Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-04-02; City Council; 11098; WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN REVISIONr 0 9 0 Eg ck 3 z o - I- o a 6 z 3 0 o CIT~F CARLSBAD - AGEN~BILL DEP' CITY AB # 1 I 09 k TITLE: DEPT. PLN CITY RECOMMENDED ACTION: WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN REVISION I MTG. qpL-$/ That the City Council APPROVE the staff-proposed work plan for * Comprehensive Update of the General Plan. Implementation of . work plan will require future Council actions on consult, contracts, the adoption of the new General Plan, and other iten ITEM EXPLANATION Originally adopted in 1973-1975, the City's General Plan has ne7 been comprehensively updated. On May 22, 1990, the City Counc adopted resolution 90-153: 1) Accepting the work of the Plann Commission General Plan Subcommittee for its review of the exist General Plan and its recommendations; 2) Directing staff to commei a comprehensive update of the General Plan; and 3) Authorizing stt to solicit proposals from consulting firms to assist in conduct the update. In the interim the Planning Department has assembled an Adva: Planning team to carry out the revision process. The role consultants has been and continues to be refined and contract WI has been started in several key areas. A work plan, based upon ' Planning Commission Subcommittee's review of the existing Gene Plan has been developed. Exhibit 1 is a detailed report to the City Manager, explaining t background further and setting out the work plan, the associa costs, timing, and other matters. In summary, the work plan consists of four phases: Phase I: Prepare a preliminary draft of a revised Gene Plan; Phase 11: Review this draft with the public and simultaneou conduct a number of technical studies, including preparation of a Master Environmental Assessment Phase 111: Revise the preliminary draft and process an E.I. and Phase IV: Hold public hearings on the draft General Plan E.I.R. Work has already beyun on this work plan; Phase I is completed the City Council and are underway. Details are contained in attached report. several of the consultant studies in Phase I1 have been approved a a 7 4 a PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL No. iyqs a " ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An integral part of the proposed work plan is the preparation of Master Environmental Assessment (M.E.A.). This document would serv as an extended Initial Study for the preparation of a comprehensiv Environmental Impact Report (E. I. R) . Developing both the M. E. A. an the scope of work for the draft E.I.R., plus reviewing the draf E.I.R. will require extensive public participation. FISCAL IMPACTS The costs associated with all of the activities involved in th comprehensive General Plan revision are major and will affect tb fiscal years. The total costs can be estimated only roughly due t uncertainties over the final scopes of work and duration of Phase I1 and 111. To the degree possible costs have been estimated Details are set out in Table 2 to the attached report. Where exac costs are unknown, both low and high estimates are provided. The major costs will be associated with consultants. Some of the2 costs are "sunk", which is to say, funds have already beg encumbered, Other consultant costs will be new. A second major source of costs will be staff time, primarily for tk Planning Department, but also for Engineering, Financial Management Parks and Recreation, and other departments. Under current: anticipated work loads, no staff additions are anticipate( Therefore, these costs may also be considered ltsunkll. A third class of costs will be those associated with operation: including public outreach, community group support, printin1 mailings, and the like. As indicted in Table 2 to the attached report, the total costs a estimated to range from nearly $1.0 to 1.2 million. However, n (unencumbered) costs will account for less than one-quarter of the amounts, ranging from $215,000 to $318,000, Nearly all of these u funded Costs would be associated with consultants. EXHIBITS 1, Report to the City Manager: IIStatus Report and Work Plan f Comprehensive General Plan Revision1'. * 0 - MEMO - Date: March 14, 1991 TO: CITY MANAGER VIA: PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: Principal Planner SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT AND WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE GENERA1 PLAN REVISION BACKGROUND Most of the City's current General Plan was adopted in the period 1973-1975. Since that time several new optional elements have beer added, some of the elements have had numerous minor and majoz revisions and other elements remain as they were original11 adopted. Under state law a General Plan is to contain seven mandator1 elements (land use, circulation, housing, noise, safety, open space, and conservation) and whatever optional elements are desired by the adopting jurisdiction. In addition to the mandatory elements, Carlsbad's General Plan also contains elements on: Parks and Recreation, Public Facilities, Scenic Highways, Historic Preservation, and Arts. Under state law these optional elements carry the same authority and legal status as the mandatory elements, Since its original adoption there has been no comprehensive update to the City's General Plan. In the interim many new planning policies and concepts have been adopted, including the implementation in 1985 and 1986 of the City's Growth Management Plan. The many General Plan amendments adopted over the years incorporating these policies and concepts have been written by a host of staff members and consultants using various formats and writing styles. Through it all the document retains the original "horizon year" of 1990. The resulting document, a jumble of the old and new, over-all is very difficult to read and understand. Although our General Plan does, indeed, contain all of the legal requirements, it has been recognized for some time as needing a comprehensive revision. 0 0 ~ - In recognition of this need, the City Council approved the review the existing General Plan. The Planning Commissior Subcommittee (consisting of Commissioners McFadden, Hall, anc Schramm) met for over a year and a half. In the course of its review the subcommittee came to realize that comprehensive public review and discussion should be undertaker before an updated General Plan is adopted. However, the existinc Genera:L Plan document--the springboard for this discussion--woulc present major problems for city officials and the general public tc evolved a strategy to produce a document which could be offered a: the preliminary draft for the new updated General Plan. This drafl would 138 based upon the existing General Plan (in terms of polic! and all other substance) re-cast in a tighter, more readable, mort understandable format. This document would differ from the existing General Plan in on11 three ways: 1. The existing text would be re-organized to follow a commor - appointment of a Planning Commission Subcommittee in 1988 to use effectively in the discussion, In response the Subcommittet format to make it easier to read and understand; 2. All of the programs, ordinances, and policies adopted by the City Council under (and, therefore, found consistent with) thc existing General Plan would be reflected better and mor€ specifically in each of the elements: and 3. Minor inconsistencies between parts of the General Plar written at different times would be eliminated through minoi clhanges in wording and without affecting the substantivc content of the document. On May 22, 1990, the Planning Commission Subcommittee presented the City Council with a revised General Plan document which achieve( just these three things. Via Resolution 90-153, the Council accepted this document (but did not adoDt it), and directed stafj to commence a comprehensive update to the General Plan, includinc, the solicitation of consultant services to assist with the effort. In