HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-01-07; City Council; 11500; La Posada Guadalupe De Carlsbad Appeal\B # &$X2-
IITG. I- 3 -9L
IEPT. PLN
CITY ‘: F CARLSBAD - AGENDl -3lLL d” 3
TITLE: ~ LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD APPEAL
(CUP 91-10)
IECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the City Council concurs, the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City's Attorney to prepare documents DENYING the appeal of the Planning Commission's determination to APPROVE CUP 91-10.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On December 4, 1991, the Planning Commission approved (6-O) a request to allow a temporary emergency shelter for the homeless, located on Impala Drive at Orion Way near the Carlsbad Safety Center. The shelter would be operated by Catholic Charities of San
Diego and would provide up to 50 men with housing in modular buildings up to sixty days. The site is zoned for industry with a qualified overlay and it has a planned industrial general plan designation. This use is allowed in this location with a Conditional Use Permit.
The target population is the homeless migrant workers of Carlsbad, however the shelter would not exclude other homeless males. The residents would receive two meals per day and also available would be support services such as literacy programs, English classes, and job training. The property is being leased for two years by the applicant, therefore the term of the CUP is two years, with possible extensions.
The appeal has been filed by an adjoining Sunny Creek property owner. The issue of compatibility with the residentially designated as yet undeveloped, properties to the north, known as the Sunny Creek Specific Plan area, was raised at the December 4, 1991 Planning Commission public hearings and was the topic of the letter of appeal, copy attached. The appelant states that operation of the emergency shelter at the Impala Drive location for more than two years would be detrimental to the future development of land within the Sunny Creek Specific Plan.
In their approval of CUP 91-10, the Planning Commission accepted the findings recommended by staff with regard to compatibility with and lack of material detriment to existing and future uses on the surrounding properties. The subject property is separated from the Sunny Creek Specific Plan by a steep (1.4:1), thickly vegetated slope over 220 feet in height. The modular buildings will be setback 60 feet from the top of slope, preventing any visual impacts. Fencing will surround the property which, when combined with the virtually impassable slope, effectively prevents pedestrian traffic from La Posada to Sunny Creek.
-. -
PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. // 500
The applicant has stated that they expect to move La Posada from the Impala Drive site after the two year lease expires, however extra time may be needed to provide a smooth transition to a more permanent location. Any extension of the Conditional Use Permit will require another public hearing.
FNVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On December 4, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director. Since the infill project site has been previously disturbed by grading and the use is temporary, the Planning Director determined that, as conditioned, no significant adverse environmental impacts will result from this proposal.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action would allow a temporary use on a vacant site and therefore, no fiscal impacts to the City are anticipated.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
II Facilities Zone ] 5 I II II Local Facilities Manaqement Plan I -15 II II Growth Control Point WA I II II Net Density I 1 WA I II Special Facility Fees
BXHIBITS
I 1 WA II
1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3325 and 3326 2. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 4, 1991 3. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 4, 1991 4. Letter of appeal dated December 11, 1991.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PIANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3325
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR 50
MIGRANT WORKERS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF IMPALA DRIVE BETWEEN PALMER WAY AND ORION WAY.
CASE NAME: LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
CASE NO: CUP 91-10
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 4th day of December, 1991, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit
“ND”, dated November 14, 1991, and “PII”, dated October 11, 1991, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
3. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed
project.
4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
impacted by this project.
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
l(
1:
II
l<
2(
21
2:
2:
24
2f
2E
2'i
2E
L
5
7
3
a
1
L
> ,
5
k
i
i
I
5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning A
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of December, 1991,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble
, & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm. .-e..-,
ABSTAIN: None.
ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PC RESO NO. 3325 -2-
*
NEGATIVE DECLAMTION ,
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: North side of Impala Drive between Palmer Way and
Orion Way in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Temporary emergency shelter for homeless migrant workers in
four modular structures.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
21 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the
Planning Department at 438-l 161, extension 4499.
DATED: NOVEMBER 14,199l
CASE NO: CUP 91-10
APPLICANT: CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO
PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 14,199l
MC&m
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (819) 438-l 161
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI’ ASSE!%hdEWT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CUP 91-10
DATE: OCTOBER 11. 1991 BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
2. APPLICANT: CATHOLIC CHARITIES
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 349 CEDAR STREET
4.
SAN DIEGO. CA 92101
(619) 231-2828
DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: AUGUST 2.1991
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR HOMELESS MEN IN
THREE MODULAR STRUCTURES.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may quahfy for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-@’ and ‘YES-insig’
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
-
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
W’JLL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards? ’
2. Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
6. Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
7. Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
a. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
-
YES YES
bigI (big) NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-2-
. BIOLOGICAL ENMRONMEXT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
big)
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
mJMANENvIRoNMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
YES
(sig)
YES NO
(insig)
x
x
x
x
YES NO
ww
x
x
-3-
I HUMAN FNVlRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? ,
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public vie&?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
YES YES
Wg) (insig)
NO A
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
4-
. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
33.
34.
35.
36.
Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce’the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a r&e or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
big) WigI
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
NO
x
x
x
x
-5-
DfSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The project involves the temporary location of three modular structures on temporary foundations
on a pre-graded, industrial infill lot. No grading will be required for the development nd the
driveway and parking lot will be surfaced with decomposed granite. The site will be fenced and
landscaped and overhead exterior lighting will be provided for safety. Based upon field visits to
the disturbed infill site, staff has concluded that no adverse environmental impacts will result
from this proposal.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.10.
11.
No grading is proposed for the existing, pregarded industrial pad, therefore no geologic
hazards or unstable soil conditions are anticipated.
No topographic changes are proposed and no unique physiographic features exist on the
site, therefore, no impacts will result.
While the site will be landscaped and irrigated, all drainage will be directed to the street
and no overflow down surrounding slopes should occur. As groundcovers are proposed,
no impacts due to erosion of soils is expected.
No beaches or stream channels exist on or near the site and no modification to such will
occur.
While no standard traffic generation route excess for this use, it is expected that the
incremental increase in ambient aerosol production resulting from this project is
insignificant.
Covering the undeveloped pad with buildings and landscaping will slightly change
climatological indices, however, this change is small in scale and considered insignificant.
No marine, fresh, or flood watercourses exist on or near the site and all drainage will be
directed to the street. No adverse impacts to water courses will result.
The incremental depletion in water supply due to this project is considered in&r&ant
and no impacts to ground or surface water will result as these water sources do not exist
within the project area.
Construction and operation of the facility will result in an incremental increase in the
consumption of fuel and natural resources, however this minor increase is insignificant.
The pre-graded, infill pad contains no archeological, paleontological, or historical
structures or objects therefore, no adverse impacts to such will result.
-6-
BIOLOGICAL FNVIRONMENT
U/13. Currently, the graded pad contains very little vegetation, consisting of weeds. The
proposed landscaping will be in keeping with the landscaping of the surrounding
developments and will not adversely affect the diversity of flora in the area.
14. No agricultural crop or farmland exist on the site and future development of the site will
be industrial rather than agricultural. No adverse impacts to crops or farmland will result from this project.
