The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-01-21; City Council; 11523; FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR OLIVENHAIN ROAD WIDENING/REALIGNMENT AND FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTa b !f 5 .. ;e 0 5 a s z 3 0 0 CITWF CARLSBAD - AGENDWILL q7 p u AB# I/ 56L3 TITLE: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DEPT. H CITY AT MTG, DEPT. ENG CITY lw 61/21/92 FOR OLIVENHAIN ROAD WIDENING/REALIGNMENT AND FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review final Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) on the Olivenhain Road Widening q Realignment Project and adopt Resolution No. 9 ,% - a’? recommending I certification of the E.I.R. and adoption of Alignment No. 2 to the Encinitas City Cour ITEM EXPLANATION: This past year the staff and a City Council subcommittee have been working with the of Encinitas to prepare alignment studies and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR] the widening and realignment of Olivenhain Road between Rancho Santa Fe Road El Camino Real. The draft E.I.R. was circulated in October and all comments have now been recek Because most of the roadway lies within the jurisdiction of the City of Encinitas they acting as lead agency for certification of the final E.I.R. The Encinitas City Council is scheduled to hear the item on January 22, 1991 to cons final certification. Upon certification and selection of the preferred alignment, the project can begin des Construction of the roadway will be accomplished by Carlsbad development inter1 either through Assessment District or in conjunction with normal development activi Proiect Description The proposed project will complete Olivenhain Road from Rancho Santa Fe Road t Camino Real to modified prime arterial standards. The project will accommodate six IE of traffic with a street section varying from 86 feet curb to curb to 106 feet curb to ( within a 107 foot and 126 foot right of way respectively. The major construction will occur westerly of the west boundary of Rancho Pondei Subdivision. The narrow two lane roadway segment within this area will be complc realigned and reconstructed to full prime arterial standard and the intersection signalized to provide for ultimate geometrics. Within the boundary of the Rancho Ponderosa development no roadway widening wi required. The project will include construction of a detention basin just south of Olivenl Municipal Water District (OMWD). This basin will be designed to reduce peak fl avoiding the need for major drainage reconstruction at the intersection of El Camino I and Olivenhain Road. , * 0 PAGE TWO OF AB# //, 523 I Alternative Aliq n m ent s The draft E.I.R. reviewed four alternative alignments for the portion of Olivenhain Rc westerly of Rancho Ponderosa. These alignments are attached for your review. Alignment No. 1 follows the old county SA 680 plan and would extend roadway directly west intersecting El Camino Real south of the exisl intersection. This alternative would impact several riparian areas and would reqr an additional crossing of the streambed. Alignment No. 2, the preferred alignment, would shift the roadway northerly i the slope area adjacent to the existing roadway. This alignment requi increased grading and conflicts with major utility lines. This alignment does meet Carlsbad standards for a 60 mile per hour design speed but avoids imp; to riparian habitats and a major bridging of the creek. Alignment No. 3 attempts to reduce the impacts of Alignment No. 2 by rr nearly following the existing alignment. This alignment intersects El Camino f at a seven degree skew. This alignment also has a 55 mile per hour de: speed. Aliqnment No. 4 follows the existing alignment meeting El Camino Real at i degree skew. This skew fails to meet Carlsbad design standards and if exten westerly would further impact riparian areas westerly of El Camino Real. Staff and the subcommittee of the two City Councils supported Alignment No. 2 as best operational link recognizing environmental constraints. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS Attached for Council review is a summary of the preferred alignment and mitiga measures as well as the mitigation monitoring program. Noteworthy impacts are as follows: 0 0 0 Potential construction detour issues. 0 Hillside excavation aesthetic concerns. 0 Potential utility relocation issues. 0 Potential construction noise impacts on riparian habitat. Increase noise impacts to the Rancho Ponderosa fronting homes. Alignment No. 2 requires curve radius standard reduction resulting in five milc hour (mph) reduction in design speed from 60 mph to 55 mph. Brian F. Mooney will present response to comments during their Council presentat L e 0 PAGE THREE OF AB# / / 523 I FISCAL IMPACT: The project is estimated to cost approximately $12,000,000 and is proposed tc financed as a part of the Rancho Santa Fe Road Assessment District. Should the Dit fail to proceed construction would become a condition of development on fro1 property owners with some support from the Citywide Community Facilities District EXH I B ITS : 1. Draft E.I.R. Summary 2. Alternatives No. 2 Alignment 3. Alternatives No. 1 Alignment 4. Alternatives No. 3 Alignment 5. Alternatives No. 4 Alignment 6. Detention Basion Vicinity Map 7. Mitigation Monitoring Program 8, Q.L/.