HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-14; City Council; 11153; Tierra Santa FeI
1 .
\B# u,r53
/lTG. 5114191
IEPT. PLN
CIT\ - >F CARLSBAD - AGEND -a BILL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. CT 9004/HDP 89-50 - TIERRA SANTA FE
tECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Negative Declaration, CT 90-4 and HDP 89-50.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On February 6, 1991 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Tierra Santa Fe subdivision. The project is a standard subdivision within the La Costa Master Plan. The map proposes lots greater than 7500 sq.ft., and detached two story homes. The project as conditioned complies with all the requirements of the zoning ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, the La Costa Master Plan and the Growth Management Program.
After review and discussion of the item, the project was approved by the Planning Commission (5-2) with the deletion of the following condition:
Prior to final map approval, the applicant (Broadmoor Homes or their successor in interest) shall enter into an agreement with the City to provide Tierra Santa Fe's proportional share of the City's total obligation for very low, and low income housing units.
The condition was recommended by staff at the public hearing in order to comply with the intent of the recent City Council action to implement the General Plan's provision for affordable housing within Master Plans. It should be noted, however, that the application for the project was accepted as complete before the City Council's action on requiring affordable housing.
The applicant was opposed to the addition of the housing condition because it was open-ended, had not been applied to other projects and was included after the project was accepted as complete for processing.
The Planning Commission acknowledged the need for the provision of affordable housing, however agreed with the applicant and chose to delete the condition.
A second item of discussion was a condition requiring the formation of a Homeowner's Association for the maintenance and regulation of fences and planting within designated open space easements.
_- . _.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. II, IS 3
The applicant objected to the formation of a homeowner's association (HOA) because of a reluctance to burden the future residents of Tierra Santa Fe with the associated costs and administration. The applicant also believes a homeowner's association has negative marketing effects. However, the applicant was not adverse to some other mechanism to provide the same end.
The Planning Commission agreed that there was a need for some form of control over the open space easements and thereby modified the condition to allow the Planning Director the flexibility of determining the most appropriate mechanism to ensure maintenance of the open space easement and design control of fences within the easements.
The attached staff report and Planning Commission minutes contain a full analysis of the proposal.
Staff completed an initial study and determined the project to be qualified for the issuance of a Negative Declaration. The site has been previously disturbed and is devoid of any significant animal or plant life. The Planning Director has determined that no significant impacts will result from this project, and a Negative Declaration was issued on August 30, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
A financing plan is required by the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 prior to final map approval which guarantees funding for facility improvements. Because improvements will be funded by the development there will be no fiscal impacts to the City as a result of this project.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
Facilities Zone 11 I I II Local Facilities Management Plan 1 - 111 I I II Growth Control Point 3.2 Du/Ac.
Net Density 3.2 Du/Ac.
Special Facility Fees N/A
EEEIBITS
1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3147, 3148, and 3149 3. Memorandum to the Planning Commission dated Feb. 6, 1991 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated Feb. 6, 1991 w/attachments 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes dated Feb. 6, 1991
city of Carlsbad
TIERRA SANTA FE CT QO-4/ HDP 89-50
.
.
.
k.
w
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PUNNING COMMISSION RESCLUTION NO. 3147
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A TENTATIVE MAP AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT TO DEVELOP A 111 LOT SUBDMSION FOR SINGLE FAMILY
HOMES.
CASE NAME: TIERRA SANTA FE
CASE NO.: CT 90-4/HDP 89-50
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of February, 1991, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according
to Exhibit “ND”, dated August 30, 1990, and “PIE”, dated August 30, 1990,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinns:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
3. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed
project.
4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
impacted by this project.
. . . .
. . . .
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a reguk meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of February, 1991,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm &
Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin & McFadden.
ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus.
ABSTAIN: None.
A-I-I-EST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3147 -2-
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Southwest Comer of Camino De Los Caches and Calle
Barcelona.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Development of 112 Single Family Detached Homes on 35.6
acres in the Residential Low Medium General Plan Designation.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for tmplementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
21 days of date of issuance.
DATED: AUGUST 30, 1990
CASE NO: CT 90-4/HDP 89-50
\ 4ti~$~- /
MICHAEL J. HuMILLEf3
Planning Director
, APPLICANT: TIERRA SANTA FE
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
Cw:lh
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-l 161
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Southwest Comer of Camino De Los Caches and Calle Barcelona.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Development of 112 Single Family Detached Homes on 35.6 acres in the Residential Low Medium General Plan Designation.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
21 days of date of issuance.
DATED: AUGUST30,1990
CASE NO: CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 Planning Director
APPLICANT: TIERRASANTAFE
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 13,199O
CW:lh
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-l 161
.
c
. ‘ # ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-4
DATE: August 30, 1990
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Tierra Santa Fe
2. APPLICANT: Broadmoor Homes
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5405 Oberlin Drive
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: October 23. 1989
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development of 112 single family detached homes on 35.6
acres in the Residential Low Medium General Plan designation
located at the west corner of Camino De Las Caches and Calle
Barcelona
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a signi&nt effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a sipnificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-sig” and “YES-insig”
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
. .
l . ’ PHYSICAL ENVlRONMENT
.WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
YES YES
(sig) (insig)
NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-2-
.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
6%)
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
HlJMAN lZNVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
YES Wig) NO
x
x
x
x
x
YES YES NO
big) (insip)
x
x
-3-
. .
‘~ * HUMAN l3WIRONMENT
‘WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
YES (W YES
(inrig,
NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-4-
.
‘, ’ MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
‘WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES (sip, @.+?I
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
NO
x
x
x
x
-5-
DISCUSSION OFENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION
.
Physical Environment
The site was previously graded in accordance with an earlier approval, CT 85-11. The result of the grading
eliminated all natural features on the site. As proposed the project design includes 263,100 cubic yards of
balanced cut and fill. The Hillside development Ordinance criteria accepts quantities less than 8000 cubic
yards per disturbed acre as reasonable. This project proposes approximately 7,960 cubic yards per acre.
Generally the grading design steps the site down from the south to the north which is in close keeping with
existing conditions.
Effects of the project on erosion, air and water quality, and course or flow of waters will be minimal. Those
slopes which are manufactured and could have the potential to erode will be controlled through slope
planting. Manufactured slopes will not exceed a 2:l ratio or exceed a height of 30 feet. Referencing Section
15064(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines: “[i]f an air emission or water discharge meets the existing standard
for a particular pollutant, the Lead Agency may presume that the emission or discharge of the pollutant will
not be a significant effect on the environment.” However, because the cumulative effects of controlled
emissions have gone beyond acceptable levels this section can no longer be accepted. Regional air quality
standards are not being met.
Project location precludes potential impacts on the course or flow of marine or fresh waters. Although natural
resources will be used for the construction of the project, primarily lumber, maintenance and operational uses
of resources, water and oil, can not be considered significant. Water consumption will be ultimately
determined by the individual user for domestic and landscape purposes. Water conserving irrigation could
be installed for common areas.
Once the project has been occupied the individual consumption of fuel or energy will be determined by the
user. Active and passive solar design, insulation and the installation of energy saving appliances could provide
a first step mitigation to reduce the need for excessive amounts of energy.
The site has not been identified as having any archaeological, paleontological or historic significance.
Biolonical Environment
The site was previously disturbed by the creation of large pads. Since that time there has been no natural
revegitation of the site.
There are no mature trees within the proposed grading areas. Early site inspections by staff did not reveal
the presence of any designated significant species. Fully developed surrounding conditions have isolated the
site from areas that are more likely to accommodate sensitive plant and animal species typically found in the
Carlsbad area.
There are no identified sensitive species. The introduction of plants and animals usually related to a
residential development will not have detrimental effects or create a barrier to movement of other sensitive
species.
-6-
.- 0 -
The’ site has not been identified as agricultural land and has not been used as such.
* Human Environment
The site carries a low medium density general Plan designation which allows a density range of 0-4 dwelling
units per acre. Zoning on the property is Planned Community. The General Plan characterizes Low Medium
density as single family homes. No zone or General Plan amendments are proposed.
Public utilities and services, such as sewers, schools, police, fire and emergency, can be provided by the
individual responsible agencies. The project will be conditioned to comply with the requirements of Local
Facilities Management Plan Zone 11. The condition requires that facilities and/or services be provided prior
to development.
Noise and light levels will increase however not to levels of significance. Noise sources after completion will
be human voices, radio and television, household and maintenance related appliances and automobile and
truck traffic. A noise study was prepared which identified areas of impact from traffic and provided measures
to mitigate the noise levels to acceptable levels. Construction noise will be short term and acceptable noise
levels will be governed by the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Light reflectivity will change due to recontouring and the future existence of residences vs. vacant property.
New light sources will be established by street lamps and individual home exterior and interior lighting. Light
sources within the public right-of-way will be subject to City designated standards for intensity.
The use of hazardous substances in significant quantities is not a part of this project, nor is it anticipated that
there will be storage of hazardous and/or volatile materials.
Implementation of the project will not create a need for additional housing however it will have an effect on
existing housing in the general vicinity. Those impacts will be primarily economic. The project is not
intended for first time buyer or low to moderate income households.
Traffic will be increased by approximately 1,120 average daily trips (ADT). This projection falls within the
service levels of the adjacent existing street system. No new mass transportation routes or facilities are
required by the transit district. Streets and sidewalks have been designed to accommodate foot, bicycle, and
automobile traffic without compromising safety.
The project has been designed to follow the general existing topography. As development moves north pad
elevations are lowered. The result reduces the visual effect of the development as seen from lower lying areas
i.e. Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. Views from the development can also be maximized by terracing the development.
Human Environment
The proposed architecture is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and buildings will be setback
from the slope tops sufficiently so that the visual impact on the surrounding area is eliminated or significantly
reduced by the slope.
Each lot will have a private yard. No common open space/passive recreation lots have been incorporated
throughout the site. No common active facilities are being proposed. The site is adjacent to the Stage Coach
Park and other public recreation facilities are in close proximity.
-7-
. ,- - .
ANXYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a)
b)
4
d
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
The project is proposed as phased development. Because there are no significant impacts to
circulation or impacts to services there is no environmental advantage to delay development
other than postponing ultimate service needs.
Alternate site designs could further reduce visual effects as seen from adjacent properties.
