The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-05-11; City Council; 12223; APPOINTMENT OF SUB-COMMITTEE FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATIONi 4 c) (d rl -d c) d 0 3 V h 0 l4-I aJ ClI c, 3 G .d c +I a, aJ cn m m \ 4 4 > Z : i, 4 J 2 3 i3 8 Cw OF CARLSBAD - AGE t" I - I AB # J ai a23 CITY DEPT. CQL CITY APPOINTMENT OF SUB-COMMITTEE MTG. 511 1/93 DEPT TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION: FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Adopt Resolution No. ci 3 -IYO appointing a sub-committee for the purpose of e\ Cultural Resource Inventory sites graded 1, 2 and 3, developing standards/cri reviewing these sites and reviewing the Historic Preservation Ordinance for revisions. I ITEM EXPLANATION: L At their special meeting held May 3, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commissic citizens' requests for changes to the Cultural Resource Inventory and the Pres Ordinance, Specific concerns express by citizens at the meeting were; 1) that bei on the Inventory should be voluntary; and, 2) all preservation activities should be VI In response, the Commission is recommending that the City Council a] sub-committee composed of Commission Members and citizens. Dutie5 sub-committee would be to evaluate sites listed in the Cultural Resource Inventor 1,2 and 3 to determine their level of significance to the City, develop standards ar for reviewing these sites, and to review and recommend changes to the Preservation Ordinance. The Commission is also recommending that the 223 p graded 3/4 be relieved of all future obligations with regard to historical documel If the Council concurs with the Historic Preservation Commission's recommenl appoint a subcommittee, staff is suggesting that the sub-committee con: combination of Historic Preservation Commissioners, affected property owners, an1 at large. In addition, if directed by City Council, City staff and the City Attc prepared to draft specific language to be incorporated into the existing ordinanc relieves properties graded 3/4 in the Inventory from future Historic Pre Commission review. Upon the subcommittee's recommendation to Council, the sub-committec abolished unless it is extended by subsequent Council action. FISCAL IMPACT: The only fiscal impact as a result of establishing the sub-committee will be st? provide administrative support. EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution No. 9 3 -IY 0 appointing a sub-committee for the purpose of t Cultural Resource Inventory sites graded 1,2 and 3, developing standards/( reviewing these sites and reviewing the Historic Preservation Ordinance fol revisions. 2. Staff Report on the Cultural Resource Inventory I I I 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 RESOLUTION NO. 93-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, PRESERVATION REVIEW CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A SUB-COMMITTEE FOR HISTORIC WHER ' SI the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined the neec h \ committee to review the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the Cultural Resource Ink WHEREAS, \h t e City Council wishes to set specific duties for the Sub-Co / :?.\ Historic Preservation R'yiew; \, \ NOW, THEREFOR? BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City c i California, as follows: \. .. \ 1. That the above reciAtions are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereb$\. \\ appointsFtittee. 3. That the Sub-committee shall be kpown as thb Historic Preservation F 4. The Sub-ciommittee shall be\.>adYso'y dl the i City Council with the spec \. '\. '$ committee. i ,I '. \, %.,, \, '! /' ,"\ l6 (( of: :\ '\ '/ $1, '>,. \ 't \ '1 " 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. Reviewing tie Cultural Resource Inventory sites graded 1, determine /their significadqe to Carlsbad's history at recomme'hdations for regrading if appropriate. I \, B., 'Developing standardslcriteria foi':,reviewing these sites. \. C. ' Reviewing the Historic Presepation Ordinance an \\x,\, i,,pmmendations for revisions. Ill Ill Ill 'q , i Ill Ill //I \. <! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 5. That upon acceptance of the Sub-committee's report by the City Counc committee shall be abolished. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad ( held o the day of , 1993 by the following vote, to wit: J NOES\; \ A E?: ABSENT\ \ ,/' />%,,, '\ '! x '\ '\ i, \ /o,, '? Cl-AU.DE A. LEWIS, Mayor \ '> /,, .,/' ATTEST: ', \ \\ "\ ,/ $5 '\ / ', ALETHA L. RAUTENKRAWZ>\City 'Clerk '',\ (SEAL) \ I ! \, i '\ i \- j !, 3 '1, "4) ',., \ \, '\ ''\I,\.:,,! I "i 0 0 EXHIBIT 2 May 5, 1993 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: @Community Development Director CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY RECOMMENDATION The Historic Preservation Commission is recommending that the City Council appoint a committee of Commission members and citizens to evaluate the Cultural Resource Inventory: graded 1, 2 and 3, to develop standarddcriteria for reviewing these sites and to revieh Historic Preservation Ordinance for possible revisions which will clarify preservation activiti NEED FOR RECOMMENDATION At their February 8, 1993 meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission invited ownel property listed in the Cultural Resource Inventory to the meeting to discuss the Inventory an impact to property owners. Several property owners expressed opposition to being listed ir Inventory and the Commission’s authority to review and recommend information/ document: prior to permit issuance. At the April 12, 1993 Commission meeting, numerous property ow protested their property’s inclusion in the Inventory and the Commission’s use of the lnver to obtain information from owners. In response to citizens’ request, the Historic Preservation Commission held a special meetin Monday, May 3, 1993 to receive citizens’ comments and to make a recommendation to COL This has resulted in an Agenda Bill for Council consideration. BACKGROUND In 1990, the City Council authorized the expenditure of Community Development Block C Funds for a Cultural Resource Survey. This Survey identified 327 properties in Carlsbad thai the potential for some level of historic significance in the City’s development. The Survey done to augment the 1980 Regional Historic Preservation Plan prepared by Westec fo Comprehensive Planning Organization (CPO). CPO is now the San Diego Associatic Governments (SANDAG). The 1980 Study identified 33 sites; however the entire City wa! surveyed and only sites that had landmark potential were identified. The 1990 Survey identified 327 sites that had varying levels of significance. These sites given a “grading” to identify their significance. Grade 1 are sites that have the potential for li on the State Register of Historic Places (6 sites), Grade 3 are locally significant (93 sites). 223 sites graded 3/4 are important as a collection representative of how Carlsbad appc during the 1920’s through the 1940’s. Individually, these sites may not be significant. on the National Register of Historic Places (5 sites). Sites graded 2 have the potential for li e Mav 5,1993 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY Page 2 In 1991, the City Council adopted the Survey and the Cultural Resource Inventory. The 327 s were then coded into the City’s computer system so that when a permit application is recei it is referred to the Historic Preservation Commission for recommendation. The Commission t recommends what type of documentation/mitigation should be done, corresponding to significance of the site. Documentation could take the form of video tapes, relocation ( historic building (as done with the Carlsbad Union Church), request for funds, plaques documentation {as done with the Kelly Barn), and photographs of the site before demolition done with sites graded 3/4). Commission recommendations are then forwarded to appropriate permit issuing authority, the Planning Commission, City Council or the Commu Development Director. This documentation is then used