HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-10-08; City Council; 11381; Carlsbad Airport Centre SP AmendmentAB # I(,’ 3gf/ TITLE. ’ SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - SP-181 (A) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE MTG, 10/8/91
6 DEPT. PLN
D
C
C
i i
a3 b
4 I m 0
z”
a
0 N
a
a, U
a 3 0 N U c -rl
a
cd c
m
m m
rl I cn
z”
rn 2
a a, U a 0 a cd
rl
El .d 0
V g
rl cn
\ a3 \ oz 40 F 0 a 6 z 3 0 0
1’ i is CITY^ CARLSBAD - AGEND~ILL
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the City Council concurs, the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that th
Council ADOPT Resolution No. ’3 1 fl 3 33 , APPROVING the Negative Declaration fc
181 (A), and INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 05 - I3 g , APPROVING SP-181 (A).
ITEM EXPLANATION
On July 31, 1991, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the amenc
to the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan. Carlsbad Airport Centre is located on the nortl
of Palomar Airport Road, west of El Camino Real, and within Local Facilities Management
5. The specific plan sets forth design and development standards for this industrial bus
park with supporting commercial uses.
The requested amendment is for relocation of the commercial lots because the applicant be
that the commercial lots will be more viable if located along the periphery of the park rathe
the interior locations which they now occupy. The remaining changes included it
amendment were initiated by the Planning Staff in order to clarify the wording in the existin!
or bring the plan into conformance with current standards as follows:
Add an architectural guidelines section;
Add an employee eating area section;
Tie maximum allowable height to the underlying zoning;
Tie parking ratio requirements to the zoning ordinance;
Clarify wording in the landscaping section; and
Add signage regulations for lots along Palomar Airport Road.
The issue of signage regulations for lots along Palomar Airport Road (a potential scenic cor
was discussed at the Planning Commission hearing. The owners of some property withi
business park wanted a maximum of 140 square feet of wall signs along Palomar Airport
whereas the Planning Department had recommended a maximum of 100 square feet. Discu
at the hearing resulted in the addition of wording which would allow 100 square feet pli
additional 40 square feet under unusual circumstances. This wording will allow sufficient si6
to identify the buildings and tenants in the business park while preventing a proliferation of
along this future scenic corridor.
The Planning Commission and Planning Department staff, are in agreement on this addil
wording, and the amendment was approved unanimously.
ENVl RON M ENTAL REV1 EW
The Planning Director has determined that the proposed amendment will not have a signii
impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on May 30, ‘
(a)
(b) (c) Clarify required setbacks;
(d)
(e) (9
(9)
i? e (15
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. ) 1; 3 &* /
L
FISCAL IMPACT
This proposal is conditioned to conform to the requirements of the Local Facilities Manage
Plan for Zone 5. Therefore, there will be no fiscal impacts to the City as a result of this pr
EXHIBITS
1.
2.
3. Location Map
4.
5.
6.
7. Specific Plan 181 (A)
City Council Resolution No.
Ordinance No. \aI % A I *’) .%‘
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3274 & 3275
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated July 31, 1991
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 31, 1991
‘1 I‘ ’ 3 3 43
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 c
RESOLUTION NO. 91-333
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATl DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 181 CASE NO: SP-l81(A
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Munici]
Code, the Planning Commission did, on July 17, 1991, holc
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consic
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing
considering all testimony and arguments, examining the init
study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
considering any written comments received, the Plann
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negat
Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the C
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and corrt
2. That the findings and conditions of the Plan]
Commission Resolution No. 3274, on file with the City Clerk
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings of
City Council in this matter and that the Negative Declara
is hereby approved.
...
...
...
...
...
5.
-7- . 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
l?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a e
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on I
8th day of October , 1991, by the following vote
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton c
NOES: None
ABSENT: None &$/[[ LL;5<? /
CEAUDE A. L QIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
- ALETIIA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cberk
(SEAL)
-2-
1-
1
2
3
4
5 '
7
8
9
10
11
12
I-3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 - p ORDINANCENO. NS 1 8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
SPECIFIC PLAN 181 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL, PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,
NORTH OF COLLEGE AVENUE AND McCLELLAN-PALOMAR
AIRPORT.
CASE NO: SP 181 (A)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, has
and considered an amendment to Specific Plan 181; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements c
City Council has determined that the public interest indicates that said plan be 2
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does
follows:
SECTION 1: The Airport Business Centre Specific Plan amend
18l(A), dated July 17, 1991, on file with the Planning Department and incorp
reference herein is approved. The amended Specific Plan shall provide the dev
standards and guidelines for this property and all development of the propr
conform to the plan.
SECTION 2: That the findings of the Planning Commission cor
Resolution Nos. 3274 and 3275, incorporated herein by reference shall cons
findings and conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty day,
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance an
to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
'.'*.
1
2
3 *
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I-g
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
e e
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carl:
Council held on the ___ day of , 1991, and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Counci
the day of , 1991, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Maj
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I.1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3274
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL, OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN
AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 181.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
CASE NO: SP 181(A)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July,
on the 31st day of July, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe1
consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the !
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, th
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning (
as follovd:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, tl
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaratic
to Exhibit "ND", dated May 30, 1991, and "PII", dated Decembe
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following finc
Findinas:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the
have a significant impact on the environment.
The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environme
The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by I
project.
There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be
impacted by this project.
2.
3.
4.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 31st day of July, I
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehul
Erwin, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Codssioner Schramm.
ABSTAIN: None.
'' ROBERT HOLMES, Chairpe
CARLSBAD PLANNING COF
ATTEST:
MICHM J. HOLZMILLIX
PLANNING DIRECTOR
I
PC RES0 NO. 3274 -2-
I i
0 e
NEGATlVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: North side of Palomar Airport Road, west of McClell
Palomar Airport.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Designation change of commercial and industrial lots wil
Specific Plan 181 business park.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described pro
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a sign&
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Nedtive Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plan;
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CalifoAa 92009. Comments from
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department wi
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn ir
Planning Department at 438-1 161, extension 4471.
-
-
\ I\ /I DATED: MAY 30, 1991
CASE NO: SP 181(A) Planning Director
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
PUBLISH DATE: MAY 30, 1991
i/bLcLLfi* ' ; Lszv*,.
MICHAEL J. HbLZMILLER
EB
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438
e a
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. SP 181b
DATE: DECEMBI
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Airport Business Centre
2. APPLICANT: Carlsbad Aimort Centre
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1921 Palomar Oaks Way. Suite 30(
' Carlsbad. CA 92008
(619) 931-0244
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Aumst 14. 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desimation change of commercial and industrial lots within
181 business Dark.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT3
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a sigmficant effect on the
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist.
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the propose1
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an E
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that '
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NOf w
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any
project may cause a sinnificant effect on the environment. The project may quallfv fi
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects ci
insimificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings YES-sig" il~
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end oft
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
e 0 e
*a
I
PHYStCAL ENVIRONMENT
iQl[>L THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES T
(Sld (insig)
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards? .__ -
unique physical features? - -
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site? - -
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
2. Appreciably change the topography or any
3.
4.
any bay, inlet or lake? - -
ambient air quality? -
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? - -
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? - -
water, ground water or public water supply? - -
depletion of any natural resources? - -
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - -
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
- .”, 6. Result in substantial changes in air
7. Substantially change the course or flow of
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
9. substantially increase usage or cause
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object? - -
-2-
(I, 0
BIOLOGICAL ENVERONMEN?"
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: GS E:] N
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants) ? -
[ntroduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
- -
73.
existing species? - -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? -
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects? - -
.9 Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
15.
16.
migration or movement of animals? - -
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
ZS E3 WILL THE PROPOSAL, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? - -
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? - -
-3-
m m
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
YES x!? (ins@ WiiL THE PROPOSAL, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
20. Increase existing noise levels? -
21.
22.
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? - -
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
24.
25, Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parki facilities, or
create a large deman 3 for new parking? -
27. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? -
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? - -
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? - -
emergency evacuation plans? - -
aesthetically offensive public view? -
existing recreational opportunities? - -
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
-4-
a 0
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - El3 N' WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: gs
33: Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory. - -
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, deftnithe period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
Does the project have4he possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
-
35.
the effects of probable future projects.) - -
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - -
-5-
a 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Pro iec t Descrb tion
The proposed project is part of a 330-acre Specific Planned business park which will contain indt
and related commercial uses. The area is to be developed in three phases of approximately 111
The project currently proposed would redesignate the specific lots to be used for industrial ("1
and commercial and support ("Area 2") uses reducing the total commercially designated acreage.
one lot of Area 1 uses, totalling approximately 5.65 acres, would be changed to Area 2 uses. Fivl
2 uses, totalling approximately 9.43 acres, would be changed to Area 1 uses, a net reduction 0:
Area 2 uses. Potential environmental impacts of the business park were evaluated in EIR #81
in 1982. Additionally, Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) will be required for development of ea(
will be prepared again with each project proposed.
Physical Environment
The proposed project will not result in impacts not previously considered in EIR #81-6. The u
proposed do not differ from those originally evaluated except for their specific locations and aci
the business park. This proposal does not involve any construction.
Bioloaical Environment
The current proposal is for land use designations only. No construction is proposed.
The presently proposed change in use locations will not affect plant or animal life of the site in ai
no construction is being proposed. The area is not currentlyused for agricultural crops, nor is
as a significant agriculturalqea by the California Coastal Commission. The potential biological
evaluated in EIR #81-6.
Human Environment
The proposed project, while redesignating the land uses on specific lots, does not alter the plam
for the overall specific planned area.
The current proposal to redesignate specific lots and their proposed land uses will not itself
negative impacts. Because the specific planned area is near Palomar Airport, the suitability of
uses has been evaluated based on the latest revised Noise Exposure Map for projected year 19
in May, 1990). SANDAG review indicates that the current proposal for land uses is acceptable
lots.
Traffic
EIR 81-6 called for the following mitigation measures:
1. Strongly promote means of reducing the number of trips generated by each land use and
trips out over a longer period of the day.
-6-
a 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont'd]
2. ' Construct College Boulevard to the Master Plan width between Palomar Airport Road and El C
including a right turn lane from eastbound El Cadno Real to College Boulevard. A minimum c
- should be constructed by the completion of the first phase of the Airport Business Center.
3. Widen Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage and eastward to El Camino Real
right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road.
Provide a connection to Interstate 5 via Faraday Avenue and Cannon Road.
Widen Palomar Airport Road over Interstate 5.
Construct traffic signals at the following intersections:
a. Palomar Airport Road - College Boulevard j
b. Palomar Airport Road - Camino Vida Roble
c. College Boulevard - Unnamed Collector Road
d. Palomar Airport Road - Palomar Oaks Way (if I'D" Street connects with Palomar Oal
Revise the street system to meet the City's intersection spacing policy or request a waiver
to allow a "T" intersection with no median break.
4.
5.
6.
7.
No formal mitigation monitvlting plan was established by the EIR. However, a summary of the 5
of the measures is as follows:
1. No easily measured goal was established. However, the City is currently particil
formulation of a Congestion Management Plan which will focus on numerous methc
reducing trip generation and promotion of "flex-time" work schedules.
The widening of College Boulevard has been completed.
The widening of Palomar Airport Road has been completed except for the section between
and El Camino Real.
This project is in progress. The EIR for the project is now in the draft stage.
This project is also in progress. Construction will start in February, 1992.
Item 6, the four traffic signals, is almost complete. Signals have been installed at the first
(Palomar Airport Road/College Boulevard and Palomar Ahport RoaUCamino Vida Rob
The connection of College Boulevard and Palomar Oaks Way (''unnamed collector road!
made and is not planned for the near future.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
-7-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (cont'd)
- The signal project for Palomar Airport Road/Palomar Oaks Way goes to bid shortly a
completed by the end of 1991.
The street system of the project was redesigned to meet the City's policy. 7.
The change proposed by this project will result in a decrease in the number of trips per day. r
proposes no change in the street system within or around the business park. No new acce
proposed. Therefore, the only change resulting from the proposal will be some slight redistributic
within the business park and two intersections leading into the park (Palomar Airport Road/Pal
Way and Palomar Airport RoadKamino Vida Roble). Both of these intersections are currently 1
at level of service "A" and can accommodate the resulting slight redistribution of traffic. Palomar A
is also functioning at level of service "A" between Paseo Del Norte and College and between Yarrov
El Carnino Real.
"-Y
-8-
0 0
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH As:
w
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f> alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
a) Development of the business park will occur in three phases of approximately 110 aci
planned phasing is not changed by the currently proposed project.
The proposed specific plan amendment does not involve specific site designs.
The proposed specific plan amendment does not address the scale of development ii
Alternate uses for the site were not considered. The proposed uses are consistent 1
uses recommended for the area by the General Plan and with the specific plan for t
The development of the business park will occur in phases as City services are av
current proposal does not involve any actual construction.
Alternative sites for the proposed use would not be reasonable. The project area
planned area) is appropriate for the uses. This "project" is in keeping with the plan
The no project alyative would, in this case, mean leaving the uses designated for ea
were approved in the original specific plan.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
-9-
T e e
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) -.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
* DECLARATION Will be prepared.
- i find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environme not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an,
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be propc
- I find the proposed project MAY have a sigruficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIF IMPACT REPORT is required.
ti
1 / 9'7 /4$, L ? - gate Sigxiature I -
-
!
'1 -- 1
,, /I I -- I . "L /-
-
Date Planning Director
EB:rvo
LIST MITIGATING MEASU-RES (IF APPLICABLE1 - g/
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-10-
P 0 *
)c
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAW REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-a,
-11-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLWON NO. 3275
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 181
FOR AN INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL,
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, NORTH OF COLLEGE AVENUE,
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
CASE NO: SP 181 (A)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Ca
AND McCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT.
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provk
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, tE
Commission did, on the 17th day of July, 1991, and on the 31st day of a
consider sdd request on property described as:
CT 81-46, Unit 1, Map No. 11287, CT 81-46, Unit 2, Map No.
