Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-10-08; City Council; 11382; AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - ZCA 91-02o\ rl 2 m z d r- I a h 0 a CJ a, a 3 h 0 u C -4 a c rd -3 m m rl I m 0 VI a al z 2 u a 0 a rd 4 .d CJ 0 V 4 \ 03 \ c 3 cn z= 0 I- 0 a J 0 z 3 0 0 - CITY & CABLSBAD - AGENDAILL TITLE:AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - ZCA 91-2 I, AB # ;/ ’ \-*e> 7- ~ MTG. 10/8/91 DEPT. PLN RECOMMENDED ACTION: If Council concurs, both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that Council ADOPT Resolution No. ‘I I 5 3 ‘1 , APPROVING the Negative Declaration i: the Planning Director; and INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 11 5. I 3‘r , APPROVING Z( ITEM EXPLANATION On August 7,1991, the Planning Commission considered and recommended approval I Code Amendment and the corresponding Negative Declaration, to allow (1 ) professic facilities in the Residential Professional Zone (RP) with a conditional use permit, and ( to the Parking Ordinance a new parking standard of .45 parking spaces for every professional care facility. The amendment is being sponsored by Marriott Corporatior seeking to develop a professional care facility on property in the RP Zone. This Zone Code Amendment would allow professional care facilities in the RP Zor conditional use permit, thus creating more opportunity within the City to locate professi facilities. Professional care facilities provide a valuable social service to the elderly and population of the City. The professional care land use is consistent with the intent ( Zone. Currently the Zoning Ordinance allows these facilities in the more restrictive ML Residential Zone (R-3), and the less restrictive General Commercial Zone (C-2). By all( land use in the RP Zone with a conditional use permit, a void in this portion of th Ordinance would be filled. Currently there are no parking standards in the Zoning Ordinance for professional carc To adequately plan for future facilities, this amendment would incorporate into th Ordinance a new parking standard. Based on technical research, surveys, inten experts, and field visits to professional care facilities, a parking standard of .45 parkir for every bed in a professional care facility is considered a conservative standa recommended for professional care facilities in the City. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On August 7,1991 , the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Negative D issued by the Planning Director on June 27, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT There will be no fiscal impacts from the adoption and implementation of the amendments to Title 21. EXHIBITS 1. 2. 3 4 5. 6. Disclosure Form City Council Resolution No. -I / - 5 3 Ll City Council Ordinance No. \)< - 1’1 C; Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3283 & 3284 Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 7, 1991 Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 7, 1991 f- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 RESOLUTION NO. 91-334 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTEI 21.18 - RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE SECTION 21.18.040; CHAPTER 21.42 - CONDITIONAL USES, SECTION 21.42.010, TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND CHAPTER 21.44 - PARKING, BY ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY. CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 APPLICANT: MARRIOTT CORPORATION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Munic Code, the Planning Commission did, on August 7, 1991, hc duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cons said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing considering all testimony and arguments, examininq the in. study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, considering any written comments received, the Plai Commission considered all factors relating to the Negi Declaration; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and cor 2. That the findings and conditions of the Pla Commission Resolution No. 3283, on file with the City Cler incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings c City Council in this matter and that the Negative Declar is hereby approved. ... ... t- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetinc the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on t 8th day of October , 1991, by the following vote wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton NOES : None ABSENT: None CLAUbg A. LklhS, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cherk (SEAL) -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 ORDINANCE NO. NS - 17 9 e AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 21.18 BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 21.18.040(4) (RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL ZONE), CHAPTER 21.42 BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 21.42.010(8)(B) (TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) AND CHAPTER 21.44 BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 21.44.020(33) (ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY. CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES CASE NO.: ZCA 91-2 WHEREAS, the findings and conditions of the Plandng Comrr forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 incorporated herein by re constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Ca ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That Title 21, Chapter 21.18 of the Carlsbad Mu is amended by the addition of Section 21.18.040(4) to read as follows: "(4) Professional care facilities." SECTION 2: That Title 21, Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Mt is amended by the addition of Section 21.42.010(8)(B) to read as follows: "(B) Professional care facilities." SECTION 3: That Title 21, Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad ML is amended by the addition of Section 21.44.020(33) to read as follows: "(33) Professional care facilities - .45 parking spaces per eve ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty d; adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance i to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after i INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the C Council on the day of , 1991, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Counc of Carlsbad on the wit: day of , 1991, by the follow AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 e e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3283 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 21.18 - RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE SECTION 21.18.040; CHAPTER 21.42 - CONDITIONAL USES, SECTION 21.42.010, TO ALL( J PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND CHAPTER OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY. CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES 21.44 - PARKING, BY ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of AI hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, t Commission ccnsidered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning I as follows: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ! A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, t Commission hereby recornmends APPROVAL, of the Negative Deckat; to Exhibit "ND", dated June 27, 1991, and "PII", dated June 12, 19 hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: I Findinzs: - 1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that thc have a significant impact on the environment. I I' ..... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 W e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of Aup the following vote, to wit: AYES: Vice-chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehubl Savary, Noble & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Chairman Holmes. ABSTAIN: None. LEA- TOM ERWIN, Vice-Chairm CARLSBAD PLANNING CC ATTEST: 1 IJLU&b MICHAEL J. HOlhMILdR PLANNING DIRECTOR l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i ! ' I PC RES0 NO. 3283 -2 - I e e NEGATNE DECWTION PROJECT ADDRESS/iLOCXTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Code hmendment to Title 21 of the Carlsbad >I1 Code to allow professional care facilities with a Con' Use Permit in the Residential-Professional Zone, establish parking srandards for this - rype faciliry. - The City of Carlsbad has conducted an emironmental review of the above desmbed pursuant to the Guidelines for [mplementarion of the California Environmental Quz and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carisbad. As a result review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that rhe project will not have a sig impact on -the environment) is hereby issued for the subject projecr. Justification action is on file in the Planning Depanrnent. A copy of the Negarive Declaration wich supportive documents is on file in the P Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carfsbad, California 92009. Comments fr public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Departmen] 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Jeff Gibsor Planning Depanment at 438-1 161, extension 4455. .. ,/-); ; DATED: JUNE 27, 1991 ' ,f : . i' - /.!,- &lJ.CH J. HOLZMIEtER CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 Planning Director APPLICANT: WILLIAM N. HOFFMAN PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 27, 1991 JC:m 2075 LaS Palmas Orwe - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 (619) 4 e I) WRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLLVNPiG DEF'ARTMENT) CASE NO. ZC4 92-2 D'ATE: .Jsdne 12, :OG'. 3 ,AC KC. ?O L v 3 1. CASE NX'IE: Prcfessioriai Care Faci!icies -. 3 APPLICXXT: Wri:llam X. Hoffman 3. ,WDE.SS AVD PHONE NCMBER OF APPLICXUT: 2386 Faradav Avenue, Suit( Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 438-1465 4. DATE EIA FORM PART 1 SUBMITTED: Januarv 25, 1991 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Code Amendment to Title 21 of the Carisbad S 10 allow professional care facilities with a Conditior in the Residential-Professional Zone and ro esri srandards for this me facilirv. ENVTRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Ankle 5, section 15063 requires that the Ci Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a sigmficant effect on th The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the propo provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Irnpacr Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence th: any of its aspects may cause a sigxuficant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" to indicate this determination. * h EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that a project may cause a sinnificant effect on the environment. The project may qudif) Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects insimificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end t DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be @v mitigation for impacts which would othexwise be determined significant. 0 e PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ‘vt’lLi THE PROPOSa DtRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES :sigj ‘mg) :. Rssuir in unsrabie eanh crndiricns or :,?crease :he e:i;:os,re *:i ;?s?:ie or prcpeAT: :3 geqlcpc >.azar?s? - - urique physicai fearures? - - eirher on or off the sire? - - Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? - - ambient air quality? - - movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? - - Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? - - 2. .-ippreciably change the topography or any 3. Resulr in or be affected by erosion of soils 4. 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on 6. Result in substantial changes in air 7. 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? - - 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? - - io. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - - 11. Alter a sigruficant archeological, paleontological or historical site, srmcture or object? - - -2- IA 0 BIOLOGICAL EWRONMENT LL'ILL TZE PROPOSU D[RECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES 51%) "5'2) ' . -. 7 Jifecr rhe diier.;;y: sf s?eciFs, k.abitat :r numbers ci any j?ec:es ;f plants lir,ciudiF.g IT,P~S, jkr,~bs, pass. rmcroficra ana aqua:!c ?1 a nr s) 1 -. - - :3. ir'.mduce new species of piancs inco an area, cr a barrier ro the normal replenishment of exisring species? - - 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any or ocher farmland of stare or local agncultural crop or affect prime, unique imporrance? - .. - - - 15. Affect rhe diversity of species, habitar or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all warer dwelling organisms and insects? - - [ncroduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the 16. mig-racion or movement of animals? - - HUMAN ENVIRONMENT YES (insip) WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (SI@ 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? - - 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, ke, emergency or other public services? - - -3- ()I 0 HU?vMN ENVIRONMENT 'A';LL :yE i)b.0?OS4u D[RECLY OR :;UD[ECTLY: YES YES \:z. ,. , :9. %?SUI[ :;i ::.e -sJJ .. -A ;- .,r ne',..' Tr modified sewer >',.s:en-.-. 5~;;: .a, :<:? -: -.~:irdozs v.~~~:~ . ,...- _i j:v.s:er.li? . -.-.r..n ~ - 20. [;..crease exsrir,S noise ieveis? - - 2:. ?:duce xw light r,r glare? - - 22. tnvo!te a sipficant risk of an expiosion or ;he release of hazardous subsrances (including, but not limited to, oil, - pesticides, chermcals or radiation)? - human population of an area? - - for additional housing? - - E. Generate subsIantia1 addirional traffic? - - create a large demand for new parkmg? - - 23. Subsranriaily alter the dens;? of the 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand 26. .affect existing parking facilities, or 27. [mpact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or - movement of people and/or goods? - - 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? - vehicles, bicyclh or pedesmans? - emergency evacuation plans? - aesthetically offensive public view? - existing recreational opportunities? - 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor - 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or - 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an - 32. Affect the quality or quantity of - -4- m ,MANDATORY’ FINDINGS OF SIGNIFlCANCE ‘&‘ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR IND[MCYLY: YES YES IlSiPj Sl8J 33. 