HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-03-09; City Council; 12097; Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan-_
CIT. .3F CARLSBAD -
fy-
AGENt-- BILL $&??&
\B # /2,0’3’ 7 TITLE: APPROVALOFVARIOUSDISCRETIONARYAPPLICATIONS
ATG. 3-9-93 NECESSARYTOAPPROVETHE CARMRADRANCHSPECIFICPLAN
PROJEa. EIR91-Q3/GPA90-1~A9oo8/sp-2o7/zC92-02/
IEPT. PLN AP76-Ol(C)/IJMP 87-13(A)
IECOMMENDED ACTION: ,
CITY MGR.$@&
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the
City Attorney to prepare documents CERTIFYING EIR 91-03 and APPROVING the Negative
Declaration, GPA 90-11, LCPA 90-08, AP 76-01(C), and LFMP 87-13(A), as approved by *
the Planning Commission, and INTRODUCE Ordinances Nos. /vS- 223 and us -2 d g,
APPROVING SP-207 and ZC 92-02.
On January 6, 1993, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and
recommended approval with modification (6-l) of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan project,
located north of Palomar Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, east of Paseo De1
Norte and west of Local Facilities Management Zones 5 and 8 on 423.5 acres. The Zone
Change also includes a property on the west side of Paseo de1 Norte north of Palomar
Airport Road and Pea Soup Andersen’s.
The project includes a Tentative Tract Map and Hillside Development Permit application
which were approved by the Planning Commission subject to the City Council approving
all the other required actions for the project. The applications would provide for the
development of up to 1,880,OOO square feet of office/research and development, retail, a
hotel, and a golf driving range. The non-residential development is planned for 92.6 acres.
Of the remaining site area 24.5 acres will be used for the driving range and the balance
of the property 306.4 acres will remain in agricultural use. The proposed project complies with all City ordinances and policies and includes the following discretionary actions:
EIR 91-2 - Certification of the Program Environmental Impact Report prepared for
the project. The EIR addresses all discretionary actions necessary for development
of the site pursuant to the specific plan. Mitigation measures identified in EIR 91-
03 have been incorporated into the project as mitigating conditions of approval.
Overriding considerations are proposed for the cumulative Air Quality and Solid
Waste impacts which result due to the status of the region with these two subjects.
GPA 90-l 1 - A General Plan Amendment to redesignate approximately 113 acres
from Non-Residential Reserve (NRR) to Open Space (OS), Professional
Office/Planned Industrial (O/PI), Community Commercial/Professional
Office/Planned Industrial (C/O/PI), Travel Services Commercial/Community
Commercial (TS/C), and Community Commercial (C).
LCPA 90-08 - A Local Coastal Plan Amendment to revise the text of the Mello II
Local Plan as described in the attached staff report in addition to amending the land
use map as described above to achieve consistency between the LCP and the General
Plan.
PAGE2OFAGENDABlLLNO. 12,047
SP-207 - A Specific Plan as defined by Government Code Section 65451. The plan
contains goals, objectives, and policies as well as development and design standards
to guide development of the site.
ZC 92-02 - A Zone Change from L-C (Limited Control, to O/P-M (Office/Planned
Industrial), C-2/0/P-M (General Commercial/Office/Planned Industrial), C-T/C-2
(Commercial-Tourist/General Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial), C-T
(Commercial-Tourist), and O-S (Open Space). All zones except OS would
additionally have a Q (Qualified Development Overlay) which necessitates the
subsequent approval of a site development plan for any proposed development.
AP 76-Olfa - A Land Conservation Contract Amendment to add to the list of
permitted uses in the Agricultural Preserve, “Public recreational uses (including golf
courses) otherwise consistent with open space uses”.
LFMP 87-13(A) - An amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
13 to increase the buildout projections for Phase I and reduce the buildout
projections for Phase II. The Zone totals will remain unchanged.
More detailed information is included in the attached staff report to the Planning
Commission. Only one person provided public testimony to the Planning Commission. The
testimony was in support of the project. No others persons addressed the commission on
the project. Additional conditions proposed by staff and the Planning Commission at the
hearing have been incorporated into the appropriate Planning Commission Resolutions.
The applicant objects to condition 5 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3480 added
by the Planning Commission at the hearing. The condition has the affect of requiring
developers within the specific plan to pay a park mitigation fee of 40 cents per square foot
on the zone’s non-residential development. It prohibits developers within the specific plan
from attempting to use the option contained in the Zone 13 LFMP of reaching an
agreement with the City to privately provide and maintain recreational facilities for the
employees of Zone 13 and the residents of Carlsbad. The project applicant would like to
maintain the LFMP option for providing park mitigation as opposed to being limited to
paying the 40 cents per square foot fee. The Planning Commission in imposing condition
5 was attempting to prevent the possibility of having privately owned and maintained park
facilities.
mMRoNMENTALREvIEw
An EIR was processed addressing all necessary discretionary approvals needed to develop
the project. The report was found by staff and the Planning Commission to have been
prepared in compliance with State and City regulations. The project would result in
significant, unmitigated impacts to air quality and cumulatively to solid waste. Overriding
considerations are proposed for adoption for these two impacts and are contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3476.
PAGE 3 OF AGENDA BILL NO. Ia, 0 4 7
The study prepared by Alfred Gobar Associates titled, “Fiscal Impact Analysis of the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207)“, dated September 1992, demonstrates that the
overall proposed land uses generate a net fiscal benefit per acre of development to the City
and State. The summary from the Gobar Report is included as an exhibit attached to the
agenda bill. In addition, as discussed in the Zone 13 Local Facilities management Plan, all required improvements are to be funded by development. The Zone 13 Local Facilities
Management Plan includes a park fee of 404 per square foot of non-residential
development. If the maximum buildout allowed by the specific plan of 1,880,OOO square
feet is achieved $752,000.00 would be raised by the park mitigation fee. The funds
collected are to be combined with the Zone 5 and Zone 16 park fees to fund park
development in the industrial corridor.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
Facilities Zone
1 Local Facilities Management Plan - 13
I Growth Control Point I-l WA
II Net Density I I - WA I Special Facilities I-I C.F.D. No. 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Location Map
Ordinance Nos.nrs-223 and @S-228 (Specific Plan 207 & Zone Change 92-02)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3476, 3477, 3478, 3479, 3480, 3481, 3482,
and 3491
Summary and Conclusions of the Study prepared by Alfred Gobar Associates
Associates titled, “Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP-
207)“, dated September 1992
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 6, 1993
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated January 6, 1993
EIR 91-03 (Previousip MU&F
SP-207 (Pmviou@ Dktribm+
h
EXHBIT 1
1
city of Carl&ad
’ Eli? Q1=3/GPA 90-W LCPA 90=8/SP 2071
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ‘ZC 9202/AP 76-l C)/ I LFMP 8743(A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 2
OItDINANcE NO. Ns-777
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE CARLSBAD RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN ON APPROXIMATELY 423.5 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH OF
FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, AND WEST
OF LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES 5 AND 8 IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: SP 207
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed
and considered a Specific Plan for future development of the site; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law,
the City Council has determined that the public interest indicates that said plan be
approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: That the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, SP 207, dated
December 1992, on file in the Planning Department and incorporated by reference herein,
is approved. The Specific Plan shall constitute the zoning for this property and all
development of the property shall conform to the plan.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3480 shall also constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it
to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
lt?
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council on the 9th day of MARCH , 1993; and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad on the of day -) 1993, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEW
1
3
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,--
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO
GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 92-02 FROM L-C-Q TO O-Q/P-M-Q,
C-2-Q/O-Q/P-M-Q, C-T-Q/C-2-Q, C-2-Q, C-T-Q, AND O-S ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD, SOUTH OF FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE, AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES 5
AND 8. PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE
NORTH OF PALGMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PEA SOUP ANDERSEN’S
IS ALSO INCLUDED.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: ZC 92-02
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended by the
amendment of the zoning map as shown on the map marked “Exhibit ZC 92-02” attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as
set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 3481 constitutes the findings and conditions
of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it
to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council held on the 9th day of MARCH -) 1993, and thereafter
. . .
. . .
. . .
h
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
day of , 1993, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
-
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
EXHBtT ZC 92-02 JAWARY 6, I993
hy of bhbad
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN 1 I
I zc 92-2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6 --4
EXIUBIT 3
PLANNINGCOMMISSIONRESOLUTIONNO.3476
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
CERTIFICATION OF A PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT, EIR 91-03, FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY
INCLUDING 1,880,OOO SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL,
OFFICE/RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, HOTEL AND A
DRIVING RANGE ON 117.1 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH OF FUTURE CANNON
ROAD, EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, AND WEST OF LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES 5 AND 8 WITHIN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: EIR 91-03
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
A portion of Lot “H” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1892,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Program Environmental Impact Report and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A> That the-FOREGOING recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B> That the Program Environmental Impact Report EIR 91-03 will be amended to
include the comments and documents of those testifying at the public hearing and
responses thereto hereby found to be in good faith and reason by incorporating a
copy of the minutes of said public hearings into the report.
c> That the Planning Commission finds and deter-n-tines that the Environmental Impact
Report EIR 91-03 has been completed in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, and the
provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the Planning
Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in
the report.
D> That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 91-03 as so amended and as evaluated
in the staff report (January 6, 1993), is recommended for acceptance and
certification as the final Environmental Impact Report and that the final
Environmental Impact Report as recommended is adequate and provides reasonable
information on the project and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto,
including no project.
That potentially significant construction-related air quality impacts would be
mitigated to below a level of significance by implementation of the proposed
mitigation measures to control dust generation and to regulate construction traffic.
Mobile source impacts would be partially mitigated through implementation of a
Transportation Demand Management Program (TDM) and adherence to traffic
mitigation measures. The proposed mitigation measures can measurably reduce the
level of significance of the cumulative air quality impact.
El
F)
G)
PC RESO NO. 3476
That the project does not result in significant unmitigatible impacts at the project
level to solid waste. To reduce cumulative impacts the Carlsbad Ranch project will
implement a recycling program for the proposed project which would include white
paper, newspaper, glass, plastic and metal recyclables. It is only because of the
existing solid waste disposal crisis, that the project would have cumulative impacts
with respect to solid waste generation. However, buildout of the proposed project
is not expected before the year 2000, and it is anticipated that the regional problem
of landfill space will be resolved by that time.
That each and every significant environmental impact identified in the
Environmental Impact Report would be overruled or counter balanced by changes
or alteration in the project which would mitigate against said adverse impacts or,
in the case of Air Quality and solid waste, that mitigation of such adverse impacts
is not feasible under the circumstances and that as a result of economic and social
considerations a Statement of Overriding Considerations is contained herein, to
support the approval of the project.
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That the following f?ndings are made relative to the conclusions of the Final
Ruvironment~ Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
and related applications (SCH #92071027) based on the EIR text, inchrding the
comments and responses to the draft EIR, and all documents, maps, public
testimony and illustrations included in the public record.
That the EIR will serve as a ‘Program EIR” by addressing impacts of the initial
project and the subsequent Site Development Plans.
That the proposed project involves the construction of up to a total of 1,880,OOO
square feet of building area consisting of retail comme.rciaI, office/research and
deveIopment,&ht manufacturing, a hotel, and a driving range on 117.1 acres and
the continued agriculturaI use of the remaining 306.4 acres.
That the EIR for the CarIsbad Ranch Specific Plan project concluded that the project
would not have significant adverse impacts except for signifkant, unmitigated
impacts to air quality and cumulativeIy to solid waste. A statement of overriding
considerations is proposed for these two significant, unmitigated impacts.
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS:
Section 15093 of the CJZOA Guidelint&
The decision makers, having reviewed and considered the information contained in
the Final EIR, and having reviewed and considered the public record, find that the
following factors support approval of the project despite any significant impacts
identified in the Final EIR and, therefore, make the following statement of
Oveniding Considerations.
The City of Carlsbad finds that the mitigation measures discussed in the Final EIR
(EIR 92-03) and the resolutions of approval for the project, specifically Planning
Commission Resolution 3483 for CT 92-07, when implemented, avoid or
substantially lessen most of the significant effects identified in the EIR Nonetheless,
certain significant effects of the project on AIR QUALITY and SOLID WA!SIE are
unavoidable even after incorporation of a.U feasible mitigation measures. With
regard to these significant impacts, the City has balanced the benefits of the project
against the unavoidable environmental risks in approving the project. In this
regard, the City finds that ail feasible mitigation measures identified in the FIR, have
been or will be implemented with the project, and any significant remairkg effects
are acceptable due to the following specific economic, social and other
considerations:
PC RESO NO. 3476 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
The study prepared by Alfred Gobar Associates titled, “Fiscal Impact Analysis
of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207)“, dated September 1992
demonstrates that the proposed land uses generate a net fiscal benefit per
acre of development to the City and State except prospective office projects
with a floor-area-ratio (FAR) below 0.5 and open space activities. The
overall total impact will be a net fiscal benefit. This benefit outweighs the
margkal cumulative impact created by the project to air quality and solid
waste.
The net fiscal benefit of the project will benefit all citizens of the City of
Carlsbad as funds will be generated which the City Council can allocate
amongst various public services and programs desired by the citizens of
Carlsbad.
The proposed non-residential uses will create employment opportunities
within the City which may result in a reduction of mobile source air quality
emissions as well as providing potential job opportunities for residents.
Development of the site is planned for as part of the General Plan and Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13. Development of the site as
proposed is necessary in order to generate income to pay the properties
portion of the Palomar Airport Road Assessment District as well as to fund
improvements identified as part of the Mello-Roos District including the
Palomar Airport Road/I-S improvements.
The ultimate development of additional office, research and development,
commercial space, a hotel, and a driving range will provide social, cultural
and economic benefits to the residents of the City by providing additional
jobs and services in a location closer to their home. Furthermore, this
project will provide significant revenues to the City by way of sales tax,
property tax, and transient occupancy tax.
All of the considerations above outweigh the adverse environmental impacts to air
quality and solid waste.
Conditions:
1. Refer to CT 92-07, Planning Co mmission Resolution No. 3483 for all conditions,
mitigation measures, and monitoring programs applicable to development of the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan project area.
2. Refer to attached Exhibit “A”, Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program, for the
mitigation measures and monitoring programs applicable to the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan project area.
PC RESO NO. 3476 -4-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the follo&ing vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOB&, C&h-person
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RF%0 NO. 3476 -5-
Mitigation Monitoring Program
6.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
6.1 INTRODUCTION
On January 1, 1989, Assembly Bill 3180 (AB3180) (Cortesc) was enacted. AB3180 requires that
public agencies “adopt a reporting and monitoring program for changes to the project which was
adopted or made a condition of project approval in OFder to mitigate or avoid significant effects
of the environment.” The purpose of the law is to establish a reporting or monitoring program
to assure implementation of nxommcnded mitigation measures.
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan Project
has been developed in compliance with AB3180 and will assist the City of Carl&ad with
mitigation monitoring and rqoxting. It presents all mitigation monitoring and reporting measures
required in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) tid outlines the procedures which mbst be
followed to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented It also identifies
documentation for reporting program when compliance with the mitigation program occurs.
6.2 PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM
The mitigation measures p#ental in this program have been developed to avoid or reduce to
below a level of significance the potentially significant environmental imp- associated with
implementi of dre proposed Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan Pruja Monitoring will occur at
various staga dming the impkmentation of the monitoring program. Copies of the program will
be kept on fn8 at ebt City of Carl&ad Planning Department. The pro$am will be updated as
appropri=
Carl&ad Ranch Page 6-1
br -PC Pa :E
24 ‘3s -10 64;4t JUZ
% CO mLS
cea
gz
0 q: m*
139 *t
4=
Page 6-i
.
~ Page 6-3
.
G
2 e
fj j
g -2 C-
si
2%
23 LI ub “U A;42 4 u -
fE3 .“(z c- -2 ‘38
5= Pa
qf
rz
32
5% us
5
Page 6-5
Page 6-d
.
Page 6-7
Page 6- 8 I
.
Page 6-9
Page 6-10
. .
Page 6-11
I-
f&Q stp i&E run
Page 6-12
_-
.
Page 6-13
.
E
Page 6-14
Page 6-15
PLANNING COMMESION RESOLUTION NO. 3477
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE
CHANGE FROM L-C-Q TO C-T-Q AND A TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP TO CREATE SEPARATE LEGAL PARCELS FOR A
PROPERTY SEPARATED BY THE REALIGNMENT OF PASEO
DEL NORTE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PEA
SOUP ANDERSEN’S.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: ZC 92-02KT 92-07
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, ex amining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according
to Exhibit “ND”, dated November 5, 1992, and “PII”, dated October 28, 1992,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
11 Fin-:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
-
3. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed project.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
impacted by this project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
1L
BAILEY NOB% Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HbtZMtiR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3477 -2-
NEGATIVE DECLARATTON
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: West side of Paseo De1 Norte, north of Pea Soup
Andersen’s in Local Facilities Management Zone 3.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. zone change from L-C-Q (Limited Control, Qualified
Development Overlay Zone) to C-T-Q (Commercial-Tourist,
Qualified Development Overlay Zone) on 2.3 net acres and a
Tentative Tract Map to create separate legal parcels for a
property separated by Paseo De1 Norte. The Zone Change and
Tentative Tract Map applications also include property on the east side of Paseo De1 Norte, north of Palomar Airport Road
which is analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report
(EIR 91-3) for the Carlsbad Ranch Speciiic Plan.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the
Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4446. .
DATED: NOVEMBER 5,1992
CASE NO: ZC 92-02KI 92-07
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH
PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 5,1992
DNd
2075 Las Palmas Drive l Carlsbad, California 92009-l 576 l (619) 436-l 161
NOTICB- Mail to: State CLearinghouse, 1400 11 Street, Rm. 121, Sacrunento, CA %81& - 91 -TiziF
Project Title: ZC 92-OZ/Cf 92-07 - Carlsbad Ranch
Lead Agency: Citv of Carl&ad - Plamirm Oecwtmnt Contact Person: Don Neu
Street Address: 2073 Las Palisas Drive Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 6446
City: Carlsbsd Zip: County: 92009 San Diego
____-___..___---._.-__________________I_-----.------.---------.----.-....---------------.-------..-.-----.....---..--.-----..--
PROJECT LOUTIW:
county: San Diepo City/Nearest Ccimkmity: Carl&ad
Cross Streets: Pasea De1 Norte L Palomar Airport Road Total Acres: 2.3 net
Assessor's Parcel No. 211-021-26 Section: Twp. Range: Base:
Within 2 Miles: State Hwy 1: I-5 Yeterweys: P ific j
Airports: McClellan-Palassr Railways: Al&SF Schools: N/A
---._-.-----.-_-_._____l______________l_----------------------..-----..-----------------.-.-------------.-----...-..-..---.---
DoomwT TYPE
CEQA: - NW Early Cons z
SupQlrrnt/Subsequent EPA: OTHER: - Joint Dowsent
1 Neg Dee EIR'fPrior SCH No.j Final Docunent - Other -Draft EIS = Other -Draft EIR -FONSI -__..__--_-._____.__------------------.------.------------.------.------..-----.----------------------..------------.-----------
LOCAL ACTIan TYPE
- General Plan Updatr - Specific Plan J- Rezone - Amexation
- General Plan Amen&ant - Master Plan - Prezone - Rsdevelopmt
- General Plan Element - Plamed unit Developnent Use Permit - Comsunity Plan - Site Plan x Land Division (S&division, - Coastal Pemit -Other
Parcel Flap, Tract Pap, etc.) ___-_______-____________________________-------------.----.-------.-.---...----..-.-----------------------.---------------------
DMLmEWt TYPE
- Residential: units Acres
Office:
X Comsercial:
sq. Ft. Acres Eap1w-s - Sq. Ft. N/A Acres 2.3 Employees N/A - Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres .- Eaploy-8 -. - Educational
- Recreational
- Uater Facilities: Type
- Transportation: Type
- Wining: Mineral
-Powr: VW Uaste Treatment: Type
= Hazardous Yaste: Type
- Other:
"CD -
Uatts
___-__.-___-_____-__-----------.-----.-----...---...----------------------------------...------------------------.--------..---..
