The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-05-19; City Council; 11694; BEACH LIFEGUARD REQUESTv a, alC u.. v) al- bo aa, Pcd u om s wa s wu 0 c uu lu t;; '$ a h k cdP -rl mu cd .rl rl ala h -4 rl u xa ala, GF-I cd p: u &Ll Mal PE as ala uo u cdu uk acd al $2 cd 3u ou kcd u k ale E:: ala sal ual va a13 Lld -4 v a GO cdu e .: uw Low ala @Lo 3u c alurl v .rl a- ka- alm uacd ku a Ti aJ alwa -rl Ga k alco a cdw d--lmO aalu GO3 u ax .rl Lo a, 2 2 3 N cn \ o\ i--I \ Y, 5 a =! g 6 8 3 CBY OF CARLSBAD - AGqCPA BILL I-. i, AB # Jfjba TITLE: DEPT. MTG. 5-19- 9s BEACH LIFEGUARD REQUEST CITY A DEPT. @!, CITY N RECOMMENDED ACTIONI: To consider a recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Commission tc immediately establish a seasonal jet ski and vehicular beach patrol, and that fund: permitting, future plans be made to provide a lifeguard program on the beach are: from Oak Street north to the mouth of the Buena Vista Lagoon. ITEM EXPLANATION:: Since 1983 the topic of providing lifeguard service to the section of beach in Carlsbac from Oak Street north to the Buena Vista Lagoon has been an issue addressed E length by City staff. The subject beach area (Exhibit 1) is approximately one (1) mil in length. East of the mean high tide mark, the land is owned by private propert owners, west of the mean high tide is owned and under the jurisdiction of the Stat Lands Commission. The City owns and assumes maintenance responsibilities for fiv (5) coastal accessways which provide for public access. To resolve what is perceive to be a regional issue, City representatives have requested assistance from Stat officials and State agencies including the State Parks and Recreation Commissior State Lands Commission, and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. 1 date, requests to fund additional lifeguard service and/or efforts to convince the Sta to relocate existing guard towers to this section of beach which has become mol popular than other currently guarded sections, due to a shift in sand deposits, ha\ not been productive. In 1989 a Carlsbad resident Mr. Pete Biltchik, approached City staff with a request 1 establish lifeguard service on the aforementioned section of beach in Carlsbad. Aft1 further analysis, staff reported (Exhibit 2) on the issue and concluded that lifegua service has not been initiated along this section of beach for a number of reasor including: The City owns no public beach along its coastline The City is not in the beach lifeguard business Various State agencies have taken the position that a guz service is not their responsibility. Creating a safety expectation for the beach environment. 0 0 0 0 Funding limitations and priorities. In correspondence to Mr. Biltchik, City staff suggested that this request should brought before the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mr. Biltchik did request issue be addressed during the November 1991 Commission meeting. The ager item presented to the Commission outlined the history of this issue and attachec * PAGE 2, AB #a*4y 0 relevant correspondence and reports regarding the establishment of lifeguard service In addition, the agenda item was accompanied by a staff recommendation to den) the request for the City to establish a lifeguard service for the same reasons a: mentioned in previous reports. After considerable discussion, the Parks anc Recreation Commission directed the item back to staff for further analysis and tr return with the following information: 0 0 0 e A cost for Uhe City to provide lifeguard service Alternatives in lieu of lifeguard services Funding sources for this request A survey of what other coastal cities in San Diego County providl with respect to beach lifeguarding Staff returned to the Commission in March 1992 with a report outlining the requeste information (Exhibit 3). In essence, staff's report identified two (2) underlying reasor for the request to establish lifeguard service, they are: 1. Enforcement of ordinances relating to beach use (i.e. alcohc dogs, surfing) Swimming and other recreational water use safety issues 2. The attached report to the Parks and Recreation Commission (Exhibit 3) offers a mo detailed breakdown of the requested information. However, alternative lifeguai programs which provide varying levels of service indicate an initial year start up co ranging from approx. $220,49;7 to $52,560 (includes admin. costs). Secondary ye operation costs range from approx. $1 30,497 to $28,800 (includes admin. costs). Tt report also offers information relating to funding opportunities and provides suw information of lifeguard programs within other coastal San Diego County cities. Parks and Recreation Commission Action: After the staff presentation with recommendation to deny the request, considerable discussion and public inl: ensued. The Commission, by a 5-2 vote, recommended "that plans be mal immediately to fund a jet skii patrol [in conjunction with a vehicular patrol] wi the idea that in the future, funds permitting, the City expand to lifeguarding ( the beac&.In The initial year start up cost of this particular program including adm cost is approx. $67,000, subsequent year(s) operation cost is approx. $40,0( Although the Commission reviewed several funding sources and were apprised oft status, availability, opportunities, and constraints associated with each, 1 Commission made no recommendation on funding. Rather, the Commiss requested a funding source be identified at the discretion of the City Council. Alternatives for Council Consideration: In light of the Parks and Recreat Commission's recommendation, and if Council considers this a direction they wisp pursue, a number of alternatives remain as options. * PAGE 3, AB # i!& Y e 1. Leaislative Assistance - In a letter dated November 29, 1983 (Exhibit 2), Claire T. Dedrick, Executive Oflicer with the State Lands Commission, stated that al of the public trust lands at this location (from the mean high tide west) are subject to recreational use by the public. However, no lifeguard services arc provided to this area (or any of California’s 1,l 00 miles of coastline) by thc State Lands Commission because the agency is not staffed or funded tc provide it. Todays urbanized setting has generated a greater draw to thi: regional resource and that in turn has created greater impacts from increase( regional use of the area. To address this issue from a regional perspective tht Council may wish to forrnally request legislative assistance to incorporate thi: area within the State Parks and Recreation system and thereby extend thr Department’s ability to enforce their rules and regulations to the adjoininl tidelands of the subject property. Maintain Status Quo - Currently the subject beach area receives a number c citizen complaints during the seasonal months. Most often, those complaint are related to ordinance violations and are typically responded to by th Carlsbad Police Department. Occasionally the department does provide ver limited use of a foot patirol and would apply only during peak use periods o weekends and holidays. Only issues related to ordinance violations at addressed. Currently the State lifeguards will respond to emergency lii threatening situations. However, response is based on a priority situation, wil the State Park property receiving first priority for emergency rescues. Consider Citv Funding ior a Lifeauard Service Proaram A. Contract Proposal 2. 