HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-07-23; City Council; 11269; ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1ns#&WL TITLE:
MTG. 7/23/91 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR
DEI
CIT r 2
5
E
u cd
Con rlm a,d 0 .rl
Lla cdw
aa a
.rl Ll a,
h !?k
$5
0 -g
w
Llc
c, aJ
u d
waJ Wrn cd-
m
a0 a, *rl uu 0cd ac 'AM
a, aa
VI
.ri aCo T4
2aJ
m -s
hlcd rnd Ll 43 mu rl '3
Ll GM ocd
z ou -rl
.d UH
rl 3H
&a,
00 Cod ad
x -d 8aJ us aw 0
aLl cdaJ
dl2 a
54
-4 2 0 e4
ocd UW
rl I
\
cr) N 1
2
2
00
0
m c
b =! 0 2 3
L
CIWOF CARLSBAD - AGENCgBlLL /' '
DEPT. FIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 CIT
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 7 1-2 3 q
Facilities District No. 1
establishing the annual tax for Commur
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Over the past few months the City Council has taken a variety of actions setti
in place Community Facilities District No. 1. This district is designed to prov
funding for a variety of infrastructure projects over the coming years which v
be necessary to meet the requirements of growth management.
In June the Council adopted an ordinance putting in place the tax formula for i
district establishing the Maximum Tax Rates that may be levied by the distr
Although this action established the ceiling for future tax rates, it did not cre
the individual tax levy that will be placed on each parcel. The process
establishing the levy will be conducted annually by the City as the funding nec
for the next fiscal years is known. The actual tax levied need not be the sal
as the madmum tax rate. In fact, the maximum tax rate will never be assess
as long as the CFD is in reasonably good fiscal condition.
The action before the Council is to adopt a resolution establishing the annual 1
levy for CFD No. 1. Staff has prepared the following brief review of the optic
available to the Council and some of the considerations that should go ir
setting this tax rate.
Project scheduling:
The timing of projects has a significant impact on the amount of rever
necessary from the tax levy. The more funding required in any given year i
higher the tax rate must be to provide funding. The project sched
proposed in the CFD report adopted by Council in January 1991 is shoi
below:
Project Title 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 199
Library 11,200,000
City Hall
Macario Canyon Park 7,Ol
Faraday Ave
Cannon Rd 3,950,000
La Costa Ave 6,000,000
houcadia Blvd
La Costa Interchange 9,500,000
Poinsettia Interchange 9,85 0,000
Palomar AP Rd Interchange 200,000 10,835,000
Utility Maint Warehouse
Total Projects
OlivenhainlRSF Rd 6,000,000
~ ----- -- 11,400,000 20,335,000 21,850,000 1 3.953.UOOh
I-_ -
.. 0
Page Three of Agenda Bill No. II.26 ? b
By setting a tax rate higher than is absolutely necessary to fund curr
projects the City has collected some excess taxes. However, any fu
collected over and above that amount needed for current projects may
used to fund the early design and engineering costs for future projects. Th
funds also allow the Council to set lower tax rates in later years.
The staff recommendation is to delay Cannon Road and set a lower tax r
for this initial year of the CFD. Council may reconsider the timing of Cam
Road annually as each year's tax rates are reviewed.
Tax Rates
During the three years that preceded the formation of CFD No. 1 the SI
held many meetings with property owners to review the possible tax rai
project schedules and the effects of the CFD on their properties. During th
discussions a variety of tax formulas and rates were discussed.
The most important document used in this process was the CFD rep
published in January 1991. This report included a cash flow forecast wh
indicated the amount of the vacant land tax that would be required to fu
the CFD projects under the schedule shown above. This cash flow and ri
forecast has become the basis for much of the fiscal analysis done by i
property owners.
If the City imposes tax rates that are considerably higher than the ra
included in the January 1991 report many property owners will be pay
higher than expected taxes for 1991-92. Both large and small prope
owners are affected by this issue.
Staff has provided two tax rate proposals based on two project schedu!
The first is based on the recommended project schedule. This schedule ci
for a tax rate that is the same as that shown in the CFD report. The secc
alternative would set a tax rate that allows Cannon Road bonds to be issc
in 1991-92. This requires a higher tax rate in the first year for bc
residential (3.25 percentage points) and non-residential (about 8 percent;
points) properties.
Staff is recommending that Council set tax rates consistent with the Janu;
1991 Report rather than set the higher rate necessary to keep Cannon Rc
on the original schedule.
Tax Rate Area 1
Januarjl Option 1 46 Increase
Property Type CFD Report Tax Rates Change Decrease
Residential
RL 208 208 0 0.00%
RLM 571 571 0 0.00%
RM 958 958 0 0.00%
RMH 1,468 1,468 0 0.00%
(74% of Mar Tax) (74% of Mar Tax)
RH 2,067 2,067 0 0*OO0h
Non-Residential
(Variable Rate Formula)
Cornrrierclal 4 08 4 06 0 O.OOO/Q
Industrial 204 204 0 0.00%
(17.01% of MaxTax) (17.01% of Max. Tax)
(Fixed Rate Formula) (40% of Max. Tax) (17.01% of Max. Tax)
Commercial 960 408 (552) -57.48%
480 204 (276) -57.48% Industrial
-__
Tax Rate Area 2 __-
Property Type CFD Report Tax Rates Change Decrease
Jartuar y Option 1 Oh Increase
(74% of Mar Tax) (74% of Mar Tax)
Residential
RL 205 205 0 0.00%
RLM 562 562 0 0.00%
RM 901 901 0 0.00%
RMH 1,382 1,382 0 O.OO%O
RH 2,027 2.027 0 0.00%
Non-Residential
(Variable Rate Formula) (17.01% 31 MexTax) (17.01% of Max. Tax)
Commercial 272 272 0 0.00%
Industrial 163 163 0 U.OO%
(Fixed Rate Formula) (4% d Max. Tax) (17.01% of Max. Tax)
272 (368) -57.48%
384 163 (221) -57.48%
Commercial 640
Industrial
. e // 6L6 Y
r
Page Five of Agenda Bill No. ,,
w
lower initial tax rates. However, the fixed rate formula would have imp0
a higher tax in the early years which remained level over a series of ye:
This level tax rate would have evened out the uncertainties for the propc
owners and offered a stable rate. The major property owners h
consistently advocated the variable tax rate concept which is n
recommended by staff.
