HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07; City Council; 11624; Evans PointCITY -- F CARLSBAD - AGENDi ’ 3lLL
199 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EVANS POINT
IECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents CERTIFYING EIR 91-2 and APPROVING GPA 91-3, LCPA 91-1, CT 91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 as approve? by the Planning Commission, and
INTRODUCE Ordinance No. as- j9.1 , APPROVING ZC 91-6.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On February 19, 1992, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval without modification (7-O) of the Evans Point project, which is located southwesterly of El Camino Real between the future extension of Cannon Road and existing Camino Hills Drive on 128.1 acres. The applications would establish a residential development of 199 single family dwelling units and 6 open space lots totaling 59.4 acres. The proposed project complies with all City ordinances and policies and includes the following discretionary actions:
EIR 91-2 - Certification of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project. The EIR addresses all requested discretionary actions. In response to the draft EIR the project has gone through substantial revision. Mitigation measures identified in EIR 91-2 have been incorporated into the project through redesign or as mitigating conditions of approval.
GPA 91-3 - A General Plan Amendment from RL (Low Density Residential) on 38.7 acres and RLM (Low-Medium Density Residential) on 89.4 acres to OS (Open Space) on 59.4 acres and RLM (Low-Medium Density Residential) on 68.7 acres.
LCPA 91-1 - A Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PC (Planned Community) to the RLM and OS designations proposed by the General Plan Amendment.
ZC 91-6 - A Zone Change from L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (One- Family Residential) on 68.7 acres and O-S (Open Space) on 59.4 acres. The R-l zone will allow for the development of minimum 7,500 square foot lots.
CT 91-3 - A Tentative Tract Map to divide the property into 199 residential lots and 6 open space lots.
HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2 - A Hillside Development Permit and a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of 199 single family homes in compliance with the Hillside Development Regulations and the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards.
-
PAGE 2 OF AGENL BILL NO. //-
More detailed information is included in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission. No testimony was received by the Planning Commission from members of the public at the hearing. Additional as well as revised findings and conditions provided by staff to the Planning Commission at the hearing have been incorporated into the appropriate Planning Commission Resolutions.
The project's impact on the Kelly Barn and grain bin was reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission at approximately 6 of their meetings. The report prepared by the structural consultant which is attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report and the information contained in the EIR were utilized by both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission in arriving at their recommendations which include relocation and rehabilitation of the grain bin and demolition of the Kelly Barn. The conditions regarding the barn and grain bin are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3352 as conditions 15 A. and B ., 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 61, and 62.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An EIR was processed addressing all proposed discretionary approvals. The report was found by staff and the Planning Commission to have been prepared in compliance with State and City regulations. All project-related impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance as a result of revisions to the project design and the application of mitigation measures required in the EIR.
FISCAL IMPACT
As discussed in the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan, because all required improvements are to be funded by development, no fiscal impacts to the City will result from this 199 dwelling unit project.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
Facilities Zone 24
Local Facilities Management Plan - 24
Growth Control Point 3.20 Du/Ac.
Net Density 3.03 Du/Ac.
Special Facilities C.F.D. No. 1
E2CHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance No. fis- lq.4 (Zone Change 91-6) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3348, 3349, 3350, 3351 3352, 3353, and 3354 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated February 19, 1992 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated February 19, 1992 6. EIR 91-2 (Previously Distributed) 7. Exhibits "AIV-l'AA'V dated February 19, 1992 (on file in the Planning Department)
I MOBILEHOME PARK
\ \ /J:
EVANS POINT EN? 91-2
city of Carllad
c 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3348
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR
91-2, FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING 199 SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLINGS AND 6 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON 128.1
ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL
CAMINO REAL BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF
CANNON ROAD AND EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE AND
WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 24.
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO.: EIR 91-2
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the
County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof no. 823, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of February, 1992, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Map and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
follows:
A> That the FOREGOING recitations are true and correct.
B) That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 91-2 will be amended to include the
comments and documents of those testifying at the public hearing and responses
thereto hereby found to be in good faith and reason by incorporating a copy of the
minutes of said public hearings into the report.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c>
D)
El
That the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Environmental tmpact
Report EIR 91-2 has been completed in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, and the
provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the Planning
Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in
the report.
That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 91-2 as so amended and as evaluated in the staff report (February 19, 1992), is recommended for acceptance and
certification as the final Environmental Impact Report and that the final
Environmental Impact Report as recommended is adequate and provides reasonable
information on the project and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto,
including no project.
That each and every significant environmental impact identified in the
Environmental Impact Report would be overruled or counterbalanced by changes
or alteration in the project which would mitigate against said adverse impacts or,
in certain circumstances, that mitigation of such adverse impacts would not be
feasible under the circumstances and under the economic and social needs
objectives and concerns in providing the improvements if the project were to be
approved, would be included as conditions of approval of the project.
Conditions:
1. Refer to CT 91-3, Resolution No. 3352 for all conditions, mitigation measures, and
monitoring programs applicable to development of the Evans Point Project Area.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
PC RESO NO. 3348 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2:
22
24
2E
26
27
2E
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Holmes,
Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN ‘: None.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992 by
the following vote, to wit:
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOEZMILL%
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3348 -3-
PLANNINGCOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.3349
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RL AND RLM TO
OS AND RLM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL
BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CANNON ROAD
AND EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO: GPA 91-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the General Plan
designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit GPA 91-3, dated February
19, 1992, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of February,
1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of GPA 91-3, as shown on Exhibit GPA 91-3
attached hereto, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions.
. . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinns:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Goa! “A” of the General Plan Land Use Element is to preset e and enhance the.
environment, character and image of the City as a desirable residential, beach and
open-space oriented community. The proposed designations accomplish this by
designating the areas of the site containing significant habitat as open space to
ensure their preservation and conserva tion which also results in the creation of
desirable residential areas adjacent to the open space areas.
The proposed amendment complies with Goal “H” of the Land Use Element of
encouraging development only in those areas which can best support a change in
land use without impact as the areas of the site not suitable for development as
well as contiguous developable areas will be preserved in open space to create a
viable open space system on and off site.
The proposed land use change is appropriate as necessaty services are =dY provided to the site as required by Land Use Element Policy “A” and additional
improvements necessary for the proposed land use have been required of the
associated tentative map.
Policy “JY of the Land Use Element is also complied with as the locations of the
proposed land use designations in conjunction with the project design will result
in a functionally efficient street system and an aesthetically pleasing site as a result
of the preservation of a major portion of the site as open space.
The proposed amendment complies with Goals Al, k3, and A5 in addition to
Policies Cl, C-5, and C.6 of the Open Space and Consenm tion Element by
designating 59.4 acres (46%) of the site as open space. Riparian habitat as well
as chaparral habitat is being preserved in its natural condition and a 100 foot
buffer is provided adjacent to the riparian area.
Uses which would be permitted by the proposed General Plan designations will be
compatible with existing and allowable future land uses.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, and LCPA 91-1,
ZC 91-6, fl91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 are incorporated herein by reference.
Refer to those documents for all conditions and mitigation measures applicable to
the development of the Evans Point project site.
2. Approval of GPA 91-3 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 91-2, LCPA 91-l
and ZC 91-6.
3. This resolution is effective 30 days following its adoption.
PC RESON0.3349 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
n 24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Holmes,
Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HiXZMIttER
Planning Director
I PC RESO NO. 3349 -3-
February 19, 1992
. . I
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
tAbad
EVANS POINT GPA 91-3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RJBOLUTION NO. 3350
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL
PLAN FROM PC TO OS AND RLM AND TO BRING THE
DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, GENERAL
PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF
EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF
CANNON ROAD AND EXlSTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE.
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO: LCPA 91-l
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Plan,
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in
conformance;
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal
Plan designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit LCPA 91-1, dated
February 19, 1992, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February,
1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the proposed
Local Coastal Plan Amendments shown on Exhibit LCPA 91-1, attached hereto, and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six ‘week public review
period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on May 10,
1990, and ending on June 21, 1990, staff shall present to the City Council a
summary of the comments received.
0 That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 91-l as shown on Exhibit LCPA 91-1, dated
February 19,1992, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on the following
findings:
Findings:
1. The proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendment is consistent with aII applicable
policies of the MeIIo II segment of the Loca.I CoastaI Program.
2. The proposed amendment to the MeIIo II segment of the CarIsbad Local Coastal
Program is required to bring the designations of the local Coastal Plan, GeneraI
Plan, and Zoning Map into conformance.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, and GPA 91-3,
ZC 91-6, CI’ 91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 are incorporated herein by reference.
Refer to those documents for ail conditions and mitigation measures applicable to
the development of the Evans Point project site.
2. Approval of LCPA 91-1 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 91-2, GPA 91-3,
and ZC 91-6.
PC RFSO NO. 3350 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 19th day of February, 1992, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Holmes, Savary, Noble 8t Hall.
None.
None.
None.
k* TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
MICHAEL J. HaLZMKLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3350 -3-
-
February 19, 1992
EXISTING LOCALplCAvSTAL
PROPOSED LOCAlpfA$ASTAL
City of hrlsbad
EVANS POINT LCPA 91-l
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3351
A RESOLUTIONOFTHEPLANNINGCOMMISSIONOFTHE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM LC TO R-l AND OS
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN
THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CANNON ROAD AND
EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE.
CASENAME: EVANSPOINT
CASE NO: ZC 91-6
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County
of San Diego, State of California, according to the map
thereof no. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February,
1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of ZC 91-6, according to “Exhibit X” attached hereto,
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions.
. . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1. The proposed change in zoning designations from L-C to R-l and OS is consistent
with the proposed RLM and OS General Plan designations.
2. The single family residential uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change to R-l
would be compatible with surrounding ezisting or proposed residential, open
space, and non-residential uses.
3. The proposed rezoning of slopes of 25 percent and greater with mized chaparral,
the riparian area, and the riparian buffer to Open Space will serve to ensure the
preservation of these areas as open space.
4. AU findings of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, GPA 91-3,
Resolution No. 3349, LCPA 91-1, Resolution No. 3350, and CT 91-3, Resolution
No. 3352 are incorporated herein by reference.
Conditions:
1.
2.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
All conditions of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, and GPA 91-3,
LCPA 91-1, CX 91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 are incorporated herein by
reference. Refer to those documents for all conditions and mitigation measures
applicable to the development of the Evans Point project site.
Approval of ZC 91-6 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 91-2, GPA 91-3, and
LCPA 91-1.
PC RJZSO NO.3351 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Holmes, Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HGLZMLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3351 -3-
.
.
;
, a
A
I .
t
I
I
!
l(
13
1:
1:
14
lf
1E
17
1E
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3352
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 205 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
CONSISTING OF 199 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 6 OPEN
SPACE LOTS ON A 128.1 ACRE LOT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY StDE OF
EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF
CANNON ROAD AND EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE.
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO: CT 91-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County
of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof
No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of February, 1992,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 91-3, based on the following findings and subject to
the following conditions:
. . .
. . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findin=:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of
3.03 du’s/acre is within the density range of O-4 du’s/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 3.2.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding residential land uses of
RI&I and RM. Provisions are provided to mitigate potential land use conflicts with
the adjacent non-residential laud uses of PI,/RS/C/TS/U in Zone 5.
An EIR was prepared for this project and has been recommended for certikation
by the Planning Co mmission. The EIR (EIR 91-2) identified a number of potentially
significant impacts created by this project and possible mitigation measures to
reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. These mitigation measures have
been incorporated into the project through redesign or conditions of approval, to
reduce all impacts to a level of insignificance.
The intent of all mitigation measures proposed in EIR 91-2 are contained in this
Resolution by way of specific conditions of approval. In some case the mitigation
measures have been modified to: conform to City Policies; or, expanded to more
adequately mitigate the impact; or, tied to a specific phase of construction so that
PC PESO NO. 3352 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
12. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24.
13. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
14. The Tentative Map (CT 91-3) satisfies all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
(Title Zl), Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20) and the State Map Act.
15. The project is consistent with all policies of the Mello II Local Coastal Program.
16. The proposed project as conditioned is in compliance with the City’s Noise Policy
No. 17.
they could be more easily monitored. Application of these measures mitigates all
identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for CT 91-3, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “AA”, dated February
19, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map (Exhibit “H”, Composite Tentative Map, and Exhibits “Q” - “AA”,
50 scale Tentative Map) as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative
Map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement
plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
3. A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within
and adjacent to the project.
PC PESO NO. 3352 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be
approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer
service is available to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement
plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities ‘fee dated
January 4, 1989, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated
by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with
the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu. fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule
in effect at the time of building permit application.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated May
25, 1983.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may
be required as part of the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
PC PESO NO. 3352 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
15.
. . .
Approval of CT 91-3 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 91-2, GPA 91-3, LCPA 91-1, ZC 91-6, HDP 91-3 and SUP 91-2.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land
use designation for this development is Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM).
The Growth Control Point for this designation is 3.2 dwelling units per
nonconstrained acre.
Parcels 1 through 199, 202, 203, and 205 were used to calculate the intensity of
development under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment
or resubdivision of any one of these parcels must also include parcels 1 through 199, 202, 203 and 205 under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.”
The applicant shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. The following items
shall be included in the CC&R’s:
A. Common ownership of Open Space Lots 200,201, 202,203,204 and 205.
B. Maintenance responsibility for lots 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205 in
addition to the grain bin.
C. Allow only development in lots ZOO-205 (inclusive) and any property subject
to an open space easement as shown on the approved grading, landscape and
improvement plans. Any further development of the aforementioned areas
shall be specifically prohibited except upon the written order of the Carlsbad
Fire Department for fire prevention purposes or upon written approval of the
Planning Director based upon a request fi-om the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report from a qualified arborist/botanist indicating the
need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending
danger to adjacent habitable units or the grain bin. For areas containing
native vegetation the report required to accompany the request shall be
prepared by a qualified biologist.
D. Require that a uniform fencing and wall design be maintained for the project
as graphically shown on Exhibit “G”.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
E. Landscape maintenance responsibility for those areas depicted on Exhibit “G”
including all landscaping in the street right-of-way adjacent to the rear
property line for double frontage lots.
F. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris within the proposed open space
easements.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
An irrevocable offer of dedication to the city of Carlsbad for a trail easement shah
be made on the map for the trails shown on the Tentative Map within Open Space
Lots ZOO and 201. If the city of Carlsbad accepts dedication of the trail easement
the City shall assume responsibility for maintenance and liability. If the City of Garlsbad does not accept liability and maintenance responsibility for the Citywide
Trail System prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant will not be required
to construct the trail.
All fences and walls for the project shall comply with the fence and wall details as
well as the approved locations for each as shown on Exhibit “G”. Walls on lots 166
to 171 inclusive shall be required for noise attenuation. The fencing and/or walls
shall be constructed by the developer for each individual unit for which a final
inspection and certificate of occupancy is being requested prior to the certificate of
occupancy being approved.
