HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-03-05; City Council; 11057; ZONE 18 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANr
P
\
d UJ
OE ‘ zi
.. z 0
I- I x A
z 3
0
c
0
1 ClmOF CARLSBAP - AGENWBILL
AB# ljiL5 7 TITLE: DEPT.
MTG. 3/5/91 ZONE 18 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY 1
DEPT. GM CITY I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council adc
Resolution No. Ct I - 7 I’ approving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planni
Director and adopt Resolution No. C;I -7 c approving the Local Faciliti
Management Plan for Zone 18.
ITEM EXPLANATION
Zone 18 is the twelfth property owner-initiated and privately prepared Lo(
Facilities Management Plan to be heard by the City Council. On December *
1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved this plan as described
the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting attached as Exhibit 5.
There is one existing dwelling unit in the Zone and no approved projects. 1
projected residential buildout of the Zone is 2,091 dwelling units, which is fully
compliance with Proposition E and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements PI;
The Plan is a regulatory document which analyzes all eleven public facilities
determine whether they conform with the adopted performance standarc
Several facilities are identified as requiring upgrading in order to accommodi
future development in the zone. Therefore, specific conditions of approval h;
been included in the Plan to guarantee that all of the public facility standards i
continue to be met through buildout of the Zone.
The conditions state that, prior to the first final map or issuance of a grading per1
or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 18, a Financing Plan must
approved by the City guaranteeing funding for construction of all public faci
improvements identified in the Local Facilities Management Plan. Until t
financing mechanism has been approved by the City, no development will OQ
within Zone 18. The complete wording of the conditions is included in the Pla
Executive Summary which is attached as Exhibit 3.
Two new conditions which should be highlighted are General Conditions 10 i
1 1. Condition No. 10 states that participation in the proposed Mello-Roos Distr
or an alternative acceptable to the City Council, is necessary in order to find i
development in the zone to be consistent with the General Plan. Condition No.
requires participation in the financial guarantee for Palomar Airport Road Eas
Subsequent to the Planning Commission’s hearing of the plan, it was determir
that the Executive Summary should be revised. The new Executive Summary I
been included in place of the previous version. The revision makes no substan
changes in the plan and is intended only to clarify the facilities requireme
placed on the zone.
a e
I Page Two of Agenda Bill No. 11 i T 5 7
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on September 2
1990, indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 is nl
anticipated to have any adverse impacts on the environment. The Negath
Declaration was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission c
December 19, 1990.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 will not cause any significa
environmental impacts. The Plan is a public facilities planning document th
implements Carlsbad’s General Plan. The Plan makes generalized projections i
to the demand for and supply of public facilities and outlines the provision
adequate public facilities concurrent with the estimated demands. The PI
recognizes that further environmental review pursuant to the Califorr
Environmental Quality Act will be required prior to the development of any put=
or private project that is generally discussed in this plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this Plan. These costs will
recovered through the processing fee established by the City Council. It
anticipated that further staff time will be necessary to monitor this Plan and otk
zone plans on a yearly basis. The implementation of this Plan, however, shoi
help future fiscal planning by estimating the timing of future public facilities a
their costs.
EXHIBITS
1.
2.
4.
5.
City Council Resolution No. (-5 I - 3 5
City Council Resolution No. rj 1-3 G-
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3175 and 3176
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes dated December 19, 1990
3. Executive Summary - Zone 18
, -’ ,
r
4 .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
RESOLUTION NO. 91-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad did on the 5th day of
March , 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the City Council considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration including Planning Commission Resolution No. 31 75
ganting Planning Commission approval of said Negative Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California as follows:
1) That the above recitations are true and correct.
2) That the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director on
September 27, 1990 was prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
3) That there is no substantial evidence that the project as conditioned may
have a significant effect on the environment.
4) That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad incorporates into this resolution
Planing Commission Resolution No. 31 75 including findings contained
therein.
....
....
....
....
%I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1*
15
l6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of March ,
by the following vote, to wit:
!9
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton and Nyga
Mayor
ATTEST:
c4QzL
ALETHA L. W$TE$;adrk c
I (SEAL)
I I
-2-
1
r. I I
&
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L 0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 9 1- 7 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PU
FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared for Loc
Facilities Management Zone 18, in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsb:
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on December 19, 1990 hold
duly noticed public hearing as required by law to consider said plan and at tt
conclusion of the hearing adopted Resolution No 3176 making findings and
recommending that the City Council adopt a plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director (
September 27, 1990, indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan is n
anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of March 5,1991 held a du
noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and arguments of anyon
I desiring to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council oft
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1)
2)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commissior
Resolution No. 3176 also constitute the findings and conditions
the City Council.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 da
December 19, 1990 on file with the City Clerk and incorpora
herein by reference is hereby approved. Any development occurr
within the boundaries of Zone 18 shall comply with all the terms i
conditions of said plan.
3)
-
1' 1
d
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
L 0 m
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of March , 1991
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton and Nygaa
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City derk
I 19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 (SEAL)
I
-2-
I 0 0
A
I. Executive Summary
The purpose of this document is to provide a plan for supplying the public facilitie
that will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 18 area of th
City of Carlsbad, in accordance with the City’s Growth Management Program. Th
plan has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbal
Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 1986.
Development Assumptions
The first step in developing such a plan is to estimate the amount of developmer
both residential and nonresidential, that will be allowed in the zone. The types (
land uses assumed for the zone are those shown in the Carrillo Ranch Master PI2
and the Carlsbad General Plan. Exhibit 7 on page 32 shows the location of tP
various land uses within the zone. For residential development it is assumed thi
the density yield will be governed by the Growth Management Control Points i
shown below:
General Plan Desianation Densitv Yield
Residential, Low Density (RL)
Residential, Low-medium Density (RLM)
Residential, Medium Density (RM)
Residential, Medium-high Density (RMH)
Residential, High Density (RH)
1.0 dwelling units per act
3.2 dwelling units per act
6.0 dwelling units per aci
1 1.5 dwelling units per ac
19.0 dwelling units per ac
The density yield factors stated above were applied to the vacant, developat
residential land in the zone. To determine the developable acreage, the followii
constrained lands were deducted:
Major Power Line Easements
Future Right-of-way for Circulation Element Roads
Railroad Right-of-way
Slopes Greater Than 40%
Riparian Woodland
Wetlands
Floodways
Permanent Bodies of Water
Future School Sites
Other Environmental Features
1
,
4 0 0
fi
In addition, it is assumed that slopes of 25% to 40% may be developed at half thi
usual density. Using this methodology it was estimated that approximately 2,09
dwelling units could be constructed within Zone 18. The actual number of unit
that are ultimately constructed in the zone may vary. However, the estimate i
useful and valid for purposes of this plan and is consistent with all applicabl
requirements of the Growth Management Program, particularly Proposition El
For nonresidential development, it is assumed that building coverage would b
30% of the net developable acreage. This method yields an ultimate nonresidentii
development estimate of approximately 2,702,463 sq. ft. Again, this is only i
estimate or assumption for facility planning purposes. Actual nonresidenti
development may vary.
The plan includes phasing schedules which indicate the property owner
proposed amount of development for each year from 1991 to 201 4. The proper
owners are not required to adhere to this phasing, and it is intended for facili
planning purposes only. The phasing schedules (Exhibits 14 through 18) al:
include the projections for other zones with adopted Local Facilities Manageme
Plans. The schedules are used to determine approximate threshold years f
constructing or upgrading various public facilities to maintain compliance with tl
Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The threshold yea
arrived at in this way are only projections for facility planning purposes. The actL
thresholds must be monitored as development takes place in this zone. Facilitii
may be needed sooner or later than the threshold years shown in this pla
depending upon the actual timing of development.