Staff is recommending that the Council adopt the tax rates that support pro.
schedule No. 1, as presented in the CFD report of January 1991 with the de
of Cannon Road. This rate may be adjusted in future years as the Council s
fit. The rate provides the CFD with sufficient flexibility in the critical first y
of the district. The recommended tax rate structure is consistent with the
tables provided in the January 1991 Report.
Either proposal will provide adequate for first year funding for the library proj
Funding of future projects will depend on the tax rates set in the next few ye
of the CFD.
Council will be asked to adopt the attached resolution which sets the spec
amount of the special tax on each parcel within the CFD boundary for 1991-
(These taxes Will be used to pay for costs of the district only.) The special
listing will then be filed with the County of San Diego to be included on the
bills for December 1991 and April 1992.
Council should note that there are NO homes of Carlsbad residents affected
this taxes. In fact, under Council Policy No. 38, there will never be any ho
owners taxes by CFD No. 1.
FISCAL, IMPACX
This is the final in a series of actions that will have a long term fiscal impact
the City of Carlsbad. The levying of taxes on parcels within the CFD will cre
the necessary cash flow to finance the construction of the new library,
interchanges and other significant projects. This action is also the precursoi
months to come. Growth Management is both a land use planning and a fis
process. There are millions of dollars in infrastructure to be constructed in 1
next few years, much of which will be financed by this CFD. Millions more v
be funded by developers directly, and others will require the involvement of i
City Council in planing and structuring the use of public debt. Each of thc
pieces fit into the long range financing plan the Council has implemented 07
the last three years.
Setting taxes under the recommended formula will raise about $2.4 million fr~
property within the district.
many growth management related issues which will be before the council in .
L e 0 Page Six of Agenda Bill No. )/; $6 7
s
EXHIBlTS:
1. Resolution No. 9 / -2 3 7 establishing the annual tax for Community Fa&
District No. 1.
2. Project and Tax Rate Schedule Option 1.
3. Project and Tax Rate Schedule Option 2.
1
2
3
%
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
RESOLC'TION NO. 91-239
. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL TAX
FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CI
CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "leqislatiue
has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, condu
election and received a favorable vote from the qt
electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a cc
facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the te
Provi8ion3 Of the "MellO-HOOB Community Facilities AC~ of
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Gov
Code of the State of California. This Community Fac
District -shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY
TIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Dist.
and,
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as autk
by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of Cz
nia, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for
and expense9 related to said Community ~aciiities Distric
this legislative body is desirous to establish the specifi
of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all tri
\ correct.
SECTION 2. That the specific rate and amount c
special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and ex1
for the next fiscal year (1991-1992) for the referenced Dir
is hereby determined and established as set forth ii
attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A".
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
SECTION 3. That the rate as set forth above (
exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance
legislative body, and is not in excess of that as pr
approved by the qualified electors of the District.
SECTION 4. That the proceeds of the special tax
used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the follo
the following order of priority:
A. Payment of principal of and interesl
outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness;
E. Necessary replenishment of bond
funds or other reserve funds;
C. Payment of costs and expenses of aur:
public facilities and public services;
D. Repayment of advances and lo:
appropriate.
The proceeds of the special taxes shall
a8 aek forth above, and shall not be used for any other pU
SECTION 5. The special tax shall be collected in t
manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collect
shall be eubject to the same penalties and same proced
sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes,
Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable a
trative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.
SECTION 6. All monies above collected shall be pa
the Community Facilities District funds, including any bo
and reserve fund.
1
w 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
SECTION 7. The Auditor of the County is hereby dir
enter in the next County assessment roll on which ta
become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effec,
space marked "public improvements, special tax" or by a
suitable designation, the installment of the special 1
for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is
the attached Exhibit *'A".
SECTION 8. The County Auditor shall then, at the '
the tax collection period, promptly render to this I
detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts
special tax installments, interest, penalties and percen
collected and from what property collected, and also pr
statement of any percentagee retained for the expense of
any such collection.
SECTION 9. This Resolution shall become ef
immediately upon the effective date of the Ordinance aut1
the levy of the special taxes for the referenced Cc
Facilities District.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council
City of carlsbad at its regular meeting held on the 23r
Of July , 1991, by the following vote, to
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton, and Nyg
ATTEST:
//
KRANZ, City Clerk
I d&*&
MTIIA Id % KAREN R. KUNDT sistant City Clerk
(SEAL)
0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
e . 08/02/91
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92 *
TOTAL CHARGE ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
167-101-03 8,771 64
167-101-19 7 , 360.82
167-101-27 10,323.60
168-040-14 17 I 822.46
168-040-16 9 I 620.94
168-040-18 31,261.94 168-040-22 1 I 529 . 72 168-040-23 11,698.42
168-040-25 64,649.96
168-050-02 5,223 -44
167-101-21 8,280.10
168-040-17 3,372.86
168-050-03 6,061. 28
168-050-05 117,683.68
168-050-06 7,900.80 168-050-07 271821.34
168-050-25 351 447.92
168-050-26 31,648.90
168-050-27 7,500.22 207-101-12 14,500.54
208-020-28 128,503.90
208-020-32 1,838.48
208-101-05 239.82
209-040-23 283.72
4,409.60 208-020-33
209-040-24 1,547.22
209-040-27 2,142.30
275.56 209-041-18
209-041-20 928 . 74
209-041-27 514 . 38
209-04 1-28 738 . 90
209-050-28 89. ao
209-050-29 3 I 959.92
209-060-59 19,349.24 209-070-02 1,622.44 209-070-03
4,127.60 209-070-04
209-070-07
209-081-01
209-081-07 730.74
606 . 24
2 09-08 1-18 1,065.50
663 . 38 209-081-19
665.42 209-081-20
209-081-22 1,094.08 2 0 9 -0 8 2-- 0 2 1,161 . 44
844.24
33,255.84
871.58
209-081-09
0 e
' 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
"
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
209-082-03 1,761.56
209-082-06 820.56
209-082-07 1,043 . 04
209-082-08 1,273.70
209-083-01 11288.00
2 09-083-02 1,069.58
209-083-03 1,118 . 58
209-083-07 1,138.98
992.02 209-083-08
209-083-11 1,163.48 209-083-12 408 a 24 209-083-15 1,004 26
209-090-01 3 ,595.96
209-090-02 3,711.30
209-090-03 3 , 455.88
209-090-04 1,058.66
209-090-07 2 , 360.22
209-090-08 4,147.86
209-090-09 2,129.56 209-090-10 2,796.80
209-090-11 16,904.30
210-100-05 244.94
210-100-06 1,363.52 110.22 210-100-12
183.70 211-040-09
211-040-12 4 , 898.88
212-020-25 775.66 6 , 511.42 212-020-37
212-020-38 5 , 899.06
212-020-39 10,287 . 64
212-040-25 2 , 102.44
128.60 212-040-26
212-040-30 37,030.36
212-041-06 2,224.90
212-041-07 2 , 000.38
212-041-09 1 , 571.72
212-041-10 4,490 . 64
212-041-11 1,632.96
212-050-43 2,184.08 967.52 212-061-03
212-062-04 1,681.94
209-090-05 2,739. 14
212-010-03 2,254.78
212-041-05 3 ,470.04
212-041-08 I, 857.48
212-062-14 1,041.00
0 e
' 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
* SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
w
TOTAL CHARGE ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
212-070-01 822.60
389 . 86 2 12-070-12
616 . 44 2 12-070-13
212-070-15 316.38
416.40 212-070-17
212-070-23
212-070-24 528.66
212-081-01 526.62
212-081-02 512.34
2 12-081-03 826.68
212-081-04 379.66
212-081-05 487 . 84
406.20 212-081-06
212-081-08 432 . 72
212-081-09 424 . 56
212-081-10 428.64
2 12-081-11 542.96
2 12-081-13 302.10
212-081-14 473.56
212-081-15 534.78
1,336.98 212-081-17
212-081-21 106.14
212-082-01 557.24
212-082-02 634.80
212-082-03 428.64
367.42 212-082-04
212-082-05 449.06
212-082-06 449.06
212-082-07 796.06
855.26 212-082-08
1,673 . 78 2 12-082-09
212-091-01 553.16
638 . 90 212-091-02
212-091-03 551.12
212-091-04 969 . 56
879.76 212-091-05
212-091-08 306.18
212-091-13 785.86
212-091-15 428 . 64
224 . 52 212-091-16
212-091-19 551.12
465.38 2 12-092-02
2 12-070-22 753.20 1,708.48
2 12 -08 1-07 334.96
2,102.44 212-081-18
\
212-091-14 522 b 54
e
' 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
.
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROU
212-092-03 569 . 48 212-092-04 794.02
212-092-05 949 . 16
212-092-06 587.86
212-092-07 342.92 2 12-092-08 312.30
2 12-092-09 304 . 14
212-092-10 316.38
212-092-11 257 . 18
212-092-12 440.90
2 12-092-13 659.30
212-092-14 775.66
212-092-15 571.54
212-092-19 677.68
212-092-22 253 . 10 212-092-23 359.24
212-093-01 1,122 . 66
212-093-02 593 . 98
212-093-63 610.32
212-093-04 904 . 24
212-093-05 716.46
212-093-06 420.48
212-093-07 447.02
212-093-08 1,153.28
212-093-09 1,043.04
212-110-01 410.28
2 12-110-02 198.00
212-110-03 183 -70
212-110-04 189 . 82
212-110-05 334.76
212-110-06 263 . 30
212-110-07 230.66
212-120-01 626.64
212-120-02 579 . 70 2 12-120-03 779.74
212-110-08 324 54
212-120-04 1,134 90
2 12-120-05 765.44
212-120-06 779.74
212-120-07 1,775.84
2 12-120-08 634.80
212-120-09 349.04
212-120-10 732.78
2 12-120-11 1,451.28
2 12-120-12 510.30
2 12-120-13 689.92
e
08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
.I
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROU
2 12-120-14 440.90
212-120-16 977.72
212-120-17 720.54
212-120-18 432.72
212-120-20 465 . 38
838 . 92 212-120-21
212-120-22 645.02
212-120-23 465.38
212-120-24 589 . 90
212-120-25 1,194.10
212-120-26 1,837.08
2 12-120-27 653 . 18
212-120-28 743.00 212-120-29 749.12
212-120-30 600.10
212-120-33 2 , 122.84
213-061-02 898.12
213-061-23 1,175.72
213-070-08 293 . 92
213-070-11 636.84 213-070-20 336.80
213-070-21 306.18
213-070-22 279.64
2 13-091-04 434.78
214-010-03 204.12
214-021-01 335.14
214-021-02 354.30
