HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-06-23; City Council; 11754; ZONE 13 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANc
a
.d QI w *d a i2
VJ (d
0 o\
,-I I c.l m
a
o\
A
CV 0
G
(d
co
l
m 0 z
g
U
rl 0 m 2
-4
3
-.a a, U a 0
a a
rl
.r( U G 3 0 u
2 0
b
J zs z 3 0 0
I
a
F CARLSBAD - AGENDWILL E
w AB# 1'! '754 TITLE: DEPT.
ZONE 13 v LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY 1 MTGl
DEPT. GM CITY I
6/23/92
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council adopt R
No.qa-/G.4 approving the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director a
Resolution No. 94- I 30 approving the Local Facilities Management plan for Z(
ITEM EXPLANATION
Zone 13 is the twenty-first Local Facilities Management Plan to be brought to the Cit
for adoption. The zone is located in the Northwest Quadrant and is approximately E
in area. The General Plan land uses designated within the zone are Travel Service (-
residential Reserve (NRR), and Open Space. There is no existing or approved develc
the zone.
The buildout assumptions used for this LFMP are based on a modified yield rate for
of the property. Instead of the usual 30% yield, this plan assumes only a 17% yiel
NRR area. This was done to assure that all facility performance standards would I
compliance through buildout of the zone. The total amount of development to be cor
in the zone is thus estimated to be approximately 3.6 million sq. ft. of Travel Service
residential space. There will be no residential development in the zone.
On May 6, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this plan as (
in the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting attached as Exhibit 5. One i!
arose during the Commission's consideration of the plan was the Parks condition. '
5 and Zone 16 plans. However, the Carltas Company requested that the Zone 13 plai
the option of providing recreational facilities within Zone 13, subject to the City's E
The Commission had some concerns with this alternative but after some di
recommended approval of the plan without modification of the condition. The Pi
Recreation Commission also discussed this item at its meeting of May 18, 1992, and i
a motion recommending that any such recreational facilities constructed with City fur
be open to the public. Further detail is provided in the attached Planning Commission a
and Recreation Commission minutes.
The Zone 13 plan is a regulatory document which analyzes all eleven public fac
determine whether they conform with the adopted performance standards. Several
are identified as requiring upgrading in order to accommodate future development in t
Therefore, specific conditions of approval have been included in the plan, as stated ii
3, to guarantee that all of the public facility standards will continue to be met through
of the Zone. The plan is subject to change if circumstances differ from the ut-
assumptions used to project facility thresholds.
This plan includes a complete financing plan in compliance with Section 21.90.1 1 1
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Therefore, it does not require a subsequent financing p
facilities required to serve development in Zone 13 can be provided by particip
Community Facilities District No. 1, by payment of normal City fees, and as condi
approval on development permits.
includes a condition requiring payment of a park fee of $.40 per square foot, similar to '
I
e e
I(, 75v
0
Page Two of Agenda Bill No.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on May 2, 1991, indica
the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is not anticipated to have any
impacts on the environment. The Negative Declaration was recommended for approv
Planning Commission on May 6, 1992.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 will not cause any significant envirc
impacts. The plan is a public facilities planning document that
implements Carlsbad's General Plan. The plan makes generalized projections as to the
for and supply of public facilities and outlines provision of adequate public facilities ca
with the estimated demands. The plan recognizes that further environmental review I
to the California Environmental Quality Act will be required prior to the developmen
public or private project that is generally discussed in this plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this plan. These costs will be re
through the processing fee established by the City Council. It is anticipated that furtl time will be necessary to monitor this plan and other zone plans on a yearly bas
implementation of this plan, however, should help future fiscal planning by estima
timing of future public facilities and their costs.
EXHIBITS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
City Council Resolution No. 92 -!gq
City Council Resolution No. 92- /40
Executive Summary - Zone 13
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3244 and 3245
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes dated May 6, 1992
Excerpt of Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes dated May 18, 1992
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
RESOLUTION NO. 92-189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CP
MANAGEMENT PLAN 13.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad did on the 23rd
June , 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LOCAL Fi
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi,
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted
and considering any written comments received, the City Council considered i
relating to the Negative Declaration including Planning Commission Resolution
granting Planning Commission approval of said Negative Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of tt
Carlsbad, California as follows:
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director o
1991, was prepared in compliance with the California Envirc
Quality Act and Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
That there is no substantial evidence that the project as conditio
have a significant effect on the environment.
That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad incorporates
resolution Planning Commission Resolution No. 3244 including
contained therein.
3.
4.
....
....
....
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 92-190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAI
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PL
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared
Facilities Management Zone 13 in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 6, 1992, hold a dull
public hearing as required by law to consider said plan and at the conclusic
hearing adopted Resolution No. 3245 making findings and recommending thai
Council adopt the plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Direct0
2, 1991, indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan is not antic
have any significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of June 23, 1992 he
noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and arguments of anyone
to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission Re
No. 3245 also constitute the findings and conditions of the City
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 dated
1992, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by ref€
hereby approved. Any development occurring within the bounc
Zone 13 shall comply with all the terms and conditions of said
3.
!I
m 0
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this document is to provide a plan for supplying the public facilities t
will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 13 area of the City
Carlsbad, as shown in Exhibit 1 on page 2. The plan has been prepared in accordar
with the City’s Growth Management Program, as outlined in Chapter 21.90 of
Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 198
Development Assumptions
The first step in developing such a plan is to estimate the amount of development, b,
residential and nonresidential, that will be allowed in the zone. All development wit1
Zone 13 will be nonresidential. The types of land uses assumed for the zone :
consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan. These land use assumptions are discussed a
their location is shown in the introduction chapter of this plan.