11288, and CT 81-46, Unit 3, Map No. 11289.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering i
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission cc I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
factors relating to SP 18l(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
recommends APPROVAL of SP 18l(A), according to Exhibit "X", dz
1991, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* 0
Findins:
1. All of the findings contained in Ordinance No. 9635 and City Council Resc
6947, are included herein by reference.
The proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of tl
Specific Plan 181.
2.
Conditions:
1. All of the conditions contained in Ordinance No. 9635 and City Council
No. 6947, are included herein by reference.
Approval is granted for SP 18$(A), as shown on Exhibit "A", dated July
incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. De
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these cond
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", my1
the amended Specific Plan Land Use Plan as approved by the Planning Cc
The Land Use Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City.
copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of buildi
or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation requir
Zo~d 5 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City (
August 4,1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Departme
future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building I
This project is approved upon the express condition that building perm
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water dish
the development determines that adequate water and service is available
of application for water service and will continue to be available un
occupancy. A note to this effect shall appear in the amended Land Use
Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for any undeveloped
the Specific Plan area, the developer shall pay the balance of one-half c
of the construction/installation of a traffic signal at the intersection (
Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
...
.-.
...
PC RES0 NO. 3275 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tf
Cornmission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 31st day of July, 1'
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehubc
Erwin, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Schram.
ABSTAIN: None.
- ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIC
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
I
PC RES0 NO. 3275 -3 -
d 0
DATE: JULY 31, 1991 gL1
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBJECT: SP 181(A) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE - Request to reduce
total amount of land designated for commercial uses and to reas
the locations of commercially designated lots within Specific Plan
for industrial and commercial uses, located between El Camino F
Palomar Airport Road, north of College Avenue and McClel
Palomar Airport in the P-M Zone, and in Local Facilities Manager
Zone 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. :
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Direct01
ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3275 recommending APPROVAL of SP 18
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
This item was initially brought to public hearing on July 17. At that time an objectic
the noticing was filed on behalf of some of the property owners within the business 1
As a result, the public hearing was continued. Two issues were raised at that time rel:
to staffs proposed language governing signage along Palomar Airport Road and prop
architectural guidelines. The project has now been satisfactorily re-noticed. The issu
sign regulations and architectural guidelines have been discussed, and staffs recomme
wording has been revised. Staffs revised language for signage along Palomar Airport I
appears on pages 25 and 26 of the specific plan text. The proposed languagr
architectural guidelines appears on page 28.
APPLI d 3N COMPLETE D
November 21, 1990
1 90-day extension
e
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 31, 1991
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: SP 181(A) - WBAD AIRPORT CENTRE - Request to reduce the
amount of land designated for commercial uses and to reassign the loca
of commercially designated lots within Specific Plan 181 for industria
commercial uses, located between El Camino Real, Palomar Airport E
north of College Avenue and McClellan-Palomar Airport in the P-M Zone
in Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Colmmission Resolution No.
recommending APPROVAL, of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Direct0
ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3275 recommending APPROVAL of SP 18
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
XI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This proposal is an amendment to Specific Plan (SP) 181, a 333 acre planned indu
development for industrial, research and development, office and related commercial
The existing Specific Plan 181 designates eight lots totaling 21.4 acres for commercial
The project proposal would reduce commercial uses to four lots totaling 17.1 acres.
lots in the center of the business park (within Phases I and 11) would be changed fr
commercial to an industrial designation. One lot at the northeast comer (within Phai
would be changed from an industrial to a commercial designation. No change in all(
uses is proposed. The applicant is requesting this change in order to respond to m(
conditions.
In addition to the applicant’s proposed amendment, staff has proposed changes to the
as follows:
a) addition of architectural guidelines section;
b) addition of employee eating area section;
c) clarification of required setbacks;
d) clarification of allowable height;
e) change in parking ratio requirements;
f) prohibition of wall signs along Palomar Airport Road; and
g) clarification of landscaping section.
a! 0 SP 181(A) - CARLSBAD ',dORT CENTRE
JULY 31, 1991
PAGE 2
The architectural guidelines section (text page 26) is being added to encourage variel
design and materials for each project while also ensuring overall compatibility within
business park. The employee eating area section (text page 27) is being added
clarification. The PM zone regulations (Chapter 21.34.070) require the provisioi
outdoor eating areas for industrial/office uses. SP 181 was required to comply with
zone regulations, but the text did not address the eating area requirement directly. I
c (text page 14) establishes a minimum interior sideyard setback of 10 feet. Item d (
page 18) clarifies that the maximum allowable height shall be that of the underlying z
The change in parking section wording (text pages 18 and 19) simplifies the parkin
that required by Chapter 21.44 for uses permitted by SP 181. The prohibition of wall s
along Palomar Airport Road (text page 23) is being done in anticipation of a sc
corridor overlay being placed on that street. The landscaping section (text pages 18
and 21) includes minor changes to ensure compliance with the City's Landscape Guide!
Manual.
111. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed project consistent with the intent and purposes of the orij
Specific Plan (SP 18l)?
Will the reassignment of industrial and commercial lot locations result in
negative impacts to the circulation system?
2.
DISCUSSION
The proposal is to change the locations of the commercially designated lots in the busj
park, reducing slightly the total acreage for commercial uses. The project is consistent
the intent and purposes of the original Specific Plan 181. Specific Plan 181 (approvc
1982) included eight lots for commercial uses intended to support the industrial office
in the business park. The number of commercial lots and acreage approved were not b
upon any minimum standard criteria. The proposed reduction in the number of come
support lots (from 8 to 4) and the commercial acreage (from 21.4 to 17.1) is consii
with the intent to provide supporting commercial uses for the business park.
Because the commercial uses were intended to serve prirnarily the business park, the
originally designated were scattered throughout the park. This proposed redesign;
would focus commercial uses to the perimeter of the park. While these lots will still :
the business park, they may also attract users from other areas. However, the abili
attract users from other areas may be necessary in order to encourage commercial us
this area. Currently this central area of the City has little commercial development el
for deli's. Workers in the business parks must drive to other locations for commercial
thus impacting the circulation system.
d e SP 181(A) - CARLSBAD id0RT CENTRE
JULY 31, 1991
PAGE 3
The reassignment of industrial and commercial lot locations will not result in nega
impacts to the circulation system. The traffic study submitted indicates that the propc
change will result in a decrease in the number of trips generated by the park. The st
also indicates that the redesignation of lots will not result in any negative impacts to
surrounding intersections. The nearby intersections are currently functioning at a lev(
service A or B and would continue to do so if the change is approved.
Iv. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project Will not have a significant im
on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on May 30, 15
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Cornmission Resolution No. 3274
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3275
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Form
6. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
7. City Council Resolution No. 6947
8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1974
9. City Council Ordinance No. 9635
10. Planning Cornmission Resolution No. 1975
11. Specific Plan 181 (A) (previously distributed)
12. Exhibit "A", dated July 17, 1991.
June 14, 1991
EB:rvo:vd
e BACKGROUND DATA SHEET e
CASE NO.: SP 181(A)
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A reduction of the total amount of land desimatec
commercial uses and to reassim the locations of commercially desimated lots w
Specific Plan 181.
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N:CT 81-46, Unit 1, Map No.11287: CT 81-46, Unit 2, MaD No.11
CT 81-46, Unit 3, Map No.11289 APN:212-091-18; 212-092-43.44,45.49; 212-09
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Acres aDproxirnately 15.08 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation P-I
Density Allowed N/A
Existing Zone P-M
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Z(
Requirements)
Density Proposed N/A
Proposed Zone P-M
Zoning Land Use
Site P-M Industrial Business Park
North CM,OS Industrial Business Park: Open Spa(
South P-M Industrial
East P-M, M, C-M Industrial. Airport
West P-M. OS UndeveloDed
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Unified Water District Carlsbad Municipal Sewer District Q
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity)
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued May 30, 1991
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other,
N/A
-
= NQV 19
CKY OF CA. DISCLOSURE STATEMEM
APPUCANTS STATEMEM OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APF
BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITEE.
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DlSCRmONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CIM COUNCIL OR ANY /
(Please Pmr)
The following information must be disclosed:
1 Aoplicant
Lst the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. WXSSAD AIRPORT CEITEE
a California Limited Partnership 1921 Palomar Oaks Way Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2. owner
hst the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the propem CAXLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
a California Limited Parnership
1921 Palomar Oaks Way
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92008
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership,
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ot the shares in the corporation or owr
interest in the partnership.
See Addendun. Dage 2
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization Or a trUS1
addresses sf any person sewing as officer or director of the non-profit organization Or as t
of the trust.
N/A
a 0
*
Oisdosure Stat-
5 Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of C
Corrmssions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - No _X tl yes, please indicate person(s)
Person IS defined as: ‘Any individual, firm, copartnecship, joint venture, association, social clu
cwganuation. corporatrorr. &ate, tw, recewer, syndicate, the and any other county, cny and I
muncipalrty, dlstnct or other political subdiva~on, or any other group or combination acting as a ur
(NOTE. Attach additional pages as necessary )
b64 II 1 L u- Signa ure of applicantldde
Car lsbad -or t Cp-p Carlsbad Aimort Centre
Print or type name of applicant Print or type name of owner
-* k\?+cJ:
NO'J I r
CITY OF C;', ADDENDUM O€x~C~. 2x22
a e cr,.c-'s:
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Carlsbad Airport Centre,
a CalFfornia limited partnership
General Partner
Carlsbad Airport Associates,
a California general partnership
General Partner
Centre Development,
a California corporation
General Partner
Dean Greenberg
Limited Partner
Weyerhaeuser Venture Company,
a California corporation
______________________c_________________---------------
Carlsbad Airport Associates
1921 Palomar Oaks Way, Suite 300
Carlsbad, California 92008
Centre Development Owner
1921 Palomar Oaks Way, Suite 300
Carlsbad, California 92008
Weyerhaeuser Venture Company Officers
a California corporation 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 310
Torrance, California 90503
Dean Greenberg
Donald Lange, Preside
Ronald Bliss, Executive
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: Carlsbad Airport Centre - SP 181(A)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 5 GENEWPLAN: P-I
ZONING: P-M
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Carlsbad Airport Centre
ADDRESS: 1921 Palomar Oaks Wav, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92008
PHONE NO.: (619)931-0244 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 212-091-18; 212-092-43,44,45.49; 212-0‘
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): N/A
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
1
41
5
TENTT+'l'?VE I*lAP (CT c1-46) TO CREA'T:; 77 LOTS 0T.J
PROPEi?'?Y GENERALT,Y
PALO;*iAR ~~11<PO~'i' KClAD,
AIRPOI:T, APPlIOXI:.I~~TI.;LY 3500 FEI.:T VI'EST 01' EL
CAIIINC 1;EhL.
i LOC;i'!'ED OI.1 TijE [;()sTj{ SI1)E oi.'
SOiJTli AND II'Z:ST OF PALO:.II;g
APPLIClil<3 : SIGNAL LA~DI!ARK/C~~RLTO:J DROPI'EU'E
8i
.. 9
lo
11
12 a s*
5 5 01
$O~$
.r .", $ 331;
~'~.clC 14
2: > , 0 15 . !: < k
:' . :< -~ L&U
;; z & *
. L-_I
2 g - rz w
Cornmission adopted Resolction No. 1974 recommcnding t I
Council that Tc-ntati17e Hap (CT 87-46) he conditionai'
and
IWEREA.5, on July 6, i982, the City Cou!~cll of the Cit
of Carlsilad, he16 a public hearing to consider the
recornxendations and heard all persons interssted in or oppose?
to Tentative Isla!' (CT 81-46); and
I I
i i
1 WEEREIJ.S, i:n Environmental Impact RcpGrt (E12 81-6) fc
CT 81-46 WBS prepared and certified as coxplete in satisfactin
l
.20 NOii, ?'!iET<I:I,'Ci?E, 11); IT R~~SO~;\~E:D by thc City Council of ! I
24
F. TiiiiL the [indings of the Planning Cor?.?i::!:ioP in I 1 Resolution No. 3974 con:;tit:ute the: ficdincl.:; of t11c CiLy Cc)i!nc:
I
-* * *I .. I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
n 12 s Y g 13
22 2
;:UJ~ 14
v no:$
15 5cYe - 33:- -I
L'; 25 :u.gn' , .- <. 16 .. .: .- 4
>U
52 2 17 >t- a dd
Is t V
*
D. That said amended Tentative Nap CT 8'1-46 is hercb
approved subject to all applicable requirements of the Carlsba
Municipal CoZe and to the satisfaction of the conditions
contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1974, dated Jc
9, 1982, marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part
hereof and, in addition, the following Condition No. 50 to reL
as follows:
50. "Prior to the approval of the final map for thi:
project the applicant shall enter into an agreement satjsfnctc to the City Attorney to hold the City harmless frm liability for personal inJLiry or property demage, or liability resulti?.: fro9 inverse condemnation caused by or resultir,g from the
operating of Pzlornar Airport or aircraft using Palonar Airport or fron the approvzl of this project. This condition shall
aply to that: portion of the project located within the FAA "clear zone" or "crash zoneJ of the airport as identified by the Environment21 Impact l?eport. I'
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at 21 regulzr meeting Of
the City Council of L!I~ City of Carlsbait, hcld on the
day of July -. , 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
20t3 --
AYES:
NOES: None
kuicil P3bers CasLer, h.;is J Kulchin, Chid< and kc
I ABSENT: ?!One 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2G
27
26
1
I
I ' i
c flLI1.,L; ?/ fit 2 i. -
I1AfiY 11 .,C'ASLI;R, i.i:yOT i 1 ATTEST: I
- QflPVb 4L ,L/..-A. p /?Q AL,i,'l'~Iti 1,. l;irU ~'L><I<!~I> i I I (sLAL1
,'
2.
1
2
3
41
51
6
,7
8
9
. 1.0
. 3.1
12
13
2-41
15
16
17
0 0
..