214-021-03 172.36
214-021-04 172 . 36
214-021-08 335.14
214-021-09 344.72
214-021-10 8,713 . 80
214-022-01 105.32
214-022-02 172 . 36
214-022-03 172 . 36
214-022-04 172.36
214-022-06 172 . 36
214-022-08 57.44
214-022-10 172 . 36
214-022-11 344.72
2 14-022-15 172.36
2 14-022-18 172 . 36
214-022-21 344.72
214-022-23 344 . 72
214-022-24 603.26
214-022-17 172 36
0 e
8 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD
CO-ITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE
PARCEL NO. TO TAXROU
214-022-25 172.36
214-160-19 848.46
2 14-160-24 2,574.74
214-160-28 863 . 14 112.58 214-160-34 214-170-17 11,442.84
2 14-170-2 1 10,198.00
214-170-51 17,035.56
214-170-22 2,030.02
214-300-08 651.14
214-430-22 498 04
2 14-430-23 465.38
214-430-24 375.58
214-450-20 318.42
215-040-18 8,072 . 18
215-040-19 68 . 54
215-040-20 30,584.46
215-040-22 5,078.68
215-040-23 22,885.48
215-070-25 2,873 . 54
215-080-24 32,193 . 16
215-590-44 109.46
215-590-45 94.78
215-590-47 84.44
215-592-64 1,045. 0Q
215-592-08 3,935.56
215-592-09 2,441.78
215-592-12 3,035 . 46
215-592-13 4,356.90
215-592-14 3,791.94
215-592-15 8,464.82 102.82 215-600-01 215-600-02 97.12
215-600-03 114.26
215-040-21 2,978 . 00
215-592-02 1,224.72
215-600-04 102 82
215-600-05 102 82
215-600-06 102.82 177.10 215-600-07 142.82 215-600-08 215-600-09 91.40
215-600-10 91.40
215-608-12 91.40
215-600-13 91.40
215-600-11 91.40
CITY OF CARLSBAD
0
6 08/02/91 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROU FOR 1991-92 t
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROU
215-600-14 91.40
215-600-15 91.40
215-600-16 91.40
215-600-18 102.82
215-600-19 108 . 54
215-600-20 108.54
215-600-21 108.54
215-600-17 102 82
215-600-22 108 54
215-600-23 97 12
215-600-24 97.12
2 15-600-25 97 . 12
215-600-26 97.12
215-600-27 171.38
215-601-01 85.68
215-601-02 79.98
215-601-04 154.24
215-601-05 154.24
215-601-07 85.68
215-601-08 114.26
215-601-09 114 e 26
215-601-11 114.26
215-601-12 114.26
215-601-27 74.26
215-601-31 182 . 80
215-601-32 182.80
215-601-33 182 . 80
215-601-59 167.90
215-601-60 119 . 50
215-601-61 100.72
215-601-62 72.32
215-601-63 124.30
215-602-01 108.54
215-602-02 108.54
215-602-03 217.08
215-602-04 485 . 58
215-602-05 405.60
215-602-06 137.10
215-602-07 114.26 215-602-08 102 . 82
215-602-09 97.12 142 . 82 215-602-10 215-602-11 348.48
215-602-12 394 . 18
215-601-03 114 26
215-601-10 114 26
0 a
1 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
. SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92 I
ASSESSOR’S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
274.20
215-602-14 97 . 12
215-602-13
215-602-15 114 26
215-602-17 91.40
215-602-34 97.12
215-602-35 85.68
215-602-36 79.98
215-602-37 79 . 98
215-602-38 79.98 215-602-55 160.36
2 15-602-56 122.08
215-602-57 98.76
215-602-58 95.12
215-602-59 92 66
215-602-60 93.80
215-602-61 100.66
215-602-62 89.74
215-602-63 91.00
215-602-71 72 . 44
215-602-72 73.64
215-602-73 75.28 215-602-74 93 . 18
215-602-75 82.78
215-602-76 76.60
2 15-602-80 75.46
215-610-01 171.38
215-610-02 125 . 68
215-610-03 125 . 68
215-610-04 125.68
215-610-05 125.68
215-610-06 125.68
215-610-07 131.38
215-610-08 131.38
215-610-09 131.38
215-610-10 131.38
215-610-11 131.38
215-610-13 131.38
215-610-14 131.38
215-610-15 131.38
215-610-16 137 10
215-610-17 137 . 10
215-610-18 142 . 82
2 15-610-19 171.38
215-610-20 171.38
215-610-21 159.96
215-610-12 131.38
\
a
CITY OF CARLSBAD
e
3 08/02/91
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR' S TOTAL CHARGE
PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
159 . 96 215-610-22
215-610-23 159.96
2 15-610-24 159.96
142.82 215-610-25
142.82 215-610-26
215-610-27 142.82
215-610-28 142 -82
215-610-29 142 82
215-610-30 142.82
215-610-31 137.10
215-610-32 137.10
215-610-33 137.10
215-610-34 137 10
215-610-35 137 10
215-610-36 137 10
215-610-37 237.10
215-610-38 137 . 10
215-610-39 137 10
215-610-40 125.68
215-611-01 165.66
215-611-02 165.66
215-611-03 165 . 66
215-611-04 165.66
215-611-05 142.82
215-611-06 142.82
215-611-07 142 . 82
215-611-08 142 . 82
215-611-09 142.82
215-611-10 142 . 82
215-611-11 142.82
215-611-12 142.82 2 15-611-13 165.66
215-611-15 165.66
215-611-16 194 24
215-611-17 308.48
215-621-18 211.36
215-611-19 199 94
215-611-20 199 94
2 15-611-21 165.66
215-610-4 1 171.38
215-611-14 165.66
215-611-22 165 66
215-611-23 165 66
215-611-24 222.80
215-611-25 251.36
215-611-26 251.36
0 W
08/ 02/9 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
251.36 215-611-27
215-611-28 245.64
215-611-29 194.24
7,277.46 215-612-04
9,604.32 215-612-06
215-612-07 8,464.82 215-612-10 12 , 563 . 18
2 15-612-14 6,348.62
215-612-17 599.84
215-620-01 102.82
215-620-02 91.4Q
215-620-03 79.98
215-620-04 79.98
215-620-05 79.98
215-620-06 79 . 98
215-620-08 79.98
215-620-09 79 . 98
85.68 215-620-10
215-620-11 85.68
215-620-12 79.98
85.68 215-620-13
2 15-620-14 97.12
114.26 215-620-15
215-620-16 114 . 26
114.26 215-620-17
215-620-18 102 . 82
102 . 82 215-620-19
215-620-20 91.40
215-620-21 91.40
85.68 215-620-23
85.68 215-620-24
215-620-25 91.40
215-620-26 79 98
215-620-27 79 98
215-620-28 79 . 98
215-620-29 79 . 98
215-620-30 79.98
215-620-31 79.98
215-620-32 79.98
215-620-33 79 98
215-620-34 79 98
85 . 68 215-620-35
85.68 215-620-36
85.68 215-620-37
215-620-38 85.68 215-620-39 85.68
0
. 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE
PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
215-620-40 97 . 12
215-620-41 108 . 54
215-620-42 108.54
215-620-43 108 . 54
215-620-45 125.68
215-620-46 102.82
215-620-47 102.82
215-620-48 102.82
215-620-49 102 . 82
215-620-50 91.40
215-620-51 91.40
215-620-52 102.82