PROJECT 1-S Dl- IIF-
X Aesthetic/Visual Flood Plafn/Floadfng Schools/LWvsrsities L u8tu Quality
X Agricultural Land 1 forest Land/fire Hazard = septic system & Uater Supply/
X Air Puality &- Gaologic/Srismic x Sewr Capacity Grand Uater
X Archaeological/Historical Winrals
X Coastal Zone
L Soil Erosim/C~tion/Grading -Uetland/Riparian
x Drainage/Akorption x Noise Solid Uasta
Population/Housing Balance 7 Toxic/Hazardwr
- Yildlife
x Public Services/Facilities x lraffic/Circuletion
Growth Inbcing
- Economic/Joke X Lsndse
- Fiscal - Recreation/Parks X Vegetation - Crarrlative Effect
- Other --.--___-_-___---._-----....-.-..----.------.--------------------------...----.-------------------.------.-------..----*--.-----
PruentLrdlbe/Zmi~ 1 Clml lba
unbvrlopad, previously graded site/L-C-O (Limited Control, Qurlifisd Dmloprnt Overlay Zone)/TS
<Travel Sorvicr Cosseercial).
Project Description A Zcne Changa froa L-C-Q to C-T-Q (Tourist-Cmrcial, Qwlified Davelwt Warlay Zone) on 2.3 net acres and a lsntative Tract Map to create separate legal parcrls for a property separated by
Paseo De1 Norte. The Zone Change and Tentative Tract Hap application also includr property on the
east side of Pares De1 Norte, north of Palmar Airport Road rhich is anslyzed in the Program EIR
(E-u 91-3) (SCH P92071027) for the Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan.
YOIE: Clearinghouse will assign from a Notice of Preparation or
DN:vd
identification w&err for all Ned projects. If a SCH nuiber already exists for a project (e.g.
previous draft docusmt) please fill it in. Revised October 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
BACKGROUND
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. ZC 92-02/CT 92-07
DATE: October 28. 1992
1. CASE NAME: Carlsbad Ranch Zone Change and Tentative Tract MaD
2. APPLICANT: Carltas Comuanv
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5600 Avenida Encinas. Suite 100
Carlsbad. CA 92008
(6191 431-5600
4. DATE EIAFORM PART I SUBMITTED: Sentember 28.1992
5. PROJEa DESCRIPTION: A zone change from L-C-O to C-T-O to make the zonk consistent
with the TS General Plan designation and a subdivision to create two senarate legal Parcels on nrouertv
presentlv senarated bv Paseo De1 Norte. The maioritv of the Zone Change and Tentative Tract MaD
annlications certain to DronerN located on the east side of Paseo De1 Norte. north of Palomar Airnort
* . .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a signi&nt effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a gigniflcant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings ‘YES-s&’ and ‘YES-insig
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
Dt. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined sign&ant.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DtRECl’LY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
big) (insig)
NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards? x
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant amheological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
--
-2-
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a baker to the
migration or movement of ariimals?
YES YES
(sigl (insig)
ENVlROlV-lWNT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
WI (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fin, emergency or other public services?
NO
x
x
x
x
x
NO
x
X
-3-
-
HuMANEiIvvlRoNMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
big) (insig)
x
x
x
x
x
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including,. but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
X
x
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking? x
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
x
X
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans? x
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view? x
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational oppc%unities?
4-
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFKAN~
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will eausesubstantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
YES
(sigl
YES NO
(insig)
x
X
X
.
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
‘This environmental analysis is confined to the 4.6 gross acre (2.3 net acre) parcel proposed on the west side
of Paseo De1 Norte immediately north of Pea Soup Andersen’s. The project includes a zone change f&m L-C-Q
(Limited Control, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) to C-T-Q (Commercial-Tourist, Qualified Development
Overlay Zone) to make the zoning consistent with the TS (Travel Services Commercial) general plan land use
designation. Also proposed is a tentative tract map to make this proposed 2.3 net acre parcel a separate
parcel. It was separated f?om property on the east side of Paseo De1 Norte by the realignment of this road.
The realignment did not however create two separate legal parcels. Both the zone change and tentative map
applications also include property on the Carlsbad Ranch located on the east side of Paseo De1 Norte , north
of Palomar Airport Road which are analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-3) for the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore this environmental analysis is confined to this 2.3 net acre property.
Phvsical Environment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A report titled, “Phase I Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Ranch Carlsbad, California” was prepared
for the project by Geotechnics Incorporated. The report is dated September 25, 1992. This lot on the west
side of Paseo De1 Norte is located on the Lindavista Formation. Generally, the Lindavista Formation
encountered in the subsurface exploration is dense to very dense and non-expansive. No faults were
observed on this site which was previously graded and is relatively flat. Only minimal grading would be
needed for development of the site therefore, no unstable earth conditions will be created.
The property is relatively flat and has been previously graded. Only a minor amount of finished grading
will be necessary to develop the property. No significant change to the topography of the site will occur. . .
Public street and drainage improvements exist on the property% frontage. In addition an existing concrete
channel is located on the property to channel drainage from two 48 inch pipes located under Paseo De1
Norte. No significant erosion problems have occurred on the property.
As indicated under item 3 above drainage facilities exist which will carry drainage waters to city approved
outlets.
The proposed zoning designation will make the zoning for the site consistent with the General Plan Land
Use Designation. The existing General Plan Land Use Designations are utilized by the Air Quality
Management District to develop the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP is based on the population,
housing, employment and land use forecasts in effect when the plan was prepared. Therefore, the existing
land use was considered in the SIP and will not result in an increase from what was anticipated for the
site based on the land use designation.
The proposed tentative map and zone change for the site will not substantially change air movement as
development of the site will result in building separations which provide for air movement.
The project will not change the course or flow of water as no streams are located in the area and drainage
waters will be handled by existing facilities.
Surface waters will not be Xpacted by the project and water will be supplied to the site by the Carlsbad
Municipal Water District.
-6-
9. No natural resources exist on this previously graded site which is bordered by existing development,
graded vacant property or public improvements.
IO. As a result of the relatively smail size of the property development of this site is not expected to use
substantial amounts of fuel or energy.
11. This previously graded site does not have a signifkant potential for containing archeological or
paleontological objects.
Biological Environment
12.
13.
Vegetation on site consists primarily of weeds and grasses as the property has been previously graded.
Existing species of vegetation on the property are not environmentally significant, therefore, the
introduction of new species of plants will not cause an adverse impact.
14. Development of the site will not reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect
farmland of state or local importance.
15. Because the project site has been previously graded , it does not presently provide habitat for wildlife.
16. The commercial uses allowed by the land use designations will not result in the introduction of
domestic animals into the area.
Human Environment
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
The proposed zone change will make the zoning for the site consistent with the general plan land use
designation.
All necessary public utilities and services will be provided in conformance with the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 3.
Sewer systems exist to accommodate development ‘of the site.
The site fronts on Paseo Del Norte a secondary arterial and is in close proximity to Interstate 5.
Surrounding land uses are commercial or agricultural. Development of the site with a commercial use
will generate additional vehicle traffic which will not significantly increase ambient noise levels.
When the site is Moped necessary lighting will be required to be directed so as to not impact
adjacent properties.
The commercial tourist zone limits the types of commercial uses that can be permitted on the property. As a result of the types of land uses that can be permitted on the property there is no significant risk
of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances from the site once it is developed.
The density of the humanpopulation of the area will not be substantially altered as development of the
site will implement the existing general plan land use designation for the site.
-7-
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. Commercial development of the site will not create a large demand for recreational facilities.
Commercial development of the site will not affect existing housing and will not generate a significant
demand for additional housing.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 was based on the buildout of the existing general PIan
designations. The proposed actions will implement the existing general plan designation.
any parking demanded created by development of the site will be required to be satisfied on site
pursuant to the City’s Zoning Ordinance.
Street improvements presently exist along the properties frontage on Paseo De1 Norte.
The site is within the outer limits of the airport influence area for McClellan Palomar Airport and is
located outside of the 60 CNEL noise contour. No impact to airport operations is anticipated.
The number of access points to the site will be limited as the property fronts on a secondary arterial.
This will help to limit potential conflicts with bicyclists or pedestrians.
The project will not interfere with emergency response plans. The existing public roadway will not be
significantly impacted or altered by the project.
Development of this site will not obstruct a scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view.
The site is located between Paseo De1 Norte and Interstate 5 in addition to being lower in elevation
than property to the east.
-8-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed project, and
g) no project alternative.
a) The proposed actions for this relatively small site cannot be phased.
b) Site designs are not being considered as part of the actions being requested on this site.
c) No plan of development is being proposed as part of the actions requested on the site at this time.
d) The requirement for development to be consistent with the general plan which designates this property
and the adjacent properties to the north and south as Travel Services Commercial (TS) results in there
being no alternate uses for the site than those permitted by the TS designation and commercial-tourist
zone.
e) The site is not proposed to be developed as part of the actions being requested. However, there is no
environmental advantage from deferring development of this site.
f) The proposed actions will create separate legal parcels from property separated by the realignment of
Paseo De1 Norte and will remove the limited control zoning to replace it with a zone consistent with the
general plan designation for the site. Therefore, alternate sites do not need to be considered for these
actions.
g) The no project alternative would not be environmentally superior as the project site contains no significant
environmental resources and is located adjacent to a secondary arter@l.
-9-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
x
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the
environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Detemination has been prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
/c’ .--y- -/2 ,;\,, 7. &,
Date Signature
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
AlTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM {IF APPLICAEV&) --
-lO-
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MfTlGA'T'ING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
DN:vd
-110
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PIANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3478
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM NRR TO OS,
O/PI, C/O/PI, TS/C, AND C ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH
OF FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE
AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES
5 & 8.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: GPA 90-11
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the General Plan
designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit GPA 90-l 1, dated January
6,1993, attached and incorporated herein, has been fled with the Planning Commission;
and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
- recommends APPROVAL of GPA 90-l 1, based on the following kl.i.ngs and
subject to the following conditions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
2%
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. Goal”A”oftheGenemlPlanIan&JseElementen coumgesthepreservationand
~~oftheenvirmunent,characterandimaneofthecityasadesirable xesidential, beach and open space-oriented community. The proposed project has
concentrated most of the development on the westem tidge of the project site,
while leaving the remaining portion of the site under agricultural and open space
llSt!StherebySatisFyingthiSgeneralphgoal.
2. General Plan Land Use Element Goal “C is to promote the economic viability of the agkultural and horticultural industries. The proposed project development
on the western tidge would provide supplemental income to sustain agkultural
operations on the majority of the remaining site. The economic viability of
~~~andhorticultureisalsoenhsncedbythe~t~onoftheareamost
valuable for growing bulb crops with its protection integrated in the relationship
with the rest of the project.
3. Development of an industrial base of ligl& pollution-!kee industries of such
magnitude as will provide a reasonable tax base and opportunities for employment
oflocalcitizensisGoal”D”oftheGeneralPlanLanduseElement. Thespecific
Plan% incoqxation of reseal& and development uss contriites to the light
industxialcomponentservingtoincrease the city’s tax base and add job
oppommities for local residents.
4. ThecarlsbadRanchSpecificPlanprovidesfrwthepreservatianof~~~ity
hmdmark of the “flower Fields” in compliance with Goal “F of the General Plan
Land use Element to pmtect and txmsewe natural rexmIre and significant
features of the aEmmmity.
5. The Carlsbad Ranch project provides for adequate kilities in conformance to the
development~establishedintheZane13IFMp,as~byPolicy
“A” of the General Plan Land Use Fknent which stats that development should
only be permitted after adequate provisions for public facilities have been
provided.
6. Asstatedin~~~“D”oftherandUseElement,thismajorcommercialandlight
industrialcenterislocatedsoastobe~ accessiible to major tmrqoHation
fkilities. Freewayaccesstothepraposedprojectisavailable~boththeI-
S/Cannon road and the I-S/Palomar Airport Road intexhaqes. Major arterial
links far local residents include Palomar Airport Road, El Camino Real, College
Bolll~andcaunonRoad
use!WhichwouldbepennittedbytheproposedGeneralPlandesignationsandthe
specificPlanwillbe~~~~withexistingandallowable~~landuseswhich
are also non-residentiaL
7.
PCRJiSO3478 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
1e
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COIlditiOX.lS:
1. All conditions of the Program JIIR, as contained in Resolution No. 3476, and
LCPA 90-08, SP 207, ZC 9242, CI’ 92-07, HDP 92-11 and AP 7641(C) are
incorpomtedhereinbyreference. Refkrtothosed ocuments for all conditions and mitigation measmes applicable to the development of the Q&bad Ranch Specific
Plan project site.
2. Approval of GPA 90-11 is granted subject to the certification of the Program EXR
and approval of LCPA 90-08, SP 207 and ZC 92-02.
This msolution is effective 30 days following its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOB&, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATl’&T:
MiCHAEL J. H&kMItiR Planning Director
PC RESO 3478 3
ii NRR\ \ 15 \
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
m@m3rr GM 90-11 JANUARY 6,1993
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN/LCPA
PRoPosED GPERAL PLAN/LCFA
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
by of hsbad
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN 1 GPA 90-11 LCPA 90-8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMSSION RJSOLUTION NO. 3479
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL
COASTAL PLAN TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE MELLO II
LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AND BRING THE DESIGNATIONS
ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, GENERAL PLAN, AND
ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH
OF FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE,
AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES
5 and 8. THE AMENDMENT ALSO INCLUDES A PROPERTY
ON THE WEST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE NORTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PEA SOUP ANDERSEN’S.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: LCPA 90-08
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Plan,
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in
confonmnce;
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal
Plan designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit “LCPA 90-08”, dated
January 6, 1993, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of January, 1992,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cmsider the proposed Local
Coastal Plan Amendments shown on Exhibit “LCPA 90-08”, attached hereto, and;
. . . .
1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
2 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
3 considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment.
4 WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review
5 period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
6
7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
Al That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on July
2, 1992, and ending on August 13, 1992, staff shall present to the City
Council a summary of the comments received.
C> That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 90-08 as shown on Exhibit “LCPA 90-08”, dated January 6, 1992, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on
the following findings:
15
I/
Findims:
16 1. The proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendment is consistent with all applicable
17 policies of the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program.
18 2. The proposed amendment to the MeIlo II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal
Program is required to bring the designations of the Local Coastal Plan, General
19 Plan, and Zoning Map into conformance.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Conditions:
1. AU conditions of EIR 91-03, as contained in resolution No. 3476, and GPA 90-l 1,
SP 207, ZC 92-02, CT 92-07, HDP 92-l 1 and AP 76-01 (C) are incorporated herein
by reference.
2. Approval of LCPA 90-08 is granted subject to the certification of the Program EIR
91-03 and approval of GPA 90-l 1, SP 207 and ZC 92-02.
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3479 -2-
2a
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3479 -3-
BAILEY NOB@ Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLkNING COMMISSION
EXHBITLCWMO-06 JAMJARY 6, IQ93
%\\ NRR i\
.A
15 ,~
NRR \ \YNRR\ 11 ? I
\
NRR \,, NRR
9 ‘,
1-v
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
1
@ ps 9
~
cz \ )I OJPI *
!I op diR y(o;Plr \ 15 \
16
NRA
\\ /\ \ NRR \ O/PI ‘1 3
-t,% J OS \
40/pI \
PAS; *0
3
,ow j
10
99
C
cl
ClOl~l C/O/PI
12 7
1s
OS 8TS’” v lJ
I/c \\( OPl \ NRR 1
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN/LCPA
momsED GEKRAL PLAN/LCPA
city of bbbad
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN GPA 90-11 LCPA 90-8
.
EXHIBIT “LCPA 90-08”
DATED JANUARY 6,1993
POLICY 2-2 LCPA 90-08 - CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
‘MIXED-USE’ DEVELOPMENT
INTENT
This policy provides conditional development standards for the area of approximately
A.,.... ..,A Y . . . . . c.< Y, y y . .> ,. 48+#?# acres north of Palomar Airport Roaq and east of Paseo del Norte ~~~~~~. .n....... .:.~..:.:‘:.:.:.:.:.:.:( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.....................,.,.,...,.,.
““““‘.> * ~~~~~~lnrrll . i..: . . . . . . i..... . . . . . . . . ..,.. . . . . . . .._.... . . .
(See Exhibit 4.3.) All such lands owned either by Caritas or Ecke or their successors in
. . interest shall be permitted, pursuant to approval of a ti
. . ~~~~t ..A.,.. 5 . . . . ,. I. >. .< An o convert certain agricultural lands to
residential and/or non-residential (including tourist-serving commercial) development as
a means of providing supplementary uses which will assist in the retention of agricultural
:+:+:.:.:;:.:.: .:,:i” . . . . . .i . . . *.:...:.y A... (.,.A. . . . . 5. Y . .Y.Y ~~~~.~~~~~~~ uses on the remaining portions of these parcels. lt should be noted ::::::::.: .,.,. :...::::::::::::::::::::::::::~..:.:.:~.~.:.~~.:.:~.:.:~. ‘:::::::.‘-. .,,.,...,,.,............,..
that residential uses are possible only where they do not conflict with the Airport Influence
Area and where they are compatible with adjacent uses.
A. Basic Permitted Uses on Existina Leoal Parcels
Where each existing legal parcel as of July 14, 1987, (See Exhibit 4.3.) is developed
individually, permitted uses shall be those described above in Policy 2-l C Permitted
Uses on Desianated Coastal Aaricultural Lands.