PLAPJMIiG COMMISSION J<ESOLU'I'ION 130. 1374
A RESOLLJTIOS C+ THE PLANNING, CO>ibl~SSION OF THE (
01.' CARLSI)i'iD , CALI FOKNIA, RECOE~MCNDIRG APP1-IOVAL
OF A. TEMTATIVE SUBDIVISION PIAD TO CREATE 77 LOT!
PRi)PER'i'Y GEPIEHALLY LCICATED ON THE' NORTH SIDE OF
PALO[?AR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH AND WEST OF PALO?IAR
AIRPORT, APPROXIMATELY 3500 f wsr OF EL CAMINO
REAL.
APPLICANT : SIGNAL LAWDMARK/CARLTON B170TiTXE
CASE NO: CT 81-46
I
-II_
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain pro]
wit:
A portion of Lot "G'! of Rancho Agua. Hedionda, ir
County of 'San Diego, according to Map thereof Nc
filed in the Office of the County Recorder, Novc
1896
has becn filed .with Cllie c'ity of Carlsbad, and referred tc
Planning Conmission; and
,. '
V?IIER~;:AS , said vqif ied application donstitutes i
provided by Title 21 of .the Carlsbad ,Municipal' Code; and
bWEREAS, the Planning Commission Sid, on the 9tl
June, 1c312, hold a duly nQt-iced public hearing as prescr:
to conside:: said request; and
'
.
I
lo 1
19,
Ir:I-!EREAS r at said pub3 ic hearing, upon hearing ar
1
20
21
. 22
23
24
. 25
-26
27 '
Iconsidcring all testimony and arguments, if any, of all I
/dcsirj.ng. to be heard, said Commission considered all fact
relztinq to the. 'rer1tativ.e Tract Php. '
I
, NOfd, TNEREFORE, BE IT HERE:DS RKSOLVED by the PI;
Conmission as follows:
A) That the above reci-t-ations are true and: correct.
B) That 1hasc.d on the evidence presented at the public hc
Commission recorninends APPKOVAL of CT S 1-46 , l~ascd on
following findings and siihject to thc fol.lowing concl.
'
I__.--
.' 1
2
31
'4
5
6
4
8
9
3.0
1.1
12
13
3-42
1.5
,161
l7
I8
19
20
21
22
23
25
24
26
27
28
0 -e
1) The pro:jzct is consistent with the ,city's General Plan s
the proposed i.ndustrio1 subdivision is consistent with t
Planned Industrizl designaLion for the site as indicatec Land Use EI.cnient OE the General -Plan.
2) The site is physical.ly suitable for the type and densit:
development since. the site is adequate in size and shapc
. accommodste industrial devel.opment at the clensi.ty propo:
he projcct is consistent with ail city public facility
icies and ordinances since:
7' a) The Planning Cornnissi-on has, by inclusion of an a.pp
3)
condition to this project, insured,that the final ~r
not be approved unless the City Couilcil finds that
service is available to serve the project. In addi
the Planning Commission has added a condition that
shall .be .placed on <he final map that building perni not he issued for the project unless the City Engin determines that sewer servj-ce is avai.labl.e, and buj
cannot occur 'within the project unless sewer servic
remains available, the Plannifig Cominission is satic that the requirements of the public r'acilities ele!; the General Plan have been net insofar as they app!
sewer service for this pro ject. i .. . b) A3.1 necessary public improvements have been providi I will be required as cond?.tions of agproval.
The npp.licslnt has agreed and is req.l,uir.ed by the in
of an appi:iip;:.iate conditi.on Po pay a public facj-li
Pc>:formJnce of that contract and pa\l';nent. of the f enab1.e this body ' to Eind that public facilities tri avai.:l.able concurrent wit11 need as reqcired by the
Assuraticcs have been given that adequate sewer for pro:jcct will. be provided by tlie city of Carlshad.
1
1
1 i
c)
'I.
j Plan.
d) I I 1 4 1 'rhc. prGpOScd project is. compatible with khe surro'undir
land uses since surrounding properties arc designated
* industrial devcl.opmcnt on the General Plan.
5) . An l?rivj.ronnicntal Iinpact Keport has been prepared and i ~lannj.ng Commission has recommended, by .minute motion
cr:rtj.ficatj.on of the RIR to the City Council. The l?ri
I<nv.ironmental' Impact Report has been amended to incluc
coinrnents and docuinenks of those testifying at the p~b' hearing ;!nd responses thereto. ylhe Planning .Conmissi ccrL-1:. if ic:s t!iat. the Environ!nentnl Xmpa.ct Report has 1x2
con1plcted in conformance with the California Environm
(Zualj.t:y nct atid the State quj.dc.lines a.nd that the Pla Co!nrni:;:; ion has reviewed, COJlSidered and' ev<2luated the
inEoIrrIia1: ion contained in the report. The ~Erivironmcnt: nepor'i as :io amended and cvuluaV.od is recommended fol:
I
PC RI~SCI rlo. 1374 -2-
.z
2
3
41
tj
4B e
acceptance as the Final. Envi.ronrr,cnt:aJ. Irnpact Report I
the Final Impact RcpGrt as r&con:.mende:l is adequritn ai'
I provides rcasonable information on the project an3 a2
reasonable and feasible alternatives theryeto, includi
project ."
Con2 it ions :
IGeniral Conditions
Approval is granted for CT 81-46, as shown on Exhibit
L
G
7
-. 8
9
10
11
12
13
dated June 9, 1982, incorporated by reference and 01-1 the Planning Department.. Developnent shall occur SL
tions.
stantially as shown unless otherwise noted i-n these c
1')
2) This project is approved upon the express condition t final map shall not be approved unless the City Counc as of the tine of such approval that sewer service i: to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon tl'e express 'condition t
building perinits will. no! be issued for developmei1t <
siibjcct property iinless the City Engineer deternices facilities are avail.able at the time of application i sever permits and will continue to be available ur,ti:
occupancy. This note shall be placed on. the final mi
' '
3)
X/1 I j-5
lLG
. 18 '7
19
20
2 1.
22
23
24
25
. 2G
27
28
,4) I
This project is approved upon the express condition i
a?;>licz.ct shall p~y a public facilities fee as requii
Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file
City Clerk and incorparated herein by regerelice, and
to the agreement executed by the applicant for payer
fee a copy of that agreement dated October 29, 1980,
amei1cled on May 28, 1982, is on file with the City Clc incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is iiol proiriised, this applrcation will not be consistent wil
Generrtl Plan and approval for this project shall be 7
I
j I 1
p1 ann iilg kpar tmeii t
5) The applicant shall establish a' property owner's ass( and corresponding covenants , conditions and restrict
. CC&r\'s shall be submitted to and approved by the Plai
Departrncnt prior to final map approval for each phasi
The applicant shall preFare .a detailed 1an.dscape and irrigation plan, for all special. landscaped streets,
parks and coniinon are'as, which shall be submitted to l
approved by the Planni.ng Dj.rcctor prior to apFrova1 (
f indl map Cot: each phase.
6)
7) .All approved 1.andscaping for special landscaped stre1
coimon areas shall be instalied 'prior to occupancy 0 ph2se.
/PC ,RESO b!O. 1974 -3-
1: 4-
.3,
2
,
..
a 5 :
6
'7 L
8
.9
10
11
12
13
14
,15
16
i7
18
19
2o
21
fi
l e e
8) ~ll landscaped are:?s shall be. naintained'in a hea
t.hriving condition, free from weedsc trash, c?!~Cl d
9) Approved landscaping and facilities for- mini-par;c
installec? hy the developer prior .to building deve
60% of the acreage of the ent.j_re phzse within whi
located as they are shown on the tentative map.
110)' Any signs proposed for this development shall be t conforrnarlce with the city's Sign Ordinance and 23.1
specific plan and shall require review and ap?ro;<
Planning Department prior to instal-lation of such
11) A uriiforrn sign progran for this. development .shall to the Planning Department: for their review 2T:d aj
to occupancy of any building. .
12) '?he applicant shall subnit a street name list coni
tlie city's street name policy subject to the ~1mr Director's approviil prior to final map approval.
13) The project shall provide bus stop facilities at 1
subject to the satisfact-ion of the North County TI trict. Said facilities shall at a minimum include
free from advertising andl'a pole for the bus stor, bench ancl pole shall be designed in c? nanner so 2s dclraet fwrn the basic architectural thqne of the
said design shall be subject to the approval of tj-
Director c?nd ijorth County Trans'it Diskrict.
The pro-jcct-, sliall attempt to develop c? ride to 1,:3'; progrziii for its employees with the North County ri'r
st-aggering of worker s1iift.s so as to facilitate th
said program.
Approval of Tentatiiie Tract No, 81-46 2s granted s approval of Zone Change 250 and to approval of the
of this property to the city of Carlsbzd..
Approval of this tentative t-.raSt map shall expire
rrlontiis from the date of city ~ounci~. approval unle
' .
[l?)
I trict. Furthermore, the project shall attempt to 1
,15) 1
It 16)
22
1 23
map is recorded. An eitension may he requested by applicant. Said extension shall be approved or de discretion of thc City Council.. In approving an e
City Council ]nay irnpose new conditions and may rev
24
25
' 26
2r/
2o
i i J'
cond it ions ., ..
The developer shall' offer short-term leases of agr:
viab1l.e parcels as feasible until such time as the: are developed..
,i 117)
118) nevelcpmcnt of the project -site shall. conform to i.'i
ycgny-d inq treigtlt 1 imitat ioni wki'ic~i may apply to car of j3uil.t.j j,,Iys within Airport Husii~css Center C~irl~bi I 1 PC 1:[:so 1.10. 1 974 .- 4 - 1.
. 1
2
3
' 4
.-
e e
Enq inctct: inq
19) ~he applicant shall agree to make provision to utili2
reclaimed water, on the subject. property in all comnc
as approved by the City Ir:ncJineer,
20) he reclaimed water irrigation system shall be maintc
_-__--
I
5j
G
7
8
9
.IO
,
J:l
12
13
e
15
16
' 17
18
I-:
. operat.ed consistent with the requirements of the citl
Carlsbad p under a contractual agree~ncnt with the horn.
association that is to give the city total assurance
would always has7e the ability to discharge the efffuc
21) Irrigation systeri~s to accormodztc future reclaimed wz
be designed consisLent with Title 17 of the Californi Administrative Code. Offsite future reclaimed water distribution systems should be anticipated by the ins
of adequately sized sleeves at crossing,poir;ts to mir:
street exc.avation,
Gradinq -
22) 'i'he developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to coinmei?ccme.tit of any clearing or grading of the sike.
123) The gradilig for this prbjeck is defined as "controlle by Section 11.06.170( a,) of the Carlsbad 1::qnic:ipal Cod 1 . . Grading shall be performed under: the observation of a engineer whose responsibil.ity it shall be 'to coord in;
ir-:spection and testing to insure', compliance of the wc the approved grading plan, SuhJnit required reports tc
Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11 -06 of . Carlsbad Nunicipal Code,
I . 1
24) [!port conpletion of grading, the developer shall insui "as-graded" geologic plan shall be .submitted to the C
Encjineer. The plan shCill c3,early show all the geoloc
exposed by the grading operation, all ge,ologic colrrec
measures as actually constructecl and must be based or
20 I
21
map which represents both the pre and post site.gr.a.dj plan. shall. be signed by both.thc soils engineer and t engineering geologist. The plan shal.l be prepared or
251.
.. ,7
23
24
z6
28
27
or sirnilcr drafting film and shall become a permanent
25) NO Grading shall occur outside the limits of the subd
unless a letter of permission is-obta-ined. from the ok
the affected properties e
'.
I
126)
I 1
'NO cut or fill slopes shall be steeper than a ratio c
horizontal. to 1 vertical (2: 1 ) .,
27) Additional drainage easements and drainage structures
I provided or inst.allcc1 as mzy be rcquired.by the Count:
Department of Sanitakion and PLood Control or the Cit
nee?: - ..
-5- PC RESO NO. 1374
..
I. I*
1
2
. 3
4
5
G
,7
8
--
9
. 1.0
. 3-1
12
3.3
0 0
28) The developer shall pay the current 10cz.l drainage 2; prior to approval' of the final nap or shall construc. systems in conformance with the ?-;aster Drainage Plzn
of Carlsbad Stand;lrcls as required by the City Enginei
Land for'all pub1j.c streets and casem'ents shown on t]
tative map shall'be dedicated on the fifial map and s:
' granted to ci.ty free and clear of all liens 2nd encu:
30) Dj.rect access rights for a11 lots abutting Palomar A
Road and all lots abutting College Roulevardd, excep
joint driveway access to lots 25 and 26 02 Phase 3 s
waived on the final map.
29)
31) Direct access rights for lots 12 and 13 in Phase 1,
"D" Street shall be waived on the final. inap. Direct
rights for lot 1 in Phase 1 and lot 3 in Phase 2, ab
Camino Vi.iia Roble shall be waived on the final map.
Pub1 ic Improvements .
32)
--
All public streets shall be improved by the develope the typical sections shown on tlie tentative map and
conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior tc
of any buildings within the phase for wi.>ich the imp% . are required. -.
14.
3.5
16
17
18
3-9
20
21
* 22
23
24
, 25
'26
27'
28
I I=reetS
133) Unless otherwise stated in the conditions below, all
improvments within a phase shall be constructed by
. developer to full-width,
'
34) Excspt as indicated in the conditions below, all str
improvements will occur in con junction with adjacer1.C
development.
The developer shall construct half-street improvemei
including a raised median, along the Phase 1 frontac
Palomar Airport Road and provide a transition east c
Vida Roble for Paloinar Airport Road improved to the
* satisfaction .of the City Engineer prior to occupant:
phase.
The developer shall construct. half-street improvener
including a raised median,' along the Phase I1 front;
Palomar Airport Road prior to occupancy of Phase I1
College Doulevard shall he improved full-width with:
Phase I11 boundaries prior to occupancy .of that phar full lO2-foofi. right-of-way shall. he dedicated at thc
the final- map for Phase I11 with gradihg bei.ng done ultimate street width.
I 135)
.
I
36)
37)
,
.. PC RES0 NO. 1974 -6-
..