Because street design generally follows the existing land contours, changing street direction
would require additional grading.
If an alternate scale of development were proposed relative impacts would change. A reduction
in the number of units would decrease density potentially increase purchase price of the units,
and reduce secondary impacts such as traffic and air quality. If the number of units were
increased a different product type would be necessary. The result could reduce the cost of units
however would increase impacts on generation issues such as traffic and air quality. Clustering
the development at the same density would have generally the same secondary impacts
howevere could reduce impacts to grading and visual (onsite and offsite).
The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designate this parcel as suitable for residential
development. The appropriateness of any other uses can not be determined at this time
because of the lack of information. A change in use would also require a General Plan
Amendment.
Future development rather than now would not appear to have any significant advantage.
Services and facilities are available now.
f) Other sites may be available with the same zoning and general plan designations; however, just
as with the no project alternative it does not preclude development at some other time of a
similar project with similar impacts.
-8-
. - .
DETERM(INATION (To Be Completed I3y The Planning Department)
x
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
BW4D
Date I- Signature
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-9-
--
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
CW:klll
-lO-
PLANNING COh4MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3148
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A 111 LOT SUBDMSION FOR SINGLE
FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMINO DE LOS COCHES
AND CALLE ACERVO, WEST OF CALLE BARCELONA.
CASE NAME: TIERRA SANTA FE
CASE NO.: CT 90-4
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 13970, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California filed in the
office of the County Recorder of San Diego County September
25, 1985 as file no. 85-355261 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of February, 1991,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 90-4, based on the following findings and subject to
the following conditions:
.
. . .
1,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Find&s:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of
3.2 du’s/acre is within the density range of O-4 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 3.2.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the San
Dieg-uito High School District and Encinitas Union Elementary School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single family development on the General
Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative
Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 30, 1990 and
recommended for Approval by the Planning Commission on February 6, 1991. In
recommending approval of this Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has
considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and
any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could
have on the environment.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -2-
l .
l
3
i
:
4
F .
t
:
E
I
l(
11
1:
II
1L
If
lf
1:
1E
1E
2c
21
2:
2:
24
2E
26
27
2E
10.
11.
12.
-
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted for CT 90-4, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “L”, dated February
6, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the tract map as approved by the Planning Commission. The tract map shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The tract map copy shall be submitted to
the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement plan
submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within
arid adjacent to the project.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
PC PESO NO. 3148 -3-
.
’ .
l
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement
plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated
October 23, 1989, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated
by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with
the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule
in effect at the time of building permit application.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone
11 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council in February,
1988, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
Approval of CT 90-4 is granted subject to the approval of HDP 89-50.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land
use designation for this development is RLM. The Growth Control Point for this
designation is 3.2 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -4-
1
* .
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
-
Parcels 255-031-22 & 23 were used to calculate the intensity of development under
the General Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubditision
of any one of these parcels must also include parcels 255-031-22 & 23 under the
General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.”
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along
all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The
trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
Preliminary landscape plans shall be submitted.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Guidelines
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on fle in the
Planning Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual
importance or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design
shall promote water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons.
One 15 gallon tree or larger shall be planted on each residential lot front-yard prior
to occupancy of each unit.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
PC RJZSO NO. 3148 -5-
.
* . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
-
The project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations subject to the satisfaction
of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall at a minimum include a
bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench and pole
shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the basic architectural
theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and North County Transit District.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils
report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two
phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid
possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the
Planning Department.
Solid masonxy sound attenuation walls to a maximum of 6’ shall be provided on lots
1,17, 18,20,35,38, 39,68, 77, 78, 79,80, 110,111 and to a maximum of 7’ on
lot 34 as shown in the noise analysis, report #90-86, dated March 27,199O. The
design of the sound attenuation walls and solid masonry privacy walls on comer lots
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of
building permits.
31. Building floorplans, elevations and materials are a specific part of this approval as
shown on (Exhibits “G” - “L.“).
Ennineerinn Conditions:
32. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
33. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -6-
.
* . .
.
1
2
3
4
fi Y
6
7
E
s
1c
11
li
1Z
14
1:
1E
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
. . .
. . .
. . .
-
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner% association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an
individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R’s.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming
Master Drainage Plan Update.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map
for this project.
The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type I form, on the subject
property in all common areas as approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water,
as defined in Section 1305(n) of the California Water Code, means water which, as
a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a direct beneficial use or
controlled use that would not otherwise occur.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuance
of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive approval
for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued a grading
permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with the
approved grading plans.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any
clearing or grading of the site.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -7-
.
. .
1
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
- -
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic
plan be submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar or similar drafting
film and shall become a permanent record.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the developer
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either amend the
Tentative Map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project site
in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading
permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chap 11.06.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed
prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by the City
Engineer.
Prior to issuance of building permits for any lot within the subdivision a deed
disclosure shall be placed on the deed to these properties subject to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director and City Attorney notifying all interested parties and
successors in interest that soils and geologic conditions exist on such property
requiringremedialmeasures specified in geotechnical and soils reports submitted for
this project and that these soils and geotechnical reports and other project details
am on file with the City of Carl&ad Planning Department. The developer has been conditioned to comply with such remedial measures and certifies that it (developer)
has complied with said measures.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -8-
.
. + ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
49.
50.
51.
52.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
-
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the improvement
plancheck process.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Calle Barcelona, Calle Acervo and Camino
de Los Caches shall be waived on the final map.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map
in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree to install
and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on
the tentative map and the following improvements:
A. unit I:
1) All of the public improvements shown on the tentative map for Unit
I and the pubic sewer main through Unit II to the existing sewer main
in Calle Barcelona.
2) Grading of the entire “off-site” public right-of-way for Calle Barcelona
and the construction of half street plus an additional 12 feet of pavement to Collector street standards as shown on the tentative map
along Calle Barcelona from Via San Clemente easterly to Calle Acervo
including the required transition to existing improvements.
B. unit II:
1) All of the public improvements shown on the tentative map for Unit
II.
PC BESO NO. 3148 -9-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. unit III:
11 All of the public improvements shown on the tentative map for Unit
III and the offsite sewer main through the adjacent property to the
south (CT 85-9 - Vista Santa Fe - Area “B” east) down Calle Jalisco
and Camino Coronado to the existing sewer at the intersection of
Camino Coronado and Via San Clemente, or that off site sewer may
be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in substantial
conformance with the approved tentative map.
53. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within a maximum of 24 months of
final map approval and/or improvement plan approval, whichever occurs first.
Custom Conditions:
54. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit proof that the
issue of the pending lot line adjustment with the issue Encinitas School District is
settled.
55. The developer shall make au offer of dedication to the City for an easement for
storm drain purposes for the portion of the existing storm drain system constructed
on this property per City Drawing No. 289-6 (PD 306). The offer shall be made
by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted
to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City.
56. Approval of this project is contingent upon the provision of adequate public facilities
to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of General Plan. At this time a Mello Roos
Community Facilities District is proposed to finance the construction of several
Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District is not formed, or if the Community Facilities District
is formed but the Zone 11 properties are not participants within that District, the
required General Plan Consistency finding cannot be made. No discretionary
approvals, Buildings Permits, Grading Permits, Final Maps, or development permits
will be issued or approved unless an alternate financing mechankm is provided by
the Developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally
applicable to Zone 11 that would have been or are included in the Community
Facilities District. For purposes of this condition the Mello-Roos District will be
considered to be formed following an aErmative vote of the property owners plus
a 3Oday Period as prescribed by law to provide for any protest regarding foxmation
of the District.
57. This approval is subject to all conditions of approval of Master Plan 149, and Zone
11 Local Facility Management Plan, and any amendments thereto.
PC RESO NO. 3148 -lO-
.
. , ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
58.
59.
60.
61.
- -
NO grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the
final maps unless specifIcally approved otherwk by the City Fngineer.
This project is specifically approved as a 3 unit phased final map for recordation
purposes. If the developer chooses to record and construct out of unit numerical
sequence, the following dedications and improvements will be required with the first
unit/construction phase.
A. Dedications: The developer shall obtain the entire “off-site” public right-of-
way dedication by separate instrumen t for Calle Barcelona as shown on the
tentative map.
B. Improvements: Grading of the entire public right of way for Cahe Barcelona
and the construction of half street plus an additional 12 feet of pavement to
Collector street standards as shown on the tentative map along Calle
Barcelona from Via San Ckmente easterly to Cahe Acervo including the
required transition to existing improvements.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certificate on the Enal map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City fkee and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
In addition to the above the following conditions shall also apply:
A. With Unit I the developer shak
1) Dedicate by separate instrument the required public sewer easement
through unit II.
B. With Unit III the developer shah obtain:
11 The “off-site sewer easement through the adjacent property to the
south (Cr 85-9 Vista Santa Fe Area “B” East) down Calle Jalisco and
Can&o Coronado to the exkting sewer at the intersection of Camino
Coronado and Via San demente, unless an alternate design is
approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to the first final map approval a hydrology study shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the city Engineer. This study shaJl include an analysk of the F&in&as Creek Drainage Basin from Zone 11 to Batiquitos Lagoon. This study must propose alternate forms in mitigating peak storm runoff flows to include a possible
flood attenuation action plan for the entire Encinitas Creek Drainage Basin
PC RESON0.3148 -ll-
.
< .
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
62. prior to final map approval the developer shall pay a proportionate share of the mitigation cost of the possible flood attenuation mentioned in the above condition.
63. Within 180 days from the date of the Tierra Santa Fe Tentative Map approval, (the
effective date of the Gity Cotmcil resolution), a financial guarantee acceptable to the
City Council for construction of Pancho Santa Fe Road improvements must be
provided by the Developer. Unless the guarantee is approved by the city Council
within the 180 day period, ah processing on the Tierra Santa Fe Final Map will
cease until such time as it is approved. The time limit may be extended at the
discretion of the city Gouncil.
64. The developer shah make an offer of dedication to the City of Garlsbad for an open
space easement over the slope portions of the following lots which are:
b”.
adjacent to public road rights-of-way,
adjacent to General Plan Open Space;
C. adjacent to Mission Estancia School
Spcxifmdy the lots are:
Lots 9-12,14-18,20,35,3841,44-60,78-80,84,85, and 105-111. The offer shall
be made by a certificate on the final map for tbis project. This offer of dedication
for @en Space Easement shall be delineated on the tentative map.