8. USES CONDITIONALLY PERMISSIBLE PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE ENTIRE AREA SUBJECT TO A MASTH@i PIAN
1. Consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan residential, commercial (including tourist
serving commercial), and other non-residential uses may be developed on up to
X3$$#@~ acres of the approximately 48@&&J acre site subject to a &la&&am . . . . . . . ! : : : :x:.,:.:.. ..:.~.:.~.~.:.~i.~...~“.‘,
. . ‘cy., ., A . . . . ‘..A..$ .,.a.,.., ,.r ‘.>>,h PIan for the entire site. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :.:.:.:.:.:::.:.:.:.>:.:.yA<.:<.. .~.,:.:.~:~.~:,,.:.:.:~.:~.~:.~,.:.:.:~.:.:.:.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:~:.~~~.~.:.~~~.:~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <.: .,........,.... ,.......... :.;:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,..:.:.:.:.:.:.~~.~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,~~.~:.:,:.:.:.~.~:.:.:.:,:
. ..~ ,..... . . ...,,,, . . . ..~..~.~..~.-.rr..~,..,y) . . . . . . . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~ ::::.::::::::::i::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+, ..:.:Q:.~~.:.:r.):.:.~.:.:.~:~.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:., . . . . . . . . ...) . . . . . . . . .,..... $,A..< .,...,,.,...,....... :5.x<.> . . . . . . . . . ...* : : : : . . . . . .._ A., ::~.:.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~:.:.:..~.~~:.~:.:.~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~~:~.~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .,........ > __ _, ,_ . . ..(/...............,.,.. ~ .,.,...........,.,.,.,. :.:+:.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..f...X...............:.:...:...:.:..~.:..~.. .: . A.. . i :.. .1 .::..
2. Development shall be clustered along Palomar Airport Road, Paseo del Norte, and
Cannon Road and clustered on the first major ridge area as designated on Exhibit
4.3A.
3. Any amendment to the location of the developable area shall be required to prove
that the new area for development is not more suitable for agriculture than the
previously developable area. The intent of this requirement is to cluster
development on lands least suitable for agriculture.
4. All remaining land
;#&!##@@ shall as a condition of the
Plan be preserved in agriculture for as long
as feasible. Feasibility shall be determined for the entire &Wae+ee### covered
by this restriction. Further, feasibility shall be subject to the requirements of the
Mello II Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone Section 21.82.060(c).
2
5. Pursuant to Section 51257 of the Government Code, the boundaries.of the lands
designated for agriculture may be amended.
Item No. 6 on page 8 of Exhibit “C” which deals with the amendment to the
Local Coastal Plan $$&# revised by CCC action to read as follows: . . . . . ..L.. . . . . . . . ‘..
6. As an interim step (prior to a complete ~~.~” Plan) up to a 35 acre
portion of the 137 acres of developable land located adjacent and easterly to
Phase I of Carlsbad Car Country may be developed as a Phase II expansion of
Carlsbad Car Country pursuant to a Specific Plan.
7. The +@@j?$ .,. ., .,. ,., ., ,. ,. ,. ,._. a ./. cres of developable Iand ~XI~iP~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .,.,.,.,., . . .
~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ includes q ~~~~~~~~ . . . . . . . . .__......... .:.. ..A..,.. . .A.. . ..,.. .,: . . . . . . . . ..,.. .:.... . . . . . . . . ..A . . .A.... i,., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . . . ..i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..i. .:. . . ..I .A.. . . . . .\\..
.,._._ ./.. .:: i..:... .,.. ,..., ,. ~~~~~~~~~ portion of the OJrg@& 482 acre site (See Exhibit 4.3A.) that has &$# .,.........i_.,.,._._.,...,.,.,...,., ..:.:.:.:.:.: . . . . . x...>>: . . 1 . . . .:..... .A.. .I L . . . . . . . . . . . . .
been developed!! j
8. The ~~~~.~~ Plan shall provide a rni4 location and intensity of land uses i... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,..., ,A...... :.
that are compatible with and will not adversely impact the long term viability of
agricl&ufaJ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ uses. :....r...<..<< . . . . . ..A. . . . . . ..LL.... i... .i...... _...r.. ..r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..:... ,A........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..i......
9. All development shall include special treatment buffers either through design or
through physical barriers that stabilize the urban-agricultural boundaries and limit
to a level of insignificance agricultural impacts on the urban uses.
3
10. All tenants of developable portions of the site shall be notified as to the
requirements of the Specific an&Me&r Plane and agricultural uses on the
designated land.
11. In implementing the ~~ Plan all land owners and tenants within the
48@!! acre site shall waive any right to file nuisance claims against normal :::::::::::.::::::::::r.::
agricultural operations.
12. All development shall be located so as to not interfere with normal agricuttural
operations including but not limited to cultivation, irrigation, and spraying.
13. As a condition of approval of either the Plan or the Specific Plan
for the Phase II expansion of Carlsbad Car Country, whichever occurs first, the
property owners (Carttas and/or Ecke or their successors in interest) shall record
a deed restriction endorsed by the Coastal Commission or it successor in interest
and’the City of Carlsbad that the ilAE land identified on Exhibit
4.3 are designated for Agricultural uses and any modification of use shall require
a LCP amendment. As a condition to any amendment to the developable area,
the property owner shall execute an amendment to the deed restriction reflecting
the modification to restricted and unrestricted lands.
14. lt is recognized that roads can function as buffers between dissimilar land uses as
well as providing access to uses. Therefore, roads may be located entirely or
partially or not at all within areas designated for agricultural use. The decision to
include or exclude (either partially or entirely) roads shall be a condition of the
coastal development permit that includes the construction of the road.
15. In order to tie the eastern and western agricultural areas together the proposed
north/south road shall incorporate a grade separation at its northerly portion. The
grade separation shall be of sufficient dimensions to allow farm vehicles and
equipment to move freely between the east and west.
16. Concurrent with the construction of the proposed north/south road the developer
shall grade area Y as shown on Exhibit “A”, subject to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director so as to create an area level enough to allow the same type of
agriculture that occurs westerly of the west ridge to continue around the ridge on
the south facing slopes of said ridge. In order to ensure agricultural viabilii the
developer shall amend the soils after grading the area to be equivalent to the
existing Class Ill Manna soils in capability.
17. All structures to be located in the future developable area shall be setback a
minimum of 50 feet from the adjacent area designated for agricutture.
5
18. A solid wall or fence shall be installed around the entire perimeter of the
developable area. The wall (Fence) shall be a minimum 6 feet in height and shall
be incorporated into the grading where feasible. The intent of this measure is to
provide a physical barrier between agricultural and urban uses. The wall or fence
shall function to both restrict uncontrolled access into agricultural areas and to
reduce drift of dust and spray materials into urban areas. The perimeter wall or
fence shall be constructed concurrent with development of the property, except
that, if the road is built in one phase, which would open the access through the
agricultural lands, an appropriate barrier shall be incorporated along the roadway.
Alternative forms of barriers may be considered provided they satisfy the intent of
this measure.
19. Windbreaks (landscaped) shall be installed on the developable portions to aid in
reducing the effects of farm spraying and dust generation.
20. Landscape plant material in the developable area shall be selected for resistance
to pests, particularly aphids, thrips, white fly and spider mites. Landscape
plantings shall be inspected routinely for presence of pests and treated as
required to control them. All pests shall be eliminated by means that do not
adversely impact agricultirral crops.
21. Landscaping with herbaceous plantings shall be discouraged, since they are likely
to be hosts of the pests likely to invade the farm crops.
6
22. Drainage water from buildings, streets, parking areas and landscape in the
development shall be disposed of through storm drains or otherwise in a manner
that will avoid any runoff onto farming areas whether planted or fallow.
23. If development of the proposed developable portion impacts water rates on the
agricultural land then the developer shall subsidize the water rates to the extent
that they equal farm water rates.
24. The developer shall notify in a manner satisfactory to the City Attorney all
tenants/users of this proposed developable portion that the area is subject to dust,
pesticides, and odors associated with adjacent farm operations and that the
tenants/users occupy the area at their own risk.
25. The cost of the above mitigation measures shall be borne by the developer and
shall not be passed on to the agricultural operators (existing or future). For all
agricultural land that Carltas or its successor in interest chooses not to farm on a
yearly basis, a reasonable effort shall be made to offer the agricultural land for
lease or rent at a value equal to or less than the average prevailing market rents
for similarly situated Coastal agricuttural land found within a 30 mile radius of the
Carltas property.
26. As part of a farm operator’s lease, there shall be a requirement to keep dirt roads
watered regularly to minimize dust impacts on crops as well as on adjacent non-
agricultural uses.
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3480
A RESOLUTION OF THE PWWNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH OF FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST
OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONES 5 AND 8
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: SP 207
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
A portion of Lot “H” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Map thereof no. 823, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1892,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and refeded to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
15 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of January, 1993,
16 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
18 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
19
20 factors relating to Specific Plan 207; and
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
22 as follows:
23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
24
25
26
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of SP 207, according to Exhibit ‘x’, and SP 207 dated
December 1992, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
Findims:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Specific Plan 207 is consistent with and implements the goals and policies of the
general plan as demonstrated in the section of the specific plan titled, “Compliance
with the General Plan.”
All necessary public improvements to implement Specific Plan 207 have been
provided or are required as conditions of approval.
The specific plan will serve as the zoning ordinance for the Carlsbad Ranch. Where
the plan varies from existing city regulations, specific policy statements are
presented to clarify the intent and purpose of the proposed regulation.
Development standards and design guidelines contained in the specific plan address
land use compatibility with surrounding agricultural operations and Palomar Airport
to the east, preservation of open space, visual aesthetics of the development, and
provision of adequate public facilities and improvements.
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan is also consistent with and implements the Local
Coastal Plan - Mello II Segment and the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The development of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan will provide supplemental
income to the property owner so that agricultural production on the majority of the
site can continue.
Conditions:
PlanninE conditions:
1. All conditions of EIR 91-03, as contained in Resolution No. 3476, and GPA 90-l 1,’
LCPA 90-08, ZC 92-02, CT 92-07, HDP 92-11 and AP 76-01(C) are incorporated
herein by reference. Refer to those documents for all conditions and mitigation
measures applicable to the development of the Carl&ad Ranch.
2. Approval of SP 207 is granted subject to the certification of EIR 91-03, GPA 90-l 1,
LCPA 90-08 and ZC 92-02.
3. Prhrtotheissuance of any development pemits for the Carl&ad Ranch and prior
to the recordation of a Final Map Chapter IV, “Development Standards and Design
Guidelines”, Section 2.a of Specilk Plan 207, shall be mvised to require the primary
bllildillg- for the offic&search and development parcels to be oriented to
theonsiteparkingareaandnotfacingRoad”A”,asisindicatedinthp:SpecificPlan
text. secondalybuildingen- will be pemitted to be oriented toward Road II I( A. _
PC RESO NO 3480 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. Landscaping around the perimeter of the development at the agricuhral interface shall utilize~ shrubs in addition to trees to create a bufkr suitable to reduce conflicts
betweenagIiculturalandurbanlanduses. Thepro~landscapingshallbe
approwxl by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Page 122, Section F, 2 (Berms) shall be revised to include this provisiox~
5. Developexs within the Specific Plan shall be prohibited from privately providing and
maintaining recreational fkilities for the employees of Zone 13 as provided for on
page 66, section III. “Mitigation”, of the Park Facilities Section of the Zon 13 Local
Facilities Management Plan.
Conditions:
6. The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
7. The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
8. If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
9. On-street parking on Road Ais allowed on the west side of the road, fronting Parcel
Nos. 3, 4, and 5. other areas are subject to site development plan review and
approvat
IO. Au non-M stmet lighting located within the public righmf-way shall be
privately mahtakA Prior to approval of a final map, adequate pmisions for such
maintenance shall be reviewed and approved by the City Erq&eer.
11. All non-standad right-of-way widths and street sections are subject to detailed
review and approval by the City. prior to a tentative map approva& such review
and recommendations for approval shall be done by the City Fngheer.
. . . .
. . . .
PC RESO NO 3480 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
‘12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOBfi, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MECHAF,L J. HOLZMktER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO 3480 4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PLANNING COMMEION RESOLUTION NO. 3481
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C-Q TO O-Q/P-M-Q,
C-2-Q/O-Q/P-M-Q, C-T-Q/C-2-Q, C-2-Q, C-T-Q, AND O-S ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH OF FUTURE CANNON ROAD, EAST
OF PASEO DEL NORTE, AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONES 5 AND 8. PROPERTY ON THE WEST
SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND PEA SOUP ANDERSEN’S IS ALSO INCLUDED. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: ZC 92-02
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
A Portion of Lot “H”, of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1892,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A>
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of ZC 92-02, according to Exhibit “X”, attached hereto and
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with all applicable policies and guidelines
in the Land Use Element of the General Plan as discussed in the staff report for the
project.
2. The proposed change in zoning designation is consistent with the General Plan and
will achieve consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as required by State
Law and the Land Use Element.
3. The non-residential uses allowed by the proposed zone change would be compatible
with surrounding existing or proposed agricultural and non-residential uses.
4. The Q-Overlay Zone, made a part of the proposed zone change, provides the City
with discretionary review over development of the site to assure that allowed uses
are compatible with surrounding land uses and conform to the requirements of the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
5. All findings of Program EIR 91-03, Resolution No. 3476, the Negative Declaration,
Resolution No. 3477, and CT 92-07, Resolution No. 3483, are incorporated herein
by reference.
COnClitiOnS:
1.
2.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
All conditions of EIR 91-03, as contained in resolution No. 3476, and the Negative
Declaration, GPA 90-11, LCPA 90-08, SP 207, CT 92-07, HDP 92-11, and AP 76-
01(C) are incorporated herein by reference. Refer to those documents for all
conditions and mitigation measures applicable to the development of the Carlsbad
Ranch project site.
Approval of ZC 92-02 is granted subject to the certification of Program EIR 91-03,
approval of the Negative Declaration, GPA 90-11, LCPA 90-08 and SP 207.
PC RESO NO 3481 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
12
14
1t
1E
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2i
2:
24
2!
2t
2:
2E
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
Commissioner Erwin.
None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO 3481 -3-
&&
BAILEY NO&E, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
\Kc.Q; 11 c-m
,+ E-A \
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
EXHBlT ZC 92-02 JANUARY 6,1993
bty of h&d
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN 1 zc 92-2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,-
PLANNING COMMISSION RFSOLUTION NO. 3482
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND
CONSERVATION CONTRACT FOR AGRICULTURAL
PRESERVE NO. 76-01.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: AP 76-01(C)
WHEREAS, a verified request for an amendment to the Land conservation
Contract for Agricultural Preserve No. 76-01, as shown on Exhibit “A”, dated January 6,
1993, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Commission;
and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for amendment
as provided in Section 51257 of the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning
Commission considered all factors relating to the Land Conservation Contract for
Agricultural Preserve No. 76-01(C) Amendment.
THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of &&bad:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission RECOMMEND S APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the
Land Conservation Contract for Agricultural Preserve No. 76-01(C), as
-shown on Exhibit “A”, dated January 6, 1993, based on the following
hiillgS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Finding:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.I..
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
I...
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
This proposed amendment which would allow public recreational uses within the
agricultural preserve is consistent with State Law as Section 51205 of the
California Gov-ent Code specifies that land devoted to recreational use may be included within an agricultural preserve.
The proposed amendment is also consistent with provisions of the Land
Conservation Contract for the property which limits the use of the premises to
agricultural and compatille uses, recreational uses or open space uses or some combination thereof.
The land subject to the boundary adJ ‘ustment is witbin the Mello II segment of
Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone and therefore the boundary adjustment is subject to
Coastal Commission approval.
The proposed amendment to the Land Consewation Contract for Agricultural
Freseme No. 76-01 will not cause significant environmental impacts as
demonstrated in program FJ.R 91-03.
This approval is contingent upon approval by the Mifomia Coastal Commission
(CCC). If the CCC denies or modifies this approval, the approval becomes null and void unless the City amends the approval to be consistent with the CCC
modifications.
PC RESON0.3482 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
$9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOBL!?, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATI’EST:
MICHAEL J. HtiMILJ%R
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3482 -3-
EXHIBIT “A”
JANUARY 6, 1993
THIRDAMENDMENTTO
AGRKULTURALPRESERVEN0.76-01 APPLICATION NO.AP 7641(C)
By this third amendment dated a 1993,
Carltas Company, a California Limited partnership, successor in interest as owner to Carltas
Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “OWNER”) and the City of Carlsbad, a political
subdivision of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as “CITY’), the Land
Conservation Contract dated February 10, 1976, by and between Carltas Corporation and
the City of Carlsbad (the “Contract”) is hereby amended pursuant to the provisions of
Section 51257 of the Government Code of the State of California in light of the following
facts and circumstances:
A. OWNER and CITY desire to further amend the contract to specify certain
conditional uses permitted under the Williamson Act.
THEREFORE, it is agreed between OWNER and CITY as follows:
SECTION 1. SPECIFIC USES. The list of uses delineated in sub-part B of
Exhibit “B” to the contract are hereby amended to add the following:
(16) Public recreational uses (including golf courses) otherwise
consistent with open space uses.
SECTION 2. CHANGE IN NOTICE. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 16
of the Contract, notice to OWNER shall be addressed as follows:
Carltas Company, a California Limited Partnership
5600 Avenida Encinas, Suite 100
Carlsbad, California 92008
SECTION 3. RATIFICATION AND AFFIRMATION OF CONTRACT. Except
as hereinabove set forth, the land conservation contract dated February 10, 1976, is hereby
ratified and confirmed. Executed on the date first written above.
SECTION 4. RECORDATION. The OWNER shall. record this amendment.
SECTION 5. AMENDMENT PROCEDURES. Amendment of this amendment
of Land Conservation Contract Agricultural Preserve No. 76-01 shall not occur until all
conditions and contingencies specified in the agreements have been satisfied.
CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
By: PAUL EWE, JR., GENERAL PARTNER
“OWNER”
CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, MAYOR
“CIW’
(Notarial Acknowledgements)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3491
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOFANAMENDMENTTOTHELOCALFACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 13 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD,SOUTH OF AGUAHEDIONDALAGOON,EASTOF
PASEO DEL NORTE AND WEST OF LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENTZONESSAND8. APPLICANT: CARLSBADRANCHSPECIFICPLAN CASENO: LOCALFACILITIES MANAGEMENTPLAN -87-13(A)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad
and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting the 1986
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and performance
standards for public facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiring the
processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 and 9829
implementing Proposition E approved on November 4,1986 by the citizens of Carlsbad,
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Co mmission did, on the 6th day of January, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to an amendment to the Buildout Projections Exhibit of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A> That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of the amendment to the Buildout Projections exhibit for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 13, based on the
following fklings and subject to the following condition:
Findinns:
1. That the amemhnt to the buildout projections exhiit for the Laal Facilities
ManagementPlanforzOne24willnotprecludethezoac!6rommeeting~
Perfolmance standards.
2. That the m to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is
consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other
Elements contained in Carlsbad’s General Plan.
3. That the m to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 is
consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth
Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan.
conditiaas:
1. Approval is granted for an amendment to the Buildout Projections Exhibit (Exhibit
12) of the Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 13 as contained on Exhibit “Z,
dated January 6, 1993 attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference.
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3491 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January, 1993, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welsons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOB&, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOBMILLE#
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3491 -3-
Exmfr. “z” JAMJARY 6, I993
EXHIBIT 11
General Han Lend Use Build Out Projections Based 05 30% Yield
(As of l/1/92)
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Non-Res’l Reserve
Travel Service
Open Space
Total Zone
GMP Non- General Plan General Plan
Net Residential Build Out Build Out
Developable LU Intensity Projections Projections
Acres Estimate in Acres in Sq.Ft.