3,
2
3
a' e I
(30) CollcSje Dou1ev;ir'd shall'be improved oif-site, from thc southern boundary of Phase 111 to Palopar Airport Roc?(
32-foot width including curbs p-rFcir! to occupancy of PI
T~C full 102-foot right-of-way shall- be dedicated.
Notwithstanding conditions '3s and 36 the City Enginee: 39)
5 'I 6
7
'8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I 16
, 17
1s
occurrences:
a) Increase of 5,000 VDP in ADT {based on Fall 1980
counts) on El Canino Real between Tamarack livei?ue Palomar Airport Road.
counts) on Paloinar Ai'Lport Road between El Canino
i
h) Increase in 5,000 VDP in AD% (based on Fall 1980
' Paseo del ILorte.
130) Prior to occupancy of Phase 1, CEtniiio Vida Roble shal
constructed full-width between Palomar Airpart Road a
Strezt. .
41) "Dl' Street shall, be constructed to' full-iJidth improve
from Palomar Ai.rport Road to the wgst end of Phase I
occupancy oC that phase.
"D" Streek shall be Constructed to .fulL-wj.dth -inprove
from the west end ,of Phase I to College Bouleva.rd, pr
occupancy of Phase 111. . .
Sidewalks shall be constructed to city standar-Sts on b of the following streets: College Boulevard, Canino
. Roble and 'ID" Street. All other streets will have, a
minhvmr sidewalks construc.Led .'to' city standards on c
..
!42)
,43-)
I of the street.. .
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
, 26
27
20
.
---
'44) T'he developer shall enter int'o a .traffic signal agree
the city and post, aa bond to in'sure construction of t requi.red traffic signals prior .to tlYe approval of thc
map for each phase.
45). The required signals and the percentage of the cost c
signals.to be borne by the developer is as follows:
~
. Developer Intersect ion . cost
* * Palomar Airport Rd and Cakino Vida Roble Palomar Airport Rd and I'D"- Street'
College BDulcvard and "D" Street
Camino Vida Roble and 'ID" Street. . 100% . I 100%
*Cost of this signal shall be thi? dif.fcrcncc between
three-way intersection and a four-way 'intersection-
- 7.- PC. RESO NO. 1374
.l
2
3
.-
'4
5'
6 '
8
9
10
11
. 12
13
14
15
16
' 2.7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.6
27
28
0 0
46) The developer shall. insfall the required traffic sig; the City Engineer determines that such signals are VJ:
and so notifies t'he developer in writing,
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regul; design requirements of the respective. sewer and water regarding services to the project .,
48) The retention basins shall be constructed in the init
of grading for the phase in which they occur, These
shall be maintained by the prpoerty. owner's associati
responsibility shall be clearly stated in the CCcR's,
/49) This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. KO bai
permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until
further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of Tit1
the Carlsbad iblunicipal Code. This note shall be plac
final map. . .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetins
Planning Commission of the city of CarIsbad, California, l-
9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
47)
AYES : Commissioners Marcus, .Schlehubcr, Jose and
NOES : None.
AGSZXT: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Friestedt an
.. . .
Rombotis.
. A13STliIN: None.
CLARENCE SCHLEMUBER, Vice-
CARLSDAD PLANNING COMMTSSI
ATTEST: .I' I ' *
I
JAbIES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary ' CARLSDAD PLANNING COMMISSION '
..
, ..
PC RESQ NO. 1974 -a-
3. ei
4i
3i
5
6
7
8/
'1 ORDINANCE NO. 9635,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER SP-181.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Califo
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That the specific plan for the Airpo
Business Center (SP-181) r dated May 26, 1982, a copy of b
on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by referc
=O
11
(3 12
15 2 22 C3
*C cq fi: < a,
SECTION 2: That the findings and conditions cor I in Planning Coinmission Resolution No. 1975 dated June 9,
and on file in the Planning Department, are incorporated
re€erence as the findings and conditions for this approvl 1
3 v? 7 x-
z>;g
3%$ zu U'
I I for this project the applicant shall enter into an agree
c4 >o k 0 181
19
20
21
z2
23
24
25
26
27
28
resulting from inverse condemnation caused by or resulti
the operating of Palomar Airport or aircraft using Palon
Airport or from the approval of this project. This conc
shall apply to that portion of the project located withj
FAA "clear zone" or "crash zone'' of the airport as ident
the Environmental Impact Report.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effec
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shal
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be pu
at; least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen da
its adoption.
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
- m 0
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of
Carlsbad City Council held on the 20th day of July
and thereafter
i __I_
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said (
Council held on the 3rd day of Aupst , 1982, by tl
following vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin
-
Council Members Casler, Lewis, Chick and Anear
9L& LL/ L &d l2 n Q
e< cn
MARY H.&ASLER, ME I
7ods OLL - 14 i 205s oC~E 15 *Gz2 u: 8 do
16 I-? sU8C "ozs
$; 2 1'7
LW
46
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
>o k u
ATTEST:
1
(SEAL)
1
2.
..
,I
'1
2
i 0 0
PLANNING COt4illISSION ,RESOLUTION NO. 1475
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE PLANNING COi4MISSION OF THE CI'
OF CARLSEAD , CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CI'
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVIMG . SP- 18 1 , P.
SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A 333 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK
lj ti
6
.7
8
CASE NO: SP-181 I
WIIEREAS, a verified application for certain prope
A portion of Lot "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
County of San Diego, according to ?lap thereof No.
wit:
filed in the Office of the County Recorder, Notrev
10
13. has been filed with the city of CarlSbad and referred to i
3-3
l2
3.4
.15
.
I /Planning Commission; and
WEREAS, said verified application constitutes a
as provided by Title 21 of the Car'lsbad 14unicipal Code; a
'
1
WHEKEAS, the Planning Commission ciid on the 9th
li\June, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing AS prescri
i 'to consider said request; 2nd '
.I ., 2d
24
' 25
! . '6
i ! 27
28
i
icomnission as follows:
In) That the above recitations ;):e tiuc and, correct.
/E) 1 conditions:
That based on the evidence presented at the public h
Plannincj Commission reconinends that the City Council
Ordirlancc APPROVING SP- lC1 basccf . on the folloi.ri.ny fi
I////
\ /// L
..
(. 1
2
3
4
I _I Findings: . i I) The site'is physic'ally suitable .in size ind shape to accommodate the proposed uses be'cause the. Specific ~1; provides standards for development which accommodate t
project with the site.
2) 'The proposed uses will not be detrimental to adjoinin?
6
'7
€3
9
. 10
. ' 11
12
3) This project will not cause any significant adverse ir
the environment because the mitigation measures of E11
recommended for certification by. the Planning Coinniiss
been incorporated into the Specific Plan.
The project is consistent with all cj.ty public facili and ordinances because the Specific Plan prohibits an
development on 'the site without the proper public imp
The specific plan. is consistent .with the Carlsbad Geri and with Sections 65451 and 65452 c)f the Govorninent C
regulate. the ,use of specific plans.
4)
\
5)
~.
Conditions : .
5 I1
14
I-3
3.5
35
17
18
'20
properties for the reasons outl-ined in the staff repoi
1) -Approval is granted for SP-1C1 for the ZJ:'?~ as shown
7, of the "Airport Business Center Carlsl,a,d Specific
dated May 26, 1982, ~ incorporated by refe;:cnce and on
the Plar-tr?!-ng Department.
All. standards and provisiolls established .in the docurr;
entitled "Airport Business Center Carlsbnd Specific P
dated Kay 26., 1982, and incorporated by reference, sh
by any future development occurring within' the hounda
this Specific Plan.
This project is approved upon the express condition t
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as rccluil: City Council po'licy No. 17, dated hpril 2, 1979, on f the City Clerk and incorporated hereiii by recercncz r according' to the agreement signed by the applicant fc
. I
2) .
~~9,/3) I
23,
24
h, "5
'26
6 07'
,+ 221
''
arnehded May 28., 1382, 'is on file wit-h the City Clerk incorporated herein by reference. If s2i.d fee is not promised, this application will iiok he coiisistent wit
General Plan and approval for this project shall be I ////
////
//// ,.
////
'I/// ..
-2- PC RES0 NO. 1975
45 .
-.
'3.
2
3
-_
..
-.
..
0 -0 --.
..
' PASSED,.APPROYED AND ADOPTED at a re'gular rneetinc
planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, t.
4.1
19th day of June, 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
I . AYES: Comnissioners Marcus ,. Schlehuber, Jose i
6
. 7.
8
9
'. lo
11
' NOES: None.
ABSENT: Chairman Farrow, Conmissioners Friestedl
Romb0tj.s.
ABSTAIN: None, . @ L~d-.-cA--h---- : /@J <& ,. .. CLAREXCE SCHLEIIUBER, Vice-
CARL S B A D P L ANN I NG C 0 blf-1 I S S
.- __ ATTEST:. ._ .
5/:
12
l3
16
17
'. 181
19
,20
21
2.2
22,
24
25
2 6
27 ''
f7Z,<<;:ig p/, * ?&./<&,[/ . - -. .. .
,I .. - - -.
1 *%' G~MES C. HAF;AMAS\~/' Secretary
$~~ARLSBAD PLAN~~G COMMISSION
.. ~ . -- .- J ..
.. I .
.- - .- _. .. . ..
. ., .. .. . --
-
..
.. .. -_ .. -
- ..... .._ - - .
I
,.
1
._ i ..
'PC RES0 NO. 1375 -3-
..
Date of Meeting: July 31, 1991
Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Holmes called the Meeting to order at 6:OO p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Hall.
ROLL CALL:
Present - Chairman Holmes, Commissioners Erwin, Hall,
Noble, Savary, and Schlehuber
Absent - Commissioner Schramm
Staff Members Present:
Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director
Robert Green, Principal Planner
Elaine Blackburn, Associate Planner
Eric Munoz, Associate Planner
Bobbie Hoder, Senior Management Analyst
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney
Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer
PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES:
Chairman Holmes reviewed the Planning Commission procedures
on the overhead for the benefit of the audience.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTES IN THE
AGENDA :
There were no comments from the audience.
MINUTES :
Commissioner Erwin requested a change to the minutes of
July 17, 1991 on page 8, to delete paragraph 8 in its
entirety.
The Planning Commission approved the minutes of July 17,
1991 as corrected.
CONTINUED PUBLIC €iEARING ITEMS:
1) 5 - Request to reduce
the total amount of land designated for commercial uses
and to reassign the locations of commercial designated
lots within Specific Plan 181 for industrial and
commercial uses, located between El Camino Real,
Palomar Airport Road, north of College Avenue and
McClellan- Palomar Airport in the P-M Zone, and in
Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
Elaine Blackburn, Associate Planner, reviewed the background
of the request and stated that this project is an
application to amend Specific Plan 181, Carlsbad Airport
Center, to reduce the amount of acreage designated for
supporting commercial uses and redesignate the lots selected
for those uses. In addition to the changes being requested
by the applicant, staff is also proposing a number of
Erwin XX
Hall X
Holmes X
Noble x
Savary Y
Schlehuber X
July 31, i991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2
changes to the text of the Specific Plan (SP). These
changes involve the clarification and modification of
wording in some sections as well as the inclusion of new
wording to govern architecture in the park and signage along
Palomar Airport Road. No changes to the allowed uses are
being proposed.
The applicant would like to redesignate five lots from
commercial support uses to industrial uses and to
redesignate one lot from industrial to commercial support uses. The net effect would be the reduction of commercial
acreage by approximately four acres and the focusing of
commercial support uses from the interior to the perimeter
lots. A traffic study of the proposed changes indicates no
negative impacts to the internal or surrounding circulation
system would occur. No additional access to Palomar Airport
Road is being requested by the applicant and staff has
indicated that no such access will be approved.
map for the original SP included a waiver of any additional
direct access rights to Palomar Airport Road from the area.
Several changes are being proposed by staff, including the
following:
- Interior setbacks are being changed from 0 or 20 ft. to
The final
10 ft.
Maximum allowable height will be determined by the
underlying zone.
-
- Parking ratio requirements are being changed to be
determined by the Parking Ordinance.
- Architectural guidelines are being added. - Sign regulations will be changed to regulate signs along
Talomar Airport Road. (This change is in anticipation of
a Scenic Corridor Overlay on this roadway.)
Staff has been working with the applicant and other
interested parties in an effort to arrive at wording
agreeable to all. Staff believes that all but two issues
have been resolved. The two remaining are (1) the total
amount of sign area, and (2) the ratio used in the sign size
guidelines. Staff's proposed signage wording set forth in
staff memo dated July 29, 1991 is intended to provide
attractive integrated signage to prevent a proliferation of
signs along the corridor.
Robert Green, Principal Planner, presented six changes to
the wording in the July 29th memo as follows:
4b. Line 1 - delete the word "onto."
4c. Line 4 - after the word overlay, add "zone per Chapter
21.40. I'
Line 6 - after the word remain, add "for the time
limits specified in Chapter 21.41."
4d. Line 6 - delete the word "long."
Line 16 - change the word sign to "signs."
Line 19 - after the words area of, add "such."
.
0 0
0 MINUTES
July 31, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3
Commissioner Erwin is concerned about the elevations because
they are near the runway departure path. He inquired if it
would be possible to retain the 35 ft. height one-half mile
north, one-half mile south, one mile west and two miles east
of the airport rather than the overall 45 ft. which would be
allowable under the new Height Ordinance.
replied that the ZCA includes language which will enact the
Height Ordinance; however, there are controls in the
McClellan Airport Plan which allow for FAA review of
buildings which protrude into an imaginary plane which
surrounds the airport.
built into the SP, however it would require a thorough staff
analysis to determine the appropriate wording for an
additional layer of height control.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, replied that the heights
specified in the Airport Land Use Plan would take precedence
over the SP.
requirements of the Airport Land Use Plan but suggested that
it would be the preferable vehicle to control height in that
area.
Chairman Holmes requested that the City Attorney address the
issues in the Stanley Prowse letter dated July 17, 1991.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, would prefer to hear from
Mr. Prowse as to the unresolved issues before he offers his
comments.