the interim the Planning Department has assembled an Advance Planning team to carry out the revision process. The role for consultants has been and continues to be refined and contract work has been started in several key areas. A work plan, based upon USE of the Planning Commission Subcommittee's preliminary draft document has been developed. The balance of this report describe: this work plan. Page 2 - 0 0 WORK PILAN FOR GENERAL PLAN COMPREHENSIVE REVISION Staff proposes to conduct the comprehensive General Plan revisior in four distinct phases (see Figure 1, Over-All Work Plan). Ir summary these phases are: * - Phase :I: Prepare a preliminary draft of revised General Plan. Phase 11: Review draft with the public and conduct technical studies. Phase III: Revise preliminary draft and process E.I.R. Phase IV: Hold public hearings and adopt new General Plan In fact:, Phase I, the creation of a preliminary draft General Plan, has a:Lready been completed. The remaining three phases (a: indicated in Figure 2, Over-All Time Line) would take approximate11 one arid one-half years to complete, assuming all things gc accordhg to schedule. Following is more detail on each phase. Phase 'r In this phase a preliminary draft of the new General Plan would bc prepared. This draft would assume that all is basically well wit1 the content of the existing General Plan; all of the existin< goals, objectives, policies, and implementing programs are workin< well, and there is no need for substantive change. The new document would be simply a cleaned-up, re-formatted re-statement of thc existi:ng General Plan. In practice, this phase mirrors what the Planning Commissioi Subcommittee has done over the last two years. It is proposed thal the document prepared by the Subcommittee be used as the preliminary draft of the revised General Plan and that this document be taken to Phase 11. Phase 12 Phase :TI is shown schematically in Figure 3. Of the four phases il is the most technically complex, longest, and most expensive. As indicated in Figure 4, Time Line, it is anticipated to takc approximately a full year to complete. First, the preliminary draft General Plan will be presented to tht public at a widely advertised kick-off event. The public will bt asked to examine this document and consider it a statement of tht vision of future Carlsbad as the City now sees itself. It is a plai establishing where the City is going and how it intends to gel there. At a series of quadrant and town-hall meetings, City staf: Page 3 w - - - z I a a. Y PC z 0 :I v) > g3 - za -l .. na -I I W > uu mu 0 ra a Flu 32 .- * Up a, Q> -.m -- + -- e Q ---*----- 7 -.-- a 3 e- -. -'O CO 0 . __-- .-_..I--- _I- .---I. -yy .- QO OATTj- -a -- -au ___I m-Q c3 --- 2 6- ___I a$ a-2 e T c cn- a_ - .. - am2 -3 2aa :*!!~~~~ aLa,sE =e po - 'Z@"=c c ma" v, -J ,f L Q) .a, 0 2 P t ! OaEnc eUT0~~ I cn oa'v, moz== e\ c Q) - E cndG =€e p22G rn tt~tt/ftttttt/tt@,,, , / / = .a, ; 5'0- ; m2o; QV,2 ; - amg; or.- ' v).GU : v) .e .E / 0'0g 5 EZa; / z -; / / / =m >mm oI.5 / me- I / / I / / / I / / / v) Em- nE g? ;; 2;: u-= -3a oQFf $2: t=z + .!! c p z.g au. c \ =m c 2x5 am me- E:;€ "Lm Loa m c. .- QV)>m m-- amcg 422 $2; r-2 zzw; p'gtj I- a 0 =c -03 cc 2: 0' m L - ;c .c Em% =lA- r U &$ mG= .5= c Lv) r kcri i. - c3 >= 0 >l= wv) $2: c .. 2- n 4- -1 P.-O .- 25: a.2, 2, > $2 g Q 3 IO n Y \a E 2u [r03 cue =zc mu - .. - e-5 g$ Gg.2 = = G guamfjz za >= xu a w e c3 -03 2 -.\ U a, a 7 .r - 2% Q- E e m =ecn $-$-6------ --. r -rrz*-gp 7 --,-----pa ..%...-L....-.-~ aa73 c a \ 3 -v!? 9 7 I ,,,- cs; cv ?3-0 3 3 g€&jrr ,.- )---=?.I- a '2 cc c\J m-(Lj-z 2 a OL.-L- 8..... - on c e Q)*a ..- -c .- si -LFAz--------- .- 7 -..- 1 - oj~-a,-.-.- 7 .-* NN - QOI- ao=w e I- I .- > Wcdk - T- - Q Q e e (with the assistance of consulting facilitators) will explain thg draft and request the public to take it home and review and discus: it. Over several months City staff will hold additional quadranl and town-hall workshops to educate citizens on the existing Genera: Plan and to solicit comments on its contents. A final set of public workshops will be held to identify any issues needing furthei discussion and resolution. Staff has determined that the existing General Plan technical bast needs updating in a number of areas. Therefore, parallel with tht public review of the preliminary draft document, a number oj technical studies will be undertaken. In keeping with Counci: Resolution 90-153, a few of these studies have already been fundec by the Council and are now underway. In addition staff anticipate: the need for assistance in the public outreach and issue: identification portions of the update process. Scopes of work foi those unfunded consultant studies are in preparation; they will bt brought forward as soon as they are ready. One other study, i part of the General Plan revision (having been proposed and fundec under another program). The costs for this study, however, art included in the over-all estimate, as this study is very importanl to the revision. Table 1 (General Plan Revision, Needec Professional Services) , describes all of studies. Briefly, the] include : !!Fiscal Impact Analysis of the General Plan'', is not official11 * Housing Element, legal and planning consultant. * Open Space Management Plan, planning and f inancia: consultant. * Fiscal Impact Analysis of General Plan (under aegis oj the Financial Management Department), economic an( financial consultant. Safety Element, seismic and geo-technical hazard mappinc consultant, * * Noise Element, acoustical consultant. * Public Discussion and Review/Issues Paper Preparation, facilitator/planning consultant. * Master Environmental Assessment (to be used in late] E.I.R.), environmental consultant. The information obtained through these studies will be critical tc an evaluation of the existing General Plan's goals, policies, an( objectives. As study results become available, staff will presenl them to City officials and the public. The information will becomt another basis for the public's review of the draft General Plan. I1 is quite possible that new knowledge derived from the studies wil: Page 4 Table 1 : I_ r- PROGRAM Housing Element Open Space Management Plan Fiscal Impact of G.P. GmTechnical Safety Noise Public Review/Over- ~u cmrdmmr Environmental Review GENERAL PLAN REVISION; NEEDED PROF.SERVICES CONSULTANT EST. pC FVf STATUS/COMMEh RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS ($1 000) Program follows separate sche from overall G.P. revision. A' targeted 7/1/91, per state-manc schedule. $20K appropriated; c authorized 1990. Consultant u Part of prior O.S. work plan a] by C.C. $127K appropriated; authorized 1990. Consultant ii Expert-IegaVplanning-assistance to Staff $0 review overall work plan, assist w/developing programs/policies, review content of draft element, assist with HCD review. a) Provide technical assistance to Open Space Advisory Comm/staff with defs. and inventory; b) Build fiscal, phasing, and space. $0 administrative management plan for ope" Prepare economic analysis of Carlsbad land phases of work, Council directed Financial Mi to undertake as separate projec have major land use implicatic $1 12K appropriated; contract a 1990. Draft of economics stud imminent. $75K appropriated for FY 90-! will vary depending upon final work. An R.F.Q. is about to b $0 /employment markets. Build fiscal model of current G.P. to evaluate the balance between revenues and expenses anticipated now and in future; if imbalance found, evaluate alternative land use and/or fiscal assumptions. Update seismic, geo-technical hazards, land use suitability maps; establish type of studies needed for development proposals; assist with policies, guidelines, ordinances. $75-100 $75,000 appropriated for FY 5 An R.F.Q. has just been issue1 Update noise contour maps for updated air and $50-75 roadway assumptions; field-check calculated noise levels throughout city. Assist in formulating noise policies and ordinances Conduct all public participationlsurvey work, including "kick-off'' event and video; coordinate integration of other consultant studies; draft and present Issues Papers; Assist with public scoping of environmental studies. of of Issues Papers Phase II: &pare master environmental assessment based upon existing data and the findings of the other technical studies. $80-120 NO funds appropriated. A Scopc work is being prepared. Grant 1 video production ate being pm 4 k) Findings from other tech. I critical to this consultant's prer $80-120 No funds appropriated A scope work is being prepared. Data an findings from the other studies integral to this study. No funds appropriated. Scope 1 will depend upon completeness master environmental. assessml the degree and nature of final G Plan revisions, Phase I11 Prepare E.I.R. for revised G.P. $50-70 costs: Unencumber- Total Costs-New Ai ed New Appropriated: Costs: $210-3 10 $594-744 0 0 .