216-010-01 557 . 90
216-010-02 734 . 08
216-010-03 205.54
216-010-04 205.54
216-010-05 205 . 54
216-111-08 16,852 -76
216-111-09 11,882.62
216-140-17 2,543 -34
216-140-18 6,229.74
216-140-25 20,754 a88
216-140-30 8 , 192.32
216-140-31 6,239.68
216-140-32 22 , 361.54
216-140-33 469.48
216-150-03 8,397 -80
216-150-05 4,347.32
216-150-16 1,685.30
216-150-18 21,040.24
216-150-19 628.40
216-420-79 2 , 346.02
222-470-23 4,002.60
222-470-25 737.32
1,318 . 34 223-010-12
223-010-18 35.34
223-010-19 1,006.42
223-010-27 9,301.16
223-010-28 2,430.82
223-010-29 17 , 215.34
223-010-37 6,676 . 94
2 2 3 -0 1 4-4 0 83 . 18
223-011-02 24 , 165 . 14
215-620-44 I42 02
216-140-27 7,242 . 18
223-010-35 5,996.98
e m
08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROU FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROU
223-011-03 805.50
223-011-06 7,815.10
223-02 1-08 1,313.94
223-021-09 5,641.40
223-021-11 2 , 410.80
223-021-12 2,615.88
223-032-01 6,654.08 223-032-02 174 . 66
223-050-54 17,852.50
223-050-59 257.08
223-050-65 8,043.62
223-050-68 3,376.26
223-050-69 16,258.62
223-050-70 5,490.00
223-060-15 15,437.46
223-060-29 1,812.58
223-060-31 6,503.94
223-060-32 17 , 513 . 50
223-060-40 23 , 680.46
223-060-50 6,530.56
223-061-01 4,113.04
223-061-02 7,677.14
223-071-05 9 , 484.14
223-071-07 5,213.06
223-071-09 11,954.46
255-010-09 48,524.54 '
255-010-18 8,460.66
255-010-19 1,302.52
255-023-02 367.42
255-030-09 22,171 . 38
255-030-10 34,169.88
255-030-11 6,186.96
255-031-17 1,256.82
255-031-20 2,114.68
255-031-22 9,511.80 255-031-23 7 , 226.68
255-031-24 40,852.52
255-031-25 18,806.54
255-040-19 20,223.30
255-041-14 61,139.82
264-010-07 41,960.52
264-010-09 771.22
223-011-04 18,926,50
223-050-67 23 , 582.44
223-060-28 253 10
255-031-18 13,767.84
0 e
g 08/02/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
- SPECIAL ANNUAL TAXROLL FOR 1991-92
ASSESSOR'S TOTAL CHARGE PARCEL NO. TO TAXROLL
264-010-11 35,590.74
264-010-21 2,938.18
264-010-22 1,798.68
264-010-23 2,191.68
264-010-25 21,336.72
264-220-47 118.52
2 64-220-7 1 11,883 -76
PARCELS: 559 $1,993,621.96
%
COWNITY FACILITIES DISTRIW NBS/LOV
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE WORKSHEET FOR TAXROLL BILLING
AGENCY: Carlsbad Unified School District BILLING YEAR 199
DISTRICT NAME: Community Facilities District No. I YEAR OF ISSUE l!
BOND REDEMPTION FUND (Current Balance incl interest):
BOND RESERVE FUND:
$308,002
Current Balance (incl. interest) $1,290,699
Minimum Required Balance 1 ,198,430
Net Surplus or Deficit $92,269
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND (incl. interest) 50,347
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS $450,618
----------
----------
--------- ---------
DEBT SERVICE:
Interest Due Sept. 1,1991 $457,339
Principal Due Sept. 1,1991 0
Interest Due March 1,1992 457,339
Interest Due Sept. 1, 1992 457,339
Principal Due Sept. 1, 1992 65,000
Total Debt Service Requirements $1,437,016
----------
COLLECTlONlADMlNlSTRIVE COSTS 30,000
OTHER COSTS AND/OR CREDITS 0
TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS $1,467,016
----------
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
1990-91 SPECIAL TAX REQUIREMENT $1,016,399
(Difference between Source & Use of Funds) --------- ---------
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL DATE:
CLIENT ACCEPTANCE DATE:
Project Title
Library
City Hall
Macario Canyon Park
Faraday Ave
Cannon Rd
La Costa Ave
OlivenhainlRSF Rd
Leucadia Blvd
La Costa Interchange
Palomar AP Rd Interchange
Total Projects
Poinsettia Interchange
Utility Maint Warehouse
1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96
11,200,000
7,000,000
3,950,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
9,500,000
200.000 10.835,OOO
9,850,000
11,400,000 20,335,000 21,850,000 3,950,000 7,000,000
Tax Rate Area 1
January Option 1 % increase
Property Type CFDReport TaxRates Change Decrease
Residential
RL 208 208 0 0.00%
RLM 571 571 0 0.00%
RM 958 958 0 0.00%
AMH 1,468 1,468 0 0.00%
RH 2,067 2,067 0 0.00%
Non-Resident ial
(Variable Rate Formula)
Commercial 408 408 0 0.00%
Industrial 2a4 204 0 0.00%
(74% of Mu Tax) (74% of Max TaxJ
(17.01% of M=T+ (17.01% of MU T=)
(Fixed Rate Formula)
Commercial 960 408 (552) -57.48%
Industrial 480 204 (276) -57.48Oh
(40% of Mu Tpx) (17.01 % of MU Tpx)
Tax Rate Area 2
Property Type CFDRepott TaxRates Change Decrease
Residential
RL 205 205 0 0.00%
RLM 562 562 0 0.00%
RM 901 901 0 0.00%
RMH 1,382 1,382 0 0.00%
RH 2,027 2.027 0 0.00%
Non-Residential
(Variable Rate Formula) (17.01% of ~ut~u) (17.019b0i MWT~)
Commercial 272 272 0 0.00%
Industrial 163 163 0 0.00%
January Option 1 46 Increase
(74% d Max Tax) (74% of Max Tax)
(Fixed Rate Formula) (40%olM~Tu) (1701%ofM~~.Tpx)
Commercial 640 272 (368) -57.48%
Industrial 384 163 (221) -57.48%
Project Title 1991 -92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Library 11,200,000 City Hall
Macario Canyon Park 7,000,000 Faraday Ave
Cannon Rd 3,950,000
La Costa Ave ~,WWOO OlivenhainlRSF Rd Leucadia Blvd 6,%Q,oOO
La Costa interchange 9,500,000
Poinsettia Interchange 9,850,000 Palomar AP Rd interchange 200.000 10,835,000 Utility Maint Warehouse
,Total Projects -_ 0 7,000,000 1~>350,000 20,335,00021,850,000
7-47- ' J~K HENTHORN 6r ASSOC~ES g', 5431 Avenlda Encinas 9 Sui& G
Carlsbad, Culifmia 92008
Fax (619) 438-0981
(619) 4384090
July 22, 1991
Honorable Mayor arid City Council City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008
Subject: Mello Roos CFD # 1 Taxroll - Request for removal of
parcels located within Coastal Agricultural Overlay Z1
The foil-owing parcels are defined as AGRICULTURAL LAND in .