&gL&& \u. 9&-a.? L e 0 SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves be aspects: widening and realignment of a portion ( Olivenhain Road between El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road; construction of floodwater detention dike just to the south of this road; and construction of a flood control ben at the intersection of La Costa Avenue and El Camino Real. Existing and proposed rights-of-wa for Olivenhain Road are within the corporate boundaries of both the cities of Encinitas ar Carlsbad, in northern San Diego County. The future floodwater detention basin "D" would 1 located in the Encinitas Creek floodplain, just west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, in the City ( Carlsbad. The La Costa AvenueEl Camino Real intersection flood control berm would I situated along the City of CarlsbadCounty of San Diego boundary, just south of Batiquitc Lagoon. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES The following environmental issues analyzed in this EIR, and briefly summarized below, hai been found not to be significantly impacted by the proposed project: cultural mources, geolog hazards, traffic/circulation, General Plan compatibility, paleontological resources, ar hydrology/water quality. Potentially significant environmental impacts have been identified 6 he remaining issues evaluated herein, but can be mitigated to below a level of significanc through implementation of mitigation measures. These issues include biological resources, traff mise, community character/visual resource, and public services/utiLities. Addition environmental issues were evaluated during an initial Environmental Impact Assessment, a~ were detennined by the City of Encinitas not to be impacted by the proposed project. The issues, which were not included in this EIR analysis, are: air quality, natural resourc utilization, land use compatibility, light and glare, hazardous waste generation and dispos housing demand, recreational uses, and agricultural conversion. Biological Resources ImDacts. The proposed project would directly impact sensitive wetland habitats includi southem willow scrub, coastal freshwater marsh, coastal salt marsh, and disturbed wetland SM as well as upland habitats including southern mixed chaparral, eucalyptus woodland, rude vegetation, and disturbed land. The impact to coastal salt marsh is considered significa Impacts to southern willow scrub and freshwater marsh habitats are considered cwnulativt significant due to their limited range. The impact to ruderal vegetation may include losses of t sensitive sand aster. A slight increase in roadway runoff volumes due to increased asph surface area for the widened road, which may include residuals of oil and grease, coi significantly impact Encinitas Creek aquatic wildlife. Significant noise levels from construed equipment operation and future traffic along Olivenhain Road may disrupt sensitive songbird (i willow flycatcher and least Bell's vireo) mating and foraging activities in adjacent ripar habitat. s- 1 e 0 Mitigation. The Alternative #2 Olivenhain Road design and the Alternative #1 flood cont berm design at La Costa AvenueEl Camino Real intersection are recommended as the le environmentally damaging alternatives. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pre-Discha Notification and a California Department of Fish and Game 1601 Streamcourse Alterati Agreement shall be p~pared and approved prior to the approval of final roadway improvemc plans. All mapped sensitive habitats to be disturbed shall be revegetated at the appropri replacement ratios and within ecologically appropriate areas on-site. All proposed habj restoration sites shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during plant installation and fo~ five-year period thereafter. Prior to construction of the proposed flood control berm at La Co! AvenueEl Camino Real intersection, the coastal salt marsh vegetation and top soil layer to impacted shall be salvaged, and then tilled into the soil of the prepared salt marsh revegetati' site. Proposed roadway construction shall occur outside the months of March through July in orc to avoid potentially significant noise impacts to sensitive breeding songbirds. In order to avc incremental water pollution impacts from oil and gas residuals into the Encinitas Cre watershed, appropriate runoff protection facilities shall be installed south of Olivenhain Roat Cultural Resources Impacts. No cultural resources are located within the proposed construction easements delineatc for the three study areas; therefore, no adverse direct impacts to these resources would occur a result of project implementation. Mitigation. Because two archaeological sites exist adjacent to the project study areas, i construction activities shall be restricted to within the limits of proposed construction easemeni as delineated by visible flagging/staking. Geologic