The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-04-20; City Council; 12179; BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY - PROPOSED CHANGES TO GENERAL PLAN, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR AN AREA GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE - GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-02/ZC 9244 5 \. 1 "* ClTWF CARLSBAD - AGENQ BILL a a, s a 0 c, k F: .rl fd F: rd 0 !-I 4 I m m a c rd n m 0 rl I m m A 00 0 l-4 I rn m tn 0 z F: -rl 0 -I-, 5 r-l * Ob tnm &I a,cY az cn a, r ~~ AB # M,li39 DE TITLE: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY - PROPOSED CHANGES TO MTG. 4/20/93 DEPT. RECOMMENDED ACTION: GENERAL PLAN, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR AN AREA GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE CI' PLN CP"fM CI' SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE - If the Council concurs both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that Council ADOPT Resolution No. 9 3 -1 08' , APPROVING the Negative Declaration issue1 Planning Director; ADOPT Resolution Nos.? 3- 104 , and 93 -/Lo , APPROVING GP. and LCPA 92-02; and INTRODUCE Ordinance No, 0 S - 2-3 3 , APPROmG ZC 92-( ITEM EXPLANATION On February 3, 1993, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to cons above referenced project regarding the modification of land use designations within tl area as shown on the attached location map. The proposed changes to existing General Plan, and Local Coastal Program designations result from a City Council ~ recommendation made by the North Beach Planning and Traffic Study (Nov. 1987 recommendation was to study the desirability of maintaining the study area as all R- family zoning since currently an unusual mixture of R-1 and RD-M (multi-family exists. A detailed overview of the land use study's background, scope of issues h solicitation of property owner input and final recommendations is contained in the z Planning Cornmission staff report. In brief, the proposal involves primarily the implementation of the R-2 zone over t€ area (with two exceptions) which will balance out the. extremes of the existing situation and be most responsive to the property owner input received regarding the regulate against multi-family product types which may degrade neighborhood charact# proposal will also eliminate existing inconsistencies between zoning and Gener designations. The existing and proposed designations are shown as attachments in tl LCPA and ZC Resolutions. At the February 3 hearing, no comments were received du public testimony and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend app the proposed land use designation changes. EWRONMENTAL REVIEW u. a0 a 02 On February 3, 1993 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the fi cda) -3 Declaration issued by the Planning Director on August 27, 1992. 29 22 OF: G -rl vo m z cn 0 2. - \ -2 zi 0 4- A 0 z 9 HSCAL. IMPACT There will be no fiscal impacts from the adoption and implementation of the propos use designations. EXHIBITS 1. City Council Resolution Nos. 9 3 e 108 . 4 3 -lo? & 9 3u/lo 2. Ordinance No. 02 -2.37 (ZC 92-01) 3. Location Map 4. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3440, 3441, 3442 and 3443 5. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 3, 1993 6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes dated February 3, 1993 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 /I . e E: RESOLUTION NO. 93-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE TO ALLOW FOR ZONING, GENERA1 PLAN, AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGES PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A CITY COUNCII DIRECTED LAND USE STUDY FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH ARE3 OVERLAY ZONE. CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY CASE NO: GPA 92-O9/LCPA 92-02/ZC 92-01 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Muni Code, the Planning Commission did, on February 3, 1993, h 9 10 11 12 13 'duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to conside] request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearin! considering all testimony and arguments, examining the ir study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 considering any written comments received, the Planning Comm: considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaratioi NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and corrj 2. That the findings and cenditiens of the P1, Commission Resolution No. 3440, on file with the City Cle: incorporated herein by reference constitute the findings 1 City Council in this matter and that the Negative Declarat hereby approved. 0.0 ... ... 00. ." I ii .9 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 I I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 1 City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 20th day of APRIL , 1993, by the following vol wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin NOES: None ABSENT : Council Memb 11 12 ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, city Cle# 13 7,4 (SEAL) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- I li 0 0 4 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. 93-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA 92-09) TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM EXISTING DESIGNATIONS TO PROPOSED DESIGNATIONS ON PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE. CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY i CASE NO: GPA 92-09 - CITY OF CARLSBAD 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on Februa 1993, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 1 consider an amendment to the Land Use Element of the Genera: GPA 92-09; and lo // WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbac .I' I/the 20th day of -, 1993, held a duly advel 12 13 14 15 16 17 public hearing to consider said amendment and at that received the recommendations, objections, protests, commel all persons interested in or opposed to GPA 92-09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and corr l8 I1 2. That the revised Land Use Element of the G I' IiPlan (GPA 92-09) is approved according to Exhibits *'A-C** 20 21 22 February 13, 1993, attached to Planning Commission Resoluti 3443 and hereby incorporated by reference, and that the fi and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in P1 2311Commissi.on Resolution No. 3441, on file in the Planning Depa 24 //and made a part hereof are the findings and conditions of tl 25 11 Council. 26 ll EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution will be effect 27 lidays after its passage. 28 11 ... I 1 r I l e e PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 0 2/lCity Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 3 wit: 4 20th day of APRIL , 1993, by the following vot 5 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin 6 NOES: None 7 a ABSENT: Council Members 9 10 11 ATTEST: 12 d!/&L 20" 13 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City C1 14 // (SEAL) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - -2- I , // 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RESOLUTION NO- 93-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY TO THE CARLSBAD MELLO I1 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTA PROGRAM, GENERAL .PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INT CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED I THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE CITY'S BEACH ARE OVERLAY ZONE IN THE'CITY OF CARLSBAD. CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY CASE NO: LCPA 92-02 - CITY OF CARLSBAD OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMEN' WHEREAS, California State Law requires that the Coastal Plan, General Plan, and zoning designations for prop 9 in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; 10 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment 11 12 Local Coastal Plan designations for certain property locat shown on Exhibits "A-C", dated February 3, 1993, attac: 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3442 and incorporal 14 reference, has been filed with the City Council; and 15 WHEREAS, saidverified application constitutes a I 16 for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad MUI 17 18 Code: and WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 20th d: 19 I APRIL , 1993, hold a duly noticed public. hear 20 Amendments shown on .Exhibit "A-C", and; 21 prescribed by law to consider the proposed Local Coast; 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all : desiring to be heard, said Council considered all factors r to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment. WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a s public review period for any amendment to the Local 28 Program. ... 'I 0 a NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the 1 Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 2 3 ~ A) That the foregoing recitations are true and COI B) No comments were received during the State mal 4 5 6 six week review period, starting on October 15, 1992, and t on November 26, 1992. C) That based on the evidence presented at the 1 'Ilhearing, the Council APPROVES LCPA 92-02 as shown on Exhib. a C", dated February 3, 1993, attached to Planning Comm Resolution No. 3442 and made a part hereof based on the fol 9 10 11 findings : Findinas: 12 13 14 2. The proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment c 15 Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bri~ designations of the Local Coastal Program, General P1 16 Zoning for the study area into conformance. 1. The proposed Local Coastal Program ,Amendment is cons with all applicable policies of. the Mello I1 Local C Program. 