Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-11; City Council; 11551; Adoption of Revised Fees for City ServicesI ". > \> Y v, a, s 5 0 CCI a 0 u 4-1 Y v) Y c 0 .rl u. urn arc $40 .rl .rl sdk uar -d a au rtt 3 -4 d wo QU a au MaJ M .c3 aJa l-l arc: *rl -rl 4-13 k WA aM -u a c-d aa b mar ara .rl + -rl v) M arc 00 aru E 4ar 4 Y u .rl G =raJ os UJJ I+ I I CJ Q\ l-i rl 2 0 6 a 5 8 1 z 3 & AB # //, .4 <! TITLE: MTG. 2/11/92 ADOPTION OF REVISED FEES CIT' DEPT. F1N FOR CITY SERVICES CIT' RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Hold Public Hearing on the revision of development related and gene City fees. Adopt Resolution ~o.7~ -34 setting development related fees. Adopt Resolution No. 93-35 setting general city fees. 2. 3. ITEM EXPLANATION The City conducted a review of fees charged by all major departments during latter part of 1990-91. The recommendations made within the report prepi by David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG), are based on the concept that departments have reviewed the report and made subsequent recommendatj on the proposed fees. Generally, the recommended fees do not comple recover costs for performing a service, resulting in subsidized services. Development related fees which include planning and engineering services recommended for a general increase of approximately 5% to 10%. Althou; much larger fee increase could be defended on a cost of service basis for cei types of services, the City's position has been that some subsidy is appropi where the service benefits the general public. The recommended fee incre reflect a balance between the need to fund services and the need for compL and public benefit. Both the DMG Study and staff recommend that fee increased in an effort to capture inflation and recover costs. The only recommended to remain at current levels are those associated with acquisition of grading permits. In this case, it is important to avoid pricing cost of compliance out of the reach of the individual or small organizations v it is in the city's best interest to encourage conformance with standards. estimated that increased development related fees will yield approximi $53,000 annually in additional revenue. New fees have been recommended in several areas. Examples of new include the following: should be set to recover the cost of services. In addition, staff from affec Master Plan Pre-Submit Tentative Tract Map Extensions Appeal City Council City Engineers Decision Although revenue from new fees is not anticipated to be major, the time ! by staff in these and other areas related to development should be recoi through fees. I I I 0 0 'i Page Two of Agenda Bill No. //,,5$/ General City fees are also recommended for increase in an effort to captu inflation and recover costs. Included within this category of fees are tho associated with charges for use of the pool, which contain reconamendc increases ranging from 10% to 15%. There is also a new series of fees f individualized instruction recommended within the aquatics category. Emergency medical transport fees are recommended for increase, from $165 $200 plus the cost of supplies. It is estimated that increased fees will result an additional $43,000 annually. The assessment of new fees within fire servic are recommended and primarily address use permits, plan review and inspecti of fire protection system installations. Again, the time spent by staff in tht areas should be recovered through fees. It is estimated that permit applicati fees will yield an additional $18,000 annually. The Park-In-Lieu fee is the only capital fee recommended for increase. T increase is based upon a recent appraisal of property within the northwl quadrant, and increases the value of an acre of land from $175,000 to $195,0( This results in increasing the fee per unit of development within this quadra All other fees are recommended to remain at their current levels. The Cow recently reviewed and adopted revised Traffic Impact Fees, Sewer Fees and Wa rates. AI1 fees are shown within this document in an effort to compile all fd charged by the City in one centralized place. FISCAL IMPACI': Charges for services are estimated to provide approximately $4.3 million General Fund revenue in the 1991 -92 budget. This revenue source supports ab 10% of the General Fund budget. Fees for services are set by the City Coui to recover all or part of the cost of providing certain services provided recommend increases in fees that will provide up to approximately $loo,( annually in additional revenue to the General Fund. EXHIBITS: 1. 2. Resolution No. 93 -37 setting development related fees. 3. Resolution No.Y& -3s setting general City fees. individuals or organizations benefitting from the service. The proposed actil Report to Financial Management Director on 1991-92 Fee Adjustmei I 0 0 ,' December 16, 1991 TO: FINANCLAL MANAGEMENT DIRECrrOR VIA: Finance Director /v FROM: - Senior Management Analyst - Finance & 1991-92 FEE ADJUSTMENTS In July, 1991, a Report on Fees, Charges and Revenue as prepared by David M. Grif (DMG) was submitted to the City. The main principal behind the recommendati services. The recommendations made by both staff from departments which generate and the DMG Report recognize that the City Council may wish to subsidize services to public. This memo will outline the recommendations made by both City staff and the D report, which are not necessarily the same. Where differences occur, they are discus Several new fees as well have been identified both by staff and the DMG Report include charges for fire