- suggest changes the City should consider including in the final, revised General Plan. In addition, several of these studies will take considerable timc to complete, and, in fact, account for the length of timc associated with Phase 11. Care will have to be taken to assure thal the principle findings of all of the studies will become available within the envisioned time frame; no one study should be allowed tc delay the whole of Phase 11. In practice, the findings of eact study will be presented as they become available. Once the technical studies are completed and their conclusions and recommendations are available, staff will combine them with thc input received at the public workshops and prepare one or more comprehensive Issues Papers for consideration by the public, thc Planning Commission, and the City Council. It is difficult to predict what will happen at this point as it is not possible to predict what issues (if any) will arise. On the one hand, only a few minor issues may be identified. If so, it may be possible to move directly to Phase 111. On the other hand, a great many complicated issues may surface. It may be necessary to conduct additional studies (as is indicated in Figure 3), or significantly extend the public discussion. In these latter cases the time to complete Phase I1 will necessarily be greater than what is indicated in staff's work plan. Indeed, the nature of Phase I11 mfLght change. Phase 111 Staff Is plan for Phase I11 assumes that the issues identified at the end of Phase I1 will be negligible to moderate in nature, and, if derived from findings of the technical studies, can be resolved with the assistance of recommendations from the consultants who conducted the studies. As noted in Figures 5 and 6, three major things will happen in Phase 111. FiLrst, staff will prepare revisions to the preliminary draft General Plan. These revisions will address the issues raised in Phase I1 and include alternative proposals for their resolution. A final draft General Plan will be prepared to carry forward to Phase IV. Second, an Environmental Impact Report will be processed on the final draft General Plan. As the revisions to the draft General Plan are being formulated by staff, a draft E.I.R. will be prepared by an environmental consultant. An important key to this work will be the Master Environmental Assessment prepared in Phase 111. Once the revised draft of the General Plan is completed, it will be made public. After a brief time for review, quadrant and town-hall Page 5 =a' - .c, Q) ,usa gzaz $d:$ c1 $;a =- - n.5 2 mw LL c or \3 -- O mu tu Ea b= r: bx-Q m gg 5 zm Em - u>- I ~sQ w = .. -I a- z- - I 2.Y; mu :$ pL :2 5 Ea2 a5 c n a% r4g 2E rn = u- kc3 slpccg .E? SZC W m Ekap nu -1 le b 7 \ > 0 Z CY b Q a, m ? l-- --. e cv b T- --. - 3 7) ? CY b 7 --. m" CY b e T t a 2 c\J e E --. c a T .Y.. 73 a, a, * - e- s - S 0 > a, .- ...-.141^4-, rvlw .- E .ti nL(!j aca ....... - ^I.ll.llllllyl. l_l~ -._--- K3= w .r w' -kc0 c aa,a .- L?lI an CI - cc sj - P $E - CT Q 0 w -3- W mx:mv L S t: cn %--' 3 '________y I ......-.-Y.Y.Y.Y..I.II-U.YIY.II 0- m- 0 la, .- cn 9 n -5 a:& a dEW=Q- 5 m- 3 == v1 a- Q) ~ ZU um =zc .- v1- ma2 => a, E 0 s .G +- L-= - .- L2 $E E.; - %j 11 caw ZI n_ CQn z aa m E@& .F &an w cj;cr2mz 0 u.5:ito d -e .. .. a a ax C/)a,J=> n qEOu ---~------- - - - a- -F6- z - a, .- ..--- 0 0 .- meetings will be held to develop final comments on the draft -- General Plan, and, importantly, the final scope of issues for analysis in the draft E,I,R, Following the review of the draft E.I.R. final versions of the E.I.R. and General Plan will be produced. Phase I11 is anticipated to take about six months. The processin2 of the E.I.R., normally a process which could easily take twice as much time, will be streamlined by the availability the Master Environmental Assessment prepared in Phase I1 (assuming it will have been prepared comprehensively and carefully and will have beer completed prior to the beginning of this phase). Phase IV Phase IV will consist of public hearings before the PlanninG Commission and City Council. Figure 2, Over-All Time Line, optimistically allocates a total of two months for Phase IV. At the conclusion the City Council will adopt the E.1.R and a fully revised General Plan. ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO This work plan makes certain assumptions about events at key points. In particular, the situation at the end of Phase I1 may be significantly different than is anticipated, such that it might not be possible for Phase I11 to proceed as planned. The most likely alternative scenario would be for serious issues to arise in one or two areas or certain General Plan elements. Were this to occur, it may be possible and desirable to continue processing individual elements separately, while striving to resolve the issues on the remaining elements. In this scenario, a new script would have to be prepared for Phases 111 and IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As indicated, an integral part of this work plan is the preparation of a Master Environmental Assessment (M.E.A.) in Phase 11. This document will serve, in effect, as an extended Initial Study for the preparation of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report. Public participation in developing both the M.E.A. and the scope of work for the E.I.R. and reviewing the draft E.I.R. will be extensive and comprehensive. In addition, the Master Environmental Assessment will serve as a source document for use in the processing of environmental documents for later City and private projects. The availability of a comprehensive inventory and analysis of environmental resources should reduce the time required for the preparation of later X.1.R.s. Page 6 e 0 ._ SEPARATE PROCESSING SCHEDULE FOR THREE ELEMENTS Because of work which has been in progress for some time, three elements of the General Plan will be ready for public hearings well before the full General Plan reaches Phase IV. In the case of the Housing Element, state law stipulates a five- year revision schedule. For all cities in San Diego County revised housing elements must be adopted prior to July 1, 1991. Staff is well into the revision of the Housing Element. Many issues associated with revising the goals and objectives and, particularly, the implementing programs sf this element will engender spirited public dialogue. A draft of this element is due soon and will be accompanied by the processing of an environmental document (anticipated to be a Negative Declaration). Hearings are targeted for spring of this year. Revisions to the Open Space and Conservation Element and the Parks and Recreation Element have been in the works for the last twc years. Both elements have been studied by citizens' committees and revised drafts are now complete. Draft environmental documents (Negative Declarations) have recently completed public review for both elements. Hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council are being scheduled. Staff proposes that on adoption these three elements be added tc the draft General Plan being