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 18 City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California on the - 19 day of APRIL , 1993, by the following vote, t 20 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin 21 I1 NOES: None 22 23 24 ABSENT: Council Members 25 /IATTEST: 26 27 ALE%u*i"\ 28 -2- ' I! e a tl 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDINANCE NO. NS-237 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE. CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 92-01 FROM R-1 AND RD-M TO R-2 CASE NO:. ZC 92-01 7 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as fc 8 SECTION I: That Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amende 9 amendment of the zoning map as shown on the map marked Exhibits "A-B" lo hereto and made a part hereof. 11 12 13 14 15 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days 16 l7 adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its a SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Corn set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 3443 constitutes the findings and cc of the City Council. l8 /I INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carls 19 II Council held on the ahday of APRIL , 1993, and thereafter 20 21 ... 22 II ... 23 24 ... 25 26 27 28 ... ... II I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 2o I 21 22 I 23 l e 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council he day of , 1993, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: , I ~ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk I I (SEAL) I I 24 25 26 27 28 11 2 $ I 0 0 EXHBIT "b FEBRUARY 3, l! -~ I EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PIAN I ' ll ."I\:\ 1 ?H RMH I AGUA HEDIONDA I City od Caalsbad LAGOON I R.1 ZONE RD-M 2O.N 1 pl 0 0 EXHIBIT %” FEBRUARY 3,19 LAND USE STUDY AREA PROPOSED ZONING I I City of -bad 1. R-2 ZONE RD-M ZOP ‘BEACH’AREA LAND USE STUDY I I c LOCATIOI LAND USE STUDY AREA EXH ' il 0 e EX 1 21 3 4 5 6 7 a PLANNTNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3440 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE -CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE TO ALLOW FOR ZONING, GENERAL PLAN, AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGES PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A CITY COUNCIL DIRECTED LAND USE STUDY FOR THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE.' CASE NO: GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-02/ZC 92-01 9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of Febn lo hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said reque I.1 I/ WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering al 12 /I // and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitt 13 14 15 as follows: 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning ( 16 factors relating to the Negative Declaration. and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission COI 18 19 20 21 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, th Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaratio to Exhibit "ND", dated August 27,1992, and "PIC', dated August 10, 195 hereof, based on the following findings: 22 11 Findinsrs: 23 1- The study area is an + &dential neighbdmtxl and impla 24 proposed land use designations will not have an impact on the enviro~ 25 2. Future projects will continue to undergo environmental review as req 26 .... 27 significant adverse impacts to the environment will be created within thf 28 I 0 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tl Commissionaf the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of Februar 1 2 3 4 AYES: Chairperson Noble; Commissioners: Schlehuber, the following vote, to wit: Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. . 5 6 NOES: None. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. kcLcGrym d ATTEST: r BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMI II \ \ I /’ ’ 1 i &&q i&qb& . MICHAEL J. H6LZMhER PLANNING DIRECTOR 16 17 I.8 i 19 !i 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 3440 -2- I1 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT' ADDRESS/LOCATiON: Southern portion of the Beach Area Overlay Zor shown on Attachment "A" of the Environmental In Assessment farm Part I1 on file with the Plai Depanment. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed changes to General Plan and Zoning designatio recommended by a' land use study designed to ad neighborhood compatibility issues. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described p pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quali and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result o review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a signi impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification fc action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Pla Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments fro' public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department I 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4441. DATED: AUGUST 27, 1992 CASE NO: GPA 92-9/LCPA 92-2/ZC 92-1 Planning Director CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY PUBLISH DATE: AUGUST 27, 1992 ENM:lh . 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carisbad, California 92009-1576 a (619) 438 0 0 ENVTRON~~TAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOG, - PART tI (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) 5.4CKCROUND - CASE NO. CPA 92-9/LCPA 9 DATE: AUGUST 10. 1992 1. CASE NAh;fE: BEACH ARM LAND USE STUDY 2. .QPLIC;L.T: CIT OF CARLSBAD 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2075 LAS PMMAS DRNE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 - (619) 438-1 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: AUGUST 3. 1992 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed General Plan and Zoninn desimation channes recon Council directed land use Smdv. The srudv area is an existinn residential neighborhood southern potion of the Beach Area Overlav Zone and is shown on Attachmerit "A". The I studv was to address various compatiblliw issues due to the current mix of single (R-1) an( [RD-MI zonina. In addition. inconsistencv between land use desimarions exists where zoned DroDenies have Residential-High (RH) General Plan designations which conemor familv zonina. The DroDosed recommendation is reflected in Attachment "E". The numbered lots corresp shown on the study area map-Attachment "A". The recommendation utilizes the R-2 zoni to neutralize the extremes of the non-comDaabk zoninn (R-1. vs RD-MI. The R-2 development standards (20 ft. front yard setbacks, etc.1 which will hein facilitate comDatibiliN while nor unreasonablv reducing the allowed densitv. The DroDosed land us are designed so that a 7.300 sa. ft. lot can accommodate two units. Since the studv area is Dart of the Beach Area Overlay Zone. all Droiects are reauired the discretionaw review and aDDroval Drocess of a Site DeveioDment Pennit. h ' environmental review. ImDlementinn the proposed Zonin~ and General Plan desimatio- 1 conditions or auaiity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article S, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Envir01 Assessment to deterne if a project my have a signrficant effect on the environment. The Enviro~ Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checkiist. This checklist 8 identifies any phy and human factors that mirtr, k impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with informati basis for deciding whek to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the proj aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of cause a sidcanf effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declara' adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmentai effects can be deemed -can& ' These fin in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the. proposed mitigation measures appears ar the end of d, Particular attention should be given to disc~ssh impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 'e e PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECI'LY: YES YES N( - big) (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geolopc hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? > - - - - - - 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? - - - 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the .bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? - - - 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? - - - 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? - - - - - - 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? - - 10. Use- substantial axmuuts of fuel or energy? - - 11. Alter a sigruficant rrcheological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? - - -2- 1 L e 0 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES big) 12. Affect the diversiry of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? - - 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmiand of state or local importance? 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the . migration or movement of animals? - .- - HUMANENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIREaY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (si@ 17. Alter the present ur planned land use of an area? - 18. Substantiaily affect public utilities, schools, police, fie, emergency or other public services? - .. - -3- .. . YES (insig) - - - - - YES (big) x - I 0 0 HUW WRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR [NDtUmLY: - YES YES N1 (si@ (insig) 19. Resulr in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? - - - 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 2s. 26. 27. 1ncreas.e existing noise levels? Produce new light or glare? [nvolve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? Affect existing housing, or. create a demand for additional housing? Generate substantial additional traffic? Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? .. .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28. Alter waterborne, .rail or air traffic? - - 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedcstrian~? 