ENGINEERS REPORT for CFD #1, Part 111, Sections I and IV.A.3.
that they are specifically designated in the certified Loc
specific designation).
ASSESSOR # OWNERSHIP PROPOSED TAX
214-010-09 sm1s 814.44 26, 974.46 214-140-40 ABADA
212-040-32 KELLY, P&R 38 , 838.62
211-040-14 MCREYNOLDS 23 , 316.58
215-070-16 OCEANBLUFF PARTNERS 17 , 138.40 52 I 789.32 214-140-07 SUNBELT DEVELOPMENT
Since the City of Carlsbad does not have Coastal Permit issuar
authority, permitted uses on these properties are limited
agricultural uses until action is taken by the California Coast Commission to allow conversion to other land uses. Even tho1 these parcels are currently zoned other than L-C or E-A, the C:
of Carlsbad can not unilaterally grant development entitlements
Therefore, it is requested that these parcels be removed from i taxroll list proposed in City Council agenda Bill 11,269.
Thank you.
Coastal. Program as agricultural (Agricultural Overlay Zone (
Henthorn
JEH : wpc
cc: D. Ri.deout
J. Elliott JA
P aIoN To TKE CkTY ;F CARLSB k CIW COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD 6: PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARL!
SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S'
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI'
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE
MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDIT USE PERMIT (sCUP'1) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEN' mDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE e
NAME ADDRESS DA'
r
0 ‘4 e
*onnlDp -
~.LIION ma 03svd
B PETA w ION TO 'FHE CITY OF CARLSB
-* '
CITY COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARL SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL 'PO REBUILD THE EXISTING S
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDIT
USE PERMIT (aCUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEH
PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
-
L
a ., e
muvatno a~4y
3ZXON 730 03SVd
PET w ION To THE CITY OF CARLSB IP CITY COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CAR1
SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING $
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THI
MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CBNDII USE PERMIT (nCUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY (
YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEI
PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFI
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
V -
W
munm aMIDw - - - - -z= - - -
310u 7311 03wd
d d) B
PET ION TO THE CITY OF CARLSB CITY COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CAR1 SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING ! TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACIL: WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO TH: MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI’ USE PERMIT (“CUP”) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY t
PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFI
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEI
-
7-
L
1 0 e Y' '
---
3JON 13a O3Wd
Pm ION TO THE CITY OF CARLS CITY COUNCIL .I -
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT Pmm AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL WORTE TN THE CITY OF CARL SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE To THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDIT USE PERMIT ("CUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY C
YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEN PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
.
ON TO THE CITY OF CARLS CITy mmcIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING i TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACIL:
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THI
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD C PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARI
” MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI! USE PERMIT (WUPg8) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY I
YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEI PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFl ENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
Di - ADDRESS
* -v
,
---
BJE~ON ma OB~
-ION To THE CITY OF - CIm COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CAFU SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILII WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI'I USE PERMIT (llCUP1l) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTME3 PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE
TS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
ADDRESS
e v
3mo~ 7aa OBW~
TION TO THE CIm OF CARLS a CITY COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARL SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI?
USE PEWIT ("CUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( - YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEJI
PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
W #
.) - 0 w
---
~~ION 73a 03wd
ION To THE CITY OF CARzSa c1m COUNCIL
T
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD 6t PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARI SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THf MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDIl USE PERMIT (llCUP1l) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTME3 PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
*-
i
.- v 0
----/
WION ma oawd
P ON TO THE CITY OF CARLS CITY COUNCIL -
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD C PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARL SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
/
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI’J *USE PERMIT (llCUP1l) WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT &EAST TWENTY (
YWS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTW
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
NAME ADDRESS
PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITYI A CUP WITH A LIMITED LZFE
DJ
-- I
(I 4 - - .c. =(\/+ <[&- J - ‘2i x.: 5 >%! i qr>l”:, C&T& f\JL:vL.:a . Ll ;;a&-
m e , ‘B -
---
~XON 130 oxwd
-
- P~ION TO THE CIW OF ams m c~m COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD 61 PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARl SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING 5
WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SIE;RVICE TO THI MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD,.
WE FBEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDI':
USE PERMIT ('CUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY (
YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTME3 PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFI
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
k
TO A NEW MOBIL MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY, THE NEW FACILl
/A\
DA
i
9 e
3~x0~ 13a OBW~
P* ON To THE CITY OF CARIS CITY COUNCIL
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CUSTOMERS OF THE MOBIL STATION AT
PAIDMAR AIRPORT ROAD & PASEO DEL NORTE IN THE CITY OF CARL SUPPORT THE APPLICATION OF MOBIL TO REBUILD THE EXISTING S TO A NEW-MOBIL MART AND,CAR WASH FACILITY. THE NEW FACILI WITH A CAR WASH WOULD PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF CARLSBAD.
WE FEEL IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MOBIL TO OBTAIN A CONDII
USE PERMIT ("CUP") WITH A VESTED LIFE OF AT LEAST TWENTY ( YEARS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMEN PROVIDE THE PROPOSED FACILITY. A CUP WITH A LIMITED LIFE
IS LESS THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE.
v clc
- - - .-/
3ltION ?3a 01Wd
e a 0 A,
RUSSELL W. GROSS€ DEVELOPMENT CO., INC,
-
5850 Avenida Encinas, Suite A .:. Carlsbad, California 92008 .;- Phone
July 19, 1991
Honorable Mayor Bud E. Lewis and City caunci.1 Members City of Carlabad q 1200 Elm Avenus Carlabad, CA 93008
Re: CUP 90-12 MdBIL OIL CORPORATION
bear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
With reopect to the above noted Conditional Wsci Pernit, and Em intarrsted property owner and long time resident in the City Carlsbad, I hope that the City Council will be reasonable in review of Mobil Oilrs appeal of Condition 11 of CUP 90-12. '
Mobil Oil srsrvice estation has been a business in the City Carlsbad serving the public for some time, and now Mobil t
desires to ii~~rave the appearance and expand ita serviceas at f loC&tion close to Xnterstato 5 at the intersection of Pasea Norte and Palomar Airport Road. They have presented I remodel
plan which demonstrates a pleasing and compatible appearance, provide8 services to tho residents and visitors to the communi
(C-T) Comnercfal-Tourist is a very restrictive aon. designation, and the service station u3e is allowed. Howsv the Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollar investment which Ho
Oil contemplates in its application warrants assurance that use can continue Zor a reasonable length af time. A 5 y restrictive life on the Conditional Use Permit ia not reamnab I. am euro that Mobil Oil and any other prudent burinasrs per would expect at least a 24 year life in order to realize acceptable return on its investment. A reasonable apprbach wa
be 20 years, not 5 ycara.