reviewed in Phase 11. The old elements would be pulled out and the new ones inserted. These elements would then be subject to the same review process as the rest of the draft General Plan. They would be viewed in the context of the remaining elements, additional public scrutiny, all of the technical studies, and any changes which may be proposed for the other elements. It is quite possible that additional amendments to these three elements will be found desirable. This is especially likely to be true for the Open Space and Conservation Element. The Open Space and Conservation Resources Management Plan being developed by the Oper Space Advisory Committee (with the assistance of staff and consultants) will need to be integrated into the Open Space and Conservation Element. The other two elements may also require additional amendments. There will be no need for concern about amending elements whict will have been recently adopted. State General Plan law clear11 states that General Plans are to be considered dynamic documents which evolve over time. Comprehensive updates should be considered at least every four to five years. The law specifically enable2 local jurisdictions to amend each element of the General Plan up tc four times each year. Therefore, there is no need to defer adoptinc these three elements because of a pending comprehensive update. Anc there is no need for concern if, in the course of the comprehensivc revision, changes, additions, or deletions are proposed to the neb elements. The process is designed to work in just this way. Page 7 v 0 .- In Figure 1 (Over-All Work Plan) these three elements are showr beginning of Phase 111, the revision and E.I.R. phase. They coulc as well link into the end of Phase 11, when the Issues Paper(s) will be prepared and public hearings will be held to discuss tht - schematically as linking into the comprehensive revision at tht issues. FISCAL IMPACT The costs associated with all of the activities involved in tht comprehensive General Plan revision are major and will affect a1 least two fiscal years. The total costs for completing tht comprehensive revision can be estimated only roughly due tc uncertainties over the final scopes of work and duration of Phase: I1 and 111. To the degree possible, the costs have been anticipated and set oul in Table 2. Phase I costs are omitted, as Phase I has beel completed. Phase IV costs have also been omitted as they includt only expenses associated with the public hearings, nominal ii comparison to other costs. Where exact costs are unknown, both lot and high estimates are provided. The major costs will be associated with consultants, Some of thea costs are "sunk", which is to say, funds have already beel encumbered. Other consultant costs will be new. Some consultanl costs ought not to be attributed directly to the General Plai revision process, because the associated studies arise from other, independent needs and programs. Nevertheless, because they will bt of critical importance to the General Plan revision, they art included in Table 2 and should be considered at least ancillar! costs. A second major source of costs will be staff time, primarily foi the Planning Department, but also for Engineering, Financia: Management, Parks and Recreation, and other departments. Undei currently anticipated work loads, no new staff additions arc anticipated. Therefore, these costs may also be considered B1sunklB Table 3 sets out details for the Planning Department's projectioi of staffing and labor costs for the effort during the third an( fourth quarters of the current fiscal year. It should be noted thal the Senior Planner position assiyned to the General Plan update, while budgeted for this year, is currently vacant. Tht implementation of this work plan depends upon filling this positioi promptly. Combined labor costs for the other City departments art forecast to be 30 percent of the Planning Department's. A third class of costs will be those associated with operations including public outreach (a video film), community group support printing, mailings, and the like. The Planning Department i: investigating the possibility of grant funding from the Foundatioi Page 8 Phase II Phase Ill Status (12 months) (6 months?) Item cost Sub-Item (Rev. & Tech Study) (EIR & G.P. Revision) LOW High LOW High B Planning Dept $226,000 $226,000 $1 18,000 $118,0C B OtherDepartments $68,000 $68,000 $35,000 $35,00 (Half Phase I1 + 4% C.O.L.A. staff (Planning x 30%) Consultants A Housing $20,000 $20,000 A 03. Management $100,000 $100,000 $27,000 $2 7,OG *A Fiscal Impact $112,000 $112,000 B Geotechnical $75,000 $l00,000 B Noise $50,000 $75,000 N Public Rev. Coord. $70,000 $100,000 $10,000 $20,0Gi N Master Envir Assess. $80,000 $120,000 N E.I.R. $50,000 $70,00 Non-Personnel N Printing/postage/misc. $3,000 $5,000 $2,000 $3,00 Phase TOTAL $804.000- $242.000 $273.00 Consultant only portion $507,000 $627,000 $S7,000 $1 17,OO low high GRAND TOTALS ................................................................... $1,046,000 $1,199,0 Consultant only portion ______________-__-__________________ $594,000 $744,00 NEW costs (all types) .................................... $215,000 $318,001 A = Appropriated funds; contract signed, work underway. B = Budgeted funds; consultant selection pendindin progress. N = New cost; funds not encumbered, no Council authorization to proceed. * = Related study, not directly part of General Plan Revision. NOTES: W w -- -_ Table 3: GENERAL PLAN REVISION Planning Department Staff Costs (Estimates for FY 90-91, Quarters 3814) Title Positions cost* Planning Director 0.33 $17,987 Assistant Planning Director 0.33 $14,470 Principal Planner 0.50 $16,636 Senior Planner 0.75 $22,875 Associate Planner 1 .oo $26,230 Word Processor I1 0.50 $6,926 Planning Tech (graphics) 0.33 $4,424 Planning Intern 0.40 $1,429 Total Costs $110,976 Rounded, say: $111,000 * (In addition to annual wages, "cost" includes 122% overhead) e 0 .- for Carlsbad Community Cable Television fay use a€ cable T.V. i~ -- the community outreach program. As indicted in Table 2, the total costs are estimated to range fron nearly $1.0 to $1.3 million. However, new (unencumbered) costs will account for less than a quarter of these amounts, ranging fron $215,000 to $318,000. Nearly all of these un-funded costs would be associated with consultants. CONCLUSION The comprehensive General Plan update would be a lengthy, complex, and expensive program. A number of other activities, already in progress or planned, are directly or indirectly related to the revision. Staff have developed a four-phase work plan. The first phase, to develop a draft document based upon the existing General Plan, is already completed. The second phase (review of the draft and conduct of special technical studies) and the third phase (preparing draft revisions and an E.I.R.) would take approximately one and one-half years to complete, in large part due to the time associated with the technical studies. Hearings on the final draft and the E.I.R. would make up the fourth phase. Three elements (Housing, Parks and Recreation, and Open Space and Conservation) are proceeding on faster, independent paths, and, upon adoption, would be rolled into the larger revision effort. DENNIS A. TURNER DAT : dat Figures, Tables, and Attachments: Figure 1: Over-All Work Plan Figure 2: Over-All Time Line Figure 3: Phase I1 Work Plan Figure 4: Phase I1 Time Line Figure 5: Phase I11 Work Plan Figure 6: Phase I11 Time Line Table 1: General Plan Revision; Consultant Services Needed. Table 2: General Plan Revision and Related Studies/Costs by Table 3: General Plan Revision/Planning Department Staff Phase. Costs for F.Y. 1990-1991. Page 9 w '- SiiZVE'i - 3B2RIO CAZCS3B3 A3E.A 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOU LIVED IN CAilLSZAD? 4-0 JTY, 2. HGW LONG SAVT YOU BEEN A P3OPERTY OWNER IN THE BARRIO AREA? gOyl?Jr YFs 3. ARF, YOU IN FAVOR OF PRSSZRVING OLD HISTORICAL EUILDINGS? 