368.01 30% 110.40 4,809,155
35.48 30% 10.64 463,653
138.26 n/a 0.00 0
541.75 121.05 5.272.807
EXHIBIT 12
Build Out Projections Based on Specific Land Use Mix and Modlfied Yield
(As of l/1/92)
General Plan Projected Net Modified
Land Use Land Use Developable LU Intensity
Designation Mix Acres Estimate
NRR-Phase.1 Commercial 13.90 23.1%
Build Out
Projections
in Acres
subtotal P ftice *
omm’l/Oftice/Hotel l
NRR - Phase II ftice+
ec’l Commercial
subtotal
Travel Service
I Open Space
I
227.37 5.9%
51.04 13.5%
35.48 30.0%
138.26 n/a r ( Tots1 Zone I 541.75 I 13.7%
NRR - Phase I is that portion of the property which is not subject to the Land Conservation Contract;
it is also identical to the portion of the property which is zoned Limited Control - Qualified Overlay Zone (LC-Q).
NRR - Phase II is that portion of the property which is subject lo the Land Conservation Contract;
it is also identical to the portion of the property which is zoned Exclusive Agriculture (EA).
3.21
19.51
20.43
13.46
6.89
10.64
0.00
74.15 3.229.700 1
Build Out
Projections
in Sq. Ft.
140,COO
k2i
1,88&ooo
586.100
886,100
46%~
0
* Phase 1 of the property designated NRR has been increased to match what is being proposed within Ihe Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. These. changes include intensity
estimates, acreage and square footage. To keep Ihe total zone build out equal lo what was previously shown, the offke portion of the properly designated NRR PIuse 2
has been decreased by the same amount as was added in NRR Phase I. Zone totals remain unchanged.
- EXHlery 1 ~ ‘-’
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
(SP 207)
Prepared for:
CARLTAS
September 1992
ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES
721 Kimberly Avenue, Placentia, CA 92670-6300 (714) 524-1000 FAX (714) 524-6149
/ /
i
:k
$
! ;..
1::
.:
jc b’ .1 i..
I
I
CHAPTER II
ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
Revenue and cost implications related to major forms of development
anticipated within the scope of the Specific Plan Proposal are shown in Exhibit
II-1 based on per acre units of development. All forms of land use identified
generate a net fiscal benefit per acre of development except prospective office
projects with a floor-area-ratio (FAR) below 0.5 and open space activities.
Office development outlined by the project proposal with an FAR below 0.5
actually has an effective FAR below 0.25. The relatively low FAR proposed is
considered the primary reason for the net fiscal cost created. Typically, garden-
style office developments achieve an FAR from 0.35 to 0.45, even within the
constraints of two- to three-story building height limits. Lower intensity office
development of the project proposal is below typical development intensities that
would otherwise generate a net fiscal benefit to the City of Carlsbad.
3. Open space agricultural activity identified reflects the net fiscal effect implied
by current conditions on site. Actual net fiscal effect of agricultural
development under the project proposal is considered negligible. Net fiscal cost
created per acre of open space driving range activity is potentially overstated.
Retail sales tax potential of the driving range has not been estimated since the
specific scope of on-site operations - snack shop, bar, pro shop, etc. - has not
been defined. Also, assignment of police protection cost reflects service
demands for a public park environment, unlike the centralized and controlled
access environment required in connection with driving range facilities.
4. Revenue and cost implications per acre of development identified by the
Specific Plan Option are shown in Exhibit 11-2. Except for the vocational
7
,-
ALFRED GOBAR ASSCklATES
5.
campus, both alternatives entail the same categories of land use activity.
Specific differences are related to the effective FAR for similar forms of
development - refer to cost and revenue factors noted in italics. The project
option reduces the effective FAR of lower intensity office development below
0.2 while slightly raising the effective FAR of higher intensity office and
mixed-use development.
A comparative summary of both Specific Plan alternatives is shown in Exhibit
H-3. Overall, both alternatives create a net annual income stream to the City of
Carlsbad ranging from $1.97 milbon a year by the project proposal to $1.89
million a year by the project option. The ratio of revenues generated to cost
created by development derivative of both project alternatives is 4.05: 1 .oO for
the Specific Plan Proposal and 3.98: 1.00 for the Specific Plan Option.
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I’
I
I
b
I
n 3
B T m
E !
8:
K I
$
L
,
,
.
L
K’
‘2
K
3
!i
K
2
iK
ii4 CL
9
: .
I
:
3 lj ci
s l- ;t c d
8 f ? ‘;
s . . k d
0
9
g
t-i
s
c;i
ri
0
9
Iii
O-t 0
0
9
G
9 In
.;
2
r 0
2
5
s
z K
6
P
z 3 0 .; ;
0 : .Z v) :
z a
: :: j 3 ;
i
i ; I
b : I t i ’ . _
1 . I . I
? ,
5 ! 2 D ;
5
:: 6
! I i
x 5 e t
e
z
8
2
d
8
4
d
8 . .
F ;;
8 c: . . 2 -i
s
2
4
8 td 2
i
8 ,: *. z 0:
s . .
lz ui
8 . .
G
*;
rz
5 9
z : P
. . I $4 pg c c c 10 (3 c-4 % z
* * z
r: $ 8
v 0 . 2 7 a UI -
Lo
v,
: I% m In % . - 2 2 *
hl m c-4 *
5
l : *
:
10
EXHIBIT II - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES
SUMMARY OF NET FISCAL IMPLICATION OF
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ALTERNATIVES
Land Use Activity
Project Proposal
Land Use Net Fiscal
Acreage BenefitKost)
Project Option
Land Use Net Fiscal
Acreage BenefitKost)
Vocational Campus
Retail
19.8 $38,471
10.7 $153,449 10.7 153,449
Office < 0.5 FAR
Office > 0.5 F+R
Office/Retail Mix < 0.5 FAR
Office/Retail Mix > 0.5 FAR
25.6 -4,582 17.3 -9,809
21.8 163,805 10.5 107,426
5.2 30,358 5.2 30,358
18.2 238,420 18.0 239,130
Hotel 7.0 504,238 7.0 504,238
Open Space - Driving Range 24.5 -22,540 24.5 -22,540
Open Space - Agricultural 306.4 neg. 306.4 neg.
Roadway 4.1 0 4.1 0
Total For Specific Plan 423.5 $1,063,147
none
423.5 $1,040,722
Project Related Adjustments:
Net Fiscal Effect of Specific Plan
Average Fiscal Benefit/(Cost) Per Acre
RevenuehCostI Ratio For Specific Plan
none
$1,972,846 $1,889,524
$4,658
4.05: 1 .oo
$4,462
3.98: 1 .OO
Source: Alfred Gobar Associates.
(i8c~l\eulrbd~~~y,xl~
11
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
APPLICATluN COMPLETE DATE:
GPA/LCPA/SP/EIR - AUGUST 5. 1991
AP - AUGUST 11. 1991
CT/HDP - SEPTEMBER 25. 1992
ZC - OCTOBER 19, 1992
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 6, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EIR 91-03/GPA 90-ll/LCPA 90-08/SP 207/X 92-02KT 92-07/HDP 92-11
/AP 76-Ol(C)/LFMP 87-13(A) - CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN -
Request for the certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report and
approval of a Negative Declaration; and the request for approval of a General
Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Specifk Plan, Zone
Change, Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, Land
Conservation Contract Amendment, and a Local Facilities. Management Plan Amendment for Zone 13 on property located north of Palomar Airport Road,
south of future Cannon Road, east of Paseo de1 Norte, and west of Local
Facilities Management Zones 5 and 8 and within Local Facilities Management Zones 3 and 13, in the Coastal Zone. The Zone Change and Tentative Tract
Map also include a property on the west side of Paseo de1 Norte north of
Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup Andersen’s.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 3476 RECOMMENDING
CER~CAl’TON of EIR 91-03 and Planning Commission Resolution No. 3477
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Resolution No.‘s
3478,3479,3480,3481,3482, and 3491, RECOMMEND BUG APPROVAL of GPA 90-11,
LCPA 90-08, SP 207, ZC 92-02, AP 76-01 (C), and LFMP 87-13(A), and ADOPT Resolution
No’s. 3483 and 3484, APPROVING CT 92-07 and HDP 92-11, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
EXHIBIT !j
h
ELR 91-03 / GPA 90-11/ LCPA 90-08 / sp 207 / zc 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
II. PROJECT DEXRIPTI ON AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting several discretionary approvals for a 423.5. acre property
located on the north side of Palomar Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, east of
Paseo De1 Norte, and west of Local Facilities Management Zones 5 and 8. The proposed
Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map applications also include a 2.3 net acre property
located on the west side of Paseo de1 Norte north of Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup
Andersen’s. Actions by the City and the California Coastal Commission in 1988 determined
the location and total acreage of the site which could be proposed for development. The
92.6 developable acres are not subject to a Williamson Act Land Conservation Contract as
is the remainder of the property. The developable acreage is delineated on the City%
Zoning Map as those areas within the project boundaries zoned L-C-Q (Limited Control,
Qualified Development Overlay Zone).
The Mello II Local Coastal Plan requires the approval of a specific or master plan for the
property to convert certain agricultural lands to residential and/or non-residential
development as a means for providing supplementary uses which will assist in the retention
of agricultural uses on the remahhg portions of the property. A specific plan is also
required as a portion of the property is within the Palomar Airport Influence Area which
is designated as a Special Treatment Area by the City’s General Plan. The General Plan’s
Special Treatment Area Guidelines require a specific plan to be processed and approved
prior to the development of this property. In addition, the proposal includes combination
general plan designations which also require the approval of a specific plan pursuant to the
Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Through the proposed actions the applicant is requesting approval of the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan (SP 207). As stated in the specific plan text, “The purpose of the C&bad
Ranch Specific Plan is to provide a comprehensive set of guidelines, regulations and
implementation programs for guiding and ensuring the orderly development of the Carlsbad
Ranch in accordance with the City’s General Plan. The Specific Plan defines the allowable
types of land use, provides detailed development and design standards and criteria, and
describes the method by which the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan will be implemented. City
Council adoption of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan will establish the zoning and
development standards for this property.” To enact the specific plan and create the
developable parcels, the applicant is requesting the following discretionary approvals:
k Certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report addressing all the
discretionary approvals necessary to develop the property except as indicated
in item ‘B’ below.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-I I /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
B. Approval of a Negative Declaration for a Zone Change from L-C-Q (Limited
Control, Quahfkd Development Overlay Zone) to C-T-Q (Commercial -
Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone) on 2.3 net acres on the west
side of Paseo de1 Norte located north of Pea Soup Andersen’s and a Tentative
Tract Map to create separate legal parcels for a property separated by the
realignment of Paseo del Norte.
C. A General Plan Amendment to redesignate approximately 113 acres from
Non-Residential Reserve (NRR) to Open Space (OS), Professional
Office/Planned Industrial (O/PI), Community Commercial/Professional
Office/Planned Industrial (C/O/PI), Travel Services Commercial/Community
Commercial (TS/C), and Community Commercial (C).
D. A Local Coastal Plan Amendment to amend the text of the Mello II Local
Coastal Plan to: (1) Change references from Master Plan to Specific Plan,
(2) Expand the uses permitted in the agricultural preserve to allow for public
recreation facilities on 24.5 acres, (3) amend the Mello II Coastal Plan to
include the city’s latest building height regulations, (4) update acreage
figures referenced in various policies, (5) Designate 24.5 acres as open space
to accommodate a public golf driving range, putting green and ancillary uses,
(6) add new language to condition the specific plan to preserve in agriculture
and/or public recreation uses the areas of the site not currently proposed to
be developed for as long as feasible, and (7) submit to the Coastal
Commission the Citywide Building Height Zone Code Amendment applicable
to the Mello II segment.
Also proposed are amendments to the Mello II Land Use Plan Map to amend
the map as described under item “C’ above to achieve consistency between
the LCP and the General Plan.
E. A Specific Plan as defined by Govemment Code Section 65451.
F. A Zone Change from L-C-Q (Limited Control, Qualified Development Overlay
Zone) to O-Q/P-M-Q (Office, Qualified Development Overlay Zone/Planned
Industrkl, Q&&d Development Overlay Zone), C-2-Q/O-Q/P-M-Q (General
Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone/Office, Qualified
Development Overlay Zone/Planned Industrial, Qualified Development
Overlay Zone), C-T-Q/C-2-Q (Commercial-Tourist, Qualified Development
Overlay Zone/General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone),
C-2-Q (General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone), C-T-Q
(Commercial-Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone), and O-S (Open
Space).
EIR91-03 / GPA 90-ll/ LCPA90-O8/ SP 207/ ZC 92-021 Cr 92-07/ HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / WMP 8743(A) CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
PAGE 4 .
G.
H.
A Tentative Tract Map to create 17 lots and 1 remainder parcel.
A Hillside Development Permit to allow grading of the site as proposed on
the Tentative Tract Map.
I. A Land Conservation Contract Amendment to add to the list of permitted
uses in the Agricultural Preserve, “Public recreational uses (including golf
courses) otherwise consistent with open space uses.”
J. An Amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 to
increase the buildout projections for Phase I and reduce the buildout
projections for Phase II. The Zone totals will remain unchanged.
The Specific Plan proposes only non-residential land uses consistent with the existing NRR
(Non-Residential Reserve) General Plan Designation. band uses proposed for the site
include a mix of compatible and complementary uses including office, research and
development, commercial, hotel, driving range and agriculture. The following table
illustrates the maximum amount of development which could take place on this site
pursuant to the Specific Plan as well as the projected phasing:
CARBBADRANCHSPECIEW PLANPHASING
(square feet)
Alternative land uses have also been provided for witbin the SpecXc Plan. They include
a vocational school campus at the north end of the development area in addition to
alternative development plans for the village center area.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
Due to the history of agricultural uses on the site, areas containing natural plant
communities are limited. Flowers, tomatoes and strawberries are grown on the property.
A palm tree nursery, produce sales stand, and a packing shed are also existing on the site.
Surrounding land uses include agricultural land to the north Car Country Carlsbad
adjacent to the site at the northwest comer, Pea Soup Andersen’s to the southwest across
Paseo de1 Norte, 7-l 1, Nurseryland, and the Price Club to the south across Palomar Airport
Road, and undeveloped property to the east.
Due to the complex nature of the proposed project, all discretionary actions and related
planning issues are discussed in individual sections of this report.
III. ANALYSIS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI- REPORT - EIR 91-03
Certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is being requested. The EIR
addresses the environmental impacts associated with all discretionary applications for the
proposed project. The EIR analyzed land use compatibility, agriculture and open space,
visual aesthetics/grading, circulation, air quality, noise, archaeological
resources/paleontology, biology, solid waste, water quality, and hazardous materials/waste
contamination. The proposed project would result in signikant, unmitigated impacts to
air quality and cumulatively to solid waste. Overriding considerations are proposed for
adoption for these two impacts and are contained in the attached resolution for
certification of the EIR Significant but mitigated impacts to circulation, noise,
archaeologicalresources/paleontologyandhazardousmaterials/wastecontaminationwould
also occur. Impacts which were considered below a level of significance or avoided
through site design include land use, agriculture and open space, visual aesthetics/grading
and water quality. Effects found not to be significant include natural resources,
fuel/energy, public facilities, light/glare, housing, traffic hazards, recreation, and
geotechnical which were addressed in the initial study. Five letters were submitted during
the public comment period. The letters and the response to the comments made are
included in the Final EIR for the project.
The proposed negative declaration is for a zone change and tentative tract map on a 2.3
net acre property located on the west side of Paseo del Norte north of Palomar Airport
Road and Pea Soup Andersen’s. This property is outside the boundaries of the specific
plan, however is under the same ownership as the Carl&ad Ranch. The zone change is
proposed to remove the L-C holding zone and replace it with the C-T-Q zone so as to
achieve consistency with the TS general plan designation. The subdivision is needed for
this site to create two legal parcels out of a single parcel separated by the realignment of
Paseo del Norte. The site has been previously graded and is relatively level. Ezisting
vegetation consists of weeds and grasses which are cleared periodically for weed abatement
reasons. No significant environmental impacts were identified for the proposed actions.
EIR 91-03 / GPA W-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-l 1 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - GPA 90-11
Planning Issues
1. Are the proposed land use designations appropriate for the site and consistent with
the policies of the General Plan?
2. Are the proposed land uses consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses?
DISCUSSION
Development of the land uses proposed in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan requires the
approval of a General Plan Amendment on 113 acres of this 423.5 acre site. The site is
presently designated as Open Space (OS) on 39.1 acres with the remaining 334.4 acres
designated as NRR (Non-Residential Reserve). Acreage left as NRR will be used for
agriculture. The exhibit attached to the general plan amendment resolution graphically
illustrates the applicant’s proposal. The following table correlates each proposed parcel
number with the acreage and general plan designation being requested:
68i7
8
TOTAL ACRES PROPOSED DEsIGNAnON
47.6 Acres O/PI
18.0 Acres C/O/PI
12.2 Acres TS/C
10.7 Acres C
24.5 Acres OS
0 (Professional Office & Related)
PI (Planned Industrial)
c (co~uui~ commercial)
TS (Tr8vel Services Commercial)
0s (Open Space)
The proposed designations will allow for a mix of non-residential land uses in order to
create a village center in the project. The proposed land uses are appropriate for the site
given the location of this property near the geographic center of the city and the
surrounding agricultural land use. Table 3.1-l in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
Program EIR 91-03 prepared by P&D Technologies compares the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Specific Plan which reflects the general plan designations being requested
with the applicable goals and policies of the Cit~+s General Plan Land Use and Open Space
and Conservation elements. Table 3.1-l clearly shows that the proposed land use
designations and the project are consistent with the policies of the General Plan.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 9041 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CX 92-07 / HDP 92-u /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 8743(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
PAGE 7
The NRR General Plan designation states that “The burden of proof to reclassify and
develop the land lies with the developer or owner”. The applicant has submitted several
studies which justify redesignation of the acreage proposed for development. The studies
are as follows: (1) Ta&bad Ranch Agricultural Plan”, November 1991, prepared by
Agland Investment Services, Inc., (2) “Carlsbad Ranch Mixed-Use Development Analysis”,
August 1991, prepared by tied Gobar Associates, Inc., and (3) “Fiscal Impact Analysis of
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan”, September 1992, prepared by Alfred Gobar Associates.
The first study is included as Appendix B of EIR 91-03.
The land uses proposed are consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses which
are also non-residential. The proposed uses are compatible with the commercial, office,
industrial, and agricultural uses in the general vicinity. Agricultural uses would surround
the proposed office, research and development, retail, and commercial uses along the
ridgeline. The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan incorporates a number of features to reduce
the potential for impacts between agricultural uses and other non-residential uses on the
Carlsbad Ranch. Page 3-19 of The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Program EIR 91-03 provides a listing of the features of the specific plan which address land use compatibility
with agricultural operations.
LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT - LCPA 90-08
Planning Issues
1. Are the proposed land use designations consistent with the applicable policies of the
Meho II Local Coastal Program?