65. The applicant shah establish a me ’ l which guarantees for the perpetual
maintenance of the open space easements or a homeowner’s association and
corresponding covenan ts, conditions, and restrictions to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director prior to final map approval.
66. The approval of the tentative map for this project, CT 904 will sqersede and
render the exist@ tentative map approval (CT 85-11) null and void.
67. All wrought iron facing shall be gal*
68. All fencing facing Pancho Santa Fe Road, Gamin0 de Los Go&es, Galle Acervo, and
Calle Jhrcelo~ shall be of a uniform design. A uniform different design may be
acceptable for each street frontage. The design(s) shall be approved by the
planning Director prior to the final map approval and a restriction shall be placed
on individual property deeds to guarantee that the uniform fence design be retained
unchanged (except for necessary maintenance) in perpetuity to the satisfaction of
the Planning Director.
PCRESON0.3148 -12-
- .
. ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Fire Demrtment:
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of
existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal
for approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
The applicant shall submit for processing and shall pay the required applicants fees
for a waterline improvement plan and appurtenant waterline easement as may be
required by the City Engineer, the Fire Marshal and Carlsbad Municipal Water
District. The deed shall be properly executed and the waterline plans signed by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials begin located on the project site.
Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the
most recent City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers,
and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department
for approval prior to construction.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide the Fire
Department with a 500’ scale map showing streets (public and private), street
names, fire hydrant locations, and beginning and ending addresses by block.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit to the Fire
Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following
criteria:
n 400' scale (1:4800)
n Photo reduction on mylar
w At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the
map (not a separate vicinity map)
n Maps shall include at least the following information:
PC RESO NO. 3148 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* Street Centerlines * Street Names * Fire hydrant locations
79. The applicant shall agree to pay a fee established to cover the cost of updating Fire
Department response maps.
80. Water shall be provided by the Olivenhain Water District.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of February, 1991, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm & Hall.
NOES: Commissioners McFadden 8~ Erwin.
ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLkIkIILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3148 -14-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNLA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF CAMINO DE LOS COCHES AND CALLE ACERVO,
WEST OF CALLE BARCELONA.
CASE NAME: TIERFb4 SANTA FE
CASE NO.: HDP 89-50
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 13970, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California filed in the
office of the County Recorder of San Diego County September
25, 1985 as file no. 85-355261 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of February, 1991,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Hillside Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 89-50, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinns:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That those areas of 40% slope have been identi&d and are exempted from
constrainted land status as areas previously disturbed by authorized grading or as
isolated slopes.
That the proposed project is consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements
of the Hillside ordinance.
That the development is consistent with the provisions of Section 21.53.230 and
240 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code.
That the site has been disturbed by previously approved grading.
That remedial grading which is exempted from the provisions of the Hillside
Ordinance is necessary to stabilize the existmg conditions for residential
development.
That the site is impacted by unusual geotechnical and soils conditions that
necessitate corrective work
That corrective gmiing work creates slopes greater than 30 feet which are broken
by eight foot benches with brow ditches.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted for HDP 89-50, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “H”, dated February
6, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any
proposed grading and/or development substantially diBerent from this approval as
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this Hillside
Development Permit.
AU conditions of Planning Comm&sion Resolution No. 3148 for CT 904 are
applicable to this approval and incorporated through this reference.
The grading as proposed, shall occur substantially as shown on ESihits “C, D, E”
dated February 6, 1991.
PC RESON0.3149 -2-
.
1'
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
~ Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of February, 1991, by
1 the following vote, to wit:
I AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm 81 Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin 8t McFadden.
ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3149 -3-
.
FEBRUARY6,1991
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
SUBTECT: TlERRASANTAFE
Staff requests that the following conditions be added to the Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3148.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Prior to final map approval, the applicant (Broadmoor Homes or their successor in
interest) shall enter into an agreement with the City to provide Tierra Santa Fe’s
proportional share of the City’s total obligation for very low, and low, income
housing units.
With the following additional finding:
The project is consistent with Policy III of the City’s Housing Element by
implementation of an agreement entered into by the applicant to provide a
proportional share of the City’s total obligation for very low, and low, income
housing units.
The applicant shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding
covenants, conditions, and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad for an open
space easement over the slope portions of the following lots which are:
i:
adjacent to public road rights-of-way;
adjacent to General Plan Open Space;
C. adjacent to Vista Santa Fe School
Specifically the lots affected are:
Lots 9-12,14-18,20,35,38-41,44-60, 78-80, 84, 85 and 105-111. The offer shall
be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. This offer of dedication
for open space easement shall be delineated on the tentative map.
The approval of the tentative map for this project, CT 90-4 will supersede and
render the existing tentative map approval (CT 85-11) null and void.
CW:km Tierra.mem
-
.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 904/HDP 89-50 - TIERRA SANTA FE - Request for approval of a
subdivision for 111 single family homes and a Hillside Development Permit
on 35.6 acres of land generally located west of Calle Barcelona at the
southwest corner of Camino de 10s Caches and Calle Acervo in the Planned
Community zoning district and Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
I. lUXOMMENDATION
-
AI’PL.K&ION COMPLETE DATE:
FEBRUARY 21,199O AN EXTENSION HAS BEEN GRANTED
STAFF REPORT
0 3
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3147
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and
ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3148 and 3149 recommending APPROVAL
of CT 90-4 and HDP 89-5 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
II. PROJECI- D ESQUPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project site is located at the intersection of Calle Barcelona and Camino de 10s Caches.
The property is vacant, has no significant vegetation, and has also been previously
disturbed through grading. North of the site is Stagecoach Park and west is Mission
Estancia School and open space. There is existing single family development to the east
and south.
There is an approved and current Tentative Map, CT 85-l 1, a 154 lot residential Planned
Unit Development, existing on the site. Although it was approved in 1985, CT 85-11 is
still a valid map because it tolled for several years, and after changes to the General Plan
it has 35.6 gross developable acres.
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 was approved in January 1988. 154 single
family units approved for CT 85-11 on 58.35 acres (including land previously designated
Open Space Covenant on the General Plan) were included in the Zone 11 Facilities Plan
as existing units.
. CT 904/HDP 89-50 - ,.ERRA SANTA FE
. ’ FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PAGE 2
Today the gross developable site acreage is 35.6 acres (excluding the Open Space Covenant
Designation) and there are 111 residential lots proposed. This is a standard subdivision
with minimum 7,500 square foot lots with public streets. Access to the project is from
Calle Barcelona at two points and from Calle Acervo at one. Streets run generally north
and south which follows the basic contour of the site. The General Plan designation is
Residential Low Medium which allows a range of O-4 dwelling units per net acre. The
Growth Control Point is 3.2 dwellings per net acre. The zoning designation is Planned
Community and the site is within the La Costa Master Plan.
Not all of the 35.6 acres are eligible to be counted for density calculations. Per the Hillside
Ordinance some of the 40% slopes and half of the 25%-40% slopes must be deducted from
the gross acreage. This deduction results in 34.94 net developable acres. At 3.2 units per
acre 111.8 units are allowed. As proposed the project is .8 units below the growth
management dwelling unit allowance and if approved would create a surplus of 43
dwelling units in Zone 11. The surplus is a result of reducing units from 154, CT 85-11,
to 111.
There are three floor-plans proposed varying in size from 2,817 square feet to 3,260 square
feet. Each of the models receives one of three exterior treatments. Common elements
include recessed windows, stucco banding, painted wood trim on the windows, stucco
exteriors and some models have precast concrete columns. Each home has a three car
garage which is divided in a variety of ways. Some models have individual single garage
doors while others have a combination of double and single doors which are offset at
different planes. Buildings are a maximum of 28 feet in height to the peak of the roof.
Fencing will be included for each lot as a part of the overall program. A wrought iron
view fence will be provided generally at the top of slopes and a cedar production fence will
be used along interior property lines. Those corner lots which are at grade with the street
will receive an upgraded privacy fence and other lots identified in a noise analysis will have
noise attenuation fencing. Fencing types are identified on Exhibit “B” and in the resolution
of approval.
The project is subject to:
1. The Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning
2. La Costa Master Plan
3. Local Facilities Management Zone 11 4. California Environmental Quality Act.
ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the project implement the Goals and Policies of the General Plan?
CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - -I _ .&A SANTA FE . I ‘FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PAGE 3
2. IS the project compatible with surrounding uses?
3. Does the project comply with the development standards of the R-l zoning and
Hillside Development Ordinances?
4. Does the proposal satisfy the intent of the La Costa Master Plan?
5. Is the proposal in compliance with the standards of the Local Facilities Management
Plan?
6. Has the project been evaluated for environmental impacts as required by the
California Environmental Quality Act?
General Plan
The proposed density is 3.2 units per acre. Coupled with the proposed single family
detached development this creates a typical suburban neighborhood atmosphere. These
factors make this development compatible with the existing surrounding single family
detached neighborhoods and consistent with the General Plan Designation of Residential
Low Medium (less than 4 units per acre).
A study of home sizes was done to analyze how well Tierra Santa Fe will fit in with the
existing neighboring subdivisions. Analysis shows the median home size within Tierra
Santa Fe is 3038 square feet. That is 67% larger than the existing homes in the immediate vicinity which are approximately 1818 square feet. However the average lot size within
the proposed subdivision is 11,280 square feet which is 52% larger than the surrounding
average lot size of approximately 7400 square feet. Staffs determination of the analysis
is that the larger homes are in proportion with the larger lots and are compatible with the
neighboring existing single family subdivisions.
Zoning Ordinance: PC with R-l One Family Residential Zone Standards
As stated in the La Costa Master Plan, this site is subject to development standards of the
R-l Zone. The minimum lot size in the R-l zone is 7,500 square feet. The project is
designed with lots that range from 7,511 square feet to 25,618 square feet. Several lots
are large because they include slope areas. The inclusion of slopes in the gross square
footage of individual lots is typical for the area. Open space easements will be recorded
over the slopes to prevent future building within those areas. Most lots meet or exceed the
minimum 60 foot width requirement. Title 20,(subdivision ordinance), allows lots which
have frontage on a cul-de-sac to be 33 feet wide and there are lots which have been
created using this reduced standard. Proposed lot depths are greater than 90 feet as
required by Title 20. Lot coverage is allowed up to 40% of each individual lot. The
maximum lot coverage proposed is 23% and the average lot coverage is 15%.
- CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - 1.-,&A SANTA FE . \ ‘FEBRUARY 6,199l
PAGE 4
Front yard setbacks are required to be a minimum of twenty feet from the front property
line. All proposed residences have a 20 foot frontyard setback or greater. Sideyard
setbacks are required to be 10% of the lot width with a minimum of 5’ and a maximum
requirement of 10 feet. The typical minimum setback is shown as 6’3”. Twelve lots have
rearyard setbacks less than 25’, however, no lots have less than the 12’6” required by code.
There are a few individual cases where rearyards are at a minimum. In those cases the
homes are typically at an angle to the property line which helps to relieve any visual
impact.
Engineering Requirements
A section of offsite sewer main is required in order to provide service to this project. As
identified, the sewer main will run through the adjacent property to the south, Vista Santa
Fe Area “B” down Calle Jalisco and Camino Coronado to the existing sewer at the
intersection of Camino Coronado and Via San Clemente. The project has been conditioned
to comply with Section 21.16.095 (CMC) which could result in the City acquiring sufficient
interest in the off-site area to allow the construction of the improvement. Should this
occur the subdivider would be required to bear all related costs.
Hillside Develonment Ordinance
The site was a borrow site for Mission Estancia School and for the construction of Can&o
de 10s Caches. The result is a site with manufactured slopes which exceed 40% and a
smaller portion of the site with natural 25% - 40% slopes. Areas previously disturbed by
authorized grading are excluded from the ordinance, therefore the preservation of the 40%
slopes was not pursued. From a design standpoint, keeping the slopes would have dictated
a less desirable grading and subdivision design.
The applicant proposes a balanced cut and fill of 263,100 cubic yards. By grading 33.05
acres there is a total of 7,960 cubic yards moved onsite per graded acre. This quantity complies with the 7,999 cubic yards acceptable by the Hillside Development Ordinance.
Nearly all of the slopes along the northwestern portion of the site are over 40 feet. Those
slopes are broken by an eight foot bench and brow ditch. The creation of these slopes is
from project design based on the existing disturbed status of the site, soil quality,and
subdivision design principles. The creation of the lower tier of lots necessitates fill up to
15 feet in depth. In addition these soils are expansive, which creates the requirement for
atypical grading design. The grading design meets the intent of the ordinance by terracing
the development, rounding and undulating tops and toes of slopes and limiting grading
quantities, therefore the Planning Commission may approve the slope heights with findings
that the site is impacted by unusual soil conditions that necessitate corrective work and
that the area was previously disturbed by authorized grading.
. - . CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - ‘I ,;RRA SANTA FE
’ FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PAGE 5
Building setbacks from the top of significant slopes vary. The average setback is 21 feet
along the lower tier closer to Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and is approximately 27 feet for the
upper tier along Avenida Miguel. Views of the project are primarily from Ranch0 Santa
Fe Road and will be partially obstructed by Mission Estancia School.
Where feasible the toe and top of slopes have been rounded and undulated in accordance
with grading guidelines. Grading quantities are within acceptable levels and building
setbacks have been provided which comply with the intent of the Hillside Ordinance.
La Costa Master Plan
Within the La Costa Master Plan the site is designated as southeast neighborhood 18.
The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan through its provision of
greater than 7,500 square foot lots and single family detached housing. The number of
units proposed is below the maximum allowed of 204 and fewer than the approved 154
units in CT 85-l 1. Contour grading concepts and general compatibility guidelines have
also been implemented. The larger lots and homes add to the diversity of housing types.
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN: ZONE 11
The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the
adopted performance standards are summarized below:
FACILITY IMPACTS
.82 acres
Drainage I WA
Circulation
Fire
1110 ADT
Station #6
Open Space I 5.24 acres
Schools I 84.36 students
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution System
111 EDU’s
24,420 GPD
COMPLIANCE
WITH STANDARDS
YES
YES
YES
YES
See Discussion
See Discussion
See Discussion
1
CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - ‘. XRA SANTA FE . . - FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PAGE 6
The project is .8 units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance and
provides a surplus of 43 dwelling units for the zone.
Onen Snace
The Zone Plan requires 15% of unconstrained lands in the entire zone to be preserved in
open space. However, as the Zone Plan was prepared, this site was designated as
providing .60 acres which contributed to the Performance Standard Open Space supply for
a total projected requirement of 247.87 acres. The open space was to be a small recreation
lot to comply with the Planned Development Ordinance. Since the project is being
proposed as a standard subdivision the recreation lot is no longer required. To remain in
compliance with the open space requirements of Zone 11, the proposed project must still
provide a minimum of .60 acres of open space.
Tierra Santa Fe provides in excess of 4 acres of varying slope area in open space
easements. Within that slope area .80 acres are less than 40%. The slopes are contiguous
to the General Plan Open Space and school west of the project site. The easements over
this land guarantee a visual enhancement of the existing open space and provide an
undeveloped buffer between the open space corridor and the housing development.
Although it is not in the same location or configuration as shown in the Zone Plan the
Open Space requirement has been met.
Drainage and Circulation
Drainage and circulation have been identified as not meeting the adopted performance
standard for Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11. Discretionary approvals can be
granted for projects within this zone. However, no building or grading permits may be
issued until there is compliance with the performance standards. The plan proposes
mitigation measures to bring these facilities into compliance, but there is no approved
financing plan to guarantee that mitigation will be available when needed.
This project has been conditioned to comply with all of the mitigation measures of the
Local Facilities Management Plan which qualify it as being in compliance with Growth
Management requirements. However, until a finance plan is approved which can
implement those measures no development will occur.
ENvIRoNMENTALREvlEw
The site has been previously disturbed and is devoid of any significant animal life or plant
materials. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding development and is consistent
with the General Plan and Zoning. Based on additional findings of the initial study Part
II, the Planning Director has determined that no significant environmental impacts will
result from this project, and a Negative Declaration was issued on August 30, 1990.
* CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - 1 . . ..&A SANTA FE
. 1 *FEBRUARY 6, 1991
PAGE 7
SUMMARY
The proposed project (1) is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan;
(2) complies with the R-l development standards of the Zoning Ordinance; (3) is
consistent with the intent of the La Costa Master Plan; (4) complies with the Zone 11 Local
Facilities Management Plan; (5) has complied with the requirements for environmental
review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 based on the findings and conditions found in the attached
resolutions.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2.
3. 4.
Z:
7. 8.
Planning Commission Resolution 3147
Planning Commission Resolution 3148
Planning Commission Resolution 3 149
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Exhibits “A” - “L”, dated February 6, 1991
September 28, 1990
. -
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET 4
CASE NO: CT 904/HDP 89-50
APPLICANT: Tierra Santa Fe
REQUEST AND LOCATION: ADDrOVd of a 111 lot subdivision for 111 single famiIy
homes located at the southwest comer of Camino De Los Caches and Calle Acervo west of
CaIle Barcelona
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Man no. 13970. in the Citv of Carlsbad,
Countv of San Dieno. State of California filed in the office of the Count-v recorder of San
Dieno Countv Sentember 25, 1985 as file no. 85-355261 of official records
APN: 255-031-22/23 Acres 35.6 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 11 l/l 11 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation Residential Low Medium
Density Allowed O-4 dwellinns ner acre Density Proposed 3.2 units ner acre
Existing Zone Planned Cornmunitv Proposed Zone Planned Communitv
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
zoning Land Use
Site PC RLM - Vacant
North PC
south PC
OS - Stagecoach Park
RLM - Single FamiIv Residential
East PC RLM - Single FamiIv Residential
West PC OS - Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Encinitas/San Dies&to Water Ohvenhain Sewer Leucadia EDU’s 111
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date October 23. 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
x Negative Declaration, issued August 30. 1990
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
DISCLOSURE !STATEMENT
APPLICANTS STATEMEM OF DISCLOSURE OF CEmAlN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON AU APPUCAllONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE
DlScRmolq~AY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CfTY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMllTEE.
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. ADDllCWIt
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
FE. CA. O.&d /%-~272~E= /~.~~kf7l/ cF&p!LPfi?&Q( cL;ltlp-IIQ?t’ :/
%iCc~rnx~e ~~~~wic-/NL ,, L&J PWqN& -We : ~;&i~yLq&L :ti C&$ll?&j+$/@L~’ ’ 535!&
.+jvg 0 Dc~tini C& L.E , ? 1 R 5-v%357-
5w DIE/;-I), fA. 5/A) 5”( E -zc?(?
@i? - y.ics-&X0 5kt’ DIE-LG , t-34 201 I
2.
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. -ggg!.@~fi?@~ f&pfic- //AC. - f* ~.A?
-CL-5 c&q== -13 pG/L 27 .s*’ gr&=mj f ci4 92.4 t 7 &&.J k s7t5+59
5i! fq-(y 700
-=%wv vie> C& mw/
3.
4.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and
addresses of all individuals owning more than 1096 of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the artnership.
f*m giL’Icl/c)LA-s % /p-p QrAJ &&&ifwLillb’~~
3~CIp73~~0014/ rlmtt? s c’,mco ~~2-7 C,kiez2u~J Df2iUk f,oc I5 cw-ieir
& 92/2-i Gf-rdD~ fwK7cO -. SiW DIHW ca- “piol
If any person identifkd pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust.
.
FRMooo13 8/90
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Cartsbad. California 92009-4859 l (619) 438-l 161
Disclo8ure Statement
(Over)
Page 2
5. Have YOU had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, 6Oards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes L No - If yes, please indicate person(s) 5 LJi%7 I rj+-L/ Fe5 , i-1 F/ Z iSFf~nf~7.
m is dtind U: l w individud. firm. copummhip. jointvmrlhJro, Bidion, so&l club, fa&md ofguk&ion, corporation, atea trust.
r@COivW. Yfldicti, thir Uid w 0thW COU*, citf Md cOU*, ci(v rnunici~~, dii 01 oth~ pdw rubdiM& or uy o*r group of
combination acting u l unit.’
Print or type name of owner
j&v&p5 &r. ;;wm
Print of type name of applioant
FRMooo13 w90
-
CITYOFCXRISAD .