The applicant is aware that the City is preparing an in-lieu fee program as an
alternative to the inclusionaty requirements stipulated in Policy 3.6b of the Housing
Element. If in the development of the in-lieu fee program, it is determined by the
City Council, in order to find consistency with the Housing Element of the General
Plan as well as consistency with Section 66473.5 of the Government Code
(Subdivision Map Act), that this project is subject to this fee and building permits
have not been issued, the applicant or its successors in interest shall pay whatever
reasonable in-lieu fee that is required and in effect at the time of issuance of
building permits. If required fees are not paid, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape, fire suppression and irrigation plan
which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the
issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first.
PC BESO NO. 3352 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
. . .
A master plan of the existing onsite trees shall be provided to the Planning Director
as part of the final grading plan to determine which trees shall be required to be
preserved within proposed open space prior to the issuance of a grading permit or a building permit, whichever occurs first.
Existing onsite trees within proposed open space shall be retained wherever possible
and shall be trimmed and/or topped. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the discretion of the Planning Department during
the review of a Master Plan submitted showing existing onsite trees. Those trees
which are approved for removal shall be replaced on a tree-for-tree basis as required
by the Planning Department.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along
all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The
trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall
promote water conservation.
The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessive litter and/or are too large relative to the lot size.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
The number of trees in a residential project shall be equal to or greater than the
number of residential units.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
The project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations within the project
boundaries subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall at a minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for
the bus stop sign. The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not
detract from the basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be
subject to the approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
An open space easement shall be placed over those portions of lots 2-17,21,22,56-
58,61-66, 76-79, 105-113, 122-128,157, and 179-197 which are in slopes and on
lots ZOO-205 in their entirety to prohibit any encroachments or development
including but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas,
stairways, and landscaping other than that approved as part of the grading plan,
improvement plans, future grading improvements of “J” Street, and a biological
revegetation program/landscape plan The gram bin and proposed trails shown on
exhibit “H” are to be permitted within the open space easement.
A minimum of four (4) different roof tile colons shall be used for the units within
the project on an equal proportion. The proposed colors and tile samples shall be
submitted for review and approval of the Planning Director prior to the issuance of
building permits due to the high visibility of the project site. The building plans for
the project shall indicate the proposed tile color for each unit.
Colored stucco samples for the exterior unit colors shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits
due to the high visibility of the project site. The building plans for the project shall
indicate the proposed stucco color for each unit.
PC ES0 NO. 3352 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
Prior to issuance of a grading pennit, the applicant shall contact the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game to determine
whether a Cleanwater Act Section 404 and/or a Code Section 1600-1603 Permit is
required from these agencies respectively for filling of the alkali meadow and
riparian scrub vegetation. If required, these permits shall be obtained prior to
approval of a grading plan and issuance of a grading permit and evidence of such
shall be provided to the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to approval of a
grading plan and issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to recordation of final map, a Biological Revegetation Program shall be
prepared by a qualified biologist for areas of disturbance adjacent to or within
designated open space areas to include manufactured slopes as identified on Exhibit
“G”. The program shah specify the species, size of plant specimens, irrigation
requirements and soil preparation requirements for all identified areas.
The Biological Revegetation Prog-ram shah specify maintenance and monitoring
requirements to ensure successful implementation of the program. Monitoring shall
be conducted to the satisfaction of the City for a period of between 2 and 5 years.
A 100’ buffer shall be provided along the riparian habitat. No intrusions or
disturbances of any kind except for the proposed desiltation/detention basin and
public improvements shall be permitted in the nearest 50 feet to the riparian
habitat. Intrusion within the outer 50’ buffer (between 50’ and 100’ from the edge
of the riparian vegetation) shall be limited to disturbances resulting from grading,
storm drams and walls required for the proposed trail, Street C, and associated
residential lots. Buildable pad areas are specifically prohibited in the lOO-foot
buffer. Minor lot encroachment areas shall be permitted, to include landscaping per
the Biological Revegetation Program. Private improvements, such as storage
buildings, pools, spas, etc., shah be specifically prohibited. Disturbed areas within
the lOO-foot buffer shall be revegetated according to a qualified biologist.
Prior to occupancy of any units, a permanent fence as shown on Exhibit “G’ shah
be installed and maintained to discourage entry into the riparian area by humans
and pets. The fence shah be located at the top of slope of all residential lots
adjacent to the riparian area.
A wildlife undercrossing under Street C approximately 6’ X 10’ wide shah be
constructed to provide a connection between the chaparral and the riparian habitats.
The under crossing shah be designed to ensure that daylight is visible through the
culvert from each end. The und ercrossing shall not be lighted in order to
discourage pedestrian use at night.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
48. Street J shall be constructed to allow sufficient turn-around space for emergency
and project vehicles, until such time as the road is extended offsite to Cannon Road.
49. A notice meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney shall
be prepared and recorded, prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the
issuance of residential building permits, that this property is subject to overflight,
sight, and sound of aircmft operating from Palomar Airport.
50. Prior to recordation of the first final tract map or issuance of building permits,
whichever is first, the owner shall prepare and record a notice that this property
may be subject to impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor in
a manner meeting the approval of the Planning director and City Attorney.
51. The applicant shall post aimraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said
signs shall be approved by the Planning Director.
The heavily brushed areas of the site shall be monitored during brush removal and
initial grading stages by an archaeologist considered qualified by the Planning
Director based on the minimum qualifications for cultural resource professionals
specified in the “City of Carlsbad Cultural Resource Guidelines’*, dated December
1990. The archaeologist selected by the developer shall be approved by the
Planning Director prior to the approval of the grading plan. This condition shah be
placed on the grading plan for the project.
If any archaeological material is detected, the archeologist shall have the authority
to temporarily divert or delay grading activities to allow standard archaeological
recording and recovery. This condition shall be placed on the grading plan for the
project.
52.
53.
54.
55.
PC RESO NO. 3352
The archaeologist shall attend a preconstruction meeting with the grading and
brushing contractor(s) to ensure a clear understanding of the conditions by all
parties. This condition shall be placed on the grading plan for the project.
Prior to the issuance of building permits the gram bin shall be relocated onsite to
open space lot 204 as shown on the project plans and rehabilitated pursuant to the . . w Relocation & Rehabilitation Study, The Kelly Barn and Gram Bin, Evans
Point Project”, prepared by Travis, Verdugo, Curry & Associates - Structural
Consultants, dated August 6,199l. A DG path shall be provided from Street A to
the grain bin.
-lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, landscape plans for the gram bin shall be
submitted to the Planning Director for his approval.
The homeowners association established for the project shall provide for permanent
maintenance of the gram bin as shown on Open Space lot 204. The CC8& for the
project shall contain these provisions and be submitted for Planning Director review
and approval prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of grading
permits.
An interpretive sign shah be prepared for the gram bin based on signage details
provided to the applicant by the Historic Preservation Commission. The interpretive
sign shall be located on open space lot 204 as shown on the project plans prior to
the occupancy of any units.
The existing Wells Fargo stage stop sign shall be relocated based on direction from
the Historic Preservation Commiss’ ion and the approval of the Planning Director
prior to the occupancy of any units.
Prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit a video and narrative
detailing the history of the Kelly barn shall be prepared by the applicant and
submitted to the Historic preservation Commission. In addition, a photo
documentation of the barn using black and white prints and architectural line
drawing to fully document barn construction methods and design. Roth interior
and exterior line drawing are required.
Grading in the area of the barn and gram bin shall be monitored by an historian
determined to be qualified by the Planning Director based on the minimum
qualifications for cultural resource professionals specified in the “City of Carlsbad
Cultural Resource Guidelines”, dated December 1990. The historian selected by the
developer shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of the
grading plan. This condition shah be placed on the grading plan for the project.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits a report prepared by the archaeologist
and historian approved to monitor the grading operation shall be submitted to the
Planning Director indicating the results of the monitoring effort.
The applicant shall consider making a vohmtarv donation based on a specific and
detailed proposal to be provided by the Historic Preservation Commission for the
preservation and/or rehabilitation of an historic resource located in the City of
Carlsbad.
PCRESON0.3352 -11.
1
2
3
.4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
64.
. . .
The project shall comply with the city’s water conservation provisions. The
following water conservation measures (recommended by the California Department
of Water Resources) shall be implemented:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
1.
J.
K
L.
Install low-flush toilets (Section 17921.3 of Health and Safety Code).
Install low-flow showers and faucets (California Administrative Code, Title
24, Part 6, Article 1, T20-1406F).
Insulate hot water line recirculating systems (California Energy Commission
Regulations).
Reduce water pressure greater than 50 pounds per square inch (psi) to 50
psi or less by means of a pressure reducing valve.
Landscape with low water-consuming plants wherever feasible.
. . . Mim.mtze use of lawn wherever possible.
Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas; mulch applied on top of soil
will improve the water-holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation
and soil compaction.
Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs to the extent possible;
established plants are often adapted to low water conditions and their use
saves water needed to establish replacement vegetation..
Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporationand
maximize the water which will reach the plant roots; drip irrigation, soil
moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of
increasing irrigation efficiency.
Use pervious paving material whenever feasible to reduce surface water
runoff and aid in groundwater recharge.
Grade slopes to minimize surface water runoff.
Promotional literature for the project shall recommend the installation of
water-conserving models of appliances.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
65.
66.
Prior to the approval of grading plans, the project applicant shall r&eke a Coastal
Development Permit from the Califomia Coastal Commission that approves
development that is in substantial conformance with the City approval. Evidence
that the pennit has been received shall be submitted to both the Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Prior to grading plan approval areas of the site to be preserved as natural open
space shall be clearly d emarcated on the grading plan to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and Planning Director. These areas shall be staked in the field by a
qualified biologist prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Engineering Conditions:
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
. . .
This project is located within the Mello II Local Coastal plan. All development
design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) unit for recordation.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private
easements within the subdivision and all the storm drain facilities located therein
and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the
owners of the units within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such
maintenance shall be included with the CC&R’s subject to the approval of the City
Engineer. (Refers to Lots 15 thm 18).
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an
individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R’s.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision
Map Act.
Prior to approval of the final map, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the
City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the Master Drainage
Plan Update.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a Hold Harmless Agreement
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map
for this project.
Prior to approval of the final map the owner shall enter into an agreement to not
oppose the formation of a drainage maintenance assessment district.
Prior to final map approval the owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for
geologic failure.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City Codes and standards. Prior to issuance of a building permit
for the project, a grading permit shall be obtained and grading work be completed
in substantial conformance with the approved grading plans.
prior to approval of the above grading plans the developer shall show compliance
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer with the mitigation measures identiCed in
the Environmental Impact Report for Evans Point as follows:
A. All grading and lantiorm alteration activities shall be subject to the
requirements of the City Grading and Excavation Ordinance.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -14-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B. All development in areas with slopes greater than 25 percent shall be
consistent with the Carlsbad Local Coastal program policies relative to
drainage and erosion control.
C. The liquefaction potential of the alluvial soils shall be mitigated to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Measures may include increasing the shear
strength of the alluvial soils by surcharging, dynamic compaction, grouting,
or by supporting structures on pile foundations. Prior to issuing building
permits on those lots that have liquefaction potential in the opinion of the
City Engineer a notice shall be recorded to notify potential owners of this
possibility. The form shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the
City Attorney.
D. The settlement potential of the alluvial soils shall be mitigated to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer by either: 1) total removal and
recompaction; 2) supporting proposed structures on a driven line foundation;
or, 3) a combination of over excavation and fill to finish grade, possibly with
the addition of a surcharge fill.
E. A specific geotechnical investigation shall be performed and shall be
conducted prior to submittal of grading plans. The study shall address: 1)
the areal extent of landslide, particularly the portion that may extend offsite;
2) areas of proposed cut slopes which might require stabilization during
grading; 3) the alluvial depth, compressibility, and depth to the ground water
in the central portion of the site; 4) the possibility of the Rose Canyon Fault
being upgraded to active and the effect of higher accelerations; and 5) the
effect of out-of-slope dips on cut slopes. The geotechnical report shall
indicate specific measures necessary to ensure acceptable factors of safety.
Changes to project design may be necessary based on the results of the
geotechnical study. Such changes shall be in substantial conformance to the
tentative map or the tentative map shall be amended.
F. All buildings shall be designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code
and applicable City codes to ensure safety in the event of an earthquake.
G. Permanent and temporary (construction) erosion control measures shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
H. Notification shall be placed on the final map to warn future homeowners of
the geologic hazards.
PCRJZSO NO.3352 -15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
. . .
I. The grading contractor shall be responsible for property treatment (which
may include covering or watering) of imported soil to minimize blowing dirt
and dust along haul routes.
J. Once a borrow site has been identified, the contractor shall prepare a map
indicating haul routes, and list specific measures to minimize street damage
and blowing dust/dirt. Such information shall be approved by the
Engineering Department prior to the importation of soil.
Upon completion of grading, the applicant shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic
plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24” x 36" mylar or similar
drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued.
In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative map or change the slope
so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially
conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this.
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chapter 11.06.
The applicant shall construct desiltation/detention/urban pollutant basin(s) of a
type and a size and at location(s) as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant
shall enter into a basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond
satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the approval of grading, building permit
or final map whichever occurs first for this project. Each basin shall be serviced by
an all-weather access/maintenance road.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -16-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided or installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer.
The applicant shall place the following note on a non-mapping data sheet of the
final map:
Geotechnical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has
agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that
may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land subsidence
and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to
its construction, operation or maintenance.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
Additional right-of-way shall be offered for dedication on the final map along the
project frontage on El Camino Real based on a center line to right-of-way width of
63 feet.
On the final map, the following lots that front on more than one street shall
relinquish access rights to the street named:
A. Lots 76 thru 79,93, 94,113,131 thru 136 shall relinquish access rights to
street “B”.
B. Lots 61 thru 66, 103 thru 105, and 120 thru 122 shall relinquish access
rights to Camino Hills Drive.
C.
D.
Lot 87, shall relinquish access rights to Street “F’.
Lots 105 thru 120,130,136,137 and 156 shall relinquish access tights to
Street “A”.
E. Lots 23 and 33 shall relinquish access rights to street “G”.
F. Lots 57 thru 61 shall relinquish access rights to Street “IT’.
PC MS0 NO. 3352 -17-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
. . .
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This conditional approval is null and void if title to
said property is not obtained, unless the City Engineer and Planning Director make
findings of substantial conformance without construction of said improvements. v
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from lo-year
frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are
equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall
be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the
desired results prior to final map approval issuance of building or grading permits
whichever occurs first.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map, issuance of grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final
map in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install
and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on
the tentative map and the following improvements:
A. Full public street improvements for Streets “A”, “B”, “c’, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “I-I”, “I”, and “s’.
B. Public street improvements on the northwesterly side of Camino Hills Drive
plus additional 12 feet of paved section beyond the centerline.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -18-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
97.