2. Are the proposed amendments to the text of the MeIlo II Local Coastal Plan
consistent with applicable policies of the LCP?
DISCUSSION
The proposed land uses are consistent with applicable policies of the Mello II LCP. Policy
2-2 of the Mello II LCP states: “All such lands owned either by Car-has or Ecke or their
successors in interest shall be permitted, pursuant to approval of a master plan’ or a
specific plan lllLd master plan’ to convert certain agricultural lands to residential and/or
non-residential (including tourist-serving commercial) development as a means for
providing supplementary uses which will assist in the retention of agricultural uses on the
remaining portions of these parcels”. The project will leave in agricultural or recreational
use approximately 306.4 acres as a result of development being clustered along the first
major ridge area. The acreage for the area to be developed is in compliance with Policy
2-2 B.1 of the LCP with the exception of the 24.5 acre driving range. Development of the
driving range requires approval of a Local Coastal Plan Amendment which will be dkcussed
latter in this section of the report.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-l 1 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / Cl. 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
Policy 2-2 B.13 states that “as a condition of approval of either the Master Plan or Specific
Plan ..* the property owners shall record a deed restriction endorsed by the Coastal
Commission . . . and the City of Carlsbad...” designating the undeveloped land for
agricultural uses. The project proposes to retain the property not developed as a
Williamson Act Agricultural Preserve. A Notice of Non-Renewal was recorded on the
property on October 4,1991, beginning the start of a 10 and 15 year period at the end of
which the Williamson Act Land Conservation Contract will have expired. The proposed
text amendment includes adding public recreational uses as a permitted use for 24.5 acres
of agricultural land. This specifically applies to the 24.5 acre driving range which is
dependent upon an amendment to the text of the LCP. The removal of the 24.5 acre parcel
from agricultural production would not signikantly reduce the acreage remaining in
agriculture. The use of the parcel for recreational activity would be consistent with the
LCP policies regarding public access and recreational uses. This use requires land use plan
designations of Open Space in addition to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The
proposed land use designations are the same as those identified above for the General Plan
Amendment. This will achieve consistency between the General Plan and LCP.
The proposed text amendments are consistent with applicable policies of the Mello II Local
Coastal Program. The proposed text amendments include: (1) changing references from
master plan to specific plan as it pertains to the site, (2) expanding the uses permitted in the agricultural preserve to allow for public recreation facilities on proposed parcel 11 to
accommodate a public golf driving range, putting green and ancillary uses on 24.5 acres,
(3) amending the plan to include the city’s latest building height regulations, (4) updating
acreage figures referenced in various policies referring to the project site, and (5) adding
new language to condition the specific plan to preserve in agriculture and/or public
recreation uses the areas of the site not currently proposed to be developed for as long as
feasible. The specific plan notes under Policy 1-A that “the long term viability of the flower
fields and other agricultural uses on the site is dependent upon numerous factors including
low cost water, availability of experienced managers, availability of an abundant labor
supply and continued economic returns”. This would cause the deed restriction policy
mentioned above to be revised to designate the proposed 24.5 acre parcel 11 for
recreational uses and the remainder of the agricultural land for agricultural uses.
SPECIFIC PLAN - SP 2pz
Pktnnimr Issues
1. Does the Specific Plan contain all information required by Government Code Section
65451 for a Specific Plan?
2. Does the Specifk Plan properly implement the General Plan and Zoning proposed
for the site?
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-l 1 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH’ SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
PAGE 9 .
3. Are the Development Standards and Design Guidelines provided in the Specific Plan
adequate to properly develop the property?
DISCUSSION
Government Code Section 65451 governs the content of specific plans. The Carl&ad
Ranch Specifk Plan contains all information required by state law. The plan consists of
both a text and diagrams which specify the following in detail: (1) distribution and
location of land uses, (2) infrastructure, (3) development standards, (4) implementation
measures including f?nancing measures, and (5) a statement of the relationship of the
specific plan to the general plan.
If approved the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan will become the controlling document for the
site. It implements the General Plan, Zoning, applicable policies governing the site, and
complies with LCP requirements for the property to develop a Specific Plan based on a
detailed analysis of the opportunities and constraints of the site. The developable area is
limited at this time due to the Williamson Act Land Co nservation Contract on this property.
The configuration of the developable area was approved by the City Council and the
coastal Commiss’ ion in 1988. The proposed land uses are non-residential in compliance
with the existing Non-Residential Reserve General Plan designation which holds areas in
reserve for non-residential uses. Table 3.1-l beginning on page 3-13 of the Carl&ad Ranch
Specific Plan Program EIR 91-03 demonstrates that the specific plan properly implements
the applicable General Plan Goals and Policies. The proposed zoning for the site achieves
consistency with the General Plan.
Development and design standards contained within the Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan are
adequate to properly develop the property. The specific plan is divided into 17 lots for
planning purposes. The same lots are also proposed on the tentative tract map proposed
on the site. Development standards and design guidelines are separated into the following
areas: (1) Office, Corporate Headquarters and Research and Development Parcels, (2)
Village Center, (3) Paseo Center, (4) Open Space Areas, and (5) Non-Residential Reserve.
For each area development standards and design guidelines are specified. They are found
in Chapter IV of the Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207). The standards address
development of the lots as well as compatibility with the adjacent agricultural and/or
recreational m. The specific plan also contains goals, objectives and policies that will
assist in guiding and dkcting development within the Carlsbad Ranch.
The concept underlying the plan for the Carlsbad Ranch is to concentrate activities within
a limited area so that the majority of the site can continue to be utilized for agricultural use. As stated in the specifk plan, ‘The intention is to build upon the tradition of flower
farming that long gave identity to this site and to establish a garden setting for a new
activity center within the community, rather than allow development to sprawl across the
landscape”. A pedestrian oriented village center linked to the other development sites
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT’ 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
along the main ridge road is planned as the focal point of the development. The village
center will contain a mix of community and business uses. Mixed use buildings containing
retail and office uses are envisioned for the village center. A hotel is proposed to occupy
the most prominent location in the southern area of the site adjacent to the village center.
The remainder of the ridge development will consist of office/research and development
uses as well as a proposed golf driving range immediately east of the village center. A
commercial center is proposed at the southeast comer of Paseo del Norte and Car Country
Drive which is linked to the ridge development by a pedestrian walk. The remainder of the
site will be utilized for agricultural purposes.
Three options are included in the specific plan. The first is the potential for a vocational
campus to be developed on the northernmost part of the developable area along the ridge.
The area and acreage for this alternative is shown on the alternative parcelization figure
in the specific plan. Two options are also contained in the specific plan for the village
center parcels. One of the options would permit ezpansion of office/research and
development uses into the village center eliminating the mixed uses except for those
proposed on the hotel parcel. The second option provides for the expansion of
office/research and development uses into this area but retains a scaled down mixed use
center. These options provide the property owner the ability to adjust to market conditions
without the necessity to amend the specific plan provided future proposed land uses
conform to a develop plan permuted by the specific plan.
The development standards and design guidelines provided in the specific plan are adequate
to properly develop the property. The standards and design guidelines will be implemented
when the required site development plans for each parcel are submitted. The proposed
standards address typical zoning issues such as permitted uses, setbacks, height, parking
requirements, etc. The design guidelines in contrast address character and urban design
issues relative to the proposed development program such as building orientation, building
form and massing, architectural character, building materials, and landscape materials.
ZONECHANGE-ZC92-02
1. Is the proposed Zone Change consistent with the Land Use Element of the General
Plan and the proposed land use designations for the site?
2. Would the uses allowed by the proposed Zone Change be compatible with the
surrounding land uses?
EIR91-03 / GPA90-ll/ LCPA90-08/ SP 207/ ZC92-02/ Cr92-071 HDP 92-ll/
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
DISCUSSION
The proposed zone change will change the zoning from Limited Control, Qualified
Development Overlay Zone (L-C-Q) to the zones listed in the following table:
TCYI’ALACRES PROPOSED DESIGNATION
0 (Office)
P-M (Planned Industrial)
C-2 (General Commercial) C-T (Commercial-Tourist)
O-S (Open Space)
Q (Qualified Development Overlay Zone)
The designations are shown on the exhibit attached to the zone change ordinance. The
existing zoning of Open Space (O-S) and Exclusive Agricultural (E-A) will be retained on
the balance of the area included within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. Parcel 18 is
located on the west side of Paseo del Norte north of Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup
Andersen’s outside of the boundaries of the Carl&ad Ranch Specific Plan. Under the
“General Guidelines” section of the Land Use Element, item 10 indicates that zoning should
be made consistent with the General Plan. The proposed zones implement the proposed
General Plan designations and will achieve consistency between the General Plan and
Zoning. The proposed General Plan Amendment was determined to be consistent with the
Land Use Element as described in the section of this report addressing that application.
Therefore, the corresponding implementing zones for the proposed General Plan
designations are also consistent with the Land Use Element.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CI’ 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
The uses allowed by the proposed non-residential zones would be compatible with the
adjacent agricultural and non-residential land uses. The proposed zones reflect the types
of uses which will be permitted. The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan however, takes
precedence over the proposed zones as it contains a modified list of permitted uses as well
as design guidelines not found in the zoning ordinance. The allowed uses include office,
research and development, educational institutions (parcels 1 & 2 only), ancillary
manufacturing, processing, storage, and distribution facilities, retail commercial, a hotel,
agricultural uses, and recreational uses. The development standards and design guidelines
included in the plan address requirements to assure land use compatibility at the
urban/agricultural interface. The proposed Qualified Development Overlay Zone made a
part of each zone requires that a Site Development Plan be approved before building
permits or other entitlements are issued for each parcel. This supports the specific plan
requirement that a Site Development Plan be approved for each parcel by alerting persons
checking the zoning map that such an application is required.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - CT 92-02
1. Does the proposed Tentative Tract Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances?
DISCUSSION
The proposed Tentative Tract Map will create 18 lots, one of which is a remainder parcel
on 428.1 acres. Six of the proposed lots are for agricultural lease purposes within the
agricultural preserve. Eleven of the lots are proposed for non-residential development
pursuant to the Carlsbad Ranch Specih Plan. Lot 18, the last lot is proposed on the west
side. of Paseo del Norte outside the boundaries of the specific plan. As stated previously
lot 18 was separated but not legally subdivided from property on the east side of Paseo del
Norte by the realignment of that road.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-l 1 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-W / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
PAGE 13
As designed the tentative tract map complies with all requirements of the City’s Zoning
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and the State Map Act. Each lot complies with all
requirements of the zone which is applicable to the individual parcel. The zoning proposed
for each parcel is indicated in the section of this staff report on the zone change application
as well as on the “Land Use and Zoning” table on sheet 1 of the Tentative Map. The
following table indicates subdivision requirements applicable to the proposed parcels and
demonstrates that the lots comply:
EIR91-03/ GPA90-ll/LCPA90-08/ SP 207/ZC92-02/ C'1'92-07/~~P92-11/
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH ‘SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
PAGE 14 .
The lot areas also comply with the minimum lot area requirement of 10 acres in the
agricultural preserve. As required by the subdivision ordinance all lots will front on
publicly dedicated streets. The proposed circulation plan has been coordinated with
adjacent circulation element roads. In addition Street “B” is planned to connect to Hidden
Valley Road approved on Tentative Map 85-17 (Final Map 12903) for College Business
Park located to the east.
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - HDP 92-11
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed Tentative Tract Map comply with all requirements of the Hillside
Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)?
DISCUSSION
The project design is in conformance with the development and design standards of the
Hillside Development Regulations and the Hillside Development Guidelines. The 184 acres
of the site proposed to be graded has been in agricultural use. The proposed grading plan
will require the cut grading of 1,145,900 cubic yards over 81.1 acres primarily along the
east side of the ridge as well as along Palomar Airport Road and Cannon Road where the
development of roadways around the perimeter of the site have resulted in sharp road cuts
which are among the steepest slopes on the site. The areas adjacent to these two
circulation element roadways will be recontoured to establish a more naturally appearing
landform which is suitable for agricultural use. Also required is the fill grading of
1,145,9OO cubic yards over a 188.5 acre area. The grading quantity resulting per acre of
6,228 cubic yards is within the acceptable range (O-7999 cubic yards/acre) of grading
volume allowed by the Hillside Development Regulations.
The proposed grading concept maintains the undulating character of the site, while
providing for recontouring of the land in limited areas to establish a more naturally
appearing landform. The grading concept exhibit in the specific plan shows that the
majority of the proposed grading is light grading having cut or i?ll ‘depths of 1 foot to 10
feet. The light grading is necessary to establish building sites and accommodate drainage
facilities. Small areas on the northern and southern edge of the property which require the
most extensive grading involve the recontouring of road cuts from Palomar Airport Road
and the proposed Cannon Road Extension.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 8743(A)
CARL!iiBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
The findings required to be made to grant approval of a Hillside Development Permit can
be made as follows:
0)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the “Constraints Map” for
the project. As shown on that exhibit natural 40 percent and greater slope
areas are not proposed to be graded. Other 40 percent and greater slopes on
the site are manufactured slopes created by authorized grading for Car
Country Drive, Palomar Airport Road, and on site drainage courses created
by authorized agricultural grading. Proposed grading of 40 percent and
greater slopes is limited to recontouring manufactured slopes along Palomar
Airport Road and regrading of the limited areas of 40 percent and greater
slopes created by authorized agricultural grading which is permitted under
section 21.95.090 (b) (1) of the Hillside Development Regulations.
Undevelopable areas of the project have been properly identified on the
“Constraints Map” for the project as wd as in Program EIR 91-03 for the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
The development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
permits are consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements of the
Hillside Development Regulations since alteration of signiknt hillside
natural resource areas is not proposed, recontouring several previously
graded areas of the site is proposed to establish a more naturally appearing
hillside, agricultural use of the majority of the site will continue with
development concentrated on the east side of the proposed ridge road, and
significant landscaped building setback areas are proposed.
No development or grading will occur in those portions of the property
which are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230.
Natural slopes over 40 percent in grade will ll3MillUIldiShvbedaSWellaS
those areas of the site containing mixed chaparral or diegan coastal sage
scrub.
The project design and lot confIguration minim&s disturbances of hillside
lands as light grading to establish building sites and accommodate drainage facilities is proposed in addition to recontouring of the land in areas to
establish a more naturally appearing landform.
The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual as recontouring of
existing steep slopes associated with the widening of Palomar Airport Road
will be completed and extensive landscaping is proposed on all manufactured
slopes.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-l 1 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
As demonstrated above the findings required to grant the Hillside Development Permit can
be made.
AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE (WILLIAMSON ACT) LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT
AMENDMENT - AP 76QlQ
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed amendment to add, “Public recreational uses (including golf courses)
otherwise consistent with open space uses” consistent with the intent of the
Williamson Act and the existing Land Conservation Contract?
DISCUSSION
The proposed amendment which would allow public recreational uses as a permitted use
on those areas of the site subject to the Land Conservation Contract is consistent with state
law. Sections 51201(d) and (n) of the California Government Code define agricultural
preserve and recreational use as follows:
“Agricultural preserve” means an area devoted to either agricultural use, recreational
use as defined in subdivision (n), or open space use as defined in subdivision (o),
or any combination of such uses, and compatible uses as designated by a city or
county, and established by resolution of the governing body of a city or county after
a public hearing.
“Recreational use” is the use of land by the,public, with or without charge, for any
of the following: walking, hiking, picnicking, camping, swhming, boating, fishing,
hunting, or other outdoor games or sports for which facilities are provided for
public participation. Any fee charged for the recreational use of land as defined in
this subdivision shall be in a reasonable amount and shall not have the effect of
unduly limiting its use by the public.
Section 51205 of the California Government Code also specifies that land devoted to
recreational use may be included wlthin an agricultural preserve. Section 5 of the city’s
land co nservation contract, “Addition or Elimination of Author&l Uses” provides for
revision to the list of author&d uses in the agricultural preserve by amendment of the
contract through adoption of a resolution of the City Council. Paragraph three of the
original contract adopted on February lo,1976 states that “The Owner and the City desire
tolimittheuseofthepremises to agricultural and compatible uses, recreational uses or
open space uses or some combination thereof’. If approved this amendment would add
public recreational uses to the list of permitted uses for this agricultural preserve. This
would be the third amendment to the contract. The first amendment adjusted the contract
boundary in addition to adding to the list of permitted uses botanical gardens, farm&s
markets, and a floral auction. The second amendment adjusted the contract boundary resulting in the present configuration of the preserve.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
There are presently four items which serve to restrict the use of areas of the site to
agricultural uses. The first is the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Plan which restricts
use of the site to agricultural use except for the previously identified 92.6 acres planned
for non-residential development. The Local Coastal Plan Amendment application is only
proposed to allow recreational use of the property on 24.5 acres identified as parcel 11 in
the Specific Plan and on the Tentative Map. Recreational use of additional areas of the site
would require the approval of a Local Coastal Plan Amendment.
The second item restricting development of the site is the proposed specific plan which
restricts the use of the’ parcels subject to the land conservation contract, with the exception
of proposed parcel 11, to agricultural uses as well as accessory uses for the permitted uses.
An amendment to the specific plan would be required to permit recreational use of the
additional areas of the site subject to the land conservation contract.
A deed restriction recorded by the coastal commission is the third item which restricts use
of those areas of the site subject to the land co nservation contract to agricultural uses. The
Coastal Commission will need to amend the deed restriction to allow public recreational
uses on parcel 11 as proposed. The remainder of the agricultural lands would be subject
to the existing deed restriction.
The fourth item is the present land conservation contract. The contract will provide for
public recreational uses if the proposed amendment is approved. Staff is supporting the
proposed amendment as it is consistent with the intent of state law as well as the land
conservation contract for this property. A Notice of Non-Renewal was recorded for the
property effective January 1, 1992. This starts the countdown of the 10 year contract
period for the majority of the contracted land with the exception of the southwestern area
of the site placed under contract in 1988 for a period of 15 years. Therefore, by the year
2002 and 2007 no area of the site will remain under contract.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT - LFMP 87-13(A)
Planninp: Issues
Is the project in cotiormance with the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 131
E1R91-03/GPA90-11/LCPA90-08/SP 207/ ZC92-02/CT92-07/ HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CABLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
DISCUSSION
The subject property is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 13. The impacts
on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted
performance standards are summarized below:
The project contains conditions of approval requiring various public improvements
including circulation system improvements. In addition the requirements of the Zone 13
LFMP have been made a condition of approval of the project. The LFMP for Zone 13 limits
the buildout of the zone based on compliance with the growth management plan standards,
particularly roadway levels of service.
Also proposed is a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 13. The
amendment revises Exhibit 12 (Buildout projections based on Specific Land Use Miz and
Modified Yield). The amendment updates the table by increasmg the buildout projections
for Phase I of the LFMP and reducing the buildout projections for Phase II. The Zone 13
total buildout projection remains unchanged. This amendment is being proposed in order
to match what is proposed in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. A revised Exhibit 12 is
attached to the resolution for the LFMP Amendment.