inspection permits and for appeals to the City Council. The DMG Report recommends increasing fees by $398,924, or 16.8% over 1989-90. : recommendations result in increased fees of approximately $1 00,000. Following discussions of the fees which are recommended for each applicable program area. included in this report is that, where possible, fees should be set to recover the cos DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES PLANNING Both the DMG study and City staff recommend increasing Planning fees by approximz 5% to 10% in order to capture 1990-91 inflation and to recover City costs. recommended fees are shown in the attached fee schedule. This level of fee assessr recovers about 50% of the City's cost of providing planning services. Staff estimates if current volumes of activity are maintained, the increase in planning fees will $el additional $50,000 annually. Fees charged for Tentative Tract Maps both Residential and Non-residential have modified in order to improve upon the equity of the fee correlating with work perfoi and to more accurately charge for work based upon volume. Further the proposed me of assessing these fees more accurately reflects the amount of time both Engineering Planning functions put into the map reviews. The fees are based upon a base fee p charge per unit or lot reviewed. For example, a Tentative Tract Map, Residential Wit lots for review has a current fee of $1,050 and a proposed fee of $5,500 or an increa $4,450 or 424%. The increase occurs both within the base rate, up $1,450, and i~ assessment of a per unit or lot fee of $100. a e _- There are two service areas which are subsidized within the planning process. The f relates to the costs of general plan maintenance. It is difficult to assess user fees for t service as this is a community based activity having an impact on all local residents. 1 second subsidy area is the pursuit of special projects as requested by the City Council, to address transportation planning and habitat management issues. The General F update is an example of a special project for which costs are not being recovered. 1 possible to recover these costs by placing a surcharge on building permits, based on construction valuation. The DMG Report states that the cost of updating the General I is approximately $405,000. It is not recommended that this fee be established. ENGINEERING The DMG Report indicates that the grading permit fees are significantly below cost, recommends these fees be increased. The DMG Report recommends increases ranging f $500 to $5,350 depending on the volume of grading. City staff does not concur with recommendations made in the Report, and recommends retaining the current fees. St recommendations consider the cost of services, market conditions, and benefits to the ( It is important to avoid pricing the cost of compliance out of the reach of the indivi or small organizations when it is in the City's best interest to encourage conformance 7 standards. With the exception of plan checking fees, all other fees within the Engineering are: recommended to increase by approximately 5% in an effort to capture infla Engineering staff estimates that the increased fees will yield an additional $3,2C revenues. The DMG Report and staff alike do not recommend increasing the plan chec fees. GENERAL, CITY FEES FIRE The DMG Report recommends raising the basic ambulance service fee from $165 supplies to $200 plus supplies, for emergency medical transport. This represen increase of $35.00 or 21% over the present fee. Compared to Carlsbad's neighboring ( Vista and Oceanside, Carlsbad's fee would still be the lowest fee for basic transport se Oceanside charges a flat rate of $260 while Vista charges a rate of $310 plus $5.C mile. Fire staff supports the DMG recommendation, and estimates that the increase will result in an additional $43,000 in annual revenue for the City. The DMG Report also recommends the City implement a new annual charge for fire 1 applications which would recover 60% of the cost of providing the service. Fire sta reviewed the DMG Report permit application fees and their method of assessment, ar several of its own recommendations to make. First, fire staff recommends that the assessed only at the time of permit application, as opposed to annually as suggested DMG Report. Staff's recommendation considers that as long as the conditions of the 1 0 0 ^. are maintained, the City incurs no additional expenses and cannot reasonably charge annual fee. Fire inspections are regularly conducted whether or not a permit is requ of a business, and as long as compliance is maintained, an annual assessmen unreasonable. The major cost in issuing the permit is when it is initialized, as plans codes are thoroughly researched. Second, staff recommends N1 recovery of the costs associated with the actual issuanc permits considering the purpose of a user fee is to recover costs of services provided. C for issuing fire permits were based upon the estimated time it takes to issue a spel permit, multiplied by the hourly rate of the reviewing employee including administra and overhead charges. The hourly rate used was $80 per hour. Third, staff recommends that the fee be reassessed only upon failure of a bushes maintain the conditions of the permit, which would be discovered during a rov inspection. If the permit needs re-issuing then the fee should be applied. This can s as an incentive to businesses to maintain the conditions of the permit. It is estimated that during the first year, the permit application fees will bring ir additional $18,000 annually in revenues. All complying uses and processes requj permits which exist on the effective date of this ordinance will be issued permits a charge as part of the rou&e inspection. Both the DMG study and staff recommend full recovery of administrative costs relate weed abatement. Administrative cost, including a ratio established for overhead, i average of $80 per parcel. Staff recommends the assessment of $80 per parcel for v abatement administration plus any additional expenses needed to compensate for contractor's charge. Staff is also recommending the assessment of one new fee for fire reinspections. assessment of this fee would recover costs of fire staff as result of builder's failur comply with orders, notices, and code requirements. Continuous failures re( reinspections and unusual demands on staff time. Any single reinspection required wj assessed at $40.00. AQUATICS It is recommended that fees associated with Agua Hedionda Lagoon remain at CUI levels. Fees associated with pool usage are recommended for increases ranging gene from 10% to 15% and have not been increased for approximately 3 years. Increasinj fees now will keep with the effort of capturing inflation that has occurred over time. series of new fees are recommended which address, 1)individualized instruction in ' swimming, and 2) advanced instruction/coaching. The proposed fee is $17.00 per and $23.00 per hour respectively for residents, and $25.00 and $31 .OO for non-resid Presently, individualized instruction is not offered as part of the aquatic prog Establishing the fee for individualized instruction will allow the program to be offered all costs recovered. 0 A modification in a series of existing aquatic fees is also recommended. The recomxnen fee consists of changing the four month pass to a term of sk months, and renaming i Season Discount. This results in an increase of $1.25 or 15% per month for the Sea Discount - Adult Resident, and $.75 or 7% for Season Discount - Family Resident. ' Season Discount can be purchased on a pro-rated basis. This recommended chang based upon survey results of fees Carlsbad charges for passes which indicate that the ( is currently below average. Second, a study of season pass users was conducted and res indicate that a pass lasting for a longer time period with the option to purchase on a 1 rated basis would be desirable. OTHER FEES Appeals to City Council is a set of new general fees which are recommended for inch The Information Systems Director compiled a list of all citings in the Municipal Code w referenced opportunities for appeals to the City Council. All appeals are included in attached schedule under the broad headings of 1) Appeal - City Council - City Engfnc Decisions, and 2) Appeal - City Council - Miscellaneous. A fee of $120 per appe: recommended which is consistent with that which is assessed for appeals related to Planning process. Following consultation with interested departments, all other gen fees are recommended to remain at current levels, WATER FEES The water usage rates recently adopted by Council are reflected in the schedules attac Staff recommends that the stand-by rates and turn on rates remain the same. The Assk General Services Manager indicated that within the next three to four months, a stud rates and the most effective means of assessing them would be occurring. Any ne' different fees can be altered at that time. SUMMARY The recommendations contained within this report were assembled in accordance state statutes requiring that the City establish fees that are directly related to the cc providing services. The completion of the David M. Griffith and Associated, LTD, Rep Fees, Charges and Revenue provided the basis for establishing the relation between cost! fees. Recommended fees do not exceed the cost of providing the service, although in : instances fees are equal to or less than the actual cost. Where necessary, fees were red so as not to exceed the cost of providing the service. Although it would be ideal to Nly recover the City's cost of providing any one seh is important to understand the impact of a full cost recovery policy upon the users. subsidy of services can meet one or more of several goals. First, lower costs can p an identified group or individuals to participate in services they might not otherwi able to afford. Second, although fees are used to recover some City costs, an effort is to avoid placing the cost of compliance out of the reach of most people. Third, fee be used to encourage or discourage certain activities. For example, assessing highe for increased water usage can encourage conservation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I.6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9 2 - 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE FEES FOR DEVELOPMENT-RELATED CITY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has the authorit to establish fees for City services; and WHEREAS, from time to time said ees are reviewed and evaluated t for City services; and ed tlpe cost of providin maintain an adequate fee structure recoveri g cos 2h WHEREAS, the City Coun il has dete I c ri I b development !related services; and I WHE*AS, the City Council firyds it nece ary o recover the costs fc ! \ 3 \ t) development-related servihes; and ', I WHEREkS, the City COuncil has determined that the fees shown i \ \ \ hxhibit A attached hereto are iair and reasonable in relation to the servicc i \ \ I G \ rec 'ved; and l WHEREAS, the City Council has held the necessary public hearing ai I allowed or pub14c comment