To estimate the amount of development that could occur within Zone 13, a density yil
factor is applied to all vacant, developable land. Developable acreage is determined
deducting the following constrained lands from the gross acreage of the zone:
Major (> 69 kv) power-line easements
Future Right-of-way for Circulation Element Roads
Slopes Greater Than 40%
Riparian Woodland
Wetlands
Floodways
Permanent Bodies of Water
Other Environmental Features
Railroad Bgh t-of-way
For nonresidential development, it is typically assumed that building coverage would
30% of the net developable acreage. This method yields an ultimate nonresident
development estimate of 5,272,807 square feet. Given the large amount of unconstrain
acreage in Zone 13 (approximately 542 net acres) and the limitations of the surroundi
circulation network, a lower overall building coverage of 13.7% was used for Zone 1
This lower coverage results in 3,229,700 square feet. Again, this is only an estimate I
assumption for facility planning purposes. Actual nonresidential development may va from parcel to parcel and overall,
1 The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-23-86 (CC Resolution No. 8797).
1992 1 Zone I3 LFM
City ... of Oceansida 0
IL;,
-,,I
City of Enc initas
Development
Services Design ' soum >omsourn oc*amae. mmor CA vzcsd Note: All locations are approximate Locat ion ET3 (61P) V67-IllZ
Hofman Planning
A I$ 0 c I at e s. ...
1~6 ~wmq ~*l.nu sw. 'm cm-a CA VZE~
(6 V) 1Y.lAb3 :- UiV) Ub-24
2
e e
The plan includes phasing schedules which indicate the property owners’ propos
amount of development for each year from 1992 to 2014. The property owners are I
required to adhere to this phasing, and it is intended for facility planning purposes on
The phasing schedules, (Exhibits 13 -17), also include the projections for other zor
with adopted Local Facilities Management Plans. The schedules are used to determi
approximate threshold years for constructing or upgrading various public facilities
maintain compliance with the Performance Standards in the Growth Managemr
Program. The threshold years arrived at in this way are only projections for facil
planning purposes. The actual thresholds must be monitored as development takes pla
in this zone. Facilities may be needed sooner or later than the threshold years shown
this plan, depending upon the actual timing of development.
Zone 13 Requirements for Public Facilities
The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the demand for pub.
facilities generated by development in Zone 13 based on the eleven adopted Performan
Standards in the Growth Management Program. Exhibit 2 on page 5 shows the curre
status of each facility with respect to the Performance Standard, given the existi
amount of development in the zone. Because there is currently a limited amount
developed land in Zone 13 the public facility demands are presently minimal and
eleven Performance Standards are currently being met. Exhibit 3 on page 6 provide:
summary of public facilities adequacy through build out for Zone 13.
In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as development occurs
the zone, the Plan contains specific conditions of approval which are listed in t.
following exhibits. Exhibit 4 on page 7 contains the General Conditions which a
applicable to all zones of the City. Exhibit 5 on page 9 contains Special Conditions f
Zone 13. The Special Conditions state each facility which must be provided, wheth
it must be financed or constructed, and when it must be provided.
I992 3 Zone 13 LFM
0 e
The following list indicates the public facilities required to serve the nonresident
development in Zone 13. This chart shows whether the facility would otherwise
provided as a condition of approval of a development project or whether a spec
funding mechanism is needed.
City Administration
Libraries
Wastewater Treatment Capacity:
Park Facilities: Special finding mechanism is required. Two options
being proposed in this LFMP. The first option entails
payment of a 40C per square foot park impact fee which '
City would use to construct recreational facilities within
industrial corridor of the City. Alternatively, the developer
of Zone 13, with the approval of the City, may provide
appropriate recreational facilities directly, in-lieu of
payment of the fee.
Condition of approval of development project.
Combination of condition of approval of development proje
and special funding, including Citywide CFD and Cann
Road Assessment District.
Funding provided by Community Facilities District (CFD)
Funding provided by Community Facilities District (CFD:
Funding provided by sewer connection fees.
Drainage Facilities:
Circulation Facilities:
Fire Facilities: NO special funding required.
Open Space Facilities:
Schools:
Sewer Collection System:
Water Distribution System:
No special funding required.
Funding provided by school fees
Condition of approval of development project.
Condition of approval of development project.
1992 4 Zone 13 LFM
0 e
EXHIBIT 2
Zone 13 Existing Public Facilities Summary
LFMP 92-13
Facility Conformance with adopted Performance Standard
Citywide:
City Administrative Facilities Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Library
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Park District #1:
Parks Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Zone 13:
Drainage Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
perf0rxnanc.e standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
perfoxmance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Collection System
1992 5 Zone 13 LFM
. e 0
EXHIBIT 3
Zone 13 Build Out Public Facilities Summary
LFMP 92-13
Facility Conformance with adopted Performance Standard
City Administrative Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted
performance standard through build out.
Library Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted
performance standard through build out.
Existing and planned facilities meet
the adopted performance standard until 2000.
Park facilities meet the adopted performance standard
through build out.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Parks
Drainage Drainage facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Circulation Circulation facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Fire Existing fire facilities meet the adopted performance
standard through build out,
Open Space Existing open space meets the adopted performance
standard through build out.
Schools School facilities will meet the adopted performance
through build out.
Sewer Collection Sewer collection facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Water Distribution Water distribution facilities meet the adopted
performance standard with the proposed mitigation
measures through build out.