Chairman Holmes opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue,
Suite 120, Garlsbad, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that many new changes are being
proposed by staff which were added after the original
accept the staff recommendation with the exception of two
signage requirements set forth in paragraph 4d.
requests that the combined total area (first sentence) be
changed from 100 s.f. to 140 s.f. and that the 1/2 s. f.
ratio (last sentence) be increased to 1 s. f. The reason
for this request is the ability to attract major tenants who
may require identification with a long name, i.e. a law
firm. Although Mr. Howes does not believe the additional
allowances will be used, the applicant would like to have
those options available in the event they are needed. He
feels that the requirement for a Planned Industrial Permit
will eliminate any possible misuse of the extra allowance.
Mr. Howes requested the Commission's consideration.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the applicant anticipates
single client tenants or multiple client tenants. Mr. iiowes
replied that the buildings have not yet been designed so it
is not possible to make a prediction.
applicant is requesting the flexibility.
Stanley D. Prowse, 2385 Camino Vida Roble, Suite 101,
Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he
represents MTK Corporation of America, the owner of Lots 1
and 10 which front along Palomar Airport Road. His client
is intending to construct two fairly large buildings which
would house multiple tenants and he believes that the
proposed signage allowance is too restrictive.
the allowance may be sufficient; huwever, he is concerned
that the words "shall not exceed" is arbitrary and would not
leave any alternatives. He requested the Commission give
Robert Green
More restrictive language could be
He is not totally familiar with the height
discussion with the applicant. Overall, the applicant can '-
His client
This is why the
In general,
July 31, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4
consideration to 140 s. f. of signage per building and a
ratio of 1 s. f. per 1 linear ft. of elevation as requested
by Mr. Howes.
sentence which states that if the Planning Director does not
approve a particular sign, that the applicant has the right
of appeal to the Planning Commission. He is also concerned
about the changes proposed in the new Height Ordinance.
client has spent a significant sum of money on preliminary
design work and it now appears that they will be unable to
build the type of building they had envisioned due to the
way height will be measured under the new ordinance. He is,
therefore, objecting (on behalf of his client) to the method
of measuring height proposed under the new ordinance.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the proposed buildings will
be designed so that all four signs will face Palomar Airport
Road. Mr. Prowse replied that there would probably be two
signs per elevation.
Commissioner Erwin inquired what size lettering would be
used. Mr. Prowse replied that he does not know. A sign
program would be needed to ensure consistency in the size of
the lettering.
Sam Blick, Attorney, 1925 Palomar Oaks Way, Carlsbad,
addressed the Commission and stated that his firm moved into
their present offices just three days ago. The main reason
his firm moved to Carlsbad was the ability to have some sign
identification on the exterior of the building. He feels a
sign can be utilitarian and still be aesthetically
beautiful.. He joins Messrs. Howes and Prowse in requesting
the two modifications to paragraph 4d, i.e. combined total
area of 140 s.f. per building and a sign area of 1 s.f. per
each linear ft.
Norm Curl, residing at 2399 Jefferson, Carlsbad, with
offices at 1925 Palomar Oaks Way, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is a commercial real estate
broker. He is concerned that prospective tenants will be
driven by the length of their name. He is concerned that
tenants with very long names, i.e. law firms, would choose
to locate elsewhere.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Robert Green, Principal Planner, responded to the public
comments and stated that:
- Palomar Airport Road is being considered as a scenic
He would also like to see an explicit
His
corridor which would require more strict standards to
reduce the proliferation of signage. As a result, staff feels that a total signage area of 100 s.f. per building
would comply with the intent of the scenic corridor
designation and they would not recommend a change to 140
s.f.
The 1/2 s.f. ratio per 1 linear foot is only a guideline
to assist staff in regulating the aesthetics.
*
* The Zoning Ordinance, Section 21.54.140, provides for
appeals to the Planning Commission.
r
t
e e
*\ MINUTES
July 31, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5
* Staff cannot comment on the building height issue raised
by Attorney Prowse until some drawings have been
submitted.
Commissioner Hall inquired how staff would respond to a firm
with a long name. Mr. Green replied that the size of the
sign would have to be smaller in order to accommodate the
long name.
Commissioner Noble can live with the staff recommendation
and feels that the appeals process is satisfactory.
Commissioner Erwin can support the 100 s.f. because most
companies can live within this requirement.
be handled via the appeals process.
Commissioner Erwin requested staff to restate how many signs
would be allowed per building. Gary Wayne, Assistant
Planning Director, replied that a maximum of four (4) signs
would be allowed per building.
Commissioner Savary can support the staff recommendation
because the appeals process is available.
Commissioner Schlehuber believes there is no right of appeal
for a sign area exceeding 100 s.f. Ron Ball, Assistant City
Attorney, replied that he is correct; there is no right of
appeal over the maximum footage.
Commissioner Schlehuber commented that he has been
affiliated with law firms that have long names but he still
feels there is sufficient area to accommodate long names.
Chairman Holmes disagrees. He feels that 140 s.f. is better
because it would allow for some input by the people
constructing the building. The buildings will get larger as I-
time goes by and granting an additional 40 s.f. is not a
significant compromise.
Commissioner Hall agrees with Chairman Holmes.
support 140 s.f. if all signs are approved by the Planning
Director. Commissioner Hall is more interested in the
architecture and design of the buildings than the sign area.
However, he would not be in favor of listing the names of
eight attorneys on the outside of a building.
Commissioner Erwin feels the Commission needs to address the
exception. He thought that an applicant wpuld have the right of appeal for a sign area exceeding 100 s.f. Ron
Ball, Assistant City Attorney, replied that all signs are
subject to the approval of the Planning Director but the
wording states that the total sign area shall not exceed 100
s.f.
exceeding 100 s.f., the wording needs to be changed.
Commissioner Erwin likes the 100 s.f. but would like the
ability to address the exception.
Attorney, replied that Section 4.d. could state something to
the effect that normally there would be 100 s.f. but in
extraordinary cases additional footage could be granted up to 120 s.f.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels there should be a definite
limit. There is no exact science for picking the maximum
length. He is not fixed on 100 s.f. He could be convinced
of another length if the wording is appropriate. He would
Exceptions can
He could
If the Commission desires to allow appeals for signs
Ron Ball, Assistant City
July 31, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6
like to hear staff’s response on the ?/2 s.f. per linear ft.
issue.
In responding, Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, used
the Opus East building as an example. It is 175 ft. long.
If the sign ratio is 1 s.f. to 1 linear ft., it would permit
one tenant with one extremely large sign. Staff felt that
would be out of proportion to the structure. The ratio of
1/2 s.f. to 1 linear ft. is merely a guideline and could be
adjusted to fit the building proportions.
feel that a sign should overpower a building.
Commissioner Schlehuber likes the guideline approach rather
than the mandatory approach. He suggested stating the
combined area as a guideline, which could then be appealed.
Commissioner Hall inquired if a worst case scenario could be
denied and sent to the Planning Commission for a decision.
Mr. Wayne replied that a worst case could be denied but when
the guidelines are too vague, it causes a lot of problems
for staff.
is higher than to have a loose guideline.
Commissioner Erwin suggested an additional sentence follow
the 100 s.f. limit which states that “In extraordinary
conditions, this limit can be increased to 140 s.f.”
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, felt that it should be
worded a little differently.
as follows:
Staff does not
It would be better to have a set footage which
He suggested the sentence read
An additional 40 s.f. of signage may be allowed under
unusual circumstances, such as an unusually long name
and/ar a sign which would not normally be visible
unless extra square footage were available.
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, stated that he
could accept the wording suggested by Mr. Ball.
Commissioner Hall still has a hard time with 4-6-8 names;
he would still like to keep a clean basic sign.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3274 recommending approval
of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director
and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3275 recommend-
ing approval of SP 181(A) based on the findings and subject
to the conditions contained therein, with the addition of
changes outlined in the staff memo dated July 29, 1991 and
corrected in this meeting by Mr. Green of the Planning staff, and the addition of new wording as proposed by Mr.
Ball which would allow an additional 40 s.f. of sign area in
exceptional circumstances.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 7:08 p.m. and reconvened
at 7:20 p.m.
2) ZCA 91-3 - CITY OF CARLSBAD - Amendments and additions
to various chapters and sections of the Zoning
Ordinance to allow for (1) the revision and addition of
zoning definitions; (2) residential building height
reductions:
commercial and industrial uses; and (4) modification of
(3) building height increases for certain
f-
Erwin X
Hall X
Holmes X
Noble X
Savary X
Schlehuber x x
e a
.
SPECIFIC PLA
CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENT1
(Formerly AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORN
SP 181
A SIGNAL LANDMA
CARLTON BROWNE DEVELOPME
AMENDED JULY,
e a
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- P
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................
A. PURPOSE ..................................................
B. LOCATION .................................................
C. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS .................... ,
II. LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PHASING ..............................
A. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ............................
B. STATISTICAL SUMMARY ......................................
C. CIRCULATION ..............................................
D. PHASING .................................................
III. PERMITTEDUSES ................................................
A. AREA1 ...................................................
B. AREA2 ...................................................
D. CC&R'S ...................................................
IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ...............................
A. BUILDING SETBACKS ........................................
B. SITE COVERAGE ............................................
C. BUILDING HEIGHT ..........................................
D. PARKING ..................................................
E. LANDSCAPING .............................................
F. SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS ...........................
G. LOADING AREAS ............................................
H. STORAGE AREAS ...........................................
I. METALSTRUCTURES ........................................
J. REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS .................................
K. TELEPHONE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE .........................
L. NUISANCES ...............................................
M. SCREENING OF EQUIPMENT ..................................
N. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC EASEMENTS .......................
0. BIKELANES ...............................................
P. ARCHITECTURALGUIDELINES .................................
Q. EMPLOYEE EATING AREAS ...................................
GENERAL NOTES AND MITIGATION MEASURES .........................
A. GENERAL .................................................
8. MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................
1. Grading/Foundation Design ..............................
2. Drainage/Erosion Control/Water Quality .....................
3. Biological Resources ...................................
4. Archaeological Resources ...............................
5. Paleontological Resources ...............................
6. Circulation ...........................................
7. Flight-Path Restricted Use Zone ...........................
0. Noise ...............................................
9. Services and Utilities ...................................
VI. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ..............................................
C. AREA 3 - FUTURE PLANNING AREA .............................
v.
e 0
LIST OF FIGURES
E
Figure 1 - Regional Site Map
Figure 2 - Specific Location Map
Figure 3 - Landscaped Streets With Adjacent Slopes
Figure 4 - Landscaped Streets Without Adjacent Slopes
Figure 5 - interior Streets With Adjacent Slopes
Figure 6 - Interior Streets Without Adjacent Slopes
Figure 7 - Land Use Plan
0 e
1. INTRODUCTION
A. PURPOSE
The Specific Plan has been prepared to provide for the design, development
operation of an industrial complex within the City of Carlsbad. The development regulat
therein will insure conformity to community goals and values and the protection of adjacent i
uses from unfavorable impacts.
As a device to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan, this Spe
Plan establishes standards for development and does not provide a guarantee of approva
future discretionary acts or projects within its boundaries. This industrial complex shall be kn
as Carlsbad Airport Centre.
This Specific Plan is adopted pursuant to the provisions of California Governr
Code Sections 65450 et seq. and the Land Use Element of the City of Carlsbad General i
The area covered by this plan is included within the Palomar Airport Special Treatment,
specified in the General Plan and, therefore, this plan is also prepared according to the sp
treatment area requirements established by the City’s General Plan. A specific plan is reqi
for this project because of the particular requirements of the special treatment area. This Spc
Plan establishes detailed regulations, conditions and programs for development within the
specified herein.
B. LOCATION
The Carlsbad Airport Centre contains 333 acres and is located on the north
of Palomar Airport Road, south and west of Palomar Airport in an unincorporated County is1
but is within the City’s sphere of influence and will be annexed to the City. See Figure
general site location and Figure 2 for the project location.
C. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
This site is designated in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Pia
Planned Industrial (PI) with the underlying zone to be designated as Planned Industrial (PI
1
e a
- _----
REGIONAL SITE MAP
2
e a
SPECIFIC LOCATION MAP
3
0
II. LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PHASING
A. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
This project is a planned industrial development which will consist of sevc
different uses such as industrial, research and development, and office and related commerc
An organized and pleasant setting will be provided for the various industrial development si
A full range of commercial and industrial support facilities will be included to service the proj
The location of various land uses is designated on the Land Use Plan (Figure 7).
development shall conform to the Land Use Plan.
The building sites and parking lots will be exlensively landscaped along \
special landscape treatments on designated streets.
The establishment of setback requirements and sign controls will help to pro!
an aesthetically sensitive environment.
Pedestrian and bicycle access will be provided throughout the developtr
Private recreational facilities will be recommended for the benefit of the employees of indivii
industrial users. Areas where heavy concentration of oak trees exist will be preserved wl
possible as natural open space. The SDG&E easements that cross the property will be uti1
for parking, other nonbuilding uses and access to the existing pole and tower structures, w
will be maintained and enhanced.
B. STATISTICAL SUMMARY
- Uses Acres
Industrial 21 1.1
Retail or similar 17.1
Streets 44.8
Open space 43.4
Mini parks 2.9
Future development area 14.0
Total Site Acreage 333.0
Special landscape areas 23.8
This plan serves to implement the general plan in conjunction with the PM zc
classification on the site. The permitted uses, development standards, and environm
considerations contained in this plan are more stringent than those found in the prop
zoning. Therefore, the provisions of this plan will take precedence. The provisions of thc
zone and any amendments thereto shall apply to any subjects which are not covered in this
4
e e
Approval of this plan does not vest any rights for future approvals of any licenses, discretic
acts or other entitlements necessary for future development of this project.
C. CIRCULATION
Primary access to the site will be from Palomar Airport Road and future Co
Boulevard and Camino Vida Roble. Internal circulation will be provided by four-lane public r
designed and built by the developer in accordance with City standards.
conjunction with adjacent development.