on the establishment of said fees. /// I I /// \' b I /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ciq of Carlsbad, California that the fee schedule shown in Exhibit A attachec hereto is hereby adopted and shall become the official fee schedule foi / development-related services for the City of Carlsbad. Any fee/area no / included in said list shall remain under the control of prev@hs resolutior adopted by this Council. All fees shall become effective on April 13, 1992 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regukar meeting of the CiQ / / / Council of the City of Carlsbad on the ""." i' 1992, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: 1 ABSENT: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor 1 ATTEST ALETHA L. RAUTEN (SEAL) Z, City Clerk w Total 1990-91 Proposed FeeChang Fee Description Note Cost Fee Fee Amount Additional Planning Inspections (first lnsp included in plan check f 50 50 50 0 Adjustment Plat 41 5 320 340 20 Administrative Variance - Single Family 1,186 240 250 10 Administrative Variance - Other 652 41 0 430 20 Appeal - City Council - Single Family 893 110 1 20 10 Appeal - City Council - Other 730 470 490 20 Appeal - City Council - City Engineer’s Decision (New) 893 0 120 120 1 Appeal - Planning Commission - Single Family 1,079 110 120 10 Appeal - Planning Commission - Other 972 470 490 20 Building Permit Fees (Base on state fee schedule) Building Plan Check - 65% of Bldg Permit Certificate of Compliance 240 240 240 0 Construction Change Review - Minor 500 50 50 0 Construction Change Review - Major 600 160 170 10 (3) (3) Coastal Development Permit - Single Family 463 110 150 40 Coastal Development Permit - Other 484 360 400 40 CUP 2,699 2,100 2,500 400 CUP - Amendment - Regular 1,500 1,000 1,000 0 CUP - Amendment - Non-Profit 1,500 75 80 5 CUP - Extension - non-profit 500 50 55 5 CUP - Non-Profit 2,700 110 120 10 DayCare Permit - Extension 500 50 55 5 Design Review - Preliminary Review - Minor 300 50 55 5 Drainage Fees (3x4) Duplicate Tracing Fees - Final Parcel Maps - per sheet 30 30 30 0 Duplicate Tracing Fees - Final Tract Maps - per sheet 30 30 30 0 Easement or Offer to Dedicate or Improve 200 160 200 40 EIA - All Others 1,321 21 0 220 10 EIA - Single Family 1,088 21 0 220 10 EIR - 1 through 4 Acres 5,806 2,100 2,210 110 EIR - 5 through 19 Acres 4,924 2,100 2,210 110 EIR - 20 Acres and up 12,290 5,250 5,510 260 EIR - Addendum 500 250 275 25 EIR - Supplemental (Requiring a Public Hearing) 10,237 10,500 10,500 0 Encroachment Permit (Before Installation) 50 50 50 0 Encroachment Permit (After Installation) 100 100 100 0 Engineering Variance - Minor 85 82 85 3 Engineering Variance - Major 1 60 157 160 3 Environmental Monitoring Fee 150 110 150 40 Final Parcel Map (Minor Subdivision) 1,580 1,580 1,580 0 Final Tract Map (Base fee + $5 per Acre) 3,081 2,630 2,760 130 Fire Hydrant Fees - See Uti1 Maint dept - $2,500 Deposit CUP - Extension - Regular 500 375 400 25 DayCare Permit 1,238 110 125 15 Design Review - Preliminary Review - Major 500 250 275 25 (Base + acutal cost) Fish & Game Fee - Negative Declaration (8) 1,275 1,275 0 Fish 8, Game Fee - EIR (8) 875 875 0 Total 1990-91 Proposed FeeChanl Fee Description Note Cost Fee Fee Amount Future Improvement Agreements 80 80 80 0 General Plan Amendment - 1 Acre or less 2,218 1,050 1,200 150 General Plan Amendment - 1 to 5 Acres 2,363 1,050 1,200 150 General Plan Amendment - 5 Acres and up 5,760 2,100 2,500 400 Grading Permit - (See Schedule for Rates) Growth Management Fees - As established by Council Hillside Dev Permit - Single Family 1,028 110 1 20 10 Hillside Dev Permit - Other 1,126 370 400 30 Hillside Dev Permit Amendment - Single Family 857 75 80 5 (4) Grading Plan Check - (See Schedule for Rates) (4) Hillside Dev Permit Amendment - Other 791 300 350 50 Improvement Agreement Extension 340 1 60 1 70 10 Improvement Inspection Fee (See Schedule Below) Improvement Plan Review (Plan Check) (See Schedule Below) Information to Planning Commission - Single Family 1,518 110 120 10 Information to Planning Commission - Other 1,733 390 41 0 20 Inspection Overtime (On Request) 1 00 75 80 5 (3x4) (3x4) Landscape Plan Check - Same as lmpvt Plan Check Landscape Inspection - Same as lmpvt Construction lnsp Lighting Plan Checks - (Plan Check) (See Schedule Below) Local Coastal Plan - Amendment - Major 5,531 5,780 5,531 (249) Local Coastal Plan - Amendment - Minor 2,642 1,580 1,700 120 Master Plan (Base Fee + $15 per Acre) 20,911 9,980 10,475 495 Master Plan Pre Submit (New) 6,249 0 3,750 3,750 Master Plan Amendment (Minor) 3,947 1,580 1,700 1 20 Master Plan Amendment (Major) (Base Fee + $10 per Acre) 15,456 3,680 3,860 1 80 Monumentation (Cash deposit as required) Notice Fees - Based on Cost to Provide Notice Park In-Lieu Fees - (See attached schedule) PO or Condo Revision - 4 or less (1) 599 210 250 40 PD or Condo Revision - 5 to 50 (1 1 2,786 1,840 2,000 160 PD or Condo Revision - 51 or more (1) 6,192 5,250 5,510 260 PD Revision - Non-Res - 4 or less (1 1 1,315 530 575 45 PD Revision - Non-Res - 5 to 50 (1) 3,243 2,599 3,000 401 PD Revision - Non-Res - 51 or more (1) 7,298 5,250 6,000 750 PD or Condo - 5 to 50 (1 1 6,613 3,680 4,000 320 PD or Condo - 51 or more (1) 11,022 10,500 11,022 522 PD - Non-Res - 5 to 50 (1) 5,551 5,250 5,510 260 PD - Non-Res - 51 or more (1) 10,504 10,088 10,504 41 6 Planned Industrial Permit 2,245 530 600 70 Planned Industrial Permit - Amendment 535 375 400 25 Planning Commission Determination - Other 2,649 790 830 40 cost cost (4) PD or Condo - 4 or less (1 1 2.1 03 420 440 20 PD - Non-Res - 4 or less (1 1 1,705 420 440 20 Permit Amendments Not Specifically Identified (6) Planning Commission Determination - Single Family 2,650 21 0 220 10 Planned Development Final Map - Minor (4 or less) 25 20 25 5 Total 1990-91 Proposed FeeChan! Fee Description Note Cost Fee Fee Amount Planned Development Final Map - Major (50 or less) 587 60 70 10 Planned Developemnt Final Map - Major (51 or more) 721 60 70 10 Planned Local Drainage Fees (4) Precise Development Plan 3,899 1,580 1,700 120 Precise Development Plan - Amendment 2,499 1,000 1,100 100 Preliminary Plan Review (Sinole Family Exempt) 250 110 I20 io Public Facilities Fees - 3.5% of Bldg Permit Value Public Facilities Fees Agreement 50 40 50 10 Quitclaim of Easement 388 260 280 20 Redevelopment Permit (Minor) 1,838 110 150 40 Redevelopment Permit (Major) 4,967 1,310 1,400 90 Redevelopment Permit Amendment (Minor) 356 75 80 5 Research Time (By Written Request) - Per Hour 0 80 100 1 00 0 Reversion to Acreage 500 250 250 0 Right of Way Permit - Single Family 224 30 35 5 Right of Way Permit - Municipal Projects paying insp fees 224 80 90 10 Right of Way Permit - All other Non-Utility 224 80 90 10 Right of Way Permit - Utility (By Contract) Satellite Antenna Permit 97 30 40 10 School Fees - (Set by School Districts) Sewer Connection Permit (5) 1,610 1,610 0 Sewer Lateral Charges - 4" line 30' long - 10' deep 800 720 760 40 Sewer Lateral Charges - 6 line 30' long - 10 deep 900 850 890 40 Sewer Lateral Charges - Over 10' deep add $7.50 per ft Sewer Lateral Charges - Over 30' long add $12.50 per ft Sign Permit 32 30 30 0 Sign Program 561 160 1 75 15 Site Development Plan (Minor) (2) 5,992 2,630 2,775 145 Site Development Plan (Major) 8,579 5,250 5,530 280 Preliminary Review - Minor 388 0 230 230 1 (3) Redevelopment Permit Amendment (Major) 1,384 750 800 50 Site Development Plan Revision (Minor) (2) 4,162 420 475 55 Site Development Plan Revision (Major) 6,727 1,050 1,150 100 Special Use Permit 1,073 260 280 20 Special Use Permit - Flood Plain 1,283 1,050 1,150 100 Special Use Permit Amendment - Flood Plain 1,208 750 820 70 Special Use Permit Amendments - All Other 1,072 200 225 25 Specific Plan Amendment (Minor) (2) 4,371 1,580 1,700 1 20 Specific Plan Amendment (Major) 12,068 5,780 6,200 420 Specific Plan - Less than 5 acres 1,580 1,750 170 Specific Plan - 5 to 25 acres 19,339 5,250 5,700 450 Specific Plan - More than 25 acres 19,903 12,600 13,500 900 Street Light Energizing Fee (See table below) Street Name Change 339 110 120 10 Street Sign Deposits (As Required) Street Vacation 490 530 490 (40) Structure Relocation 267 1 60 1 80 20 Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 5 - 25 Units or Lots 3,987 1,050 1,150 100 Total 1990-91 Proposed FeeChang Fee Description Note Cost Fee Fee Amount Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 26 - 100 Units or Lots 3,813 1,310 1,425 115 Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 101 or more Units or Lots 5,365 2,100 2,350 250 Tentative Parcel Map Processing Fee 1,611 1,580 1,611 31 Tentative Parcel Map lyr Extension 365 424 365 (59) - Tentative Tract Map RES - 5 - 49 Lots or Units (9) 12,524 1,050 Tentative Tract Map RES - 50 or more Lots or Units - (9) 20,782 2,630 Tentative Tract Map NON-RES - 5 - 49 Lots or Units - (9) 12,524 1,050 Tentative Tract Map NON-RES - 50 or more Lots or Units - (9) 20,782 2,630 Tentative Tract Map Extension - 1 to 25 (new) 295 0 240 240 . Tentative Tract Map Extension (new) 374 0 225 225 ' Tentative Tract Map Extension - 101 or more (new) 427 0 260 260 ' Tentative Tract Map Litigation Stay - 114 orginal Fee (3) $2,500 base + $100/1ot or unit over 5 (whichever is greater). $7,500 base + $25/lot or unit over 50 (whichever is greater). $2,500 base + $100/1ot or acre over 5 (whichever is greater). $7,500 base + $lOO/lot or acre over 50 (whichever is greater). Traffic Impact Fee - North /South Carlsbad Variance (Single Family) 1,573 260 280 20 Variance (Other) 1,762 530 575 45 Water Service Connection Fees - (Set by CMWD) Waste Water Discharge Permit 112 0 25 25 ' Zone Change - 5 or fewer acres 2,532 260 280 20 (5) Zone Change - 5.1 to 25 acres 2,675 790 850 60 Zone Change - 25.1 or more acres 2,680 1,970 2,175 205 Zone Code Amendment 3,181 1,050 1,150 1 00 (1) - Based on number of units or lots whichever is greater (2) - Minor Residential Development - Defined as - 50 or fewer units or lots, Whichever is greater Minor - Other Uses - Defined as less than 2 acres (3) - No change recommended - Previous council action establishing fees remains unchanged (4) - See attached schedule for rate table (5) - Based on fees established by Council on 1/15/91. (6) - Any Permit Amendment not identified assessed at 50% of original cost. (7) - Research Fee = Minimum $25.00 to Maximum $100.00 based on hours to completion. (8) - Fees set by State Statute. (9) - New fee structure assesses a base fee plus a cost per unit or lot. Specific costs are outlined under the appropriate headings above. . 