HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-10-08; City Council; 11382; AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - ZCA 91-02o\
rl
2 m
z d
r-
I
a h 0
a
CJ a,
a 3
h 0
u C -4
a c rd
-3
m m
rl I m
0
VI
a al
z
2
u a 0 a rd
4 .d CJ
0 V
4
\ 03
\
c 3
cn
z= 0 I- 0 a
J
0
z 3 0 0
-
CITY & CABLSBAD - AGENDAILL
TITLE:AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL
CARE FACILITIES - ZCA 91-2 I, AB # ;/ ’ \-*e> 7- ~
MTG. 10/8/91
DEPT. PLN
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Council concurs, both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that
Council ADOPT Resolution No. ‘I I 5 3 ‘1 , APPROVING the Negative Declaration i:
the Planning Director; and INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 11 5. I 3‘r , APPROVING Z(
ITEM EXPLANATION
On August 7,1991, the Planning Commission considered and recommended approval I
Code Amendment and the corresponding Negative Declaration, to allow (1 ) professic
facilities in the Residential Professional Zone (RP) with a conditional use permit, and (
to the Parking Ordinance a new parking standard of .45 parking spaces for every
professional care facility. The amendment is being sponsored by Marriott Corporatior
seeking to develop a professional care facility on property in the RP Zone.
This Zone Code Amendment would allow professional care facilities in the RP Zor
conditional use permit, thus creating more opportunity within the City to locate professi
facilities. Professional care facilities provide a valuable social service to the elderly and
population of the City. The professional care land use is consistent with the intent (
Zone. Currently the Zoning Ordinance allows these facilities in the more restrictive ML
Residential Zone (R-3), and the less restrictive General Commercial Zone (C-2). By all(
land use in the RP Zone with a conditional use permit, a void in this portion of th
Ordinance would be filled.
Currently there are no parking standards in the Zoning Ordinance for professional carc
To adequately plan for future facilities, this amendment would incorporate into th
Ordinance a new parking standard. Based on technical research, surveys, inten
experts, and field visits to professional care facilities, a parking standard of .45 parkir
for every bed in a professional care facility is considered a conservative standa
recommended for professional care facilities in the City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On August 7,1991 , the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Negative D
issued by the Planning Director on June 27, 1991.
FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no fiscal impacts from the adoption and implementation of the
amendments to Title 21.
EXHIBITS
1.
2.
3
4
5.
6. Disclosure Form
City Council Resolution No. -I / - 5 3 Ll
City Council Ordinance No. \)< - 1’1 C;
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3283 & 3284
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 7, 1991
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 7, 1991
f-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 91-334
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTEI
21.18 - RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE SECTION
21.18.040; CHAPTER 21.42 - CONDITIONAL USES, SECTION 21.42.010, TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL CARE
FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT; AND CHAPTER 21.44 - PARKING, BY ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY. CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 APPLICANT: MARRIOTT CORPORATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Munic
Code, the Planning Commission did, on August 7, 1991, hc
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cons
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing
considering all testimony and arguments, examininq the in.
study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
considering any written comments received, the Plai
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negi
Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and cor
2. That the findings and conditions of the Pla
Commission Resolution No. 3283, on file with the City Cler
incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings c
City Council in this matter and that the Negative Declar
is hereby approved.
...
...
t-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetinc
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on t
8th day of October , 1991, by the following vote
wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
CLAUbg A. LklhS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cherk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
ORDINANCE NO. NS - 17 9
e
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 21.18 BY THE
ADDITION OF SECTION 21.18.040(4) (RESIDENTIAL
PROFESSIONAL ZONE), CHAPTER 21.42 BY THE ADDITION
OF SECTION 21.42.010(8)(B) (TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL
CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT) AND CHAPTER 21.44 BY THE ADDITION OF
SECTION 21.44.020(33) (ADDING A NEW PARKING
STANDARD OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER BED IN A
PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY.
CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES
CASE NO.: ZCA 91-2
WHEREAS, the findings and conditions of the Plandng Comrr
forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 incorporated herein by re
constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Ca
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That Title 21, Chapter 21.18 of the Carlsbad Mu
is amended by the addition of Section 21.18.040(4) to read as follows:
"(4) Professional care facilities."
SECTION 2: That Title 21, Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Mt
is amended by the addition of Section 21.42.010(8)(B) to read as follows:
"(B) Professional care facilities."
SECTION 3: That Title 21, Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad ML
is amended by the addition of Section 21.44.020(33) to read as follows:
"(33) Professional care facilities - .45 parking spaces per eve
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty d;
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance i
to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after i
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the C
Council on the day of , 1991, and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Counc
of Carlsbad on the
wit:
day of , 1991, by the follow
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3283
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE
CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 21.18 -
RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE SECTION 21.18.040;
CHAPTER 21.42 - CONDITIONAL USES, SECTION 21.42.010,
TO ALL( J PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP
ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND CHAPTER
OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A
PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY.
CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES
21.44 - PARKING, BY ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD
CASE NO: ZCA 91-2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of AI
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, t
Commission ccnsidered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
I as follows:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
!
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, t
Commission hereby recornmends APPROVAL, of the Negative Deckat;
to Exhibit "ND", dated June 27, 1991, and "PII", dated June 12, 19
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: I
Findinzs: -
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that thc
have a significant impact on the environment. I I'
.....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
W e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of Aup
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Vice-chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehubl
Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Chairman Holmes.
ABSTAIN: None.