Hazards Impacts. There are no soil or geologic conditions present within the three study areas whic would preclude project implementation. The presence of undocumented fill soils ar compressible alluvium, however, would require removal and recompaction of all loose soils pric to construction. Stabilization replacement fds would be required for the proposed 32-foot hig 2:l cut slope along the north side of the road segment to be realigned. The presence of shallo groundwater at this location would limit the depth of remedial grading to just above tl groundwater level. Placement of a geotextile fabric and coarse aggregate blanket would 1 required over the exposed cut soils prior to compaction of fill and paving. Constructic dewatering, particularly adjacent to El Camino Real, would also be required. MitiEation. Prior to the approval of final roadway improvement plans, a detailed soils 8 geologic investigation addressing the approved alignment shall be performed. All propose roadway improvement and grading plans within existing utility easements on-site shall t s-2 e 0 reviewed and approved by the Public Works Departments of the cities of Encinitas and Carlsba prior to final approval. All manufactured roadway cudfd slopes shall be planted with erosion-resistant groundcovc vegetation, and watered by a welldesigned and maintained irrigation system. A Landscape an Irrigation Plan for all graded slopes shall be approved by the Public Works Departments of tk cities of Encinitas and Carlsbad prior to approval of fmal roadway improvement plan Landscaping and irrigation of all manufactured roadway slopes, per approved plans, shall t installed as soon as practical after grading in order to reduce erosion potential on exposed slope Tra fidCirculation Irmacts. The proposed project would improve existing traffic congestion which presently occu! along Olivenhain Road to acceptable levels of service. It would also result in acceptable leve of service at primary street segments and key intersections in the project area under build-oi (Year 2010) traffic conditions, except for El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road south Olivenhain Road. Some temporary traffic delays may be experienced along Olivenhain Road a its intersections with El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road during the construction perio Mitiaation. Closure of Olivenhain Road to through traffic shall not be permitted during j proposed widening and realignment, unless other detour options, such as Calle Barcelona betwec EB Carnino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road (if it is allowed to be completed prior to proje implementation), are identifed which would be acceptable to the City Engineers of Encinitas su Carlsbad. A Traffic ControlDetour Plan for the proposed project shall be approved by the citi of Encinitas and Carlsbad Planning and Engineering Departments prior to approval of fin roadway improvement plans. Approval of such a Plan would eliminate temporary traffic dela otherwise caused by detouring, thereby maintaining existing traffkdcirculation patterns within t: project area. During the construction period, the road shall be re-striped to allow one lane each direction for use by public and emergency vehicle traffic. The existing traffk signal at t Olivenhain Roam1 Camino Real intersection shall be switched to the flashing red mode duri construction equipment operation. Future improvements to El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road segments in the vicinity the proposed project will be required prior to build-out year traffic forecasts to ensure complian with the City of Encinitas General Plan Circulation Element. General Plan Compatibility Impacts. The proposed Alignment #2 would result in minor deviations from General P. roadway design criteria established by the cities of Encinitas and Carlsbad for the constructj of a Prime Arterial; however, the respective Circulation Elements contain provisions for variat in design. In particular, the descriptions of width and other facilities are offered as non-exclus alternatives which allow for such minor variations in roadway design. Consequently, s-3 d * 0 proposed project is determined to be in substantial conformance with the General Plan Circulatioi Element standards for a Prime Arterial roadway. Mitigation. No mitigation measures are required. Traffic Noise Impacts. An increase in future traffic volumes along the widened Olivenhain Road would resul in increased traffic noise levels at existing residences fronting the proposed project route on bot1 sides of the road. Construction equipment operation may also result in short-term noise impact to these residences, Significant construction noise levels may also impact sensitive breeding bin species that use the Encinitas Creek riparian area adjacent to the south side of the proposed roac Most of the proposed road construction would take place at the western end of the project route Since no residential land uses occur in this area, construction noise would primarily impac biological habitat. Mitigation. Future traffic noise