8 City of Carlsbad Park In-Lieu Fees Value Fee Quadrant Per Acre Per Unit District 1 - NW 195,000 Single Family Detached 8 Duplex 1,755 Attached (4 units or less) 1,463 Attached (5 units or more) 1,170 Mobile Home 1,034 District 2 - NE 175,000 Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575 Attached (4 units or less) 1,313 Attached (5 units of more) 1,050 Mobile Home 91 9 District 3 - SW 175,000 Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575 Attached (4 units or less) 1,313 Attached (5 units or more) 1,050 Mobile Home 91 9 District 4 - SE 175,000 Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575 Attached (4 units or less) 1,313 Attached (5 units or more) 1,050 Mobile Home 91 9 The Park Fee ordinance establishs a method of determining park land values in each quadrant City of Carlsbad Planned Local Drainage Area Fees Eisting Fee Area Per Unit 1 0 2 0 3 3,808 4 1.686 5 2,658 6 200 7 2,273 8 0 9 2,878 10 1,196 11 1,630 12 4,445 13 2,858 Council will be adopting revised drainage fees as part of a new master drainage study. This study is currently being conducted by the Engineering Department. City of Carlsbad 0 Sewer Connection Fees General Connection Fee All Areas Plus Local Sewer Fees shown Below 1,610 Current Fee Sewer SeM'ce Fee By Area Area A 279 Area B 491 Area C 407 Area 0 785 Area E 803 Area G 76 Area H 514 Area I 285 Area J 982 Area K 1,981 Area L 776 Area M 38 Area F a79 i F:\US€RSDNM\OTHFEES a 7 rading Plan Check Fee Schedule ’. Base Fee Plus Per Grading Plan Check - 100 CY or less 100 - - Grading Plan Check - 101 to 1,000 CY 500 80.00 1OOCY Grading Plan Check - 1,001 to 10,000 CY 1,300 80.00 1OOOCy Grading Plan Check - 10,001 to 100,000 CY 2,100 80.00 10,000 CY Grading Plan Check - 100,001 CY to 200,000 CY 2,900 80.00 10,000 CY Grading Plan Check - 200,001 CY or more 3,700 80.00 100,000 CY Grading Permit Fee Schedule Base Fee Plus Per Grading Permit - 100 CY or less 25 - - Grading Permit - 1,001 to 10,000 CY 175 52.50 1000 Cy Grading Permit - 10,001 to 100,000 CY 700 60.00 10,OOOCY Grading Permit - 100,001 to 200,000 CY 1,300 180.00 10,000 CY Grading Permit - 200,001 CY or more 3,100 300.00 100,000 CY Grading Permit - 101 to 1,000 CY 75 10.00 l0OCY r Street Light Energizing Fee Watts Lumens Fee 70 5,800 48.00 + $73.35 per light 150 16,000 90.00 + $73.35 per light 200 22,000 115.00 + $73.35 per light 250 30,000 148.00 + $73.35 per light (Above fees are the cost for energizing each street light for eighteen months) 100 9.500 67.00 + $73.35 per light >. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 e 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9 2 - 3 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE FEES FOR GENERAL CITY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has the authoril to establish fees for City services; and WHEREAS, from time to time said fees are reviewed and evaluated 1 maintain an adequate fee structure recovering costs for City services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the cost of providir general City services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the fees shown Exhibit A attached hereto are fair and re sona e in r received; and tion to the servici 3- I\ b WHEREAS, the City Coun il as heldkhe necessary public hearin; and allowed \\f or public comment $-.. o the establishment of said fees. 3j \ .3 '1 \ \ \ \ /// /// /// \ 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \ I ~ /// /// /// /// /// /// /// '. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 e m NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cj of Carlsbad, California that the fee schedule shown in Exhibit A attach hereto is hereby adopted and shall become the official fee schedule for t City of Carlsbad. Any fee area not included in said list shall remain und the control of previous resolution adopted by become effective on March 16, 1992. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a / Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 1992, by the following vote, to wit: hay of 1'' / ,/' AVES! /> 1 / NOES: ABSENT: \ CLAUDE A. LEWIS, May( 1 ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTEN Z, City Clerk 18 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ (SEAL) r 1 ~ / SEPTaJIBER, 1991 Total 1990-91 Proposed Note Cost Fee Fee Fee Description General City Fees Abandoned Vehicle Abatement - Actual Administrative Cost Cost cost 500.00 500.00 Administrative Fee for 1915 Act Bond Call Ambulance Fees 165.00 200.00 Appeal - City Council - Miscellaneous New 0.00 120.00 Appeal - Housing and Redevelopment Commission New 0.00 120.00 Bicycle Licenses - Replacement or Transfer 1.00 1.00 Business License - Fee for Listing of Businesses !x00 25.00 Bicycle Licenses 3.00 3.00 Bond Search 30.00 30.00 Business License - Base Fee (No change in other fees) 25.00 25.00 Business License - Motion Picture taking First Day 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Business License - Private Police/PatrolMlatch Service Business License - Sign Painter 30.00 30.00 Cabaret Dance Permit 200.00 200.00 City Council Minutes Subscription - Set by City Manager Copies - each 0.15 0.15 Emergency Response Billings - DUI At cost At cost Facility Rental (1 1 Fire Use Permit Fees Public Assembly - Candles or Other Open Flame New 40.00 0.00 40.00 - Assembly New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Covered Mall Use New 80.00 0.00 80.00 Temporary Use -Tents New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Carnivals and Fairs New 240.00 0.00 240.00 - Fireworks Display or Special Effects New 240.00 0.00 240.00 Hazardous Materials and Processes -Welding New 40.00 0.00 40.00 - Compressed Gases New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Dust Production New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Combustible Fiber Use and Storage New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Flammable Finishes New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Hz-Mat Use and Storage New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Dry Cleaning New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Motor Vehicle Repair New 160.00 0.00 160.00 Hazardous