30. Interfere with - rt!~p~M plans or emergency evacuation ph? 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - - - - - - - - -4- 0 0 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: - 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the'habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to ,the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of prokwt future p'ojtcW goals? (A shorbterm impact on the 36. Does the project h8~ environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - YES big) - - - - YES I (insig) - - - - -5- 0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 0 ?ws~cX ENVIRONMENT Implementing the proposedland use designations and modifylng development standards will n( any aspects of the physical environment of the study area or adjacent areas. When actual dew is 'proposed, a Site Development Plan (SDP) will be required which involves specific enkc review. BtOLOG~C.~L Eh'VIRObiMENT Implementing the proposed land use designations and modifylng development standards will n any aspects of the biological environment of the study area or adjacent areas. WTtc deve!opment is proposed, a Site Deve!opment Plan (SDP) will be required which involve environmental review. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 17. The planned land uses will be altered in that typically high intensity multi-family proje associated with RD-M zoning will be repiaced by duplex and winhome type developmc with only a slight density reduction over the study area. 18. Implementing the proposed recommendations will not adversely impact any facilitie2 services associated with Local Facilities Management Zone 19. This proposal does involve adding any residential units to the overall study area so as to impact i facilities/services. 19. No changes or modifications will be required to existing sewer systems or solid w: processes. 20. Noise levels will not be increased by implementing the proposed recommendations, 21. This proposal will not produce light or glare. 22. N/A 23, The mximun allowed densities for some properties within the study area wil altered. Ho-, the final allowable densities are designed to consider lot sizes compatible pdwt types. 24. There will be no impacts to existing housing or housing demands. 25. A reduction in overall &c would result if the proposed designations were fully out as proposed to if the current designations were fuily built out. - -6- t 0 0 26. There will be no impacts to parking facilities and each.future project will provide for i' own paking demand. 27. [mplementing the proposed designations will not have a negative impact on the exisrir infrastructure or circulation systems. In addition, future projects will provic improvements, etc., as required for project approval. 28. There will be no impacts to rail, water or air traffic. 29. There will be no impacts to motor vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians. 30. Implementing the proposed recommendations will not affeci existing emergency respon pians or capabilities. 31. No views will be creared or impacted by the proposed land use designatio-. 32. Recreational opportunities will not be created or impacted. - -7- r e e .bVhLYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATNES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the sire, e) development at some future time rather than now, f, alternate sites for the proposed project, and g) no project alternative. a) The proposed land use designations need to be implernented concurrently. b) No site design in involved. c) N/A d) Alternate land uses for the study area other than residential would not be. approprial e) The desire to address this issue and implement a solution has been shown by the City Planning Commission. f) There is no alternate study area involved. g) A no project alternative will allow current land use designations to remain in pla Associated with this are zoning designation incompatibilities and zoning and Gene Plan designation inconsistencies. - -8- L e e DETERMINATION (TO Be Completed By The Planning Depmment) On the basis of this initial evaluation: - X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and DECLWTION will be prepared. - t find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmenl environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conj previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental reviev Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared. - t find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environml not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an 2 have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. - I find-the proposed project MAY have a significant effect,on the environment, and an EM [MPACT REPORT is required. 0. 2/. 72 €4 It;'+Q Date Signature +q47 - -* \ Date Planning DirP-*-* CLLUA . LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPUCABLE] ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APpLIw?& - -9- 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 34-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNLA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM EXISTING DESIGNATIONS TO PROPOSED DESIGNATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY CASE NO: GPA 92-09 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the G designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", datl 3, 1993, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning C and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of Feb~ hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req WHEREAS, at said public -hearing, upon hearing and con testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the recommends APPROVAL of GPA 92-09, as shown on Exhibit ''( the following findings and subject to the following conditions .... II 11 0 e FbdiIlES: 1 1. The proposed General Plan designation modifications are consistent w 2 Designation inconsistencies and conflicts. 4 of promoting neighborhood compatibility within the study area. 3. The land use study and corresponding public input to conside 5 3 2. The proposed amendment will eliminate existing General Plan i 6 designation changes within the study area was carried out in a 'manne with the original City Council recommendation. 7 4. The proposed General Plan designation changes will allow for 8 development given the average lot sizes within the study area. 9 10 11 12 13 5. Goal "A" of the General Plan Land Use Element is to preserve and t environment, character and image of the City as a desirable residentia open space oriented community. The proposed designations accoml allowing the product types and densities that will help resolve nc compatibility issues. 6. Uses which would be permitted by the proposed General Plan designa compatible with existing and allowable hture land uses. 14 7. Implementation of this General Plan Amendment will not create an in 15 availability of public facilities or services as outlined in the Zone 1 LOC Management Plan of the City Growth Management Program. 16 17 each other within the study area if this proposal is approved. 18 9. All findings of Resolution No. 3443, ZC 92-01 and 3442, LCPP 8. The proposed Zoning, General Plan and LCP designations will be cor 19 21 Conditions: 20 incorporated herein by reference. 1. Approval is granted for GPA 92-09 as shown on Exhibits "Att - "C", dal 22 3, 1993. 23 24 2. Approval of GPA 92-09 is granted subject to approval of LCPA 92-02 01. 25 26 27 .... PC RES0 3441 2 28 11 0 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution will be effective 30 daq 1 passage. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tk Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of Febn by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble; Commissioners: Schlehuber, Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. AA nd BAILEY N LE, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING CON ATTEST: % 4\\ MICHAEL J. H~LZM~~LER Planning Director 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 3441 3 0 0 EXHBJT “b FEBRUARY 3,ll - EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL, PIAN 1 I, JM 1 Ill I I I I I .lbl Q. ..... .. . J . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . ..... .... ?H RMH I AGUA HEDIONDA I City of Carlsbad LAGOON I - ’ R-1 ZONE RD-M ZON - BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-9/ ZC ! LCPA 92-2 I I 0 0 EXHIBIT '3'' FEBRUARY 3,19! r 1 LAND USE STUDY AREA PROPOSED ZONING I I City of -bad I, " R-2 ZONE RD-M ZON - BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91 ZC ! LCPA 92-2 I I e EXHIBIT “C” FEBRUARY 3,1g$ ~ LAND USE STUDY AREA PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN I City of Carlsbad -. BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91. ZC ! LCPA 92-2 I m ~~~~ ~ ). I e 0 1 2 3 4 '5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3442 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MELLO I1 SEGMENT OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE. CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY CASE NO: LCPA 92-02 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coasta General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Z8 conformance; 12 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Lo1 13 February 3, 1993, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with th l4 Programs designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibits '*A'' ' 15 11 Commission; and 16 // 17 i/ WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for 2 18 as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of Febn 20 1 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the pro1 21 I/ Coastal Plan Amendments shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", and; 22 23 24. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and corn testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said ( 25 I1 considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment. 26 27 .... .... 