HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-05-18; City Council; 12230; APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO SUPPORT JPA CONSULTANT SERVICES3 2
z o i= o 4 d 5 0 0
<-% cw OF CARLSBAD - AGEWA BILL L '
-,
AB # J2.2-30 TITLE:
MTG. 05/18/93 APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
DEPT. U&M TO SUPPORT JPA CQNSULTANT SERVECES
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. c13- lioappropriating $10,000 from the Solid Waste En
Fund for Carlsbad's portion of consultant services desired by the North Coun~
Waste Management Agency.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On August 4, 1992, City Council adopted a resolution which authorized the R
execute the North County Solid Waste Management Agency Joint Powers Ag
(JPA) with the cities of Escondido and Oceanside. The PA was formed in an consider innovative and progressive approaches to solid waste manage]
cooperation with other cities.
Since that time, disposal of solid waste has become more uncertain. The Couni
Diego accelerated the long-standing flow control issue, and the expansion of
Marcos landfill is still in question. As a result, pressure has increased to
alternative disposal options. At its April 14, 1993 meeting, the PA agreed tc
Request for Proposals (WP) for consultant services to complete the followinl
Preparation of a Request for Proposals for securing solid waste b
processing and disposal options as alternatives to the San Diegc
Solid Waste System;
Assistance in evaluating the reliability, technical and fiscal ade
alternative disposal proposals received in comparison to the CUI
anticipated County of San Diego solid waste disposal options; i
Assistance to the Joint Powers Agency in negotiating with \
toward obtaining a contract for alternative solid waste t
processing and disposal.
1.
2.
3.
This RFP was sent to the firms of Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson (HFH) and G
Brkkner & Bratton (GBB), as both firms are experienced in this line of -
complete copy of the RFP is attached as Exhibit 2.
Both HFH and GBB submitted proposals. Staff preliminarily reviewed the prop
recommended further review and selection of a firm to complete Task 1 on
May 10, 1993 meeting, the PA representatives decided to interview the f
request that each JPA representative ask their City Council to approve an appi of $10,000 to cover the cost of the consultant services. A final decision to pro
Task 1 will be made by the JPA at its May 21, 1993 meeting.
e 0
PAGE 2 OF AB# J2! 630
FISCAL IMPACX:
The estimated cost of the recommended consultant services is approximately $2
(Task 1 only). Representatives of the three member cities have agreed to divi
expense equally, and request from their respective Councils $10,000 to cov
expense and any contingencies. The cost for consultant services to accomplish a
tasks is estimated to be $60,000. Funds for Task 1 are available in the Solid
Enterprise Fund. The Solid Waste Enterprise Fund is funded through gra
available, and the AB 939 fee of 1.1% of the residential and commercial solic
services rate.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
Resolution No. 9 3 - J 5 '
Request for Proposal for Consultant Service to Prepare a Proposal I
Alternative Disposal Services.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 93-150
A RESOLUTEON OF THE (=TTy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALFORNM TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN
THE SOLID WA!3E ENTERPRISE FUND FOR CARLSBAD'S
PORTION OF COSTS IN- BY THE NORTH COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
WHEREAS, the CITY OF CARLSBAD is a member of the P
Solid Waste Management Agency (Agency), a joint powers authority Wit1
Escondido and Oceanside; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that consultant
necessary to accomplish the task of soliciting alternative refuse disposal 1
WHEREAS, member agencies have agreed to share the
consultant services equally;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council
Carlsbad as follows:
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. $10,000 shall be appropriated in the Solid Waste En
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Cound i
1 Carlsbad at its regular meeting held on the 18th day of MAY
I
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nyc
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
0 0
NORm mU"Y SUUD WASIS MANAG- AGM
April 21, 1993
Harvey Gershmann
Gershmann, Brickner & Bratton Corporation
2735 Hartland Road
Falls Church, VA 22043-3537
Re: Request for Proposal (WP) for Consultant Service to Prepare a Proposal Seek
Alternative Refuse Disposal Services
The North County Solid Waste Management Agency, a Joint Powers Agency cor
representatives of the Cities of Carlsbad, Escondido and Oceanside, is soliciting propc
two firms that have extensive solid waste management knowledge. The agency is
proposals from the consultants for the following three (3) tasks:
1. Preparation of a Request for Proposals for securing solid waste
processing and disposal options as alternatives to the San Diego Coi
Waste System:
2. Assistance in evaluating the reliability, technical and fiscal adc
alternative disposal proposals received in comparison to the CL
anticipated County of San Diego solid waste disposal options; and
Assistance to the Joint Powers Agency in negotiating with vendor(
obtaining a contract for alternative solid waste transport, proce
disposal.
3.
It is the Joint Powers Agency's intention to pursue the above stated tasks in
consistent with the draft policies of the Agency, which are contained on attache1
Staff to the Agency has considered a number of specific issues that need to be addri
in the preparation of the RFP. as well as the evaluation of responses. These topic
Disposal Sen-ices - What will be the method(s) for disposal? Where
place? Should both short and long term options be considered? T
capability of the proposing firm in providing full support to our nee
Exhibit
*
0 0
* Transfer and Transportation - The RFP must address the method b! y
the respondent firm uill dcd uith the transfer of trash to its ultirn3tC
site. Will it participate in providing transfer capability in the local c(
or will the Agency be responsible for local transfer? Guarantees
required so that contracts are in place for transportation to the ultima1
site. Additionally, information relating to the cost for such transport
be evaluated, including transfer costs and possible host fees that
assessed along the route. Rate stability is of utmost concern to the d
Liability and Legal Issues - Definitive answers will need to be
regarding any new liabilities being assumed by the agency to deposit
in landfills elsewhere. Additional information is needed regarding
aspects of interstate commerce (should interstate transport be involvt
as other legal issues.