Installations - Medical Gas Dispensing System New 160.00 0.00 160.00 - Industrial Ovens New 120.00 0.00 120.00 - Combustible Storage Facility New 120.00 0.00 120.00 - High-Piled Combustible Storage New 240.00 0.00 240.00 - Refrigeration Equipment New 160.00 0.00 160.00 Flammable and Combustible Liquids, Gases and Aerosols - Use New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Dispensing New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Storage New 80.00 0.00 80.00 - Tanks New 80.00 0.00 80.00 Fire Protection System Installation - Automatic Sprinkler Systems - See Schedule for Rates New 320.00 - A ' ' 2 2 1 1 1 . . . ' 1 1 2 1 Total 1990-91 Proposed - Fee Description Note Cost Fee Fee A - Fire Alarm Systems - See Schedule for Rates - Other Fixed Fire Systems - See Schedule for Rates Fire User Fees - Repeated Inspection, New Construction New 40.00 0.00 40.00 New New -Weed Abatement (charge per parcel) 80.00 49.00 80.00 Fire - Routine Fire Inspection for Business 85.00 0.00 0.00 Fire - Failed Business Inspection 80.00 40.00 40.00 Library Audio Visual Insurance fee - Per Video Tape 0.50 0.50 Library Fines (2) Library Online Searching Fees (2) Police - Alarm Permit 30.00 30.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - Second Occurance 25.00 25.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - All Additional Occurances 50.00 50.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - Businesses - During Business Hrs 100.00 100.00 Police - Fingerprinting Fees 5.00 5.00 Police - Hourly Cost per Police Officer - Determined by Finance Dir At Cost At Cost Police - Hourly Cost per Police Officer With Vehicle - Determined by Fin Dir At Cost At Cost Police - Impounded Vehicle Administrative Charge 12.00 12.00 Police - Report Fee (Free to Victim) 10.00 10.00 Public Dump Permit - Fee per acre 200.00 200.00 Publications - As Determined by the City Manager Returned Check Fee 15.00 15.00 Special City Services - Billed at Cost Special Events - Minimum Filing Fee - One Street (3) 25.00 25.00 Special Events - Traffic Variance / Minor - 5 or fewer interesctions (3) 100.00 100.00 Special Events - Traffic Variance / Major - 5 or fewer intersections (3) 300.00 300.00 At Cast SEPTEMBER, 1991 Total Fee DescriDtion Note Cost General City Fees - Parks & Recreation Agua Hedionda Annual Fee - Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Over 8 Annual Fee - Non-Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Sail boats over 8 Annual Fee - Resident -Board SaillBoats under 8' & Passives Annual Fee - Non-Resident - BoardlSail Boats &Jet Skis under 8' & Passives Annual Fee - Board Sail - Additional Decal Replacement Lagoon Permit Decal Daily Fee - Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Over 8' Daily Fee - Resident - Passive Use & Vessels under 8' Daily Fee - Non-Resident - Passive Use &Vessels Under 8 Per Admission - Youth &Teen Per Admission - Adult Season Discount - Adult - Resident Season Discount - Adult - Non-Resident Season Discount - Family - Resident Season Discount - Family - Non-Resident City Classes - Adultrreen - Learn To Swim - Res City Classes - Parentllnfant thru Adv Pre-School - Res Daily Fee - Non-Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Over 8 Aquatics ' (4) (4) (4) (4) City Classes - Beginner - Learn to Swim - Res City Classes - Beginner - Learn to Swim - Non-Res City Classes - Adultrreen - Learn To Swim - Non-Res City Classes - Parenfflnfant thru Adv Pre-School - Non-Res Contract Classes - Adapted Aquatics - Res Contract Classes - Adapted Aquatics - Non-Res Contract Classes - Aqua X I Masters Swim (Daily Fee) - Res Contract Classes - Aqua X l Masters Swim (Daily Fee) - Non-Res Contract Classes - Diving, Synchro Swim - Non-Res Contract Classes - Masters Swim Workouts - Res (Monthly Fee) Contract Classes - Masters Swim Workouts - Non-Res (Monthly Fee) Individualized lnstr - Basic Swimming - Res Individualized lnstr - Basic Swimming - Non-Res Individualized lnstr - Advanced lnstrlcoaching - Non-Res Rental - Exclusive Use - Commercial/Corp (Per Hr) Rental - Exclusive Use - Community/Non-Profit (Per Hr) Use Agreements - C.U.S.D. (per lane per hr) Use Agreements - N.C.A. - (per lane per hr) Staff Costs - City provided services (Life Guard I Supervision etc. - Per Hr) Contract Classes - Diving, Synchro Swim - Res New New New Individualized lnstr - Advanced lnstrlcoaching - Res New (1) - Facility rental rates have not been addressed in this study. Existing rates remain in effect. 1990-91 Proposed - Fee Fee A 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 15.00 15.00 17.50 17.50 10.00 10.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 3.50 3.50 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.75 35.00 60.00 40.00 66.00 45.00 72.00 50.00 78.00 15.00 17.00 20.00 23.00 20.00 22.00 25.00 28.00 20.00 22.00 25.00 28.00 15.00 17.00 20.00 23.00 2.75 2.75 3.25 3.25 20.00 22.00 25.00 28.00 27.00 28.00 32.00 34.00 0.00 17.00 0.00 23.00 0.00 31.00 75.00 80.00 30.00 32.