Zone 18 Requirements for Public Facilities
The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the dema
for public facilities generated by development in Zone 18 based on the elev
adopted Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. T
following table (Exhibit 2) shows the current status of each facility with respect
the Performance Standard, given the existing amount of development in the zo
Because there is currently a limited amount of developed land in Zone 18 .
public facility demands are presently minimal, and all eleven Performar
Standards are currently being met.
In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as developml
occurs in the zone, the Plan contains specific conditions of approval which (
listed in the following two exhibits. Exhibit 4 contains the General Conditions wh
2
I e e
4
4
are applicable to all zones of the City. Exhibit 5 contains Special Conditions fo
Zone 18. The Special Conditions state each facility which must be providec
whether it must be financed or constructed, and when it must be provided.
The following is a list of the public facilities required to serve development in Zonl
18. This chart shows whether the facility would otherwise be provided as i
condition of approval of a development project or whether a special fundin!
mechanism is needed.
Ci Administrative Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. At tht
present time, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District is proposed.
Library. Special funding mechanism is required. At the present time, a Mello
Roos Community Facilities District is proposed.
Wastewater Treatment Cwacitv. Funding provided by sewer connection fees.
Park Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. This is typicall!
addressed by an agreement between the City and property owner@).
Drainaae Facilities. Condition of approval of development project.
Circulation Facilities.
projects and special funding, including proposed Mello-Roos CFD.
Fire Facilities. No special funding required.
Open Space. No special funding required.
Combination of condition of approval of developmenl
Schools. Special funding may be required by the appropriate school district.
Sewer. Condition of approval of development project.
Water. Condition of approval of development project.
3
I e 0
Financinq for Facilities
Section 21.90.1 1 O(3) of the Municipal Code requires that Local Facilitie
Management Plans contain a discussion of various methods of funding the facilitis
and improvements identified in the plan. This plan for Zone 18 provides a generi
discussion of the estimated costs for each facility and one or more possibli
methods of funding. However, the City is considering a Mello-Roos Cornmunit
Facilities District (CFD) for some Citywide facilities, and this District is not yc
formed. Other proposed funding mechanisms require agreements or financinl
instruments which have not yet been identified. Therefore, the financing discussio
in this plan must be considered preliminary and not fully meeting the requirement
of Section 21.90.1 lO(3).
In order to allow orderly and appropriate planning activities to continue for Zon
18, and to permit the property owners to exercise certain property rights while th
planning effort takes place, it is recommended that this Local Facilitie
Management Plan be approved subject to the condition that a Financing Plar
which fully meets the requirements of Section 21.90.1 1 O(3) be submitted by thf
property owners and approved by the City prior to finaling any subdivision mal
or issuance of any grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first withir
Zone 18. In addition, General Condition No. 10 states that participation in th(
proposed Citywide CFD, or an alternative acceptable to the City Council, i!
necessary in order to make the finding of consistency with the Public Facilitie:
Element. If the CFD is not formed, or the Zone 18 properties are not includec
within the CFD, no previously approved tentative maps could be finaled and nr
new tentative maps or other discretionary permits could be approved unless ar
alternate financing mechanism acceptable to the City Council is approved tc
finance the citywide facilities required to serve Zone 18.
4
4 l e
c
This page was intentionally left blank to preserve page numbering.
5
-. (I t 0 0
This page was intentionally left blank to preserve page numbering.
6
1 1 W 0
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
CITY OF VIST,
CITY OF ENCINITAS
LOCAL FAClLITlES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 18 CITY OF ENCLNITAS 1'
110 mu
/f K GROWTH Ex t
MANAGEMENT 0 LOC ATION 201 PROGRAM
7
1 t 0 e
EXHIBIT 2
ZONE 18 Existing Public Facilities Summary Sheet
Conformance with Adopta Facility Performance Standard
City Administrative Yes, existing facilities meet the ac
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the a(
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the
Library
Wastewater Treatment Capacity adopted performance standard.
Parks Yes, proposed facilities meet the
performance standard.
Yes, existing drainage facilities n
adopted performance standard. Drainage
Circulation No, existing circulation facilities
meet the adopted performance sG
Yes, existing fire facilities meet t
adopted performance standard.
Yes, existing open space meets tk
performance standard.
No, existing school facilities do I
the existing performance standarc
Yes, existing sewer collection fac
meet the adopted performance sk
Yes, existing water distribution f;
meet the adopted performance stz
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Water Distribution
8
I I a W
EXHIBIT 3
ZONE 18 Build Out Public Facilities Summary Chart
Conformance with Adoptel
Fadip Performance Standard
City Administrative Existing and planned facilities me
adopted performance standard thr
build out.
Existing and planned facilities me
adopted performance standard thr
build out.
Library
Wastewater Existing and planned facilities
Treatment Facilities meet the adopted performance sta
through the year 2000.
Park facilities meet the adopted
mitigation measures through builc
Drainage facilities meet the adopl
performance standard with the pr
mitigation measures through builc
Circulation facilities meet the ad(
performance standard with the pr
mitigation measures through buil
Existing and planned fire facilitic
adopted performance standard th:
build out.
Existing open space meets the ad
performance standard for existink
approved projects. An ongoing \
program will assure the open spa
performance standard will be ma
through build out.
Parks performance standard with the pr
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
9
I W W
Conformance with Adopt
Facilitv Performance Standard
Schools School facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the prc
mitigation measures through build
Sewer facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the prc
mitigation measures through builc
Water facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the prl
mitigation measures through builc
Sewer Collection
Water Distribution
10
0 0
EXHIBIT 4
General Conditions for Zone 18
1. All development within Zone 18 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of t
Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilit
Management Plan.
All development within Zone 18 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursua
to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended frc
time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 18 shall also
necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard.
The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 18 pursuant to Subsectia
21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All development in Zone 18 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Faciliti
and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 2
1986.
Periodic amendment to the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated
incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade standards
determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may 1
initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at a
time.
If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopt
performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter w
be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that
non-conformance does exist then no future building or development permits shall t
issued unless an amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone is approved by tl
City Council which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities in
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowc
unless the performance standards are complied with.
Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projec
within Zone 18. All future projects within Zone 18 shall undergo environmental revie
per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determint
during a project’s environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unle
findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council.
2.
responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
11
0 a
9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects with
Zone 18. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsba
Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residenti
units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any specif
residential density.
Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 18 shall be contingent upon th
General Plan. At this time a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District is propose
to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve ne
development. If the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District is not formed, or
the Community Facilities District is formed but the Zone 18 properties are nc
participants within that district, the required General Plan Consistency finding cannc
be made. No discretionary approvals, Building Permits, Grading Permits, Final Map
or development permits will be issued or approved unless an alternate financin
mechanism is provided by the developer and approved by the City Council to financ
the facilities legally applicable to Zone 18 that would have beedor are included i
the Community Facilities District. For purposes of this condition, the Mello-Roc
District will be considered to be formed following an affirmative vote of the properf
owners plus a 30 day period as prescribed by law to provide for any protest regardin
formation of the District.
Prior to the first discretionary action, approval of the first development permit c
issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any projei
within Zone 18, the property owner(s) shall provide a financial guarantee for thl
construction of Palomar Airport Road East. This guarantee may be in the form c
participation in any existing Assessment District or Mello-Roos Community Facilit
District formed to finance the construction of the road segment, participation in th
existing forward funding agreement as applied to Zone 5 property owners, or a
alternate financing plan acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney. Th
following activities are exempt for this: grading, minor planning entitlements, o
minor construction as part of ongoing agricultural operations; minor subdivisions an1
lot line adjustments for financing purposes. Any exemption is solely at the City’.
discretion.