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
IDCAL FA(3UIES IMPACE ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: Tierra Santa Fe - CT 904/HDP 89-50
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 11 GENERAL PLAN: Residential Low Medium
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Broadmoor Homes
ADDRESS: 5405 OberIin Drive. Suite 101. San Dieno. CA 92121
PHONE NO.: 1619) 431-7700 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 255-031-228~23
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 35.6 Acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K. Water: Demand in GPD - 24,420 GPD
L. The project is .8 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
‘Leucadia County Water District
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) =
Park:
Drainage:
Demand in Acreage =
Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distriiution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site pIan)
411 42
111 EDU
.82
N/A
N/A
1110
6
Aa-
84.36 Students
N/A’
-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
3) CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - TIERRA SANTA FE - Request for approval of a subdivision for 111 single family homes
and a Hillside Development Permit on 35.6 acres of land
generally located west of Calle Barcelona at the southwest corner of Camino de 10s Caches and Calle
Acervo in the Planned Community zoning district and Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
Christer Westman, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is requesting
approval of a Tentative Map for a 111 unit single family
residential development. The site was previously graded as a
result of a borrow for the Mission Estancia School and Ranch0 Santa Fe Road. The general area is also known for expansive
soil conditions. Therefore, any project being completed in
this general area, and specifically on this site, requires special grading considerations to be taken. These special
considerations qualify the area for some special exemptions from the Hillside Ordinance.
A 154 unit single family residential PDD subdivision was
previously approved for this site (CT 85-11) prior to the
adoption of LFMP Zone 11. When Zone 11 was adopted, those 154 units were included in the zone plan and are counted now
as existing units. Broadmoor Homes has subsequently purchased the property and has chosen to offer a different
type of product with fewer units.
The current proposal is for standard R-l lots, 7500 s.f. or greater. The density is 3.2 du'siacre. which is within the
O-4 General Plan range. It is .8 units below the growth control point. The project consists of 2-story homes with floor plans ranging from 2.800 s.f. to 3,200 s.f. There are
three exterior treatments proposed. The building heights are a maximum of 28 ft. to the ridge of the buildings. Each unit
has a 3-car garage, with a variety of styles. Standard R-l setbacks are required, i.e. 10% for side yards, 20X for rear
yards, and 20 ft. for front yards. The project complies with
all of the required setbacks, although some of the rear yard setbacks do go down to the minimum; however, most of them do
exceed that. In some cases, the lots include slopes.
There is an open space easement proposed to go over the
exterior slopes of the project which face Ranch0 Santa Fe Road, Mission Estancia, and Calle Barcelona. Staff memo dated
February 6, 1991 sets forth some additional conditions and refers to the creation of a homeowner's association. The
intention of that homeowner's association is to provide a mechanism for maintenance of the open space easement.
The proposed homes are larger than those of existing adjacent
neighborhoods. However, the type of use is essentially the
SZUIW. Zone 11 identifies some inadequacies in drainage and
circulation; however, conditions have been placed on the map to comply with Zone 11 requirements prior to the final map being recorded.
The project is also located within the La Costa Master Plan.
As a result of recent City Council action regarding affordable housing within Master Plan areas, staff is also
requesting that some additional conditions and findings be placed into Resolution No. 3148 to bring the project into
compliance with that policy and also with the existing
General Plan housing element. Staff is recommending approval
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 COMMISSIONERS \;
of the project with the additional conditions set forth in
the staff memo.
Commissioner McFadden referred to Condition /148 of Resolution
No. 3148 and inquired if this requirement runs with the deed
of the land. Bob Wojcik replied that staff has prepared an additional condition which would require notification to be
included in the deed.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney , stated that Condition 1148
will be included on the final map as a notification to
subsequent purchaser(s).
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the process to place
this condition on the final map. Mr. Ball replied that the
City Attorney's office submits it to the City Engineer's
office, who then submits it to the County Recorder for
recording. At that point, the title company oakes an abstract of title and title insurance is issued based on the
condition of title as shown on the records and the final map.
Commissioner Schlehuber does not understand the basis for
Condition 81 relative to the proportional share of the City's total obligation for very low income housing. Gary Wayne,
Assistant Planning Director, replied that this condition was placed on this project for consistency with the existing
General Plan. Staff does not envision that this specific project will need to be redesigned to provide affordable
housing; however, in the near future, there will be various
programs available for developers to provide their fair share. This particular project is required to do so at this
time because it is within an existing Master Plan and the
existing housing element targets all existing Master Plans and Specific Plans for affordable housing.
Commissioner Schlehuber stated that he has never seen this
condition before. He attended a City Council meeting just a
couple of weeks ago. Gary Wayne replied that the impetus for
including this condition was generated by very recent City
Council action; he does not know why we haven't done it
before.
Commissioner Hall thinks it is frustrating to ask someone to sign a blank check. He understood that we weren't going to
do this until there was an agreement between the parties.
Gary Wayne replied that the formula approved by the City Council a couple of weeks ago is for 152 inclusionary housing
and in-lieu fees would probably be based on the 15X or whatever is approved in the updated element.
Conrmissioner McFadden stated that the Planning Cormnission has
twice voted to have this requirement in all Master Plans.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how close the proposed homes are
to Calle Barcelona. Christer Westman, Associate Planner,
replied that minimum distance is 20 ft. from the curb face or 15 ft. from the sidewalk.
Commissioner Erwin is concerned that the homes are all two story and that they are larger than the ones which were
previously approved. Christer Westman replied that all of
the homes were proposed as 2-story units with 3-car garages,
many of the building pads are 7,500 s.f., and the lots average 25,000 s.f.
. MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 COMMISSIONERS Y
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if the developer could still go back to the old approval and build. Christer Westman replied that the existing Tentative Map is still valid.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if Condition 858 is a standard condition. Bob Wojcik replied that the developer can file
three final maps if they so choose.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if this is something new. Bob
Wojcik replied that he hasn't seen it for a while.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if approval of this
Tentative Map will supersede the previously approved Tentative Map. Bob Wojcik replied that this is correct.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the location of the
proposed high school site. Christer Westman stated that the
high school is proposed at a site which is south and east of this project, in a small valley near Ranch0 Verde.
Chairman Holmes opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday 11120,
Carlsbad, representing the applicant, addressed the
Commission and stated that he was the original planner on this project approximately 6 years ago. The 154 unit
development is still a valid project and could still be built
if the current project is not approved. The applicant is requesting to reduce density and traffic in this project,
eliminate a private street system , and increase the value of the homes and the lot sizes. The proposed project meets or
exceeds every requirement of the R-l subdivision ordinance. When presented to the surrounding homeowners, the proposed
project received a strong favorable response.
Mr. Howes stated that the applicant completed all of the
requirements for approval some time ago and at 4:00 p.m. yesterday was presented with five new conditions. The client
can accept most of the conditions; however, the conditions
for affordable housing and formation of a homeowner's association are unacceptable. Broadmoor Homes has no
objection to putting an open space easement over the slopes
to ensure that no structures are built in that area; however, they do not believe a homeowner's association should
be formed to assume the responsibility for maintaining external slopes which fall in private property, especially
since there are no coxsnon lots or private streets in the development. They feel it is unfair to tax some homeowners to maintain the private property of another homeowner, not to
mention practicality and legality. He cited the Circulo
Adorno, Suaxait, and Spinnaker Point projects as examples of
R-l projects with external slopes that do not have homeowner's associations. The applicant feels this will
greatly affect the marketability of the product because many prospective homeowners want nothing to do with an association
due to the problems they create.
Regarding the affordable housing condition which was added at
4:00 p.m. yesterday, Mr. Howes stated that it makes this project economically infeasible. If this condition had been known earlier, the applicant would probably not have purchased the site or spent the considerable sums of money for redesign of the project. Their biggest concern is that
they are being asked to sign a blank check, which is infeasible.
-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION -4
Page ’ COMMISSIONERS \ ’
Mr. Howes requested approval of this project with the
elimination of the conditions for affordable housing and a homeowner's association.
Commissioner Erwin inquired what the setbacks would be if the 154 unit project were to be built. Mike Howes replied that
the front yard setbacks would still be 20 ft., the side yard
setbacks would still be 5 ft., but the back yards of the original project were almost nonexistent.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if, in lieu of the condition for a homeowner's association, the applicant could accept a
notation in the CC&B's for certain lots to maintain the slopes in a specified manner. Mr. Howes replied that they
would have no problem with that requirement.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about the plan for fencing.
Mr. Howes replied that wrought iron fencing will be used on top of the slope to protect the views; cedar fencing will be
used between the homes.
Commissioner McFadden inquired what will ensure that
additional fences will not be built at a later date. Mr. Howes replied that wording could be added to the open space
easement to prevent that from occurring.
Chairman Holmes requested that the applicant consider
galvanised wrought iron rather than plain wrought iron. Mr. Howes replied that the applicant is willing to look into
galvanized wrought iron.
Nick Banche, 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is an attorney representing
Broadmoor Homes. He reiterated that the 154 unit Tentative
Map only disappears with approval of this Tentative Map. Further, on a map which has been finaled for a long time, it
is his opinion that the filing of a Tentative Map application
freezes the condition process to those regulations in effect when the application was deemed complete. The only exception
to this rule is when the City specifically gives notice of its intent to take action and bind existing projects. Mr.
Banche contends that this was not done when the City Council adopted the inclusionary condition on January 29, 1991.
However, Mr. Ball has advised him that Condition 111 is still supported by virtue of the language in the housing element of
the General Plan and by virtue of the Master Plan. Mr. Banche disagrees with Mr. Ball because the word "should" is
used rather than the word "shall."
Further, on page III-13 of the La Costa Master Plan,
Affordable Housing, it states that "Section 3L of this Master
Plan has identified those neighborhoods that would be
suitable for low or moderate income housing because of their accessibility to necessary services such as shopping and
public transit." Mr. Banche noted that this particular site is not one of those identified in the Master Plan. Although
it was done on Aviara and Arroyo La Costa, he contends that this condition was negotiated with the developer.