15/16. The existing graded, infill pad contains no significant diversity of fauna and no new
species of animals are proposed to be introduced. No adverse impacts to crops or
farmland will result from this project.
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
While this conditional use will differ from the adjacent land uses, the daily operation
periods of the uses will not overlap and there will be no change in the future industrial
land use designation. No adverse land use impacts are anticipated.
All public utilities and services required to serve the proposed project are in place and
adequate to accommodate the use. No adverse impacts are expected.
All existing sewer and waste control systems are adequate to accommodate the proposed
use and no additional systems or modification to the existing systems is needed.
While installation and operation of the facility will produce an incremental increase in
noise levels, this is considered insignificant because of the neighboring industrial uses.
Some exterior lighting will be installed on the project site, the lighting is in character with the surrounding development and no significant adverse impacts will result.
No hazardous substances are proposed onsite and no significant risk of explosion is
expected as a result of the proposed development.
The maximum of 50 temporary residents of the shelter is not considered a substantial
alteration of density of human population.
The proposal is providing a housing supply, not creating a. demand therefore no adverse
impacts are expected.
The project is not expected to generate traffic equal to an industrial or office use and is therefore considered insignificant.
No existing parking facilities exist on site and all parking demands should be
accommodated within the project area. No adverse impacts to parking is anticipated.
-7-
-
27.28.
2;.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
No existing transportation systems or circulation patterns traverse the project site and
therefore no impacts to such is expected.
The modular trailers will be transported along pre-approved haul routes and all
construction and assembly will occur out of the public right-of-way. No increase in
traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians is anticipated.
No emergency response plans or evacuation plans involve the project site and no impacts
to such are expected.
The project will not obstruct any scenic vistas and landscaping and setbacks will
eliminate any significant aesthically offensive public views.
No recreational opportunities exist onsite and the project is not expected to create
additional demands on recreational opportunities.
The infill, temporary development on the pre-graded pad will not degrade the quality of
the environment, habitats, or examples of California history since these features do not
exist onsite.
The project will not produce either short-term or long-term environmental disadvantages
since it is a temporary use on a previously disturbed, intill industrial lot.
No cumulative impacts are anticipated since all affects of the proposed development re
well below the level of significance.
No direct or indirect impacts to human beings are anticipated from this inEll
development as it provides for emergency shelter for homeless individuals without
impacting the site or public services.
ANALYSIS OF VIAE3LE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
B)
0
D)
El
F)
G)
‘MG:lh
A a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
The project is too small to phase and must be completed as a whole in order to function
properly.
Alternate site designs do not produce any environmental advantages alternatives.
The proposed scale of development is necessary for the proposed.
The proposal is temporary and the ultimate use of the site will be industrial, as
designated int he City’s general Plan.
The emergency shelter is in response to a current housing need. Development at a future
time would postpone addressing this issue.
Since this site accommodate the proposed without any significant impacts, alternate sites
do not necessarily produce environmental benefits.
See E) above.
-9-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATMZ
DECLARATION will be prepared.
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the
environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required.
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
- I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-lO-
-
.
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJEm.
Date
,
Signature
-ll-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3326
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW A TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR 50 MIGRANT
WORKERS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF IMPALA DRIVE BETWEEN PALMER WAY AND ORION WAY.
CASE NAME: LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
CASE NO: CUP 91-10
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 4th day of December, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
Parcel 2 of Map No. 15247 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to CUP 91-10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
~ ) A That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES CUP 91-10, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
. . . .
.
. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
11
16
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
Fin-:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the
community since it supplies a needed housing supply, is essentially in harmony
with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not
detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which
the proposed use is to be located;
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use because all required and desired facilities and landscaping fit within the
project boundary;
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained, as demonstrated in the large
structural setback from the top of slope and the landscaping along Impala Drive;
That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use since Impala Drive is an industrial street with
a capacity of 10,000 average daily trips.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Approval is granted for CUP 91-10, as shown on Exhibits “A”-“C’, for an emergency
shelter for up to 50 migrant workers for a maximum of 60 days per individual,
dated December 4, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the site plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The site plan shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The site plan copy shall be submitted to
the City Engineer prior to issuance of haul permits or grading plan submittal,
whichever occurs first. L
This project is approved upon the express condition that haul permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines
that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits
and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated
May 25, 1983.
PC RESO NO. 3326 -2-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
1:
16
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
2z
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of
building permit issuance.
This conditional use permit is granted for a period of two (2) years from the date
of certificate of occupancy. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the
Planning Director on a semi-annual basis to determine if all conditions of this
permit have been met and that the use does not have a significant detrimental
impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning
Director determines that the use has such sign.Xcant adverse impacts, the Planning
Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the
permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the
significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public
hearing, if it is found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on
surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, or the conditions
imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable
period of time not to exceed one (1) year upon written application of the
permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such
extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect
on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare will result because of
the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on
surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the extension
shall be considered as an original application for a conditional use permit. There
is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high solid wall with gates.
Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure
shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief
and the Planning Director.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
PC RESO NO. 3326
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
12. Notices shall be posted on the site, in English and in Spanish, asking residents to
travel on public streets to and from the shelter.
. Ermnd Conditions:
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
Pretreatment of the sanitary sewer discharge from this project may be required.
In addition to the requirements for a sewer connection permit the developer shall
conform to the requirements of Chapter 13.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The developer shall apply for an industrial waste water discharge permit
concurrently with the building permit for this project. No Certificates of
Occupancy for the project will be issued before the industrial waste discharge
permit application requirements have been met and all applicable fees paid.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chap 11 .O6.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or
installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by
the City Engineer.
This project is approved specifically allowing site drainage to flow out the
proposed driveway onto Impala Drive.
The water meter for the project shall be installed outside of the proposed
driveway.
The sewer cleanout shall be fitted with a t&Tic lid.
The proposed onsite driveway and parking lot shall be constructed with
decomposed granite to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
PC RESO NO. 3326 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
I.1
12
12
14
15
16
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
23. Concurrent with the submittal of the building plans for the project the developer
shall also provide a “fine” grading plan for review. The “fine” grading plan shall
be reviewed as a part of the building plans, no additional plancheck fees are
requiredandnogradingpermitwillberequired.
Fire Conditions:
24. P$or to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be
submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
25. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval of access,
driveways and general traffic circulation.
26. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational
prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
27. Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with “Knox” key operated
override switch, as specified by the Fire Department.
28. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall
have posted “NO Parking/Fire bane” pursuant to Section 17.04.020, Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
29. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing
systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
30. The dormitory shall meet the requirements of Title 24.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3326 -5-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular. meeting of the Plating
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of December, 1991,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
,
Chairman Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savary, Erwin, Noble
& Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PC RESO NO. 3326 -6-
APPL, .I’ION COMPLETE DATE:
OCTOBER 23.1991
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DECEMBER 4,1991
PMNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CUP 91-10 - LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD - Request for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation and operation of a temporary
emergency shelter for 50 migrant workers on property located on the north
side of Impala Drive between Palmer Way and Orion Way, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 5.
