The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991-09-17; City Council; 11350; Eagle Canyon; *I. CITY ., ?F CARLSBAD - AGENDb-blLL + UNIT EAGLE CANYON PROJECT. 3ECOMMENDED ACTION: Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and CT 91-2, HDP 91-2, SUP 91-l and LFMP 87-24(A), as approved by the Planning Commission, and INTRODUCE Ordinance No. n C - 17 5 , APPROVING ZC 91-5. ITEM EXPLANATION On July 17, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and approved without modification (6-O) the Eagle Canyon project, which is located on the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive. The applications would provide for development of this 14.54 acre property with 29 single family residential units on minimum 7,500 square foot lots as required by the R-l (One-Family Residential) zone. Three open space lots would also be created totaling 6.13 acres. The project requires approval of a Zone Change from L-C (Limited Control) which is an interim zone, to R-l (One-Family Residential) and O-S (Open Space). The proposed zones would designate portions of the property consistent with the existing General Plan designations. The proposed Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit are required to subdivide the property as described above. The amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 is necessary due to an error in the original open space map for the zone plan. The open space performance standard will be met for the zone as shown on revised Exhibit “44” to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24, and attached to the staff report dated July 17, 1991. The proposed project complies with all City ordinances and policies. Public testimony at the hearing consisted of only one speaker who indicated support for the project. No conditions were modified or added by the Planning Commission. More detailed information is included in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On July 17, 1991 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director on January 3, 1991 FISCAL IMPACX As discussed in the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan, because all required improvements are to be funded by development, no fiscal impacts to the City will result from this 29 dwelling unit project. * ,- PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. j I,3 50 GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS Facilities Zone 1 - 124 Local Facilities Management Plan Growth Control Point 3.2 Du/Ac. Net Density 3.17 Du/Ac. Special Facility Fees I - I C.F.D. No. 1 EXHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance No. nS -II 5 (Zone Change 91-5) 3. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3268, 3269, 3270, 3271, 3272, and 3282 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, July 17, 1991 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 17, 1991 MOBILE HOME PARK City of CarMad ’ ZC 9%5/CT 91-21 HDP 91-21 SUP 91-V LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON , I , , 1 ORDINANCE NO. NS-175 2 3 4 5 i 6 7 AN ORDtNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 91-5 FROM L-C TO R-l AND O-S ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE. CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: zc 91-5 9 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: 10 SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended by the 11 amendment of a zoning map as shown on the map marked “Exhibit ZC 91-S” attached 12 hereto and made a part hereof. 13 / SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission 14 / set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 3269 constitutes the findings and conditions 15 I Jj of the City Council. l6 /I 17 j EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its 18 1; adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to !I 19 j’ be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption. ‘I 20 / INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City 21 / Council on the day of , 1991, and thereafter 22 ’ 23 -‘-’ 24 ‘-‘- 25, ‘.‘. , 1 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council 3 of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the day of , 1991, by the 4 following vote, to wit: 5 AYES: 6 NOES: 7 ABSENT: 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY 9 10 11 12 VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney 13 j , 14 ‘/ I 15 I 16 ‘1 CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor Al-TEST: 17 18 / lg ,I ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk 20 j (SEAL) 21 22 23 24 25 ; 26 ’ -2- 27 28 RMHP 1111111a zw WRY City of hrtsbad EAGLE CANYON ZC 91-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RFSOLUTION NO. 3268 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO CREATE 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITH A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 7,500 SQUARE FEET AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON A 14.54 ACRE SITE. CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Conditional Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Conditional Negative Declaration according to Exhibit “ND”, dated January 3, 1991, and “PIT’, dated September 27, 1990, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following fklings: Findinns: 1. The initial study shows that the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, however there will not be a significant impact in this case because the mitigation measures described in the initial study have been added to the project. , . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 1c 11 12 12 14 15 1E 17 1E 15 2c 21 2: 2: 24 2: 2E 27 2E 2. 3. 4. Portions of the site have been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis and the site was disced at one time to allow for the planting of the existing eucalyptus grove. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed project provided that mitigating conditions of approval are complied with and that traffic improvements specified in the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan are developed. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly impacted by this project provided that mitigating conditions of approval are complied with. Conditions: This project is subject to the following mitigating conditions: 1. a) Submittal of a final Landscape and Irrigation Plan in substantial conformance with the conceptual Landscape Plan/HilEde mitigation Plan for the Planning Directois approval is required prior to the issuance of a grading permit. b) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall deposit at a financial institution subject to regulation by the state or federal government, a certiEcate of deposit or letter of credit made out to the City of Carlsbad or such other security which is acceptable to the City. This document shall be for at least twice the estimated cost of the proposed mitigation landscaping. If the proposed mitigation landscaping is not installed in a timely manner, in accordance with the approved plans, the Planning Director may authorize the utilization of these funds to do the necessary remedial work. Any funds remaining after the completion of this work shall be returned to the applicant. 4 In addition to erosion control measures, the required landscaping and irrigation systems shown on the approved Landscape and ligation Plan shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any unit within this project. 2. The project shall adhere to all requinxnents in the proposed Master Drainage Plan revision and the National Pollutant dkcharge elimination system permit pursuant to San Diego Region Water Quality Conml Board Order No. 9042 which may be ineffectatthetimeoffinalmap. PC RESO NO. 3268 -2- . I . . -l- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 4. 5. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carl&ad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard three phasedprogram,onfle inthe Planning Department,shallbeundertakentoavoid possible signikant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the PlatlningDepartmtxlt. The area shown on the project plans as “Area of Native Plant Understory” shall be preserved in its existing natural condition and be included within an open space lot as shown on the approved exhibits as lot 30. The Final Map, Improvement Plans, and Landscape Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map design which p reserves portions of the &sting eucalyptus grove and the conceptual Landscape Plan which indicates areas of the site to be revegetated with eucalyptus species so as to provide long term roosting areas for the monarch butterfly and numerous bird species. The proposed noise mitigation measures recommended in the study titled, ‘Report on an Acoustical Study, Eagle Canyon, F.l Camino Real at Camino Hills Drive, Carkbad, California”, dated May 1, 1990 prepared by James C. Berry and the addendum dated July 10, 1990 shah be completed at the time specified in each measure. The required mitigation measures are as follows: Grading plans shall not be approved tmless they show that noise attenuation for lot 22 shall be achieved by constructing a three foot high supplementary berm along the top of the proposed slope adjacent to EI Camino Real, stretching the length of the lot 22 boundary line so as to maintain a 25 foot height differential between the road grade and the top of the barrier No upstairs balcony facing El Camino Real shall be allowed on the two story house planned for lot 2% This shall be verified at the time building plans are submitted for approval. Prior to recordation of the final tract map or issuance of building permits, whichever is first, the owner shall prepare and record a notice that this property may be subject to impacts from the EI Camino Real Transportation Corridor in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (Noise, Form #l). . . . . . . . . PCRESO NO.3268 -3- 7 ^, . J? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 1c 11 lI? 12 14 15 1E 17 1E 15 2c 21 2i 2: 21 2f 2t 2: 2t 7. 0 Prior to the recordation of the Hal tract map or the issuance of residential building permits, whichever is first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of this tentative tract/parcel map shall prepare and record a notice (Noise, Form #2) that this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of a&raft operating fi-om Palomar Airport in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney. d The applicant shall post aircrah noise notilication signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (Noise, Form #3). The project shall be required to modify and up-grade the existing traffic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real and Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive/“A” Street to bring it into conformance with City standards for a four-way intersection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning i Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL J. IWLZMIIUR PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3268 -4- CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: On the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive (Y.M.C.A. property). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A zone change from L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (Single Family Residential) and OS (Open Space). Also proposed is a Tentative Tract Map to create 29 residential and three open space lots on 14.54 acres with a Hillside Development Permit and a Special Use Permit. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Conditional Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. . DATED: JANUARY 3,1991 CASE NO: ZC 90-2/CT 90-8 HDP 90-16/SUP 90-6 V MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director APPLICANT: The Camino Group (Eagle Canyon) PUBLISH DATE: JANUARY 3,199l 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 * (619) 438-l 161 . -h - f _ OF CALIFORNIA-OFFICE OF THE G0”ER‘k.i OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 . .-. ’ . ( ,i.,$ Jan 30, 1991 1;' ;.> DON NEU \ -; '; 6;; ;:;jec$ /#>/ ..n:,--\. < __ .*. \ :r:, CITY OF CARLSBAD ‘,, I , 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE '. "' , _. ' CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 Subject: EAGLE CANYON SCH # 91011002 Dear DON NEU: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above nam>d environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call Terri Lovelady at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, David C. Nunenkamp Deputy Director, Permit Assistance . .I - I ) - -. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT’ AS!ZSSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. ZC 90-2/CT 90-8/HDP 90-16/SUP 90-6 BACKGROUND DATE: September 27. 1990 1. CASE NAME: Eagle Canyon 2. APPLICANT: The Camino Groun 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1558-A Summit Avenue Cardiff. CA 92007 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: March 1.1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A zone change from L-C to R-l and OS. Also nronosed is a Tentative Tract MaD to create 29 residential and three onen snace lots on 14.54 acres with a Hillside DeveloDment Permit and a Snecial Use Permit. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a &&ant effect on the environment. The project may quality for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-sig” and ‘YES-insig” respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. . .t . * PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECI’LY OR INDIRECTLY: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. . Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? YES NO (insig) x x x x x - x x x - -2- 8 . . x BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT _- WIiL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 75 S SI 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HuMANENvIRoIuMEIuT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? F S msig) NO x - x x x - x NO x x -3- , . . ’ HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECl-LY OR INDIRECTLY: 19.. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? Increase existing noise levels? x x - Produce new light or glare? x Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? x Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Generate substantial additional traffic? x x Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? x Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x x x x x Ei S F S SI msig) NO -4- - . MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential - to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively con- siderable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? F S insig) NO x i . x x x -5- 3 I 9 .- I , . DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Physical Environment 1. The “Preliminary Geotechnical Study, APN 212-050-40, Carlsbad, California” prepared for the project . by Geo Soils, Inc., dated February 28, 1990, concluded that research and onsite exploration does not 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. - - * indicate any active or potentially active faults currently mapped in the immediate vicinity of the site. The report also concluded that natural slopes onsite appear stable and no significant adverse geologic conditions have been identified. All graded slopes are proposed at inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) to provide stability. The Preliminary Geotechnical Study states that the site is suitable for the proposed development from a geotechnical viewpoint. Topographically the site is comprised of a shallow north-south trending valley with slopes ascending to either side. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Study, most of the site appears to be largely at or near natural grades and is planted with eucalyptus trees disturbed by discing. Grading for El Camino Real and Camino Hills Drive created cut slopes, some of which have significantly eroded. Fill extends into the site on the eastern and southern portions from Camino Hills Drive. Approximately 11.04 acres or 76% of the 14.54 acre site will be graded. As a result of the existing topography, the desire to preserve areas of the eucalyptus grove and the need to widen El Camino Real to its ultimate Prime Arterial Standards, slopes over 30 feet in height will be created. To mitigate the impacts of the proposed grading operation and the creation of slopes over 30 feet in height, a conceptual Landscape Plan and Hillside Mitigation Plan has been prepared. Submittal of a final Landscape and Irrigation Plan in substantial conformance with the conceptual Landscape Plan/Hillside Mitigation Plan for the Planning Director’s approval is required prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The applicant is also required to deposit a Certificate of Deposit or Letter of Credit for at least twice the cost of the proposed mitigation landscaping. In addition to erosion control measures, the required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to occupancy of any unit within this project. Grading of the site will not create significant erosion problems as eroding slopes adjacent to El Camino Real will be reduced in height by regrading. Extensive landscaping of slopes will be provided, and required drainage improvements constructed. As a result of the proposed finish grades, drainage improvements, and the site’s location, the project will not impact or change the bed of any water body. The generation of an additional 290 Average Daily Vehicle Trips at buildout will not have a significant impact on the air quality of the region. However, an incremental increase in emissions from the increase in average daily trips is anticipated. Proposed grading will be subject to the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance including requirements for dust control. The proposed grading concept results in the site terracing down from east to west with significant amounts of open space being retained on the project perimeter. That, in addition to the proposed public streets providing open corridors through portions of the site, will maintain air movement. -6- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (co&d) 7. . Due to the project’s location and required erosion control/drainage improvements identified on the tentative tract map, no substantial change to the course or flow of water is anticipated, 8. ’ Runoff from the project site may reach the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. This could result in urban pollutants being deposited into the Lagoon. To mitigate this potential impact, the project shall adhere to all requirements in the proposed Master Drainage Plan revision and the National Pollutant discharge elimination system permit pursuant to San Diego Region Water Quality Control Board Order No. 90-42 which may be in effect at the time of final map. 9. Almost the entire site has been previously planted with eucalyptus trees. The site has also been impacted by prior grading in areas. The canopy effect of the existing eucalyptus grove coupled with the large amount of decayed leaf material on the ground, has prohibited other significant vegetation from establishing itself. Although there are no natural resources onsite, portions of the existing eucalyptus grove will be preserved. Areas of the site which will be graded will be revegetated. 10. The total number of units permitted at buildout will add only incrementally to existing demands for fuel and energy as a result of the project’s relatively small scale. 11. An archaeological reconnaissance of the property was conducted on March 8, 1990 by Advanced Sciences, Inc. No findings of cultural resources were made during the archaeological reconnaissance. A portion of the project site contains soils possessing a high fossil content. Therefore, prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material, then a standard two phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department. Biological Environment 12. A site reconnaissance of the property was conducted by Advanced Sciences, Inc. on March 8,199O with a supplemental reconnaissance survey conducted on April 12, 1990. The entire area consists of a eucalyptus grove, a non-native plant species. A small area in the southeastern portion of the site contains an understory of native plant species including toyon, California scrub oak, and lemonade berry, among others. One sensitive plant species was also found in this area, a small stand of California adolphia (Adolphia Californica) . This species has no state or federal status but. is listed by the California Native Plant Society as rare, threatened, or endangered in California but is more common elsewhere. The area where these native plant species exist onsite will be retained within an open space lot. 13. The vegetation on the project site consists almost exclusively of a eucalyptus grove. The eucalyptus trees are a non-native species. Portions of the grove will be retained and eucalyptus species will be used in the landscaping of the site in addition to other plant materials. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (co&d) 14. Due to the existence of the eucalyptus grove and the size of this property, the site has not been, nor is it presently, suitable for agricultural use. 15. A report titled, “Biological and Cultural Resources Constraints, Y.M.C.A. Eucalyptus Grove, Carlsbad” dated April 2,199O was prepared by Advanced Sciences, Inc. The report concluded that no endangered or threatened wildlife species were observed during the survey; however, three potentially sensitive species were observed. Three red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and one black-shouldered kite (Elanus caeruleus) were observed circling or perched in the trees. Both species are California Department of Fish and Game fully protected species. Although nests were not observed on the parcel, eucalyptus trees are suitable and often used as nest sites. A large number of monarch butterflies (Danaus nlexinnus) were observed flying within the grove of eucalyptus trees. Due to the number of butterflies observed and proximity to a now nonexistent site listed in the Natural Diversity Database (1989), the trees may be used by the butterflies as a roosting area. Neither roosting areas nor the monarch butterfly have federal or state protection status. However, such sites may be considered sensitive by other agencies or the public. Incorporating portions of the existing grove as part of the ultimate design of the project will provide long term roosting areas for the butterfly if it is found that they are currently using the site. The project design will preserve portions of the existing eucalyptus grove and the landscaping of areas of the site to be disturbed with eucalyptus species will mitigate any potential loss of roosting areas. 16. As stated previously, the primary species of animals utilizing the site are birds and a species of butterfly. Since the site is used only as a roosting area and can continue to function in this capacity as portions of it will be preserved, the introduction of domestic pets to the site will not have a significant adverse impact. Human Environment 17. The project is consistent with the planned land use for the site specified on the General Plan Land Use Map as Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM, 04 DU/AC) and Open Space (OS). The use is compatible with the Ranch0 Carlsbad and Camino Hills Mobile Home Developments as well as the Evans Point Project currently being reviewed which borders the site on the south and west. 18. The project is in Local Facilities Management Zone 24 and will comply with all public facility requirements of the Local Facilities Management Plan. 19. Any need for new or modified sewer systems created by this project will be satisfied prior to or commensurate with development as specified in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. 20. A study titled, “Report on an Acoustical Study, Eagle Canyon, El Camino Real at Camino Hills Drive, Carlsbad,Califomia”, dated May 1, 1990 was prepared for this project by James C. Berry - Acoustician. An addendum to the study dated July 16, 1990 was subsequently prepared as a result of revisions to the Tentative Map. The report prepared pursuant to Administrative Policy 17 concluded that the project will contribute no unusual noise source to the community and that the project-generated traffic noise -a- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (co&d) 21. 22. 23. will be insignificant compared to the prevailing ambient. The major noise source at the site is vehicular traffic on El Camino Real. Individual overflights of aircraft using McClellan-Palomar Airport can also clearly be heard. The project has been designed to take advantage of noise reduction due to distance from the source and grading of the land to provide acoustical shielding. The studies results show that all lots will have exterior noise levels below 60 dB(A) CNEL as shown on the Tentative Map except for lot 22 which will have a noise level of 63 dB(A) CNEL, 3 dB(A) above the limit. Noise attenuation for lot 22 can be achieved by constructing a three foot high supplementary berm along the top of the proposed slope adjacent to El Camino Real stretching the length of the lot 22 boundary line so as to maintain a 25 foot height differential between the road grade and the top of the barrier. The study also requires that there be no upstairs balcony facing El Camino Real on the two- story house planned for Lot 23. The following standard condition is being applied because of the project’s location near El Camino Real: Prior to recordation of the final tract map or issuance of building permits, whichever is first, the owner shall prepare and record a notice that this property may be subject to impacts from the El Camino Real Transportation Corridor in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (Noise, Form #l). The project will remain outside the 60 dB(A) CNEL contour of McClellan-Palomar Airport. However, because the project is within three miles of the airport, the following conditions will be required: Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or the issuance of residential building permits, whichever is first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of this tentative tract/parcel map shall prepare and record a notice (Noise, Form #2) that this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from Palomar Airport in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney. The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (Noise, Form #3). The interior noise levels will be below 45 dB(A) CNEL even with windows partially open. The project will not produce new light or glare that will negatively impact adjacent properties. Residential lighting on individual homes and required City street lighting will be installed. A significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances will not be created by this project as it proposes residential uses. The density of the human population of the area will not be altered as the project is within the density range designated for the site by the General Plan Land Use Map. -9- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION fcont’dl 24.. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.- 30. 31. 32. The project will provide additional housing opportunities. The proposal will generate 290 Average Daily Trips with a peak between 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. totaling 29 trips. The amount of traffic generated by the project is not significantly high and can be accommodated by the existing street system with the project improvements. The project will provide all required parking in attached garages. The proposed project access to El Camino Real will create a four-way intersection. The project shall be required to modify and up-grade the existing traflic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real and Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive/“A” Street to bring it into conformance with City standards for a four-way intersection. No alteration to waterborne, rail or air traffic will occur as a result of this project which is outside the airport influence area for Palomar-McClellan Airport according to SANDAG staff. The project is not located in the immediate vicinity of a rail line or body of water. d . The creation of a four-way intersection controlled by a traffic signal at El Camino Real and Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive/A” Street in conjunction with the closing of access to El Camino Real from Camino Hills Drive will reduce the risk of traffic hazards. This residential project will not interfere with emergency response plans as the proposed street location aligning with Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive will provide for access to adjacent property. The site has been sold by the Y.M.C.A. who had previously used the site in its primitive outdoor programs. The visual value of the existing eucalyptus grove will be retained in part through the proposed program of preservation and replanting of areas around the perimeter of the site. The project is required to dedicate land and/or pay park-in-lieu fees to mitigate the additional demand for parks that the project will create. -lO- 1 . . ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: 4 bl 4 4 4 g) a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. Because the site must be graded at one time to implement the project proposal as a result of the existing terrain and the relatively small scale of the project, phased development is not feasible nor does it provide environmental advantages. Alternate site designs would not be substantially different or provide environmental advantages as the alignment of proposed “A” Street is established by the existing traffic signal and ‘T’ intersection. In addition, the goal of preserving portions of the eucalyptus grove around the perimeter of the site to maintain its visual value further restricts site design alternatives. The proposed density is in conformance with the General Plan designations for the site. The proposal complies with the use designated for the site by the General Plan and the corresponding R-l (Single Family Residential) zone proposed for the site. Development at some future time is not consistent with the land use designations for the site which is in an area that is presently partially developed;contains approved projects not yet constructed, or proposed projects. There are alternate sites for the proposal, however, this project is consistent with the density designated for the property and will comply with all requirements of the Local Facilities Management Plan for zone 24. The no project alternative would maintain this previously disturbed site in its existing condition with no significant environmental advantage as it has very limited value as wildlife habitat. -ll- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: - I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sign&ant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE . DECLARATION will be prepared. x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. - I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Date ’ Signature V Planning Director ” LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) 1. a) Submittal of a final Landscape and Irrigation Plan in substantial conformance with the conceptual Landscape Plan/Hillside Mitigation Plan for the Planning Director3 approval is required prior to the issuance of a grading permit. b) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall deposit at a financial institution subject to regulation by the state or federal government, a certificate of deposit or letter of credit made out to the City of Carlsbad or such other security which is acceptable to the City. This document shall be for at least twice the estimated cost of the proposed mitigation landscaping. If the proposed mitigation landscaping is not installed in a timely manner, in accordance with the approved plans, the Planning Director may authorize the utilization of these funds to do the necessary remedial work. Any funds remaining after the completion of this work shall be returned to the applicant. c) In addition to erosion control measures, the required landscaping and irrigation systems shown on the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any unit within this project. -12- MITIGATING MECASURES (co&d) 2. The project shall adhere to all requirements in the proposed Master Drainage Plan revision and the National Pollutant discharge elimination system permit pursuant to San Diego Region Water Quality Control Board Order No. $0-42 which may be m-effect at the time of final map. - 3. 4. 5. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading or building pennit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department. The area shown on the project plans as “Area of Native Plant Under-story” shall be preserved in its existing natural condition and be included within an open space lot as shown on the approved exhibits as lot 30. The Final Map, Improvement Plans, and Landscape Planshall be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map design which preserves portions of the existing eucalyptus grove and the conceptual Landscape Plan which indicates areas of the site to be revegetated with eucalyptus species so as to provide long term roosting areas for the monarch butterfly and numerous bird species. The proposed noise mitigation measures recommended in the study titled, “Report on an Acoustical Study, Eagle Canyon, El Camino Real at Camino Hills Drive, Carlsbad, California”, dated May 1, 1990 prepared by James C. Berry and the addendum dated July 10, 1990 shall be completed at the time specified in each measure. The required mitigation measures are as follows: 4 b) cl 4 Grading plans shall not be approved unless they show that noise attenuation for lot 22 shall be achieved by constructing a three foot high supplementary berm along the top of the proposed slope adjacent to El Camino Real, stretching the length of the lot 22 boundary line so as to maintain a 25 foot height differential between the road grade and the top of the barrier. No upstairs balcony facing El Camino Real shall be allowed on the two story house planned for lot 23. This shall be verified at the time building plans are submitted for approval. Prior to recordation of the final tract map or issuance of building permits, whichever is first, the owner shall prepare and record a notice that this property may be subject to impacts from the El Camino Real Transportation Corridor in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (Noise, Form #l). Prior to the recordation of the fmal tract map or the issuance of residential building permits, whichever is first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of this tentative tract/parcel map shall prepare and record a notice (Noise, Form #2) that this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from Palomar Airport in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney. The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (Noise, Form #3). -13- . . I MITIGATING MEASURES (co&d) 7. The project shall be required to modify and up-grade the existing traflic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real and Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive/“A” Street to bring it into conformance with City standards for a four-way intersection. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. /s-ar--9o Date -14- . . . . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3269 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-l AND OS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN CAMINO HILLS DRIVE AND AN AREA APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET NORTH OF THE EXTENSION OF RANCH0 CARLSBAD DRIVE. CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: zc 91-5 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A> That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC 91-5 according to “Exhibit Y” attached hereto and, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .- Findins’ 1. The proposed Zone Change R-l and OS is consistent with all applicable policies and guidelines in the Land Use Element of the General Plan as discus& in the staff report for the project. 2. The proposed change in zoning designation from L-C to R-l and O-S is consistent with the General Plan and will achieve consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as required by State Law and the Land Use Element. 3. The residential uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change to R-l would be compatible with the adjacent existing and permitted future residential land uses. 4. All fidings of the Conditional Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 3268, and m 91-2, Resolution No. 3270 are incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. ABSTAIN: None. i : ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. H%LZMItiER Planning Director PC RESO NO 3269 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3270 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 32 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON A 14.54 ACRE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE. CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: CT 91-2 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: Al That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CT 91-2, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: - . I 1 2 8 9 10 - 11 12 13 14 15 1C 17 1E 19 2c 21 22 22 24 25 26 27 2e Fin-: 1. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of 3.2 du’s/acre is within the density range of 04 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control point of 3.2. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed. 3. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. 4. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School District. 5. 6. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. 7. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. 8. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan. 9. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 3, 1991 and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on July 17, 1991. In approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment. PC PESO NO. 3270 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10. 11. 12. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive treatment of the City’s hillside resources. Conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. . . . . . . . . Approval is granted for CT 91-2, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “X’, dated July 17, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within and adjacent to the project. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. PC PESO NO. 3270 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated February 28, 1990, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated May 25, 1983. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may be required as part of the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. Approval of CT 91-2 is granted subject to the approval of the Conditional Negative Declaration, ZC 91-5, HDP 91-2 and SUP 91-l. PC PESO NO. 3270 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1E 19 2c 21 2i 22 24 2E 26 27 2e 13. 14. 15. 16. The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision and final mylar of this development submitted to the City: “Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land use designation for this development is RLM. The Growth Control Point for this designation is 3.2 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre. Parcels 1 through 30 were used to calculate the intensity of development under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of these parcels must also include parcels 1 through 30 under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.” The applicant shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. The following items shall be included in the CC&R’s: a) Common ownership of Open Space Lots 30, 31 and 32 by the individual owners of Residential Lots 1 through 29. b) Maintenance responsibility for L&s 30,31 and 32. 4 Prohibit development on or alteration of Open Space Lots 30, 31 and 32 except upon the written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department for Ere prevention purposes or upon approval of the Planning director based upon a request fkom the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report from a qualified a&o&/botanist indicating the need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to adjacent habitable units. 4 Require that a uniform fencing design be maintained for the project. The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first. PC RESO NO. 3270 -5 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17. A master plan of the existing onsite trees shall be provided to the Planning Director as part of the final grading plan to determine which trees shall be required to be preserved prior to the issuance of a grading permit or a building permit, whichever occurs first. 18. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 19. Existing onsite trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and/or topped. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the discretion of the Planning Department during the review of a Master Plan submitted showing existing onsite trees. Those trees which are approved for removal shall be replaced on a tree-for-tree basis as required by the Planning Department. 20. The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List. 21. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning Department. 22. Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1 plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall promote water conservation. 23. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been installed as shown on the approved landscape plans. 24. 25. All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 26. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans, improvement plans and grading plans. 27. All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and shall match the grading plans in termS of scale and location of improvements. 28. The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons. PC RESO NO. 3270 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36" blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shah also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan. The total height of all walls, fences, retaining walls, and combination fence/retaining walls in a required setback shall not exceed the following limits: A. In a required front yard setback, the total height shall not exceed 42 inches, (Example - Two 42 inch retaining walls would not be permitted nor a 42 inch retaining wall and another 42 inch fence). B. In a required side and rear vard setback, the total height shall not exceed 6 feet. (Example - A 4 ft. retaining wall and a 5 ft. fence would not be permitted because the total exceeds 6 ft.). C. Upon approval of the Planniug Director, the total height sball not exceed 6 feet in a required street side yard. Otherwise, the total height shall not exceed 42 inches in a street side yard. (This includes all combinations of fences and retaining walls). PC RJZSO NO. 3270 -7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 2c 21 22 22 24 25 26 27 26 35. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing the required mitigation measures. All submittals to the City of Carl&ad to fulfill the conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration shall reference: 1) the project file No. ZC 91-S/(X’ 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-1, 2) the Conditional Negative Declaration’s State Garinghouse No. and, 3) the specific mitigation number listed below. A. B. C. D. 1) Submittal of a final Landscape and Irrigation Plan in substantial conformance with tbe conceptual Landscape Plan/Hi&de Mitigation Plan for the Planning Director% approval is required prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shah deposit at a financial institution subject to regulation by the state or federal government, a certificate of deposit or letter of credit made out to the City of Carlsbad or such other security which is acceptable to the City. This document shall be for a least twice the estimated cost of the proposed mitigation landscaping. If the proposed mitigation laudscaping is not installed iu a timely manner, in accordance with the approved plans, the Planning Director may author&e the utilization of these fuuds to do the necessary remedial work Any fund remaming after the completion of this work shall be returned to the applicant. 3) In addition to erosion control measures, the required landscaping and irrigation systems shown on the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any unit within this project. The project shall adhere to all requirements in the proposed Master Drainage Plan revision and the National Pollutant discharge elimination system permit pursuant to San Diego Region Water Quality Control Board Order No. 9042 whichmaybeineffectatthetimeoffinalmap. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared aud submitted to the City of Carl&ad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard three phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible signii%ant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department. The area shown on the project plans as “Area of Native Plant Understory” shallbepreserv ed in its existing natural condition and be included within an open space lot as shown on the approved exhibits as Lot 30. PCRESON0.3270 -8- . ’ * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E 9 1c 11 12 1: 14 1: 1E l'i 1E 1: 2c 21 22 2: 24 2f 2e 2’i 2E E. The Final Map, Improvement Plans, and Landscape Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map design which preserves portions of the existing eucalypti grove and the Conceptual Landscape Plan which indicates areas of the site to be revegetated with eucalyptus species so as to provide long term mosting areas for the monarch butterfly and numerous bird species. F. The proposed noise mitigation measures recommended in the study titled, “Report on an Acoustical Study, Eagle Canyon, El Camino Real at Camino Hills Drive, Carlsbad, California”, dated May 1,199O prepared by James C. Ekrry and the addendum dated July lo,1990 shall be completed at the time specified in each measure. The required mitigation measures are as follows: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) . . . . Grading plans shall not be approved unless they show that noise attenuation for Lot 22 shall be achieved by constructing a three foot height supplementaxy berm along the top of the proposed slope adjacent to El Camino Real, stretching the length of the Lot 22 boundary line so as to maintain a 25 foot height difkrential between the road grade and the top of the barrier. No upstairs balcony facing El Camino Real shall be allowed on the two story house planned for Lot 23. This shall be verified at the time building plans are submitted for approval. Prior to recordation of the final tract map or issuance of building permits, whichever is first, the owner shall prepare and record a notice that this property may be subject to impacts from the El Camino Real Transportation Corridor in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (Noise, Form #l). Prior to recordation of the final tract map or the issuance of residential building permits, whichever is first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of this tentative tract/parcel map shall prepare and record a notice (Noise, Form #2) that this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of a&raft operating fkom Palomar Airport in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney. The applicant shall post aircmf? noise notification signs in sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (Noise, Foxm #3). PCRESO NO.3270 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 36. 37. 38. 39. G. The project &all be required to modify and up-grade the existing traffic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real and Pancho Carl&ad Drive/‘A” Street to bring it into conformance witb City standards for a four-way intersectioIL The developer shall submit a plan showing the fence design and proposed location for Planning Director approval prior to grading plan approval. A uniform fence design shall be utilized for all residential lots within the project. The fencing shown on the plan for individual residential lots shall be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for each respective unit. This project is approved upon the express condition tbat building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of application for water service and will continue to be available until time of OCCUpl~. Prior to the issuance of grading plans, the project applicant shall receive a Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission that approves development tbat is in substantial conformance with the City approval. Evidence that the permit bas been received shall be submitted to both the Planning and Engineering Departments. Prior to grading plan approval areas of the eucalyptus grove to be preserv dSh2d.l be clearly demarca ted on the grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director. These areas &all be staked in the field by a qualified biologist prior to the issuance of a grading permit. EntieerinE Conditious: 40. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map. 41. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project. 42. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities. 43. This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase. . . . . PC RESO NO. 3270 -lO- . ’ I . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R’s. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of Planning Commission approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the Planning Commission. In approving an extension, the Planning Commission may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code. The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with Master Drainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming Master Drainage Plan Update. The owner of the subject property shall execute a Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project. No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued a grading permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with the approved grading plans. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either amend the tentative map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. PC RESO NO. 3270 -ll- 1 _ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. A’separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chap. 11.06. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. i The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. El Camino Real shall be dedicated by the developer along the project frontage based on a center line to right-of-way width of 63 feet and in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards prior to approval of final map. Direct access rights for all lots abutting El Camino Real shall be waived on the final map. Some improvements shown the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1. The form shah be provided by the City during the improvement plancheck process. PC RESO NO. 3270 -12- . ’ . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1: 14 15 1e 17 1E 19 2c 21 22 2: 24 2: 2e 21 2E 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. .- Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements: A. Full half-street improvements to El Camino Real along the project frontage including the entire 18 foot wide median and required transitions to join the existing pavement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. Modifications and upgrades to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real, Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive and “A” Street to accommodate a four legged intersection including appropriate traffic signing and striping. C. Full half-street improvements to Camino Hills Drive along the properties easterly frontage including required transitions to join the existing pavement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of final map approval and/or improvement plan approval, whichever occurs first. Lots 30, 31 and 32 (open space lots) shall be oHmed “in common” by the owners of the 29 single family home properties, not the Homeowners Association. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining these common area lots and to distriiute the cost of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the units within the Subdivision, Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included within the CC&R’s subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad for an Open Space Easement over Lots 30,31 and 32. The offer &all be made by a certificate on the final map. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutants D&barge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to dkcharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvement shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first. Prior to final map approval the owner shall receive and submit proof to the City of the relinquisbmen~quitclaiming of the 40 foot wide private ingress/egress easement within the project boundary recorded on September 17,1971, Recorder’s File No. 211501. PC RESO NO. 3270 -13- 1 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E 9 1c 13 12 12 14 15 1E 17 1E 1s 2c 23 22 2: 24 2c 2e 23 2E 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. The owner shall provide a one foot wide “blocker strip” along the subdivision boundary at the intersection of “A” Street to deny access to the adjoining property as shown on the tentative map. This one foot “blocker strip” shall also be offered for dedication on the final map and the offer rejected by City Clerk and shah therefore become an irrevocable offer of dedication. Witbin 90 days after tentative map approval for this subdivision, the owner shall dedicate to the City of Carl&ad a temporary slope and grading easement. Said easement shall enable the City to regrade the slope adjacent to El Camino Real to provide for vehicular sight distance. The description of the easement shall be approved by the City Engineer. The existing intersection of Camino Hills Drive at El Camino Real is to be closed and vacated in the future and Camino Hills Drive is to be culde-saced when extended to the south to connect with Faraday Avenue. Therefore, prior to final map approval, the applicant shall provide a surety agreement in an amount and of a type required by Carlsbad Municipal Code to guarantee the ultimate demolition of these portions of Can&o Hills Drive adjacent to the properties easterly boundary as shown on the tentative map. A deed notice shall appear on all grant deeds transferring ownership for all properties within the subdivisions informing buyers of the future closing of Camino Hills Drive at El Camino Real. A note to this effect shall be placed on the final map. This approval is subject to all conditions of approval of Zone 24 Local Facility Management Plan and any amendments thereto. Fire Conditions: 73. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts location of required, proposed and existing hydrants. 74. An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. 75. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site. 76. Brush clearance shah be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clearance plan to the Fire Department for approval. 77. All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. PC RESO NO. 3270 -14- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 2c '21 22 22 24 25 26 27 26 78. Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the developer shall submit to the Fire Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following criteria: n 400'scale n Photo reduction on mylar w At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the map (not a separate vicinity map) n Maps shall include at least the following information: * Street Centerlines * Street Names * Fire hydrant locations G&bad Mu&&al Water District Conditions: 79. 80. 81. 82. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic, landscaping and fire flow demands are met. Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The Developer% engineer shall prepare a water analysis on the project and submit it to the Water Disbrict. PC RESO NO. 3270 -15- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ia 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. ABSTAIN: None. _-. -- ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. I%?LZMIL~ER PMNNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3270 -16- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ia 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION’ RESOLUTION NO. 3271 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 32 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE. CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: HDP 91-2 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823, in the City of ‘Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896, has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July, 1991, consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A> That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of HDP 91-2, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2c 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Findins: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map/hillside development permit exhibit. Undevelopable areas of the project site, such as slopes over 40% have been properly identified on the constraints map/hillside development permit exhibit and were determined to be excluded from the Hillside Development Regulations by Sections 21.95.090(a)(1),(2) and (3). The development proposal and all applicable development approvals and permits are consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements of the J%llside Development Regulations. The finding that no development or grading will occur in those portions of the site which are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 21.53.230(b) can be made as slopes over forty percent were excluded from density calculations as required and were excluded from the Hillside Development Regulations by sections 21.95.090(A)(1)(2) and (3). Grading design minim&s disturbance of hillside areas to the greatest extent possible given the fact that portions of the site have been altered by previously authorized grading and the widening of El Camino Real a Circulation Element Road is required. The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the Hillside Development Guidelines as follows: i: C. d. e. f. iI i. Rounded slopes are proposed in areas. where possible undulating slopes are proposed. Earth berms at the top of slopes are proposed to mitigate noise and visual impacts. Single story units are proposed for Lots 21 and 22 closest to El Camino Real as well as for Lots 1 and 29 at the project entrance. Extensive landscaping is proposed on all manufactured slopes. units wi& in germ-al, screen proposed manufactured slopes but not rise above the horizon. The proposed units provide a varied articulated tile roof. The major slope along El Camino Real will be part of an open space lot with easements and will be maintained by a home owners association. The width of drainage benches on slopes are varied to accommodate landscaping for additional visual screening. PC RESO NO. 3271 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1E 19 2c 21 22 2? 24 25 26 27 2E! 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. - The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of 3.2 du’s/acre is within the density range of 0 - 4 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control point of 3.2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School District. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 3,199l and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on July 17,199l. In approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment. . . . . PC RESO NO. 3271 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1c 11 12 1: 14 15 16 17 1E 19 2c 21 22 22 24 25 26 27 2e 16. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. 17. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. 18. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive treatment of the City’s hillside resources. Conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Approval is granted for HDP 91-2, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “X’, dated July 17, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. Approval of HDP 91-2 is granted subject to the approval of ZC 91-5, CT 91-2, and SUP 91-2. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, ZC 91-5, CT 91-2 and SUP 91-1 are incorporated by refkrence herein. PC PESO NO. 3271 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1e 19 2c 21 22 23 24 25 2t 2’; 2E PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. ABSTAIN: None. ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION Al-I-EST: MICHAEL J. HaZMILrER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3271 -5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3272 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A 32 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: SUP 91-l WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and ’ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Special Use Permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of SUP 91-1, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 2c 21 22 22 24 25 26 27 26 Fi.ndins2s: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The project enhances the scenic qualities of the El Camino Real Corridor consistent with the corridor’s development standards by providing an attractive development which complies with the specified building heights, a minimum building setback of 70 feet aloug El Camino Real, and extensive landscaping which incorporates the theme trees for the corridor. The project protects scenic views and tr&ic safety along El Camino Real by providing attractive buildiugs, performing corrective grading, extensively landscaping proposed slopes, making street improvements along the project’s frontage, and takiug access off of FJ Camino Real at an existing signaked intersectiorL The following findings of Section V of the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards are made to allow cut or fill grading within the setback from El Camino Real to exceed 10 feet from original grade: The limit of 10 feet of cut or fill is feasible given the grading required for the widening of El Camiuo Real with or without the project. b) The use of setbacks, landscaping, and the creation of 2 to 1 slopes will not compromise the scenic qualities of the corridor. The existing slope is barren, scoured and near vertical. 4 The proposed grading is necessary to accommodate the widening of a circulation element road. All pert&rent traBc standards will be met by the project including sight distance requiremems and the deviation will not have an adverse impact on traffic safety. d) The project as proposed has been designed to meet or exceed the intent of the remaining EI Camino Real Corridor Development standards. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of 3.2 du’s/acre is within the density range of O-4 du’s/acre specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control point of 3.2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed. PC RESO NO. 3272 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School District. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 3,1991, and recommended for approval on July 17, 1991. in approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. . . . . PCFESON0.3272 -3- 15. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive treatment of the City’s hillside resources. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for SUP 91-1, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “X”, dated July 17, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. Approval of SUP 91-l is granted subject to the approval of ZC 91-5, CT 91-2, HDP 91-2. 3. Al.l conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, ZC 91-5, CX 91-2 and HDP 91-2 are incorporated by reference herein. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . 1 PC RF60 NO. 3272 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E S 1c 11 12 1: 14 1: 1t 1: 1E 1: 2( 23 2: 2; 24 2f 2t 2: 2E . > , 5 L 5 5 7 3 3 1 L E 5 1 5 5 7 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Saw-y, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. ABSTAIN: None. ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HaLZMIttER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3272 -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ia 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3282 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAIUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 24 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF CAMINO HILLS DRIVE. APPLICANT: EAGLE CANYON CASE NO: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 24(A) WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and performance standards for public facilities, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 and 9829 implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citizens of Carlsbad, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to an amendment to the Open Space Exhibit as well as related text of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: Al That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of the amendment to the Open Space exhibit and related text for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 24, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: /I Findings: That the amendment to the open space exhibit and related text for the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 will not preclude the zone from meeting the Open Space Performance Standard. 2. That the amendment to the Jocal Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 is consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad’s General Plan. 3. That the amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 is consistent with Section 21.90 of the G&bad Municipal Code (Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. 4. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 3, 1991. 9 Conditions: 10 a 1. Approval is granted for an amendment to the Open Space Exhibit and related text changes to the Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 24 as on Exhibit “Z” dated July 17,1991, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. 11 12 13 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla&ng l4 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, by the 15 16 17 la II 19 20 21 22 following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble and Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Schrm- .--- .I_ ABSTAIN: None. P ! s : ‘V ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson 23 CARLSBAD PL,ANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 24 25 nr Gw Ij PLANNING DIRECTOR 27 28 PC RESO NO. 3282 -2- EXHIBIT “2” dated July 17, 1991 ZONE 24’LFMP AMENDMENT - TABLE OF CHANGES CHAPTER 1 PAGE 1 CHANGED INFORMATION Introduction Build Out 24 27 Changed Open Space boundaries to reflect City General Plan Changed boundaries and associated acreage on OS-l and added RLM-8 to Constraints Map. Changed Summary to reflect new Exhibit 10 Build Out 28 Changed Exhibit 10 to reflect change in Land Uses (ie RLM-8 and OS-l) (Added footnote of exdanation) Build Out I I 33 Changed Exhibit 12 to reflect addition of RLM-8 and associated acreage (Added footnote of exolanation) Build Out I I 34 Updated Exhibit 13 to reflect addition of RLM-8 and associated Build Out DU Projections (Added footnote of exolanation) Build Out I I 35 Updated Exhibit 14 to reflect additioi of RLM-8 Ad associated Build Out Population Projections (Added footnote of explanation) Phasing 39 Updated p. 3 of Exhibit 15 to reflect phasing of additional Dus generated by RLM-8 for Zone 24 and Totals of Adopted LFMPs (Added footnote of explanation) Phasing 41 Updated Exhibit 16 to reflect phasing of additional Dus generated by RLM-8 for Zone 24 and Totals of Adopted LFMPs (Added footnote of exolanation) Phasing I I 42 Updated Exhibit 17 to reflect additional Dus generated by RLM-8 for Zone 24 and Totals of Adopted LFMPs (Added footnote of explanation) Administrative Facilities 45 Updated Projected Population, Pe$ormance Standard Demand, and Zone 24 Build Out year to reflect new totals and Phasing Schedule due to the addition of 32 Dus in RLM-8 Administrative Facilities 49 Updated Exhibit 19 to reflect new Phasing Schedule, DU totals, Population Increases, and Adopted Phasing Adequacy Analysis due to the additional 32 Dus generated in RLM-8 Library Facilities 52 Updated Projected Population, Performance Standard Demand, and Zone 24 Build Out year to reflect new totals and Phasing Schedule due to the addition of 32 Dus in RLM-8 Library Facilities 57 Updated Exhibit 22 to reflect new Phasing Schedule, DU totals, Population Increases, and Adopted Phasing Adequacy Analysis due to the additional 32 Dus generated in RLM-8 1 additional 32 Dus generated in RLM-8 (added footnote to explain new Updated Exhibit 44 to show new Open Space boundaries and totals (due to Eagle Canyon Development and revised Evan’s Point Open Space Changed Performance Standard acreage for Zone 24 Build Out, change amount of Required Future Open Space, amount of Provided Future gs to reflect how much Open future and Build Out Projections for Elementary, Junior H.S. and Dus and Student population to reflect an additional 32 units 2 APPLILATION COMPLETE DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1991 STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: I. JULY 17,199l PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-1iLFMP 87-24(A) - EAGLE CANYON - Request for approval of a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and O-S, a Tentative Tract Map to create 29 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 3 open space lots totaling 6.13 acres on a 14.54 acre site, a Hillside Development Permit, a Special Use Permit required by the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, and an Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24, located on the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive, in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3268 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No.‘s 3269,3270,3271, 3272, and 3282 RECOMMEND ING APPROVAL of ZC 91-5, CT 91-2, HDP 91-2, SUP 91-1, and LFMP 87-24(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECF DESCRIFTION AND BACKGROUND The project includes a Zone Change from L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (One-Family Residential) and O-S (Open Space). The intent and purpose of the L-C Zone is to provide an interim zone for areas where planning for future land uses has not been completed or plans of development have not been formalized. The only permitted uses under the L-C Zone are those permitted by the E-A (Exclusive Agricultural) Zone. No conditional uses are permitted in the L-C Zone. The proposed Zone Change would designate the portion of the site subject to the RLM (Low-Medium Density, 04 DU/AC) General Plan Designation as R-l and that portion specified as O-S (Open Space) on the General Plan Land Use Map as O-S. ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991, ' PAGE 2 The project consists of 29 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet as required by the proposed R-l Zone. The average residential lot size proposed is 8,724 square feet. Three open space lots are also proposed. Open space Lot 30 contains 1.58 acres and encompasses a part of the eucalyptus grove to be preserved along the western boundary. This lot is presently designated as RLM by the General Plan. Open space Lot 31 contains 2.98 acres and contains the slopes to be created along the eastern boundary of the site as a result of the widening of El Camino Real as well as portions of the existing eucalyptus grove to be maintained. Open space Lot 32 totals 1.57 acres located on the north side of proposed Street “A” which would be an extension of the existing Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive. This lot also contains portions of the eucalyptus grove to be maintained as well as preserving the natural drainage pattern to allow for the continued viability of the riparian area located on the adjacent property to the north. The three open space lots total 6.13 acres. i . The project is proposed at a density of 3.17 dwelling units per acre. This density was determined from the constraints map/slope analysis prepared for the project. The slope analysis indicates that 2.205 acres are in 25 to 40 percent slopes and therefore only receive 50 percent credit for density calculations. A total of 0.6 acres of the site are in slopes over 40 percent which receive no credit. In addition, approximately 4.21 acres are designated as General Plan Open Space. As a result a total of only 9.144 acres of the 14.54 acre site can be utilized to calculate the density for the project. The site has previously been disturbed by grading associated with the construction of El Camino Real a prime arterial on the Circulation Element of the General Plan as well as Camino Hills Drive. The site appears to be largely at or near natural grades but was disturbed by discing in order to plant the existing eucalyptus grove. The applicant is requesting that exclusions specified in section 21.95.090 of the Hillside Development Regulations be determined to be applicable to the project. The exclusions will be explained in the section of this report on the Hillside Development Regulations. Consistent with the proposed R-l zoning 29 single family residences will be constructed. The units are a contemporary Spanish-mediterranean style with stucco exteriors complimented by brick and stone veneer, stucco molding and quoins, scored stucco, divided light windows, and tile roofs. Four unit plans are proposed with each having an “A” and “B” front elevation. Both two and three car garages are proposed with the majority of the garage doors being oriented away from the street scene. Plan one is a single story 2,316 square foot unit with a maximum height of 14 feet 9 inches measured to the midpoint of the roof. Seven plan one units are proposed. Plan two is a single story 2,508 square foot unit with a maximum height of 14 feet measured to the midpoint of the roof. Eight plan two units are proposed. Plan three is a two story 2,730 square foot unit with a maximum height of 22 feet 9 inches measured to the midpoint of the roof. Eight plan three units are proposed. Plan four is also a two story unit however it contains 3,137 square feet. Plan four has a maximum height of 23 feet measured to the midpoint of the roof. Six plan four units are proposed. . ’ ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP L1-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 ’ PAGE 3 An amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 is proposed due to an error in the original open space map for the zone plan. The proposed amendment will be explained in the Growth Management section of this report. The proposed project is subject to the following standards and policies: a) Low-Medium Density Residential (RLM) and Open Space (O-S) General Plan Designations b) Limited Control (L-C) Zone - (a zone change to R-l is proposed) cl The Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20, and the State Map Act 4 Hillside Development Regulations d El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards for Area 3 0 Scenic Corridor Guidelines g) Interim Open Space Ordinance h) The Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24 The site’s previous owner was the YMCA of San Diego County. That organization used the property as a primitive camp site at one time. Adjacent land uses to the property consist of undeveloped property to the north and west where the single family residential Evans Point project is currently proposed, the Ranch0 Carlsbad Mobilehome Park and golf course to the east, and the Camino Hills Mobilehome Park, a single family residence and undeveloped property to the south. III. WYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the proposed project comply with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan and the Low-Medium Density Residential and Open Space Classifications? 