impacts to residences fronting the south side of the project roui shall be mitigated via proposed extension of existing noise attenuation walls. The feasibility ( extending existing walls for the purpose of future traffic noise attenuation along the rear yarc of residences fronting the north side of Olivenhain Road shall be internally evaluated by the citit of Encinitas and Carlsbad, in accordance with Policy 1.1 of the Encinitas General Plan Noh Element. If found to be feasible, any proposed wall extensions shall be of sufficient height an uniform building material consistent with existing structures so as to reduce noise to exterior an ground floor receptors, but may not significantly reduce noise to second floor receptor Proposed roadway construction shall occur outside the months of March through July in ord( to avoid potentially significant noise impacts to sensitive breeding songbirds. Paleontological Resources Impacts. The Santiago Formation occurs in all three project study areas, and contains significa fossils as evidenced by their abundance and high potential for discovery in the immediate proje vicinity. Quaternary age marine terrace and alluvial deposits found in the study areas are al! considered significant, but have a low potential of fossil occurrence in the Carlsbad area. Mitigation. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to pedorm periodic inspections excavations within all three project study areas and, if necessary, salvage exposed fossils. T paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or redirect grading from the areas of exposed fossils facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage. Due to the small nature of some fossils, it m be necessary to collect matrix samples for processing through fine mesh screens. Any foss collected shall be prepared to the point of identification and properly curated before they a donated to their final repository. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-pro institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural Histc Museum. s-4 4 * 0 HgdrologyNVater 0 uali t y Impacts. The proposed project is not expected to create sipficant water quality impacts withh the project areas or downstream watersheds, such as Batiquitos Lagoon. Temporary increase in turbidity and/or total suspended solids may occur within Encinitas Creek during thc construction phase of the project, but no surface or groundwater impacts are expected. Due tc anticipated increases in future traffic volumes and paved surface area, slight increases in greasi and oil residuals runoff may be encountered. Sediment transport is expected to decrease due tc the increased paved area and the addition of floodwater detention basin "D." Mitigation. Debris fences and screens shall be stationed downstream from proposed grading, br outside the Encinitas Creek 100-year floodplain limits and associated sensitive wetland habit; boundaries. Any temporary dams shall be constructed from material such as clean gravel whic would cause little or no siltation. Except as shown on approved plans, no riprap, rock or otht impermeable materials shall be discharged into Encinitas Creek. Any temporary fills shall t: constructed of nonerodible materials and shall be removed immediately upon completion of th work. When road construction operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall t removed from the work areas. Bridge plans for the El Camino Real bridge just south of Olivenhain Road intersection indica1 that riprap protection is in place approximately 20 feet upstream and downstream of the bridgc but is currently silted over. Prior to road construction, the status and condition of this ripra shall be inspected to determine if it is still providing adequate protection against scour fro1 erosive velocities on the upstream side of the El Camino Real bridge. Community CharacterNisual Ouality Impacts. Proposed roadway cut slopes along the north side of the realigned road would res1 in significant visual impacts to northbound traffic along El Camino Real, south of its intersectit with Olivenhain Road, and to existing residential land uses south of the project route. Adver visual impacts to the Thompson residence on the south side of the proposed realignment wou result from placement of a fill slope/retaining wall approximately 12 feet away to support t widened road segment at this location. No visual impacts would occur from proposl construction of detention basin "D" dike or the flood control berm at the La Costa Avenue/ Camino Real intersection. Mitigation. Mitigation for visualflandform modification impacts associated with propos roadway grading shall include scarification of the cut face by the use of a serrated blade or 0th methods to create pockets where planted vegetation could better take hold. Where possible, ; manufactured slopes shall undulate, with rounding of the tops and toes of the slopes to bet blend them into the surrounding terrain. A detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plan for manufactured slopes shall be approved by the cities of Enchitas and Carlsbad Planning 2 Engineering