LEA-
TOM ERWIN, Vice-Chairm
CARLSBAD PLANNING CC
ATTEST:
1 IJLU&b
MICHAEL J. HOlhMILdR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i !
'
I
PC RES0 NO. 3283 -2 -
I
e e
NEGATNE DECWTION
PROJECT ADDRESS/iLOCXTION: City of Carlsbad
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Code hmendment to Title 21 of the Carlsbad >I1
Code to allow professional care facilities with a Con'
Use Permit in the Residential-Professional Zone,
establish parking srandards for this - rype faciliry.
-
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an emironmental review of the above desmbed
pursuant to the Guidelines for [mplementarion of the California Environmental Quz
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carisbad. As a result
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that rhe project will not have a sig
impact on -the environment) is hereby issued for the subject projecr. Justification
action is on file in the Planning Depanrnent.
A copy of the Negarive Declaration wich supportive documents is on file in the P
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carfsbad, California 92009. Comments fr
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Departmen]
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Jeff Gibsor
Planning Depanment at 438-1 161, extension 4455.
..
,/-); ; DATED: JUNE 27, 1991 ' ,f : . i' - /.!,-
&lJ.CH J. HOLZMIEtER
CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 Planning Director
APPLICANT: WILLIAM N. HOFFMAN
PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 27, 1991
JC:m
2075 LaS Palmas Orwe - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 (619) 4
e I)
WRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLLVNPiG DEF'ARTMENT)
CASE NO. ZC4 92-2
D'ATE: .Jsdne 12, :OG'.
3 ,AC KC. ?O L v 3
1. CASE NX'IE: Prcfessioriai Care Faci!icies
-. 3 APPLICXXT: Wri:llam X. Hoffman
3. ,WDE.SS AVD PHONE NCMBER OF APPLICXUT: 2386 Faradav Avenue, Suit(
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 438-1465
4. DATE EIA FORM PART 1 SUBMITTED: Januarv 25, 1991
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Code Amendment to Title 21 of the Carisbad S
10 allow professional care facilities with a Conditior
in the Residential-Professional Zone and ro esri
srandards for this me facilirv.
ENVTRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Ankle 5, section 15063 requires that the Ci
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a sigmficant effect on th
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the propo
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an
Irnpacr Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence th:
any of its aspects may cause a sigxuficant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO"
to indicate this determination.
* h EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that a
project may cause a sinnificant effect on the environment. The project may qudif)
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects
insimificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig"
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end t
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be @v
mitigation for impacts which would othexwise be determined significant.
0 e
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
‘vt’lLi THE PROPOSa DtRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
:sigj ‘mg)
:. Rssuir in unsrabie eanh crndiricns or
:,?crease :he e:i;:os,re *:i ;?s?:ie or prcpeAT:
:3 geqlcpc >.azar?s? - -
urique physicai fearures? - -
eirher on or off the sire? - -
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? - -
ambient air quality? - -
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? - -
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? - -
2. .-ippreciably change the topography or any
3. Resulr in or be affected by erosion of soils
4.
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
6. Result in substantial changes in air
7.
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply? - -
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources? - -
io. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - -
11. Alter a sigruficant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
srmcture or object? - -
-2-
IA 0
BIOLOGICAL EWRONMENT
LL'ILL TZE PROPOSU D[RECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
51%) "5'2)
' . -. 7 Jifecr rhe diier.;;y: sf s?eciFs, k.abitat
:r numbers ci any j?ec:es ;f plants lir,ciudiF.g
IT,P~S, jkr,~bs, pass. rmcroficra ana aqua:!c
?1 a nr s) 1 -. - -
:3. ir'.mduce new species of piancs inco an area,
cr a barrier ro the normal replenishment of
exisring species? - -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
or ocher farmland of stare or local
agncultural crop or affect prime, unique
imporrance? -
..
- -
-
15. Affect rhe diversity of species, habitar
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all warer dwelling organisms
and insects? - -
[ncroduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the 16.
mig-racion or movement of animals? - -
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
YES (insip) WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(SI@
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? - -
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, ke, emergency or other public services? - -
-3-
()I 0
HU?vMN ENVIRONMENT
'A';LL :yE i)b.0?OS4u D[RECLY OR :;UD[ECTLY: YES YES
\:z.
,. , :9. %?SUI[ :;i ::.e -sJJ .. -A ;- .,r ne',..' Tr modified sewer
>',.s:en-.-. 5~;;: .a, :<:? -: -.~:irdozs v.~~~:~
. ,...- _i j:v.s:er.li? . -.-.r..n
~ -
20. [;..crease exsrir,S noise ieveis? - -
2:. ?:duce xw light r,r glare? - -
22. tnvo!te a sipficant risk of an expiosion
or ;he release of hazardous subsrances
(including, but not limited to, oil, - pesticides, chermcals or radiation)? -
human population of an area? - -
for additional housing? - -
E. Generate subsIantia1 addirional traffic? - -
create a large demand for new parkmg? - -
23. Subsranriaily alter the dens;? of the
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
26. .affect existing parking facilities, or
27. [mpact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or - movement of people and/or goods? -
- 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? -
vehicles, bicyclh or pedesmans? -
emergency evacuation plans? -
aesthetically offensive public view? -
existing recreational opportunities? -
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor -
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or -
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an -
32. Affect the quality or quantity of -
-4-
m
,MANDATORY’ FINDINGS OF SIGNIFlCANCE
‘&‘ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR IND[MCYLY: YES YES
IlSiPj Sl8J
33. 3oes rhe ?rojecr have the Forential
to substantiaiiy degrade he quality
o i I he e n\-k o rm e r: I, 5 u b s r a n : i a 1 ly
reduce the habirat >f a 5.jh or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop beiow self-sustaining
ievels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal communiry, reduce the number or
reSKnCr rhe range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California tustory or prehistory. - -
34. - Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brie-f, definitive period of
time whde long-term impacts will
-
endure well into the future.) - -
environmental effects whch are in-
35. Does the project have the possible
dividually limited but curnularively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) - -
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will CIIUSC substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - -
-5-
@ 0
3 ! S C L' S S IO N 0 F OA'? RO N M.1 E 3T.q EV.4LL' AT1 0 N
?;e project 1s a Zone Code Amendment 10 Title 21 of :he Carisbad Municipal Code. The new
requires one parking space for every TWO beds for professional care faciiiries, and allows proie
:3!-::1!:es ;n :.?e ~~s;l_len[iai-Professional Zone (W) with a Corditional L'se Permir (C~P). T
:xrreri:;y ;roi;css :=r ::.e developnenr of cenain iou-inrensiry busmess and professional ofiYt;cer
:? j;icF,;;ii xeas, 2~: ::?:?des :ransirional light traffic-senerating com,ercial ESeS beweer
-1 . ->;der.r:a; -.
