Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-07; City Council; 11143; APPROVAL OF VARIOUS DISCRETIONARY APPLICATIONS NECESSARY TO APPROVE THE 121,388 SQ. FT. PRICE CLUB DISCOUNT STORE PROJECT. (GPA 90-01|LCPA 90-02|ZC 90-01|SDP 90-05|CUP 9’ m@/ CITY e CARLSBAD - AGENDA~LL /i. OaJaJ Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documc APPROVING the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by Planning Director, GPA 90-1, LCPA 90-2, ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837, as approved by the Planning Commissic ITEM EXPLANATION On April 3, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a puk hearing and approved with modifications the Price Club proj proposed on the south side of Palomar Airport Road east of PC Del Norte. The Planning Commission vote was 5-2 II Commissioners Holmes and Erwin voting against the projc Although Commissioner Erwin supported the Price Club project, was opposed to the condition which would allow the possibilitj removing the gates on the Paseo del Norte access in the futurc an amendment was approved by the Planning Commission or C Council (Condition No. 63 of SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209). The project requires approval of a General Plan and Local Coas Plan Amendment from Planned Industrial (PI) to Extensive Regio Retail (RRE) on 23.6 acres, a Zone Change from P-M-Q (Plan Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) to C-2-Q (Gene Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) on 23.6 acres Site Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Hills Development Permit for a 121,388 sq. ft. Price Club Discount St containing a tire center, optical center and a small exter eating establishment. Also proposed is a minor subdivision create four parcels out of this 62 acre property. A considerable amount of testimony was heard by the Plann Commission. The majority of the opposition to the project based on concerns in regard to traffic impacts expressed residents of the Alta Mira Project located to the south. detailed discussion of traffic issues and required mitigation contained in the Planning staff report beginning on page 4. : commission also heard testimony in favor of the project. 1-l-l a, aJ The Planning Commission added several new conditions to 1 1 3 TI Ti project. The conditions deal with onsite sidewalks, hours . parking lot sweeping, truck access, noise attenuation, accc easements, and restriction on the use of the future building pa( The specific conditions added by the Planning Commission have bc incorporated into the resolutions adopted by the commission i are included in the attached memo to the City Manager. h-d NO m rd(7 m Facilities Zone -5 Local Facilities Management Plan -5 Growth Control Point - Net Density - Special Facility Fee - N/A N/A $.40 Sq.Ft. Park F L EXHIBIT 1, I L " LOCATION MAP 1 pT EXISTNG GEERAL PLAN/ PI LOCAL COASTAL PLAN PROPOSEDG€ERALPLAN/ M 4 LOCAL COAST. PLAN city of hriakl I PRICE CLUB GPA 90-1/LCPA b LOCATION MAP 2 EXISTNGZOHNG PM-0 PRopOSEDZoHNG C-2-0 4 Gity of Cartd L PRICE CLUB zc 9oa 0 LOCATION MAP 3 e 4 city of carisba SDP 90-WCUP HDP 90-9/MS PRICE CLUB I/ 0 e APRIL 8, 1991 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Planning Director PRICE CLUB PROJECT COMDITIOMS The Planning Commission added several conditions to the Price Clu2 project at the April 3, 1991 hearing. The conditions have beer added to the Planning Commission Resolutions. They are listec separately in this memorandum so that the Council can see whal revisions were made by the Commission in response to public testimony. The new conditions are as follows: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OR PORTION IN BOLD TYPE WERE ADDED TC PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3209 (SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN) 32. Areas labeled on the project plans as ''Future Building Pad' shall not be permitted to be developed, subleased or utilizec for any use including temporary uses such as Christmas trec interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the citj Engineer. Development of the #@Future Building Pads" wil: require approval of an amendment to this Site Developmenl Plan. 34. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing thc required mitigation measures. All submittals to the City 01 Carlsbad to fulfill the conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration shall reference: 1) the project file No. GPA 90- Conditional Negative Declaration's State Clearinghouse No. anc 3) the specific mitigation number listed below. 1. All parking and driving areas shall be swept and vacuumec on an established weekly schedule to prevent tht accumulation of dirt/oil/grease which could be washec into the storm drain system. Sweeping of areas south ol sales until the improvements to the 1=5/Palomar Airport Roac 1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837; 2) tht the building shall not begin until after 7:30 A.M. 37. A noise attenuation wall shall be constructed to screen tht truck area shown on Exhibit lmBIl dated April 3, 1991 from thc Seagate Condominium Project to the south if and when it is determined to be necessary by the Planning Director. 62. The Price Club shall be closed for business from 4 P.M. to t P.M. Monday through Friday or such other time as determine( after hearing, by the Planning Commission, until tht improvements to the 1-5/Palomar Airport Road interchange art completed to the satisfaction of the City engineer. Signagt shall be posted at the entrance and exit to the store to EXHIBIT 2. e e APRIL 8, 1991 CITY MANAGER PAGE 2 inform patrons of the business hours. Notification of the special business hours of the Carlsbad store shall also bc made to Price Club Members in any newsletters 01: advertisements published. Signs to notify patrons of the 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Monday through Friday closure shall be approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director and be in- stalled prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. Prior to occupancy the driveway to Paseo Del Norte shall be equipped with a gate to limit the access to exiting deliveq trucks only. Said gate system shall be to the City Engineer's approval and shall remain permanent unless an amendment to the Site Development Plan initiated by the property owner or Citl of Carlsbad is approved by the Planning Commission. All trucks and delivery vehicles exiting onto Paseo del Norte The shall proceed northbound to Palomar Airport Road. property owner shall place and maintain a sign at the gate with those instructions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to or concurrent with parcel map approval three access easements shall be granted through the Price Club property tc adjoining properties. At such time as the adjoining properties utilize the access easements they shall be required to share in the maintenance and insurance costs. Prior to occupancy the developer shall construct sidewalks 5 feet in width at the following locations: 3. Along the east side of the western driveway entrance main east/west onsite driveway immediately ad] acent tc the Price Club Store building. 63. 64. 66. 71. (closest to Nurseryland) from Palomar Airport Road to the -i MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director e: Assistant Planning Director arb fiprice..mem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 1' 18 19 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3205 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND MINOR SUBDMSION TO DEVELOP A 121,388 SQUARE FOOT PRICE CLUB DISCOUNT STORE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO.: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1lSDP 90-SlCUP 90-3/HC 9/MS 837 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of April, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, , WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considerii testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the inforn submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Pla Commission considered all factors relating to the Conditional Negative Declaratio NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corm as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. /I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Pla Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Conditional Ne Declaration according to Exhibit "ND", dated February 28, 1991, "PII", January 8, 1991, and Appendix "P", attached hereto and made a part hereof, on the following findings: Findings: 1. The initial study shows that the proposed project could have a significant i on the environment, however, there will not be a significant impact in thi because the mitigation measures described in the initial study have been ad the project. EXHIBI' I 1 2 3 4 5 g 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 0 2. 3. The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental an: The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed p according to the traffic report provided that mitigating conditions of approv complied with. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be sign3 impacted by this project provided that mitigating conditions of approv; complied with. 4. Conditions: This project is subject to the following mitigating conditions: 1. All parking and driving areas shall be swept and vacuumed on an estak weekly schedule to prevent the accumulation of dirt/oi.Vgrease which COI washed into the storm drain system. Urban pollutants such as oils that are deposited on the parking lot surfa automobiles shall be removed from waters leaving the site by directing dn through an oil trap subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The oil tra~ be shown on the gradinghprovement plans for the project and be opera prior to occupancy of any permanent building on the site. The developer shall provide conclusive proof that the proposed pollutant tra be effective in removing storm water based pollutants. h lieu of pmvidi~ required supporting do<sumentation, a three year monitoring program to ev the effectiveness of the proposed pollutant trap shall be established t satisfaction of the City Engineer and paid for by the developer. The following hra€fic mitigation measures shall be implemented for this prc a) Widen and reconstruct the improvements at the intersection of Pa 2. 3. I 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte in order to pmvide dual left turns I north, south and east legs of the intersection induding appro transitions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Include modific, of the traffic signal at the intdon of Palomar Airport Road and Del Norte including appropriate traffic signing and striping. All improvements and work shall be coordinated with the improveme the interchange at 1-5. Construct an appropriate acceleration/deceleration lane along Pa Airport Road for the proposed right-h/right-out driveway. I b) PC RES0 NO. 3205 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 c) dose the access to Paseo Del Norte to automobile traffic unti improvements to 1-5/Pdomar Airport Road interchange are complet the satisfaction of the City Ehgheer. Construct fdl signalized intemxtion on Palomar Airport Road at th( entrance of the Price Club site including the addition of an added east€ right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road into the project. d) 4. To mitigate any aesthetic impacts that development on this site could meat following measures are required as part of this project: a) The truck loading, trash compactor and pallet yard area shall be scr by the use of walls, fencing and landscaping as shown on the project Old tires removed at the tire center shall be stored inside the buildin outdoor tire storage will be permitted. No roof equipment other than skylights shall be permitted as is shoi the project plans because of the difficulty in screening equipment residences to the south and from view of travelers on Palomar P Road. b) c) d) The exterior of the Price Club building shall have a rough aggregate in those areas indicated on the project plans in addition to the prc accent reveals to provide an aesthetically pleasing building in the Pa Airport Road scenic corridor. ..... ..... ..... ..... -*.-. ..... ..... ..... ..... PC RES0 NO. 3205 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 15 16 17 18 19 0 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P1 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 1991, following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, M; Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Co&ssioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. ..+ ” -*-I. ~ % ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS ATTEST: 4 i!k&-YHwmg - PLANNING DIRECTOR I 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I PC RES0 NO. 3205 -4- CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: On the south side of Palomar Airport Road east c Paseo Del Norte. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 121,338 square foot Price Club Discount Store containin a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating establishment (pizza, hot dogs, etc.: Also proposed is a graded pad for a future 15,000 square foot office building and a 5,OO square foot retail building. The proposal requires a General Plan and Local Coastal Pla acres. A zone change from Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (P-M Q) to General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-2-Q) on 23.65 acre is also required. Additional permits necessary for the use are a Site Development PlaI Conditional Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and a Minor Subdivision to creat four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described projec pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Ac and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of sa review, a Conditional Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justificatic for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in tk Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments fro the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Departme within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in tl Planning Department at 438-1 161, extension 4446. Amendment from Planned Industrial (PI) to Extensive Regional Retail (RRE) on 23.6 DATED: February 28, 1991 CASE NO: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/ CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837 APPLICANT: The Price Company PUBLISH DATE: February 28, 1991 2075 Las Palmas Drive 0 Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 0 (619) 438-1 1 € NWXAGE 3F COMPLETION Hail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Ten reet, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/ 13 See YOTE Beclar: Project Lead Agency: Title: City Price of ClIlb Csrlsbed Ptarnins DeDartment Contact Person: Don =E Nw Street Address: 2075 Las Palms Drive Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4446 City: Carlsbad zip: 92009 County: Sen Dieso PROJECT LOCATZOY: County: San DiePo City/Nearest Comnnity: Carlsbad Cross Streets: Palomar Airwrt Road/Paseo Del Norte Total Acres: 62 Assessor's Parcel No. 211-040-08. 09, 12 Section: 20 8 21 Twp. 12s Range: 4u Base: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy W: 1-5 Uaterways: Pacific Ocean & Asua Hedionde Lagoon ..................................................................................................................... Schoo 1 s : Airports: Palamar Railways: ATgSF --_.___-.__---_-___.--.------.-----.-----.-------------------..--..--.-------------.--.------------------------------- WCL#NT TYPE CEQII: - MOP - Supplement/SlbSequent YEPA: - NO1 OTHER: - Joint Docwr - Early Cons - EIR (Prior SCH No.) - EA - final Oocuner - X Neg Dec - Other - Draft EIS Other - FONSI - Draft EIR - __---____-_____---______________________--------------------------------------------------------------------.--------. LOUL ACTIOY TYPE Amexat i on - X General Plan Amenhent - Master Plan - Prezone - Redeve 1 opn Coastal Pel - Comnunity Plan - X Site Plan - X Land Division (Subdivision, X Other Coast Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) knendment,Hillside - General Plan Update - Specific Plan - X Rezone - - General Plan Element - Ptamed Unit DevelopiEot X Use Permit - ___-___-___--___-_._~-------------------*--------------------.-------------------------------------------------------- DEVELWEYT TYPE - Residential: Units Acres - Uater facilities: Type H( - X Office: Sq. Ft. 20.000 Acres 27 Enployees - Transportation: Type - X Comnercial: Sq. Ft. 131.700 Acres 27 Enployees - Mining: Mineral - Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Empl oyees - Power: TYPe Wi - Recreational - - Hazardous Uaste: Type Uaste Treatment: Type - Educational - - Other: __---.___---_____--_~----.-----.-----------------------------.-.------------------------.------------------------------ PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN WaWNT - X Aesthet ic/Visual - Flood Plain/Flooding - Schools/Universities - X Uater Owli Uater Suppl - Air Quality - X Geologic/Seisrnic - Sewer Capacity Ground Uate X Soil Erosion/Compection/Grading - Yet land/R i p - X Coastal Zone - X Noise - Solid Uaste - Uildlife Growth lndu - Economic/Jobs - Public Scrvices/Facilities X Traffic/Circulation - X Landuse - Fiscal - Recreation/Parks - Vegetation - Curula t i ve Present Land uSe/Zming/Gawal Plan be Undeveloped/Planned Industrial, Qualified Developnent Overlay Zone (P-M-a), Residential Professional (R-P) and Open S)/Planned Industrial (PI), Open Space (OS), Travel Services Comnercial US), and Professional and Related (0). Project Description A 121,338 square foot Price club Disc-t Store containing a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating est (pizza, hot dogs, etc.). Also proposed is a graded ped for a future 15,000 square foot office building and a 5,000 s retail building. The proposal requires a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amencbnent from Planned Industrial (PI) to Regional Retail (RRE) on 23.65 acres. A zone change fran Planned Industriat, awlified Developnent Overlay Zone (P-M-12) ' Comnercial, Qualified Developnent Overlay Zone (C-24) on 23.65 acres is also required. Additional permits necessary fc are a Site Developnent Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Hillside Developnent Permit and a Minor Subdivision to create four p of the entire 62 acre property. NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification rwbers for all nen projects. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docant) please fill it in. - Agricultural Land - Forest Land/Fire Hazard - Septic Systems - - Archaeo~ogical/Historic81 - Minerals - - X Orainage/Absorption - Pgulation/Housing Balance - Toxic/Hazardous - Other - - __--___-._._.__-___L_----------------.--------------------------------------------------------------------------..-----. -.---__-____-__--__.____________I_______-----.------------------------.-----------------------------.-----------------. If a SCH nutber already exists for a pro Revised Oc 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90 9O-S/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ DATE: January 8, 1991 RACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Price Club 2. APPLICANT: The Price ComDany 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: P.O. Box 85466 San Dieno. CA 92138 (619) 581-4699 4. DATE ETA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: February 13. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 121.388 square foot Price Club Discount Store containi1 center, o~tical center and a small exterior eating establishmen hot do~s, - etc,), Also proposed is a graded - pad for a future 15,000 square foot office buildinE - and square foot retail buildinn. - The proposal reauires a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendme Planned Industrial (PI) to Extensive RePional Retail (RRE) on 23.65 acres. A zone change from Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (P-M-0) to General Commercial, Qualified Devel Overlay Zone (C-2-01 on 23.65 acres is also required. Additional permits necessary for the use ar Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Hillside DeveloDment Permit and a Minor Subdivision tc four parcels out of the entire 62 acre DroDertv. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environment: Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environment2 Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, b and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to u basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. h A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or : aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indi determination. An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the prc cause a simificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration ho adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insimificant. These findings ai in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. * A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the for DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mihg impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. e 0 PHYSICAL ENvIR0"T YES YES NO WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: big) (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? Substantially increase usage or cause X - - - 2. X - - - 3. X - - - 4. X - - - 5. X - - - 6. X - - - 7. X - - - 8. - X - - 9. depletion of any natural resources? - x X - - - 10. 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X - - - -2- 0 0 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DtRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO big) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic X plants) ? - 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? x 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? - x 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the x migration or movement of animals? - HUMAN m0"T WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIREGIIk YES YES NO (insig) (si& 17. 18. Substantially affect public utilities, Alter the present or planned land use X - of an area? - - schools, police, fire, emergency or other X - public services? - - -3- w e HU" ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? - X - - X X - - - 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. 22. - - - Produce new light or glare? Invohre a sigdicant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, - pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? - X 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? - X - - 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? - X - - - X - 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? Impact existing transportation systems or alterpresent patterns of circulation or - - X - 27. - movement of people and/or goods? - X - X - - 28. 29. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Interfere with emergency response plans or X - - - 30. - X - emergency evacuation plans? - 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - X - 32. X - - - -4- e 0 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sip) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. X 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and X - 35. X - - the effects of probable future projects.) - 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - x - - -5- w 0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Phvsical Environment 1. A report titled "Foundation Investigation Carlsbad Price Club Lots 6-8, Carlsbad Ranch Busir Carlsbad, California" was prepared for the project by ICG Incorporated. The report is dated 8, 1990. The report concludes that no credible risk of surface rupture exists at the project known active faults or potentially active faults cross the site. The site was previously grade construction of a nine lot business park approved in 1988. Additional grading will be nec construct the proposed project. All grading will be required to comply with the recommend the soils report. Appmximately 21.99 acres of the site will be graded. The proposed grading plan will requir grading of 109,000 cubic yards of soil over a 10.25 acre area. Also required is the fill g.l 96,000 cubic yards of soil over a 11.17 acre area. A total of 13,000 cubic yards of soil will be from the site. The grading quantity resulting per acre of 4,960 cubic yards is well within the a( range of grading volume allowed by the Hillside Development Regulations. The northern p' the site closest to Palomar Airport will be lowered in elevation approximately seven to tei height. This soil material will be placed on the southern area of the site which has been pi graded causing it to be raised in elevation approximately 13 feet at the greatest point to creat buil&ng pad for the structure. These changes to the topography of the site are not conside1 environmentally significant. A storm drain system is proposed to collect all runoff from the site. Runoff from the parking be directed through a pollutant trap to remove pollutants from drainage waters before they f 2. 3. floodplain to the south. Landscaping of all slopes is required to prevent erosion of soils. 4. The;iproposed project will not modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean will&e deposited into the floodplain within the southern area of the site after being routed th energy dissipator. A change in the land use designations applicable to the site and the-number of vehicle trips g by the proposed uses will result in a greater impact to ambient air quality than expected €i permitted under the present designations. However, because of the project's location in close p to Interstate 5 as opposed to other locations previously considered, the proposed site is local to minimize the length of vehicle trips from geographical target areas to be served. The Price ( destination oriented vehicle trips since it is a membership store and the new location will re( distance coastal residents will have to travel to patronize a Price Club store. A total of 10.34 percent of the 27 acres to be disturbed will be covered by the Price Club build remainder of the site excluding the two future building pads will not have obstructions to air mc use of trash compactors that will be emptied on a regular basis to prevent odor problems. Lanc is proposed throughout the parking areas to reduce the impact of large asphalt areas which c increase in onsite temperatures. Refer to responses to numbers 3 and 4 above. 5. 6. with the exception of landscaping. Trash generated by the use is proposed to be processed thrc 7. -6- e e DtSCUSSlON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont’d) 8. Runoff from the project site will be conveyed to the floodplain on the southern portion of the sit parking and driving areas shall be swept and vacuumed on an established weekly schedule to p the accumulation of dirt/oil/grease which could be washed into the storm drain system. Park runoff will be collected in the proposed storm drain system onsite and be directed through a PO trap prior to being discharged into the floodplain. These requirements intended to remove polj from waters leaving the site will be environmental mitigation measures for the project. The area of the site proposed to be developed has been previously graded for the construction business park approved for the property. Therefore, no natural resources will be affected. Construction of the proposed use will not by itself create a significant demand on energy sour A cultural resource survey was completed for the business park approved for the site in 1988 found no cultural resources within the subject property. 9. 10. 11. BioloRical Environment 12. The area of the site proposed to be developed as a result of the project was previously graded p’ to a prior environmental analysis. Therefore, the diversity of species of plant life will not be a Areas of the site will be landscaped including slopes to prevent erosion. Perimeter area! landscaped will utilize Zone 3 naturalizing plant species to provide a transition to areas which 1 be disturbed. The project site has been approved for the construction of a business park and been gr: conformance with that plan. No agricultural crops are grown on the site which is presently des for industrial development. Because the project site has been graded pursuant to a previous environmental analysis, it d presently provide habitat for wildlife. The commercial uses proposed will not result in the introduction of domestic animals to the z 13. 14. 15. 16. Human Environment 17. Necessary for the approval of the proposed use is an amendment to the General Plan and Local Plan as well as a zone change to redesignate the site from industrial to commercial. The projecl contains both commercial and industrial uses which the proposal is compatible with. All n public facilities for the use will be provided in conformance with the Local Facilities Managem and the requirements of the Engineering Department. All necessary public utilities and services will be provided in conformance with the Local 1 Management Plan for Zone 5. 18. -7- m m DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont'd) 19. The project will result in the need for a system of removing oil from onsite drainage prior tc discharged into the existing floodplain. A system to remove oils left in the parking automobiles has been required and will be approved by the Engineering Department. The proposed project will cause an increase of 5,528 average daily vehicle trips to and from in comparison to the business park approved for the site. The additional vehicle trips significantly increase ambient noise levels as the site is adjacent to a prime arterial and wit1 proximity to Interstate 5. The site is within the 60 CNEL noise contour for McClellan-Palomar LigMng fixtures are proposed to be attached to the Price Club building and will direct light do7 A lighting plan will be required for the project to ensure that lighting is designed to reflect dc and avoid impacts on adjacent properties. The goods and services offered at the proposed store will not involve a significant risk of an ex The potential for the release of oil and grease into the floodplain will be mitigated by weekly s' and vacuuming of all parking and driveway areas in addition to the construction of a pollutan 20. 2 1. 22. remove parking lot oils and grease from drainage before waters exit the site. 23. Thexhange from a business park to commercial uses has the potential to increase the densit human population of the site during business hours. The population onsite will vary based t day of the week and will not create a significant impact as all necessary public facilities and will be provided to meet demand. The project, if approved, could cause a demand for additional housing as new jobs will be Housing is presently or will be available within the City to satisfy the demand that may be crc the project. The Price Club and uses proposed for the future building pads will generate a total of 8,411 daily vehicle trips. A traffic study was prepared for the project by Urban Systems Ass Improvements necessary to mitigate the impacts caused by the project are listed under item num The proposed development will create a large demand for new parking which will be satisfied project site. A total of 450 parking spaces are required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. A total spaces are proposed recognizing the demand generated at other Price Club facilities. As stated previously, the project will generate a substantial number of average daily vehicle tril City presently has a project in the design phase to widen the Palomar Airport Road brid5 Interstate 5 as well as to improve the on and off ramps. A traffic signal is proposed for the p access point to Palomar Airport Road. A Traffic Study was prepared by Urban Systems Associi the proposed project. The City's Traffic Engineer is requiring that the following mitigation m be implemented: 24. 25. 26. 27. -8- e m DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont’dl a) Widen and reconstruct the improvements at the intersecdon of Pdornar Alrport Road and Pa Norte in order to provide dual left turns on the north, south and east legs of the inter including appropriate transitions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Include modificai the traffic signal at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte in appropriate traffic signing and striping. All improvements and work shall be coordinated with the improvements to the interchangt b) Construct an appropriate acceleration/deceleration lane along Palomar Airport Road proposed right-idright-out driveway. c) Close the access to Paseo Del Norte until the improvements to I-S/Palomar Airpor interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d) Construct full signalized intersection on Palomar Airport Road at the east entrance of the Pri site including the addition of an added eastbound right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road 1 project. 28. The site is not located so as to impact waterways or rail lines. The property is within the influence area for McClellan-Palomar Airport but is located far enough to the west of the airpc to not create a compatibility problem with the airport. SANDAG staff has reviewed the pro] found it to be consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan. All necessary street improvements and a traffic signal will be constructed along the project’s I safe manner. The project will not interfere with emergency response plans as street improvements on adjacen will be completed to ensure that access is available. The project will not obstruct a scenic vista as views to the open space area on the southern pal site will still be retained. An aesthetically offensive public view will not be created as the truck : trash compactor and pallet yard area will be screened by the use of walls, fencing and landsca] addition, old tires removed at the tire center will be stored in the section of the building contaii service bays. Conditions will be imposed on the project to guarantee that the above me screening and method of storing used tires is maintained. No roof equipment is proposed because of the difficulty in screening the equipment from resid the south. The building exteriors are proposed to contain areas having a rough aggregate j further enhance the visual appearance of the project. These items will also be addressec 29. Airport Road frontage to create a circulation system that has adequate traffic controls to funct 30. 31. conditions for the project, 32. This proposed commercial project will not create a large demand for recreational facilities. A indoor and outdoor eating area is proposed. All projects within Local Facilities Managemenr are required to pay a park-in-lieu fee of $.40 per square foot of non-residential building area. will offset the demand created for park facilities in Zone 5 by this project. -9- 0 m ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATMZS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project proposes to phase development by leaving two pads for future buildings. The major parking areas and landscaping will be constructed with the Price Club building so as to minimi disturbances to the site. b) Alternate site designs have been considered including various access arrangements and orientations. The proposed design provides the best solution to all concerns identified. c) An alternate scale of development would not have significant environmental advantages on this p graded site. d) Alternate uses for the site include the previously approved business park which would have th of generating less traffk. Circulation system improvements planned will cause the roadways in tk vicinity to operate at levels which meet the performance standards of the City's Growth Mar Program even with the traffic generated by the proposed project. e) Development at some future time would leave this previously graded site with a temporary perimt in its present condition with no environmental advantages. f> Alternate sites for the project have been considered. An application was previously filed to co Price Club store and additional commercial buildings at the southwest comer of El Camino College Boulevard. Previous sites have been rejected in favor of the proposed site due to its locati has benefits from a circulation standpoint. g) The no project alternative would not be environmentally superior as the project site contains no s environmental resources and is located adjacent to a prime arterial in close proximity to Inters -10- 0 0 DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: - I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a N1 DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, t not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attac sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. - I find the proposed project MAY have a sigmficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRON IMPACT REPORT is required. 2-22 -g/ &x % Date - -- +- .+..j. - ‘;I i !/ Date DN : wo :km LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) 1. All parking and driving areas shall be swept and vacuumed on an established weekly sck prevent the accumulation of dirt/oil/grease which could be washed into the storm drain : Urban pollutants such as oils that are deposited on the parking lot surface by automobiles removed from waters leaving the site by directing drainage through an oil trap subjec approval of the City Engineer. The oil trap shall be shown on the grading/improvement the project and be operational prior to occupancy of any permanent building on the site. The developer shall provide conclusive proof that the proposed pollutant trap will be eff removing storm water based pollutants. In lieu of providing the required supporting docum a 3 year monitoring program PO evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed pollutant trap established to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and paid for by the developer. 2. -11- 0 w LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) (cont'd) 3. The following traffic mitigation measures shall be implemented for this project; a) Widen and reconstruct the improvements at the intersection of Palomar Airport Rc Paseo Del Norte k order to provide dual left turns on the north, south and east leg intersection including appropriate transitions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. modifications of the traffic signal at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Pa Norte including appropriate traffic signing and striping. All improvements and work shall be coordinated with the improvements to the intei at 1-5. Construct an appropriate acceleratiorVdeceleration lane along Palomar Airport Roac proposed right-idright-out driveway. Close the access to Paseo Del Norte until the improvements to I-S/Palomar Airpc interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Construct full signalized intersection on Palomar Airport Road at the east entrance of Road into the project. - b) c) d) Club site including the addition of an added eastbound right turn lane on Palomill 4. To mitigate any aesthetic impacts that development on this site could create, the following r are required as part of this project: a) The truck loading, trash compactor and pallet yard area shall be screened by the use fencing and landscaping as shown on the project plans. Old tires removed at the tire center shall be stored inside the building. No outdoor tir will be permitted. No roof equipment other than skylights shall be permitted as is shown on the proj because of the difficulty in screening equipment from residences to the south and fi of travelers on Palomar Airport Road. B] c) dl The exterior of the Price Club building shall have a rough aggregate finish in th( indicated on the project plans in addition to the proposed accent reveals to pr aesthetically pleasing building in the Palomar Airport Road scenic corridor. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -12- e 0 APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. -7pJ/ q ate (&,I $?-)Z,d Iss I, 11 STATE OF CALlFORNl I/ Ij COUNTY OF ,Ah d&UA 11 On this -&LhL day of /I !( before me. the unde I personally kn (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who ex within Instrument on behalf of the Corporation therem named, and acknowledged the Corporation executed it WlTNESS my hand and official seal / A 4L d,AL 3 ACKN0W~EDGMENT-Cor~oralion-Wolcot~s Form 222CA X-RW 5 82 Notary Public in and for said State 982 WOLCO'TS wc (Dice class 8 21 -13- h m co $ n ? E + g z * h v I 0 P, : $ q ; 3 2 2 u z.g3 - % 2% g :ge 2s %Z * 053 '5 3 E3E 2 2.2% o@ 8 .5 -- 0 n EEz 8 .%2: '2 pa +i 2 g 5364 t: *f; -5 e- 2 Om 'S 0 G.2. + >*g g 5 2s 4 pI en (a3 22 oa a m "5 Sa w n*2s zu UaJ :$ gaJoh uaJ 0 .z 8 -2 0 'E: :.E: u 53 E 8GE $eg=I 85 s gg $5 OZh 3 w- 'C 3 *g Z m aJ a= a w .cy.!! Q)oo: 'C u- aorn >zso a0 Y oa Y 'ccc 9 c YvlP a om g a' s a! 1s @ 2 h!j g .4 0 Elm El- E$ El; a5 a5 gs $1 p 8 i2.g g 0 2 am a .s 3 .g -8 - aJ f *F Q) sf aJ $ 3v bo z g2.3 $1 .F c 2 2 Qs aJ8E E! g 'Q .- *3 Y Y Y Y Y 2 g 2 g 2 $ E g 8 arz 407 .. h e 0-aJ -2 k 2 Gubo z US= Sz gE SE -n uuo 3 aJ # 8 .[ 4 5 C -8 E: 5 e .$ c W w W W E: lij ; .sa U %B fi w 8 6 zsz Y bo 2 u rr!ga & .g a =!W E .:!.., 3 0 6 2 % oaz .: &, f $ .$ 0- z g2 0 QJ am -3 Y-( L5Ej a Yh a7 aJ aJ p aJT2S 3gYp 2e &?2 h&*g& & aJ- pg$&$$ * h2.5 gqqE8 Pmt. +gaE -a.Q 3a-O f+&aJh&.- gsc:., 25saau bo2 .E '6 be boSz5 aJsa :? 324 s 2 z-2 ;;i $x cq.5 b35- 70 bog wd5z 1Eaog-= mcmw Om a4Yh.ds *au- Y g 8 3 ag.3 c&za sgM-:z gzz: vraJ.2 q$g 2-538+ 2s~e ~S+ESZ & ?%$$ 8 cwQ'2-a >E 00 aJaJoz -PZA OaJaJO m3aaJ U Y Y U V 0) V aJ a a V aJ a 0 aJ a *C) *? .CI .C) El 41 i2 El -E 4 i aJ kit YQQU +E c- m 'E 3 gj cb aJ ccmz OC 'd, 7 0d:E 2's & 5: 0 we: ma 58 -8 ri : S$pn aJ 02.9 -g g 40) z.9 Of E-ct-EaJ 3: gs bow E:% "EL55 32 ?$go t4n .PaJ=.cc 8i2.5.p c .SP 2; 'C g-g g 2 d -3 $$+S$Z gs-a Y OYSZ g&a,alg cpu &E3 gaga -4 ap.50aJ go- cz p.e, VCnh2 2: 5-gr;aJrnaJ oo5w* gg$ WE: zosz -Egs gj sEzag& 32s g9\G 5.i aP E:a gw maus va -*Em 0 m* 0.eaJ g g &ZS .Cs $c mEQ aE ag,&.52 z %*a 8.5 303 g.EjJ %t 3 : so: u* $5 m fA 242 g1 -$ aJ,a'CE -&.C ,%E; up 8gz-m5 3.5ae~.g UA-C ~U28 u< ma aom Y( Fj 3 c, c - & 1- .3, 5 : 3i y 3 B 2i $ .-. 8 4 0, = + 3 03 v) z c v? - c - CrJ 5 g i; A 'f VI, m .. 2! gz 9 ;+ 2 go 2 VI2 %% m .# y 4 .z m m 042- 226 -Qv) Ow4 .4 .5 0 uu- asz '?MU Ema 4 3 0 3 *; 2 c n z -ma $ 3 5 d+2 5 2 .s Y Vh d W qg VI 256 8 -5 'S 2.2. 2 4 :g g&g >*E 8 333 E: 0mT.g 1 -G 2 am aS.5 <Q)g - f q I \ - g 2 " .g:z 2 E 3 'Z 4 $ sa v 3a v) 5 $25 2 I 0 Egzz CrJ2 5 b W8.p o8e 2 VI- a .g 4 .g 9 suo z 52% uvg 2 23 z uf& 2 g.zc E:uW L 8 2 u gu ", 3 5 g:a 2OSZ 0-c v) M .Y ; .3 3 69 *us 6208 2s 5 3'2% r,vE 2 q &%2, g r c-2 2 0.2 clj 5 :2 X E Q) 'a 3 .5 .g & & .o 4 .Ei 3L iSE0 @- m 00 Z.:M e 3SrnQ) 3E:WSW z t *E 11 t 'd"% a 2% 5 6 3 $ '$ 4 0 3 $-e QE: - 6aaJE:w 4- co -0 3rnQ)A c 0;lW -&E: 1 1) e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3206 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO EXTENSJYE REGIONAL RETAIL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO.: GPA 90-1 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Genera: designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit GPA 90-1, dated A1 1991, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Cornmi and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amenc as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of April, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consideri testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Corn i considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corn of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A> B) That the above recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn recommends APPROVAL of GPA 90-1, based on the following findin subject to the following conditions. ...._ I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 m e Findinrrs: 1. The General Plan Land Use Element states that Extensive Regional Retail should be located at the intersections of primary streets, or near these intersec along a major arterial. The proposed site meets this requirement as it is lo adjacent to Palomar Airport Road, a Prime Arterial, and is approximately : feet east of Interstate 5. The proposed land use change is appropriate as necessary services are cun provided to the site as required by hd Use Element Policy "A" and addii improvements necessary for the proposed land use have been required c associated site development plan. The proposed amendment complies with Land Use Policy '8" as the propose maintabs adequate separation from residential land uses and will be located area with easy access to a large population. Policy "C' of the Land Use Element is also complied with as properties east site on Palomar Airport Road are presently designated as Planned Indi resulting in the conclusion that the amendment is not creating strip corn development. As stated in Policy "D'' of the Land Use Element, this major commercial : located in an area which is accessible to major transportation facilities th 2. 3. 4. 5. complying with that policy. 6. Land Use Element Policy x" is also satisfied as the proposed land use desip would allow for a commercial use that would add to the economic base of th while reflecting environmental constraints. Uses which would be permitted by the proposed General Plan designation 1 compatible with existing and allowable future land use which are alsa residential. 7. Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3205, herein by reference. Refer to those documents for all conditions and miti measures applicable to the development of the Price Club project site. Approval of GPA 90-1 is granted subject to the approval of the Cond Negative Declaration, LCPA 90-2 and ZC 90-1. 90-2, ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837 are hcorp~ 2. PC RES0 NO. 3206 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0 0 2. Approval of GPA 90-1 is granted subject to the approval of the Cond Negative Declaration, LCPA 90-2 and ZC 90-1. This resolution is effective 30 days following its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P1 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 1991, following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, Marcus & Hall NOES: Chairman Holmes, Co&ssioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. At] -4 q I; U!) I? n it f ‘‘...JkdkmT&a ,- - Chairpegon a /.”AU ; 1. ‘T 1 :i - : ,.i j i; 4 .La *,&gjfl - CAFUSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 181 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 kka 4L-4 7 1 MICHAEL J. HMMILL Planning Director I PC RES0 NO. 3206 -3- t 0 0 yp= ExlsTHG MAL PLAN/ PI W COASTAL PLAN PROPOSEDGEERALPLAN/ M 4 LOCAL COAST& PLAN Aprl3,1991 City of Carisba L PRICE CLUB GPA 90-VLCR d i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3207 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MELLO 11 SEGMENT OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PLAN FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO EXTENSNE REGIONAL RETAIL AND TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME:. CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO.: LCPA 90-2 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal I General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone conformance; WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Local C Plan designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit LCPA 90-2, date( 3, 1991, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Comm and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amen as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of April, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the proposed Coastal Plan Amendment shown on Exhibit LCPA 90-2, and; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consideri testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Corn considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public rei period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on Januar 1991, and ending on March 1, 1991, staff shall present to the City Cour summary of the comments received. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commi recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 90-2 as shown on Exhibit LCPA 90-2, dated 3, 1991, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on the following find C) Findinns : 1. The proposed Local coastal Plan Amendment is consistent with all appll policies of the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program, The proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carkbad Local CI Program is required to bring the designations of the Local Coastal Plan, Gc Plan, and Zoning Map into conformance. 2. Conditions: 1. AU conditions ofthe Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3205 herein by reference. Refer to those documents for all conditions and miti: measures applicable to the development of the Price Club project site. Approval of LCPA 90-2 is granted subject to the approval of the Con& Negative Declaration, GPA 90-1 and ZC 90-1. 90-1, ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837 are incorp~ I 2. ..... ..... -I-*- PC RES0 NO. 3207 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 * e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the PI Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 3rd day of April, 1991, by the fo' vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, M Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. ,,'''L g. 1 J a 7 ..,,$ !f . , 0 ROBERT wM*; +&a&% 7 ,: "2 .-.I #$ CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 3207 -3- II EXlSTNG MAL PLAN/ PI LOCAL COASTAL PLAN PROPOSEDGE?EJ?ALPLAN/ m 4 LOCAL COASTAL PLAN April 3,1991 City of CiAsba PRICE CLUB GPA 90-1/LCPI I, I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 l7 18 19 e 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3208 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM P-M-Q TO C-2-Q ON CASE NO.: ZC 90-1 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning CommissioI WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of April, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consideri testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Comrr considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corn as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Comrr recommends APPROVAL of ZC 90-1 according to "Exhibit X" attached here1 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions. Findinns : 1. The proposed Zone Change to C-2-Q is consistent with all applicable poliu guidelines in the Land Use Element of the General Plan as discussed in th report for the project. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 2. The proposed change in zoning designation bm P-M-Q to C-2-Q is consistent. the General Plan and will achieve consistency between the General Plan Zoning as required by State Law and the Land Use Element. The commercial uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change to C-2-Q wod compatible with the adjacent existing and permitted future non-residential 3. uses. 4. The Q- Overlay Zone, made a part of the proposed Zone Change, provides the with discretionary review over development of the site to assure that allowed are compatible with surrounding land uses. All findings of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3205 SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209, are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3205, 90-1, LCPA 90-2, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837 are ~COV herein by reference- Refer to those documents for all conditions and mitig measures applicable to the development of the Price Club project site. Approval of ZC 90-1 is granted subject to the approval of the Conditional Ne$ 2. Declaration, GPA 90-1 and LCPA 90-2. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... -...