98.
C. Public street improvements on the southerly side of El Camino Real sufIicient
to complete half street improvement plus full median all to prime arterial
standards, and reconstruct or overlay existing paving as may be required by
the City Engineer. Half median improvements are eligible for reimbursement
from the appropriate City Funds.
D. public sewer and storm drain facilities.
E. To meet cul-de-sac policy a 26 foot wide roadway along the alignment of
Faraday Avenue and Halley Drive as shown on City Drawing No. 294-l shall
be constructed. This width is considered temporary, future improvements
will be to City standards. The roadway shall be as shown on the tentative
map.
F. A temporary turnaround and barricade on Camino Hills Drive at the
northerly project boundary to be constructed after an alternate cinxlation
route for Camino Hills Mobile Home Park is open. The alternate route shall
meet cul-de-sac policy.
A note to this effkct shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed
above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
The owner shall offer for dedication a temporary slope and access easement over
Lots 199 and 201 for the future extension of Street “J” to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
The owner shall post a cash bond or other security acceptable to the City Engineer
for this project’s share of the future extension of Street “J” to the project boundary.
The amount of bond shall be based on an engineer’s estimate approved by the City
Eugineer. The estimate shall include, but not be limited to, paving, base, sidewalks,
curbs and gutter, grading, clearing and grubbing, underground or relocation of
utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights and retaining walls.
98(A) Con currently with the recordation of the final map a notice shall be recorded on lots
179 thm 199 (Phase 4) to notify potential owners that Street “J” shall act as access
to future residential development. The form of the notice shall be to the satisfaction
of the City Fngineer and City Attorney.
PC RESO NO. 3352 -19-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
99. Prior to approval of a final map Cnancing for the construction of the South Agua
Hedionda interceptor from El Gamin0 Real to the Vista/Q&bad Interceptor shall
be guaranteed consistent with the latest Zone 24 LFMP and any amendments made
to the JJMP prior to recordation of the final map.
Fire Conditions:
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
Additional onsite public water mains and fire hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed, and existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
The plan should include off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency seivice vehicles
shall be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the
Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or
other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction
operations cease until the condition is corrected.
All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational
before combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
Native vegetation which presents a fire hazard to structures shall be modified or
removed in accordance with the specifications contained in the city of Garlsbad
Landscape Guidelines Manual. Applicant shall submit a Fire Suppression plan to the
Fire Department for approval.
The applicant &all provide a street map which conforms to the following
requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements
and at least two &sting intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict
street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names.
Prior to building permit issuance for Lots 184 through 199 of Phase 4 of (3 91-3,
the C&y Fire Marshal shall find that adequate tie protection measures are in efkt.
Carlsbad MuniciDal Water District Conditions:
107. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
non-potable and fire flow demands are met.
. . .
PC RESO NO. 3352 -2o-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
1E
11
1E
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
108. The Developer's Engjneer shall schedule a meeting first with the City Fire Marshal
and then with the District Engineer to review the preliminary water system layout
prior to preparation of the water system improvement plans.
109. The Developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The
Developer shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will
be collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
110. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving
the development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time
of application for water service and will continue to be available until time of
OCCUpanCy.
111. The source of potable water is to the south of the southerly boundary line, offsite
water system shall be a requirement of the developer.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Holmes, Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.
MICHAEL J. HtiZMIL&R
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3352 -21-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3353
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMtSSION OF THE
CITY OF CAIUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A
205 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 199
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 6 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN
THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CANNON ROAD AND
EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE.
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO: HDP 91-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County
of San Diego, State of California, according to the map
thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February,
1992, consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
Al That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
Bl That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of HDP 91-3, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
,lO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map/hillside
development permit exhibit.
Undevelopable areas of the project site, such as slopes over 40% have been
properly identified on the constraints map/hillside development permit exhibit and
were determined to be excluded from the Hillside Development Regulations by
Sections 21.95.09a(b)(l) and (3).
The development proposal and all applicable development approvals and permits
are consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements of the Hillside
Development Regulations.
The finding that no development or grading will occur in those portions of the site
which are undevelopable pursuan t to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section
21.53.230(b) can be made as slopes over forty percent were excluded from density
calculations as required and slopes greater than 40 percent impacted by the project
were excluded from the Hillside Development Regulations by sections
21.95.090(b)(l) and (3) thereby permitting them to be developed.
Grading design minimizes disturbance of hihside areas to the greatest extent
possible given the fact that portions of the site have been altered by previously
authorized grading and the constraints to development of the on and offsite
Girculation System identified in the Hillside Development section of the staff
Report (February 19, 1992).
The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts ilhrstrated
in the HiUside Development Guidelines as follows:
k
Rounded slopes are proposed in areas.
Where possible undulating slopes are proposed.
C. Earth betms at the top of slopes are proposed to mitigate noise and visual
impacts.
d. Single story units are proposed on lots which are at highly visible key
locations in the development.
z
Extensive landscaping is proposed on all manufactured slopes.
units will, in gelEra& screen proposed manufactured slopes but not rise
above the horizon.
f
The proposed units provide a varied articulated tile roof.
Significant portions of the site including hillsides will remainasundisturbed
open space.
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density
of 3.03 du’s/acre is within the density range of O-4 du’s/acre specified for the site
as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 3.2.
PC RESO NO. 3353 -2-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of
the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the
Carlsbad School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee,
or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative
impacts created by the project.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding residential land uses of
RLM and RM. Provisions are provided to mitigate potential land use conflicts with
the adjacent non-residential land uses of PI/RS/C/TS/U in Zone 5.
An EIR was prepared for this project and has been recommended for certification
by the Planning Commission. The EIR (EIR 91-2) identified a number of
potentially significant impacts created by this project and possible mitigation
measures to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. T&se mitigation
measures have been incorporated into the project through redesign or conditions
of approval, to reduce all impacts to a level of insignificance.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24.
PCRESON0.3353 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
19. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 21.95.070 (a)(l) the Planning Commission
finds that the site has unusual geotechnical or soil conditions that necessitate
corrective work that requires significant amounts of grading. The proposed
grading volumes are a result of remedial grading required for excavation and
recompaction of the alluvial area of the site as discussed in the staff report for the
project dated February 19, 1992. The proposed grading quantities are in the
acceptable range when the amount for remedial grading is deducted.
20. The Planning Co mmission finds pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 21.95070
(a)(3) that the proposed m&cation to the development and design standards
will result in significantly more open space or undisturbed area than would a strict
adherence to the requirements of Section 21.95.060 as an additional 13.90 acres
of property will be provided as open space. This acreage would need to be graded
in order for the grading quantity per acre to fall in the acceptable range as
discussed in the staff report.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for HDP 91-3, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “AA”, dated
February 19, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map (Exhibit “H”, Composite Tentative Map, and Exhibits “Q” - “AA”,
50 scale Tentative Map) as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative
Map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
3. Approval of HDP 91-3 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 91-2, GPA 91-3,
LCPA 91-1, ZC 91-6, CT 91-3, SUP 91-2.
4. Ah conditions of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, WA 913, LCPA
91-1, ZC 91-6, CT 91-3, and SUP 91-2 are incorporated by reference herein.
PC RESO NO. 3353 4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Holmes, Savary, Noble & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3353 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3354
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A 205 LOT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 199 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS AND 6 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO
REAL BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CANNON
ROAD AND EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE.
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
CASE NO: SUP 91-2
.
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County
of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof
No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February, 1992,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Special Use Permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of SUP 91-2, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Findings:
The project enhances the scenic qualities of the El Camino Real Corridor consistent
with the corridois development standards by providing an attractive development
which complies with the specified building heights, required building setbacks along
El Camino Real, and extensive landscaping which incorporates the theme trees for
the corridor.
The project protects scenic views and t&Tic safety along El Camino Real by
providing attractive buildings, extensively landscaping proposed slopes, making
street improvements along the project’s frontage, and taking access off of El Camino
Real at an existing signalized intersection.
The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed density of
3.03 du’s/acre is within the density range of O-4 du’s/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the
growth control point of 3.2.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding residential land uses of
RLM and RI% Provisions are provided to mitigate potential land use conflicts with
the adjacent non-residential land uses of PI/R!VC/T.S/U in Zone 5.
PC PESO NO. 3354 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
11. An EIR was prepared for this project and has been recommended for certification
by the Planning Commission. The EIR (EIR 91-2) identified a number of potentially
significant impacts created by this project and possible mitigation measures to
reduce these impacts to a level of insignilicance. These mitigation measures have
been incorporated into the project through redesign or conditions of approval, to
reduce all impacts to a level of insignificance.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City’s hillside resources.
This Special Use Permit required pursuant to Section 21.40.040 of the Scenic
Preservation Overlay Zone is approved as the project complies with all requirements
of the Ez Camino Real Corridor Development Standards for Area 3.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted for SUP 91-2, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “AA”, dated February
19, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map (Exhibit “H”, Composite Tentative Map, and Exhibits “Q” - “A-A”,
50 scale Tentative Map) as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative
Map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement
plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
AU conditions of EIR 91-2, as contained in Resolution No. 3348, GPA 91-3, LCPA
91-1, ZC 91-6, CX 91-3, and HDP 91-3 are incorporated by reference herein.
PC RESO NO. 3354 -3-
1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Holmes, Savary, Noble 8~ Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOtiMILyER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3354 -4-
ORDINANCE NO. NS-195
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 91-6 FROM LC to R-l AND OS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CANNON ROAD AND EXISTING CAMINO HILLS DRIVE. CASE NAME: EVANS POINT CASE NO.: ZC 91-6
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
is amended by the amendment of a zoning map as shown on the map
marked "Exhibit ZC 91-6" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the
Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution
3351 constitutes the findings and conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at
least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council on the day of I
1992, and thereafter
.,_. - _._-L-..... -.__-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day o,f
I 1992, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
RONALD R. BALL, Acting City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
-2-
.
OS I- ,WO,,( I 4
P;;P$;ED
EVANS’ POINT
4
City of hIsbad
ZC 91-6
APPLIL~TION COMPLETE DATE:
FEBRUARY 20. 1991
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/cT 91-3/HDP 913/SUP 91-2 -
EVANS POINT - Request for the certification of an Environmental Impact
Report and the approval of a General Plan Amendment from RL and RLM to
OS and RLM on 128.1 acres, a Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PC to OS
and RLM on 128.1 acres, a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and OS on 128.1
acres, a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use
Permit for a 205 lot subdivision containing 199 residential lots with a
minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 6 open space lots totaling 59.4
acres on a 128.1 acre site. The project site is generally located southwesterly
of El Camino Real between the future extension of Cannon Road and existing
Camino Hills Drive in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management
Zone 24.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3348
RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION of EIR 91-2 and ADOPT Planning Commission
Resolution No.‘s 3349,3350,3351,3352,3353, and 3354 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
of GPA 91-3, LCPA 91-1, ZC 91-6, CT 91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 to the City Council
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting several discretionary approvals for a 128.1 acre property
located on the south side of El Camino Real between the future extension of Cannon Road
and existing Camino Hills Drive. This property is the site of a previously proposed Master
Plan and associated applications by a different property owner which included single family, units and townhouses totaling 380 units. An EIR was also prepared for that project and
completed in 1986 but the entire project was put on hold as a result of the adoption of the
Growth Management Ordinance.
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCF,. 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/uJP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
Discretionary approvals required for the presently proposed Evans Point project include:
(1) certification of an Environmental Impact Report which addresses all discretionary
approvals requested for this project, (2) a General Plan Amendment from RL (Low Density
Residential) and RLM (Low-Medium Density Residential) to OS (Open Space) and RLM
(Low-Medium Density Residential) on 128.1 acres, (3) a Local Coastal Plan Amendment
from PC (Planned Community) to OS and RLM on 128.1 acres, (4) a Zone Change from
L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (One-Family Residential, minimum 7,500 sq. ft. residential
lots) and O-S (Open Space), (5) a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and
Special Use Permit for the development of the 128.1 acre property.
The proposed project consists of a 205 lot subdivision containing 199 residential lots each
with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet. Six (6) open space lots are proposed which
total 59.4 acres. The open space lots include environmentally constrained property as well
as unconstrained property. The project is proposed at a density of 3.03 units per net acre.
The number of units proposed is well below (67 units) the 266 units allocated to the site
for facilities planning purposes by the Zone 24 Local Facilities Management Plan. The
acreage for each of the constraints which was identified on the site are listed on Exhibit
“F” titled, “Growth Management Data”. A maximum of 210 units could be allowed on the
site under the proposed general plan designations were the project proposed at the density
allowed by the growth control point of 3.2 du/ac.
Exhibit “A” delineates the existing resources on the site which acted as opportunities and
constraints to development. Exhibit “E” shows how these resources were impacted or
preserved. Exhibits “C” and “D” depict the grading proposed. Existing elevations on the
property range from 302 feet above mean sea level (msl) on a knoll located in the south
central part of the site to 30 feet above msl in the site’s northwest corner. The topography
of the site includes steep slopes in excess of 40 percent gradient as well as a relatively flat
area in the northern portion closest to El Camino Real. The project design includes onsite
grading 75.9 acres (59 percent) of the 128.1 acre site. The site will be graded to create
pads on progressively higher terraces moving north to south from El Camino Real. The
grading for the proposed project is not balanced onsite. As proposed the project includes
759,910 cubic yards of cut and 694,300 cubic yards of fill with the need to import 10,380
cubic yards. (Refer to the Hillside Development Permit Section of this report for further
details). The total graded area including offsite improvements is proposed over 81 .l acres.
This results in a grading quantity of 9,370 cubic yards per graded acre. These totals
include offsite grading for three streets in addition to remedial grading calculated to be 10
percent of the cut total based on shrinkage due to the alluvial soils onsite.
Consistent with the proposed R-l zoning 199 single family residences will be constructed.
The units are a contemporary Spanish-mediterranean style with stucco exteriors, tile roofs,
and wood trim (see Exhibits “S’ -“M”). Four unit plans are proposed with each having an
“A”, “B”, and “C” elevation. Plans 1, 3, and 4 are two story units. Plan 2 is a single story
unit. Forty (40) plan 2 units are proposed which results in 20 percent of the total units
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCk. 31-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/L JP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 3
in the project being single story. All four plans will have 3 car garages except for plan 1A
which is a two-car version of plan 1. The proposed plan 1A is utilized on 10 lots. Plan
1A allows for required building setbacks tobe met on lots at or close to “the minimum
required lot width of 60 feet. The unit breakdown is as follows:
UNIT TYPE SIZE IN SQ. FT. # OF STORIES HEIGHT LOTS MIX
1 2,293 2 25 ft. 44 22%
1A 2,293 2 25 ft. 10 5%
2 2,017 1 19 ft. 40 20%
3 2,855 2 24 ft. 6 in. 53 27%
4 3,501 2 26 ft. 52 26%
TOTAL 199 100%
Exhibits “I” and “N” through “P” illustrate the unit placement and provide an indication of
the building coverages relative to their respective lot sizes.