3. Upon request, the State Department of Parks and Recreation hi submitted cost estimates to provide lifeguard service through contra ($220,497 1 st year - $1 30,497 2nd year). However, they have indicate that it would be too late to establish this service for the 1992-93 seaso If the State would be willing to commit to provide the service for the ’9 94 season, staff would submit a funding request during the Budg Review process. Lifeguard Service By City Forces Although the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended tb plans be made iimmediately to fund a jet ski patrol [in conjunction w a vehicular patrol], the ultimate goal was to establish a lifeguard servi similar to the proposal outlined by the State. Realizing the currc economic situation and the ability to fund such a program, t Commission opted to provide a less costly guard service now, and expand in future years when the economic situation improves. Wl staff believes the jet ski program used in conjunction with a vehicL patrol would be effective and provide immediate relief of beach relal ordinance violations and water safety issues, it obviously would t provide the level of service as outlined in the States proposal. B. * PAGE 4, AB # rr@-f Y 0 e If Council wishes to pursue a lifeguard program utilizing City resources, a service level expectation should first be defined and the possible consequences of that service level in terms of liability exposure should be considered. Upon review by the City Attorney’s office, there is currently no legal liability exposure to the City for accidents occuring at this stretch of beach. However, if the City were to establish a lifeguard program, even a lirnited one, the City’s immunity to liability would then cease. A single liahility case could far exceed the costs of providing this service for many years. Although several alternative lifeguarding programs have previously been outlined in a report to the Parks and Recreation Commission, the service levels and liability issues associated with each should be further analyzed. If Council desires to provide lifeguard service through the use of City resources, staff recommends that the issue return to Council once further analysis considers the following: e Service level expectations e e Liability exposure associated with service level expectations Detailed costs associated with a program to meet service leve expectations (to include lifeguarding and beach maintenancc responsibilities). FISCAL IMPACT: Depending upon which alternative the Council chooses, the fiscal impact would vaq If Council recommends to establish a lifeguard program and initiate the expenditur of funds to provide for that service, the amount of funds would be contingent up0 the service level expectation. However, the Financial Management Director ha reiterated that any expenditure of funds for lifeguard services will require an equ. reduction in spending on other general fund services/programs, if the City is . maintain a balanced budget. Efforts to pursue legislative assistance could produce a lifeguard service provided k the State of California Parks arid Recreation Department at no cost to the City if tk State would extend the State Parks responsibility and jurisdiction to include tl subject State Lands Commission property. The fiscal impact to maintain the status quo would remain at a minimum expenditu of City funds. Contingent upon Council decision staff would return with furth detailed cost estimates if necessary. EXHIBITS: 1. Site Location Map 2. Memo to Assistant to the City Manager -- July 3, 1989 3. Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Bill No. 392-7 -- March 1992 I BEAClbLIFEGUARD ISS@ 1 . BUENA VISTA LAGOON >TATE LAND COMMISSION & PRIVATE PROPERTY STATE PARKS 8 REC REA TI'O t4 PR 0 P E R T Y . EXHIBIT I 4 @ wa 0 July 3, 1989 TO: PHIL CARTER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AN0 RECREATION DIRECTOR LIFEGUARD SERVICE REQUEST FROM OAK STREET TO BUENA VISTA LAGOON BACKGROUND: Mr. Pete Biltchik is requesting that lifeguard service be provided along thl beach from approximately Oak Street North to the mouth of the Buena Vista Lagoon RECOMMENDAT ION : Write a letter to Mr. Biltchik informing him of the City’s position and that i he wishes to pursue this matter further that he be scheduled to make presentation/request at the next Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, whic is scheduled for July 17, 1989, at 5:OO p.m. at the Calavera Community Center DISCUSSION: In reviewing past correspondence from the City and various State officials, appears the issue of providing lifeguard service from Oak St. to the mouth the Buena Vista Lagoon has been an item of discussion since shifting sand h made the area attractive to the public around 1983. Attached are past documentations sent from City officials to State agenci requesting the State consider providing lifeguard services. The various State departments responded that in their opinion since the land question is either not under their jurisdiction or they do not have the author or funding to service the beach areas not under the ownership, they would provide the requested lifeguard service unless they enter into a contract w the City where the City would reimburse the State for the guard service. In discussing the cost for lifeguard service with Bill Fait, Area Manager the State Parks and Recreation Department, he estimates the seasonal start cost for the approximately one mile stretch of beach would be 4208,000 an 8117,000 per year thereafter. It has also been brought to MY attention there is no legislation requiring Ci to provide lifeguard service. According to other officials that I have SP to, when a City does provide lifeguard service they create a public expecta of safety tnd open the door to liability issues. Recent court cases have r agencies are liable not only from negligence, but also for natural condit that may be hazardous to the public such as an uneven sand bottom. Accor to Ron McCullough, RegionaR Director of the State Parks and Recrei Department, the Cities of Newiport Beach, Huntington Beach, and San Clement( not renew their contracts for lifeguard service because of an injury award Newport Beach was required to pay. t EXHIBIT 2 f 1. 0 a Page 2 Memo - P. Carter 7/3/89 SUMMARY CONCLUSION: The City has dropped their pursuit of providing lifeguard service along the beach from Oak St. to the Buena Vista Lagoon because of the following: 0 The City owns no beach areas along its coastline 0 0 The City is not in the beach lifeguard business Various State agencies have taken the position that the guard service i not their responsibility. The 1 i abi 1 i ty issues. 