- ..... ..... ..... ..... PC RES0 NO 3208 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 15 16 1'7 e 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 1991,l following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, Ma Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioner Envin. ABSENT: None. /-\ ABlaj n ,$/AH $6 ; :f ' i--:,q /! it fiJ c UdqJ 1 j (. .J>% ;; >k--f -.. kJ&p% (1 ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS ATTEST: 4LW& MICHAEL J.WOLZI~& ER Planning Director 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 I I -3- PC RES0 NO 3208 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 BBEXIIIBI 0 QRDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 90-1 FROM P-M-Q TO C-2-Q ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NO.: ZC 90-1 CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Californ does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal is amended by the amendment of a zoning map as shown on the marked "Exhibit ZI1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolu 3208 constitutes the findings and conditions of the City Coun EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effec thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall cer to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be publish€ least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after adoption. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of Carlsbad City Council on the day of 1991, and thereafter ..... ..... ..... ----- ..... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I-5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C da> Council of the City of Carlsbad on the , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk PRICE CLUB zc 90-1 I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 LO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3209 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 90-5 TO CONSTRUCT A 121,388 SQUARE FOOT PRICE CLUB DISCOUNT STORE CONTAINING A TIRE CENTER, OPTICAL CENTER AND A SMALL EXTERIOR EATING ESTABLISHMENT AS WELL AS TWO GRADED PADS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO: SDP 90-5 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbz referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided b 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Pk Commission did, on the 3rd day of April, 1991, consider said request on property des as: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tesl and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside factors relating to SDP 90-5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corm of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3.6 1'1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn RECOMMENDED APPROVAL of SDP 90-5, based on the following findiI subject to the following conditions: Findin ys: 1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundin environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectivt general plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses spe permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and 7 adversely impact the site, surrounhgs or traffic circulation as the stru~ located an adequate distance from the access points to the property allow good on-site circulation and vehicle queuing so as to not impact adjacent roi The truck area which has the greatest potential to &pact adjacent uses is on the south side of the building adjacent to the open space area. h additi screened from view by walls, fencing, and landscaping. The main entrancc building is oriented to draw patrons in from the main entrance which sup] present site design as being properly related to the site. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accomma use as the project proposes 977 parking spaces while the Zoning ordinance 1 450. This equates to 46 percent more parking than required by code evidence that the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the addition, six percent of the parking area will be landscaped in contrasf Zoning Ordinance requirement of three percent. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other f necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future use receiving area, trash compactors, and pallet yard will be screened by the concrete walls, fencing utilizing saran screen, and landscaping. The buildiI closest point is 160 feet from the western property line and 80 feet fr Caltrans property in the northwestern area of the Site. A 50 foot landscaped will be provided form Palomar Airport Road which will be landscaped in accc with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly ha trafiic generated by the proposed use contingent upon circulation hnprovements which have been required. A rraffic report titled, 'Transpc Analysis for The Price Club/Carlsbad", dated January 16, 1991 was prep; Urban Systems Associates, Inc. and reviewed by staff of the En@& Planning Departments. The required circulation system improvements are b the results of that report as well as data and plans in the possession 2. 3. nei@borhood will be provided and maintained. The truck area contain ,I 4. FagineeriIlg Department. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I-8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 a 5. The project is in compliance with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines as they ap Palomar Airport Road. The project design includes a 50 foot wide lands setback adjacent to Palomar Airport Road with a three foot high berm adjac the proposed right-of-way. The parking area is a minimum of 15 feet 101 elevation than Palomar Airport Road. Oak, which is the corridor theme tm Holly Oak, the specified median tree, will be utilized as shown on the Lam Plan- The Airport Land Use Commission staff has found the project to be consisten the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McQellan-Palomar @a. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless tl Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the P1, Cornmission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this I Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be requj conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appri condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and p( concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be prov the City of Carlsbad. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land USE surrounding properties are designated for non-residential development General Plan. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Con1 Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on Febru 1991 and RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL by the Planning Commission c 3, 1991. In approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the F Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all 1 mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the si? effects this project could have on the environment. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. of the fee will enable this body to fmd that public facilities will be a1 11, 12. 13. ..... PC RES0 NO. 3209 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 2.3 14 15 16 17 18 a e 14. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility f new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide b! additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan pre pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will e continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative in created by the project. TGS project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (I- Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the se treatment of the City's hillside resources. 15. 16. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for SDP 90-5, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "N", dated f 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depa Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted i~ conditions. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36', mylar ( the Tentative Map and Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commissiol Tentative Map and Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by tl The Map and Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to b grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits . be issued for development of the subject property unless the City E determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application f sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 2, 3. i 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant I 4. public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as a from time to time, and any development fees established by the City pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other 01 adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and imprc plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities ft February 13, 1990, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application wil consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be voic I ..... PC RES0 NO. 3209 -4- I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 a 5. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval c final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service age( between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, date( 25, 1983 subject to availability. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures whicl be required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan an( amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by 1 this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provic Government Code Section 65913.5, If any such condition is detemined invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines tl project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of b permit issuance. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued project within two years from the date of project approval. Approval of SDP 90-5 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 90-1, LCP 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ZC 90-1, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837. 12. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall wi pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approvec Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or material! project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. I 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 13. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally in1 and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent proper satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for 1 Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and a impacts on adjacent homes or property. streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. BO-( 14. ..... PC RES0 NO. 3209 -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 I? 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a a 15. NO outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire t In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chic the Planning Director. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which sh submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of gr 16. or building permits, whichever occurs first. 17. 18. All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of a 24 inch box in size. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving conditio; from weeds, trash, and debris. The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-fOOt intervals all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manu submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Pli Department. Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual impc or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and desig promote water conservation. The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce ex litter and/or are too large relative to the lot size. Planter width shall be a minimum of four (4) feet, not including curb, f and/or other paving, and parking overhang. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape archite be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping lx installed as shown on the approved landscape plans. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as requ Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include buildin improvement plans and grading plans. All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contc shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improveme 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 1 24. 25, 26. 27. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -6- I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 -0 0 28. 29. The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be desi( conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and a of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the E Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy of any building. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; ( identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. Areas labeled on the project plans as "Future Building Pad" shall not be pt to be developed, subleased or utilized for any use including temporary uses Christmas tree sales until the improvements to the I-S/Palomar AirPo; interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Develop the "Future Building Pads" will require approval of an amendment to t Development Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall receive a Development Pennit from the California Coastal Commission that q development that is in substantial conformance with the City approval. E that the permit has been received shall be submitted to both the Planni 30. 31. 32. 33. Engineering Departments. 34. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing the required mi measures. All submittah to the City of Carlsbad to fulfill the condition! conditional Negative Declaration shall reference: 1) the project file No. ( l/LCPA 90-2/ZC Wl/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837; 2) the Con( Negative Declaration's State Cleaninghouse No. and 3) the specific mil number listed below. 1. ,I All parking and driving areas shall be swept and vacuumed on an esta 201 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 weekly schedule to prevent the accumulation of dirt/oil/grease whic be washed into the storm drain system. Sweeping of areas south building shall not begin until after 7:30 AM. Urban pollutants such as oils that are deposited on the parking lot SUI automobiles shall be removed from waters leaving the site by d drainage through an oil trap subject to the approval of the City En The oil trap shall be shown on the grading/jmprovement plans project and be operational prior to occupancy of any pmnanent buik the site. 2. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3.6 11 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 m 0 The developer shall provide conclusive proof that the proposed pollut< will be effective in removing storm water based pollutants. h providing the required suppOrting documentation, a three year mol program to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed pollutant trap established to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and paid for developer. The following traffic mitigation measures shall be implemented project: a) 3. Widen and reconstruct the improvements at the interm Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte in order to prov left turns on the north, south and east legs of the inte including appropriate transitions to the satisfaction of t Engineer. Include modifications of the traffic signal at the inte of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte including app traffic signing and striping. AU improvements and work shall be coordinated w improvments to the interchange at 1-5. b) Construct an appropriate acceleration/deceleration lane along 1 Airport Road for the proposed right-in/right-out driveway. dose the access to Paseo Del Norte to automobiles u1 improvements to I-Sflalomar Airport Road interchange are co to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Construct full signalized intersection on Palomar Airport Roa east entrance of the Price Club site including the addition of a eastbound right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road into the To mitigate any aesthetic impacts that development on this site coulr the following measures are required as part of this project: a) c) d) 4. I The truck loading, trash compactor and pallet yard area : screened by the use of walls, fencing and landscaping as show project plans. Old tires removed at the tire center shall be stored inside the b No outdoor tire storage will be permitted. b) ----* PC RES0 NO. 3209 -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 e 0 c) No roof equipment other than skylights shall be permitted as is on the project plans because of the difficulty in screening equ from residences to the south and from view of travelen on P Airport Road. The exterior of the Price dub building shall have a rough ag finish in those areas indicated on the project plans in additior proposed accent reveals to provide an aesthetically pleasing E in the Palomar Airport Road scenic corridor. d) 35. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicai include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24 blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits I be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district the development determines that adequate water and service is available at t of application for water service and will continue to be available until OCCUpanCy. A noise attenuation wall shall be constructed to screen the truck area shc Exhibit ‘8” dated April 3,1991 from the Seagate Condominium Project to th if and when it is determined to be necessary by the Planning Director. The project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations subject to the sa6 of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall at a minimum in bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench a shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the basic archi theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the approval of the P Director and North County Transit District. 36. 37. 38. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I ! 39. Bicycle racks for the use of employees shall be provided prior to the issuanc occupancy permit for the Price Club Store. The location of the required racks shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director a: be shown on a revised site plan and the required mylar. EnRineennn Conditions: 40. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Stanc authorized by virtue of approval of this site plan. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requi of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the proje 41. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 42. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacif phone, and Cable TV authorities. This project is located in Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan. Recen monitoring has revealed that Palomar Airport Road from El Camino Rea eastern City limit falls below the adopted performance standard. Therefoi to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall participate in the guar; a proportional share of the cost of improving this segment of Palomar Airpoi 43. 44. The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type t form, on the property in all common areas as approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimec as defined in Section 1305(n) of the California Water Code, means water w a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a direct beneficial use trolled use that would not otherwise occur. Pretreatment of the sanitary sewer discharge from this project may be requ addition to the requirements for a sewer connection permit the develop conform to the requirements of Chapter 13.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Co developer shall apply for an industrial waste water discharge permit conc with the building permit for this project. No Certificates of Occupancy project will be issued before the industrial waste discharge permit apI requirements have been met, all applicable fees paid and permit issued. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities sh the site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuai building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive appr grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued a permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with proved grading plans. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencemen clearing or grading of the site. A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city lim Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construc within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from Engineer for the proposed haul route. conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regard 45. 46. 47. ' 48. 49. The developer shall comply hauling operation. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be 1 50. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -10- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 a a in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Ref Chap 11.06. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or in prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by tl Engineer. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public strec easements required by these conditions or shown on the site plan. The off( be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offere be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and withc to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededica Some improvements shown the site plan and/or required by these conditic located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has su title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition or interest. The Developer shall conforrn to Section 20.16.095 of the C Municipal Code. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the ow give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the bound the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Land District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the imprc plancheck process. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a frequency storm of a 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed condi equal to or less than the moff from a stom of the same frequency and d under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm duratic be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomi desired results. Runoff from this project is conveyed to environmentally sensitive area 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 1 56. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 developer shall provide adequate means of eliminating grease and oils from d prior to discharge. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the fi in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree t and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements sl the site plan and the following improvements: 57. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -11- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 €3 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 A. Sidewalks and street lights along the entire project frontage along P Airport Road. Reconstruction of the median on Palomar Airport Road to allow for turn pockets at the proposed signalized intersection. Landscaping irrigation and median improvements to the median on P Airport Road from the intersection of Paseo Del Norte to the easterly property boundary. A 12’ acce1eratiorVdeceleration lane along the eastbound lanes of F Airport Road from the proposed signalized intersection on the east er and including any necessary offsite length and transition beyond the 7 frontage. The improvement of the triple 5’ x 10’ box culvert capacity under Pa Norte to prevent overtopping of the road. The cost of this shall be t against Master Drainage Area Fees. Signing and striping on Paseo Del Norte to allow full access at the p driveway. Construction of a full signalized intersection on Palomar Airport Roa east entrance of the Price Club site including a hard wire interconnc the Signal at Pas- Del Norte. Widen and reconstruct the improvements at the intersection of 1 Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte in order to provide dual left turn north, south and east legs of the intersection including appropriatt tions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Include modificatioi traffic signal at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo D including appropriate traffic signing and striping. AU of these improl and work shall be coordinated with the improvements to the interck 1-5. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 58. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of par approval and/or improvement plan approval, whichever occurs first. The Fire Marshal has determined that onsite fire hydrants are required to st project. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the site, the applica submit and receive City and water district approval for appropriate M improvement plans and easements. All improvements shall be desi conformance with City and Water District Standards, plancheck and inspec paid and improvement security shall be posted with the Water District. 59. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -12- 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1'7 19 I.8 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e 60. The structural section for the private driveway and parking lot isle must be d with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to a truc through the parking lot and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. pavement improvements may be reflected on the site grading plans. A : improvement plancheck and inspection fee is required for the surface an drain improvements. Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall be designec tent with Title 17 of the California Administrative Code. Offsite future re water distribution systems should be anticipated by the installation of adt sized sleeves at crossing points to minimize street excavation. The Price dub shall be closed for business from 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Monday Friday or such other time as determined after hearing, by the Planning Corn until the improvementS to the 1-5/Pdomar Airport Road interchange are co to the satisfaction of the City engineer. Signage shall be posted at the en= erdt to the store to inform patrons of the business hours. Notification of th business hours of the Carlsbad store shall also be made to Price Club Me: any newsletters or adv ertisements published. Signs to notify patrons of th to 6 P.M. Monday through Friday closure shall be approved by the City 1 and Planning Director and be installed prior to the issuance of an occupanq Prior to occupancy the driveway to Paseo Del Norte shall be equipped wil to limit the access to exiting delivery trucks only. Said gate system shall 1 City Engineer's approval and shall remain permanent unless an amendme Site Development Plan initiated by the property owner or City of Ca approved by the Planning Commission. AU trucks and delivery vehicles exiting onto Paseo del Norte shall northbound to Palomar Airport Road. The property owner shall place and a Sign at the gate with those ~tructions to the satisfaction of the City E Direct access n&ts to Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte shall b on the Parcel map except for the four access points shown on the tentati 61. 62. 63. 64. I 65. I j map. 66. Prior to or concurrent with parcel map approval three access easement! granted through the Price Club property to adjoining properties. At suc the adjoining properties utilize the access easements they shall be requira in the maintenance and insurance costs. 1) The first easement will be granted to the Caltrans property from west and the east driveways onto Palomar Airport Road. Spec% easement shall be 30 feet in width from said westerly driveway PC RES0 NO. 3209 -1 3- I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I* 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e Caltrans' northerly boundary, then following the westerly driveway as intersedon with the main east/west parking lot driveway. Then f along the main easvwest driveway to its intersection with the main e: driveway to Palomar Airport Road. Then northerly up the centerline main enmce driveway to its intersection with Palomar Airport Ro The second easement shall also be granted to the Caltrans property t Del Norte. Speafically, the easement shall be 30 feet in width fx Caltrans southerly boundary following the driveway between the Pri building and the most westerly Price Club parking lot southerly u1 reach Paseo Del Norte. The third easement will be granted to the Nurseryland property fi-c the west and the east driveways onto Palom Airport Road. Spec this easement shall be 30 feet in width from the easterly boundaq Nurseryland property easterly to its intersection with the aforeme westerly driveway, then following the westerly driveway as show tentative parcel map southerly as described in the "first easement' des to Palomar Airport Road. on the kntative parcel map southerly inlo the Price Club site 2) 3) 67. A 20 foot wide public sewer easement shall be offered for dedication on th map amss Parcel 2. Said easement shall be located adjacent to the 21 easement from the existing sewer easement to the easterly property line c 2 and continuing northeasterly along said property line a distance deemed a by the City Engineer. AU land so offered shall be granted to the City free a of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Approval of SDP 90-5 is granted subject to the approval of MS 837. All co of approval of MS 837 are incorporated herein by reference. Approval of this project is contingent upon the provision of adequate public to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. At this time Roos Community Facilities District is proposed to finance the construction c Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the Mt Community Facilities District is not formed, or if the Community Fa&& is formed but the Zone 5 properties are not partiapants within that Dis required General Plan Consistency findings cannot be made. No disa approvals, Building Permits, Grading Permits, Final Maps, or developmen 68. 69. will be issued or approved unless an alternate financing mechamsm ispm the developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilide applicable to Zone 5 that would have been or are included in the Co facilities District. For purposes of this condition the Mello-Roos Distric considered to be formed following an affirmative vote of the property ow PC RES0 NO. 3209 -14- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 a a 3May period as prescribed by law to provide for any protest regarding for of the District. &&tent with LFMP Zone 5 specid condition, "d non-residenti;ll developm be required to pay a park-in-lieu fee of .40$ per square foot to be collecter time of building permit issuance. prior to occupancy the developer shall construct sidewalks 5 feet in widd following 1oCatioIls: 70. 71. 1. Along the west side of the main entrance from Palomar Airpoi southerly to main easvwest onsite driveway. Along the north side of the Service drive from Paseo Del Norte nod the south end of the employee parking lot. Along the east side of the western driveway enhance (closest to Nursc from Palomar Airport Road to the main easvwest onsite d immediately adjacent to the Price Club Store building. 2. 3. 72. Prior to issuance of a grading pennit, the developer shall enter into a Monitoring Program to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This shall bi year program hcorporathg automatic sampling at the influent and locations. Test equipment and funding for testing will be required. The d shall contract with a reputable firm satisfactory to the City Engineer to control the monitoring program, collect and compile test data and su information in a report format to the City Engineer on a schedule approve agreement with the City regarding the implementation of an Urban 1 Ciw. 73. Prior to occupancy the developer shall remove and replace all curb, 8 sidewalk along the project fiontage that is found by the City to be m I damaged. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fire Conditions: 74. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be r to and approved by the Fire Department. Additional onsite public hydrants are required. An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction. 75. 76. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -15- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 77. AU required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operation to combustible building materials being located on the project site. AU private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, ai have posted “No Parking/Fire Lane” pursuant to Section 17.04.040, C Municipal Code. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extin8 systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. Buildings havbg an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet I protected by an automatic sprinkler system. Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the fc criteria: 400’ scale a Photo reduction on mylar H 78. 79. 80. 81. At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be reference( map (not a separate vicinity map) Maps shall include the following information: * Street Centerlines Street Names Fire hydrant locations * * 82. Storage above 12 feet high is considered high piled storage. Building sh requi.rements of UFC Article 81. Carlsbad Municipal Water District Conditions: 83. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject proj be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for d landscaping and fire flow demands are met. The developer‘s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Enghee City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout preparation of the water system improvement plans. The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the majo charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The d shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capaaty charge which 84. 85. PC RES0 NO. 3209 -16- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0 II, collected at issuance of application for meter installation. 86. The developer shall be required to install reclaimed water system and fad directed by the District Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the PI Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 1991, following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, Mi Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: I.8 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 1 PLANNING DIRECTOR i PC RES0 NO. 3209 -17- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 m e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3210 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OUTDOOR FOOD CONCESSIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO: CUP 90-3 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of and referred to the Planning Cornmission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as prt Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Commission did, on the 3rd day of April, 1991, hold a duly noticed public h consider said application on property described as: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Co considered all factors relating to CUP 90-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ET HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Co of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Coi RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CUP 90-3, based on the following find subject to the following conditions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the developmen community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and obje the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses spc permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located be compliments the Price dub retail function, provides a convenient se shoppers and is located adjacent to the store entrance. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accor the use as the food concessions are not located in any required setback required parking has been provided. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future us neighborhood will be provided and maintained as the food concession located under the entry canopy to the store and a 30 to 50 foot wide pedestrian area has been provided in this area to accommodate pedestrj That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly h traffic generated by the proposed use as the proposed food concession expected to generate vehicle trips by themselves. They are an accessory I Price Club Store and will benefit from vehicle trips made for the pt patronizing the store. All findings of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3 SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209, are incorporated herein by reference. 2. 3. 4. 5. Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3 SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209, are incorporated herein by reference. these documents for all conditions and mitigation measures applicab development of the Price dub project site. Approval is granted for CUP 90-3, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "N", date1 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Dei Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise notec conditions. Approval of CUP 90-3 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 90-1, L( 2. I 3. ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, HDP 90-9 and MS 837. ... PC RES0 NO. 3210 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I* 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 a 4. The food concessioIls permitted on the site by CUP 90-3 as shown on exhi "N", dated April 3,1991 shall have their hours of operations limited to hours which the Price Club Store is open. The maximum number of tables permitted outside the Price Club Store i.! to be used by customers for sit down outdoor eating. Additional tables preparation such as condiments may be permitted and will not be include of the maximum of 6 tables allowed. A total of 9 parking spaces are required for the food concessions use. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit there shall be a 1 restriction on real property placed on the deed to property subjec satisfaction of the Planning Director notifying all interested parties and s in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Conditional Use P Resolution No. 3210 on the real property owned by the declarant. 5 restriction shall note the property description, location of the file cc complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any c or restrictions specjfied for inclusion in the deed restriction. This apprc not be effective and permits shall not be issued until this notice is recorc office of the county Recorder. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 5. 6. 7. Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 195 following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, Marcu! ATTEST: d%&&!'&&--&-& MICHAEL J. HOLZAMLER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RES0 NO. 3210 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3211 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO.: HDP 90-9 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commissioi WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provi Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of April, consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimc arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corn 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corm RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of HDP 90-9, based on the following findir subject to the following conditions: Findinns : 1. All findings of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 32( SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209, are incorporated herein by reference. 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 2. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (H Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the ser treatment of the City's hillside resources. The net grading amount of 4,960 cubic yards per acre falls within the acce] range required by the Hillside Development Ordinance. The project will not create manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in he 3. 4. Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 320 SDP 90-5, Resolution No. 3209, are incorporated herein by reference. Rt these documents for aU conditions and mitigation measures applicable to tht Club project. Approval is granted for HDP 90-9, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "N", datec 3, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depan Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in conditions. Approval of HDP 90-9 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 90-1, LCPP ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3 and MS 837. 2. 3. ..... ..... ..... *.*** ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .-... PC RES0 NO. 3211 -2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 e e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the E Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 199' following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, McFadden, h Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. ING COMMISSIOh ATTEST: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12 13 14 15 16 I' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3212 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF A MINOR SUBDMSION TO CREATE FOUR PARCELS ON 62 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. CASE NAME: PRICE CLUB CASE NO.: MS 837 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided 1 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and ' a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of April, 199 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all test and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside factors relating to the Minor Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corn as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn recommends APPROVAL of MS 837, based on the following findings and sub the following conditions: ..... ..... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ’* 11 12 13 14 15 16 l7 18 19 0 6 Findinns : 1. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition t project, ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City C finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Pk Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed on the final ma building permits may not be issued for the project unless the City En1 determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur with project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Cornmiss satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the Genera have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be requir conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appro condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and pa! of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be ava concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be provid 2. 3. 4. 5, I the City of Carlsbad. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses surrounding properties are designated for non-residential development 01 General Plan. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Condii Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on Februar 1991 and RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL by the Planning Commission on 3, 1991. In approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the Pla- 7. 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all req mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the sigrd effects this project could have on the environment. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fc new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide bj additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan pre] pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will e continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative im created by the project. 8. PC RES0 NO. 3212 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 e 9. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as : been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hi Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sen treatment of the City's hillside resources. 10. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for MS 837, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "N", dated AI 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depart Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in conditions. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36', mylar co the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy slx submitted to the City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement submittal, whichever occurs fist. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits wi be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Ens determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This shall be placed on the final map. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant p: public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amc from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Cc pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordii adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvc plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee February 13, 1990, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk ai 2. 3. 4. 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will n consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval c final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agree between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, datec 25, 1983 subject to availability. I 5. 6. PC RES0 NO. 3212 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a a 7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures whic be required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan ar amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by 1 this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provic Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines th project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the L Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of fina approval. Approval of MS 837 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 90-1, LCPA 90 8. 9. 10. 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9. Engineering Conditions: 11. The applicant may request a review of the preliminary conditions within (1 0: of the date of this approval. The request must be submitted in writing to th Engineer in accordance with Section 20.24.120 through 140 of the Carlsbad M pal Code. The tentative parcel map approval shall expire two (2) years from the date letter containing the final decision for tentative parcel map approval. The developer shall provided the City with the reproducible 24" x 36' mylar of the tentative parcel map as approved by the City Engineer. The tentative 1 map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy sh submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits, improvc plans, or grading permits submittal, whichever occurs first. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standa authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative parcel map. The developer shall submit proof of a California State Coastal Commission p prior to parcel map approval. All required fees and deposits shall be paid prior to parcel map recordation. I 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. attached list.) ..... PC RES0 NO. 3212 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 15 16 17 e a 17. The developer shall pay the local Drainage Area Fee prior to approval of thc map. Area No. 11. Prior to approval of the parcel map the developer shall pay and/or enter agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a resul 18. fonhcoming Master Drainage Plan Update. The subdivider shall be responsible to pay the recording fees for all agret 19. easements and documents required for this project. This project is approved upon the express condition that building perrnits 1 be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineel mines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for sucl permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This no be placed on the parcel map. The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement ing drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the parcel I this project. Grading in advance of final map may be allowed subject to City Engineer ai in accordance with Chapter 11.06 Carlsbad Municipal Code and depart 20. 21. 22. policy. 23. Approval of MS 837 is granted subject to the approval of SDP 90-5/CUP 90- 90-9/GPA 90-1/ZCA 90-l/and LCPA 90-2. All conditiolls of approval of thf mentioned applications are incorporated hex& by reference. Prior to parcel map approval the developer shall grant a covenant of easerr access to Parcel 1 over the 6ce drive through Parcel 3 to Paseo Del Norl covenant of easement shall be shown and recording infoxmation called out 24. parcel map. 19 I.8 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25. This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issi the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the provisions 1 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on a separati of the parcel map. No grading permits or building permits shall be issued designated remainder parcel without prior approval of the City and 4 Commission. This note shall be placed on a separate sheet of the parcel m I ... .'. PC RES0 NO. 3212 -5- 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of April, 199 following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schram, McFadden, h Hall. NOES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION A'ITEST: 1 2 3 0 e 26. Per State laws governing the associated Palomar Airport Road Assessment AD 86-1, a segregation of the assessments to the subject property must be for or the assessment must be paid off in full prior to the approval of tf Map. The applicant shall agree to pay all associated costs of said segregati application shall be submitted with the parcel map. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RES0 NO. 3212 -6- APPLICA a _- N COMPLETE DATE: Januarv 4. 1991 0 G STAEF REPORT 0 DATE: APRIL 3, 1991 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-!5/CX.JP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837 - PRICE CLUB - Request for approval of a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PI to RRE on 23.6 acres, a Zone Change from P-M-Q to C- 2-4 on 23.6 acres, a Site Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Hillside Development Permit for a 121,388 sq. ft. Price Club Discount Store containing a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating establishment. Also proposed is a graded pad for a future 15,000 sq. ft. office building and a 5,000 sq. ft. retail building. A minor subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property is also proposed. The project site is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road east of Paseo Del Norte in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3205 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No.’s 3206, 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211, and 3212 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of GPA 90-1, LCPA 90-2, ZC 90-1, SDP 90-5, CUP 90-3, HDP 90-9 and MS 837, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. PROJECI DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting several discretionary approvals for a 62 acre property located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road east of Paseo Del Norte. This property is the site of a previously approved nine lot business park (CT 87-2) containing eight industrial lots, one open space lot and one remainder parcel. A signalized intersection was approved on Palomar Airport Road to provide access to the site. Access was also approved on Paseo Del Norte. The proposed Price Club project would gain access at both of the previously approved locations. The area of the site to be developed has been graded in conformance with the approved business park plans. Regrading of the site will be necessary for the proposed project. EXHIBIT 4. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 0, “-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9 # 13 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3,1991 PAGE 2 Discretionary approvals required for the proposed Price Club project include: (1) adoption of a Conditional Negative Declaration, (2) a General Plan Amendment from PI (Planned Amendment from PI (Planned Industrial) to RRE (Extensive Regional Retail) on 23.6 acres, (4) a Zone Change from P-M-Q (Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) to C-2-Q (General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) on 23.6 acres, (5) a Site Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Hillside Development Permit for the development of the property, and (6) a Minor Subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property. The proposed project consists of a 121,388 sq. ft. Price Club Discount Store containing a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating establishment (pizza, hot dogs, etc,), Also proposed is a graded pad adjacent to Paseo Del Norte for a future 15,000 sq. ft. office building and a graded pad adjacent to Palomar Airport Road west of the signalized access to the site for a future 5,000 sq. ft. retail building. Development of these pads will require approval of an amendment to the site development plan for the property. The Price Club Discount Store building contains a ground floor area of 11 7,188 sq. ft. and a mezzanine level with an area of 4,200 sq. ft. The ground floor area contains 87,588 sq. ft. of retail area, a 21,600 sq. ft. receiving area with ten roll-up doors, a 600 sq. ft. food concession area, six autocenter service bays totalling 3,600 sq. I?., a 3,000 sq. ft. tire storage area, and an 800 sq. ft. tire sales/display area. The 4,200 sq. ft. mezzanine contains administrative offices, two employee break rooms, and employee lockers. The building will be constructed of tilt up concrete panels. The base of the building will contain an exposed aggregate finish. A series of eight inch accent reveals are also proposed along each elevation of the building to further enhance the structure. The accent reveals will be dark gray with sections of the walls separated by the reveals being either light or medium gray in color. Adjacent to the main entrance in the northeast corner of the building is an entry canopy which reaches a width of 20 feet. Wall signage for the Price Club is proposed to be bright blue in color. An outdoor employee eating area is proposed adjacent to the southeast corner of the building. The eating area will have a shade trellis with a concrete frame and wood infill. Concrete screen walls varying in height from 7’-6” to ll’-6’ are proposed on the south side of the building to screen the truck area, pallet yard and trash compactors from view to the east and west. A 12’ high chain link fence with saran screen and vines is proposed to screen this area from view to the south. The building height will vary from 28’ to 32’ based on the adjacent ground elevations. The entry canopy has a maximum height of 22’. Industrial) to RRE (Extensive Regional Retail) on 23.6 acres, (3) a Local Coastal Plan GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC &SDP 9O-S/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9 /a! 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3,1991 PAGE 3 The size of the parking area for the Price Club has resulted in the need to provide a considerable amount of landscaping to help lessen the impact of a large asphalt surface. A total of six percent of the parking area will be landscaped in comparison to the Zoning Ordinance requirement for three percent. Six foot wide landscape planters border the main circulation aisles. Intermediate landscape islands are 5 feet by 18 feet long and are offset throughout the parking area. A 50 foot landscaped setback is provided adjacent to Palomar Airport Road. A three foot high berm is proposed along the Palomar Airport Road frontage of that area of the site to be developed at this time. Planter widths of 6, 15, and 20 feet are provided adjacent to the north and west building elevations to allow enough room for landscaping which will compliment the structure to grow to maturity. All trees to be used on the site will be a minimum size of 24 inch box and all shrubs will be a minimum size of five gallon. Parking lot cart storage areas will be provided and will be located adjacent to intermediate landscape islands in most cases. As stated in the Environmental Impact Assessment - Part I1 completed for this project, approximately 21.99 acres of the site will be graded. This affects the area previously graded and currently fenced. The grading is necessary to create a pad to accommodate the proposed building. The section of this staff report dealing with the Hillside Development Permit addresses grading for the site in more detail. The proposed minor subdivision will create four parcels on the 62 acre property. Parcel 1 totalling 23.6 acres will contain the area for the Price Club Store and the pad for the future retail building adjacent to Palomar Airport Road. Parcel 2 will contain a 15 acre open space parcel on the southern portion of the site. Parcel 3 will contain 3.4 acres and a building pad adjacent to Paseo Del Norte for future development consistent with the existing TS/O (Travel Services Commercial/Professional and Related) General Plan Designation and R-P (Residential Professional) Zone. Parcel 4 Will contain a 20 acre remainder parcel. As stated previously, the area of the project site proposed to be developed has been previously graded in conformance with approval for a business park project. The area north of Palomar Airport Road is used for agriculture. Adjacent property to the south is developed with the Sea Gate Village 286 condominium unit project. Property to the east is undeveloped. To the west is Nurseryland, a Caltrans storage yard and an office building. Approximately 20 letters of opposition to the project as well as a signed petition have been received to date. The letters and petition are on file in the Planning Department. The letters are primarily from the residents in the Alta Mira Project. It should be noted that the signatures on the petition date from December 1989 to May 1990 which is prior to project redesign so that it is not known whether the level of project opposition stdl exists. Also on file are 560 post cards from Carlsbad Price Club members indicating support for the project. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC d/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9 /a 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 4 Traffic The Price Club property is fronted on the north by Palomar Airport Road and on the west by Paseo Del Norte. Palomar Airport Road is classified in the circulation element as a prime arterial road with a total of six travel lanes. Paseo Del Norte is classified as a secondary arterial with four travel lanes. Currently, both roads are fully improved to City standard requirements along the project frontage with the exception of sidewalks, street lights and median landscape treatment on Palomar Airport Road. Access to the Price Club site is proposed at three locations. The primary access is proposed along Palomar Airport Road at the east end of the project site. This access would be fully signalized and provide for left turn movements into and out of the site. The signalized access coincides with the signalized intersection location approved by City Council for the previously approved Carltas Ranch Industrial Park. This signalized intersection will ultimately provide access to the undeveloped properties to the north of Palomar Airport Road. A second right in/out only access is proposed along Palomar Airport Road at the west end of the project site. The second access is needed to facilitate truck access to the Price Club loading bays and to more evenly distribute traffic to the interior of the project. In the future, this second access will potentially be utilized as access for the existing Nurseryland property as well as the Caltrans maintenance facility should it ever be converted to development. The third access point is from Paseo Del Norte. This access will not be signalized but will allow for both left and right turns into and out of the project site for automobiles once the interchange improvements are completed. The purpose of this requirement is to reduce the potential traffic impacts associated with customers impacting Paseo Del Norte south of the project in advance of 1-5/Palomar Airport Road/Paseo Del Norte improvements. Until the interchange improvements are completed, access will be limited to delivery trucks only. Since Paseo Del Norte south of the Price Club site is not an approved truck route, truck traffic will only be allowed north of the service driveway. Internal site traffic will be distributed throughout the parking lot area along several core isle ways which are free of parking stalls. Vehicular access from Palomar Airport Road to Paseo Del Norte through the parking lot is possible; however, it involves making numerous turning movements. For this reason, short circuiting of traffic through the site should not be a major concern. The primary traffic issues raised by this project are as follows: 1. Conformance with circulation standards of the Growth Management Program. Specific problem areas include the Palomar Airport Road/I-S interchange, Paseo Del Norte/Palomar Airport Road intersection, Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Red intersection and Palomar Airport Road east of El Camho Real. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 46 -1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ @ 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 5 2. conflict of Price Club generated traffic with existing traffic volumes to be routed through the construction zone on Palomar Axport Road When the bridge widening project over 1-5 begins. Temporary and long term increase of traffic on Paseo Del Norte through the Alta Mira residential area, especially truck traffic. Disruption of progression of through traffic on Palomar Airport Road. Provision of traffic access to adjacent properties. Potential relocation of Paseo Del Norte through the Price Club property. 3. 4. 5. 6. Each of these issues will be discussed separately in the following paragraphs. The proposed Price Club project will significantly increase the amount of traffic on adjoining City streets over the previously approved industriaVoffice uses. The traffk study prepared for the project estimates that all proposed uses on the project site will generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 8,410 vehicles into and out of the site. This compares with 4,800 ADT which was projected for the existing approved industrial project at this same site. The traffic study provides details on the estimated distribution of this traffic onto the City street system and calculates the impacts to the street network and various intersections in accordance with the requirements of the growth management program. Regardless of this project, there are two previously identified locations where the adopted performance standard is not met for roads or intersections impacted by traffic generated by Zone 5 of which this project is included. The adopted performance standard is not met for the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection and Palomar Airport Road east of El Camino Red. Both of these locations were previously identified as not meeting the adopted performance standard and an appropriate financing mechanism to correct the deficiencies was approved by the City Council. The proposed conditions of approval include provision for the Price Club project to contribute to financing the improvements needed to bring the intersection and road segment that do not meet the adopted performance standard into conformance with the adopted performance standard. This project is expected to generate additional traffic sufficient to cause the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte to not meet the adopted performance standard. The traffic study contains recommended improvements to mitigate the intersection to bring it into conformance with the adopted performance standard. These recommended improvements essentially include the addition of dual left turn lanes on all legs of the intersection. A condition to accomplish this mitigation is included in the proposed conditions of approval. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 4d /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ l@ 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 6 The traffic study for this project, as well as the recently completed traffic circulation monitoring report prepared by JHK & Associates, indicates that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and the 1-5 odoff ramps has dropped below the adopted performance standard. The City is well along in process of preparing improvement plans for the widening of the freeway overpass and ramps including installation of traffic signals; however, financing of the interchange project is not yet guaranteed to be in place when needed. The currently proposed financing mechanism is the Mello Roos District which will be voted upon by the property owners in the near future. Should the Mello vote fail, no building permits, grading permits or final maps will be issued for this project or any other project in Zone 5 until an alternate financing plan for the interchange is approved by City Council in accordance with the Growth Management Program. In the event that the Price Club is approved and the Mello Roos District or other financing mechanism for the interchange is also approved, it is probable that the Price Club could open at some point in time before construction of the interchange is 100% complete. This would expose the interchange construction site to additional traffic. The Price Club traffic study proposes several mitigation measures to mitigate this impact. It is the opinion of staff that most of the proposed mitigation would not be effective due to the complexity of the construction detouring. The Price Club applicant has proposed alternative mitigation which consist of closing the Price Club store during the peak traffic loading periods. Because the Price Club does not open during the AM peak hour, the closure would be limited to the afternoon peak period which occurs between 4 PM and 6 PM on weekdays. Staff agrees that such a closure would have some benefit and has included the daily two hour closure as a proposed condition of the project. The afternoon closure would remain in effect until the City Engineer determines that the interchange construction has provided adequate capacity to accommodate the increased traffic. Another identified traffic issue is the proposed Price Club access to Paseo Del Norte. There is some concern that the Price Club traffic will adversely affect the nearby residents south of the project site specifically with regard to construction and truck traffic. Paseo Del Norte has previously been designated as a non-truck route south of the project site. Staff believes the Paseo Del Norte access will not unduly attract additional traffic to Paseo Del Norte after completion of the 1-5 bridge improvements. The traffic study indicates that only 5% of the Price Club traffic would ultimately use this access. To reduce truck traffic at this location, the applicant has proposed the addition of the previously discussed secondary Palomar Airport Road right turn in/out access. This secondary access point provides a reasonably direct truck access to the Price Club loading area off Palomar Airport Road from 1-5. The existing truck prohibition on the southerly portion of Paseo Del Norte would remain in effect, Staff is recommending that the project be conditioned to install an automatic gate across the Paseo Del Norte entrance to prohibit customer access into the Price Club from this direction until after the interchange construction is completed. This will help reduce the likelihood of vehicles using Paseo Del Norte to access the Price Club in order to avoid the Palomar Airport Road interchange construction zone. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2jZC !@I )SDP 90-5)CUP 90-31HDP 90-9/ I@ 837 - PFUCE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 7 Another project concern is that the Price Club access on Palomar Airport Road could potentially obstruct eastbound through traffic. To mitigate this impact, an ad&iona\ combined acceleratioddeceleration lane is proposed to be constructed on the south side of Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage. The boundary lines of the project site wrap around several properties which have limited access to Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte requiring staff to consider how this project relates to the ultimate development of these adjacent properties. After reviewing the potential needs, it was determined that the best method to provide for any future development would be to condition the project to provide reciprocal access rights to the additional justification for installation of the right turn in/out on Palomar Airport Road and for the proposed traffic signal. The final traffic issue raised was the potential relocation of Paseo Del Norte easterly through the project site. The previous project approval for the Carltas Ranch industrial project included a condition to reserve a portion of the site in the event it was determined to realign Paseo Del Norte. The City Council recently commissioned JHK & Associates to investigate this alternative design as part of an overall program to investigate the operational characteristics of Palomar Airport Road adjacent to the 1-5 interchange. The report did indicate that overall traffic flow would improve slightly with such a realignment; however, the incremental improvement was not expected to raise the service level. Considering the potential negative impact of cutting off existing businesses and the financial and environmental impacts of constructing the realigned road, staff recommends not pursuing the matter with this application. No conditions to retain any future access for the realignment of Paseo Del Norte on the Price Club site is included in the proposed adjacent properties though the private parking lot, Such reciprocal access rights provide conditions of approval for this project. II1. ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL, COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENTS - GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2 Planninn Issues 1. Is the proposed land use designation appropriate for the site and consistent with the policies of the General Plan? Is the proposed land use consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses? Is the proposed land use designation consistent with applicable policies of the Mello I1 Local Coastal Program? 2. 3. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC@I,SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9 #!3 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 8 DISCUSSION Development of the proposed Price Club Store on this site requires the approval of a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendment on the 23.6 acre "parcel 1" to be created. The applicant is requesting that the designation on that proposed parcel be changed from Planned Industrial (PI) to Extensive Regional Retail (W). Because the Local Coastal Plan land use designation for the site is the same as the General Plan designation, an amendment to the Mello [I Local Coastal Plan is also required. The existing General Plan designation of PI would allow industrial development including manufacturing, warehousing, storage, research and development, and utility use. The proposed RRE designation allows a wide range of commercial establishments dealing in large, low volume items. Because of the types of items sold and the infrequency of purchase, customers are willing to travel greater distances to compare price and quality. Uses falling into this classification seek locations accessible to a large population because they have a relatively low patron frequency. The General Plan Land Use Element states that the location of these uses should be at the intersections of primary streets, or near these intersections along a major arterial. The proposed site meets this requirement as it is located adjacent to Palomar Airport Road, a Prime Arterial approximately 1,740 feet east of its intersection, with Paseo Del Norte a Secondary Arterial. In addition, the site is approximately 2,240 feet east of Interstate 5. The proposed change in land use is supported by numerous policies found in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The most applicable policies are as follows: A) Permit the development of land only after adequate provision for services such as transportation, water, sewerage, utilities and public facilities. Arrange land uses so that they preserve community identity and are orderly, functionally efficient, healthful, convenient to the public and aesthetically pleasing. B) C) Discourage strip commercial development. D) Locate major commercial and industrial centers in areas which are easily accessible to major transportation facilities. Encourage the types of commercial and industrial activities which will supply the city with a broad economic base, provide for the social need and reflect all environmental constraints. K) The proposed change in land use designation is appropriate as necessary services are currently provided to the site and will be improved as required such as circulation system improvements that will be made a condition of the associated Site Development Plan. The proposed site contains adequate separation from residential land uses and will be located in an area with easy access to a large population. Properties east of the site on Palomar GPA 90-l/LCPA 90-2/ZC dh /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9 /Ilb 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 9 Airport Road are presently designated PI which results in the conclusion that the proposal is not creating sUip commercial development. In regard to policy "D", the site is located in an area which is accessible to major transportation facilities, thereby complying with that policy. Finally, the proposed land use designation would allow for a comercia1 use that would add to the economic base of the city while reflecting environmental constraints as specified in policy ''IC'. The proposed "parcel 2" to be created adjacent to the property to be amended is designated as Open Space and contains 15 acres. Goal C.1.2. of the Circulation Element states, "Develop the Circulation System concurrent with need. Wherever possible, the adverse impacts of new development on the Circulation System should be mitigated." Specific project conditions of the associated Site Development Plan detail circulation system improvements to be made before the project would be allowed to open for business. A detailed discussion of traffic conditions and required improvements is included in the preceding "Project Description and Background'' section of this report. The following policies of the Circulation Element also apply to this project: C.3.1. Operational efficiencies of streets should be improved by using modern design standards and latest available technology. C.3.2. Adequate traffic safety measures should be provided at all intersections. Once again the proposed land use designation change will comply with the above policies due to circulation system improvements made a condition of development. Some of these required improvements are specified as traffic mitigation measures in the Conditional Negative Declaration proposed for the project. The proposed land use is consistent with and compatible with surrounding land uses which are also non-residential land uses. The proposed use is compatible with the commercial, office, industrial, and agricultural uses in the immediate vicinity. The nearest residential area is located to the south of the site. The area of the site to be developed is separated from the residential area to the south by General Plan designated open space. The project designed to facilitate the flow of traffic from Palomar Airport Road as the primary access point to the property. The land use change also complies with Tommercial Guidelines" number 12 and 15. Those guidelines specify the area southeast of the intersection of the San Diego Freeway and Cannon Road as being one of the few areas of the city intended for regional commercial development. Commercial activities which will supply the city with a broad economic base are also to be encouraged. site is also lower in elevation as much as 60 feet in some areas, The project site has been GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 d -1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ t 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 10 The proposed land use designation is consistent with applicable policies of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. Policies regarding slopes and preservation of environmentally sensitive vegetation are being complied with as they are presently designated as open space and will not be affected. Drainage and runoff control measures are being required of the specific development project including the removal of urban pollutants from drainage waters before they are allowed to exit the site. The Soils Report prepared for the site did not identify any landslides or other areas of possible slope instability. The area of the site affected by the proposed amendment has been graded and drainage improvements required by the Engineering Department will prevent problems of accelerated soil erosion. The area of the property within the 100 hundred year floodplain will remain as open space. In summary, the proposed amendment complies with all policies of the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program. ZONE CHANGE - ZC 90-1 Planning Issues 1. Is the proposed Zone Change consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the sites proposed land use designation? Would the uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change be compatible with the surrounding land uses? 2. DISCUSSION The proposed zone change will change the zoning from Planned Industrial, Qualified Development ,Overlay Zone (P-M-Q) to General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-2-Q) on 23.6 acres. This is the area designated as "parcel 1" on the Tentative Parcel Map and coincides with the area proposed to be amended on the General indicates that zoning should be made consistent with the General Plan. The proposed C-2- Q zone implements the RRE General Plan designation and will achieve consistency between the General Plan and Zoning. The proposed General Plan Amendment to REE was determined to be consistent with the Land Use Element as described in the preceding section dealing with that application. Therefore, the corresponding implementing zone for that General Plan Designation is also consistent with the Land Use Element. The uses allowed by the C-2-Q zone would be compatible with the adjacent non-residential land uses. The proposed Qualified Development Overly Zone made a part of the zone change requires that a Site Development Plan be approved before building permits or other entitlements are issued for the property. There are only minor exceptions listed to the requirement for a Site Development Plan. They are found in Section 21.06.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. As a result, the Q-Overly Zone provides the City with discretionary review over development of the site to assure that allowed uses are compatible with surrounding land uses. Plan Map. Under the "General Guidelines" section of the Land Use Element, item 10 GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 PI - /SDP 9O-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ R 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 11 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SDP 90-5 Planning Issues 1. Can the four findings required of the Q Overlay Zone, required for the approval of the Site Development Plan, be made which are as follows? A) That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and wll not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation; That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. Does the project comply with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines? Is the proposed project consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Auport? Is the proposed project consistent with the Meno 11 Segment of Carlsbad's Local Coastal Program? B) C) D) 2. 3. 4. DISCUSSION The site is located along Palomar Airport Road, a designated Scenic Corridor by the Scenic Corridor Guidelines. The area along this roadway presents the City of Carlsbad to a great number of persons entering and passing through the City. As a result of its location and concerns that land use compatibility be achieved, staff recommended and the applicant agreed that the Q-Overlay be placed on the property. Therefore, all four findings of the Qualified Development Overlay Zone must be made. All four findings can be made for the project as proposed and discussed below. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP m 9O-S/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ IiP 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 12 Finding number 1 required for the Site Development plan can be made as the structure is located an adequate distance from the access points to the property allowing for good on- site circulation and vehicle queuing so as to not impact adjacent roadways. The truck area which has the greatest potential to impact adjacent uses is located on the south side of the building adjacent to the open space area. In addition, it is screened from view by walls, fencing, and landscaping. The main entrance to the building is oriented to draw patrons in from the main vehicle entrance to the property which supports the present site design as being properly related to the site. Finding number 2 can also be made as the project proposes 977 parking spaces while the Zoning Ordinance requires 450. This equates to 46 percent more parking than required by code and is evidence that the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. In addition, six percent of the parking area will be landscaped in contrast to the Zoning Ordinance requirement of three percent. All necessary yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping and other necessary features have been provided to assure compatibility with existing and permitted future uses. The truck area containing the receiving area, trash compactors, and pallet yard will be screened by the use of concrete walls, fencing utilizing saran screen, and landscaping. The building at its closest point is 160 feet from the western property line and 80 feet from the Caltrans property in the northwestern area of the site. A 50 foot landscaped setback will be provided from Palomar Airport Road which will be landscaped in accordance with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines. The street system serving the proposed use has been determined to be adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the use contingent on circulation system improvements which have been required. A detailed discussion of traffic conditions and required improvements is included in the "Project Description and Background'' section of this report. Improvements to the I-S/Palomar Airport Road interchange are estimated to be completed by early 1993. Because timing of the interchange improvements are out of the control of the City, actual construction of the improvements do not have to be completed before the applicant is permitted to obtain occupancy of the project pursuant to the Growth Management Program. The Growth Management Program does, however, require that financing for the improvements to the interchange be guaranteed prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Representatives of the Price Company have made a proposal to further reduce traffic impacts in the vicinity of the project while the interchange improvements are under construction. The Price Club doors would be voluntarily closed for business from 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Monday through Friday until the improvements to the I-S/Palomar Airport Road interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Traffic counts taken on February 5, 1991 by the City's Traffic Division confirm that this closely matches the afternoon peak period. The following is wording to accomplish the proposed closing which has been included as a condition of the project: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 @ /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ I@ 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3,1991 PAGE 13 The Price Club shall be closed for business from 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Monday through Friday until the improvements to the I-S/Palomar Airport Road interchange are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signage shall be posted at the entrance and exit to the store to inform patrons of the business hours. Notification of the special business hours of the Carlsbad store shall also be made to Price Club members in any newsletters or advertisements published. Signs to notify patrons of the 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Monday through Friday closure shall be approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director and be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. This proposal has benefits as the Price Club is a membership store enabling it to notify its members of the special business hours. Also of concern are the hours at which delivery trucks will be entering and exiting the site as well as the number of deliveries which will be made. The attached letter from Kathy Nishihira of the Price Company, dated January 14,1991 details the hours of delivery, number, and type of trucks that will be transporting merchandise to the store. Scenic Corridor Guidelines The project is in compliance with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines as they apply to Palomar Akport Road. The guidelines recommend maintaining substantial, heavily-landscaped setbacks along the roadway to visually soften the impact of adjacent buildings. The guidelines also recommend that parking areas be screened from traffic on Palomar Airport Road by a combination of berms and landscaping. The project design includes a 50 foot wide landscaped setback adjacent to Palomar Airport Road with a three foot high berm adjacent to the proposed right-of-way. The parking area is a minimum of 15 feet lower in elevation than Palomar Airport Road. Oak, which is the corridor theme tree, and Holly Oak, the specified median tree, will be utilized as shown on the Landscape Plan. Aimort Land Use Plan Plans for the proposed project were sent to the staff of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) as they serve as staff to the County Airport Land Use Commission. SANDAG staff, in the attached letter dated January 30, 1991, found the project to be consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mello I1 Local Coastal Promam As discussed in the section of this staff report on the proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendment, the project complies with all resource preservation policies of the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program. Environmental mitigation has been required for the project dealing with removing urban pollutants from drainage waters prior to them leaving the site. Conditions number 1 and 2 of the EIA Part I1 contain the specific wording GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC a /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ a 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 14 for this requirement. Generally they require that all parking and driving areas be swept and vacuumed on an established weekly schedule to prevent the accumulation of dirt/oil/grease. NSO, pollutant traps to remove storm water based pollutants have been required. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-3 Planning Issues 1. Can the four findings required for granting a Conditional Use Permit for food concessions (take-out restaurants where food is not served within a dining area) be made? Specifically: a) That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. b) c) d) DISCUSSION The proposed food concession consists of a 600 sq. ft. area within the structure which has service windows on the building exterior and a food cart to be located near the main entrance to the Price Club building, Pizza, hot dogs and other foods would be sold from these concessions. Six patio tables with chairs are proposed to be located near the food cart under the entry canopy to the store. Because of the limited outdoor seating to be provided for this accessory use to the Price Club, it has been determined to function along the lines of a take-out restaurant. The food concession is considered to be a desirable use as it compliments the Price Club retail function and provides a convenient service to shoppers. The parking requirements for the site have included the area devoted to food concessions to anticipate the largest possible parking demand. The location of the food concession is not expected to cause a detrimental impact on existing uses as it is near the entrance to the store in an area where store management can monitor the operation closely. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 @ /SDP 9O-S/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/h.i 3: 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 15 The site design has always included the proposed food concessions so that the additional parking demand created has been provided for. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use as evidenced by the provision of the necessary parking and its location far from neighboring uses. Because the food concessions are located under the entry canopy to the store, all setback requirements have been met. A 30 to 50 foot wide concrete pedestrian area has been provided in this area to accommodate users of the store and food concessions, thereby preventing pedestrian circulation problems. The street system serving the site was discussed in detail under the "Project Description and Background" section of this report. The food concession use is not expected to generate vehicle trips by itself. It is an accessory use to the Price Club Store and will benefit from vehicle trips made for the purpose of patronizing the store. Therefore, based on the circulation system improvements required for the store, the street system has been determined to be adequate to properly handle all traffic that can in any way be attributed to the food concession use. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - HDP 90-9 Planning Issues 1. Does the proposed Site Development Plan and Minor Subdivision comply with the development and design standards of the Hillside Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Zoning Ordinance)? DISCUSSION The project design is in conformance with the development and design standards of the was graded for the project previously approved on the site. The proposed grading plan will require the cut grading of 109,000 cubic yards of soil over a 10.25 acre area closest to Palomar Airport Road. Also required is the fill grading of 96,000 cubic yards of soil over an 11.17 acre area immediately south of the cut area. A total of 13,000 cubic yards of soil will be exported from the site. The grading quantity resulting per acre of 4,960 cubic yards is well within the acceptable range of grading volume allowed by the Hillside Development Regulations. The northern portion of the site closest to Palomar Airport Road will be lowered in elevation approximately seven to ten feet in height. The soil will be placed on the previously graded southern portion of the site causing it to be raised in elevation approximately 13 feet at the greatest point to create a level building pad for the structure. No slopes greater than 30 feet in height will be created. Only minor areas of the site that contain slopes over 25 percent will be developed. These areas are exempt from the Hillside Development Regulations. The 21.99 acre area of the site proposed to be graded GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC a /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ I@ - 837 - PNCE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 16 requirements of the ordinance by Section 21.95.090(1) as they are areas previously disturbed by authorized grading. The building's closest point to the top of slope is at the southeast corner where it is 15 feet from the top of slope. MINOR SUBDMSION - MS 837 Planning Issues 1. Does the proposed Tentative Parcel Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act? DISCUSSION The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would create four parcels (two buildable parcels, one open space parcel and one remainder parcel) out of this 62 acre site as described in the Project Description section of this report. Each lot in the proposed Tentative Parcel Map complies with all requirements of the zone which is applicable to the individual parcel. The C-2-Q, R-P, 0-S, and L-C zones apply to the property. Each parcel will have a different zoning classification. All proposed lots will front on publicly dedicated streets. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Planning Issues 1. Is the project in conformance with the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone S? DISCUSSION The project is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the southwest quadrant. Because the project is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, administrative revisions to the Zone 5 plan will need to be made to keep the plan up to date. The impacts on public facilities created by the project and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized below: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 bl - /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ I@ 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3, 1991 PAGE 17 Circulation A discussion of the circulation system impacts caused by the project and compliance with the growth management standard is included in the "Project Description and Backgroundt section of this report under the heading of traffic. Iv. ENVIRONMENTAL, REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that the project could have a significant effect on the environment, however, there will not be a significant effect in this case since the mitigation measures described in the initial study have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration was issued on February 28, 1991. This decision was based on the findings of the Environmental Assessment, traffic report, and a field survey by staff. The area of the site proposed to be developed was previously graded pursuant to a pnor environmental analysis. The Conditional Negative Declaration was sent to the State Clearinghouse and a notice was published in the newspaper. No comments have been received to date. GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 9 @ /SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ a 837 - PRICE CLUB APRIL 3,1991 PAGE 18 SUMMARY The proposed project is consistent with all policies and ordinances governing the subject site. The land use plan amendments and zone change comply with all applicable policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program. The project design includes provisions for the future development of two building pads, thereby providing a comprehensive framework for development of the site. Staff therefore, recommends approval of all the previously mentioned actions. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Background Data Sheet 13. Disclosure Form 14. 15. 16. 17. February 28, 1991 DN:rvo Planning Commission Resolution No. 3205 Planning Cornmission Resolution No. 3206 Planning Commksion Resolution No. 3207 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3208 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3209 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3210 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3211 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3212 Location Map 1 - GPA and LCPA Location Map 2 - Zoning Location Map 3 - General Location Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form Letter from Kathy Nishihira of the Price Company dated 1-14-91 Letter from SANDAG dated 1-30-91 Exhibits "A" - "N", dated April 3, 1991 0 uA.ur.unuu~~~ unin oncci 0 CASE NO.: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-l/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837 CASE NAME: Price Club APPLICANT: The Price Companv REQUEST AND LOCATION: GPA and LCPA from PI to RRE on 23.6 acres, Zone Change from P-M-O to C-2-0 on 23.6 acres, Site Development Plan. Conditional Use Permit, and Hillside Development Permit for a 121,388 square foot Price Club Store and two future building Dads. Also proposed is a Minor Subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together With a portion of Lot "Ht of the Rancho Awa Hedionda. Map No. 823, in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego, State of California APN: 211-040-08. 09. 12 (Assessois Parcel Number) Acres 62k Proposed No. of Lots/Units Four lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation PI/TS-O/O-S Density Allowed N/A Existing Zone P-M-O/R-P/O-S/L-C Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Density Proposed N/A Proposed Zone C-2-O/R-P/O-S/L-C zoning Land Use Site P-M-Q/R-P/O-S/L-C Graded site for a business park & undeveloped North E-A/O-S/L-C Anriculture south 0-S/P-c &en Space & Condominiums East L-C Vacant West C-T/R-A-lO/R-P Nurse rvland/ Cal t r ans st o r a ge yard/Office building PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Februarv 13. 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - Negative Declaration, issued - Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, Conditional Negative Declaration dated Februarv 28. 1991 58.6 DN:wo GPA9Ol.bds DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANTS STATEMENT' Of DISCLOSURE Of CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTEREST'S ON ALL APPUCAflONS WHICH WlU RE DISCRRIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CllY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED WARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Aoalicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. e5e.e- 2. Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the propeFty invo The Priro CQmpanv 4649- Mora Blvd, San Dieao. CA 92117 3. if any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, fist th addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning ai interest in the partnership. Sol Price c/o The Price Company 4649 Morena Blvd. San Diego, CA 92117 4. If any person identined pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list tt addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee of the trust. FRh400013 8/90 2075 LaS Palmas Drive Carisbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1 Penon 10 dofind u: 'Any individual, firm. cop~rtnorship. joint vonturo. amocilhon. social club. ftatornd organuahon. corporation estatc roeo~ar, ayndlcato, thia and mny othw county. ce and county. cC rnuniei@&. dirtrid or othu pol&ed urbdiVirc0n. or my other gr combination acting u I unh* - m e THE PRICE COMPANY GEPIERAL INFORMATION DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Sol Price Theodore Wallace Chairman Emeritus Robert E. Price Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer Giies H. Bateman Vice Chairman Director and Executive Vice President Jacklyn M. Horton Director and Executive Vice President Director and Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer (East Coast) F. Anthony Kurtz Executive Vice President Dennis R. Zook Executive Vice President Chief Operating Offcer (West Coast) Neal B. Harris Executive Vice President Don H. Lewis Executive Vice President Mitchell G. Lynn Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer General Counsel Richard M. Libenson Director Paul A. Peterson Director and Secretary Attorney at Law Jerome S. Katzin Investment Banker Hans W. Schoepflin Director Investor . Director coRPoIuTE OFFICES 2657 Ariane Drive P.O. Box 85466 San Diego, CA 92 138 (619) 581-4600 OTHER PRICE CohiPur OPUUTIONS Photo Processing-National City, CA . SHAREHOLDSR/INVESTOR RELATIONS Meat Processing-National City, CA Optical Lab-National City, CA Automotive Centers Price Club Optical Price Club Pharmacy Price Club Furnishings Price CIub Packaging Club Distribution Daniel T. Carter THE PRICE COMPANY P.O. Box 85466 San Diego, CA 92 138 (619) 581-4741 TUNSFER AGE~~AND REGISTRAR First Interstate Bank 707 Wilshire Boulevard (W 1 1-2) INDEPENDENT Amrro~s 501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92101 Los Angeles, CA 9001 7 (213) 614-2362. Ernst & Young The Company was incorporated under the laws of California on February 13, 1976. Its office! are located at 2657 Ariane Drive, San Diego, California 921 17; its telephone number is (619) 5S1 4600. \ 04 dOVKM8EE /lr,my rd& p8tcz COMPW~ HM 4-801 $STO&ICc/OLDERS OF RECORD4 PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: Price Club-GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/ MS 837 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 5 GENERAL PLAN: PI/TS-O/O-S ZONING: P-M-O/R-P/O-S/L-C DEVELOPER'S NAME: The Price Company ADDRESS: P.O. Box 85466, San Dieno, CA 92138 PHONE NO.: 581-4699 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 211-040-08, 09, 12 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 62 acres, 121.388 square feet L @ 0 THE PRICE COMPANY PRICE CLUB@ P.O. BOX 85466 0 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92138 0 (619) 581-4600 January 14, 1991 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Project : GPA 90-1 / LCPA 90-2 / ZC 90-1 / SDP 90-5 / CUP 90 HDP 90-9 RE: PRICE CLUB TRUCK TRAFFIC Price Club truck deliveries are scheduled according to appointme arranged through The Price Company Trafficing Department which a gives directions concerning the required or preferred truck rout a facility. deliveries between 5:OO AM and 12:OO noon made by trucks ranging size from bread vans to 40 ft. semi trailer trucks. On week end there are only bread van deliveries of around 10 per day before noon. On week days there are approx. 40 to 50 truck THE PRICE COMPANY /v 'd Kath Nishihira, Manager Real Estate Development cbad2 3 0 0 _.I San Diego ASSOCIATION C GOVERNMENT5 Suite 800, First Interstate Pla2 401 B Street San Diego, California 92101 (619)595-5300 Fax (619)595- January 30, 1991 .. . Don Neu, Senior Planner City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Dear Mr. Neu: SANDAG staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Price Club. The following comment has not been reviewed by the SANDAG Board of Directors as the Airport Land Use Commission. The proposed plans are consistent with the McClellan-Palomar CLUP. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 595-5372. Thank you for allowing SANDAG to participate in the City’s development review process. Sincerely, ).-pLpc+T- JACK KOEWER Special Projects Director JWcd ..- MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chuia Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas. Escondido, Imperial Beach, L: Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway. San Diego. San Marcos, Santee. Solana Beach, Vista and County Of Sari 0 ADVISORY/LiAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense and Tijuana/Baja Cal Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Holmes called the Meeting to order at 6:OO p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Holmes. ROLL CALL: Present - Chairman Holmes, Commissioners Erwin, Hall, Marcus, McFadden, Schlehuber, and Schramm Staff Members Present: ($pT Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director Robert Green, Principal Planner Don Neu, Senior Planner Bobbie Hoder, Senior Management Analyst Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer Jeffrey Gibson, Associate Planner Alan Sweeney, Associate Planner Adrienne Landers, Senior Planner Bob Johnson, Traffic Engineer Steve Jantz,Aseaciate Engineer David Hauser, Assistant City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED IN THE AGENDA: Dolores Welty, 2076 Sheridan Road, Leucadia, CA 92024, spoke on behalf of Project Future, a regional land planning public interest group, and discussed the approved work plan for the General Plan Review that was approved the previous evening at the City Council meeting. She expressed Project Future's support and discussed the processing of any general plan or local coastal plan amendments in the interim. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES: Chairman Holmes reviewed the Planning Commission procedures on the overhead for the benefit of the audience. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1) HDP 87-1(B) - VON PACKARD - An appeal to the Planning Commission of a Planning Director's decision denying an amendment to a Hillside Development Permit to maintain an existing graded building pad that was not graded in accordance with the original approved Hillside Development Permit HDP 87-1. The property is located Zone 1. at 4435 Sunnyhill Drive in Local Facilities Management Robert Green, Principal Planner, indicated that the applicant has requested a continuance and that Staff supports the request and recommends a two week continuance. Chairman Holmes asked if anyone was present in the audience who wished to speak on this item and was not able to attend on April 17th. No one came forth. Commissioner Schlehuber queried whether there would be an automatic approval if the item was not heard that evening. Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, said that automatic approval was never brought up. In addition, he mentioned it was an amendment thar was currently before the Planning Commission. Motion was duly made, seconded and carried to coctinue Item #l until April 17, 1991. < COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm EXHIBIT f April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 Motion was duly made. seconded and carried to move Item X5 forward in view of the large group of people in attendance for this item. 5) GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90- 9/MS 837 - PRICE CLUB - Request for approval of a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PI to RRE on 23.6 acres, a Zone Change from P-M-Q to C-2-Q on 23.6 acres, a Site Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Hillside Development Permit for a 121,388 square foot Price Club Discount Store containing a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating establishment. Also proposed is a graded pad for a future 15,000 square foot office building and a 5,000 square foot retail building. A minor subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property is also proposed. The project site is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road east of Paseo Del Norte in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Don Neu, Senior Planner, described the location of the property and indicated that it was within the Coastal Zone, with adjacent land uses being the Sea Gate Village Condominium Project on the south, agriculture on the north side of Palomar Airport Road, undeveloped property on the east, and Nurseryland, a Caltrans Storage yard and an office building on the west. Mr. Neu discussed the approvals being requested: A General Plan Amendment from PI to RRE on 23.6 acres; a zone change from PMQ to C-2-Q, also on the same 23.6 acres; a site development plan, conditional use permit and a hillside development permit for 121,388 square feet Price Club discount stare cantaining a tire center, optical center and a small eating establishment in addition to two graded pads for future developent. He indicated thar: the final permit approval being requested is for a minor subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property. He mentioned +tat the property was presently graded and was previously approved for a nine lot industrial subdivision and described what it contained as well as the approval of a signalized intersection on Palomar Airport Road to provide access to the site. He said that an access was previously approved on Pasao Del Norte and also mentioned that regrading of the site would be necessary to accommodate the Price Club. He stated that the site plan features included a loading area at the southern part of the building. There would be a screenwall on both the east and west sides. He also mentioned that there would be a 12 ft. high chain link fence on the southern portion of the property that would have saran screening and be planted with vines to cover that area in an attempt to blend it in with the open space area immediately to the south. He talked about the parking lot and number of parking spaces which exceed the City standards by about 46% and the larger than required planned landscaped area fcr tho property. He then addressed the traffic issues, which he indicated were the primary issue of concern. Mr. Neu indicated that there would be three access points to the project. access would be along Palomar Airport Road at the east end of the project site and would be a signalized intersection. The area immediately to the north would also provide access to the Carlsbad Ranch property when it was to be developed. The second access proposed would be along Palomar Airport Road at the west end of the site immediately adjacent to the Nurseryland property. One of the conditions would provide reciprocal access rights to accommodate future access from The primary COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm MINUTE Q 0 / COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 the Nurseryland property as well as the Caltrans property should it develop with a different use in the future. This second access is a riaht infright out access. The third access would bo from Paseo Del Norte in the southwest corner of the property, and until the 1-5/Palomar Airport RoadfPaseo Del Norte improvements are completed, the access would be gated to restrict it to Price Club deliveries only. Mr. Neu discussed other circulation issues which included conformance with circulation standards of the Growth Palomar Airport Road/I-5 interchange, Paeeo Del Norte/Palomar Airport Road intersection, Palomar Airport RoadfEl Camino Real intersection and Palomar Airport Road east of El Camino Real. The City Council has already approved financing mechanisms for the last two deficiencies and the Price Club would be conditimed to contribute to financing those needed improvements. There would be an addition of a dual left-hand turn lane on three of the legs of the Palomar Airport RoadfPaseo Del Norte intersection. Also, the 1-5 and Palomar Aixyort Road intersection does not meet the adopted performance standard. Mr. Neu pointed out that the Price Club project was contingent upon approval of the Mello-Roo8 District being approved to guarantee financing of needed interchange improvements. A second traffic issue involved the volume of traffic while the I-5fPalomar Airport Road bridge widening project was taking place. The applicant proposed special operation hours in which they would close during the 4-6 p.m. peak hours during the weekdays. Mr. Neu mentioned that they would not be opened during the morning peak hours. Staff required the closing as a proposed mitigation measure. A third traffic issue concern was the temporary and long term increase of traffic on Paeeo Del Norte through a residential area, especially truck traffic. A proposed condition of approval would re6ult in the gating of the access onto Paseo Del Norte point until improvements were completed. 10% of the Price Club traffic would potentially be using this access when the interchange is improved. The fourth issue was the impact of Palomar Airport Road in terms of obstructing eastbound through traffic. This would be addressed by an additional combined acceleration/ deceleration lane along the projects frontage on Palomar Airport Road. Mr. Neu stated that the fifth traffic issue was to provide traffic access to the adjacent properties. He mentioned that he explained this earlier when he described the project. He indicated that the applicant disagreed with proposed Condition X62 of the Site Development Plan, Resolution 3209. The last traffic issue was the potential relocation of Paseo Del Norte easterly through the project site. He said based upon a traffic study commissioned by the City Council that it was determined to not be worthwhile to pursus this matter further. Regarding/environmental determination, staff recommended that a conditional negative declaration be adopted and indicated that no comente were received during the public review Management Program and the problem areas which included the the period, Mr. Neu indicated that they received a letter from tte State which indicated that there were no deficiencies with staff ‘8 determination. Mr. Neu pointed out that additional letters were received from the public since the packets were sent out and that staff proposed additional conditions to the project which were presented to the commissioners this evening. He !!? e MINUTE F COMMISSIONERS Aprrl 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 mentioned that the applicant also disagreed with Condition 161 which required on-site sidewalks along two of the onsite driveways. He indicated staff believed that the project was consistent with the policies and ordinances governing the subject site, the land use plan amendments and zone change comply with all applicable policies of the general plan and local Coastal program, and that the project design included provision for the future development of two building pads. Mr. Neu stated that staff recommended approval of the project. Mr. Ball informed the Planndnt Commissioners that being a member of the ?rice Club was not in legal conflict with voting on this project since there was no source of income, and therefore would be no grounds for withdrawinq from hearing the ites. He did mention that if a Commissioner was Chairman Holres asked if any uf the Commissioners had any problems and no ona indicated any conflict. Mr. Bill Hoffman, Hoffman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, CA 92008, represented the applicant and summarized the history of the project. He indicated that the Price Company had been looking for a site in Carlsbad during the last five%years and that applications were made two times prior to the present application. He stated that the present site was identified by the City for the company to pursue. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the impacts and goals were studied early in the project to identify potential issues and were discussed with both staff and local homeowner groups in the area. He stated that one of the key issues was that of traffic and the impact on the 1-5/Palomar Airport Road interchange and Paseo Del Norte. He indicated that a traffic study was done in addition to the study done by the City and the conclusions included reconmendations and conditions for approval for the Price Club to work at this locacion. Mr. Hoffman said that based upon the homeowner's concerns and findings of the traffic studies, significant revisions were made to the site plan. He explained, while pointing to the map on the screen, the homeowner's concerns about truck traffic which resulted in a redesign of the project where the a shareholder of the Price Clvb that it would be a conflict. trucks could only go north on Paseo Del Norte, He emphasized trucks. He mentioned that the trucks could enter at the secondary access to preclude any left turn movements into the facility off of Paseo Del Norte and would greatly reduce traffic on Paseo Del Norte. Regarding the Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 interchange construction, he stated that this peaked during 5-6 p.m. The Price Company decided that it would close the store from 4-6 p.m. every weekday until full improvements were completed which could be for a period of two years. Mr. Hoffman mentioned that it was impossible to make everyone happy, primarily those people from the Alta Hira subdivision and that others in the vicinity were supportive of the project. Mr. Hoffman indicated that 8600 surveys were sent to members of the Price Club and that 3834 sent back responses, 3814 in favor and 19 opposed. He brought them with him to the meeting and the surveys were given to the Planning Department for their files. He believed that there was significant support of Carlsbad citizens in spite of the area opposition. He stated that they were in agreement with all the conditions of approval with two exceptions: the first one being Condition #62 of Resolution 3209 concerning the site development plan resolution requirement of a reciprocal assess easement for the Caltrans and the Nurseryland property adjacent to the west. was advised by their lawyers that they could have serious that the Price Company would enforce this with their company He indicated chat the Price Company MINUTE f m p COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 liability concerns and asked that this condition be deleted since both companies still had access to public streets. The second condition that the Price Company disagreed with was Condition f67 of Resolution 3209 which required sidewalks to be built along the main entry driveway and on the driveway from Paseo Del Norte. Mr. Hoffman pointed out the required location of the sidewalks on the drawings on the board. He said that these sidewalks were not needed for this type of facility since customers usually required vehicles and since there were no residential units or parking allowed on Palomar Airport Road, he felt that no one would use the pedeetrian access. He indicated that Paseo Del Norte would be drawing traffic into the area and truck area which could present traffic concerns. Other than disagreement with these two conditions, the applicant concurred with the staff report and asked the Planning Commission to adopt staff's recommendation for approval. At this time, questions from the Commissioners were asked of the staff. Commissioner Schlehuber referred to page 5 of the Planning Department's report and wanted to know if calculations were based on the area the Price Club would be occupying or were there other buildings that could have been added. David Hauser, Assistant City Engineer, stated that the maximum potential ADT would be approximately 5600 ADT. Commissioner Marcus wanted to know if a U-turn would be allowed at the signalized Price Club access on Palomar Airport Road by traffic exiting the Nurseryland right injright out only access and would this be an acceptable maneuver. Mr. Hauser responded yes. Commissioner Hall questioned if the size of the parking spaces were 9' wide and he was told they were. Commissioner Hall asked staff to explain what the Palomar overpass would be like when it was completed. lie was told that it would be seven lanes wide. Mr. Hauser pointed to the drawing on the wall and described how the traffic would flow. He indicated the placement of the off-ramps at Commissioner Hall's request. Commissioner Hall inquired as to the distance from the project to the nearest residential unit, and Mr. Neu replied that it was 800 feet from the southeast corner of the Price Club building to'the nearest Sea Gate unit to the south, and 900 feet from the southwest corner of the building to the Sea Gate unit closest to Paseo Del Norte. Commissioner Hall wanted to know how this compared to the May Company. Mr. Neu stated that May Company was 530-600 feet, depending on the portion of the Center that you were looking at to the units that gained access from Hosp Way. Commissioner Schramm asked what the hours of service were for weekdays and weekends. Mr. Neu answered that on Tuesday and Thursday there would be wholesale hours from 10-noon, and regular hours from noon-9; on Monday, Wednesday and Friday from 9-6 and on Sunday the hours would be from 10-5. Mr. Hoffman then indicated that during the 4-6 closing the store would be closed and people would be out of the store. Commissioner Schramm referred to Item 25, Resolution 3212 which indicated that no grading permits or building permits would be issued on the designated remainder parcel without the prior approval of the City and Coastal Commission. She wanted to know if that meant that they could not stockpile. Mr. Neu stated that stockpiling would require grading permits. the hours would be from noon-9, on Saturday it would be open MINUTEP W p April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Erwin wanted to know the mechanics on how the gate would work on Paseo Del Norte with the temporary gate only, how it would be monitored, and whether or not it was a temporary gate. The applicant indicated that the gate was conditioned and that they were planning to keep it indefinitely. Commissioner Erwin asked if the trucks would enter on Palomar Airport Road, drop off their loads and exit by making a right turn only, and Mr. Hoffman replied that they would. Commissioner Erwin asked about the two hour closing. He wanted to know if it meant that by 4:OO the store would be vacated of all customers. Mr. Hoffman said that it would be like the closing at 9:OO pm. be vacated before the 5:OO peak hour traffic. Kathy Nishiria, Manager Real Estate Development of The Price Company, P.O. Box 85466, San Diego, CA 92138, explained that the Price Club would make an announcement that the store was closing in ten minutes and that no customers would be allowed in the store during that last ten minutes. She agreed to close the cash registers during this time. Commissioner Erwin queried staff about the Mello-Roos financing and wanted confirmation that if the financing for the Mello-Roos improvements were not approved, then unless the Price Company could fund these improvements or some other funding device was available, the project could not go ahead. Mr. Neu verified that this was correct and explained that the funding had to be guaranteed for the interchange. Mr. Hoffman indicated that the applicant understood that. Commissioner Erwin asked where the employee parking would be located, and Mr. Hoffman pointed it out on the drawings on the board. He emphasized that the employees could not use Paseo Del Norte to get there. In response to Commissioner Erwin's question as to whether or not there would be a physical barrier to prevent employees from exiting to Paaeo Del Norte other than a threat of punishment, Mr. Hoffman stated that employees were not going to be allowed to exit to Paseo Del Norte. Commissioner Erwin wanted to know about the truck traffic from 5 a.m.-12 noon, and Mr. Hoffman replied that trucks were scheduled and would not be coming in groups because the loading docks would not be able to accommodate groupe of trucks at one time. Commissioner Erwin asked what would be done to mitigate the noise level from the off loading activity at 5-6 a.m. Mr. Hoffman indicated that the loading area would be at a lower level elevation with block walls with vines which would reduce the noise. Commissioner McFadden asked staff to explain the permitted uses in a planned industrial zone. Mr. Neu listed the various types of uses, including research and testing facilities, a variety of manufacturing, storage, wholesale and distribution facilities as well as various administrative offices. In response to Commissioner McFadden's query about the permitted use in a C-2 zone which was what the.applicant was requesting it to be changed to, Mr. Neu listed all retail and wholesale uses, auto repairing, and basically the full range of commercial facilities such as printing shops, upholstery, etc. Commissioner McFadden brought up the subject of an office park being constructed in the future and stated that she thought people did not understand what the zone meant and that an office park was not included. This would allow the store to MINUTEP w p COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 Commissioner McFadden asked if there would be any delivery trucks during the time the store would be shut from 4-6; that nothing would go in and out, and she was told that was correct. Commissioner McFadden wanted to know about the vacant future building pad and whether anything would be allowed to go on the vacant portion of the property until the 1-5/Palomar Airport Road interchange was completed. She queried whether the applicant would accept the wording that they would not sublet it to Christmas tree lots that did not need development, and the applicant agreed. Commissioner McFadden expressed concern about the large building being at the end of the property and said that some people would be walking two city blocks to get to that building from the parking lot. She stated that she felt there was a need for sidewalks plus an additional one at the east side of the right in/right out only driveway access, especially since there was a focus for employees and shoppers to use mass transit. Mr. Hoffman explained that the applicant's main concern was the expense which would result in very little use. He said they were not trying to go away from the desires of public transportation but from a practical matter did not feel that sidewalks would be used and would therefore like to have the sidewalks deleted, if possible. When Commissioner McFadden asked if the applicant could live with the sidewalks, Mr. Hoffman responded that they could. Commissioner McFadden queried whether the applicant had spoken with various homeowner groups and asked if their concerns were addressed. Mr. Hoffman replied that they thought they were and that the concerns involved Palomar Airport Road/I-5 and Paseo Del Norte. recognized that they conld not solve everything but did as much as possible. He further indicated that a lot of people who were originally opposed have changed their views since they made the changes but that did not include everyone, especially the core of Alta Mira residents. Commissioner McFadden referred to Condition 1.62 and asked Mr. Ball about conditions maCa on other projects and wanted to know why there was such a liability to this particular project . Mr. Ball responded by saying that it was possible that the applicant miscomprehended what was being proposed because it was part of a plan for better access at this site rather than presenting any additional liability problems and explained why. He further stated that these conditions would improve He explained that they the overall traffic and asked for clarification from the engineering department. Mr. Hauser pointed to the drawing on the board and said that normally they would bring a public road in. He said the easements would improve overall circulation for the properties and would not be that nuch of a detriment to the Price Company property. Commissioner McFadden asked Mr. Eoffman if they would reconsider opposing Condition #62 and Mr. Hoffman reiterated that they would not since they were advised by legal counsel that there was a liability problem. He clarified that he did not understand the depth of the legal issue and that he understood the rationale that Mr. Hauser explained but it was a legal issue rather than a planning issue. At this time he was not prepared to withdraw the opposition to that condition. Chairman Holmes asked Mr. Hoffman to compare the San Marcos facility to the proposed Carlebad property, and Mr. Hoffman explained that the Carlsbad one would be larger by 15,000 square feet. MINUTES 0 F April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Chairman Holmes discussed his problem with closing from 4-6, which included the fact that customers who had been standing told to get out of the building. address this issue. Mr. Hoffman said that it would be temporary until the full improvements were made and that the Price Company was willing to live with it to help alleviate the traffic problems. Chairman Holmes wanted to know if the Price Company was able to control truck deliveries from all over the country and he was told by the applicant that they could. ne wanted to know about the possibilities of having trucks come in during the evening hours, and Mr. Hoffman explained why that was not feasible. He added that this has been a successful formula for the Price Company in the past. In reply to Chairman Holmes' question regarding the number of trucks that were expected at the Carlsbad facility, Mr. Hoffman stated 40-50. Chairman Holmes calculated it to be one every 8.4 minutes. Commissioner Erwin stated that the parking was 46% more than required and expressed his concern that in Orange County there were always large parking lots and that when they were built on, the parking spaces were reduced. He wanted assurance that the parking would be used for that sole purpose on their project. Mr. Hoffman said that the property would be developed further on another portion of the site after the freeway improvements were completed and that they would keep parking in in line at the registers would be very unhappy if they were He asked Mr. Hoffman to perpetuity. He pointed out that this was subject to approval of the Planning Comisaion if the applicant wanted to make any changes. Commissioner Erwin mentioned that it was a plus that they were planning extra parking since this was always a problem at the various Price Clubs. He expressed concern that they would come back in later years. Mr. Hoffman indicated that the parking problems at San Marcos would be alleviated with another Price Club in North County. Commissioner Erwin expressed concern about the scheduling time of the sweeper for cleaning the parking lots, since they could be very noisy. Commissioner Schlehuber raised questions on the applicant's concern about the entrance proposed west of the entrance on Palomar Airport Road and that the applicant felt that Nurseryland should have its own entrance, but Commissioner Schlehuber reminded the applicant that they normally want to cut the amount of entrances rather than increase them. Mr. Hoffman replied that he could not explain the legal point of view. Comissioner Schlehuber asked staff if the Nurseryland people could get out on a signalized intersection and whether the frontage road to avoFd coming through the parking lot. He 20' area in the Nurseryland area would ever be used as a described an example where people from Nurseryland could cut through the Price Club parking lot and get out to the signalized exit which would require them to go through a maze. He said that this may be the time to look at a frontage road and get other people out to the signalized intersection rather then sending them through the parking lot. Mr. Hauser explained that they would not like to get into a redesign of the project and discussed other problems that could arise. Comissioner Schlehuber queried the applicant on the proposed exit at Paseo Del Norte and asked what would be the a MINUTEJ u COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9 possibility of slanting it to make it more than a 900 turn so that there would be no chance for anyone to make a left turn. Mr. Hoffman deferred that question to staff. RECESS Chairman Holmes declared a recess at 7:15 p.m., and the Commission re-convened at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Holmes explained that he wanted to ensure that all points of view were covered and asked the audience to avoid repeating the same points. Charlene Larsen, 901 A Caminto Estrada, Carlsbad, CA 92009 indicated that she wished to speak as a resident and voter only and that if she did not address all the issues, others could speak after she was finished. She expressed objections to the increased traffic on Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airport Road and excess congestion in the residential area. She said it would be like the Indy 500 race track in your front yard and a concrete parking lot and warehouse in your back yard. She discussed the cost to widen the intersection and said that it would be 10-11 years before the City realized any profit from the project. Ms. Larsen indicated she received a phone call that day from business from Carlsbad merchants. she also addressed the water conservation issue and wanted to know where they would get their water for the trees. She would rather see the money that it would cost the City to bring the Price Club to Carlsbad go towards the goal of furnishing reclaimed water to Carlsbad residents. Ms. Larsen expressed her opinion that the 4-6 closing was ridiculous and that she felt the company would find ways to get around them. She described the traffic congestion at 5:15 p.m. in the area that evening and said that with the Price Club at the Carlsbad location it would get much worse. Ms. Larsen explained that it was very difficult to turn off of Paseo Del Norte at the present time and that traffic would come from Alga Road to Paseo Del Norte from a number of ways. She discussed the surveys sent out by the Price Club and felt that they were misworded since they were told to return it only if they were for the project. She also mentioned that 5000 were not returned. Jan Stovall, 812 Caminito Del Reposo, Carlsbad, Ca 92008, discussed her concern about Alga Road. She said there was no mention of the additional traffic from Alga Road now that it is a through road; there was no mention of Home Depot being built on the property to add to the additional traffic; and that she was concerned about off street parking and bike small merchants who felt that the Price Club would take away lanes that would be lost on Paseo Del Norte, She also asked for additional information on the Mello-Rooe vote in June and where individual voters can input their feelings on that. Dan Seach, 6531 Camino Del Parque, Carlsbad, CA 92008, discussed his opinion about the 4-6 closure. whether the Price Company was trying to buy a piece of property on 6020 Avenida Encinas and whether there was another piece of real estate involved. Gary Maple, 900 Caminito Madrigal, Carlsbad, CA 92008, talked about the 1991 fall opening of the Price Club and the fact that the bridge was scheduled to be completed in about two years. He quoted average daily traffic figures of 7500 in 1989 on Paseo Del Norte, 10,600 in 1990 and in 1993 the maximum allowed would be exceeded for a secondary arterial without Price Club's impact. He indicated that it was difficult at the present time to merge left from Caminito Madrigal to Paseo Del Norte, which created a safety problem. He questioned MINUTE@ 0 p ( April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Drake LaFace! 097 Caininito Del Mar, Carlebad, CA 92008, stated that on Palomar Airport Road there were beautiful industrial parks with high tech companies, engineering firms, etc. He suggested that the El Camino Real shopping area would be a better site for the Price Club and explained why. Mark Benson, 3812 Sierra Morena, Carlsbad, CA 92008, represented local merchants who did not agree with the Price Club’s method of doing business and did not want the company in the community. He felt that it would create problems for the Carlsbad Village and for other merchants in other coastal towns. He said that the real issues were ethical issues and discussed the people who would be affected. Mr. Benson asked the Planning Commission to consider the long term implications upon the merchants, the businessmen, the employees of Carlsbad, their families and their children. Alice Ross, 828 Caminito Verde, Carlsbad, CA 92008, commented that she felt this was a most unacceptable project and did not want it. Minnie Knych, 902H Caminito Madrigal, Carlsbad, CA 92008, the Price Club opening, and had several concerns about the proposed construction of Price Club on the property adjacent to Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte, specifically the traffic along Paseo Del Norte. She quoted traffic figures for the street in 1989, 1990 and future projections without the construction of the Price Club and said that the street already needed traffic mitigation. Ms. Knych stated that residents of more than 4000 homes used Paseo Del Norte as a major access route to Carlsbad and discussed daily traffic without construction of a Price Club. She explained why it was dangerous to turn left on Paseo Del Norte and expressed her concerns that people would use Paseo Del Norte to get to the site. Florence Weiss, 6740 Camino Del Prado, Carlsbad, CA 92008, discussed the park being planned on Paseo Del Norte which would also have exits and entrances on Paseo Del Norte. She said that it was not necessary for the Price Club to be near a freeway and discussed other Price Club locations. Edward Miller, 9008 Caminito Madrigal, Carlsbad, CA 92008, discussed the arrangement of the Price Club as a membership only department store and that it did not depend on walk-in traffic for ita business. He stated that he did not think it had to be located on a busy main arterial road since members would go to the nearest Price Club to do their business. said that she waa concerned about the prapoaed schedule for Alain Blanc, Carlabad Stationers, 560 Grand Avenue, Carlebad, CA 92008, commented on his major concern that the Price Club as a wholesaler to the public put small businesses out of business. He stated that the taxes they would bring to the City would be those taxes that the small business owners made. He felt that the parking problem with the San Marcos location should not be solved by the City of Carlsbad. Sue Ellisor, 6560 Camino Del Parque, Carlsbad, CA 92008, indicated that her front door was 18 feet off Paseo Del Norte and that at the present time she could not keep her front door open because of the noise. She invited anyone from the Price Club to sleep in her den at 5:OO a.m. when the trucks came through, and expressed concern about the noise factor. Jane Beaver, 6677A Paseo Del Norte, Carlsbad, CA 92008, indicated that she was on the endangered species list if the Price Club was located on the property. Colleen Holloway, 6673D Paseo Del Norte, Carlsbad, CA 92008, discussed the parking problems on Paseo Del Norte and the fact that it would be changed to no parking. She indicated that the parking allocations at the residences are now against City code, however complied when they were built and that the residents were told they could use the street for parking. They were advised that the parking lanes would be MINUTE Q 0 y April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION removed and Paseo Del Norte would be restriped to four lanes which would create prOblemE for the reSident8 in the area. Beverly Richardson, 814 Caminito Azul, Carlsbad, CA 92008, expressed concern about a mass exodus at 4:OO from the Price Club into traffic and back into the entrance between 5-6 when the Price Club reopened. Nancy Maple, 900E Caminito Madrigal, Carlsbad, CA 92008, talked about her concern that the trucks coming in and out of the facility between 5:OO a.m. and 12 noon would be coming out during early morning rush hour. She stated that the trucks would take two lanes before they pulled into the right lane and compound the traffic already in existence. Jim Knych. 902 W Caminito Madrigal, Carlabad, CA 92008, stated that the Price Club may be good neighbors but would bring a lot of traffic. He mentioned that the gating was discussed at meetings with homeowner groups and that they were told the gating was permanent but now were told the gates would be temporary. Mr. Knych requested that if this was passed that the Planning Commission should require permanent gating, and that it was the reason some people who were previously opposed to the project were now supporting it. He indicated that the Price Club would lose a lot of business in closing their store from 4-6 and that the store closure would make conditions worse. Nancy Comvertino, Alta Mira 4, Carlsbad, CA 92008, discussed the club house across the street on Paseo Del Norte and explained how it was difficult to cross safely at the present time. She was concerned that it would be much worse when the Price Club was in. Chairman Holmes asked for hands of opposition and was informed that there were more opponents outside. He then asked a representative of the audience who was in favor of the project to speak. Bailey Noble, 5470 LOB Robles Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, represented the Terramar Association and referred to an article in the Blade-Citizen on April 2nd. He mentioned that people kept demanding more and more services. He described the area when he first moved here and suggested that people look at the alternatives if the Price Club was not developed on the site. Mr. Noble addressed the problems with Palomar Airport Road and how it was difficult to turn and how people would use the freeway and Palomar Airport Road. He discussed meetings with the homeowner's associations and the Price Company earlier this year and said that the hoxeowners voted in favor of the project with proper traffic mitigation. He explained that over 8600 Carlsbad residents donated to the San Marcos treasury by shopping there and that this location would help reduce traffic along Highway 78. He also mentioned that he was not a member of the Price Club and had never seen any delivery trucks when he drove an elderly lady to the San Marcos store. Cindy Ward, 937 Begonia Court, Carlsbad, CA 92008, talked about the Price Club and what it meant to her and that she felt that a Price Club hysteria had developed. She indicated that she never noticed any problems with trucks nor experienced any severe traffic problems going in and out of the Price Club. She felt that people who lived through the neighborhood were the ones traveling on Paseo Del Norte and discussed traffic routing through the area and how she felt indicated that it wae not a private street. Ms. Ward the problems would be resolved. She stated her belief that Carlebad should get the revenue instead of the other cities and that it would be a benefit to the City of Carlsbad. MINUTE P e F COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 12 Robert Imler, 7723 Anillo Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008, mentioned that he was a resident of Carlsbad for the past fifteen years and that he fully supported all the Planning Department's findings and recommendations. He felt that mitigation measures proposed more than adequately addressed the legitimate concerns of the neighbors to the south and suggested that the willingness to close at 4-6 showed a responsible corporate neighbor. He discussed the tangible elements of life and the fact that it was expensive to develop and maintain. He said that these elements were supported by one form of taxation or another, and described them. the City. Bruce Kopcso, 3970 Gloria Lane, Carlsbad, CA 92008, indicated that he was a member of the Price Club for many years and that in an individual survey that he took among his clients who were small business owners, almost all were in favor of the project. He said that he would like to see the Price Club in Carlsbad and that it would lessen the traffic commute on Highway 78. He felt that it would broaden the tax base in the City and that it would be cleaner and less noisy than many industrial areas. He said that the benefits outweighed other factors that existed and that the traffic problems would be resolved. Robert Meyer, 7133 Linden Terrace, Carlsbad, CA 92008, represented the Sea Cliff Homeowners Association and said that the group supported the conveniences and increased tax base of Carlsbad. They recognized the increased traffic problems but indicated that they would accept it. He felt that it was a prime piece of property which should be developed and recommended approval. lots of money improving Palomar Airport Road, he felt that residents should be diverted to Carlsbad instead of to San Marcos. Don Schempp, President of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce, 5411 Avenida Encinas, Suite 100, Carlsbad, CA 92008, read a letter of support for the project. Bohlmann should be contacted for further information. Lee Bohlmann, 1535 Sunrise Circle, Carlsbad, CA 92008, represented the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce. She stated that their members were surveyed and that they were aware that not everyone wanted to purchase bulk amounts and that they provided a different kind of service than the Price Club provided. She also mentioned that the small businesses would buy more supplies from the Price Club if they were located in Carlsbad. The Chamber asked San Marcos about the impact on small businesses in their area and was told that there had been an increase in small business growth. She discussed taxable sales and the growth management plan. Ms. Bohlmann emphasized that the bridge will be paid for by owners in zone 5 and not by the residents and that the Price Club would add a great deal to the taxable sales base. She referred to the traffic issue and said that there would only be a temporary inconvenience until the overpass is completed. She complimented staff on their report and mentioned she was encouraged about the employment of 250 employees, and encouraged approval of the project. He felt that the Price Club should be sought out by Since Carlsbad spent He indicated that Lee Chris Calkins, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, CA 92008, Price Club. maintained and discussed why the location of the Price Club was important. Mr. Calkins stated that the company could provide a tax base and that the deficiencies of the circulation system would be corrected. He mentioned that it was important from a planning point of view as well as a fiscal point of view and stated that he believed the Price Club would be in support of businesses that existed in the area and discussed why. He thought that the traffic issues were addressed and that the Price Club would be an enhancement to the community. manager of Carltae Company, discussed his support of the He explained that a commercial core should be 0 MINUTE@ u April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Joseph Onder, 3430 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, CA the people would have to accept gomething else in the future for a project on that site. RECESS Chairman Holmes declared a recess at 8:35 p.m., and the Commission re-convened at 8:45 p.m. Mr. Hoffman was given a chance to respond on behalf of the applicant and said that he believed that the 4-6 closing would work. IIe felt that traffic wsuld be mitigated during the peak traffic time, and that in regard to the competition issue, he felt that competition was healthy. Ee clarified that the new bridge at 1-5 would be paid for by new development in the entire City of Carlsbad with the Mello- Roos financing and not by existing taxpayers. He also stated that Paseo Del Norte was the key concern and said that based upon every traffic study that had ever been done, it would still work in the worst case. He realized the concern about the traffic and pointed out that they were eliminating the access from Paseo Del Norte for all customer traffic by limiting it to a right turn out only for trucks moving north. Mr. Hoffman declined the invitation by an audience member to 92008, indicated that if the project was turned down, then and would probably make the same arguments at a later date sleep in her den and etated that Price Club trucks would not be driving by her house. He mentioned that the opposition was one of a local nature and that the majority of citizens in Carlsbad would be in support of the project. Commissioner Erwin said that he was still concerned about the noise impact of trucks in the morning on the Sea Gate project and wanted to know if there was a Plan B mitigation in case Plan A noise mitigation did not work. Mr. Hoffman expressed his willingness to entertain suggestions and mentioned possibly putting up a solid block wall. Commissioner Erwin replied that it might be considered as a condition. Commissioner Schlehuber expressed concern that if it came through and a gate did not end up a gate five years from now, he would prefer having the access heading to the north instead of 90°. Mr. Hoffman said if there was concern about the gate being removed, that the applicant had no intention of removing the gate and would agree to a condition to make sure that the gate remained there. Commissioner Schlehuber asked staff about looking at the 4-6 closing hours and asked if it was not working, could it be dependency on hypothetical traffic patterns. Mr. Hoffman responded that the Price Company would control the people and were willing to work with the staff to make sure that the people were out of there by 4:OO. He said that they could possibly prevent people from getting in line at a certain time. Commissioner Schlehuber queried about the closing time of the entrance, and Mr. Hoffman said that they were willing to work with staff on that issue. Mr. Hoffman pointed out the location of the gate in response to Commissioner McFadden's request. Commissioner McFadden also asked about the proposed office building and Mr. Hoffman indicated that there would be another access point which would come off from Paseo Del Norte. changed to 3:30, and described his concerns and the MINUTEQ a p COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 14 Commissioner Hall asked Mr. Hauser to respond to Commissioner Schlehuber's question. Mr. Hauser said that the access brought in by the Price Company was an angle out only drive way. The Price Company was requested by the Engineering Department that there be an access with left turns infleft turns out and right turns and opened up to the full general public. He explained that at buildout the Paseo Del Norte/Palomar Airport Road intersection would operate at lower levels of acceptability and that the Paseo Del Norte access will provide some relief. Mr. Hauser also stated that traffic volumes on Paseo Del Norte would be the same regardless of whether or not the Paseo Del Norte access was open or closed. He also discussed the closure and said that a quick analysis was done on the buildout condition which showed that the Paseo Del Norte/Palomar Airport Road intersection would still be at an acceptable level of service if the Paseo Del Norte access were closed. He emphasized that the traffic would not change significantly with closure. He indicated staff's preference would be to open it up and explained why. Commissioner Hall asked about the matrix of the southwest quadrant and asked Mr- Hauser to explain how College dropped down and would eventually happen. Mr. Hauser responded referring to the map on the wall. explained what the area would look like in the future and described the traffic patterns. Commissioner Hall stated that traffic today was not what it would be in five years and that he thought the problem of Paseo Del Norte would be alleviated in time with the 1-5 interchange. He indicated that he could sympathize with what people would have to go through but that when the project was completed, there would probably be a different traffic pattern. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. Chairman Holmes stated that staff and/or the applicant would respond to questions from the Commissioners. Chairman Holmes asked about Alga Road traffic. Mr. Hauser explained that the traffic study was analyzed at the 1991 conditions and at buildout conditions and that they did take into consideration traffic from Alga and Poinsettia. driveways and intersections along there but they would occur whether or not the Price Company project went in. He described the increase in traffic. Chairman Holmes requested staff to address how the project would affect other merchants, and Mr. Wayne replied that staff was not qualified or prepared to respond to the question but that the Chamber president and directors had already responded to that directly. Chairman Holmes questioned about eliminating the parking on Paseo Del Norte and Mr. Hauser said that this project would not have any effect over what was going to happen with the striping on Paseo Del Norte. He described Paseo Del Norte and said that if traffic backed up overall, not just from this project but from other developments in the area, it may be necessary to change the striping pattern. He cited La Costa Avenue as an exmple. Chairman Holmes expressed concern about the gate on Paseo Del Norte. Mr. Wayne stated that when the project was conditioned, the design of the gate was not settled on and that it must be approved by the City Engineer. would be operational for exiting delivery trucks and would be in place until the City Engineer determines that construction of the interchange inprovements were completed. He He said there may be operational problems because of existing The gate April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Schlehuber asked about watering, and Mr. Neu responded that the Water District indicated we are still in Stage 5 30% cutback which meant that no new meters for grading or construction would be allowed to be issued. He said development projects for construction purposes would have to use non-potable water and that the requirements of the project would be those of the current stage of alert when pernits were requested in order for construction to proceed. He also said that in terms of whether a new project could be developed and have a future drain on water reserves that the project must submit a proposal to the Water District showing how they would offset increased demands. Commissioner Schlehuber queried whether or not the landscaping would be drought tolerant, and Mr. Neu said that it was a condition placed on the project and that the final systems. require landscaping to be in initially. Commissioner Erwin asked if the exterior was plumbed for reclaimed water, and Mr. Neu responded it was one of the conditions but that it may not be available. Commissioner Schramm mentioned that someone questioned the park and traffic constraints on it, and Mr. Hauser indicated that he did not believe that this had been analyzed with this project. He said that the park was currently in the preliminary planning phases and that there may be an access onto Paseo Del Norte from the park site. He further stated that as the project came through there would have to be an environmental review and analysis. Commissioner Schramm wanted to know if anyone would be monitoring the success of the store closing between 4-6, and Mr. Wayne replied that staff was not required to monitor it, but the condition could be modified to include it. Commissioner Schramm asked about staff keeping an eye on it if did not work, and Mr. Wayne responded that once the applicant complied with all the conditions and they were operational, there was only an enforcement of existing conditions and suggested that the Commission may want to dedgn would be far a drought tolerant landscaping with drip He added the possibility that they might not consider something that allowed for the monitoring of the hours of closure. Commissioner Schramm asked if staff would recommend it and Mr. Wayne said that he thought it was a good idea to provide flexibility in both directions. Commissioner Schramm expressed her concern and said that she would like to have something like that. Commissioner Hall asked staff to address the issue of Mello- ROOS and explain who could vote on it and who was responsible. Mr. Wayne explained that the Mello-Roos process was a vacant land tax which would be a self-imposed tax that would not be placed on existing developments but on vacant lands that would be developed in the future. Commissioner Marcus stated that most of her questions had been answered and wanted to know if the traffic impact on Paseo Del Norte if the gate remained closed would be significant. Mr. Wayne said that the opening or closure of that access point would not make that much of a difference in the impact to Paseo Del Norte. He said traffic was generated by people who were living in that particular area of the City. Commissioner Marcus asked if it did remain closed, what impact would it have on the intersection and 1-5. Mr. Hauser Palomar Airport Road at Paseo Del Nofte. said if it remained closed there would be some impact to Commiseioner Marcus wanted to know what the traffic study showed, and Mr. Hauser replied that the traffic study did not address that but the Engineering Department did an analysis COMMISSIONERS 5 0 MINUTE@ F COMMISSIONERS Page 16 April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION that day on the intersection at a buildout condition and it showed there was a lessening of the level within the level but it did not drop significantly. Commissioner Schlehuber indicated that someone mentioned pedestrian crossing over to the recreation hall. to know whether there were plans in the future for some type of crossing. plans but pointed out that residents could go before the Traffic Safety Commission to discuss their concerns. He wanted Mr. Hauser did not think that there were any Commissioner Schlehuber asked if a crossing signal for pedestrians could be put in if there were any problems and Mr. Hauser replied that if it was found to be warranted, a study would have to be done. Commissioner Schlehuber talked about the curving area and asked if the City was looking at it in the future. Mr. Hauser assured him that the traffic engineer was always looking at it. Commissioner Schlehuber discussed the analysis on the left turn and right turn if the north lane did not come at a 90° angle, and then later determined that there should be a right turnlleft turn lane later on and asked if there would be an easement large enough to go back and make it a left turnlright turn. Mr. Hauser responded that it could be engineered either way. Commissioner McFadden referred to the speaker who asked about the truck turning radius out of the connection to Paseo Del Norte. She wanted to know if it was adequate as it is engineered at the present time, and Mr. Hauser said it was as proposed on the project plans. Commissioner McFadden asked about remedying existing housing units which were underparked by todays standards, and Mr. Hauser pointed out that it was an operational problem unrelated to this project. If traffic approached levels where the City Engineer felt it needed to go to four lanes they could possibly eliminate the bike lanes in order to keep the parking. He mentioned there were various alternatives and options that could be looked at. Commissioner McFadden referred to discussion on water usage and asked staff to confirm that the water usage would be 12,892 gallons per day. Mr. Wayne responded that was correct as indicated on the sheet. In response to Commissioner McFadden's query, he stated that this amount included reclaimed water. Commissioner McFadden asked for confirmation that it was a condition of the subdivision that they would get the water only if it was available, and Mr. Wayne responded that she was correct. Mr. Hauser further explained the water figures generated by the project and said that the figure looked at was for a retail store but that this facility would be different and would probably only use about 1,000 gallons per day. Commissioner McFadden had questions about the reciprocal access, Condition #62 on resolution 3209, and said that she thought that the second one might be eliminated. Mr. Hauser said that they were asking the applicant that the City have the ability to maintain the option but did not think the applicant would do it. condition that said that at such time as these easements be a sharing of the insurance and maintenance of these He mentioned that they could add a would be utilized for any other development that there would easements. Mr. Hoffman indicated that they definitely did not want to continue the project on that issue. Commissioner Erwin mentioned that several psople indicated that limits would be exceeded on Paseo Del Norte as a secondary arterial if this project or another project came in 1 Page I' COMMISSIONERS $ April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION sometime in the future. Bob Johnson, Traffic Engineer, stated that there may be an increase in traffic volumes until the buildout circulation roadway is reached. the volumes should decrease to the lower limit of a secondary arterial to about 10,200. At that time Commissioner schlehuber asked if the Price Company accepted all the conditions, and Mr. Hoffman responded that they did. Commissioner Erwin then expressed his personal comments. He said that he would vote in favor of the project with several restrictions. was a cash cow and that was the reason he wanted it. He indicated that he was concerned about the impact on the people in Carlsbad, including the traffic on Paseo Del Norte and therefore could only support the project if there was a condition that there would be a right turn only and that it would be gated permanently. Commissioner Erwin indicated that he would like a condition Plan B for mitigating noise on the truck problem in the morning on the people at Sea Gate and that he requested a condition that stated there would be a sound attenuation wall placed between the Price Club and the Sea Gate project that would be approved by the Planning Director. He mentioned the hours of sweeping and said they should restrict the hours of sweeping of the back of the facility to no earlier than 7:30 to 8:OO a.m. in the morning. He added that he could agree with adding a sidewalk on the west side and that he was in support of the other conditions added to the project. He said that he desired the project because it Commissioner schramm said that she would like to add a condition that there would be a two way communication between the Price Club and staff if the 4-6 closing did not work. Mr. Wayne suggested that this was a site development plan and could be subject to an amendment. would work. He said that this one condition was one of the major conditions of the project that deals with traffic mitigation and should warrant a public hearing process. Wayne suggested that the condition remain as it was and could be amended if necessary. Mr. Ball stated that he would suggest that it be changed so that the wording would state that the Price Club should be closed for business from 4-6 p.m. or such other time after hearing as determined by the Planning Commission. He discussed what would happen to the recommendztion when it went to the City Council. Commissioner Schramm expressed her alreewent with that. Commissioner Hall said that he could suaprt the project and that he did not think he had to go into detail. Comqissioner Marcus indicated that she could support the project. Commissioner Schlehuber stated that he could support the original exit to go north out rather than 900. He also mentioned that sidewalks from Paseo Del Norte up into the project were necessary and explained why. He mentioned that it was the Price Club's duty to put in future easements and cut out accesses on Palomar Airport Road. He further stated that he supported Commissioner Schramm'a amendment dealing with time. Commissioner Marcus said that she was having problems with the sidewalk and asked if someone said that it was not safe because trucks would be corning in and out and going to the back of the building where the trucks would be located. Hauser responded that this was mentioned by the applicant. He explained how this Mr. project with all items diecussed but that he still wanted the Mr. MINUT& e Page 18 p t COMMISSIONERS April 7, 1991 PLANNING COHMISSION He indicated that the gate would prevent vehicles but not increased safety when there were other vehicles. pedestrians from entering at that point and that a sidewalk Commissioner McFadden explained that she would vote in favor of the project with the conditions mentioned. She did not think there should be a permanent gate and that if improvements were made to the intersection, they might be sorry that it was in place. She mentioned that if it did not work, then it could be changed at a later time. Regarding the right turn only, Commissioner McFadden said that she did not think it was necessary. If the applicant was willing to do it later on, she wanted it to go in but she did not know whether it made sense. She also liked the sound attenuation for Sea Gate, hours of operation, hours of sweeping, sidewalk along the east side of the westerly driveway going on to Palomar Airport Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and wanted to add something to Condition 162 regarding wording on the easements which stated that they would contribute to maintenance and insurance with development of the other properties. She also commented that the Planning Commission had never had an economic analysis of the land use element to advise the Planning Commission on these matters. When the General Plan was reviewed, there would be an economic analysis and then the people would have something to speak to on the subject. Chairman Holmes stated that he would play the devil's advocate in that he wanted the Price Club but that this proposal was not in the right location. Commissioner Schramm said that she could support the project with the conditions added to it which included keeping the gate open after the bridge was built and then doing a test on it at that time. She also supported the sidewalk going in on the left side of Paseo Del Norte, and the items that Commissioner Erwin included in it. Commissioner Erwin expressed his concern that the Price Company made a pledge to the community to make the gate permanent and that he would support a permanent gate. Commissioner Hall said that he agreed with Mr. Erwin and that in 5-10 years they could call for a new hearing. He would like to see the applicant agree to it. Commissioner Schramm said she did not mind if the gate was opened later. Mr. Wayne said that he did not know at this point that there might be a need for the gate in the future, and that the City Attorney's suggested wording referring to the closing time could be placed on the gate at Paseo Del Norte so that if the City wanted the gate removed, they would have the ability to bring it back. Commissioner Schramm asked if it was correct that even if the gate was closed that they could have it changed later and Mr. Wayne said that this could be done through the amendment process. It was also suggested by Mr. Hauser that the Commission could add a condition that would require the trucks to go in that direction and he explained why. He suggested that they add the wording that the Price Club trucks utilize the access routes as provided which was Palomar Airport Road for entry and out (right only) on Paseo Del Norte. Commissioner Schlehuber said that he wculd support what was said but he felt an easier way was to change the zngle too for them to go right. Page I' April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION A motion was made by Commissioner Erwin that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolutions X3205 recommending approval of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3206, 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211 and 3212 recommending approval of GPA 90-1fLCPA 90-2fZC 90-1fSDP 90- 5fCUP 90-3/BDP 90-9/MS 831 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein with the following amendments and conditions: 1. Sidewalks will be added to the east side of the western entry drive from Palomar Airport Road to the Price Club. That the hours of sweeping at the rear of the structure will be after 7:30 a.m. All trucks departing the Price Club at the rear turning 2. 3. out onto Paseo Del Norte will make a right turn to avoid the southern part of Paaeo Del Norte. 4. The gate will be erected permanently and it will be a right turn out only. There would be sound mitigation in case the original mitigation is not effective that will be in the form of a noise attenuation wall at the discretion or approval of the Planning Director. 6. Resolution 3209, Condition f59 in reference to the hours, the following clause that was added by the City Attorney stating hours or at the discretion of the Planning Commission on hours. I. Resolution 3209, Condition f62 would share maintenance and insurance costs at such time as the properties are developed. 8. Additional set of conditions listed as Price Club conditions which were distributed by staff. 5. Commissioner Marcus asked if the gate would be included and Commissioner Erwin said that the permanently closed gate would never be reviewed. The motion was seconded, Commissioner Schlehuber asked for clarification that if the property were to come back, could it still come back at anytime because the conditions were changed regardless of whether or not the gate was permanent. Mr. Ball responded that he was correct. Commissioner McFadden asked if the City could ask it to come back but that maybe in the future the City might like it done, and she was =old that it could not. Commissioner Schlehuber said that he would like to give the City more flexibility and withdrew his second. The motion failed for lack of a second. Commissioner HcFadden asked Commissioner Erwin if he would accept an amendment to the motion and Commissioner Erwin said that he would not since the company made a pledge to the community. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolutions #3205 recommending approval of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3206, 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211 and 3212 recommending approval of GPA 90-11LCPA 90-2fzC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837 baaed on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein with the following amendments and conditions: COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm Page 20 April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Sidewalks will be added to the east side of the western entry drive from Palomar Airport Road to the Price Club. 2. That the hours of sweeping at the rear of the structure will be after 7:30 a.m. 3. All trucks departing the Price Club at the rear turning out onto Paseo Del Norte will make a right turn to avoid the southern part of Paseo Del Norte. The gate will be erected permanently unless removed by 4. 5. There would be sound mitigation in case the original formal amendment and it will be a right turn out only. mitigation is not effective that will be in the form of a noise attenuation wall at the discretion or approval of the Planning Director. 6. Resolution 3209, Condition X59 in reference to the hours, the following clause that was added by the City Attorney stating hours or at the discretion of the Planning Commission on hours. I. Resolution 3209, Condition P62 would share maintenance and insurance costs at such time as the properties are developed. 8. Additional set of conditions listed as Price Club conditions which were distributed by staff. 9. Vacant building pads could not be subleased. Chairman Holmes read a statement that the Planning Commission's action would be a recommendation to the City Council who would act on it in about one month. If approved by the City Council, then it would go to the Coastal Commission for approval. Commiesioner Erwin commented that he supported the project but that he also felt that the company made a pledge to the people in the community for their support. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to continue the the remainder of the April 3, 1991 agenda items until Wednesday, April 17, 1991. Chairman Holmes asked if anyone of the other three applicants were not able to return on the 17th. None responded. MINUTES The Planning Commission approved the minutes of March 6, 1991. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion at 1O:OO p.m., the meeting of April 3, 1991 was adjourned. COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm Erwin Hall Holmes Marcus McFadden Schlehuber Schramm April 7, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL HOLZMILLER Planning Director RUTH STARK Minutes Clerk MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. COMMISSIONERS * I 0 I I~~(~)UPPORT OF PROJ c[-t/~hml:l: 017 COML lEI<(-C ,I! March 27, 1991 Carisbad Planning Commission 1200 Elm Avenue . .. Carlsbad, Ca 32008 Dear Friends; The Carisbad Chamber of Commerce Directors wish to offer its support for the location of Price Club in Carisbad. The site at Palomar Airport Road is well suited for easy access from North and South 1-5. We understand that Price Club representatives will work with the city Traffic department to alleviate concerns about traffic congestion before the completion of the bridge at Palomar Airport Bridge. We feel that the enhanced tax base provided by Price Club will more than offset the temporar) inconvenience caused by the construction. This is a rare and. significant opportunity for economic development in our city. Let's work together to locate Price Club in Carlsbad. We offer assistance of our Chamber, the Carlsbad Economic Enhancement Council and encourage the swif' processing of its permits. Should you need any further information from us, please contact our Executive Vice-president, Lee Bohlmann, 931 -8400. Sincerely, The Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce John Anewalt, Hotchkiss and Anewalt Larry Ciemens, Hillman Properties Gelynn Gonzales, Garcia's Restaurant David Kulchin, Hughes Aircraft Don Hoyt, Travel Plus Stephen LHeureux, Attorney Elaine Lyttleton, HA Lyttleton and Associates Sandy Matheus, Glendale Federal Bank Jayce McClellan, McClellan Insurance Agency Kim FAikhael, Law Offices of Simon Mikhael Sarbara Miles, Pacific First Bank Dennis Pearson, First National Bank of North County Scott Rash, Corporate Benefit Solutions Bob Riesgo, J. C. Penney Don Schempp, Capital Bank of Carlsbad Phil Urbina, Daniels Cablevision Peggy Wimberley, Plaza Camino Real Hope Wrisley, A World of Travel cc: Carlsbad City Council, K. Nishihira 5.1 1 1 i~\~~lli~l:~ \~:ll~~ilj;1~~ s(li(c 100 I).(). I\OS IOOS (:;II.I\I):IcI. (:xliloi.iii:l O.?()()x (0 I 9) 93 1 -Hi00 1::~s (0 IO) 93 1-9 I53 E X H I B I T ! 0 0 With regards to the proposed Price Club to be located on the south side of Paloinar Airport I I Road, enst of Illtcrstate 5, plcasc be advisccl that I support approvd ol' this project. I i i I I r I. ~ ,I Date: ~/~olp/ i I I i I I 7-L $949 PORK DR I ... ,. Address: eQALSRGO, CQ 9x0 08 'i I 1 ____________. ___._ - - - - - - . . ______I cr 1- _I-, - - b. /,L'JQ c:'. a < a 1 c;/ x-! -- -We"' -- p. /$ Q' .$ 2 ! '.; ; c - K- Nislhfiira The Price Company P.0- Box 85466 San Diego, CA 92186-5466 .c- ....x EXAMPLE OF THE 3,814 POSTCARDS SUBMITTED INDICATING SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT m e LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY D. PROWSE CAMINO CORPORATE CENTER 2395 CAuluO VI3A QOBLE. SUITE 101 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 02009 FIX 6 31 438-4379 6 91 438-8460 March 22, 1991 Carlsbad Planning Commission 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Price Club Application April 3, 1991, 6:OO p.m. Ladies and Gentlemen: We wanted you to know that we heartily support the proposed Price Club near the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte. We have been Price Club members for several years, and do a lot of our shopping at the Price Club in San Marcos. We occasionally also go to the Price Club in San Diego. Either of these is a relatively long and aggravatin trip. We would much prefer the convenience of having a Price Club here in Carlsbad at the proposed location. There is nothi bucolic about the site. It is already commercial, and it is adjacent to a freeway interchange. We are confident that any legitimate visual or traffic related concerns could be adequate mitigated. a valuable addition to the community and a good corporate citizen. We urge you to support and approve this project. Sincer y, We are also confident that the Price Club would be !+7+ 0b-J- ,+/2 - anley D. and Joy E'. Prowse rd SDP:nmm I IN urrusiiw~ IU rwwi I 7,;{3! ! L L- 0 $, //y/ I- ;yp .$ (-. b! h/J<tt /cz. fiLr+,d2Ly,L /&p LzL5 L/L. -' ,.:,?./%7fL.F! -2.' :*A 6- P. j' /x7 !>A cic,~ j 2&/fip& .. L /7- /-"a /J&4 f /A&L.& C'w-4-'/L?e. &Ai2 &,,;, //LiL' .I ,+:<-LC'- //& /ut.* c2/&;r';' &-tc >>rf:/ '2 Li.c j <L2-?dL ,I .. ,//&/o u /<c/cLcb<d&L& &, c '2 - " ~ L7- E' ( ".-'u,/, /&/&J+?++.& L'JU A&/! -22 a&oL&,:&L &&.9 c-:. i.L ' ' CL-L 4 Z74c; *L/ 4 2 +?-, LLU- '5 &!Cy <>Aid /+(, +!,L)L- &"- .&f LL'Lk-G /-L j. / Ai&. /&<&27- //&& 4% .- f /L.a., l& L-d- / JJl7 <%/& , ,,,,,*/-,f", '3L4. ?A< c -LC<, /+-5 / - 'I :, __(_ Hi4 &&&W'b4,&L., \ > -: / -a/ ,I *&J .I 1- .& ,. LI.L.:' /- / - =-.- d)L: 2".<,-4,. 2 zL 1 /is L c ,JL:--c/fc4'; ,, 5rrp*c=A-;L./ i' /?/ +LLi*IC.L . I -' f ' &/;A AS[ :a <,lL CL L I , .. . -.. - -. . EXHIBIT 7, .Q - . 0 !I '. ., 3018 Avenida Christina Carlsbad, California 92009 March 23, 1991 Mr. Mike Holzmiller Direct or Carls bad Planning Commission City Hall, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Dear Mr. Holzmiller: Although the residents of the area surrounding the projected Price Club at the junction of Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airport Road (and these number hundreds of homes) are appalled at the possibility of the impact on their neighborhoods, they are definitely not alone in their dismay at this scenario. I live off Alga Road ;~1 La Costa. use El Camino and Palomar Airport Road for their access to Inte state 5. You should hear what they say about traffic jam-ups a commuter hour now. 'dhat will it be like when the Price Club OF a prqjected 102,000 r7f warehouse, open 7 days a week, with a thousand parking spaces--probably an underestimated figure. If they open the facility before the bridge and extra lanes are finished--well, this is migraine territory. Is this a time for the city of Carlsbad to put their taxpayers in debt for 11 million dollars, taking years to recover it? dha about the envirowen3al impact of thousands of extra vehicles from all,directions, with trucks lumbering in and out; with pos sible liability problems like the Rancho Santa Fe incident: wi-t future water shortages as construction is curtailed elsewhere? I don't want to withhold watering my lawn so that a giant cor- poration can have- its way with taxpayers. This is short-sighted planning. Sincerely Mrs. Joseph Grispino Many commuters in our area @'P '&* 0 e \Vith regards to the proposed Price Club to be located on the south side of Palomar .Airport Road, east of Interstate 5, please be advised that 1-t approval of this project. 2v m+ Apporf ,a2 f-& SI, (1 nature : LZLQ LkZL Date: .3/2L/ ~ 4f Same: CA4WA6Lz ci uw Addres: L 5% i3e &'L;CL\R L.vt l!kL+ P&Ld Cn, 7 bvfi / \ \ \ \ i L I ,/"* <' I e 0 ,Received .i.5 r.=si&3t.= of Carlsbad, WB wisk ti3 rsai~ter GUT s-crong anpsitic 1.75 r$e j$qrb'y'",: - ,,I ?r:co Slub off Palomar Airport had arid DaSeO del liarre in Carlsba -- ',J+ 3rp ?,ST z2Dosd .. to the canstruclim si Price GLYC in the coe;$T& (dfeC&RL$$w ,-Q.- .-,,,;en;i3: . srei, !he z.rsffic prc'bles ior r-2.sicents in Tiis area which will ~5i3'~ ;lswe\,e:-, -:e .:c:.~;t.ra~:::gn ;f ?yit:2 ;,iub $fill 5e awesone and pcss~bly hazjrialis. Ye urge the Carlsjad ?ianni?,g Coi.;=ission to sYand by their statemeT.r_ sat ths pa d+vels?zent fcr t3i.i property is a bu:iine:%s park. .- ' I.-, j ,r4t . lime Si gnat u re Address dsts we are firmly appo:sed ta locs~ing the Price Club in &EWfli3~QCgS~&.~ .?. ' b J3. -- - / T G-&dc*_d &-L&UL.,C ;3d-,dd& - ; &;...A SLANT ZEAdck p ,.I:& ! / PIA :.% t ,f&> a, . &,Pj&+b, &: G?s,fIU.<- n && , ((1 5.0 &*L- f&x-&tL CtrLS-zA 13- /iL+/- - y I 17 p y - ;fL/' s / $'@,,;a. k&K' /Li+L-P (3 :2F5 f r, 9, 3w -;E& L, * fld&- L] &&i& ./@l& &UlE ?H& / 8zf!u P&P,t 4 (6 g ram& fib.JL. && &m,; /G / / ?&$&&.d L ,* S!Ch d 1 39, H. GJBd /& &$A( p3n4 k: BR]TZA, +&.d' &-x$. ?/rfi. cs:C;cn ./Y LLpJ CARPJJ. 71 -.@z !& /dl m 4163(LL&!i.&+ L. . 'pLN /?6 u & T. O'lC4c, t76(uh,a:,.-J. c, /efitq CI t$-A cpm. MfiOYLi/JTA: && q,d Pmr4ludL4Cd /ZL A/& AdLbr 2bd&h tt & A7 , f , ,pJ I. !\' - tcLY' >-JA i. i X' I 3/ AS ,/7 '- f ~ // // /I // 4 /& Dd'tecl A - < /V/i c. a<!.\ ' cfir;u(7*- c- - 8 2 5 4 (-*=, )v(> i F4 hkdL-7, - 4k V L ic-4/./ // 33 /I .€l' /IC& 2,,, f+ [ (3 cim c> ; Tf :I.-. I' rfi ! (2;7L( 1 3c 7\J!U &(/I\+> Q&A 7& %WW&~ ?/kc chnwcs c3 'I nfixcn Q.A+?*d qrg i3 eqw EsrRn\3/, C-RRU 8 I q . -A 5' 4 1 7 2 -1 4-6 /Zhd hcLbL&.r( CCin fiLqc\(/7 ~~J/&-~AF~&~~GT/z~~ -. tr h d PddWV M z/ 'EkiFSQ 9dsf - P / 0 a As residants of Carlsbad, H% wisb %o rcaistsr OUT strcng GpFoSit.ion to t,ke CGr.5yT,LC ?rice Club off Palomar Airport Road. and Paseo del Nlorte in Carlsbad. Lis are ?.at opposed to the canstructioo of Price Ciub in the coastal area of Ysrth .: hawever, we bre firmly oppo:sed to locating the ?r!ca Club in an already trsffic 537 residenti31 %rea. The traffic problezs for resikents 12 this are3 which will rss;i :he ccnstrii,z::on 3f Price Club will be swescze and ?cssibljr hnzsrdrus. '4, urge tke Caris'zsd ?laming Co;-,-,ission to stand by their statezent :?.at t'r.2 --.,-- w 6eveios~er,t fcr this property is a business park. ?Ti?.: time A-ddress date ''L&C[>f,h fc, fl?&2, e// / .z - -c /by+ )J - 1 q/c/ r ( /,4IV/*/, , L, /+Ld(, I -1. dh-A-6 6% 5P^o A&, 7,, , ,J - YZ, LJ~, , ri,'Gfi ct< G cqj-@j~ %;$Y - / g4.h. 0 J 35- cj /-)fide ;2{ /t'.J+ df4 0 I< ri/q-.J?c I /1 G .Vt% 1 k 'c/ '( ---4?.&+, 6?7CF HL '0 &/' /i Le& / .; , ' .. ~ . c ( ;3'L1Acxp --.- _f?.,.+?&& A 74/.a w: ,m . p -/e- . 2'. c Ln R LC e C,J& 5 7-0 <P[= e sc" LGP14d:Ab f, LSS 7~:%J-Fo b,. -- - - - ), ._. /, i. A/'..&L . x //*-; - ST,- 4 . ./ 'e '--- IL, - -/- - -..--+-- P,' " ~ - / 3 I dre;c Ea ,.LLCC5 /jub-A2-,* 4- ?G2F f '!i,n, ~b ,4wit-t .[LC,; )-A/ <- J J i 0 0 Aa residents of Carlsbnd, ws wisk to rsgistor our strcnz cppositigr, :g t.30 .---=--.. >MI._ ,. -. Price Club off Palomar Airport Road and 3aseo del Morte in Carlsbac. We are not opposed to the construction of Price Club in the coastal area of Xcrtk hawever, we are firmly opposed to locating the Price Club in an already trzffic 53 . -e,- ,,dential i the constructi0n of Price Club will be awesome and ?GSStbiY hbzardcUS+ area. The traffic prcblezs for residents in this ares which will res\ ‘de urge the Carlsbad ?laming Co;ar,issica to stand by their stateZen? that ?:?e -*;T LYI-. davelopnent far this property is a 5u:sines.s park. Trinr Yame date m suT c-'Cq- - ---7-; *: ~" .. Acj rey:;tnts Gf carisbad, k{? .rii5> T.2 r=7ic-3r 7b- -.A& U,JyldZ- '.-ill 73 Tke ::~T.~~~~~~~ - -3""'" ?rice Club off ?alomar Air?orr 3cad end ?aseo 65; Xc:-=e 12 Cnr?sjnd. 4.3 31.3 ?.CY .=-szc:-,ed -. to t5.e s:zn~ry~~~1z3 :i ?rics C;L:% in Eke coa,scjl Zrea of xcr:~ ;; ~~wsv~:.-, '*ie 312 fir3ly o;.ncstd :a 1=~=:1~.3 EL.. ?y:c? C1uj ir. a?, alrtaiy :r~ff:c 39:'. ~k.2 ,:~~.~trut:::n~. 31 Prke Club wi11 ':e iwezcze a?.d. ?cssl~ly h-.aric.!;s. :, 42 urye tks Csrlskad ?l302:~.3 Cc?=:l=sicn t3 ssa7.d by their scatex?.: ;>.ac tk.2 --?.I u iav~1gp-o~~~ fcr tYi.3 ?rs?erty is a 31~3' -.--,a,= np*- ;ark. .. ,I ,.: : 7 ---.. -- , r 1 ., /. ,-J .-=~:?e>T.>ai - 21-e~. The ~rafiic ?TO~-ZZS for 1-5~iCsnTs i?. :his d/23 WL~.C~ ,vi-- .___ 1. .. .. ?Ti?+ .'Ta:-s Sipat ilre .i-d dr e 5 5 date - .? ?L.M+-,U d,-/ -/A cccuG bL-c ~-9.3~ SBUDC~L~~~ 2~. >-A $%&4 ._ + I; khnf P$&rk y 77/~~,C&/:,4 d7/s' && -yL &: &. ,: I ..d.ct;& C' 7 2 y ,. '.J tL;; ,J,, LL &-cL ,I; 4 1 I / I b,? ' 44 k GLL.9 F . ~ 1: ,- n J c ;/2 !;f I L:L[;.c2 L , n -- -. 3j/ .') 4--Tkjt-+--'-G . -,/ ' .+ L i -e r; j,)?, -. c UC, . Lt C- - c c F:r,,bc '- .I > :.( , ,-? LP 52i)i-),< kc2 X\%? 'D.2 :.+ c , J' J A w- ,.t :2 ;c I du,i-dmL;bi ,'. i ;,).i I 7 3- c I( . I . . _- 14 \-l\~L&~4L+.+- '3Cl-!!J P) /{\..&hii LVK :*C;,ET &;-bR .I bL pi E ; '.\ '< F v '> ,' ! :\ - ah4 t, Rt 7- ..- - 4> pL . h. * *., ? G .q \-I LJ:,?? [r,d _,o_>L p.. .,*' -- I\ / 4 L Am :I, PI --2d _L.Fk-A, ; X --5 -3 1, ~~&+~ ~~ , I GI7p FGd24 I !$x &?i? r %- LlL33 LUCdW &A i$,l,Y ,q L' L J TL.7 ,Y/'-y <%kt L' YX Y 5L,k J("''/ 3 'i L d,-. 2 ?-,&&;:y, ,j f;c{ v\ 17 e' /,? 13 &TJ ,, /7 c .y-,.i- ab r, j L ,XL+. ;I; .c 'XY a 'I, /- c Y3 ;7LL*/&L,-w, .- i - / - - ., < c , ... L&CLfLd P k./id*dd .- . I M. k3u',7lu I- I. e 0 .. .. * - 7zq. 4>- ..- -- . ,--$ --.. ~3 of <=:1~32i, 7i2 ~15~ ::I ~2~i~r3r ~"r ~~rc~~~ c?;,zslt:z?, 7,z 7~2. 3-T.: >pic+ KUj oif Talcar Xir---t P'. - _.--- +-a- A_.- a-. ?-s*g +1 x;?.-- - -- -e in Czrisksd. 'a2 2r2 Ti2: Zlpsed to the c3?bsIT":lz:. 2: rr1:,'.3 ClCb ir. ZSE? c=1=-- c.ya~~l 2~23 2: li:: :,*-*e:-, ,\qt .J,. . 'de ZTZ firzly O??CXd ',3 :c:2::?.'7 TCt rriz2 C1-j in &?. elrsa..;y -re::'< -. ... ., .- ~ .. .. .. a - ,7- ,-z=.-?q-- -- -n.- 1s-q .,^.c; ,,;>,: . .. :-~2>'i+?.tLsl ea. The ~r~.ffi~ ?TCZ-~Z~ -.-- ------.."a L.. ":.-a -.c- *. ..___ ,v___ - -_ L:.2 u-..al.r --I---./- ,Ltio3 cf Price <11;j ',:iLl >? ~$~;2::t+ 27.2 -c.ss:?ly ~~~3r==~s. .. ".._-. a.C.-. _-.. v .__-_ lY.2 r ,, .* 1~rg2 t2.2 cZr;=*-= ____ 2 -' r'-=..-- .--... :*.3 cc:yLj33i'~ ';- st.:..' by t:.s: r ----3F3?* -n>v . .. .;>..>1 r--irt fzr l>.ii zr3~e-:y is 5 :~.51::,:;5 :.zrk. A. L- " - -v _4.-- .I - .J>?2 . .. _A v - -. . .-- 7.- .-.--- --a -. k. 1 ; y-2 5 2 -- 5 Y ? r > ?, t ;:A ;;? .. *\ ..- -- ,f .cI . / ;I 1- '\.? > , ) /I(<< \- , i .-L,w'w [kc CiLjL h (:C?C*X t4 "';7 < )fl b4,i &fY.3,-!3 .:.,..4 -/ ;1 4, LL.\L ri 1; x,?;- b ; i 2 I; ( L.... (94 4& AI-, 7Ct. 4 1- j .. ,n \ & c ;* I+ ~ J ,,f fl- &,y- i'k.: & I _- I 8- F I 1' ,< *& - 7 .- I 4 ' fi .. .. * L-L{ , L /\,& ,- ':I LL d r;, 7.! .. >L . 7 (b !CY, /t 1 . ..&L *ii 14.1 ,, . /G &DAW 4. (, f, -! 2 -'; - , '2,,+:,.? AI ,io !I -1 ) ddlic gw &A& @,.LC, \ ? +WLI -' ,,e, -G I .h , ' A *?i,' . y/ I 1 , I -*' *\ . -. . . ./- l.. L.. : <. ; &I\/ FL <pgy. I. I *- e I- <- ,: { EQT, lq,JccL. 3 (14 Cp/y+&.7c &&;F):&;- d L + &I riAILr - I' u .. &J,& 1.. /& >E p L\c;yc, t: (; /,e I - .. . / .3 '2- -. P .-\. . . /' -2-?.I byl PL r~/t L L! 'II &&y/ " L -, t \ .., ..- *. ,#< , - .- . I.' . .. . .. ./I.. , - l ~ '. --. *-L-- <- ' b '1 L ,\ ' t 1 t 6 <. \Lk,\ L -$?r+~ 3\. L-.-LLLhi -icI !" L,..#.. ~. .LLtLkdL;. 0 I) --- -- .. - ., .i'i r~z:~~~~;= af LZtiS'xfi. vis W:S~ 7.3 T~T~Z;.?: C~T -C- Zb.C."Z CDZCSiTi3:: *--. -.. '.c :?? ~ -..3. -. -_-_ ?r:C.s .C;A~. off Palomr Airxrc ;~zs-..c::<- ?r.?t?..ce! ;:g:--z* in. -- .... Car!sQaC. - - ___ - ?ric3 Clzj i?. ch2 con.5;al -srz& c< :;cry y7.e <rz.ffic '\*-'''S-= __"--_-* :-,- --. :-~~::~~.~~ ir: :.?is '.re3 \;::irk \;ill 7. 5-=. * c. d =--; -- rn,9r.,; -=in- ~3 sta~c! *Jy t2eir ~;~~e.".~y,t -,.;..ss ::,? ,z -- .--. -_ -. . .T --X f" :re-------.- L-:;3 1:: &=&, 7-2<;;- -. d- - -1 - - . .. .. -e5L""n.Lil 3r23. -:> _-I_ ,-?--*?..-*: u-.hs,,+ ,.,-,c~ sf ?rlc=e Club ~{ii; '2: .- 3'fiSS2:-3 ar.ji Z:CSSLOL>~ :.~~3rij~i;~, .. - , ,- - ';* ,..--- ...& : i?.s Csrl L-- - __.__ ._._ 5 VI _.___ z---.- .. ,&v~13=~3"r fzy r>.:.j 3r25ey'y 15 5 .:~si::.:s.5 car?* ?r:nc :;s:.:s si 5"' : 1; rs .. 1ci -* r-e.;s d9C2 ,-<'* /~, ' , ,.?q. ' (7 , l!d v /q j ',f;L; ' I (I .!-r : ' , ,a?>- 4 17 , , ! i,+tku.; .b; ?,id; :3 - .: -> 7 _. 7 &I "' .-I ', . r- , . , .l-L' , ' - . ,- :. I, : -1;; ' , '.''t'" i ~ , , .,.'I: \- .. * 4, ! ..: . . , _,_ _.,-I,, f:'. - .-_ 1 .__ 1 I ,', . ,. , .*/<. ,',- _- /+. . I I , I I r- 'J 1. i :\ 1':. ~ i l- 0: 'y, , : ' : c. y+-; (. .'. 7. kt / / , -(-*-! :f. ~. - ,. r/ i $-- ffil 7 , /' .- - - /'; /1 I ._- L- 4 , , :.i ., /. +. t <%, . .'<: --is> ___ i .? * t i. i :, '*> (' \ ~ I_ 4 ': , . , . ,- ,- I/ .I . ._ ir ; ,_ : : r. : .- !,: ; ; f- ,I - --I .. ., .- T- I. -.- ;'> tg,q ;d,:,q 11, Ik I It. ,,--I JlJ -.& -j[&iL/d'q b, &L&, . ,'?&p&4d'-:c' 1 \' 1 i; 7'3 2 / flG[,.& I -. y' &$,4 --. ?@ aM4 M@&?IW'?L - * C ! m 0 With regards to the proposed Price Club to be located on the south side ot Palomar Road, east of -nterstate S, please be advised that I -1 oi this ProJe~ - The proposed Price Club would act as a focal point, drawing concentrating traffic from all the surrounding communities. congestion on El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road absolutely become intolerable. At present, the traffic is extre heavy twice a day. I know it’s a bitter sweet decision. The prospect of only driving I minutes to purchase bargain paper goods is very attractive. How I urge you to consider the consequences of your decision. Kenneth H. Magrini Palomar * MSI 6150 A Yarrow Drive March 22, 1991 y -- Carlsbad, CA 92008 - - - _---- -- -__ _.- - -.. / yTth regards to the proposed Price Club to be located on the south side of palona; Road, east of Interstate 5. please be advised that IAupport approcal ot thls pro,ec Dc hdr- / / ,J i, / &, ,- Date: /L1 4c 2 3, <I Signature: Iz ~ Name: / ’ // +/)(Jy - Address: C/q,q< I hZhJ\ k& n, 74 / A .!./ .c L ’ 1 I ,‘WL r* c* c€dcbr:J r- r 7 7-2 capk - 4 0 e 3 1 NIth regards to the proposed Price Club to be located on the south side of Palomar hrpo-: Road. east of Interstate 5. please be adcised that I - , I Do jvoTAPPrdvt= i oi this projecr Date: s -91- 71 Signature: J Xame: Address: ! 4 * W 0 March 22, 1991 fli ke Hol tzmi 11 er 2075 Las Palmas Carlrbad, CA 92008 I am writing to express my strong opposition to Price Club warehouse locating on Palomar Airport Road/Paseo del Norte. commercial area for a discount warehouse. The traffic on Paseo del Norte is already heavy and hazardous to residents. A traffic survey in 1989 showed Average daily traffic (ADT) was approximatel 7,500 vehicles on Paseo del Norte. Another traffic survey in 1970 conclude( that ADT was 10,600 vehicles -- a 3,100 increase in about one year. A secondary arterial such as Paseo del Norte is designed to handle 10,000 to 20,000 ADT. With a 3,100 per year vehicle increase ADT, it would take approximately 3 more years for Paseo del Norte to reach full capacity. With Carlsbad at only 50% buildout this will soon happen anyway. A Price Club would cause the ADT to FAR EXCEED ITS MAXIMUM CAPACITY. What will happen to transportation on this road when bridge construction Planning Director This is not a proper begins and continues for 1 to 2 years? Residents living in this corridor will be unable to enter or exit their residences; pedestrians will be unable to safely cross the street; a ?eft turn onto Paseo del Norte by residents will become virually impossible And there will be no parking on Paseo del Norte - which creates additional problems for residents. For example, there are 16 condo units at 6673-6675 Paseo del Norte and 6 parking spaces. There are 13 condo units at 6677-667' with 3 parking spaces. spaces per unit plus 1/2 space per unit for guests. does not even meet 50% of parking standards for the city. officials are considering taking away street parking altogether. these units were built by Pacific Scene, the city permitted street parking to be included in meeting standards. A possible gate system on Paseo del Norte for truck exit - right hand turn only would not stop drivers from traveling north from Poinsettia offramp on Paseo del Norte and turning right on Palomar Airport Road Parking ordinance for Carlsbad is 2 parking This present parking Today city When to gain entrance to Price Club. Also, consider traffic hours. Present zoning as Planned Industrial would result in additional traffic but that would be normal working hours M-F. pm on weekends. INCLUDING TRUCK TRAFFIC. Price Club is open to 8:30 pm on weekdays and 6:OO and 6:30 There would be continual traffic EVERYDAY OF THE WEEK m 0 2. Consider the noise and air pollution: The combustible engine is the single largest pollution factor in Southern Californ. in Carlsbad are rightfully opposed to a trash-to-energy plant in San Marcos because of environmental pollution. Yet they have not considered the air and noise pollution which 4,000 residents in this area would experience with increased traffic generated by a Price Club. And finally, consider the economic impact. Before Price Club can be built, the Palomar Bridge/I-5 project must be FULLY funded according to Don Neu, Price Club Project Planner. The City of Carlsbad will pay $11 million to complete this project. CALTRANS will not reimburse the city for this construction. f4ello Roos community Facilities District \;CIS approved recently. Under this policy, the city is allowed to sell bonds to pay for work and then be reimbursed by the taxes on undeveloped land plus a one-time fee on new buildings as permits are issued. Under Carlsbad's Growth Management Plan, commercial developments such as Price Club would not be allowed without certain improvements such as the Palomar Bridge. However, the taxes for undeveloped land would not even begin to cover project expenses. This will put the city in a position of huge bond indebtedness. And, the latest information is that Price Club is using pressure to begin construction BEFORE WORK EVEN BEGINS on the Palomar Airport/I-5 interchange updates in order to open Fall 1991 -- with bridge construction to begin Fall 1992 and possible 2 years until completion! Community Development Director Marty Orenyak was quoted as saying: "the city's main concern with the business (Price Club) is the amount of traffic the high volume sales warehouse will generate"(B1ade Citizen 11-29-89/Flark Larabee). of life of Carlsbad residents and DISALLOW PRICE CLUB in this most unsuitabl area. Sincerely yours, City officials PLEASE EXERCISE THIS CONCERN NOW for the qual i ty Col 1 een Hol 1 oway 6673-D Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 cc: Don Neu, Price Club Project Planner 0 0 WCH 21, 1991 LETTERS TO EDITOR, CARLSW JOURNAL 3138 ROOSEVELT ST. CARLSBW, CA. 92008 I AM JUST ONE OF MANY CONCERNED CARLSBAD RESIDEhTS WHO OBJECT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PRICE CLUB AT PASEO DEL NORTE AND PALW AIRPORT ROAD. THERE ARE NUMEROUS REASONS FOR CUR CONCERN, BUT PARTICULARLY THE RESIDENTS OF ALTAMIRA, HARBOR POINT, CARLSBAD CREST, AND SEAGATE VILLAGE AREAS DO NOT WA\T THEIR FRONT YARD TURNED INTO AN "INDY 500 RACE COURSE" AND THEIR BACKYARD TURNED INTO A CONCRETE PARKING LOT AND WM.EHOUSE. THE INCREASED TRAFFIC ON PASEO DEL NORTE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD WILL CREATE SO MUCH CONGESTION TWT RESIDENTS WILL EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY ENTERING AND EXITING THEIR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. FUNDING FOR THE WIDENINGOF PALOMAR BRIDGE E I 5 INTERCHANGE WILL APPROXIMATE $11 MILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS. THE INCREASED TAX REVENUE FROM PRICE CLUB ANTICIPATED BY OUR CITY COUNCIL WILL NOT REALIZE ANY SIGNIFICANT PROFIT FOR 10 OR 11 YEARS UNTIL THIS $11 MILLION HAS BEEN RECOVERED. ANOTHER BIG ISSUE IS THE USE OF OUR PRECIOUS WATER SUPPLY 8Y SUCH A HUGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WITH THE PgESENT WATER CONSERVATION POLICY, IT WOULD BE MORE ADVISABLE TO USE THIS SAME $11 MILLION TOWARD THE GOAL OF FURNISHING RECLAIMED WATER TO CARLSBAD RESIDENTS. I ASK YOU, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, WHEN YOU CAST YOUR VOTES FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT, PLEASE LOOK BEYOND THE GREED OF MORE TAX MONIES AND CONSIDER THE RESIDENT'S WISHES TO MVE PRICE CLUB BUILD IN A MORE CCWIERCIAL AR EA..." NOT IN OUR BACKYARD." -. TUK YOU, L 1' &&&#& CHARLENE LARSEN, 901 A CAMINIT0 CPRLSBAD, CA. ( cc/ MR. MIKE HOLZMILLER, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 US PALMAS m 0 l~lAl~I.l?f * FI?\JIi' Cl?Cl-IARlX -- 1 :,; 6 . . - - " - . - <-.c, z iJ.' ;'.+-. . ., - ~ _- _I_ - < .; -, - ---,..,.. . .. .:: - .. . .._^ .r - . -- . -. .. . ~. -_ . I -. . I-; ;-,- -- .. Elarch 20, 1990 Planning Director City of Carlsbad 12GG Eiril Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Sir: Hadley Fruit Orchards would like to receive written notice of all hearings regarding the proposed development of the Price Company on property located between Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airport Road. Macley's is pzrticularly concerned with any possibility of restricting access to Paseo Del Norte either through a barrier across Palomar Airport Road or any means which alter the present road. 18 years and is dependent in large part on tour busses.We believ that serious and very negative impact on Hadley's business. We would appreciate copies of any staff reports on the matter, Hadley's has been doing business in this location for any restriction of Paseo Del Norte Roas would have a Sincerely, Iu'an "I"&l""- Gusla President 1, :;,:, j j = 7py: <;+.: 2 :- - I 1 -- 4. f -. Cf, i 7; (' FOR RESPONSE 1 -. =o .. ---. c, 7y.& -A .- &2a(yr AL ,-r. ' *% -+ -+ -x &-& L -2- -pL '-.A,?- - AWL-- A>L L *..-,.= - ,a (J L V' L T- -- &b " - I -j(&) - && &-.,,L I- ??-& 277-L - - -=-? - .>' -I- - .- ; ,L /-..y>-LL ,a== +- A- .. I - -., - - a-d.-, L -,\.A --=A a -Ul- -2L L->-&---.x Yd 2 * - - I- && ,7-G.=.=.- 7- ,-L .i - U.r=y -.-LL >> --mL-&-Ll.& Liz,' - )I :L-- - d -, .T,.-v---- Jz.t&&b ?&- 7 8r--u r' 6. I ., .. /fL 'd - - , c FOR RESnNsE L e p-2- - &L - -e-;fz, /,Y L ’ *&-*> /3-- 1 /? Ab’i . , $&&.t-i 2 A//. c ,- /$/H ,; i - . /+J J- ; - ~- /JJ/ /? ^L , ,-L+, .&,, J<l.J/ /.. - 4 A?<’. .c i ... - 4 , .. , A.7 > -.#A *// : -I I I* , - >I /z- ’< c - ,< ,. f .-, _.- ,- ~. .:+ /,d ’ -/. , ‘Y ,x/ ./; ,?,a \. . :’. - .. e,! - -2 Mu- /r .x LL- ‘_ 5 y,,-/* 71, 1- . ”.’ 7 _- ,A,,<: ,Mb J ,.A,-d/ Aht ’ - 2 JL, ,,.&L/ __ . ’- ..- __---- - --- - - /,/’ ’ ~ ,q -.- Ad‘-. Y,;/-V , -‘>L+, /’.” >,/ 7. . ,- I&, .* ).‘ ’ ~ ,l /f ,q,,-A-- - - /’ , ,: 1 -A Ll-/-,, ’l . ? . / .> --f/<‘ LT-. .- ,<.4 , ,. ? - / I. /.../ ’_ F.22 ’ . ,+? ,/ - / - ’I ,/”. -. j, _.- , 2 - . ./ l&h c I / ./a,’ r . .. ,L,? 4.i ..<. L , -i L- : .-.-L >L,?>.!I ‘.C’.f - ‘1 -&/4 i .L * c /’ ’- ’ ,w- (1 M</-d.*/- t - . , r 5L /A,!,‘ A/,(, ;-/ LA-.; /XdL-- - />,- TC / ’. r- 1, .A’/ 1 * .. /dd/,/&+! ’ 4.- : -, ,<l/t< Ob’ .-d .’ Z//. /?.A/’3/z* A 2‘ ’ /u ~ ,: -. L ,!-.:{ r - a/., I IC J- ,I c CJ I /A* ri*d I : -M If’ ,-U’ i - - Lhq Z9M i - - >,;u 6 I 7 ..c - ‘ TY / “’LL +. ... I i>LA?L ’/ i L.- - ’ .- G ... -- - 8 '. -- 1- 6701-B Paseo Del Nor*, Carlsbad, CA 92009 March 13, 1990 / Mayor Bud Lewis 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis: concerned about The Price Club and its intent to put in a place of bus the corner of Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airport Rd. We are very up the fact that people who live in the area have been kept very much in about what is going on. The remark by Councilman Pettine, 1'1 didn't k anybody was against it.", shows clearly that the Mayor's office and the have been less than open in dealing with the public and especially th affected by the proposal. We would like to think that the Mayor's of the Council is more concerned with the citizens of Carlsbad than they business, but so far it doesn't appear that way. The entry and exit from our condos are on a small curve. to enter onto Paseo Del Norte and go left. will become impossible. The development of a park across the street enough traffic in the area without adding a business such as The Price Presently, traffic at the corner of Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airpor very congested. There is not enough room for big trucks to make ' without crossing over into the left turn lane. We have all seen near a at this intersection with cars trying to make left turns onto Palamar Rd., being forced to back up or pull out into the lane of through With 30-40 trucks, the situation will be impossible. There is also deal of difficulty with traffic in and out of the 7/11 that is on the Presently, north bound Interstate 5 traffic in the morning is lined up or more back on the interstate trying to make right turns onto Palomar Rd. We are aware that there are plans to redo this intersection, but t be several years in the future, and until then traffic on Paseo Del Nc only get worse. It would seem that you have the cart in front of the t The Mayor and Council need to come and study the situation by observation before blindly accepting The Price Club's application to this location?. The best time of day for doing this would be 6:30 AM - at noon, or from 4:OO PM to 6:30 PM. We have no objections to The Price Club's decision to locate in Carls with a large industrial/business park area with many prime build1 located in the area of Palomar Airport Rd. and El Camino Real, wher roads are already in, would seem to be a much better location# Agre not as close to the freeway, but that should not be the primary consids We, the undersigned, all live along Pam Del Norte in Altamira, we l It is diffi With the increase in tra 0- a \1 The impact on current residential areas should come first. If the 2 store is closed, it would be much closer for those people and The Pric would tend to lose less of their present customers at that location i they are choosing to build. in being good citizens of the Community instead of trying to force thc where they will destroy residential neighborhoods and generate ill wi The actions of you and the Council will be well remembered when election rolls around. It Would also demonstrate that they are Sincerely, 4 ) IC, /e.![’ &i&k 17j?ll&, d+ Q’*&,~d /1 -Y- i- ,‘c/-/3 j# &.iU &.L-f-.(-- ai Lick< -,--; d I’ $?-8&-. :It-tr WUb c ic / - H, KIL ‘t; E 27 h-dii j+-- i LL&VbWt)L- (; Ic/-cr - ‘3c-h” h2f,vLk d‘q $;&Ldf c , &, [ /p~@M&* 1 i! 7 bL r, fl 3JLl r/r‘ ’ccP bAL3 G-Lw-U~ c‘lc3Pl pu &&. Q& %X%$L l/n4),b+ cc: Mike Holzmiller, Carlsbad Planning Director The Price Club >!ayor 3ud Lewis 1200 ila Avenue REFERRED to ClTl MAM fM RESPONSE / e 0 '%fCh 2.$, 11,s )3 \ v\f$( - '- ..-.- - ?:ark Pettine, Councilaan 1200 519 Avenue 3~1.1; 7 -, :I ?IFERR@ Ti, .: i :':e Illri, jrfq;, am Carlsbad, Calif. 92008 i i FOR REL?C:;SE ; & .)ear Sir: Please add cy 'ram to those J~J?::,CS! to t;he Price b:lcr; mi::; loc3trd at t'tloroar and Pewu del orte. ihe already 'wavy traffic st the Palmar A PSWO 3iz,..i31 lt~,~~ts ha8 %come a bdard, Try1T.g to pull aut a€ aapmc of trw riu:rdtf of ouni:iessea, lucri as Jsdleya - 7-11 - etc., is 10 easy nattar. lava you triad it? The opaninq of ?oi.isetfie .ilAe:;e 'res rlrcdy rrc!dcd mte traffic ea Pare0 drti *;orte, aid tho p;or+usy corners, ire. P8-3 4 Poinwttto sr.4 PatfiSettia t Avenida .iiICi.IaG. These 5usy cornerr CIOY rurrmnd 1~:w i.sta5liahed residevitial areasl telllnP ua that Prlco Zlui'r 40-30 trucks 8 day and illto et8 .:of il,oing ta use ~8s.o del :iorte? .hy iot rake US. of all that industrial erea betwen Palomsr md Canrlon. Psseo del :.orti haa aluaya baen a :.? Pi"C<i .%Lii,?h Youte ;lot At lr88t tkn you wn't Se dlsrtrpctng the live8 of rany of your long time Carlr&d re8ideilt8. '\ Pleese, uphold your promi8e8 to your Car1sb.d neiqhboto. 51 3- re 1 y , 4gig7c y; /GLL r;otieerne& sbad tiesidmt cc:Hika jblzmilter *ark P.ttlne Don Neu Ud but8 0: g 5 P 3, p. 3 r.9 r- 0 3 5 305 (D e,mu 1 a 3p, gca(Dr 9nJ e, 14w P- r.v. 3r-3w-(D ca N rno r< rt w r-Y m e, ' c) PC . 307 3 rn (D sac prir <C)SYV 970 Y POP. 3 3.3 0 PJ Ud 0 0 3 0 - rn ortp rwprrrw r.14 CY nmz a 2 e, yPr3 1 r\o< 3 Pur3 - PIC] me, DXD (~~trt3m (D *a s 0r.u 0 wrtm pl cl(D r : ?$ 0. c 9 F v1I R (D r- :x\; 3 s P*€P-nc ow= G p' rt +' * e rtr(DY1 70 ' aa rtc (Do1 :?yo Gr hl (D zg n y. zv om h 00 (DIDpIrub TOR P' .. a ;E: 6- 11 Pull rt 6mY wt-rta(D rr OLC Y Y Y tfoc Ort mmID3r (0 Or. C1a rt ert r- 3 1< (DID rt C 3 0r-l pi MZ 9 m CD W q G mo r <+(I, a 02 ft z Om (DD* mO OT31 a0 00 QW oc 00 fA w (Dm (DID (D b B oe, !=g r-0 YX rtoplrnrt as IDS lrnrnltn, -9 rDIDc(D1 Or m(D r-rt n* 1 a0 0 WID e1 U 3 < L rnrt m ( 3 0s I 7 r i L __ 2 1 I 0 e Diane T. Brandt 26441 AvenidaDesea Mission Viejo, California 9269 1 1 EEFERRED TO CIM MAN( 1 FORRMNsE March 26, 1990 The Honorable Bud Lewis, Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis, Please be advised that as a property owner from the Altamira Condominiums I am vehemently opposed to the construction of a Price Club warehouse at the corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte, just as I am opposed to any similar canetruction which would result from a rezoning of that area. Our property values, and thus the general value of the area and the tax base it provides, are dependent upon maintaining this as a desireable residential area. The current zoning for business parks adjacent to our residences should accomplish this objective. commercial businesses with the traffic congestion they create would be detrimental to this maintenance. I have not been apprised of any positive rationale for the change in zoning ordinance that would allow the proposed construction of a Price Club or other such busineos in this location. I certainly hope that you will furnish such information to the homeowners in this area if you feel that the zoning change is desireable and that you will exercise the dutieu of your office in accordance with the wishes of the local homeowners when those wishes are made known to you. I look forward to retirement living in Carlabad because I - up.ct it continue being a well planned community where the Rezoning to allow large L . zz%: wncernu of local busineases and residents can be mutually s;'.gr.eable and beneficial. - Thank you for your attention to this issue. 03/22/90 e 0 Bud Lewis m- Edward F, Miller 900-B Caminito Madrigal Carlsbad, CA 92009 c REFm9rn-m Mayor 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis, This letter is being written by an interested homeowner who will be contiguous to the proposed Price Club complex. Our understanding at the time of our home purchase (1976) was that the parcel held by Price Club now was for Commercial and Light Industrial use. We object strenously to changing the Lots from the indus- trialloff ice use envisioned to the Warehouse-Retail operation Price Club represents. Why? Excess, troublesome and unplanned for volume of traffic that will be generated especially on weekends and off hours for the nearby residential areas. While Paseo Del Norte is a "NO Truck Route" from Poinsettia Lane to Palomar Airport Rd; petitioned for by the area residents and grudgingly provided by the City traffic department: early or late arrival inter- state trucks will use the area to wait out the opening of Price's receiving dock. Refrigerated trucks will be especial- ly noisy as the load will need to be kept cooled at all times. According to the Traffic Dept. trucks delivering locally or on Paseo Del Norte can use the "NO Truck Route", With the in- creasing congestion of the Carlsbad Blvd./Palomar Airport Rd. Interchange and no relief in sight until 1992, my feeling is to use Poinsettia Lane from the South and Cannon Road from the North and then onto Paseo Del Norte, Obviously, if trucks find it more convenient, what about the Price Club members from Encinitas and point South and Oceanside and points North and East. Local traffic will increase drastically on all the area streets. Price Club has announced publically that the San Marcos location is deficient and would be closed soon after the opening of the Carlsbad Club. More traffic, no fa- cilities!! If you do not believe my projections above, just spend some time during morning and evening commuting hours at the inter- section of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte and see what effect the 7/11 Store has on traffic congestion and near accidents. It is considerable, yet the store can not hold more than fifty people. Extrapolate that congestion at least ten fold and you will soon realize that we the neighbors and the City's facilities can not handle any one like the Price Club. Sincerely yours, Edward F. Miller'--- that most trucks will find it much easier and more convenient c7 --I . -- -\ ,I,. I , -\ I- - t. . .,- - 0 e - - 1200 ELM AVEYUE I €-E= UALSaAO. a 92008-1989 (619) G, Office ol me Cry Manager aitg of a3ri9bah CctDber 17, 1989 Xr. and Mrs. R. J. Ranscm, Jr. 2298 Bryant Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Xr. and Mrs. Ransom: Mayor Lewis referred your recent letter reqarding your c3T;cezz about develogment in tSe southwest corner of El Camino Real a?. College Boulevard to the Cit-1 Manager's office for review. Your concerns, along with others in ycur area pertainin to the development of this industrial area are being reviewed. Th prcposed development at this intersection will be consi2ered by th Planning Commission and City Council as it continues through th planning process. You are invitsd and encouraged ta parziclpt in this decision making process. If you have any specific questions reqardinq the statas of develogment apglication at the southwest ccrner of El Camino Re: and College Boulevard, please contact Mr. Michael Holzmille: Planning Director, at 438-1161. Sincerely , f+ D. e-+k PIiILIl 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager saf c: Mayor City Council City Manager l.-JA &/ w-- v mA w /J A d=b &>bW i i f REFERRED TO CITY MANAGER FOR RESPONSE A I REFERRED TO CITY MAfJAGER 0 0 34G *&e -*,p P--- & A *A-r-n-&-- A= M/C>fi e77 &&be&&Ae* & + d- my” +4 my?- %x* w-7- -9 -+&+& h *z+& fwzL?- ’4 &2- &&w%z4/--y-LJz%&jT&&p2A& /&&ULJP-- F&e& ;r_tu&uh--c &/a+ 72%&4-=-44m’F!i&aaf- 4 w- At=;hx*. “..T x M WWU,” -& utl.Q&%-- -7- &7& q -- 2y: U!Ci-Q-=+f - & A =& -hLLuf* w-. ZZL- - REF ERRED TO CITY ~vIANA ( FOR RESPONSE A 0 a 2-7 g-s 31 cp +-/? 0 - . :J C\N w _111 (5 __ _-- - 6bLLd‘A I-’ ,I ESPoNsE @J&, I mT&q /3flo bJLl i2 $720- / 124 &A?/ kr.JI a #L?A? A? 4 d &?A .M+JY p?&-2 AJk -+ mp* N? cw p4,pL L+ p-i r-zR/I..- A @f+7$+fi&!Ll7 dw P-=- /&e **PA u& A%-:-+ ddYMJJ@+ >3ik@J-:/F$@&,.&.J Qc3 y-dd __ Yrp p”Y %4,- A &a& A, +&&bel* A+ /&A8 A m &!e/- --P-~xp~fT& I- - _<“ - .- -_ .-_- - , - . 4 +I c I 0 a- . / 1 *' El .\ .. . Q) OD Q) c; OD :zo g O-5 alalrn oc, k 9 m alo Gal u :Q)!2 3 s?J rl k *A al 0 umo* c, a E: om rlsrl U*4h@ c,k 3alu c, m k ZE u E urn0 iiiE* E s c, n IZUE 4a Er=U alh4JO 9 - P as VQ RI % - L b\ al rn.4 om tnk U-J k.4 1 cr, al h am 1src c, 4J k ou h4J w fd36)O h 0) al kOO au 01 0 h.4 4 L1 k b rn& oco3 - 5c kmhm h; al0 0 k3 ala @ah0 E1 d! f c1 "go, Q-44 * al cu 4 9 w LC sasa - -x rn &mal 11 v) 8 cw zg "0 I3 -: 3. 