2. Is the proposed Zone Change consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the sites proposed land use designation? 3. Would the uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change be compatible with the surrounding land uses? . L iC 91-5/m 91-2/HDP >I-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 ’ PAGE 4 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Does the proposed Tentative Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act? Can the findings required to grant a Hillside Development Permit be made (Sec. 21.95.030) including identifying Exclusions (21.95.090) applicable to the project? Is the project in conformance with the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards for Area 3? Does the project comply with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines? Are the requirements of the Interim Open Space Ordinance applicable to the project? Is the proposed project consistent with the Mello II Segment of Carlsbad’s Local Coastal Program? Is the project in conformance with the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 241 DISCUSSION GENERAL PLAN The proposed project complies with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The project will retain open space and has been designed to preserve areas of the existing eucalyptus grove although it is a non-native species with limited habitat value. Property will be dedicated along the east boundary of the site for the widening of El Camino Real to its ultimate width consistent with its prime arterial classification as indicated in the Circulation Element. The project also complies with the General Plan designations applicable to the site. The project site is designated on the General Plan Map as RLM and O-S. Those areas of the site designated as RLM are proposed to be zoned R-l while areas designated as O-S would be zoned O-S. As delineated on the Tentative Map open space lots are being created to help assure the preservation of those areas. Lot 30 which is not designated as General Plan Open Space will be subject to an open space easement. ZONE CHANGE The proposed Zone Change will change the zoning from L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (One- Family Residential) and O-S (Open Space) on this 14.54 acre site. The proposed zones correspond with the existing General Plan designations. Approximately 4.21 acres will be L ‘ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP z I-2/SUP 91 -l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 * PAGE 5 zoned O-S with the remaining 10.31 acres zoned R-l. Under the “General Guidelines” section of the Land Use Element, item 10 indicates that zoning should be made consistent with the General Plan. The proposed R-l and O-S Zones implement the existing General Plan designations and will achieve consistency between the General Plan and zoning. The existing L-C Zone is an interim zone intended only to be in place until planning for future land uses has been completed or development plans have been formalized. The proposed zone change is therefore appropriate at this time. The type of development allowed by the R-l Zone is compatible with the existing and proposed adjacent residential land uses. The design of this project and the adjacent Evans Point project have been coordinated especially in regard to circulation and open space. All standards of the R-l Zone have been met as demonstrated in the following table: REQUIRED PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT I 35 feet maximum I 14-23 feet to the midpoint LOT COVERAGE I 40% I 21% - 33% FRONT YARD SETBACK 1 20 feet I 20 feet minimum LOT SIZE LOT WIDTH 7,500 sq. ft. 60 feet 8,724 sq. ft. average 60 feet PARKING I Two-car garage I Two & three car garages All lots meet the minimum required side and rear yard setbacks which are a function of the proposed lot widths. TENTATIVE MAP The proposed Tentative Map will create 29 residential lots having a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet as required by the zone and 3 open space lots out of this 14.54 acre property. All residential lots front on streets offered for dedication. The minimum lot width of 60 feet and depth of 90 feet are also complied with. Side and rear lot lines are located along the top of manmade slopes where practicable. The proposed street plan has been coordinated with the project proposed on the adjacent property to the north and west. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Portions of the project site have been previously graded as a result of the construction of El Camino Real and Camino Hills Drive. The site was also disced at one time as part of the planting of the eucalyptus grove. The project proposes grading in the amount of L ‘ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP z I-~/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 . approximately 81,000 cubic yards of cut and 84,500 cubic yards of fill. A total of 3,500 cubic yards of import are necessary. As a result the project grading totals 7,655 cubic yards of grading per acre which is within the acceptable range pursuant to the Hillside Development and Design Standards. Contour grading is proposed in many areas primarily where the altered site areas blend into those portions of the site that will not be disturbed. The proposed units also comply with the hilltop architecture standards. Building pads closest to El Camino Real will be screened in part from view as a result of the proposed slopes and the elevation of the proposed lots. The project proposes grading of slopes over 40 percent. These areas are exempt from the provisions of the Hillside Development Regulations pursuant to section 21.95.090. The areas involved are mainly previously manufactured slopes created by the construction of El Camino Real and Camino Hills Drive, along with minor isolated areas which are not part of the surrounding generalized slope. These isolated pockets are less than 15 feet in height and less than 4,000 square feet in area. In addition, slope areas are proposed which will exceed a height of 30 feet. These areas which are adjacent to El Camino Real or a direct result of the road widening are excluded from the requirements of the Hillside Development Regulations as it is a result of the widening of El Camino Real, a circulation element roadway. Areas where circulation element roadways must be placed and no feasible alternative is available may be excluded from the standards. The findings required to grant a Hillside Development Permit can be made. EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The project complies with the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards for Area 3 with the exception of the grading standard. That standard limits cut or fill within the setback from El Camino Real to 10 feet from original grade unless a variance to the standard is approved as identified in Section V of the standards. The project complies with all other standards by proposing building heights within the required limits, compliance with the specified setbacks, and preserving or replacing portions of the eucalyptus grove around the project perimeter to achieve a rural residential character. Because of site conditions described previously a deviation to the grading standard is proposed. Practical application of the grading standard is not feasible nor in the interest of good planning practice for this site. The following are the proposed findings to grant the deviation request: The limit of 10 feet of cut or fill is infeasible given the grading required for the widening of El Camino Real with or without the project. b) The use of setbacks, landscaping, and the creation of 2 to 1 slopes will not compromise the scenic qualities of the corridor. The existing slope is barren, scoured and near vertical. ” ’ ‘ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP . I-~/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 ’ PAGE 7 ’ 4 The proposed grading is necessary to accommodate the widening of a circulation element road. All pertinent traffic standards will be met by the project including sight distance requirements and the deviation will not have an adverse impact on traffic safety. d) The project as proposed has been designed to meet or exceed the intent of the remaining El Camino Real Corridor Development standards. SCENIC CORRIDOR GUIDELINES The project complies with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines. The theme tree, London Plane, is proposed to front El Camino Real and the interior project streets. Eucalyptus trees will be planted on the slope adjacent to the roadway as well as around the project perimeter as it is the support tree for the corridor. Proposed units will be setback a significant distance from the roadway and will be screened in part by the topography. INTERIM OPEN SPACE ORDINANCE The Interim Open Space Ordinance is not applicable to this project. The size or environmental quality of open space as shown on the map titled, “Comprehensive Open Space Network Map, City of Carlsbad” dated August 9, 1989 is not being affected. The Planning Director has determined the boundaries of the General Plan Open Space on the property to be as shown on the Constraints Map for the project. The area to be dedicated by the project as the result of the widening of El Camino Real is presently shown on the General Plan Map and therefore does not represent a reduction in the area of open space. The project can however meet the requirements of each of the findings of the ordinance even though they do not apply. An additional 1.52 acres will be made open space as shown on Exhibit “H”. The proposed new open space contains portions of the eucalyptus grove as well as an area of native plant understory. The acreage is contiguous to property to be left as open space by the Evans Point project proposed immediately adjacent to the west. A further discussion of open space is included under the growth management section of this report. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM The project site is subject to the requirements of the Mello II Segment of Carlsbad’s Local Coastal Program. The project as proposed is consistent with all development and resource preservation policies applicable to the site. The project site only contains one small area of native vegetation which will be preserved as part of open space Lot 30. A project mitigation measure requires the project to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit pursuant to San Diego Region Water Quality Control Board Order No. 9042 which may be in effect at the time of final map. The project will require a Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. - ‘ZC 91 -S/CT 91-2/HDP ‘/ A-2/SUP 91 -l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17, 1991 . PAGE 8 GROWTH MANAGEMENT The subject property is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 24. The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted performance standards are sununarized below: FACILITY IMPACTS COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS City Administrative Facilities 107.48 Yes Library 57.36 Yes Wastewater Treatment Capacity 29 EDU Yes Parks .2149 Acres Yes Drainage N/A Yes See Discussion Below Circulation 290 ADT Fire Station 5 Yes Schools Yes 14.5 Students 29 Sewer Collection System Yes 6380 Yes Water Distribution System Open Space 3.871 AC See Discussion Below The Zone 24 Plan, adopted on November 16, 1988, identified improvements needed by 1990. The improvements consist of the construction of Cannon Road from El Camino Real west to Interstate 5 and the installation of traffic signals at the Cannon Road/I-S northbound and southbound intersections. The project has been conditioned upon these required improvements being financially guaranteed prior to Final Map approval. The required improvements apply to the other property owners within this zone as well as adjacent facilities management zones. OPEN SPACE Exhibit 44 in the Zone 24 Plan shows existing and future open space acreage. On this exhibit the entire project site is indicated in error as being General Plan designated Open Space. The Planning Director based on discussions with the City Attorney has determined . . 'ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP .I-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLECANYON JULY17,1991 . PAGE9 that this interpretation of the General Plan Map is incorrect. The area of the site designated as General Plan Open Space is limited to the area along the northern and eastern area of the property as shown on the project exhibits and previously mentioned. The Growth Management Staff has taken a revised Zone 24 Open Space exhibit to the Open Space Advisory Committee where it received a recommendation of approval. This amendment to the open space section of the zone plan is being processed concurrently with this project. The project is proposing a density of 3.17 du/acre which is below the growth control point for the property. The amendment to the open space map will add 10.2 acres of RLM designated property to the zone and the potential for an additional 32 units were the site to contain no land considered to be undevelopable per Zoning Ordinance Section 21.53.230. The adjacent Evans Point project in the zone is presently being redesigned based on identified mitigation measures in the EIR for that project. That project will be more than 32 units below the number of units allocated to the property in the zone plan. In addition, the “Growth Management Program - Comprehensive Monitoring Report, 1986 through 1990” shows that 986 units are available in the northwest quadrant under the Proposition E Cap due to buildout of the facilities zones under the established cap. As a result correcting the error in this zone plan will not cause the zone or quadrant to exceed the established maximum number of units that can be constructed pursuant to the Growth Management Program. The revised Exhibit “44” for the zone plan shows that the open space performance standard for the zone will be met. Numerous pages will be revised to update the zone plan to be consistent with this amendment. SUMMARY The project complies with the existing General Plan designation for the site. The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the General Plan and will provide for development which is compatible with adjacent properties. Compliance has been achieved with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, Scenic Corridor Guidelines, Local Coastal Program, and Growth Management. ENvIRoNMENTALREvIEw The Planning Director has determined that the project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the initial study have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration was issued on January 3, 1991. This decision was based on the findings of the Environmental Assessment, Acoustical Study, Biological Reconnaissance, Archaeological Reconnaissance, Preliminary Geotechnical Study, and field review by staff. The majority of the site was previously disturbed to allow for the planting of the eucalyptus grove. No comments have been received following publication of the ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) EAGLE CANYON JULY 17,199l ’ notice declaring that a Conditional Negative Declaration was issued for the project. At a meeting at the adjacent Camino Hills Mobilehome Park attended by staff numerous persons expressed a desire to see that the entire eucalyptus grove be preserved. The environmental determination was sent to the State Clearinghouse for review. At the end of the 30 day review period no state agencies had any comments. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Z: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3268 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3269 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3270 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3271 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3272 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3282 Location Map Background Data Sheet Disclosure Form Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form Exhibits “A” - ‘X’, dated July 17, 1991 r- :yj r&N UP) c ::::.:...:. p, ::::::... ” j;;j:j:;:;. >. :::::::. M .., ._ ” ::::::: . ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ....... ......... ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... ....... ......... ......... ...... ........ .......... ......... ul 0 1 I i i i a : ,- E 2 I i i i i i i i il i ! ,L -\ I -- i --.--- ; l \. E” ; ‘7 \ N . i i f? j ” .i 5 2 i 3 i i f !‘,‘-y !’ f7 .:..;,& ’ - -7 i. t ; H :-I a ......... ........... ......... ::.::: ........ ....... ........ ....... ...... ......... ...... ......... ........ ........ ......... ......... jj c::.nJ ::z:: c ::l.‘- 0’. “‘C ;;z; 5 ;j aJx3:: :: m ..a :: I=:: *. :: m;:-; jjz;;; .. v) ....... 1: Q,::::::: .. .;. ...... ... _ ....... .. _ ..... : : .u : : ;i : ifs;;? ............ . ::3;: p).: :: “.: c:’ :: 0’: 0 : ::d.:N ......... .......... ........... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ .......... ............ ............ .......... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ .............. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ I :::::::::::_ .i Ii ! ! I --._ I 1 i -'-.- '7 E" \ ?J . P I -0 i -0c. .I 4*c, I II _/ I ,'I ? 2 ij i, I ,;’ -8O, j ,,:,i if oli 7 i I’,‘.- i i ! 5r’i - *-5. . i ,’ w” \ I -.-. , ; . I +I cn i O i i -. i i i i tz .- 5 ‘1 1 i) i .I i > i r2 i [I’.; i _h ,, ‘. i i I jl i i 1 i I j I r ! i ).) ./ l )’ I. j #’ 4 ‘, n y/i! ‘, ‘0 .’ a 0 I I I * . 5 lE% i EXHIBIT 10 I- I- I- I I I I- I- I- I= I- I I I= I ZONE 24 - LFMP BUILD OUT PROJBCITONS - CONBIUAINTB ANALYSIS (AS OF lflJ98) --I- --- --I_ ------___-_ I I- ACRBS OF DBVELOPMBNTAL CONSIRAINTS (1) I I ---- GENERALPLAN 1 , GROSS!- PULL 1 PARTIAL , ScHWii I NET LAND USE ---.I ---j DEVELOPABLE 1 DESIGNATION 1 ACRBS 1 A B C D E P G H IIl’3TALl J m I K I ACRES I RL-1 I 38.7 , 6.9 I 6.9 , 6.6 3.3431 I 28.50 / ---- -----m--s RL TOTAL I 3a7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 6.9 I 6.6 3.30 , 0.0 1 2aso , .--v ------ RLM-1 I 89.4 1 1.0 03 9.0 I 10.3 I 85 4.23 , 74.65 ( RLM-2 0.8 I 0.0 1 0.2 0.10 I I 0.70 , RLM-3 (2) RLM-4 (2) I 9.3 I 0.1 I 0.1 I 0.1 0.0s , 9.35 1 2961 0.0 1 0.08 , RLM-S 5.0 1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1 0.0s 1 I 29.60 1 4s 1 RLM-6 5.0 I I 0.8 I 0.2 0.10 I I 4.90 I 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.7 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RM-1 (2) I =I I 0.0 , 0.3 0.15 I I 2.35 j RIM TOTAL I 23 1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 , 03 0.15 I 0.0 1 2.35 i .a1111 TOTALRBS I T 0.0 1.0 0.0 7.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 17.6 I 163 ais I 0.0 , il I I-I-I--P- j$&g$ -IUIUIllPPI-lYIll=---*~l I =I~NG I I I I “““““““““““““““““““” MAJOR i i i I ARlERIAL(3) I 5.4 I 5.4 5.4 I 0.00 I .- -III-- TOTALZONB ( l 0.0 6.4 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , I 16.3 ais 1 0.0 , - --I NOTES: (1) CONSIRAINTBz A - MAJOR POWBRLINEBASBMBNT E - RIPARIAN B - CIRCULATION P-WETLANDS C - RAILROAD ROW G-PLOODPLAIN . D-SLOPRS.40% H - PBRMANBNTBDDY OF WAlER (2) AREAS WITH EXlSllNO LAND USBS (SBB EXHIBIT 11). VWm---m- VI---__-_ I - OTHER BNVIR. FEATURE J-SLoPBs23%TO40% K - SCHOOL SllE OVERLAY . 28 __ ExHmrr 12 I I- I CXVEUPING STATUS GEN PIAN ----------------------------------------------------. LWD USE 1 GROSS; m-1 PROJECT 1 APPLICATION I TENTATIVE 1 ema I BUILDING 11 TUTAL 1 EXISTING DESIGNATION 1 ACRES 1 m=I ACXESI SUBMW'L4L IAPPROVAL 1 MAPI PERhms I I I (1) .----------_~____----1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RL-1 I 38.71 cra6-1 I 36.7 1 nl I I I I ni --_-_-__________----I-----_---------------I----------------___--------------------------------------------- RLTOTAL I 38.7 1 I 36.7 1 ni I I I I ni 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RLh4-1 RLM-2 RLh4-3 RIM-4 RLM-S RLhi-6 Cl’86-1 I I 166 I I I 1 1 112 I RLMTOTAL I I I 09.4 1 186 I I I I I 166 I 114 RM-1 1 25 I I I I I I II I 1 ------------------------------- -------------mm- ---------- - ----- - --------- -- ----------- - -------_ -- RMTOTAL I 25 I I 01 01 I I II 01 1 ~11111111111~11111**uIIIIIII*IIII~uII~I~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~*~~~~*~**~11111111*~**~*111~1~1*11*1~~*1111 TDTALRJS I I I 128.lI 2631 I I I I 263 I 11s 33 . . EXHIBIT 13 ZONE 24 - LFMP RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTiONS (AS OF l/1/%8) I I 1 BASE I IG-=I 1 RESIDENTIAL I I I I LANDUSE I NET 1 GMCP I BUILDOUT 1 EXIST. I APP. I DESIGNATION I ACR= I (1) 1 PROJECTIONS I DU’S I DU’S RL-1 I 2850 1 1.0 I 281 I I 28 j ------------------------------------------------------------------- I RL TOTAL I 2850 1 I 281 01 01 281 ------------------------------------------------------------------- I RLM-1 I 74.65 1 3.2 I 239 I 11 I 238 I RLM-2 0.70 1 3.2 1 21 11 1 I RLM-3 I 935 1 3.2 I W I t 30 I RLM-4 29.80 1 3.2 I 95 I 112 I RLM-5 I 4.85 I 3.2 I 15 I I I (7 RLM-6 I 4.90 1 3.2 I 16 I 1 I 16 I RLM-7 I I I I ----------------------------------------------------------- -RLE~~~~~~-__! !---“41------o_! RM-1 I 235 1 6.0 1 14 I 1 I I 13 I i RMTOTAL I 235 1 I 14 I 1 I 01 13 i i TOTALRES I I I I 115 I 01 t’ 3.1 NOTES: L 34 EXHlBm 14 - ZDNB 24 BUM OUC FOPtHATKX4 PRQlgcllo Ns(As0Plm8) ----------___--------___I________________----------------------------------------------------------------. , RLTOTAL 1 =I 01 01 alI II 01 01 @I 69 I / u-1 I 239 I 1 Wll 2.4511 21 01 588 I 590 I I I Eli-: 21 1 3011 111 2.4n 2471 1 I 21 01 01 RLL4 I 2; 74 31 I 74 51 I , 112 (2; I 2.4n i 2711 I 001 ‘::‘I 237 , , RLM-5 1s I 2.4n I 37 I , FUM-6 I 16 I i 16 I I 2.m I 39 I 39 I / RMTCYTAL I 14 I 11 I 13 I I II 21 0 , P llllllllllllPI -lllll.llillllllllll ] TOTALRES I 11s , 0 I 2.471 i i Ml 0 35 - ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........ ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ~.- CASE NO: ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON APPLICANT: THE CAMINO GROUP REQUEST AND LOCATION: ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-l & OS, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 29 RESIDENTIAL AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS, A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN CAMINO HILLS DRIVE AND AN AREA APPROXIMATELY 230 NORTH OF THE EXTENSION OF RANCH0 CARLSBAD DRIVE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF LOT F OF RANCH0 AGUA HEDIONDA ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 823 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON NOVEMBER 16.1896. APN: 212-050-40 Acres 14.54 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 32 LOTS/29 UNITS (Assessois Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RLM & OS Density AIIowed 0 - 3.2 DU/AC Density Proposed 3.17 DU/AC Existing Zone L-C Proposed Zone R-l & OS Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on CarIsbad’s Zoning Requirements) zonirlq Land Use Site L-C VACANT North L-C/RMHP VACANT/Kelly Barn & Grain Bin South L-C/RMHP SFIUMOBILE HOME PARK East RMHP/L-C RANCH0 CARLSBAD MHP & GOLF COURSE West L-C VACANT PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad EDU’s 29 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated FEBRUARY 28.1990 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT x Negative Declaration, issued JANUARY 3.1991 - Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, DN:lh . .- . . . DISCLOSURE STATEMENT I 1 APPlJCAM’S STATEMENT OF DlSCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE I DtSCRETlONARY AC7ION ON TM PAaT Ot WG Cl-t-Y COUNCIL. OR ANY APPOtNTED BOARD, COMMlSSlON OR CoM~rl-r~~, (Please Pm) The following information must be disclosed: Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. - a rallf. Tnvestments . Inc. a Calif. General partnerswosed CorDoration as to a 30% of: William H. Fairchild interest. and Jenay Fairchild H/W as to a 50% int., Old Salt Co., A Nevada Corp., as to a 20% 2. - o,&pterest and Corder0 List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved William and Jenay Fairchild Corder0 Investments Inc. 1558-A Summit Avenue 5050 Avenida Encinas Cardiff, CA 92007 Suite 160 Old Salt Co., Inc. Carlsbad, CA 92008-4371 140 Lomas Sante Fe Drive, Ste.103 Solana Beach, CA 92075 3. If any person iden,tified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names am addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnershr interest in the partnership. . . Old Salt Co.. A Nevada Cna Corder0 Investments, Inc. Allen Cook Jim W. Anderson, Pres. Thatcher Threlkeld James-B. McInnis, Sr., Vice Pres Lynn Lawrence, Vice Pres/Sec. Manley Bland, Jr., Vice PreS. 4. If any person idWikd pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organitation or a trust, list the names an addresses of any person sewing as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficlar of the trust. FFtMooo13 am 2075 Las Palmas Drive l Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 436-l 161 r .- ‘\ - \ . . * D~~C~OSWI Statement (Over) Psg?t 2 5. Have you had more than $250 horth Of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes __ No XX, If yes, please indicate person(s) I I I PIWWI il drfinrd U: ‘Any Individual. firm. copartnrrrhlp. joint vrnturr. reroclatlon, aociml club. fratarnrl organiz.tlon, corporrt~on~ ,,t,,,, I,~,,, WCW*~. Wdle&t4. tM md W other county, city And county, city municipality. dlrtrict or other p&tlcaj )ubdlviaion, o, my o,he, g,oup o, combmatlon Ming &i( 4 unit.’ L I (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) Print or type name of owner THE Print of type name of applicant FRMoo13 8/90 - - . I CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FAcILlTTES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) * PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: EAGLE CANYON - ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2,‘SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 24 GENERAL PLAN: RLM & OS ZONING: L-C (R-l & OS Pronosed) DEVELOPER’S NAME: THE CAMINO GROUP ADDRESS: 1558-A SUMMIT AVENUE, CARDIFF BY THE SEA, CA 92007 PHONE NO.: (619) 436-2637 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 212-050-40 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 14.54 AC. 29 DU ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: I A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 107.48 B. Library: Demand in.Square Footage = 57.36 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 29 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .2149 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 290 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = s H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - 3.871 I. Schools: 14.5 Students (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 29 Identify Sub Basin - 24A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD - 6380 L. The project is .09 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. DN:lh - MINUTES co idered three different site designs and they feel the \ pres t location is the best of the three designs. ‘\a Chairman olmes opened the public testimony and issued the invitation k~, speak. Mark Mucci, Joseph Wong Design Associates, 2359 Fourth Avenue, San Diego;- addressed the Commission and requested approval of the project. He stated that he was available to answer questions. There being no other perso)ls~ desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Conrmission members. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3276 a‘pproving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director'and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3277, 3278 and 3279 approving CT 90-28, CP 90-7, and HDP 90-41, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 7) ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) - EAGLE CANYON - Request for approval of a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and O-S, a Tentative Tract Map to create 29 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 s.f. and 3 open space lots totaling 6.13 acres on a 14.54 acre site, a Hillside Development Permit, a Special Use Permit required by the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, and an Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24, located on the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive, in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 24. Don Neu, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the proposed project consists of a zone change to acconanodate 29 single family residences. The average lot size proposed is 8,724 s.f. Three open space lots totaling 6.13 acres are also proposed to preserve the existing eucalyptus grove and the natural drainage pattern serving the riparian area located on the adjacent property to the north. The units are a contemporary spanish- mediterranean style with stucco exteriors complimented by brick and stone veneer and tile roofs. A majority of the garage doors will be side loading. Four floor plans are proposed , of which 52% will be single-story and 48% will be two story. An amendment to LFMP 24 is also requested due to an error in the original open space map for that zone plan. Using an overhead, Don Neu described the requested zone change and the amendment to LFMP 24. The site's previous owner was the YMCA of San Diego County. That organisation used the property as a primitive camp site at one time. Adjacent land uses to the proposed project consist of undeveloped property to the north and west where the single family residential Evans Point project is currently proposed, the Ranch0 Carlsbad Mobilehome Park and golf course to the east, and the Camino Hills Mobilehome Park, a single family residence, and undeveloped property to the south. The project complies with the existing General Plan designation for the site. The proposed zoning designation is \ 7 July 17, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 13 COMMISSIONERS Erwin Hall Holmes Noble Savary Schlehuber MINUTES \ a July 17, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 14 COMMISSIONERS consistent with the General Plan and will provide for development which is compatible with adjacent properties. The project complies with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, Scenic Corridor Guidelines, Local Coastal Program, and Growth Management. Staff recommends approval. Commissioner Erwin inquired if the open space is shown on the City's open space map and whether or not that open space map is unchangeable. Don Neu replied that some of the proposed open space is shown on the City's Open Space Map. An additional area of open space is being added to the present amount. No amendment to the City's Open Space Map is being proposed; however, if the findings of the Interim Open Space Ordinance can be made, the map can be amended. Commissioner Erwin inquired if the total open space area is shown on the map. Don Neu replied that the additional area of open space being proposed is not currently shown on the map. Chairman Holmes opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Jack Henthorn, 5431 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, representing the applicant, a ddressed the Commission and stated that he feels the open space issue has been resolved. He concurs with the staff report and recommendations. Ronald Schwab, 5200 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, representing the Ranch0 Carlsbad Homeowner's Association, addressed the Commission and stated that after talking with Mr. Henthorn and reviewing the maps and staff recommendations, it appears that the property owner and staff have made the very best use of a very difficult piece of property. Based on that, he can support the project. He further stated that Mr. Henthorn has agreed to present the proposed project at a Ranch0 Carlsbad homeowner's meeting. He complimented the developer and stated that he believes the proposed project will result in a very fine development. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Conomission members. Coaaaissioner Schlehuber commented that this project and the open space issue have been reviewed very carefully by the Open Space Cormaittee and he can accept the project as proposed. He is especially happy about the side-loading garages. Connnissioner Erwin can support the project. He is glad to see some single story homes in the project. He thinks it is a good project but he doesn't like the small side yard setbacks and the small back yards. Nevertheless, he will support it. Commissioners Savary, Noble, Hall, and Chairman Holmes can all support the staff recommendation. - MINUTES \ ? July 17, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 15 COMMISSIONERS Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3268 recommending approval of the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3269, 3270, 3271, 3272, and 3282 recommending approval of ZC 91-5, CT 91-2, HDP 91-2, SUP 91-1, and LFMP 87-24(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. e, Assistant Planning Director, announced that there report on the'Airport Business Center to the July 31st meeting. He added that the Building Height will be renoticed and, in addition\ copies of the meeting notice have been sent to all those who k,equested it at the previous hearing. Staff has also met with aware of the nquired if the St. Francis item will need to be renoticed. replied that the St. by staff. The public hearing portion will be greatly abbreviated to alleviate hearing things which have already been said. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion, the meeting of July 17, 1991 was adjourned at 8~40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL HOLZMILLHR Planning Director BETTY BUCKNER Minutes Clerk MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL TBE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. Erwin Hall Holmes Noble Savary Schlehuber Erwin Hall Holmes Noble Savary Schlehuber . Carlsbad Journal . Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication I STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk- of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of loca1 news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC ‘HEARING EAGLE CANYON ZC Bl-S/CT WZJHDP 91-Y notice hereinafter referred to; and that the SUP gl-IILFMP 67-24(A) hive, in the Coastal Zoae and Lot- al Facilities Management Zone 24. and more particularly described ~. &ortionofLotFofRanehoAgua notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Hadionda, in the City of Carlsbad. the City Council of the City of Carlk County of San Diego, State of Cali- and entire issue of said newspaper and not bad will hold a public hearing at fornia, according to Map No. 823. the City Council Chambers, 1200 filed in the Office of the County Re- in any supplement thereof on the follow- Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly corder of on November 16.1898. Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, Ifyou have any questions regard- ing dates, to-wit: ingthis matter, please call Don Neu I atSzWp.m., on Tuesday, September 17.1931, to consider an applieation in the Planning Department at 43E for a Zone Change Tom L-C to R-l 1101, extension 4446 and 0-S. a Tentative Tract Pap to ’ IfyouchallengetheZoneChange, create 23 residential lots with a Tentative Map, Hillside Develop- September 05 192 ! minimum lot area of 7,300 square ment Permit, Special Use Permit feet and 3 open space lots totaling and/or Local Facilities Manage- 6.13 aeresona 14.34acresite;a Hill- ment Plan Amendment In court, 19- : side Development Permit; a Spe- you may be limited to raising only cial Use,Permit required by the El those issues raised t you or some- one else at the public hearing de- 19- Camfno Real Corridor Develop ment Standards; and an Amend- rlibed in this “Otii, or in written ment to the Local Facilities Man- correspondence delivered to the w-- agement Plan for Zone 24, on prop CityofCarlsbad.CltyClerL’sOffke, ertg generally located on the west at or prior to the public hearing side of El Camino Real between Applicant: The Camlno Group CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL w-- Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet nortb of the I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of I ! SITE+,\y EAGLE CANYON IJ till d cd&d w SW w-v FW 07-24(A) California on the 5th - day of September, 1991 clerk of the Printer NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EAGLE CANYON ZC 91-5/CT 91-Z/HDP 91-2/SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, September 17, 1991, to consider an application for a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and O-S; a Tentative Tract Map to create 29 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 3 open space lots totaling 6.13 acres on a 14.54 acre site; a Hillside Development Permit; a Special Use Permit required by the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards; and an Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24, on property generally located on the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive, in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 24, and more particularly described as: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4446. If you challenge the Zone Change, Tentative Map, Hillside Development Permit, Special Use Permit and/or Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: The Camino Group PUBLISH: September 5, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL c City II Clfihl zc 9%S/CT 9i-2/ l-w w-21 EAQLE CANYON SW LFW 8K44N ’ . .,’ *s 3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the PIarming Commission of the City of CarIsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly EIm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 17, 1991, to consider request for approval of a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and O-S, a Tentative Tract Map to create 29 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 3 open space lots totaling 6.13 acres on a 14.54 acre site, a Hillside Development Permit, a Special Use Permit required by the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards, and an Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24, on property generally located An the west side of El Camino Real between Camino Hills Drive and an area approximately 230 feet north of the extension of Ranch0 Carlsbad Drive, in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 24 and more particularly described as: A portion of Lot F of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July. 11, 1991. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4446. If you challenge the Zone Change, Tentative Tract, Hillside Development Permit, Special Use Permit and Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: ZC 91-S/CT 91-2/HDP 91-2 SUP 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) APPLICANT: EAGLE CANYON PUBLISH: JULY 3, 1991 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION DN:vd \ . r l .*I cii I( CIIW zc 9lwCT 9%2/ I EAGLE CANYON . -- - , . t (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK ’ S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice zc 91-5/(X 91-2/HDP 91-2/SUF’ 91-l/LFMP 87-24(A) - EAGLE CANYON for a public hearing before the City Council. 1 Please notice the item for the council meeting of . Thank you. MARTY ORENYAJC Assistant City Manager AUGUST 8, 1991 Date 2286 Morgan R\ Carl sbad Ca 920% RE: 2286 Morgan Rd 2287 Morgan Rd u::ar 1 &ad Ca 92008 RE: 2287 Morgan Rd Mr. and Mrs. Nor f 1 eet ‘“Et8 Morgan F’d I- c,~ 1 =bad I:? ‘j’2~:)(:18 _h - FE: ‘;88 Horgan Rd LLS’j Morgan Rd I:~+, 1 shad I::a ‘3”(:)‘:)8 FE: T,‘H’3 Horqan Pd Hr. and Mrs. Arney Hr. and Mrs. Fr ichtel ~“91 Horqan F’d ““31 Lindsay Dr Lh lzar 1 &ad C’a ~32008 ITar 1 shad #::a ‘~LCl(j8 C’E: 231 Morgan Ed RE: 22’31 Lindsay Dr Mr . and Mrs. Feder son 22’32 Hcwgan F’d l:ar 1 sba,j ~:a 92008 F:E : 2=*j” Horgan Pd Hr. and Mrs. Hanf 12’32 Morgan F’d 11 or 1 &ad I,a ‘32l:ll:l8 RE: ,‘“93 Morgan Rd Mr. and Mrs. &gel ander Li ‘“‘34 Morgan Rd j:ar 1 &ad ~_:a ‘3X108 RE: ~‘)94 Morgan Rd Hr. and Mrs. Peake ““‘35 Mot- gan Rd (zar 1 shad Ca 92(:1(118 RE: 2295 Morgan Rd Ms. Lange1 111 22’36 Mar gan Rd Car 1 sbad Ca 92008 RE: ‘2296 Morgan Rd Mr. ad hr. Tarango 901 th Ave *5 i-kc i Wight% Ca 91745 REX Morgan Rd Mr. and Mrs. Walker 2298 Morgan Rd Car lsbad C:a 32008 RE : 2298 Morgan Rd 22’39 Morgan Rd Carl sbad Ca 92008 RE: 2299 Morgan Rd Mr. and Mrs. Smith 2297 Sawyer Ln _ - -... ..- Mr Mrs. Fal rman 530. owning Pd Car 1 sbad Ca ‘32iJO8 RE: 5307 Browning Rd 5200 El Cami no Veal 11 ar 1 sbad II a ‘3’2WS RE: 52W3 El Cam1 nn Rea 1 i 345 Harding St #lCK3 II ar 1 sbad Ca 9~?:)8 p E . . Carnln~:~ Hills Dr Mr. fiunn 1 gan &L ““30 Lindsay Dr Car 1 sbad Ca ‘32008 FE: 2230 Lindsay Dr -‘“‘32 ,J ndsay Dr -- Izar 1 &ad ITa ~j2(:iOS FE: z”‘j= Lindsay Dr Mr. and Mrs. Van Li “-‘93 Lindsay Dr Car 1 shad II a ‘32008 RE: X93 Lindsay Dr Mr . and Mrs. Rizza 2294 Lindsay Dr Car 1 shad )::a ‘3W1)8 L RE: 2294 Lindsay Dr Mr. and Mrs. Gulp 2295 Lindsay Dr Car 1 sbad I1.a ‘32008 RE: 2295 Lindsay Dr Mr , and Mrs. Krenz 2297 Lindsay Dr I’ar 1 sbad C:a 92008 a RE: 2297 Lindsay Dr 2298 Lindsay Dr Car 1 sbad Ca ‘32008 RE: 22’38 Lindsay Dr Hr. and Mrs. Bander et 2299 Lindsay Dr Car 1 sbad Ca- 92008 RE: 2299 Lindsay Dr A mice has been mailed to ail property owners/occur>an Mr. Vigilante 2288 Lindsay Dr Car 1 sbad Ca ‘32008 RE: 2288 Lindsay Dr (I T :I 2296 Lindsay Dr Car lsbad Ca ‘32008 RE: 2296 Lindsay Dr Mr . Stenard 586 Prownl ng Rd Car 1 sbad C:a 92008 RE: 5286 Etrownlna Rd 5288 Brouning Rd rl’ar 1 sb.d Ca ‘3’2Ot:)S RF: 53?R Rrruni no Rd a- Mr . and Mrs. Tabat a P 0 Hc* ‘343 1 C’ar 1 sbad Ca ‘33:) 18 h RE: Ms. i elly ~~“32 Br~:~wning Rd ~I’ar 1 shad l:a 3~~lX~8 RF: ~;.?~i’.? Rr-+.m~ no Rd Mr. 3nd Mrs. tiof fman “;2*34 Br-+3wn 1 ng Rd I: ar 1 si,ad 11 a ‘3’XK)8 F’F: *<?-id lir ,-,wn I nn Rri Ye. Jab; a.oc,t: 1 J3,:‘;: Br bown i ng F’d 1: a f 1 e-bad 1: a ‘-j”t:N:@ 6’F: cs,2(j;’ Br e-,wn I no Rd Mr. al~d Mr 5. Hea: kr ‘J::~:~.+ Hcawnl ng Rd fynr 1 shad La 32OC18 RE: 531:~ Etr own 1 na Rd - Mr. and Mrs. Morton ;306 Rr #own 1 ng Rd ICar 1 sbad C‘a ‘321508 RE: 5306 Hrowni na Rd Mr. rnd Mrs. Sage 53t:xq Br mown 1 ng Rd ICar 1 sbad Cd 92008 RF: ~308 Hrawnina Rd P 0 Ho>; 2138 r;ar 1 sbad Ca 32018 RE: I Mr . t:e11y SL’N’, El Ilamln,:, F’*gl l:arlsbad ~:a ‘3-“,(:,4 RE: Mr . and Mrs. till..ts ,c 13 8 I -, ‘,. ‘3 ,a IC3r1 cb3cj la ‘g;r:b!e RE: 2; t 1 I:.arnx~~:~ HI 11 5 Dr P 0 EL2 336l:ln ‘San Di 3qaz.l I::, ‘??lF,z FE: El ‘Iartllnc~ Pe41 II .am 1 “$7 r4ttn: William F.~lrctllld 15.78 Slumml t: t Ave #A*~:,a<d ‘jy4sl:,: F:E: El ~l;,mlncc ~e,,l . . )’ ,. . . 4980 El IIaminc~ Peal Car 1 sbad Ca ‘33X:u3 FE: 4’380 El C’amino Peal - -- RESIDENT 1 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 4’34 A ! CARLSBAD, CA. , ‘32008 4 - i RESIDENT S200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 3’35 CARLSBAD, CA, , 331:)08 S1W EL CAM INO PEAL SPACE # ~‘36 CAHLSBAD, CA. , ,jZr:,(:@ RESIDENT 52C’c:! EL CAfiINO REAL SPACE # ! C,SRLSE(r4D, CA. i ‘33XiP 3E ; I T’G!q’i 5;m:,, I z:* :AiYINO FE*>L SPACE d L t’;~~l::I.‘.~i~ADr CA:. , ,3;,,quj:s RE’j iDEN i S~!:U:’ EL JCAMINO PEAL SPACE # 3 IXliLSPAD, I:++. , ,3::ms RES I DENT ;Ir:l~.) EL CAMINC) PEAL ,5pACE # 4 T:i,Rl.SPAD, CA. , ,3”Q’:f8 ya:‘>,:~ CL CA~IINO REAL SPACE # 55 I:ARI.SEMD, -A. F ,?:008 S:i~r:, EL r,AMfNO PEAL SPACE # 6 F;ARLS&AD, [:A. , *9”008 RESIDENT 5;“:id EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 7 CARLSBAD, CA. , ‘32008 RES I DENT s:0r, EL CAMlNO REAL SPACE # 8 CARLSBAD, CA. , 92008 RESIDENT 5100 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # ‘3 CARLSPAD, CA., 92008 0 REAL SPACE # 10 , 92008 - i Q _ .- RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # ,+Y, CARLSE~AD, CA. , 3’;008 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 4’%3 CARLSRAD, CA. , 3X108 RESIDENT %X)0 EL CAMINU REAL SPACE # 4’3.3 CAHLSbAD, CA. , ‘325,(:13 RESIDENT smo EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 500 CARLSBAD, CA. , 9X108 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 501 CARLSBAD, CA. , ‘32008 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE f 502 CARLSBAD, CA., 92008 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 503 CARLSBAD, CA. , 92008 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE 11 504 CARLSBAD, CA., 42008 RESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL SPACE # 505 CARLSPAD, CA., 92008 A notiC@ has been mailed to air Pwefly OW?erS/occupan~ lISted herein i .- ----a f” I. ..s.+m.*- i 4 Mr. Kel 1 y 5200 El Oaminu &al Car 1 sbad ~:a 920(:)8 RE: P Cl Eox 33i508 San Di ego ~:a ‘321&J RE: El C:amino Real 2299 Morgan Rd Car 1 sbad Ca 92008 RE: 2299 Morgan Ed .