4. A2E YOU IN FAVOR OF CXZATING A HISPANIC jir/S 5. AX YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPANIC yps 6. ARE YOU IN 'AVOR OF CSEATING A 3IS3ANiC MUSZUM IN TEE BARRIO? -3- SLKITAGZ? COMXEilCiAL AkZA IN TZE BAXRIO, TZAT WOULD IXCLUDZ A TOPTILLZRTA, MEXICAN EXSEIY, CURIO SHOFS, MZXICAN B30K STGRS, HEXICAN RESTAURANT, %TC. ? JEr 7. AZZ YOU IN ,oavoli CF AN IWORMATION CWTEZ IN jzs 3. AXIE YOU iN FAVO2 OF MCSE Hi'L1IPLZ UNITS IN TSE no THE aA32IO ARZA? EA2:KI 0 AREA ( APARTMEXTS j ?- NAME: $/m &$ fl&yfl ADDRESS : 67F Od' /~, eQ/Lpatd e&& qzod TELEPHONE NUMSER: 724 -lYM Q W *- ._ SURVZY - 3AZRIO CAXLSBAD ASEA ysys ' 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOi; LIVED IN CAEILSBAD? 2. HOW LONG HAVE YOii BEZN A PROPERTY OWNER IN 22 Ljrr5 THE -AREA? 3. ARE: YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESERVING OLD HISTORICAL EUILDINGS? ps. 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC 4s 5. MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU m FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPANIC - ETSI TAGE? 7"5' 5. AX% YOU IN YAVCIR OF CZZATING A HIS?ANIC COMMERCIAL A2ZA IN TXZ BAilRIO, TSAT Fu'OiiLD Iiu'iCiUDE A TOXTiLL9RiA, MEXICAN BXEliY, CGilZO SHOPS, MEXICAN BOOK STORS, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC.? -7 e5 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR CF AN IYFORMATION CEXTE2 IN 7 &. THE BARRIO AREA? 8. A~E you m FAVOR OF MORE MULTITLE UNITS IN THE h'g BARRIO AREA (APARTXENTS)?- /1 NANE: I/epA a&; (k. 7s 7 -7d7 ADDRESS: 3SZQ Ccl f /Ssd wf TELEPHONE NWMSER : P 0 ... _- SVXVEY - ;3BX,ti0 CA-ZLSBXD AREA &O 37 Y- w 1. HOW LONG HAVE YO3 LIVED IN CAXLSBAD? 2. ;OW LONG HAVE YOL' j3EEN A PROPERTY OWNER IN TEE BARRIO AREA? 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESERVING OLD HISTORICAL EGILDINGS? 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? F w & 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPAXJIC H3RITAC;E? 5. AX% YOU IX FAVOR OF CRSATISG A HISF'ANIC COMMERCIAL AREA IN TKZ BAZRIO, THAT WCULD INZiUr)9 A TdRTILLERIA, XEXICAN GA:iE2Y, CUXIIO SHOPS, EEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RZSTAURBNT, ETC. ? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN INFORMATION CEXTE2 IN THE BAEiRIO ARZA? -2d a. AZE YO6 IN FAVOR GF MCRE MULTIPLE UNITS IN TYE BB2HIO AREA (APAE?TMENTSJ?- NAME : i?$l..GW ADDRESS: 323 ( hlaL TELETXONE NUHBER: 72. 7 - 5 73 8 U .- _- SLiiVEY - 3B2RIO CA-qLSSAD AREA 1. 2. HOW LONG HAVE YO" LIVED IN CAXLSBAD? 5iOy eafS HOW LOLUG EAVE YOi' 32ZX A PilGPERTY OWNER IN ro 7fS* yes I'g-5 FS yes 8. BA2RIO AREA (APARTMENTS)?- *yyp Pd CCcT/&q NAME : +f&-/ ADDRESS: 1 {/o Gue~~r~ TELEPXONE NUMBER: 72Y-/35 -0 THE - AREA? 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESZRVING OLD HISTORICAL EUILDINGS? YU 4. AZE YOU IN FAVOEi OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN TIiE BARilIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR XISPANIC ETSI TAGE? 5. AXE Y~U IN FAVOR OF cmay:;xG A HIS~ANIC COHMZRCIAL A2ZA IN TEZ BARRIO, THAT WOULD INCLUiI3 A TC)RTILLERIA, MEXICAN BMEXY, CURZO SHOPS, MEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC.? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN IN7?ORMATION CENTER 131 THE FIAiZRlO ABTA? A2E YOU IN FAVOR OF NGRE ML'LTI2LZ UNITS IN ily fldrc H ' w 0 I_ ... SaRVEY - BA3SIO CkLSEAL: PASEE; 1 > 1. EOk' LONG HAVE YOU LIVED Ih: ChZLSE.k3? 33 -y-wx 2. ZOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A P2OPERTY OWXER IN -7- 29 yea ii=E BARRIC] AREA? 3. AZZ YOU IN FAVOR OF PI?E:SEZVING OLP HISTORICAL 3.a ZLJlLDINGS? 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC 3- MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF XAIXTAIKING OUZ HISPANIC HERITAGE? L I?Z 3 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOE; OF CREATING A HISPANIC COKNERCIAL AXEA I1\' TEL bkXI0, THAT GOLiiD INCLUDE A TORTILLERIA, MEXICAN BAKERY, CURIO SHOPS, KEXICAN 390K STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC. 3 ?F 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR CF AN INFORMATION CENTER IN 3- THE BARRIO AREA? 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE Nb BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? - NAME: &v>dy'& &ye\" ADDRESS : 33& mp\&q *e<+ 725 -?a&\ TELEPHONE NUMBER: w -_ .- SLS.VEY - EAZKILj CAF:;;LSBAI; AREA 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOii LIVED IK CA1RLSEAC? 55 2. EGW iOP!G HAVE YOU 2EZK A 2ZOPERTY OWNER IN AYd TXE BkRF:IO kXh? p3s 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CF.EATING A HISPANIC Ye5 ye 5 y"- Ye 3. Al?Z YOU IN FAVOR OF P3ESESi'V'ING OLD HISTORICAL Eii I i D I N G S 5 MUSEUM IN THE: BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUi: EISF'ANIC FEZ I TAGE? 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CZEATING A HISPANIC COMMERCIAL AZZA IK TEE EA;;IF,IC, TEAT GGLJLD INCLUDE A TORTILLEXIA, MEXICAN EAKEZY, CURIO SEOPS, KEXICAN EOOK STCRE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC.? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR 0% AN INFORMATION CENTER IN THE BAFRIO AREA? Nc a. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF XORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE ck BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? NAME ,DD&7--) : du,44L-- yrd k2 d .$L--- TELEFHONE NUMBER: 6- W 0 ._ -- SgzVEY - aJLF;\"nIG CAS.LSEAL I&E,A 1. HOW LOISG EBVE YOU LIVED IK CARLSZX)? $0 -'I- fidW LOKG HAVE YClU BEEN A PZOFERTY OWNER IN 2. i EL BARR1 CI I-:F;:;E.A? $0 p."- 3. ARE YOU iX 7AV3R 01: PREESERVIXG OLD HIZTORICAL yg f' Eii i L D I N G S ? y6 y 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR GF CREATING A HISPANIC MVSEUM IN TXZ BAEiEiIO? 5. ARE YCU IN FAVOR OF MAINTBIKING OUR EISF'ANIC 0~5 HEE I TAGE? /' 6. ARE YO2 IN FAVOR OF CSEATING A HISPANIC /kz T COEMERCIAL AREA 11; TEZ BAZF:IO, THAT F;OiiLD INCLUDE A TORTILLESIA, MEXICAN EAKERY, CZRIO SHOPS, MEXICAiJ EOGK STCRE, MEXICAN RESTAURAIU, LlC.? -m 7. ARE YOU iN FAVOR OF AI$ INFORMATION CENTEE~ IK 7fC THE SkRSi=O AtiEI.,?' 8. A2E YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLZ UNI'?S IN THE d& BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? NAME: bod S*& Cid ADDRESS: &a< ,&%4#fick A t/c TELEPHONE NUMBER : q3 y 5 If 7 / 4 w -- _- SLiKVZY - SB2E;IO CkhLSBkZ KEA 9 37 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOU LIVED IN CkRLSEh32 2. HOW LONG FAVE YOLT El"-' 3~3 A ?2DPEi?Tk' OWNER IN 14 56 y..- :hfi BAEF.10 L?EA? 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESERVING OLP HI,CT@S;ICAL C$-P ELTILDINGS? ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATIEiG A HISPALU'IC MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 4 4. 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOF. 0% MAINTAINING OUR EISF'ANIC w HZ21 TAGE? G. ARE YOU IN FA'JOE; OF EEATING A HISPANIC COKMERClhL AZZA iR TEE EA;IEIO, THAT W3ULD INCLUDE A TORTILLZRIA, MEXICAN BAKEXY, CURIO SHOPS, KEXICAN EOOK TORE, MEXICAN RESTAURBRT, ETC. ? 4 AR% YOU IN FAVOR OF AN INFORMATION CEXTER IN TEE EARRIO AkEA? -%@ 7. 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF SORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? mo . NAME: 1- m4 ADDRESS: 3'f 5% R-2 TELEFHONE NUMBER: / L/c 3 y 6/ r/ Ir w .- .- SilliVEY - SAEIRIO CAZLSBAD AREA 6 WVJ L\ 1. HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN CALILSBAD? HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A PROPEX'TY OWNER IN 2. THE BARRIO AREA? 454$ 4 d d ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESZRVING OLD HISTORICAL BUILDINGS? 3. 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BARiiIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUE SISPANIC HSRITAC!Z? 6. AiiE YO1: IN FAVOR OF CSEXTING A iiISPANIC COt+IMMERCIAL AXZA IN TXZ BAiiRIO, TEAT WOULD INCLUDZ A TORTILLZ?.IA, IYEXICAX BAKEZY, CGRIO SHOPS, MEXICAN BDOK STCRS, MEXICAN RESTAURANT ETC.? J 2 7. ARE YG~J IN FAVOR OF AN INFORXATION cmmx nr THE BA!?IRIO AXZA? 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MCRE MULTIPLE UNITS IN TXE r P' EA2210 ARZA (APARTZENTS)? PQdaa;4 NAME : akQ.4 %; ADDRESS : 52 9% TELEPHONE NUMBER: q3y- 2/ P/ v e .