0 Accordingly, the City has installed signs at each of the accesses that state "h Lifeguard, Swim at Your Own Risk". If Mr. Bilchik would like to raise the issue of lifeguard service in this arl again, I suggest he make a presentation to the Parks and Recreation Cornmissif who meet the third Monday of every month at 5:OO p.m. EXHIBITS : 1. Letter from Shirley Dahlquist, Parks and Recreation Commission, dat 9/27/83. 2. Letter from Herbert Heinxe, State Parks and Recreation, Regional Direct( dated 10/13/83. 3. Letter from Assemblyman, Robert Frazee, dated 10/19/83. 4. Letter from Claire Oedrick, Executive Officer of State Lands Commissi dated 11/29/83. 5. Letter from former Mayor, Mary Casler, dated 7/29/85. 6. Letter from Ronald McCuSlough, Regional Director, dated 8/16/85. t A --A > '. s . \ J7Cra -1 I f -+it !2 , "57-L. = ?/ ;' - I\ ' c: Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager Bob German, Risk Manager Vinca Blond01 City Attorney .___I '1 : July 7, 1989 'i 2\- Pete Bi 1 tchi k lj ;c ' 353 Christiansen Way 1, li;WN /pet, ; I 1 .. Carlsbad, Cal ifornia 92008 LIFEGUARD REQUEST Your request for lifeguard services from approximately Oak Street North to tl Buena Vista Lagoon has been given to me for a response. Our records indicate that in the past several years the City has been correspondence with State officials regarding the need for State involvement . provide lifeguard service in this particular area of Carlsbad. The various Sta. agencies feel it is not their responsibility. Because of the impending liability issues; the fact that the City of Carlsb( does not own the subject property, (the land is State owned and privately ownec at this time the City is not pursuing the matter of guard service; however, tl City has installed "no lifeguard, Swim at Your Own risk" signs. If you would like this matter reviewed further, I suggest your make your conceri known to the Parks and Recreation Commission who meet the third Monday of ea! month at 5:OO p.m. in the City Council Chambers. To be able to put you on the agenda, we need your written request two (2) wee prior to the meeting date. If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 434-2824. - Parks and Recreation Director c: Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 - (61 9) 434-28 ;<a e 7 I ! J i i- - __ - . - L 0 2 c, L 3 +- U W cn L L. E:= aJ (U 0 *r + in V- u ac -LC, LO ma0 w* n acne am tntn LW Q)d (daJ VLW cco 3!b (u L (v CLVIa LI VI la E: Ob .r uoc, m p!L S*r(d VI* E: Oc, a0 (dwx VI* *r a A+ c, LU YXVI CnW WE ou LUQ) h.7 (d c a+ aLw 3 3(d* u- II rt 0 VIOWW 0 - hnc, -tu c,VI ? (d (dw -- c,.oE:w s LL *rc,OV, OQ) Wcn T Q)C ra*rc, u- L VIW /: xi2 c h VI a, Gz L 30 2co *. aJaJ v *C VI 0 Y wm hW(u c,a CLCJ nL 5: C(V *r W(d Q)-wc *?a UT TJ a~n vc, 6 I-c, T:cr n E -I7 el- r e 40 uo. at v r-a @a> c, :E m At aJOW co a cn 4 vc, 0 .rLa L =I 0 (dl-- r\i mra r: 30 QIV=rO =E h T L4- E: *r *C 0 +- t -r apr)~ n +c, un-v HV- V, LL? (d v) .rm4 7 or r .r 0 .I- CJv, - -.rU . Sa (dLL- Tc, - "3 Yc, w >o - I-v ai- v) w aJ (d-r OC' n h=r; ac, (d 0 *r urn EVL HVI +- Iv) (d Sf @-=x v, 0 a :P --I *- vtn r >vmL OL Q) - L Lc, CaaJWC, *E U K a, S C,NL (d J 3 CJmm Ql 00 3 I TE L (619 0- (r 120i ELM AVZ-iLE CAR Ls BAD, CALI FO 9 .'a ;> 32008-1 989 airtp 01 4LarfSbab PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Septenbsr 27, 1983 The Hocurable Trusse Norris, Chairman .' State Parks and fiecreatian Commission ' 13301 So- Van Ness Gardena, CA 90249 Dear Mr. Norris: The Carlsbad Parks and Rscreatian Commission requests that State lifeguard. services he provided to a one mile stretch of beach awned by the State Land Commission between knz area north of Oak Street and the mouth of the 8uena Lagoon in Carlsbad, California. The influx of sand has made that beach the attractive one in the area- Thare 8re no lifeguard9 in the vicinity & u entire are& is urptotzcted. It is the understanding of this Commission that this'approxinste one mile stretch of beach is owned by the State Lands Cormissiarr frcm =ne mesa high west, and is therefore under the State's jurisdiction. State's responsibility to provide reasonable protection to the baach-qoers The State Department of Parks b Recreation, who provides lifeguard service1 between Uak Street and South Carlsbad State Park, should show some flexibi now and in the future and simply relocate the towers from where beach traf down due to sand depletion to this more heavily used area, The City has ai to allow the State to use City access ways for the lifeguard towers. Your immediate attention to this hazardous condition would be appreciated concerned, Sincerely, It is undoubtedly t We will be waiting for your response. Q $f* buy bc!j2&pd#+6 Shirley Oahlquiat, Chair Parks and Recreation Commissiorr SD/ds c: Congressman Ronald Packard Senator William Craven Assemblyman Robert Frazee Mayor !?ary Casler Ctlrlsbad City Council Frank Aleshire, City Manager , Same letter sent to: State Parks and Recreation AFea thriager 5t ate Parks and I$ec Feation .Director State Lands Commrssmn 0 - -- .r --- - I. - e 0 e- 1 STAR oc eAkimI*l-mt am*a A-1 GEORGE DEUUHEJ1h.N n 083.3-403 Southern Region Headquarters San Olego, Cat i fornia 921 10 2505 Congress Street PE": U-. - +2'&&Js+p (61 9) 231-7961 I= w October 13, 1983 Ms. Shirley Dahlquist, Chafrperson p* P+ Parks and Recreation Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Ms. Dahlquist: Director Briner has asked me to respond to your letter of September 27, 1983 requesting us to assume the responsibility of providing guard towers and lifeguard services to a one mile stretch of beach from Oak Street north to the mouth of the Buena Vista Lagoon in tarlsbad, California. You have cotrectty stated that'the beach below the mean high tide line in this area Is owned and under the jurisdictlon of the State Lands Commission. The beach above the mean high tide line, with the exception of three City owned 50 foot wide stairway accesses, is privately owned. The State Pub1 ic Resour Code, Section 5003 and 5067, define the powers and duties of t State Parks and Recreation Department. My Oepartment has no legal authority to expend funds for the cafe, maintenance or control of any lands which art not part of the State Park Syst However, we may enter into contracts with cities, counties, or other political subdivisions of the state for the care, mainte and control of lands not under our jurisdiction. As the land in question is not part of the State Park System c way we can provide the services you are suggesting is to entel into a contract with your city. The only other way I'm aware is by tpecirl legislation including an appropriation to cover costs. The fact that no services are being provided on this beach is a unique situation, Many miles of state, county, and city ow beach along California's coast are used by the public for bea recreation purposes nithiut benefit of lifeguard or other services . t i 0 -. e 0 Ms. Shirley Dahlqulst, Chairperson Page 2 October 13, 1983 Thank you for expressing your concern in this matter. I regret that your request cannot be complied with as you suggested. Sincere1 y, ,, . -3 -31 5.:- . -y Herbert L. Heinze, Regional Director Southern Region HtH:stl cc: Senator Craven m : . .. -:- "__ : a. .