Departments. All plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the respect cities' Landscape Architects. Prior to final "as-built" approval of grading plans, representatii s-5 4 e 0. from the Public Works Departments of both cities shall inspect landscape installation to ensur( conformance with the requirements of this EIR and relevant Grading Permits. Additionally, thl project Landscape Architect shall certify by letter to these departments that the landscapl installation conforms to these requirements. Rather than constructing a retaining wall or fill slope adjacent to the Thompson residence, on of the following two alternative mitigation measures shall be implemented during roac construction in order to reduce adverse visual impacts to below a level of significance: 1) Twc six-foot high vegetated crib walls shall be installed adjacent to this property, with a three-foc wide planting area between them; or 2) Two, six-foot high slump-block retaining walls, siiz in color and appearance as the existing four-foot wall fronting the Willow Creek/Bridgewate subdivision to the west, shall be installed. In addition, a four-foot high slump-block wall sha be installed at the southern ROW edge, at the top of the slope. This wall shall match and tie int the existing aforementioned block wall to the west. Three-foot wide planting areas shall also b established between each wall. Construction of either alternative shall meet commonly-accepte engineering practices. Vegetation and irrigation associated with either alternative shall b specified by the homeowner, but shall not be unreasonably demanded. Public Utilities Impacts. Relocation of existing utility lines within the western segment of Olivenhain Road t be realigned would not be required as long as these lines remain within the proposed ROW c the new road alignment; there is no major excavation required for the new roadway cut; and n new facilities connections are proposed. If relocation is required, these facilities would remai in service until new lines have been relocated and tested. As long as standard constructic procedures for utility line relocation are followed, no impacts or interruptions to existing servic in the project area are anticipated. Existing gas and electric facilities within the 150-foot wic SDG&E easement that crosses Olivenhain Road near El Camino Real would be lowered accommodate the new profile of the proposed road realignment. Potential impacts resulting fro these relocations could include accidental damage to lines during construction and/or pub1 safety impacts from personnel working too close to the lines. The proposed project may significantly impact law enforcement, fre protection, and paramed emergency response time to the Olivenhain Road project area, particularly during peak-ho commuter periods, should bottlenecks, traffic delays, or detours occur at existing neighborhoc access points and transition routes during the construction phase. Mitigation, To ensure that public services in the project area are not impacted, specificatio shall be placed in the construction documents that would provide for temporary servi connections in the event of anticipated interruptions to water, sewer, gas, electric, telephone, television lines. The cities of Enchitas and Carlsbad shall coordinate final approval of roadw improvement plans with the respective utility companies and agencies to ensure non-interferen with existing public facilities. Furthermore, SDG&E requires that certain standards be follow while working in or around gas transmission facilities. S-6 c @ Finally, the County Shefls Department and local fire departments shall be provided copies oj the approved Traffic Control/Detour Plan for the proposed project. Receipt of such Plans woulc provide these agencies information regarding the variables which could potentially affeci emergency response mode and time to the project area during proposed road construction. Witt this information, these agencies could develop alternate routes or other methods to ensure tha emergency response to the project area is not significantly impacted during project construction 5-7 c @ 10.0 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST Mitigation measures which would reduce or eliminate potential environmental impacts of proposed project have been identified in this document. The cities of Encinitas and Carlsl are required to implement adopted mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance, following Mitigation Monitoring Program and checklist has been formulated The Mitigation Monitoring Program is intended to be administered by the Departments Planning (DP), Public Works (DPW), and Code Compliance (CC) of the cities of Encinj and Carlsbad These Departments, augmented by possible contracts personnel, shall responsible for enforcement of the zoning regulations. It is further intended that funds : administering the Mitigation Monitoring Program be provided on a full-cost recovery basis the two cities. Certifkations of Compliance required by other agencies, such as Caltra County of San Diego, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildl Service, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be secured by the C of Encinitas Planning Department. No authorization to commence any activity on-site sh be granted except with the concurrence of the respective cities’ Departments, The following checklist is intended to be used by personnel from the above-listed Departmer as the appointed monitoring entities. Information contained within the checklist clea identifies the mitigation measure, delineates the monitoring schedule and defines the conditic required to verify compliance. Following is an explanation of the six columns whj constitute the checklist. Column 1 Mitigation Measure: An inventory of each mitigation measure is provided, w a brief description. m: Each mitigation measure is classified as either Project Design (PI Mitigation, Ongoing Mitigation (OM), or Cumulative Mitigation (CM) bas upon the following definitions: Column 2 Project Design Mitigation - mitigation which has been incorporated ir On-going Mitigation - mitigation associated with a project over a pen Cumulative Mitigation - mitigation which requires monitoring over the project design (e.g., acoustical barriers, road improvements); of time (e.g., dust control, landscape maintenance); 0 greater period of time (e.g., progressive reclamation of mining site). Column 3 Monitor: Identifies the agency or department which is responsible to determi compliance with the mitigation measure and to inform the City of Encinit Community Development Department (CDD) regarding compliance. x- 1 c @ Column 4 Schedule: As scheduling is dependent upon the progression of the oveI project, specific dates are not used within the "Schedule" column. Instei scheduling &scribes a logical succession of events (e.g., prior to occupanc annual) and, if necessary, delineates a follow-up program. Repom 'ne - Requireme nts: The status of on-going and cumulative mitigati measures is to be documented in letter report after each visit. The monitor c quickly determine whether a mitigation measuxe has been completed by refem to this column. Upon satisfaction of the reporting requirement listed in tl column, the mitigation measure is considered complete. Where the "Schedul column indicates annual or other on-going mitigation measures, verification compliance may not occur until completion of the project. Information providc within progms reports will be helpful in the development of future mitigatic programs. This Mitigation Monitoring Program is to be adopted by the Lead and Responsible agenci upon formulation of Findings, in order to comply with the requirements set forth by Assemb Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Column 5 x-2 - *cI E n esoJepuod iep OWJetl __ ___ - - -- -. - I -m - 4 au / . .- .._ x i , 3 ur 9 L .- - 1 ; I : *. * i - I f .- ** EE EE 1 t ,/ t 1 i 1 I ! ! , I ! 1 1 I i i j i 1 1 e rn -* r\ EE c( EE cs gg) ! za .! TT L1 XE 00 ec, SO ck QZ ZQ 02 e gg Q Q, 2 ct E Pi 0 &/ opJ1 E$$ B@ PI: CI k @ .E!& I i I, I 9 Gz Future Detention Basin "D' , 1 -. ! Olivenhain Road Alignn Vicinity - .I ! A' 0 1OOo' 2000' f 7 Mian F moon@v a~~Gila&Q Figure d Hmg. design h environmental studies ' SOURCE: U.S.G.S. 7.5' Quad Map (Encinitas 8 Rancho Santa Fe) 3 - E r PI M 5 Er: 8 E 22 84 x: V "E W zg 35 3s 2 Q t E 2 z i g g 2 4 g 2 E vi B g ; $ :- l @ *- MA$ %A .t a !!i 'g s$ * g -5 !$ iE.$ 1;: 1: l.u $ $4 ' 83 228 ti ' [# qQ * .s z-g&w 2; E2 &3q3s pi $j -3 Q4 15 - p %" 85 zcp -26 -OD 8ipp b 2: # 38.e b sia .s 3Q$+ $4 & a; 888 %84E52t? 1; 20 dg $ 6% g !! 'I gE +fa 6 'S 0 1: 93 E?F i % % 5 g Ei OD.8 -5 8 g ta"? u B .g3 g "B 9- 8, 3E$ % s 883 4 gg gin -5% %$* 86 g w8io S8 $y ;!E 3, Eoia $ 22 g tE SEE b gg: 3 3 . B -2 86 $5 38.8 B $1 $23 k$ c"$+ Qdri el2 cP* cg b% t:m~ )C 8 8.5 -5 ij 3% .,E g if $2 5 Sgs 2% td $P$S &x a ~s q& &)?$ 28 Be E j8 Q" VI 35"a *!$I E3 x Sb .E3 86 .d .a*$ *g i5 6 g 5 &=.. m e, -+s $& aE- gE$ s.5 h -$ E@ sbs - A8 3 :j cas: e jt nsg 3'3 3838 "0 2k f -L 3- e .; E 2 .g $J uz sa s "".OB 5 :g ux* 8.8 k.pg E z=a3 -3 f $3 srnj QdaB 3 8 B g 3 gaguo c g 'F) 8 SQZ~~%B~UM M >v=mvgb gg$& 2 g gs 5 i$s$pg:b $;$E % u 32 -2 $8 132 !i cz .s ga-g&CDs Fg 1 i.2 8 h 23 8 gm 6 s e gg g $2 raw c 3 i!E, 3 *e - 23b .- 3 a 3€ a 9 .-P2 -* P5 .i? %8S$di$'ia 5,gj 31 $9 g6z a?:$ @E 0) > .- f s. 8 B P I. > *'F) P 8 2 $ g ,ss hSQE2zc e p e5 u,a2gs%a 2 z ga 4v1 .$ H -a%z4s svladt 58-53 8 ,I *$ ~~EEZ~~ZNV-, agig P~:~,EsZi I tm- 4gg- 'd g q a3 2 z; 25 $?&Ed& - r( 3 1 L !5 I E" 'f! i k $2; 3 -g* 53w .;& I az 6 vg ;z Lilg sz SS& E 4 $ 22 g p 6 & 4 5 - u - c( & 3 3.q: .s d" iZW l ;; I 30 8, 8, e "8 6 bo 'a Ft. .a" 9s g jag *a9 3% o 3 -E. ij 882 88'3, 8Bj En JBgSb.9 b.5 b.5 i."; !."% ;g gag lek CUB $g.E$sdjsd~si! ss%s.s%E.p .S% 3 1: CI #{* 9% pg 1 I+; h 8, F.$*El f.;; "1 kij kP.8bf.Bbjj 83 8JG & 338 @si 33% sq 5.9 tis &@. 4fa 3< 8" el 3aP3-d gg-,gp ; p: CI i! B- 3 BB E 4 3. 3 38.g f g: ooi 3 p. !Xi q .B 3 .; !%I $3 0; 5 815 g .s w- .+ L) E .C L) E .C L) .- B .: .; 0- L) : L) 5 L) 5- : 8.E h& 2 8 I f I B .i B 854 g s 9 -8 3 a E 8 'E: a 8 2 $jf H 3 2 f $1 2s t: jj $8 .$.,.,M .e .- &3 p =s 3- fi WE 5 .I= 2f i .g 5-j B $3 3 3gJ E 3!6a 3: .