1. RECOMMENDATION
0 3 STAFF REPORT
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Plannn, i m Commission Resolution No. 3325,
APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Pla,nning Director and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3326, APPROVING CUP 91-10, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PRCLJEV DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUNQ
The applicant, Catholic Charirics of San Diego, is proposing to locate a temporary
emergency shelter for homeless migrant workers on a previously graded, in-fill lot on
Irnpala Drive near Orion Way. The shelter would consist of four modular buildings placed
on temporary foundations, including a dormitory, mess hall, resident manageis office, and
an office/classroom. The buildings wculd cover approximately 7,645 square feet of the
52,270 square foot graded pad. Landscaping would be installed in and around the
buildings, providing external screening and an interior patio, and a 10 space parking area
would also be provided. The site is zoned M-Q (Industrial with a Qualified Development
Overlayj which allows, by Conditional Use Permit, a variety of establishments involving
the overnight stay of large assemblages of people including hospitals, treatment centers,
and overnight campgrounds.
CUP 91-10
LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
DECEMBER 4,1991
PAGE 2
The shelter would be operated by Catholic Charities of San Diego and would provide up
to 50 men with housing for up to sixty days. The target population is the homeless
migrant workers of Carlsbad, however the shelter would not exclude other homeless males.
The residents would receive two meals per day and also available would be support
services such as literacy programs, English classes, and job training courses. The property
is on a two-year lease, therefore the Conditional Use Permit is being recommended for a
two year period with semi-annual review.
ANALYSIS
1. Can the four findings required for a Conditional Use Permit be made? Namely,
That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the
community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and
objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to
uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be
located;
b) That the site for the intended use is adequate is size and shape to
accommodate the use;
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in
the neighborhood will be provided and maintained;
d) That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly
handle all traffic generated by the proposed use.
2. Is the proposed project consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for
McClellan-Palomar Airport?
DISCUSSION
la. Necessity and Consistency of prOposed Use
A
The emergency shelter will provide temporary housing for homeless migrant workers that
currently inhabit the undeveloped portions of Carlsbad. By providing support services as
well as shelter, La Posada Guadalupe will aide the homeless in securing more permanent
. CUP 91-10
LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
DECEMBER 4, 1991
to the community. The project is consistent with the General Plan because it implements
the objectives of the newly adopted Housing Element by providing affordable housing for
groups with special needs (e.g. farm workers and the homeless). As discussed below,
external noise levels will be below 65 CNEL and all public facilities required to serve the
project are currently in place. Given the above, the project is desirable for the community
and essentially in harmony with the General Plan.
lb. Adequacy of Site in Size and Shape
As can be seen on Exhibit “A”, dated December 4, 1991, all proposed improvements
necessary to support the proposal can fit on the pregraded site and no expansion or grading
is required. Patrons of La Posada Guadalupe are expected to arrive by bus, bicycle, or foot. Bike racks are being provided and a bus stop is located nearby. The ten space parking lot
can accommodate the maximum of four employees, since the occupants are not expected
to drive automobiles. As discussed below, all features necessary to adjust the proposed use
to the surroundings can be provided. Therefore, the site is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the requested use.
lc. Yards, Setbacks, Walls and Other Features Necesuy to Adjust Use
As shown on Exhibit “A”, dated December 4, 1991, the site is a pre-graded pad, separated
from the adjacent industrial uses to the east and west by large 2:l slopes. The most
prominent view of the property is from the west therefore the buildings have been grouped
on the eastern portion of the pad. Fencing and landscaping will be provided along the top of slope to minimize views of the project from properties to the west. Planting will be
installed along the street frontage to soften views and the project will be adequately
setback from all property lines. In summary, all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping,
and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or future uses in the
area will be provided and are conditioned to be maintained.
Id. Adequacy of street SJrstem
The site is served by Impala Drive, an industrial street with a maximum capacity of 10,000 average daily trips. Currently, only some of the surrounding properties are developed and
Impala Drive is operating well below capacity, at approximately 3,000 average daily trips.
Therefore, the street system serving the site is adequate to accommodate all traffic
generated by the proposed use.
2. Consisteucy with the Airport Land Use Plan
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport requires that no tall
buildings be located within the flight activity zone and that no residential development
occur within the area subject to noise levels above 65 CNEL. The project is one-story and
CUP 91-10
LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
DECEMBER 4, 1991
PAGE 4
occur within the area subject to noise levels above 65 CNEL. The project is one-story and
lies within the 60 to 65 CNEL noise contours, as shown in the Land Use Plan. The project
is therefore consistent with the guidelines of the Airport Land Use Plan.
Iv. ELWIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Since the in-fill site has been previously disturbed by grading and the use is
temporary, the Planning Director has determined that, as conditioned, the project will
be compatible with surrounding uses and no significant adverse environmental impacts
will result from this proposal and has, therefore, issued a Negative Declaration on
November 14, 1991.
SUMMARY
Considering that all findings required for a Conditional Use Permit can be made, Staff
recommends approval of CUP 91-10, as conditioned.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3325
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3326
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Statement
Exhibits “A” - “D”, dated December 4, 1991
MG:lh
November 6, 1991
SITE
\
\
!SAFElYCENTER
,
I A city of clll*l
,
LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD CUP 9140
- BACKGROUND DATA SHEET -
CASE NO: CUP 91-10
CASE NAME: LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD
APPLICANT: CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Temnorarv emergencv shelter for 50 migrant workers on
pronertv located on the north side at Imnala Drive between Palmer Wav and Orion Wav. ,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P[
Dieno. State of California.
APN: 209-041-28 Acres 3.62
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation PI - PLANNED INDUSTRIAL
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A
Existing Zone M-O Proposed Zone M-O
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site M-O VACANT INDUSTRIAL
North O-S OPEN SPACE
south M-O VACANT INDUSTRIAL
East M-O GOVERNMENT
West M-O VACANT INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 4.25
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued NOVEMBER 8. 1991
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, MG:lh
DISCLOSURESTATEMENT
F
APPLICANT’S STATEMENT ‘OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP IFCTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE
DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMillEE.
(Please Print)
The following information must be discfosed:
1. Amlicant
ing a financial interest in the application.
2. Owner
List the names and addresses of al! persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
AQ~rf!rr&4S
3, fl’i7cLY s--?-J- __ nl~r~14-a t4. Qaoac’
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or pa9nership, list the names and
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares’in the corporation or owning any partnership
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-proffl organiration or a trust, list the names and
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
FRMooo13 8/90
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Cartsbad. California 92009-4859 l (619) 438-l 161
.
Disclosure Statement
(Over)
Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - No J/If yes, please indicate p&son(s)
Per,on is ddinod U: ‘Any individual, firm, copartnership, jointvWtur,, Mintion, rob4 club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust,
raCcIw@r, ryndicata, thir and any other county, city and county, city municipality, dirtrid or other political aubdhirjon, or any other group or
combination acting aa a unit.’
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
Signature of Owner/date ‘ Si&Iature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner
ld7-a aC <
Print or type name of applicant
FRMooo13 8/90
.