ric..-.c- ->e :r in:ez: 'r;i :be zcw. ,. -1u ..:[ 1.~5: :ne n --- . .
.A sarhy s[ar,dard for resideztial care facilities will ensure that [he faci!iry has adeqcaLe cnsi
i;c~~i;L~cd3te paricng demand generated by :he use, rhus reducing impacrs on :he suro~
: : : c x! 3. i io n s y s t s rn .
50 physical aireration of the environment is associated wirh ilus project, rherefore no sigrufil
Siologcal, or human environmental impacts will result. The development of a professional care
?up Zone will require a CCP whch is discretionary and subject ro Funher CEQA rebiew. Wk
faciiiries are planned and developed, environmental impacrs will be identified and mitigatec
eniironmenral retiew associated with the CUP process.
- ..
.,
a~3s anc - -.-.?Y : 7 :F.dcsrrial develcpment. Professional care [aciiiries &veicpel
,I .~ ... . ..
(F?J OQ
-6-
@ e
.\,\;.ILYSIS OF \TULE .UTERXATXS TO TZE P3OPOSED PROJECT SL'CH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
5 j Lrernate site designs,
:; al:e.mate scale of development,
d:, ::r?Tate Gses for :he sire,
e) t~~:elr3Dr.ent :I: scme fuLyre rime rather :han now,
C'j alc?~..-:? c;:ss !:r rhe proposed, and
3,; ?.o 3rz:e'c: :;:.'r.at:ve.
?hasing. airernare sire design and uses, scaie of deveiopmenr, alrernare sires, and de.i-e!
future :ime are not applicable ro ths projecr because no direct physical deveiopmer,r is
The 30 project alternative would rerulr in the potential for parking and circulation impac,
the aevelopmenr of a professional care facility rhar did nor have adequare onsire park;n
lack of a required parking standard. The RP Zone is an appropriate zone to locare profi
facilities, and they provide a beneficial community senice to the elderly, therefore, by ;
them in the RP Zone with a CUP, the number of viable locations in &e City is reduced i
social impacts may result.
-7-
0 0
-,--,-r- JcI :?-II!?;,A.T:~N i>TQ 3e &r?.?le[ed ay The P!arJllng Depanment)
en rb.e 'cask cf ::js :fitiai ei;aiuation:
: 5r.d ci-,? ::7z~;5e.j ?ro!ecc 'C)LL~ YOT 'nave a sig-iscanr effect cn :!-,e er.\l,rcrment. ani
;ECLll't\ T:O\ ..\Til ?e preaared.
_, ---. - . ..-- - 82,'. --. COCL3 VOT ha\.e a sivAF,cmt e~xi ;r. rk:e er,\-,rc?ne?.*
,pn ^, 4 -?p4 ,? . -VI
, ,,I.V ... c. .,.e 3:
---.-----;-.[ai . . . . ~ .. . __. . -.
.,*",,dl SrL'\'"'-- ,A ,,,,,er,;:2. :es.-.7 *
.I .. 1. -
._ ' .:- 4 .A -r *i-
.. - L. -
cif?.i:j ; ::.e Frgpos*d ;rr\Jie,:f 'y,a~.e ~~~~~~~,~ 3ean L-,.>ALc,Ld .., L .., .... .;, c<z:rea ~ni:r~~,r,er,rai ioc,ner,rs ma r.3 ~Ai9 ri,-m - . :.?:~rs:e. a Ncrice or Detemnation has been prepared.
- L ....J ;ha[ al[hough :ne ;Ircposed projec: could have a sipficanr effecr 3ii [he t??,-k-.3?-..
nsr je a sivricant: efiect :n this case because the mitigation measures descF.bed cn 2?.
si;eec have been added to the project. .A Conditional Negative
5eciarat:on Ltdl be proposed.
,- I." .
.. - [ find [he propcsed projecr )LAY have a sipficant effect on [he enGmnmenr, and an EhLi
- :.LlP..ICT XPORT is required.
-
IC / J-- b--- 2- 9: e ,I-
.y I
Date Signarat L' J ,/
/ I! / , -.