Mr. Banche feels that adding this condition at 4:00 p.m. on
the day before the public hearing is unfair, not to mention
the fact that it may be illegal.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the applicant is asking for a continuation. Mr. Banche replied that he is not requesting a
continuation because there is nothing to negotiate; he feels
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page lo COMMISSIONERS Y
that this project is far superior to the existing approval. Further, he feels that it will be impossible to find a lender willing to accept the blank check that this affordable
housing condition imposes.
Ellen Gillis. 3248 Avenida Anacapa, Carlsbad, representing
herself and her husband, addressed the Commission and stated that she does not understand many of the things she has heard
tonight but, as a member of a homeowner's association, she
would like to go on record that there is no such thing as a good homeowner's association. She is concerned about the
congestion in Carlsbad and the intersections which are
currently non-functional. She feels we need more low density
projects.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the public
testimony closed and opened the item for dismssion among the Commission members.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, stated that whether or not to require a homeowner's association is up to the discretion
of the Commission. In Mr. Ball's opinion, if an open space
easement would sever the use and enjoyment of private
property, yet the property owner is responsible for
maintenance of the easement area, it probably won't work out.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired what is intended by the open space easement. Christer Westman, Associate Planner, replied
that because the slopes are visible to public rights of way,
there should not be construction of decks, patios, etc. in the easement area, and it should only be available for
landscaping and irrigation.
Conrmissioner Schlehuber inquired if there would be public
access. Mr. Westman replied that there would not.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if the only restriction would be that no objects could be constructed. Mr. Westman
replied that this is correct.
Commissioner McFadden inquired about fencing in the easement.
Mr. Westman replied that no fencing would be allowed other
than the wrought iron fence along the back.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr. Westman was familiar with the Sammis property. He replied that he was somewhat
familiar. Commissioner Hall stated that the real problem with Sammis was that there was a trail system which this
project does not have. If a homeowner feels an additional
fence is necessary, Commissioner Hall believes a deed restriction should be made requiring fencing which faces outward to be of the same type of construction. Mr. Westman
replied that fencing is being included with the project for
that very reason.
Commissioner Hall feels the problem will occur maybe a year after construction when someone wants to build a pool with an
additional fence for privacy. Ron Ball, Assistant City
Attorney, replied that it is legal to specify the kind of
fence which is allowed and what other structures, if any, may be built in the area. Enforcement would then fall to the
City's code enforcement officer.
Commissioner Hall inquired if the intent is to restrict what
can be built in the rear yards, similar to the Sammis
-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page ” COMMISSIONERS y
project. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that the Sammis project was somewhat different than this one
in that there was a Local Coastal Program to deal with and
the coastal permit required a buffer from the slope. In the Tierra Santa Fe project, the open space easement is a visual
resource which can be seen from the Ranch0 Santa Fe scenic
highway so it is important that it all be maintained in the same manner to avoid a "checkerboard" look. This is why
staff is recommending a homeowner's association, to control that the easement is maintained in a uniform way. If the
easement area were removed from the lots, they would not meet the 7,500 s.f. minimum.
Commissioner Erwin inquired who maintains the property on the other side of Calle Barcelona. Gary Wayne replied that it is
controlled by a homeowner's association.
Commissioner Schramm inquired if the landscape plan would
specify which plants may be grown on the slopes. Gary Wayne replied that it would.
Commissioner Schramm inquired how the watering would be controlled. Gary Wayne replied that the developer would be
required to install irrigation system.
Commissioner Schranxn inquired if there would be a trail
system through this project. Gary Wayne replied that the
trail system would be located along the north perimeter.
Commissioner Schramm inquired if this project needs to be continued to allow staff to come up with other alternatives.
Gary Wayne replied that it is not necessary; he feels this
can be handled tonight.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the Commission can restrict a
homeowner's association to specific areas of responsibility,
with no other powers. Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney,
replied yes.
Commissioner Hall requested the City Attorney to respond to Mr. Banche's comment regarding low income housing. Ron Ball,
Assistant City Attorney, stated that the low income
requirement has been imposed on all cities and counties in California by the legislature. The state requires us to meet
our fair share of the regional housing goals which have been given to us by SANDAG. The blank check could be troublesome
because, at this point, no one knows what the 154 fair share housing obligation will mean in terms of in lieu fees or
money. Mr. Ball can accept Mr. Banche's opinion regarding the policies, laws, and ordinances in existence at the time
an application is accepted as complete. Staff has mentioned that this application was complete one year ago. However,
the low income housing policy has existed in the General Plan
for five years.
Conxaissioner Schlehuber inquired if the language which Mr. Banche read is correct. Mr. Ball replied that he believes
the wording is correct. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, noted that the word "should" (rather than "shall")
is used throughout the element.
Nick Banche, 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, was given time
for rebuttal but he had nothing to add.
Commissioner Hall inquired if Mr. Banche has further input on
homeowner's associations, CC&R's, or deed restrictions. Mr.
. . _-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page l2 COMMISSIONERS
Banche replied that the type of fence and what can be built in the easement area can be specified in perpetuity.
However, he does not know how a homeowner's association can
manage what belongs to someone else in fee, with the requirement that you can't have a structure on it. He feels
a deed restriction could be made which dictates that
maintenance of the area must be to the satisfaction of the
City of Carlsbad, and that a homeowner's association would only add one more layer. In his entire career Mr. Banche has
never heard of having a homeowner's association where there are public streets and no common areas. However, he has
heard about open space maintenance districts in other cities, albeit they also have some problems.
Chairman Holmes inquired if the applicant would consider a continuance to work out some of these problems. Mr. Banche
replied that nothing could ever be worked out about the
inclusionary housing. He feels that the some language could
easily be devised with regard to the homeowner's association
debate. He would prefer not to continue this for that point alone.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 7:48 p.m. and reconvened
at 7:58 p.m.
Commissioner Schlehuber has a problem supporting the need for
a homeowner's association. He feels this could be handled with a condition that states to the satisfaction of the City.
As to the other condition, he doesn't feel comfortable with
the legal situation. He feels the City Council could have
done it differently. He cannot support Condition i/l of the of the staff memo regarding affordable housing.
Commissioner Hall has a problem with Condition I1 because it
boils down to a fairness issue. As far as the homeowner's
association is concerned, he would be comfortable leaving it up to the Planning Director. He can support the project
because he feels the homes are better designed.
Commissioner Schramm supports the City's obligation to
provide low income housing; however, she agrees with Commissioners Hall and Schlehuber. She doesn't think it is
fair to be given new conditions within hours of this meeting. As far as the homeowner's association, CC&R's, etc., she is
comfortable leaving it up to the discretion of the Planning Director. She does likes the project and can support it.
Connaissioner Erwin requested staff to comment on whether an
agreement regarding conditions was made with the applicant during the recess. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director,
replied that he is trying to draft a condition which would allow the Planning Director to waive the requirement for a
homeowner's association if the applicant can provide an acceptable alternative to ensure landscaping and maintenance
of the open space easement.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Condition #l had been
discussed. Mr. Wayne replied that Condition 111 was not discussed during the recess. He feels the City Council will
discuss this condition at length when it comes before them for final action.
Commissioner Erwin suggested wording for a condition to
address standardised fencing, i.e., all fencing facing out
-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page l3 COMMISSIONERS
from the project shall be of the same material for each
roadway. Gary Wayne replied that a new Condition 116 would be
added.
Gary Wayne also recommended that Condition #4 be changed to
include deed restrictions to prohibit fences and other
structures in that open space area.
Commissioner Erwin referred to Condition 1148 and inquired if a caution should be placed on the deed regarding geotechnical
restrictions. Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, agreed that this should be done and stated that the City Engineer has the
proper wording from a previous project.
Bob Wojcik read aloud the proposed condition as follows:
Prior to issuance of building permits for any lot within the subdivision, a deed disclosure shall be placed on
the deed to these properties, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Attorney,
notifying all interested parties and successors in
interest that soils and geologic conditions exist on such property requiring remedial measures specified in
geotechnical and soils reports submitted for this project, and that the soils and geotechnical reports and
other project details are on file with the City of
Carlsbad Planning Department. The developer has been conditioned to comply with such remedial measures and
certifies that it, the developer, has complied with said measures.
Gary Wayne read aloud the proposed wording of Condition 83 as follows:
. ..prior to final map approval. The Planning Director
may waive the requirement for homeowner's association and CC&R's if the applicant can develop an acceptable
alternative method to guarantee maintenance of the open
space easement area.
Cormnissioner Erwin feels that although the project meets City standards, he is really concerned by the tremendous amount of
square footage in this project, i.e. large houses on small
lots with 20 ft. front setbacks and 6 ft. side setbacks. He will support the project but he is very concerned that this
111 unit project creates more square footage than the
previous project with 154 units. At the same time, it then kicks out a bonus of 43 homes which can be used somewhere
else in the zone. He thinks we are missing the whole point of density reduction. As far as the low income debate, he
reiterated that it is the law and we are going to have to begin enforcing it.
Commissioner McFadden is disappointed with this project. She
feels it is monotonous with great big homes craanaed on very small lots and a long line of front loaded garages. She sees
the real estate pages full of this type of product and she thinks we might be better off with the original map.
Nevertheless, the project just barely meets the ordinance, including the added conditions. She thinks the City should
begin to enforce the low income requirement. Regarding Condition 113, she thinks the reference to homeowner's
association is the problem and that it probably should be changed to "open space maintenance district" and be limited to those lots which are affected. She doesn't feel the
internal lots should be affected at all.
. .
t
-.._
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page l4 COMMISSIONERS r
Gary Wayne replied that this may be an alternative for the applicant to consider. In any regard, some maintenance
requirement will be needed so that it is not left to the
discretion of the individual property owners.
Chairman Holmes sees a difference between what is right and what is proper. He reluctantly supports Condition Ul because
it is the law. He would not want to be in the developer's
position and have a project which meets the ordinance but is given a new condition at the last moment for a law which has
been on the books a long time and never enforced. He will support it but wants to go on record that he feels Condition
#l should be excluded.
Regarding Condition 83, Commissioner Schlehuber feels that we
should adopt a condition which indicates that a deed restriction be placed on each property, i.e., that the
homeowner shall maintain the property subjeCt to the conditions of the Planning Director dated (use a specific
date). Then each condition should be written in a format
which can be handed out to the homeowner. We need to be very
explicit regarding about what is or is not allowed. He feels
this is where the mistake was made in the Sammis project.