5 u Y k a& 2 3% as a 2 h Eal aa alJQ urn - E YalO sal rnual :- $:2 *rl 04a a rnrn alk0P al -4 m 4 k chta mnhrl u .. dm u co k m ma0 GEEA -5 I:u C0-J m al CXLl Q) 0-4 bpu P wala HE03 ul Iz v) Jz w 3 j February 22, 1990 Jim and Diane Jameson 6673 F. Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Jameson: Thank you for your letter regarding your concerns about the proposed Price C1 site on Palomar Airport Road, and the traffic impacts on Paseo del Norte. Your concerns pertaining to the development of this industrial area are bei reviewed. The proposed development in this area will be considered by t Planning Commission and City Council as it continues through the planni process. You are invited and encouraged to participate in this decision maki process. If you have any specific questions regarding the status of a Price C1 devel opmen t appl i cat i on on Pal omar Ai rport Road, pl ease contact Mr. Mi ch; Holzmil ler, Planning Director, at 438-1161. Si ncerel y , Mk Mayor UOE A. BUD' LEUIS jw:pgk c: City Council City Manager 1200 Carlsbad Vlllage Drive Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 (619) 434-28. Jim and Diane Jameson FOR RESPONSE 0 a Mayor Claude "Bud" Lewis and Carlsbad City Council February 15, 1990 Page 2 It seems that the zone change in 1988 was made to pave the way for a Price Warehouse, We have been told bv the Planning Department that this land may now not even require a zone change -- possibly only a conditional use permit, unless oE course, Price Company has that 17.7 acres of open space included in their parcel. Interesting, indeed! Something else has drawn our attention which seem slightly more than coincidental. Paseo Del Norte from Palomar -4irport Road to Camino Del Parque has been resurfaced and striped to two lanes each way. Why was this road work completed at this time when there is no need for it now and by whose authority? We understand that Paseo Del None can ultimately handle 20,000 vehicles ADT. We have a letter from Traffic Engineering dated December 19, 1989, stating that present ADT is 7,500. Can you actually believe that a Price Club at that location, an office building at Poinsettia and Paseo Del Norte, an office building and a mini-storage at Paseo Del Norte and Camino Del Parque will not create considerably more than 20,000 ADT? Then we will soon have the opening of Poinsettia to El Camino Real, all the additional homes yet to be developed, plus a proposed major shopping center at Cannon Road, Oh yes, we failed to mention the future city park on Paseo Del None and Camino De Las Ondas. It would be nice if our City Council and Planning Commission could put their heads together and think about this whole area for traffic impact instead of one project at a time. This is irresponsible planning and very unfair to the taxpayers and voters in our community. We would like to see more interest in people's lives rather than so great an interest in tax revenues. Sincerely, Jim and Diane Jameson &*/p-;? cc: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineering Division Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director Members of the Planning Commission 0 0 City of Carlsbad April 13, 1990 Ronald & Ruth Atkinson 6701-A Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Atkinson: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you an your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pric Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured tha when we consider development proposal s, the concerns of our citizens are alway foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception. All o the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to th members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when th matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again. At thi point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardir the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently beir reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project wi' be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it continut through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate . the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club si will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palom Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on t interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will ta approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traff congestion on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developme application, please contact Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-116 Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on tl matter. Your concerns as citizens are of the utmost importance to us and we w' certainly keep them in mind. 1- Sincerely, /;/ ' .wL**<! -c .7 + /' ' / L' /' * <,/-e f Mayor jw:pgk c: City Council City Manager P1 anni ng Di rector . CLAUDE A. 'BUD' LEWIS A - 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 - (619) 434-2 April 13, 1990 Betty Leverett 6723 Oleander Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Ms. Leverett: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you a your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pri Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured th when we consider development proposals, the concerns of our citizens are alwa foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception. All the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to t members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when t matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again, At tt point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardi the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently be. reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project w' be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it contint through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club s will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palor Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will t approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traf congestion on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developm application, please contact Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-11 Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on t matter. Your concerns as citizens are ~f the utmost importance to US and we w certainly keep them in mind. Si ncerel y , / /a ' / ' 'L A[ f </ /- 4,fC CLAUDE A. 'BUD" LEWIS Mayor jw:pgk c: City Council &%#%9/ - 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive - CarlsDad. California 92008-1989 - (619) 434-2 April 13, 1990 Paul F. Olivier 6703-A Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. 01 iver: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you an your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pric Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured tha when we consider development proposals, the concerns of our citizens are alwaj foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception. All c the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to tt members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when tt matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again. At th. point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardii the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently beii reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project wi‘ be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it continuc through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club si will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palom Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on t interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will ta approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traff congestion on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developme appl i cat i on, pl ease contact Michael Hol zmi 11 er, P1 anning Director, at 438- 116 Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on th matter. Your concerns as citizens are of the utmost importance to us and we wi certainly keep them in mind. Si ncerel y , /;,;’ // 4-h: // ( .& --f7 ’CLAUDE A. “BdO’ LEWIS Mayor jw:pgk c: City Cwncll / - 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 (619) 434-2E April 13, 1990 Richard and Marilyn Clever 6701-8 Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Clever: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you ar your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pric Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured th; when we consider development proposals, the concerns of our citizens are alwaj foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception. All ( the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to t' members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when t matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again. At th point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardi the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently bei reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project wi be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it continu through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club si will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palon Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on t interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will ti approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traf' congestion on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have'specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developmc application, please contact Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-11( Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on tl matter. Your concerns as citizens are of the utmost importance to us and we w certainly keep them in mind. Si ncerel y , 'I /-- / ,/ L2+ ,,,f[ff9 C~AUOE A.'~BUCP LEWIS Mayor jw:pgk c: City Council City Manager P1 anni ng Director 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 - (619) 334-2 April 13, 1990 Fred H, Behan 910 0 Caminito Madrigal Carl sbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Behan: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you a1 your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pric Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured th, when we consider development proposals, the concerns of our citizens are alwaj foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception, All c the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to tt members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when tt matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again. At th- point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardir the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently beii reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project wi' be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it continuc through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club si! will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palom; Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on tt interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will tal approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traff congestion;on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developmei application, please contact Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-116 Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on thi matter. Your concerns as citizens are of the utmost importance to us and we wil certainly keep them in mind. Sincerely, , A' 6 'isa(" e// Ly+< 'c L - C UDE A. BUD"'LEU1S Mayor jw: pgk c: City Council City Manager PI anning Director 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 (619) 434-282 April 13, 1990 Bonnie Cummings 6701-C Paseo del Norte Carl sbad, CA 92009 Dear Ms. Cummings: On behalf of the entire Carlsbad City Council, I would like to thank you ai your neighbors for taking the time to express your views on the proposed Pric Club site at Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte. Please be assured thi when we consider development proposals, the concerns of our citizens are alwa. foremost in our minds. This proposed Price Club site is no exception. All ( the letters sent to me regarding the Price Club have been circulated to t members of the City Council. We are keeping these letters on file, and when t matter comes before us, we will have your concerns to review once again. At th point, however, the City Council has not received any formal action regardi the Price Club. Your concerns pertaining to the construction of a Price Club are currently bei reviewed, including the development of detailed traffic study. This project wi be considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council as it continu through the planning process. You are invited and encouraged to participate the decision-making process. In addition, the approval of the Price Club si will most likely be conditioned to preclude construction until the Palom, Airport Road freeway interchange is brought up to standard. Work on tl interchange is tentatively scheduled to begin in late 1991 and will tal approximately one year to complete. This will help to alleviate traff congestion on Palomar Airport Road before the Price Club opens. If you have specific questions regarding the status of the Price Club developme application, please contact Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-116 Once again, I appreciate your taking the time to express your concerns on th matter. Your concerns as citizens are of the utmost importance to us and we wi certainly keep them in mind. Si ncerel y , //” /’ i j&- .\:/;/: yp-- CCAUDE A. ‘8W LEWIS Mayor jw:pgk c: City Council u 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 Carlsbad California 92008- I989 (6 19) 434-28: March 2, 1990 Ms. Colleen D. Holloway 6673-0 Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Col 1 een : Thank you for your letter to the City's Planning Department regarding you concerns about the proposed Price Club site on Palomar Airport Road, and th traffic impacts on Paseo del Norte. Your concerns pertaining to the development of this industrial area are bein! reviewed. The proposed development in this area will be considered by thc Planning Commission and City Council as it continues through the plannin! process. You are invited and encouraged to participate in this decision makin( process If you have any specific questions regarding the status of the Price Clut development application on Palomar Airport Road, please contact Mr. Michae' Holzmiller, Planning Director, at 438-1161. I appreciate your taking the time to express your views on this matter. mfmg,L LAUOE A. "BUD' LEWIS Mayor jw: pgk c: City Council City Manager P1 anni ng Department, Oonal d Neu 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad. California 92008-1989 (619) 434-2830 e e -4 February 27, 1990 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 Attention: Donald Neu Reference: Price C1 ub Thank you for your information by phone yesterday - namely that Price Club has purchased all 62 acreas of land by Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte, including the "gully" - designated as open space. And that on February 13th Price Club applied for a zone change from Industrial/Residential to C-2 - all general commercial (retail/wholesale) for this acreage. I am writing to express my STRONG opposition to this zone change and to Price Club cement warehouse locating in this area. The traffic on Paseo del Norte is already heavy and hazardous to residenuentering and exiting from Altamira. Shoppers coming from Encinitas, and points south would no doubt use the Poinsettia exit, down Paseo del Norte to Price Club. Even after the planned improvement of the Palomar Airport exit from 1-5 is completed, Price Club will cause terrible traffic congestion on both Palomar Airport Road and At this time, the worst traffic hours on both streets are week days 7-9 am and 4-6 pm. traffic all day long and will include weekends. Price Club has 40 to 50 semi-trailer truck deliveries per day. The planned truck entrance is on Paseo del Norte between Tip Top and Sea Gate Apartments. at once. Where will they park while waiting? And cross-country trucks sometimes arrive the night before delivery day. Will we have to contend with big rigs running their refrigerator engines while parked overnight along residential Paseo del Norte? The current zoning for that property is "planned industrial" would mean a business park similar to the one on Avenida Encinas. Paseo del Norte. Price Club shopping hours will increase that Fifty trucks can't pull into the warehouse which e 0 2. Compare the traffic and noise pollution from the business park on Avenida Encinas with traffic and noise pollution attributable to the Price Club on Nordahl Road. deserted on weekends, resulting in little weekend traffic impact. Weekends mean business as usual for Price Club. small business has 5 employees and would generate far less traffic than the 2000 to 4000 customers who would be attracted to Price Club 7 days a week. I urge the City Council and Planning Department to stand by the original plan of a business park on that site. Sincerely, A business park is practically The average California &/-eu1, Col leen 0. Hol 1 oway 6673-D Paseo del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 cc: Mayor Bud Lewis cc: Planning Commission 4 a a t DT%& APR .--n 6701-B Paseo Del Norte Carlsbad, CA 92009 March 13, 1990 -. Mayor Bud Lewis 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis: We, the undersigned, all live along Paseo Del Norte in Altamira. We i concerned about The Price Club and its intent to put in a place of bus the corner of Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airport Rd. We are very ups the fact that people who live in the area have been kept very much in 1 about what is going on. The remark by Councilman Pettine, '*I didn't k anybody was against it.", shows clearly that the Mayor's office and the have been less than open in dealing with the public and especially th affected by the proposal. We would like to think that the Mayor's of the Council is more concerned with the citizens of Carlsbad than they business, but so far it doesn't appear that way. The entry and exit from our condos are on a small curve. It is diffj to enter Onto Paseo Del Norte and go left. With the increase in tra will become impossible. The development of a park across the street enough traffic in the area without adding a business such as The Price Presently, traffic at the corner of Paseo Del Norte and Palomar Airpor very congested. There is not enough room for big trucks to make without crossing over into the left turn lane. We have all seen near i at this intersection with cars trying to make left turns onto Palomai Rd., being forced to back up or pull out into the lane of through With 30-40 trucks, the situation will be impossible. There is also deal of difficulty with traffic in and out of the 7/11 that is on thc Presently, north bound Interstate 5 traffic in the morning is lined up or more back on the interstate trying to make right turns onto Palomai Rd. We are aware that there are plans to redo this intersection, but . be several years in the future, and until then traffic on Paseo Del N only get worse. It would seem that you have the cart in front of the The Mayor and Council need to come and study the situation by observation mior8 blindly accepting The Price Club's application to this location? The best time of day for doing this would be 6:30 AM - at noan, or from 4:OO PM to 6:30 PM. We have no objections to The Price club's decision to locate in Carl with a large industrial/business park area with many prime build located in the area of Palomar Airport Rd. and El Camino Real, whe roads are already in, would seem to be a much better location. Agr not as close to the freeway, but that should not be the primary consic 0 e Jiiu arid Diane Jameson 6673 F. Paseo Del Norte Carlslxid, California 92009 ,n I' I February 15, 1990 Mayor Claude "Bud" Lewis and Carlsbad City Council City OF Cnrlsbacl 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 REGARDING: Proposed site for Price Club -- traffic iiiipact on Paseo Del Norte Dear Mayor Lcwis and iiieinbers of the City Council: We were extreinely disturbed after reading in the Blade Citizen or1 February 1. 1990, th Price Com~xi~iy has closed escrow 011 30 acres located on Palomar .4irpcirt Road bctwet Paseo Del Norte and College Boulevard. It was stated that the plans would briil have s be approved ,by the City Council and Planning Commission which appears to be just i official formality. Would Price Company purchase that property without assurance th they could locate there? Regarding File CT 87-2 P!anning Commission Staff Report 6/15/88. Subject: zc i7-11C Carlsbad Ranch Business Center zone chance from P-M, L-C, R-P to rcconligure tho, designations to add an OS designation and a Q-Overlav to P-M area. Applicant Carli Development Company requested approval of an iildustrial subdivision 011 56 iicres of tI property. Staff Report approved the above mentioned subdivision August 6, 1938. Why was iiidustrial zoning approved for this laEd so close to neurby residences md t coastal area? Property nearer the airport certainly would have been more suitable f industry and farther away from people's Iiomes. A business park would have had Far IC traffic impact and have been more aesthetically appropriate for this area than either industrial park or a discount store. 0 0 Mayor Ciaude "Bud" Lewis and Carlsbad City Council February 15, 1990 Page 2 It seeins that tlie zone clinrige in 1988 was made to pave the way for a Price Warehouse We have been told by the Planning Department that this land may now not even requirc a zone change -- possibly only a conditional use permit, unless of course, Price Cornpan! has that 17.7 acres of open space included in their parcel. Interesting, indeed! ~ornetliing else has drawn our attention which seems slightly more than coincidental Paseo Del Norte from Palornar Airport Road to Carnino Del Parque has been resurfxec and striped to two lanes each way. Why was this road work completed at this time whei there is no need for it now and by whose authority? We understand that Paseo Del Norte can ultimately handle 20,000 vehicles ADT. We havl a letter from Traffic Engineering dated December 19, 1989, stating that present ADT i 7,500. Can you actually believe that a Price Club at that location, an office building a Poinsettia and Paseo Del Norte, an office building and a mini-storage at Paseo Dei Nort and Camino Del Parque will not create considerably more than 20,000 ADT? Then w will soon have the opening of Poinsettia to El Camino Real, all the additional homes yt to be developed, plus a proposed major shopping center at Cannon Road. Oh yes, w failed to mention the future city park on Paseo Del Norte and Camino De hs Ondas. It would be Ilicc if our City Council and Planning Commission could put their lxa( together and thiiik about this whole area for traffic itlipact instead of OW project at a timl This is irresponsible planning and very unfair to the taxpayers and voters in CN community. We would like to see more interest in people's lives rather than so great a interest in tax revenues. Sincerely, Jim and Diane Jameson &+ /p-YT 4 /ih cc: Martiri C. Lauber, Traffic Engineering Division Mike Holzmiller, Plarining Director , Members of the Planning Commission a@&* &A & '&&MA '/ bJz A ?A 3 d& *@& @Ty7A &/ )J/&cL ' &&2 A 0w-y & &; 4 @&&an *&m- %A Jw &A-. $4 f*yz>A 4 y0' 9s fiy r +Y* A? *. &Ab A?@+ A5 +kHD fhd p- A ++mfln P-J ~~>&92@ Ada md$hJ w y, 'd Jw- .d 2 A/A w LJflA dd &A ** A&/&' \ \ . \ &/- 0 0 Charlotte Hutchison, Feature Writer 30 18 Avenida Christina April 5, 1990 Carlsbad,CA 92008 (6 19) 744-8069 Mr. Mike Xoltzmiller, Planning Director City of Carlsbad 2.075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Holtzmiller: It boggles the mind that anybody would seriously consider locatir.: a huge warehouse off a narrow residential road, at the junction o an intersection servicilzg four busy streets. One can foresee trz backed up for miles in every direction. Palornar Airport Road has an industrial park with huge spaces, RUC more appropriate for an enterprise like the Price Club, and easil available from every direction: San Marcus, Carlsbad, Gceanside and nearby communities. dhy allow a corporation take precedence over the people who live in or near this congested area? dhy junk up Carlsbad? Please reconsider. Sincerely, Q* 5. 'I Lqhu f% &f&5&;c?\ i Charlotte' Hut chis on e 0 Diane T. Bran& 26441 Avenida Deseo Mission Vieo, California 9269 1 March 26, 1990 Mike Holzmiller Car lsbad Planning D irector 2075 La8 Palmas Drive Carlabad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Holzmiller, Please be advised that as a property owner from the Altamira Condominiums I am vehemently opposed to the construction of a Price Club warehouse at the corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte, just ae I am opposed to any similar construction which would result from a rezoning of that area. Our property values, and thus the general value of the area and the tax base it provides, are dependent upon maintaining this as a desireable residential area. for business park8 adjacent to our residences ehould accomplish this objective. commercial businesses with the traffic congestion they create would be detrimental to this maintenance. I have not been apprised of any positive rationale for the change in zoning ordinance that would allow the proposed construction of a Price Club or other such business in this area. I certainly hope that you will futnieh such information to the homeowners in this area if you feel that the zoning change is desireable and that you will exercise the duties of your office in accordance with the wishes of thtr local homeowners when those wishes are made known to you. I Look forward to retirement living in Carlabad because X exm-At continue being a well planned conrmunity where the coR= agx -, and beneficial. Thank you for your attention to this issue. The current zoning Rezoning to allow large of local businesses and residents can be mutually Homeowner, 916-F Caminito Estrada 0 0 March ZL, 1390 an ‘!eu Carlsbad Planniqg Xpt. 1200 dlm Avenue CarlsDad, Calif. 92008 3ear Sir: Please add my wm to thore OPWSW to tho Price Club beid& located at Palomar and PaHod.lrte. The alnrdy heavy traffic at the Palmar Sr PIUO signal likhto ha8 become a hazard. Trying to pull out of anyone of the number of buiinersor, ruch em Hadlay8 - 7-11 - stc., 18 no easy matter. qave you tried it? The openinq of Poinsettia villege us already added -re traffic on Pareo del Norte, and tw morQusy corners, t.0. PIWO 6 Poinrrttis aQd ?oinrotCla 41 Avenid8 Encinae. Theso bury cornet8 now rurround long e8tabli8hrd reridential areas: Pane0 de1 Nort8 has olweyr been a No T’UUCKS ALLOd3. Youh aot telling us that Price Club’r 40-90 trucks a dry and aite ate not going to U88 PI8.0 de1 30tt.t “hy not mako uro of all th8t indurtrial area kcwen Palomrr wid Cannon. of yout long tim Catlabad rerldentr. Plaaw, uphold your prwinr to your Carlrbrd noighborr. At hart thore you won’t ba dirrupting tho liver of many s1 ncer. Ly , \ /&/hPGl TP!. Gxmarnef Grl8b.d erident aainfLI Llrdllor eud Uuia Mark Pattino Don Neu e e 03/22/90 Edward F. Miller 900-B Caminito Madrigal Carlsbad, CA 92009 Mike Holzmiller Carlsbad Planning Direct. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Holzmiller, This letter is being written by an interested homeowner who will be contiguous to the proposed Price Club complex. Our that the parcel held by Price Club now was for Commercial and Light Industrial use. We object strenously to changing the Lots from the indus- trial/office use envisioned to the Warehouse-Retail operation Price Club represents. Why? Excess, troublesome and unplanned for volume of traffic that will be generated especially on weekends and off hours for the nearby residential areas. While Paseo Del Norte is a "NO Truck Route" from Poinsettia Lane to Paldmar Airport Rd; petitioned for by the area residents and grudgingly provided by the City traffic department; early or late arrival inter- state trucks will use the area to wait out the opening of Price's receiving dock. Refrigerated trucks will be especial- ly noisy as the load will need to be kept cooled at all times. According to the Traffic Dept. trucks delivering locally or on Paseo Del Norte can use the "NO Truck Route", With the in- creasing congestion of the Carlsbad Blvd./Palomar Airport Rd. Interchange and no relief in sight until 1992, my feeling is that most trucks will find it much easier and more convenient to use Poinsettia Lane from the South and Cannon Road from the North and then onto Paseo Del Norte. Obviously, if trucks find it more convenient, what about the Price Club members from Encinitas and point South and Oceanside and points North and East. Local traffic will increase drastically on all the area streets. Price Club has announced publically that the San Marc- location is deficient and would be closed soon after the opening of the Carlsbad Club. More traffic, no fa- cilitiest! If you do not believe my projections above, just spend some time during morning and evening commuting hours at the inter- section Of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte and see what effect the 7/11 Store has on traffic congestion and near accidents. It is considerable, yet the store can not hold more than fifty people. Extrapolate that congestion at least ten fold and you will soon realize that we the neighbors and the City's facilities can not handle any one like the Price Club. Sincmely you understanding at the time of our home purchase (1976) was ./ / T -./ -7 = L-5, "'\/^') .. Xr . ,.:%e Yolzxiller, \:arlsjad Plarrirg 2irc::cr 'ax-, t, lcar ... d-- , --.7 ~= t:--e ..:.=. Ir; ;;?+rt-y .. <cy &,.?-e :it-7 e-- - L .__ -' rla3-,z, - . ... ic ,%I! :r - C' .. L --.;cy .. -2 3+-cr $.-.E -rice .,*-J .::f CTF 'irg - ':"SI::-, < : t' - --. '5s at ??.e 7-l . :,, 7 Elr '-..=:. -- -- . . .. - .t.T :: -s~~-:~: .,;--:y: -.: 'z~: .a:ec 6-1 '--...L . "e. >-- : _. ' - L; - .at ;;_L '+,h--e 'Le&-; &I: !--E :,:a; '3 :=--. - ,. 2LG.J" .. s .:::iers ',c 3 ?; I-.!.: '~cc h~~~~r.irg, ;'e 2 l~lll ..-A --.-'L ~ c- - ,,rate. ., .-; ce ic'.c:Ted ir >'-.e ai-ar-.a~e c.: lc:!.-tr~ lyc~ ;?e :..;t-.re - tte ::tire. rf Zarlsyaaci Sit;. .?-,at dc ;-TU see: ?cFe;'l-lly a rell slarred dltj- xh.ere recple gar: t.c ,:vB. A ?It;. t,k.at is r.ct arct'rer 'I' 55er 3ta.z;' cr' SLker l:eati,xs .,~!-e.-e ,de%ericrati-r sCfr. sets !r. 6,':er the 'Trice 2l~ks' h,ave . ade +,heir ~!S'J.FSS ark axd disappeared ! riho vu it that said !'.. - - . - .- _I .. _LA_. 9 -- TECPLE PF.ISH"? ', -. 7. -*-- -.n-r 7.: ..h - TtTP.' -.% f?J 71 - ,ease, --TC ?r'_ce :C~L':;. 00 - Tes?ect.%;.ly, --. C. iir-kelyleck L5nl IC' ?aseo ;El :-crte :zrlsbad :a. ~~375 4. ,-lLfT -- -3 e e P r- &hA* # dd w[dd-- Md&,--co & a *dl 9--$--- &/ A++d AGG& <L -& 8-Ab z-4 ciatuedb&- PA ULL. 0 0 3 6 -w- $5" /!G& 9 -. -mw4 zw2 pu wG & p--a+- fj wu R"*y-* w fiw - R..^J*& ma-?-- w -y-c A u eL*z: - v- 4 &ah, klR p2La4.J ;* # $?&? 7%&& /I.-../.;.-. - -&rr hll m d-z - T2W rn T -& u hx%u u AN= --- -7%- m & - 6677G - 4d1 rc Py8-4~ euh4r). 9-t * * March 4, 1990 Mayor Bud Lewis 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis: As residents of Carlsbad for fourteen years and lovers of our city and the neighborhood of Altamira, I wish to vigorously protest the allowance of Price Club to build a facility in the neighborhood of Paseo del Norte and Paloma Airport Road. Such an incursion would be a gross distortio of our community's direction, and I believe strongly that you and the planning commission should stop what could become a terrible hazard to traffic and quality of life in our area. S'ncerely yours, hLJqhL4 Robert V. Hine Carlsbad, CA 92009 906-D Caminito Madrigal cc. Mr. Mike Holzmiller / Mrs. Diane Jameson e 0 2-2 2-70 Zg! &&U,l ?POa Ad /2T 73gd%!.!. LP Ax- WM I gQu A A!.-@ Lz../+-W La4 - J A-t-JhJflfi tcb & /-2.-2 @? -b i-de afl && &&&A4= zz2PLFT* J?y Am.+ PTk-d 3- @&/A ?.d!d>W k/g.t -m A 7 /ctO FL&dd 4- vd 9--- a &%!iC d y e+2f+g* -J2- u 'A+ 3ki4?& 6 ,I v d,7'-Lf'f - - : -;&a,$ -\ r. * , u 8 3 .-J. e 0 The impact on current residential areas should come first. If the Sa store is closed, it would be much closer for those people and The Price would tend to 108. less of their present Customers at that location tF they are choosing to build. It would also demonstrate that they are ir in being good citizens of the comunity instead Of trying to force thei where they will destroy residential neighborhoods and generate ill will The actions of you and the Council will be well remembered when election rolls around. Sincerely, /22w.d2&/ 344; f7.U d -&-b 6 ?d/-0 w LlL? LhLGT 7gAx.L Q&,cAL-d7yJ &lid &c* b IC\ / -19 I-+- &Q--?z44?L @bdL+ et‘-e IC loi-f!-O‘hwL GAkt -1 4 z$ $ddf Gcgzz~~oLd/v L.13 5 O/P&wG&’d9 LJ81Q3 pauo OdL u& %X$k;& ‘IYIdyC cc: Mike Holzmiller, Carlsbad Planning Director The Price Club RZD DGLlur6flED r3.T J/7/9/ TERRELL WAIT, AICP PLANNING CONSULTANT SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94123 (416) 669-0543 FAX (416) 663-8701 0 1757 UNION STREET COudCIL m€€r,d - May 6, 1991 Bv Facsimile Mayor Lewis and Members of the City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Comments on Proposed Approval of GPA 90-l/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDF 90-9/MS 837 - Price Club Dear Mayor Lewis and Members of the Council: This letter is submitted on behalf of Project Future. As you are aware, Project Future has long advocated the completion of the General Plan update currently underway prior to the processing and approval of major projects requiring general plan amendments. The purpose of this letter is to apprise the Council of Project Future's position that until an adequate General Plan is adopted, projects such as the above-titled project (hereinafter the IfPrice Clubtf) should not be processed or approved. In addition, for the reasons set forth in detail below, Project Future believes that an environmental impact report must be prepared €or the project. The key source of information about proposed project's and their environmental consequences is through the environmental document required by the California Environmental Quality Act (tlCEQA"). Unfortunately, the proposed negative declaration for the Price Club project does not provide the disclosure required by law. Indeed, the evidence indicates that an environmental impact report ( flEIRrl) is required. Set forth below are the specific reagons in support of an EIR for the proposed project. A. The Proposed Negative Declaration Is Inadequate and Insufficient A negative declaration may be prepared when the initial study shows either that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or that potentially significant effects have been reduced to insignificance by revisions to the project or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines section 15070. Where a negative declaration finds that a project will not have a significant effect, the initial study must provide the factual basis for such a finding. See Sundstrorn v. County of Mendocino, 208 Cal. App. 3d 296 (1988). %. 0 0 Mayor Lewis and Members of the Council May 6, 1991 Page 2 The negative declaration prepared for the proposed project is deficient in at least the following respects. first, the proposed negative declaration fails to adequately describe the project. Indeed, there is no description of the total likely level of development on the whole 62 acre site in the negative declaration. Second, the document does not contain sufficient evidence to support the environmental checklist findings of no significant impacts related to the project. specifically , many of the discussions related to the checklist contain conclusory remarks. For example, while checklist item 5 states that the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposed use will result in a greater air quality impact than expected from the uses permitted under the present designation, it is concluded that vehicle trip length will be reduced due to the location of the store. This conclusion is reached in the absence of quantified air quality or trip length data. Also, the checklist fails to establish a factual basis fur concluding that the admitted significant adverse traffic impacts of the project, in part due to the fact the project will be completed prior to needed road improvements, are mitigated tc a level of insignificance. Third, the negative declaration fails to describe the likel! significant adverse impacts of the project. Such impacts include but are not limited to, the following: 1. An increase in traffic which is substantial in relatioi to the existing traffic load and capacity of the stree system: 2. Contribution to khe demand for extensions of publi infrastructure with capacity to serve new development 3. Substantial contribution to existing air qualit violations: 4. Conversion of prime agricultural land to nor agricultural use and impairment of the viability c other prime lands; and 5. Degradation of water quality in local lagoons. In addition, the project may have additional adverse impacts fc which there is no evidence to support a finding of insignificanr in the negative declaration. These impacts include but are n limited to the significant adverse cumulative impacts related decreased air and water quality, increased traffic, aesthet impacts and loss of open space. 0 e 0 Mayor Lewis and Members of the Council May 6, 1991 Page 3 The negative declaration altogether fails to address or analyze cumulative impacts of the project in combination with other committed or foreseeable projects, including future development of tfie 62 acre parcel and other similar general plan amendments. Unanswered questions that must be addressed in the negative declaration before the findings can be made include but are not limited to the fallowing: 1. Are the public services available to serve the project expressly contemplated in the general plan? Is there sufficient traffic capacity to accommodate the projected development in combination with planned growth in the region? How much open space will be converted to urban uses as a result of this and other foreseeable general plar amendments? What are the project related and cumulative air quality, traffic and water quality impacts? 2. 3. 4. B. An EIR Should Be PreDared CEQA requires that all projects which may result in one or mort significant adverse environmental impacts be the subject of ar environmental impact report. If there was substantial evidence that the proposed project might have a significant environmental impact, evidence to the contrary is not sufficient to support a decision to dispense with preparation of an EIR and adopt a negative declaration, because it could be 'fairly argued' that the project might have a significant environmental impact. Stated another way, if the trial court perceives substantial evidence that the project might have such an impact, but the agency failed to secure preparation of the required EIR, the agency's action could be set aside because the agency abused its discretion by failing to proceed 'in a manner required by law'. (Pub. Resources Code, section 21168.5) The Court of Appeal has stated: i 7) e 0 Mayor Lewis and Members of the Council May 6, 1991 Page 4 In the instant case there is substantial empirical evidence that the proposed project might have a significant impact on the environment and insufficient evidence to the contrary. For the foregoing reasons, we request that an EIR be prepared for the proposed project. e. The Project Is Inconsistent with The General Plan As the Council is aware, for a project to be found consistent with a general plan, the applicable general plan must be adequate. Project Future submits that the City's general plan is inadequate in ways which implicate the proposed project and make it impossible for the City to adopt required findings of consistency between the project and the general plan. Specifically, the general plan fails to set forth building intensity limits a5 required by law for the subject site, as well as €or most non-residentially designated parcels in the City. This omission renders the land use and circulation plans internally inconsistent and not correlated as required by law. Indeed, there is no way to determine whether the land uses and circulation system are correlated. In addition, the proposed project constitutes a piecemeal amendment to the general plan. Since the general plan update process is currently underway, this and other general plan amendments should be evaluated as part of the overall update program, rather than piecemeal as currently contemplated by this proposed project. Conclusion For all of the above-stated reasons, Project Future respectfully requests that this project be incorporated into the general plan update process and approval of the project await completion of the general plan. The environmental review of the general plan should include the subject project. Very truly yours, Terry h Watt, uJ?& &A Planning consultant Zach Cowan, Attorney at Law - -1 - -___ -- 44s Yes I No Name Et Address: Signature: Susin d22 4-* i( $/vll;i7 3- .%&@LL N,/P w.2 -- 5277 FL fl&BK de cG&&9;\ f- /l --.---I_---- - q -- / -- -, --- -7 --. t--- .-I -- ~- - ---,-I L%c&-uL- C/71R,C -~ f PLpL _- 2-J~-~-~-*--- - -- /%JLLfx-( s%%/-.-Q- L5Y-y . &+./ ..- __--- &? &J,, iL* c/,LB93 J?&UUfLq- - - - 1 q i CPWLe, f-L;r.”. G>-<-, - CL - i ----1_-- fa- -- ---- --- _________^___ ---- ---- --.-__ ---- __--_I__ - &2 ._____ _c_____ _-_--I-- -- ‘;.Wg&/(&/Q _- I-.__ - __ -- .- - ---- _I_- - -----.. _--- -- --- -- - -__- .- ____^--..- .---- - --_ --_I_- --x -- I- -- - --- --- -- -.- -- -.- - ___- -- -- -- _-_- -- - -I .---- ------ ------ - __- -________---I- - - --- _______-__----_- ------ ---- --I_-_ -_ - __ ______- --- --- - - - -- _____ -_- - ___ __ __ _____ __ -___ _____ _________ - ____ I -- _-.--- ------- - --. Out of the.proposed cons ction of .. -. .... * The rice Club in Carlsbad? __. . 4)- PETITION: Do YOU F:eturn -To: (%lain Elanc/Carlsbad Stationers 560 Grand Ave. Carlsbad, 92008 ... - ........ - -. . -.. ... E3u s i n --. .. 5-39 F&..-@€...L5B.D .---. ____ . _. .--- --. --- ._,._ .... .-... ... __----.------- ---------------'-- ..... , - ,,~______,____I_____ _.___-.-- -.-.-.-. -------.-_ ___ __. _.___ .. .- ........ _._______.___.____.. .- - ....... .... ..- .................. ---.- .... .. .- .. __-_.- _-. __ ______ -.-- --.- ----- ... -'. __._.~._ . ...-. ... __. ............... .-- .. rove of the proposed cons stion of 1.( ___ ___ . . .. . . .- . _.__ __ .-_-- -.. -..--. .- . .-- - * PETITION: Do YOU The rice Club in Carlsbad? Return To: Alain Slanc/Carlsbad Stationers 500 Grand Ave. Carlsbad, 92008 .- --- .. - -.. -. ..-.--...._._.._. _._~ ______. .__..... ----?-- ----.--- _-- ---_.---- --.. -_--- -.--..- --.----I_ ---_--- ~ -_.-.-- ---.-- _..__-------I- --- -_I- --...--- ._------ _.--_. _-_____ - --.I-.---- - ove of the proposed consection of The rice Club in Carlsbad? __ ..__ - . .. . . ..-. - ;$r . . .-. . -- . PETITION: Do YOU Return To: Alsin Elanc/Carlsbad Stationers 5BU Grand Avc. Carlsbad, 92008 _.... .. .-. . .... .-. ._. .... .---. ..... - Busir CMLCh%?/> ' -- .-.---- _____ _....-. _.__... _-_--. < 4 PETITION: Do you (@rove of the propos.ed coneuction of The Price Club in Carlsbad':' Return To: Alain Elanc/Carlsbad Staticlners 5tjO Grand Ave. Carlsbad, -. 921308 -.. . .._....._.. - ____ C\-rn&L1 ..-. - .______._ __-_ __-- -.-____I &--.-.- 1, Yo& MAPi!z 4 AbP-55 - -- - . __ - .__ __ - --- -- - ___ -,-. _____ ------ -- '1s . . __- Qc" you n\l'\cour= -@ __- - . coidST~C-~0d OF -\* ?cz;G -& 3 .- \a &.lzlCQhD - ._ - -- ____- 1 ____ _- - - ____ - ...* - __-- - - - _-_ -- _-. - - _--- -- - Yo& QLME 4 AbP%TS ._ ._ - - - _.. __ - . __ .__ - .., ___ .. -s euiAAA :--- 'i: - 9ZY-S yic Q-tox . _-_ E- \I -m. . de& ..I?c&jL -&-k3:-& :*L-&L&*'Lf(p- S5Q w.Ly--B !L+-Ld&& __-____ -E& - __ dkll il/db&Q - - ___. - __ __ - __ ____- - $:vd -* ~~ e=- - ~ -g-&pz--.-lS ~~ _____-- -_.__--- --- .iR '19 ._ - - - --. !&-4b-- f7 '. -- - l2L-e JkGLLC4- 3-f-G pqpf<Ls?- - __ __. . __ -- ~luw R* edl' 9/31 &Ull)< PI - - I T\ik+$ Yw-vwY 7 - 27-t bqJ&L\ p\-.c La.=& h/kGGiL pi t~fiifi, dAh d~' :>A- RUE /E i/i hh/dn~/vE t l:-&g/dz j&. L,Je T;?-&L~ (G~~&/-W~/&A />?xJ .Ji: /yp-~~ ~ &fl:sf*,22 mw Too0 m3 3 hyers 0 Sdc LL L(\dJ yL.- h 2 d&& +GG\yuid--J /. 6%- /@-A SQb-r N&?r *&hk- c2d- =Ph ZLT( c7Cf3kMkd d, oahl: .. uf ( .wh- 3i20 CAuk/dd s- C~PL~MD -/p 'A 9 ' 3543 dA "7 @&L .-/- - - __ - -- -- Cma, -- 6772 Cw_b$ PA&- cLOtL.04 & ZbfZ &a Vgkp w h -/rs,JT /d,LIdZZ[ a2 /&jg/XG 44 d22 q:/47 iijr(/XI*N.& 3~/VD-whPOP 2% GlUd $&& =L& 1351 I&& &- w &. fm. -. '/€s - - - ___ - - - - - - - _.__ - x- _._ __ ___.. - - - - - ._ Y _- F- x ,x -_ .. x- __ ____ /J( .- 3 . -r -~-- ___ _____.-__.. _-- .^ ._-. f - .. "-C---.l...l.~I.-..-----"..-I- D*.//Dok&- - ---- I- ---.__ $A& __.--..--. __._ _-_. ._I.--- -- -----I --___ -_-___ .... ----_..._ ____. - - - __.__ 23543 J7797T Jr - -I- I--.-.-- -I--- _____ . -.-___ ................ ........................... Akprova;l: Yes No Name & Address: ~_I @ / -PI---.- 2457 fl~aG77 --_--__ LfwZ&x&d -- ~ -- - -----._.-._-_- ___--- ~- ._--__.-._- -- ---. ~_______ -I._---.-_.--l._____l ____.- .____ _---. .__,-I ....................--.-..... __ ____I- __---.. . __ ........ _I.I_ ..................... ^___.___.___._I,__ ___ ____I________..-_ . ....._.. ~--- -_.-. --__.-__.___.__ ~ l___._____l __ ~-I_ I__- ---_. ~ .--I_- __--- ... --- __.-.. --.-- __l________l --_---------...--I_- _______ ___ --_- __.l_--l.__- _--- I_- --. _I_ ___.____ __._____ -- --- -_______ - --- - -- I- --I_-.._--._._-.-- _I__ --- ---- ~---_ --.- -.--_ .--- -.--_______ - .-- --- -- --l-....l--. .._...._. ..... .__- _____ _-_. -.- . ...............___I- .-__--- .____._..__ . _-_______._.__._... _-._-. -._ _--_.__,. .............................. ____._... ^___.___.____ .._..._. ........ .._............__.___..._._..._.........__.....~.. ....-. ....... .___lI.___I._._..________._I ........_..._........ . ...._ ........--....,.............. ----..-.- Signature: Bus. i i $ t+Qkk hold ---I-- ?l&y' ___-._- W&dF& ----.- ----_---- .__-__II--__._-- ..--- -- --.-.-- _----___.---- --I-- ..... -.----. _. -_.-... ........ .-.-I II~-~-.. - ---.--.----.-. .....-_..... ... .......... .....-..... --.--.---..-- ..... - --.------ .................... -__...-....---- ..... .-... ...... ._....'..I _.__.____^I_------_ ..................... .__.._.__- - .._._.__.I - -.._--- -I.-. ~ ~ _________._--__-._.--.-- -.---- ......... I _.___ ..--_._ .............. ___.__ -_--- --_ .--- I.-.-. -_-_____- I_ ----- .__.-- _--.. I___.r._.._-..- -- I.-- ----. .... .-_.-...-_...--._.-------.. ............ ---._....-_.-.--_-----. . ---. ....... _-..--I-- ~ __--._---.-. .------ -.-- ............_._...... ....................................... .............................. --- ... ---.- ......... -. ......... .......................... - .. .-. -.. - . .-. . rove of the prclposed con. uction of 6 9 .. @ PETITION: Do you Th rice Club in Carlsbaci? Return -1-G: Alain Elanc/Carlsbsd Stationers 560 Grand Ave. Carlsbad, 92008 . . .. . . . - - . . ..---. ~. . -. .. . LL&!I.LZ.-O&ML ---_I- ,.'9f mL?,:d &!El R I c If - CA---.---- 4-9.0- -.-- z\TT--r I_ -----._I-. 337 >F*TC -.-.-- -. . -___.- _._____ -- -.___---- _--..I-. .I_-- ----. ------ _- -.--..-I_- -_-- . .. . . - -f]fL/L- V‘/V a PETITION &I, &ce/v”a TO DENY APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PRICE CLUB AND TO DENY APPROVAL Op THE PROJECT We the undersigned homeowners, voters and residents of Carlsbad residing in the following residential area request the City Council of Carlsbad to deny approval of the Negative Declaration and Project Proposal to locate a Price Club on Palomar Airport Road until all the required improvements to the infrastructure system to protect public health and safety are implemented. Further, we feel that additional information/\concerning the potential short-term and long- term traffic, noise and community compatibility impacts of the Price Club. We feel that in order to adequately assess the potential impacts of the proposed development, as required by CEQA, additional traffic/circulation studies need to be completed to assess the interim traffic impacts from project implementation to buildout of the General Plan Circulation Element, including feasible projections as to when each of the improvement phases will occur and what Level of Service (LOS) will occur from each improvement phase on Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane, Paseo del Norte and all Interstate 5 offramps at Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane and Canon Road. An additional study should be conducted to assess the degradation to existing conditions and public safety potentially occuring from implementation of the project to Carlsbad Boulevard until circulation buildout. We further feel that a detailed acoustical study40 determine potential short-term and long- term impacts from project implementation to residential units adjacent to Paseo del Norte. We would further request that the noise study determine the feasibility of the project required noise attenuation wall adjacent to the Sea Gate Community to mitigate noise impacts to Sea Gate residents. We recognize that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that mitigations for significant impacts be reasonable and feasible to reduce the impacts to from 4 PM until 6 PM on week days to prevent significant impacts to local circuIation is infeasible and is a direct violation of CEQA Guidelines. We request that additional studies be conducted by indepentent traffic engineers to assess the feasibility and potential impacts resulting from such a proposal. The Planning Commission has stated that there is no fiscal impact data available to ascertain the actual tax benefit and community costs of having the Price Club located in Carlsbad. We feel that prior to approval of the development and associated Negative Declaration that a fiscal impact study should be conducted to ascertain whether the tax dollars generated from this development constitutes new tax dollars, or is merely the re- distribution of existing tax dollars from existing local merchants. We recognize that the Resale customers of the Price Club do not pay sales taxes. We would like the information to assess how the exemption to resale members effects the anticipated tax dollars to the community. Furthermore, we demand a fiscal impact study to determine exactly how many tax dollars will be required to support the infrasturce system, including police and emergency services for this project - not only at buildout, but during the interim period of full circulation buildout. (We recognize that the City of Carlsbad will be doing a General Plan Update during the next year - we would suggest that any approvement of this project )r v 15 Ivecded 1 s r4eekd insignificant levels. We feel that the proposed mitigation to close the Price Club facilities q&7jDJ l@a( T#flT- 2- fifC25: I- &Lo r be deferred until such inf A tion is available. Should the appli @ t wish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve1 ' consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PdYe i * DENIAL OF APPRov?~, 9 PRICE C MAR rn be deferred until such info ation is ava&&qe. %oipt%e appficant%xh &?proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE P&fk!mG i5 : 14 L- 7 2- f + S& /2/ AUC-&S * (23 d!A,LA q?ETte 1 w 15, ffL 7, 7 *4 -%lv- Lo. e ps &JJ&*J$ d! ///’ J&7L (-(f GdY FLL ALb 4 eY<-/)fl 4 in / ( r&LLJ- -+j :452 c/‘ t-- c- -: - ‘9 q .CP-7.Q4 ,&Le Y //$$tyOEI h4w-7w%fLl .A &!+ &4G&YtM&5-/j@ f&& b‘i & ($b& l Ld? 3[&J /)d[L4t q. G/4 LKj i/ 4 JGL J kk/4 I ,f& wc7e 3 * r&Jm F f hO~~SZqfi1A.c C~GXCAZ~~J)/IC~ I I i/ L / (‘2 // r( pj&Pc &$i 7 GO$? .&C’&&Y7C9iP Loy .&aA:X ->eL: vJ LfdZ&Wd 1 &&/ / --I-. f- /Lqpp.p A&>&\ Is: U"?? 81 2L!Z&flu'eMi/e 9k "-7" ,jge I&C.u'Sb&M \+.)f+&.q Lp /&% ,3 f-) g3fL.e /;fbg L 5-11- k-ij-2 \/ 5 T C-d-pl,[Sfi &i/? :fuy 4 il"; mr J&-)fp / I - PJ6fqqq 1 y@hfl d .-' " I , 4 /? .r, t - x "W"': -.-- consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) DENIAL OF AP~~(~VAL , YKILC LLUD nl rfiU"l-1' be deferred until such info v mation is available. Should the applicant wsh to proceed at thi 6 the, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve1 1 .. %% YMk /d'& mkw JmrJkrklPd@&&d ?