28 I/ 11 ' 'ii m 0 ll 1 2 3 4 5 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning ( of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. (B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the ( February 3,1993, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on th findings and subject to the following conditions: recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 92-02 as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" . 7 Fin&=: 8 10 9 1. The proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendment is consistent with all policies of the Mello I1 LCP. 2. The proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad LCP to bring the designations of the LCP, General Plan and Zoning for the 11 3. All findings of Resolution No. 3441, GPA 92-09 and Resolution 3442 12 into conformance. l3 ll are incorporated herein by reference. 14 I/ conditions: 15 16 17 18 19 20 1. Approval is granted for LCPA 92-02 as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", da 6, 1993. 2. Approval of LCPA 92-02 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 92 92-01. .... .... 21 .... 22 .'.. 23 11 .... 24 25 26 27 [I .... .... I .... 28 PC RES0 NO. 3442 -2- t ii 0 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th Commission. of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 3rd day of February, 19! 1 2 3 following vote, to wit: 4 5 6 7 AYES: Chairperson Noble; Commissioners: Schlehuber, Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 8 II ABSTAIN: None. .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I A+%& 1 BAILEY NONE, chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COM ATTEST: 4 k.&&"j !&q kt A MICHAEL J. H~LZM~LER Planning Director I 1 ~ 21 22 23 24 25 11 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 3442 -3- li I 0 0 EXMBJT ‘‘1 FEBRUARY 3,l’ EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN .RH RMH City of Carlsbad 1 AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON I rn R-1 ZONE RD-,M ZON 1 BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91 ZC ! LCPA 92-2 I w 0 e EXHWT ‘‘S” FEBRUARY 3,11 LAND USE STUDY AREA PROPOSED ZONING I citY Of -labad I- R-2 ZONE RD-M ZONl I I I BEACH AdEA LAND USE STUDY I LcpA 92-2 GPA 92-91 ZC i I rn e 0 EXHIBIT “C FEBRUARY 3,1s I I LAND USE STUDY AREA I PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN I City Ot Carlsbad I I BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY I LcpA 92-2 GPA 92-91 ZC i I rn -1 I I1 @ 0 ' I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3443 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM EXISTING ' . DESIGNATIONS TO PROPOSED DESIGNATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE. 1 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING 3 4 5 CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY 6 7 CASE NO: ZC 92-01 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, 8 9 located as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C', dated February 3,1993, attached and incorporated herein, LO /I has been fled with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commiss 11 12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of Febru; 13 the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by 1 l4 I/ hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said reques 15 16 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission con! factors relating to the Zone Change; and 17 18 19 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cc 20 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 21 as follows: 22 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cc 23 recommends APPROVAL of ZC 92-01, as shown on Exhibit "B", basc 24 following findings and subject to the following conditions. 25 .... 26 .... 27!l 28 ll e a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Findings: 1. The proposed zone changes are responsive to the goal of addressing ne: compatibility while neutralizing the extremes of the existing single famil family zoning mixture within the study area. The proposed R-2 zoning H compatible development standards and a communitywith appropriate siz 2. The proposed zone changes will eliminate existing General Plan cc inconsistencies with General Plan designations within the study area. 3. All findings of Resolution No. 3441, GPA 92-09, and Resolution 3442, I are incorporated herein by reference. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for ZC 92-01 as shown on Exhibits '*A'* - "C", dated 1993. 2. Approval of ZC 92-01 is granted subject to the approval of GPA 92-09 ar 02. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tl Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of Februax the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble; Commissioners: Schlehuber, Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 20 ABSTAIN: None. 21 22 23 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMl kk md BAILEY NO , Chairperson 24 II ATTEST: 25 . 26 /lI&& -LSm & MICHAEL J. HOCZMIL~R 27 PC RES0 NO 3443 -2- 28 Planning Director - a EXHIBIT *'A FEBRUARY 3,l EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN RH RMH I, City of Carlsbad AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON I I -. R-1 ZONE RD-,M ZOh BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91 ZC ' LCPA 92-2 . - m a EXWT ‘‘e, FEBRUARY 3,19 ___ LAND USE STUDY AREA I PROPOSED ZONING I citY Of Carlrbad I= R-2 ZONE RD*M ZON BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91 ZC ! LCPA 92-2 I m . 0 W EXHIBIT "C' FEBRUARY 3,19 ~~~~ LAND USE STUDY AREA PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 1 I City d Carisbad ' rn RM RMH 1 - BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY GPA 92-91 ZC ! LCPA 92-2 '. . 0 0 APPLICATION COMPLETE DK AUGUST 3. 1992 PROJECT PLANNER: ERIC MUb STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: FEBRUARY 3,1993 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: GPA 92-09ILCPA 92-0ZC 92-01 - BEACH AREA LAND USE sI"CJI Proposed changes to General Plan, Local Coastal Program and Zor designations as recommended by a City Council directed land use study an area generally located in the southern portion of the Beach Area Ove Zone within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and the Mello I1 L Coastal Program. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Phming Commission Resolution No. 3 recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 3441, 3442, and 3443, recomenc APPROVAL of GPA 92-09, LCPA 92-02, and ZC 92-01, based on the findings and sut to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECI' DEscRIpTlON AND BACKGROUND In 1987, a study titled the North Beach Planning and Traffic Study (NBPTS) completed. The NBPTS addressed various traffic and land use issues within what is : I the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ). In November 1987 the City Council adopted sel recommendations of the NBPTS. The subject of this proposed action (general amendment, local coastal program amendment and zone change) addresses one of recommendations of the NBPTS adopted by the City Council in November 1987. In looking at traffic issues and land uses for the beach area, the. NBPTS identified s residential areas that either were developing or had the potential to develop land incompatibilities between smaller scale single family residences and larger scale m the neighborhood was raised by the NBPTS and was expressed in the form 1 recommendation. family projects. The issue of preserving the existing single family character and sca @ GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-0 9 /ZC 92-01 0 BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY FEBRUARY 3,1993 PAGE 2 Specifically, five residential areas within the beach area were identified relative to neighborhood character issue described above. For each of these five areas the NE recommended that the City "should conduct public hearings to obtain citizen input or desirability of placing the study area in R-1 zoning and also the RM General Plan categ Should these areas remain R-1 it would also be desirable to encourage the formation 04 or more neighborhood associations." In November of 1987, the City Council adopted this recommendation for two of the study areas. This report and recommendation focuses on one of the study areas loci in the southern portion of the BAOZ around the southern terminus of Garfield Street. study area has 35 lots involved as shown on the attached location map. This I primarily has smaller scale single family and duplex developments with several lots thar either vacant or could be redeveloped. The development of these lots could significa change neighborhood character. Existing zoning and General Plan designations are shl on Exhibit "A". As shown, the existing zoning for this area is a non-compatible mi zoning and the General Plan in the form of some single family R-1 lots that have a 1 density RH (Residential-High). or RMH (Residential-Medium High) General : designation. In addition to the land use compatibility and neighborhood character iss this area is served by an extended cul-de-sac street system with one access point (Gar St). Because of this, the issue of emergency vehicle access and response for this area to be addressed by this land use study. This neighborhood was studied first because of the issues described above and becau zone change application for a single family R-1 lot on the south side of Chinquapin wi the study area in 1991 has acted as a catalyst for the land use study to commence. September 4, 1991, the Planning Commission denied the zone change request (ZC 9' without prejudice to allow time for this land use study and any resulting recommendat to be completed. The other study area that was approved by the City Council to be assessed for desirability of maintaining R-1 zoning, that is not part of this report, does not have same issues involved as the subject area of this code amendment. This other study is in the northernmost portion of the BAOZ with a consistent R-3 zoning (no inixed zo' designations on adjacent lots) and no inconsistencies between zoning and the General E In addition this other area is built out 4th very few infill vacant lots. Staff intend assess land use designations and any options/solutions for the second study area by the of 1993. single family and multi-family zoning, Also, there are currently inconsistencies bem For the area involved in this code amendment, staff conducted a land use study included a series of certified mailings to all the property owners within the study a Staff solicited and assessed all input regarding the desirability of retaining R-1 zoning I RM allowed density for about a three month period. Input was received from all but a1 5 property owners (out of 23 total) by phone and individual meetings throughout this 1 J 1 GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-0 @ C 92-01 0 BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY FEBRUARY 3,1993 PAGE 3 period. Based on the research and input reviewed during the land use studJ recommendation has been developed that staff feels provides a solution for addressing than the study-wide R-l/RM option that was the focus of the adopted recommendat The proposed solution is primarily to implement the R-2 zone for the study area. Propc zoning and General Plan designations are shown on Exhibits "B" and "C". issues involved, The recommendation being made with. this code amendment is diffe~ This recommendation, more fully described in the analysis section below, is responsiv (1) the existing conflicts in land use designations; (2) the property owner input receil and (3) the development scale and neighborhood compatibility issues involved. Apprc of this project requires a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to adjust General I designations, a Zone Change (ZC) to modify the area's zoning and a Local,Coastal Prog Amendment (LCPA) to the City's Mello 11 LCP. 111. ANMYSIS 1. What is the impact of circulation on determining land uses and residential dens for the study area? 2. What combination of zoning and General Plan designations best addresses the 1 use compatibility and neighborhood character issues involved with this study a: 3. Is the recommendation consistent with City and planning policies; specifically Mello I1 Local Coastal Program and the City's Growth Management Program? DISCUSSION 1. CIRCULATION IMPACTS ON LAND USE DENSITIES As mentioned the study area is currently served by an extended cul-de sac SI system that violates the Engineering Department's cul-de-sac policy. The policy Specifically, this street system exceeds (1) the 600 foot length maximum; (2) 50 dwelling units cap; and (3) the 500 ADT traffic limit. The current situation potential maximum density under existing land use designations violates the PC The original option of all R-1 zoning for the study area would not create a situ: where there would be compliance with the cul-de-sac policy. Therefore fror Engineering standpoint, with the current existing non-conforming situation; decrease in potential units for the area would be incrementally better and suppc by Engineering. Comparing potential units under existing designations (94 units) to potential units under the staff proposed designations (70-103 units) SI that the proposed recommendation would lower the maximum potential units u a buildout scenario. Furthermore, the City Fire Department has stated thal limits for cul-de-sacs regarding allowed length and number of dwelling units ser 8 0 GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-0 C 92-01 BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY FEBRUARY 3, 1993 PAGE 4 existing scenario as well as a proposed scenario of reduced units would not afi their current ability to provide adequate emergency response services to the st1 area. 2. RECOMMENDED ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Property owner input was essentially split with regards to favoring R-1 or mt family zoning (RDM). This represents the mix of the two designations within study area. Several owners of existing R-1 lots or lots under 7,000 square i favored the R-1 single family zoning while property owners of larger sized lots M the current allowance to build multi-family type projects did not. A common the, however, from all property owners was the need to prevent large scale multi-far projects from deteriorating existing neighborhood character elements. There 1 general agreement on the need for compatibility, and project design control. As the primary factor continued to be a scale and neighborhood character is: most property owners agreed that a R-2 (duplex zoning) scenario would be m favorable than eliminating the R-1 zone or letting the RDM zone (with multi-far development standards) remain. As such, this proposal recommends the designations shown on exhibits "B" and The R-2 zone is proposed to balance out the extremes of the incompatible zor designations while allowing developments of a reasonable scale and densit] occur. A lot's allowable density within the study area would be based on the size and General Plan designation's density range. Two units would be allowec lots with a minimum lot size of 7500 square feet. In addition, the R-2 zone more single family-like development standards (20 foot front yard setbacks and allowed lot coverage) as compared to the multi-family RDM zone. Therefor1 duplex or twin home neighborhood may ultimately develop as opposed to a mixi of high density multi-family projects adjacent to single family residences. The proposal to introduce the R-2 zone, therefore, is more of a product type con instead of a downzoning of the study area. Multiplying each lot in the study : by its existing and proposed designations shows that the proposed scenario c( yield a theoretical maximum of 70-103 units while the existing scenario could y approximately 94-132 units maximum. In reality, several properties have and continue to have single family residences. Also, these numbers are approximate do not consider compliance with development and design standards. However, proposal does not represent an intensification of the residential land uses of study area thus rendering the existing street system adequate for fu development. Staff is proposing two exceptions to the R-2 zoning. First, the south sidl Chinquapin would have the single family islands eliminated and replaced with fi GPA 92-O9/LCPA 92-0 9 /ZC 92-01 . BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY FEBRUARY 3,1993 PAGE 5 zoning and Residential Medium High (RMH) General Plan land use designatic General Plan designations were reduced from RH to RMH to allow more appropr densities given average lot sizes and adjacent uses. The two eastern lots on south side of Chinquapin are proposed for R-2/RM designations. The redr densities for these lots is reflective of property owner input and the goal! reducing development impacts to this area. The second exception is the existin2 unit condo project at the south-eastern end of Olive Avenue. By maintaininj existing designations, this lot will not become any more non-confonning to cur codes. With this proposal, General Plan and zoning is in conformance for each lot wi the study area. The staff proposed designations are an equitable solution to neighborhood compatibility concerns that exist within the study area. They pron conformity and consistency between General Plan land use designations and zon Also they best reflect the property owner input received concerning reason scales and densities of development while regulating against non-compatible m family development projects. 3. A. MELLO I1 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Implementing the proposed land use designations would require a Local Co; Program Amendment (LCPA). The Mello I1 LCP designates this area as Med High Density with a corresponding RDM zoning classification. The LCPA modify these current designations to reflect the proposed General Plan designa modifications and zoning changes including the introduction of the R-2 zone. proposal will not adversely impact any of the issues the LCP regulates includ land uses, grading, coastal access, natural resource protection, etc. B. ZONE 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Since implementing the proposed land use designations does not involve increa densities or allowable units, this project complies with the Zone 1 Local Fad Management Plan. In fact, this proposal slightly reduces the maximum pote density in this area so there may be less of a demand for services than with ex& designations. Future projects will undergo environmental review and a Stan assessment of impacts to facilities and services so that all growth managel performance standards will be maintained. GPA 92-09/LCPA 92- b ZC 92-01 0 BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY FEBRUARY 3, 1993 PAGE 6 rv. SUMMARY In summary, staff feels the recommendation is a functional solution to the issues addre All property owners 'were given the opportunity to have input on the final pro] recommendation at a noticed workshop on August 20, 1992. Three property 01 attended and no significant opposition was expressed against the proposed recommend; either at the meeting or in written comments from those not in attendance. Implementation of the R-2 zone ultimately could result in a duplex type neighbor1 Development standards would be more similar to single family than multi-family zo: There would, not be a dramatic decrease in currently allowed densities within the 5 area but two units would be allowed on a lot of 7,500 sq. ft. or greater. The R-2 zo: and proposed designations in general, will (1) be appropriate for the study area's lot 5 (2) provide a solution where product type and neighborhood compatibility issues w: minimized; (3) neutralize the extremes of the existing incompatible R-l/RDM zoning 1 responsive to the public input received and not represent a wholesale downzoning 0: area. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The implementation of the proposed land use designations will not create an ad1 impact to the environment. As required, future projects will go through environmt review. The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a signif; impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on Augus 1992. adjusting General Plan designations to be consistent with zoning; and (4) be ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3440 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3441 (with Exhibits "A' - "C") 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3442 (with Exhibits "A" - T') 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3443 (with Exhibits "A" - T') 5. Location Map. ENM:lh:km September 9, 1992 0 0 LAND USE STUDY AREA AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON ,.a City of Carlsbad AITAW ,.I 6 e PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1993 PAGE 7 stimony and issued the invitation to speak. dress the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noble declal e item for discussion among the Commission members. Commissioner Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Planni ion No. 3495 recommending approval of ZCA 92-06, bas€ ioners Erwin, Hall, Savary, Schlehuber, Schramm, : NOES: None ABSTAIN: None 5. GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-02/ZC 92-01 - CITY OF CARLSBAD - BEACH AREA LAND USE h Proposed changes to General Plan, Local Coastal Plan and Zoning designations as recoml by a City Council-directed land use study for an area generally located in the southern pori Beach Area Overlay Zone, within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and the Mello II Locz Plan. Eric Munoz, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the Beac Land Use Study came as a result of the North Beach Planning and Traffic Study (NBPTS) which in the late 1980's. In looking at traffic issues and land uses for the beach area, the NBPTS identii residential areas that either were developing or had the potential to develop land use incompatibil between smaller scale single family residences and larger scale multi-family projects. The issue preserving the existing single family character and scale of the neighborhood was raised by the b and was expressed in the form of a recommendation. The area being addressed tonight is locate southern portion of the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) around the southern terminus of Garfie The study area has 35 lots containing smaller scale single family and duplex developments, with lots that are either vacant or could be redeveloped. The development 'of these lots could significa change neighborhood character. The existing zoning is a non-compatible mix of single family ar multi-family zoning. Staff conducted a land use study that included a series of certified mailings to all property owner5 the study area. Over a three month period, staff solicited and assessed all input regarding the de of retaining R-1 zoning with an RM density. Input was received from all but five property owners on the research and input reviewed during the land use study, staff is recommending the implem of several zone changes and General Plan designations to eliminate the current conflicts within tl area. Using an overhead projection, Mr. Munoz showed diagrams of the proposed zoning and General designations and discussed in detail each of the proposed changes and its effect. Chairman Noble stated, for the record, that he had received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Kelly, resic the study area. He inquired if their property would be affected. Mr. Munoz replied that the propo changes would have no effect on the Kelly's property. However, the Kellys currently have two un property, which is a non-conforming use. If they were to redevelop their property, they would on allowed one unit. Commissioner Hall inquired if everyone in the study area was noticed about tonight's hearing. M replied that they were. In addition, it was also noticed in the newspaper. He received several tek calls from people inquiring about the hearing. MINI - a 0 PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1993 PAGE 8 Commissioner Schlehuber inquired about one lot on the north side of Chinquapin which is zoned Munoz replied that the lot in question was not in the study area. He also stated that in the past tt- lot of spot zoning in this area. Commissioner Erwin inquired about the 25% density reduction as a result of the proposed zoning Mr. Munoz replied that the density reduction is primarily due to the General Plan designations wh changing from RH to RMH. Commissioner Schramm praised Mr. Munoz on his excellent staff report. Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. There being no persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noble decla public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Schramm, and duly seconded, to adopt PI; Commission Resolution No. 3440 recommending approval of the Negative Dec iss,ued by the Planning Director and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nc 3442, and 3443, recommending approval of GPA 92-09, LCPA 92-02, and ZC based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. .. . $; -E . . 7-0 A. 23: Chairman Noble, Commissioners Erwin, Hall, Savary, Schlehuber, Schramm, i NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Welshons here would be no meeting on February 17, h it will be very light. onference to be held in Monterey. He stat1 eople to the conference-and he would like tend. Those designees are Commission€ to conserve finances. ADJOURNMENT: 93 was adjourned at 754 p.m. Respectfully submitted, GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director \ BETTY BUCKNER Minutes Clerk \ MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTlL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPR( MlNU z e * 4 Carlsbad SUN Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-485 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulatio: published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and whicl is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and wh per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subs which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the s Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one Preceding the date of public; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1 GPA 92-9LCPA 92-WZC 92-01 frid - e annexed to; LAND USE STUDY AREA . lished in e aid newsp; I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I,, .*I thereof on I the City Council ofthe CityofCarlsbad will hold a Dublic hearing at the Citv I Ill 111, r-ll \ 11 I Council Chambers, 1200 Chsbad Vii- .lage Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 600 p.m., on Tuesday, April 20,1993, to 1 1 ~+\:;$~:+;?$?~;:;j ~~~ .~~ 1J"Ll \ II I consider an Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, an Amendment to the Local Coastal Plan. I L! and a Zone Change from R-1 and RD-M Beach Planning and Traffic Study for the area generally located in the southern portion of the Beach. Area Overlay Zone, within Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and the Mello I1 2 ." " Local Coastal Plan. m If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department, at (619) 438- 1161, ext. 4441. "qp? Amendment, Local Coastal Plan ' Amendment, andlor Zone Change in court, you may be limited to raising 1 12 8th only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing de- scribed in this notice, or in written cor- respondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing. Applicant City of Carlsbad CT 4236: April 8.1893 ~ ~ ~ ~.~~~ .-l to R-2, as recommended by the North 7991 1 .!.!'f! . .a. ..., . ?,-e.. , f G.3.. I ..., $X+ cz i <.".*._ .< If you challenge the General Plan AO"A ,."."..- I LA. .. "I A 'I '. ,+=-A I ~ ~ n City of CIrlrbid - CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL L,. .- . . . . . " I LIC1n' ril 08 ty of perjur; I II tIkPIVpIDA I QOON . I I San correct* Diego. Ex - I Ici1, 1993- Bmcu AM4 LAND USE SNOT. i +Ej I7& P1"l7 r I I Carlsbad SU Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Tnc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-485 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen yeas, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled 1 I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulatior published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and wh per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subs( which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the s; Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one preceding the date of publica notice hereinafter referred to; 2 notice of which the annexed i and entire issue of said newspa . - .... . . . . . . . . P,UBLI.(= HEARING, copy, has been published in e GPA 92-91LCPA 92-2lZC 92-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in any supplement thereof on the City Council o'fthe City of Carlsbad ing dates, to-wit: will hold .a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Vil- lage Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, April 20,1993, to April 08 consider an Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General PIan, an Amendment to the Local Coastal Plan, and a Zone Change from R-1 and RD-M to R-2, as recommended by the North Beach Planning and Traffic Study for the area generally located in the WjSe Circle, Carlsbad CA 92008. southern portion of the Beach Area Overlay Zone, within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. and the Mello I1 stee makes no representation or 'ranty. the street address(es) or er common designation of the we described property is: 1535 I ad property is bein sold for the 2 Pose of paying the o%ligations se. 1 ed by w!d Deed of Trust including I E and expenses of the Trustee and I alifornia Reconveyance Corn- ( ;ale. I W. as said Trustee. By: Suzanne ly. Executive VrCe PreSidenl 9200 'I (dale Ave. Chatsworth. Cat/fornia L 111-6519. (818) 775-2575. Dated AP79681 Local Coastal Plan, If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department, at (619) 438- rch 09,1993 1161, ext. 4441. 