. PALOMAR INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES
GENERAL PARTNERS
Darnell Development Company
1920 Main Street, ste 720
Irvine, CA 92714
25%
Werdin Development Company
1920 Main Street, ste 720
Irvine, CA 92714
25%
Carlsbad 48
P.O. Box 230577
Encinitas, CA 92023-0577
GENERAL PARTNERS
Morris I Steiman
6243 Rockhurst
San Diego, CA 92120
50%
33.33%
Donald P Hubbard
410 Arroyo Dr
Encinitas, CA 92024
33.33%
Robert Astleford
1010 Linda Vista Dr
San Marcos, CA 92069
16.67%
R. D. Templeton
1010 Linda Vista Dr
San Marcos, CA 92069
16.67%
Catholic Charities
CORPORATE BOARD
1990-g 1
,
Mr. Robert H. Baker 730 Camino de1 Rio North Rev. Daniel Dillabough Diocese of San Diego San Diego, CA 92108 Post Gffice Box 85728 B/297-5001, San Diego, CA 921865728 W756-3655 B/574-6300
Mr. John T. Blankinship, Jr. 2775 Via de la Valle, 201 De1 Mar, CA 92014 B/755-5166, R/755-5658
Most Rev. Robert Brom Diocese of San Diego Post Gffice Box 85728
San Diego, CA 92 186-5728
B/574-6300
Ms. Trina Brown Wells Fargo Bank 6545 Balboa Avenue San Diego, CA 92111
B/2386415,
R/262-2090
Rev. Joseph Carroll St. Vincent de Paul Center 1550 Market Street San Diego, CA 92101 B/233-8797
Mr. Barry M. Crane
110 west c street 23rd Floor
San Diego, CA 92161
B/234-0792, R/270-3669
Sister RayMonda DuVall Catholic Charities 349 cedar street
San Diego, CA 92101-3197 B/231-2828
Rev. Msgr. I. Brent Eagen
10818 San Diego Mission Road
San Diego, CA 92108
B/283-73 19
Ms. Martha Emerald 4597 Rueda Drive San Diego, CA 92123 B/2376330,
R/569- 1787
Mr. John Ford 4382 Ampudia Street San Diego, CA 92103 R/291-2617
Mr. J. David Gardner
1202 Kettner Boulevard
5th Floor
San Diego, CA 92101 B/23 16700
w669-0589
\ ~:ov\lcsIn SERVI(:E \IISISTR\ Diocese of San Diego
Cl
:MY (:ccl;lr SII-LW. San L)iey). C..\ !JL’IOl-:1lY7 l (6191 ?JI-‘LHL’H -III,- ‘mchm” .- I ,A
Mr. Robert A.‘Hoeh.n 5566 Paseo de1 Norte
Carlsbad, CA 92008 B/438-9599, FAXJ438-8094
Mr. Jesse Macias
3%3 Ashford Street San Diego, CA 92111 R/277-846 1.
Sister Dolores Molina St. Rose of Lima Church 293 “H” Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 B/427-7637, Rl422-2573
Ms. Elizabeth A. Moore Port District 3165 Pacific Coast Hwy San Diego, CA 92101 B/291-3900
Mr. Mike Reidy Nexus Development 9373 Town Centre Dr., Suite 200
San Diego, CA 9212 1
B/587-2 100
R/756-25 10
Ms. Mary Jo Riley SD Housing Commission 1625 Newton Avenue
San Diego, CA 92113
B/231-9400, X 223
R/223-5092
Dr. Anthony Rippo Post OfFice Box 2509
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 B/673-1851 R/75w252
Mr. Robert H. Taylor Post of&e Box 927
Solana Beach, CA 92075 B/4814815, RI7561826
Mr. Bruce Wadman 989 Sidonia Street Leucadia, CA 92024
B/755675 1, R/753-88 12
FAX/7556063
Mrs. Diane Wadman
989 Sidonia Street Leucadia, CA 92024 Rl753-8812
RD.wP 03/27/g 1
MINUTES
.
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 COMMISSIONERS ’ \
- Request for an extension of
tional Use Permit 298 to continue permitting a
"granny flat" addition to a single family
at 1315 Basswood Avenue in Local Facilities
Robert Green, P ipal Planner, reviewed the background of
the request and d that the applicant is requesting a
five year extensio n existing CUP for the second unit
addition to a sing ily residence at 1315 Basswood
Avenue. The original it was granted on December 17,
1986 and is due to expi December 17, 1991.
conditions allow for an ted number of extension
the discretion of the Comm for periods of u
years. The applicant has me of the condition
approval of the original appli n and conform
requirements of the zoning ordin
units. All findings required to e n be made.
Therefore, staff is recommending ap
Chairman Holmes opened the public test nd issued the
invitation to speak.
Homer Hinkley, 1315 Basswood Av
Commission and stated that he h
would appreciate receiving an a
request.
Chairman Holmes declared the
stated that he has some reservations
Commission Resolution No. 3320 approving a five
3) CUP 91-10 - LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD - Request
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation
and operation of a temporary emergency shelter for 50
migrant workers on property located on the north side
of Impala Drive between Palmer Way and Orion Way, in
Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
Michael Grim, Assistant Planner, reviewed the background of
the request and stated that the applicant, Catholic
Charities of San Diego, is proposing to locate a temporary emergency shelter for homeless migrant workers on a
previously graded, in-fill lot on Impala Drive near Orion
Way. The shelter would consist of four modular buildings
placed on temporary foundations, including a dormitory, mess
hall, resident manager's office, and an office/classroom.
Landscaping would be installed in and around the buildings,
providing external screening and an interior patio, and a 10
space parking area would also be provided. The shelter
would provide housing for up to 50 men for up to 60 days.
/
\
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Noble
Savary
Schlehuber
-
MINUTE5
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4
Residents would receive two meals per day. Also available
would be support services such as literacy programs, English
classes, and job training courses. In analysing the
proposal, staff determined that all findings required for a
CUP could be made. The emergency shelter would provide
temporary housing for homeless migrant workers that
currently inhabit the undevelopable areas of Carlsbad. By
providing support services as well as shelter, La Posada
Guadalupe will aid the homeless in securing more permanent
employment and learning English. Therefore, this use
provides a much needed use to the community. The project is
consistent with the General Plan because it implements the
objectives of the newly adopted housing element by providing
affordable housing for groups with special needs, i.e. farm
workers and the homeless. The site is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate all proposed improvements. Fencing,
setbacks, and landscaping have been included to adjust the
proposed use to its surroundings. The project is also
consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport land use plan,
since external noise levels on the site remain below 65 CNEL
and, as conditioned, no environmental impacts are
anticipated. Based upon this analysis, staff recommends
approval.
Mr. Grim concluded his presentation by stating that Exhibit
"D" was inadvertently included in the package and should be
removed. Therefore, Condition Cl to Resolution No. 3326
should be revised to read "...Exhibita A-C...". He added
that staff was recently contacted by a property owner across
the street who is present tonight to comment on the proposed
project.
Commissioner Hall stated that just prior to the meeting he
had received a letter dated December 4, 1991 from Robert D.