All local streets will be constructed by the developer to City standarc
D. PHASING
Three phases of approximately 110 acres each are to be developed, the lim
which are shown on the Land Use Plan. Approximately three years are estimate(
development of each phase. The phasing schedule has been developed in accordance wit^
best information available at the time of adoption of this plan. Minor changes in ph:
(changes which do not affect availability of public utilities or services, or cause an alteratic
- +lo% of the development plan) may be approved by the PUanning Director. If a change
cause a significant alteration to the development plan, or create a problem with respect tc
availability of public utilities or services, or may have other significant impacts, the Plar
Director shall refer the change in phasing to the Planning Commission for approval. h(
changes in phasing may necessitate an amendment to this Specific Plan.
Development of the Carlsbad Airport Centre will begin with Phase 1 as show
Figure 7. Phasing will be completed sequentially as shown on Figure 7. The Planning Dirc
may approve nonsequential development, providing that public facilities have been compl
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. For the purposes of this plan, public facilities inc
streets, provision for a dual water system for domestic and reclaimed wastewater, sewer facil
mini-parks, landscaping, drainage facilities, electricity, gas and telephone. Specific improvei
plans will be prepared and submitted as required by conditions of approval on the tentative
map and each final map.
In order to accommodate the overall grading requirements for the entire site
and fill may occur outside the boundaries of each phase subject to approval by the
Engineer. Also to accommodate the overall utility requirements of the entire project, L
construction may occur outside the boundaries of each phase, and this too is subject to
approval of the City Engineer. Specific public improvements shall be constructed in accord2
with the following schedule:
5
e s
1. Streets
a. Unless otherwise stated in the conditions below, all s
improvements within a phase shall be constructed by the devel
to full width.
b. Except as indicated in the conditions below, all s
improvements will occur in conjunction with adjacent developn
The developer shall construct half-street improvements, inch
a raised median, along the Phase I frontage of Palomar Ai
Road and provide a transition east of Camino Vida Roblc
Palomar Airport Road improved to the satisfaction of the
Engineer prior to occupancy of that phase.
The developer shall construct half-street improvements, inclu
a raised median, along the Phase II frontage of Palomar Ai
Road prior to occupancy of that phase.
College Boulevard shall be improved full-width within the Pha
boundaries prior to occupancy of that phase. The full 102
right-of-way shall be dedicated at the time of the final mal
Phase 111 with grading being done for the ultimate street widtl
College Boulevard shall be improved off-site, from the soul
boundary of Phase 111 to Palomar Airport Road, with a 32-foot k
including curbs prior to occupancy of Phase 111. The full 102
right-of-way shall be dedicated.
Notwithstanding conditions e and f, the City Engineer may rec
construction of College Boulevard to City standards pric
occupancy of Phase 111 based on the following occurrences:
1) Increase of 5,000 VPD in ADT (based on Fall 1980 t
counts) on El Camino Real between Tamarack Avenuc
Palomar Airport Road.
Increase in 5,000 VPD in ADT (based on Fall 1980 t
counts) on Palomar Airport Road between El Camino
and Paseo del Norte.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
2)
h. Prior to occupancy of Phase I, Camino Vida Roble sha
constructed full-width between Palomar Airport Road and "D I
(Palomar Oaks Way).
6
e 9
i. I'D" street (Palomar Oaks Way) shall be constructed to full-w
improvements from Palomar Airport Road to the west end of Ph
I prior to occupancy of that phase.
"D street (Palomar Oaks Way) shall be constructed to full-vu
improvements from the west end of Phase I to College Boulev
prior to occupancy of Phase Ill.
Sidewalks shall be constructed to City standards on both side
the following streets: College Boulevard, Camino Vida Roble
"D" street (Palomar Oaks Way). All other streets will have,
minimum, sidewalks constructed to City standards on one sic
the street.
i-
k.
2. Traffic Siqnals
a. The developer shall enter into a traffic signal agreement with
City and post a bond to insure construction of the required ti
signals prior to the approval of the final map for each phase.
The required signals and the percentage of the cost of tl
signals to be borne by the developer is as follows:
b.
Developer Pt Intersection cost - LOC
Palomar Airport Rd & Camino Vida Roble 50% 1
Palomar Airport Rd & "Dl street
Camino Vida Roble & I'D" street
College Boulevard & "Dl street
1 *
1 00%
100%
,
\ , s
*Cost of this signal shall be the difference between th
a three-way intersection and a four-way intersection.
The developer shall install the required traffic signals when the
Engineer determines that such signals are warranted anc
notifies the developer in writing.
c.
3. Mini-Parks
Mini-parks will be considered the same as other public facilities in re1
to phasing. Mini-parks will be constructed by the developer pric
building development of 60 percent Of the acreage of the entire p
within which they are located as they are shown on land use plan.
7
0 .9
4. Landscaping
All approved landscaping for special landscaped streets and comr
areas shall be installed prior to occupancy of each phase.
8
.. e 3
Ill. PERMITTED USES
A. AREA1
*
Area 1 is designated for light and medium industrial uses, research
development uses, industrial support and service uses, and business and professional c
uses, provided that such uses are confined within a building or buildings and do not contri
excess noise, dust, smoke, vibration, odor or toxic or noxious matter to the surrour
environment nor contain a high hazard potential. Uses permitted in the Carlsbad Airport CI
will not produce any of the following:
1. Noise in excess of 70 decibels (American Standard for noise level met
a. For a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes in any hour
b. Plus 5 decibels for a cumulative period of more than 15 minuti
any hour; or
Plus 10 decibels for a cumulative period of more than 5 minuti
any hour; or
Plus 15 decibels for a cumulative period of more than 1 minu
any hour; or
Plus 20 decibels for any period of time;
C.
d.
e.
Vibration, heat, glare, or electrical disturbances beyond the boundarif
the site;
2.
3. Air pollution detectable by the human senses without the aic
instruments, beyond the boundaries of the site:
Emissions which endanger human health which can cause damag
animals, vegetation or property, or which can cause spilling at any F
beyond the boundaries of the site;
Odor detectable by the human senses without aid of instruments be)
the boundaries of the site.
4.
5.
All wastes discharged into the wastewater discharge system will meet City standards.
All uses shall conform to the general development concepts for a high-qu
business park, with all standards and restrictions established by this plan and with CC&R’:
Specifically, the following uses are permitted in Area 1 :
1. Uses primarily engaged in research activities, including resei
manufacturing such as, but not limited lo, the following:
a. Biochemical;
9
e e is
4 b. Chemical;
C. Electronics;
d. Film and photography;
e. Medical and dental;
f. Metallurgy;
g* Pharmaceutical;
h. X-ray.
2. Manufacture, research assembly, testing and repair of compon
devices, equipment and systems, and parts and components oi
following:
a. Coils, tubes, semi-conductors;
b.
c.
d.
e. Graphics and art equipment;
f. Metering equipment;
g. Radio and television equipment;
h. Photographic equipment;
I.
i. Optical devices and equipment;
k. Filling and labeling machinery.
Light manufacturing, processing, and/or assembly of the followin
similar products:
a. Food products;
b.
c. Lumber and wood products;
d. Furniture and fixture products;
e. Chemical and allied products;
f. Plastic and rubber products;
g.
h. Fabricated metal products;
1. Professional, scientific, controlling, photographic, and OF
Communication, navigation, guidance and control equipmeni
Data processing equipment, including computer software;
Glass edging and silvering equipment;
Radar, infrared and ultraviolet equipment;
3.
Apparel and finish products from textile products;
Stone, clay, and glass products;
products or equipment.
10
0 0
4. Service industries or those industries providing a service as opposed
the manufacture of a specific product, such as the repair and maintenar
of appliances or component parts, tooling, printers, testing shops, sn
machine shops, shops engaged in the repair, maintenance and servici
of such items, excluding automobile and truck repair, and exclud
equipment rental yards.
Industries engaged in the distribution and/or storage or warehousing
products similar to those listed in other permitted uses in this group.
Construction industries such as general contractors, electrical contractc
plumbing contractors, etc., and their accessory and incidental office UI
Blueprinting, photostatting, photo-engraving, printing, publishing, i
bookbinding.
Administrative and professional offices, limited to a) offices which
associated with any permitted industrial use or b) offices which do
attract nor are primarily dependent upon business customers visiting
office. Permitted offices include, but are not limited to, corporate offic
regional offices, general offices, and such professional offices
accountants, attorneys, engineers, architects, and planners. Prohit
offices include, but are not limited to, banks and financial institutil
medical and dental offices, employment agencies, real estate agenc
and travel agencies.
Employee cafeteria, cafe, restaurant, or auditorium accessory with
incidental to a permitted use (intended primarily for the express us
those persons employed at the firm or use where such incidental u!
applied).
Accessory uses and structures when related and incidental to a perm
use such as, but not limited to, food preparation, food service, and e:
facilities.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
B. AREA2
Area 2 is designated for industrial support uses, business and professional I
and certain retail uses supporting the business park.
The commercial areas in Area 2 require a conditional use permit and
development plan for each use pursuant to Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Cc
11
0 m
Q-Overlay Zone) prior to development. Any development within Area 2 shall conform to the
Development Plan as approved.
Permitted uses in Area 2 are:
1. Retail businesses (oriented to needs of complex employees);
2. Service businesses (oriented to needs of complex employees
businesses);
3. Personal service businesses;
4. Financial service businesses;
5. Blueprinting, photostatting, photo-engraving, printing, publishing,
bookkeeping;
Administrative, professional, and business offices;
Health or athletic club facilities;
6.
7.
8. Service stations;
9. Hotels, motels, and theaters providing the developer institutes a gei
plan amendment for those uses prior to construction.
Restaurants may be permitted anywhere in the Airport Business Ct
with a conditional use permit subject to the provisions of Section 21 .A
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. At a minimum, this conditional use p
shall address adequate parking, distance between restaur
compatibility with surrounding uses, and hours of operation.
10.
C. AREA 3 - FUTURE PLANNING AREA
Because of topography and access problems, possible development of Are;
premature at this time. If at some time in the future development is proposed for this area,
a major amendment to this Specific Plan will be processed by the Planning Commission anc
Council. Uses proposed for this area should be compatible with the adjacent Macario Ca
Park. The burden of proof to develop this area lies with the developer. Before developme
this property can occur, it must be shown that proposed uses for this area are compatibk
Macario Canyon Park and with the adjacent open space area and that proper access is ava
to the site.
D. CC&R’S
Prior to any development within the Carlsbad Airport Centre, the developer
prepare covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) applicable to the entire park site. -
CC&R’s shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of any final map fl
12
0 e
IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
This section provides standards which will allow unique site planning and building de:
on individual parcels while maintaining regulations assuring the development of an indus
center of excellent quality. Various setbacks, building separations, building heights,
architectural styles will be allowed as a result of the mixed land uses and prevailing topograr
although visual continuity will be provided by unified landscaping along the special landsce
streets.
A. BUILDING SETBACKS
For the purpose of this ordinance, setbacks are defined as that minimum dist:
from the ultimate right-of-way line of the frontage street. Special landscaped streets an
follows: College Boulevard, Camino Vida Roble, and 'ID" Street (Palomar Oaks Way).
1. Streetside Setback. No structure shall be located within 30 feet 01
street right-of-way line, except that unsupported roofs or sun screens
project 6 feet into the setback area. The following improvement:
specifically permitted in the streetside setback:
a. Walks;
b. Paving and associated curbing, except that vehicle parking i
shall not be permitted within 36 feet of the streetside right-ol
lines of special landscaped streets or within 10 feet o
streetside right-of-way line of other streets. In either case
parking overhang is prohibited;
C. Landscaping;
d. Planters, architectural fences, or walls not to exceed 3 fc
height;
In the case of through lots extending from street to street, both i
frontages shall be treated as a streetside setback.
Interior Setback. No structure shall be located within 10 feet of any ir
lot line.
Rear Setback. No structure shall be located within 25 feet of a rc
line. Parking areas shall maintain a ten-foot setback from rear lot line
no parking overhang permitted.
Fiqures 3 throuqh 6 represent graphic examples of how setbac
special streets and interior streets should be treated. Treatment
limited to the method depicted in this graphic, however.
2.
3.
4.
13
%
0
'ii
z
ld h
al I 0
ll A
I
ii n
si
\I
15
!ll
1
16
0 e
3
Q
VI
2
f
2
B
I
lL <
3
1
17
0 e
B. SITE COVERAGE
Maximum building coverage, including accesson] building structures and exclud
open parking areas, shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross lot area.
C. BUILDING HEIGHT
The maximum height of all structures shall be determined by the underl)
zone.
D. PARKING
No on-street parking will be allowed.
Parking shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 2
of the Zoning Ordinance. Where two or more uses occupy a single structure, the par1
requirement shall be determined by calculating the requirement for each use individually be
on its proportional share of total floor area. No change to a use requiring more parking wil
allowed unless the additional parking for the new use is provided. If additional parking is
provided, the City shall deny the appropriate permit or license for the new use.
E. LANDSCAPING
The following standards shall apply to all landscaping within the developrr
"Special Landscaped Streets" have been designated on the Land Use Plan (see Figurc
Special consideration will be given to the landscaping along these streets and is referre
under separate sections of the following standards, All landscaping must comply with the
of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
1. General Requirement
a, All landscaping pursuant to this section shall be installed bl
developer and maintained through the business park associi
or, if approved by City Council, a maintenance district.
A minimum of 15 percent of each building site area sha
reserved for irrigated landscaping which shall be maintained
neat and orderly manner. The configuration of the reqi
landscaping may be creatively distributed but shall, at a minil
include the following areas:
1) Streetside Setback Areas
b.
a) General Statement: An effective cornbinatic
street trees, trees, ground cover, and shrut
shall be provided.
18
e e
b) Special Landscaped Street (College Boule\
Camino Vida Roble and "D" Street (Palomar C
Way)): except for approved driveway and side
locations, the entire area between the curb anc
building setback line shall be landscaped (Fig
3 and 4).
c) Interior Streets: Except for approved driveway
sidewalk locations, the entire area from the cu
a point 10 feet beyond the right-of-way line sh:
landscaped (Figures 5 and 6).