10.
provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of th
11.
12
m W
EXHIBIT 5
Special Conditions For Zone 18
CITY ADMlMSTRATIVE FACILITIES
No special conditions.
LIBRARY
No special conditions.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequ
wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000:
A. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow ra
and to have an early warning of capacity problems.
PARKS
A. Prior to the recordation of a final map within Zone 18, a parks agreement between
City of Carlsbad and Zone 18 property owners shall be entered into and shall include
following provisions:
1. The secured dedication of 8.5 acres of park land with the execution of t
agreement at a location to be determined acceptable to the City.
Provide a plan which establishes acceptable access to these park sites subjecl
the approval of the Planning Director and the City Engineer.
The Parks Agreement must be consistent with the requirements af the Cit
Growth Management Program.
If any reimbursements and/or park-in-lieu fee credits are to be given, the Pa
Agreement shall provide a mechanism to do so.
2.
3.
4.
B. At any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park Districi
no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 18 unl
actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities.
13
W
DRAINAGE
A. All future development in Zone 18 will be required to construct any future Zone I
storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan and revised Drainai
accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of any fin
map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for any development requirir
future storm drain facilities in Zone 18.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permi
whichever occurs first for any specific watershed within Zone 18, the developers of th
project are required to:
Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities necessary
B.
1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Mast
Plan and;
2. Execute an agreement to pay any drainage area fees established in tl
forthcoming revised Drainage Master Plan.
C. WATERSHEDA
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed A of Zone 18, t,
developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the proposl
30-inch storm drain crossing future Melrose Avenue as required by the Ci
Engineer.
D. WATERSHEDB
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed B of Zone 18, t
developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the propos
inlet facility and 48-inch storm drain in future Melrose Avenue as required by t
City Engineer.
E. WATERSHEDC:
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed C of Zone 18, t
developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the propos
72-inch storm drain crossing future Melrose Avenue, the detention/desiltati
basin, and inlet and outlet facilities as required by the City Engine
14
a a
Construction of the detention/desiltation basin shall be concurrent with t
grading operation of the project requiring the facility.
F. WATERSHEDD
1. Drainage facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfactj
of the City Engineer.
G. WATERSHEDE
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit
building permit, whichever occurs first within Watershed E of Zone 18, t
developers are required to financially guarantee the construction of the propos
42-inch and 48-inch storm drain system along El Fuerte Street as required by t
City Engineer.
H. WATERSHEDS F ’& G:
1. Drainage facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfacti
of the City Engineer.
I. All WATERSHEDS EXCEPT H:
1. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit
building permit, whichever occurs first within any watershed except H of 20
18, the developers are required to:
Financially guarantee Zone 18’s proportional share of the construction
the proposed inlet and outlet facilities, detention/desiltation basin a
enhanced natural channel as required by the City Engineer. Constructi
of the detention/desiltation basin shall be concurrent with the grading a
operation of the project requiring the facility.
Prepare and process for the City Engineer’s approval a hydrology analy
that addresses flood attenuation in Zone 18 and downstream throu
Zones 17 and 10. Said analysis to address runoff reduction/desiltati
required by all future development to reduc.e downstream impacts.
Financially guarantee on site drainage improvements as required by t
City Engineer to achieve runoff flow reduction/desiltation consistent wj
the above hydrology analysis.
15
0 e
J. WATERSHED H
1. Drainage facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfact
of the City Engineer.
Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit 2,
building permit, whichever occurs first, within Watershed H of Zone 18, 1
developers are required to:
Prepare and process for the City Engineer’s approval a hydrology analy
that addresses flood attenuation in Zone 18 and downstream throu
Zones 16 and 15. Said analysis to address runoff flc
reductionddesiltation required by all future development to redl
downstream impacts.
Financially guarantee on site drainage improvements as required by
City Engineer to achieve runoff flow reductions/desiltation consistent w
the above hydrology analysis.
Financially guarantee the construction of the proposed detention/desiltati
basin east of future Melrose Avenue as required by the City Engine
Construction of the detention/desiltation basin shall be concurrent with 1
grading operation of the project requiring the facility.
Prior to issuance of any building permits for projects draining south into Ag
Hedionda Creek within Watershed H of Zone 18, the sediment detention ba!
east of Melrose shall be constructed.
16
W e
CIRCULATION
Prior to the approval of the fust discretionary permit for any future development in Zone 1
the specific alignment of Melrose Avenue from the northern City limits to the southern bounda
of Zone 18 must be established. The alignment study must evaluate alternative alignments a
include the necessary environmental review to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and t
Planning Director.
Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of grading permit or building permj
whichever occurs first within Zone 18, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeir
construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1992
a. Palomar Airport Road - El Camino Real to East City Limit
Palomar Airport Road from El Camino Real to El Fuerte shall be constructed i
include the following:
1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arteri
2.
3.
4.
standards;
Provide two lanes in each direction;
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Fuer
to provide an additional eastbound through lane for a total of two.
Improvements to the intersection at Palomar Airport Road and El Camir
Real, including signal modifications to provide an additional southbour
left turn lane for a total of two, an additional westbound left turn lane fc
a total of two, and an additional eastbound through lane for a total (
three.
Estimated Cost - $7,244,029
Completion Date - 1992
17
L W W
CIRCULATION
Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuaxe of grading permit or building perm
whichever occurs first within Zone 18, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeii
construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1992
a.
Palomar Airport Road from El Camino Real to El Fuerte shall be constructed
include the following:
1,
Palomar Airport Road - El Carnino Real to East City Limit
Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arter
standards;
Provide two lanes in each direction;
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Fue
to provide an additional eastbound through lane for a total of two.
Improvements to the intersection at Palomar Airport Road and El Cami
Real, including signal modifications to provide an additional southbou
left turn lane for a total of two, an additional westbound left turn lane i
a total of two, and an additional eastbound through lane for a total
three.
2.
3.
4.
Estimated Cost - $7,244,029
CornDletion Date - 1992
17
.
1 0 a
be
Melrose Avenue from east internal collector to Alga shall be constructed
include the following:
1.
2.
3.
Melrose Avenue - Internal Collector to Alga
Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime Mer
standards;
Construction of one lane in each direction;
Construction of Melrose Avenue and east internal intersection to provi
westbound through lane.
one northbound through lane, one eastbound through lane, and o
Estimated Cost - $5,110,789
ComDletion Date - 1992
C. Palomar Aimrt Road/ScnDus Way
Construction of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Scripps Way
provide one northbound through lane, one southbound through lane, a
eastbound left turn lane, two eastbound through lanes, one westbound left tu
lane and two westbound through lanes.
Estimated Cost - $64,OOO
Completion Date - 1992
2. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1995
a.
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Rc
to provide one additional northbound through lane for a total of three and c
additional northbound right turn lane for a total of two.
Estimated Cost - $52,000
Palomar Aimrt Road and El Camino Real
ComDletion Date - 1993
18
I 4 e m
b.
Carrillo Way from Melrose Avenue to Zone 18 western boundary shall 1
constructed to include the following:
1.
Carrillo Way - Melrose to Zone 18 western boundarv
Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arten
standards; 2.
Estimated Cost - $549,838
Completion Date - 1995
Construction of two lanes in each direction.
C.
Palomar Airport Road from El Fuerte Street to east City limit shall be construct
to include:
1.
2.