.,/I I I i \-* , ,/. / ( i c/
Date Plarping Dirdcror
- ,5 -. 0 0 rO Q
LIST J!!T'IGATI?JG MEASURES (IF BgPLI~ChBLE~
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLEr
-8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4B 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3284
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT, AMENDING
TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER
21.18,040; CHAPTER21,42 - CONDlTlONALUSES, SECTION
21.42.010, TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN
THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND
ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD OF .45 PARKING
SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE
FACILITY.
CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES
CASE NO: ZCA 91-2
21.18 - RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE, SECTION
CHAPTER 21.44 - PARKING, SECTION 21.44.020, BY
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of Ac
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said
considered all factors relating to the Zone Code Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
as follows:
A) 1 B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
recommends APPROVAL of ZCA 91-2, according to Exhibit "X", datc
1991, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
subject to the following findings.
I
i
Findings:
1. The Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the intent of the Ger
increasing the opportunities for professional care land uses whic
valuable social senrice to the elderly and disabled population of the
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
@ 0
2. The Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the RP Zone. Profe
facilities are transitional light traffic-generating medical/residential la
will be compatible with surrounding commercial and residential are2
The Zone Code Amendment will not cause any sigmficant environme
and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director
1991, and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission c
1991.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of Aug
the following vote, to wit:
3.
AYES: Vice-chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehubl
Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Chairman Holmes.
ABSTAIN; None.
%L
TOM ERWIN, Vice-chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS!
1 ATTEST: I
WUuL
IICkLd 1
Planning Director
I
PC RES0 NO. 3284 -2-
I
APPLI @ - JN COMPLETE D
February 25, 1991
I)
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1991 c
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: ZCA 91-2 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - Request for approva
Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Resid
Professional Zone, Section 21.1 8.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional
Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone v
Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.0;
adding a new parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bec
professional care facility.
1. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No.
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Dir
and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 recommending APPROVAL o
91-2, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCEUFTION AND BACKGROUND
This Zone Code Amendment would allow professional care facilities in the RP Zonc
a conditional use permit. Professional care facilities are currently allowed in tk
restrictive multi-family residential zones with a conditional use permit. The profes
care land use is compatible with permitted uses in the RP Zone and would
appropriate use in the zone under the terms of a conditional use permit. The zonc
more opportunity within the City to locate professional care land uses, The
approximately 19 RP zoned properties throughout the City, and six of these propert.
vacant, totaling approximately 25 acres of undeveloped land designated RP
Professional care facilities are defined in the Zoning Ordinance as, "a facility in whicf
shelter, and some form of professional service is provided such as nursing, medical, d
exercising or other medically recommended programs. Not included in this definiti
hospitals and mental hospitals".
Currently there are no parking standards in the Parking Ordinance for profession:
facilities. In the ordinance there is a parking standard of two spaces, plus one spa
every three beds for a residential care facility, however professional care faciliti
normally larger in size, provide some form of professional medical and dietary servicc
have residents who drive or maintain vehicles. As a result, there is a higher r;
support employees per bed, more vehicles onsite, and a greater demand for onsite p
spaces. Professional care facilities should have a separate and more restrictive p
amendment would correct this oversight in the Zoning Ordinance, in addition to cr
0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 @ LARE FACILITIES
AUGUST 7, 1991
PAGE 2
standard. To adequately plan for future professional care facilities, this amendment w incorporate into the Parking Ordinance a new parking standard .45 parking spaces
every bed in a professional care fa.cility.
111. ANALYSIS
PlanninR Issues
1. Is the Zone Code Amendment consistent with the General Plan, and is a profess,
care facility an appropriate land use in the RP Zone?
Will the parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed in a professional
facility adequately accommodate the parking demand created by the land use
Will the project have a significant impact on the environment?
2.
3.
DISCUSSION
General Plan and Zoning
The proposed Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the intent of the General
Goal (E) and Policy (K) of the General Plan Land Use Element state that the City sl-
generate the development of commercial enterprises that support the local popul:
encourage the types of commercial activities which will supply the City with a 1
economic base, and provide for the social need and reflect all environmental constr
Professional care facilities provide a valuable social service to the elderly and dis
population of the City. Allowing professional care facilities in the Rp Zone would inc
opportunities for the land use by expanding the number of potential locations withi
City to locate the use. The development of professional care facilities in the RP
would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), The CUP process would ensure th:
impact on the surrounding area or the environment.
The intent of the RP Zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intc
businesses and to provide transitional light traffic-generating commercial areas bet
established residential areas and nearby commercial areas or industrial areas. The RP
permits, by right within the zone, medical and dental clinics, offices, residential use!
other business and professional land uses. The professional care facility land us1
combination of medical and residential uses and is a light traffic generator. These fac
can be expected to generate 2.2 daily trips per occupied bed, with three percent of
trips occurring in the AM peak hour and eight percent of the trips occurring in the PN
hour.
The professional care facility land use is consistent with the intent of the RP
Currently the Zoning Ordinance allows these facilities in the more restrictive Multi-1
Residential Zone (R-3) and in the less restrictive General Commercial Zone (C-2:
land use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and does not have a detrin
a 0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 iARE FACILITIES
AUGUST 7, 1991
PAGE 3
allowing the land use in the RP Zone with a CUP, a void in this portion of the Zo
Ordinance would be filled.
The Planning Department recommends that Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal C
Chapter 21.42 (Conditional Uses), and Chapter 21.18 (RP-Residential-Professional Z
be amended to allow professional care facilities in the RP Zone with a CUP and re:
follows:
New Land Use
1. Chapter 21.18; Section 21.18.040 Uses and structures permitted by conditiona
permit; (4) Professional care facilities.
Chapter 21.42; Section 21.42.010 Permitted uses; (8) R-3, RP, RD-My C-2, ar
zones only: (B) Professional care facilities.
