr. Spindler replied
that the post office has not yet identified the size the
facility to be built.
stored onsite, but private vehicles of postal employees would
probably be parked someplace else.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how Mr. Spindler would feel about
a parking structure in 5-10 years. He replied that a parking
structure could probably be made to work with the right
planning.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Mr. Spindler agrees that using
the current parking standard of 1:150, 363 spaces would be
required rather than 320 spaces using the 1:ZOO standard. He
agrees with this computation.
Commissioner McFadden commented that she had heard that the
post office would not consider a reciprocal parking
agreement. Mr. Spindler replied that the post office has not been in favor of reciprocal parking but it has not been
discussed recently; they plan to fence off their site.
Postal employees would park in a strip along the northern
edge of the postal parcel.
Commissioner Hall inquired if there will be a restaurant
located on the site. Mr. Spindler replied that two small
restaurants are planned for Pad A of the shopping center.
There is another 5,500 s.f. site on Pad B which was planned
for a restaurant but the size might be reduced to 3,000 s.f.
Seena Trigas, 6430 Flamenco Street, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that she chairs the Library
Architectural Committee and is President of the Library Board
of Trustees. The architectural committee visited a San
Bernardino library, which includes an art gallery, using a
1:300 parking standard. That library has not experienced any
parking problems.
ratio of 1:ZOO will be more than adequate and they support
the staff recommendation. She requested consideration.
Commissioner Erwin asked the City Attorney if the parking
shortage using the current standard could be handled with a
variance. Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, replied that
there is no application for a variance before the
Commissioner.
could be met.
Hap L’Heureux, 1731 Calavo Court, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is also a member of the
architectural committee. In his opinion, it would be
extremely difficult to reduce the size of the library and . still accommodate the various uses. If the facility requires
downsizing, it would necessitate elimination of the
auditorium and the art gallery and would set the project back
6-8 months.
and urged the Commission’s approval.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr. L’Heureux wants to build a
structure where people will have to fight to find a parking
Postal vehicles would have to be
The Library Board feels that a parking
A variance would be possible if the findings
He supports the staff recommendation of 1:ZOO
MINUT I!! 0 ** ..
\
COMMISSIONERS December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9
place.
scheduling of events.
Gary Wrench, 3135 Charter Oak Drive, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is on the Library Architectural
Review Committee and a former member of the Planning
Commission. He requests support of the change in parking
ratios because it is a reasonable request, regardless of the
15% allowance for multiple uses.
Bebe Grosse, 5850 Sunny Creek Road, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that she is on the Library Board and
feels that standards are established to serve a need. She
believes this parking standard should have been addressed
long ago.
research as to trends or need. The current approach is
reasonable. She requested the Commission's support.
Dick Martin, 2350 Cipriano Lane, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is a member of the Library
Board and he supports the staff recommendation. He hopes the
Commission will also support it. If the library requires
downsizing because of the parking situation, it will probably
jeopardize the State funding.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Schramm declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Commissioner Marcus thinks the study has been very thorough.
She would be interested in knowing how often the auditorium
and art gallery in San Bernardino is used. Cliff Lange,
Library Director, replied that the San Bernardino auditorium
is used 3-4 evenings a week, and sometimes in the afternoon.
Occasionally the teachers use it during the day for inservice
training.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired how many consultants or
firms are active in the library parking field. Mr. Smith
replied that there are 35-40 part-time consultants and 6-8
full-time consultants in this field.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if Mr. Smith primarily works
on library parking. He replied that he works on library
planning which includes library building, feasibility, and
programming studies. He has been in the field for 22 years.
In his observation of libraries which have active galleries or museums, the major traffic occurs on opening day and
closing day. Galleries and museums of the size planned for
South Carlsbad usually only have 12-15 persons in them at any
given time.
Commissioner Schlehuber is satisfied with Mr. Smith's
knowledge of library parking standards.
should be made based on logic. is reasonable and can accept the opinion of the expert.
He replied that any problems can be handled with
The current standard was set up without any
He feels a decision
He feels the 1:200 standard
He . can support the change.
Commissioner Marcus doesn't want to see the library downsized
and she feels the present standard was arbitrary.
that 1:200 is reasonable and she can support it.
Commissioner Erwin feels we are opening the flood gates by
changing an ordinance to reduce parking to accommodate the
library.
She feels
He thinks the City should set the example. He could
COMMISSIONERS Page 10 December 5, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION.
support a variance for 13 parking spaces but cannot support
changing the standard.
Commissioner McFadden noted that the cities surveyed did not
give 15% for joint use. She is sorry that a reciprocal
parking agreement has already been signed and thinks it is
curious that the post office can use everyone else's parking
but no one can use the post office parking.
she does not think a parking standard of 1:200 will be
adequate.