Palomar Airport Road - El Fuerte to East City Limit
Construction of an additional lane in each direction to bring to full pri~
arterial standards;
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Scrip
Way to provide two northbound left turn lanes, two southbound left tu
lanes, one southbound right turn lane, one additional eastbound left tu
lanes for a total of two, one additional eastbound through lane for a to
of three, one additional westbound left turn lane for a total of two, o
additional westbound through lane for a total of three, and one westbou
right turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $1,686,062
Comdetion Date - 1995
19
4' a W
1
d. Mekose Avenue - North City Limit to Palamar Airport Road
Melrose Avenue from North City Limit to Palomar Airport Road shall
constructed to include:
1.
2.
3.
Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arter
standards;
Construction of two lanes in each direction;
Construction of Melrose Avenue and Palomar Airport Road intersecti
to provide two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound through lanr
one northbound right turn lane, two southbound left turn lanes, t'
southbound through lanes, two eastbound left turn lanes, three eastbou
through lanes, one eastbound right turn lanes, two westbound left h
lanes, and three westbound through lanes.
Estimated Cost - $1,710,286
Completion Date - 1995
e.
Melrose Avenue from Palomar Airport Road to Carrillo Way shall be construc
to include:
1.
2.
3.
Melrose Avenue - Palomar Airport Road to Carrillo Way
Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime artel
standards;
Construction of two lanes in each direction;
Construction of Melrose Avenue and Carrillo Way intersection to prov
one northbound left turn lane, two northbound through lanes, (
southbound left turn lane, two southbound through lanes, two eastboi
left turn lanes, one eastbound through lane, one westbound left turn la
and one westbound through lane.
Estimated Cost - $3,847,055
ComDletion Date - 1995
20
I , m
1 m
t
f. Melrose Avenue - Carrillo Way to east internal
Melrose Avenue from Carrillo Way to east internal shall be constructed
include:
1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime artel
2.
3.
standards;
One lane in each direction;
Improvements to the intersection of Melrose Avenue and east internal
provide one northbound through lane, one northbound left turn lane, c
southbound left turn lane, and one southbound through lane.
Estimated Cost - $5,163,537
Completion Date - 1995
€5
El Fuerte (within Zone 18) shall be constructed to include the following:
1. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arter
2.
Estimated Cost - $1,760,248
ComDletion Date - 1995
El Fuerte - Through Zone 18
standards;
Construction of two lanes in each direction.
3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2000
a.
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose to provi
one additional southbound through lane for a total of three.
Estimated Cost - $ 32,000
Completion Date - 1997
Palomar Airport Road and Melrose
21
0
1
b.
Melrose Avenue from Carrillo Way to east internal shall be constructed to inclu
the following:
1.
2.
Melrose - Carrillo Way to East Internal
Construction of an additional two lanes in each direction to bring to f
prime arterial standards;
Improvement to the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Carrillo Way
provide one additional northbound through lane for a total of two and o
additional westbound left turn lane for a total of two.
Estimated Cost - $355,884
Completion Date - 1999
C.
Palomar Airport Road from El Camino Real to El Fuerte shall be constructed
include one additional lane in each direction to bring to full prime arter
standards.
Estimated Cost - $ 379,313
Completion Date - 2000
Palomar Aimort Road - El Camino Real to El Fuerte
4.
a.
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte
provide one additional northbound left turn lane for a total of two, one additio
northbound through lane for a total of two, one additional southbound left ti
lane for a total of two, one additional southbound through lane for a total of tv
one additional eastbound left turn lane for a total of two, one additio
westbound left turn lane for a total of two, one westbound right turn lane and
elimination of one southbound right turn lane and the elimination of c
eastbound right turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $146,000
Completion Date - 2004
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY BUILD OUT
Palomar Aimrt Road and El Fuerte
22
r
L w
b.
Improvements to the intersection of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Ro
to provide one additional southbound through lane for a total of three, o
additional eastbound left turn lane for a total of two, one additional westboui
through lane for a total of three, and the elimination of one southbound right tu
lane, the elimination of one eastbound right turn lane, and the elimination of o
northbound right turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $ 47,000
Completion Date - 2008
El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road
C.
Melrose Avenue from North City limit to southern Zone 18 boundary shall
constructed to include the following:
1.
2.
Melrose Avenue - North City Limit to south Zone 18 Boundary
Construction of one additional lane in each direction to bring to full pri
arterial standards;
Improvements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Melrc
Avenue to provide one additional northbound through lanes for a total three, one southbound right turn lane, and one westbound right turn la
Improvements to the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Carrillo Way
provide one additional northbound left turn lane for a total of two, c
additional northbound through lane for a total of three, one additio
southbound through lane for a total of three, one westbound right ti
lane, and the elimination of one westbound left turn lane;
Improvements to the intersection of Melrose Avenue and east internal
provide two additional northbound through lanes for a total of three i
two additional southbound through lanes for a total of three.
3.
4.
Estimated Cost - $ 2,958,254
ComDletion Date - 2010
FIRE
No special conditions.
23
1 w
OPEN SPACE
No special conditions.
SCHOOLS
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permi
whichever occurs first, for any development within Zone 18, the following condition shall 1
met:
1. The deeding of an acceptable school site to the San Marcos Unified School District if
is determined that a school site is warranted.
A financing plan approved by San Marcos Unified School District guaranteeing t
construction of necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 18 pursuant to conditil
2.
#l.
If any reimbursements and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreementlfinanci
plan shall provide a mechanism to do so.
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. ALLWATERSHEDS
All development within Zone 18 will be required to pay the appropri;
sewer connection fee prior to issuance of any building permit.
B. WATERSHED A:
Prior to the first discretionary permit approval for any development
Watershed A of Zone 18, the City of Carlsbad and the City of Vista sh
approve a flow transfer agreement to provide sewer service to futi
development within Watershed A.
OR
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of building permit
grading permit, whichever occurs first for any development in Watersf
A of Zone 18, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of 1
SAH trunk and interceptor system from Watershed A in Zone 18 to
Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor shall be provided as required by the C
Engineer.
24
1
i 0 m
C. WATERSHEDB:
1. Watershed B is located within the BuendSan Marcos Interceptor Seu
Drainage Basin. Prior to recordation of any final map, issuance
building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first for a
development in Watershed B of Zone 18, an alignment must be fixed, a
environmental review completed, and a financing mechanism guaranteej
the construction of the following facilities must be in place:
a. BSMTlA
b. BSMTlC
C. BSMTlD
d. BSMTlF
e. BSMTlG
f. Lift Station
2. Prior to issuance of building permits in Watershed B of Zone 18, the (
Engineer shall make a determination that the proposed sewer system f
Melrose Avenue to the existing gravity line in El Camino Real mus
complete and operational to serve development within Watershed I
Zone 18.
WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. All development with Zone 18 shall pay a major facilities fee basec
EDU’s to the CMWD and a capacity charge based on meter size tc
San Diego County Water Authority. In addition, all development in 5
18 shall be required to provide any water reclamation facilities ident
in the future Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the Di:
Engineer. Any water reclamation facilities necessary to accommc
future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of a
map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever o(
first for any project in Zone 18.
B. ALL SERVICE AREAS
Palomar Airport Road is proposed to be widened from El Camino Re
the east City limit in late 1991. As part of the widening improvem
the existing potable 27-inch transmission line within Palomar Airport
will be replaced with a potable 33-inch transmission line. The cost ( replacement 33-inch line is included in the circulation cost estimate fc
25
(
1 0
widening of Palomar Airport Road2. The developer(s) required to wid
Palomar Airport Road will finance the 33-inch replacement line w
partial financial reimbursement from CMWD.
c. -
1. The following water facilities will be required as a condition to
satisfaction of CMWD:
a. The proposed potable 16-inch main in the propo
approval of future develdpment witkin Service Ara A to
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
The proposed potable 16-inch water main in Palo
Airport Road west of the western boundary of Zone 1
The proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in the prop(
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
b.
c.