Berms: The landscaping in all streetside setb
shall include berms as noted below. The avc
height of berms shall be 42 inches for SF
landscape streets and 30 inches for all other sti
The height of the berm shall be measured fror
street curb or parking lot curb, whichever is hi
When the parking area is more than 36 ir
below street level, the berm may be 18 in
Berms are not required where the entire
between the street and building is to be landsc
and free of parking.
d)
e) Intersections: Landscaping and berms,
including trees, along all streets shall be limit
a height of 2.5 feet within the triangle formed
line extended between points 35 feet distan
the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolo
All landscaping planted within the confines c
Diego Gas & Electric easements shall confc
the standards applied to those easements.
g) All screening trees shall be evergreen varietic
Palomar Airport Road. A special landscape corridor
Palomar Airport Road, with a minimum width of 50 fee
right-of-way, shall be established and maintained t
r)
2.
19
0 0
developers or homeowners' association. The landscar
shall consist of a combination of trees and shrubs i
ground cover that is consistent with the general the
along Palomar Airport Road.
3. Interior Setback.
a) General Statement: All designated undeveloi
areas such as setbacks and areas not used
parking or storage shall be landscaped with grc
cover, shrub, and tree materials.
b) Undeveloped Areas: Undeveloped areas
unpaved areas proposed for future expansion !
be maintained by developer/owner/lessee i
weed-free condition, but need not be landscap
c) Screening: Areas used for parking shall
landscaped in such a manner as to interrup
screen said areas from view from access streets
adjacent properties. Plant materials used for
purpose shall consist of lineal or grouped mass
shrubs and/or trees.
4. Parkinq Areas. Trees, equal in number to one pel
parking stalls shall be provided in the parking area.
trees may be distributed evenly throughout the area or
be grouped or clustered in order to create a rar
pattern. Canopy trees shall be used in parking areas
Slope Banks. All slope banks greater than 5:l or 6 ft
vertical height and adjacent to a public right-of-way shl
stabilized, planted with a combination of trees, shrubs
ground cover, and irrigated as required by the
Engineer.
Entrvwavs. Special landscape and sign treatment sh
applied to all entry ways into the business center at Cc
Boulevard (both ends), Camino Vida Roble and Pa
Airport Road, and I'D" Street (Palomar Oaks Way
5.
6.
20
0 m
Palomar Airport Road. Distinctive landscape de
consisting of ground cover and hedgerows combined
contour berming shall be included. Entryways shal
limited to ground signs which contain the name of
business center only and which conform to the sign
graphic standards of this plan. Entryway plans shal
submitted to the Planning Director for approval pric
issuance of sign permits. Entryway signs shall be limit$
25 feet in length and 6 feet in height.
A detailed landscape and irriqation plan for all SF
landscaped streets, mini-parks and common areas, Shi
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director
to approval of the final map for each phase.
Mini-Park Development. Four mini-parks, located as st
on the tentative map and Figure 7 of this Specific
shall be constructed to provide passive rest and F
areas for employees and visitors of Airport Business Cc
Each park shall be developed according to
requirements of the City's Parks and Recreation Dirl
Prior to development of any phase, plans for constri
of all parks within that phase shall be submitted t
Parks and Recreation Director for approval. The mini-
shall be maintained by the property owners throi
property owner's association according to stan
established by the Parks and Recreation Director.
mini-park will incorporak berms, landscaping and fur
(to include picnic benches, tables and trash receptac
7.
8.
F. SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS
1. General Standards
a. Only one single- or double-faced permanent sign will be al
per street frontage per tenant (except as otherwise indicate
b. Signs will be restricted to identifying only the person
company, or corporation operating the use conducted on tl
or the products sold therein.
21
m 0
c. The area of a wall sign will be measured by a rectangle around
outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol.
All signs attached to the building will be surface-mounted.
Signs visible from the exterior of any building may be lighted,
no sign or any other contrivance will be devised or constructec
as to rotate, gyrate, blink, move, or appear to move in any fast-
Public service devices such as clocks and temperature indica
will be devoid of advertising.
Each project shall have a sign program approved by the Plan
Director. No sign which is not consistent with said program
be allowed. Each sign must receive a sign permit.
d.
e.
f.
g.
2. Wall Sians
a. No wall sign will exceed an area equal to one and one-half sq
feet of sign area for each foot of lineal frontage of the buildir
store. Total signage shall not exceed 200 square feet in are:
lot or comprise more than 10 percent of the area of the elevi
upon which the sign is located, whichever is less.
b. In multi-tenant industrial or office buildings, each indiv
business may have a wall sign over the entrance to identif
tenant. Said sign will give only the name of the company an
be limited to letters six inches high. Said signs will be oric
toward the parking or pedestrian area for that building and
not exceed a maximum area of five square feet.
In multi-tenant commercial buildings, each ground floor bus
may have one wall sign per buiUding frontage. Said signs shz
be located above the ground floor facia. Each sign shall be lii
to an area equal to 10 percent of the business face upon wt
is located or a maximum of 35 square feet.
C.
3. Ground (or Free-Standinn) Sians
a. Ground signs shall not exceed four feet above grade in heig
more than one and one-half square feet in area for each on
of lineal frontage of the building or store. However, no sigr
exceed 200 square feet in area (both faces).
22
0 0
b. Every lot may have at least one ground sign. Additional grl
signs may be added for every 200 feet of street frontage in er
of the first 100 feet of street frontage.
No ground sign shall be located within 100 feet of another grc
sign.
c.
4. Frontina Palomar AirPort Road
It is the intent of this section to ensure that all signs fronting Pall
Airport Road are aesthetically pleasing in design and appearance an
not adversely impact the appearance of the potential Palomar Airport t
Scenic Corridor. The signs subject to these standards are all s
fronting Palomar Airport Road within Lots 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 28
29. For purposes of this section, fronting Palomar Airport Road ml
"visible from the portion of Palomar Airport Road directly adjacent tc
lot in which the sign is located."
a. Special care shall be taken in the design of all signs fror
Palomar Airport Road. All wall and monument signs shal
subdued in tone and integrated into the architecture of
building. The intent of this section is not to specifically pro
recognizable logos.
All signs fronting Palomar Airport Road shall be subject to
review and approval of the Planning Director.
If a Scenic Corridor Overlay is placed on the Palomar Airport R
corridor, then all new signs fronting Palomar Airport Road I
comply with the requirements of the scenic corridor overlay z
(Chapter 21.40). Signs existing on the effective date of the scl
corridor which are not in compliance shall be allowed to remair
the time limits specified (Chapter 21.41) unless they are modi
or changed in any way except for routine maintenance anc
repair.
b.
c.
d. Wall signs fronting Palomar Airport Road shall not exceec
combined total area of one hundred (1 00) square feet per builc
(excluding monument signs). An additional 40 square fee.
signage may be allowed under unusual circumstances, such as
unusually long name and/or a sign which would not normally
23
e 0
visible unless extra square footage were available. A maximL
4 signs per building fronting Palomar Airport Road shall be allo
Of these 4, a maximum of 2 signs per elevation shall be allo
A curvilinear elevation with distinctly separated section
substantial length may be counted as more than one elevg
Signs permitted in Section F2b and F2c are exempt from t
regulations. The overall area of each wall sign fronting Pall
Airport Road should be in tasteful proportion to the overall ar
the elevation on which it is located and to the elements c
elevation, and the letters or symbols employed should ordinar
no larger than reasonably necessary to enable them to be rei
recognized quickly and easily by vehicular passers-by.
guideline the total area of such sign(s) on each elevation SI
not exceed a ratio of 1/2 sq. ft. sign area per 1 linear fc
building elevation fronting Palomar Airport Road (and in no
shall the combined total area of such signage per building er
one hundred (100) sq. ft.) except under special circumst:
noted above.
Monument signs are allowed in addition to wall signs, limit
one (1) monument sign fronting Palomar Airport Road per lo
to exceed thirty-five (35) square feet per face.
Should Lots 28 and/or 29 develop entirely with commercial
sign programs for those lots shall be subject to Plar
Commission review with any accompanying discretic
application.
e.
f.
5. Miscellaneous Siqns
a. Temporaw Identification Signs
1) Sales or Lease Sign. One sign not to exceed 15 s
feet in area advertising the sale, lease, or hire of the s
be allowed.
Construction Sign. One sign not to exceed 20 feet ir
denoting the architects, engineers, contractor, and
2)
relat€d~w9beaacMledattheccmmencementof~
24
0 0
3) Temporary Future Tenant Sign. One sign allowing
identification of the future tenants and other persons. 5
signs shall not exceed 20 square feet.
4) None of the above signs (1-3) will be allowed a
Palomar Airport Road. One temporary project :
advertising lot sales or lease, may be placed along Palc
Airport Road, not to exceed 40 square feet per phase
b. Special-Purpose and Directional Signs. Directional and sp
purpose signs shall be allowed, subject to approval of the Plar
Director.
G. LOADING AREAS
1. On special landscape streets, no loading shall be allowed which is v
from adjacent streets.
On other than special landscaped streets, streetside loading sha
allowed provided the loading dock is set back a minimum of 70 feet
the street right-of-way line. All loading areas must be screened
adjacent streets.
2.
H. STORAGE AREAS
1. All outdoor storage shall be visually screened from adjacent street!
property. Said screening shall consist of a solid concrete or mason
other durable material approved by the Planning Director) wall no
than six feet in height. Outdoor storage shall include the parking
company-owned or -operated motor vehicles, with the exception of rc
passenger vehicles (automobiles).
No storage shall be permitted between streetside and the building I 2.
1. METAL STRUCTURES
No metal structures with metal siding or sheeting exterior shall be permitte
J. REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS
1. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be completely enclosec
screened from access streets and adjacent property by a block Wi
feet in height, approved by the Planning Director. All such areas
have concrete floors, and shall be of sufficient size to contain all
25
0 0
generated by the business. These ares shall be no less than six by ei
feet in size.
No refuse collection areas shall be permitted between streetside and
building line.
2.
K. TELEPHONE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE
All "on-site" electrical lines (excluding transmission lines) and telephone lines s
be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually screened from b
from streets and adjacent properties.
L. NUISANCES
No portion of the property shall be used in violation of the performance stand<
of this plan or in such a manner as to create a public or private nuisance.
M. SCREENING OF EQUIPMENT
Exterior components of plumbing, processing, heating, cooling and ventik
systems (including but not limited to piping, tanks, stacks, collectors, heating, cooling,
ventilating equipment fans, blowers, duct work, vents, louvers, meters, compressors, mo
incinerators, ovens, etc.) shall not be directly visible to surrounding areas to the satisfactic
the Planning Director.
N. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC EASEMENTS
Should San Diego Gas & Electric Company utilize their easement righ
underground utilities or in any other way disturb parking areas, access ways, or other appr
portions of the site, the developer shall be responsible for restoring such parking areas or ac
ways to their required condition.
0. BIKE LANES
Provisions for bike lanes shall be made by the developer for College Boule
If the City Engineer determines that enough width exists on "0 street (Palomar Oaks Wz
provide adequate space for a bike lane, then the developer shall provide appropriate strig
P. ARCHITECTURAL GU I DELlN ES
Projects within this specific planned area shall incorporate a variety of me
to improve visual impacts. Such methods may include the following:
1)
2)
3)
Variety of roof and wall materials and colors
Variety of building architectural accenU features
Varied building roof heights and roof overhangs
26
0 0
4)
5) Enhanced fenestration
6)
7)
8)
9) Articulated building forms
Varied building street setbacks beyond the minimum requirements
Varied building exterior accent colors
Enhanced architectural and landscaped entry treatments
Varied front yard landscaping treatments within an overall unifying thc
Roof planes
Wall planes
InseVoffset windows/doors
10) Installation of large specimen-size trees or groupings of smaller trec
front setback
Q. EMPLOYEE EATING AREAS
Employee eating areas shall be provided in accordance with the Carl:
Development Code and all City policies.
27
0 0
V. GENERAL NOTES AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The following general notes and mitigation measures shall control the overall developn
of Carlsbad Airport Centre. The developer shall be responsible for implementing the mitiga
measures which are based on the EIR for the project.
A. GENERAL
1, Except as specified in this plan, the requirements of the PM zone ani
other applicable provisions for the zoning, subdivision, grading
building codes (and any amendments thereto) of the City of Carlsbad !
apply *
2. Where minor questions arise regarding interpretation of this Specific F
the Planning Director shall resolve them in a manner consistent with
Municipal Code, adopted City plans, and City policy. Such decisior
the Planning Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission
City Council.
The developer or association shall be responsible for maintainin
natural canyon areas, all fill and cut slopes adjacent to public streets,
all special landscape areas as outlined in this text.
3.
B. MITIGATION MEASURES
1. GradincdFoundation Desian
a. The conclusions and recommendations of the final geotech
study required by the Subdivision Map Act shall be incorpoi
into this project.
The ultimate engineering design of the project will incorporatl
specific recommendations of the geology consultant relati\
design criteria and foundation development.
Clearing of ground cover in advance of actual grading operz
will be avoided.
All graded or fill slopes shall be revegetated immediately
grading.
A soils engineer shall review the final grading plans and be pr
during grading operations on the site.
b.
c.
d.
e.
20
e e
2. Drainase/Erosion Control/Water Quality
a. A master plan of drainage for the site shall be prepared
submitted to the City Engineer for approval in conjunction wit1
first tentative tract map. Such plan shall be consistent witt
Master Drainage Plan of the City as adopted by the City Cot
The developer shall be responsible for construction of any drai
facility required as part of tentative map approval.
A plan for siltation control for all storm runoff from the pro
during construction and initial operation of the tract, anc
maintenance of silt control facilities during normal operation,
be prepared by the developer and submitted to the City Eng
for approval prior to recording the final map for each element (
development.
Drainage and siltation control facilities shall be constructed b
developer prior to or concurrently with grading operations.
Ground cover suitable for slope erosion control will be plantec
maintained by the developer immediately following grading.
A regular street-cleaning program will be implemented b!
developer or the property owner’s association to minimize poll
runoff from internal private roadways and parking areas relat
the project.