1992 6 Zone I3 LFM.
e e
EXHIBIT 4
General Conditions for Zone 13
LFMP 92-13
1. All development within Zone 13 shall conform with the provisions of Secti
2 1.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of tl
Local Facilities Management Plan.
All development within Zone 13 shall be required to pay a public facilities 1
pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, and
amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zc
13 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into tl
plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopi
performance standards.
The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 13 pursuant
Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All development in Zone 13 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywi
Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797
September 23, 1986.
2.
3.
4.
5, Periodic amendment to the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrac
standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendme
to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Counc
or property owners at any time.
If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adoptc
performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, tl
matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Counc
determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building 1
development permits which would impact the facility shall be issued unless i
amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone is approved by the Cii
Council which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities ini
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will t
6.
7.
allowed unless the performance standards are complied with.
Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review fi
projects within Zone 13. All future projects within Zone 13 shall underg
environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. AI:
mitigation measures determined during a project’ s environmental review shall t
8.
1992 7 Zone 13 LFM
b *
complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration
made by the City Council.
9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projc
within Zone 13. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 13 shall be contingent upon
provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Elemenl
the General Plan. At this time a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District
been formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necess;
district, the required General Plan Consistency finding cannot be ma
Therefore, no discretionary approvals, Building Permits, Grading Permits, Fi
Maps, or development permits will be issued or approved unless the subj
property annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provic
by the developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities leg:
applicable to Zone 13 that are included in the Community Facilities District. 1
following activities are exempt from this: grading j minor planning entitleme
or minor construction as part of ongoing agricultural operations, mil
subdivisions and lot line adjustments for financing purposes or a Plani
Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely at the Cit
discretion.
10.
to serve new development. If Zone 13 properties are not participants within t
1992 8 Zone 13 LFA
0 e
EXHIBIT 5
Special Conditions For Zone 13
LFMP 92-13
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 13 and mi
be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 13. These conditio
are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility.
City Administrative Facilities
No special conditions.
Library
No special conditions.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensu
adequate wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000:
A. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determii
actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems.
- Parks
A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-resided
development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This ft
will be used to construct recreational facilities to offset the demand created t
employees within Zone 13.
Should the City and the Carltas Company, or its successor, mutually determir
that it is feasible and in the best interest of the City to have the Developer($ i
Zone 13 privately provide and maintain the recreational facilities for th
employees of Zone 13, then upon the financial guarantee of those facilities, a
Zone 13 park fees col cted to date shall be disbursed to the provider of th
recreational facilities an no additional Zone 13 park fees shall be collected.
Drainage i4*L+%a+p&&.
A. All future development in Zone 13 will be required to construct any future Zor
13 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan an
revised Drainage Master Plan, or acceptable alternate facilities, as determined b
the City Engineer. -4ny facilities necessary to accommodate future developmer must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of
I992 9 Zone I3 LFM,
. 0 0
grading permit or building permit, for any development requiring future stor
drain facilities in Zone 13.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or buildir
permit, whichever occurs first for any specific watershed within Zone 13, ti
developers of that project are required to:
1.
B.
Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainal Master Plan and;
C. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or buildi
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within the Agua Hedionda Cre
Watershed of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required to financia
guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or alternati
facilities deemed acceptable to the City Engineer:
1.
2.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or buildil
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within the Canyon de las Encin
Watershed of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required to financial
facilities deemed acceptable to the City Engineer:
1.
2.
51" - 66" storm drain line BA
36" storm drain line BM
D.
guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or alternati
42" - 48" storm drain line CB
42" storm drain line CC
Zone 13 LFA 10 1992
0 0
Circulation
A. Prior to the first discretionary action in Zone 13, the Carltas Company or its succes:
shall irrevocably offer to dedicate any Cannon Road right-of-way which falls wit
Carltas ownership. Said dedication shall include provision for adequate slope rights E
drainage easements necessary to install road improvements.
B. The construction of the following circulation improvements shall be financi.d
guaranteed, as set forth in the finance chapter of this plan:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1993
a. Traffic signals at Cannon Road/I-5 northbound off-ramp, Cannon Road/
Southbound off-ramp and at the Cannon RoadIPaseo Del No
intersection.
Estimated Cost - $310,000
b. Ultimate improvements at I-YPalomar Airport Road Interchange.
Estimated Cost - $ 11,035,000
c. Widen westbound approach of Palomar Airport Road at Paseo Del No:
to four lanes.
Estimated Cost - $102,370
d. North and southbound left turn lanes on Paseo del Norte at the intersecti
of Palomar Airport Road.
Estimated Cost - $63,630
e. Ultimate improvements at Palomar Airport RoadlEl Camino Re
intersection, to include a 3 lane approach, dual left turn lanes, and rig
turn only lanes on all legs.
Estimated Cost - $1,750,000
2. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 1995
a. Widen Cannon Road on north side to provide a third westbound la
between Paseo Del Norte and the 1-5 Northbound On-Ramp.
Estimated Cost - $435,000
Zone 13 LFm 1992 11
\ e a
3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2000
a. Westbound right-turn-only lane on Palomar Airport Road at the Paseo 1
Norte intersection.
Estimated Cost - $46,407
4. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2001
a. Cannon Road between Car Country Drive and Faraday Avenue as a fc
lane major arterial.
Estimated Cost - $11,000,000
b. Cannon Road between Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real as a four 1;
major arterial.
Estimated Cost - $8,000,000
c. Widen Cannon Road/I-5 North and Southbound Off-Ramps to prov
three lanes at the off-ramp junction.