Commissioner Erwin disagrees. He prefers to give the
Planning Director that option.
Commissioner McFadden inquired if Commissioner Schlehuber is
suggesting that this be continued. He replied that a
continuance is unnecessary. Commissioner Schlehuber feels
Condition 113 should read as follows: That CC&R's shall be placed on those lots that border open space; that each
individual owner shall keep that lot maintained, subject to
the conditions set forth by the Planning Director of the City of Carlsbad, by that written statement dated (use specific
date).
Commissioner McFadden feels this option is available in the
condition proposed by Gary Wayne.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3147 recommending
approval of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos.
3148 and 3149 recommending approval of CT 90-4 and HDP 89-5
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the following: (1) addition of those
conditions set forth in staff memo dated February 6, 1991 excluding Condition Bl and Finding 62; (2) modification to
Condition 113 of staff memo giving the Planning Director full discretion to waive the requirement for a homeowner's
association and CC&R's under certain conditions, as read aloud by Gary Wayne; (3) modification to Condition #4 of staff memo to include a deed restriction on open space lots prohibiting fencing and structures in the open space easement
area; (4) addition of a Condition 116 to staff memo requiring
uniform fencing which faces out onto the public roadways, with the exception of noise walls; (5) modification to all
references of wrought iron fencing to specify "galvanised" wrought iron fencing; and (6) modification of Condition 1148
to Resolution No. 3148 to include deed disclosures for
geotechnical, as read aloud by Bob Wojcik.
Commissioner Erwin requested that the record show he could not support the project because of the exclusion of
Erwin
Hall Holmes
McFadden Schlehuber
Schramm
_-
MINUTES
February 6, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page l5 COMMISSIONERS Y
Conditions i/l and Finding 112 of staff memo dated February 6, 1991.
Commissioner McFadden requested that the record show she could not support the project due to the deletion of Finding
112 . Further, she does not feel the project is consistent
with the General Plan.
- Resolution of rdinance to make the time
e or incomplete ate Law timelines.
Robert Green, pal Planner, reviewed the background of the request an ed that Resolution of Intention No. 187 is for the pur f amending the Zoning Ordinance to make the time deadlin or reviewing complete or incomplete
applications con ent with state law timelines. This item
is a housekeeping intended to bring one section of the
City's Zoning Ordi ce into conformance with current state law. The state law ch the Zoning Ordinance implements
published time limit f processing applications and was originally due to expi on January 1, 1991. This state law
was subsequently amend and is now in effect until and
unless it is repealed. sequently, the City's Zoning Ordinance must also be ded to delete the time limit.
Staff therefore recomme
Commissioner Erwin inquire any other options are available. Mr. Green rep1 hat the state law is a
procedural item and the Zo Ordinance should be in
conformance with the state
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attor conxaented that this law is
eliminated by the Legislature e can now devise our own forms; however, we must follow rocedures since applications which are not approv r denied within the time limit are deemed approved.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and rried to adopt
Resolution of Intention No. 187 for one Code Amendment
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code by ame ng Chapter 21.54 based on the information contained in e staff report.
ADDED ITEMS AND REPORTS:
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, s
. The minutes for this meeting may be d due to time constraints of the Minutes Clerk.
. There may not be a meeting on March 20, 1 Planning Commissioner's Institute to be h
March 20-23 in Monterey. Commissioners p attend should contact Anita as soon as po registration and arrangements.
Chairman Holmes requested that Commissioners who ma reservations to attend the institute should stick w
Commissioners find they are unable to attend a pre-
Erwin
Hall Holmes
McFadden
Schlehuber Schramm
1
* l
I Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the-,age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of 1ocaI news and intelhgence of a genera1 character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
..- preceding the date of publication of the -. 1.. .~.- ,-;- ._ , _, -%'l'ICEOF -.w,. Tl..r- f h’Cf&~ md 4 Of l’8rd Map No. notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
TIRRRA SANTA FE
SO?O,intheCity ofCarlsbad, Coun- v of San Diego, State of Califortda, died in the offica of the San Diego CoullW Remrder on September 25,
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
NO’lWE IS RRRRBY GNE% that IOeq an File No. flkw~z~l of of&
theCityCounciloftheCityofCar1, eial records. and entire issue of said newspaper and not
bad will hold a public hearing at If You have a4 questions regard-
the City Council Chambers, 1200 bthis matter, please call Christer
Cklsbad Village Drive (formerly We8tamn in the Piannin~ Depart-
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
Elm Avenue), Carlsbad. California, mat. at 1381161. extension 444S. ing dates, to-wit:
at 6~00 P.M.. on Tuesday, May 11 If You challenge the tentative
1981. to consider an application for tract map and/or hillside develop
a bntdva map and a hillside de Wnt permit ia court. you may be
velopmant permit for 111 single lhdted to raising only tboae issues
family homes on S5.S ac~ of i00d med b You or someone else at the May 02
on Property generally located west public hearing described in this 19%
Of Calls Barcelona, at the south- notice, or in wrttton correspond- Wart Corner of Camino de 10s mm delIvered to the City of earls- 19-.- Caches and Calle Acervo, in &al bad City Clerk’s Office at or prior to
Facilities Management zone 11 the public hearing
and more particularly described Applicant: Broadmoor Homes 19-
aa: ‘XRISBAD CITY COUNCIL -ICI
TERRA SANTA FE I CT 90-w HOP 89-50
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali-
fornia on the 2nd
day of May, 1991
Cl&k of the Printer
. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 90-4/HDP 89-50
TIERRA SANTA FE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue),
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, May 14, 1991, to consider an application
for a tentative map and a hillside development permit for 111 single family homes on
35.6 acres of land on property generally located west of Calle Barcelona, at the south-
west corner of Camino de 10s Caches and Calle Acervo, in Local Facilities Management
Zone 11, and more particularly described as:
Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 13970, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the Office of the San Diego
County Recorder on September 25, 1985, as File
No. 85-355261 of official records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Christer Westman in the
Planning Department, at 438-1161, extension 4448.
If you challenge the tentative tract map and/or hillside development permit in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: BROADMOOR HOMES CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
PUBLISH: May 2, 1991
I
TIERRA SANTA Ft I HDP 09-50
City of CAM
-_ -- l CT 90:4/-
L____ ” . . ._. --
- -.
c NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
L
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on February 6, 1991, to consider approval of
a subdivision for 111 single family homes and approval of a Hillside Development Permit
on 35.6 acres of land on property generally located west of Calle Barcelona at the
southwest comer of Camino de 10s Caches and Calle Acervo in the Planned Community
zoning district and Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as:
Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 13970, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California filed in the
office of the County Recorder of San Diego County September
25, 1985 as file no. 85-355261 of official records.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 31,199l. If you
have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at 438-l 161,
ext 4448.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map/Hillside Development Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at
or prior to the public hearing.
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK ’ S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
CT 90-4/HDP 89-50 - TIERRA SANTA FE
for a public hearing before the City Council. I
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
.
Thank you.
MICHAEL HOLZMILLER, Acting Corn. Dev.Dir.
Assistant City Manager
419191
Date
W'IERSHIP LISTING _I > . .- _' P COLJKESY OF FIRSTAMERICANTITLECO. I
GFDRGE FERNANIAN BCEDEWiWPMENT 915 CAMINO DEL MAR 200 999 s HASTINGS STREET DEL MW, CA 92014 vANcouvERBc V6C2W7
223-060-53 223-060-49
TWMYD GRAYSON l3ImALD&SUzANNEBARRFITE 770 HAMILm AVENUE #B 3473 c1m ADORN0 SAN PEDRO, CA 90731 CAIUSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-01 223-321-02
LLoYD&sANDRAKIM MASAHARUNLJKA 1521 CALM RYAN 3465 CIRCLJUl ADORN0 ENCINITAS, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-04 223-321-05
HARRYVPOP 3459 CI&RNO LA COSTA, CA 9209
223-321-07
JOHN R COUSIN0 THOMAS & MARY WRGESS 3457 c1m ADmNo 3455 c1m ADORN0 c?aLsB?D, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-08 223-321-09
JOHN & LINDAWILLIAMS JOSEPH KORB 3453 c1RCum Ammo ROSE RINCON CARLsaAD, CA 92009 3449 c1laJm ADORN0
223-321-10 muI3AD, CA 92009
223-321-11
JOSEPH M TRUPIANO 3445 CIRCULO AlxmNo CARLsm, CA 92009
223-321-13
ALAN&JOANNJ3LIGHTON 3443 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLS~, CA 92009
223-321-14
ARTHUR& ELIZAEEI'HANNSMITH JOSEPH & PATI'I VINSON
3437 c1RCum AmRNo 3423cIRctJm mm0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LA COSTA, CA 92009
223-321-16 223-321-22
WILLIAM & KATHRYN S GFEENE DoNALD&LINDAAWlENTO 3417 CIRCULC) ADORN0 3415 c1RCum ADOmo CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-24 223-321-25
SHAWYUEEI & MEI-LI LIN PHILIP b KATHLEEN MILLER 3409 CIRCULO ADORN0 3407 CIRCULO ADORN0 CAiusBAD, CA 92009 I CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-27 223-321-28
COPY FOR YOUR lllFORhlAlIOI
CITY OF CARLSBAD NOMAILINGADDRESS FORTHIS OWNEX 223-060-51
THl33DORE F LINDSAY 3469 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-03
STEVENFTENENBAUM DIANAROWLAND 3463 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 223-321-06
DENNIS & KAYOKO 3447 c1RCuLO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-12
JD&JUNEBOYD 3439 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-15
MARYY SHEPHERD MARILYNJHENDRICKS 3419 CuRcum ADORN0 CARLSIMD CA 92009 223-321'-23
MICHAEL & DIANE GIBLIN 3413 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-25
HEtm?nws & MAAIKEKOLENBERG
3405 c1Ff3Jlx Ammo CAIUSBAD, CA 92009 223-321-29
. .