3oes rhe ?rojecr have the Forential to substantiaiiy degrade he quality o i I he e n\-k o rm e r: I, 5 u b s r a n : i a 1 ly reduce the habirat >f a 5.jh or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop beiow self-sustaining ievels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communiry, reduce the number or reSKnCr rhe range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California tustory or prehistory. - - 34. - Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brie-f, definitive period of time whde long-term impacts will - endure well into the future.) - - environmental effects whch are in- 35. Does the project have the possible dividually limited but curnularively considerable? (“Cumulatively con- siderable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) - - 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will CIIUSC substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - - -5- @ 0 3 ! S C L' S S IO N 0 F OA'? RO N M.1 E 3T.q EV.4LL' AT1 0 N ?;e project 1s a Zone Code Amendment 10 Title 21 of :he Carisbad Municipal Code. The new requires one parking space for every TWO beds for professional care faciiiries, and allows proie :3!-::1!:es ;n :.?e ~~s;l_len[iai-Professional Zone (W) with a Corditional L'se Permir (C~P). T :xrreri:;y ;roi;css :=r ::.e developnenr of cenain iou-inrensiry busmess and professional ofiYt;cer :? j;icF,;;ii xeas, 2~: ::?:?des :ransirional light traffic-senerating com,ercial ESeS beweer -1 . ->;der.r:a; -. ric..-.c- ->e :r in:ez: 'r;i :be zcw. ,. -1u ..:[ 1.~5: :ne n --- . . .A sarhy s[ar,dard for resideztial care facilities will ensure that [he faci!iry has adeqcaLe cnsi i;c~~i;L~cd3te paricng demand generated by :he use, rhus reducing impacrs on :he suro~ : : : c x! 3. i io n s y s t s rn . 50 physical aireration of the environment is associated wirh ilus project, rherefore no sigrufil Siologcal, or human environmental impacts will result. The development of a professional care ?up Zone will require a CCP whch is discretionary and subject ro Funher CEQA rebiew. Wk faciiiries are planned and developed, environmental impacrs will be identified and mitigatec eniironmenral retiew associated with the CUP process. - .. ., a~3s anc - -.-.?Y : 7 :F.dcsrrial develcpment. Professional care [aciiiries &veicpel ,I .~ ... . .. (F?J OQ -6- @ e .\,\;.ILYSIS OF \TULE .UTERXATXS TO TZE P3OPOSED PROJECT SL'CH AS: a) Phased development of the project, 5 j Lrernate site designs, :; al:e.mate scale of development, d:, ::r?Tate Gses for :he sire, e) t~~:elr3Dr.ent :I: scme fuLyre rime rather :han now, C'j alc?~..-:? c;:ss !:r rhe proposed, and 3,; ?.o 3rz:e'c: :;:.'r.at:ve. ?hasing. airernare sire design and uses, scaie of deveiopmenr, alrernare sires, and de.i-e! future :ime are not applicable ro ths projecr because no direct physical deveiopmer,r is The 30 project alternative would rerulr in the potential for parking and circulation impac, the aevelopmenr of a professional care facility rhar did nor have adequare onsire park;n lack of a required parking standard. The RP Zone is an appropriate zone to locare profi facilities, and they provide a beneficial community senice to the elderly, therefore, by ; them in the RP Zone with a CUP, the number of viable locations in &e City is reduced i social impacts may result. -7- 0 0 -,--,-r- JcI :?-II!?;,A.T:~N i>TQ 3e &r?.?le[ed ay The P!arJllng Depanment) en rb.e 'cask cf ::js :fitiai ei;aiuation: : 5r.d ci-,? ::7z~;5e.j ?ro!ecc 'C)LL~ YOT 'nave a sig-iscanr effect cn :!-,e er.\l,rcrment. ani ;ECLll't\ T:O\ ..\Til ?e preaared. _, ---. - . ..-- - 82,'. --. COCL3 VOT ha\.e a sivAF,cmt e~xi ;r. rk:e er,\-,rc?ne?.* ,pn ^, 4 -?p4 ,? . -VI , ,,I.V ... c. .,.e 3: ---.-----;-.[ai . . . . ~ .. . __. . -. .,*",,dl SrL'\'"'-- ,A ,,,,,er,;:2. :es.-.7 * .I .. 1. - ._ ' .:- 4 .A -r *i- .. - L. - cif?.i:j ; ::.e Frgpos*d ;rr\Jie,:f 'y,a~.e ~~~~~~~,~ 3ean L-,.>ALc,Ld .., L .., .... .;, c<z:rea ~ni:r~~,r,er,rai ioc,ner,rs ma r.3 ~Ai9 ri,-m - . :.?:~rs:e. a Ncrice or Detemnation has been prepared. - L ....J ;ha[ al[hough :ne ;Ircposed projec: could have a sipficanr effecr 3ii [he t??,-k-.3?-.. nsr je a sivricant: efiect :n this case because the mitigation measures descF.bed cn 2?. si;eec have been added to the project. .A Conditional Negative 5eciarat:on Ltdl be proposed. ,- I." . .. - [ find [he propcsed projecr )LAY have a sipficant effect on [he enGmnmenr, and an EhLi - :.LlP..ICT XPORT is required. - IC / J-- b--- 2- 9: e ,I- .y I Date Signarat L' J ,/ / I! / , -. .,/I I I i \-* , ,/. / ( i c/ Date Plarping Dirdcror - ,5 -. 0 0 rO Q LIST J!!T'IGATI?JG MEASURES (IF BgPLI~ChBLE~ ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLEr -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4B 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3284 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 21.18,040; CHAPTER21,42 - CONDlTlONALUSES, SECTION 21.42.010, TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES IN THE RP ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND ADDING A NEW PARKING STANDARD OF .45 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY BED IN A PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITY. CASE NAME: PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES CASE NO: ZCA 91-2 21.18 - RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE, SECTION CHAPTER 21.44 - PARKING, SECTION 21.44.020, BY WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of Ac hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said considered all factors relating to the Zone Code Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning as follows: A) 1 B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the recommends APPROVAL of ZCA 91-2, according to Exhibit "X", datc 1991, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following subject to the following findings. I i Findings: 1. The Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the intent of the Ger increasing the opportunities for professional care land uses whic valuable social senrice to the elderly and disabled population of the ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 @ 0 2. The Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the RP Zone. Profe facilities are transitional light traffic-generating medical/residential la will be compatible with surrounding commercial and residential are2 The Zone Code Amendment will not cause any sigmficant environme and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director 1991, and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission c 1991. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of Aug the following vote, to wit: 3. AYES: Vice-chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehubl Savary, Noble & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Chairman Holmes. ABSTAIN; None. %L TOM ERWIN, Vice-chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS! 1 ATTEST: I WUuL IICkLd 1 Planning Director I PC RES0 NO. 3284 -2- I APPLI @ - JN COMPLETE D February 25, 1991 I) STAFF REPORT DATE: AUGUST 7, 1991 c TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ZCA 91-2 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - Request for approva Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Resid Professional Zone, Section 21.1 8.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone v Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.0; adding a new parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bec professional care facility. 1. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Dir and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 recommending APPROVAL o 91-2, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. PROJECT DESCEUFTION AND BACKGROUND This Zone Code Amendment would allow professional care facilities in the RP Zonc a conditional use permit. Professional care facilities are currently allowed in tk restrictive multi-family residential zones with a conditional use permit. The profes care land use is compatible with permitted uses in the RP Zone and would appropriate use in the zone under the terms of a conditional use permit. The zonc more opportunity within the City to locate professional care land uses, The approximately 19 RP zoned properties throughout the City, and six of these propert. vacant, totaling approximately 25 acres of undeveloped land designated RP Professional care facilities are defined in the Zoning Ordinance as, "a facility in whicf shelter, and some form of professional service is provided such as nursing, medical, d exercising or other medically recommended programs. Not included in this definiti hospitals and mental hospitals". Currently there are no parking standards in the Parking Ordinance for profession: facilities. In the ordinance there is a parking standard of two spaces, plus one spa every three beds for a residential care facility, however professional care faciliti normally larger in size, provide some form of professional medical and dietary servicc have residents who drive or maintain vehicles. As a result, there is a higher r; support employees per bed, more vehicles onsite, and a greater demand for onsite p spaces. Professional care facilities should have a separate and more restrictive p amendment would correct this oversight in the Zoning Ordinance, in addition to cr 0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 @ LARE FACILITIES AUGUST 7, 1991 PAGE 2 standard. To adequately plan for future professional care facilities, this amendment w incorporate into the Parking Ordinance a new parking standard .45 parking spaces every bed in a professional care fa.cility. 111. ANALYSIS PlanninR Issues 1. Is the Zone Code Amendment consistent with the General Plan, and is a profess, care facility an appropriate land use in the RP Zone? Will the parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed in a professional facility adequately accommodate the parking demand created by the land use Will the project have a significant impact on the environment? 2. 3. DISCUSSION General Plan and Zoning The proposed Zone Code Amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Goal (E) and Policy (K) of the General Plan Land Use Element state that the City sl- generate the development of commercial enterprises that support the local popul: encourage the types of commercial activities which will supply the City with a 1 economic base, and provide for the social need and reflect all environmental constr Professional care facilities provide a valuable social service to the elderly and dis population of the City. Allowing professional care facilities in the Rp Zone would inc opportunities for the land use by expanding the number of potential locations withi City to locate the use. The development of professional care facilities in the RP would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), The CUP process would ensure th: impact on the surrounding area or the environment. The intent of the RP Zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intc businesses and to provide transitional light traffic-generating commercial areas bet established residential areas and nearby commercial areas or industrial areas. The RP permits, by right within the zone, medical and dental clinics, offices, residential use! other business and professional land uses. The professional care facility land us1 combination of medical and residential uses and is a light traffic generator. These fac can be expected to generate 2.2 daily trips per occupied bed, with three percent of trips occurring in the AM peak hour and eight percent of the trips occurring in the PN hour. The professional care facility land use is consistent with the intent of the RP Currently the Zoning Ordinance allows these facilities in the more restrictive Multi-1 Residential Zone (R-3) and in the less restrictive General Commercial Zone (C-2: land use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and does not have a detrin a 0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 iARE FACILITIES AUGUST 7, 1991 PAGE 3 allowing the land use in the RP Zone with a CUP, a void in this portion of the Zo Ordinance would be filled. The Planning Department recommends that Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal C Chapter 21.42 (Conditional Uses), and Chapter 21.18 (RP-Residential-Professional Z be amended to allow professional care facilities in the RP Zone with a CUP and re: follows: New Land Use 1. Chapter 21.18; Section 21.18.040 Uses and structures permitted by conditiona permit; (4) Professional care facilities. Chapter 21.42; Section 21.42.010 Permitted uses; (8) R-3, RP, RD-My C-2, ar zones only: (B) Professional care facilities. 