[~&@d&[&CL & VJ' /L"/f$i.& w / G LL,Y 4, /h*JWi?q2 P/Y4w//v17~LAd f. sr'i )4%Iq I-+, EYL*k< (" WCLh 9 !Z &yb,q;\ c+. &?Jb~-, /4& * &k& b. ."+ fa &e, dn, i AZw-3 P#.\ZD a5c. /a&& L2A&Cs bk I*LA\U D bqgq 5&j{bW+TIs OR uu-.E~&:b=-4 C??fi/b@h~;kC/ L X@&d a&/ DEN1AL OF APPROVA@F PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR ~~~gr~*~ d a Q NAME ADDRESS i 7 ie 13. Cfl- E%.TtE'Ai3fi% CLfiS p\1.. W' h 19 le -h @ l<\\ l\ /ia& * d!.& 4 'ZP? dWW&-r 44- ?$& +. p: vu, \ G.&%E -c-- h bb+&& . 2 ,A, \% L4Jsc+ CC%.,-s. &, i/ i' ,! - ,u- &---$-- - y 1-J j-y ..I B '-, i' ,' ,-&, &LL& ;p3[ r --I_ -. i '/1 h _..- -I i,b\ L 5, fi 72 *&\ (E ,.el >y I-. i p- I i.4 .?,; ++2 &if i ,~FF >>g . ,<d:.,M> . , Pr , ". DENIAL OF APPROVAT F TEE PRICE CLUB AT PALOF- AIRPORT RD. PA( #i !a 'v be deferred until such info t wish to proceed at th time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) tion is available. Should the appli c ~ 12 - -5 ," -\#u ju*- 8 /' ' /' -'c&%7cx FRLlsL. 3 CCCLt-c;2jP. 4GL-f T&!€@Lf N4\ Ps- @.-4ZL~Jl3WJ -1 ,I <L&T&f /- - ,'J /' //- ' ;#.&& / - ,&&q 1% b/5/@+< iI, Lp47 -' /&l&? y&g e!<& I / 1,>,4/A.d A f f * $S-lACt &&& 7/63 Wg+- 047, G.kz$6& GV,gm , h / -- .* ---" f/){.??&- e't" /L.y *yfi*kA3 m3/ e”. PAGE 6 ‘t- ;Lr DENIAL OF APPROVAL O~RICE CLUB AT PALOMAR AIRP NAME ADDRESS Si NATURE t *..A.-.,, i; e-!, y-h 9- r” ..--. ,e- .G:, 9 j9?.+.. .-, g kLC/-9 - -.&L.;<, -;rY4L*-/c/+ t, ( :-; 4.-pL: -2 x Lx 52. e: <! i LCL-4 9 B :J i. ci.-.-. <*a? ‘G‘,.., ’ ,’ &>j~+J~ . ~ ; {,, )” G .LC.* q,; 7 <.* &,m>. I- f /$./$q$’4 -/ ,7 ,&< ‘. T’. /*f i fl:*,y4, 2 2w-% j b-. &$<-{;-&/ ,? &vy:y !A$L&&,-.J : ii / i? ’, ’ ‘ ‘T-) 3 4 ,/f-;-- :h,.. / ;, .*.,y-. , (yt 4; ,,, Ir ” j ,f 4/ ,.,/*&-A, . J ,A+<-.-:;:” 1 k Q L-Lb,:!x I,\/+\ (, 1 +*““.,.L I !i ii i . i) ’ .T c;.\ ’. -q ., ;\, ! .,.; ;q , , , X.’ .. G2-’, &-:~&/- g..(,/i. r &><5 7’yL<&&5&+. / i ,.,/ .,;-& 4. ,‘ /.LA ____ L-’ i 9 ,/ 4,/&dih+&!fm/ pa5-2 wish to proceed at thi5 ant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec f WG"' KD- DENIAL OF B AT PALOMAR . Should the applic * consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ADDRESS - /-- t-; la \ N/q I? I3 -? )( "I I- L FIl- fl3.- E ,yG Lib3 kd 2iZL c-&~q&~ .+ c ~~~~~,~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~/~ ,Llj ZL, , fLJ [-p w (14 [ 'iT. 1 /l.,/fk-rJ" / I - / rh-&+iAA *I & d-q+Ah 30if &, L Gb,"IA84.p 914 3 cA-Fc.%:{& &:& Dm? Q~W LcLSrEoM P Le &ddFf 3d J slS M ~wa eQfl;~A-~dh?h ZfiENE /)3ccd/)/I/cLk~ qog-E @AM~/YITO k-57 #ih&d>lJ fl@J c DENIAL OF APPEOV OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR RPORT RD. PAGA ADDRESS F!LN*wRE c-i 0 NAME 1c , XG!S IQO -s3v (75-7 OGWOOO Qm An BtSTrnCi 915-u rp (&?N&& f?h&?? &pA \J .&!YJkwc L:k+ RCf,s 2\31 SlCdZ a. taA b d R iLT;.iu 6. d!* \ LJ i)JCc;t< 5.i-q ,T 'ti tzX\TkZL6 (-J- ( Y. k bPG'?P3 ./Lv LUA? n zl?Zpj 2- L&&7;.rJ /&t b..q%?@< e 91% h f3 +9& ab49 cB/o/ B AT PALOMAR A ORT RD. PAGE mi 4 e. Should the applic consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) wish to proceed at this propriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved 0 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE QH3 -flfw&W Ahid I&/ bL73-i fi&.J&iL /JGR6 flhW J& / dE a 7 !@A:W li ---ibAn 3- Sc/&e/e b 673/4flW &/gGz M& ]& 1 .1 /&&k "d/ /y 0 *i I@Ffilf,.$iJj$f3 AT PALOMAR A ORT RD PAGE DENT#&$PPROVA dkN~4mkE P& J-roclCL Jd*J ff e /d 73 P&P",D\,/ 0 &rk,f- LL// ,A A+ Y&* 5 AQ&cvTL4uP PQ&3E-. /4-L nA;L-P LC /4L7izzdb/ i f% 4 &&7@H@?&d- b?F5z+-&& #k/T/f&MK fiJ/J 6 I, flP& LOl;lr7L4Kf /f+LE *> d 1- f c"9p *! '&?d/JQ//'$ j r , &9l&yj---Lcs $&+04 ld @U&"dj pf&$!L& /@ .iGdd& p -/* f' u' -1 /' GmRbk /wR!&~ &?3fi5P~ DFL~~OTEYE &e' o &A?&) CR 14 h' Gb~~~)~ 6\75 (3 'i'rj u 'M/ iGl\L- \ \- naJL z M,lt-R,Ylr;BE% 447~53Z5CLr J&Nm,47z, @i?jF / /!$/znp--f /+fiC/.CEd? G 6 73 ffiSL-0 p k-L fJo4TL- 1 i FAD ;A M@K7(*cS.z K757-93/& 7LL4gL-G- A2 dLx.Q, &A:! 9- bS 7 3 H-Fanon LA, 1 r/)-s< . 1 &Ql PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR AIR PAGE i a mT RD. % DENIAL OF APPRoVfiL be deferred unbl such info wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) tion is available. Should the appli t NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE n I pl {OQn c- \/ .I ooga 5cLDT /7 '2'8 /7Qf'J 7- (>J& JLM+ .. k&--J& ( ab^^ Lfqg '7 U4A &e> /?.id E CkA ;?LC J 00 c) in/ A jy 4 --CS3 7 E /+s9 ST- -@(&$~ LJk Jf+.d (&LG$&; #P /ATb Dd/ DENIAL OF APPROVAL *RICE CLUB AT PALOMAR AIRF -'T RD. PAG 7 4 NAME ADDRESS S GNATURE f y&& @Ey L nvu .L d ~~uj-j A'i' .YALUI"IHK HiKk'Ufi I e: we' enu ' DENIAL OF APPKWVAL Ur be d.ef..-ed until such infor tion is av_aiW Should the appliGa t wish to prweed at thi: time, it iFcppropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad apgrovec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) .g- 1 SIGNATURE - NAME ADDRESS *Pk u 2 Rc*<h 1_ #&S En) fl I &;d&w Q&RI.EJ~ LRaiRE 90 / 4 CwInl;n Eirnf)h& CAcLLSN*&. & . %w?q E ! 1 R y-pfi;; 1 6 ,"/'* - J p;,, <.!J k u<*& > Lz/4 f ,&& LC J j ri\ f7 j L I P&& &a/ I DENIAL OF APPRcVAaF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR A@ ’ORT RD. c\flo i bl {lo -de t3yi ;l.i /,saji 30, --I f 5! ii &e g]p&xj$, 1:&4y-&; F GNATURE 4J NAME ADDRESS I L iqA.> jJ/,S/r I‘ik ,VS” y vY- I” ’L‘ rt / /j / I - > r;; !I!\ i‘ ‘ JU& -J .p kb .i ---7 (2 G L </i>L& r: ,ci-;z Lier> L 3-A z- //A /7/-//*d ,” +L&4 ‘Fh2-K c ,rglL > /-,/ ;2 /jq ’ J&d2c? ”P (.&& /&!-&-:&x- ,[444?d.. fhffi G L& ?&@J b[& /$&--& -e &&,e* yy. fw y5-P/- p fi7H -C&[i.!&./ py JHLl~d.&// - ./#&-- ~~~ic/A 4N~fiNa ~KV ~&d~f&rj5 &zxigT~ d 44 /&&/A /f*t -/&A4+ 7327 p+* &Lj,+- @ i;’ P Jjc3 L?.6--?#f-%- ‘4 &!Ls i-&Q&l 7Q 2 -/= (<&&iVL.2A, /$$UCri/k: U ,.& // II/ La/&< /r cui hdLLq? Ii --f)d &A& && &&/J , & /L-. /d 2/2h e/, pJ L~L /Fib45 JZI~~S~?) r\ A c/ fT*2 $- 1, p4’RO~ -9 y)y/+/>$pc .-/ 64 & 4 .“a .&pj=& &$h 7klh 1)C-L i&%gr;?ec E 0 fie^^ / fill ;?.I; ~zc~ 7 ! /I 4 ,/am ’/ I9 / &% J, --* -pJ ..$ <.AL& * p,4,3 79/23 scc/-& . q?-&J?& C4&; c I. 8 PAGE @’OR”’ RD- DENIAL OF APPROV OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR be deferred until such info m tion is available. Should the applic wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Zd&! Yh’ L, 5/7L 577-774~- i-- /? k aB lkww!/yT& ,Ti8 aLsma A(& FA:L& Gf&?m- 8-h &&Cfi~UL~ p3U3-s LC$ p &S a&.. , /Jk& 7 a$? c;(F-/vl/rj/.+&!=fi MS&D - Ad ab, 1_ OdOLiL 8N cc~w:L\&%c&x c or& 1 k\ 0 &&$ , gLY,#3/G?L, DA &, b$&L{*w fl‘ y&LdTf/+bbkg& its e644 lNl’T-2 &J& C2&LBP0 &i!!G+-k wzg- Jk% y &I/+ // /r -0 L R kmke1, k3? &rnLZ& ‘3 Ra, fCJALJ\ \, d ~ , -7’ &/,I) L Jl)/? /5 i i77qc ’ ’// L L,: /! xq,/zh flgYflfltz7- /qzdO&E I/’ pv 2 LCArn -&,= 74 /f??s14 I, flzymf7 -/ c_ “Ledhfi/E fzz L!m./u/c&&s~ Nd?.j?f .$fib. *flA a9) I J--- DENIAL OF APPROVAL! 0 AI P be deferred unhl such info&&;% kikb?: &kku%?#e ap&c@$& to proc"i?28a$t&s consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) .", time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract With City of Carlsbad approved 23pf f?WFGLC 4- - : ,f LJflEPCE // k/ :s &g_r'/q.ipEf/$a. & iLA,f&@p 32-i&d gq&g 581-7 &I 78 /Li'fl-N. kj 1 Cbes' <' /?A. /]yf L/ d@\n ,/>p - (3 ?%GiYKClS GR/?y 7q-c -soLyq 0.57 ,%&z-YJQ~ FkL e@ L' -4 (;37' i- . --t 1% 'j:s L\JFJ.?+ Kq ;$L-d?- r /-' JF. n $9 ..x I / I ,:j /+LL ;I- dh: d L;%Ly b$72J#M+hd DL71 vi? - -9 I 1 I ?' iiiOk0 6 y P s ik&L2&tJL,pd ;>be- 'I /",yt& . .t& !"/ sc-e '/ 7 t /& I t7Qj I /TIL1 I a DEKIAL OF PRICE CLUB@!' PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. m PAGE 17 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE <-e d $ 1 -L w w %! *o@GQ + 4%$?> 97kQ vi/ ! %P e' 9-' * 6, $?p- &yyi +e$+%* \ *$+p- , *-- DENIAL OF APPROT OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR RPORT RD. PAG I time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) be deferred until such info !!? ation is available. Should the applic * t wish to proceed at this i-&A - &p,<< .y 24, LZ- ,kgcA < b-- <&4& &>& -f c NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE - g,&+Rel' f. 'gyp ,g/k ~AfW{O G&- /K $ lhvl," k ICpg 8/r<am Y7I r L) ]/&/Je d c",..&,j. Jkv -*,I s LE?; &a3%&$/c An/&5 flgR 72-fo x ,L' P/2 CQfm! z&4jG CLJ-md #+jd,&/jJA //qv'i.QE aGcriiM/;i;:okH7i I gflmD(7 %. b&J&..h2, lJfl - / -";"i"", ..-9 &- CT/-='\ c $@-dJS le /iL/4/?.& i.7(~~~c& (:-x2 &, I y+&LeLLg #42 8 z7 (3pw/ /y CTC kid@ ,5 CAKL St38 0. PA / $&L411. %&/I c3)l B ,Lp L 4fle p 4 /?-/&/&I jz/&r r&%fl,'4jPG &de# JA.nr5 4 -3 I ,L/g;f-- Y2S(?/iAja jL+L 13/ + t! 7 XL e'$ /I /1eYl c pdb e q l~C4fiAb Ykzje -Lir/5b24j d2L+ 1 / /E $&6J SI &,27-j+D/L f 913 ~UWP~~ ik-Edbz t-%ds~,p F -.---- 5f7-7-E- ia/(* L,/V ea, E2-7 - ' I ~ VL&-,U4,fP J4C4 /J LI/L/+ c // ( ~'W&A.&-&&J .*& Y - 7 I 6 01 \ DENIAL OF APPROVj-OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR e!PORT RD. ' AGE NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE % v irs~eT LL LEIPER &s CRM& I)ELP~~~OS)~ 1(&g& I&J \\I L\ /+I- If E /+I A/ G$-[ 5 (agq/&LO pfg pepq dZ&& ow c LJ 1 1f.b W Yhl\IIHL Ut HYPKUVA UP PKLCE CLUB AT PAL0 ( FIAReRPORT RD. PAGE be deferred until such in fb ation is available. Should the appl b nt wish to proceed at thi . time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve1 consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) * t # 1 I 4 3-u5fl E- L--GLG-&# d5-2 D &,fifl& &* .A$%=- NAME ADDRESS h c $_ a E. 3EeeBhqGi.f &<Pi cm I / Lli’ DEL a,,,, l_p c <LA 7 </<J 4 ,~d&, ?m 2 o 65Z 7 60 I de T hUULS.Q (LXs5 ,.c kSL7 CL\%lLkL v p!Pd \+?& d rJ &s63 rs,b.,;tuCs &\ &;.;.Le . / F * 6?:l Ciifi..lik~ ~6’c fkAbo t ? 0 6 e PETITION hm @/+I TO DENY APPROVAL OF THE NEGATM2 DECLARATION FOR THE PRICE CLUB AND TO DENY APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT We the undersigned homeowners, voters and residents of Carlsbad residing in the following residential area request the City Council of Carlsbad to deny approval of the Negative Declaration and Project Proposal to locate a Price Club on Palomar Airport Road until all the required improvements to the infrastructure system to protect public health and safety are implemented. IS Meche~ Further, we feel that additional information\ concerning the potential short-term and long- term traffic, noise and community compatibility impacts of the Price Club. We feel that in order to adequately assess the potential impacts of the proposed development, as required by CEQA, additional traEc/circulation studies need to be completed to assess the interim traffic impacts from project implementation to buildout of the General Plan Circulation Element, including feasible projections as to when each of the improvement phases will occur and what Level of Service (LOS) will occur from each improvement phase on Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane, Paseo del Norte and all Interstate 5 offramps at Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane and Canon Road. An additional study should be conducted to assess the degradation to existing conditions and public safety potentially occuring from implementation of the project to Carlsbad Boulevard until circulation buildou t. We further feel that a detailed acoustical studyZto determine potential short-term and long- term impacts from project implementation to residential units adjacent to Paseo del Norte. We would further request that the noise study determine the feasibility of the project required noise attenuation wall adjacent to the Sea Gate Community to mitigate noise impacts to Sea Gate residents. b i. IS Ivceded We recognize that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that mitigations for significant impacts be reasonable and feasible to reduce the impacts to insignificant levels. We feel that the proposed mitigation to close the Price Club facilities from 4 PM until 6 PM on week days to prevent significant impacts to local circulation is infeasible and is a direct violation of CEQA Guidelines. We request that additional studies be conducted by indepentent traffic engineers to assess the feasibility and potential impacts resulting from such a proposal. The Planning Commission has stated that there is no fiscal impact data available to ascertain the actual tax benefit and community costs of having the Price Club located in Carlsbad. We feel that prior to approval of the development and associated Negative Declaration that a fiscal impact study should be conducted to ascertain whether the tax dollars generated from this development constitutes new tax dollars, or is merely the re- distribution of existing tax dollars from existing local merchants. We recognize that the Resale customers of the Price Club do not pay sales taxes. We would like the information to assess how the exemption to resale members effects the anticipated tax dollars to the community. Furthermore, we demand a fiscal impact study to determine exactly how many tax dollars will be required to support the infrasturce system, including police and emergency services for this project - not only at buildout, but during the interim period of full circulation buildout. (We recognize that the City of Carlsbad will be doing a General Plan Update during the next year - we would suggest that any approvement of this project ?E~UL%J 06( p/fb?TZc j%2%-i5 /--A0 1 1 be deferred until such inf a ation is available. Should the appli a! t wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) t NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DENZAL OF APPROV. GF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR RPOEiT RD. PART I NAME ADDRESS 9GNATURE r,, *k $.&5li-c Cl_a rei/ (254L t PJ 2-7’1 1 )?iD pa ., $i , fG rg LP gJze c flzs fl+L &u;# ~~~~s~~/Lj19/)i*~~~~~1/t P cL,ILL, Luvu nA rLI~u~~inn nguix' L\U L nL\A AI W' YUIvALAY VL LaL rnuvn -. be deferred until such info t wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved ation is available. Should the appli consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE &dL&J $7 ILbKF /> . FILL i/$& P7bk ,- /5&&dd &A /Add& 5U&//& 4- j5l g: h c .OM& c7&6G4/,,,.J!,,L'j/4?nP d- c///* Pmb# '? fl /-7 / / t?k 'y 6 748 6ha4 9 *u//lMiq [Pfljh 4 dFLd'd,i C&/48IQJ &/; J/d/ r4.b // A ht 111 e bogd CAI~WN~ dq y~~do Q~R~~~A~~ & 1 md dflLDJ, L 7Q &1&3C) j9j~LKisG* (--ixXb 3 3 @# G7 '&&!i!z &LM-L 177- 2Lfi-W- 63 && I Ale \ kipi R v / -., / i"&-r lcC"rk&, (&-)/]g)T /.y27 fi.*\,,,/# ,/-4; i- /j,,:[i;L /+ l&+L ( //f&L*c4w<- / 1 v ,a- ,- 0 PI - "! 1,- ' i I il "/ - ? .? ! ; X' 3 2 /Ir, , ,(J2&{f /&,/&& &54 .LB;d/!!; be,! . ,l$& n p , p J 2 h Pi I 1 . :/&Lh,,,q 0 2, . il - d v c; c/LchnLkL f 2- @&E &Q/ DENIAL OF APP VAL OF PRICE CLUB AT PAL0 R AIRPORT RD. PA1 be deferred until such inf ai ation is available. Should the apph h t wish to proceed at thi, . the, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve( consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ’- 54b ih &Wrn x bhfT05A L& ,h,, LS&CsL 247 Lu.fa hl KW IW!!f& b##&LEj XJ 4S-TfG w 303 L hQ- &A ?$?a&& n3 dzd.xf%*. & -, r- -7 /- L dv-,u-9 $@%w-%@~Le-n 6- ,?,J L &&Z//~*l>~ &$ -44!!& -1 $&&/ @O/ ‘J 7 6a&&lo.L U~IVI~U ur Hrr'K~vki r risiLE CLUB AT PALOMAR A ORT RD PART I1 F ~ time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) be deferred until such inf 3m ation is available. Should the appli !Hi t wish to proceed at this -.- NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE &MO 6/4~ 8aL? c~~,wii piz fw rd~~sdj~ &&/&& &JJ)E G/&~S ~OJ C:/.?HI~J/~~ D&L &! P~~~JZW J p~# cwA&&.-p Gm-M?- Mc L9d 06 \ i 4 GLL 0 .J- m,.Iv4 M'DC rjeAi 98 p GWW/ 7.5 dELs9.r )?;x. rLf5-v .ELsib SZKH~K fJ3 rddlk/7/a -PEL 3%~ AqiLLQ&*& A /&LQ!j J *. /& I Tfo&fl,' g/b ~4% b ef- 4 82 $a/&] U &d4 Rd, /e FI - ftv~~~twg~~ 'd4 €&e rct /Ty PJ/ ~l// J%L/.E r27FKd FJ/ p#f+/'79 -2&Z .hi.& &&2 &q -h, fgLP74 A. mLEy 6% (?#jytY./Ti 3Lz- sh- L,LLi.E- flf.D Gk C.f,Wl~ ZkZ soi @ii* 7q&& avf /%EA9 kid8 (-%V/A% otz SOL- .4.22e.64i Eir//;7 Q c&/? e ~a 4'- G,~, n I .t <I lF j u qr L'/ P&z4d f. JWlVd+ '1 F&Z&.&AY44W ,,,- - G#?7zz&;;N dl &/ , DENIAL OF F,PP~()VA F PRICE CLUB AT PALOKAR A””ORT RD PAK’l’ 11 be deferred until such info ‘dll ation is available. Should the appli e t wish to proceed at thi the, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense. ‘I- . ,/ ’ - 3 - /:: & 7-33 L 4 &Cr C; Ljp / a/ /7 f4 I-Se -f f4>/r~ r?- ?TJ.,~.Fx 6 7-27 i,i%JJL?-,& c: T Q-4-k “P t -c u ,.*v f- Davits A.,E3%k C 6 j5 HM&?’,~ CY. G /&&/ d. fii /&;e 08 1 I ’ -DENIAL OF APPROV OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR RPORT RD PART 11 d, NAME * ADDRESS dGNATURE .f f 1 Lb,,? /blJ &LC&. /;7 id/”~~”1,~707/j~~*L;~,~~~ccI(rc:I, ij &#fp/5&Ql gJbLJbd; 67p3 q? Ai.,isLi&- cT v 4 ’’. >> ’ - JI-, ’ - ’! ._-- d4 I” i “2 J’ Ggi&Q2 f+ !+i iL f :t ,,( > 5 .i; / t <i ( (i 7- -{hy&,< !/)< C’,, ,.Li.’ ,. A ;syk-” /) .’/> ’ / n i:b J 5/.-4 q ;?/ \ ;j :7’7 17 t? li ‘L7 ./ 3 i;k!xi5.~f< , ‘/i”- ’, , L.KP. if,+!-- 41<, u /,. / J;) ?/ ;.,I { *(/ i y 1 ;/d,,c{,&4J ‘i ,,C’d,.4 A L .’ L,L* ’. ‘7, r- /, -.-..IF -\ ,u y <7T. -. fi d b G 77 (+jp;fl~~, &,7T’L@ /:z &? /L& r/ y 6 7 3 4 0 d:?/*D$fl kt&fl ,/=&A ,:. A-,-,*S..- ,. J .--- /Bj .G -7,s /I / *-, :’ 1 27cll$iv,q /L7&#<. &J; i,&3 e / /5 / ,--, ,CL- : P *.. .- i / ./, .*-q / , 7 \ ‘Ue.-mLLl f .;, q (I ._L-IJI- , \-+ 1 ->A ,Lc?fq,. --\* \:, -.-- c \ la . .- 9 1 ;l?i. L--y&&L, k. [ , / ‘\\ \ .\J .&yk A‘&FJ .. ocy UIWIHL OF APPROVA F PRICE CLUB AT FALOMAR AT ORT RD. PART I1 I be dgfenedantil such inf w dation is available. Should the apphb ep nt yish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carisbad approve1 consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ADDRESS SIGNATURE / /i i -3 d c 12 5-/k:T,,- [& /f!!- -:ec NAME ' "i IC-,? i>e, rJ-7 j dk)] GI) .L, tie k,/ / , /i I ./ / 8a4vy he& cL< b7/7 N7hCW77f CS C4@5PA;E), +-d- kc& &!J\QL*U7 6c~C rL-6 b/ jj0&e &ff((JZ I , UJV L yg&;/ &78/ ruKi KU, rAKi II be deferred until such infflltation is available. Should the appll t yish to proceed at thiz time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carisbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) wi ULIVIAU WL nrrliwv~ WL LL~ILL LLUB XI YHLUIvlHK -- l=?- <Aeku3 @& CACvt7.A C&/SJ C&, q'i /$477i &LdklU* 'dGc3Q.- i\' \ O-LW VM, 85 k?i"$WST &z , &2+?L&&?f?~ 04 ""a< I pii% I4 \J&& 4 ip& p?k [I bk/L I.. / /IA 1".- \ \ Ihiq, ht,k c; c 1 q iq i -L S':%,wLS Gd3 si\ '& iVUTXc<-T- /-7 #!fl L9Q/ ~,_-- ---I ___ - --U"II-L\ L2LL.A --.- -I- L rIL'L _I L I--- - be deferre8 untksuc% in!&atkiu8 a%h&&? ?%8u I&%%@ %$'@I a t wiS Wpdikeed QE t& time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) DENIAL OF-AP-P-OYA--C) - p NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE i ,. ,.. @&Pl &%w \ 9 ~ DENIAL OF APPRO* OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR RPORT RD PART I1 NAME ADDRESS 9G**TURE I -/ ---- \ ,<- 7->P/ ;-v<c r\/ i //& r-7- .... /9/&-4& p,.+/.,-tf & {J =T&/y i(4'~r/l{& /-: j7 .:?f-7";yF,I ,I, / 71'7 ,-io /$ detf cz , /i A .G&*G/,J.- 9 'L-5: *i r- e-/ r .i- !? : 'U' v.' 6 &&9 &] DENIAL OF APPROVAL 0 *RICE CLUB AT PALOMAR AIRF T RD PART 11 PAbB NAME ADDRESS !lGN*TURE fARL t? /3lk/gj: - 04 G4Af = JacA&f Fa$8 gaq rctmn lbnn iA5bM ~4m CM b/ r3bQp-D u4. 4L , \ ( /; \ L.J i /& &/ ge deferred until such infaation is available. Should the appli a t wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) D NIAL UF APPKUVAL U' rL'L"u Ly"v -A- NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Gc-orc;\\q Tro\nq by37 Cavr\a t ton. &AyvLLL, Jfg+&?g h 0, $4, {$ 'J (Ax- F &$?f&fq risLLI: LLUD AL rfiLUMHK P'YYUK'i KU YAK1 11 Y LAL rnuvfiar a YYIII'AU "L be deferred until such inf t wish to proceed at thi: time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvet ation is available. Should the appli I consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense,) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE /&& W' (~l. Beg 8/dmgL yz ,dp ~kgd @ (\ ; _/ J f &i,/" 4 J' I ,A l/ .J, -, f\ >&/,>;&,6- p&Tb&ial q. uLIulllu ur ArrJsuvfih vr rniih CLUB A’L’ ~“ALUMAK AIRPORT RD. PART I1 1 be deferred until such inf a ation is available. Should the app la t wish to proceed at thi5 time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) a. ADDRESS /‘( /-- ? &?*yLmcv ' DENIAL OF APPROVA~ PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR A ORT RD PART 11 PA NAME ADDRESS 9GNATURE c - 7L 7 ,& -+-7 pf 7' <d =, i + -&, 'h. 1 2 i PI iLf\! c x J'* %+--&-AX, f?lf </C.\- Liz x 5- p p q VI 2 \.. ,? - F g;,;/&/ fi,/ fi2fl&d, d&+Z?YJ // /< I .J 7 h:/z ?d/5L-LLd4A, T/h (&9M(.44& f EfJ -r .kL,/2 & *%s&33 N19s &9/ &i&* L% k & %A2 /$Leo Ld. -6' eAT7-f fb 71"n fl/ /1/ ,7Q $el f+OJ0)&gB&/T 1 h42!/3 zL4 7- 7 y"' 11 I1 I\ / +& ! L i/.r 1 & O& / RD PART I1 PAGE b jl I r- - dd D?-.Lfi/9R .&,57 di 3,- he, kt 02’ 2 I I Xn &:, ( dd- d py-’ ~ &- #-> g/ -? ,’ c’ - c 7: PAM? A; n P / ,A 4 //r [jJ< , J i A?*&fl v8 &.4??7 /. c /‘A +vtn t /,J da / c %. /t75 JL AD /2&-9 ,‘/ I / ,-? .$b >’ ? >. 4--- * \;2flfl ,:&.+/;~ 914- - ‘?’^@*&L./ c , -c k. P* &Lv i!‘ I ; uLiuInu UL ur PKICB CLUB ~i PALOMAR TRPORT RD PART I1 nfyKUV* ADDRESS hGN*TuRE '5 NAME 3 a' / */-/ I I 4 kL-LT6 2;i.A sr ( -7 \ $q f- Lpiu c kJ 7 2 /p I<R~ STF~L~I~~RG~~ '4r3 C*-?rntdIiTt. UERDE . Kt ,&&cJQ4 JJ m\ vr r~lLc LUUII LIL L'ALIUI"MK CK~-UJSJ nu TLIL\L II. nrrKuv#l &I ULIVIfiU VL be deferred until such inf t wish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve1 consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ation is available. Should the appl 4 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Y ?$J&X &@I . I DENIAL OF APP AL OF THE PRICE CLUB AT P OMAR AIRPORT RD. be deferred until such info w ation is available. Should the appli @ t wish to proceed at thi: time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE JI~~~~~~ A. X~JTKY m t&M/nl/lO ALL&, e4uzm -a Qc ki& G-4 3 3-79 8 f Cm//rlrh ~ZUC, c4&&d AAd4a- , 911-/?&/ 9l7 / JA”& . %- B@Z@?q+ FGJq i? blf e,W,A/,.;i-ZAZYL !J!&QoIv 4, A&/ ffa fo7 dAmi1~1 TO /q2& L LzW .cx BE/ L5- n*H& / Ff{C*rn,d/ /o C2.U L , /7,c-& * p j L7 - .+ i &&l 3 dHy&E5 &gfN g// d&fl//l?/TU .& VL - //d -44- 9/- 1 h,AN 4 Mn yrwd 932& M 1 N 60 U&DE 7-v h )39& yfi!&*h2 L!O/ AIRPORT RD PAR' Pagt GNATURE 9 r DENIAT; OF APPROVA F THE PRICE CLUB AT PAL0 NAME w ADDRESS faor Cb.mLnLCo c PPw Hldefl --%-5€i !" /hL. I7 t J/lhu2m &Ab T &--z C&f&L!/n/f 6Hf/V%y 26z-d ChUnLLLE 3GRb.I (&e LV3a" ~S&E.&3R C'wm \- A QAR~L m, L~~~EAT L~j'30lm~1ob De6 P&+le &wrbgfr% I' d!! 0 PETITION @&fi-.237 @l'-l./ c e 1 b TO DENY APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PRICE CLUB AND TO DENY APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT I We the undersigned homeowners, voters and residents of Carlsbad residing in the following residential area request the City Council of Carlsbad to deny approval of the Negative Declaration and Project Proposal to locate a Price Club on Palomar Airport Road until all the required improvements to the infrastructure system to protect public health and safety are implemented. Further, we feel that additional informatiomconcerning the potential short-term and long- term traffic, noise and community compatibility impacts of the Price Club. We feel that in order to adequately assess the potential impacts of the proposed development, as required by CEQA, additional traffic/circulation studies need to be completed to assess the interim traffic impacts from project implementation to buildout of the General Plan Circulation Element, including feasible projections as to when each of the improvement phases will occur and what Level of Service (LOS) will occur from each improvement phase on Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane, Paseo del Norte and all Interstate 5 offramps at Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane and Canon Road. An additional study should be conducted to assess the degradation to existing conditions and public safety potentially occuring from implementation of the project to Carlsbad Boulevard until circulation buildout. We further feel that a detailed acoustical studyqto determine potential short-term and long- term impacts from project implementation to residential units adjacent to Paseo del Norte. We would further request that the noise study determine the feasibility of the project required noise attenuation wall adjacent to the Sea Gate Community to mitigate noise impacts to Sea Gate residents. We recognize that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that mitigations for significant impacts be reasonable and feasible to reduce the impacts to insignificant levels. We feel that the proposed mitigation to close the Price Club facilities from 4 PM until 6 PM on week days to prevent significant impacts to local circulation is be conducted by indepentent traffic engineers to assess the feasibility and potential impacts resulting from such a proposal. The Planning Commission has stated that there is no fiscal impact data available to ascertain the actual tax benefit and community costs of having the Price Club located in Carlsbad. We feel that prior to approval of the development and associated Negative Declaration that a fiscal impact study should be conducted to ascertain whether the tax dollars generated from this development constitutes new tax dollars, or is merely the re- distribution of existing tax dollars from existing local merchants. We recognize that the Resale customers of the Price Club do not pay sales taxes. We would like the information to assess how the exemption to resale members effects the anticipated tax dollars to the community. Furthermore, we demand a fiscal impact study to determine exactly how many tax dollars will be required to support the infrasturce system, including police and emergency services for this project - not only at buildout, but during the interim period of full circulation buildout. (We recognize that the City of Carlsbad will be doing a General Plan Update during the next year - we would suggest that any approvement of this project 1s &rdq& IS NeeAed infeasible and is a direct violation of CEQA Guidelines. We request that additional studies *? /a cc Ecflmotf.3 ocd qt&-m- PCSG If- Ik.5 0 m h be deferred until such information is available. Should the applicant wish to proceed at thi5 time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) a NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE c PKICE CLUB AT’ PALOMAR AIR T RD PART I11 PA( be deferred until such infZlllbation is available. Should the appli img t wish to proceed at tb time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve I consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) UEIVIAL OF APPROVAL + NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE > *. M/AbdlCM KNycH qoz. f/ CM/”Ti! f~dD2Ic;p-c flL&i%L dd ‘t I l’ 1 4 icct qrg rrnje4 * qis+*f &I&/ ~KL KU rnrci 111 r DENIAL U!? APPKUVAL YKiCL CLUB A1 YNLWMHK HI be deferred until such info@tion is available. Should the appli t wish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) c t NAME ADDRESS IGNATURE %ot G, 0t.1 $!$j? ~?Q?J%-r;)f>SaD%, ddTt Gd;Y, Ob/ "21 i I/ ./,. jLL;p.; /?j?: tpsiz\/ 96 q-,~ &2,&, Iw#1 rL )< y-yh~~ /3 lll I / 3 y,&*2?2 DO/ L A.- . *A- - -.--- I-__ ___ - -Li2"LLc,L, 1lLL\L "L\L I\- L LAL.A -*- t 1 I I I/ I- I. !' QO i L a I-_ - be deferred until such inf - -a- .lation is available. Should the apphcd t wish to proceed at thir time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applhants expense.) UU1.-rr- __ n& L L\- - LA- ADDRESS ( /d%xfl .c'/&/ vr rn~L.c LLUD ni rALUMAK KPUK':' KU FAK'I 111 L= A- r KV " al r%, ULIIYI~Y UL be deferred until such inf . ation is available. Should the appl t wish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve1 consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) 1 r! r J I ,ALf-@kPJL[!A/ &Cd!'Lifl ftcx !" r)p5bki,f& ?.EL p&qLnn &> \h?,m;@ , I 3 cq;h$h, oq . DENIAL OF APPROVAL ePRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR AI *T RD PART irI PA( NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1 L! 1 y2d:/&-z rnlLk CLUB A'I P'ALWMAK AI ORT RD PART 111 P mi --..___- WL firrnuvi-iu be deferred until such infaation is available. Should the appl t wish to proceed at thi time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) A*& tW/ ~ - __ ___ - .________. ~IL\I UL\ I L\U I ni\A AI J ! be deferred until such inf a ation is available. Should the appli !B t wish to proceed at thi: consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve( I <' , - .i <j/,t gdb$ aoi UENIHL UP HYk'KL' L Vi? YKI LC LLUB HI ifAILVL"1 HHIKYUKI KU YAK1 I a 23h "r be deferred until such inf t wish to proceed at this time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approved consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ation is available. Should the appli t g 05 1 6\ $lWkq,- f)),&&#L 5 5) dl i/ f", .:di;&d Lo7 r G, 9; h fi/&&--& & L c,_------ e 11 y) L-. \ /;#{ j j .t; & 1 \"f$.&- ril L/' /fb &LJ&&/+- , /il 1; p @(I ,\& y,,\\,&(- Y v--- ~ .. 4qa-P SAn4p-a &ri, nbr%dd - t y%-& (go/ PUK'I' KU PART I11 6 ADDRESS F GNATURE DENIAL OF APPROV OF PRICE CLUB AT PALOMAR t NAME I /c a@/ YUIY.L'>U "L CLL I L\ VL LLLLL~ LUU~ nI L~UWIII ~J.~\LVL\L L\U LLIL\I J . NAME en'kRESS !!GNAWRE /. f.t /Q& (JJ,nz K2KhwJl-Z DEL I! #*?. )lJ+uuL yi&&P Oc'f ‘IVL c. LU paL L 111 p * aa - - - - - - - - - LLLVVUI VL yLLLb LIuu uv yuL~~~ia~ be deferred until such infaation is available. Should the app t wish to proceed at thii time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) ADDRESS 49 &/ DENIAL OF APPROVAT F PRICE CLUE AT PALOMAR A”P0RT LiD PAK’l lil be deferred until such inf a tion is available. Should the apph a t wish to proceed at thi5 time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) I) J I /x \/i Y~G\ p j?) E LL f IV Q/c +-. (bc*h;\q c (70 ’ - &A k5/C &zq- Y2-19fl?e& J~/;.J;&f&{ , A. 2, f1;7 ii </(? L-&- &&/& (,+J& jp@.&&;fk; fi( It /CY A’/ / L7 /- r- /- I /- ----/ \ %!L RJ,? LL]’, I’ / c //b j ,< p> /e 2- 72 I &/?& 12 {> L 2”,/ iI/ / %:--S.-lc/ 1.2 / -- - P J--- -. 0 ,, / I &$hiilcd A. &?#A 96Y23 Lpffl 0 /\3flJgfi&L I rl *&+dm& i /YA&‘< 3” /c 1 /u & L.2 z-L t .s 7- yL5 7 - k- &fq ;&’-, ?[ aYfiI/’R/G /-7L <.. 1,:g ; (0 , -e i- SL,lhJCwl 4 I~-B-?GdO& ESLiL\G) /q.wL7 d</%k I :/ B J q5 @Q/ a HL ur PRICE CLUB AT PALOM AIRPORT RD PART UJLI\~IAL ur -rrKa "Ih be deferred until such info t wish to proceed at thi! time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approvec consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) tion is available. Should the appli NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE @*I \ 7dW -7 be deferred until mh ../ info v& tion is r:'-- available. Should the appli wish to proceed at thi! time, it is appropriate to require that the applicant contract with City of Carlsbad approve( consultants to perform these studies, at the applicants expense.) b ' P' qa7~ ed? nz- &/ c fl 3-4 UL &aouo 4. 8A&% 1zzq NlJ47-mA- LAf4-q %&mI)" c/4 qz i . DENIAL OF AFTROVAL &RICE CLUB PIP PALOMAR AIRP NAME ADDRESS !!h?RAaTE"' PA ~-& CB &%y- &e $J (yd Y / W/ &&/7 @czzH&Tflfi @. &ku@+f -I yL \ e/Zd)G4g-y # &KG3 f& L 0 9, c Y ? May 2, 1991 **: FROM: Price Club - Proposal to amend Condition No. 66 Staff is recommending that Condition No. 66 for Price Club be amended to add tl following: @ Community MANAGER Development Director The easement documents shall be worded such that the grant is not effective until the following conditions are met: A. The use of the easement by either property is compatible with the commercial use of the Price Club property with regard to vehicle types, traffic generation rates and adherence to traffic rules as determined by the City. The owner of the adjacent property agrees to share in the cost of maintenance and insurance based upon a pro-rata share of traffic using the easements. The owner of the adjacent property agrees to hold the Price Club harmless from any liability associated with the adjacent property owners use of the easement, and maintain independent liability insurance coverage. For the Nurseryland property only, one or both of the existing driveways on the Nurseryland property are closed to the satisfaction of the City. B. C. D. Staffs primary motivation in amending the existing condition is to clarify that utilization the easement by adjacent properties is anticipated to occur only at the time those propert develop, not necessarily with development of Price Club. MARTY ORENYAK M0:CH Attachment c. Planning Director City Engineer B 1' I with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to a tr 16 I 1 17 i 64. All trucks and delivery vehicles exiting onto Pasm del Norte shi northbound to Palomar Airport Road The property owner shall place ax 22' I I 24 I 23 1 25 1 I 26 j 20 27 I I med &ugh the Price Club pmperty to adjoining properties. At s tfwadia;n;nnproperties utilize the access easements they shall be qui in the mainrename and insurance costs. 1) The first easementwill be granted to the calhans property fn west and the east dximys onto Palomar Airport Road. Spec easement shall be 30 feet in width from Said westeT1y dxivev PC RESO NO. 3209 -13- I I' i 13 ' 67. A 20 foot wide public -= easement shall h offered for dedication on map across Parcel 2. Said easemmt shall be located adjacent to the 21 i' 22 i i 24 I 25 26 27 23 I 28 Cammunity Fadtities %met is not formed, or if the Community Fa& is formed bur the Zone 5 properties are not partidpants within that nquired General Plan Consistency findina cannot be made. No d qpmvak, Budding Permits, Grading Pads, Final Maps, or ddopn the developer and approved by the City coundl to finance the fad applicable to Zone 5 that would have been or are included in the fa&ties District, For purp<3ses of this condition the Mdo-Roos a considered to be formed following an affirmative vote of the property will be issued or approved unless an alternate hcing mechum 'is PC RES0 NO. 3209 -14- PRlcEcUa (prrOo.~~U 211 Ml 9Dcw/QIw w ooom 63r the public hearing. t APPLICANT: Price Club PUBLISH: April 25, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ! City oi &IW GM9&1/Lcw19&2/ Dc 90-1 PRlcEculs I =-%<%E' FAX TMNSMITTAL FROM FAX #: '(619) 434-1987 TO FAX #:(6/,) - $Jd-,&* DATE SENT: &&, TIME SENT: / NUMBER OF PAGES SENT (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Oz/ TO: IY' DEPT:~~ u FROM: DEPT: &'a//&, c CONTACT PHONE< (619) &4-27/7 INSTRUCTIONS: A - qu $!ixhY // 4 I u %/&-/bhZ+& &) - ANY PROBLEMS WITH RECEIVING THIS FAX CALL: (619) 434-2803 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, April 3, 1991, to consider recommending approval of a General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PI to RRE on 23.6 acres, a Zone Change from P-M-Q to C-2-Q on 23.6 acres, a Site Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Hillside Development Permit for a 121,388 square foot Price Club Discount Store containing a tire center, optical center and a small exterior eating establishment. Also proposed is a graded pad for a future 15,000 square foot office building and a 5,000 square foot retail building. A minor subdivision to create four parcels out of the entire 62 acre property is also proposed, on property generally located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road east of Paseo Del Norte in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and more particularly described as: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 2949, together with a Portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after March 28,1991. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4446. If you challenge the General Plan AmendmenVLocal Coastal Plan AmendmenVZone Change/Site Development Plan/Conditional Use PermiVHillside Development PermiVMinor Subdivision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 90-1/LCPA 90-2/ZC 90-1/SDP 90-5/CUP 90-3/HDP 90-9/MS 837 APPLICANT: PRICE CLUB PUBLISH: MARCH 21,1991 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 0 a 1 r/, -&k j @g$s $4 8 Uh "6 jq& tl 8 3 &? N x f pi \3 :; qo- Q&?B QQ $jyT co a?$ y44 'Kl t 3iy Ll 67 88u cy- .%. s P? w.e z 0 N - ,- \ s .% 8 "$ Y $8 qq <% :A- $$$$ nl e*%$ .d 4 u -- k ;t '- $38 x 8 $$$ 0 0 \ c i 4 UI I rrr D Fld c .?I FJ a, hrn ab ri <I < O+b 'i 1 0 bJ tT t'4 LL: -6 e.. x u u a 3- P CJ- rd i dr- w u P c 13 a47 r c4 A r 7-4 Q3 Qj tL Qj t Io 0 13 Ii3 '3 9 r) 0 4 c rz r.1 *s r, ?am -I N - c-4 P4 UI 4 01w c # u tnu In 0 I$ wrlf I> n! tn 0 12 i-1 @~ z f.1 a0 - E3 drl0 C* 4aa .rl 2: *rl m iruo w-3 ama 3w CI a*a mi= cO c :- * - rl rl ';1 B @. ct e.. a P. c '2 u. 1-1 I> I. *rl rl n i> P 0 . Ted ii-9 0 wx c u u x @ c 0 + Ul 03a E p -.-I ?I tn a, z -d 2 cl +z # 0 *rl *PI K L a: UOd g pj 2 b-.. - r-. L co ld YR! $2; U' iI rd' ri L 1x1 id bMcn us i= 0 u d e ,=a c C.4 -.I iy 8 v Dl t-9 cT-4 .r4 pj Crr we 32 i..d ct e.. I L Q3 @ a Lt Lfl 03 T-4 rj .-I a* > 24 ut CJ i= E r.4 01 u a c i p. 0 # c.. ad a ow u J= at=* ij r_S * rd e# -4 a UI Iil fJ P Lou ui > i P - :&I > 34 fa i 02 - m e. P c n!A # u 1-1 UI z c.4 Q HAL Ll 2:a t nr # UI n! -P *r( Jz ;< 13 L 01cl rd z *l-l c t;r 3 .rt rda 0 4Jrd 4Jt i33flSn L 0 u iCjOt c ,:'I 5= L '-4- .- ut 0 c. .- 74 .r( E iii d- u k fJ & ctj a c.4 m $c i:i rtie c @\ rd .-a# -4 uf m k U 33 0 c cr, c, l-l* io m a,a, UI ?+ * --@e G -.-I P ul E j- Id co c 03 M H2OJ ID IJJ rl cnrl .4 + 0 *r( 0 hl rl c\1 + a 0 lfl u 0 oca i i i4 i C f4 a BJJ .?I I?., ow@. cc) aa: i-1 hW4 *.-I N 4 0 fl fdrrt rlqu L i Kt P w ili 0 nz a .fi t- LCP 7 3 7 3 :ql -@ OXF a- Id i2 > 121 uoa, a -.-I Q -4 Ji llfd ad UI L UI CUI a, a P? .?I c.4 - u* -4 0 G doc L ,z (- 30 i ldp rd - it e .I$ k *a lJ LO rr( +PI [I> In <I EO n! i.4 *?I e. ,=-I p. i CI c.4 -ld x3 (li P.4 .PI i:! UI :- C;I 3 -rl a :- 0 -9 4 z lzl rc r:t -@bE J- '2 -m L >.<.A nJ n! ** -4 El J Id QO $ i 13. P # ardu tlr rc 4 biJ a0 I- dtn UI -.-I 3 a, 13: t l.1 0 1 E cda il i':r i ts 3 _* am (dB LT-4 - u u -4 F r - am 4-i 12 i id i - - ib$ - - .- e e t:J :?J v f.12 TI1 rd 128 LE -2 -@ UI ut il! :- :?J -c, 0 - *ti i= :- :- cf clj -*ut* AI- 0 d !L*I+d F-r-rO 23 $3 $3 ,3 iY * V r-4 tl a I c.4 y y t> p. 0 p. i Eii UCLU id dL d R1 u .I+ E Ll v ct >- F ;- LLC n -7- n Id :>LT3 3 13!=4 R1 v 0 C8.t u ciz 4 E us Ll 0 cf 0- Qbc Ub t L--..4:3 L\b # E u cil ci r u tJ u *1-I r!l iy i iZxI?$ 5 Ul z * I3.l u t c 0 d H 0 i 0 UI -0 ct UI N 1-1 V 9 YV U -0 '3 nf+ id ncr 4 (13 0 i i 123 C' P '-I% a 00 0 9 c: - 20 UI 13 i Pi -2 I '3 g u c4 ulii dLi) .I4 - I>. a A 13.. .2-' 13 '3 ;- ar Id fit tf mag Id Lf F-D -I+ L L -sf :- LO* EOd * LC R(i .CY ut T il! Zr IC- L Q3 D .* 2: i JZZ* 1-1 iij Za -1-I b 2 .rl p- c: L P El p. :> r. ddil! 7 \ r.4 ct Lb 0 <I iJ Z U c;i ti3 z c.4 : F 3 U i> ! '37 C, v-t CI KG Lfl t 0 1-1 .. r a *Ti .c Ul t 23 Cd Y c3 .:- t <I ..- I-- - .qJ rtr c.4 rs a 83 i5, '2 n! I- 0 *flj - 7 E 1-1 iL .* CL E >- * -w d2C Vi L 1-1 3 i $3 0-P 13 Ji LZL 17 0 13 13 ,:r z u tii - lx iq- 0 -- .. .. .rt b 3 - i\ --.. ... .. !..C _I' - I-, i-" r- 1-1 ;-. 7: - // ,.-. e ,, ii* ,:::, !Ji.iii'ira;...(.. r': r.. ' TF;N F(E-:; MI,? ;-:.j... 1- .; ,-,j-.- - e i .:~ i;L i2! 1-1 [Z <<; 1- z 1: x:, i,: _. Ai 1 * r<zr:t; .............. ..................................... " ................................................ ...................................................... f .. ............................................... '7' 1 1 ... r1.71 1 ,._ .I r: S i t IJ 5 : N I:+ !3 j, t. [,,I i A ,j jj 1 . qi+ 5 i. 2.- .L - .... i. . .I. %..,I iIiidi'l<<r : I::(~RLTA::; I~I:[, tzlI1p.j!:; {-.:= ..J +L 1 ; ;:;fqpd!:;:; .I!> &(:i!,j~ f lerl j: i;tp.,j~~ F:>I-I?:~ ,_:I 2, jj~:: - 'Ti.. d,: bi-. , !~.,;. ,. ; - 1 2 L;i$[;j 1, Pl&r~]~:]-~~SfER ALJE !Z;TE 2fi& ~ E:;qj-. i r.2 :l T';>!::; iI:$ C~7[)?.?r : _I_ - 4- %I-__ I s -.-. :i i .z:s : ., <\iyi n IXRII2TEI PI I Si: rT:i-<i2?!:; . i. p 2 1, I? ,i 122 ,/ ;E;L, F\'e ". . ,\: ; I:,i ; . 1 i i y,. ; r,, 1 n 1..' 3 3,. a< ..................... .................................... ............................... ,, ... .,. ..< :~: , . j n .+ :-I .-I ., , _. .=% :i L1 +? ,:, ,:-,.::, .! 1- (2 <L i'l 8 ,Ti :: : i-,! i'i c !i, : ;-- *:I* i. ::; .+ r .I: : ............................................................... _. ...... _. .......................................................................................... . AL i-i !;? ; ;:.;c,<> p&\,-$>t..jpj-; p T TT7-j- ?;E!, Tp.F:: > ..... st I? 1.1.: ,, . .... I i L- . ?<:!<:);!;;. ..q,iP;4:'.:.; J y .:If? --(:, !I:!'Jp:rq I ~~~~-:!~;T~1~~~~~.~~~~ lj r1 c. 1:) ;I;, t <: ; 1. ::.:: i( (1:; (-, ;.' ;-; ;!; E 2 ,I f.;. ; I...! : { .: 5 : i- 1 I 1 L i .. c: -8 4 F': t n I;ii+:-:;CiFt: ................................................................ ..........._..-... - .- ........... ......._.. ................. ..........-......... .. -./. ......................... ~ .............................. F< fi , !J: 2 R L, ::;E F; D !I: & [-+::;a 1 : ~~~,jj~:~ .[If A/:;!,JA I !...I' I ::'fi .- I I:il,.iDA /::ti::!!:t iI![- 1 r.;il;. 'i. .... .. (4 5 s tj z 2. :I. ? I ;3.q, , ;=j<:>;:.; .. ,!, 7 ." . >:, i '1 iI L : L i.i & i-1 $7 . '.. m 111 i = I :._ ::; -.$ 1 <,I !-j a t <!I : .:#$d? <.* Gin 1 : 1; 1 ?L ; !-lrl t 5 : :z 1, 1 " (2 :::[:I .. '[:::I ::: !:; j. $ ij F. : A ~j tj r I 5 5. 5 L... $-I 3 : n !-j i.c i"i <,? i .. : (1: :[ -y 'y !.:r 1- 1: fi R L 5; :{A K[ , p.4 :-I; rd :;; ___. I = PI.. .-. .: ,. 1 2 NE! PIPI It.. I PJ!:i &IXiJ? FIX TI.:l:;; !I!tJp&q } 1. p I.?, I-, <? . 1.: El 3. :: <? : y< ,j c l.- - D1:l 1: .% :: ... L 0 3.1-1 Ani .i p. .-I= 1 e hit, : IT" ..a. 1 ;> 1:ia .'; <$ : 7, i.? '1 ;: z fc t: ki 5 : _- ,<:I 1, j. '-.(_!:3i? .:25 12:,,.rl,.:;.': I"1l::IJIN ClIIHP, CI:INS Le%$] ; Lot )..; F"' M<i..i. 1 z 6j-<:>:Z &$'ENILIA ENfzINfiS STEI 8, ~:~~i-:~~~~lJ I::? ' pSJ.j; $JJ,"'"' '.- - i,)3 3 E .q. 1, '. .7 1 NZll,JS, FACTC]R\/ -- L, I rL!T il I iqFc 1 7 L'JIIV' .. r .-. n PI ... JL.J y t:l..:Ii) I ill f' -,!Ill f *. , < trlS: 7 E: .i 11 5 : N IJ L t3 .L :; .? F t ; ........................................ .-. ................................. ....._...... ...................................... _.. .......... __. _... _. ........... ._. ... .....__. .__..... ........... ......_........_. .................... !2 j. 1: :-; h; ... &, v = F; 1 i t:, h's 5, ;j : (1) I ii'i 7 c[ l-l .-. = .... -2 <A- " '2 .. 3,j r'n, 5 : 11 1-1 t: 5 : L il' 1. :< ;q 1" 1. ; fFi.iPfI;;;l;:t; ............... ............................................... I-.- .-.__.. ----..- ._..-..--_.. ~ ....-_._._......__.... -._ ....._ -. ._. ..... --. ._.. ._.. .... .._. -_. ._.. .-_ -.. .... .".. ._.. ._ ... ..._ ..-. .-. .._. ............ _- .. si t 1~ 5 : $., i(]2 ALfEPJ 1 D;ri Ep.ji-. _... I PJA::, i~fi~l-r~;3AD !I:;? 17>2<1)<:),:> .... 1 $C!5 J -'.' '1,. 12,:';:<:: t:)l;'<:Iq/:32 Re,: Et,;,,: .$; I;! -<]<:)<);y 31 :: 31j(..ii.i5: 3 t ti 5 : [.-I {-I t 5, :: ::;a 1 e &[+It : ............. .._.. ................ .- ..................... ._. ....... ......- . ~ _.._ ..... ._ ~ ...... ._. ____ _.... ___.__ ____..._,. _._.__..___._.__._ .......................................... - .._._. ~ ._.._.._ ...... r 'L I IY - ,j. ji F I:I p 1 i.ti k i I:I 1'1 F) c" I:, ''4 j, ij el .- -j i 5 tj 3 e frL.2 tj p 3 7 i a kt 1 ,k I 3 IJ ,t: i 5 1.1 [:I t 9 ij & f' a ~'1 4: .? .? m 11: l::s + ..,.. i j, :: i i .j, f' r; 1.4 1 1;~ '7 (I:! r-, .-. . , ' :-\I .............................................................................. -. ...................... __. ......................... -. ..................................................................... ...- ... ;...iiD:J, C!pJEA p(>R f]F Tr.a 1- :. ti-ls A-i I- ._._. -.. c ,-17.-. I-.4 '3.'!' , , --l j_ 1 ; QC:,4'7' fli:!F;;:pd(q SI-, .I !> 1 ri 1:.J _.I .. .L L i /' l,l-,, 1=.=. l-.2 ii 1 z ~;;At.ji~:l ;i:j p$>!_!A ' 'r- z lIl f', e :: R;q 2 (;:I ,<, .-, c c i-, 7 :.-,.-<.-I .-I ;:. , r .... .- L ..... e I ii. :. .. " 'i I i *- =. = ...................................................... _. ................... ._ ................ __ ... ._. .. _.. .- ...* .............. ._..... _- ........ .-. ..- -... ..... ..- -- ....... ..I .-. .................... J- --. ... .-.. ."- ..- ......... .- ..... -. .;? 1, 1 .( i_! q1:) .i:j'? !I; .i ;: 1, J $ ilj ,:l :{2 i t 1.j =. 2 Ij ;_I l-. <= 5 3 :r!rii ; i <s r ; .!;. PE 1 !:I: i_: !I: i:2 .::I I:: fi r; F' ;:, , I,-: -- i".! pi ::; I L,,.~s ... , .~. .... ,% 1 : ~;~~:it.Jf:i- 113 fii>l-iF; \-:Ex! I !:tf.J3F; Fi2F; {>F 'T f .G, j:: T l.. . J. ,!I F; 5 5 ,< 2 h ':t.-:t /:. ' ;)Ei ~ f r;F; I !';TLl r") I :E;::: !::!7;12p::; 2 111 rl* c FiA 1. 0 +.%.( i.. 3 '...I J ; i; '(I\:>. :: <2 : i, j, / 1 ; :I:';' R @ i' 7-1 )..I -. 6,:3 5 ?I?;? L .. I- 4 2 ."":I. 3;:. ". 7 I L :~ -!I .- k: !.:* 3.2 i I i I 5 z -: 1 1 . .<.;; .q.g . 1,:;; i:! !il i I <? F . :: $+ET; I :::E :I.: 111 .::I i:: r_:t pr--' 5 , 1:: ::I p4 s Ptt3. i. 1 : 5 i:l f. .... - pM A55dE v 244 , Q!::l(:'; I ill i ... it:. _I <? : .@:::I- 7 I f..IDl_!!3 ~ VA!I:F;tltT L iV. , l,. p ,lc, i 3.. t- (r .., n n 1 1, / 22 / 1'7' Re 11 [I 111 11 ;t. :: ;;,:3 5 53 7 .,-,S,J? r1at.e: 11/22/ ::;&I e Al1l.L E $57 z[>iz:lv i:>{!(:j.%EI t-i::~a.j-i Aiilt. 2 'E! 1 i: : E! d r'I1.i 5 : Eittis: -L 1.i I- 2. :: 'c' . .#Ti. - 'c e ; i a, 1 . i "T.'.? .(._j.. / I r.r,; L) .. ::;$, 1 <;. ,:x 8" , { 5. : Aril t : I zi>i:j, i:';O!:i.!;I! Loari Airit :: I I.... '. .- *-,IC=.: .. t t- I-, _, 1- , r.-m .?, i . I-' ,-. 1.. i Ij " !E&> 7 c5 .i '-8 ,!. c- .-I -, :- !.. '5 I 7.. ..,*, .. ._.." ........ ..- .......... .... .-, ....... ___ ............ _.,. ". ._ ................. .__ -... ._.. ............ .._. ........... __. "... ...... .- .... .__ .._. ..- ... .._ ... ...- .-. .... -. .-- .. ..-. ...- ... ...- .-.. .- .... ...- ........... -.. .-. .... -- x? ,-. : ,L ;: :,i 5 z .F''k!;Zi3 DEL p>j[3s;iE7 I;;?Hl-:;z;?j-J \:J i- L .> ci - 1. -_ 1 :: L 111 t ;-.I F' t: ..-. Fp I I L!:,."q - 9 1 I.. x.. - .._ ............. ____ ........ ._ ..______ ___- ____ ______ ________.. _._ .-.. ._ ... .___._ ._. .._ __- ... __ - __ __._. _._ .._. .._ ._ ...._. .... -_ ......... .-. .-.--. .-...- ..... ...- ........... --.. .............................. .'-I 3 j . .<-: n (j . 1 4 I:_ i .,. ... I 'T.- ' Si-tUs: PALiIMRF< ,? a T.-lL, ,, ;;,F T fici 7 i~A~;:t:~~ii~i !::A J c!~.,~~.~~~: ?I:: MEYNCILDS, ANDREW, rmw L~.=SI : LO^ 1-1 F' : 1 B l::p,LLE ct-1 I ~ij I T'A , LA .iixw, ix r'.y*.-..- ':. ;t-J .:: - { 1 RE!? I Ii ~ S I NCiLE FAM I LY Zt:trle : pi: F;<21,1 Da tQ.:: 1:2/:2:3/5'3 Rec ~ii;ll~ #: ~.---~'~!.,.~,.~.-~':~' L - :; LLU -..;;> .I _I. 1 e 113 c & :: :E;& 5 2 Al,it :: I- ICI a ri Art1 t : 3.1 t: 1'.7!5.4 :{Iji...Iy,s.: :z z<;-t,s:: 2. <]<I! l_!rtts: L l:l .t r3 4 F .t ; Ilyti2r:qF i:. :: 21, 1 .(:,.qi:] -17 [lll~~i+y~ #,AT1,-AN'Tfi::: CAp1:T[i[- I)$JESTCIF( L~r-ja.1 : [,i:it '" C.1 F pl,yj 1 : 1&':~:31 t,JIfi TRZlzifij !;Ti? I>, SAfd ~i~~i~ii~i iI:$?i '7.y'1.77 ..L LI Qs, e : 2C)..-k, C:i~MM. L'&C:A"f J L 1. ..l I$ & : pi:: ASSjj E $$,$,2, 4.,2? J. It 1 t' il 7 .:, .- ?e,: xiat.<?: r:,:3;'10/:3'? xiel: 1fI:lI: .#: -7 / i. I-) *? ,-,d,~ - (2 r1ij-e: ~;>:~/~(>/:~~~ :;if e Artti :: $2, 231 , r:>l;~i.~.Ii Li:lhri Jbnlt.:: $1. I &(>07 QOQi3 E::.::<; ff1.i t 5 : ;? 1 i: :: E :;.:I .;: ... __, ,__,__ .. _, ............ ....._... " ,).,,__,.__.__ ... ___..( ... .____.._ ___ ..... _.. __.._.._.-.._ -.__ __ ... ..__.._.__....__.......-._ _- . ................................. - ..-...--....-.-....-.. - ..............- - ...-..-.... ......... :!; i i. i, 5. n pd l:l c' .-* 1 . t IJ :;. :"i ij lj I-' ;a L__ 4 :i J T.v. - E{ t k, s ; L lIl t S.. F: i. ; 1. 5 1 ~ 1 Tl:2 1 TT' 1 i- . ..x.: .-a q F t. : 3 11 I-' i(l 5 : .._._. .......... ._. ....... ..._... ...... ._. ........... .__ __.. "_ .._..___.. ....... - __ ____._ ....... .__.__... .-. -. ...___ ,____. ". __.__.__-_.-...._ .-.- ..-....... ._ ......................... -_...- .---.. .. , . _I. 17 .x. !. - 0 e c.... , .... .?. , .z,il. .I -rr-;l.j 1 l:?:?i:j .-i.~r-ii A .... 11. i! F' y ,-.I 1 i c' ,-. -- ..- ... I i.-#: ..,.-.L.. :. 1 ;:-.;) E:'',: ." ......................................................... .J ............................................................................. 7 ... _. .. (. r%l-. p.. .... ..x r( __ : I_/ It <=,: jl , I .._. ? ,.. J. $11 r;=:?i..!a - 'I .- .I -7 ..-, .-; 8 ;, , .._. I I i? ; .: ..-2 :I , !::!l?l.S.p ),.,,::i<;{l fi;il.!,.:: i- 13 t I:::. .. c.- L. " .-$-!I c it I. :-. , :, j, . ;,: 1 , !.;. :: {;, :" ;;;: (1, r' n ::; 5: I;[ D ;I t, ;.4 (3 F: 1- E , iz: A ;:: \ ._ - .._ i .L I I i r .i 'I I t., = .*. . > j .:. .j i.. ......................................................................................................................................... ____ ........... -~. ......... _._ ................................................ P -1 ?> 7-1 ::,<;,'3.... 1 1 1 :E; J .....- *L 83 ILa i'.!& i_ 1 ;; ::I g ZiI[ , 6 1 ... . .:,I 5 r .2 ; .? L_ 3 .I. $., ... I-: - ]:I p! p? ~ p.1 :r C; 1: n ;;I; T i2 1:: E 2; 1. 1;; :; T !x z l-., ri .;? E y; F' As 5 1;; : . ., 8.-8... 1 Illi ... - i .. 77 -~ I.. ;L , 9 .-, ,J .-I .". , - I-.' ,... ..... .- " & .,:.. , .,.:*:.,.; /, :::.:I F:<> i: j".ll:< 1: li: : !:I: "'4'3:35::: : 1 -1 i 1 ..... I ;: :. n 11 t ~,~~,':~;(~)/~~~ :;dl $2 Aiiit c $::;, 525, fjlj .I:] t_[Ia[, /J;.i.l.i: E :>; @ 13 i: i..l s, ; I-,;, ;.S;:[[.: t n s, ,413, E,k<[Ij Iill;-:;;qFt:: ................................................. - ................................. ..- ........ ..- .............. _. ... -.. ......... -.. ........... ..-. -.. .............................................. .__ ..- -.. ...- _-. -.. -_. '-' J ,.-_ , '7 I._ 1, 1 4. ..<I) /I;-, , ....... .'-? 1 .<. .:::, 1, :; IJ 3 :: p:; ,Il I:; j, t 1.1 z. ;2, *j 1,] i-. .:= J 5 I I'JI-~I~,~ 1. : /-.iADL,,[;:',,: F:'A~,,}l_~,:~t-Ii3i:;\~ TT;:; ~ N:-; L.e.s~.f :: L,,lz, t J.-j f:' _-, _- A !.-> 1 .... '"-. 7' I: P4lJi.J!:; L. 'ifP;IZ:ANT 2 l;l r1 2 : RT' Ili ;:I ;l, .i 1 z ,,I * 7 ,, 'I .'1 .'I, .,_, 1l-j ; l<,];:y:x;? !;I-, ~(2ip.;pJ~p.jr; !;:q 2 .;; ; <-,,.: ,, .-* ! , .-,.- .._ ..... i ,::. i.> /J ; :* ..j we $2 E[ tj ,:: ii: :: I:: .. 1. 7 ifr.:3<:, 5 ,='? 1 .... 5'1.- f .... " .> ... 1 ... Ll:l~.il Artit.: '1. CT Anit: .".tYl I ,:: . ..Ti ?. 'C = .... 7. .,,::, . 2- L. i i (I :- ..-, 4 p i- (I 3 ? .? ; .... T:;iji'.,i',3; :j i: ;"l $. ; 1.ii-t ;. 5. :: L Kl t !2 .:, ;:: t: ; ............................................................................................. ...--. ............ ...-........ --. . ............................ ... ....._. ........... _..._... .... _._.-__. .................- .___ . ......._.... ......... ,<! 1, I, .... <:,.:)<] ... :.; i : ,J =. - : t.~~i,~.ir~~:: 1. : I-i&~!~-.E.'f ~-'ni..lL,P~~[-~i~iI~;'i' TR!:; 7 PJ::; L-eaa 1 : L<:I t I..; F' ;.l;.i, i 1 ; 47-13 iJ ; $-JF;:En t-? ,.I 7- , 3 & fij N I t,j 12 1; {q v .. L '7' _L '3 .-, A'..) .- ;.-I :+. <? E .?. (1). 7 I f.Jr! 1-1 !:; D \'A 11: fi li) T 2 ,:, rIg : T(f' 3: rli 1;; ;> I... It ,+j. i: <;; : r:, 5 ,: 1;; kl \ :E: :3 F: <? iI j-1 I:, lI .;I : 1: .. 1 7 6.3 <:I 5 :..;a 1 &.x 1)s. 1. ;I; : :2il e Ftriit : i $11 a 1'1 Ani t : 1- i3 t :.; .+ F t :: ,$ '72 '78 r '--, =(Ijr..ins :: E{ t fl 5. : !J 1-i .t J : ' 2.- 7 &,4.2. p.4 !:I !:; i t. 1_1 5 &ti ,j f' c 5 5. J .- f'. ~ly,..>!;..4;T.~ z ,I - r, '1 :. It 1.' 3 i " ........................... ...........- ".I .__.. ."...,.-.".. .- .. .....-. .- ......-..-...- -...-. .............. .-....-.. ... I._.. ......... ......- ...................................... I .................................................... ._ ............ .- ,/; f j, ' <! !$!-J '. 2 5 si tu 5 : 0 125 ~A!~;~~~i ElEL I\j!IizTE 'i !I:Ar?LSBIqzi [;:A '~~2~1~~*~..-. 1 1 1 TJ 13 bj : I (3 I. z E 0 11; E 111 T T 0 J&RCI!SE I1:FIRtiL z-1 L.<+r;i 1 E LO t t-) F" I~GD LANE, !2ANTA ApJA !;:A *Tjz7<:j!:T g lzl i; !A E i" .3 7 1. .:z '7' .:> :ja tc: (:,:3/'(>:2/ i L LL .. :: I 1 ..-.7 I Nrli-rS. FACTORY -.. t I 01. :T rin: z i:l Ti E : RF' g)s 5 lj : &:y:j 1 ? ::::::q I i'li - ... L.lIl.ll.i kini : !!:;s,l ;:: f!;:;I,e: (:):~/(~~\:~:> ;;a1 3 g)rilt : $lo[:>, [)(>[> 1:: I lrl i3 !7 .i F t : ':-I i.' 1 !. L' - zt ij r lii 5. C it t i-1 5 z IJ TI -t 5 : Lo tS-;F ;. 2 4.5, &<y? -3 ' r -. ..... .-. ................................... ._. ...... .-.. ............ -_._.. ... ..- .... __._.. .............. ._ .-._.._. .__... ....._. .... - -.... ._ .__ .......... .__. .-- ....... _"_. -.. __. .... ._. .._.__ .__. .-.__ _.____ ... .- ........ ....._.__ ....... :I; i i,. ij 5 :: v%j ct :; i -t 1-1 5. :q 1j tj r' ,$:. h. J [iwrler. :: I-.i&f!t,C'i/ T-:'~~J.JL&:F'E]~;l~'~ Tf?:;, NE; Lc.;;.%a1 : i,~~t I-.] F' fq:i i 7 ; /~74~.2 1.1 ~..~I-I~FE% ST, E+Gp.,jN ING i;A z.?y~~i:, Li i 2 : 1 0 .--.7 I fiK! !-.I :E; , i,) A!:: A N T zi:iri+: F-;'F' Assli: &b, 152 I iii !-r , 'n.,.y . 4,: ri+l t 9 : <:)? \ 24:. / :3:2 r<+ {I 11 (11 lz .2 : 11: .-. 1 7&:3[3 5 ::is 1 <+ rl;,. :- <!: : :;a f e &-l,i. :: LoiIi Clti-ilt :: E ::.:I 2 1.j 1-1 t 5 :: L.9 1 t :: 5 31.1 i.'!rls :: 7 j . i 1 5. f 5 : LCl :;:3.+F t :: '74, i:)ZZ 1 {fi .+:I; ..+ F t : ....................................... ..- .. -_._.. ..... ._ _. -. ...................... -_ _.._ ___ - __.. ...... _._ ...... __.__ .... .._.... .__ _..._ ____. . _.__ -_._._-.__..- ... _..._ .... ...._.....___.. -. .....-......... I. ., *. _I. I, <- , . .