Estimated Cost - $800,000
d. Restripe Cannon Road at the 1-5 Southbound Off-Ramp to provide a d
left turn for the westbound to southbound on-ramp movement, subject
approval of traffic engineer.
Estimated Cost - $3,450
e. Install traffic signal at Cannon Road/Faraday Avenue intersection.
Estimated Cost - $110,000
1992 12 Zone 13 LFI
e 0
5. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY 2005
a, Widen Cannon Road between the 1-5 Northbound Off-Ramp and Pas
Del Norte to provide two eastbound lanes and a right turn only lane
Paseo Del Norte. (Cost below assumes 1850 square feet of Right-of-I4
acquisition. )
Estimated Cost - $49,651
- Fire
No special conditions.
ODen Space
No special conditions.
Schools
No special conditions.
Sewer Collection System
A. ALL WATERSHEDS
All development within Zone 13 will be required to pay the appropriate seu
connection fee prior to issuance of any building permit.
B. Basin A
Basin A is located within the South Agua Hedionda sewer drainage basin. I
improvements are required to this system for Zone 13.
C. Basin B
Basin B is located within the BuendSan Marcos Interceptor sewer drainaj
basin. No improvements are required to this system for Zone 13.
Water Distribution System
A. All future development in Zone 13 shall pay a major facilities fee based 4
E.D.U.’s to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District and a capacity charge to tl
1992 13 Zone 13 LFk
e 0
San Diego County Water Authority. In addition, all development in Zone shall be required to provide any water reclamation facilities identified in t
future Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the District Engine€
Any water reclamation facilities necessary to accommodate future developme
must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a gradii
permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. These guarantees shall based upon the requirements for the service area within which the propos
development is located to the extent that the demand is created by futu
development.
B. Service Area A
Water facilities will be provided at the time of development within Service AI
A, to the satisfaction of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
1.
2.
The proposed 14-inch water main in future Cannon Road.
The proposed 12-inch water main from the reservoir to Cann
Road.
The proposed 12-inch water main from existing 16-inch water li
to the existing 12-inch water line in Car Country Drive.
The proposed pressure regulating station in Cannon Road at C
country Drive.
The proposed 6-inch reclaimed water line.
3.
4.
5.
C. Service Area B
The following water facilities will be required as a condition to the approval
future development within Service Area B to the satisfaction of CMWD.
1. The proposed 16-inch water line from existing reservoir to t
existing 16-inch water line in Palomar Airport Road.
The proposed 12-inch water line from existing 16-inch water li
to existing 12-inch water line in Car Country Drive.
The proposed pressure regulating station at the existing reservo
The proposed 6 and 10-inch reclaimed water lines.
2.
3.
4.
Zone 13 LFA 1992 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3244
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, NORTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 5, AND WEST OF
MACARIO CANYON.
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 1
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of May, 1 S
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, an
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considc
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the infc
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning COI
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration i
to Exhibit "ND", dated May 2, 1991, and "PII", dated April 19, 1991,
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinns:
1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 will not cause any si environmental impacts. The plan is a public facilities planning docun
implements the existing General Plan. The plan makes generalized projc
to the demand for and supply of public facilities, and outlines the pro
adequate public facilities concurrent with estimated demands. The plan rt
that CEQA review will be required prior to mitigation of any public c
project that is generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declaration
issued on May 2, 1991 and recommended for approval by the
Commission on May 6, 1992.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the l
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of May, 199
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramr
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
%L
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIOIf
ATTEST:
v MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL~R
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3244 -2-
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Aqua Hedionda Lagoon, West of Maca
Canyon, East of Paseo Del Norte and North of Palon
Airport Road
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 whj
guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent w
devleopment to adopted performance standards.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described proj
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality,
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of s
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a signific;
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for t
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plann
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department wit
21 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Brian Hunter in
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4468.
DATED: MAY 2, 1991
CASE NO: WMP 13
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
PUBLISH DATE: MAY 2,1991
Planning Director
BH:vd
2075 Las Palrnas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1
0 0 , E"MENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASENO. LFMP13
DATE: APRIL 19. 1991
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Local Facilities Mananement Plan Zone 13
2. APPLICANT: Hofman Planning Associates
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2386 Faraday Avenue. Suite 120
CA 92008. (619) 438-1465
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: April 17.1991
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan which marantees the a1
public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City c
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the en
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. TI
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an En\
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that thc
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any a
project may cause a sidcant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can
insifificant. - These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given tc
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
. 0 0
a PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
YES YES N WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
big) (insig)
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
- - -
2.
- - -
3.
- - -
4.
7
1 - - -
5.
E - - -
6.
2 - - -
7.
x - - -
8.
X - - -
9.
X
X
- - -
- - -
X - - -
-2-
1 @ 0
1 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES N(
(sid (insig)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
1 1 - plants)? -
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
1 1 existing species? -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
E importance? - -
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
E - - and insects? -
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
E - - migration or movement of animals? -
HUMAN ENVIR0"T
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NC big) (insig)
17.
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
Alter the present or planned land use
X - - - of an area?
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? X - - -
-3-
< 0 0 HUMANmoNMENT
YES YES N WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: (sig) (insig)
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? - - -
- - - 20. Increase existing noise levels?
21.
22.
- - - Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
- - -
23.
- - -
24. - - -
- - - 25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
- ' - -
27.
- 1 - -
- 1 - - 28.
29.
- 1 - -
30.
- - 2 -
31.