D. Service Area B
1, The following water facilities will be required as a condition tl
approval of future development within Service Area B tc
satisfaction of CMWD:
a. A portion of the proposed potable 12-inch main i1
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
A portion of the proposed reclaimed 12-inch main j
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
b.
E. Service Area C
1. The following water facilities will be required as a condition
approval of future development within Service Area C t
satisfaction of CMWD.
a. A portion of the proposed potable 1Zinch main
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
2 The details of the cost estimate are included in Appendix A-5.
26
( e
b. The proposed potable 12-inch main in the propos
alignment of Carrillo Way.
c. The proposed reclaimed 14-inch main in the propos
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
The proposed reclaimed 10-inch main in the propos
alignment of Carrillo Way.
d.
F. Service Area D
1. The following water facilities will be required as a condition to
approval of future development within Service Area D to
satisfaction of CMWD:
a. A portion of the proposed potable 12-inch main in
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
A portion of the proposed reclaimed 14-inch main in
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
The proposed reclaimed 6-inch main north of Me1
Avenue.
b.
c.
G. Service Area E
1. The following water facilities will be required as a condition tc
approval of future development within Service Area E to
satisfaction of CMWD.
a. A portion of the proposed potable 12-inch main ir
future alignment of Melrose Avenue.
The proposed pressure reducing station at the sout
comer of Zone 18.
The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line ir
proposed alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
A portion of the proposed reclaimed 14-inch main i
proposed alignment of Melrose Avenue.
The proposed reclaimed 10-inch main in the sou
portion of Zone 18.
b.
c.
d.
e.
27
t
I
1 e 0
f. The proposed reclaimed 6-inch main in the southea
portion of Zone 18.
The proposed reclaimed 36-inch main in the proposc
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18. g.
H. SERVICE AREA F:
1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to
satisfaction of the CMWD. The CMWD may require additio
improvements outside of the service area boundary, if deerr
necessary, to serve development.
All development within Service Area F shall pay the appropri
water fees established by CMWD.
I. Service Area G:
1. The following water facilities will be required as a condition to
approval of future development within Service Area G to
satisfaction of CMWD:
a. The proposed reclaimed six-inch main in Palomar Air]
Road.
The proposed reclaimed six-inch main north of Palc
Airport Road.
b.
28
'I I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I.8
e '
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3175
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND
WEST OF THE CITIES OF VISTA AND SAN MARCOS EAST
OF EL CAMINO REAL.
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of I
1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider sai
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the iI
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the
Cornmission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning C
as foIlows:
A)
1 B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, tl-
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaratio
to Exhibit "ND", dated October 4, 1990, and "PII", dated Septembe
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following find;
Findinns :
1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 Will not cause an
environmental impacts. The plan is a public facilities planning dol
implements the existing General Plan. The plan makes generalized pi
to the demand for and supply of public facilities, and outlines the
adequate public facilities concurrent with estimated demands. The pla
that CEQA review will be required prior to mitigation of any publj
project that is generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declarati
issued on October 4, 1990 and recommended for approval by t
Cornmission on December 19, 1990.
2 I1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
W
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of Decemb
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber
Erwin, Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner McFadden.
ABSTNN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIC
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZ~ILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
19 1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
!
-2- PC RES0 NO. 3175
. ,
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Avenue intersec
and surrounding 906 acres.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LOC~ Facades Management Plan Zone 18 which gUXXl the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with developr
to adopted performance standards.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described prt
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Qualit)
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project Will not have a signif
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification foi
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on fde in the Plar
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the P
21 days of date of issuance.
'
DATED: SEPTEMBER 27, 1990
CASE NO: LFMP 18
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1990
BH:km
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 43f
I * m
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
YES YES N(
big> (insig) WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property - - to geologic hazards? -
Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? -
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 7 -
2. - -
3. -
4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? - - -
ambient air quality? - -
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? - -
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
water, ground water or public water supply? - -
depletion of any natural resources? - -
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - -
11. Alter a sigruficant archeological,
paleontological or historical site, structure or object? - -
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
6. Result in substantial changes in air
7. Substantially change the course or flow of - -
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
-2-
m 0
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(5l@ (urn@
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste x control systems? - - -
x 20. Increase existing noise levels? - -
21. Produce new light or glare? -
-
1 - -
22. Involve a sigruficant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? - - -
human population of an area? - - -
for additional housing? - - -
25. Generate substantial additional traffic? - - -
create a large demand for new parking? - - -
23. Substantially alter the density of the
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
26. Affect existing parking facsaes, or
27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patlems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? - -
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? - -
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? - -
emergency evacuation plans? - -
aesthetically offensive public view? - -
existing recreational opportunities? - -
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
30. interfere With emergency response plans or
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
-4-
t m m
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The Locd Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 is a facilities planning document. The inten plan is ro establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when ne
derermined by the Civs adopted performance standards, TO accomplish this purpose occa
locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes.
Traditionally, the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home
tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate
housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other
incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with eithe
moderate income housing due to its proximity to the Pacific Ocean and the La Costa Area.
It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other corm
but the existing nature of the market place.
It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general and does n
CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plar complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in
Facilities Management Plan.
-6-
b m
bETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the propod project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmei will not be a sigdicant effect in this case because the mitigation measures describe
attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
1 find the proposed project MAY have a signrficant effect on the environment,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
x
-
-
3hk 3
Signature
3 27,1990
Date Planning Director
BH:h
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE1
ATTACH mu MITIG PROG FAP I
-a-
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3176
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
PLAN FOR ZONE 18 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITIES OF VISTA AND SAN
MARCOS AND EAST OF EL WINO REAL
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 1I
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Cads
referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting t
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and perf
standards for public facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiring the pi
of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 and 9829 imp1
Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citizens of Carlsbad, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of Decemb
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said reque
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission cons
factors relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corm
follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
....
I
a '"
1
2
3
4
5 '
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Coi
recommends APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 18,
the following findings and subject to the following condition:
Findinas:
1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 is consistent with
Carlsbad's General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 is consistent wit
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), as am
Ordinance No. 8110 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adopted 1986
Facilities and Improvement Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 and the c
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by enst
public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted pel
standards.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 will control the ti
locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision facilities and improvements.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 d ensure public faci
services are available in conformance with the adopted performance
prior to development occurring.
Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements con
2)
3)
4)
5)
Condition
1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 18 as
in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18, dated Dec
1990, incorporated herein by reference.
....
....
a,..
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3176 -2-
*
r
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of December
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes,
Marcus & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Cornmissioner McFadden.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PC RES0 NO. 3176 -3-
Page 2 December 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
allow the storage of new automobiles on Lot 8 of CT 87-3, located on the west side of Car Country Drive,
between Cannon Road and Paseo del Norte.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3177 approving
CUP 89-4x1, based upon the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
3) PCD/GPC 90-8 - OAK AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - Request for a
determination of General Plan Consistency for the
installation of a storm drain, curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the north side of Oak Avenue between
Roosevelt Street and the AThSF right-of-way.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3173 approving the
Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director on
November 15, 1990, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution
No. 3174 approving PCD/GPC 90-8 based upon the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein, including
the revision set forth in staff memo dated December 19, 1990.