On-site retention basins as shown on Figure 7 shall be constri
and operational prior to any grading on the site.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
3. Biolosical Resources
The developer will protect approximately two acres of the depleted rip
oak woodland habitat located in the southeast part of the property. This habitat w
incorporated into a larger five-acre open space area. Also, erosion of soils will be cont
during and subsequent to grading operations to minimize sedimentation to downstream hat
The proposed project could have significant impacts on a numt
archaeological sites on the subject property. Strategy for mitigating significant impacts to a
of insignificance consists of a well-conceived, thoroughly planned, and carefully controllec
phase testing and salvage program.
4. Archaeological Resources
29
0 0
Significant impacts to some cultural sites might be mitigable in the fi
two phases. Phase I procedures would include mapping, posthole excavation, surface collec
and at most sites the excavation of sampling units. Phase II procedures consist primarily of
extensive subsurface excavation according to a research design planned to accurately idc
and evaluate archaeological resources.
A second phase of unit sampling is specifically recommended for
SDM-W-123 and SDM-W-128, while sites SDM-W-2493 and SDM-W-2404 may also require a
phase approach. A second phase might also be necessary at any of the other sites, per
results of first-phase analysis, but this is considered unlikely for SDM-W-2400, SDM-W-:
SDM-W-2404, and SDM-W-2405. Perhaps less likely, but also feasible, is that first-F
mitigation might be attainable at SDM-W-1983, SDM-W-1984, SDM-W-1985, and SDM-W-:
It is noted that mitigation has already been achieved for SDM-W-2406, which was su
collected at the time of field survey.
The City maintains the right to review any archaeological reports subn
as mitigation for this section. if the Planning Director determines that such work is inadeq
a consulting firm may be used by the City at the expense of the developer to review and c(
these reports.
5. Paleontoloaical Resources
The greatest potential for paleontological resources are located ii
Delmar Formation found along the southern boundaries of the property. Given this poten
qualified paleontologist will be present at all pregrading meetings (required by the City’s gri
ordinance) to determine at what stages of grading and at what locations the paleontologi!
be present during grading operations.
Paleontological sites uncovered during grading operations and te
significant by the inspecting paleontologist will be left exposed until fossil collection
appropriate investigations are accomplished or until reasonable mitigation has taken pla
determined by the Planning Director.
6. Circulation
All recommendations included in the traffic study regarding inters€
geometrics and roadway assignments will be incorporated into the project as a requireme
development unless otherwise addressed.
7. Fliaht-Path Restricted Use Zone
A restricted use zone, 500 feet wide (250 feet each side of the cent
of the Palomar Airport runway), is shown on the tentative map and Figure 7. The land USE
30
a 0
will be applied to lots underlying this zone. The purpose of this restricted use zone is to rei
the number of people actively employed in the zone, lowering the potential impact of an airF
crash on the site. Within this zone, the following lot coverages for potential uses will be apF
a.
b.
Warehouses or similar uses--maximum 75% lot coverage
Offices or similar uses--maximum 35% lot coverage
These coverages shall apply to any lot which is impacted by this zone greater than 25% c
net pad area. No storage or manufacture of explosives or highly flammable materials w
allowed within this zone. The appropriateness of use allowed in this zone will be at the discr
of the Planning Director. The Planning Director shall determine if uses similar to warehouse
uses are appropriate for this area. All other standards outlined in this Specific Plan ani
underlying zone shall apply to this area.
8. Noise
The most significant source of noise at Airport Business Center will be
aircraft operations at or near Palomar Airport, with minor amounts of noise generated
vehicular traffic along College Boulevard, Palomar Airport Road and "Dl' street (Palomar
Way). Noise impacts are especially severe (greater than 75 dBA CNEL) in the area just wi
the runway. This area is shown as the Flight-Path Restricted Use Zone on Figure 7, the Ian(
plan. Recommendations and noise standards below shall apply only to this area of the Sp
Plan.
a. Uses: Warehouses, parking areas and other low-intensity
should be encouraged to develop in this area. Office type
shall be permitted but should meet special construction stanc
to minimize noise.
b. Internal Noise Standards: For warehouses and low-intensity
employee type uses, internal noise levels shall be reduced
dBA CNEL from all sources. For offices, conference area!
classroom type uses where frequent communications c
interior noise levels shall be reduced to less than or equal
dBA CNEL from all sources.
C. Construction Standards: For office and similar types user
following standards are recommended at a minimun
construction to reduce noise levels to the above standards:
1) Limit the number of wall openings (door and window
minimum amount.
31
e 0
2)
3) Use double-glazed glass.
4)
Minimize window surface area and locate windows in i
not exposed to noise source.
Reduce the need for open windows by providing adeq
mechanical ventilation.
Exterior door should be of solid-core construction.
Exterior wall coating should be of materials which par
absorb noise, thereby reducing reflected sound.
Sound buffering materials should be utilized for t
construction such as masonry with double-glazed windc
5)
6)
7)
9. Services and Utilities
Development in the Specific Plan area will not be allowed until the
Council has determined that sewer service will be adequate to serve this site.
The City of Carlsbad has approved in concept a Wastewater Reclam:
Master Plan. Part of the plan will be implemented by the construction of a satellite treatr
plant in conjunction with an adjacent development (Carlsbad Research Center) which will
provide service to the Carlsbad Airport Centre as well as the surrounding area.
This project shall be approved under the express condition that the applicant z
pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, or
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference and according to the agreen
executed by the applicant for payment of said fee. A copy of that agreement, dated June
1980, is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not f
as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for
project shall be void.
32
0 e
VI. LEGAL DESCRIPTION . That portion of Lot "GI' of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, Stat
California, according to map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of
Diego, November 16, 1896.
33
L
Q)
,'F,' ,'/ .'
* 34
- @kWdTS flAT8MEM Of QSCLOSURB Cr CERfAlN OW4ERGWtP IHTWan ON AU MPON# WHICH V ~~6T'WUAY AaN OH 7% PM OP THE ClTY COUNCIL OR ANY ApWiHpIR) WD, ~MI$$I~N M COMM
DISCLOSURE STA#ENT
ADDENDUM
e
*
Carisbad Airport Ccntre, a California limited partnership
Ljnuidating Limi&.d Partncr
Weyerhaeuscr Vcnturc Company, a Nevada corporation
Former Ge neral Pttrtnc t
Carfsbad Airport Associates, a California general partnership
Gcncrai Partner
Centre Dcvclopmcnt, a Caiifornia corporation
(;encra1 Partner
Dean Grccnbcrg
-..---------------.------
Ca PI ~bad Airport Associates 1921 Palomar Oaks Way, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008
1921 Palomar Oaks Way, Suite 300 Carlsbad, Caii f ornia 92008
Weyerhacuscr Ven turc Company, a Nevada corporation 21515 Hawthorne BouIcvard, Suite 310 Torrance, California 90503
Ccntrt Devetopmcnt Qxu
Dean Grccn berg
Of Ciccrx
Donald E. Langc, RonrlId S. Bliss, E.
0
4. * t*
e Dlwf~rurr $tawrnent .
6. Have you had more thm @So wrth at buslrtess transacted with my memi Cmmlsslcms, Committees afid COMC~~ witbtn the past tweka months? YW - NO .J. tf yM, ph8# lndlcate person($) L
- w k dMnM U: 'Any Indlvrdud MR cWuln~h~pl jdd WWr, wtdoq Wd dub, trr~+d multsrtlor
WUW. *Adkr(o, tnfm Md uy ornu MuRty, dy ad countyc cb munloipdt)l, dWfl vr orhu pdklod ruUW wmbtnrth ruth0 u ~r UnK'
w: Attach addttlod pgw 8s n&@fiuryq)
By; We erhscuser. Venture By : Weyerhacuser Venture Company s , a Nevada cor oration a evada cot oration Its L ifrlatfng TAmited PBrtncr K Its Liq1 *dating T,imit
Slgnotunol~ 8tr
..- Carlshcld Af rn-
fl*UfA ; Ld-rj3L
&@@Ufo d -/&a Ronaid S Hlias
Executive Vice President/CQO Executive Vic
C c 4 PriytypmdW
.'
:*
NOW3 8/90
e 8 Carlsbad Jo
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sun Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entii
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character,
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription lis'
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intc
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one
preceding the date of publica
notice hereinafter referred to; E
notice of which the annexed i
copy, has been published in e
and entire issue of said newspa]
in any supplement thereof on
ing dates, to-wit:
NOTICE OF
SP 181(A) - AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE
the City Council of the City of Carls-
the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 600 P.M., on Tuesday, October 8,
amendment to a specific plan to re- ducethe total amountofland desig- r commercial uses and to the locations of commer- cially designated lots within Speci- fic Plan 181 for industrial and corn- medal uses on property generally located between El Camino Real, Palomar Airport Road, north of College Avenue and McClellan-
7 PUBLIC HEARING ment Zone 5, and more particularly described as: CT 81-46, Unit 1, Map No. 11287. CT 81-46, Unit No. 2, Map No. 11288.
11289.
ing this matter. please call Elaine Blackburn in the Plannlng Depart- ment at 438-1161, ext 4471. If you challenge the amendment
maybe limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing de- scribed in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the publlc hearing. Applicant: Carlsbad Airport Centre
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that and CT 814, Unit No. 3, Map No.
bad will hold a public hearing at If you have any questlons regard-
l991, to consider a request for an to the Specific Plan in court, you September 26
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
I certify under penalty of perji
foregoing is true and correct. 1
Carlsbad, County of San Diet
California on the 26th
day of September, 19
j Clerk o
4
** cltl II crhu
. ARPOATBUYJESSCENTER SP %l(N I CI 8326 Sr71 mhr- "7 n-
# 0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
- 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR. 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
UPLAND INDUSTRIES CORP.
C/O UNION PACIFIC REALl-3
P.O. BOX 2500
BROOMFIELD, CO 80020
MORGAN/PALOMAR INDUS?
800 W. FIRST STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
ALADRAY NAZEAH & JOSEP€
P.O. BOX 2308
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 9206
BCS PROGRAM L - 2, CONS
1303 AVOCADO STREET
NEWPORT FINANCIAL CENT
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES
31 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 200
IRVINE, CA 92718
HUNTINGTON BEACH CO (C
C/O CHEVRON USA INC.,
PROPERTY TAXES
P.O. BOX 7611
SAN mmcrsco, CA 94120
0 0
CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE
1921 PALOMAR OAKS WAY
SUITE 300
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
KELLY ROBERT PATRICK &
KELLY RICHARD C.
P.O. BOX 175
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MI1 PARTNERSHIP, CONS
C/O BENCHMARK PACIFIC INC.
6670 EL @AMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
COX JAMES M TR, NSJT
COX VIRGINIA P TR, NSJT
2411 CORDER0 RD.
DEL MAR, CA 92014
OPUS SOUTHWEST CORPORATl
4742 N. 24TH STREET
# 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
MTK CORP. OF AMERICA
17771 MITCHELL NORTH
IRVINE, CA 92714
PACIFIC RIDGE COMMERC
ASSOCIATES
C/O WILLIAM SHIRLEY
701 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. #3
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
0 0
BIRD ALLAN S.
1935 CAPdiINO VIDA ROBLE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
FOX-CROFT ONE
404 CAMINO. DEL RIO S. #lo6
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
CHEATIHAM DAVID T,
CHEATIHAM SCOT A.
167 SAXONY ROAD
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
BASSI BRUNO & RITA
2121 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAT sum 200
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MADISON SQUARE DEWLOPM
4223 PONDEROSA AVE., #A
SAN DIEG0,CA 92123
COBRA-BLACKMORE, CONS
C/O ALLEN BUCKMORE
P.O. BOX 424
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
BDN CARLSBAD NO 1 LTD PAI
C/O TmAMMELL CROW
701 B STREET
SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
0 e
s
- CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES INC., CONS CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES Ih
31 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
IRVINE, CA 92718
31 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 200 SUITE 200 - IRVINE, CA 92718
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NSNS
MCCLENNAN PALOMAR AIRPC
2198 PALOMAR ROAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO., CON!
MAIL STATION All0
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
P.O. BOX 1042, BLDG 2-C
MC ROSKEY JOHN W.,MMNS
6212 CBRTE DEL ABET0
CARISBAD, CA 92009
BOURGUIGNON KENNETH &
17712 GOTHARD ST. #B
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92(
2052 NOGAL GROUP LTD., CO
10318 CENTINELLA DR.
LA MESA, CA 92041
KAISER DEVELOPMENT CO.,
3470 MT DIABLO BLVD.
LAFAYETTE, CA 94549
I) 0
GRAHAM BUSINESS PLAZA, C(
2141 PaOMAR AIRPORT ROAI
SUITE 3
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GRAHAM BUSINESS PALZA, CONS
2141 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GRAHAM BUSINESS PALZA, CC
2141 PALOMAR AIRPORT RON
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GRAHAM BUSINESS PLAZA PROPERTY GRAHAM BUSINESS PLAZA
OWNERS ASSN, CONS OWNERS ASSN, CONS
2141 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD 2141 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROA
CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MADISON SQUARE DEVELOPMENT 11, CONS
4223 PONDEROSA AVE., STE. A
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
MADISON SQUARE DEVELOP1
4223 PONDEROSA AVE., STE. t
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
SWOWTWOOD DONALD & LE'
C/O WILLIAM PATCH
4650 VIEWRIDGE AVE. #B
SAN DIEG0,C A 92123
BANK OF SAN DIEGO
225 BROADWAY # 1320
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
PRODUCTS & CHEMICAL IN(
JC SCHUMACHER CO.
1969 PALOMAR OAKS WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
0 0
BRITCHER-PALOMAR OAKS
611 LAPAZ
LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677
(I, a
c
k
I
October 16, 1991
Carlsbad Airport Centre
a California Limited Partnership
1921 Palomar Oaks Way Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA92 008
Enclosed for your records, please find a copy of the
following Resolution No. 91-333 adopted by the Carlsbad
City Council on October 8, 1991.
LEE RAUTENKRANZ
CITY CLERK
LR:lw
Enclosures (1)