- 7- , 0 0 \-lzlb:..<r. i .;jiit -rf-;l.;. 1qgr. .... d Tf;;&j F(E I !;; ..... MI,; 1 2 .; . 1- i i.( ;> ~ i>;,;,~,in,~Lr...,; ;;;ei.ol... t !:, ; .-. !i F-; E !;! !-,! E: c;; T' E ,z E; ".i' ; i:lt,'f i-:i t I ...,.-, SI ......................... ....................... . .-. ._... ....... ......_.......__..... .. ......_._........ ................................. .................................. /,,, c; :j, t l-l 2. ; ;:, :L 1, 7 .T**.?. in iji;i p.$..iF(iS';_ , [=;qr;;;:t,.!::;;z ~.J~Jc; jjp~:.;p~-r 1 pji:; L- f : F; fi pJ 1;: 1.. ; !-:I g$ ;I: 1-1 (4 ;..;gT' E[_ ./ ,'il i1t-y E i. 7 <:l T'i <: :: pp p+s 5 ;j ." 3.,q 'i $ : i,,. ;.i :.j p p.j <; ;-;T 7 :3f?,l',.J -r [q ,A 7; a 11: ;i?i 87 :J 1 :3 <I) i- ;:I a% i i (:I fff +: : :. T ..,.. ... 8:::. . .-. !,j s 2 3 ; 1 q. :;: L i"i i,,,i-.I,.-i/' t :: .- I , '.. i. . n ,:. I- 1 I ;:. (I ...... ...- ............ .._. ....... -.. ... ._.. .. .-. .......... .._. ..... __ ...... _... ._ .._ ........ ..._ ........................................... ...- .. 11 I[Z!- p..j~~~-/-.E, [I I $1: f NIT: , ;':$>pJ:;; 1 -2'. . .UT= ". 1 2 TiAhl11:I. tiIi fi!I;i.ffi i.-tEL! f f!f\tak F'f-~fi I-IT *_. Tr.al: c3'::J ,J :LiAp.j E[ 1 Ci-jtzI f:: (4 ' 1 (><, I i.1 c. ...., eL1 E. 1iat.?:: :.:;:.;:~Q~~~:~ S,=J * firllt :: ~.:2~ 525, ~:>i:;.::j.#.ti Ll:lan ,qriii:: $2, ~oc::!~ [::lt:l~:i~i E::.:~ ;,j ! ;: : :'5 <. 9 1_ 1, .,yj .. >:].!':j . zJ;.:l <.T~IJJ~,+ i... : L.41 !. .. I....:[ $PI::; F(1 i:l.:&T;Zi 1;: TF;7 !'!:E; !-<2rz% f :: f-;gpJ[::I-.:ili AiIil-!F; f..:Ef!I12pJfiF; f'!:iT; I:!!- Tr,;d l:- ....... .... &as.;ij: s.%::)rILJ., Y .. L1 c;[?[;:, I Ill i ; =., G" ; .'::% 2 i L ..._ (:, $1: (3 r.7 pq II pq 1 z;; 11: , ;:; -j 11 F;' E s 1 1:: 5:; -r 111 z lil ri .2 : F:. p :p e 1,,; .?;a 7 Q ,T@, t .e ." (I>:::.! L2/8.T; !.I;& 1 Ly ..'. An1 .I: : $'30Q , Ofjd F L..ijarl &r,lt c $. E; I ifi .L r::. f 1- I.. Lo t !I;+F t : ,,?.Z, <:'.,::::3 t ....&7 v- i : ;-; '{ :: : 1, ';1:3(:) Ei 11 I" 1\15 ' ' :: ;j t i-i 5 Z iJ {-, t 5 : I- As 5 (1 ; I... (:, !I:!I$+jt"i ). 3.,,Jeil:fipdT zi:1riie E ->,._.E I -1. 7 4 c? ,717 3 i7 <;! +:: TI ,I :: + 2 1. 2 / :3 i:} / $3 fL; ::: <+: ,: JJ (1, (1 it 2 iz ... :? '3 :3 5::; 1, -. :-{ y .". ... I ir 2 : j:{ 2 ;..I 5 ; lifi :: 5 : t ill 2 !:; ;1 ;r ;: z 2 7 , 4 .q ;.z :[ iTl i. !; ''1 1- i' z I... 1 I I ....._ ............ ._.... ... ~ ............... ._..._ ...... ..........._.._. ............. ......_..._.-... ...._..._- . -~._...__.._.. ._ ..I_. .__._.- .._. " _._. ..._... ^ ........................................ .._......._.__.._.__ __ ____ .~~ ,-. i , t 1, 5 ; & 1 1 $2 ~&!.::~i~( - L p,iI>R-rE, I~,RL:~;B~~I~~ [::A ~~;J~~;~~;~,~ ... 2, 1 I ;;, J Pi\ I .. :. I. J. ; 1 . n " 1-1 1.- f"[ ... 3j:1;( f, 77 , !;;AN L1.J ;[ !:; T(5.y' !I:<; I;:I:<>,,!!,;~ ... )-+I ,:\, 2 <' ; (j'7 ._ .-, , ,' 1 ,1, .-, ,r.I / ,-a ,: ,.,_ c i I-, l.t,;2 .. i- DI:l 11 3: :3 .-.f-1'T'i-)-TzT:~' ._ '1 ._ ._I ; '1 - - .............. ...-- ......... ..._.. .-... .... ........................ ..-.... .- ....-......--..- --.._.._ .-.. .. --.- ..-_-........... ~ ..__.- - .-.. _ ..-._-.....__.-..... ." ..... _-.---_ .................................. .,_... _... .._..._...__.. .... .-> .j: 1 1 --.iI!5<:i f.!t.\jfl<:I.~ 4.JIt4TEZR RA'h'&l.IIpJTrR E:ARE:F;T;'fi Lr.9 ,qrJi:t.:i:i AI~I-IA I-IET!~ i:~rm,q PI:IF; ctr T,-~.~: PI.+, .j. 1 Z 1. 745 ~I~i{~[~:~'j' F(!II&Ei , FIJLLEy(TII[~.j iI:A I,,.I:~~ E 27-..C:, iI:i~tPIM. ~~;Ef-;';t/]:f~E !ZTATIiItN f'ie 1: )-+j,:~ k .2 : (1):;; ; Ci 1 I/ :3 4 ZA ~ 5- - Ki ,:I i: 4 z 111 .-9'7t1!4<J 1 .$:i;: !:; i 2 ,J 5 2 :3*.;!,;! p;qL!I[plAX (3 1 * VT*T $1 RE, i:AF;L.!:3AE! I::(?, ':J::<:lt:):3 d i l:l r1 2 :: i::.zT'F' FiS5Ij:: $24.5,> t81 1 I !I1 F .._i e !::a 1 <? T!al: e :: !2a 1 e &rlt : Loarl Anit-: - .. 5 F{ 1 '.. " it 1.j i" IT~ s : tJ 1-1 t 3 :: LIZ, p..+.7't; 22, :;,51 1 Inr:>.. _$-I1 r t: Erttrs: ,L f"' i-i 15 rl e r.1 ij iri ti + p :: ( &, 1 '3 ) '7!'':3 .-. j, 1 :I: 7" ,-. 1 c " .. ... .-. .. ...............-.. -" .... .-.. ... .- -...-..----....-- ..__-_.._ --.-..-_.---. ._ .......- . .-.._ ._ ..... _. -_..-...._._-......-.-..-..~__--- ..-..-.. __ ..._.-... _.. ..... ._ .....- .- .-_-.. .-- ...-....-....... ._ --- ........ :i: 1. 1. -i:,50 --1)3 lLli,t!iie I. : l.4 I NTET"; R NTER BCSRE;AFifi Le3iLl : RFINCtil:I Al>l,JH IiEDI[Ird[ifi P1:iR [117 Tr.*. a' ,: tq.5.i. 1 :: 1743 T<izi1zI.: Cr 3 Fi-iLLERTiZ:.j 113 '32k,:3 1 IJ~~ :: 2(:,.. B 1l:i:lriM. VACANT zl:lrl+: 1::2F'p As 5 Id : !$.&,2:3, :>(><> I Ill !.? <+ 1,: E! i r: >* :: i:) 9 / 0 1 ; g.4 Rc 1: 11 Ill c ;f : 111 .--""? (1) 4 r:, 1 55.12 Elst <>: !:;a 1 e Ar1l.L : Loan Arilt : tu s : P(2,:sEci E[zi- ~JIII~T~, i;p,zL:z;BAEi i;A *72Q[):3 d :-, ..:\ 1 ;7 :: r j ij {-' irb 2. : - it 8.. I. ti 5 :: ii r, t 2. : LIIl 2!3;.117: t.: 11<:),&,42 IrrgF!''..qI":t: .... ._. ._ ............ ._ .............. ..._... .._.._...- .. ._.._.. ._...--..___,._ -- ......_.-._..--.._ ._..___..-.----..-.I. ..^.... -_-- ....._....--._.. ~ -.-... ........................................................ -.-..- .ye .& 'j, 1 .-..<:,5i:, .-<:I.?. :;i kus: &, 1 15 ;.x pA:i;ziIl DEL NiIizTz, f:AWL!.SBACi I:(?, $.~(~)(:)8~~ ... 'j, 1 17 ET; ,-lAPlE!3 M&II~~IRIIIT~ \\' M , Lesi 1 E R&S.\III:~-II~I AI~\-\A )...;ED I iIiNEi& PI~IR i1iF T r'a 1: PI? i 7 :: ::::3ib(:) 3 f EII;EII:R~!ST Kty( f 'JE, izA,'.tl!zB(?,~~ I::(?, '32<:)!:):3 I-I~Q~ 21;- 7 i~:iJ~l~.jq M]:S!;:. !ZT!ZiF;E!Z J-:z !sTIzi Zizii-i.2: M As 5 lj : $4,'.5, C:.(:.(3 I ill !sa1 * It&f.i.te: !:;,a 1 2 &fjt : Lciar1 Amt: i- ..... * 1 T{1 t; 3 1.l r irl5 : bt";-15: l-Il-1 t 5 : Lo tP.+F .-' k: 7'7, 271.;) 1 i(l p!;;if: t- E Z,%+t: E!ake: C~I<;,/i.:,3/&'~j \?et: DI~II; 8: iz.-i3'37357 F ti l:, rr e ~~~J~~~~~~ r ; ( 6 1 '7) ) T'73YJ I i ... ...4(1):+ r .... .- ..-._. -_.... ._ ..__.._..- ._ ....-. " ........ ._. ._ ..-_.._.._.. .. ._ ._.._. -- ...-..._..-..._. ._... ~ .._ .. ." ___.. ~. ___T__.______.____ _.___.. ~ ._ ..._.___ _.._ _____ ....__ .-_.___.__.._..____._ .__.___.__._._.- ......._. .- -I 0 m I.-, ;.., :., I ,-'I 'r , ,/. il A 2,, k,, ;j ; r> r=# :,:!.:s 'I 4 i"i .C'... . .I__ i I. J. .-: I ........ 1 n i- c ::. -, , II t. {:I i. I-; F' (21 5 :,; ,-j : .$,2 1 7 , :z $:, 1 I I1 ...... ... I .::,,= 7 , c &i!t : Lciari Ariii : .. E::; I,j i'. ,!. Ii ..: .-. :: ir i TI 2 = ''i c.. I. , . , ifqt 2 5. : !::; -. ,. ;r !,i ::, :: p.jo f2 i ;I !J 2. r\ I1 IJ .I IJ .I I ...... ..2 1 - .- Z I i 1-1 " ;. . !-..+I__ ..'. -1 c : ...I '"<j - .( . (?T>!. . ,._I,._, - r; 7 ,,.s I k : ' .;., .z 1. 1- .. c:i 7; r:, . <:? :3 p! .3, i 1 : p..ji:[ p: R I !_. :c 94 (1; ;? !2 11 F: j- i:i ;;: I-; ! I :;;; :2 ?if p,j z z ..... - ......................................................... ..-._... ..... -. ._. __ .._......_._.__._.. __.^.. .__ .._..-..-. ..- ......... -.- ....... .-. ....... ..-. -.. ..-. ..-. ...- ... ..._. _..._ ._.._.. ...... ...._ ._ ...............-_ .--._ ..-_. -_ -. J 0 LL; i I 2 r . ; ;;; -j- p-r r- I-.! F 1;: :: I T r.7 i'i rx y I fi ,,, p~ !:; p.] E; i .-. ... - 1 L/ 7 I f.. I-. ..rat .... I. I ,_I/ \I i-'L- 2 CL I = I ii p E; & lj ; <;I ?- - ZOfie: p)! 2q:> I- rl - .. I % ,- - A,., 1.1 1- 9 : ... ... .... c.-. zcr. 7 6 %Z CIFiit ; Lctart hit :: y{ij .-_ . - 'r :.j : i ?I ' 5. : i-ii-{ i: 5. :: L If I ':E. I . ,.+Ft: 1:::2, 516 :!?I; "_ I lit3 : 8:: _I 1 <2 ri .t n i .{ 1 I.. " .... '21 : .A""- L \r - .... -- i 2s I ... -.. ....................... _..... ........... ............................ __.... ........ ..___.-_.._ ...._.._.... __._ .... .--.. .---..-. -.-.--. - ..-..-......-.... " .... -. ...... ^.._ ..-... _"_ ......_.-..... " ..... .......-._-........ .. ......-.. .. I .-., *. .: 1 b 1.1 5. I! $:, j. (:)(I) ~~!~:~l~{ D5.L $.]$Ilr(T,, J 1~~~~[L!~:8(:\]~l !I:fi J-12!3[)2;:J-.... 1 1 i ,& --.M It. f"?.F;Z;T I C pR;!:iiil-I~:T!~ 1-e~;~ 1 :: F;pipJi:f.-li:! A!:;l-iA I.-1ET! 1 CipJZiFi F:'i:iF; i:!F -rra.;: '1 1 - -7 I t.JEil-l!3 ~ F&jl:::f!zF;'./ .-- L I i;I--:T ET): z $1; rie :: M As 5 ,-j : $5.77, 2.22 I ii I:rf , I,yf, . .; .5 : :: $, 1, C)o ;:-pl:2zi2 IjEL pJi;i;;;TEI, f;p#L:.:;;=:fiE[ iy, g.z<;)<:):;; I i < .- 7. z ;* !;.I !-> ;L .: 3 : (11 :' 1' i) '7 / 6, :I< I-' l'{.; '2 I: El i:1 1: .;E : <2:3:3;35 1 !:;% 1 8 xrit .:++ : !sal 3 firtii :: 2: k: 3 ij r in 5 : T- i?th5: !.-I rt k 5 : 16, 74<:, ilTir::.:;F _.. _. L jl -r ....._.. ................. _.... . .__.__ ._.__ ____________._.._.__.__.___ "_ _.._____ __ ___._ ____-..__....__._..._.... .. .-_._ ...._.___--.... . ...._ .__ . ...-. ...._..._..... ._... . ....--. ............................. .-.-. :;: 1, 1. -i:,5<:j . 1 0 si iij 5 : ,L,<:):z<:) FA!I;E!;l LfEL f:jiIi!3TE7 i~+~~L~~;~~~~~ IzA '32<:)<:)*7 .... i 1 I/ i~!~,iI!.+r~.: I:!E&L!-',' 5: WILLIAM ,IR&F(!-ITt.j l..-ek:~'l t t. is t ]...I p :,.,I 5 e ; "Y7 ... I._. .. ,i. -a CCIMM ,, FiESTA!_IWANT z l:l r1 e : t:2 u 5 5 l3 : $:3[:,k,, '3 18 I ri [: :::;SI2 1iat.g: r31,':2?/:37 !?ale Firlit: Loart Ant :: - 31 i:: z{ljpiri=: 3 2 t.1 5 : !.-I i-i 2 5 : LCl t:S.qF 2 :: I lTi &.+F k : '2 j. 1, .. 0 5 <:). '. 1 1 i2Lort.2r.: MTPJTEF.;' f.-(iMfL-'~' ~AF;lN~F;!3~.fI~ Lera1 : Ll:1t j-1 p M.;.!;i. 1 ; 17.45 [l[l~:l.:::i/ {Y;!''$!,fl, F!._ttJf'?T[$J i:A . lTQ(,3 1 1.J 5 e ; 2 1 *. $, f: 1-J f"f M . PI I :z f' c' T [I! r( E fS 1 _.T c' 7 1-1 -. .- I -. m .-.* J .-, ._, l -, Z 111 rle : !-.i ~ ,,e ',I 1Jd t &, :: 1 .z, ,/ :2'3 ;'<>'T r(e ,_ p,u ,x 3 : 1-1 ... 7 1 .--.:ir.. .- , iLL4 Sale &i.e:: j.:~/17/:3(:, ::;ale Hrllt: $7:2,5(:>(:> F Lctari Ami :: E E{l t: 1'774 z{ij(..ir,3: Bti-.,s: if 1-1 t 5 : L *zl i- !2 .+ F t ; 14, '?<:I4 I irip:s.-lF t. pl.3, j- '! : i::/i'J EiEALY PROFERT I E!s 2kt7<:) EizL MAR I--{EIi31...IT:t; R(1IAj-i !2TE 2, riEL MAR iI:k a'; 1: .(:!at<?: i:)1/:;;J:37 f"7ei: ~ii:il: ;!: i: .<:1:31<:).2':J _. . ........ ..._....._. ... ._ ..._... .............. -.___.._..__ .__.. ....._.... .. ....._._..... _._.___,.... -.-.- -._--.-..--.-._-.-..- _.-- -- .- .--..-.....---...--.-I.-.---- ..... --...- - ...---.-.-...-..-.... - T;; i :I 1J 5 : $,(:]2[:) Ff;;!z;ziz[ 1iZ-L I'.Jf-JWTE, i~$,i~LS3A~:i 114 *32<:]<:)9..... 1 1 14 4 &s 5 d : $2:1:.q, ~ (:,'30 Ii I-, . '- ....... ._- .-. ._ ... -. -... .......... .._ ._.. ........... ._ ." .....- ._ ...... .-. -....-.-._ .__..._ ..__.._-.._.-__.....___..._-_... _. .._.-._._.._. ._ .._..._..__.__.._.._.__ - ..-. .. ... ..... ..... e i' :-, ._. . ... .. r . . ! 1-i I 1-w~ .T~F I t.~; i'q l-i '1 ; . .- ; .:, F'i. E: r: A i:; E; 1.i ;- 1-j r; E ~ ;L?.yJ2 ~ ,;?27 f Ji E ::.::e 1: g.:i;:+: 9 L:-, ...) i.7 L'y;;;$y - I.- - ;:;+l: z{i>1: .:+:: !:-..k,1cfqi.rS 3. 1 t :'-!x:#-/ .,-I L! i: ;[ 5 :: iJ l-i t 5. :: :::.7 I li.lp!~.-lF t ." r.;, , i.." L ...L 2, zl,~rl~!.<.: ........ ._^ ...................... ._ .. ._. ............................................. .-.. ... .._ ... .-. ,.- .... .- ._. ............ .- .......... .- ....._. ..... .-- .....--. ... -... ..................... ..-. ..... .-.. ............ .-... - -- ..--.. .-- - "3 ,,:.1. 1 1 1. -.<-> .. 7 I 1 ... ....<"! 13 i;;il-!! I, e ;. : 1;11..~1.,,~ I -.-r fit-3 1 [-'$ &:;;:E; j'ii:: I & TfI!:: , i- e 9 2.1 : I:::&~~L!~C~+~i T<:T #-E:<> -.-2 4 T r ;i I: % 1 1 ?!;:.S (-. ,;I ,. ,I 2 I: I.! 5 ; n;? 4 <I) :I; ; j 12 ;? 1: I::.? .z:3 T R :I[ , 1; A .T( . 1 - t7 ,-,L,i.lEi ii 5. 1::s ia~;~<:j'~~ .... 1 1:::;:J '7 1 f E I_i R 1.j f"E (1: [I! 2 ztl7 z $1 pl r2,W 1: I .I 1- fi N z ::; 7- iz 2 i] <I) ..... pi 7 :3 T [I! !: 1.:; 7- Ci N 11: A F; i: I:; T r! L1 5, (:I ..: i...~ r.j I T ::: ?--. b 1-1 , i <? ~ : fi 5, 5 l-j :: $3 , 1 :!;2 1 <:j i 2:s i ;I:7 r?;? 1.. D (1% ,I .tb :: 1; ---& I<:) Q 1 5 r- .. ,. _.. /;;:7 sei 1 i? &;isit ; $::t,, f=1::4 , 231. *I! L.l:la;-i &li,t ; L- ..... c [-I ,i - i i- c = ... z ,j .- - /7 L <:I t !:;..-l 1: 2 E :34 .- --- , !...I ; !.-I - L! k ki ?; z ......... .._... ................. ....-.... -..... ..- - ... .....- ............ ,.._- -...,.. .._.. .........-..-.._....._ ......... .._.... -- - ....--_.....-.._. .._..- - ...-.--..-..-.... _..__ - ............ _.-...-.. ............ --. ............... I .._I L' ._ ':t ,,..., i :, i .,. .<:,73. .-!:)?x !: i ::I, 5. :: z~L,(:) EA!;;..; !;y;~~-y DF;, 1::ArqL I i _d cqqri 1.- r 1-8 !:A ~.7~~~:)<:!*~.... 1 ~r:j 1 J !'~i~;~,.~;.; p)!,Jk,,Tf- FFjf.1It)" & ;!:I!I:IfiT[.TS, !-exa7 : !I:ARL!sBAIi T!I:T +i.li:f:2..-.24 T'r.a;:,i 1 ''y'i.E; [la-;(, j, i ." !:I: ;' ig T! I , .:r ,~_, i:ry ,II , ,- i%.:c L ~- iI:!Ii 2 1 t.J k1&Ri:; .I L!l,t\iE :;-r% 2if(S ...-.2, y :~~-!~if'\.:~f!3pd !I:$, '752(]7 \ ... {c;e - :: !L &,-. /?- prc \I __..._ SI ci, .::?I-! l...IN I 2 6:' rf 2 :: fissc;: $2, C:20&, 1.:,09 Ill fa ,..'...,- .> ,: . jJ el, 'c <> : ....a c. -> i i 1. .> 'r1 I..'CI. -. j. 2 E ,'". i r, ,J .:~n, ~ _,,. /-,7 ::I !sile knit: ct.:1~. YL.-l, cI.~-Q7~;:'-~i.~..r+ c. L 2-L. I - i' L~:~~~~ &nit E E:;.:: ( rJ 'I !.. E i ,:1,7,-7 2, l 1 r lrl 5 : B t ti 5 : !Jr, t. 2, ; :3 1 LIIi +;;.{$r 'c :: i3I-8, 2'3$2 I i F, r. ::; .q f- t : :;: 1. 1, .i:!7 1 .-<:I& L.. i]~ I,<+ r' t k'!l,,J],-T 1 .. F&M y fi!~!~~If: 1 ATE!:;, L+s:i 1 2 !~:&RL!~~kjJ T!::T #:::2.---' i-r ' Tr.ai::t 1 j.:::&5 pl.3, ,i, 1 : 13 /I? Ti .fE i2RlJPE izo 223 1 W MA3:2:-1 L&NE :E;T% zQiI)--i2,, !STC!!Zl,::TiZiI'.I iz;111 '352i:i7 ,,. - Il ,zl lI 41 z I-: .-. ,; i i-jn i r=. 1 (1) / :;:*\;' ; $7 r> '5 1- - * L I ..- 'T I .._I il t i. .,, .: t.1 I ....... .-. .......................... .-.. ._._ .... .__"_ _..--.-- --.-..- ____._ ___ ..___.-. - .. .._.__. ... .-. ._ .._. .- ......... .-.-. _...._ -- .... .-. ................ .-. ..-. -.- .-. .- ...-.. ..- .-- ...- ... ..-. ... .-. ......... i t u s : ~~~:)~> i~ I pi D g F< I F T EI;:~ y 11: (ri 8 L I:; 3 g, D 1: A '13 ':I e-) (1) ,.TI .:... 1 1 2 -.. 7 ;I I._Is.g: ib- 4 RETSTJ3. AC>+ !-!NITS Z,:,rt*:: Rss,-j: $~.:~:22,E;::!1:, 11 .-8 l '1. ..e ... I.: E .x t <? : l;a.j e j-j;iLie: 1<-/2y,t;z7 !sale fiiil.k: e2~,,".~14,.~.~1is~ .-IJ; &..-I Lciari ~~~~t: E::.::? q 1 '.. " i ci*:,7 ?,,A . = :: i! c ti 5. : if rI ;: 5 2 T*"? L lxl k !2 .+ F t t: $, :2 y :3:31.7 1 Ifip!~;:if: t E ';: 1 1 ..g7 1 -.<I9 'Ti .-, !-l i J .. 3 4 Q YfiB 1P.ER ST, !Zi3.RL:3cGjE! izA 1. (3 ,' :2 ':I ,' 37 F(3 I: 11 i:i i: 4 : I-: -. 6 1 <I) 4 1 5 ii' F' i t i " 1. ... 8.f I I ' i Ii "' ..... ......._... ....... .._.... .... .____ ....._._.._ ..- __,._..... -. _._.- .__._.__" __._____._.___._._._.... __.__... .............................................................. I.._ .-.--.- -....-.....--I-.-...--. J i"J~i-irtis r' ." MI-lllf f -FF;M I L')' F.:~;:~i~i~: I ATE!:;, Le%h 7 2 lI:fi[.;'t!:;E;F;D TC:T #,;:;2..-24. T~a~1.t 1 l:I:&,yt :la. j, 1 : ::; 111 Ti [E 17r ,-ll (-, I ic'r I-- !::[:I 22.78 1 1J plAR!,:I--I LANE :;YE 2i:)Cj. .-:2,, f~Tf~i!~:k::Tl~!N !::A '-'22i:!7 !..I%.? z ICt-. 4 F;E!z;fZI. L'ACF.INT z 111 ['I e : {A:. 5, lj c $25, ye8 1 I-, ,.\*,-, . - [l,x;:<&: 1(:);2'7/;37 Zs1: [iiji: 2: I: ..~tlc~)4l~ ::;ale Date: ~C~/~~/~li:? !:;ale firfit: $2&,z2472:31.x.Ei Li:lar' &rjltc f_ I:.:: i-li-i t 5 : xIri&;II": t : - 3- JIj ritts : 3 '2 1-+ 5 : L lzi .k :3 51 7 k ; 9 &., y 7 (1) :3 L! 1 i: : .___. _,. __ __. .__... ..... ......_ . ._ ......... .._. __. ._ ......... __ .... .- ....... ____._ _____._ ._. _.._ __._.__ __.._ ....... ..._ .-._. ._. ..-. .... ..-. .._ ........... -- ..-.-.- -.-.-.-..-- .-... - ......................................... +.. I, ,, %_1 .- L ' 0 e 1; lIi + ..(. ).. ;i :;+ j i $ -y 17; w ! ::;I 1;; !;:l TT$J f:?J:; ... p1-A ,~ , ,~ :-; i . .!- i i-i .? :~;i~l~ii~i,~,,-.'.~' :p<= ;-:.,Il i" t. ;..> ;::< 1, -. . !:'ic"!,t!y-;;Tf:.Ei ;.::y ; *I '.y;.:i. r+ 111 i. .:? -I a::, ... ".. .............................. ,-. .._... ._ ...................................................... ..._.... ...._ ......................................................................................... .._. ........... J ;?I r: L ::; E: A xi .Ti:: T $4. ::; 2 ... ! ! . 5 :I:, t i j, ::;, j . (?i , PI 5 !., {j :: .z.&:z: .~ '::::-?;;; .i i 1 i _.. .. L, (;l i j .e ; if :: rii;- ; e:;'/.. ". .L I_, ? :.2.<q., 2:21.#.f! L.gan ;qrii.! 2 I !::: .-< % .f I % c-, .,'T 4 * i Cy ... i iii'i :: 2. :: ...._......_ .._ ............ ._ ............. _.... ....... ....._. .................................. ._ .... .- ..... ..-.. ......-. ... .- ......... ....-. ................ .....-. .... ..-...._..._. ~ ............. ...-..... .....-. ..--._.... .-.. . -. ,z 1. 1, .... (1) 7::;; . (2 j, f; .,:, I lJ 2, E :';I 7. (1 5.2 i f'7 L i ,< 11: L F 111 F( , j;: &;:it- !; g; $:i X:! 11: [::+ I (-y!w;,ci.e ?!],-)!,,,.TI.. f'-pif.)I!-Y fi!~~G!::rl::!:AffZS7 !-esa,? ; C:Af;L_E;E:&E! 7f:T i"f i, j. 1 ; 1;; ,>' (;( '7 I I , ..I 1;: ! .. I.-. LI!~ !Y. .... 1 ./ r1,- I L- I_: IJ :;' .y '3 1. I,] pj <; F:i:;. 1 1- kP.4 ;.: 5; T E 2: (3 i:, ..... (fi , c; 'i' [::1I; !.'. ,...,TC[r<j I::{? *!?52[>7 I ._ I E, _. ..:> 1- 2 1, (:, ... 4. FiE!? i D ~ (:,<>-! I,.!PJ 'J, T!::; ;> <,;; 1- p, ryL :: .> : 1 (1) /f .;;'? /f :::.;7 p'..> 1 i.". 1- - D (:, I- .$ :: :;a 1 e fr <!, 1 c+ ; :;; b 1 cf p, I i i 1 ; 3.2 5, , rl 2 4. ,i..-'A .:cr. i .:.:.I-! n ~ 1 .-"rLiI :: .-. . p lilil. . . :: E{ : i.l J :: :,j 1 2 : 1';!:37 :3,..: v iri 5 2 L__*_ . F4 I' I' -; n * ":I .-L.-:I.-I C.-. - -' - J 2 I-. n +.'A , ..::s.iL. , .-LA1 .t i'll 1 .. -. I:. I..! i i (2 2 i; --.;;- j, (1) ..q p 5 1 r:; ,/ ':X >._. n _.' I .! ~1.7 *,..a I E I;.:: E !f i1 t. ~ : .: 7 L " I.. #? ,-~ I- ;. :: f I j _'-I/'-I 1 {Ti p!?r 7 t z 1-1 1- ..1 1 - .-I 1:. ? <:n -x:, - ....... .___ ................... ._ ...... __ ................ .- .. ._.. ._. . .__ .... -... .._ .. - ._. .._..___... ._... _ ......- . ._._ .- .._.__...... ~ ................ ._.. . __.._ ..._.._. ... _._._. ..._.... _... ............ ..._.__._. ~ ...._-_._..___ 1 .,.. s. 3 .._ j .. 1. 4::j 7 y.2 ...[ 1 :! ,-ti I l.24.; p\l,J-,-rX .... FpMIt... y cr; I AfL-82 I .>, .... 1 n !l:&RL;E;P!-.>D 8 ri f'!;:T +fC'.>.-..? j,-sA- &.4 Ti'a~l l~~i&.-,~ \.-I=,+: I/. :,.-. qr; <:A:)-: i...rpJ I T ::; 7- .&.. 1.) fie :: k:,; .'J 3 :: :E. I 'I ;:I,&,;: 7 333 11; I? <+ {;; Ei ,Xi ;: <> :: 1 :37 ;:(.:? I: El 1:I lz 2 : 13: -6 1 <I) 4 1 5 12 ... 'C -i, 1 /:a ,._ Kla i e : /I:.-:? :sa 1 <I* &ff,i ." $2&, .yz;q., ; :I .S.D l-l:i,ziri F;IiJt :: 'g-; L.' 1 t ; 1'737 2, {.; (% tli <, ; ti .Ll *.. I,. i-, 5 : I ,_ lri t .< - ; 17 Lo k!;;4F;:: iJ3, 5&;:) ;[!r,;z!.;.+r t.: !:; ._ :: . t I-! G. ." 1;~i:)i:j !:;:TA t.J 1 ND i-'T _.. , I::F~F;LP~{ .JL kILI ".Ti CA .- 11 '~/ziJ(:)~~....t .a 1 14.2 d '...* 1. r ,.-.-.a? ~i.. 3r-a t = 1 ; 1::: ;it:[ Ti .I;: ::;;;;:I-i;7:;1 1; 3 1 GI MARI:; .I 1 - kpi~ STE 2i;)i;) ..... fi , ~~~~-~~~~~.:~~"~~i~..~ [::A t ............................ ._ .............. ._.... .......... __. .... ._ ...-..._. .. ...._.._...__.... ..._ - .- .._..... _.. .... ._ ..._......_.._._.._. ... -._ _ ...._........_ .___..... _._ .... .._ .._..._. ... __.._.... . .._. ._...... .~. .. _._ .__ ......_...._ __.. ~ ''7 .A_ 1 .I. 1, ... <) '7 2 .. (1 3 s i t ,, s ; t7c2(I) !;EA 1::LF ~~~:, iy,pt,:z;zAD ciq 82[:)c!3..... 1 1 :3y .J izi~ ri e f" :: Mi-ILT f '. .F&M I L'\/ cj!z!31:ii:: f &TI.I!s , i.. ~ ci *. a=l - z f:ARt_!zE:AD TI:T .j+~~:~-~~ T;.ai:t 11:'ik,z (d I,* - 1. . 1 3 = t-, ... I /{-I .- TI..iC.- 1 \!..- (?.-,[ .Jl-% -1 (Cry I._ i;i'J 7,.7<.:ii .i L ... Lf pl:qRiI:;...i Lgrsi!Z -_ STE ~<:Jc:!. ..A .I !.;TiJ!I:b::T[I{pd iI:r> ~~!5:~!;)'7 ),-ise: il .... 4 F(I7::T - -8 .I. 11 , kc 1:, -I. !-lN 1 T !s Z 111 i-1 2 : A:.s,-j: $1 7 2[y$, ;T;'T;q 1; !;;~i.l e rli3i3: j.(:,/;":l/:z7 Safe Aril?: $,,2&,52L).,Z;:31%f! L.I:I~,T~ Artit:: '- i'.. , 31 ;r i 1':;:37 c{{di-.{T,sE E{ t ti 5 :: I-{ ,$I-=* .- i - n 14 L<:lk!srFt: :35,71':' &[\fy::,-,F t :: .3 i. 1 3, ... (1) 7 :z ..... (1) /q J. '...I ;?.st;,: J:!;~:<s." $,i;j,*'z'7/:37 gel: ~{1~~1: .%: C. .::,I::).C+,$5 1:: ._ ,. . T ... I-.. .I ........... __ ..-. .. ._ ........-. .. .-.- .......-..._.---_- ---. -._.__.-_-. ._. ._ __ ..._.._ .-. _._ ... .-. ._.. ._..__-.-_... _._ .__ -..._..- ._ ..._.__ ......._ - __.. ._. ._.. ...... ~ ...........- -..._ ___ ....._.._ .-.. Si tu s : 9<:)<1> SA I LF I :<!-.I FL, iy,F:L:;EaKi iziq r:~2t:j(;)v?.-.. 1 1 :3:;: 4 l:!bjr!?:.: MI.-J[-Tf.. F&t.lmiv ASScffI:IATE!2, Le~af ," I~,QRL!:;E:F;Q -ri:T #'2'7'.--2~1 r *L Ji...a~:i. 113&5 Ml.j,i 1 ; l:;/[:l TI..IE GRIJ$E lz[Il 2.2'71 &J MAH1Zr.f Lfif.45 ZTE 2i](:j-.--;q, :3Tiiti:CzT!JN f:A ';;52t:)7 !...I 3 e ; 1. t,- 4 RE:S x rt (. ,m+ )-IN ITS Z 1:' rr 4 : PIS 5 Ci e 881,OI 19x I1 :'i*,... JJ.3i.e: 1.ij//2':?/;27 Riel: E,:I,: ;: 1=.-.<,11:icf15 !&I e Date: j.r:j/28/:::7 Sal <? Flrtlt 2 $26, 524, :1%.11 LI:I~~, &tit: E ::.; 31 2; 1*7:'37 311i..,ns; 3 t ;"I 3 : I1 it t 3 :: 1<:1 LCi t!.:..+ F 2 E :3<:j 7 IZJ~& f (ti p 1.2 ..-x q F- t: :: :z 1 1 .-.(:)72 ..(I)? ..... ._.. ._. ._. ..-. .. ._.. .._ ._..-_. ._ - .... --. ... _.. ._ -. _... .. -..-. .-.__ .__..... --. .-..-._ .- .__ ..- ._- .-.-..._. ..._-.. ._._... -._ .-. .._. .-. .- --. .-.. ._ ..-.-.- ._.-... .- ---.-..---..-..-.--I .... - .-- -.-.- .- ..- .-. .-.. :I; i 2 8~ 5. ; ,922 T I DE CT, j;ARL!:;BAEl I::& i32c)c)1;~--. 1 1 44 J l~i~~~~~l-~: PI/lt.TI..-.FAMIL'Y A!S!Z;!JII:IkTE!Z, Legal : ~z::O;~L!~~fi~! -[!zT 4.:32-.24 Tr.a.ct 113&5 M.3 i i :: iz/lIi f: .]E lIiH1JPE C{:i .:r-:"~i L L ... 1 LJ p1Axl::;-.l LANE :sTE 2[:){:) -..A, :sTr-JI,:l.::fiI[N 1;fi '352<:)7 I...IseE Id- 4 f.;'E!SICi. 60-! I-INIT!Ci z 111 f-i 3 2 Assid: $.1,54':), 17::: I ?;,e I: ga t e ; 1 g /I 1: .-& li:)4 15 Sale 1iatt.E 10 : ~25,~ 524 , 2:; 1 3.11 L l3 a f-, fitr, t : E::.:; E1 t: 1'337 z!,J,-.ir,5: 3 t. I-I 5 : Unts:: 1:3 Li:l ?".+":I: ....I I 7 1 '1 438 Iirip:?.+F t: .. .._.._ ~ ..-... . ..._...._..... .__ ._.- ...-..._.__.. .._..-...._._. .-_. ~ ...__ _- ....._...- .--_.__._._ _.__-..... ._.___.-..-._...- ~ ._._ .............................................. I .... "-.- .-..-..-... I m e 9 y:: .\ . , i71. 1::- r; r i-8 !\ p r- rl E- c- 1-1 II , ,,_.. Ti. ~.i-.,.~~ r I,.~I., Y :? r- !3 = I %.--i = ...................................... ................. ............... -... -. .._ .._ ................ ......... ............ .-.... ....................................................... J , .! .-_ --T (7. - , . ,I.,: j',<: .-(,!<:, ?,? .' : 1 .I 1-: I" I_! '-r % :.'..,. i I " .. fi !j ~j d ; $. 5 3 ~ i') ti 1:j 9 fill E ::.:: _.._ vi :[ iriFt:.?.q;z t * ,-' 1- iIl i. ;; .q 7 t :: .7 (1) r:, <'' :::; ::; .- !J ri t 5 :: _I... ?-(I -... ; .! t vi J : v- .?. 3 1 1: : j,f I j I.. j I, '5 ; .._.._ ........_ ... .._... ......... .__.. ..................... .._ ... -. ....... .._..._.._...._.__._. -_ ..........._.._ -_.- .- ..--....... . -.... ..-....-..-..-. . -...-. ..-_....-. ~ .-- ................................................................. '7 .,:.. i .L '7 L -.{-i ..., .,,I 7.. f) .::x . ..'.<.. .78 !:; ,i 2 ij ::. z f.4 jl{ !: I ,; 1. '. 1- IJ 5 Ai! Ij I-- i" 5 5. J . LI m I,/ I'..L-. 1- 1 ._ 1 - './ I [y! .... I j: t. ! ! 1i"ll ,? Ti \ fi ELL'\' f-,'cLi L..eral E R~NCJ.i~~l fiiI_i!.Jfi ~~E~!~!-J~J~l{~ F'!I!['; i-jF' TI.,%!:.: .. I...' rrr, /-% PI ,A j. 7 R ::: 7 ;T r:, :I; !._j t;l rd y - l ... , .z., '.... {-I Ei 7 11: (2 2 L.. :!; z 2 D i3A ':' :z (1) <:i i.2 1 I ,. .'. = $7 ... ;!; lqj~; D I r;;-;: z (5 il e ; I.1; ;/ {Ij 1 9 z, 5% ;j :: $. 1 7 428 , 27 2 I ;I j , .J.? L " L. . 5: ;> #- 'r-1 <;; ll .;; 2 I-:. .. i 'Si") .? .q 7 2~ 1 E4 Ailit E T, .,-x 2- t ). ; I <:. : !_! 1-i t 5 ; psi '5 :; i :: IJ 2. & *.j {j r' ;- - .- s %L - Ai..-& Iz 1 ii, ;; $; '.i 1.. I- L r. - *I ri if Aril .L :: C" 711 t: .-t t .7t ... (1) ,$iJ. . :'J 5 ]-&I 11 +.+. 1 . 2 f.:::E:[_1-'y F; 2 I:].! EL!-'$ i"(lJE L-..-.-. L>a -I 1- = L1:1t. Ei F' PI.:;' i 1 : c; !>l-j i::i]EE:I7J- '2 7 7 (1) ::;If PJ N x( I: XEE b: z if (4 fl ? (: ARt!:; ti &!3 1: A '3.2<1) (1) :!: rl.l...:Il:i,; L.I t.J ? . L ]Z( ;: I:; '4 6: t: 2 .-I I ...-_ ..__._..... . .._...._.. ............... ......_......._... ..................................... .- ...... .....-...- ..._ ._... . .....-...-.....-. J--- .-... .- .................................. ._ .......................................... e53 .i.. 1. .L I i~ii E:x:? I fis 5 li E &.:s9'7 7- i 7 !..I 5.. ;:j : .4 0 "' 7 I r.! xi !.r !:; " z [:I ,q 3 : Y~'4i 7 i A I R;,?:: z,~k.+: <:)~/'~,:~~:~::I F{*i- ?-'{l:,l: .g: I:! -.'2:>:31,;:,{:, 1. i:c s ~i fiffl i ." :3,3l .* &flii. : 7 1-1 n t 5 :: i- *zc t !S .., F 2 c 1 ln e. !% .+ F.' t E =! tj C' IT+ 5 $ L{ t i-r 5 : ......... ._. ....................................................... .-..._ .-. ._...- _._.-- .-.. .- -..- .- -.- .--.- ...--... ... -.-.. ..-..-....--.-....- ..... --....- .-.. .- ....-.. 4 .-I i. i .L '7 .c- .<I) ,:i (1) ...: :;c, si t IJ 5 E $&LI~IM~~T< 4 I pq- F~J, CAF{Lz;3i+D iz& '3'7'ijijCz L ._ ._ 1-t i3ii.irIer.: f.:::~].-]-Y F\IlI!EERT F&tt:EtLY RII1:l-i Leraf f l-ot !:; F' M.3. i f : [:/!:I ZiIiZ{ERT p KELL'( 277(:1 !~;l-f~.~fij'y' iI:F;EE!.:: F:tI[@,ct, t:::~?r(L!;E<{?fi [::A '~//2<:)~~):.~ !...is+: (,j.-j At:. NCIN-IF;RII>TD l--lc> At:::; zi:tric; G5.5 13 : $:2: 15 7 425 I ril ;:;a. 1 ;:.: ];I ". t .> * T, 1"'1 1 ;.. _jl 4 #;: Q3, t i" ; <1)..7 I ,'? ,Ll,-) .- , / ,-,.-, ,7f= F(* lx Et *:I lz G :: I-.. -. ... ::cq -8 QC) 8-S .. 7" >-l . _. .I T1 L 11 Sal 2 Anrt : L3:iSil.i Riiit :: E z( 1: i.. 13' .. = - ktsjr.,r,s: !f i-i t. 5 :: L {:* t !.?.+ ,r t z I,TIF!;*F t :: ........................... ~ ..-._. . ...._.... ._ ......._._ ................................................................ I-.-._-._ ............................................................................ 7, .i 1 13 L. .,. i') ._ .<T (3 2 III~II.I<+ r. 2 l.<:~~-~">' R I [:f.tfiRD f:&l.<ELL'/ RIzIE Leri 1 t pia i 1 : 277r:) ::;i..t~~y I::RZ:E!.:: Rt:t,!xj, i:azL:zBficl Iy, l.;~r:)o:3 I,J:~*: 4~-7 1rg~i.j::;. L~AI::ANT z I:I r, 3 : A5,5ii: $1, 1:3:3,7p,5 1111 F( <+ {. '[I ,& i- e ; I :72 ,' '7 1 / $31 ,.-,.-, c R* iI Di:l lx .%: iz ..4'.7;:,2:32 E I:.;: .- !:;;;. 1 3 Kk,i 3 :: ::;a 1 <> Ail1 t : LIr1aI.i Aii1.t : e, . '3, .-x? 17 .1 j, t ij 5 z ]Z:;qt_[3MAR A I F;FT F(c[? fzAf(L!"z{AD CA :33i-)i-)CJ L ._ ._ I' J . r.. I ._' 31 :: TI L' f j I"' 11, 5 z z t h 5. : if j-i t 5 :: 1-i:i ;I!SqF t : x {Ti f.!2:+ F t z .-. _-... ...... " .... ~ .... ~ ............ ~.. ._ ..........-.-....... ..........._ .-.. ... _- .- ..._...-.. __.. ..--...-. -..- .- ..-.... -.---..-- ..-.. ---- - -.--.-- --. . ....-.. -. -..-. -.-.-.--...--.. ... --. ...-- ..... -.- ....... ..-.-..-.. .- .- ....-. W m (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE FROM: PLAHNING DEPARTMENT RE t PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice PRICE CLUB for a public hearing before the City Council. t ,-- ,, Please notice the item for the council meeting of .-/.”. A”$ Thank you. MARTY ORENYAK 4/17/91 Assistant City Manager Date */5 e' m e. q~. I /5, u- 906-D Caminito Madrigal Carlsbad, CA 92009 July 20, 1987 Mayor and Council of the City of Carlsbad City Hall 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor and Council: My wife and I wish seriously to protest the permission for the Price Club to build a facility on Poinsettia Lane and Avenida Encinas. This is most inappropriate use of the land and would be a real detriment to the area. We have lived at one address in this area for eleven years. We would very much appreciate anything you can do to stop the Price Club idea. They do not need bargains, and an interior site should provide no problem for them at all. such a location, People go long distances for Price Club obert V. Hine s$G-tlyp.lknej Shirley M. Hine WT bn .LV The conversation he is referrin began many months ago whe on the land,” said Jack Schu- e city, however, is ment director, “is that there has -- rn -- L .”_A -.,_ ~ il c, 1% /“‘d*i PLg / I pT+: C&&L&E_tb +5yx < &&*& JL?/ qze& i.5. L, 87 &L &LAl( ~&;Lc-&c.-ih. r- e. JL1p bz&-L. ht . J!LbL--&- +r-+ / &to+ mq -/.?--Z+/&K&%J , G& &#- /&&.ZJ?% a\ Jf 11 ~~-+-zk- &*a,, nt,, && &&. &2/ ,& h4Wd&&, 9 0” p/L&!?-7 l4.L &ZW< OJ., dL3 ~ Uk?-wLL,&& &&&e Ad& /(&5 &/&..&U/&--) & +&@ /-) 254 </w$f@&& .fiqfY-: @-r’/lz**cP-rJ&\ rd&&+ ,&33 & Gf&& ,,y&a&i ;L/Lf$ 4dLw ki? 3 I.akt TT{ &&J2L 44 G--.J”’.2R”-’ 25. p‘ wLW& A- t%-wJD&&u>i L“L11:/& If; FL p&zPi /& F+P7 .%/-as&( -& c - I - $9 ?tA+? 7 ,&,SL. ! DL a4.-+%LL &Yx&#/& &L p I&4/c/cy &-&/ ft&J - /zL- *I Lfi%49L4z-q&$&-q c *‘ &?a rL~~fw,$f!.&&d G& j&$a --y 1 /Td 4.. /4-- py. zd rnL&f& bw-3 / Ah &d. &F4%:i- 4 6 \Q&qb, G c- c;wLic(*v< %Lg 5WsnIL A”4E LAkL5GAb Cc“t ~~o<3~ ?3%-$7,y-J @/*' dm Pa fide * cr7. &2 July 15, 1987 Mr. Michael Holzmiller Community Development Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Mr. Holzmiller: Please be advised that the undersigned vigorously object to the building of the Price Club at the proposed site in the City of Carlsbad. Many people have paid extra money for their view of the ocean and it doesn't seem right that it should be marred or taken away by having the Price Club built, It would also create unsolvable traffic problems for an already over- crowded and busy area now and in the future. We must maintain the integrity of Carlsbad. Where is the slow growth initiative? With buildings already in exist- ence that are vacant and the availability of a Home Depot and a Price Club in nearby communities, we 'feel that the erection of another warehouse is not necessary. We strongly urge that this contemplated action be curtailed and we thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely , L" Z,&- /cy C;&@.n-z/ - ppr/&.. +d?-- cL??d / a , .'7L? - &iwy Ab. i.-p /:&A/ I LL 7' &J&L wt / %-.* 7% B&'$ /-fAiy0c4 et- &&..g& 8x3 JJqc-# c= As4 ,,? J a,+- &- &&y&-=4 CC Mayor and Council Members Robert Price - Price Club Don Howells - Price Club Ray Patchettt - Acting City Manager ’;;s>/sr.v eo,,e’L e Le?&/& e,mp- pLrp YW’* 8 o-fl July 15, 1987 Dean Muyon and City Council MemBenh, Ah u mem&en ot u committee wonlcing veny hand to yet uh mung uh ponhi.&&? to hiyn u petition to htop the Pnice cLu& deiny &ui.kL on Avenida Encinun 1 urn pleading with you to giue it LJOU/Z. nlncena connLde~atLon. ‘TXLn LA much too clone. to OUR 10~e.Q.y deuch unea - the tnu+!+!ic in honnendouh ~tln~~dy - we do not need Lunge deliveay tnuck4 chewing up OUR noffdh und congeding tnu//ic &e4icler, the thounund~ o& cunh enteniny oun uaeuh. 1 do nof &QQL that QVQn though thid tnu+!&‘ LC con- clition in dedi with it going to muke u di&&enence in ehthetic quulitieh ot oun community which we Lny ho hand to pne4e&ue. PLEASE Let yOlLfL Love {OR CUdh.&Ud in4piRQ YOU to do whut you cun to 4Lop the /3nice clud {nom going into thi4 pun-zticulun Location, Sinceady, 0. P&iL- Vingen DeQLin 91’6 7- A Cuminito E4tnudu CunLd.&ud, CA 92009 PLeu4e 4end thi4 on to the PQunniny Commihhion, g&%r; &7&&c;Le MT. and Mrs. Virgil Bomhorst 915 E. Cclrninito &rt.rada CmIcbad, CA 920q a CLed ?.+-?i &.“ &. 0Ra”T.f July 10 lSt7 It came to our attention thaflis an intent its To Carlsbad Yon. Mayor Rud Lewis and GomciP Members, there bulPd 8 FA.ee club BLdg in the area of the Poinsetta Lane caffYmp, -_ . we live in the beautiful altimfra Area mea think that the 31s 6n Avenlida Encinas ape beautiful 31-d s-. and khat a price Club wc not fit, into the Bioture.I$ would plus noise and consestion. Price Club should be briilt Industl.fa1 Area like balt~t~~~ A~Y~QP& Road, opposed to the Plan, Most of the new bu\ ding in OW area believe that R Price “Iub would flit in. *- , rad* 3 more.traffic t.? the Area in aE3 Me have talked to several ~f our neighbors and all are is very nice ,tile roofs, beautituf. 1~ d scape6 . we OQ not 7”/&, ir d&-/ i, 7 Li&/Y, f) f3 7 &AL “QWB T.s?\fla f . ! y$qJ -9 ) -A& (f ,/ a/-&%* &lk@c. U / g- :@ , y L/v -- .z '... ~- .JdC fi -L).*-./&:,?r I.. ', I' ~ , ,I i L 'L ~ -- - /{ F,- /,, <./j -. i Um 14 /n" "-Y: 1 I -9 qhiy J LY,<-~ _r ,;--? ~. ,,:sD:&L& $!$e, qJ,e, &3jbi &p ; q-' L, c ,;.7 r' j 3 &; +c/ , ' -7!LY//7 ''3 i . ?( -i ,<;? +- /* f ,:q ,z. c:; rc Q.h42L"" & piL./L:;L c -.,! &[,;q @&? J &-2.9/., ,.r 9 ;+F$?7 j/i ? "i-*>: ! "/;/;- ,+;'J ' 4 /,:7/,~ . ?,'$ r Lg-- h 35. .It -Y v -. h-'.' !, ' /j :/ i' .I .. .. / $kzc #+ CC>/+~.&~ ~ /../?e /%$ 1 *{L> L, i k- ,-' fl ' , i i3gG.cFG!+ 1:. sf q jl/.'.s ;icj~~~~,~S ,sTcje. QT- J </ p(&hfq7,?!;? G%J ..L @e- --+- /- ,i/h ' G&+&- p I;: n f? ~,3e[.@&5-C? rf-: __ pk C-i-X. / c.-- ,'=-/. , r"+ /k: ./ R -7-- C?' .f,.&> G,&ye,$c q.~-+L+-- E , &-p L.s r /&&ip- Y .. /J lL.-. /7 Ge,g.+*; Zj?] e/.? iJ 7/; ,s L&5/+ . :97p , /-,q :/-:/ /yLi$ )\&yG+ ,rf ;-&&A 7 \_ -- / /" , ._ '* . r, L' x!< :.kt q p ,5 g2;T .-J- , *' I ,:G. i-i-iir- ,: A, p/ -Jz ., . .;!? iI .+ ' ..,>e :,,, ,r >y-- 8 F(> q( bi L7'i-f c?--.- ~ lp .2fipT , c, 5 d' ~-+fi-p. / 4pd- i x- . -yJ ,3<,C(. ./ &yP? I. ,/ ~ A<? y 5 f'" .: ~-.C?--?&y,/p /(.: ~.~ c7..j i -, L?@Jrf* ,9/@,)\/C ;.?<>-. &- ..-7 C>& p&$ c--,j ii q, ?" _= +$q/:,+ _._ ,;kg<$ ) ) ,;y ,-q Q!, J F? l'/ ,/ Ii i I /I ., # /*--4 I /p"t'--j .. d I? /I &. * 91 6 'ig c ij /., 1 >;,LQ,,+ 2%H- ;<+ &:+ $/: cl& ;;&@ J '.' db 4- pq/?[ ;pc 7; / P 4 CL .. jL&&+.r-. i $. A)U3 k 62 , ,, Y jhd.,ck? /,> /' I I ill 2C.P r'/.-' ie. 3";J 7 ;:jpli C;bq-3j L% J ~ ,e . /k e4 /e]t)a.Lq '. Gw!%+5!, cy$* 92coq ,' -. &z=Q 9 r7* P2 a- et%, qfl July 8, 1987 TO: Mayor and City Council of Carlsbad I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed Price Club being constructed near 1-5 (West) and Poinsettia Drive. This would seriously add to the traffic congestion already projected by study just completed for the City, as well as being incompatible to the surrounding community. I ask that this proposed building be DENIED. Sincerely yours, LLi5.4 8-dq Helen L. Britz 912 D Caminito Madrigal Carlsbad, CA 92009 F-L /c/ 1- Lu/f"-r- (g&/#I!&, &&/, qa&( A ULt//G pa='$?& &le4 2?LJ-L e--.?-- m- 4 &k4L-.4 nL&.yLL+ ' /T&z/b&a /kq/L.A I- 2 274 p2 rw- F-3A-M }lb&&L L@c? .t & h(J LLL JA -.q,&&& Q--L L4L. &"&@&&&& a S-Gka. i) 4 -b=p &-, &Q&&g&f F z4L%L4.w(;-w 2 4 ?A 9, j 9 8.7. 9 6. Up d- /YluL-. Q&L.&/ 4 w L--&Q$& i3Wt fhL-; &u- f4-Ce-f o+ &Us""r/..a -h9Ly7 "Lp- &LL&& g -2 sJ /, Y/d i a,cst= eo& e- m6 @ *, 'A 4 / p+d.yaA. T-3 c& +-@%b-tu&/ @*M/*- &L& g/&/& 1 P ~%kLi &e@&ii&&& +JL&d -4- - hcL%2 y+A@!-=Le -+A pu7wFx ,&,- +&J& " ??. &dd&m& /- EWkey ; k .. @a?- A- La-;.@* u )&&A/&>, 9 WSX' cd--t% @Le024 CITY OF CARLSBAD e/>7 / CITY HALL P2 Lb 1200 mM Am CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 A t t. e 1-1 t. :i. [:I 1-1 :: CLAUDE A. ' 'BUD' ' LJZWI S MAYOR R I: [::: E [\.I -r I-.Y I.. E A WPI E r) T 1-1 n T A z c) M I: 1x1 E c I-M N G E w I: I... I,. B E RE: (3 I.J IF E; T I:: D ~ AI.-!-.fJW :E 1'43 St3l.. lV? I:CX p FOUNDER CJF TI-IE I:% 1: CE CI-UB CtIi4 I I\! 9 '1"13 COI\.IS"I-F:UCT A ~fil?G E! 'T' (2 17 E!: 1-1 E: I? 15: 1: P.1 C: A R I... S B CI 11 ,, t J IV F O I7 1" I J hl A 1" E L Y II :I: I( A 5; A I' I? I t: E I:: L. \J B E EM BE R !, AN I! A RES II:IENT r:!F C:~:'I:~I.,,SBAD, I='E:EI ... n.it3-i- .-ri-iE L.CJCA'I- J: n~ F-OR n-i1: E: NEW 5~t3~;~ IS I'~c~I- flf'I':'["([:)f"'~y[ A-rlz l:[")"' .?y"IlC *'.. "- -' I." * i 1 UEL'l~L(IPI'4EI~II" E:{''$ "!"E-IE I-lt_lt'..IT BI~:CiYt.IERS (PAC IF i (3 F; f PI) ,, .w. f kllz 1: !:;: PF:ULt,7E:i:"r 113fitS I:: (:I lii E; T' I? 1.1 c: -r I [I iii u F n s 1-1 o P P I IV G PI A I.... I_ w HI: (3 1-1 w I I_. I.." :I w t: t, i J D I: -I- ;...I i: F:' 1:: :I: (:I.-.INI w I IJ.. CF::EG'I-I-E I"IC)MIfMhiZi\i"i-At. TWAFI- I c CRNGEST r ON P~T .i-i-im- I~F'I=--RAMF' n CJF iwfi m::r:md n m-i I :: ENT IRE AAEA IS ~u 's.-rE: FRAG x LE FROPI A1j.i ECOLCIG I :IAL FEZ I I:~Er~lT!3 I iil TI-IA-r &REA II :K NCLUD I NG MYSEI-F I WI31!I,r) I... 3 I 1-0 cojyr J: lqlj~ cis 3: pjG : 1-r n: A 1:: r:j I::;; c: CI A E; T iq I.... 1-1 1: G I-~IW A 'u' A c i: E 5 s w 1: 'i=- 1-1 (3 IJ I- iii I~I C: (:] u IV -I- E F; :[ 111 G 1- A ;q C< E 1- R P, 1:: F: 1: [:: s \..I I:{ F: cs 1.i lv XI I I~I G IJ s I.:' 1.1 13 c 1-1 A 5; E XI a 1.1 r:: t-I ti M E s w 1: T 1-1 -r 1-1 E I D E A T ii A 1- l;\i E WE F; E s E T T I_" j: N G I I:) 4. I I, (1; Id (2 5 E iil !I 1' (1 R TI-.! E I" 0 1,- I,. (;I W 3: til (2 R E A Ei (::I I\! i:.j i 13U 1: I9SE'T"T'1: PI OFI='.-I'<GIYF' I='li'DJET;TI: ON5 FGR TliE NECfiR FUTLIFi'E I I'.JCLI.IBE F?: l..AiRGE A CC3l\'iF'L ... ETE REDES I GN OF TI.-iE PC] I lilSETT 's. A L3.I;FF--RAt"lP ,3 US'T 1-n AcCQP'iI'JD{>j x5 !:; n .. - I 1-1 E. F' 1';; CI I"[:] $; 12 If 8 I 'T' If. C1I" 7" 1.4 I, NE bj F' 13 I: C: IZ C 1.- 1.i B bJ 3: I, 1. BE !hJ I: "I" 1.4 1 hl {AJ A I... /.::: :I: P*.! is D 1: 2i.l- (21 14 [I !3 '1" inhl n F' C:I :I: hi.1 g A I;I I) "I" 14 If: 1;: 1'4 T P I? E ARE A W I: 1.. I- S 1.1 F I=' E R F R 0 Pi E; l..j C: 14 6) jz' R CJ J 12 C; "!' ,, PI 0 4; 1- $1 AI"16 !, Wll X CH 1°F: I CE CI-.LJES 5 N CI'TMEF? :"IWEAS "TENE TO GENERATE " A!... Pi C2 S 1- A!.., I.... CIF '1" HE RES 1: 1312 IV 1- S QF (2 A R L S E A D C:R IC Ei T AND -I_ I-i E DE V!: I.. CI IVI E NTS 01 I-Pi I I'FI .... Y [X1 I E"l" I:1129 3: KIE3~l"l" I Gil- IqE 1: [3-lEGl~~l-4~jCjD I bl3: L.L. 3: NEXCIDE: A Pi7 :ICE CL..IJB C3P.I OUR DtiDF:S"rEP w I 1-1.. C[-Icqr$jGE 'T#l: t:i\l']- 1: I::;\: AE:6 3: BE.NT :I: Ai ... ASI::'E:C'T" OF UlJR NE 1: Gi-IBCifl-JiIClD ,, C!B!J 1: a\JSl...'{ 1 A Zuii.!E C{.-1ANI;E l.r'W 1: [:{-I P T K \J S "I" '1" I-I AT A 1.". I.. 0 1: ''I+ t412 AH 0 0 E CONS I D If RAT I 0 bl S Ld I t.. I-. B E C: Pi F; I: F GI- 1.- Y tnJ E: I G ti E D WHEN "THE RE(JLJE5il I'Cl15 z[]l\l{, [31-{fil\1cjfi 1:; Cof*.f~~]: DlzT;;:EB n f: A F: I,... S B A Ij g I:: fi (I (7 2 <::) (11 i? -.. - - @Led@ A* d Et.$ 17 a 0 July 5, 1987 Bud Lewis, Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California Dear Mayor Lewis; It has come to our attention that the city is assisting the Price Club in the site selection and zoning change for a facility at Poinsettia and Avenida Encinas. As residents of Spinnaker Hill we strongly protest both the city's assistance and the location. Typically Price Clubs are located in industrial areas where the unattractiveness of the Price Club would not be highly visible. The corner of Poinsettia and Avenida Encinas should be utilized for facilities which will enhance the beach area since this location is within easy walking distance of the beach. We particularly protest the proposed zoning change and Mr. Orenyak's ignorant decision that this is a good location for a Price Club. Please keep us informed of the'-progress of any zoning change so that we may continue to express a negative opinion. Sincerely, Kathryn Kly F Rangus 1013 Tulip Way 1013 Tulip Way Carlsbad 92009 Carlsbad 92009 mcy/az; L va lyc-6~ w @Le& k e+ fit m. t4-4 Larry Williams 917C Caminito Estrada Calf I 8 kad , Ca 1 If a~iiia 920009 July 5, 1987 City Cotdncil Carlsbad, California tladames and Sirs: It has been brauaht to my attention that the Price Club proposes to buiid a Price Club at Poinsettia and the 4.05. This letter puts you QII notice that my family and I are adamantly opposed tu this proposal. The traffic and congustion such a business would cause would cast a negative pall over a beautiful neighborhoodlcomm~rcial area. The area should be dovoted to a \IS& ccrmpatible with the exiking ones, suck as hausing or lov density commercial or ideally, if money can ba found, a public park. r Very truly yours, x9wv7 &ddL&;zwg Larry Williams CC:Price Club, Executive OffiCQB J 11 I-., i' 5 B 11. 9 8 '7 9 0~15~; e Le# 4 CITY HALL el% m r/3( d@ CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM STREET CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 '&l!J"Li,WW: ANN KULCHIN (MAYOR PRO TEM) , ERIC WON, MARK PEXTINE, JOHN MAMAUX :1: 1-1 A V E: !3 1:: 1:: E t4T I,. V I-.. E ARNE D Ti-I 61l" A 2: (3 N I I'J G C: 14 A 1\.1 G E lii I I.... I... BE: I? 1, U 1 AI q..I-.C3W :I: 1VG SO1 ..,. PI7 *. T FF * .... 'I , FCIUl'4BER 01: 'f'I-lE PF7 1: CE CI-1JB U-Vi I I'fl ,, TU CON % f) ), 1 j pj F: vi R zl i,.j f+i :[ p? {: <e. I/.. . . ... p C;$\R , I-EEI .... THA-I- .r I -([..I r I I I AT E: F: LI rq TI-I E s I 'I- E i:: 1-1 LI ;E b.1 !$ I- !I R -1- il E F GI.. I... fl w :I 111 13 R I... A s CI 1\1 t3 :: {r, /::IF I" - .:.c I X) I, y I, I., CI F' 171 E I\/ '1" B y '7 1-1 E 1-1 u PI "I" B w CI 'T' 14 !.. R s I p nc 1: F' I [: R 1: PI i " pcj I NBE'I-T 9 A IJFI:-I:;:A~~ PF;;C]JE 1- : 0 ~4 s F o ~t y :..I E 1.1 E: p, p;; rq.j.1- I,,J tq t: :I: iq c::: I... tj 1) E A I,. ,q li G E 'f' 1-1 1;;; I [q I" 1:: 1:) J E 13 7' :I: [J I\! 5; ENV I 5s I (IN A C~:~MF~~:'...I::TE I~~EDES 1: GN OF -~I-E F'CS 1: NSETT I A ai-F--i::ww :JI.!ST n3 AUXII~IC~D I? I\I E:: E D s n f:; (I N ST R I.KT :I: [x.! 0 F' A s 1-1 u I:' P I: N 13 PI A I". I- w I-I I i:: is-t w :I: 1.. I... :I: 1i.1 c I. I..J r) E I-I-I I:: r::' R w I I". I... C: RE A '1" E: PI o N I..J PI IC 1'4 I- A I_ 'I- I:; A F F I c c D rd G I, ST I: 0 r..i A I- '1" 1-1 A -I- ci I- F- .- R A PIP Is .'I.. I-I 1,: F' !? (3 tY:l E; 1, I) S :C T E. CI 1:; -I" 1-1 1, 1t.I E W F' I3 I: C E I:: L 1.1 E 14 I: I-.. I... BE W I "I" 1-l :I: N IrS AI.. 0 1: '1-1-4 E (3 C'; I, AN 11 "I" I-I I S E,: IiJT :[ I3 E ARE A 3 S G!U i: "I" E 1: R A G I I.... E I' 13 CI M A 1'4 E C O !3T'fiNDPU 1: 1\11" y PC) 1: klSE"I""I" :c A FC7R ~11'38E;l"nL. 1-1 1: GtlWltlV ACC:E';E; 14 1: TCI(3LI"I" f.l\.lC:ClLII\JlEIR 3: la: I...AR[SE '1"RAF'F':I: 1 fil\lD 'THE E.NT :E lilf AREA W J: lM,,tw $J,,IF'FE::Ft T;;F;CIM til,J[::bl h I":'RCI\?ECITt,, 1405T RESI uEtw-5 I iu TII~~T AFE~~ I NCL.I..JD I NG MYSELF !, WOULD L I IE -rn CONT I MJE us I:NG lr~ws y WH:C CH PI::? ICE ci-.iI~!3 I 11 u'ri-tEFt AREAS TEND TO GENI::F;ATE n ~~L.IRI=:C:~~..~I\.~D :i: I\.IG tis ILJRCI-IASED ~?UR E.;UPIES w I: 7-1-i wiE 1: rxx 'TI-IAV HE WIEIIE: SE-rn.. 3: M:$ A FA 1: F~I .... Y (XJ I: !::-I- I::;I:G I:DE~..IT:I: A;, NE E-l B (3 17 1-1 C1 CITI ,a [2 B V 1: (3 i..fS1... Y I A Z CI hl E. C: E-1 A bi 13 E: W i-I :I !:I: w I i...~.... I iuxum:: A F:' H I c I: c: I.... u B Q III FZ DO c) ~7 s -r E I=' w I I-, I-. c 1.-i A 1'4 G I: T I-I I:: I IT *.. P\I '1- I I? E: HES I X.)ENTP AI... Asr:*Ecr WF: [JIJI:F ~\IE T. wma~:i-i[xm I I TKIJS'T 7"l Ai ... t-. C~FT 'rI-iE ABDVE caw 1: DERRT I ONS w I L.L HE CFIKEF'!..IL.L.Y WE I: GWE A I.... M 0 Ei '1" AI .- I.. CV' 7" 1-1 1E I? E S 1: 1) l34T S 0 F' CAR I_- S E A D C I? E 5 1" PI I\.l 1) l" 14 E 1) E SICi.. Cl I" PI E I'4T !3 Id!-IEP.1 "I-I-IE I?!-: ,'I" 1=ut=: ZC3PE (::l-li-?b.lGE IS CONS 1: i3E:REii) n '. 6935 CGRNAl-I ON K!R :i: VE FH:: 4x8-31 c34 17 A F: I..,. :?a I$ D y (1 PI ,I Y 2 0 0 9 Lv----- &/e# Y e,$ m6d m. 0- July 4, 1987 e Pl, air - Office of the City Council 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Price Club Warehouse Dea.r Council Members : Many things about Carlsbad charmed me when I was deciding where in San County to purchase a home when I moved from Los Angeles. One reason I the Las Playas development in Carlsbad was its closeness to the ocean, a sense of neighborliness that I find unusual these days. Come up her€ time of the day and evening, and you will find residents of all ages wi ins and jogging and riding bikes, stopping for a chat, around here as T as along Poinsettia to the ocean. I think it is exciting to live just mile from the leading edge of a continent, as well as in a lovely, fric neighborhood. I am looking forward to the construction of the Safeway shopping cente: at 1-5 and Poinsettia. But I was appalled to receive information in tl mail to the effect that you are considering changing zoning so that tht Price Club can build a warehouse between 1-5 and the ocean. The traff: with signals, I think people will not be able to ride or walk over to i ocean without great risk. And I understand this will be an uqly build: out of character with the other construction in this area, both busine: and residential. As I think about this matter, and as I’ve read in the papers about pro: among the members of the City Council, I find I would like to have infc tion about the philosophy of this city; what are the qoals toward whicl you folks are working? What is the feeling you want residents, as we1 tourists, to have about Carlsbad? I know we are growing rapidly and tl this growth has presented us with many challenges. But, please, do no any quick decisions on something such as rezoning, when such a decisioi could result in setting a precedent for a type of business that I for ( feel has no place in what is essentially a quiet residential and resor neighborhood. I know there are hotels and at least one car agency in area, but those are totally different in character from a discount sto such as the Price Club. Please, listen to the residents, consider the long-term goals of our c not just the potential tax revenues. Much of that money would have to for increased police protection of our neighborhoods, as well as towar handling traffic congestion that has to result from this scheme. I look forward to hearing from you, because every neighbor to whom I h spoken about this question feels as I do. We are a new neighborhood, we are concerned Carlsbad citizens. Incidentally, I do not - want to become a part of La Costa and am sorry that for zip code purposes, thi that will result will destroy something in this section of town. Even area has been lumped with them. Thank you. Sincerely, G44A Diane L. Warren 6845 Batiquitos Drive P--~~I-.~A PA a3nna 0 &/ST' CL=-'C * e/% p3\6 PI- d* July 2, 1987 k> Mr. Sol Price PRICE CO, P.0, Box 85466 San Diego, CA 92138 Dear Mr, Price: As a resident of Spinnaker Hill in Carlsbad, Ca. I am very disturbed by the prospect of a Price Club being built on Avenida Encinas in Carlsbad, While my wife and I enjoy shopping at The Price Club, 1 feel this location is not in keeping with the tourist atmosphere of our small town, traffic jam at the intersection of S-5 and Poinsettia Lane, which is the intersection used by us and our neighbors, Please reconsider and.place The Price Club in the properly zoned area either offfE1 Camino Road or Palomar Road. Sincerely, I also feel it will create an enormous Merrill K, Lyon 915 Begonia Ct, Pettine Ku 1 chin Mamaux Larson / /- &)A+: L?b&(ut?ri ,>+ I-- p &.LJb<<A4< /bzA<"-&A ' ' /L.# -<. CK-4df-P Ck, 2A.902 fiO-yRK J Y [&&&&//:H-c-ced~v ? P J "td @40&4? e,q Ire I &/x 7/87 \ (YW/GF5 Ar &4i* / .7r -7L 7 J p+++JzLQz @ * / AM -z- 3 -J. -/\ '=rp, /L/-2 zJ < OL/J'.-- (..-/4fl4 -+"b d;J$L. , ./&.+eL&J +s &"%?4~/.-wpw~ ,a APl"/--L/d rl f ~ZPL~.~~~~-*r~\J/4i qfk4Jbv c_-- f J&/ZLMe7' m 2% lAKEsHoRE GARDENS ASSOCIATI @/Y> GOLEEN STATE HOMEOWNERS ' LEAGUE CHAPTER NO. 863, REGION 7 7114 SANTA BARBARA, CARLSBAD, CA 92009 June 24, 1987 Mayor "Bud" Claude Lewis Members of the City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Proposed establishment of Price Club at Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Lane Dear Mayor Lewis and Council Members: We at Lakeshore Gardens were apprised of the desire to establisl a Price Club and Warehouse by the Carlsbad Journal on 27 May. Our Board of Directors at a recent meeting would like to go on record as objecting to this proposal in the strongest manner possible. We feel the traffic generated by this activity will be unmanageable and this type of building and business would destroy the quality of the neighborhoods. It is the wrong business in the wrong location; therefore, we respectfully re- quest that the establishment of this activity not even be considered at anytime. Sincerely, Kffkzt& Lakeshore Gardens Association cc: Acting City Manager Ray Patchett a Qysr PdKN &/a& D- rl) &e&?, I Gorothy il, XieTler Carlsbad, CA 92008 June 24, 1987 308-B Cminito IXadriqal TO THE 14AYOR AXD COUNCIL C>F THE CITY OF CARLSBAT): I am strongly opposed to the construction of a Price Club ware- house between 1-5 and Carlsbad Boulevard on Avenida Encinas. That the City Council should consider rezoning the area for such use is reprehensible. Traffic congestion in the area is already a serious problem, a constant threat to life and limb. To permit the location of a huge warehouse between 1-5 and the sea is an invitation to disaster, with increasingly heavy traffic, the ensuing crime, and environmental lsliqht. The destruction of the rural character of this community is already well under way. Those of us who moved here in the delight of a charminq mall coamunity must now reconsider. I urge you to prevent the infliction of this monstrosity upon the owners and residents of the City of Carlsbad. Xespectfully, *!la7 h .+ Dorothy 2:. Ziegler yy' e/+ -4 e 0. d-ye p. 4- C mf. 570 Grand A Carlsbad, CA (619) 729-5 Coast Office Products OFFICE SUPPLIES D COMPUTER SUPPLIES W FUI June 24, 1987 Office of the Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mayor Lewis: I am enclosing an article that appeared in the Carlsbad Journal--an article with which I whole- heartedly concur. It seems to me that rezoning such a "prime ocean-abutting" area for the pur- pose of establishing a Price Club is totally inappropriate. I hope that all of the individuals involved in this decision will consider the long term problems permit a Price Club (or any similar enterprise) to build on this site. Carlsbad's coastal area is beautiful. it that way! Sincerely , inherent in commercializing this area and will not Let's keep ,' 1 &A/&!d&&/ fie &.c-J-/ +A. Bernadette Koretke enc . cc: City Council Members Community Development Director Acting City Manager / i - 0 $.E I z7y ga fn m 0 ?De WP, eem "S ge g g g g=o c (D 4 2. a *am ms-.(D c u) 2 S$*E3 E g g ??=a 1 * g $E. 2 5 ollm E:ne5*0 gg tl g =r zp. 0 m fD -e- z =-.w 5'3 g m +ZZ$ c w O(D o 0 (D - uo * uc)a-gog*;t E. Cm -=+6~g~P,gpP,~ P,o~m(Do-&;. 2 ggs3.p $0; 8 E- g gg P, * g 3 rp e c) 3- z3 0 0 ag (D (0 I (D eD z P, 0 m- ;;I 2- ge- l3 ;.m *"g.ErtJ 0 (D - g 3: D? C3..,< ?.~3 E$ m 0 e gu3 ZS D 3 g 3 *3 P,3 1 *E-2 E*% x&-- Eo P, E: *;a" ;r am pgm, r8 c g $v/%$ z 9 *go Tar; Q $kg g 0 my3 I, re?.$ ?- gzns*(D -* m (D P" r.0 q oO*~w'c~~ 8 ro o iDDm185,0 8agcP: L(&,, (D 0 gg $ob e3 (D Ls J 'p -.$ z-pg %BE"* (D *zz pa ro *= 0, g;m *o (D ~c) mag s g EE~Y *5arn a;;~.Mm (D &, rt- gg;sm Fg~eegc garu Z$L¶ 3 $2 c) c) (D Z g o P,LcI-D $0 m z 2 sz 2.- (u (D Et- (0 N" sg ,. E: 9 5.g 2 g$.c 283 g rc p, wrr3 c) 03 g P, 4.'" 0 -O 8 ;*g:"o (D 3 +5zm 5F.ww 'Dw &j.a 0 8 9 r: sg;", gwps- E (DJa 3 c 59.2 --aq O ii qwb 0 (D El g LJ gz tu (D ryzg fo -&w-n rx3gmg Sq'** 2. j: 0' c) c -~-w*E: 1 E: Fev :*gg 2; $ ggg 6 (D 5 (f&"'! "oa --(D -1.0 'Do 0- P, z- (D Lf q- 02 E*gy -* 1 -ON g * 2: %$ 2 3 N rg * c zm a-1 0 "0 (D g 2 Z='a 0 3:z.g; $ g-zg E+*; 99 !2&gq.3.- rn7 D, 33-;;-0 0 gm g-.sg2.g.P, J -% 2 30 g --%!zl(o 2 q! -zrfo 922s e- "aam--*~~mm -(Da~e,~cr,~.osP,~~~ z-rn(D(DJaP,, (Dpl(pg 52 1- (D yc (D 5- P, rg.g 3.2 $3- ne 1-0 0 1 cjm P,w 3 (D - 024 sE.q; @==J g4 r$ i3 2 g.; g 20 =- (D 3% (D ='7-*** 9r3- wg --urn rA ug--=e32 *E: 2 5&g; gx0 grz-y (D (D E** *300=;' 2 "z~a~-oJommPOg-E.g E.- I c)mzJJ WE: (D eerrpg-aq m zw ew'crrg=d_d 3%: v, 1, m zsgg $2yy &GJrv, 0 1 Ef=v(D 1 c ;-G-B mqz 5; g3y -om e, ?Frt g (D 8 e%$ ?TQ 8 %gzg 0 tr 2.2 ;I g y(D urn ct-&n(D "oq ,&z.g$ z a qrem'P 8 g z zs.3z-c *g-=r t: 02 cog 3 0 ggg 3 g $(g qg 0 Y'D a(D -=.E< !g-s: eg 0 e*- %< z-0 0 0 m e P,w mL.m =r =r P, z,'."yo 3 J ?Os 1 am a mmwg cm $3-0 FP,"oa€g -g 4ae:g am ro 0 0 rn r= "3 * 3 g 0 e=*= 0 i;' e~ mw ZP, mg c, (0 ~3 ~ag 9-w g~ gm 9 ai; 2-m SO m d%3~., 0 gw rtc 2 g-K$ %go a9 am< uc) 1 m; 2 g !Lzra 9 (D D, P, F8 5' -.g gzgg E: F$2g g ; $52 !?p."!n8 $%. gs.& 2 5 g &rgT -2B E$ B 6 gOs m c) ~;;~l"&pg.~J~.~.JOJD1.a~mg~.~~m~.(De-.R~ -.-m&.pg $z 9 rgg s gP, GFP e(D anq z5-1 L~EEE: (D ,~Z~Y~WY *g g ec c) E: 2.$u (D.!agg: 9 ?gq g msF(D 0 (D "0 n G-2 z.47 JG~~og-zcg m m m32$*tr Ko%mP, JCOm p2323 g: 0g;m J 3- mwcl E: ;I -.E? go s% =. *o=sP,gi;- z:,For3 %g RkJ 0 g,-r!'.d* c =r *mE.$c rn y ea 3 5 $:"-; 2 pro m(DOQ.'c g69-3 D,$ 3 eo * e9-e CD 7 -.~*~z.~**g -Os 5d G: 2 $2 5.D) c P, ps r2 KT$ gE c;lx-.aq 3 c) or-wD,o D1asz("* 3% - c) e% --e ma-o ,, =Io T7 3 Eg OJ ZZE 2;:: 2% 53 0 -eo ct--. 0 0 c) g SP, ag-g p =r c) 3 c;u ?.a ~g L: tg~ =no D *.--(D 1 Bm 9. c) 9 (D €ruN-. -0 sm 0 (D m (D g g (0 apwq g Lg 8Qgm,,,2,%2 WDO* w Ern-. m(D3- (P 63 *(DP,UOc) -0 3 0 -r mP no 0 zg -4 r,;;f 2; ;? s P, gm u3 n=;.,g J " m T8.b YT pP,= *3 Eg cpbp r~%~.~u-c 0 *;w- E: (D gr~ ggxLz'g =O zm P, =;'reo zw (D -- 1 x 5-* ' 0 2 0 *om0 0 Y'13 ;:%E. " * % 7p g 8. -3 n. - Q 0 E. E. 2 6 !$ 51 ? 2 s F A. p&gmodw*---a*e mmg;--mare3 0.p ansnu*cz rL-3 r'D i; zg o?P.qEaP;.Pg-,, E. m mp pg;;I 8 "P, O& ;sg "g yqpz J gZP Eg 5- El =;1 g 2 g- =;'- e1 0 z-pg g (D 0 v, gz: sg $3 ra r*eg g:pg (D 3- &.so 5'- )r I-aq "Z g %-a% xm gD E 8 I.& c) 3 E: 8 E- g w'R.*.*3 %z S (Dm,. ag- -e -m z-q5*: v) P, 0 s D, -P, cg Eg "P *=e Lm x0 2 Suf3 *-rP,gE g;."g Fggggg $8 g4 0 3 ym g 50%:" ? 3-m 5s: (D Kgggw K y %A2 3 3 yJ 2 (D Etg; &%$ggq;F cjE-?1- (DWDgec . 3c)*P,*c)o $pS;g P, g.5p c.4 (D (D 1 P r0 (D rw 0 ZaF-aq Et1=;'? $E: :% rr* ,"e gzz P, zs sg%z.gg ;t: -m am J ggrc',x E***? or.? o'pE. (D-p0" g-5-r 30 (D grn-0 * =r ab u- c m*P, 2??G (D Ei 8 P,c<8-z 3 Q (DV(D3- g 3szgc) -*Elo-ozo 9P,-z+g :.E: (D 350 m *&gg am 0 *J at& P P, go 5.,", gg $ 2 snm g EEZ.1 0 P, zmu %?.$%X3 E i ;E Tz SP, rge 2 $-% ggmq :g 1 (D r.O 3 J m 6 P, m r EP, $5?e- 4 ,.ma P, m m- 1 eo $-*E 0 u-*w ggz q g*rm *(D 7-P, (D i;;O 0 3 - a T&* *E: PkZ.3 P g "3 2 (D ZFga., 3 3 - ez- 4z-e.m 1 33 z=(D E: rn 08 5.$@ 23 2 ""."O a mtDgy$;lPN eo; g g.2 2 3 "ZOY 2 P, z P, P m -. E P,w: p SV%n? -.xga, zz: b P,(Dc;*3 3 ap 0 E.= 9e-3 2p&5pzIg87 2 g2agg.g;;I 5*5.$ P) r!j KP? &F2 cy gET 2.:: g gzg gg $g g$$;p; P, Y I. e2.g (0 -O m *= 2.w *e. 'Pcc),I 10 e-. rgt"ga 2 g g+sz2 g+nf -* I-- S$.,m (D (D 3 -.D KO **ZP z- 0 ;'Dl e E.*SW 3 e 0 -09 8 %=De e, e-, ; *v'rg a/>? &w&+ccct e &Le?& ‘4 “ac“ SEA 1 -