=,,2=3 io Assemblyman Fratee Di rector's Office Commissioner Yrussc Norris State Lands Commission Mayor Mary Casler San Diego Coast Area 0 COMMIVCCS RCVCHUC h TAXATIOI COVLRNYENTAL Oac (01 6) 44S-2390 @ :!*a, LOCAL GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC DLVELO~I AN0 NCW TECYNOI SUITE 200 JOINT LCGISLITIVC I ) a -8- e s~cR4MCNTo AODRCY STATE CAPITOL SACRIMCNTOBS~~~ o~sTIICT OCCICR 3080 P~O ~(co omvc $ssernbbg M#lifarrti# ple$idature CARLSIIO CA 92- (61 9) 1311 749 ROBERT C. FRAZEE ASSEMBLYMAN, SEVENTY-FOURTH DlSTRlCT October 19, 1983 Ms Shirley Dahlquist Chairperson Parks and Recreation Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear I appr Mm: 'ate your sending me a copy of your letter con- cerning lif rd8 *ween the area north of Oak Street A member of my staff has looked into the situation and four that there are some problems preventing the State Parks Department from complying with your wishes. State Public Resources Code Sections 5003 and 5007 define the powers an duties of the Department and limits it legal authority to spend money for care, maintenance or control on lands whic are not part of the state park system. The system is allo to enter into contracts with political subdivisions such as cities and counties in order to care, maintafn or contr lands not under the Department's jurisdiction. The beach in question above the mean high tide is private1 owned wtth the exception of three, 50-foot-wide stairway accesses owned by the City of Carlsbad. It is my under- standing that these accesses are not suitable for towers; land below the mean high tide is unsuitable for towers; ai the Department is not empowered to place facilities on private property. Thank you for keeping me apprised of your concerns. and the mout T@ of the Buena Vista Lagoon in Carlsbad. Sin r ly, Ro r C. Frazee At q Assemblyman, 74th District & 0 0 RECEIVED DEC [ GEORGE DEUKMEJ EXECUTIVE OFF 1807.13th Strm KENNETH CORY, Conrrollu S.snmento, Calif0 CLAIRE 1. DEDR LEO T. McCARTHY, c!./wfWWnr CfoWmor Excuttvr Offirr MICHAEL FRANCHETTI, Dmtff Of hn8nc. STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION r 9 w ii, \ 1 ;wq ' Yb ., h I/ I,."*.' -- 4 November 29, 1983 Shirley Dahlquist, Chairwoman Parks and Recreation Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 Dear Ms. Dahlquist: Your letter of September 27, 1983, requested s lifeguard services for a mile stretch of beach between an north of Oak Street and the mouth of Buena Vista Lagooi Carlsbad. The State Lands Commission holds title to sover yblic trust land8 which were acquired by California statehood. These sovereign lands include the three-mile- strip of tide and submerged land adjacent to the coast lying waterward of the ordinary high water mark (Civil Co 830). As to the area referred to in your letter, the e location of this line has not been determined or fixec agreement or adjudication. All of the public trust lands at this loca (lands waterward of the ordinary high water mark) are sub to remtional ure by the public: however, as is true the vast majority of public trust lands in the State, in qseemnt with a, local or state agency -ma- provided. The State Lands Commis lifequa* m is not funded or staffed to provide lifeguard services for of the appointed 1,100 miles of state coastline. The State Land6 Commission would be willing to coordinate some type of contract or agreement between Department of Bark8 and Recreation and/or the City of Carl to insure the proteetion of the public's health and sal absenc€u@ wa&& e e Shirley Dahlquist -2- November 29, 19 Recently enacted urgency legislation gives State Parks t ability to enforce their rules and regulations on adjoini tidelands. Given this, Parks may be able to respond mc readily to your request. 1983. Should you desire further information, please contz Georgia Lipphardt at (916) 322-7803. Enclosed is a copy of Chapter 897 of the Statutes Sin rely, / CLAIRE &Add T. DEDRICK Executive Officer cc: Herbert L. Heinze, Regional Director Department of Parks and Recreation southern Region Headquarters 2505 Congress Street San Diego, CA 92110 Honorable Robert C. Frazee Assemblyman, 74th District Attn: Richard Ledford 3088 Pia Pico, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92008 * e 0 T €1 (6lC 7200 ELM AVENUE CARISBAD, CA gzOoblW0 OffiCO Of tho M8yW Citp of Qarlsfiab July 29, 1985 Mr. William Briner, Director State Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Rox 2390 Sacramento, CA 95814 Oear Mr. Rriner: I am writing to you on behalf of the citizens of the City of Carlsbad to sol your support in solving a very serious problem. The problem is that the Sta does not provide lifeguard services to a one mile stretch of beach between t area north of Oak Avenue and the mouth of the Buena Vista Lagoon in Carlsbad In years past this was not much of a problem because of the rocky nature of beach, but due to a large volume of shifting sands this has become the most attractive beach area along our coastline. This is not the first time this issue has been raised with the State Oeparti of Parks and Recreation. I have enclosed copies of previous correspondence facilitate your prompt and personal attention to this matter. In your department' s correspondence you cite the State Public Resources Cod1 Sections 5003 and 5007 and conclude "My Department has no legal authority t expend funds for the are, maintenance or control of any lands &ich are nc part of the State Park System." contracts with cities, ... for the care, maintenance and control of lands r under our jurisdiction." What you are suggesting is that if the City would pay, your department woul provide the lifeguards. I appreciate your position, but this City and man other coastline cities arc not in a position to pay but we do provide plil paramedic and other local services to these beaches, and State beaches. This fs not just a Carlsbad problem so I would challenge you and your stat' work wfth the City of Carlsbad to explore alternatives aimed at solving th problem. A few ideas which I have thought of are listed below. aopreciate your review and suggestions on how these could work. You CJO on to state, "We may enter into I would .r 1 0 0 A. Homeomers in the affected area could grant the State an easement tc include the beachfront area in the State beach system during the swimming season. How would your department react? 8. If the City authorized lifeguard stands on our beach accesses in th area, would the State take advantage of the opportunity? mentioned previously, this is the nicest beach fn Carlsbad and is t center of beach activity. Is there any authority that rests with the State to form a lifeguar a s se s smen t di s tr i c t ? 