Shoecraft of Duckor & Spradling, Attorneys at Law, 401 West
"A" Street, Suite 2400, San Diego 92101-7909, representing
Mr. J. C. Baldwin. He inquired if staff had also received
and read this letter. Mr. Grim stated that he had not seen
the letter. However, Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, did
receive a copy of the letter just prior to the meeting. A
copy of the referenced letter is on file with the minutes in
the Planning Department.
Commissioner Hall inquired if the person that staff has had
discussion with was Mr. Baldwin. Mr. Grim replied that he
has had discussions with James Baldwin on two or three
occasions prior to this evening.
Commissioner Erwin requested time to read the letter, which
was granted.
Commissioner Hall asked the City Attorney if it would be
preferable to continue this item to the next meeting. Ron
Ball, City Attorney, replied that the Planning Commission
has the prerogative to continue the item if it so desires.
However, there may be some urgency as to timing, etc. which
the Commission might want to consider. Gary Wayne,
Assistant Planning Director, stated that he understands
there is a time constraint but the question should probably
be posed to the applicant.
Commissioner Erwin would like to hear what both the
applicant and Mr. Baldwin have to say. It appears that the major issue in Mr. Shoecraft's letter is that Mr. Baldwin
did not receive notice, but it sounds as though staff
members discussed the matter with him on several occasions.
MINUTES
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Pace 5 COMMISSIONERS \;
Chairman Holmes opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Kathleen Wellman, 4213 Isle Drive, Carlsbad, President of
Caring Residents of Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and
stated that her organisation is jointly working with
Catholic Charities of San Diego to implement La Posada. She
introduced several other citizens in the gallery who have
also helped with the La Posada project.
Ms. Wellman stated that Caring Residents of Carlsbad is a
community volunteer organisation comprised of approximately
50 members which was formed about a year and a half ago.
Their first project was to find a way to help the homeless
migrant workers in Carlsbad. Tney first met with the City
Council and stated that grant monies were available which
could help to resolve the homeless problem of the migrant
workers. They then contacted Catholic Charities who has
some expertise in providing shelters for the homeless. A
grant proposal was then written and submitted to the State
of California which resulted in funds of approximately
$300,000. In addition, Catholic Charities was able to
secure additional monies from various other sources to
assist with the project.
Ms. Wellman is in full agreement with the staff
recommendation except for Condition 121 which states that
the driveway and parking lot must be constructed of
concrete. Since La Posada will only be a temporary shelter,
she would like to request that decomposed granite, instead
of concrete, be used for the driveway and parking lot.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if any homeless person is able
to use the shelter, or if it will be restricted to migrant
workers. Ms. Wellman replied that the shelter is targeting
migrant workers but no homeless person would be turned away
if room is available.
Commissioner Hall inquired about the square footage of the
driveway/parking lot area. He would also like to have a
realistic projection of how long the shelter will be located
at this site.
Ms. Wellman replied that the lease is for two years, after
which they must relocate to a permanent site. The structure
will be modular units that can easily be relocated. All
special features being installed in and on the structure
will also be easy to remove when it is time to relocate the
shelter to a new site. Even the kitchen facility is
designed so that the large cooking stove will be modular and
easy to relocate. The County Health Department has approved
the first permit process.
Commissioner Hall inquired if at the end of two years the
shelter fully expects to relocate to a permanent site. Ms.
Wellman replied yes.
Commissioner Hall inquired if she had received a copy of the
letter from Mr. Baldwin's attorney or had seen the petition
signed by the Sunnycreek property owners. Ms. Wellman replied that she had just seen both documents for the first
time just prior to the meeting.
Commissioner Hall stated that this is why he feels a
continuance might be preferable to making a decision on this
matter tonight. Ms. Wellman replied that time is of the
-
MINUTE5
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6
essence because the shelter must be operational no later
than January 26, 1992 'in order to receive the grant funds.
If this item is continued, it is unlikely that the
aperational target date can be met.
Commissioner Hall stated that he is more interested in
nearing all sides of the story from the various parties
involved.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if it would be possible to
secure an extension on the grant monies. Ms. Wellman
replied that there is a possibility but it has not yet been
confirmed. If an extension is possible, it would only be
for 30-60 days.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if she was the person responsible for notifying all owners of record as of
November 20, 1991 and how she obtained the names of the
property owners. Mr. Wellman replied that Stewart Title
provided a list of property owners from the tax rolls. .
Bob Ladwig, Rick Engineering, Carlebad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is involved with the
engineering aspects of the La Posada project and would be
happy to answer any questions.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired about the size of the
parking lot. Mr. Ladwig replied that it is approximately
5,000 s.f.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if a paved parking lot
would create a problem when the shelter relocates after two
years. Mr. Ladwig replied that the asphalt would have to be
dug up and disposed of. As far as water runoff is
concerned, asphalt would be better; however, the parking lot
is a flat grade so there should be no major water runoff to
cause erosion.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the parking lot would be
graded to slope towards the street. Mr. Ladwig replied that
the site drains to the street now and it would not change.
The only difference is that asphalt would cause more runoff
while decomposed granite would have lees runoff due to
absorption.
Chairman Holmes stated that there should be some sediment
runoff with decomposed granite and he inquired how that
runoff could be controlled. Mr. Ladwig replied that the CUP
requires a final grading plan to be provided to the Planning
Director. The runoff issue will be addressed at that time.
Robert Shoecraft, Duckor & Spradling, 401 West "A" Street,
Suite 2400, San Diego, representing the J. C. Baldwin Co.,
addressed the Commission and assured the Commission that Mr.
Baldwin is not against homeless persons. His major concern
is that he did not receive notice and only found out about
the project two days ago. Mr. Baldwin purchased the
property in 1990 and has paid taxes on it for the past 14
months. During most of this time, he has been working with
staff to construct offices on the site. Mr. Shoecraft
stated that his eight page letter dated December 4, 1991
contains the substantive issues to support Mr. Baldwin's
position on the La Poeada project. (The original letter was
given to the Minutes Clerk and will be on file in the
Planning Department.)
- -
MlNUTEs
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7
Commissioner Erwin inquired if it was true that Mr. Baldwin
heard about the project only two days ago. Mr. Shoecraft
replied that his client lives in Encinitas. It is his
understanding that Mr. Baldwin was told about the La Posada
project by SDG&E approximately S-10 days ago. He claims
that the Planning staff had not made him aware of the
shelter prior to that time. Mr. Shoecraft does not feel
that a residential use such as a homeless shelter fits the
intent of the zoning ordinance. Because his family will be
working in the offices located next to the shelter, Mr.
Baldwin is concerned about many issues, including safety.
Mr. Shoecraft feels that because his client was not formally
noticed about the public hearing, he has been deprived of an
opportunity to property evaluate how the issues will affect
his proposed business.
Commissioner Erwin asked Mr. Shoecraft to repeat how his
client was made aware of the project. He replied that Mr.
Baldwin was told about the La Poaada project by SDGLE when
he was attempting to arrange for power to his new offices to
be located next door to the shelter. After hearing about
the shelter from SDG&E, Mr. Baldwin immediately inquired of
the Planning staff, who supplied more details. He never
received formal notice of the public hearing even though he
has paid taxes on the property for approximately 14 months.