2.
Parkinx Standard
A professional care facility parking requirement survey was conducted and eight San I
County cities were contacted. The comparison is based on the proposed parking star
of .45 parking spaces for every bed in a professional care facility:
A) Two cities have a more restrictive parking standard.
B) Two cities have an equal standard.
C) Two cities have a less restrictive standard.
D) Two cities unable to make a cornparision.
Seven professional care facilities located in the North County were also surveyed to i
the characteistks of these facXt;es in terms of edsting parking, percent of OCCU~
peak number of employees per shift, and residents with vehicles. The results are
below:
A)
B)
C)
D)
Averaged occupancy rate of 81 percent.
Average of one peak hour support employee per every three beds.
An average of seven percent of the residents had a vehicle.
An average of one existing parking space per every three beds.
9 e ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 AL LL~FU~ FACILITIES
AUGUST 7, 1991
PAGE 4
A Parking Generation Study conducted for three professional care facilities by the
Group on April 30,1991, analyzed employee, resident and visitor usage and concluded
the three existing professional care facilities generated the following parking deman
A) At peak hour on weekdays, the three facilities demanded an average of .32 pa:
spaces per occupied room.
At peak hour on weekends, the three facilities demanded an average of .35 pa
spaces per occupied room. B)
A survey of 12 existing and approved Mamott Catered Living Communities throughot
country indicated a required parking space average of .37 parking spaces per bed M
maximum requirement of .48 parking spaces per bed. The Marriott facilities :
professional care land use consisting of the following:
A) A community center providing dining, kitchen, social areas, and limited commc
services.
Residential suites each having a living room, bedroom alcove and private bai
A nursing center which offers 24-hour nursing supervision as well as roon
dining, recreation, visitation and doctor examinations.
B)
C)
Based on the above mentioned study and surveys, interviews with experts, and field
to professional care facilities, a parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every 1
recommended for professional care facilities in the City. In relationship to the other
surveyed in the County of San Diego and the requirements of other cities throughoi
country, the recommended parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed is av
to above average in restrictiveness. This parking standard would adequately satisi
parking demand generated by a professional care facility.
The Planning Department recommends that the Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal 1
Chapter 21.44 (Parking) be amended by adding a new parking standard for profess
care facilities that reads as follows:
New Standard
1. Chapter 21.44; Section 21.44.020 (33) Professional care facilities - .45 ps
space per every bed.
0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 lda. a FACILITIES
AUGUST 7, 1991
PAGE 5
N. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEW
No physical alteration of the environment is associated with this Zone Code Amendr
therefore no significant physical, biological, or human environmental impacts will r( The development of a professional care facility in the RP Zone will require a CUP v
is a discretionary permit and subject to further CEQA review. When individual fac: are planned and developed, environmental impacts will be identified and mitigated thr
the CUP process. An adequate parking standard for professional care facilities will ei
that the facility has onsite parking to accommodate the parking demand generated b
use, thus reducing impacts on the surrounding offsite circulation system and adjacent
uses. The Zone Code Amendment was analyzed through an Environmental Assess1
Part 11. The Planning Director has determined that the proposed Zone Code Amend
would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a Ne1
Declaration was issued on June 27, 1991.
SUMMARY
The Zone Code Amendment is (1) consistent with the General Plan; (2) meets the.
of the RP Zone; (3) provides an adequate parking standard for professional care faci
and (4) will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts based o
requirements for environmental review under the California Environmental Qualit;
Therefore, staff recommends approval of ZCA 91-2, based on the findings found j
attached resolutions.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3283
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284
June 28, 1991
JG:rvo
August 7, I991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2
Vice-chairman Erwin opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Brian Kim, 348 Pine Street, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he has owned another deli in the
industrial area for the past two years and he has been
encouraged by many of his customers to open this rrew
facility.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Vice-chairman Erwin declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Commissioner Schramm inquired about the disclosure statement
which does not specify the ownership composition of the
LlOll Partnership. Mr. Westman passed out a Mission West Properties Memorandum dated August 7, 1991 which stated that
Mission West Properties is a 91% partner, Howard Anderson,
VP of Mission West Properties is a 6% partner, and Joseph
LaBreche, President of Mission West Properties is a 3%
partner. the Planninq Department.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3285 approving CUP 91-7, based on
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
He requested approval of the CUP as proposed.
The memorandum will be on file with the minutes in
3) ZCA 91-2 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - Request for
approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to
Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section
21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section
21.42.010, to allow professional care faciiities in the
zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 -
Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking
standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed in a
professional facility.
Jeff Gibson, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of
the request and stated that this Zone Code Amendment would
allow Professional Care Facilities (PCF) in the RP Zone with
a conditional use permit, and would amend the Parking Ordinance to establish a PCP parking standard of .45/bed.
There are presently 19 RP Zone properties throughout the
city, six of which are vacant. acreage zoned RP is approximately 25 acres.
At the present time, there is no PCF parking standard.
Residential care facilities (RCF), however, are addressed
with a parking ratio of two spacestbed, plus one space per
every three beds. Residential. care facilities differ from
professional care facilities in that residential care
facilities are normally larger in size, provide some form of
professional, medical, and dietary services, and have
residents who drive or maintain vehicles. As a result,
there is a higher ratio of support employees per bed, more
vehicles onsite, and a greater demand for onsite parking.
Because the uses differ, staff recommends that a separate parking standard be established.
facilities provide a valuable service to the community and the CUP would add an additional level of approval.
The current undeveloped
Professional care
COMMISSIONEF
Erwin
Hall
Noble
Savary Schlehu
Schramm
e MINUTES I)
\
August 7, 1591 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 COMMISSIONER
I
The proposed ZCA is consistent with the intent of the
General Plan, meets the intent of the RP Zone, provides an
adequate parking standard for professional care facilities,
and uill not have any significant adverse environmental
impacts based on the requirements for environmental review
under CEQA. Therefore, staff recommends approval of ZCA
91-2.
Commissioner Hall inquired about the current parking
requirement for a care facilities in other zones.
Gibson replied that there is no parking standard to follow.
This is why the Ayres Center used the same parking standard
as that of senior housing.
Commissioner Hall inquired if staff feels comfortable with a PCF parking standard of .45/bed. Mr. Gibson replied that
into all types of care facilities in southern California;
this research indicated that during peak periods a parking
availability of .32/bed to .35/bed was needed. Staff felt
that this seemed too low and recommends a parking standard
of .45/bed, which is used in other parts of the country.
Commissioner Schranm inquired about the parking standard
which was approved for the Ayres project in La Costa.
Gibson replied that the Ayres project will be parked at
.7l/bed.
felt this was going to be inadequate in a residential area.
She would like to see the PCF parking requirement at least
the same or higher.
Comissioner Schlehuber commented that the staff report
stated that a parking SUNey was taken of 12 Marriott
Professional Care Facilities and it determined the parking
average to be .37/bed. Also, that staff surveyed eight
other cities in San Oiego County and found that the PCF
parking requirements in two cities were more restrictive, two were equal, two were less restrictive, and two had no
had experienced any problems. fir. Gibson replied that no
problems were reported.
Commissioner Schlehuber noted that the concern over the
Ayres project may have been that residents in the
surrounding area were concerned about parking simply because
they did not want the facility in their neighborhood.
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that when the Ayres project was first proposed, it was to be a senior housing facility. However, Ayres has since added assisted
living and it is becoming more like a professional care
facility. For this reason, staff does not anticipate parking problems at the Ayres project.
comfortable with a PCF parking standard of .45/bed.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that some reliance should be
given to the staff research.
that the information is inaccurate. Mr. Gibson replied that
many facilities had a vacancy rate of as high as 80% and in
other cases only 7% of the residents had vehicles. Because
most residents of nursing homes and assisted living projects
requite a lot of care, they are usually not drivers.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that more parking will be needed for staff than for the residents.
employee parking will be adequate at .45/bed. Mr. Gibson
Mr.
this standard was established after considerable research
Mr.
Commissioner Schrannn commented that many people
standard. Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if other cities
Mr. Wayne feels very
He has no reason to believe
He inquired if the
0
MINUTES @j
\
August 7, 1991 P~ANNING COMMISSION Page 4
COMMlSSlONEl
ieplied that staff feels this standard will provide a
sufficient allowance for employee parking.
Commissioner Schrarmn inquired if Carlsbad currently has any
professional care facilities and, if so. what they are parked at.
considered to be professional care but because it was built
so long ago, it only has 13 onsite parking spaces for the
entire facility.
Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if the .45/bed parking standard
includes employee parking. Mr. Gibson replied that it does.
Vice-chairman Erwin opened the public testimony and issued
the invitation to speak.
Cheryl aloodworth, Director of Development for Marriott
Corporation, 3130 So. Harbor Drive, Suite 400, Santa Ana,
California, addressed the Commission and stated that
Marriott currently operates 25 professional care facilities
throughout the Unitsd States. In addition, there are 30
projects currently in various development stages. Marriott
has done intensive parking studies of their facilities as
well as those owed by others, and found that the maximum
demand is .35/bed. She stated that the typical resident
normally needs assistance in dressing, may have a hearing
impairment, may use a walker or cane, may need medicine
reminders, and IS provided all meals. These are usually the
most active residents in the project. The remainder of the
residents are in nursing facilities and are basically
immobile. The employee ratio during the peak hour averages
1 employee per 5 occupied beds. The typical worker is hourly and is involved in some type of meal preparation or
service; the biggest percentage of them do not drive their
own cars. However. the administrative employees usually do
have vehicles. The residents who have vehicles usually
comprise about 5% which would mean that only 5 out of 100
residents vould be drivers. Employee parking usually averages 25 per 100 occupied beds. Visitors are often
scarce so minimal guest parking is needed. Ms. Bloodworth
feels that parking of .45/bed will be more than adequate for
a professional care facility.
Commissioner Hall requested Ms. Bloodworth to repeat her
comment about the 1:5 employee ratio at peak hours. She
replied that one employee in five would usually drive a
vehicle. The peak hour is 11:OO a.m.
Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if Marriott is planning to
where it would be located. Ms. Bloodworth replied that
Marriott is in escrow for a vacant 7 acre site located at El
Camino Real and Elm. Marriott has contracted for 4 acres.
David Dunn, 13352 Loretta Drive, Santa Ana, representing the
property owner, Hoyt Pardee, addressed the Commission and
stated that they are happy to have Marriott interested in
developing a professional care facility in Carlsbad.
came to answer any questions, if any.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Vice-chairman Erwin declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Mr. Gibson replied that Carlsbad by the Sea is
build a professional care facility in Carlsbad and, if so,
He
Page 5 August 7, 1991 TLANNING COMMISSION
Vice-chairman Erwin has a problem with the parking.
calculation, there should be 8 employees per parking space
and he thinks that is too tight.
Comissianer Schlehuber stated that he has not heard any
testimony that more parking is needed. He feels it is
adequate.