Commissioner Holmes feels he must support the expert since he
has no experience with library parking.
Commissioner Hall can support the staff recommendation due to
the testimony of the expert and the staff report.
Chairman Schramm was on the library committee and can support
the staff recommendation because the library is already
parked at 350 spaces.
library, post office, and theatre together. If more parking
is needed, the shopping center can build a parking structure.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Erwin
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3167 recommending Hall
approval of the Negative Declaration, and adopt Planning Holmes
Commission Resolution No. 3168 recommending approval of Marcus
ZCA 90-1, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Schlehuber
Unfortunately,
This is a new concept of having a
McFadden
Schrannn
Commissioner McFadden requested that the record show she
could not support a library parking standard of 1:200 because
of the joint use.
t Planning Director, stated that this review the design of the proposed
the issuance of building perm
the architectural
was provided for committee and the Library Board.
the Commission and gallery to vie
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the 19 ft.
the south side of the building had been r
Grim, Assistant Planner, replied that the
of the parking stalls is 20 ft. as shown on t
.
library design.
(Form A) * 0 ** ' v
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: Planning Department
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice -
ZCA 90-1 (PARKING STANDARDS FOR LIBRARIES)
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
JAN. 15, 1991 .
Thank you.
1/2/91 - Assistant City Man-- Dat
0 *e&*’
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GJYEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a pu
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Aveni
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, to consider approva
a request for an amendment to Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to adjust
parking standards for libraries.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the p~
hearing, If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Departmer
438-1161, ext. 4499.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice (
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public heal
CASE FILE: ZCA 90-1
APPLICANT: LIBRARY PARKING STANDARDS
PUBLISH: BLADE CITIZEN - JANUARY 4, 1991
CARLSBAD JOURNAL - JANUARY 10, 1991
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
0 , Id? .*I b
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(201 5.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
Blade-Ci tizen
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for
the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial circulation in Bonsail, Fallbrook, Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, County
Court of the County of San Diego, State of California,
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), bas been
of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior
under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy
published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
January 4, 1991
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Oceanside,California, this 4 day of January, 1991
--------
Signature
BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising
1722 South Hill Street
Oceanside, CA 92054
P.0. BOX 90
(61 9) 433-7333
-
- e
This space is for the County Clerk's Filii
Proof of Publication of
Public Hearing
.........................................
. . NOTICE OF --------- PUBLIC HEARING ------------
NOTICE IS HEREBY 'gof Notice GIVEN that the City Council of 3ELy the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council ;pace. Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad. California, at 600 p.m on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, to consider approval of a request for an amendment to Chapter 21 44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to adjust the parking standards for libranes Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Depart- ment at 438-1 161, ext 4499. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or so- meone else raised at the public heanng described in this notice or in wntten cor- respondence delNered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public heamg.
APPLICANT: LIBRARY
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
Legal 30707 January 4, 1991
CASE FILE ZCA 90-1
PARKING STANDARDS
2-
e * rrl Lt -
PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer Of
.
Blade-Cit izen
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for
the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial circulation in Bonsall, Fallbrook,
Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, County of Sari Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed COPY (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the
following dates, to-wit:
January 4, I991 -
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
-
Dated at Oceanside,California, this 4%‘ OfJanuary 3 I99 1
7 > / : -* .;/a<
i
l---ZX,
~ <,c.--.GL.;ii+ I\
- i Signature
,,,,,,,~---------------L----------.~----------------
/;i
BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising
1722 South Hill Street P.O. Box 90
Oceanside, CA 92054 (61 9) 433-7333
e
This space is for the County Clerk’s Fill
Proof of Publication of
P1.2blTc :~p:--~~ 1:: r
__________________------------------.----
-------------------------------‘--------~
* hl tire Pa
NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEAR~NG
NOTlCE 1s HEREBY GlVEN that the City Council of the clb’ of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad VikJe Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), CaAsbad, Calfiornia at 600 Pm on TueMai Januq 15, 1991, to conside; approval of a request for an I amendment to Chapter 21 4 1
Of fie Carlsbad Municipal I Code to adlust the parking standards for libraries , Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the Public heanng If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim In the Planning Depart- merit at 438-1161, ext 4499 If YOU challenge the zone code Amendment in court you may be limited to raisin; MlY those issues you or so- mmne else raised at the public hearing d-cnbed in this notice or in written wr- respondence delivered to the city of Carlsbad at or prior to the Public hearng CASE FILE. ZCA go-) APPLICANT. LIBRARY PARKING STANDARDS CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUN~IL
Legal 30707 January 4, 1991 -