Portions of the project site have been previously disturbed. Areas of the site had been
devoted to agricultural use. Several residential buildings were located on the project site.
The Kelly Barn and grain bin are the only remaining structures. Most of the steep slopes
are covered with mixed chaparral. Surrounding land uses include the existing Camino Hills
Mobile Home Park to the east, the existing Ranch0 Carlsbad Mobile Home Park to the
north across El Camino Real, and the Carlsbad Research Center to the south. At the
northeastern comer from the Evans Point site is the recently approved Eagle Canyon
project which contains 29 minimum 7,500 square feet residential lots and 3 open space lots
totaling 6.13 acres on a 14.54 acre site. Single family residences and the Kelly Ranch
project, a 433 acre multi-use project, including a maximum of 1,400 residences,
recreation/commercial facilities, and neighborhood commercial are located to the west.
III. ANALYSIS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT-EIR 91-2
Certification of an Environmental Impact Report is being requested. The Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 91-2) addresses the environmental impacts associated with the
proposed project including all discretionary applications. In response to the draft EIR, the
Tentative Map has gone through substantial revision. Environmental Review has been
completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and mitigation measures
identified in EIR 91-2 have been incorporated into the project through redesign or as
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCI-,, 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/sLJP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 4
mitigating conditions of approval.
Table l-l, ” Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures”, found in the draft EIR beginning
on page l-5 identifies project impacts as well as appropriate mitigation measures. It also
assesses impacts after the application of the mitigation measures. These mitigation
measures have reduced the identified impacts to a level of insignificance in all cases except
air quality.
In regard to air quality the EIR states that individually the proposed project will not have
a significant impact upon air quality. However, the project would make a significant and
incremental contribution to existing and projected exceedances of national and state ’
ambient ozone standards. The EIR determined that the regional impact remains significant
and that mitigation is outside the control of the project and the City.
In conclusion, based on the environmental analysis contained in EIR 91-2 staff is
recommending that the Planning Commission find that all identified project related impacts
can or have been reduced to a level of insignificance by the application of mitigation
measures and conditions contained in the EIR. Therefore, project approval would not
require the decision makers to make findings of overriding consideration.
GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENTS - GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l
Planning Issues
1.
2.
Is the proposed land use designation appropriate for the site and consistent with the
policies of the General Plan? .
Is the proposed land use consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses?
3. Is the proposed land use designation consistent with applicable policies of the Mello
II Local Coastal Program?
DISCUSSION
Development of the proposed Evans Point project on this site requires the approval of a
General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendment on this 128.1 acre site. The applicant is
requesting that the General Plan designation on the site be changed from RL (Low Density
Residential) on 38.7 acres and RLM (Low-Medium Density Residential) on 89.4 acres to
OS (Open Space) on 59.4 acres and RLM (low-Medium Density Residential) on 68.7 acres.
The configuration of the areas designated as RLM on the General Plan Land Use Map is
being adjusted. The Local Coastal Plan land use designation of PC (Planned Community)
is also being changed to the proposed General Plan designations of OS and RLM.
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCk4,91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-S/HDP 91-3/;UP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 5
The existing General Plan designations would allow residential development. The RL
designation exists on an area of the site containing steeper topography as well as areas on
the higher elevations of the site previously used for agriculture. The RLM designation
exists on the remainder of the site. The proposed OS designation is being applied to
environmentally constrained areas of the site in addition to adjacent unconstrained areas
in order to provide viable habitat which is connected onsite and offsite. As stated
previously, based on the existing General Plan designations and deducting constrained
acreage, a maximum of 266 units were allocated to the site for facility planning purposes
by the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24. Utilizing the proposed designations
deducting constrained acreage including additional constraints identified by the EIR result
in a maximum of 210 units for the site. The associated Tentative Tract map is proposing
1% residential lots. The proposed amendment actually decreases the maximum number
of units which could be developed on the property.
The proposed change in land use is supported by numerous goals and policies found in the
Land Use Element . The most applicable goals and policies are as follows:
Goals:
A.
F.
H.
Policies:
A.
B.
J.
L.
Preserve and enhance the environment, character and image of the City as
a desirable residential, beach and open space-oriented community.
Protect and conserve natural resources, fragile ecological areas, unique
natural assets, and historically significant features of the community.
Encourage development only in those areas which can best support a change
in land use without impact.
Permit the development of land only after adequate provision for services
such as transportation, water, sewerage, utilities and public facilities.
Arrange land uses so that they preserve community identity and are orderly,
functionally efficient, healthful, convenient to the public and aesthetically
pleasing.
Develop and retain open space in all categories of land use.
Implementation of this element shall consider the social, economic and
physical impacts on the community.
.^
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPn 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19. 1992
The project conforms with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element. Designation
of the onsite riparian area and much of the steep slopes as open space areas will ensure
their preservation and conservation. Development has been limited to those areas of the
site which can best support it without creating an environmental or land use impact.
Services will be provided to the site in accordance with the requirements of the Zone 24
LFMP. The proposed project has been designed to have a functionally efficient street
system. The proposed site alteration in conjunction with the residential architecture
proposed will result in an aesthetically pleasing development.
The Open Space and Conservation Element contains numerous goals and policies applicable
to the project. The following are most applicable:
Goals - Snecial resource Protection
A.1 Prohibit development on environmentally sensitive land and buffer areas.
A.3 Preserve open space in as natural a state as possible.
A.5 Preserve as Open Space, agricultural land, hillsides, ridges, valleys, canyons,
lagoons, beaches and other unique resources that provide visual and physical relief
to the Cityscape.
Policies
c.1 Utilize sensitive design criteria to preserve the unique and special resources in the
City and to integrate them into the design of any development.
c.5 Consider for Open Space, hillsides, valleys and ridges during the approval of Specific
Plans, Master Plans and Planned Developments, and also at the time of subdivision.
C.6 Designate as a buffer a portion of land next to sensitive environmental areas.
The project complies with the goals and policies of the Open Space and Conservation
Element by providing 59.4 acres of open space (46 percent of the site) which includes
Growth Management performance standard open space (26.5 ac.) as well as constrained
land. Riparian habitat as well as chaparral habitat is being preserved in its natural
condition. A 100 foot buffer is provided adjacent to the riparian area. Evans Point proper
is being preserved in its existing state and will be accessed by a pedestrian trail which is
shown on the project exhibits.
The proposed land use designations are consistent with applicable policies of the Mello II
Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The policies which apply to the project are found
on pages 3-28 and 3-29 of the draft EIR. The project is proposed well below the 381 units
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPn 91 -l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 7 .
maximum that could be considered for the site based on the LCP Density Criteria for Slope
Areas. Slopes of 25 percent grade and over, possessing mixed chaparral, will be preserved
in their natural state except for the permitted encroachment allowed by the LCP. The
project proposes a 9.1 percent (1.7 acre) encroachment into slopes of 25 percent and above
containing mixed chaparral. The LCP allows up to a 10 percent encroachment. Exhibit
“E”, titled “Resource Preservation” graphically depicts the proposed encroachments. The
project was redesigned to comply with this policy. In addition the project design results in
the preservation of 11.0 acres of mixed chaparral in slopes of from 0 to 25 percent which
are not protected by policies in the LCP. Attached to the staff report is a letter from the
Coastal Commission staff confirming that the policy was correctly applied to the project.
Two desilitation/detention basins are proposed which will enable the project to comply
with the policies for drainage and erosion control. In summary, the proposed amendment
as well as the tentative tract map complies with all policies of the Mello II Segment of the
LCP.
ZONE CHANGE - ZC 91-6
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed Zone Change consistent with the Land Use Element of the General
Plan and the site’s proposed land use designation?
2. Would the uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change be compatible with the
surrounding land uses?
DISCUSSION
The proposed Zone Change will change the zoning from L-C (Limited Control) to R-l (One-
Family Residential) on 68.7 acres and O-S (Open Space) on 59.4 acres. The proposed
zones correspond with the proposed General Plan designations discussed previously. Under
the “General Guidelines” section of the Land Use Element, item 10 indicates that zoning
should be made consistent with the General Plan. The R-l and O-S Zones implement the
proposed General Plan designations and will achieve consistency between the General Plan
and zoning. The existing L-C Zone is an interim zone intended only to be in place until
planning for future land uses has been completed or development plans have been
formalized. The proposed zone change is therefore appropriate at this time.
The type of development allowed by the R-l Zone is compatible with the existing and
proposed adjacent residential and industrial land uses. Lots 97 through 100 in the
Carlsbad Research Center adjacent to the southern boundary of the site are restricted to
office uses by condition 13 of Planning Commission Resolution Number 2508. The
Carlsbad Research Center (CRC) Specific Plan contains a number of special standards which
apply to the area of CRC adjacent to the project site. They are found on Page 30 under
demonstrated in the following table:
1 PROPOSED I
19-26 feet
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPri 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 8
number 18 , Land Use and include a 30 foot setback from the exterior property line of the
industrial park. The design of this project and the adjacent Eagle Canyon project have
been coordinated especially in regard to circulation and open space.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - CT 91-3
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed Tentative Tract Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances?
DISCUSSION
The proposed Tentative Tract Map (Exhibit “HI’) will create 199 residential lots and 6 open
space lots. All standards of the R-l Zone and subdivision ordinance have been met as
1
LOT COVERAGE 40% max. 29% - 39% (based on 7,500 sq. ft. lot)
/ :~~~~~ SETBACK / ~~~~~q. ft. 20 feet minimum
7,500 sq. ft. and greater
II LOT WIDTH
60 feet
/I 90 feet
LOT DEPTH
60 feet and greater
90 feet and greater
PARKING Two-car garage Two & three car garages
All lots meet the minimum required side and rear yard setbacks which are a function of the
proposed lot widths. Side and rear lot lines are located along the top of manmade slopes
where practicable. The proposed street plan has been coordinated with plans for the
adjacent properties.
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-S/LCPrr 91 -l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - HDP 91-3
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed Tentative Tract Map comply with all requirements of the Hillside
Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)?
DISCUSSION
The project design is in conformance with the development and design standards of the .
Hillside Development Regulations and the Hillside Development Guidelines. Exhibit “B”
titled “Slope Analysis”, shows those areas of the site within each of the four slope
categories as required by the ordinance. Exhibit “C” titled “Hillside Development - Grading
Data” delineates the areas of the site to be cut or filled and the quantity in cubic yards for
each. In addition it indicates impacted slopes of 25 percent to 40 percent and 40 percent
and greater. The slopes of 40 percent and greater can be excluded from the requirements
of the Hillside Development Regulations pursuant to section 21.95.090 (1) and (3). These
areas were either previously disturbed by authorized grading or are areas of topographic
change less than fifteen feet in height and less than four thousand square feet in area,
which are not part of the surrounding generalized slope.
The “Hillside Development Site Sections” provided on Exhibit “D” show in cross sections
how the topography of the site will be altered by the proposed grading. The proposed
grading projected for the project consists of 759,910 cubic yards of cut and 694,300 cubic
yards of fill (Exhibit “C”). These quantities include offsite grading for Camino Hills Drive,
a portion of Faraday Avenue, a portion of Street A running through the Eagle Canyon
project site adjacent to El Camino Real as well as remedial grading. The total graded area
including the offsite improvements equals 81.1 acres. This results in a grading quantity
of 9,370 cubic yards per graded acre which is in the potentially acceptable range.
There is justification for the project to propose grading in the potentially acceptable range.
Findings can be made pursuant to section 21.95.070 (a)(l) and (3)(Modifications to the
development and design standards). The proposed cut which exceeds the fill volumes is
needed for excavation and recompaction of the alluvial area of the site which is
approximately three quarters of the entire property. It has been estimated that the
required remedial grading is equivalent to 75,990 cubic yards. This is based on an average
of 10 percent shrinkage per the soil engineer’s preliminary estimate and is based on 15
percent shrinkage anticipated for loosely compacted topsoil and alluvium recompaction
along with 5 percent bulking of cut materials. Without the necessary remedial grading the
grading volume is 8,560 cubic yards per acre which is within the acceptable range.
The second finding which can be made to allow a modification to the development and
design standards of the ordinance is that the proposed modification will result in
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCt, i 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
significantly more open space or undisturbed area than would a strict adherence to the
requirements of Section 21.90.060. Mathematically there are two ways to decrease the
total grading volume to strictly adhere to the Hillside Ordinance. Either decrease the
numerator (i.e. cut) or increase the denominator (i.e. graded acreage). These two scenarios
are discussed below.
1) Decreasing the Cut Volume (numerator)
Cut is reauired for fill in the lower area
The most significant area of cut is in the upper portion of the project. There are
two primary reasons for cut in the knoll area: 1) as mentioned earlier, fill is needed
for remedial grading of the alluvial area; and 2) the cut serves as a fill source to
provide for gentler transitions in the lower portion of the site.
The fill in the lower area is required because of the fmed elevations of existing El
Camino Real and Camino Hills Drive. A new access is required to be provided to
the Camino Hills Mobile Home Park from El Camino Real. In order to access the
existing mobile homes, a collector road must link those two existing roadways. The
elevation differential between the fixed points is approximately 60 feet. The fill in
the lower area is required to allow a transition between the set elevations of the
collector street and the natural terrain to the west. The fill tapers to a minimum
toward the edges of the developable area. Fill is necessary to provide a gradual
transition between the collector streets and the developable areas of the site without
exceeding the 30 foot slope height limitation.
Cut has been designed as sensitively as possible
As shown on cross section “b-b” of Exhibit “D”, the lower slopes of the project site
and adjacent steep slopes are much more visible from El Camino Real than is the
top of the knoll. In order to comply with the intent of the Hillside Ordinance to
preserve the natural appearance of hillsides, it was important to maintain grades as
close to the natural terrain as possible in the lower area. Therefore, the design
minimizes cut in the lower area, utilizing the less visible previously disturbed knoll
top as a cut source. Because the lower area is of much greater size than the knoll
area, greater cut depth is required at the knoll to provide minimal fill for the lower
area.
As visual compensation for the cut in the upper portion of the site, development in
that area has been designed to be screened from viewers along El Camino Real. As
shown on cross sections “a-a” and “b-b” of Exhibit “D”, the steep portion of the
hillside forms a berm in front of the homes at the top of the site. In many cases the
roof tops do not exceed the height of the berm as viewed from El Camino Real.
EIR 91-2/GPA91-3/LCt-.91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/k JP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY19J992
The steep, visible slopes running parallel to El Camino Real are being preserved. In addition, the design in the knoll area is sensitive to visual impacts by single
loading the loop street in key locations to minimize the visual impacts and impacts
to slopes.
From the above explanation, the cut volumes cannot be significantly reduced.
Therefore the numerator in the grading volumes equation remains relatively
unchangeable. The site has been designed with sensitivity to the location of the cut.