It is my understanding that in all other applications for Permits by Mobfl Qil service station developments within Disrgo County and Orange County, there has been no such 5 y
restriction as imposed by the Planning Commission in Carleb We would recornend that the City Council ask Carlsbad Plann
PAIDMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE
Contractor$ license No, 378383
I-- --- -- - e 0
Wonorable Mayor Bud E. Lewis and city Council Members
July 19, &SO1 City Of Catlsbad
Page 2
8taff to rWiaW the reasonablenesi of this otandard reconsider the rrstrictfve lifs requiroment ae inposed.
We strongly aupport the remodelhg and development of the M Oil Bervicr station as proposed. Further, the changes (w, includo reduction of drivowaya on Palomerr Airport Road and Pi del Norte along with an offer to dedicate an additional 7 : Zor future widening of Paseo del Norte) are conditions agree( by Mabil Oil Carporation. Thesm CQnCesdon8 will help existing COnditiOXl8 of those two frontage roads. If Mabil Oi: not granted an extension of time for the restriotive lie. of conditional Use Farmit, the present Wobil oil service stat would b+ allowad to continue as is, The opportunity for the C
to roalize the new expanded services and remodaled building, the upgrading of roadways and accesa anta Palo~ar Airport I:
and PasBo 401 Narta should aneeuraga the city Council recornend a 20 year lift far the Conditional Use Permit.
I wish t0 go Oh record in aupport Of Mobil Oi1’6 appeal Condition 11 for CUP 90-12c and I hope the City Council Y agree to their reasanable requsat,
Sincerely yours,
-
L ;hu% e-%
Babe Grosse
Of RWSSELXl W. GRQSSE DEVELOPMENT C0.t XNC.
B@:jh cc: Michael Holzmiller, c Plnnning Pirrctar /
RECEOVIE
JUI. 1 9 199 1 -------eo---
0'
CAdsbAd RETAI1 AssociATEs
J 1 5 I AIRWAY AVENUE SUITE 1. I
COSIA MESA, CALIkORNIA 92676
714 850-057b FAX 714 8504Jb4
July 18, 1991
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008
RE: CUP 90-2-Mobil Oil
t
e
Southwest Corner of Paseo del Norte and Palomar Airport Road
The purpose of this letter is to recommend your approval of Mobil Oil Corporation's request for a 25 year term for the referenced Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
Carlsbad Retail Associates is the owner/developer of the P1 Paseo Real shopping center at the northwest corner of El Ca Real and Alga Road. We are presently negotiating with Mobi
locate a gas station on a pad site within the shopping cent Having reached agreement on business terms, we plan to file
application for a CUP on our property later this month to accommodate the gas station use.
Mobil Oil Representatives recently advised us of the appeal are presently reconsidering. We believe Condition No. 11 o Planning Commission Resolution No. 3203 as proposed provide
City with ample flexibility to address potential detrimenta effects, if necessary, throughout the term of the CUP regar' of its duration, Restrictive term limitations for a CUP PO significant and apparent risk to the operational continuity business. In most cases, as likely with Mobil, this 6isk pi to be an insurmountable obstacle to making the initial investment.
Mobil Oil Corporation's request for a 25 year term CUP is
reasonable and deserves your favorable consideration.
sincerely,
,
2LL-Ju L
&p$&d*I Frederick T. Von der Ahe
o---....-------
1661 11 in[ l
JAMES M. GAISER @ 334ORffiECRESTDlWM cARLsBAD,cAwoRNlA-
0
July 16, 1991
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re; C,U,P', 90-12
Mobil' Oil Corporation Palomar Airport Road i
Paseo Del Norte
Dear Mayor and Members ofthe City Council:
Because my wife and I have been long-time residents of t City and we do own the land that Hadley's Fruit Orchards buil
is located on, which is directly south of the subject Mobil 0 project, we are vitally interested in this upgrading of that
We ask for your fairness and reasonableness in applying terms and conditions of the proposed C.U.P. It does not appe Planning Commission.applied anything other than what has been in the past, which appears to be arbitrary without regard to
facts or circumstances of each case.
It is suggested that some reasonable and fair basis be u
in determining the length of a C.U.P., such as, the length of
lease, or the estimated useful life of the primary assets as utilized by the Internal Revenue Service, or generally accept lengths of estimated useful economic lives used within the pa ticular industry or business involved.
If a reasonable and fair basis were applied to the,Mdbil
project, it would appear the 5-10 years proposed is a much to1
short a period and most likely a 20 year period would be ass&
We urge you to assign a 20 year C.U.P. for this project.
,
Yours very t uly, ,,*Lq James M. Gaiser
cc: blichaal Holzmillor
@lobi1 Oil Corp.
Planning Director
JU 1 5 1991
I.
"Y y=Ivosw Aw @
July 11,1991 &mi ---------------
e
RE ElfBPEb
JUM 1 1 1991 URGENT
-------L-l*l-..
-* E June 7, 1991
'-A -a
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: CUP 90-2/SDP 90-4 Appeal of Condition SWC Palomar Airport
& Paseo del Norte
We write to you as the owners of the property located a'
to Mobil oil. This letter is to request your consideration
support the appeal by Mobil to modify condition 11 of CUP 9( which limits the life for the CUP to a five year period. TI
item is scheduled for your consideration on June 11.