2. Parkinx Standard A professional care facility parking requirement survey was conducted and eight San I County cities were contacted. The comparison is based on the proposed parking star of .45 parking spaces for every bed in a professional care facility: A) Two cities have a more restrictive parking standard. B) Two cities have an equal standard. C) Two cities have a less restrictive standard. D) Two cities unable to make a cornparision. Seven professional care facilities located in the North County were also surveyed to i the characteistks of these facXt;es in terms of edsting parking, percent of OCCU~ peak number of employees per shift, and residents with vehicles. The results are below: A) B) C) D) Averaged occupancy rate of 81 percent. Average of one peak hour support employee per every three beds. An average of seven percent of the residents had a vehicle. An average of one existing parking space per every three beds. 9 e ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 AL LL~FU~ FACILITIES AUGUST 7, 1991 PAGE 4 A Parking Generation Study conducted for three professional care facilities by the Group on April 30,1991, analyzed employee, resident and visitor usage and concluded the three existing professional care facilities generated the following parking deman A) At peak hour on weekdays, the three facilities demanded an average of .32 pa: spaces per occupied room. At peak hour on weekends, the three facilities demanded an average of .35 pa spaces per occupied room. B) A survey of 12 existing and approved Mamott Catered Living Communities throughot country indicated a required parking space average of .37 parking spaces per bed M maximum requirement of .48 parking spaces per bed. The Marriott facilities : professional care land use consisting of the following: A) A community center providing dining, kitchen, social areas, and limited commc services. Residential suites each having a living room, bedroom alcove and private bai A nursing center which offers 24-hour nursing supervision as well as roon dining, recreation, visitation and doctor examinations. B) C) Based on the above mentioned study and surveys, interviews with experts, and field to professional care facilities, a parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every 1 recommended for professional care facilities in the City. In relationship to the other surveyed in the County of San Diego and the requirements of other cities throughoi country, the recommended parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed is av to above average in restrictiveness. This parking standard would adequately satisi parking demand generated by a professional care facility. The Planning Department recommends that the Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal 1 Chapter 21.44 (Parking) be amended by adding a new parking standard for profess care facilities that reads as follows: New Standard 1. Chapter 21.44; Section 21.44.020 (33) Professional care facilities - .45 ps space per every bed. 0 ZCA 91-2 - PROFESS10 lda. a FACILITIES AUGUST 7, 1991 PAGE 5 N. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEW No physical alteration of the environment is associated with this Zone Code Amendr therefore no significant physical, biological, or human environmental impacts will r( The development of a professional care facility in the RP Zone will require a CUP v is a discretionary permit and subject to further CEQA review. When individual fac: are planned and developed, environmental impacts will be identified and mitigated thr the CUP process. An adequate parking standard for professional care facilities will ei that the facility has onsite parking to accommodate the parking demand generated b use, thus reducing impacts on the surrounding offsite circulation system and adjacent uses. The Zone Code Amendment was analyzed through an Environmental Assess1 Part 11. The Planning Director has determined that the proposed Zone Code Amend would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a Ne1 Declaration was issued on June 27, 1991. SUMMARY The Zone Code Amendment is (1) consistent with the General Plan; (2) meets the. of the RP Zone; (3) provides an adequate parking standard for professional care faci and (4) will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts based o requirements for environmental review under the California Environmental Qualit; Therefore, staff recommends approval of ZCA 91-2, based on the findings found j attached resolutions. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3283 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 June 28, 1991 JG:rvo August 7, I991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 Vice-chairman Erwin opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Brian Kim, 348 Pine Street, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he has owned another deli in the industrial area for the past two years and he has been encouraged by many of his customers to open this rrew facility. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Vice-chairman Erwin declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. Commissioner Schramm inquired about the disclosure statement which does not specify the ownership composition of the LlOll Partnership. Mr. Westman passed out a Mission West Properties Memorandum dated August 7, 1991 which stated that Mission West Properties is a 91% partner, Howard Anderson, VP of Mission West Properties is a 6% partner, and Joseph LaBreche, President of Mission West Properties is a 3% partner. the Planninq Department. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3285 approving CUP 91-7, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. He requested approval of the CUP as proposed. The memorandum will be on file with the minutes in 3) ZCA 91-2 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES - Request for approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care faciiities in the zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of .45 parking spaces per every bed in a professional facility. Jeff Gibson, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that this Zone Code Amendment would allow Professional Care Facilities (PCF) in the RP Zone with a conditional use permit, and would amend the Parking Ordinance to establish a PCP parking standard of .45/bed. There are presently 19 RP Zone properties throughout the city, six of which are vacant. acreage zoned RP is approximately 25 acres. At the present time, there is no PCF parking standard. Residential care facilities (RCF), however, are addressed with a parking ratio of two spacestbed, plus one space per every three beds. Residential. care facilities differ from professional care facilities in that residential care facilities are normally larger in size, provide some form of professional, medical, and dietary services, and have residents who drive or maintain vehicles. As a result, there is a higher ratio of support employees per bed, more vehicles onsite, and a greater demand for onsite parking. Because the uses differ, staff recommends that a separate parking standard be established. facilities provide a valuable service to the community and the CUP would add an additional level of approval. The current undeveloped Professional care COMMISSIONEF Erwin Hall Noble Savary Schlehu Schramm e MINUTES I) \ August 7, 1591 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 COMMISSIONER I The proposed ZCA is consistent with the intent of the General Plan, meets the intent of the RP Zone, provides an adequate parking standard for professional care facilities, and uill not have any significant adverse environmental impacts based on the requirements for environmental review under CEQA. Therefore, staff recommends approval