4) PCD/GPC 90-9 - GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR THE CITY OF CARLSBAD CARRIUO RANCH STABILIZATION AND RESTORATION PROJECT.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3172 approving
PCD/GPC 90-9 making the determination that the Carrillo
Ranch Stabilization and Restoration Plan is consistent
with the General Plan.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
5) LFMP 18-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 18 -
for property generally located south and west of the
cities of Vista and San Marcos, east of El Camino Real.
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, Growth Management,
reviewed the background of the request and stated that
Zone 18 is a primarily residential zone located in the
southeastern and northeastern quadrants of the City adjacent
to the cities of Vista and San Marcos. Of the Plan's 906
total acres, 504 acres are residential, with densities
ranging from low-medium (0-4 du/ac) to high-medium (8-15
du/ac). Nonresidential General Plan land uses include 138
acres of open space, 145 acres of mixed use planned
industrial/office, 23 acres of commercial, and 71 acres of
industrial.
The following public facilities in Zone 18 will meet the
adopted performance standard through buildout:
City Administrative Facilities
Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Fire
Water Distribution
Mr. Rideout turned the time over to Brian Hunter, Senior
Planner, who stated that:
COMMISSIONERS
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Marcus
Schlehuber Schrm
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Marcus
Schlehuber
Schramm
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Marcus
Schlehuber
Schramm
*..._ -
December 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
Parks Park facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the proposed
mitigation through buildout.
Existing open space meets the adopted
performance standard for existing and
approved projects. An ongoing work program will assure the open space
performance standard through buildout.
Existing and planned school facilities
meet the adopted performance standard
with the proposed mitigation through
buildout.
Open Space
Schools
Mr. Hunter turned the time over to Steve Jantz, Associate
Engineer, who stated that:
Circulation Circulation facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the proposed
mitigation through buildout.
Sewer Sewer facilities meet the adopted
Collect ion performance standard with the proposed
mitigation through buildout.
Mr. Jantz stated that the area of Zone 18 south of P.A.R.
will require the construction of a pump station and force
main in Zone 10. The area north of P.A.R. is located in an
assessment district for an existing sewer pump station in the
Vista Sanitation District.
temporarily use this system until the South Agua Hedionda
system is completed through Zone 16.
process a flow transfer agreement with the cities of Carlsbad and Vista prior to the approval of the first development.
Mr. Rideout concluded the staff presentation with an overview
of the financing program for Zone 18.
plan will be required to meet the recommendations for
guarantee. created to apply to this zone as well as all future zone
plans. The purpose of Condition 1110 is to establish a
finding of consistency to the General Plan.
this finding, a Mello Roos District must be in place.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Growth Management
Ordinance, and the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan
to ensure that public facilities and services will be
available in conformance with the adopted performance
standards prior to development occurring. Therefore, staff
recommends approval.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the possibility of the
Melrose improvements being accelerated. Steve Jantz replied
that there will be sufficient funds to provide for the
, acceleration of Melrose should it be warranted. Buildout is
anticipated in 1998 and development will be providing the
improvements.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how the Melrose improvements
would be funded if the majority of traffic is generated
outside of Zone 18. Mr. Jantz replied that future '
development must provide street improvements regardless of
where the traffic originates and cited Palomar Airport Road
as a classic example.
This portion of Zone 18 will
The raceway basin must
A follow-up financing
He referred to Condition 1/10 which has been
In order to make
I
COMMISSIONERS December 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if a traffic circulation problem is anticipated before 1995.
development within this zone and adjacent zones.
Chairman Schramm opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Bill Hofman, Hofman Fi Associates, 2386 Faraday, Suite 120,
Carlsbad, representing the property owners in Zone 18,
the staff recommendation and was available to answer
questions.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he is concerned about the
properties located near the final approach to Palomar
Airport. He inquired if the property owners are considering
any other zoning for this area. Mr. Hofman replied that he
is currently preparing the Master Plan to address specific
land issues and cannot answer for the property owners until
this has been completed. He added that staff would have an
opportunity to review the Master Plan and they are sensitive
to this issue.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Mr, Hofman had read the letter
the Commission had received from Carrillo Ranch dated
December 4, 1990. Mr. Hofman stated that he had not seen the letter and a copy was given to him.
Brian Hunter, Senior Planner, stated that the letter from the
Friends of Carrillo Ranch regarding relocation of two pillars
near the entrance to the ranch refers to City-omed property.
After reading the Carrillo Ranch letter, Mr. Hofman stated
that the issues in the letter are ones which have to be
addressed at the time of development and have no bearing on
the LFMP for Zone 18.
Commissioner Schlehuber requested Steve Jantz, Associate
Engineer, to discuss the "F" intersection at Palomar Road and
the "E" intersection at El Fuerte. Mr. Jantz replied that
the City currently has an action plan to improve the
intersections at Palomar Road and El Fuerte during the latter
part of 1991. Before development can proceed in Zone 18,
these intersections must be corrected.
William Dougherty, 2600 La Golondrina, Carlsbad, addressed
Zone 18 which shows that the riparian area is much larger
than what is shown in the zone plan and extends beyond the
gates to the Carrillo Ranch. In addition, a vernal pool
whirh exists in Zone 18 is not indicated in the staff report.
The riparian area extends from the lower dam up to the Willow Woods. The planned Melrose improvement would run through the
center of the wooded area and will require 40 ft. of fill for
the road bed. Mr. Dougherty believes that a bridge will be
needed to enable some type of trail through the area and to
avoid a high animal kill. He is also concerned that the
proposed school site is located in a floodplain which is
forbidden by state law. Further, he believes the Melrose
extension will be an eyesore from the Carrillo Ranch because
it will be elevated 120 ft.
Brian Hunter, Senior Planner, responded to Mr. Dougherty's
comments by stating that the original EIR was performed in
1979-80 and it is possible that the riparian area has
Mr. Jantz replied that
all improvements are timed in accordance with planned
addressed the Commission and stated that he concurred with
the Commission and stated that he has an aerial photograph of
'
Page 5 December 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
expanded since that time. another environmental evaluation must be done. However, none
of Mr. Dougherty's comments would have any effect on the zone
plan.
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, responded on the
school comment by stating that the San Marcos Unified School
District is only required to acquire a site somewhere within
Zone 18; however, it may not necessarily be the site which
Before any development can occur,
Mr, Dougherty pointed out.
Chairman Schramm inquired if it is common practice to bridge
road beds which separate a riparian area.
Senior Planner, replied that this point will be looked into
when the Master Plan is reviewed.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, requested Mr. Dougherty to
surrender the aerial photograph for the record so that it can
be forwarded on to the City Council and referred to when
development is ready to take place, the land use will be
reviewed and Mr. Dougherty's comments will be taken into
consideration. Although Mr. Dougherty would like the aerial
photograph returned, it must remain on file with the Planning
Department.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Schramm declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution Resolution No. 3175
recommending approval of the Negative Declaration issued
by the Planning Director and adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3176 recommending approval of Local
Facilities Management Plan 18.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 6:45 p.m. and reconvened at 6:52 p.m.
6) MP-l77(B)/LCPA 90-5/CT 89-37/HDP 90-2 - AVIARA PHASE 11
Brian Hunter,
documents are evaluated. Mr. Ball stated that when
- Request for a Master Plan Amendment/Local Coastal
Program Amendment for Aviara Master Plan 177 to:
modify planning area boundaries for Planning Areas 25.
26, 27, 28, 29 and 30; (2) change permitted product
types from multi-family to single family within Planning
Areas 26 and 30;
design criteria for Planning Areas 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ~IIJ 30; and (4) reduce maximum dwelling unit potentials
from 569 du's to 484 du's while increasing total open
space by 15.43 acres. The approval of a 247 acre/ll lot
Phase I1 Master Tentative Tract Map and Hillside
Development Permit is also being requested. The project
site is located north of Batiquitos Lagoon, south of
Alga Road, west of Aviara Phase I, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19.