2) Increasing the Graded Acreage (denominator)
Since the cut volume cannot be significantly reduced, the only possibility to reduce
the grading volumes is to increase the graded acreage. Increasing the denominator
of the grading volume equation would mean increasing the graded acreage. In
order to achieve 7,999 cubic yards per acre or less, the graded area would have to
be increased to 95 acres. This would be an additional 13.90 acres of graded area.
As shown on Exhibit “F”, titled “Growth Management Data”, all ungraded areas
within Evans Point are to be set aside as Open Space. Increasing the graded area
would decrease the amount of Open Space provided. Therefore, the project as
proposed, results in 13.90 acres more Open Space than would a strict adherence to
the Hillside Ordinance.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT - SUP 91-2
Planning Issues
1. Is the project in conformance with the El Camino Real Corridor Development
Standards for Area 3?
2. Does the project comply with the Scenic Corridor Guidelines?
DISCUSSION
The project complies with the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards for Area
3 and the Scenic Corridor Guidelines. Proposed units comply with the building height
requirements based on their distance from the right of way. Required setbacks are being
complied with as the closest’ residential lot is approximately 47 feet from the El Camino
Real right of way to it’s rear property line. The residential unit on this lot will then be
setback an additional 15 feet from the top of slope (rear property line). The specified
theme tree and support landscape species required are also proposed.
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCk,i 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/&P 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Planning Issues
Is the project in conformance with the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24?
DISCUSSION
The subject property is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 24. The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted
performance standards are summarized below:
FACILITY IMPACTS
City Administrative Facilities I 737.5935 sqft. Yes
t Was tewa ter Treatment Capacity
Drainage I N/A
Circulation
Fire
1,990 ADT
Station 5
Open Space I 26.5 ac.
Schools I 100 students
Sewer Collection System I 199 EDU
Water Distribution System I 43,780 g.p.d.
COMPLIANCE ltVl7-H
STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The project contains conditions of approval requiring circulation system improvements. In
addition the requirements of the Zone 24 LFMP have been made a condition of approval
of the project.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
The project has been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission at approximately
6 of their meetings beginning shortly after the project was submitted and most recently on
September 9,199l. In addition to the information contained in EIR 91-2 the applicant had
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCkn 91 -l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-S/HDP 91-3/ aUP 91-2/ - EVANS POINT
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 13
prepared at the Historic Preservation Commission’s request the attached report titled,
“Preliminary Relocation & Rehabilitation Study, The Kelly Barn and Grain Bin, Evans Point
Project.” The report is dated August 6, 1991 and was prepared by Travis, Verdugo, Curry
& Associates Structural Consultants. This report was used by the commission in arriving
at their recommendation which included relocation and rehabilitation of the grain bin and
demolition of the Kelly Barn. The commissions recommendations have been included in
the project as conditions of approval.
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The project was presented to the Open Space Advisory Committee on January 23, 1992.
The committee had no objections to the proposed open space designations and trail
location.
SUMMARY
The project complies with all applicable goals, policies, and ordinances. Approval of the
Local Coastal Plan Amendment and issuance of a Coastal Development Permit are required
by the California Coastal Commission. Staff recommends approval of all the previously
mentioned actions.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
;:
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3348
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3349
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3350
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3351
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3352
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3353
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3354
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Letter from Paul Webb of the California Coastal Commission dated October 15,
1991
Preliminary Relocation & Rehabilitation Study, the Kelly Barn and Grain Bin, dated August 6, 1991, prepared by Travis, Verdugo, Curry & Associates.
EIR 91-2 (previously distributed)
Exhibits “A’‘-“AA”, dated February 19, 1992.
January 16, 1992
DN:km
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO.: EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-S/SUP 91-2
CASE NAME: Evans Point
APPLICANT: George Wimnev. Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Certificaiton of an EIR GPA, LCPA. Zone Change,
Tentative Man for 199 residential and 6 onen snace lots, Hillside Development Permit, and
a Snecial Use Permit.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A nortion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Arma Hedionda according to MaD I
no. 823 filed November 16. 1896. APN: 212-050-22. 29. 30 & 34
Acres 128.1 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 205 lots/199 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RL and RLM (RLM and OS Proposed)
Density Allowed O-3.2 Density Proposed 3.03
Existing Zone L-C Proposed Zone R-l and OS
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site L-C
North RMHP/L-C
Agriculture and undeveloned
Mobile home Park/Golf course
South C-M Undeveloned (Carlsbad Research Center)
East RMHP/P-M Mobile home Park/undeveloned
West P-C Single family residence/undeveloped
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 199
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Januarv 4, 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative Declaration, issued
x Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated December 1990
Other, DN:km
RW By: XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ; 1-2’0-32
2:06PM ;
OISCLOSME S?A’RMEhT r
r?@:.C*rR~ Str’ymfr CP OldCCCSLPE cc CErn44Y CWkgwlP !MEREET¶ CN ALA 4PC~~A7C49 vvr:Cw w!:L 2gq’+‘Rg 31SCtifliCWW ACttCN Sk T*lE PART OF -5 :Ifv COL’NC!L OR ANY APWMfO 8dAP!L CC%WSS;CN On C~~ki~~~
1 ,,?mAr Pm,0
The ?Cllawlq information mu$t be diScbW
1.
L.&t the mmes md addnssrs ef all parsons hav!ng a flnmciol interrrt in the apglicatiorr.
508 West Mi.ef.on Avenue. Suite 105 Eseondido, CA 92025 . c
2 QYUW
L&t the flrMs Qno addr@ur$ Of Ml pWSOtl5 b@ting Uty cwfl*fship kteW$t ifA th0 pfOg@f?y invOlv@d.
m. Avenue. S&&g 105
Escondidn. CA 92025'
3. H any pmmm identJbd puimnt ta (I) or (2) r&w te a cwp8rtiw1 oc pamwhip, lirt the norr.~ and
addtrrue of irll Individual@ owr;Mg met8 than 10% of thm abuse in tM ~~rporrtion or awning my ~wtnorship
htrrHt itl th8 prfbOnhip.
San QieuA 92163
\ 4 C
Jf 8ny prwm idontMod pwwm to (1) or (2) dmm k 8 nmgr~ilt orp$8tiarr or a kutt lirt rha nam5 and ~dmeee 01 my person eenmg u ofku er dltmctor ti ttw non-proo$ or~lratip or u trwtw or benrmary oftha trwt
Pm!13 c/o1 Paplal2 ’
2076 LUG mtmu orb0 l 428r18Wu, ~acifo~nrm glooe~a . IIa-n - - - --
RC’J BY:xERDx TELECUPIER 7010 : l-20-92 2:ISrFM ;
-0~rcl084fn stotmwlt
5.
(Ovcq
mgcr 2
Have you h&d n-10; than $250 worth of business VutXacted with &ny member oi City stdf, &atcs
Commissions, Cf3mmitfeet snd Council within the p8st twelve months?
H ye$, pkWS6 itWcdt0 p@fSOt7($)
m * @flnad a&. ‘Any ingividd. firm, OopuWmWip. JeiM wWO, WUllon, SO&J hb, h!#mrt 4tp~1~4Ue~ oorpoc@tW ntat#. 1%~
r&$wt, yndW8, tRr% &W Wy othc Cornry, cq md counv, ~4 mun#W~. dMnc4 01 OWW #btkJ klbQiv!Wn. W my o~W ;:otio or
PUS 13 4491
h (3?&bw. . .
Prlflt8f61p@nUn~d-
Ip4r2d2
I
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILlTIES IMPACI’S ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: Evans Point-EIR 91-Z/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 24 GENERAL PLAN: RL and RLM (Proposed RLM and OS)
ZONING: L-C (Proposed R-l and OS)
DEVELOPER’S NAME: George Wimnev. Inc. (Morrison Homes)
ADDRESS: 508 W. Mission Avenue. Suite 105, Escondido. CA 92025
PHONE NO.: 741-1884 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 212-050-22.29. 30 & 34
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 128.1 AC, 199 DU
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 737.5935
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 393.622
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 43.780
Park: Demand in Acreage = 1.475187
. Drainage: Demand in CFS = Ai.&
Identify Drainage Basin = N/A
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 1.990
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire S(ation No. = 5
Open Space: Acreage Provided - 26.5
Schools: (99.5) 100 students
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 199
Identify Sub Basin - 241V24C
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD - 43.780
The project is 11 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
PEE WILSON, Govcrncr
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA
3111 CAMINO DE1 RIO NORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 5214036
October 15, 1991
Mr. Don Neu City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Subject: Mello 11 LCP Grading Restrictions
Dear Don:
As we briefly discussed in our phone conversation earlier today, the information I gave you previously regarding grading restrictions in the Mello II Local Coastal Program (LCP) was not
entirely accurate. As you will recall, our conversation was centered on the exemptions from the grading policies outlined in the Mello II LCP.
The LCP, as amended in LCP Amendment 2-85, contains specific exemptions from grading restrictions on steep slopes for
circulation element roads and utility delivery systems. That is, slopes in excess of 25% grade may be graded for circulation element roads and utilities. In addition, the .LCP policy allows the construction of roads on steep slopes to access flatter,
more developable areas, where that is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
The LCP does not, however, explicitly state whether the permissive allowance for construction of access roads must be included in the allowed 10% exemption that may be applied to a project site. Although I indicated to you in our phone conversation that we would consider access roads to be part of the 10% encroachment allowed under the LCP policies, we do not require that such roads would be included as part of the 10% limit. This would be consistent not only with past actions in the Carlsbad area (e.g., Brocatto), but also with the Commission’s interpretations of similar policies contained in the City of San Diego LCP.
We would like to stress that the construction of roads on slopes in excess of 25% to provide access to flatter portions of sites should only be allowed where they are the least environmentally damaging alternative and where they are necessary to provide a
minimum reasonable use of a site. We do not feel that this
Mr. Don,Neu October 15, 1991
Page 2
exemption should be automatically granted, but should only be allowed after a thorough alternatives analysis. We do, hpwever ,
feet that the such exemptions are appropriately excluded from the 10% allowance stated in the LCP policies.
I am sorry for any confusion which may have resulted from our prior phone conversations. If you have any questions regarding
this or any other matter, please contact me at the Commission’s
San Diego Area Office.
Sincerely,
Paul B. Webb Coastal Planner
(3933L)
A
PRELIMINARY RELOCATION & REHABILITATION STUDY
THE KELLY BARN AND GRAIN BIN
EVANS POINT PROJECT
4867 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
George Wimpey, Inc.
Prepared by:
TFWVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOClATES
Structural Consultants
444 Camino del Rio South, Suite 110
San Diego, CA 92108
August 6, 1991
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1
GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................ 1
EXISTING CONDITION ...........................
CODES AND STRUCTURAL EVALUATION
Codes ...................................
Structural Evaluation .........................
.......... 2
.......... 2
RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *. , 3
SUMMARY AND COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . 4
APPENDIX
Cost Estimate
Plans
Photographs
PRELIMINARY RELOCATION & REHABILITATION STUDY
THE KELLY BARN AND GRAIN BIN
EVANS POINT PROJECT
4867 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA
INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared for George Wimpey, Inc., to evaluate the condition of the barn and
grain bin structures at the Evans Point Project and to investigate the feasibility of relocating and
rehabilitating the structures. The study involved the following tasks:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Visual examination of the building.
Review of the excerpts from the Draft Evans Point EIR (1991) and the Roth and
Associates study (1990) plus relevant building regulations.
Preliminary evaluation of the structural framing system.
Preparation of schematic plans of the buildings.
Conceptual development of relocation and structural rehabilitation schemes.
Development of an opinion of probable costs for relocation and rehabilitation of the
structures.
No existing drawings of the buildings were available for review in this study and no testing was
performed. The existing structural framing of the barn is observable from the interior and exterior.
The grain bin is protected by a fence with no gate but the framing is easily viewed from outside
the fence.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The barn was built in about 1905 and the grain bin probably at about the same time (Draft EIR).
Each has been repaired and reroofed at various times since then. The grain bin was placed on
a concrete foundation, probably in 1977 (Draft EIR).
The barn measures roughly 60 feet by 58 feet. It is constructed with 4x4 posts, double 2x beams
and purlins, 2x4 rafters, 1 x12 vertical siding and 2x4 wind girts. The wood framing appears to
be redwood or another decay resistant species. The posts are aligned and interconnected in
frames running east-west and spaced at about 8 feet on center. The posts are embedded in the
ground to provide lateral stability for the building. The interior of the barn is divided into three
areas by 8 foot high partitions aligned between the interior posts. The partitions create a central
space, 30 feet by 60 feet, and two side spaces, 14 feet by 50 feet. The space on the east side
is further partitioned into stalls. The roofing is cedar shingle or shake.
The grain bin is roughly 11 feet square. It is framed with 2x6 external studs, lx horizonal siding
placed inside the studs and 2x4 roof framing. Most of the roofing and some of the rafters are
missing. 2x6 boards are notched into the original studs around the base of the building. These
boards were apparently installed to facilitate the lifting of the grain bin when it was placed on new
foundations. They now bear on top of 4 short corner posts which project from a concrete slab
base to provide the new foundation for the building.
EXISTING CONDITION
The barn structure is in a seriously deteriorated condition. Its overall stability is precarious. Vertical and lateral support is provided primarily by the 4x4 posts. The posts are typically rotted
at the ground level and many are gnawed, burned or otherwise reduced in cross-section near
to the ground level. Some of the tall interior posts are significantly bowed at mid-height. Rafters
and purlins are generally in sounder condition but some are broken and many are significantly
bowed under the weight of the roof. The west edge of the roof has developed a swayback,
deflecting a foot or more at mid-length. This distortion is caused by a loss of support from the
rotting of the posts and siding at ground level and in turn has resulted in overloading and bowing
of the interior posts under the thrust of diagonal braces from the roof. Newer bracing has been
added at the top of the interior posts, perhaps to compensate for the distortions cause by the
gradual decay of the perimeter roof support, but this bracing is only marginally effective.
The siding, doors and interior partitions are also deteriorated. 10% to 20% of the wood siding
is broken, burned or missing. At most locations the bottom edge of the siding and interior
partitions has become embedded in the dirt and has rotted at the point of ground contact. The
track supporting the large doors on the south side has given way and the doors hang at skewed
angles.
The grain bin structure is much smaller and is more solidly built than the barn. It is more stable
than the barn but it also is heavily deteriorated. Much of the roof structure is missing. The
bottom of the studs and posts rotted off before the building was put on new foundations.
CODES AND STRUCTURAL EVALUATlON
Codes:
Generally, the structural repair of existing buildings must comply with the provisions of -le
Uniform Building Code (UK). Existing portions of the structure may be retained and need ,lot
comply to the UBC provided they do not present an unsafe condition. For designated historical
structures, structural repair would be governed by the State Historical Building Code (SHBC).