5, 411, 418 If you challenge the General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan ' I Amendment, andlor Zone Change in 'CITACION JUDICIAL) I: California on the 8th court, you may be limited to raising CASE NUMBER: only those issues raised by you or (Nirmem de1 Cam) A someone else at the public hearing de- iAiU BERNARDINO COUNTY Ir scribed in this notice, or in written cor- SUPERIOR COURT respondence delivered to the City of NORTH DESERT DISTRIff b S Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior 0 to, the public hearing. FCE'IK) DEFENDANT: ) s, A Applicant City of Carlsbad Ea PIES E. BORDIER I jm 1 )D c I certify under penalty of perjury \. 4189: March 25. Apr. 1.8.1993 ti o foregoing is true and correct. Exe CIVIL SUMMONS p Carlsbad, County of San Diego, : BCV- 2 day of A++--; 1 10% I 9 LJ (BARSTOW) CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL u ARE BEING SUED U' L Clerk oj 1 e 0 +. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA 92-9/LCPA 92-2/ZC 92-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hl a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri' Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m, on Tuesday, April 20, 1993, to consider Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, an Amendment to the Lo1 Coastal Plan, and a Zone Change from R-1 and RD-M to R-2, as recommended by North Beach Planning and Traffic Study for the area generally located in southern portion of the Beach Area Overlay Zone, within Local Facilit Management Zone 1, and the Me110 I1 Local Coastal Plan. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Eric Munoz in Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4441. If you challenge the General P1 an Amendment, Local Coastal P1 an Amendment, and Zone Change in court, you may be 1 imi ted to raising only those issues raised you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in writ correspondence del ivered to the City of Carl sbad City C1 erk's Office at, or pr to, the pub1 ic hearing. APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH: April 8, 1993 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL LAND USE STUDY AREA I. lil Ilk r4 1 l a city of Carlsbad Gm 92-9/ LCW 92-2/ BEACHAREALANDUSESrUW ZC 92-1 , e e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA 92-9/LCPA 92-2/ZC 92-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carl sbad will h a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m, on Tuesday, April 20, 1993, to consider Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, an Amendment to the Lo Coastal Plan, and a Zone Change from R-1 and RD-M to R-2, as recommended by North Beach P1 anning and Traffic Study for the area. generally located in southern portion of the Beach Area Overlay Zone, within Local Facilit Management Zone 1, and the Me1 lo I1 Local Coastal Plan. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Eric Munoz in Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext.'4441. If you challenge the General Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Plan Amendment, and, Zone Change in court, you may be 1 imi ted to raising only those issues raised you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in writ. correspondence del ivered to the City of Carlsbad City C1 erk's Office at, or pr to, the public hearing. APPLICANT: CitJy of Carlsbad PUBLISH: April 8, ,1993 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 4 City of Carlsbad t Gp6 92-9/ f?4 92-2/ BEACH AREA LAND USE STUW ZC 92-1 A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hc a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsb; California, at 6:OO 'p.m. on Wednesday, February 3, 1993, to consider proposed chang to General Plan, Local Coastal Plan and Zoning designations as recommended by a C Council directed land use study for an area generally located in the southern portion of t Beach Area Overlay Zone within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and the Mello I1 Lo1 Coastal Plan. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the put have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at 438-1161, e 4441. If you challenge the General Plan Amendment/Local Coastal Plan Amendment/Zc Change in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else rail at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to ' City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 27,1993, If J CASE FILE: GPA 92-09/LCPA 92-02/ZC 92-01 CASE NAME: BEACH AREA LAND USE STUDY PUBLISH: BLADE CITIZEN JANUARY 22, 1993 CARLSBAD JOURNAL JANUARY 21, 1993 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION i;\ yf>FrF :z,yn'3,Y ~-~~t~<~~~~~ bb$@&'\d~~~~ I March 15, 93 -*!./8 /a"-T&,Y;3) PS. / di~l y ad also nee t*"d in2 p&& / 3 Lfli I I I: +ad€kLun to the c". 1 list of labels, &3.-(* , L a. FAX TRANSMITTAL FROM FAX # (619 434-1987 TO FAX # (d/y) #3/- WJJ DATE SENT 443 TIME SENT NUMBER OF PAGES SENT, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: A. TO: DEP~MENT: &-- d COMPANY: .. FROM: r & CONTACT PHONE (619) 434-fg08 INSTRUCTIONS: ?q$&J"* DEPART~ENT: * u //A; > / A - #A ~z-~,h~~? m-+Ac 1 / A 2L& - D&a- -&A&-&-> ANY PROBLEMS WITH RECEIVING THIS FAX, CAL (619) 434-2803 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive - Carlsbad, California 92008-1 989 - (61 9) 434- I L a m (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice - GPA 92-09/LCPA 9?-02/ZC 92-01 - BEACH AREA LAND USE STUD for a public hearing before the City Council, e Please notice the item for the council meeting of Thank you. VI. @ ,3 /' 1. ;; ,; ,,/' 4 MARTY ORENYAK 3/15/93 Assistant City Manager Da 1 .:- j -/{ d" .YD .& ( f:&/& , ,7 /-" /"a'" ,4 : ''.{ ' j3 I 4 " C..) -/ ,, &A r-8 L ., I 04/06/93 MAIL1 @ LABEL LIST 0 OWNER HALL FAMILY TRUST 2619 COVE ST CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060131100 182 CHINQUAPIN AV GOLDEN SUNSET C/O CONNOLE CONSTRUCTION 113 15 RANCHO BERNARDO RD SAN DIEGU CA 92127 GOLDEN SUNSET 11315 RANCHO BERNARDO RD SAN DIEGO CA 92127 IKE JEANNETTE B TR 3955 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 FRINCHABOY FAMILY TRUST 1 3981 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 FORGEON KENT&CINDY 2816 CAZADERO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 HARGER ROBERT A 1230 6TH AVE MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 MCCRACKEN JOSIAH C III&JA 135 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 TABER BRUCE C 145 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 HOFFBAUER KARL F&VIRGINIA 3432 CASABLANCA WAY FALLBROOK CA 92028 2060131200 CHINQUAPIN AVE VACANT LAN1 2060131300 CHINQUAPIN AVE VACANT LANE 2060131800 GARFIELD ST 2060131900 3981 GARFIELD ST 2060700100 PARCEL RETI: 4011 GARFIELD ST VACANT LAND 2060700200 165 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060700700 135 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060700800 145 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060700900 155 CHINQUAPIN AVE SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRIC CO UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 2060701000 GARFIELD ST VACANT LAND i e 04/06/93 MAILING LABEL LIST 0 OWNER SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRIC CO UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060701100 GARFIELD ST VACANT LANE NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 2100100900 VACANT LAN1 NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS .OOOOO 2100101000 VACANT LAND SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRIC CO 2100103600 UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 BL VACANT LANE 04/06/93 MAILIN 9 LABEL LIST OWNER TAMARACK NO 237 580 BEECH AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 OSTERHOUT THERESA M 245 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008 TAMARACK PARTNERS 780 CHAPARRAL LN ESCONDIDO CA 92025 BOYD LEE G&E"A A TRS 391 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BOWERS BOWERS&STOSCHER 3885 MONROE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 LOVE FAMILY TRUST 04-30-9 390 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MILLER STEPHEN A P 0 BOX 99194 SAN DIEGO CA 92169 9. PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060200100 237 TAMARACK AV 2060200300 245 TAMARACK AV 2060200500 305 TAMARACK AV VACANT LAND 2060200800 391 TAMARACK AV 2060201700 293 TAMARACK AV 2060201900 VACANT LAND 2060202000 VACANT LANE 2060202400 390 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060203100 351 TAMARACK AV MERCER THOMAS C 321 N RAMPART ST #110 ORANGE CA 92668 SHARP LIETTE C 838 OAKWOOD ST GLENDORA CA 91740 2060203200 253 TAMARACK AV 2060800100 4008 GARFI.ELD ST 04/06/93 MAIL1 @! LABEL LIST 4 OWNER GALLADE JAMES A&PAMELA J 4016 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 DONEGAN JOSEPH C&BARBARA 7712 ROMERIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 KUTLESA LIVING TRUST 11-0 4024 GARFIELD ST #B CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060800200 4016 GARFIELD ST 2060800300 4020 GARFIELD ST 2060800400 4024 GARFIELD ST RALEIGH MARY TRS (DCSD) 9816 BONNIE VISTA DR LA MESA CA 91941 MILLIKEN FLORENCE E TR 4062 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060800800 4058 GARFIELD ST 2060800900 4062 GARFIELD ST BURKE BILLY J 1791 PREMIER ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 BURKE BILLY J 1791 PREMIER ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 2060801000 CHINQUAPIN AV VACANT LAN1 2060801100 251 CHINQUAPIN AV NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 2060802700 2060802800 VACANT LANl VACANT LANl - NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 2- - 2060921000 VACANT LANl 04/06/93 MAIL1 flt LABEL LIST 0 I OWNER NORTH S D COUNTY TRANSIT UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060921100 VACANT LAND . 