- - z -
32. z - - -
-4-
\ 0 0
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES N1 big) (insig)
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods . ’ of California history or prehistory. -
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) 1 1 -
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
3 the effects of probable future projects.) - -
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
1 either directly or indirectly? - - -
-5-
I 0 0 DESCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is a facilities planning document. The intent o
is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as dc
Plan. Locations and costs of facility improvements are estimates for information purposes only.
It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates in general does not sati
requirements for the specific project. The zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan requires comp
review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Managen
by the City's adopted performance standards, The land uses analyzed are taken from the adopte
-6-
\ 0 0
AVALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not effi
adequately address the need for public facilities.
b) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
c) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
d) Uses within the plan reflect the existing General Plan.
e) The plan considers phased development.
f) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
g) The no project alternative would not assure public facilities to meet demand and is therefore
detrimental.
-7-
< 0 0
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a N
DECLARATION d be prepared.
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, be environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunc
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
- I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attz
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROP IMPACT REPORT is required.
q- 23-4f 3&h&
Date Signature
42@-- Planning Director
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE]
-8-
,
\\
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3245
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL, OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
PLAN FOR ZONE 13 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, NORTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 5, AND
WEST OF MAW0 CANYON.
APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.! LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 13
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbz
referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting the
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and perfor
standards for public facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiring the pro'
of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 81 10 and 9829 irnplem
Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citizens of Carlsbad, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of May, 1992,
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimo
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside
factors relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Codss
follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
\\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn
recommends APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 13, ba!
the following findings and subject to the following condition:
Findings:
1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is consistent with th, Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements eonhi
Carlsbad's General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is consistent with 5
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), as amen(
Ordinance No. 81 10 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adopted 1986 Ci
Facilities and Improvement Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 and the con
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensurir
public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted perfor
standards.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 Will control the tirnii
locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision of
facilities and improvements.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 will ensure public faciliti
services are available in conformance with the adopted performance sta
prior to development occurring.
2)
3)
4)
5)
Condition
1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 13 as COI
in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 13, dated May 6
incorporated herein by reference.
....
1.11
....
....
."'
PC RES0 NO. 3245 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
e e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the PZ
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of May, 1992,
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Hall & Savary.
NOES: None.
A3SENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
%U
TOM ERWIN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
16
17
19 l8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING DIRECTOR
I
PC RES0 NO. 3245 -3-
L
May 6, 1992 PUNNING COMnISSION
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2) LFMP 13-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 13 -
Request for approval of a Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone 13, on property generally located north
of Palomar Airport Road, east of 1-5, south of Aqua
Hedionda Lagoon, and west of Macario Canyon.
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst, handed out page
revieionr to the Zone Plan a8 followmr Page 103, a
corrected open epace map for Zone 13; Page 108, an updated
discussion of schools; Page 107, an updated map of school
locations, and Appendix A-4, an updated parks inventory from
the Parks and Recreation Element.
Mr. Rideout stated that Zone 13 is located in the northwest quadrant, comprisem approximately 678 acres, and two owner8
hold title to the entire zone, i.e. Carltas Company, and San
Diego as & Electric. There is no existing development at
the present the, as the acreago is predominantly being used for agricultural purposes. Tho Gemera1 Plan derignation8
are Non Reeidential Resorve (NRR), Travol Sorvico (TS), and
General Plan open Space (OS). Tho zoning do8ignations aro
Local Control with a Qualified 0evelopP.nt Ovorlay (L-C-Q),
Exclusive Agriculture (E-A), Public Utility (P-U), and open
Space (OS). The agriculture use8 in the L-C-Q zone aro not
protected under the Williamson Act and thi8 i8 the only
devolopablo land in tho zono at the pre8ont tiw. Tho E-A area is currently protected; however, it may bo dsv01op.d in
a futuro pharo.
The buildout arrumptionr used to prepare the Zone 13 plan
contain a “modified yield” which mean8 that the devolopmr
ha8 voluntarily scald back the propond usos 80 that existing facilitiem will bo adequato to buildout.
Thero will bo two construction phae.8: (Phase I) the L-C-Q
zone which will consist of approximatoly 1.1 million 6.f.;
and (Phaso 11) tho E-A zone which will consist of
approximately 1.6 million 8.f. The TS zone, which will
consimt of approximately 463,000 s.f., could occur in either
Phaso I or Pha.0 11. Theroforo, total buildout of tho zono
will mormuro approximately 3.2 million s.f.
The tonom aro furthor broken dm into Planning Area8 A-F.
Phming hr0a A i8 tho TS zono; Area8 B-E i8 Ph.8. I# and
Arm I is Phamo 11. Additional detail8 can bo found in tho
Financing soction of tho Zono Plm.
Brian Buntor, Sonior Plannor, prosentod tho Park8 and op.n
Splco ol.mmntm of the Zono plan. He mtrtod that the Park.
pOrfOnnrinC0 8tmd.rd i8 3 aero8 Of CCamtunfty park. pOr 1,000
population, which muat be rch.du1.d for conrtruction within
a five yelz pmtiod. Zone 13 ia non-rmaidmntirl and Fa similar in nature to Zone 5.
Zone8 5 and 16 plana, a 40 cont por m.f. fee war inmtitutod to encourrgm indu8trial dovolopllwnt to provide rocroational
facilition for their day urn. population.