12:OO noon, which is a peak hour, and he was able to find a
parking space on the street directly in front of the
entrance.
Commissioner Hall is very concerned that professional care
facilities located in residential neighborhoods be parked
adequately. He thinks the parking standard is too tight.
Commissioner Noble has visited many assisted living
facilities in San Diego County as .ell as other cities and
states. He has never had difficulzy finding a parking
space.
In his
He visited Carlsbad by the Sea last Saturday at
Even in Scottsdale, Arizona. where parking is quite scarce, he has never had a parking problem.
Commissioner Savary referred to Mrs. Bloodworth's comment that many hourly workers do not drive vehicles to work but,
instead, use public transportation. She believes the
parking will be satisfactory if that is factored in.
Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, commented that
whenever a situation arises where there is no parking
standard, the best staff can do is research other cities
with similar demographics. In this case, the staff research
indicated that a parking requirement of only .33/bed. In
addition, staff had a consultant do a study and, in their
opinion, a parking requirement of .35/bed was needed.
Finally, a survey-of 12 existing Marriott facilities
indicated a parking requirement of .37/bed. Staff is
recommending a more restrictive standard than anything found
in the surveys.
Commissioner Hall inquired why one of the Marriott
facilities indicated a parking requirement of .48/bed.
Mr. Gibson replied that the figures stated are the parking
requirements of the cities where the professional care
actually being used at any one facility.
demand study.
others cities required less.
and there were 12 different parking requirements. When the
facilities themselves were studied, the parking usage ranged
between .32/bed and .35/bed.
Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if the survey was only taken at
Marriott facilities or if other. facilities were also
included. Mr. Gibson replied that 7 facilities in North
County were studied in addition to the 12 Marriott
facilities.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3283 recommending approval of the
Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and
adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 reconnnending
approval of ZCA 91-2, based on the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein, including the changes set
forth in staff memo dated August 7, 1991.
facilities are located, rather than the amount of parking
This was not a
One city required parking at .48/bed while
Twelve cities were surveyed
COMMISSIONERI
Erwin
Hall Noble
Savary
Schlehi
Schraan
DISCLOSL'RE STATEMENT
I
1?3i CX\* S STA-EI(E\T 5F 28SCL'C'SuRE C3F CER;A*N OWhEilSHiP INTEGESTS CN ALL APPCICATiONS ;NHIC
j bbnt 1'2PdAii.Y ACT CN Zh 7-E 3AnT CF TFE C7l? C3LhC:L CR ANY APPGINTED BCARO CCMMISSrCN CFc CCI -. -p--
I
I
P easz Prm)
I ';e ;oIic;:,iing informa:ion must be disclosed. I
j$ n 0 { ica 17 2
Le-l---"
List t!ie nz,nes and addresses of 211 persons having a financial interest in the appiicatiol %rri'ott Corporati on 3nO So~ith Harbor Blvd. Suite 400 San'cd ha, California 92704
--
- 3 -
L:ss ?ne names and addresses of 211 persons having any ownershrp interest in the propc
!jr% Hoyt S. Pardee
Paci fi c Pa1 i sades, Ca. 90272
hlfl --I."--- Aim Real Dr. -
II
<> v If amy person dantified pursuant 30 (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnershi(
address~ of all individuals oi~cing more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or 0
5
_I
-I ;is,ssi? icie~~"r:iZad pu:suar:t to (I) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a tr .w:: c;f 2ny persor: sm,ng is otiicsr ci director of the non-profit organization or a 0; :i;.; !valS!.
-----
--
-1-
- I-. TL( - tir- r - A "LlrLJL3 8/90
2075 Las Palmas Drtvs 0 Carlsbad. Calrfornla 92009-4859 ., (61s
e 0
zi: "",IY'."
9. -15 J
v have YOU hac! Tcre than $23 worth of business transacted wth any member of C
(3Dmrrlss,crs CzmmiEe~s anc CCiiGCil within the past twelve months7
Yes __ ~cj jd if yes piease incica:e pzrscnjs)
d
-ll
--^--
JAr-on 9 os4,nsd 9-3 'Any Individbcl i rm Cop8,mtiiS?*D ]air: veqtjre nssoc%tion soclal club, fraternal organization corpcrat
c,iotver syndicsta, thia ana any ottle: courry cl*j and county crty rnunicipalq (1 rtrrct or other polnlcai subdivision or sn'
Camoiria~ion scrtrg es 2 unit '
_-- j
L-- \JOT? Pz:ac,h addltiomi pages as cecassay 1
9(27Iq 1 .;$Li.41,& B g-?JJq,- ~ ____,- - S lgqat ure of a p p I icanvdat e -
1 x' s cJz.tiJLi Qf o\vGsf/dat~
-
Print C\I f/pe nave of owner
Fn_iI"Cyif? t;/W
-- -
i_ -_ EF: _f _i
1 b.-
F OF PU-
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ctty of Carisbad wih Po13 a p~iciic hearlng at ?Re City Council Chambers, 1200 Carisbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenbe! Carlcbad, California, &t 8:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1981, to ccnsider approva! of a Nqalive Declaration and amendments to Cqapter 21 18 - Rasldentlai P'cfessloml Zone, Sea 3n 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Condltlonal Uses, Sectlon 21.42.0tC, to ailow professional cam facilities in the zone wlth a Condltlonaf 'Jse Permit, and Chaptar 21 44 - Parking. Section 21.44 026, by adding a new parklng standard of cne jsark47g s3aclj per edery two beds in a professional care facllty
If you have ary questions regarding thls natter, please cail Jeff 13 bso:? in f9e pmring
DQpartTiant, a! 438-1 161, 6Xt. $455.