- ,
MICHEAL & SUSAN DAVIA 3403 c1m ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-30
EDWRD&IREWF.BRABANT 3466 C1Xm.o ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 223-321-33
WILLIAMRNUGENT 3452 CIRCULX) ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-36
RICHARD 6r qREsA MOSTELLER
3436 Cmcu~~ ADORNQ CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-39
'I'HOMAS&SUSANWELMEXER 2305 ERIE STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 223-321-42
DONALD L BRENCCMPANY NO MAILING ADDRESS SHOWN E;y>R THIS OWNER
BCEDEYELQPMENT 999 SOUTH KASTINGS STREZX VANCOUVER, BC V6C2W7
255-031-26
CONGT & HA1 PAHN 7916 CALLE SAN FELIPE CARLSW, CA 92009
255-151-07
BIUANbT@WWHERMAN 7910 CALLE SAN FELIPE I, CARLS~, CA 92008
255-151-10
scuIT&DA,wNmL.uxK 3476 CIRCULQ ADORN0 CAIUSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-31
JOSEPH& RANDEEMX)NJIAN 3464 CIRCULQ ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-34
DANIEL & DEBRAFIELD 3440 CIxUm ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 223-321-37
JAMESRGREEN NANCYSGREEN 3434 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-40
GREGORY & JEAN WILT 3416 CIRCUL0 ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-43
CUNNINGHAM-BMISIC DEV.
340 S ITOWER STREEX' ORANGE, CA 92638
255-031-20
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL NO MAILING ADDRESS FOR THIS OWNER
255-031-27
YIN TSUI & YEUK M&N HO 3508 SIT10 BAYA CARLSMD, CA 92009
255-151-08
THOMAS & PAULA DEAN 7908 CALLE SAN FELIPE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-11
ROSS&TAM?i.RAGRANADOS 3474 c1m ADORN0 CARLSBAD,. CA 92009 223-321-32
MR&MRSROBEIVJMZ.MANUS 3454 cIRcuLo ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-35
MR JOHN s wILFoRD 3438 CIRCUW ADORN0 CARLSW, CA 92009
223-321-38
JOHN & COLIXE&J BRUNER 3420 CIRCULO ADORN0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
223-321-41
THEFIELDS'IONECOMPANY 14coRPOR?nEPmzA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92060
223-322-02
B C E DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIl 4340 MULTIFOODS TOWER 33 SOUTH 6TH STREET
Mb'!&, MN 55402
BERNARD E PASCH M?mLENE BACON 6 HARBOR SIGHT DRIVE ROLLING HILLS EST, CA 920'
255-151-01
MICHAEL & MARILYN STRONG 7912 CALLE SAN FELIPE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-l 51-09
DAVID & DtXTIELYNCH 7906 CALLE SAN FEiLIPE LA COSTA, CA 92009 255-151-12
-
’ MARKSCHAFFEE 7904 CALU SAN F'ELJPE CAIUSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-13
DEBORAHDBREESE 7325 ALICANTE mm #A CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-16
DAVIDM?i'ITY 7917 CALLE PQSADA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-19
RANDY & Ml?LZK
T 7918 CALLE SADA CARLSBAD, CA 82008
255-151-22
CATHEm MALQNEY
7912 CALLE POSADA
CARLSEnD, CA 92008
25i-121-25
EvEm&-DoucElTE 1422 CALLE CHRIS'IOPHER ENCINITAS, CA 92024
255-151-28
STEPHEN & DENISE SEUFEHT 7922 CALLE POSADA CARLS~, CA 92008
255-152-28
MALCOLM&EEl?IEPERRY 3363 CORTE TIBURUN CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-03
RAyMoND&FFWlCESALTENBURG
3357 COITll'E TIBUmN LA COSTA, CA 92009 I,
255-170-06
SALmmRE&GRACEDOMENicI 7905 CALLE POSADA CARLSILPD, CA 92008
255-151-14
MICHEALDEERY 7913 ClULE POSADA CAIUSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-17
JAMES C SKOMSKI 7917 CALLE FQSADA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-20
DENNIS&CONNIESCHWANDER 7916 CALLE POWA LA COSTA, CA 92009
255-121-23
JAMES&NORMAGAUNCE 7910 CALLE FOSADA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-121-26
IWBERTCONWAYCAROLECONWAY 7925 CATLIE POSEDA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-154-26
MhRIAN GUZINSKI
8768 STRANG LANE ALTA LOMA, CA 91701
255-l 52-29
JOAN & ROBERTMYOUNG 2905 CANDIL PLACE R?iNCHO LA COSTA, CA 92009
255-170-04
if.. &ANITAEXXD
3355 CORTE TIBURON CAIUSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-07
RXERT&CHOUARNOLD
7907 (I7iLLE posADA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-151'-1'5
FREDERICK & JANET BALCOM
7915 CALLE POSADA
CAIUSBAD, CA 92008
255-151-18
JOHN J BENJAMIN 7921 - l?asDA CARISBAC, CA 92008
255-151-21
JOSEPH & JENTSE MC EACHROE 7914 CALLE F'OSADA CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-121-24
M?mcLYNOKEmE 8901 GILMWJ DRIVE IA JOLLA, C74 92037
255-121-27
JOSEPH FENICK 6254 LAKE LU- DF?IVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92119
255-152-27
CHERIE & JOSEPHGERSCH 3367 CORTA TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-01
CARL &-HAMILTON 3359 CORTE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-05
wILLlIAM&-Gu)MB 3353 COFtTE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-08
,-- . ._
c
!IYmuNE KURE 3351 CORTE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-l 70-09
BUREll&MARIANAPOSHIAN
3354 CORTE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-12
REx&KATHLEENLAMB
3360 CORTE TIBURON CARLSW, CA 92009
255-170-15
DOUGLAS & SUZANNE COLLINS
5211 G.LASGOW DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CA '92117
255-170-18
ROBERTCARR
LAURA SPIEGEL 3294 CAMINO CORmADo IA COSTA, CA 92009
255-170-21
MR 64 MRS EUGENE c REIZ
2508 PAGE AVENUE ALTADENA, CA 91001
255-170-24
WILLIAM 61 -MOORE
3287 CAMINO CORONAIB CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-27
PEiTER&MARGMETEVANS
3277 CAMINO CORONADO IA COSTA, CA 92009
255-170-30
DOLPHUS & ELIZABETH DINKINS
3267 CAMINO CORONADO CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ' .
255-170-33
GEZAF!D&CAROLWINDLEM&N
3350 CXXWE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-10
DamNIC &MAEEGARFTPRISCO
3356 CORTE TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92008 255-170-13
JOHN & CATHY LYNN
3362 COFC!X TIBURON CARLSBAD, CA 92009 255-170-16
GAYEDIGAN
3290 CAMINO CORONADO
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-l 70-l 9
LA CRESTA AT COLINAS DE OR0
5075 SHOREHAN PLACE STE 160 SAN DIEGO, CA 92172
255-170-22
PATRICK&ALLISONCAMMANN
3291 CAMINO CORONAm
CARISBAD, CA 92009
255-170-25
VIcToR&CHRISTIN?iORSATl?I
3285 CAMINO CORONADO CHUM VISTA, CA 92009
255-170-28
GORDON & ELJZABETH DAVISc;eJ
3273 CAMINO CORONADO
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-31
RAYMlND&LINDABIEZWACKI
3265 cAMIN coRoNADo c?mLsBAD, CA 92008
255-170-34
cHARLEs&susAN~mmGLE
3352 CORTE TIBURON LA COSTA, $A 92009
255-170-11
KMN & HIANLIEM
3358 COKCE TIBURON LA COSTA, CA 92009
255-170-14
MR&MRsPAE%DoPOUmS
3364 CORTE TIBURON CARLSW, CA 92009
255-170-17
G?mY&NANcYTHoMAs 3292 CAMINO CORONADO LA COSTA, CA 92009 255-170-20
ERNEST B CO- COX 3295 CAMINO coRoN?iDo CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-23
MR&MRsMILLER 3289 CAMINO CORONADO CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-26
JEROm&LOIsSCHlxxJs
3281 CAMINO COFENADO
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-29
THOMAS E & JUDY JOHNSON 3269 CMAINO CORONADO CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-32
RAY & EDITH NEMMAN
3263 cAMIN CORONADO ~AFUSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-35
-.
-
G?iRY&PENELoPEELLU'JOR 3261 CAMINO cmONAD0 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-36
VERNER&MN?JLYNREXNYTH 7951 CALIS cozuMEz CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-39
MR & MRS WHITE 3256 cAMIN CORONADO CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-42
RICHARD DEMEX THUSZ 3.n 3262 CMAI coRoNADo
CALRSBAD, CA t $92009
255-1.70-45
MR&MRsMARIcNLoNG 3270 CAMINO coRoNADo CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-48
MSMARYFINN 7905 CAILE MADRID
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-191-21
KENT&PAMELA- 3290 AVENIDA'-A CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-200-02
PAUL Ch?RAS'IEINHARIk 3259 CAMINO ComNADo CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-170-37
JOHN &I LESLEYMJIR 7949 CALLE cozuMEL CAIUSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-40
JOHN & BARBARA ROSENEWfIT 3926 C?MlNI'IO CASSIS SAN DIEGO, CA 92122
255-170-43
CHARLESCCHRISTINEMILLER 627 RANCH0 SANTA FE ROAD OLlxmNHAm, CA 92024
255-170-46
CHARLES&VERAUHL 3274 CAMINO CORONADO LA COSTA, CA 92009
255-l 70-49
BRUCEBJENNINGS
7903 CATAE MADRID
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-191-22
JAMESCPATRICIAMILLER 3286 AVENIDA ANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-200-03
DR. AND MRS KONELL 7952 CALLE cozuMEL CARLSBAD,. CA 92009
255-170-38
JUSTIN & FERN GORDQN 7947 CALLE cozuMEL P o Box 3048 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-41
MR TIlEcmRE FOIN 3260 C?QdINO CORONADO CARISW, CA 92009
255-170-44
MR IcGoum~ 3266 CAMINO CORONADO CARLSBAD, CA 92009
255-170-47
BERNARD PASCH M?lRLEmBAcoN HQRBORSIGHTDRIVE #6 ROLLING ESTATES, CA 90274
255-191-18,19,20
CECIL&KATHRYNwRxHT 3294 AVENIDA ANAC?@A CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-200-01
DONALD&MARSHAGAIIL3ZEWSKI 3284 AVENIDA ANACAPA CARLSBAD, CA 92008
255-200-04
TIMOTHYJDELUCA 3280 AVENIDA ANACXPA -. CRRLSBAD, CA 92008.
255-200-05