of ZCA 91-2. Commissioner Hall inquired about the current parking requirement for a care facilities in other zones. Gibson replied that there is no parking standard to follow. This is why the Ayres Center used the same parking standard as that of senior housing. Commissioner Hall inquired if staff feels comfortable with a PCF parking standard of .45/bed. Mr. Gibson replied that into all types of care facilities in southern California; this research indicated that during peak periods a parking availability of .32/bed to .35/bed was needed. Staff felt that this seemed too low and recommends a parking standard of .45/bed, which is used in other parts of the country. Commissioner Schranm inquired about the parking standard which was approved for the Ayres project in La Costa. Gibson replied that the Ayres project will be parked at .7l/bed. felt this was going to be inadequate in a residential area. She would like to see the PCF parking requirement at least the same or higher. Comissioner Schlehuber commented that the staff report stated that a parking SUNey was taken of 12 Marriott Professional Care Facilities and it determined the parking average to be .37/bed. Also, that staff surveyed eight other cities in San Oiego County and found that the PCF parking requirements in two cities were more restrictive, two were equal, two were less restrictive, and two had no had experienced any problems. fir. Gibson replied that no problems were reported. Commissioner Schlehuber noted that the concern over the Ayres project may have been that residents in the surrounding area were concerned about parking simply because they did not want the facility in their neighborhood. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that when the Ayres project was first proposed, it was to be a senior housing facility. However, Ayres has since added assisted living and it is becoming more like a professional care facility. For this reason, staff does not anticipate parking problems at the Ayres project. comfortable with a PCF parking standard of .45/bed. Commissioner Schlehuber feels that some reliance should be given to the staff research. that the information is inaccurate. Mr. Gibson replied that many facilities had a vacancy rate of as high as 80% and in other cases only 7% of the residents had vehicles. Because most residents of nursing homes and assisted living projects requite a lot of care, they are usually not drivers. Commissioner Schlehuber feels that more parking will be needed for staff than for the residents. employee parking will be adequate at .45/bed. Mr. Gibson Mr. this standard was established after considerable research Mr. Commissioner Schrannn commented that many people standard. Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if other cities Mr. Wayne feels very He has no reason to believe He inquired if the 0 MINUTES @j \ August 7, 1991 P~ANNING COMMISSION Page 4 COMMlSSlONEl ieplied that staff feels this standard will provide a sufficient allowance for employee parking. Commissioner Schrarmn inquired if Carlsbad currently has any professional care facilities and, if so. what they are parked at. considered to be professional care but because it was built so long ago, it only has 13 onsite parking spaces for the entire facility. Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if the .45/bed parking standard includes employee parking. Mr. Gibson replied that it does. Vice-chairman Erwin opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Cheryl aloodworth, Director of Development for Marriott Corporation, 3130 So. Harbor Drive, Suite 400, Santa Ana, California, addressed the Commission and stated that Marriott currently operates 25 professional care facilities throughout the Unitsd States. In addition, there are 30 projects currently in various development stages. Marriott has done intensive parking studies of their facilities as well as those owed by others, and found that the maximum demand is .35/bed. She stated that the typical resident normally needs assistance in dressing, may have a hearing impairment, may use a walker or cane, may need medicine reminders, and IS provided all meals. These are usually the most active residents in the project. The remainder of the residents are in nursing facilities and are basically immobile. The employee ratio during the peak hour averages 1 employee per 5 occupied beds. The typical worker is hourly and is involved in some type of meal preparation or service; the biggest percentage of them do not drive their own cars. However. the administrative employees usually do have vehicles. The residents who have vehicles usually comprise about 5% which would mean that only 5 out of 100 residents vould be drivers. Employee parking usually averages 25 per 100 occupied beds. Visitors are often scarce so minimal guest parking is needed. Ms. Bloodworth feels that parking of .45/bed will be more than adequate for a professional care facility. Commissioner Hall requested Ms. Bloodworth to repeat her comment about the 1:5 employee ratio at peak hours. She replied that one employee in five would usually drive a vehicle. The peak hour is 11:OO a.m. Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if Marriott is planning to where it would be located. Ms. Bloodworth replied that Marriott is in escrow for a vacant 7 acre site located at El Camino Real and Elm. Marriott has contracted for 4 acres. David Dunn, 13352 Loretta Drive, Santa Ana, representing the property owner, Hoyt Pardee, addressed the Commission and stated that they are happy to have Marriott interested in developing a professional care facility in Carlsbad. came to answer any questions, if any. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Vice-chairman Erwin declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. Mr. Gibson replied that Carlsbad by the Sea is build a professional care facility in Carlsbad and, if so, He Page 5 August 7, 1991 TLANNING COMMISSION Vice-chairman Erwin has a problem with the parking. calculation, there should be 8 employees per parking space and he thinks that is too tight. Comissianer Schlehuber stated that he has not heard any testimony that more parking is needed. He feels it is adequate. 12:OO noon, which is a peak hour, and he was able to find a parking space on the street directly in front of the entrance. Commissioner Hall is very concerned that professional care facilities located in residential neighborhoods be parked adequately. He thinks the parking standard is too tight. Commissioner Noble has visited many assisted living facilities in San Diego County as .ell as other cities and states. He has never had difficulzy finding a parking space. In his He visited Carlsbad by the Sea last Saturday at Even in Scottsdale, Arizona. where parking is quite scarce, he has never had a parking problem. Commissioner Savary referred to Mrs. Bloodworth's comment that many hourly workers do not drive vehicles to work but, instead, use public transportation. She believes the parking will be satisfactory if that is factored in. Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, commented that whenever a situation arises where there is no parking standard, the best staff can do is research other cities with similar demographics. In this case, the staff research indicated that a parking requirement of only .33/bed. In addition, staff had a consultant do a study and, in their opinion, a parking requirement of .35/bed was needed. Finally, a survey-of 12 existing Marriott facilities indicated a parking requirement of .37/bed. Staff is recommending a more restrictive standard than anything found in the surveys. Commissioner Hall inquired why one of the Marriott facilities indicated a parking requirement of .48/bed. Mr. Gibson replied that the figures stated are the parking requirements of the cities where the professional care actually being used at any one facility. demand study. others cities required less. and there were 12 different parking requirements. When the facilities themselves were studied, the parking usage ranged between .32/bed and .35/bed. Vice-chairman Erwin inquired if the survey was only taken at Marriott facilities or if other. facilities were also included. Mr. Gibson replied that 7 facilities in North County were studied in addition to the 12 Marriott facilities. Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3283 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3284 reconnnending approval of ZCA 91-2, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the changes set forth in staff memo dated August 7, 1991. facilities are located, rather than the amount of parking This was not a One city required parking at .48/bed while Twelve cities were surveyed COMMISSIONERI Erwin Hall Noble Savary Schlehi Schraan DISCLOSL'RE STATEMENT I 1?3i CX\* S STA-EI(E\T 5F 28SCL'C'SuRE C3F CER;A*N OWhEilSHiP INTEGESTS CN ALL APPCICATiONS ;NHIC j bbnt 1'2PdAii.Y ACT CN Zh 7-E 3AnT CF TFE C7l? C3LhC:L CR ANY APPGINTED BCARO CCMMISSrCN CFc CCI -. -p-- I I P easz Prm) I ';e ;oIic;:,iing informa:ion must be disclosed. I j$ n 0 { ica 17 2 Le-l---" List t!ie nz,nes and addresses of 211 persons having a financial interest in the appiicatiol %rri'ott Corporati on 3nO So~ith Harbor Blvd. Suite 400 San'cd ha, California 92704 -- - 3 - L:ss ?ne names and addresses of 211 persons having any ownershrp interest in the propc !jr% Hoyt S. Pardee Paci fi c Pa1 i sades, Ca. 90272 hlfl --I."--- Aim Real Dr. - II <> v If amy person dantified pursuant 30 (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnershi( address~ of all individuals oi~cing more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or 0 5 _I -I ;is,ssi? icie~~"r:iZad pu:suar:t to (I) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a tr .w:: c;f 2ny persor: sm,ng is otiicsr ci director of the non-profit organization or a 0; :i;.; !valS!. ----- -- -1- - I-. TL( - tir- r - A "LlrLJL3 8/90 2075 Las Palmas Drtvs 0 Carlsbad. Calrfornla 92009-4859 ., (61s e 0 zi: "",IY'." 9. -15 J v have YOU hac! Tcre than $23 worth of business transacted wth any member of C (3Dmrrlss,crs CzmmiEe~s anc CCiiGCil within the past twelve months7 Yes __ ~cj jd if yes piease incica:e pzrscnjs) d -ll --^-- JAr-on 9 os4,nsd 9-3 'Any Individbcl i rm Cop8,mtiiS?*D ]air: veqtjre nssoc%tion soclal club, fraternal organization corpcrat c,iotver syndicsta, thia ana any ottle: courry cl*j and county crty rnunicipalq (1 rtrrct or other polnlcai subdivision or sn' Camoiria~ion scrtrg es 2 unit ' _-- j L-- \JOT? Pz:ac,h addltiomi pages as cecassay 1 9(27Iq 1 .;$Li.41,& B g-?JJq,- ~ ____,- - S lgqat ure of a p p I icanvdat e - 1 x' s cJz.tiJLi Qf o\vGsf/dat~ - Print C\I f/pe nave of owner Fn_iI"Cyif? t;/W -- - i_ -_ EF: _f _i 1 b.- F OF PU- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ctty of Carisbad wih Po13 a p~iciic hearlng at ?Re City Council Chambers, 1200 Carisbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenbe! Carlcbad, California, &t 8:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1981, to ccnsider approva! of a Nqalive Declaration and amendments to Cqapter 21 18 - Rasldentlai P'cfessloml Zone, Sea 3n 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Condltlonal Uses, Sectlon 21.42.0tC, to ailow professional cam facilities in the zone wlth a Condltlonaf 'Jse Permit, and Chaptar 21 44 - Parking. Section 21.44 026, by adding a new parklng standard of cne jsark47g s3aclj per edery two beds in a professional care facllty If you have ary questions regarding thls natter, please cail Jeff 13 bso:? in f9e pmring DQpartTiant, a! 438-1 161, 6Xt. $455. FRIDAY C *r> -~f-Ccad-9-27 3x5 dlant'kate 9-24 +J$q; 4 LU-9,L-J I Ll w Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNN OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inierested in the above entit I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general c published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which I is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, , newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular inte said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one preceding the date of publica! notice of which the annexed is copy, has been published in ea in any supplement thereof on t a notice hereinafter referred to; a and entire issue of said newspar - c, ing dates, to-wit: F, . r" September 26 $L t' 4 '9 <- I certify under penalty of perju foregoing is true and correct. E Carlsbad, County of San Diegc California on the 26th September, 199 day of * Q klerk of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZCA 91-2 PROFESSIONAL CARE vA(!ILITlT;!S - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Cexicil df the City of Carl bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carl bad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad California, at 6:' p.m. on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negati. Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Profession Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Sectic 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Ca ditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every two beds a professional care facility. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibs in the Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455. Ifyou challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limit to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the pub hearing described-in this notice, or in written correspondence deliver to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearir Applicant: Marriott Corporation CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL CJ 6324: September 28,1991 i” u ill .>UllUQ.y. Lnl~ wmei .- ing surfers and old surfers I put blood. sweat and tears surfing has played a huge role in intL .is.