4s I C. D. If the Community were to raise funds to pay for lifeguards, how muc would the State charge to cover the specified area? I am sure that if you look at this with the intention of solving the probler there is a means to do SO. I have listed my ideas, but I know there must b others I have not recognized. This is no doubt a liabflfty problem statewit that we would all like to solve. It makes no sense to me for our residents be placed in an unguarded, potentially unsafe recreation envirorment simply becuase of rules or laws which may need amending. mine if I can be of any assistance in identifying a solution to this proble I solicit your help and 7 e1 -.* L MARY r-L3 CASL Mayor t4C:ds cc: City Council Parks and Recreation Commission Paul Albertson, M.D. Senator Bill Craven Assemblyman Robert Frazee Aseemblyman Bill Bradley Enclosures ? L It 0 0 -7- ez d Pr 1 I fTAlt OI CALIK)RN!A-THL RtSOUICtS AGENCY GEORGE OEUKMEJI DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Southern Region Headquarters 1333 Camin0 Del Rio South, Suite 200 San Diego: California 92108 (619) 237-7961 August 16, 1985 Honorable Mary Casler, Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Clm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mayor Casler: X dm responding to your letter of July 29, 1985 to Director Briner. You reqt .that we review and commmt on four suggestions you made regarding the pravic of lifeguard services on a mile long stretch of beach in the City of Carlsbac which is n6t part of the State Park System. Item A - Our Department would not be willing to accept a temporary easement during the swimming season on these private and publicly owned lands. An easement is not necessary for the State to provide the services requested if a contract is executed by the owner(s) of the properties involved. In the past, the City of Carlsbad contracted with our Department for lifeguard services on properties the City leased from San Diego Gas and Electric. The last such contract terminated in mrd-summer 1981r when the City chose not to renew their lease on the property. Since that ti-, San Diego Gas and Electric has been contrdcting direct with us for the service. Item B - k stated in our October 13, 1983 response to the City on this subject, our Department may enter into contracts with cities to provide services on lands not under Parks juris- diction. Funds to pay for these services would have to be provided by the contractee. Howeverr because of recent court cases in Californra (Gonzales VS. City of San Diego (1982) and Taylor vs. City of Newport Beach (19841, contrac- ting agencies have taken a hard look at the liability factor when contracting out lifeguard services. The courts involved in the above cases have ruled that agenci 0 Honorable Xary Casier c i Lfor Page 2 August 16 , 1985 are liable not Only for negligence, but for any natural condition that may be hazardous to the public such as an uneveh sand bottom. In the Newport Beach case alone, Taylor was awarded a verdict in excess of 7 million doilars. Because of this action, the Cities of Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, and San Clemente did not renew their contracts with the County of Orange when they expired in 1985. Our Department at this time is unwrlling to extend our liability exposure by providing service to any but our own beaches. & Item C - The State Department of Parks and Recreation has no authority to form a lifeguard assessment district. The City does have this authority and could form an assessment district in order to provide the needed service to their constituents. Item D - The Department would charge a'contractee for the actual cost of the services rendered (staff, equipment and operating expenses) + 15% contract administration costs. Our staff's estimate for providing contracted lifeguard service on this beach would be $127,000 for the initial year start up costs including equipment, salaries and communication system, and $75,000 for subsequent years at current operating cost rates. We can provide you with a breakdown of these costs if you desire. San Diego Coast District Superintendent William Fait has previously met with Carlsbad City Parks Director David Bradstreet on this particular subject. We agreeable to meeting with you and your staff again, to further discuss this m Please contact me at the above address if I can be of assrstance, or District Superintendent Fait at the San Diego Coast District office, 2680 Carlsbad Bou vard, Carlsbad, California 92008, telephone (619) 729-8947 to arrange a meet Sincerely, ,&&LA- /PRonaid C. McCullough, Regional Director Southern Region cc: San Diego Coast District Director's Office AB # %q2-1 MTG. 3idoq& DEPT. f$fi TITLE: REQUEST TO ESTABLISH LIFEGUARD SERVICES (ACTION) I 0 March 6, 1992 TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION VIA: FROM: Senior Management Analyst LIFEGUARD ISSUE During November, the Parks and Recreation Commission addressed a request to establisk lifeguard services along the section of beach adjacent to Ocean Street from Oak Avenue North to the City limits at the mouth of the Buena Vista Lagoon. Although staffs recommended action was to deny the request to establish lifeguard service: for a number of reasons as outlined in the Agenda Bill (Attachment l), the CornmissioI took no action other than to direct the issue back to staff for further analysis. Thc Commission specifically requested information to include I) the cost to provide €or lifeguarc service, 11) alternatives in lieu of lifeguard service and III) alternative methods for fundin1 of this request. In addition, this report presents a brief synopsis of present situatiot occurring in coastal cities throughout San Diego county, with regards to lifeguard service As requested, further analysis of this issue is as follows: I. Parks and Recreation Director * COST TO PROVIDE LIFEGUARD SERVICE Department staff has met wish the local district of the State Parks and Recreatic Department to solicit their input regarding the possibility of providing for lifeguai service to the subject beach area (Attachment 2). Although at this time the State cannot commit to providing seMce by a contra proposal, they have indicated that it may be possible in the future. However, Sta officials have indicated it is already too late to implement a contract for the 19 season. Although the attached report provides more detailed information and I(c( estimates" to establish and continue lifeguard service on a year to year basis, t summary of costs are: k lniEial 1st year start up and operation Salaries $109,692 Operating expense ALUM 15% Add. Cost 28760 GRAMDTOTPU, $220,497 Subtotal $191,737 0 0 March 6, 1!W2 Page Two B. Second year operating costs Salaries $108,714 Operating expense 4.762 Subtotal $113,476 15% Admin. Cost 17.021 GRAND TOTAL $130,497 11. ALTERNATIVES IN LIEU OF LIFEGUARD SERVICES After analysis, there appears to be two principle reasons for the request to establ lifeguard service. 