FRIDAY C *r> -~f-Ccad-9-27 3x5 dlant'kate 9-24
+J$q; 4 LU-9,L-J
I Ll
w
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNN OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inierested in the above entit
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general c
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which I
is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, ,
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular inte
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one
preceding the date of publica!
notice of which the annexed is
copy, has been published in ea
in any supplement thereof on t
a notice hereinafter referred to; a
and entire issue of said newspar -
c, ing dates, to-wit:
F, . r" September 26 $L t'
4 '9 <-
I certify under penalty of perju
foregoing is true and correct. E
Carlsbad, County of San Diegc
California on the 26th September, 199 day of
* Q
klerk of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZCA 91-2 PROFESSIONAL CARE vA(!ILITlT;!S -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Cexicil df the City of Carl
bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carl
bad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad California, at 6:'
p.m. on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negati. Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Profession
Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Sectic
21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Ca
ditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020,
adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every two beds a professional care facility.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibs in the Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455.
Ifyou challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limit to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the pub
hearing described-in this notice, or in written correspondence deliver to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearir
Applicant: Marriott Corporation
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
CJ 6324: September 28,1991
i” u ill .>UllUQ.y. Lnl~ wmei .- ing surfers and old surfers I put blood. sweat and tears surfing has played a huge role in intL .is.“ said Dave Hanson, while Oceanside. taking a break from working on the Internation a1 surfing contests building’s restroom. often have been staged on Ocean- Zell Dwelley. who with her hus-
side beaches, and local businesses band. Ga137, owns the Beach Break long have relied on cash spent by Cafe on South Hill Street - itself a
the wave riding throngs who live mini-museum of surfing - said and visit here. surfers and area residents have But the role of surfers in this given materials, labor and time to beach city never has had formal the museum acknowledgement - unless you “We own the Beach Break. and count the weird day four summers my husband’s life is surfing,” ago when former city Councilwom- Dwelley said Wednesday. “Our an Lucy Chavez arrested a surfer business is relying on the surf com- who allegedly violated the council’s munit).. so at some time you have to rule against surfing near the pier. give back.
All that will change this week- “1t”j been a real labor of love for end, when the California Surf us. People are here because they
Museum opens its doors at the foot want to be.” of the Oceanside pier. The project The long, one-story building has is being completed this week with been remodeled throughout.
the blessing of local developers Painters are scheduled to create a and the city’s redevelopment com- multicolored sunset scene on the mittee. exterior walls today. and several The museum, planned nearly six surfboards will be parked on the years ago by a group of San Diego roof. County surfing aficionados. finally Inside, historic longboards and Dave Hanson and Zell Dwelley, bot
has a home: the old Pride‘s Inn bar contest posters line the walls, and a for its openlng Sunday mornlng. Tht
brate. tors can see the real thing while E 433,4441
Saturday evening, a parade of played along with mementos
classic “Woodies” will make the belonging to famous surfers. trip from Encinitas to the new The exhibit area looks out on To subscribe call, museum, where members will cele- the pier and the ocean, where visi-
The California Surf Museum is they learn the sport‘s histop
OCEANSIDE - For decades, ha
at Pacific and Third streets classic Pontiac Woody will be dis-
1 RIN
PROFESSIONAL CARE FAG IUTIES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a
Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.01 0, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per
every two beds in a professional care facility.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning
Department, at 438-1 161, ext. 445!5.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by your or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Off ice at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation
PUBLISH: September 26,1991
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
e e
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZCA 91-2
PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hc a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, Octot 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapt 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in t zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Secti
21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every t beds in a professional care facility.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in t Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raisi only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing describ in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsb city Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation
PUBLISH: September 26, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
L-kI f/ J7 /9/
N c/ h
_. 8 e .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZCA 91-2
PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will h a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, Octa 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chap 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.4; Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Sect
21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every beds in a professional care facility.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to rais only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing descri in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carl: City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation PUBLISH: September 26, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
..'-."&.' &&*/
@NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING W
u
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commksion of the City of Carlsbad will ho
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly El
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, August 7, 1991, to consid
approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Resident;
Professional Zone, Section 21 A8.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Sectic
21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Perm
and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of o
parking space per every two beds in a professional care facility.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the puk
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 31, 1991. If y have any questions, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning Department at 438-1161, e
4455.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising 01
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice 01
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public heari
CASE FILE: ZCA 91-2
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLISH:
CARLSBAD JOURNAL - JULY 25,1991
BLADE CITIZEN - JULY 26, 1991
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
)I * 8 e
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for YOU to notice -
ZCA 91-2 - AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FAC
for a public hearing before the City Council.
t
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
9/10/91 MARTY ORENYAK
Assistant City Manager Da t
I . 1) * *
October 16, 1991
Marriott Corporation
Attn: Cheryl Bloodworth
3130 South Harbor Suite 400
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Enclosed for your records, please find a copy of the
following Resolution No. 91-334 adopted by the Carlsbad
City Council on October 8, 1991.
LEE RAUTENKRANZ
CITY CLERK
LR:lw
Enclosures (1)
-___- _--
Authorized Agent For
NOTICE OF PUBUC HU
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad. California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every two beds in a professional care facility.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning
Department, at 438-1 161, ext. 4455.
If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by your or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or
in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at or prior to
the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation
PUBLISH: September 26, 1991
’ -