Tho Opon Spaco prrformmco standard requirom that 15% of tho
total land aroa in tho zone, exclu8iva of envfrormentally
con8trained, non-developable land, b. sot a8ido for
pormanont opm 8paco and must bo available concurront with
developaunt. Analymf8 of Zono 13 indicator that it door
With the adoption of the
have sufficient open space. Net developable acreage of Zone
13 is 541.75 acres, multiplied by 151, equals 81.26 required
acre8 of open space. The zone presently ha8 138.26 acre8 of
performance standard open space which is all located on
General Plan open space land. Project open space will be
brought before the Conmission with the Precise Development
Plan for the SDGbE property and the Specific Plan for the property south of Cannon Road, which are currently being
processed.
Steve Jantz, Associate Engineer, presented the Circulation
element of the Zone 13 Plan. The major facility which
impacts Zone 13 is the construction of Cannon Road. Future
development in this zone is required to provide a financing
mechanism which guarantees that construction. Also required
will be improvements at the intersection.of 1-5 and Cannon
Road, and an additional lane along Palomar Airport Road.
During Phase I, as development occurs along the top of the
ridge, Cannon Road must be developed from ita existing
terminus to Ridge Road. During the Phase 11 construction,
the remainder of Cannon Road to Faraday will be required.
should it be developed prior to Phase I1 of Zone 13,
easements would have to be provided through Zona 13 to allow
the construction of Cannon Road.
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analymt, concluded the
presentation by discussing tha Financing Plan for Zona 13.
The key points are that the zone must annex to the
Hello-Room Comnunity Pacilitiem District (CFD) with tha first discretionary action other than a Specific or Mamter
Plan. Therm is almo the Park. fee and the guarantw for Cannon Road which have been heretofore discussed.
Thereform, all facilities not provided by the CFD will be
developer-provided.
Tha Local Facilitie8 Management Plan for Zona 13 meat8 all
of the requirements of Proposition E and the Growth
Managenuont Ordinance and staff recormends approval.
Comnimrionar Schlahuhr inquired about the shopping centor
that wa8 onca planned for the SDGa property in Zone 13.
Brian Huntar, Senior Planner, replied that any
' Since Zone 8 aleo require8 completion of Cannon Road to 1-5,
intenrification of the proposed plan would require a
anundnmnt to the Zone Plan.
Commismionar Welmhonm requested additional clarification on
park mitigation fee which was established with tho approval
of Zona 5.
park. feo equataa to an equitable relationship batwean the projactad comt of the facilitiem and tha square footage at buildout.
Commismioner Walshono inquired if tha opm spaca raf1.ct.d
on the map. im in porpotuity. Mr. Hunter replied that therm
im premantly a 92 acre Hub park learned by the City which h
includod in tha park. and rocreation inventory. However,
becaume it is a Spacial Ramourca AT.., it is not, countad ln
tha park8 performmca mtandud invantory. In ra8pon8a to
tha quamtion am to whathar tha own #paca is in perpetuity8
it would roquira an action by the Planning Coomimmion am
well a. tha City Council to changa the open spaca
demignat ion.
Mr. Huntar replied that the 40 cant por 8-f.
Cornmissioner Schramm commented that because Cannon Road has not yet been constructed, she hopes staff and the Comission
will use sufficient foresight so that it (Cannon Road) will
bo wide enough to handle a heavy amount of croas-town traffic.
Cornmissioner Welshons noted that the Negative Declaration
was issued one year ago and she inquired if there is a time
limit. Mr. Hunter replied that there is no time limit since
there are no substantive changes; it is still considered to
be valid.
Chairman Erwin opened the public teStimOny and isaued the
invitation to speak.
Dan King, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue,
Carlsbad, representing the Carltas Company, addressed the Conmiasion and stated that each Zone Plan in the City is
unique due to the unique characteristic6 of the property it
rapreeents. He concurs with the staff recomendation and
atated he would be happy to answer queetions.
Cornmiesioner Welshons stated that ahe was curious about plans for the SDGCE property in Zone 13.
Paul O'Neal, SDG&E, addressed the Commission and stated that
SDG&E i8 presently planning for prop.rtio8 we8t of 1-5 and
has not yet, undertaken the planning for propertie8 ea8t of
1-5.
Them being no other pereons desiring to addres8 the
Comission on thi8 topic, Chairman Erwin declarod the public
testimony cloaed and opened the item for diecussion among
the Commission rnamber8.
Commierioner Noble rtated that if the deve1op.t ohould decide at a later date to build park8 rather than pay the
parka fee, ha would like to sea the parks have public
acceas.
Commiaoioner Welshons stated that she takes exception to the
application of the parks fee on page 9 bocau8e it state8
that the dovelopar may elect to build private recreational
facilitiam and have the fea reimbursed. She fool8 that thi8
will defeat the purpo8e of tho mitigation feo. Mr. Huntar
replied that the provision for providing and maintaining a
privato facility do08 not precludo anyono from using it.
The City ha8 the right to make a determination a8 to what i8 in the beat interemt of the City.
Commis8ioner Wel8hon8 can accapt tho wording ar long a8 the
City ham tho final say.
Karon Hirata, Oeputy city Attorney, Stated that thi8 could
be ramodiad if page 9, paragraph 2, were to eliminate tha
word. "for the amplOyM8 of Zone 13" and ham it re&
"public racreational facilitiem."
Thr applicant war rrqurrtmd to rrrpond to tho attorney'.
recomwndation.
Chri8 Calkinm, Carlta8 Company, addras8.d the Cominaioa and statad that the existing language i8 in the City's favor and
Hay 6, 1992 PIAWING COIQIISSIOZ? Pago 5
ho would Irk. to moo rt ranarn. Ho did not. that rf tho
facilitiom aro oponod to tho public, him company would not
bo in a pomrtion to maintain than duo to tho liability
LBOU..
that employeam had mom. rocrortional aroam on .+to whrCh
would not roquiro thom loavo tho gonoral work aroa.