1. 2. Swimming and other recreational water use safety. Enforcement of ordinances relating to beach use (Le. alcohol, dogs, swfh Although the establishment of lifeguard service would perhaps provide the most effect control in terms of ongoing surveillance, alternatives do exist and others could implemented to reduce or eliminate concerns relating to beach safety and enforcem issues. A. In emergency situations, the State of California lifeguards will respond water rescues. However, given a priority situation, State lifeguards wc respond to State property first. Cost: None B. The current police foot patrol of this beach area provides for spori surveillance and immediate relief of violations Occurring on the beach. ' patrol is prhady implemented upon receipt of complaints €tom prop owners on Ocean Street and is performed on an as needed basis. Howe limited relief from violations occurring in the water exist due to limited ac to; and therefore, control of the water surface. Cost: Minimal expenditure experienced by Police Department C. Surveillance of the beach and water surface could be increased through availability of more man hours for patrol, The patrol itself could incr effectiveness through the use of a motorized vehicle/(4 x 4 or Qu equipped with surfboards which would provide for access to the water. 0 e March 6, 1992 Page Three Although this scenario addresses only enforcement issues, water safety or lifeguarding application could be applied if the patrol person has received adequate safety training and the vehicles were also equipped with medical supplies and two way radios for contact with police and emergency medical services. This patrol could consist of part time employees and implemented during peak use periods (summer months). The issuance of citation powers would be critical to the effectiveness of this program. Estimated Cost: 0 1,080 hours per persodyear @ $10/hr. = $10,800 0 4 x 4 vehicle $ZO,OOO/every 3rd year 0 Vehicle maintenance and replacement cost $5,000/per year o Two way radio $3,500 each o Medical supplies $5500 a Training $2,000 per yeadper employee a Administrative cost @ 20% Total Cost Initial Start Up Based On 1 Vehicular Patrolling Guard: $43,800 + Adxnin. Cor The use of a jet ski and patrol person with citation powers to enforce watc surface violations is also a consideration to be used in conjunction with foc or vehicular patrol. Although use of the jet ski patrol would be sporadic could prove effective in the control of surfing ordinance vioiations and cou aid in rescues during life threatening situations. D. Estimated Cosk 0 Jet ski $5,000 0 Jet ski travel trailer $1,500 0 Maintenance and replacement cost $1,500/per year 0 400 hours per person per year @ $lO/hr. = $4,000 Total Cost Initial Start Up In Coqjanctioa with Vehicular Patrolling Guard: $SS,W Admin. Cost IIr. ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR FUNDING OF THIS REQUEST A. General Fund - The use of general funds during times of a more prospe1 economic situation would perhaps provide a source of most read9 availr funding. However, current budgetary constraints due to an unstable econc has forced the City to cut back and reduce expenditures from this fun order to operate within a balance budget. The Parks and Recrez Departments budget this year has been required to reduce spendin1 approximately $550,000 for FY 1992-93 coupled with reductions in spen for FY 1991-92 the Department has reduced expenditures by 20% unde operating Budget of FY 1990-91. e .. 0 0 March 6, 1992 Page Four In order to fund lifeguard services from this account, other program/s would be required to be identified, and its funding eliminated or deferred. Given the program reductions and eliminations to date, the use of the general fund would have a serious impact to the existing operation. Transient Occupancv Tax (TOT) - The TOT is an integral part of the general fund in that the funds collected from local hotels and motels are used as revenues to operate from the general fund. In essence any request for funding from this source would be the same as a request for funding from the above mentioned general fund. Reauest for Lepislative Assistance - This alternative would direct staff to investigate opportunities and request assistance from area legislators to provide funds from State or County sources in light of this being a regional issue in which sexvices are provided not only to Carlsbad residents but tc citizens on a county and state wide basis as well. B. C. IV: SURVEY SYNOPSIS A. Imwrial Beacb (Contact Jim Barber) The City of Imperial Beach leased their beach property back to th San Diego port district in 1989. Lifeguard service is provided by City Employees year round with fu time coverage during peak use periods and flexible staffbg during nc peak use. Approximately 1 3/4 miles of beach is patrolled on an as needed ba! with a 3/4 mile primary swimming area patrolled year round. One full time staff person year round with additional 20 part time Sti members during peak use periods. The Port District subsidizes the cost of beach services includ lifeguard services at 140,OOO per year. 0 0 B. Coronado: (Contact We Neil) Only City designated beaches are guarded. Guard service is provided by non permanent City employees. Full time guard seMce is provided during summer months 7 weekend only seMa during the winter. -4 r 0 0 March 6, 1992 Page Five C. Citv of San Dietzo: (Contact Shawn Cicheto) e Approximately 50 full time permanent lifeguards provide year roun service from San Diego bay North to Blacks Beach. Additional 15 part time employees provide guard service during summer months. Areas guarded are City owned (for the most part) and include tt following: South Mission Beach, Ocean Beach, Mission Bay, Pacif Beach (towers in South and vehicle in North), La Jolla Children’s POC La Joila Cove, La Jolla Shore, portion of Blacks Beach. Permanent tower stations (headquarters) at the above locatio1 operate year round with portable towers operational from spring bre through October. e e a Lifeguards will respond anywhere in emergency situations. Whe access is limited, 911 call boxes have been installed. D. Citv of Del Mar: (Contact Grant Lawson) e Lifeguard service is provided year round with four (4) full time C employees classified as public safety employees. Additional 25 seasonal employees provide increased service le during the summer months. Area sf responsibility includes the entire 2.5 mile Ocean frontage, so of which is both privately and publicly owned. Department operating Budget for FY 91-92 was $283,OOO. e 0 0 Citv of SOlanaBea c4: (Contact Andy O’Leary) 0 E. Before recent incorporation the beaches were guarded by the Col of Sam Diego. Upon incorporation the newly formed City absorbed lifeguard sen and formed the Marine Safety Department. Although there is limited private beach front ownenhip the majc of beach frontage is owned by the City. The Marine Safety Department is responsible for providing g service year round to the entire Solana Beach frontage with five (5‘ time employees year round with a total of 15 during peak use per L e I.