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.90 10.00 11.00 0.00 25.00 Total 1990-91 Fee Description Note Cost Fee Utility Fees -Water Services Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 5/8" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 314" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 1 " meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 1 142" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 2" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 2 112" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 3" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 4" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 6" meter Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 8" meter Water use > 7 units up to target (target = base year - 20%) (cost per unit) 5.50 5.60 5.70 6.20 13.60 16.80 20.00 24.60 26.50 29.70 Qualified Single Family Residential Lifeline (1-7 units of water) (cost per unit) Water use > target and up to 20% above target (cost per unit) Water use > 20% above target (cost per unit) Water Service Fee - Per New Account - Service Turn on Water Service Fee - Accounts scheduled for termination for non-payment Water Meter Deposit - Construction Meters Water Meter - Construction Meter rental fee Utility Fees - Sewer Services Minimum Monthly Charge Group I - Residential 7.30 Group 111 - Commercial - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet Group IV - Commercial - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet Group V - InstitutionslSchools 15.00 20.00 450.00 50.00 Group II - Commercial - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet - Elementary School - rate per hundred cubic feet - Junior High School - rate per hundred cubic feet - High School - rate per hundred cubic feet - Boarding School - rate per hundred cubic feet - Beckman Micro Operations - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feed - Culligan - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet - Hughes Aircraft - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet Group VI - Large Volume Users Proposed Fee A 5.50 5.60 5.70 6.20 13.60 16.80 20.00 24.60 26.50 29.70 0.90 1.15 1.73 15.00 20.00 450.00 50.00 11.58 11.58 1.43 1.87 2.96 0.26 0.51 0.77 3.86 3.88 1.11 1.15 1.43 City of Carlsbad Fife Protection System Installation Fees Plan Inspection Fees Total Review No. ICost Fee Automatic Sprinkler Systems - Commercial System $80 +.75/spklr 6 at $40 each $320 +.75/spklr - Tenant Improvement 40 1 at 40 each 80 - Residential System 40 3at 40 each 160 Fire Alarm Systems - 1 to 10 Devices 40 minimum 1 at 40 each 80 - 11 or more Devices 40 +$l.OO/device 2at 40 each 120 +l.OO/device Other Fixed Fire Systems - Hood and Duct 40 1 at 40 each 80 - Halon 60 2at 40 each 140 - Special Chemical Agent 40 1 at 40 each 80 - Standpipe 40 2at 40 each 120 - Paint Spray Booth 40 2at 40 each 120 v. z b e e ..- Carlsbad Journal Decreed A legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego Count Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (61 9) 753-6542 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above en. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of genera published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and whic is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 charactei newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription li subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular in said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding 01 preceding the date of public notice hereinafter referred to; notice of which the annexed copy, has been published in and entire issue of said news1 in any supplement thereof 0; NOTICE OF The City of Carlsbad will hold a PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF CARLSBAD public hearing on Tuesday, Janu- cil Chambers of City Hall, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, to discuss the increase of various City development fees discussion regarding the fees which are proposed for increase, as well as several new fees recom- mended for implementation Interested parties are invited to attend this meeting and present their views and comments to the City Council. The basis for recommending the by David M. Griftith and Associates. This report is available for public review in the City of Carlsbad Fi- Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, tion which. has been prepared for able for public inspection at the Village Drive. may be directed to Debbie Neville of the Finance Department, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, 434-2f373. CJ 6574 January k, 1992 ary28,1W2,atB:M)P.M. inthecoun- ing dates, to-wit: and general fees. Included will be 23 January proposed fees is a report prepared nance Department Offices, 1200 California. Copies of the informa- City Council review are also avail- City Clerk’s office, 1200 Carlsbad California on the 23rd Written and telephone inquiries day of January I certify under penalty of pe foregoing is true and correct Carlsbad, County of San Di - e 1, a b- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF CARLSBAD The City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 28, 199 6:OO P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carl: California, to discuss the increase of various City development fees and general Included will be discussion regarding the fees which are proposed for increase, as w several new fees recommended for implementation. Interested parties are invited to attend this meeting and present their view: comments to the City Council. The basis for recommending the proposed fees is a report prepared by Dav Griffith and Associates. This report is available for public review in the City of Car Finance Department Offices, 1200 Carslbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California. Cop the information which has been prepared for City Council review are also availab public inspection at the City Clerk's office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive. Written and telephone inquires may be directed to Debbie Neville of the F1 Department, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, 434-2973.