As you are aware, on April 17, 1991 the Planning Commis! unanimously approved CUP 90-2/SDP 90-4 following a recommendation from Staff for approval. The CUP/SDP is for
remodel of the existing Mobil gas station and addition of a wash. There was no public opposition to the project and thi proposed project provides a valuable service to the communi1
As a property owner in the City of Carlsbad, I believe 1
in order to attract and retain viable commercial projects w! the City it is necessary to allow commercial users adequate in order to realize a reasonable economic return on their investments. By limiting CUP'S to a five year life, a sign:
requiring a commercial user to reapply for a CUP after'an unreasonably short five year period and risk the possibilit] a change of opinion.
sizeable investment in the City of Carlsbad versus another 1 jurisdiction in San Diego County which does not impose a lip life, the limited CUP life may result in a loss of such a UE for Carlsbad. It is my understanding that other agencies ir
Diego County do not impose a restrictive CUP life on similal commercial projects.
A condition of the subject CUP already calls for the Planning Director to review the CUP on an annual basis.
SWC of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte, which is lr
sent to the business community which inhibits investments bj
If given a choice between making a
Thc
-
- - - _-
/ - - - - - - -- -
@ and City Council Member office of t City Clerk June 7, 1991 1- page 2
requirement for Mobil to formally apply for an extension
continued occasions would also create an unnecessary
and Mobil.
Your consideration to amend CUP condition 11 for a lj five year CUP, as per Mobil's appeal, is respectfully rec Support of this appeal would enhance the City of Carlsbac
position to attract viable and needed services to meet tk of the City.
-- - -
w c nunoraoie M
.1 ./
/
administrative burden upon City staff, the Planning Commj
ery trulg=&
Ray & Barbara Winter,
1745 Rocky Road Fullerton, CA 92631
,- l# p&ggLJ &u- -&
cc: Michael Holzmiller - Planning Director
FAX sent, Holzmiller, 6-9-91 619-438-0894
I
e e
July 22, 1991
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: CUP 90-2-Mobil Oil
Southwest Corner of Paseo del Norte
and Palomar Airport Road
The purpose of this letter is to recommend your approval of Mobil Oil Corp~ration~s request for a 25-year term for the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 4
The Southland Corporation opened our 7-Eleven at 901 Palomar Airport Road in the Spring of 1988 with a ten-year CUP. If we could have
had the opportunity for a 25-year CUP, it would have been very much appreciated and welcomed.
Mobil Oil Representatives recently advised us of the appeal you are
presently reconsidering. We believe Condition No. 11 of Planning Commission Res01uti~1-i No, 3203 as proposed provides the City with
ample flexibility to address potential detrimental effects, if
necessary, throughout the term of the CUP regardless of its duration,
Restrictive tern limitations for a CUP pose a significant and apparent
risk to the operational continuity of a business. In mast cases,
as likely with Mobil, this risk proves to be an insurmountable obstacle
to making the initial investment.
Mobil oil cvrpration's request for a 25-year term CUP is reasonable
and deserves your favQ7;able GonsideratiQn.
Sincerely, '-pqyl<+., \ Mark Simmons
Development Manager
K/tp
T-Eleven hs I Sari Diego Division 7811 University Avenue I RO. &x 698 I La Mesa, California 9lg4eoese
phone (619) 4B&(Tnl I Fax (619) 480-2627 C*I ;;Eu$;u;"~~p k'> C6RP6hhVlbN
0 e
c
m
July 29, 1991
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: Financial Management Director
RE: TAXROLL FOR CFD NO. 1
The taxroll for CFD No. 1 has been revised, as directed by Council at the
July 23, 1991 meeting, to remove all parcels falling under the definition
of Agricultural Property. The attached list of 29 agricultural parcels has
been provided to NBS/Lowry for their use in preparing the final taxroll.
We will, have a new attachment "A" as soon as NBS/Lowry modifies the
S F. ELLIOTI'
Corrections to Taxroll for 1991 -92
Parcels assessed a tax under the CFD which are
Zoned LC by City or designated
for Ag use under the LCP August 1 , 1991
Land Use or Amount 01
Parcel No. Zone Ownership Zoning CFD Tax
209-060-03 15 Western Land Dev LC(RM) 1,9:
209-060-57 15 Barber LC ( R H/C/O) 1,1!
21 1-040-08 5 Price Club/Open Space LC 4,3(
21 1 -040-1 4 20 McReynolds LCP( PC) 23,3'
21 2-020-23 5 Fox LC(NRR) 42:
21 2-040-29 20 BCS Program L-2 LC 3,6'
21 2-040-32 20 Kelly, Pat LCP(RDM\Q) 38,8:
21 2-040-35 5 Kelly, Richard C LCP( PM\RD M\Q) 1,6
21 2-040-36 5 Kelly, Richard C LCP(RDM\Q) 1 ,OI
21 2-040-37 5 Kelly, Richard C LCP(PM\Q) 2,4:
21 2-040-38 5 Kelly, Richard C LCP(PM\Q) 7:
21 2-040-40 5 Kelly, Richard C LCP(PM\Q) 25
21 2-040-46 20 Laurel Tree Invest LCP(0) 3,4;
21 2-050-22 24 Wimpey LC 7(
21 2-050-29 24 Wimpey LC(RLM) 22,0!
21 2-050-37 24 Steindorf LC(RLM) 7!
21 2-050-38 24 Steindorf LC(RLM) 7:
21 2-040-41 20 Carlsbad Heights LCP( RD MIQ) 39,2(
21 2-050-1 3 24 Higdon LC 2,7!
21 2-050-30 24 Wimpey LC( R LM) 11,61
21 2-050-34 24 Wimpey LC(RURLM) 16,1:
21 2-050-39 24 Steindorf LC(RLM) 64
21 4-01 0-09 22 Sammis, Lee LCP(PM\O) 81
21 4-1 40-07 20 Sunbelt Development LCP(RDM\Rl O\Q) 52,7€
21 4-1 40-40 20 Abada LC P( PC) 26,97
21 4-1 40-42 20 Bramalea LC P(RD MIQ) 63,l C
21 4-1 40-44 20 Tabata LCP(R1-10) 1,71
21 5-070-1 6 20 Oceanbluff Partners LC(RLM) 17,1:
Grand Total 359,6;
21 5-070-1 5 20 Roesch LC(RLM) I I ,oi