Financial capabilities - We will need to be assured that the responden
financially capable of meeting the obligation they are assuming
contract.
*
*
* Technical CapabiliF - The Agency will need to determine thc
capability of the respondent proposal, specifically relating to th
quality of the proposed landfill and processes used to remove hazar
from the waste stream prior to disposal.
Attachment 2 outlines the desired contents for each of the Requests for PI Attachment 3 outlines the evaluation cntena.
Proposals must be submitted and received no later than Ami1 28. 1993 at 3:OO P.
to be considered. In order to expedite the processing and review of those PTO~OS;
copies of the proposal shall be submitted to each of the following agencies:
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attention: Frank Mannea Assistant City Manager
City of Escondido
Civic Center Plaza
201 North Broadway
Escondido, CA 92025-2798
Attention: Jack Anderson Deputy City Manager
City of Oceanside
300 North Hill Street
Oceanside, CA 92054
Attention: Dana Hield %%itson, Deputy City Manager
e 0
The Agency reserves the right to make an award without negotiations
proposers should submit their best price initially The agenc) also resmes thc right a contract to those proposers determined to be most advantageous and detsrmtned to
Agency's best interest, price and other factors considered.
This Request for Proposal does not commit the North Count): Solid Waste Man
For this re;
Agency to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a prc
response to this request. The Agency reserves the right to accept or reject any or all I
received as a result of ths request; to negotiate with any qualified proposer or to canc
or in its entirety this request for proposal if it is determined to be in the best intere5
Agency.
Thank you for your interest in this project.
Frank 7dd Mannen
Assistant City Manager City of Carlsbad 1;- dl /- / ,--I ,' &'I - &( -&----
Jack Anderson
Deputy City Manager i/ City of Escondido
// - >/, 4_ rJ$](Qkb
Dana Hield Whitson
Deputy City Manager
City of Oceanside
DHW:ms
Attachments: 1. Draft Policies for North County Solid Waste Management Agenc:
2. Contents of Proposals
3 /&G??Y&Z8d ck?/re/?3
0 0
ATTACI-
DRAFT POLICIES FOR NORTH COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
1. Recognize that solid waste management requires a regionally coordinated :
that encompasses both short and long term objectives, with a view toward
minimizing costs to the rate payers while also complying with regulatory i
environmental statutes.
Continue cooperation and dialogue with the County of Sari Diego and other 2. county cities in seeking a regionally oriented solid waste system that F
representative decision making, reliability, equitable sharing of costs and cc
solid waste processing and disposal options.
Pursue development of a subregional plan for the North County area that i
~ith and can be integrated with a regional solid waste system, but, at the
would allow North County Cities to secure a range of
alternative disposal options in the event that a cooperative countywide s:
imple mented.
Explore a variety of solid waste disposal opportunities pursuant to the N
subregional plan, considering cost effectiveness, environmental suitabilit]
compliance with State and Federal mandates, and both short and long ter
Make all disposal opportunities developed through the Joint Powers Age1
to all other agencies in San Diego County, either through a regionwid
through the PA.
Retain maximum flexibility to pursue future solid waste processing
technologies which would minimize environmental impacts andor mode
projected tipping fees.
Minimize potential liability for both the PA and its member agencies.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
e 0
ATTACH5
CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL,
1. The Statement of Work - State understanding of the requirements to be accor
State general experience, capabilities and approach for each task. Demonstra
understanding of the nature and scope of work to be performed and its relati
the Agency’s needs.
2. Experience and Support - Demonstrate, through experience of the
subcontractors and/or through personnel employed by the company, a comp
knowledge of solid waste disposal requirements.
Task Methodology and Management - For each task list specifically and separ
intended methodology, that is, what you are going to do and how you are g
it.
Management Structure, Including Subcontractors - Demonstrate willingness
appropriate resources to the proposed work with appropriate diligence. Dc
proposed assignment of work and overall contract management.
Personnel Qualifications - Provide resumes for the key management and p
3.
4.
5.
personnel proposed for use on thls project.
6. List of Projects of Similar Size and Scope - Submit a description of your
in the management of similar programs within the last 5 year period, in
name(s) of the agency, point of contact, and the dollar value of each such
Disclosure of Business Relationships - Please indicate any past or curre
relationships With any of the Member Agencies or potential s
dispodprocessing contractors that could provide reason to question tk
performance of the consultant.
Technical Proposal - The techcal should enable the Agency to thorougl
whether the proposal meets the agency’s requirements. The proposal s
specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the 1
thorough understanding of the agency’s requirements and the knowledge tc
needs.
Samples of Previous Reports - At least copy of a similar type rep
demonstrate the fm’s ability to provide the required senices.
7.
8.
9.
0 0
Contents of Proposal
Page 2
10. References - List title, name, address, area code and telephone number for at
(3) references of projects as similar to this one as are available. Indicate the
project performed for each of these references and the year in which it W~S I
Pricing Proposal - Provide a separate price schedule which will remain I
period of 120 days from the date of the proposal deadline. Costs shal
supported by such supplemental materials as are necessary for full docu
Costs should be further broken down by each of the three (3) specified tasl
Proposals shall include all travel, lodging, transportation, hourly wage rate:
expenses incidental to this proposal. However, travel, if any will be separa
and displayed.
11.
e 0
ATTACH!
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
1.
2.
Understanding of the problem and soundness of approach.
Organizational structure and capability to complete project in
timely and effective manner.
Personnel qualifications and technical resources. 3.
4. Management and organization.
5. Performance record.
6. cost.
7. Interviews - The Joint Powers Agency reserves the right to interview any o
uho submit proposals to assist in the selection process.