“ said Dave Hanson, while Oceanside. taking a break from working on the Internation a1 surfing contests building’s restroom. often have been staged on Ocean- Zell Dwelley. who with her hus- side beaches, and local businesses band. Ga137, owns the Beach Break long have relied on cash spent by Cafe on South Hill Street - itself a the wave riding throngs who live mini-museum of surfing - said and visit here. surfers and area residents have But the role of surfers in this given materials, labor and time to beach city never has had formal the museum acknowledgement - unless you “We own the Beach Break. and count the weird day four summers my husband’s life is surfing,” ago when former city Councilwom- Dwelley said Wednesday. “Our an Lucy Chavez arrested a surfer business is relying on the surf com- who allegedly violated the council’s munit).. so at some time you have to rule against surfing near the pier. give back. All that will change this week- “1t”j been a real labor of love for end, when the California Surf us. People are here because they Museum opens its doors at the foot want to be.” of the Oceanside pier. The project The long, one-story building has is being completed this week with been remodeled throughout. the blessing of local developers Painters are scheduled to create a and the city’s redevelopment com- multicolored sunset scene on the mittee. exterior walls today. and several The museum, planned nearly six surfboards will be parked on the years ago by a group of San Diego roof. County surfing aficionados. finally Inside, historic longboards and Dave Hanson and Zell Dwelley, bot has a home: the old Pride‘s Inn bar contest posters line the walls, and a for its openlng Sunday mornlng. Tht brate. tors can see the real thing while E 433,4441 Saturday evening, a parade of played along with mementos classic “Woodies” will make the belonging to famous surfers. trip from Encinitas to the new The exhibit area looks out on To subscribe call, museum, where members will cele- the pier and the ocean, where visi- The California Surf Museum is they learn the sport‘s histop OCEANSIDE - For decades, ha at Pacific and Third streets classic Pontiac Woody will be dis- 1 RIN PROFESSIONAL CARE FAG IUTIES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.01 0, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every two beds in a professional care facility. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning Department, at 438-1 161, ext. 445!5. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by your or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Off ice at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation PUBLISH: September 26,1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL e e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZCA 91-2 PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hc a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, Octot 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapt 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in t zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Secti 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every t beds in a professional care facility. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in t Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raisi only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing describ in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsb city Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation PUBLISH: September 26, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL L-kI f/ J7 /9/ N c/ h _. 8 e . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZCA 91-2 PROFESSIONAL CARE FACILITIES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will h a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, Octa 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chap 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.4; Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Sect 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every beds in a professional care facility. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to rais only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing descri in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carl: City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation PUBLISH: September 26, 1991 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ..'-."&.' &&*/ @NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING W u NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commksion of the City of Carlsbad will ho a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly El Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, August 7, 1991, to consid approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Resident; Professional Zone, Section 21 A8.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Sectic 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Perm and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of o parking space per every two beds in a professional care facility. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the puk hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 31, 1991. If y have any questions, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning Department at 438-1161, e 4455. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising 01 those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice 01 written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public heari CASE FILE: ZCA 91-2 APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLISH: CARLSBAD JOURNAL - JULY 25,1991 BLADE CITIZEN - JULY 26, 1991 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION )I * 8 e (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for YOU to notice - ZCA 91-2 - AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 21 - PROFESSIONAL CARE FAC for a public hearing before the City Council. t Please notice the item for the council meeting of Thank you. 9/10/91 MARTY ORENYAK Assistant City Manager Da t I . 1) * * October 16, 1991 Marriott Corporation Attn: Cheryl Bloodworth 3130 South Harbor Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92704 Enclosed for your records, please find a copy of the following Resolution No. 91-334 adopted by the Carlsbad City Council on October 8, 1991. LEE RAUTENKRANZ CITY CLERK LR:lw Enclosures (1) -___- _-- Authorized Agent For NOTICE OF PUBUC HU NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad. California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration and amendments to Chapter 21.18 - Residential Professional Zone, Section 21.18.040; Chapter 21.42 - Conditional Uses, Section 21.42.010, to allow professional care facilities in the zone with a Conditional Use Permit; and Chapter 21.44 - Parking, Section 21.44.020, by adding a new parking standard of one parking space per every two beds in a professional care facility. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning Department, at 438-1 161, ext. 4455. If you challenge the Zone Code Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by your or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Marriott Corporation PUBLISH: September 26, 1991 ’ -