(1)
(3) modify development standards and
Chris DeCerbo, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the
request and stated that Phase I1 of Aviara consists of the
western 247 acres of the Aviara Master Plan including
Planning Areas 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30. The remaining
90.5 acres of the property which is predominantly comprised
of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub habitat and Eucalyptus groves,
COMMISSIONERS
Erwin
Hall
Holmes Marcus
Schlehuber
Schramm
*. 0 a
February 27, 1991
Mr. Michael Holzmiller, Dir.
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, GA 9ZQU9
Reference: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 18
Dear Mr. Holzmiller,
The Conservation Committee of the Buena Vista Audubon
Society has reviewed referenced plan and has the following
comments which we would like to have entered into the
record.
1. Alignment Study - Melrose Ave., Sheet 5 of 8, prepared
8/26/88 (Preliminary), and Zone 18 Constraints Map.
Please note the area just below the Profile and directly
below APN 222-011-06, and relate to Zone 18 Constraints
Map depicting the Riparian Woodland east of the Proposed
Melrose alignment.
The Alignment Study shows the fill required to raise the
road to match the slope of the terrain. The fill would
destroy over 90% of this riparian habitat and preclude a
trail system from traversing the valley. By dividing
the habitats by a road, elevated 40 feet, the Cal. Fish
and Game representative has stated that the wildlife
"strike" due to the cars would be excessive.
In a survey conducted in 1988 by John and Jane Griffith,
biologists, they defined the grove east of the breached
dam at the upper end of the "Los Quiotes Valley" as being
comprised of Arroyo Willows with hedges of Seep Willow as
an understory. They characterized the grove as prime
Least Bell's Vireo nesting habitat. According to the
report, the valley, between the lower dam and the willow
grove should be able to sustain up to five (5) breeding
pairs of the vireos. This is considered as critical
habitat!
Recommendation: Bridge the area in lieu of fill, or
relocate the road further east, or
terminate the road 100 ft. on either
as collectors for Zone 18 development traffic only.
side of valley and utilize each segment
r .' a
Buena Vista Audubon, Page 2.
2. Zone 18 Constraints Map
The %kmt of the riparian woodland bh the elemen~ary
school site is in error. Mature oaks line the stream
bed up to the wooden bridge at about the point where
the Caretaker Cottage is located.
We hope that these comments will be of value in your evalu-
ations of this initial plan. If you have any questions
concerning our views, please contact me through the Chapter
Off ice.
Sincerely,
1- Ab4 [- /L,/LLi.&eL
Herb Williams, President
cc: Carlsbad City Council
L_rtL-U\-S w - -- c-3 - - _-_. _l_-- a+
,-
/.- I-- LC c
?(&&* L
TO : Mayor Bud Lewis, Councilmembers Ann Kulchin,
Eric Larson, Margaret Stanton, and Julie Nygaard
FROM: PROJECT FUTURE
DATE: March 5, 1991
RE : AB #11,057*- ZONE 18 LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN &
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Please enter the following into the record of the public
hearing on this matter.
Future respectfully requests that the City Council
postpone further consideration of the above-captioned
until the following actions have been taken:
1. A legally adequate general plan is adopted;
2. An environmental impact report is prepared
for the project.
Submitted by Anne Mauch, Secretary, Project Future c- h.Lz4-L +/?/
*Item #13 on 3/5/91 Council Agenda
c D d FRIENDS OFWARRILLQ RANCH, INC. wq~+,p L€ -.-
2622 EL AGUILA LANE~ CARLSBAD~ CA 92009 0 6
ALL RECEIV
March 1, 1991
To: Mayor/ Mayor Pro Tern Members of Council - City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Public Hearing - March 5, 1991
We note that the Agenda Bill for the subject item does not include the attached comments submitted for consideration by tht Planning Commission at its prior Public Hearing on December 19,
1991. Unfortunately, the official minutes for this Planning Commission meeting are vague, inaccurate and incomplete with respect to the future of Carrillo Ranch Historic Park.
Commissioner Erwin attempted to stimulate discussion on tht comments by the Friends of Carrillo Ranch. However, staff appeared disinclined to pursue the matter and the developers' representative dismissed our letter as irrelevant to the review of the Zone 18 LFMP.
Since we feel otherwise, we ask that the attachment be
included in the record for your March 5 deliberations. Thank yo
Local Facilities Manauement Plan
Yours truly,
q-kbk-' A
A1 n K. Kindle
b -, 1' FRIENDS OF~ARRILLO RANCH m
-c-
2622 EL AGUlLA LANE 0 CARLS8ADI CA 92009 0 619
December 4, 1990
Mr. Michael Holzmiller Planning Director
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City of Carlsbad
City Engineer
2075 Las Palmas
Carlsbad, CA 92009
-. - RE: Local Facilities Management Plan -&e 18
Sirs:
We have been advised by Brian Hunter that the subject Plan
will be coming before the Planning Commission on December 19. T avoid any possible miscommunication or failure on our part to
attend the Public Hearings, we offer these comments for the
record. We hope you will take the 'following recommendati0,ns int consideration to the extent they specifically impact on the
Carrillo Ranch Historic Park:
>>>> A with a surveillance and security fen r perimeter,
rdsS33S A or more woul The relatively high density RMH zoning proposed so close to the Park's southern boundary is unfortunate and makes the buffer issue all the more crucial;
>>>> The w-&g&nalee nGazxiixgtaaash&&b& . &&e+across the
stream on the north side are historically significant, s&&bk&&
~~~~-~~and~~sed~~~~~~u ad and crossing should a1
the I1acceptable access plan" required under Special Conditions For Zone 18 (EXHIBIT 5 - Parks A.2.);
>>>> The o~hazFTeSE~-SE~~bka~s displaying the I'Flying
LC1' brand are presently positioned only a few feet south of the
Palomar Airport Road right-of-way. Both s-MWe
-pk+r some other protected site well before the widening
PAR begins. A permanent disposition can be determined later. Or pillar is in relatively good condition: one has been virtually
demolished but is restorable:
>>>> It appears the alignment of Melrose Avenue will obliterate or effectively isolate 11&nc@'9zBdO~Gzave~b from t
Park and make public access dangerous, impractical and/or
* .r. m w
Messrs. Holzmiller/Hubbs -2- December 4, 199
ssFmn’WWfdobesba preceding any is requirement included as a Special Condition For Zone 18; and,
>>>> The 10.5 acre city-owned Park should be shown as
lfpassive,lu not I1active1l as currently published in the Plan.
It is our interpretation of the Zone 18 Plan that EIR’s wi
be necessary for the parcels surrounding the Park. We would
appreciate confirmation or clarification of this point.
We want to restate that we wish to be included in any
opportunities for discussions, meetings or public hearings concerning Carrillo Ranch Historic Park and/or any directly relevant matters. You can be assured of our cooperation and constructive demeanor. Thank you.
Yours truly,
Alan K. Kindle
- --.
' <, , e- w'w' w r"np
&Lee& (4
P.O. BOX 480
February 27, 1991
Carlsbad City Council
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Reference: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 18
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
The Conservation Committee of the Buena Vista Audubon
Society has reviewed referenced plan and has the following
comments which we would like to have entered into the
record.
1. Alignment Study - Melrose Ave., Sheet 5 of 8, prepared
8/26/88 (Preliminary), and Zone 18 Constraints Map.
Please note the area just below the Profile and directly
below APN 222-011-06, and relate to Zone 18 Constraints
Map depicting the Riparian Woodland east of the Proposed
Melrose alignment.