EIR 91-03/ GPA90-ll / LCPA90-08/ SP 207/ ZC 92-02/ CT 92-07/ HDP 92-ll /
AP 76-01(C)/ LFMP 8743(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH ‘SPECIFIC PIAN
JANUARY 6,1993
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
The screencheck draft of the Program EIR was provided to the Historic Preservation
Commission. On July 13, 1992 the committee indicated they had no comments on the
document.
OPENSPACEADVISORYCOMMIlTEE
The project was presented to the Open Space Advisory Committee on September 15,1992.
The committee approved 6-O the proposed open space designation and pedestrian
pathways.
PALOMAR AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The project was submitted to the Palomar Airport Manager for review. At the request of
the airport manager staff presented the project to the Palomar Airport Advisory Committee
on October 15,1992. The committee made no formal recommendation however comments
expressed by committee members were contained in a letter dated October 20,1992 from
Roger Walsh, Assistant Director of the County Department of Public Works. The letter
including a response to the comments made is contained in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-03), dated November 1992.
SUMMARY
The project complies with all applicable goals, policies, and ordinances. Approval of the
Local Coastal Plan Amendment and issuance of a Coastal Development Permit are required
by the Califotia~Coastal Commission. Staff recommends approval of all the previously
mentioned actions.
EIR 91-03 / GPA 90-11 / LCPA 90-08 / SP 207 / ZC 92-02 / CT 92-07 / HDP 92-11 /
AP 76-01(C) / LFMP 87-13(A)
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
JANUARY 6,1993
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
Z:
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3476
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3477
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3478
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3479
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3480
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3481
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3482
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3483
Plamkq Commission Resolution No. 3484
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3491
Location Map.
Background Data Sheet.
Disclosure Form.
16.
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form.
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207), dated December 1992 and Exhibits “A” - T”,
dated January 6, 1993. (Previously Distributed)
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Final Program EIR (EIR 91-03) dated November 1992.
(Previously Distributed)
17. Exhibits “G”- “Z”, dated January 6, 1993.
DN:lh lka?mber 1, 1992
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET -
CASE NO: EllR 91-03/GPA9@1lACPA9@08/sP 207/ZC 92-02KT92-07/HDP 92-ll/Ap ~~-O~(C)/LPMP 87-13~~1
CASE NAME: Plan Carlsbad Ranch S_ Decific
APPLICANT: C&has Comnanv
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Certification of a Program EIR and annrova.I of a Snecific Plan and
related actions on nrouertv located north of PaIomar Airoort Road. south of future Cannon Road,
east of Paseo De1 Norte. and west of Local Facilities Mananement Zone 5 and 8.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A nortion of Lot “H” of Ranch0 Anus Hedionda. in the Citv of CarIsbad,
Cotmtv of San Dieno. State of California. according to map thereof No. 823.
APN: 211-010-25: 211-021-18. 19. 26 thm 29 Acres 425.8 Proposed No. Lots/Units J&
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation NRR. TS. OS (Existing): NRR. OS. O/PI. C/O/PI. TSK. C. TS (Pronosed)
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A Existing Zone E-A. O-S. L-C-O
Proposed Zone E-A. O-S. O-O/P-M-O. C-2-O/O-O/P-M-O. C-T-O/C-2-0. C-2-O. C-T-O
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on CarIsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
zoning
Site E-A. O-S. L-C-O
North P-U
South C-T-O. C-2-O. L-C
East P-M. O-S
West C-2-O. C-T-O
Land Use
Agricuhure and related uses
Undeveloned
7 -Elev N
UndeveIoned (Annroved IndustriaI Dark & future narksite)
Car Countrv Auto Park. Undev. & Pea SOUD Andersen’s
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Water District Carlsbad Sewer District CarIsbad
Equivalent DweIIing Units (Sewer Capacity)
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Sentember 14. 1992 (for Cl’ 92-07)
r
x Negative De&ration, issued November 5.1992
x Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated November 1992
Other, DN:L
DISCLOSURESTATEMENT
APPLICAM”S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON AU APPIJCATIONS WHICH WIU REQUIRE
DISCA~OruMY AOTION ON 7HE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOtNlED BOAROe COMMlSSlON OR COMMTEE.
(Please Prim)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Aaolicant CARLTASUJMPANY
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. SAMEAsBELm
2.
4.
9wnor
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. PAUL ECKE, JR. 5600 AVENIDA mcm~~. m. a EL1WK.D . PAUL ECXE, III LIZABEX'H A. EEKE
SARAM.ECKE
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and
addresses of all individuals owning more than 1096 of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership. PAuLEcKE,JR. ~~C~AVB'~IDAHVCINAS,~XRLSWD,CA
gp; ELISABETHK, PAULECKE. IX
LIZEEWA.w SAFtA M. ECKE
If any person idontHIad pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust.
FRMooo13 w90
2075 Las Palmas Drive l Car&ad. California 920094859 0 (819) 438-l 161
Disclosure Statement
(Over)
Page2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - No x If yes, please indicate person(s)
m 18 dofinod m: ‘Any MividuJ. firm. coputnonhip. joint vonturo. a8Sooi@ion. W&I club. h&rnal wghz&ion. corpr@jon, OMU~, trust.
ro~oivr, yndieato, tf~io and any othr eoum, cw and cow, ci& munioiPai#y. dii 01 othw pol&ul a&dit&ion, or ury oth grip or
combination acting u l unit’
ml pages as necessary.)
,ACALIKRNIALIMITED P-P
signature al applicanr/date
cHRIsmPHERC.cALKINs,~
PfitltOftypellWVl6iOfOWtW Pfintorlyperlatnedapplicant
FRMooo13 a/90
mcALFAcumEsIMF~AssEssMEhlTFoRrul
(T’o be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME: CAFUSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
FILE NO: EIR 91-03/GPA90-11/LCPA9@08/SP 207/ZC 92-02/(X92-07/HJJP 92-ll/AP 7t501KWLJ'hQ 87-13(A)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 13 GENERAL PLAN: NRR. OS. O/PI. c/O/PI. TSK. C. TS
ZONING: E-A. O-S. O-O/ P-M-O. C-2-O/O-O/P-M-O. C-T-O/C-2-0. C-2-O. C-T-O.
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Carhas COXlDaIW
ADDRESS: 5600 Avenida Encinas. Suite 100
PHONE NO: (619) 431-5600 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 9
QUAIVITIY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 117.1 AC.. 1.880.000 sa. ft.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Year 2000 .
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
1.
J.
K.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = ,-
LibElI)? Demand in Square Footage = N/A
Wastewater Treat&nt Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A
Park: Demand in Acreage = $&/sa. ft. or ameement to Drivatehr provide facilities
Drainage: DemandinCFS= N/A
Identify Drainage Basin = Arma Hedionda Creek WatershedKanvon DeLas En&as Watershed.
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: DemandinADTs= 38.090
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 4
*Open Space: Acreage Provided - 24.5
SCbOOlS: N/A
(Demands to be determined by staff)
sewer: DemandinEDus- N/A
Identify Sub Basin - 1 Sou
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: DemandinGPD - N/A
EXHBIT 6
PLANNING COMMISSION January 6,1993 PAGE 7
5. EIR 91-03/GPA 90-l l/LCPA 90-OS/SP 207/ZC 92-02/CT 92-07/HDP 92-l 1 /AP 76-01 (CVLFMP
87-l 3(A) - CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN - Request for the certification of a Program
Environmental Impact Report and approval of a Negative Declaration; and the request for approval
of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone Change,
Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, Land Conservation Contract Amendment, and a
Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 13 on property located north of Palomar
Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and west of Local Facilities
Management Zones 5 and 8 and within Local Facilities Management Zones 3 and 13, in the Coastal
Zone. The Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map also include a property on the west side of Paseo
del Notte north of Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup Andersen’s.
Don Neu, Senior Planner, introduced the Carlsbad Ranch project and stated that Betty Dehoney, P&D
Technologies, an environmental consultant to the City, would address the EIR issues associated with this
application. He stated that the applicant is requesting several discretionary approvals for a 423.5 acre
property located on the north side of Palomar Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, and immediately
east of Paseo del Norte. The development program for the project includes non-residential uses, office,
research and development uses on parcels 1, 5 and 9, mixed-use (retail and office) on parcels 6 and 7,
and a hotel with additional mixed-use (retail and office) on parcel 8. Parcel 10, immediately adjacent to
Paseo del Norte is proposed as a retail center. Parcel 11 is a proposed golf driving range. The remainder
of the site is proposed to remain in agricultural production. The plan also proposes a phasing schedule
with buildout projected at the year 2000. The first item proposed in the phasing is the retail center
(Parcel 10) adjacent to Paseo del Norte.
The items being presented for approval tonight include the following:
Certification of an environmental impact report (EIR 91-03) for the 423.5 acre Carl&ad Ranch and
adoption of a negative declaration for an area on the west side of Paseo del Norte which is included in
the tentative map and zone change;
A General Plan Amendment (GPA 90-l 1) covering the areas of the site not under Williamson Act
contract;
‘A Local Coastal Plan Amendment (LCPA 90-08) including some text amendments and map exhibits to
the Mello II coastal plan;
A specific plan (SP 207);
A zone change (ZC 92-02) to change zoning on the site to match up with the designations in the
specific plan as well as the proposed General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Amendments;
A tentative map (CT 92-07) to create 17 development parcels and a remainder parcel;
A hillside development permit (HDP 92-l 1) covering the grading associated with the tentative map;
An amendment to the Williamson Act contract (AP 76-01(C)); and
An amendment to the Zone 13 facilities plan (LFMP 87-13(A)).
Don Neu turned the time over to Betty Dehoney, who presented the environmental impact report. She
stated that no issues were found to be significant at the project level. However, there were two significant
unmitigated impacts at the cumulative level, i.e. air quality and solid waste. Because the region is in
non-attainment for air quality, the contribution of vehicular traffic and the associated air emissions from
the project were considered significant at the cumulative level. Solid waste was also considered cumulative
due to the capacity issue in southern California.
Mr. Neu reviewed in detail each of the discretionary approvals being requested which are also defined in
detail in the written staff report. In conclusion, he stated that the project complies with all applicable goals,
policies, and ordinances. Approval of the Local Coastal Plan Amendment and issuance of a Coastal
Development Permit are required by the California Coastal Commission. Staff recommends approval of all
actions.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION January 6, 1993
CORRECTED
PAGE 8
Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, reviewed a staff memo dated January 6, 1993, outlining two
corrections to the engineering conditions of Resolution Nos. 3480 and 3483.
Commissioner Welshons is concerned about the request for private recreational facilities rather than a
public park. Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney, responded stating that the City Attorney has
recommended that this reference be deleted because there is no such thing as a private/public park.
Commissioner Welshons proposed that the following condition be added to Resolution No. 3480:
“On page 141 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, the second paragraph under Section 3, Park
Mitigation Recommendations, shall be deleted. Text shall be added to this section of the plan to
prohibit developers within the Specific Plan from privately providing and maintaining recreational
facilities for the employees of Zone 13 as provided for on page 66, Section III, Mitigation, of the Park
Facilities Section of the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan.”
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the parking ratio for the vocational school. Mr. Neu replied that staff
has established a standard of one space for every three students (1:3) but noted that there is a wide
disparity throughout the state on parking for vocational schools, ranging from 1 :l to 1:4.
Commissioner Erwin is very concerned about removing land currently protected under the Williamson Act.
He would like to see the some agriculture remain in perpetuity. He feels that the City is being requested to
make a long term guarantee to the applicant in return for a temporary protection of agricultural space. He
is concerned about how the decision on “economic viability” will be made. Mr. Neu replied that the City
and the Coastal Commission would each make a decision on “economic viability.”
Commissioner Erwin is also concerned about the height of the proposed structures; he does not want to
see a hotel “hanging” over the hillside. Mr. Neu replied that all development on the Specific Plan must
come before the Planning Commission for Site Development Plan approval, which provides the Planning
Commission with discretion over building and site design.
Commissioner Erwin is also concerned about the reference to “shared parking.” He would like to see this
reference deleted. Mr. Neu replied that this was included to comply with the regional transportation plan
now being formulated. The applicant is not being given an approval for shared parking.
Commissioner Erwin inquired why a center median is required on “A” Street at Palomar Airport Road and
not on “A” Street at Cannon Road. Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, replied that Condition #72 of
Resolution No. 3483 calls for a 10 ft. striped median.
Commissioner Welshons inquired if there wilt be bike lanes on Road A. Mr. Wojcik replied that Resolution
No. 3483 requires a striped bike lane.
Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Chris Calkins, Manager of the Carltas Company, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carl&ad, addressed the
Commission and stated that this project is attempting to create an environment which integrates the
agriculture with the commercial element. He passed out a recent newspaper article from the Los Angeles
Times which states that Governor Wilson is recommending removal of the subsidy for properties protected
by the Williamson Act. Mr. Calkins went on to say that the proposed project will leave a large area for
flower farming near Palomar Airport Road and another agricultural area at the Cannon Road end. The
commercial area along Paseo del Norte is designed to permit marketing of vegetables, flowers, and other
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION January 6, 1993 PAGE 9
products related to the ambiance of the area. Although there is an area for a hotel, he is not sure that one
will be built until the economic climate improves to make a hotel viable.
Mr. Calkins objects to three conditions as follows:
. The new addition to Condition #64 in Resolution No. 3483 (staff memo dated January 6, 1993) which
requires a sidewalk on the east side of Paseo del Norte, as well as Bullet #7 of Condition #64 in
Resolution No. 3483 which requires a sidewalk on Palomar Airport Road west of Road A.
* Condition #71 in Resolution No. 3483 which requires reimbursement for road improvements to
Palomar Airport Road.
. The condition proposed to be added to Resolution No. 3480 removing provisions of the Specific Plan
and Local Facilities Management Plan that may allow for privately provided and maintained
recreational facilities for employees of Zone 13.
Mr. Calkins is opposed to the sidewalks immediately adjacent to the agricultural fields because he does not
want to encourage pedestrian traffic in that area. Having sidewalks there would necessitate the need for a
fence to protect the crops being produced. However, he has no problems with the requirement for a
sidewalk next to the commercial uses. He would be willing to add a sidewalk in the future if and when the
agriculture use converts to commercial use.
Mr. Calkins plans to voice his opposition to Condition #71 at the City Council meeting. He is requesting
that Carltas not be required to reimburse the City for road improvements related to agricultural land since
he is only changing the boundaries and not changing the quantity of land dedicated to agricultural uses.
He responded to Commissioner Welshon’s concern regarding the park issue and stated that he would like
to provide some type of recreational park for those who will work in the area.
Commissioner Erwin is concerned that the intensification of land use being requested is permanent yet the
City will only receive a temporary guarantee from Carltas to continue the agricultural use. He feels the City
should receive a permanent guarantee in return for a permanent land use change. By removing the land
from the Williamson Act, it will reduce the viability for agricultural use. Commissioner Erwin inquired if
Carltas would be willing to sign a document to ensure that the agricultural uses will be permanent.
Mr. Calkins replied that 30 years ago, the Williamson Act was a protection to the landowner. However,
with the passage of Proposition 13, it has become a hindrance. He stated that Carltas has already signed
a deed restriction but would not be willing to sign anything else.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the reference to “medium-rise” structures. Mr. Calkins replied that he
has no problem deleting this reference.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the reference to “shared” parking. Mr. Calkins replied that this was
included to accommodate an unknown future situation because of regional transportation plans have not
yet been finalized. When the specific Site Development Plans come forward, there will be an opportunity
for the Commission to go into detail on the parking issue.
Commissioner Schratim would like to add a condition requiring additional landscaping around the
perimeter of the developed areas, especially on the west side of Road A, and more particularly Parcels 1
and 8. Mr. Calkins has no problem increasing the landscape requirement.
Commissioner Schramm read her proposed condition to Resolution No. 3480, as follows:
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION January 6,1993 PAGE 10
“Landscaping around the perimeter of the development at the agricultural interface shall utilize shrubs
in addition to trees to create a buffer suitable to reduce conflicts between agricultural and urban land
uses. The proposed landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. Page 122, Section F, 2 (Berms) shall be revised to include this provision.”
Mr. Calkins stated that he has no problem with the added condition as read.
Dennis Cunningham, 6469 Camino del Parque, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he is
employed for five years as a planner for a private company in Carlsbad. The company has no connection
whatsoever to this project. Mr. Cunningham stated that he is speaking as a private citizen. He has
reviewed the Zone 13 document and the Specific Plan and he thinks the Planning Commission and City should be very happy with this project because of the public facilities which will be provided. He likes the
architectural theme and feels there is adequate underground parking. He also likes the pedestrian
sensitivity to the agriculture. He thinks the proposed changes are excellent and that Carltas understands
the issues.
Commissioner Erwin asked Mr. Cunningham who his employer was. He replied that he works for Planning
Systems, a small planning company with offices on Palomar Airport Road.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the extension of Cannon Road and his understanding that it would
only go to A Street. Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, replied that Mr. Cunningham was referring to the
zone plan which extends Cannon Road all the way to El Camino Real. The Specific Plan only extends
Cannon Road to A Street.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noble declared
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Hall requested staff to comment on the sidewalk issue. Mr. Wojcik replied that staff believes
the sidewalks are an important circulation element and it may be the last time we can add the sidewalk.
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, added that this issue has been brought up before. The Planning
Commission has always felt that sidewalks were important but decided to wait until development was
proposed. Now that development is being proposed, it is time to add sidewalks. We are following earlier
Planning Commission direction.
Commissioner Hall felt that Mr. Calkins’ comment that he doesn’t want to encourage pedestrians at the
edge of the flower fields is a valid concern. He inquired if a barrier is being proposed adjacent to the
sidewalk. Mr. Wojcik replied that staff is not proposing a barrier.
Commissioner Schlehuber pointed out that there are many streets in Carl&ad with a sidewalk on one side
only. He feela it would be easy to require a bond for the sidewalk until it is needed at a later date. He feels
that Mr. Calkins’ concern makes sense. A bond would give the City control over the situation. Mr. Wojcik
replied that a condition could be added to require a future improvement agreement.
Commissioner Schlehuber agrees with Mr. Calkins on the sidewalk issue but not on the reimbursement
issue. The City Council can handle that as they see fit. He does not feel we can force the applicant to
produce a specific agricultural product because it may not be viable ten years from now. On the park
issue, he feels the Commission should follow the City Attorney’s advice regarding the park mitigation.. As
far as the shared parking is concerned, it is simply an option to cut the red tape in the future. He can
support that. He can also support both Commissioner Welshons’ proposal and Commissioner Schramm’s
proposal. He feels we should not force the sidewalk at this time and that we need to handle it with a bond
agreement or something similar.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION January 6, 1993 PAGE 11
Commissioner Hall requested Commissioner Welshons to repeat her recommendation.
Commissioner Welshons restated her proposed condition to Resolution No. 3480, as follows:
“On page 141 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, the second paragraph under Section 3, Park
Mitigation Recommendations, shall be deleted. Text shall be added to this section of the plan to
prohibit developers within the Specific Plan from privately providing and maintaining recreational
facilities for the employees of Zone 13 as provided for on page 66, Section Ill, Mitigation, of the Park
Facilities Section of the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan.”