Commissioner Erwin asked Mr. Shoecraft to elaborate on the
zoning issue. He replied that the property where the
shelter will be located is zoned industrial and he does not
feel that a homeless shelter fits the parameters of the
industrial zone. The La Posada project does.not fit the
meaning of "lodge" as it is defined in the zoning ordinance.
Commissioner Schlehuber inguired if Mr. Baldwin authorised
him to make this appearance on his behalf. Mr. Shoecraft
replied that he did.
Commissioner Hall requested staff to respond to the time
frames of when Mr. Baldwin was made aware of the shelter
project. Michael Grim, Assistant Planner, replied that
about six weeks after Mr. Baldwin had submitted his building
permit application, he saw him at the counter and mentioned
to him that an application had been received for a temporary
shelter for migrant workers which would be located across
the street from his proposed offices. He does not recall
when the actual discussion took place about the hearing but
it was probably within the past two weeks. After that
discussion, Mr. Baldwin called and said that he would be
sending his attorney down to discuss the matter. A
representative from Duckor & Spradling came to the Planning
Department last Monday and did their research.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Mr. Grim specifically advised
Mr. Baldwin at the time he talked to him that the project
would be on tonight's agenda. Mr. Grim replied that he did.
Bill Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday
Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and
stated that he is representing the property owners who live
adjacent to the site in the area known as the Sunnycreek
Specific Plan. The property owners have signed a petition
that expresses their concerns. The petition was submitted
to the Commissioners as well as the Minutes Clerk. Although
the property owners in Sunnycreek think that the La Posada
project is a very worthwhile cause, they are concerned about
the possibility that the shelter will be there in excess of
-
MINUTES
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8
two years, which would be detrimental to future development
in that area. The property owners have requested that the
following conditions be added to the CUP:
* That the CUP be granted for a two year period only, with
no possibility of extension.
* That the users of the facility be required to use the
public rights-of-way for access.
. That access to the shelter be restricted close to the top
of the slope to reduce fire potential.
* That a berm be required along the top of the slope to
separate industrial uses from the Sunnycreek area.
* That lighting be directed such that it does not spill onto
the Sunnycreek property.
Dennis Mehan, 3981 Gloria Lane, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that La Posada is an outstanding
project and he is concerned that the adjacent neighbore say
they are not against the use, yet they are all trying to
sabotage it. The migrant workers are a segment of the
Carlsbad population which has long been ignored. The
community has banded together to try to resolve this problem
in an area where there will be little impact. He noted that
the migrant workers are currently walking through the fields
to reach their work. He is unclear how the shelter can
control where the workers walk or force them to use public
rights-of-way. Further, it is impossible to foresee the
situation two years from now. He urged the Commissioners to
support the project.
Ed Scarpelli, 929 Orchid Way, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is President of the Carlsbad
Rotary Club and is speaking on their behalf. The club was
contacted two years ago to assist in this community effort
to help control the homeless problems of the migrant
workers. They have assisted the effort by meeting with
every agency who has a potential impact on the project. The
Carlsbad City Council has encouraged their efforts. There
is a dire need for the shelter right now and it has taken a
long time to find the right location. He noted that this
particular site has many advantages because it is close to
the Safety Center, is already graded, and is not too close
to the residential areas. He urged the Commission to grant
the CUP as requested so that the workers can be housed
before the real cold weather hits and the date for the grant
funds expires.
The applicant was permitted time for rebuttal.
Allen Bureon, an attorney with Feiet, Vetter, Enauf & Loy,
residing at 7210 Daffodil Place, Carlsbad, and representing
Caring Residents of Catlebad, addressed the Commission and
stated that the attorney representing Mr. Baldwin apparently
does not realize just who will be using the shelter. It
will not be a situation of people coming in and staying for
60 days and then being replaced by another group for 60 days. Many of the residents will be there for one night and
then gone. Others may be there for a week and gone. sixty days is the maximum that any person will stay. As far as
the two year period is concerned, that has been stipulated
in the lease. It would be financially infeasible for the
shelter to operate at this location after two years.
-
MINUTES
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9
However, the lease allows for a period of time after the two
years in order to disassemble the structure. Regarding the
noticing issue, the ordinance requires that notice of a
public hearing be sent to those owners listed on the most
recent egualized assessment rolls. The equalised assessment
rolls are not necessarily up to date. As a matter of fact,
the Baldwin Co. has had actual knowledge of the shelter for
at least 10 days, which is all that is required. In actual
point of fact, the notice was sent to the bank who formerly
owned the property and they have advised us that the notice
was mailed out to Mr. Baldwin on the very day it was
received by them. He urged the Commission to support the
project.
Ms. Wellman responded to the issues raised by the Sunnycreek
property owners. She can agree to most of the conditions
proposed by Mr. Hofman on behalf of those owners. In
response to the first condition regarding the two years,
Caring Residents has stated over and over again that they
will be out in two years but she would like to have the
option of an extension if, for some reason, the permanent
site is not totally ready at the end of the two year period.
As far as the third proposed condition, the buildings will
be set back 60 ft. from the north slope and the project will
be completely fenced so that should take care of the
problem.
Commissioner Hall can agree that it is not feasible to put
down asphalt for only a two year period. He could accept
decomposed granite for the driveway as long as the shelter
will not be there longer than two years.
Commissioner Erwin stated that, as he understands it, the
applicant plans to be out in two years but they would prefer
not to have a "drop dead'* clause in the CUP in case it is
necessary to extend the move out date for a legitimate
reason. Ms. Wellman replied that this is correct. Some
overlap may be needed but that is not known at this time,
and they would prefer to have some flexibility should it be
necessary.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the applicant could accept a
limitation of one additional year. Ms. Wellman replied that
a one year extension would be more than sufficient.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if notices could be posted
requesting the workers to use public rights-of-way to access
the shelter. Ms. Wellman replied that the entire facility
will be fenced and it is unlikely that people will climb the
fence in order to enter and leave the premises. However, it
would be possible to post notices in Spanish and English
asking workers to use the public rights-of-way.
Bob Ladwig, Rick Engineering, addressed the Commission and
stated that the fourth condition requested by the Sunnycreek
homeowners is for a berm at the top of the slope. The
facility has been designed to be at least 60 ft. from the
slope and, with landscaping, it should be almost invisible
by adjacent homeowners. There will also be a fence. The
gate to the property will be at the street. As far as the
second condition is concerned which requests workers to use
public rights-of-way, this may pose a problem since there is
no network of public streets in that area and the condition
may be difficult to enforce.
Commissioner Schlehuber is not in favor of drop dead clauses
where extensions to CUP's are concerned because it might be
MINUTk;
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 10
necessary to extend the CUP due to extenuating
circumstances.
Commissioner Erwin stated he would like the condition to
read that the CUP will be granted for a period of two years,
with one year renewals as needed. Mr. Ladwig requested if
the condition could also be stated as two years from the
date of occupancy which would allow time for inspections,
etc.
Mr. Ladwig stated that all of the lighting on the premises
will be directed away from surrounding properties. All
lights will be focused towards the interior of the site.