The barn and grain bin have not been designated historical, so the SHBC does not specifically
apply. The primary difference between the UBC and the SHBC from a structural standpoint is
that the UBC contains prescriptive design provisions with the goal of protecting life safety and
minimizing property damage whereas the SHBC provisions are performance oriented, allowing
for engineering judgement with the goal of providing life safety without necessarily protecting
property. The differences as applied to the barn and grain bin would be minimal.
Structural Evaluation:
The existing barn structure is in a state of precarious stability. The primary structural frame,
particularly the columns, is significantly weakened. The lateral stability is diminished due to the
deterioration of the columns and the second line of resistance, the siding. The light framing,
including the rafters, skip sheathing and wall girts, is in reasonably good condition. The rafters
generally are not capable of supporting current code loads but have withstood 85 years of
service life and do not appear to present an unsafe condition.
Page 2
To stabilize the building, it would be necessary to strengthen or replace the structural skeleton.
It should be possible to save most of the light framing members.
The grain bin structure is very small and is inherently relatively stable. It requires repair or
replacement of damaged or missing roof framing members and replacement of the roofing in
order to protect the interior from the weather.
RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION
In order to be preserved, the barn and grain bin will require rehabilitation either in place or at a
new location. Based on consideration of proposed widening of El Camino Real and drainage
problems reported at the site, it is assumed for the purposes of this report that the buildings will
be relocated.
The barn is too large and unstable to be moved in one piece. One plausible scheme for
relocating and rehabilitating it would be to build a new structural frame at the new location and
to dismantle the roof and walls in large sections, transport them, and re-erect them on the new
frame. It appears that the roof could be braced and moved in three sections: the peak section,
30 feet by 50 feet; and the two side pieces, 14 feet by 50 feet each. The side walls could be
moved whole, 8 feet by 50 feet, or in 8 foot square sections. The end walls could each be
moved in several pieces. The interior partitions could moved in 8 foot square panels.
An alternate scheme for relocating the barn would be to dismantle it into small pieces or board
by board and to move it and re-erect it on to a new frame. It could also be stored along the way
if desired. This alternative would be more costly and would probably result in greater damage
to the barn.
With either scheme, a new structural frame would be required. It does not appear practical or
safe to salvage the existing frame. The new structural frame would be designed to support
current code loads and would probably be comprised of 6x6 posts and 6x beams and purlins.
It would include only the essential structural elements and would not duplicate the miscellaneous
struts and braces that have been added to the existing frame. The existing roof sections and
wall panels would be attached to the new frame.
The exterior siding and interior partitions would require extensive repair and stabilization. How
much repair would be required would depend on the amount of damage caused by the move
and the end use and desired appearance of the building. Three levels of repair might be
considered:
1. At a minimum, the existing sections would be stabilized and attached to the new frame.
This level of repair might be appropriate if the building is only to be viewed from the
exterior as a stabiiized but abandoned building, open only for maintenance.
2. As an intermediate level, the original sections would be stabilized and the missing
sections replaced. The interior stalls might be rebuilt. This level of repair might be
appropriate if the building is to be open to guided tours.
Page 3
3. As the highest level of repair, the missing and rotted or otherwise damaged pieces would 1
be replaced. The roofing might also be replaced. This level of repair might be s
appropriate if the building is to be open for commercial use such as a museum or
giftshop.
The grain bin is small enough and stable enough to be moved in one piece. It would require a
new foundation and a new roof. It might require repair to the bottom edge of the studs and
corner posts and to other parts of the walls and floor, again depending on the desired end use
and appearance.
SUMMARY AND COST$
The barn and the grain bin each require substantial amount of repair if they are to be preserved.
Each could be moved and rehabilitated to various revels of use. The feasibility depends on the
economic constraints, the availability of a site, and the desired historical authenticity of the
finished product. Any repair is likely to include an essentially new structural frame. The original
exterior sheathing can be reused but up to 30% will have to be replaced with new materials
depending upon the intended use of the buildings.
Opinions of probable costs for relocating the two buildings were developed based on assumption
of the intermediate level of repair defined in the “Relocation and Rehabilitation” section and on
experience with related projects. The probable costs are itemized in the Appendix to this report.
We estimated that the probable cost for moving and rehabilitating the barn and grain bin may
be $120,000 to $150,000 and the cost for the grain bin alone may be $10,000 to $15,000. These
figures include only initial costs and do not account for annual maintenance costs that will be
necessary to preserve the buildings. The maintenance costs could average several thousand
dollars per year.
The costs developed appear reasonable when compared to other similar work but actual costs
may vary significantly, depending on the difficulties encountered in moving the structures and on
the level of repair and maintenance desired for the end use.
Page 4
2,
APPENDIX
KELLY BARN & GRAIN BIN
PRELIMINARY RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION STUDY
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
1. General Requirements
A. Super?, Insurance, Bonds, etc
B. Equipment Rental
C. Scaffolding (set 8 reset) . r..
2. Site Work
A. Prepare Pad
3. Erect New Buildings Frame
4. Dismantle & Transport Existing Barn
to new site
A. Roof
B. Side Wall Panels
C. End Wall Panels
D. interior Panels
E. Loft
F. Doors
5. Reconstruct Barn
A. Roof & Repair RFG
8. Side Walls
C. End Walls
0. Interior Panels
E. Loft
F. Doors
6. Repair Work
A. Replace Stalls
8. Replace 20% of Siding & Girts
C. Replace Door Hardware
0. Misc. Repairs
8. Grain Bin
A. Move Intact
B. Repair Roof
C. Repair Framing
Subtotal
Contingency 25%
Engineering & Permits 12%
TOTAL
Bam & Grain Bin
w
$8,000
$10,900
$4,200
$3,600
$17,600
$6,400
$1,600
$4,700
$900
$800
$8,260
$5,040
$5,040
$1,440
$2,460
$680
$2,100
$2,400
$2,ooo
woo0
$1,000
82.ooo
$1,000
$96,520
$24,130
$11,582
8132,232
Grain Bin
w
$500
$3,600
$400
$1,000
$2.000
$l,ooo
$8,500
$2,125
$1,020
$11,645
TRAMS, VERDUGO, Cu?RY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO. CA.
DATE +b,h 1 JOBNO. 9 ' s 1 9
BY be C/ 'q J c SUBJECT I<EtLy i?ARti SHEET OF
REllSlz exw.
RouP PRAM I t-J6
BUlL~lbm ~Ec-fI~ti @ARti
l/8” s i ‘-0”
TRAMS, VERDUGO, CclRRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, C
DATE a! 514 1
BY ABC / Rat SUBJECT HELL7 tawwl
JOB NO. Olwq
SHEET OF-
-
2
50’ /
0 q u 0 0
y-l *+.
1
b
[,&J-ii/ ’
0
I
0 a d y
i
cl{
I
91
SC I
ID 0 /
CT Nlhl f%Sr +f%
\-REPAIR Ems. 0 c 8’ tw4 F%HEtS
tw+q’I’
I I
I--+]
I I
14 30’ 14’ 1 -I 1 , ,
A
1. BARN VIEWED FROM SOUTH EAST
2. BARN FROM SOUTH WEST
SWAY BACK AT WEST EDGE OF ROOF
3. SOUTH WALL OF BARN, INTERIOR VIEW -
SKEWED DOORS, DAMAGED SIDING
4. NORTHEAST CORNER OF BARN - FIRE DAMAGE
5. NPtCAL DAMAGE TO BOlTOM OF SIDING
6. TYPICAL DAMAGE TO SIDING AND INTERIOR PARTITIONS
8. BARN INTERIOR -
7. BARN FRAME -
BOWING OF BRACING
AND POSTS
H ;;, * . ,: --
-av
GRAIN BI N - DAMAGED ROOF
10. BASE OF BRAIN BIN -
DAMAGE TO POSTS AND STUDS,
2X6’S ADDED AROUND BASE
y- 7 aB .!L J
1
. I I I. I
- . !?I i iii IJ
0 2 B. 0 }\i II;
+‘. ..$
t
: ‘- .., &-
I 1 , ; $ 5 I
‘(I II,;
I rl.,r
i iiijj ”
e
ii’ I
i Ii rl El
I
i 1
1
F
;L
v . .
;1
1
i
.
.; I
; i ; 2‘
;’
I
i:
I: . .
‘*
\
..:
i
d
MINUTES
February 19, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION
Commissioner Schramm would like the applican
constructing a 6' tunnel for animals beneath
when they are constructed. Mr. Chang replie
would be addressed hs part of the design of
has already been in contact with Teri Woods
open space and he will give the 6' tunnels
There being no other persons desir
Commission on this topic, Chairman
testimony closed and opened the it
the Commission members.
red the public
iscussion among
Commissioner Schramm feels
agrees with the park fee o
an is well done and she
Motion was duly made, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission tron No. 3246 recommending
approval of the N e Declaration issued by the Planning
Director and ado anning Commission Resolution No. 3247
recommending a 1 of Local Facilities Management Plan 16
with the fol g revisions: (1) amending the dates to
92; and (2) amending the last sentence on
tata "...construction of a fire station if any
owing thresholds is met...“.
ng nodded his acceptance of the revision to the zone
n regarding construction of a fire station.
7) EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/% 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP
91-3/SUP 91-2 - EVANS POINT - Request for the
certification of an Environmental Impact Report and the
approval of a General Plan Amendment from RL and RLM to
OS and RLM on 128.1 acres, a Local Coastal Plan
Amendment from PC to OS and RLM on 128.1 acres, a Zone
Change from L-C to R-l and OS on 128.1 acres, a
Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and
Special Use Permit for a 105 lot subdivision containing
199 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500
s.f. and 6 open space lots totaling 59.4 acres on a
128.1 acre site. The project site is generally located
on the south side of El Camino Real between the future
extension of Cannon Road and existing Camino Hills
Drive in the Coastal and Local Facilities Management
Zone 24.
Don Neu, Senior Planner , reviewed the background of the
request and stated that the applicant is requesting
discretionary approvals for a 128.1 acre property located on
the south side of El Camino Real between the future
extension of Cannon Road and existing Camino Hills Drive.
Adjacent land uses are Camino Hills mobilehome park to the
east, the Rancho Carlsbad mobilehome park to the north, the
Carlsbad Research Center Phase IV to the south, and single
family residences and the Kelly Ranch Master Plan to the
west. There are a number of discretionary approvals
involved with the application, the first of which is
certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). An
EIR was prepared on a previous project design. As a result
of that, a number of mitigation measures were developed by
the environmental consultant. In response to those
measures, the project has undergone a substantial amount of
revision and all mitigation measures have been incorporated
into the project through redesign or have been made
conditions of approval.
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Noble
Savary
Schlehuber
Schramm
MINUTES
February 19, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 14 COMMISSIONERS \;:
The second action requested is approval of a General Plan
Amendment. The General Plan has designated the site as low
density residential on 38.7 acres and low-medium density
residential on 69.4 acres. The proposed amendment would
change to open space 59.4 acres with the balance of the site
(68.7 acres] going to low-medium density residential. The
main purpose of this is to recognise the constraints on the
property as well as to develop an open space system that is
more viable for habitat use and also provides connections to
offsite areas.
An associated discretionary action with this GPA is a Local
Coastal Plan Amendment (LCPA). The proposed LCPA would
change the site designations to the same designations
proposed by the GPA. This will achieve consistency between
the Coastal Plan and the General Plan.
The next action would be for approval of a Zone Change. At
this time the entire site is designated limited control
which is a holding zone. The proposed zone change would
designate as R-l the 68.7 acres designated for low-medium
density residential by the proposed General Plan Amendment
and OS for the remaining site acreage.
The remaining actions are for approval of a Tentative Tract
Map (CT), a Hillside Development Permit (HDP), and a Special
Use Permit (SUP). The tentative map proposes 199
residential lots with a minimum 7500 s.f. and six open space
lots which total 59.4 acres. The HDP has been required due
to the topographic changes to the site. Staff believes that
all requirements of the Hillside Ordinance can be met.
Mr. Neu discussed two proposed modifications to the Hillside
Development and Design standards being requested which deal
with the proposed grading quantities that fall within the
potentially acceptable range. There are two findings in the
ordinance that can be made to allow this grading, which are
primarily a result of remedial grading for the alluvial
soils onsite in addition to the added open space which is
being provided through the project design, that causes the
graded area to be reduced. This, in turn, causes the graded
quantity per acre to increase.
The final permit, the SUP, is required by the El Camino Real
Corridor Development Standards. The project complies with
these standards in addition to the Scenic Corridor
Guidelines. The proposed project does propose single family
residences. The units are a contemporary Spaniah-
Mediterranean style. Four unit plans are proposed ranging
in size from 2,017 s.f. to 3,501 s.f. and each unit will
have an A, B, and C front elevation to provide a variation
in the street scene. The majority of the units will have a
a-car garage and approximately 20% of the overall units in
the project will be single story. The single story units
have been disbursed throughout the project and are located
in the most highly visible areas with regard to the hillside
concerns.
Staff has distributed a memorandum dated February 19, 1992
containing a number of corrections to the staff report and resolutions. He noted that three corrections need to be
made to the memorandum, as follows:
’ In item 1) on page 1, the condition number should
correctly read 79.
MINUTkS
February 19, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 15 COMMISSIONERS ‘r:
In item 6) on page 2, Condition C20, line 4, should read
"...determined by the City Council, in order to find...".
In item 11) on page 3, should read "...a notice shall be
recorded on lots 179 thru 199...".
Ir. Neu stated that the applicant has submitted a letter
iated February.14, 1992 addressing Condition #20 regarding
affordable housing. Staff has had numerous discussions with
:he applicant regarding the affordable housing issue and the
lpplicant will speak to this issue.
:n conclusion, Mr. Neu stated that the project complies with
111 applicable goals, policies, and ordinances; staff
:ecommends approval.
:ommissioner Schlehuber stated that this project was also
xesented to the Open Space Committee who approved it. Some
If the discussion there dealt with historical structures on
:he premises.
!ommiasioner Schlehuber would like to hear a comment from
:he City Attorney regarding the legal brief received from
Nw, Fletcher & Mack.
Caren Hirata, Deputy City Attorney, referred to Mr. Ball's
response to Higgs, Fletcher 6 Mack dated February 18, 1992.
Mr. Ball feels that the applicant had prior notice that this
was City policy. He feels we are on firm legal ground.
Since the applicant is requesting discretionary approvals,
an amendment to the General Plan, and rezoning, those
discretionary approvals can be conditioned by the addition
of this condition.
At the request of Chairman Erwin, Mr. Neu reviewed each item
in the staff memo of February 19, 1992 for the benefit of
the applicant.
Commissioner Hall requested staff to explain Condition X73
to Resolution No. 3352. Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer,
replied that in some open space areas there are brow ditches
which are not located in public easements. The brow ditches
need to maintained so this condition provides for their
maintenance.
Chairman Erwin inquired if there will be backyard walls
without gates placed so that backyards will not encroach
into the 100' buffer. Mr. Neu replied that the walls will
be at the top of slopes and will be a combination of wrought
iron and block.