- .- SijZVE'i - BB3.210 CAZLS3X3 AREA 1. HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIED IN CARLSBAD? 3n7&* "/" 2. HOW LONG HAVE YOU aEm A PROPERTY OWNER iN 3. THE BARRIO AREA? ARE YOU iN FAVOR OF PRBSERVING OLD EISTORICAL fH BIJ I L D I NGS ? 7, 4. AtiE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MGSEUM IN TEE BA22IO? Yd TM 5. AI?% YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPANIC HZR I TAZE? 6. A25 YOU IN FAVOR @C CZEATING A HiS3ANiC COMMERCIAL AZZA IN TEZ BAXRIO, TEAT WGGLD INCLUDZ A TOE'TILSZ2IA, MEXICAN BAKS'IY, CZRIO SHOPS, MEXICAN EOOK STGRZ, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC. ? vf 7. ARZ YOI; IN FBVOEi OF AN INFOREATION CZXTEX IN THE BARRIO ARZA? 8. A2E YOIj IN FAVOR GF WCRE MC'LTI2LE UNITS IN THE e BARRIO AREA tAPAZTXENTSj?- NAME : #&A&T / AWkw ADDRESS: z33H@ch G- w7 N/o 1 TELEPHONE NUMSER: +3y'/ fx 7 II m .- _- S3ZVZ;Y - 3A3iR;G CAZLS3;Iil A5EB 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOU LIVED ig CAXSEXD? ,$OL$+J 2. SOW LONG HAVE YOU 3EZN A ?3OPE8YY OWNZR IN /" AREA? JdP THE 3. AEiE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRSSZ VIMG OLD HISTORICAL Gws BUILDINGS? ii 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOE? OFCREATING A HISPANIC MZSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING CUE HISPANIC ZTfiITAGE? I !,6& I, 6. AiiE YOU IN FSVbR OF CZEATING A HIS?ANIC COMME'ICIAL AREA IN TXZ BAXEIO, TEAT WOULD IXCLUDZ A TORTILL%?IA, MEXICAN BAKSZY, CUSIO SHOPS, PIEXICAN BOOK STGRT, MEXiCAN RESTAURANT, &LC.? -7- i2A 7. A2E YOU IWFAVOR OF AN IXZORMATION CENTEX IN y5 THE BARRIO ARXA? 8. A2E YOU IN FAVOR GF NCRE MGLTIZLE UNITS IN THE l?.' d BAZRIO ARZA (APAl?TMENTS)?- // d? NAME: L b/g/odL/ qt ~q~/s ADDRESS! LJ?/b 9//, J,, TELEPHONE NUMSER: ?-; f-~psl Ji/ (1 &f ~ pdv //Jv- 5-(2 p4 4 & mt L-7 T d9 5i'/"CcSS &+ 3;435l,,sC i LT :^'idAa J @ F -_ .- Sa-RVzyl - SA?"' LALO CAZLSSAD A2EA 1, HOW LONG IiAVE YOU LIVED IN CARLSaAD? 3 ye3 2. X097 LONG HAVE YOU BE3 A 2ROPERTY OWNEZ IN TEE BARRIO AE!EA? 3 yfig 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESERVING OLD HISTORICAL YES BUILDINGS? YE 5 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPANIC p> HER I TAGE? + 6. ARE YOU iX FAVOR OF CREA'TZNG A BIS?ANIC COMMERCIAL A2EA IN TEZ BAX?IO, TEAT WOULD 1NZiirT)E A TOXTILSERIA, MEXICAX SAXEZY, CURIO SHOPS, MEXICAN BOOK STGEIE, FEXICAN RESTAURANT, yss ETC. ? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR CF AN INFORMATION CSXTE2 IN Ys THE aAREZIO AEIZA? ARE: YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE ML'LTZ?LE UNITS IX THS BAiiRIO AREA (APARTXENTS!?- Mo 8. NANE : J &S Jo*d3?0 ,,, ADDRESS : 3 zzz iZQQSClJEL7- TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7zo 733 J w e -- _- S3sVE-f - BAERIO CkgLSz,ki ii5;EA 1. HOW LOKG EAVE YOlj LIVE9 IX CARLSE.X?? 2. HOW LONG EAVS Y32 SEEK A 2EOPERTk‘ OWNER IN m,.- AriL BARRICI ARth? 3. AS2 YOU I1\1 FAVGF: OF P“nESESViK.:G OLP IiIF70RICAL BLJILDINGS? 4. ARE YOU Ih’ FAVOR OF CREATING A HiSPAXIC MUSEUM IN THE BAEZRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR GF MAINTAINING GUS HIS?ANIC HEF: I TAGE? 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC COKXERCIAL AF:EA Th’ ‘TEX EARRIO, THAT WCULD INCLUDE A TORTILLERIA, MEXICAN BAKERY, CURIO SHOPS, XEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC.? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR 0% AN INFORMATION CENTEZ IN THE BARRIO AXEk? a. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE BARR1 0 AREA (APARTMENTS ) ? ‘-7~ X; & , ..’? i N AEE : ADDRESS:3,2.L2: t ’,,,/\ L-. L., ,, &b / ,:?flL,’ <-* /<scL’ I u’ - 3- -. ,T - ; ,,,’ ,:;:; cz 5- 7- - - ,. “2 ; -, __ TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7 ~ 7 f- / <LL.’ 7/x+, -2 F m .- .- SZXVE'li - SA"niIr31 CAS.LSEAL k5Eh Y5 1. ROW LOIUG HAVE YOLJ LIVE3 iK CkZiSEkC? 2. ?OW LOKG HAVE Y3J BEEX A FilGFERTY OWI\;ER IN 39' TEE BARKICI A3E.k: r-l 3. AXC Y3Tj IN FAVGZ OF PkESZKVING OLD HIST@F,ICAL 63ILDIKGSZ ','jC 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CEEATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN TEE BARRIO? \'$? / 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF KAIKAINING OUE EiSPANIC EEF. I TAGE? \ / ~5 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOk OF CZEA'TiNG A HISPAHIC COKMi2'iC:AL AF,ZA If< IT.'- li7L BAXEIO, TZAT F'OLJLE INCLUDE A TORTILLEXIA, MEXICAN BAKEXY, CURIO SHOPS, KEXICAN E03K STORE, KEXICAN RESTAURBW', ETC. 3 * 'e*:, 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOF; CF AN INFORMATION CENTER IN Yrf THE EIAKEZIG AREA? 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE KO BARRIO AREA (AFAKTMENTS)? c NAME: bfld 4. v)&c& ADDRESS: 630 Mdydh fipf CALL TELEPKONE NUMBER: 1 a? - 3-7 0 6 W 0 SZRVEY - EASRIO CAkLSEAZ A>.EA i4 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOU LIVED IN CkRLSEA3? 2. EOW LOXS HAVE YOU BEEN A PROPERTY OWNER IN 8 TEE E€&&&&@ &?;'EA? Pd w 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PFiESERVING OLD HIFTORICAL ELJILDINGS? 4. AkE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN TEE BAEiiiIO? F 7- (--/&Zd 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUE EISPANIC HZRI TAGE? 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOEi OF CSEATING A HISPANIC COKHERCIAS AZEA Ih' TEE BAREIO, THAT KCULD INCLUDE A TORTILLEi?IA, MEXICAN BAKERY, CURIO SHOPS, KEXICAN B30K STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC. ? 7, ARE YOU IN FAVOR 0% AN INFORMATION CENTER IN THE BkRRiG AREA? P 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR Or" MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? NAME: -@. dm" @&ZL-rBrn 44 - 9oO4 ADDRESS : 2406 flhJwS fL* TELEFHONE NUMBER : 753- gt/qc 43d -5"J- I w 0 .- SUR'\!F;il - EcALiF11 IO I~:ASII.-'SB/?+rJ $&EA ._ . . ... ... -, . s- 8 .?/a 1. HOW LUNG HAVE YUl! LIVED IN 11:#4l?LSE#4@ 2" HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A F:RUF'EF:TY (_IWNEE IN THE BARRIO AEEA'? .- 5. , .. 7- r r (7- 7- c4 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR UF F'EESEFWXNG 0LI:l NISTORIORL EU I L.D :E I'.IGS'? 4. ARE Y~U IN F-AVOF: UF I::F:EATI rdrj A t.iI SPAN I 1:: MUSEUM IN THE FAF:F:I[3? 5, ARE YOLl IN ' F-Ab'[lFi OF MA I NT'A I r.1 I NG [3lJR HI SPAN 111: HER 1 TAGE'? El. ARE YOU IN F-AVCIF? OF I3?EA'TJ.i\lG A F-lISF'AhllII: C:OMtvlEF:C: I AL MEA I: N THE BARF: IO y T!-iAT WOULD 1NC:LUI)E A "TOF:TILLEEIA, MEXICAN EiAKEF:'i', C:URIO SI-ICtFS R PiEX I CAI4 E!O@t::: STGFE, PlEX Z C:AN F:ESTAUF?ANTS p EfC D .? ,AFiE YOU IN F'AVCIR !2F AN I NF'13F?PlAT 1614 CE!'4TER .T.Y THE RAE:[? I U &!!?.EA'? -T /* NAME :: - az%?zd &&LA/-- ADI2F;::ESS: a 8 7 -4 ,,p&./q- , 7.22 7-5-2 Y2- T'ELEPC.IBNE : .. .. W 0 -- SZIIVEV - EAR510 CASLSSAT k3Eh 1. HOB LONG EAVE YOV LIVED IN CAEZLSEX? HOW LOKG EAVE YOU BEX A ?iiOFEF’;Y 0WXZ:R I8 iaE BAHRSC: AF:’Eh? -.- 2. 3. ALE YOU ih’ FAVOR GF PRF‘SZSVISG OLD I.IE7’OORICP.L EUILDIKGS? 4. AKE YOU IN FAVOR OF CF.EATING A HISPAKIC MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MA;NTAINiNG OUR EISPAXIC HEF.1 TAGE? 6. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CSEATING A EISPANIC COXMERCiAL AKA It< TXE EARRIO, EA‘: WctULIj INCLUEE A TORTiLLE2IA, MEXICAN BAICEilY, CURIO SHOPS, XEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURBNT, ETC. ? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN INFORMATION CENTER IN THE EARRSO AREA? 8. ARE YOV IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLZ UNITS IN THE 4749 BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? ! r fJ ?“‘d #L& ;? 41 NAME : M&i&+ c<;-%#.+ ADDRESS: 3 q q4 pw P e tre/!* l! p+&k&&a4.4./ TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7, -wpp P w -_ -- SljIiVEV - 6ARK;O CAF.;SSAC A?EA 1. ECIK LONG EAVE YO3 LIVED IK CkfiLSELi)? 2. HCJW LONG EAVE YOU 3EEX A 22OFERTk' OPIU'ER IN TEE BAE.;F,ICt AXLA? 3. ASS YOU IN FAVOF. OF PT'ESfKVIKiG OLD HISTOF.ICAL €LTiiDIKGS? 