The proposed condition was discussed in detail. The intent of Commissioner Welshon’s proposed
condition is to correct the reference in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 to ensure that the
Carltas Company cannot provide private recreational facilities for their employees in lieu of paying the park
mitigation fee.
Chairman Noble inquired if the facilities plan for Zone 13 stated that the City would retain control. Gary
Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that the plan does not make that statement.
Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney, commented that the legal issue is that when a fee has been
established, an exception cannot be made when it contradicts the intent of the fee. The park mitigation fee
was established to provide public parks for all citizens. When someone requests to build private
recreational facilities for their employees, it contradicts the intent of the fee, i.e. to provide public facilities
for all citizens.
Commissioner Schlehuber feels that the Commission should follow the recommendation of the City
Attorney and include the condition by Commissioner Welshon to remove the reference to park mitigation.
Commissioner Erwin stated that although the project is well designed, he will vote against the project
because Carltas benefits from intense development which is permanent and guaranteed but the public’s
benefit of keeping the property in an agricultural preserve is temporary and not guaranteed. If the project
is approved, he urged those voting in favor of it to consider requiring sidewalks on both sides of the streets
because it will be a pedestrian oriented project. He also urged deleting the reference on page 12, Policy H,
referring to Mid-rise Buildings and that Policy H be retitled to read Clustering Intensity or some other title
which is acceptable to staff.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Schiehuber, and duly seconded, to adopt Resolution
No. 3476 recommending certification of EIR 91-03 and Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3477 recommending approval of a Negative Declaration, and adopt
Resolution Nos. 3478,3479,3480, 3481,3482, and 3491, recommending approval of
GPA 90-l 1, LCPA 90-08, SP 207, ZC 92-02, AP 76-01 (C), and LFMP 87-l 3(A), and
adopt Resolution Nos. 3483 and 3484, approving CT 92-07 and HDP 92-l 1, based on
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the following
amendments: (1) inclusion of Commissioner Schramm’s proposed condition regarding
landscaping; (2) inclusion of Commissioner Welshon’s proposed condition regarding
park mitigation as approved by the City Attorney; (3) inclusion of engineering condition
#7 to Resolution No. 3480 per staff memo dated January 6, 1993; (4) creation of a new
condition which requires a bond assessment for sidewalks adjacent to the agricultural
preserve along Paseo del Norte and Palomar Airport Road, said sidewalks to be
provided when the City feels they are needed; and (5) delete the reference to mid-rise
buildings.
AYES: Chairman Noble, Commissioners Hail, Savary, Schlehuber, Schramm, and Welshons
NOES: Commissioner Erwin
ABSTAIN: None
MINUTES
. 03/05/93 14: 12 CFlRLTFlS CDMPFlNY 002 -*
*. l,g
59
%
Cf3RlTFIS . ;w--~’ Q&&AlAd
comrww
March 5, 1993
Mayor Claude "Bud" A. Lewis and Counail Members City of Carlsbad 2200 Carlsbad ViLlage Drive Carlebad, California 92008
Rr: Park Mitigation, Carlebad - Carlobad Ranoh Specific Plan fHearina.March 9. 19931
bear Mayor and Members of Counoil:
The purpose of this letter I,8 to urge the City Council to include within the carlsbad Ranch Gpeoific Pl.an the language previously adopted for the Zone 13 Loual Facilities Management Plan which mould permit the creation of recreational facilities open to the public, but located exclusively within Bone 13. The langt\age provided in the Zone Plan as quoted below also provides the opportunity for the facilities to be areated in advance of the tjme when the city would be able to economically support such facilities and have them maintained privately until the City is in an economic
situation whiah would permit it to assume the responsibility, Thus, it may be pcmsible to provide recreational activities for the employees of the businesses to be located in Zone 13 before the City could economically assume the responsibility,
The LOCal Facilities Management Zone Plan provides OS follows:
"Should the City and the Carltas Company, or its rmccessor, mtuallv dete& that it ill feasible arL.I in the best interest of the City to have the Developer(s) of Zone 13 privately provide and maintain the recreational facilities form emnlovese of Zone-l-8 ths residents of earlsbaa, then upon the financial guarantee of those facilities, all Zone 13 park feee oollected to date shail be disbursed to the provider of the reoreateunel faoilitiee and no additional Zone 33 park fees shall be collected." (Emphasis added).
This alternative was included in the draft Specific Plan, but was deleted by the Planning Commission.
5800 AVENIDA ENCINAS . SUITE 100 . CARLSE3AD, CALIFORNtA 82008 U&A.
(61s)431-5600 FAX (619) 43%9020
. 03/05/93 14:12 L.
J-. 7
CFlRLTFlS COMPFlNY A 003
Mayor Claude rtBud*l A. Lewis and Council Mambara City of Carlsbad March 5, 1993 2
The provision of a fee and the alternative provision of facilities upon mutual agreement between the City and the developer reflects, in part, studies that were done at the time of development of Zone 5 Laoal Facilities Plan. The Zone 5 Plan reflected a focus on the large concentralAm of employees in the industrial area csntsrsd around the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real.
Most of Zone 5 has been built out as a cXaeaic business park environment with very low coverage and few commerciaL service facilities integrated within the park. Thus, the need far automobile transportation. from one building to any aommercial or other serviceB which would be required by the employees, consequently, a gentraw facility funded by an overall. park mitigation fee appeared appropriate,
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan ira intended to encourage. the development af a more intense, integrated environmsnt which would have services available to the employees and visitors in the immediate area and not require additional -ePortation burdens for those persons visiting or working in the CarZsbad Ranch Specific Plan area, To require contribution to a fund for the construction of a facility located at some distance which would require employees to get in their oars and drive there in order to use the faoility would be self defeating, The purpose of this Specific Plan, if adopted by the City Council, is to discourqw more automobile transportation and to enoaurage a central focused project with all the primary amenities required to minimise the number of transportation tripe,
The provision of the Zone Plan and of the Specific Plan as proposed by staff, contemplated an alternative to this mitigation fee if mutually determined to be acceptable by the City and landowner, not one which could be unilaterally imposed by the land uwner~ or developers within zone 13. Consequently, this obligation of mutual agreement would appear to provide adequate assurances to the City council and to the City Attorney and staff that any such proposal would have, impliaitwithin itr relationships that are satisfactory to the City.
Tn a time of reduced governmental. resources and capital burdens, Borne flexibility in assuring those services necessary for the mombare of the community is appropriate and the provieions of the zone Pl.an, if incorporated in the Specific Plan, will provide Par that flexibility.
03/05/93 14: 13 CFlRLTFlS COMPANY . - - Y . i -. a
004
Mayor Claude ,IBudtt A. Lewis and Councril Members City of Carlebad March 5, 1993 3
The studies which are included in the Zone 13 Plan which were compXsted for purposes of the application for the Park Mitigation Fee specifically called out the need for facilities which would benefit the employees working in the area. The purpose of the Park
Mitigation Fee was pz& to provide a park for the general benefit of the community. These parks are provided, in part, through the MellO-ROOs District of which the carlsbad Ranch will tie a part and through the general oapital improvement program, Any park created, however, would ultimately benefit the entire aommunity.
Aocordingly, we request this language whfohthe Planning Commission deleted be included within the Specific Plan as an opportunity for providing an additional park mitigation.
Very truly youra,
ccc/dsf
CC: Don Neu, City of Carlsbad Planning Department
I-80-115 1-90-x.78 l-90-234 L-80-335
03/05/93 14: 11 CFlRLTFlS COMPFlNY 001
CARLTAS PEVELOF’hflENT
COMPANY
FAX NWME5IEERr <6=LB> 43x--9020
PAX MESSAGE #: 48
PAGE 1 OF , ., 4
*****C*****+**tX*+*,*~~~~~~**~~~~~~*******~*~**~******~***~*****~
DATE5 : March ti,, 1993
TO: Mayor Bud Lew?s
COMPANY NAMES City of Carlsbad
FAX NUMBER t _7?0-9461
F’RCXH f Chris lalkins.. _ .._-.- __
RECSJ’KRDING t .- CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC,PtAN (Hearing) _
MESSACZE z
_._.-._...._..._- . . .._ . . ..,_---- -
If yau JaavaEe slx-ky probI1,-ms p pZSslS8
csa11,x Diane a* (62-S) 43X-56000
5800 AVENIDA ENClNAS l SUITE 100 . CARLSE)AIS, CALlfORNlA 8PM8 U.S.A.
(619) 431-5800 FAX (618) 431-9020
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 9, 1993, to consider a request for the certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report: approval of a Negative Declaration: and approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone Change, Land Conservation Contract Amendment, and a Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 13 on property located north of Palomar Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, east of Paseo de1 Norte, and west of Local Facilities Management Zones 5 and 8, and within Local Facilities Management Zones 3 and 13, in the Coastal Zone. The Zone Change also includes a property on the west side of Paseo de1 Norte north of Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup Andersen's and more particularly described as:
A Portion of Lot "H'l of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1892.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4446.
If you challenge the Environmental Impact Report/General Plan Amendment/Local Coastal Plan Amendment/Specific Plan/Zone Change/Land Conservation Contract Amendment/Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: EIR 91-03/GPA 90-ll/LCPA 90-08/SP 207/ZC 92-02/ AP 76-Ol(C)/LFMP 87-13(A) CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH PUBLISH: February 25, 1993
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
l mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~
a 8 : :
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
city of GarIshad
’ EIR 9%3/GPA 90-111 1
LCPA 9098/SP 2071
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice EIR 91-031
GPA 90-WLCPA 90-08/SP-207/ZC 92-OZ/AP 76-Ol(C)/LFMP 87-13(A)
(CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN) for a public hearing before the City Council. I
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
MARTY ORENYAK
Assistant City Manager
JAN, 26, 1993
Date
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 6, 1993, to consider a request for the
certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report and approval of a Negative
Declaration; and the request for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan
Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone Change, Land Conservation Contract Amendment, and a
Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 13 on property located north of
Palomar Airport Road, south of future Cannon Road, east of Paseo de1 Norte, and west of
Local Facilities Management Zones 5 and 8 and within Local Facilities Management Zones
3 and 13, in the Coastal Zone. The Zone Change also includes a property on the west side
of Paseo de1 Norte north of Palomar Airport Road and Pea Soup Andersen’s and more
particularly described as:
A Portion of Lot “H” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November
16, 1892.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 30, 1992. If
you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-l 161, ext.
4446.
If you challenge the Environmental Impact Report/General Plan Amendment/Local Coastal
Plan Amendment/Specific Plan/Zone Change/Land Conservation Contract
Amendment/Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in
this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
CASE FILE: EIR 91-OS/GPA 90-l l/LCPA 90-08/SP 207/ZC 92-02/
AP 76-01 (C)/LFMP 87-13(A)
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RANCH
PUBLISH:
CARLSBAD JOURNAL - DECEMBER 23,1992
BLADE CITIZEN - DECEMBER 23, 1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION DN:km
hy of ~arlsbad
’ ElF? Ql-WGPA 90-W LCPA 9098/SP 2071
CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ‘ZC 92=2/AP 76-l \ C)/ LFMP 87-13lA
brn{
:
3.
:
E
.: l :
: : m
CARLSBADUNIF SCHOOLDIST
801 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LEUCADIACOUNTYWTRDIST
1960 LACOSTAAV
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITYOFCARLSBAD
ENGINEERINGDEPT
CITYOFOCEANSIDE
320NHORNESTREET
OCEANSIDE CA92054
CALIFDEPTOFFISH& GAME
330GOLDENSHORE#50
LONGBEACH CA90802
MARJEHOWARD-JONES
4823ARGOSY LANE
CARLSBADCA92008
SANMARCOSSCHOOLDIST
1290W. SAN MARCOS BLVD.
SANMARCOS CA 92069
VALLECITOSWTRDISTRICT
788SANMARCOSBLVD.
SANMARCOS CA 92069
CITYOFCARLSBAD
UTILITIES&MAINTENANCE
CITYOFSANMARCOS
105WRICHMARAVENUE
SANMARCOSCA92069
EITANAHARONI
1824OAKAVENUE
CAFtLSBADCA 92008
EDWARDMCCANN
3485 CHARTEROAKDRIVE
CARLSBADCA 92008
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST
189 UNION STREET
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SANDIEGOCOUNTY
DEPTOF PLANNING
5201 RUFFIN RD,STE”B
SANDIEGO CA 92123
CITYOFENCINITAS
505 S.WLCANAV
ENCINITAS CA92024-3633
CITYOFVISTA
PO BOX1988
VISTACA92084
DENNISGALLEGOS
2908VIAPEPITA
CARLSBADCA 92009
PEGGYSAVARY
6528 PERSASTREET
CAfUSBADCA92009
Copyright (c)1991 Da-taqu k Information Network (61 455-6900 Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘21 ) Prcl:211-050-01 Site:889 PALOMAR AIRPORT RDUCARLSBAD CA 92009
0wnr:WINTER RAY TR Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use : REEiTAURANT Ph: zn: c Tfr: Date: 06/21/91
Loans : Xmpt: Yb: 68 Sqft: 4,327 Asd: 3496,839 Imp: 36% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 40,510
J ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 1 Prcl:211-05Q-04 Site:6115 E PASEO DEL NORTE*CARLSBAD CA 92009
0wnr:GAISER JAMES&DOROTHY Mail:3340 RIDGECREST DRUCARLSDAD CA 92008
Use: l-3 ST OFF/STURE Ph: Zn: M Tfr: $Q Date: 04/23/92
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 3494, 168 Imp: 82% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotst: 1.81 A
r -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1 Prcl:211-050-05 Site:901 PALOMAR AIRPORT RDSCARLSBAD CA 92009
0wnr:WINTER FAMILY PARTNER Mail:1745 N ROCKY RDSFULLERTON CA 92631
Use: l-3 ST OFF/STORE Ph: Zn: c Tfr: 8600, OOOF Date: 12/29/87
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 88 Sqft: 3,072 As d : $628, 349 Imp:41% Un:
Map: PM195 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 27,878 ___---------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘4 ) Prcl:211-050--06 Site: 925 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD+CARLSBAD CA 92009
Ownr: JCM TOM COMPANY Mail:1524 DORCAS ST+SAN DIEGO CA 92110
Use: l-3 ST OFF/STORE Ph: Zn: C Tfr: $498, OOOF Date: 07/30/91
Loans: $340,000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd : $498,000 Imp: 80% Un:
Map: PM195 Blk: L.ot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 30,056
‘5 ) Prcl: 211-050-08 Site: *CARLSBAD CA
Ownr: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Mail-1867 13’ ST&UT, S19cEnm~rJTd;QA SStJ%’ F
use: Ph: Zn: Tfr: Date: 03/11/66
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: Imp: 0% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4. 18 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘6 ) Prcl:211-050-09 Site:6100 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92009
Ownr:CAL-MIL PLASTIC PRODU Mail:6100 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSbAD CA 92009
Use: LIGHT MANUF Ph: Zn: M Tfr: Date: 03/07/68
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 6487,838 Imp: 80X Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2. 67 A
l7 1 Prcl: 211-050-10 Site:6030 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92009
0wnr:DEALY FAMILY TRUST 02 Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use : RESTAURANT Ph: Zn: C Tfr: BQ Date: 02/28/90
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 8325,701 Imp: 54% Un:
Map: PM2923 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz:
1. 8 1 Prcl: 211-050-11,1?.,\3 Site: 6020 PASEo DEL NORTEuCARLSBAD CA 92009
0wnr:WINTER FAMILY PARTNER Mail:1745 N ROCKY RDUFULLERTON CA 9263 1
Use: l-3 ST OFF/SlMIE Ph: Zn: C Tf r : $600, OOOF Date: 12/29/87+
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 74 Sqft: 6,389 Asd: $6031416 Imp: 75% Un:
Map : PM2923 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz:
/;;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
) Prcl: 211-060-02 Site:5334 PASEO DEL NORTEUCARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr: AR0 PARTNERS Mail:PO BOX 45499CARLSBAD CA 92018
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 06/11/91
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 91,942,018 Imp: 30X Un:
Map: 7492 Dlk: Lot: 5 Bdrms: Bths: Lotst: 2.86 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 1 Prcl: 211-060-06 Site:5356 PASEO DEL NORTEuCARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:BROOKING DORIS TR Mai 1: 375 SKYLINE DRWISTA CA 92084
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: !6Q Date: 06124191
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 74 Sqft: 38,423 Asd: $2, 129, 520 Imp: 93% Un:
Map: 7492 Blk: Lot: 9 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3. 26 A
c
Copyright (c)1991 Dataqr-k Information Network (61- 455-6900 Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
’ 5 1 1 Prcl: 210-170-08 Site:5850 AVENIDA ENCINAWCARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr : PAL.OMAR#CO, Mail:5850 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD.CA 92008
Use: l-3 ST OFF/STORE Ph: Zn:M Tfr: Date: 11/06/84
Loans: Xmpt: Yb:72 Sqft: 10,977 Asd: 8489,906 Imp: 86% Un:
Map: PM13955 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotst: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘12 1 Prcl: 210-170-09 Site: AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA
Ouunr : PALOMAR%CO, Mail:5850 AVENIDA E&INAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
\Jse: PARKING LOT-GAR Ph: Zn:M- Tfr: Date: 11/06/84
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: $223,233 Imp:O% Un:
Map: PM13955 Blk: ,, Lot: Bdrms: Dths: Lotsz: 30,056 ---------------------i------------------------------------------------------------
‘13 ) Prcl: 210-170-J,O Site:5980 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Olunr: PALOMARWO, :’ Mail:5850 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: RESTAURANT Ph: Zn: c Tfr: Date: 11/06/84
Loans: Xmp t : Yb: 86 Sqf t: 9,320 Asd: $1~366,515 Imp:89% Un:
Map : PM14014 " Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: --------------~---------------------------------------------------------------
‘14 1 Prcl:210'170-11
I/-
Site:AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA
Our: PALOMAR& 0, Mail:!3850 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML.. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 11/06/84
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: $138,391 Imp:O% Un:
Map: PM 14p.14 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: L.otsz: 22,651 __-__-__----__--I-------------------------------------------------------------
“15 1 Pri 1:210-170-12 Site:AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA
Ownr : PkLOMAR&CO, Mail:5850 AVENIDA ENCINASUCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 11106184
Loa!ls: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 3324,691 Imp:O% Un:
Map : PM14014 L)lk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.21 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J -16
6
) Prcl:210-170-13 Site:AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSDAD CA
unr: PALOMARWO, Mail:5850 AVENIDA ENCINASuCARLSBAD CA 92008
.‘Use: PARKING LOT-GAR Ph: zn: c Tfr: Date: 11/06/84
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd : 3850,536 Imp: 5% Un:
Map: PM14014 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2. 97 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘17 1 Prcl:210-170-14746 Site:5999 AVENIDA ENCINAS+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr : PALOMAR VENTURE Mail:5962 LA PLACE CT 200wCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: WAREHSE-STORAGE Ph: Zn: M Tfr: Date: 04/20/82
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 87 Sqft:40,040 Asd: $2,353,030 Imp:64% Un:
Map : PM 15906 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.47 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ / 18 1 Prcl: 211-010-19 Site: *CARLSBAD CA
0wnr:SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRI Mail- e.0 %0x (~~I,s~~D\E~~,~~\FuP~~
USC: Ph : Zn: Tfr: Date: 97A”X
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd : Imp: 0% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsr: 3.00 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“1 Y 1 Prcl:211-010-23 Site: +CARL.SBAD CA
0wnr:SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRI Mail:- p-0, bd. 1831 SRN DLeGo,CAL\FDP#r@
Use: Ph: Zn: Tfr: Date: 11/01/85 92\\1,
Loans : Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: Imp:O% Un:
Map : 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: 1.otsz: 147.03 A --------------------__I_________________--------------------------------------
J20 ) Prcl: 211-021-04 Site: *CARLSBAD CA
Ownr: COSTA, REAL MUNICIPAL Mail: -E 2950 &L Cfifnr ,-, 0 6%&f-, C-k~6At2,C/$ yaoog
use: Ph: Zn: Tfr: Date:l0/11/79
Loans: Xmp t: Yb: Sqft: Asd: Imp: 0% Un:
Map: Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: 1.ots2: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L
Copyright (c)1991 Dataqu-k Information Network t&l-’ 459-6900 Page 3 -__-------------I------- ,-------------------------- , .-------------------------
I +21 ) Prcl:211-021-22 Site:800 PALOMAR AIRPORT RDSCARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 1OOwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use : RESTAURANT Ph: Zn:C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
Loans: xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 65,000,OOO Imp: 64% Un:
Map: PM1 1284 Blk: L.ot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5.63 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘22 1 Prcl: 211-021-23 Site: 840 PALOMAR AIRPORT RDuCARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use : HOTEL-MOTEL .Ph: Zn:C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
Loans: Xmpt: Yb : Sqft: 67, 184 Asd: $5, 500,000 Imp: 61% Un: 141
Map: PM1 1284 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7.48 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘23 ) Prcl: 211-021-24 Site:PASEO DEL NORTE*CARLSBAD CA 90020
0wnr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 1OOwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
Loans: xmpt: Yb : Sqft: Asd : $1,353,040 Imp: 0% Un:
Map: PM1 1284 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3.80 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ / 24 1 PrcI:211-021-26 Site:PASEO DEL NORTE*CARLSBAD CA
Ownr: CARLTAS CO Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn:CR Tfr: Date: 12/22/8&
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: sqet: Asd: $57,433 Imp: 0% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotst: 2.23 A --------------------__I_________________--------------------------------------
J2s 1 Prcl:211-030-27 site:&020 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92009
Ownr: GRUBB%ELLIS, INDUSTRIA Mail: 1 MARKET PLZ SPEAR ST TOWER*SAN FRANCISC 94105
Us e : WAREHSE-STORAGE P h : Zn:M Tfr: Date: 12/31/91
Loans: Ql2,450,000 Xmpt: Yb: 75 Sqft: 78,610 Asd : 86, 000, 000 Imp: 41% Un: 0
Map: PMl31.0 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms; Bths: Lotsz: 9. 75 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JHubJfifi totiBLncHC 7
at/- OYf - 30,3/,33
“/
0 0 C?f+EvRON U-se ZNC. ?R6&Rt-Y ~l~lsIo~
?.!o 80% 3611
5r9ti FRC)NC~SO, CALIFOLNI~~ ?4jaa
’ ’ .