to update the Inventory. Listing in the Inventory does not mean that sites are Designated Landmarks. In fact, there ( two privately owned Designated Landmarks in the City. Designation is done by the City Cot with the property owner’s written consent. A permit must be issued by the City Council for \I on a Designated Landmark (excluding ordinary maintenance). With the Commission’s action recommending that the 223 sites graded 3/4 be relieved 1 future documentation obligations, these sites will not be referred to the Historic Preservz Commission when property owners request a permit. Staff is prepared to work with the Attorney to develop specific language to be incorporated into the existing Ordinance w relieves properties graded 3/4 in the Inventory from future Historic Preservation Commis review. Although this should alleviate properly owner concerns, staff is not convinced that recommendations proposed by the Commission will satisfy homeowners with properties lis They are requesting that their properties be completely removed from the listing. If the Council chooses to remove properties from the listing, the Historic Presenration Commis Ordinance will need to be modified accordingly. MARN ORENYAK M0:PC:tlg Attachment * e Potential Local SignXcancdGrade 3 Note: the st~I~X~res, bcales and products of the built environment listed below pmide , range of ages, styles and fmctions reflective of the entire span of growth and settlemen1 within Carlsbad. For individual style/construction date and condition is Table #l. 3640 Adams zkqntn - Sccr~h ,440~ 2892 Jefferson 1432 Basswood 3048 Jefferson 258 Beech (house and barn)hWG=C~0o5~3971 Jefferson 327 Beech 270 Juniper 351 Beech L1 Jcrn OLIS HIS 1 2560 Carlsbad BlvdSswb(;tM&/ 605'689 Laguna 2585 Carlsbad Blvdpem y/ff,f~y 06, 624 Laguna 2775 Carlsbad Blvd x fl /@m 's 3112 Lincoln 2802 Carlsbad Blvd ~L~'x~~~~& 2738 Madison 2855 Carlsbad Blvd LUrHm+,v ~d~,g 3475 Madison 3003 Carlsbad Blvd FI~GL '/cod& 1098 Magnolia L~sfe/k/n &# 3406 Carlsbad Blvd 1196 Magnolia 3862 Carlsbad Blvd 2476 Mt. View A:& %NW I' A 142 Chestnut 1212 oak ' 1088 Chestnut 1542 Oak 352 christiansen )/dulllG WuS6 4050 Park 380 Christiansen ,y/oa WL.S HOUSE 4055 Park 1330 Chuparosa R/pn SA^ &uc& 2 go62896Roosevelt ,C ;//.lb/J /6dosc 2597 crest 2921B Roosevelt uAusd/t k60: 2691 Crest 3255 Roosevelt El Camino Real 3304 Roosevelt 417 Elm 3312 Roosevelt s75 58 Elm 68/bd&' //llcs/r~ (hk &bs] 3379 Roosevelt 560-62 Elm koepsem 21~3 3#4&4+ Roosevelt ~~~~0~ J-g 1166 Elm GkcFnJWOob MMg lfi&> 2787 state 1265 Elm 2822 State 1448 Forest Jec~/pmlply A&@ 2900 State 2650 Garfield 2940 state 3288 Garfield 2998 state *R#MS*Pr' &ZbG 3363 Garfield 3044 State /p~@~e-/lJ corn 3839 Garfield fk6b/@ /6cou~e- 3077 State 2916 Highland 168 Sycamore 2987 Highlmd . 310 Tamarack 3307 Highland 3190 Tyler 3016 Highland 2#i.~/&bff,@H %OH8 3176 Tyler 3081 Highland5,+'firc/lsct/flAL&e ,40c~vStr' Bridge on Carlsbad Blvd 3140 HighlandCcrL w-0 Ye - GMP m~~~ Highway #lo1 3384 Highland Calavera LakeDarn 3788 Highland Calavera Road Quany 3789 Highland Calavera School Site 3828 Highland Hosp Grove 4095 Highland Rock Retain Wall at foot 2801 Jefferson of Beech William Kelly farm site 571 Elm &wss)/ 2639 State Kelly Stage Stop 0 e Potential National RegistedGrade 1 (3 Address Style Condition 2978 Carlsbad Blvd Queen Anne Victorian eldgood m//J _T#& (1887) 400 Eim Cvnter Gothic excellent SWWE ,k (1887) 3309 Roosevelt Vernacular (19 18) fairldeter. ~AI~/RE" Hhd 3329 Roosevelt B/C Spanish (1923) fairldeter. /n/ss/6 w s4ml 2770 Sunny Creek Adobe rehab (1842) excellent A&&& NE&J/~/D,~ outbuildings (c.1900) fair/deter. (KKU Y * mi Potential California Level SigniTcancdGrade 2 Address Style El Camio Real LANDMARK#784 s?%riG- Kelly Barn vem barn 1906 Haymar Rd. Adobe Iemodel-Spanish 1842 3080 Lincoln Monterey 1925 2956 Stiue Spanish Eclectic Rancho Los Quiotes Spanish (1935-39) Stage Coach Park Adobe ruins (1842) @re 1925) Condition n/a /SJ6rILJA 5 deter. excellgood ex&ood 6~6&"0S ex/god Shsf Llou) *l fair/good CARR~LLQ 2194 deter. 100