Chairman Erwin opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Bill Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday
Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, representing George Wimpy, Inc., addressed the Commission and stated that the original
submittal of this project was in 1985 for a 300 du project
that got caught up in the Growth Management Ordinance of
1986. In the last seven years, the project has undergone
two EIR's, two application withdrawals and resubmittals,
three major redesigns to comply with growth management and
environmental concerns, and a reduction of 181 units.
Further, there was a change in ownership on the property.
MINUTES
February 19, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 16 COMMISSIONERS \;t
Mr. Hofman stated that the applicant has made every effort
to address all of the numerous project issues and concerns
which were raised. He stressed that 47% of the site will
remain in open space which will ultimately tie into the
Citywide trail system. The only issue which is causing a
problem at this point is Condition #20 relating to
affordable housing. The applicant's attorney has submitted
a letter on this issue and a response was received from the
City Attorney. Subsequently, several discussions have taken
place with the City Attorney and Planning staff.
The applicant can accept the Condition X20 as set forth on
page 2 of the staff memo dated February 19, 1992. All other
conditions in the memo, and subsequent Serbal amendments by
staff, are also acceptable.
Chairman Erwin inquired if the disclosure statement
adequately identifies all ownership. Mr. Hofman replied
that the disclosure is correct and there is no individual
owning more than 10% of the project.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman Erwin declared the public
testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among
the Commission members.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired about the status of the
affordable housing in-lieu fee program. Gary Wayne,
Assistant Planning Director, replied that staff is presently
in the process of drafting an inclusionary ordinance which
is almost ready to undergo review. After revisions have been made, a public hearing will be required in order to
establish a fee. He stated that there are projects which
could pull building permits prior to the fee being
finalised.
Chairman Erwin stated that there are inconsistencies between
the EIR and the resolutions regarding the number of homes.
The EIR shows 230 homes and the staff report indicates 199.
The grading numbers are also different. With the deletion
of Condition 151, the EIR shows in two places that there
will be an avigation easement given to the County. He
inquired if the discrepancies between the two documents
could cause a problem.
Don Neu, Senior Planner, replied that the project has less of an environmental impact than the EIR analyzed. The
number of units is less. The grading quantities have more
cut but less fill than the original proposal, although the
guantitiee per graded acre are relatively close. Staff
feels that the EIR pointed out the potential environmental
impacts and the redesign has addressed those items and
reduced the impacts.
Chairman Erwin inquired if the two documents would be
considered to be consistent with each other. Mr. Neu
replied to the affirmative. As regards the avigation
requirement, it was put into the EIR, at the request of staff, to comply with the noise policy. Since we no longer
require the avigation easement, it is appropriate to delete
that condition.
Chairman Erwin noted that the EIR stated that the width of
the trail system should be reduced and he inquired if a 4'
wide trail would be creating a significant impact. Mr. Neu replied that the original trails plan called for a standard
MINUTES
of up to 12'. At the time, the concern was that a 12' trail
going up the side of Evans Point could be a significant
impact, which is why the EIR stated that the trail should
not be that wide. The project has actually been designed with a 6' wide trail that staff feels is appropriate, given
the conditions of the site.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that a finding should be
included which states that the EIR is consistent. Mr. lieu
replied that Resolution No. 3348, item (B), states that the
minutes of the public hearing will be incorporated into the
EIR regarding certification. In that case, Commissioner
Schlehuber can accept the resolution as drafted.
Commissioner Hall takes exception to Condition X79 which
requires that the owner enter into an agreement to not
oppose the formation of a drainage assessment district
because it waives the rights of future homeowners.
Commissioner Savary inquired why the hold harmless agreement
for geologic failure is required. Bob Wojcik, Principal
Engineer, replied that it was required because ancient
landslides had been identified on the property.
February 19, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 17 COMMISSIONERS \;:
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Noble
Savary
Schlehuber
Schramm
Commissioner Savary inquired if the homeowner or buyer will
be made aware of this condition at the time of purchase.
Mr. Wojcik replied that the notice will be placed on the
map. Most of the time the title companies pick up those
types of notes from the map and include them in the title
report. The final map is a record document.
Commissioner Schlehuber stated that the map is absolute and
that is as clear as it can possibly be.
Chairman Erwin stated that he hopes a notation will also be
included in the subdivision report.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3348 recommending
certification of EIR 91-2 and adopt Planning Commission
Resolution Nos. 3349, 3350, 3351, 3352, 3353, and 3354
recommending approval of GPA 91-3, LCPA 91-1, ZC 91-6,
CT 91-3, HDP 91-3, and SUP 91-2 to the City Council based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein, including the staff memorandum dated February 19,
1992 with revisions to items 1, 6 and 11 as stated by staff.
ITEMS: GbfJssy
8) STATUS~PREVIOUSLY APPROVED P.C. GOALS AND WORK
PROGRAMS
Gary Wayne, Assistant
memorandum dated February
Planning Commission W
of the 1988 work prog
exception of the View
item of the 1989-90 w
yet to be started.
Mr. Wayne stated that
established for the i
the staff workload, he reguested that the tasks be
undertaken sequentially rather than concurrently.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2
EVANS POINT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, April 7, 1992, to consider a request for certification of an Environmental Impact Report; an application for a General Plan Amendment from RL and RLM to OS and RLM; a Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PC to OS and RLM; a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and OS; and a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Special Use Permit for a 205 lot subdivision containing 199 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 6 open space lots totaling 59.4 acres, on a 128.1 acre site on property generally located on the southwesterly side of El Camino Real between the future extension of Cannon Road and existing Camino Hills Drive, in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 24, and more particularly described as:
A portion of Lot "F" of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
San Diego County, on November 16, 1896.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Don Neu in the
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4446.
If you challenge the Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Local
Coastal Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development
Permit, and/or Special Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in
this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: George Wimpey, Inc. PUBLISH: March 26, 1992
I wouLLHoMC Par
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
‘C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public ’
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 CarIsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, ’
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 19,1992, to consider a request for the certification
of an Environmental Impact Report and the approval of a General Plan Amendment from RL and
RLM to OS and RLM on 128.1 acres, a Local Coastal Plan Amendment from PC to OS and RLM on
128.1 acres, a Zone Change from L-C to R-l and OS on 128.1 acres, a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside
Development Permit,, and Special Use Permit for a 205 lot subdivision containing 199 residential
lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and 6 open space lots totaling 59.4 acres on a
128.1 acre site on property generally located on the southwesterly side of El Camino Real between
the future extension of Cannon Road and existing Camino Hills Drive in the Coastal Zone and Local
Facilities Management Zone 24 and more particularly described as:
“r A portion of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County of San
Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof no. 823,
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
November 16, 1896.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing.
Copies of the staff report will be available on and after February 11, 1992. If you have any
questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4446.
If you challenge the Environmental Impact Report/General Plan Amendment/Local Coastal Plan
Amendment/Zone Change/Tentative Tract Map/Hillside Development Permit/Special Use Permit
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at
or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2/
CASE NAME: EVANS POINT
PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 6,1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
DN:ktn
I MOBILEHOME PARK
city of Carlsbad
‘EIR 91=2/GPA 9%3/ LCPA 91WZC 9%6/
CT 9%3/HDP 9%3/ SUP 91-2 EVANS POINT
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice EVANS POINT--
EIR 91-2/GPA 91-3/LCPA 91-l/ZC 91-6/CT 91-3/HDP 91-3/SUP 91-2
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
Assistant City Man-
314192
Date
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of loca1 news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
PUBLIC HEARING EIR Vl-!%PA Bl-WCPA 91-l/ zc vi-turn vi-3mw vi-3mP vi-2 EVANS POINT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carls- bad nhl hold a public hasring at D the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlabad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 8:oO P.M., on Tuesday, April 7.1992. to consider a request ; for certification of an Environmen- tal Impact Report, *n applleation for a General Plan Amendment thm RL and RLM to OS and RLM; a Local Coastal Plan Amendment ’ Tom PC to OS and RLM; a Zone Change Tom GC to R-l and OS; and ’ a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside De-
r velopment Permit, and Special Use Permit for a 205 lot subdivision con- ’ taining 198 residential lots with a ’ minimum lot area of 7,500 square t’9eet and 6 open space lots totaling * 59.4 m-es, on a 128.1 acre site of pmperty generally located on the southwesterly Bide of El Camino Real between the future extension ! of Cannon Road and existing Cami-
. . e and Local Facilities Management 3 Zone 24. and more partieul~rly de- scribed as: A portion of Lot “F’ of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego. State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the OfRce of the County Re- corder of San Diego County, on November 16, lS96. If you have any questions regard- inl this matter. olease call Don Neu in the Plan&Department at 42V- 1161. extension 444& If you challenge tbeEnvironmen- ta1 Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tenta- tive Ract Map, Hillside Develop mtdt Permit, and/or Special Use Permit in court, you may be limited to mislng only those issues raked by you or someone else at the pub- lic hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence deli- vered to the City of Carlsbad, Cityr Clerk3 ORlee et or prior to the pub- ” lie bearing. Applicant: George Wimpey, Ine CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
March 26 1992
19-
19-
10
19-
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on th
day of l&h
26th 1992
. . :
t t .
L 1'1
J /v7c )&-yjj
Clerk of the Printer
.
CJ 6727~ March 28,1W2
I
CnNW ODE
a, WrD
1 w-
-05 m 3
o-ma 5-
a 77
05
05 3 5 3 2. A. -
WSY NO 0 +
OW-3 wm s
5m -rt
0
n
l www * *ml-D7 * *-onm * . ..s. x
5 P5
3 b-3
WO-
W 5
-* 3 -I
CD 5 ww 0 *Ll
7 in-7
-mlD m
o- m 2’ 0, -2.
a 5
0
n5 x
53
--L* w
103 0
NO o-
0 t-0
OW7
wm rc 5Ln -0
3
E+ ID5 * z m7 l
l e-m *
z+ ma *
* a * * frr * o-o * * Y-5 *
l . . . . *
* *
* *
l *
* *
* *
r+w
w a
w 0
CL 3
0
N
rlulw
5 Nd.
7 on
--‘OS-
07 w
o-m-5
5 -n
o-ow
5 0
TOO-
- CD
v) w-7
o-o r?
5X
a -0
w
o-477 5 G-Inn,
w -
N Y
0
+
w
CI-WZ
5 0
7 oo-
- 0
cr, w-5
o-o s
5X!&
a m
w-e
OF3
0 N5
CD w-5
5 bl<
3 a.
m KS
2. m
n-s I
rv5Qo
t-
005-Z
570
8 2.
WN a,
r-4
0 D
Ln
Q\ v) A.
-0 u
(D A
Oh-c
5 CT\-‘*
7 o-l-5
-07Ca
v) -I*
o-m3 5 -2.
a 5
0
05x
53
4. w
wso
NOO-
0 m
OW-5 wmrc
5cn -0 3
oull-
5 Nnr
7 03
--lOCL
m I?0
wmo
5 -CD
a c
om
05 --I
530
d.-O
-033
NO m 0 3
owe
wm
wo
¶z
CD
07
l-t
CD
z
a
c7c-l o.bm 5 w- Y w 3 w 0 + F w ;:
05
53x
2. CD
ws -
NO -
0 (D
OWY
wn,
a, --I 4 5’ o-
5
rt
5
OPIC
0 h)DJ CD w-s
5 Ii< 3 2.
CnWl 5 wo 3 WP N5 CI 7
0 -on Ln a* msm 0!20 artu
5fua la5
omw
5 N-1.
7 00
0-lw-n
5 w5
3 u-l3
N -1.
wo-
2. Y
(DI w 4.0
-03
u) 5
o-m7
5 -a
a
or) 09 a,
05
fll37i
a* m
ws -
NO -1
0 Y
OW
wm
5 A
S A.
WN 5
10
0 0
VI
a v) -I.
-0
-0
ID
ws 5
w-a
w-h
w -0
00*
73
03
0
ex
Nrn
o- --1
Y
IIWW
5 00
own
0 ;;I’ w -
3 fr
ntdn
5 NT
7 m5
-Wo7
0-l -
o-x(D
5om
a7
WC/Y 05 PO
5,3x 5
ww7
MO-Y
0
0 x w n
0 0 7
3 a*
0
zr
ON&
5 NO
ONL
5 NO
3 WI-
-033
m
o-x-0
5opo
111 zc ws
ONT 5 NC-D
7 ti-i
--‘NO
v) Y
O-3.
500
CL7 Qo ww
n5 0
5 3 m 5
ww-5
NO-Y
0
0 2K w
0 NCn 5 h)x 7 WA.
-0\3
cn 3
o-3tc-D
507
n7
we
05ul
53w
ON-0
5N
7 wo
-05
10 <
o- 3 4.
5on
3-7 lia
Lox
05 5
537
Y
ww
war
0
0 w
w rD
m
(1
rww-o l
*mm)7 l
.-onm l l ..s-o *
* m5 * * 4n-s *
l rtm E
l (DO-r
* a l
* *.
l o-o l
* YT *
z . . . . *
* *
* *
* *
* *
> *
-I wm
-Cnn,
0 -0
o-Ic:J 50 Q-LOO 5 -)* a; I WDPO
05 zc
535
w
wwm
X-f-l
lrcpc
CDS-W 2. CD
WDO-
T< t-0
*CD 0 ‘9 n
=uz5
057 5 3 -I*
m
WW-
ran
0 z
0
w 1
;:
II
5
7i
rD
7
0
ww
NO--
0
0 w
W
+
;:
-u
m
5
77
m
wnn
0 5
0 3 w a*
nul
5 -I
5
w 7
+ 5
-4 3
b u3 ul 0
-0
m
a
rD
;: 0 3
nIL)-u
5 NfD 7 we
--CD
07 7
o-3:
5OL.J
a7 PO
wm
05 0
533 L.
ww5 NQ 0 n
0 5
w 3
TI
c
3
o-
ID
0
x
OIvaz
5 N5
7 w-
-W* ul CD
mb.371
5 NO 7 w-
--‘WP
nrom
5 w,a
t W6
ONZ
5 Nrn
-7 wn
-03
0-J z
O-X0
507
n-5 -h
-Lo-
5lD ns CD
5 rt
W
wn
N 0
0
w
OWL
5 NO
7 WI-
--‘MS
u)
wzzrn
5Opo
n-i w
wm
n5 rt
53rc
Y
u3W
t-sac-r
0
0 D
w 3
a
ID
-3
m
num
5 UT-3
7 VT0
no38 -1. -0
-hm
-I w- -+- m
o- x f’
503
--‘a5 v)
rx:;:
50
n-5 L
‘LO 5
o-3Lw
5om
n-x 7
w
05 w
5310
w
WWW
Nn
0 1
0
w 2
v1
*
w2c-i
50
n-5 n
wnao n5 w 5 3 2.