Copyriyht (c )1991 DataqL k Information Network (61 455-6900 Page 1 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
J’l 1 Prcl: 210--090-45 Site:5411 AVENIDA ENCINASuCARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr: SAN-GAL TRUST THE Mail:550 W C ST lf32O*SAN DIEGO CA 92101
Use : L IGHT MANUF Ph: Zn: M Tf r : $4, 475, OOOF Date: 12/14/87
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 86 Sqf t: 86,432 Asd: $7,000,000 Imp: 71% Un:
Map : PM13051 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5.65 A -_-------_--------------------------------------------------------------------
d2 1 Prcl: 210~090.-48
Clwnr:AVENIDA ENCINAS-ASSOC
Use: l-3 ST OFF/STORE Ph:
Loans: Xinpt:
Map : PM 14009 Blk: ---.------------------------
‘3 1 Prcl: 210-090-50
Ownr : CARL-MART, L P
Use: WAREHSE-STORAGE Ph:
Loans: Xmpt:
Map : PPll6274 Blk:
Site:5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Mai 1: 3200 N SAN FERNANDO RDULOS ANGELES CA 90065
Zn: M Tfr: BQ Date: 04/09/8&
Yb: 87 Sqf t: 48,200 Asd: 94,309,398 Imp: 74% Un:
Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2. 07 A .---------------------------------------------------
Site:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Zn:M Tfr: Date: 11/29/89
Yb: 80 Sqft: 99, 999 Asd: 67,9&2,312 Imp: 41% Un:
Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 12. 70 A
/4 1 Prcl:210-090-51 Site:5825 AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Qunr:PACIFIC POINT BUSINES Mail:4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR 2lO*SAN DIEGO C 92122
Use: WAREHSE-STORAGE Ph: Zn: M Tfr: $2,870,395F Date: 11/09/90
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 92 Sqft: 82,018 Asd: $5,285,000 Imp: 62% Un:
Map : ml 6274 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5.87 A --------_---------_--__I_________________-------------------------------------- J- 5 1 Prcl: 210-100-07 Site:&65 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr: ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail: 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD ,CA 92008
Use: SERVICE STATION Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
L.oans: Xmpt: Yb: 70 Sqft: 1,827 Asd: 6765,000 Imp: 20% Un: 1
Map : 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.02 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jb 1 Prcl: 210-100-14 Site:PALOMAR AIRPORT RDSCARLSBAD CA
Ownr: PACIFIC CENTER ASSOCI Mail: 701 PAL.OMAR AIRPORT RD 2509CARLSBAD CA 92009
Use: PARKING LOT-*GAR Ph: ’ Zn: C Tfr: Date: 04/17/85
Loans: Xmpt: Yb : Sqf t: Asd: $719,815 Imp: 9% Un:
Map : 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms : Bths: Lotsz: 1. 18 A ----------------.--------------------------------------------------------------
“7 1 Prcl: 210-100-15 Site:703 PALOMAR AIRPORT RDUCARLSBAD CA 92009
0unr:PACIFIC CENTER ASSOCI Mail:701 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 250sCARLSBAD CA 92009
Use: l-3 5T OFF/STORE Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 04/17/85
Loans: Xmp t : Yb:89 Sqft:44,082 Asd: $4,039, 552 Imp: 82% Un:
riap : 823 Blk: Lot: H Bdrms: Bths: L otsz: 40,075 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“8 1 Prcl: 2lo-loQ~-la,r7 Site: PALOMAR AIRPORT RDUCARLSBAD CA
0wnr:NEW ENGLAND *WAL LI Mail:399 BOYLSTON ST*BOSTON MA 02116
Use: PARKING LOT-G@%. Ph: Zn: c Tfr: Date: 09/2&/90’
Loans: -'Xmpt: Yb : sqet: Asd: 81,210, 519 Imp: l’ic Un:
Map : PM 15386 Bik: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.05 A
/9 1 Prcl: 210-170-O& Site: 5990 AVENIDA ENCINASwCARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail:1101 LEUCADIA BLVD*ENCINITAS CA 92024
Use: RESTAURANT Ph: Zn:C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
Loans: xmpt: Yb: 86 Sqf t: 4,328 Asd: $6541972 Imp: 79% Un:
Map : PM 13937 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsr: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘10 1 Prcl: 210-170-07 Site:AVENIDA ENCINASUCARLSBAD CA 92007
0wnr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail: 1101 LEUCADIA BLVD.kENCINITAS CA 92024
Use: VACANT COMML.. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: O&/21/91
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqf t: Asd : $388, 524 Imp:O% Un:
Map : wi i 3937 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 26,571 ------------------I-___________________I--------------------------------------
I $Y$g
* .
-.
Copyright (c)1991 DataqL k Information Network (61,. 455-6900 Page 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- __ .d 11 1 Prcl:211-060-07 Site:5555 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSBAD CA 92008 Ournr: DIXON, VINCENT R Mail:5555 PASEQ DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: (619)438-9171 Zn: C Tfr: dQ Date: 08/27/87
Loans : Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: bl,353,325 Imp:64% Un:
Map : 7492 ' Blk: Lot: 10 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5. 72 A
f- ---------------------c--------------------------------------~-------------------
12 1 Prcl:211-060-14 Site:5550 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ournr: SHARP DONALD D TR Mail: PO BOX 19199DETROIT MI 48288
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: 8Q Date: 04/04/89
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 8518,712 Imp:75% Un:
Map : 7492 Blk: Lot: 8 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2. 67 A --------------------__l__________l______--------------------------------------
/13 1 Prcl:211-060-15 Site:5500 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Ournr: SHARP DONALD D TR Mail:5411 AVENIDA ENCINAS lZO+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: BQ Date: 04/04/89
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 96938 233 Imp: 80% Un:
Map : 7492 Blk: Lot: 8 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3. 13 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/14 ) Prcl:211-060-16 Site:5424 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ownr: JONES,LO\JIS V Mai 1: 5424 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use : AUTO SALES-SERV P h : Zn: C Tfr: Date: 12:/31/76
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 9834,722 Imp: 62X Un:
Map: PM5426 Blk: Lot: 6 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.92 A
J ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 ) Prcl:211-060-17 Site:5434 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Ournr: TOWNSEND ROBERT E&MAR Mai 1: 588 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH+SAN DIEGO CA 92108
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 03/10/89
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 80 Sqft: 19,263 Asd: +1,343,625 Imp: 53% Un:
Map : PM5426 Blk: Lot: 6 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.92 A --------------------_______L____________--------------------------------------
/lb ) Prcl:211-060-18 Site:5444 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ournr: JONES, LOUIS V Mai.l:5424 PASEO DEL NORTEwCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date: 06/15/89
Loans: %l, 784,000 Xmpt: Yb: 84 Sqf t: 46,800 Asd: 93,885,051 Imp: 57X Un:
Map : PM865 1 Blk: Lot: 7 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4.46 A
7 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
17 ) Prcl:211-060-19 Site:5199 PASEO DEL NORTE+kARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:HOEHN ASSOCIATES Mail:5566 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn:C Tfr: Date: 02/13/81
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: 82,754,127 Imp: 64X Un:
Map: PM865 1 Blk: Lot: 7 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3. 12 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘18 1 Prcl:211-080-01 Site: AUTO CENTER CT*CARLSBAD CA
Ounr : CARLTAS CO +.i& Meil:S600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. $.. fh: Zn:C Tfr: Date: 12/22/86
Loans: .” .%p t.: Yb : Sqft: Asd: 9400,467 1mp:OX Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 1 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3.52 A
7 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 ) Prcl:211-080-04 Site: 5215 CAR COUNTRY DR*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Owtr: DIRTTA INVESTMENTS Mail: 5215 CAR COUNTRY DR+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn:C Tfr: Date: lo/lo/90
Loans : Xmpt: Yb: 89 Sqft: 32,704 Asd: $6,298, 581 Imp : 48% Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 4 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4. 66 A
I- -----3--------c--------------------------------------------------------------
20 .) Prcl:211-080-05 Site: CAR COUNTRY DRUCARLSBAD CA
0unr:TOWNSEND FAMILY TRUST Mail: 588 N CAMINO DEL RIO*SAN DIEGO CA 92108
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: 92,0601 OOOF Date: 10127189
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: $1,071,612 Imp: OX Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 5 ,Bdrms: Bths: LotsI: 1.82 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
- . .I 7 *_
- -
Copyright (c)l991 Dataql ,k Information Network (61 455-6900 Page 3
- J ------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 1 Prcl:211:080-06 Site: CAR COUNTRY DR+CARLSBAD CA
0wnr:TOWNSEND FAMILY TRUST Mail:588 N CAMINO DEL RIO*SAN DIEGO CA 92108
Use : VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: 82,060, OOOF Date: 10/27/89+
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: Blr07lr612 Imp:O% Un:
Map: 12242 B.lk : Lot: 6 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.82 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'22 1 Prcl:211-080-07 Site:5363 CAR COUNTRY DRSCARLSBAD CA 92008
0unr:CHRYSLER REALTY- CORP Mail:12000 CHRYSLER DRSDETROIT MI 48288
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: $l,462,509F Date:01/06/89
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 91 Sqf t: 17,890 Asd: 83~762,335 Imp:55% Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 7 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.70 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J23 1 Prc1:211-080-08 Site:CAR COUNTRY DR+CARLSBAD CA
0unr:HOEHN ASSOCIATES II Mail:9966 PASEO DEL NORTE*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Blr461, 811F Date: 12/09/88
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: %1,531,485 Imp: 0% Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 8 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 2.67 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J'24 1 Prcl:211-080-09 Site:CAR COUNTRY DR+CARLSBAD CA
Ownr: HOEHN GROUP THE Mail:5454 PASEO DEL NORTE+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT COMML. Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Blr76&663F Date:12/09/88
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: sq9t: Asd: $lr876,215 Imp:O% Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 9 Bdrms: Bths: Lot,sz: 3.16 A -_----------------------------------------------------------------------------
J2s 1 Prcl:Zll-080-10 Site:5513 CAR COUNTRY DRWCARLSBAD CA 92008
0wnr:DIRTTA INVESTMENTS Mail:9215 CAR COUNTRY DR*CARL%BAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: tn: C Tfr: Date: lo/lo/90
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 90 Sqft: 27, 153 Asd: 85,241,326 Imp:48Y. Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 10 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4.22 A
J26 1 Prcl:211-080-11 Site:1050 AUTO CENTER CT+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Ournr : CARLPLAZ, Mail:5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AUTO SALES-SERV Ph: Zn: C Tfr: Date:02/28/90
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: 91 Sqft: 31, 128 Asd: %3,500,000 Imp:S4X Un:
Map: 12242 Blk: Lot: 3 BdFms: Bths: Lotsz: 3.70 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/27 1 Prcl:212-010-11 Site: wCARLSBAD CA CJzoo~
Ounr : CITY OF CARLSBAD Mail:- /a00 @lRLSaAD v#i~nGe DRId&,cr)eLFBAD,ciq
use: Ph: Zn: Tfr: Date: 09/30/81
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: sq9t: Asd: 1mp:OY. Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: F Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 171. 42 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'28 1 Prcl: 212-04Q-35 Site: *CARLSBAD CA
Ournr: KELLY R ICHAm G TR Mail:2770 SUNNY CREEK RD+CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT LAND-W’ Ph: Zn: M Tfr: 8Q Date: 07/13/83
Loans: t, ~Xrnp t: Yb: Sqft: Asd: $352,550 1mp:OY. Un:
Map: PM2993 .Blk: Lot: G Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 10.92 A
/29 1 Prcl:212-040-48 Site:PALOMAR AIRPORT RD+CARLSBAD CA
0tunr:KELLY RICHARD C TR Mail:2770 SUNNY CREEKmRDUCARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: VACANT LAND-IND Ph: Zn: M Tfr: BQ Date: 05/14/90
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$696,887 Imp:O% Un:
Map: PM2993 Blk: Lot: Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 8.80 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J30 1 Prcl:212-041-05 Site:STEWART RDWARLSBAD CA
0unr:ECKE PAUL SR TR (DCSD Mail:SbOO AVENIDA ENCINAS lOO*CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use: AGRI-CONTRACT Ph: Zn: A Tfr: Date: 06/21/91
Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd: $198, 165 Imp:O% Un:
Map: 823 Blk: Lot: G Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 20.65 A -----------------.-------------------------------------------------------------
I
,,-. , 61-
SENT BY:STEbH?T !z33xcHIM x-*12- B-92 4:!51Pm : 6190-4048-, 619 431 9020;# 1
STeWART II 72.E
-PREPARED FOR: CARTS ‘DEVELOPMENT 12/08/Q2 San Diego County
Sales Updated Through: 12/02/02
----------------------------------------~---
4PN: 21 I-040-08-00 *. Si tua: SITUS PENOINCI
3wner: PRICE CO<CORP> /CONS Legal: T \nai I: P Q BOX 8S48O;SAN DIEQO
JSC : 40-VACANT - INDLiSTR!AL
3ale Date: ll/22/8Q Smls Amt: <,I,
6th i.... .Tot
**END DC REPORT*+
PAGE 1
I
: c-s- TITLE cs ’
h%ART TI 7-U
RCPARED fOR: CARLTAS DPV-,OPMENT
_ F/08/92 San Diago County
alas Updated Through: 12/02/92
12-m-92’ 84: lml 1361 Ia4 .-
PAGE t
FItGUESTED BY: JEANNE
REP: RS
----_-------------------- --------------------____________________- ----ma-----ww
PN: 211-040-14-00 Si tus: PALOMAR AIRPT RD CARLSBAD
wncr : MC REYNOLDS ANDREW TR/NSJT Legal: RANCH0 AGUA HEDIONDA POR OF, F’M02949, @
ail: 2316 CALLE CHIGUITA;LA JOLLA CA 92037 Phone: (819)454-5385
SC: ll-SINQLE FAMiCY RESIDENCE Zone: 1 Asd: $263,384 Imp: 5%
ale Date: 05/11/89 Sala Amt: Loan Amt: Exempt:
It: 54 Rms:Bd Bth Tot Units: Latsqtt: A 34.300 Sqft; 1372 _I--------_------------------~- ------T_-------__---____________________~-------
THE 1NFORMAtlON PROVIOED IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED
COPYRIGHT TRW RED1 1986, 1901
*END OF REPOUT**
_ __ ._ .IL.YIL . . . ,--A ._^ -. -.. .,._ _“_..
-
Carlsbad SUN
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-4850
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspa-
per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and
which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next ,:. t, .--’ bPwtknorhtw preceding the date of publication of the . 1 ‘I Amollodhda,lntbeCibdcul- notice nereini skL(klultyor~~sktod. . ifter referred to; and that the 0 .’ Clll~~bNcptboro. Norr;ar~~*&&- OrNoirn nlod latbot3lIbortbo notice of which the annexed is a printed
‘& a~-, ~~~&c,~ Couob Record.? of kn Dloso COW, has been nublished in each regular
8bAwlUhoM8~blkbowk#at tbo condwu CbBmbon. lsm cub c0unt.i. Novombor 1& u1 -
Olll~~~:
vlkdto.ttoluitbopakbqrlaC If~luvowva~~an ror tba cortlfkakll or, M ~nrlroamratrl Impact R*po-r* dpprorrl of l Nogrtlvo Do&. ctlon: rnd l Drov~ or. tlonoml
L d. A and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow- ing dates, to-wit:
Plml~Alm&iloat, Locll ixwstai Flrn Amosdmont. Spoclfk Ph. zena cbon#8. Llnd con8orvatlon Alnondmont, l lld I Local Pncllltlor Yaa~roment Plan
AnondmwWSpoelfk Plau&no Ch;’
la
Februarv 25 1993
19-
rn 17-
19-
19-
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on ‘l! q nnq 1 1yy.J day of
- Clerk of the Printer