Chairman Holmes inquired if the trash receptacle could be
moved closer to the kitchen area. Mr. Ladwig replied that
there is room up front and he will give that suggestion some
thought.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Holmes declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Chairman Holmes requested that the City Attorney respond to
the points which were made. Ron Ball, Assistant City
Attorney, stated that the code reads that notice must be
sent to the owners of record as stated on the latest
equalised assessment roll. Unfortunately, properties get
sold and the latest assessment roll is not always accurate.
The due process requirement was satisfied in this case
because Great Western was the owner of record on the latest
equalised assessment roll as verified by Stewart Title; In
addition, staff went beyond that because the project was
discussed with Mr. Baldwin on more than one occasion and,
coincidentally, also by SDG&E. This is evidenced by the
fact that Mr. Baldwin's representative is in attendance at
this meeting. In Mr. Ball's opinion, the due process
concerns have been satisfied. As far as the zoning is
concerned, there is a provision which would allow this use
in Chapter 21.42.010 of the Municipal Code. Although an
emergency shelter for migrant workers is not specifically
stated, hospitals, treatment centers, and overnight campgrounds are permitted and the shelter is similar in
nature to the stated uses so it, too, would be permitted.
As far as the term of the CUP, Mr. Ball feels it should run
from the date of occupancy. The CUP, as written, allows for
unlimited extensions in two year increments. This can be
changed to no extensions , or any other period of time
different than two years. Extensions are treated the same
as renewals.
Commissioner Erwin requested the City Attorney to state the
proper wording in order to restrict renewals to one year.
Mr. Ball replied that in Condition #6, after the first
couple of sentences, on Line 9, "two years*' could be changed
to "one year." The first sentence would also have to be changed to read, "The Conditional Use Permit is granted for
a period of two years from the date of issuance of the
Certificate of Cccupancy or final inspection."
Commissioner Schlehuber feels there are sufficient
safeguards in the proposed CUP. Since the migrant workers
are probably now sleeping somewhere in the vicinity of the
project, he feels it will be good to congregate them into a
facility. In view of the two year term, he agrees that decomposed granite would be the best material for the
MINUTE;
December 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 COMMISSIONERS y
parking lot. If, for some reason, the CUP will continue for
a longer period past the two years, he would probably then
be in favor of asphalt. Commissioner Schlehuber thinks that
there are sufficient safeguards to limit the sediment which
will run off with the water. He can also agree that the
effective date of the CUP should be concurrent with issuance
of the Certificate of Occupancy.
Commissioner Savary can accept the project, as proposed,
with the corrections which have been mentioned.
Commissioner Erwin feels that the issues identified by Mr.
Shoecraft and the Sunnycreek property owners have been
addressed satisfactorily. He is in favor of one year
extensions rather than two year. He is satisfied with sign
postings in English and Spanish which request workers to
utilize public rights-of-way to access their work sites
whenever possible. Access close to the top of the slope and
the request for a berm has been taken care of with the
fence. He can support the project because it is needed in
the community and will benefit the citizens as well as the
workers.
Commissioner Noble concurs with the comments which have been
made.
Commissioner Hall can support the project and feels it is
long past due.
Chairman Holmes can support the project with decomposed
granite for the parking lot, relocation of the trash
receptacle, and posting of signs to use public
rights-of-way.
Ron Ball, Assistant City Attorney, noted that the resolution
does not specify a limit of 50 workers for up to 60 days.
He suggested additional wording be added to Condition tl as
follows H . ..approval is granted for a CUP, as ehown on the
Exhibits, for an emergency shelter for a maximum of 50
workers for up to 60 days."
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3325, approving the
Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and
adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3326, approving
CUP 91-10, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein, with the following revisions:
(1) change Condition Yl of Resolution No. 3326 to read
"...Exhibite A-C..."; (2) incorporate in Condition #l a
maximum of 50 workers for up to 60 days per individual;
(3) change the first line of Condition #6 to read, *'...for a
period of two years from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy...'* and line 9 to read *I . ..may be extended for a
reasonable period of time not to exceed one year, upon
written application..."; (4) replace Condition X21 with a
statement which specifies that the material for the parking
lot shall be decomposed granite; (5) add a new condition
which requires that notices be posted in English and Spanish
requesting residents to use public access, in lieu of
private property, to reach their work sites whenever
possible; and (6) relocate the trash facilities closer to
the kitchen.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 7:40 p.m. and reconvened
at 7:49 p.m.
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Noble
Savary
Schlehuber
. .
1200 ELM AVENUE
. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
TEtEPHONE fI:(6191;434-2808 --Y .. ~1 A’: : : I!‘-- .’ ,,._, ~ 2 ! 1
(” j A ,, ;‘ ‘~ ,:
c :: ] -,,,s _’ ” :, ,. ;I^. - _ I 3’J, 3 1
E. .r) /,” I (J-J 4 CD . . I-,..
g L-j
. /,..’ r.rl ‘.
APPEAL FORH
I (We) appeal the following decision of the Planning Commission
to the City Council:
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
LA POSADA DE GUADALUPE (CUP 91-10)
Date of Decision: December 4, 1991
Reason for Appeal: See attached.
fl-//- 5y
Date
Banning Cantarini
Name (Please Print)
905 Laguna Drive
Address
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 729-2046
Telephone Number
APPEAL OF CUP 91-10
I own property within the Sunny Creek Master Plan area which lies to the north of the
proposed shelter. Currently my property is undeveloped. My concern is that the
ongoing operation of the shelter beyond two years will create substantial adverse
impacts on my property as well as the entire Sunny Creek project. While I am also
concerned that the temporary operation of the shelter will have a direct and negative
financial impact on me, I am willing to support the CUP if one condition is added.
I feel a specific time limit of two years without the ability for any extension should be
included as a condition of approval of the CUP for the following reasons:
i) such a condition would encourage effort and attention toward locating a more
suitable and/or permanent site for an emergency shelter;
ii) such a condition would not create any false hopes on the part of the applicant
in being able to extend the CUP; and
iii) existing and future property owners would know with certainty the date the
CUP would expire, thereby minimizing any long-term financial impacts or
uncertainty to individual property owners.
Banning Cantarini
&TLEFORL/ &
CONSTRUCTION INC. . .- (6 19) 744-0630 (619) 727-1347 “’ RE~‘~~~-
January 6, 1992
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Vi 1 lage Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Attn: Bud Lewis, Mayor
RE : La Posada De Guadalupe (CUP 92-10)
Dear Bud:
It is my understanding that the property owners of the Sunny Creek area have filed an
appeal of the CUP 91-10 passed by the Planning Commission.
For your information, we made this property available to the La Posada De Guadalupe
group at the request of the City. Our understanding with this, group is that the faci 1 ity
would not be on the premises for a period longer than two years. At the time of agreeing
to a lease, we stated that we had plans for the property after the two (2) year period.
In fact the lease was ammended to include, at the end of the two year limit, the lease
amount would be doubled to an amount that would be discouraging, if not prohibitive to
the organization.
We hope this clarifies our position regarding this property.