Comnisrionor Hall thinkm tho uordr mhould bo loft alona
minco thoro im tuna to mako thoro docimionr at a lator dato.
Chairman Erwin rnquirod if ho could accapt tho chango if it
warn uordod "public and amployoom of Zono 13." Mr. Calkinm replied that ho im concorned about tho lrabrlity rmmuo for
public accomm. Ho would liko pormismfon to work with mtaff
on tho wording boform it goom to Council mo that rt will bo
accoptrblo to evoryono. Ho im partrcularly concernod on
making our. memo ruroational awnitrom aro available to tho
largo anployoo bamo rn that aroa.
Comimmionor Walmhonr notod that the rocroation contor could
jumt am oamily ba built in 201%. 5. Mr. Calkinr ropliod that
thim area will ba imohtod from Zona 5 and ho VUlt8 to Iluk.
sur. that raployeom don't havo to leavo tho work aoa and
thum add to tho traffic problau.
Comrntrrionrr Wrlrhonr can accrpt tho applicant' r rqurrt to
intont of tho puk mitigation foa kttor dofined a8 it ir in
Zona8 5 and 15.
Coc~mimmionor Schrum mtatod that thim documont doomn't allow
tho applicant to do anything. Sho can accopt it am it im
currantly worded.
Cacrmimmionor Noblo a9r-• with Cormnimmionor Schrum.
undormtmdo tho applicrnt'm domiro to havo tho rocroationA1
amonitios qouad towudr tho mployeor. Ea can mupport tho
mtaff rocolllawndation without Chmg08.
wimrionmr savuy cm also mupptt tho oxisting wording.
mho frla thoy ham thm right to mrk. it ucommFb10.
Cammionor Schlohukr cm mupprf tho wordinq a8 it
mtandm. If chmg.m uo mado, it could croato an 1nconsimt.lly la another part of tho Eon. PI-.
ha. tho ability to roquiro what im bomt for tho City.
CaUiOW all CIII WpDort if a@ it rtrndr.
cluirm~ win not& that Cclplrfmoionar mlrhonr' polnt fm
-11 tun.
Thr idrr behind thr privata facUitfra war to enaura
work on tha vordrng with strff. Sho would likm to mw tho
FI.
If a Cag.ny builds md Milltain8 tacroatiolul fuility,
Tho City
Motion was duly mad., rocondad, and curlad to adopt Rowlution Uo.
Dmcluation i.8U.d w thm' Pl-ing Diroctor md .dog+
FtOMlUtiOn No. Iacilitiom U8naq.mnt Plan 13, includlaq tho rovind
prawntation.
3244 rmcolllawndinq approval of tho N.gatfm
3245 rmc-nding approval of Local
paqem which warm idontitid at tho boglnahq of tho
3) CT 91-5/HDP 91-lO/C? 91-3 - LA COSTA FAIRWAYS VI- -
Roquomt for approval of a ringla lot Tantatlvo Trut
COMMISSIONERS
Erwin
8.11
Noblo
S.V.rp
Schlohubu scum
W.lmhono
DRAF I' 0
Parks and Recreation Commission -3- May 18, 199
ACTION: On motion by Commissioner Heineman, to recommend to the Cit
Council to endorse the Batting Cage Donation Agreement with th
City and La Costa Youth Organization to allow for the constructio
of a permanent batting cage facility at Stagecoach Park.
Chairman Castner, Commissioners Finnila, Heineman, Ward
Commissioner Frazier, Lawson, and Strayer
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT:
8. AB #592-8 - CITY HALULIBRARY XERISCAPE PROJECT
Mark Steyaert, Park Development Coordinator, reviewed the report.
Commissioner Lawson arrived at 321 p.m.
ACTION: On motion by Commissioner Lawson, to support the propose
xeriscape project with the addition of several suggestions as outline1
by the Commission.
AYES: Chairman Castner, Commissioners Finnila, Heineman, Lawson, an1
Ward
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Frazier, and Strayer DRAFT
9. AB #592-9 - PARK MITIGATION FEE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Keith Beverly, Senior Management Analyst, reviewed the report and responded t
questions posed by the Commission.
Persons speaking in support:
Grace Manves, Carltas Company, 2386 Faraday Avenue.
Bailey Noble, Planning Commissioner.
General discussion ensued by the Commission regarding:
private vs. public use of the park
planning for local company employees for recreation
indoor/outdoor input by companies paying 40 cents per square foot fees
* F 0 0
Parks and Recreation Commission -4- May 18, 1992
On motion by Commissioner Heineman, to go on record requestinc
that any recreational facility developed with public funds (Par1
Mitigation Fee) be open to the public and that a report on the statu
of the funds collected to date be prepared for the Commission.
AYES: Chairman Castner, Commissioners Finnila, Heineman, Lawson, anc
Ward
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Frazier, and Strayer
AB #592-10 - NAMING OF PARK SITES SUBCOMMITTEE
ACTION:
ACTION:
10.
On motion by Commissioner Lawson, to appoint Chairman Castner
Commissioners Finnila and Ward to a subcommittee to address thr
naming of the Larwin and Alta Mira Park site locations.
AYES: Chairman Castner, Commissioners Finnila, Heineman, Lawson, an(
Ward
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Frazier, and Strayer
XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Commissioner Finnila gave an update of the recent Carrillo Ranch subcommittee meetinc
ADJOURNMENT:
ACTION: On motion by Commissioner Heineman, to adjourn the Reguk
Meeting at 651 p.m.