4. ALE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BAEZRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FkVOii OF KAINYAINING OUR EiS?ANIC HZF, I 'TAGE? 6, ARE YOU IN FAVClEi OF CSEATING A IiISPANiC COXHERCIAL AREA IN TEE EARF,;O, TEA3 63L'LD INCLUDE A TORTILLESIA, MEXICAN BAKESY, CIjRIO SHOPS, KEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURAICT, ETC.? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR 0% AN INFORMATION CElVTER IN THE BARRIO AREA? a. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS I? $"1. .#J Q -pyBL NAME: q TELEPHONE NUMBER: w -_ SU3.VZ;'I - 5B,S,X;O CAA?LSSBiI BSEA 1. HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN CARLSBAD? j4 yQaks 2. tiow LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A ~ROPEZTY OWNER IN 5ye~c5 THE - AREA? 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRZSERVING OLD EISTORICAL Y- BAEZR1o? Y- BUILDINGS? 4. AXE YOU rx FAVOR OF CXIEATING A HISPANIC MUSELJM IN TiiE 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR XISPAXIC Y- EZRITAGZ? 5. A2Z YOU ILU 7AVOEi OF CZEXTING A ZIS3ANIC COMMERCIAL AREA IN TEE BAIIRIO, TEAT WCijLD INCLUDE A T~EYIZAL~RIA, XZXICAN BAKEZY, CURIO SHOPS, MEXICAN BOOK STCEI5, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, ETC. ? /?i/5cLQ' 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR CF A11 INFORMATION CZNTEX IN -3- THE BARRIO ARZA? 8. AXE YOU IN 2AVO;i OF %RE MGL'TI2L% UNITS IN TXE lIlb ' BA2R;O AREA (APARTMENTS)?- NAME : ag- c&& &$ &e* ADDRESS: 36/q fl/%&roeLk L' TELEPHONE NUXSER : ?'?> qc34 w 0 ._ SQiiVEk' - 6Bki;ZO CAkLSBAL A3EA 1. EO6 LOEG EAVE SI03 LIVE9 ?ti CkRLSZAi;? 2. ZOW LONG EAVZ YSC aEES A PEOFERTY OWIZER IN TEE BARKIO E.Zih? 3. A3Z YOU IN FAVOK GF PkiESZRVIfu'G OLD HISTCRICAL &;'I LD I Id GS 2 4. AKE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUE IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF KAINTAIKING GUS SISFANIC HZRITAGE? 6. ARZ YOU IN FAVOk OF CSEATING A EISDANIC COKHERCZAL AF,.ZA JK TEZ EAXF,IO, THAT POiiiD INCLUDE A TORTILLERIA, XEXiCAX BAKERY, CURIO SHOPS, KEXJCXJ E'JOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURXJT, ETC.? 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN IIWORMATION CENTER IN THE BAKRIO AiiEA? 8. AEiE YOV IN FAVOR OF MORE MULTIPLE UNITS IN THE &cJ BARRIO AREA (APARTMENTS)? /r f' P- grrd I ADDRESS : I 'b9 t3 le7 TELEPHONE NLTMBER: w 0 ... SGRVEY - BBZRIO CA3LSBAD AREA 0x4 4 od SJL x. 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOU LIVED IN CARLSBAD? d 2. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A PROPERTY OWNER IN AREA? 72- THE F r Y v w 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESERVING OLD HISTORICAL BUILDINGS? 4. ARE YOU IN FAVOR Or" CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BARRIO? 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MAINTAINING OUR HISPANIC EZRITAZE? 6. A2E YOU IN FAVOR OF CSSATING A HISPANIC COMMERCIAL AREA IN TSZ BAZRT.0, THAT WOtiLD INCLUDE A TORTILLERIA, MEXICAN BAKEXY, CURIO ETC.? SHOPS, HEXICAN BOOK STORE, MEXICAN RESTAURANT, 7. AZE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN INFORMATION CENTER IN THE BARRIO ARZA? 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR Or" MCRE MULTIPLE UNITS 18 THE BARRIO AREA (APBRTHENTS)? rn € L- NAME : ADDRESS: c Hw h TELEPHONE NUMSER : 43rf - 2/7/ e rn -_ SURV3'i - ShZRIO CAZLSSXD AaEA lo- /aL[/zJ 1. HOW LONG EAVE YOG LIVED IN CAFtLSZAD? 2. HOW LONG EAVE YOL' BEEX A PROPERTY OWNER IN TEE .T"scc, AREA? f.jt'Ean~ BUILDINGS? y<S 3. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF PRESZRVING OLD HISTORICAL 4. AZE YOU IN FAVOR OF CREATING A HISPANIC MUSEUM IN THE BAZRIO? dl-'% 5. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF MBIXTAINING OUR HISPANIC HEXITAGE? ye 2 6. AXE YOCT IN SAVOi? ,ClF CSEATING A HISPANZC COMMERCIAL AREA Ih' TZE BARRIO, THAT WOUL3 INCLUDE: A TORTILLZ2IA, HEXICAX BAKE;IV, CURIO SHOPS, MEXICAN 200K STGRE, MEXICAN RZSTAURANT, ETC.? y c=5 7. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF AN INFORMATION CENTE2 IN THE BAR810 ARZA? ye\ 8. ARE YOU IN FAVOR GF XCRE MULTIPLZ UNITS IN THE BAZRIO AREA (APARTXENTS)?- w NAME : W\C hfie ( 63 p@/cs ADDRESS: qllc ~~h~~c!- $k TELEPHONZ NUMBER: 729 ?f? 7 w m SIJR'JE)' - BARF: 1 CI II:AI..II.-SBAI) AREA .- ., . 1. HOW LONG HAVE \m.i LIVED %rd C:AIXSEAP? c .-, L. HOW LONG I-IAVE YCIU EEEN A F'E~CIF'EF.ITY DbJI\-IER 15 jrj IN THE EAI;.RTO AEEA'I.'.-..- - 3. ARE YOU IN F VUR OF FEESERVING OLri HISTORICAL FUILD:CNGS'I.' VfS+ .$o ARE YOU IN F-AVUR OF I:: ,'EAT1 P43 A HI SF'ANI 11: ., ": ! 4. MUSEUM IN THE: EAF:F: I O?'aj ARE YUU IN F-A'v'fjF! OF MA I NTA I N I NG [:3lJFl 1-l I SPAN I C HER I TAGE':.' c? I/ -1 s leJ 6. ARE YOU I h! F'AVOF: OF CREAT'I i\.lG A 1-i I SFAN i I-: C:OPIPlEF:I I AL AFEA I PI THE BARF: I Cl p Ti4 AT WOULD 1NIZ:LtlDE A TGF:TILLEEIA, MEXICRN J3At:::EF;:Y B CURIO SHOPS, PFX I I::AN E~IX IE;TI~)F.'E rir:x I Ixi-4 RESTAURANTS q ET(::. -7 fi Jz2fl A g]'? ui/h,. 4, ' ' ARE YOLJ IN FAVOR OF AM 1NF'OF:PiAT 1 DN CENTER LN 7 /e hS THE BARRIO fk\EE&.? I NAME :: &,w "/ /-,$ddA 4$ ADDRESS: '32-i flU~~~~/ I TELEF'HCINE :: -7&Q 6 I t ,. , W m L, CUF:'\)[<'i - BA,Lq:Fi; I c) I_:AFcJ.-SB,A,JJ AREA .- .- 1. HOW LOIUi HAVE YUI..! L I OED IN CAF?LSHAE? .i . Sl clear+ HDW LONG WAVE YGU REZj4-A F'CC1:QI"'EFL::TY CII.II;\IEE IN THE EAERI: CI Al?EA? ARE YOLI !i N FAVCIB bF . F'RESEF:V I"! Ut. ..I? 141 STDR j: CAI.. FU I L.D 1 NGS'? .-. 6-1 y66fi r) a. 9es 4. AF2E YlfU ihl F-AVC3R CIF i1:FEATI: f4I3 A 1.4 i SF:'Al\i T I_: twsr:ut'I IN -ri-iE mm-: f D? ~lv S HEF: ?: TAGE.~ q es I::~~II~IE~;:IT: I AL RF;;~:!; 1: P~J 'JI-~E BP,F;~ I ~lr ,, - APE YOU T f-l F-A'v'('jF: KIF MA I NTA I 1.1 Tl\.iG !:!L!FI ti I SFAh! I: IC: I- d= 6. Ai.: E 'Y' [I CJ 1 N F'"& i/ KIF: [I F 11: F: E +I T' J. i\l!3 64 1-1 I .:; p 6; !\I 1 11: 1: r\j[:l,-UI)E R .:rgF:T' 1 IJF' 1 A, . MEj: 1 I=&t;\l :EF:'{ I I-JJR 10 Sk-\(Iiz'S p rqEX I II:Ar4 FOG!::: STGF:E 1 MEX 1 iz:Ar.[ l7ESTAURAfiJT.s (I u e== ET(":, .7 T 1. $\RE yet-\ Iq Ffi)\ &,i 1 >j r- r! i;. i"] $, -: I THE E+lF:R 1 CI fi,i?F r-j A M E :: Ifj&flL&&< JAG ADQRESS: qb<a @,aAT '4' 3 29- WLO TELEPHONE: I 1 0 SURvE'f - BAF:F: I L? r::AF:I.-SEAr,) AREA L. 3. 1-1~~ I,ONI~ I-iAvf: KI\,,.~ 1- I VED I r.1 I_:;~I:;:I...SPAD?~~ YRS I HI)I..J I.-OP\lG HAVF YOU REEN A F'EOF'EF:'TY C!I.II:-!EF: .- 2" - IN THE BAE~~::IU AREA'I.' 2 7 )/R S, 3. AF:E YUU 1 N F-AVCIF.: [IF F'F.:ESEF:V I NEi ClL..l::) li I STOF: I C:AL FU I LD :r. f435'7 \/ E 5 riusEuti IN THE: EAEEIU'? \IEs 4, AF:E YOU Ird F-AVOF r~ IXEAT I txi A t.i I SF:~AN I I: 5. AF:E YP1-l I i'4 F:-AL'[:)ir: Or MA I NTA :I: N I NiYi r!!Jr> 141 SPAtil 11:: HEI:ITAGE"? (/€SI yks E. AF:E: 'f0I-J I r,l ~AV~IE: i:]F c:REA'T I1\113 A 1-1 I SF:'r?hl I I:: i::OpllvlEF:!3 I AL &+/:?EA 1 N THE EAFR IOn Ti...iRT WOULD INc:LL!DE /+ TDf.:TiLL,.F_F;:.IA, FlEX I~I:iqt\.l E!PF:::EiF:Y, C:UE:IO S1-][Jj='S p p1EX I I_:RPd E!:xfli.:I STOFlE .r ME)I :[ CAr4 !?E!3TAUF:ANTS, ETi':. .? \ /E5 *.- -7 1. $,E E: '4 n iJ 5 1.4 v- A ?/ fJ E: i': F gI ?ti I: ?si F' [j 5: 14 A -I- I E) hJ I::: E p,[T E E: I $4 THE: BAF:HIrJ AFyEA.7 vcs nfAME: bulb ,+ Boa4 d41.9-dPr " AUDFi.ESS:F 3/77 ,aboSedd7 .. .. ST. CARLLbQJ TELEF'kiUNE::7&CI- 5b?7 / 4q5- 78'29 / 4 , i I a W SUF:'.,I[zy - EcCiT;:F: IO I-:AF:I.-SEAU AREA .. 1. HOW Lur*1!3 HAVE YCN..! LIVED :r. i'.i ~I~~FAD? f+ -'el- HDbJ LON15 biAVE YOU EEEN A F'f;-:OPEF:TY C!I.INEFG: IN THE {i F: E A'? ARE YclU IN F-AVGF: OF PE:ESEF:VING OLD I~ISTOR%II:AL S; 63 y" .-l L. q a. FU I LP I HGS'.' 4. ARE \m-t I td I--AVOR KIF IXEKT'I 141; f:t 1.15. SPAN I I--: Si r .-I * AI;.IE KXJ I i.4 FAL'E:!I? OF PIA L NT'A I N I NG !::)l.!F? 1-l I SPAN I!: si MUSEUM IN -rttE PAFX I 0.1.' HEF: 5. TAGE'? .. EJ. AF:E: "YO!.! TPJ !'"AVril? OF CF.IEA'T I Ni; A 1-1 S/' I::~MMEF:I:: I AL RI-IEA IN :r.i;iF:_mF:R I n, T! Irdr::!-i!rx A -~ORTIL-LEZIA, MEX IC::~ Ef:i:::r::Fry, I::UF:IU 1- C;}-!ufz'S i p?E:g IK:AN ~~~:~;!J)::: STORE-_'^ fiEX 1 iz:Ap\J RE.ZTAUj?fi,fiJTS, E.r c:: ~ '7 .. I ARE ~0l-l IN !y(+:j!2p :f7F AFsj 1: ~%JF'(!&:k1,!+i 1 C:N I:Y:ENl*EF! J, !iJ 7 1. "? i- TIiE BARF;: 113 &F:Ect'? b.1 k M E :: S&i7&-- fiUfl4 /"(-PP ADDRESS: 3 3 0 $- ,J-&&+> 33- TELEPHONE: 7 A?- 249/ . 0 SLJ[;1:!jE'{ - E(+:[;:: I ci I":Al"r:l.,SE{+r) &#EA . . ... - .. . 