@ -x 4 -x 3B ;;f 8 2% u an 'OB i?n 2 -3- fr 55 10 $3 s.3 2 @ 6 883 a &&a 368 8 8 9% !g!gG *B -.gp Ea 8 -32 p .t-/ i &E aa UP a3 4 3.i U* CaZ m m - 5: E 3 3pH s v1 p PBB M E52 P % c E On .- E% '22 d c B gs 9 x E -0 as %& E a $ 8T.K 00' d c c .s -3 B tf 55 c Zi c 5 c m' F 6$ - 9s E s L) QZ t.b 44 - AS 5 5 "33 t:2 Wr5 a a .Y ss zs 8" E338 5 'd 3 .% a= 3:: gas R" sg 43 .p 0- & 0.i: i! gk 5: $ j'p g,: g 5 % 'j; 8 3 gB $E s 8 -s 95 gg -52 5G.E .g .E g 'SO 83 8 2; *$; 0 5% .,Ea 3: sz !js& t v1 + 5 33 2 g-s 5.2 $4 -a $ Q p 3 .E "E "a; .s 0x9 g g % $ 2: sg 2s Y 3.g +p 3 32 Q $ g3 85 s.us 8 ,s %f :q 0 v1 '3 ss3 z s "I gs sx fig E.5 La,* .- a 5% :k 2s *E-? $ 5 Ig g$ %5 rJ 'E 6 2 :$ $3 0 2; ZS- 9 * 2.3 %a sg 2 &"a p ?% 29 0- 3;"B 2 5 & $j ' $2 3 .3 8 8; 3% ss 2s: g p U sg ii 3; r; 6.5 %$ :la E 2 WE 2.g zg 88 d 32 a amp s m-% *e n - z8 B b, -8 4 Egg " z- '3 T;i "% 25 2 s 23 :s 8 5 'd .C g+ B E E $3 so VI Y 5 4 .s .g -0Zo n* 2 -c 2 & 6 * &.5 22 tz do A2 Pi ri e vi w r-: 1 8 !i Lm 5 %i 1 k 34; -8, ZBW c zg 5g I YW 425 30 32 gs 8 % 5 E f 0) w al L. P S 2 I LP .~CI . CI .ZB 3 3 @ 8 ga 3 e& B.EG@& -0 '$ ii gi UE Gg EP %S E; 51; ol9, B pen @E 888 ,Ss,PIs, s 1 c( 8 5% e58t at 38&3aE38€L z 2 s d $$% P -& 8 135 1 B B 4 !PO e, ,a EL& .g .a .E ! 5 -8 3 eke Bn 0 L 0 d Eij i# i q f -2 3 g + $ .g 212 .g .5, 5 -E a 3 a 5 a& e & & ?t 2 E k 3 cn 2s ss g g 5 -1 !i E 8 B 0 P o 4 s 3.5 g -3 1 3 E% Mom 3 z 3 2 .agge g 3- E& z.s $sa fi s *$ 5 Q $$ "B 22 Q $8 *$ "3 B k -2 0 g *5 e .E *%.., g; Q 3 *z 52 s gg sm h V % E3233E 9-5 sa g, 8.. 8 $ a .B 2 0 mu I2 .% 3, B 28 3s *q 34 .e 8 aS, ..a E-.. ds 3 4 : 4 2.5 2.g S- ~3 Bg p $2 -s ds 4 2 .e4 38 '2 3% 3 .BB i3 .Q B 72 38 c 0 3 g -3 $8 3 GI4 e,8 xw 2.2 3; 3 4 1 88 p 24 .fa Q .99 9 -.g a 2 $12 83 gl! :$ gg '5, cg &4 22 *gg Q z2 zOD 13 g., $4 4 8 "8 mu .s gj 3 +p. -3 3 me e$ - - moo '$' .*E .% i8 z..g a.s -;ax E 2TJ 8g $4 8s % 3333 4 4 2-g sg $3 z!i E.Fi g 25 2.5 sg kj 23 g 5 6 E8 d - a j **a 1.2. e fj 8.S 1 *g It 0 B e -8 3b P g4.8 aa.5 33.8 -3 3 -e $. P 22 e 88 33 ** aaa $2 a -3 aI P e c a 4 P e 3 e aaa W 0 234 W k g k a b c) W W m e 9 9 3 .!3 3 xn 3~ f e g5 2 93 9-s .s .s 8 6s ai=i $a E3 38 33 -&I z ca dS m SOD .5 8 c 3 !!2 .5 c) C E OD 4 &w a .- OD rru -u w.5 Ed e 2 8 D 6 a * M ii $2 35 53 p.4 4 si 4 d 62 I I E $ t 5 wi B L - wi M k $2 82 93& Gg sa 5 ii zg fBb * sz 1g x g 2 f 5 g - ;;i I u M 8 8 .& - a 'il % $ 'f3 s fj ..&g pi M12 sag s* 2; M3 *& $4 YI st E% 2 M .a JeL t~! 89; .e 9 os 2$ E6.a f$.S g.p e6 @86Q9_ -1 lift ti b4 r9% ;s% .mag sa= & q pi -9 k.E -8 &'il ! 3 9.5 -3 *? 8"; g - $E -j .f &% si% gg*a EaE gaig swE szrj see*$ hlb~:t .s .E YI 3 C b:s s k E '5; k! !g :g 4 23 n 3 8 B € & .c .? 8 .e 5 8 8 M .e 2 .C *d s OB 8 3 1$ P 1 g? .B :; *E $! M -ff .? 2 B 4 it 2 1 g P 3 B s 4 8 w$ B m$ $$ .s e .: g 2 g 9 QS -a -111 83 88 83 du ad n .e e@ e e 3 ti a B S .e 7) n E - a B 5 8 3 3 E 8 3 3 g e 3 M 0 9 - !l I. E b 3 s 6 %, & ..b 8 B .3 s b $2 t Q sg 2% & % 3 cLga e-3 8 B 22: g s 1 8$53 4% - MBec "-< $2 0 e32 ?WE g $800 33 *; 2 3pgg 0- -- 43 5 ti .c" 0-5 'hi :fgg2 aq 0-Pa .gig s % g "3 2. ; "4 8-9 'c: 9s 2 2 .5 $24 P.'e IEl ~ 83pz 3;: 5" 5 -5 .Y%d asg "x2 gz z g .."*c:&g "=;% &:g ow- 3; 5 5 g;g@ -e-'&: 239 "-$ 22 "q 0 -s3*s 3 8 5t.g 2 reo *i? P s F 4 E 2:92; 0.5-- 2%- B3.S 2 5 -5msz$ $3: +; :" 5.5% 4-4 a= 2% -a Z.~S cc $$2stf ?j-gli 3 8 hs? c8u 'G; " s.,;gw d.4 gmz..sg rigs -5ori.g 22; 5.5, aa2= ij3q 2 -5 2c3gg -2J 8 8s c 0 j&$ 23; fi 5 &j07)0 agw "3 zgo 5%2 33 gn9bt xcc9.5 3223 s i; 8 i -2 b a s 'E 0 $3 SF e& w 2 :? * 0 20 - 'E: * g '6p:z 4 U 5 1 .?a < 0 3 -a 3% 23 e. a& v1 ap c i% .&Zrk a= n$ %: Ssr 9p -% 3,g":& 2 sg.9 gg &Cq~~ 8% s 8-3 is 6 'E - Q,& 8 2-53 g k E.;;, .r c 8 -3 a < tfOM7)g a .g, *5 p - do 2 <2tc,4 murn 68 U2LW% AaSo f 5 2 5 5 E& r; 0 rr 3 8 E h 8 z 3 M s 0 E 3.; !a$ :g 78 sg ,sq - sw 42 so HE 42 4t: Egg e E i? 3 - M - 8 te - 3 ws 8 sn *e-3 e.TG 8 % 1 !.*.gJe g 8e k I E3EgU.E Qg 2. g 8.5. rrsL"- t.gp33 "3 i*i *g 8 p k3.d kit! *t%$'p !nBsnB 33: B M .f .E? Q Q B B B s .5 M .g -K *g h -3 $: 5 -g B B 2 2 '3 .f .$ Q Q 9 9 4.4 L. B la S& CI sg. 3 mg mE 2 .& e 5% 2 -00 2 88 68 e8 b3 88 8 ss 2f .5P5$ MgSJ -aq-g& $5'5ds 4. $E33 4 3 *g gp 3gg.5 $% -&* 81 sg h 35 .f ". E!? 2% %;Sa 500 s 8.Sg3 L&bSa * SES .5 .c -q33 :gzEc2. 0 3 -3 8gY 33 pp 5 €5 -8 3 333 %Ma zg hz gsg 3 &:!!I - g'3*5.5 $$+ 3 .si, E$ss s 0 :E 5 34 388 E M $33 -g38E s,~'Ss--P *g 9 .ps 8 BEc :q '~t be %g g dw ;.!ai 'f3;"81 1.- Pgg 1J sm .E1.518-oGi$ $g sgg gzs $33 SE g'! @"e $?sg leggat - *Cpo 3-84 &&&8EC% o+% 8mGm 33 8; s85 1 ",.e .E! ha SF2 - 53: :!I 9$ g3 2% 2 B- 5 &$ &$Tg <Eo +a. g$ zea $mi w$3saL.- gs n d $8 d si d E f7 b -2 5 .s I 3 o= 0, $,QSs$* $3 %.$ ; 8-34 Eg*csmM am- ?i *E? 'P gq & -5 8ZE 2.319 14E%a-E-g E g:; 25.3 pp 8 2 3 .3 250 $9 aO& *2 Eg uu d 5. ;; Y E t ? 8 - & 2 'J, a E 23 so df 33s qj oh "g 22 22 0 .3 3 5; %= P 2L F f g g z 5 '3 % - c) 1; B g. .3 = 332 -2 .i e! 28&%g$ t: k-p 8 g.5 ! g3.sgq 8 cIscIvIBpI& j& 2 g.sqq- e! 2-g 8" 0 "2 -5 3 ~~a~~n :% g 3GEs38 .I $e tu 3rE 4 t w Q 3; $3 2g M 3i rz 7 e; c !$Tu 6 3 .e 50 3 .s & 'E1 9 B Q - 8 5 e.$ .3 8 $2 12 33 *g a 3 2 23 +ii gii B & E- - .% 2 B - 32 34 I. $3 '3 E3 4qs B2r&3 d '-'%pa tf! g g -g 2 =a B3lg fg 36 Q 6B Q .2n p .p 3 .H $pG.H .