HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-12-10; City Council; 11479; PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 CHANGES TO THE WORK PUBLIC HEARING4w
z 0 F 0 a 3 5 o 0
TOTAL $390,00(
After the above funds are set aside, there will still be a balance of $140,00( which staff recommends be used to reduce future assessments.
Alternative works which could also be considered are the following:
1. Construct sidewalks 220,00( 2. Construct median landscaping 765,00(
e 0
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. /Ij ’{q 7
Obviously, constructing either sidewalk or median landscaping could not be don( without additional funds from property owners.
Staff scheduled a meeting with all property owners and asked their opinion. Nc property owner wished to use any of the excess funds for any projects beyond thosc proposed by staff. Two, in fact, felt that all the excess funds should be returnec to the property owners. (See the letter from the Price Club attached a: Exhibit 2.)
The extra work proposed by staff will not increase any assessments nor change thc boundaries of the district. Therefore, although a resolution ordering changes i: required, a public hearing is not required. However, staff wanted to keep thc owners informed and provide them with the opportunity to comment and has therefore, noticed this meeting as a public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final project cost was as follows:
Property Owners $3,965,980 City Contribution 3,304,466
TOTAL PROJECT COST $7,270,446
The property owner’s balance is as follows:
Assessment District Appropriation $4,496,338 Property Owner’s Cost 3,965,980
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BALANCE $ 530,248
The expenditure of approximately $390,000 on mitigation repair monitoring an maintenance will leave a balance of $140,000 which will be used to reduce propert owner’s payments.
EXHIBITS :
1. Location map.
2. Resolution No. ‘;I -LlK) Ordering Changes and Modifications in Proceeding and Assessments in a Special Assessment District, Palomar Airport Road Wes Assessment District No. 86-1.
3. Letter from Price Club, dated October 29, 1991.
'W w .-
w
4. '
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 w
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -400
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN PROCEEDINGS AND ASSESSMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has previous
adopted its Resolution of Intention and confirmed an assessment for certain wor
of improvement in a special assessment district, pursuant to the terms a
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of t
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; said special assessme
district known and designated as Assessment District No. 86-1 (Palomar Airpc
Road), hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"; and,
WHEREAS, subsequent to the confirmation of the assessment and afl
the improvements were ordered, but during the pendency of these proceedings,
appears to be in the best public interest to order certain changes i
modifications to the proceedings, the Engineer's "Report" and the works
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That it is hereby ordered that certain specific changes (
modifications be made, said changes and modifications generally described
follows:
A. Mitigation repair and replacement including weeding, planti
irrigation repair and fertilizing, cultivating or associa
work as required.
S1 ope erosi on control i ncl udi ng raki ng , hydroseedi ng , pl ac
jute matting and hay bales.
Annual monitoring and reporting for a five-year period.
B.
C.
///
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e w
D. Annual maintenance including replanting, weeding, fertilizin!
and associated work as needed for a five-year period.
The estimated cost for the referenced changes in work is as follow!
A. Mitigation repair & replacement $ 60,01
B. Slope erosion control $ 50,OI
3.
C. Annual monitoring & reporting $ 20,Ol
D. Annual maintenance $150.0
TOTAL $280, 0
4. That said changes and modifications are hereby ordered pursuant
the provisions of Section 10352 of the Streets and Highways Code and said chang
and modifications will not result in the increase in any individual assessme
or result in the inclusion of any properties not originally within the boundari
of the Assessment District.
5. That no public hearing is required for these changes a
modifications inasmuch as said modifications meet the intent and requirements
said Section 10352 of the Streets and Highways Code, and it is further her€
determined that said changes and modifications are in the best public intere:
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
r
k. *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
w
and convenience for the Assessment District and the property owners affect
thereby.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsb
, 1991, by the following vot City Council held on the loth day of December
to wit:
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Nygaard & Stanton
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, C AA
(SEAL)
W w
THE PRICE COMPANY RECEIVED
PRICE CLUB@ P.0. BOX 85466 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92 aff4ft 'lag) 581-4600
MUNLCt PAL PRGJECTS October 29, 1991 DiViSiON
Mr. Richard Allen City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1519
RE: PAIL)- AIRPORT ROAD - ASSESSHENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1
Dear Mr. Allen:
In response to your letter dated October 21, 1991, concerning the
remaining balance in the assessment district account, we would very
much like to see the excess funds used to call (pay off) some bonds
and reduce future assessments to all property owners. The other
items listed in your letter were not specifically identified as
improvements to be taken care of by the assessment and the funds
should not be used for those items.
We are unable to attend your meeting on October 30, 1991, but we
would appreciate your contact after the meeting to inform us of the
general comments and information to be presented to the City Council on November 19, 1991.
Thank you for providing the opportunity for us to have input.
Sincerely,
THE PRICE COMPANY /- u
Kathy Nishihira Director of Planning, West Coast
EXHIBIT 2