1. HUM LDNG HAVE YOU L NED Ir.1 C:AI~:LSEAI?? s'o ' y fis. H .-l L. HOW LONG HAVE YBU EEEN A PF:C)PEF.:'TY Ii!I*Ji\IEF? 3 <)/E&cs 4 1 N YHE EAT.:l;:: I 0 A/-.IE+!+'? a. m ARE you 1 pi F-AvoF: [IF PEESEW I: Nizi OL-~ HI STOR I ixL- )" ex BU I L-D I i'.113S'? Y (523 4. A F: E y r! 1.1 I tq F- ci 14 E] F; cj F I:: F: E f:, 'T I ?.I 13 c1 1-1 I s p A p.1 I I:: f MlfSElJM I i'4 THE BAiZ:F: TU'? I= d n ARE YULJ I &I F'A'v!r3F: T;F PIA 1 NT'A I N I t4G rJIJF t-l I SPAPI X 11: y &s HEl? I TAIIiE':.' 6. ARE: YOIJ J I,! F:"AVC!F' IX- I::F:EAT' I i\tG A /...I I SpFq\! 1 I:: 1:: i> til 1'1 E E 11: 1 (n, L A E: I i'il -riiE ~RR I r3 n T!...:AT ~J~JIJLD Ipxi-firx ,tj -rsG ME:< f 1::(i,t\./ Ejc,k::EF:'f, v 1yJF; 10 Yc;-S YFB .GI-.IE ~ pi~~ I c::c3r.i rt=STp,UF;:F,bj-rS ~ 7 /9 121FE YrJlJ I p~j F"tqIJ[:!F;: c:F Ab.1 I NF'C.:Ki;.;,i?,-j'' I C;pJ !:>Eb\I"rEE I: 74 Tj-.[[+; E,i?,F:[;;: 1 (J $!RE A'? f-.iAi+lE:: J~FN e?/ /"v) 0 a +fi ue c ADlDl?ESS; 3391 fl#dis'T,fi 9 -1 , <14k1S$73q, e, TEL-EF'HDNE: 7 xT - 4 2 Uc c 1 , -. U. ; I A 0 e SlJG.:.I'LJEY - SkER 10 C:AF'::I,-SFftC. {+REA -_ 1. d. HOW LONG HAVE '{Ut! LIVED IN IX)RtSECiT?;> 33 yps HOW I-ON15 HAVE Y Otl EEEN A F:F:CIFEF:T'.i' ' C!l.II'.iEF? IN THE EAFIr?I: u AREA'? .- 7 yl- 5- 3. ARE 'r'UU 1: N FAVCllR CIF F'F::ESEF:V I: t\iG Ot..i:! HI 5TOR I: C:AL Btl J. 1m NE?? y,, 4- ARE 'f[?Ll I PJ FAVOE: C)F. 'IZ:EE,~T J, r.ilJi $\ 1-1 I SF::Ab.] I iI: Pl!JSElJM I M THE EifiF:F: I U? WkL 5. AEE '<E!-! I P.1 FAVUF: C!F . PIA I'NT'A I: fd 1 NI3 'KILiF? tl I SPAN If:; HEI? J. Tg9i2E.T YL- G. RF:E: YOLJ IN F-A'y'QF: nF i_:E:EA'T J, ;\]!3 fJ 1-4 1 sF:'rqr\l I 1:: u.wimz5;::: I AL MEA I: r.1 THE EARF I CJ, TE-N- WSULD I Nl::l.-L!rjE A "i-EIF?T I 1-I ... ER 1 A r KEX i I::cit.J BAKEE'i q l::uF:I E sI-Ic!I-'s F PIEX 1l;Ap.J 13::: E;'rC-RE ~ PlEFX I II:AN F:ESTAUF:Af.JTS, Ye J E-Tf'-. '7 - -." . - -? /m $,?.E 'f0U I :.I FhVl:)R OF- AN :: NFfiF:>l$l-r I gpj i;ENTEF.: I t.4 Y,s TFIE EARF 10 $\F:EA.? r-.tAiiE:: Si&b7 &/yaw Je TELEF'HUNE (61 9) Lf3 4 - g5 G 8 AJjDRES.5: 32?3 @aevfLTJ P'- cb4 c\. I 1, I < 0 a -. 4 irn BARF? IO t:AF:I .-SRhIl AREA ._ J, y/ 1. HOW LtmG HAVE \itx L I VEQ I r.4 [::Fii~:cmm? /y+& HOW LONEi HAVE YOU BEEN A F'ROF'EF:TY C3WlEF: i., L. i IN THE EAF:R f 0 AI?EA'? YcpWd -J 3. ARE YOLJ IN FAVOF: CIF F'F:ESEF:V 7: NG 13L..I! HI STUF: 1 CAL ARE 'inu IN F-AVOR OF t::E::E,m I: r..ir3 A [.i1 sF::w\i I I:: Y- Y- FU J. L-D :r. P.IGS'-' ARE YE?!.! I i'.l FA'V'UEI OF MA T NTA 1 N I NG 0!1FI HI SF'AN IC MUSE!.JM I b.1 THE EAFF: I O? HE IS: 3: T I.i 1; E'? 4. 5. 6. RF:E: '(C31-J li\i [y AVQF: nF f:EEA'S' I NG A 1-1 I SF'AN I I: iI:OPlI'iERi,: I AL (\!?Eh IN THE BAFrF: I n p TliAT Wt)Ui.D SI-.I(-~~-'S 'i pi~)i: II::AN ECKII::: s-m , PIEX f i;::#+Pd RESTAUEANTS s J. f.ll::LlJDE A TOF:T I LL..EF: I A 7 X I C:AN BAi:::EF:'f s CUF: IO -7 /e '{ 5 i-1 I N I-' fi I.) !_j E: e F A 91 I: pj F [:I! 5; ?ti?, -I- 1 II: 74 !I: E p4 T E R I N 3' ' TI-![: BARF! I(3 $'F:E<+'? r.1 A M E :: *&;a @ e - f$i>f:F:E!sS 2 TE LE F:>s Cj hJE ; U9- 729- A217 ' . .,. ... .I I i 7 0 0 '. SUF:'dEY - EAEF?I c! C:AF:/.-SEAD AREA *. I. HUM Lurd(3 HAVE \iuii LI:!.,ED :mi i::AiF:t-sgc;D? - /93 7 H / 71 1 ." 2. ~ 14Ul4 LONG HAVE YOU EEEN k F'T;:OF'EF.:TY OIAJNEE c sfl& IN THE - AREA.7' ARE Yau IN F-AvuF: OF w:E-;sw:v 1: NI:; oL.1:) i-II sroE 1 cAL- VAT EU I 1-0 I rw:'? 3. 4 n AFiE YOll If4 FAVC3R CIF iX:Ef?zTIP.ji3 A F,iISF::'filP.iIi:: - MUSEUM IN THE EAF:F: I O? yG- 7- 5. ARE \Kt! I hl F-R':.!tX: OF MA I IWA I NI N11i f?I,!r2 t.11 SPAN I I:: c HEE: 1 TAi3E" 6. AF:E: YO!J IN FAVUR nF CF:EA'T'INI~ A 1-4 I SF'AhI II:: i::t3r+iww:i:: I AL liiFim I-N THE E~R IO 9 T!-.IAT L.JOULD P ;r?l-IOFS, PIE:X ICAN Ei:J[]f::: STuF:E, f.tilzX 11::Al !e\ Fr E: yo I..! : N F- A ::; E) F: r_i F I; p.1 i: N F" [:; F: 1'1 ;+ T I i> I',l !I: E !ij T E F: I ?\) I: NCl-UDE A TOF:T I LLER I A, HEX I CAN EA! ET[.": D '7 .. '7 -c p- /m THE BARF:IU C;F:EA'? p..iAriE ; 4/14 ,q. M < s/ AEDRESS: /SI& fp."E,- '#B pL0 k) 7a?-gbO T'ELEFHUNE: i .. I I + 0 rn . -. -. S1JliVE'i -. . B:$j 113- I_:AI:.I:l.-SB,4T) AREA h .. . .. la HUM LOw HAVE YULJ L I VEB IN I::AIG:LSFAD? 3 \f&T (b-2- yd y.s Yd HObJ LONG HAVE 'YEU BEEN A FF'UF'EF'TY U14VER .-. rl. IN THE EAI;.:RTU AF:EA"? 3. ARE YOU IN F-AVGF: OF Pf?EE;EF:V It4Ei 0L.D HI STOR I KAL FU I ID I rws.7 4. ARE YOU IN FAVCB OF 1I:F:EAT I i\lG A I-i T SF'AN I I: MU5EUPi IN THE FARF:IO'? AF:E mu 1 i;i F-AVOF: OF tic, 1 rd-r;+ I r%iI N~T~JF? H 1 sp,w\i 11: j ZC - kl = HER 1 TAGE':.' 6. AF;:E YOlJ IN FAVC!?. QF iz:f:EA'T- J. !x!!> &! !-!I ZPAM 1 11: Y6 I~~:OPlI~lEF:lI: I AL {+/?[<A 1: P.1 'TKE EAF.:;;: 113 ,; T!...i/JT WULlLn IrdC:i,..!*!r:;E A -rgg:r I LLEP I A ~ i'q~.:::~ 1 ~::i:,p.j mI.::r:~\ ..._ t.. .i 'I CUR I n C;f-]UpS - v MEZ: Ii::Ap;I Fig@:.: STE;;E:, p;F-:x ,: i_'AN RE.TTAiJF:AN'rS ~ E -r 1:: ~ "7 - jm I;t4EE YDlJ 5 N F-:\?/oF: I2F q>J I NF[:::F?P1@,T' I j ENTER T N OF- cO\, THE FAFIR IO AREA'? t-1 A 171 E ; -+&bU ADj-JliESS: 3-4 v--3=& -rELEw-irmE 2 $2 Lf SG 0 T ,L x&- ... , II 4 - ~apj~y - ER~.:F;: I L- I_:A~I,-sBA~~ AREA 8% 1.. HOW LUNG HAVE YOL! LIVEP 1r.i I::A~+LSEAL)? 47 y-* cc4 y-. y&Y* ye .-I L. HOW LObli3 tIAL'E YfJU SEEN A F'ROPEF:TY C!l.INEE 1 IN -rHE BART;..: I u AREA? PI ARE YUU IN FAVOR UF F'RESEPV I: NG 0L.U 141 STOE I CAL / a. , FIJI L.D i r,w':.' 4. AF:E y!y...l It4 FAVOR UF 1::EEATI: Ni3 A 1.41 SF::,-?N I I::: \/ CY3 MUSEUM IN THE BARF: ID'?' L7 4 (1 ARE: YDI. ..I I ?,I F-A'v'CiR CIF MA I NTA IN I I\lG C31JT;II 1-1 I SF'AN I C: HE)? 3: TAi5E.T 6. ARE: YOLJ IN FAVClI? OF C::F.:EA7'I I\..IG A 1-4 1 SF'AN I IC: i::OPIPlERi:: I AL r.IF:EA IN THE BARR I 0 ? ?-!-iAT WUULD I NC:I.-lJDF_ A TGRT I IL-EF? I A . HEX I I24N BAt:::EF:Y ? 1l:UR IO ET[:: II '7 %Ij@F5, L T.1EX 1I':pIiij FOU)::: STGF:IE 1 T.1Ex 1 II:AN F:ES'TA\JRANTS, y,, 4 y-. - Io ,&,RE yQ!J IN FA!,'gF: f'iF Ab.1 3: NyTjF:~+!RT I Qid f:Et:iTEF: I: ?%J THE BARF: I I] AaE&I.: NAME :: x J. be^ 0 (6 tt &-we- AD D F., E JF r-. . ;13: TELEPWUNE :: -9- a030 ._ . . ... -. i .. . I a a & . . s u I.:: I<,' 1:: y - 1.3 E"\ [ : I !:] I:: A 1;: I.._ $3 l.:i /j 1:) Al;: E A *: J 1. CIUW LUNG Hi2,lJE XI\.! LIVED I Fj I:~ARL-SBAII? 39 --I .L " HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A FT.:nF'EF:'TY [31.JliJER / 9 - i IN THE BARR IO i;liE,A? , I P- Y--- Y w Y- 3. ARE 'f%U IN FAVCjF:: CJF F'F.ESEF:'v'I NGi OL..2:.) 141 STOE J. CAI- EUIL-D:C~~T~ 4. ARE Y~LI I td F-AVOR CIF 1::~:~i.i-r I r.413 A t-i x sv+il;i I t: i MUSEUM IN THE PkF:F: IO'?. - - 5 m A F E Y 0 I.-; I N F" A '$ C:! F: CF MA I N T'ci I N I t\l I3 111 i.J r:I ii I SF AN I I: HEF: 1 TAGE? .. . 6. ARE YO!J IM F-AVDI? OF C:F:EA'T' I t.1G A 1-1 I SPAN 112 I::EIPIPIERI:: I hL AF;:Eii 1 N 'TI-iE RAE? IO p T!--IAT WOULD j: Nl::t,UIjE A TC1F:T I L! ... EF: I A, MEX IC:EiN Fr"\t:::EF:Y 'I 6:UF: I !I ET(:: ~ ?' SM[lr='S ~ METX III:AN Fc:i12)::: ST!zF:E, MEX I Iz:&i'J rG:E.!3TAUF?AP.IT.Sp -"r i .) $,RE y0k-i 1P-j F''A'$ OF AN I NFUGfilAT 1: fiN I:::ENTER IN THE BAF;:F: 1: [:I p?i?E Q72-W TEL_EPHOt.IE: (L, 9) 727 - 362% ADDRESS 2 4 3 5 c fli=s7N~7- ! ; m q 4 & * 5; L1 [;I' \.! [: '; - B @, [ j J (-1 I_: A 1;:; 1 ,_ s I.:{ A :] ;:,F;j E:. A .4 1. ~r3b.1 ~rjp\~i:;; FIAVE yc!i-.! L I:/ET) I p.! i~:AF;ri-S~~~? "pW"-"x"- HOW LONG I-iAVE YUCJ BEEN A F'Rf_lF~EF:f'Y f':LbjldER .- .L* 2G.y IN THE Bf?.1F:T;::l 0 AI?E.A'?' rl J m ARE 701J J: N F"AVC3F: OF FRESEFV 11. NG CI1..1:! I41 STOF: ICAL F 3- EUILT):[~.IGE;'-' 4.. ARE: y[iLl Z til iz-ALJLIF: 'OF 1:::F:EAT 1: r-43 A i-i T SF:'AN If: .v MIJSElJt't IN THE FARF: IO? . .. I- dm AT;:E \LQl,.! I I'd F-At!f::!F:: UF MA I tiITA1: N I NIIi (IJt..!F ii I SPAN 1:: HEl;i 1 TAGE':.' 6. AF:E: YRLJ i N FAVDF: CIF CREA'T J. id!: A I-.] r ST-': AN I 1:: i~:fl~ll~IEH~I: I AL AREA I: N TFE BARR1 D !, 'I-!4AT GJOULD I NCI-JDE {:I TfJFlT 1 LLEE.I-A., -ME:( :iC/+T..l Eii!jL:::E5:'/ F Iz:Ul?I 0 m ,=I-IupS, PIEX I fl:&jj'-J Ei[jjOb::: STOFE ~ PI!-!X I iI:AN FES'TAL;F:Es,NT'S, - /. $,>j 5: N:''(2RtlA'T 1 [jtii I:::ENTL<F? 1: $1 r- 3333 K&7 b-S'@ge IY SR 4/77 T H E E f:,, F: F: :I D f:, 1;: F: tt '7 #UJ/?by W=L'E %' N A t'l E: :: ADDT;:ESS: TELEF'l-4OME: 734 --A qfl 1 J 7