The Aligninent Study shows the fill required to raise the
road to match the slope of the terrain. The fill would
destroy over 90% of this riparian habitat and preclude a
trail system from traversing the valley, By dividing
the habitats by a road, elex7ated 40 feet, the Gal. Fish
and Game representative has stated that the wildlife
"strike" due to the cars would be excessive.
In a survey conducted in 1988 by John and Jane Griffith,
biologists, they defined the grove east of the breached
dam at the upper end of the "Los Quiotes Valley" as being
comprised of Arroyo Willows with hedges of Seep Willow as
an understory. They characterized the grove as prime
Least Bell's Vireo nesting habitat. According to the
report, the valley, between the lower darn and the willoh-
grove should be able to sustain up to five (5) breeding
pairs of the vireos. This is considered as critical
habitat!
Recommendation: Bridge the area in lieu of fill, or
relocate the road further east, or
terminate the road 100 ft, on either
side of valley and utilize each segment
as collectors for Zone 18 development
traffic only.
'1 I w w
\. t' "
r
Buena Vista Audubon, Page 2.
2. Zone 18 Constraints Map
The extent of the riparian woodland on the elementary
school site is in error, Yature oaks line the stream
bed up to the wooden bridge at about the point where
the Caretaker Cottage is located.
We hope that these comments will be of value in your evalu-
ations of this initial plan. If you have any questions
concerning our views, please contact me through the Chapter
Off ice.
S ince re 1 y--, /. /kg- L!~;dL4----
Herb Williams, President
8
* (Form A)
w - R 7'. - I,.
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: &?& v&&?i?
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
Please notice the item for the council meeting of i/z7y
. -- & ,/os-s/t
Thank you.
- /- 9-41
_I Assistant City Man-- Date
CsORu, &-&k by)-& - *&
gyap d. -2a) L4M-d
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dnve (formerly Elm
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, December 19, 1990, to consider
approval of Local Facilities Management Plan 18 on property generally located at the
eastern boundry of the City adjacent to Palomar Airport Road more particularly described
as:
Those portions of Township 12 south, Range 3 west and
Township 12 south, Range 4 west (Carlsbad Raceway, Carrillo
Ranch) -
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 13, 1990. If
you have any questions, please call Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at 438-1161,
ext. 4468.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited tc
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in thi:
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to thf
public hearing.
CASE FILE: LFMP 18
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
PUBLISH: DECEMBER 6, 1990
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
1 ,’
- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Vil- lage Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, March 5,1991, to consider an application for approval of Local Fa-
erty generally located at the eastern boundary of the City adjacent to Palo- mar Airport Road more particularly described as: Those portions of Township 12 south, Range 3 west and Township 12 south, Range 4 west (Carlsbad Race- way, Carrillo Ranch). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at 438-
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone
cilities Management Plan 18 on prop
1161, ext. 4468.
ublicati
:d to; an
exed is
d in eac
2wsPaP of on tE
ruary 2
f perjur.
rrect. E,
iego, Sta
21st
else at the public hearing described in
ence delivered to the City of Carlsbad
public hearing.
Applicant Hofman Planning
this notice, or in written correspond-
City Clerk‘s Office at or prior to the
ZONE 18 EXHDBlT “A” cq d Ct*i Associates
CARLSBAD C1TY CoUNCIL LOCAL FACUES MANAGEAlENT PLAN LOCATION MAP CJ 5812: February 21,1991
p
d&%Fd
Clerk of
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sun Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (61 9) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am Over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitle
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general ci:
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which nf
is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, a1 newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list (
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and. published at regular inter.
tate of California, for a period exceeding one T
preceding the date of publicati
notice hereinafter referred to; an
notice of which the annexed is
copy, has been published in ea(
ZONE 18 ng owners: The ,,.A< and entire issue of said newspap
in any supplement thereof on tl
_...._.- I
PUBLIC HEARING ‘hesZEy’s TRANSMISSION
aid;owhel of Trust in I
saidcounty
common The SIre. de
real propel
the land the
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ’cated at: 561 Waverly Place
Escondido, Calif. 92025 purported
; hereby registered by the follow- Boulevard
.JAMES ALLEN STOKES claims any
other comn
made, but H ranty. expr gardingtitl,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th; 7817 Quebrada Circle
the City Council of the City of Carlsba Car1sbad* Cal’f. 92009
rectness of
shown her< ing dates, to-wit:
brances,to
will hold a public hearing at the Cii oms Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad vi Carlsbad, Calif. 92009 hge Drive (formerly Elm Avenue This business is conducted by in- Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., dividuals - husband and wife.
The registrants commenced the cipal sumo _____ application for approval of Local Fim, cilities Management Plan 18 on pro1 /SI BARBARA L. STOKES advances, i~ ~~ erty generally located at the caster This statement was filed with the boundary of the City adjacent to paliounb’ Clerk of San Diego County mar Airport Road more particularly ~~$!$~,l~;,l~,l& 1991
February 2 Tuesday’ March 5’ 1991, to consider aransaction of business on July said Deed thereon, as
the Deed 0 charges anc teeandoftl --
Deed of Tn
Those portions of Township 1 . Thebene
of Trust bt delivered
Demand Notice oft fc Sell. The UI
Sell to be 1
and mOre t
Date: Janu;
CONS
Vice ! 17802 Tusti!
~~ described as: “A”.
south, Range 3 west and Township 1 south, Range 4 west (Carlsbad Rac(FICTIT1OUS BUSINESS way, Carrillo Ranch). NAME STATEMENT written Dec --
in the Planning Department at 43~”,e,:~~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~~ foregoing is true and correct. E
1161, ext. 4468. ocated at: where the I Carls’bad, County of San Diego, s IfYOU challenge the Local Facilitic 77131 N. EI Camin0 Real, Suite Management Plan for Zone 18 in cour X203 elapsed sin fomia on-
YOU may be limited to raising on] those issues raised by you or SOmeOn~ hereby registered b? the folio.*.- FOR? day of pp‘nru
If you have any questions regardin this matter, please call Brian Hunt€ FILE NO. 91 05529 1 certify under penalty of perju
Notice ofL
the 21st La Costa.Calif 92009
ng owner: else at the public hearing described i, GARY HUFF By: T1 _’ _. this notice, or in written corresponc 361 N. Willowspring Dr. ence delivered to the City ofcarlsba Encinitas, Calif. 92024 City Clerk’s Office at or prior to th This business is conducted by an ndividual.
ransaction of business on Decem- ier 21,1990.
014) p The registrant commenced the 8 -- public hearing.
Applicant: Hofman Planning
Dated: Ni Recorde CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL This statement was filed with the
:ounty Clerk of San Oiego County D~~~~~~~ in January 28,1991. IrAYEB ai
/Si GARY HUFF Associates
CJ 5812: February 21. 1991
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18
rlCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue) Carlsbad, California, :00 P.M., on Tuesday, March 5, 1991, to consider an application for approval of Local Facilities
iagement Plan 18 on property generally located at the eastern boundary of the City adjacent to mar Airport Road more particularly described as:
Those portions of Township 12 south,
Range 3 west and Township 12 south,
Range 4 west (Carlsbad Raceway, Carrillo Ranch).
)u have any questions regarding this matter, 5se call Brian Hunter in the Planning )artment at 438-1 161, ext. 4468.
)u challenge the Local Facilities Management n for Zone 18 in court, you may be limited to ing only those issues raised by you or someone
? at the public hearing described in this notice or rritten correspondence delivered to the City of ,Isbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public Iring.
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
'LICANT: Hofman Planning Associates
3LISM: February 21, 1991 -