*
WW5
NCL 0 2x
0
w I
5
3
+
-hs 0
35
LnDpo 051 5,3m
03 3 5 4.2.
rcs w-0
h)
OD
OC
d(D
=uz
D
05 J 5 3 2. 7
ww-
h)nm
-5
w w 2.
run3
0 w
0
w D
2
m A
5
3
n
ID
1
0 Y 0 w t
3
0
w 2.
2 0 3
T)NO
5 N--I*
7 033
-0u m fD
O-r- 5 A.
o-3 n
nw
nv) 3
5 5 a*
w’,’
wu
07 + 0 7
Tb< 0 0 a*
C)NW
5 NO
‘1 ws
-*5 lo -
urn
50
n-Tw woo
CT5 x
5s5 I+
WWS-
NCLCD
0 ‘5
0 2.
w 3
CD
l-
D
2
m
Y
IWW
5 00
0 wn
a. 0
CD VI-
L2
5 2. xn
Irc5x
CD 370
CD
Irl’ D o-
ONV)
5 NT
7 WDV)
-a5
07 3
O-3
5 ol-
n7 ru
ws
n5w 5 sm A
ww-
wno
0
0
w
or-477
5 NO TWO--
-W=
.m 5
UIKW
5O(D
a7 -i w
OhlL
5 r-J--‘*
I-w3:
0 +a*
u) -43
FW
7 W-J
A*-
u)
D x t’
503
a7
103: c)5 Qo
533 5
WW7
t-dna
0 5
0
w ;;:
cn 2.
3 0 A
5 -1.
3
u) wf+ b-l
DSE5 3 7i D --1.
3m-
W-SQQ
t-v50
-3 0
u2 co-‘.
mm
-< 0
CDDO 05 w
53u3
w
WWW
h)n
0 --I
0
w 2
03
rc
Los-5
e-0
nm 5
5r 3< m
rtmo
v1 0
-5 nul
-0 woo 0 - 2.
5 -i
5 w + zl
4 3
a rD.
ul 0
0
N
1
ClNac
5N5
3v3-
-ti*
v) m
uw7
5%
0s 0
Y
ONW
5 Nru
7 033 - -4i.
(J) 5
o-r3 n, 2, a.
ns 3
n
nm m
55QQ
Y-o
f-INS0
ib N5
7w-
-w-O ul 3
0-r
5 4. w
a3 m
QD
nm 3
553
Y5
‘W
NWZC 07
0 w
w 5
3
a
CD 7
CD
rt
I a.
n
I 3
ONW 5 NS 7w*
nh)sz
5 N4.
7 w-
-w-
U-J
o- r it’
5 2.3
a3
ns
nv)po
550
ONc.0
5 N5
7 w-
-h-C
u) 5
OIWL
5 N5
7 033
-03(0
v) m
0-r
5 2.L
tlNC
5 r-J).
-5 wa
- NC3
m 0
o-rQ=J 5 2-m
CLsa n. a*
nmrt
5 52- Y
w -
NW
031
0 f w Lr)
-Ull-+
m CD
o-l-7
5 A*
a3 w
o-l-*
5 2.0
a3 7 nm
no-l
55w Y -4.
w N
NON
0-r 0
0
w w
3
2
nW
nv) w 55cL nm c-l
5-Y-T
!a
wi-x
IQ3 5
0 rt
0 3
w -
c-0
CD
3
Lr)
3 a.
rt
3
0
E
3
D
?
n
D
.A
n
5
3 i.
3
3
5 5w
Y 2.
w -
h,w5
07 3
0 r+
w fD
Y
w -I
MW-5
o-s s
0 # w e-
YO
w 7 w 7
N w -I*
07 07
0 n
W 4.
LI)
D
3 CD
CD
;;:
7
NW0
07 r+
0
w -c
5
3
-I
5
in
m
m
!?o L
0
W d.
N
N
0
ONOJ
5 N7
ONCO
5uNS
-TWO?
-W5
v) 3
o-l-
5 -1. w
n3 2.
PC)
n&-J 3
55
Y
W
NW
07
0
‘W
mi-m
Loma
0-s
om5
3N7
a a
4.s In
a --1+
ow 1
” s-7
-s
05 v)
53 rt
n
W
N-c
05
N-
Ul-
CD
Y
W
n
T)NL
5 NO
7 WJ
-03
v)
VWL
5,7Qe
ny 3
ONW
5 NO
7 wo-
-*CD
m
ml-;:
5 a*
O-3 w
npo
nv)Ll
55rD
Y5
T)NL
5 NO
7 WJ
--‘AS
w
o-r=
5 a. Qo
0-3 D
nc
0 v1 2.
55m
Y w -0
NW
O-5 4
0
W ;:
x
ii
3
N
ONX
5 N(D
7 ws
--103
v) t-D
o-re
5 4.3
CL3
nx
no)
DP3Z
7McD -
0 CL5
5 a
am a. 5 n
5x5
3
c-l r -I.
5s-
--l*Y
W(n
F ---I
ow-s
ems
diy 0-l
r+
W
nr
F
A
t-L
7 wo
--LOJP In 3
o-l-
5 --I* 1
a3 7
as
nw 07
55rt
Y
w +
NWM
07 I
0 0
w b
55
OS -s
5 rtY
WWL
N-s
550 YS w 3
NWS
0 7 -1’
0 w
w 5
3
w 3
NW o-3 m
0
w 71 7 A.
0
3
I-+
(D
0 n
0 5
w - --I
2.
v)
c-t
0
I
W
0
w * mu, nt-dn
5N5
-SW3
--‘*CD
m 1
O-l-0
5 -1.3
CL3
CL-n
nv) 5
r)NW
5wo
-%+a- --‘a a.
L.0 3
0-w
57L
nw 5
5s
03 II)
5r+m 3
woo
N7
0
ouls
5 wo
1 OE
-45
ONCD
5 N-5
7 035
-ws 0-J 3
nh)l-
5 h)Y
7 ws
-U-l3
l/-l
o-r!--
5 A.I)o
CL3 CA
as
owm
5 NS
7 ww
-wnr
u-l 3
o-l-m
5 -1.
n3 w CL-
ON-I
5 NS
7 W-T
--‘MS in m o-i-7
5 -I.
ns n
n5
00-J 3 5 5 -I*
Y- w Y
NW
0-T -i
0
W 2
II-J
I-+
C)NO
5 N5 7 w-s 3rn
03,
ww
JO ens
.w 0
(3-l 0
D3I
w-0
. . r
m
--I
m
-a\- cn n33: 57 no n
2QQ
w
0-f-W
5 2*Qo 0-r
5 --“I
O-3 7
0-S
nul m
556.
Y
w 0
bJ0-d
o-3 I
0 w
w 0
ns L
nm
nv) 5 03 w
5 A* 0
nm r
5 5%
YS
w 3
NW
07 m
0
w 3. 0
0 5 7 r+
3
rD
Y
553
Y A*
w -
NOW
07
0 +
W
2
m
rl-
0
a\
L5
YW
W
w-0 07 s 0 -
w -0
553 Y
W D
NW
07 E 0 2.
w -
a
Tci
3
33
ww 3
w 5
ow oat W n 5 2.
z
5
3
0
W
ti
0
A
W
0
W
I
0
w
N
4
nr--Js
5 w 2.
TA-
-ul-
m cn
u-1
55 s
CL7 0
n3
n-‘* m
53 0
WE
w 3
Nv7c-D
0*-X
0 Lo
W3t
FD
OUI W
0
5
3 -L.
3
0
ON=C
5N5
7-47
-ID<
In
o-i- 2
5 -)*
ns v)
nw
om m
55m
Yr+
W
NWS
07
0 z
w
w
nrww l
03mmv,
wvjr)nm
-cl0032 W www
-DWWt,
G1-owcrls
sz 1.. wwn mm0 -I lD3:
wiucw-0 EWWO. r
NZ m
i- I m --I
WI-w m
w 0 *-
WF
o-8 w b I W
Ob
ow
--. . .-a.-
occupant ‘- RANCH0 CARLS~~ 3469 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant WUJCHO CARLSBAD 5320 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3485 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5454 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5446 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5430 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3485 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5446 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5438 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5422 Don Luis Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant. RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3485 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5418 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5434 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5452 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5459 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
OccuDant RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 5443 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5427 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5411 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA, 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5426 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5442 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5460 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5451 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5435 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupatlt RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5419 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5405 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CkF!LSBAD 3442 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3450 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3458 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3473 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3461 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3449 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3439 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3479 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CAFKSBAD 3467 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3455 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3443 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5410 Don Felipe Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occuPant RANCH~CULSBAD 3445 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCHOCARLSBAD 3437 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3429 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3410 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3418 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3426 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3434 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3441 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant IUNCHOCARUBAD 3433 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3425 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3414 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3422 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3430 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFILSBAD 3438 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDZillt RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 3430 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCHO. CARLSBAD 3446 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3462 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3476 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3490 Don Albert0 Drive ‘Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3461 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3453 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3438 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3468 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3484 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3496 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3457 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3449 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
~.
occupant RANCH0 C%RLSBAD 3539 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3491 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3479 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3463 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3449 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3437 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3420 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3497 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3485 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3471 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3455 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3443 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3431 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3424 Don Albert0 Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3514 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3530 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFLLSBAD 3546 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3562 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3571 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3555 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3506 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3522 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3538 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3554 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3570 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3563 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3547 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3468 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3474 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3502 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 35 15 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3531 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3545 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3561 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3472 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3478 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3505 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3523 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3539 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3553 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3569 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3457 Don Ortega Drive 3451 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3445 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3441 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3435 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant . RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
‘occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3462 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3443 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3439 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3433 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3450 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3458 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3464 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3460 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3466 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3470 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3478 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3479 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3473 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3476 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3462 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3468 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3474 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3534 Don Carlos Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3475 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3471 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3463 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3437 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3431 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3432 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3438 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3442 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3433 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3429 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD , 3434 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3440 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3444 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3450 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3456 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
.
._
occupant RANCH0 C%RLSBAD 3475 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3469 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3465 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3459 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3453 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3447 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3443 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDZiIlt RANCH0 ChLSBAD 3471 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3467 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3461 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3457 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3449 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3445 Don Lmenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3439 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDNlt RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 3462 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3466 Don Imenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3470 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3476 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3480 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3488 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3481 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3434 Don Lmenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3468 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3472 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant ’ RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3478 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3484 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3485 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3479 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3430 Don Lorenzo. Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3436 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3442 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3450 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Imenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3458 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3432 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3438 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3444 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3448 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3499 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3456 Don Imenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3460 Don Lorenzo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3480 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3473 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH~ C~BAD 3461 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3449 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3437 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3488 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3479 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3467 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3455 Don Arturo Drive Tarlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3443 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3431 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3481 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3465 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3447 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3435 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3440 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3452 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3464 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3473 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3457 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3441 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3432 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3458 Don Arturo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3472 Don Arturd Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 3449 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3433 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3415 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3438 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3444 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3460 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3476 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDi%lt RANCH0 t%RLSBAD 3441 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3423 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-BAD 3420 Don Juan Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3434 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3452 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3468 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3489 Don Porfirio Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3414 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD - 3426 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3438 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3450 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 3462 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3474 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3467 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3420 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3432 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3444 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3456 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3468 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAIUSBAD 3475 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3457 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3421 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3407 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5310 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5326 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 5342 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 5358 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3402 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3413 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5302 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5318 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5334 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5350 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5366 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3408 Don Jose Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3419 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 4505 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3414 Don’ Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARTSBAD 3430 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3446 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3453 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3437 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3411 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3406 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3422 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3438 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3454 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3445 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3429 Don Cota Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 115 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 129 Don Mata Drive. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 143 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 157 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5171 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5183 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3435 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5121 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5135 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARL!SBAD 5151 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5163 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5177 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3443 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3427 Don Alvarez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 139 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5123 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 5 172 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5158 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 144 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5128 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 101 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5131 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5178 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5166 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5150 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 132 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5117 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5107 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
ommnt RANCH0 CkRLSBAD 5168 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5176 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5184 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5188 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 192 Don Rodolfo Drive 5 194 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 198 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 155 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 172 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5180 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5186 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 190 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 5 163 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5 147 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 C-AD 5 110 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 120 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 128 Ih Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 136 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 144 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occu t RANCH0 ARLSBAD F 5152 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5160 Don Rodolb Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 116 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5 124 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 132 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 140 Don Rodol fo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5148 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5156 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5164 Don Rodolfo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-AD 5146 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 151 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CAF&SBAD 5139 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5127 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant
RANCH0 C-AD 5115 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occu t RANCH0 &BAD 5105 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-AD 5102 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5157 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5145 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 5133 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5121 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5109 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-AD 5101 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5106 Don Mata Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
OccuPant RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 5188 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5119 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5135 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5147 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5108 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5120 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5134 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-ARISBAD 5101 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5 125 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5141 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5155 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5114 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5126 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 140 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occuoant RANCH0 ChRISBAD 5255 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5241 Don Rim-do Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5227 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5211 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5165 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5152 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5136 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5253 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5239 Don Rim-do Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5215 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5201 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5 163 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5144 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5128 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5209 Don Valdez Drive 5201 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5202 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5218 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5232 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5246 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5268 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5279 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5208 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5228 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5240 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARESBAD 5258 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5272 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5267 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5236 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5226 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5210 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5271 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5257 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5233 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5223 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5216 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5202 Don Miguel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5265 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CAFUSBAD 5245 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5229 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5217 Don Valdez Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
kCUDi3Dt RANCH0 ChFUSBAD 5256 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5244 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5362 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5373 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5357 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5341 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5327 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5313 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5270 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5370 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5365 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5349 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5335 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5321 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5301 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5266 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5327 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
l
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5343 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5359 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5302 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5318 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5330 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant .XANCHO CARISBAD 5346 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 C-ARLSBAD 5335 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5351 Don Rim-do Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5367 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5310 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5324 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5338 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5354 Don Miquel Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5364 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5348 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5336 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5320 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5308 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5301 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5315 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5356 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5342 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5328 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 53 14 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5302 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
’ Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5307 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 5321 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3333 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3343 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3355 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3 3379 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3340 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5376 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDliIlt RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 3339 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3349 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3361 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3373 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3385 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5382 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 5370 Don Rim-do Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3372 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3358 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3342 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3328 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 33 12 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3301 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 33 19 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3366 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3350 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3336 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3318 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3302 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARL!SBAD 3317 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3327 Don Pablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3340 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3324 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3302 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3311 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3329 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3345 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3384 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
&CUDiUlt RANCH0 ChRLSBAD 3332 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3314 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3301 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3321 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3337 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3390 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3378 Don Diablo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
oCCUDZ3Ilt RANCH0 ChRISBAD 3349 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3338 Don Quixote Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3322 Don Quixote Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3302 Don Quixote Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3315 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3331 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3347 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3346 Don Quixote Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3330 Don Quixote Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 33 14 Don Quixote Drive- Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3301 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARUBAD 3323 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARISBAD 3339 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant RANCH0 CARLSBAD 3348 Don Tomaso Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008