- P ia Page Six citv o laaa Beach: (continued) 0 Fletcher Cove Beach Park provides year round lifeguard station w four (4) relocatable towers provided during summer months at four I public accessways. The remainder of beach property is patrolled vehicle. e Annual operating budget is $477,000. Citv of Encinitas: (Contact Tom Bruckner) 0 F. Until last year, Encinitas contracted with the City of Solana Beach provide guard service at three (3) beach parks (Moonlight, Beaco and Grandview) and at several public accessways, (Swamis, "D Stre Stone Step). For reasons primarily related to liability exposure the City of Sola. Beach ceased contractual agreement with Encinitas. The City of Encinitas formed a beach services division to assume tl guard duties previously performed by contract. Encinitas operates with 3.5 full time personnel year round wi approximately 17 part time guards on duty during periods of peak us The annual operating Budget is approximately $240,000&ear. 0 Citv of Oceanside: (Contact Mat Steveris) 0 G. City provides lifeguard service from northern limits of Oceansic harbor to the southern city limits at the Buena Vista Lagoon dependh, on tides. On occasion has patrolled the subject beach property i Car lsbad. Peak sewn guard service provides 12 towers, 1 pier tower and vehicles, with 19 guards per day and 1 roving lifeguard. Full time staffhg of 3.5 permanent personnel provide limited seMc on a year round basis. Not d beach front property is publicly owned, however they providc service to all property through use of towers or vehicular patrol. 0 a nual operating Budget is $449,330. baLy KEITHBEVE Y Attachments: C: Assistant City Manager v- Financial Management Director PETE NILSON. e e STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOURCES AGENCY - --. -.- DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION ( La Costa District 2680 Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 729-8947 January 13, 1992 Keith Beverly Senior Managernenc Analyst City of Carlsbad, Parks and Recreation 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Keith: This is in response to your letter of December 12, 1991 requesting availability and cost estimates for State provided lifeguard services in the area from Oak Avenue to the Buena cannot commit to providing this service by a contract proposal, however preliminary discussions with our Regional Headquarters staff indicate it may be possible. Vista Lagoon. At this time we We have updated our cost estimates and, as1 am sure you will notice, they are significantly higher than those given to Mr. Bradstreet in November of 1989. This is due to the fact that salaries, operating expenses, and associated administrative costs have increased. As per our earlier discussion these are "cost estimates". Actual billing would be for services rendered only and would likely be less than the estimated costs. in our operating expense-cost estimate. full picture of what starting this service would cost. contract with us for this service or not we stand by our offer to provide you with two of our surplus towers now (and possibly a third tower later) at no cost to you beyond transporting them from their present location to the site of use. Also note that three lifeguard towers are included We included these to give you a Whether YOU Cost estimates are for two individual years. The initial year, 1992, reflects salaries, expenses, and start up costs while the second year, 1993 reflects salaries expenses, and maintenance. Although we feel it is alread too late to implement the program in 1992, these estimates nonetheless give you a good idea of costs for the respective years. Costs for salaries change from year to year depending upon when Easter week falls on the calendar. *hQR I fyg+.g 4 li +#, .&+ e o? I, .. Keith Beverly Page 2 January 13, 1992 Services would be provided only during high use periods from April through October and are a reflection of staffing levels provided on the adjacent State Beach. services on days when inclement weather lessens the need. this is a reflection of operations on the State Beach. We would reserve the discretion to cut back Once again, No law enforcement is included in this plan although lifeguard staff would provide advisory public contact regarding municipal ordinances such as surfing, dogs, alcohol, and glass containers. In cases of continued violation Carlsbad Police Department would be notified for enforcement. This proposal provides for service that is phased from partial coverage in the spring to full coverage in the summer. Service is then phased out in the fall and concludes in October. Hours of service would normally be 1O:OO A.M. to 6:OO P.M. for towers, and from 1O:OO A.M. to 7:OO P.M. for the lifeguard vehicle. We recommend that towers be sited at the foot of Carlsbad Village Drive (tower l), Beech Avenue (tower 2), and just north of the northern- most public access near the Buena Vista Lagoon (tower 3). dictate that these towers be placed on site in June when conditions allow, and removed in October when sand begins to erode. necessary for this task and an "off-season" storage site for the towers should be identified. Responsibility for tower movement and storage is not included in the plan. Maintenance for the towers themselves is negotiable. Beach conditions Heavy equipment is Phone communication with towers, and radio communication with the lifeguard vehicle would be provided by oursstate Lifeguard dispatch center located at South Carlsbad State Beach. There are several other considerations that are negotiable such as storage and off-season use of the lifeguard vehicle, surf/swim area locations, call-back procedures, and billing procedures. Our Department is required by the State policy to recoup all costs The billing rates for salaries here when providing contracted service. cover costs in training, vacation time, sick leave, retirement, and employee health benefits. The 15% administrative charge is to cover administrative costs in workers'compensation, industrial disability, unemployment compensation, life insurance, recruiting, testing, and hiring. .. 6. s' Keith Beverly Page 3 January 13, 1992 As this is a samewhat detailed cost estimate you may have questions. Please contact me or Lifeguard Supervisor Dennis Stoufer for clarification. We are well aware of the complex public safety issues at this popular beach and we hope we can help you to resolve them. Sincerely, I&&-- % ?22 -. William V. Fait District Superintendent WVF : cmb Enclosure , CONTRACT @ LIFEGUARD SERVICES CARLSBAD "CITY" BEACH (Initial Year. 1992) 0 LIFEGUARD TRAINING . . . . .I . . - . . . . . . . . . . 