04/06/93 MAIL1 !B LABEL LIST 0 OWNER PRITTEN LEW&JO ANNE 330 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 TALKE FRANK'E&KATHRYN A T P 0 BOX 9514 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 ENGEBRITS NORMAN&ERSILIA P 0 BOX 651 CARLSBAD CA 92018 SEA PINE PARTNER!: C/O MICHAEL STRAUB P 0 BOX 1306 CARLSBAD CA 92018 FEARY MAUREEN E 344 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 NUTE WILLIAM T C/O TORREY PINES PROPERTY P 0 BOX 2306 LA JOLLA CA 92038 TAMARACK PORPERTY INVESTO C/O RODNEY C MILES P 0 BOX 6905 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92607 TAMARACK PORPERTY INVESTO P 0 BOX 6905 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92607 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060201100 330 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060201200 306 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060201500 250 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060201600 240 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060202700 344 CHINQUAPIN AV. 2060203400 350 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060420100 411 TAMARACK AV 2060420200 421 TAMARACK AV TAMARACK PORPERTY INVESTO C/O RODNEY C MILES P 0 BOX 6905 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92607 2060420300 431 TAMARACK AV CASE MICHAEL F 2060420400 437 TAMARACK AVE 437 TAMARACK AV CARLSBAD CA 92008 HERSKOWITZ DAVID S&JOAN M 3915 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060420600 3915 HIBISCUS CR . * 04/06/93 MAIL1 @ LABEL LIST 0 OWNER COWEN ARNOLD E&AUDREY C 3925 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060420700 3925 HIBISCUS CR WOOD WILLIAM H&SHARON F 3935 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WILBER SABINA B 444 W DUARTE RD #C-8 ARCADIA CA 91007 BRUUN ELEANOR 3955 HIBISCUS CARLSBAD CA 92008 THOMAS ALLAN J&RUTH P TRS 3965 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 TURNER HAROLD L&MIGNONNE 3975 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DOAN LARRY G 725 NORTH AVE VISTA CA 92083 PATTERSON BOBBY J&ANTONIA 3995 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 LITTLE ROBERT T&MAE E 3940 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 0 CONNOR MICHAEL F&DIANE 3930 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SILVESTRI MICHAEL G&SALLY 3926 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060420800 3935 HIBISCUS CR 2060420900 3945 HIBISCUS CR 2060421000 3955 HIBISCUS CR 2060421100 3965 HIBISCUS CR 2060421200 3975 HIBISCUS CR 2060421300 3985 HIBISCUS CR 2060421400 3995 HIBISCUS CR 2060421800 3940 HIBISCUS CR 2060421900 3930 HIBISCUS CR 2060422000 3926 HIBISCUS CR 8 f 04/06/93 MAIL1 d! LABEL LIST 0. OWNER NUNEZ RUBEN&AIDA C 3924 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 TEATER ROBERT D 518' CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 STONE CHOICE&BARBARA J 422 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060422100 3924 HIBISCUS CR 2060423100 518 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060423300 422 CHINQUAPIN AV BALDWIN ELIZABETH A 418 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 WALKER STEPHEN 3996 LONG PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CREWS STEPHEN M&JUDY A 3986 LONG PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 GOSSARD THOMAS C&DOROTHY SUN VALLEY CA 91352 8610 GLENCREST ,DRIVE NEUMAN CHARLES WslHAND SUS 3956 LONG PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060423400 418 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060423500 3996 LONG PL 2060423600 3986 LONG PL 2060423700 3976 LONG PL 2060423800 3956 LONG PL CHANON M FAMILY TRUST 09- 21715 COSTANO ST WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364 2060423900 3946 LONG PL GREAGREY CLIFTON O&MARTHA 3916 LONG PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060424000 3916 LONG PL BLESER PETER F 2060424100 470 CHINQUAPIN AVE 470 CHINQUAPIN AV CARLSBAD CA 92008 . x 04/06/93 MAIL1 d b LABEL LIST e ‘OWNER BLANKENHORN RICHARD C 1645 FORD AVE REDONDO BEACH CA 90278 MATA TONY A&PHYLLIS T 450 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 KERN RICHARD A&DEBRA K 446 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 SHU SHU-HONG&KIN-PAK 4025 HARBOR DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 MEYER JOYCE A 4045 HARBOR DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HAWES JAMES A&MARSHA G (DV 4065 HARBOR DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WATKINS-EVANS GLORIA I 1651 S JUNIPER ST #156 ESCONDIDO CA 92025 HILL FRANKLIN A&JOANNE E 4095 HARBOR DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HERMAN FRANK&GEORGINA TRU 710 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 GUSTAFSON HAROLD C&ESTHER 3120 CANYON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RUSCHEWSKI EDWARD FSlMABEL 4165 HARBOR DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060424200 460 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060424300 450 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060424400 446 CHINQUAPIN AV 2061010300 4025 HARBOR DR 2061010400 4045 HARBOR DR 2061010500 4065 HARBOR DR 2061010600 4075 HARBOR DR 2061010700 4095 HARBOR DR 2061010800 4125 HARBOR DR 2061010900 4145 HARBOR DR 2061011000 4165 HARBOR DR .. ,I 04/06/93 MAIL1 B LABEL LIST 0 OWNER DIMOND RICHARD L&PAULINE 519 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT C 100 BAYVIEW CIR #2000 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2061011400 519 CHINQUAPIN AV 2062222400 4200 HARBOR DR SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRIC CO UNKNOWN ADDRESS 00000 2100102600 VACANT LAND 9 I t 04/06/93 MAIL1 lllt LABEL LIST e OWNER SAUNDERS WILLIAM B&NEDRA 160 SEQUOIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060111000 172 SEQUOIA AV TINNERSTET LARRY V&GAYLOR 3943. GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD .CA 92008 JAMES JOYCE A TR 3931 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BLACK LILLIE M 3921 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 GOT0 JAMES T&SHERYL 3911 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 EALY HARRISON 2521 1/2 S VISTA WAY #212 CARLSBAD CA 92008 SEARLS SIDNEY F 3912 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 GARNER ROGER D TR 721 PASSIFLORA AVE LEUCADIA CA 92024 DOCKI" ARTHUR S&CLARA E 3930 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MCEWEN TRUST 09-05-82 3940 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 LINDAMOOD DORIS G TRUST 1 3950 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060111100 3941 GARFIELD ST 2060111200 3931 GARFIELD ST 2060111300 3921 GARFIELD ST 2060111400 3911 GARFIELD ST 2060120100 3900 GARFIELD ST 2060120200 3912 GARFIELD ST 2060120300 3920 GARFIELD ST 2060120400 3930 GARFIELD ST 2060120500 3940 GARFIELD ST 2060120600 3950 GARFIELD ST 4 I& 04/06/93 MAILIN 9 LABEL LIST a ~WNER HERBERT JOAN L 3960 GARFIELD CARLSBAD CA 92008 RUZICKA MARJORIE L 3970 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARCEL#/ADDRESS 2060120700 3960 GARFIELD ST 2060120800 3968 GARFIELD ST YOUNG LORRAINE TR 931 N BUSHNELL AVE AMAMBRA CA 9'1801 NOTEY,THOMAS & JANET 1831 DEEHILL TRAIL TOPANGA CA 90290 N0TE.Y THOMAS&JANET C 1992 1831 DEERHILL TRAIL TOPANGA CA 90290 2060120900 3978 GARFIELD ST 2060121000 GARFIELD ST 2060121001 3980 GARFIELD ST 1 xi PARCEL RET1 " . NOTEY THOMAS&JANET C 1992 1831 DEERHILL TRAIL TOPANGA CA 90290 VINCENT FAMILY TRUST 06-1 4494 N PERSHING AVE SAN BERNARDINO CA 92407 HEARD JEFFERSON C&EVELYN 1306 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060121002 3982 GARFIELD ST 2060121100 202 CHINQUAPIN AV 2060130500 151 SEQUOIA AV GEMINI TRUST 1520 KING ST SANTA CRUZ CA 95060 OGDEN ALAN P 169 SEQUOIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 IKE JEANNETTE B TR 3955 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 2060130600 159 SEQUOIA AV 2060130700 169 SEQUOIA AV 2060130800 3955 GARFIELD ST .> I 4. ' e. J 0 e RUTH V. GORDON 4224 MOONLIGHT LANE KEAiUSIDE, CA 920% LYLE H. AND CORA A. MARSHALL 385 CHINQUAPIN AVENUE -BAD, CA 92008 GEORGE H. & ELIZABETH MEESE 4078 GARFIELD STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 LOUIS J. JR & BEVERLY FARKAS PO BOX 8284 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 SARA C. MOWS 305 DATE AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 JAMES E & LII VINE 280 CHINQUAPIN AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 DAVID & NATALIA P MARTINEZ 395 CHINQUAPIN AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 KAY OTA 4 BEUEZA STREET IRVINE, CA 92720 ROBERT W. FI'IZPATRICK PO BOX 932 SAN JLJW CAPISTRANO, CA 92 KIP K. MCBANE 2691 CREST DRIVE CAMSBAD, CA 92008 PERCY D. & LUCIU 5201 SHORE DRIVE cAIu38AD, CA 92( NEMAC INC C/O NORTHEAS' SA1 12526 HIGH BLUFF C SAN DIEGO, CA 921: OSTERKAMP FAMIX JOE & DONNA OST 315 STEWART CAN FALLBROOK,CA 9: ELISABETH GERUM 13342 DEL MONTE SEAL BEACH, CA 9( JAMES M & PHYLLl 4354 RANDOLPH TI SAN DIEGO, CA 92 MARGERY k NELSON 220 OLIVE AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 MARY L. DAVIS 236 OLIVE AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 MA"IEW R & LAURA S. PETERS . HIGMAN DANIEL G. 306 OLNE AVENUE Po Box 54s CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 EDWIN C. & GENNl 815 E. LONGDEN A ARWIA, CA 91w SHIGERU & MARY ' 352 OLIVE AvEMlE CARLSBAD, CA 92i ARTHUR J. & MARGARET J. HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION BONAS 333 OLIVE AVENUE 231 OLIVE AVENUE cARLsBAD,CA 92008 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 , f ..ST a *r. a 4 BEACH ARE OVERLAY ZONE FOR CITY COUNCIL NOTICING SAN DIEGO COUW. DEPT OF PLANNING CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD 5201 RUFFIN RD, STE "B" ENGINEERING DEPT UT"IES & MAINTEl SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY OF OCEANSIDE 505 S. WLCAN AV 320 N HORNE STREET ENCINITAS CA 92024-3633 ' OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CMWD 5950 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 I ._XI. - .- . f. > ; L.a*