@ 3 -5, 6 -5, 28h $4 2s 2s M3 8 3 23 B -; M s2 3 gT t;$% .% E- O 54 gh -8g.j 8-4 4.2 *i;y -$*E 89 2 r-e 3% 5j -3 .C 2 .sJ E 5% B.5 3 $g +q 5% $4 se Fz .ge ;.?* c2 s: g SM ?:+ ap ?% z 5-g 82 32 E-? s.4 ng5 23 CCD a10 .5 -2 8 t'fP &g 3.2.3 4: 24 g 10 f: g: 323 $; 9 .sa E!g -5 233 pn 8 2; gat3 23 @f .?E -9 - 'E M a -2 22 .;g "rg 2% Ea E *- g~n "3, gk k, ZEi 83: ".g Q-3 3& 3 4 'C :: g1g sm' -- - -3s -- "3 88 34 35% g& p s$ 253 81 $$ ag S1-g -8s spu .g..* 'ga-3 %e3 -3 :s3 3% iis: s; $81 =- $g $8 Od a3 B sz- 4s 8 3.- E - 2%- eo 1; *gg <3 543 E=u 3 %.s8 E*& ?G,E a g E 452 g=z gn g.2 p g is% 802 3s E33 fi58 6 2; fia BV LE eq d .si d d 2 -g 33 E 3g E3 1" - .- a kud g b *3 n P M 'd *u 2\ - -2 ti 0 9 e a %CY %. 8 3 8 .gJ mc Eo I '5 .E) '$ .- E E I.9E 94 g% 0 8 3- .s g6 -O0 Slg B% s0g g%a 'EM p's .SO? E5 52.3 $3 %E2 a ddm + d x 4 g B 1 2 I H M g d E $5 ,x? p2x :E e - zg zg sp ilz 3% %z b E v ry f g g I % M - * g Bp c 9% 3 3 t: .5 8 - $ k33 p$ 8 s -3 I zz; 6 r( 288: 2 2 4 1 B g P f- eL ?E -0 & 8 8 ,x8 .+ 8 .e 8 B B E E BB eg .; -3 .K -3 !3% 2% f -8 ;E E8 a ‘5: 8 e$ .$ p 3 3 ga g g.3 %pa pwi EOE $.!E Qgn .ebs m 45; 3888 $68 i k j$ # I 8 0 2 $ € x. *5 Q) I -0 c Q)c zo %a .5 2 -3 i? E =M 5 *g . 8 e e8 a, B M g 5 $2 gzap 2 e’ 88 $E, -R &sn 5 61 E &*Z %g E .B q .2 5 .j bB 4.8 -Q “ga 8% B P- zg @c gT *gas L1 -2 At *;$ Ig.2 La* 03 423 gg u kgs*$ -0-0: gge3 .ck E$ f;zz x. *si; 8 .s 5- 8 2.2 ZPe! -3 &.Z g?YJz; 3g cs -O *EL .s ld f; w.8 -.@ p .sg *.ye *bzg a$;.! $3 eS.2 $2 Ees .p 5, 0 13f *@23 .5 -0 E& BQ) yif.s ag :gg 5.f :6f .!I& $z,; g313 3.13 ;: -& $3 32 i?gk ‘e00 2 33% 3 5 .. B b e!~m 32% J 5 35 &-e32 5 bs Ba 9-* .e%b:= s~)%~ 8 Q)2 fi 3% -0 - -E 2 3 .B E4 2 ‘5 Cd.55:; gj 3E 43 323 S- - -0 GQ-0 as .@ -Og a 225 f g-qs Q)c 3% .siE .22 ,a 33 =-0g OJ u -3- cc ;e %%E% h h h h Q) a 8 2.2 3 e3 3 3 On z*2s st3 %e! 2% 644t5 si;ssn c 8 c. 0 P.0 kt.c-0, Ezlk $3 33 n9 g:j-g i 51 Ed *; 06 si$ uj d 9 Fi r h f E f a - i! d M a 0 E ds -34 pB c zg ;h q :z sa &Z 0 t; [I & G $ L2 I 5 4 % - 4 ;;; -0 .!A I $ - i? B 7id g E .B 3 e a 2 a s s B c k 2 3 $ ?et> +,rag “87i.ga JS. s .a .E - em.3 d g.3 $an Sdt€E35 e -9 2 2 2 ‘p B E *& 2 4 .g sa 3 3 1s 3 35 3 i: 3 &gH = g.302 s: jg @E? g,.g,x, BE%g 8, ig2 2E-c $&3A9.g Y355 B B ”,$ QgnS 5 @$! .z Y 3% %:a 3h.s.~ g 3!ss i -8 ngz E~mlg 858.2 S aw .$!E sFaa.gg 8.s EE &l;& 3Dg: &“$$.e ‘g:z s 9 3 42 3 3 3.3 p 3 .P gs*s .Eig BE -.5 0 ,a.g5 a5 g!M E3 Z2.k 82.: v1 ~~BgLn g 5 $3 &-.E! 6-03 “,Q g.gk.3 23 :g ;$E? g4.8 ;$! as: &2B: *&pafi m+ .ss eet =8E$ &s’2.gEc 88 d d r; an^ Io 2-Z r,ci < N L \ d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 92-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIF0 RN IA RECO M M EN Dl NG CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPTION OF ALIGNMENT 2 FOR THE WIDENING AND REALIGNMENTOF OLIVENHAIN ROAD FOR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD TO EL GAMIN0 REAL. WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 21 st day of January 1992 hear and re\ the finding of the Environmental Impact Report for Olivenhain Road widening realignment, and WHEREAS, the proposed Alignment 2 is the environmentally preferred alterna and WHEREAS, the proposed project has no significant unmitigatable environmc impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carls - as follows: A) B) That the above recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented in the final Environmental Iml Report presented at its January 21 st, 1992 meeting, the City Council hereby recomme to the City Council of the City of Encinitas California Certification of the f Environmental Impact Report for the Olivenhain Road widening, realignment and FI1 Control Project (SCH #91011035) dated January, 1992. C) That Council recommend approval of Alignment 2 for final adoption implementation and approves variance of design speed standards to allow a 50 mile hour design speed and reduction of street and right of way widths to match exis conditions. Findinas: 1, The reduction of design standards are required to protect the environn- reduce increased noise impacts and to better relate to existing des configuration, \ J *, w 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e 2. Standards variances will not result in unusually restrictive traffic flc characteristic and fall within generally accepted engineering practices. Appropriate signing will adequately indicate roadway conditions. 3. 4. That the granting of such variance will not cause substantial drains problems. That the granting of such variance will not conflict with existing or futi traffic and parking demands or pedestrian or bicycle use. That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the pu welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in wh the variance is granted. 5. 6. 7. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect comprehensive general plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad ( Council held on the 2istday of J-Y, 1992 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton an NOES: None ABSENT: None Nygaard 7-/ &/4gdd CLAUDE A. LEW S, Mayor ATTEST: 1 AMHA L& EN NZ, City Clerk TZ, Assistant City Clerk (SEAL) KAREN R* a