AYES: Chairman Castner, Commissioners Finnila, Heineman, Lawson, an
Ward
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Frazier, and Strayer
Respectfully submitted,
JLuL ki.dzQd
Isabelle Paulsen
Minutes Clerk
. 0 0
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (61 9) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitl
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general c
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which I
is published for the dissemination of locaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, i newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular inte
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one
preceding the date of publicai
notice hereinafter referred to; a Take Par notice of which the annexed is
copy, has been published in ea
four Community Forums to en5 and entire issue of said newspar
EREBY GIVEN that c inany supplement thereof on t 1 of the City of Carls- a public hearing at ing dates, to-wit:
LFMP ZONE 13
The Community Forums w in-depth discussion on issi
Growth Manager
Wednesday,
Forums run from 7 to 10 p June 11
The purpose of this forum IS to incrc
familiarity wlth me Ctry s Growth M,
City staff will provide a brief overvie
and evolution and outline the struct
the program as it functions today 1
asked to assess the adequacy of CL
administrative facilities. such as the
schools, 4) circulation and 5) open
I certify under penalty of perju
foregoing is true and correct. E
Carlsbad, County of San Diegc
day of June 1992
2) wastewater drainage. sewer and
Traffic Circulatic California on t hP I I t h
p 6u13ueuii pue luaiua6euew uoIlisintm 40 ieiiqeq sanssi JO~ ssnmp spuei pue II'M ads sluedt~ed uado uo1isa6uo:, qjeJi an
uoiie,n:,:13 JO~ sa
dp rYp%Li
Clerk ol r JG~CJ 9110:i~: 6~iJUeid ~OlleAJaSU03 IWQe'J lMwJ s ki3 au
1 Carlsbad moving ,
against ‘bitch’ sign 1
Anti-Kulchin placard has no permit
By Gary Warth Swab in the 3600 block of Adams Staff Writer Street, the city cannot measure it to determine if it exceeds size restric- CARLSBAD - The city is taking tions for signs in residential areas. action against the owner of a sign Such signs cannot be larger than that calls City Councilwoman Ann 2 square feet, he said. Kulchin a “bitch.” The sign is one of two on the City building inspector Pat Kelly property and reads, “Ditch the said the sign does not appear to bitch, Citizens to Defeat Kulchin.” have a permit and may be too large Kelly said the contents of signs for city codes. must be approved by representa- Had the sign gone through the tives of the city’s Planning Depart- normal permit process, Kelly said ment before obtaining permits. its content would have been reviewed for compliance with a The city’s policy is to contact decency rule. people in violation of the sign code “There is a provision in the sign only after receiving a complaint. code that deals with obscene or Michelle Levy’s “Remove the Bars” indecent or immoral material on signs on her Carlsbad Village Drive display,” Kelly said. home drew a complaint last month “What we anticipate doing here that resulted in a contact from the is mailing a letter to the property city and the signs’ eventual volun- owner describing that the sign does tary removal. not have a permit,” he said. Kelly said the city has received “Should he choose to get a permit one complaint about the Kulchin for the sign, then a determination sign. The city will send three could be made for the content of notices of violation to sign owners the sign.” who do not comply with permit reg- Because the sign is on private ulations before contacting the dis- property presumably owned by Jim trict attorney for possible citations.
I
edge of Highway 78.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LFMP ZONE 13
\IOTICE IS HEREBY GI VEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
Iublic hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
;alifornia, at 6:OOpm on Tuesday, June 23, 1992, to consider approval of a Local
-acilities Management Plan for Zone 13, on property generally located north of Palomar
4irport Road, east of 1-5, south of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and west of Macario
:anyon.
f you have any questions regarding this matter, please :all Don Rideout in the Planning Department, at 438-
11 61, extension 421 2.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in
sourt, you may be limited to raising only those issues
raised by you or someone else at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk‘s Office at, or
xior to the public hearing..
APPLICANT: Carltas Company
PUBLISH: June 12, 1992
, e a
b*
c
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
LFMP ZONE 13
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will holc a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, June 23, 1992, to considei approval of a local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13, on property general11 located north of Palomar Airport Road, east of 1-5, south of Agua Hediond, Lagoon, and west of Macario Canyon.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Don Rideout in thc
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may bi limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the publil hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to thl City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at, or prior, to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Carltas Company PUBLISH: June 11, 1992
Planning Department, at 438-1161, extension 4212,
{P-+-+J
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
4
clq d cvb
LOCATION LFMP ZONE 13
e@kJt&-* *
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
4
Clty It CVbLl
LOCATION N LFMP ZONE 13
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, May 6, 1992, to consider approval of a Loca
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 on property generally located north of Palomai
Airport Road, east of 1-5, south of Agua Hedionda Lagoon and west of Macario Canyon.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after April 29, 1992. If yo1
have any questions, please call Don Rideout in the Planning Department at 438-1 161, ext
4212.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
CASE FILE: LFMP 13
CASE NAME: ZONE 13
PUBLISH: APRIL 23, 1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
DR:km
9
(Form A)
L I) I)
1
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: v€3fJ ZQ!eJ<
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
Gr%& [ 3 m. F?-/U7LS &&%+?-IT fm
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of 5&w
Thank you.
- fl 2-3
A s s i s tan t C i t y Man w- - &
u- - @*(y-d
/9?+- C+-tYF?+ 9Lb 4?+& w-