5,000.00 SALAR I ES Days Rate Extension various 30.23 3,627 -60 Hours Lifeguard Supv.11 120 APRIL Extension Station tiou rs Vehicle Guard 8 11 \ 15.64 1,376.32 8 11 18.18 1,599.84 Vehicle Guard Re1 ief Guard 4 11 15.64 688.16 Dispatch 1 - 11 . ia. 18 -1 99.98 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 1 11 27.84 306.24 Office Assistant I 1 11 14-82 163.02 4,333.56 Days Rate MAY Ex tension Station . Hours Days Vehicle Guard 8 10 - 15.64 I, 251.20 Vehicle Guard 8 10 18.18 1,454.40 Relief Guard 4 10 15.64 625.60 Dispatch 1 10 18.18 181 -80 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 1 10 27.84 Z78.40 1 10 14.82 148.20 Office Assistant I 3,939.60 Rate JUNE Ex tens ion Station Hours Davs Rate rower 1 8 20 ' 15.05. 2,408 .OO Tower 2 8 20 15.64 2,502.40 Tower 3 8 20 - 15.05 2,408.00 Relief Guard 8 20 15.64 2,502.40 Vehicle Guard 8 20 15.64 2,502.40 Jehicle Guard 10 20 18.18 3,636.00 3ispatch * 2 20 18.18 727-20 ,ifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 2 20 27.84 1,113.60 Iffice Assistant I 2 20 14.82 - 592.80 10,392.80 JULY Station t-fou rs Davs Rate Extension Towor 1 8 30 15.05 3,612.00 Tower 2 8 30 15-64 3,753.60 Tower 3 8 30 . 15.05 3,612.00 ;?el ief Guard 0 30 15.64 3,753.60 Vehicle Guard 8 30 15.64 3,753 -60 Vehicle Guard 10 30 18.18 5 454.00 li spa tch 2 30 18.18 1,090.80 1,670.40 -ifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 2 30 27.84 Iffice Assistant 2 30 14.82 889.20 27,589.20 hh s 0, * L CONTRACT LIFEGUARD SERVICES AUGUST Days Rate Extension 15.05 3 , 852 -80 8 32 15.64 4.003.84 8 32 15.05 3,852.80 8 32 15.64 4,003.84 8 32 15.64 4.003.84 18.18 5.81 7 - 60 32 18.18 1,163.52 32 27.84 1,781.76 29,128.48 e Station Hours Tower 1 8 32 Tower 2 Tower 3 Relief Guard Vehicle Guard Veliicle Guard 10 32 Dispatch 2 Lifeguard SUPV.~ (PI) 2 Office Assistant r 2 32 14.82 9 4 E,A e SEPTEMBER Ex tension 5 t a t i on 8 17 15.0s 2 , 046.80 Tower 1 Tower 2. 8 17 15.64 2,127.04 8 13 15.05 1,565.20 Tower 3 8 17 15.64 2,127.04 Re 1 i ef Guard Vehicle Guard 8 30 15.64 3,753.60 Dispatch 2 30 18.18 1,090.80 Li f egoard Scipv. I ( PI ) 2 30 27.84 1,670.40 2 30 14.82 889.20 Of Fice Assistant, I 20 v 724.08 tiou rs Davs Rate Vehicle Guard 10 30 18.18 5 * 454.00 OCTOBER Days Rate Extension Station Hours Vehicle Guard 8 5 15.64 625.60 Vehicle Guard 8 5 18.18 727.20 Dispatch 1 5 18.18 90.90 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 1 5 27.84 139.20 Off ice Assistant I 1 5 14.82 74.10 1,657.00 TOTAL INITIAL YEAR SALARIES 109,692.32 OPERATING EXPENSES (Initial Year, 1992) E ---- I tern Unit --- Ex tens ioD 1. 3 Moveable Lifeguard Towers 16,000.00 48,000.00 - 2. 3 Tower Equipment 100.00 300.00 3. 3 Tower- Phone Installation 250.00 750.00 4. 3 Phone Service Charge 134.40 336.00 6. 1 Auto, Utility 4WO 18,939.00 18,939.00’ Light. Bar 13 PA 1,400.00 1,400.00. 7. 1 8. 1 Equipment Rack 300.00 300.00 9. 1 Mobile Radio & Installation 3,900 -00 3 , 900.00 3. 1 Portable Radio 5,400.00 5 , 400.00 400.00 I. 1 Rescue Board 400.00 2. 1 Back 8oard & Accouterments 300.00 300.00 500.00 3. 1 Equ ipnien t Box 500.00 4. 1 Resuscitator 500.00 500.00 300.00 5. 4 Oxygen Rottles 75.00 3. 8 Rescue Buoys 65.00 520.00 5. 4 First Aid Kits & Supplies 50.00 200.00 - Total Initial Year Operating Expenses . 87 045 nn - _-- (e @ SUMMARY (Initial Year, 1992) LIFFGOARD TRAINING . . . . - . . . . 5.000.00 SA I- An-!= Lifeguard Supervisor I1 3,627.60 April 4,333.56 May 3,939.60 June 18,392.80 July 27 , 589.20 . August 29,428.48 Sep teniber . 20,724.08 October 1.657.00 TOTAL SALARIES 109,692.32 OPERATING EXPENSES 82,045.00 SUB-TOTAL 196,737.32 15% ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 29.510.60 TOTAL INITIAL YEAR, 1992 226,247.92 m .\ c e , -. CONTRACT LIFGUARD SERVICES CARLSEAD "CITY" BEACH (Second Year, 1993) I-IFEGUARD TRAININ - - - - - - - - - - . - . - . . . . 1,000.00 SALARIES Hours Lifeguard Supv.11 80 various 30.23 Davs Rate Extension. 2,418 -40 APRIL Hours Davs Rate Ex tensign Station 1,626.56 Vehicle Guard 8 13 15.64 Vehicle Guard 8 13 18.18 1,890.72 Relief Guard 4 -. Dispatch 1 13 18.18 236.34 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 1 13 27.84 361.92 Office Assistant I 1 13 14.82 192.66 5,121.48 13 15.64 813.28 , MAY tloul-s Davs Rate Extension S tclt j 011 Vehicle Guard 8 10 15.64 1,251.20 Vehicle Guard 8 10 18.18 I, 454.40 Relief Guard 4 10 15.64 625.60 Dispatch 1 10 18.18 181 -80 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 1 10 27.84 278.40 148.20 Office Assistant I 1 10 14.82 3,939.60 ----- JUNE Station ti 011 r s Days ~-- Extension Rate Tower 1 8 21 15.05 2,528.40 Tower 2 8 21 15.64 2,627.52 Tower 3 8 21 15-05 2,528.40 Relief Guard 5 21 15.64 1,642.20 Vehicle Guard 8 21 15.64 2,627.52 Vehicle Guard 10 21 18.18 3.81 7.80 li spa tch 2 21 18.18 763.56 - i feguai-d Supv. I ( PI) 2 21 27.84 1,169.28 3f f ice Assistant I 2 21 14.82 -- 622.44 18,327.12 JULY Sta t. ion t-iou rs pavs Rate Extension -ewer 1 8 31 15.05 3,732 .. 40 rower 2 8 31 15.64 3,878.72 rower 3 8 31 15.05 3,732.40 ?el ief Guard 8 31 15.64 3,878.72 Vehicle Guard 8 31 15.64 3,878.72 veliicle Guard 10 31 18.18 5,635.80 3 ispa tch 2 31 18.18 1,127.16 1,726 - 08 _*feguard Supv.1 (PI) 2 31 27.84 Iff ice Assistant I 2 31 14.82 -- 918.84 28,508 - 84 .. 4 :3 4b CONTRACT LIFEGUARD SERVICES AUGUST b Extension 8 31 15.05 3.732.40 8 31 15.05 3.732 -40 8 31 15-64 3,878.72 10 31 18.18 5,635 -80 2 31 18.18 1,127.16 2 31 27.84 1,726.08 Days Rats ?tat ion Hours Toigor- 1 Tower' 2 1 ower 3 Relief Guard Vehicle Guard Vclliclo Guard 0 i spa t c h L i f eguar'd Scipv. I ( PI ) Office Assistant I 8 31 15.64 3,878.72 8 31 15.64 3.878.77 2 31 14.82 as, a !I 28,soa. a4 - SEPTEMBER Rate Extension S La t i on Tower 1. 8 16 15.05 1,926.40 Tower 3 8 12 15.05- 1,444.80 Relief Guard 8 16 15.64 2.001.92 Vehicle Guard 8 30 15.64 3,753.60 Dispatch 2 30 18.18 1,090.80 Lifeguard Supv.1 (PI) 2 30 27.84 1,670.40 20,233.04 t tou rs Davs Tower 2 8 16 15.64 a 2,001.92 Vehjcle Guard 10 30 18. ia 5,454.00 Off ice Assistarit 1 2 30 14.82 --- 889 * 2Q OCTOBER Extension Vehicle Guard 8 5 15.64 625.60 Vehicle Guard 8 5 18.18 727.20 Dispatch 1 5 18.18 90.90 Lifeguard Scipv. I (PI) 1 5 27-84 139.20 Ullice AssistarlL I 1 5 14.82 --- 74.10 1,657.00 TOTAL SECONO YEAR SALARIES 108,714.32 Rate S La t i on tiou rs Days OPERATING EXPENSES (Second Year, 1993) UNIT EXTENSION . 3 Moveable Lifeguard Towers 512.00 1,536.00 . Phone Service X 3 Towers 134 - 40 403.20 . Rescue Buoy Roplacement 130.00 . First Aid Kits 6 Supplies 320.00 120.00 . Vehicle Rescoe Equipment - vehicle Operation (4O6 of 80% of 16,000) (11.20 X 12 Months) (2 per year X 65.00) (10.00 X four X 8 months) 2,252.80 (-44 per mile x 40 miles x 128 days) - Total Second Year Operating Expenses 4,762.00 n 1 (; 1/8/92 rmrml c: fa) 0 1 -b w \ ? a W d SUMMARY (Second Year, 1993) I L IFEGUQflD TRAINING . . . . . . . . . 1 .OOO.OO Z8LRRZE.S Lifeguard Supervisor 11 2,418.40 April 5,121 -40 Play 3,939.60 J 11 ne 18,327."12 Ju 1 y 28,508.84 f?UglJS t 28,508.84 September 20,233 -04 October 1.657 - 00 Total Salaries 108,714.32 OPERATING EXPENSES 4,762.00 SUB-TOTAL 114,476.32 15% ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 17.171 -45 TOTAL SECOND YEfiR, 1993 131,647.77