Sincerely
PAL0 R INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES dIiii?be Y’
Bob Astleford /
Partner J
BA/mlb
,n,n r ,xcn~ \I,PTA T\DI\IIT- CAP.’ h”n Df‘C\C f-A1 IUf\DNlA O?IMXl
j ~ _.. ’ --:- c -- f’. i .. ! . . j j i;: ; : -- .. _ 1 --.. ..L. 1 .:, j -’ .‘Lf’iL.
p ‘7 IL’* -‘_. ,.:, ; - 7 fi * . i ,i r,: 25
r, i -..- 1 , L. ? f i ii’ .- :‘i : i : f t -.- , -I ~i‘.&#qj
January 7, 1992
City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
To: Office of City Clerk
This letter is to withdraw my appeal of the Planning Commission's CUP 91-10, La Posada de Guadalupe, dated December 4, 1991.
Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 729-2046
cc: Mayor Bud Lewis Deputy Mayor Ann Kulchin
1200 ELM AVENUE
e CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk ClJit~ of Mnrls;bab
TELEPHONE
(619) 434-2808
DATE: December 13, 1991
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Bobbie Hoder - Planning Dept.
Karen Kundtz - Clerk's Office
CUP 91-10 - La Posada De Guadalupe
THE ABOVE ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
According to the Municipal Code, appeals must be heard by the City Council
within 30 days of the date that the appeal was filed. (REMINDER: The item
will not be noticed in the newspaper until the agenda bill is signed off by
all parties.)
Please process this item in accordance with the procedures contained in the
Agenda Bill Preparation Manual. If you have any questions, please call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City Council
Meeting of
Signature Date
MEMBERS OF PLAWWIWG COWMISSIOW Deixmber 2, 1951
Re: CUP 91-10
The undersigned property owners constitute substantially all of the owners of property contained within the Specific Plan #SP-191 known as Sunny Creek Specific Plan and also property lo- cated outside the SP-191 boundary (see attached map).
We have just recently been informed of the proposal relating to the above referenced Conditional Use Permit. Many people have worked hard to bring the temporary homeless shelter into frui- tion, and we recognize the need for such a facility. In the short run, we have no opposition to the concept or its location. However, if the use were to extend beyond the two ye,ars, we believe the use at the proposed location would be detrimental to a future development of the land within the Sunny Creek Specific Plan area.
We also believe that there are current operational standards which we would recommend. Therefore, we request that the Plan- ning Commission condition its approval of the project as follows:
(1)
(2)
.
(3)
(4)
CUP 91-10 be issued for two years only without any right of renewal under any conditions at this location;
Those persons utilizing the facility be required to ac- cess the facility through the use of public right of ways only. Our concern is to deter any foot traffic up and down or across private property owned by the under- signed as a convenient way to reach El Camino Real or farm jobs immediately north of the site. .
The potential for fire is great, and access of any kind close to the top of the slope or any part of the slope must be prohibited at all times.
The conditions established for the development of this area in the first instance should be complied with: it has always been our understanding that a raised earth berm would be constructed along the top of slope, visually separating the industrial zoned project from the Sunny Creek Specific Plan area, and that all light- ing be directed in a manner to prevent a direct view of such lighting from the Sunny Creek Specific Plan area.
WAWDAWA CAL CO.
nr\120291\bebe\cup91.10
SUNNY CREEK PROPERTYOkNERS
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
. .
.
.
\. .
1.
2
KELLY
KATO .
3, MANDANA
4. GROSSE 5. .MANDs?A
- 6. EBRIGHT’- 7. DELORM
a WRISLEY
9. GRIBBLE
10. HAGAMAN 11. BARLOW
. .
.
. ,
12. iYCAMORE CREEK CO. 13, CANTARINI 14. WESTERN LAND 15. %JNNY CREEK II
.
.
. . . .
“W *
.
.
By:
Patrick Kelly
Karen Kelly
-JJwar ' Ida Kate
Harold Gribble
Dorothy Ebright
Chase Koman
SUNNY CREEK II
By:
Russell W. Grosse
Mary E. Grosse
Tim Barlow
* Betty Barlow
2
nr\120291\bebe\cup91.10
Patrick Kelly
Karen Kelly
Harold Gribble
Dorothy Ebright
Chase Koman
SUNNY CREEK II
By:
Russell W. Grosse
.
Mary E. Grosse
Tim Barlow
* Betty Barlow
Jim Gaiser for Cantarini Family
2
nr\120291\bebe\cup91.10
-
' Ida Kato
Harold Gribble
Dorothy Ebright
Chase Koman
/ ,/
-Russell W. Groske
t /,,Q* -f - , &o Mary E" Gtdsse
Tim Barlow
* Betty Barlow
Jim Gaiser for Cantarini Family
2
nr\12029l\bebe\cup91.10
-
By:
Patrick Kelly
Karen Kelly
* Ida Kate
Harold Gribble
Dorothy Ebright
Chase Koman
SUMMY CREEK II
By:
Russell W. Grosse
.
Mary Eflrosse
Jim Gaiser for Cantarini Family
2
nr\l20291\bebe\cup91.10
i
Patrick Kelly
Karen Kelly
' Ida Kato
rl N. Gribble
.
Dorothy Ebright
Chase Koman
suNN?fCREEKII
By:
Russell W. Grosse
.
Mary E. Grosse
Tim Barlow
* Betty Barlow
Jim Gaiser for Cantarini Family
2
nr\120291\bebe\cup91.10
-
.
Patrick Kelly
. .
Karen Kelly
* Ida Kato
Harold Gribble
SUNNYCREEKII
By:
Russell W. Grosse
Mary E. Grosse
Tim Barlow
r Betty Barlow
Jim Gaiser for Cantarini Family
2
nr\12029l\bebe\cup91.10
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL
CUP 91-10 - LA POSADA DE GUADALUPE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, January 7, 1992, to consider an appeal of a condition of approval for CUP 91-10 which allows for extensions of the permit. This project will allow the installation and operation of a temporary emergency shelter for 50 migrant workers on property generally located on the north side of Impala Drive, between Palmer Way and Orion Way, in Local Facilities Management Zone 5, and more particularly described as:
Parcel 2 of Map No. 15247 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at 4348-1161, ext. 4499.
If you challenge this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPELLANT: Banning Cantarini PUBLISH: December 26, 1991
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
LAPOSAMnrrvl!## I UP -10
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK ‘S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
LA POSADA GUADALUPE DE CARLSBAD APPEAL -- CUP 91-10
for a public hearing before the City Council. I
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
MARTY ORENYAK
Assistant City Manager Dec. 18, 1991
Date
, -
IMPALA CARLSBAD PARTNERS, GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS, PALOMAR INVESTMENT LTD., CONS NSNS ASSOCIATES, CONS. C/O GERALD A. DUCOT C/O REO DEPT. P.O. BOX 577 1148 FOURTH AVENUE 9301 CORBIN AVE ST ENCINITAS, CA 92024 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 P.O. BOX 1010 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91328
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS INC., COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CARLSBAD CONS NSNS NSNS 2500 HARBOR BLVD. 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE FULLERTON, CA 92634 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MANDANA CAL CO (CORP), CONS 4675 MAC ARTHUR COURT SUITE 1210 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660