Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-06-15; City Council; 12262; 1993 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAMI f a > i2 CL !A! 0 Z 0 F 0 a 6 z 3 0 0 p ’‘* Cll(l)r OF CARLSBAD - AGEW BILL ’i! AB#JA,AGL TITLE: DE? MTG, 6/15/93 1993 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PIAN CIT’ CIT DEPT. ENG RECOMMENDED ACTION: TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM Adopt Resolution No. 9 4- ’ ’ ‘ approving the consultant agreement for the 1 S! Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program. ITEM EXPLANATION: The City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan requires that the performance st; circulation be met at all times as growth occurs. The standard states that segment or intersection in the Zone nor any Circulation Element road SE intersection out of the Zone which is impacted by development in the Zonc projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak hours, nor Service Leve peak hours. Impacted is defined by 20 percent or more of the traffic generatl Local Facilities Management Zone using the road segment or intersection.” On March 10, 1993, staff sent Request for Qualifications to twelve (1 2) consuli engineering firms to provide services for the 1993 Growth Management PI Monitoring Program. A total of eight (8) Qualification Statements were re1 interested consultants. A selection committee of City staff in the Engineering anc Departments met to review the submitted Qualification Statements. Based u experience and other factors, the committee unanimously selected JHK & Ass( the most qualified consulting traffic engineering firm to perform the work eleme 1993 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program. Staff is recommending that the agreement with JHK & Associates be approved the consultant to obtain traffic data for the 1993 Growth Management PI Monitoring Report. Counts will be obtained in 1993 during the summer months c August. Traffic volumes will continue to be monitored through subsequent r programs as each individual development project is approved in Carlsbad. This r program is a planning study with no environmental review required and is exei CEQA regulations. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of services under the consultant agreement with JHK & Associates is Funding is available in the Growth Management Pian Traffic Monitoring Prograr Account No. 31 0-820-1 840-331 6) using Traffic Impact Fees. EXHIBITS: 1. Traffic Count Locations. 2. Resolution No. c, 3- lca 2 approving the consultant agreement for the 19s Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program. 3. Consultant agreement with JHK & Associates. an OF OCEANSIDE NOT TO SC .--INTERSECTION COUNTS m---MID-BLOCK COUNTS 1993 GROWTH MANAGEMENT TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS i .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I’ l2 13 14 15 16 3.7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9 3 - 16 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CW COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR THE 1993 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of Carlsbad solicited I Qualifications from consulting traffic engineering firms to perform the traffic monitorii of the Growth Management Pian; and WHEREAS, the firm of JHK & Associates was selected as the most qualified the work; and WHEREAS, the Ci Council of the Ci of Carlsbad hereby finds it necessai and in the public interest to award the consultant agreement to JHK & Associates oi California to provide services for said project: and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has previously collected Traffic Impact Fees project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City t California, as follows; 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the consultant fee of $38,028 will be charged to the Growth Manat Traffic Monitoring Program (Project Account No. 31 0-820-1 840-331 6). 3. That the consultant agreement with JHK & Associates is hereby apprc Mayor and Ci Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreemei the Mayor’s signature of said agreement, the City Clerk is further authorized and ( Ill 111 Ill I// ’- t r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 l2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e forward a copy of said agreement and this resolution to JHK & Associates, William R. Reilly, 8989 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 335, San Diego, California, 92108. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad C held on the 15th day of JUNE , 1003 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnil NOES: None ABSENT: None AlTEST: ALETHA 1, RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk (SEAL) 0 0 * AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 18th day of JUNE - , 1993, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corpora hereinafter referred to as "City", and JHK AND ASSOCIATES, hereinafter referred ti "Consultant". RECITALS City requires the services of a traffic engineering consultant to provide necessary traffic counting, capacity calculation and report writing services for prepar: of the 1993 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program; and Consu possesses the necessary skills and qualifications to provide the services required bj City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual coven contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS Consultant shall complete the 1993 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitc Program in conformance with the provisions of its proposal to the City of Carlsksd d May 6, 1993 and attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Rev. 6/1 e 0 3 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS The City shall provide all relevant data at its disposal relative to the propc study and assist in coordination and obtaining additional data from other agencie allow the expeditious completion of the scope of services as outlined in Exhibit "A', 3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION The work under this contract will begin within ten (IO) days after receir notification to proceed by the City and be completed within 180 days of that c Extensions of time may be granted if requested by the Consultant and agreed writing by the City Engineer. The City Engineer will give allowance for documented substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of fore! on the part of the Consultant, or delays caused by City inaction or other agencies' of timely action. 4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONSULTANT The total shall not exceed the fee payable according to Paragraph 6, "Payme Fees," and shall be $38,028.00. No other compensation for services will be allc except those items covered by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 8, "Chant Work .I1 2 Rev. 6/ 0 0 ,. 5. DURATION OF CONTRACT. This agreement shall extend for a period of 180 days from date thereof. contract may be extended for two (2) additional one (1) year periods or parts thc based upon satisfactory performance and the City’s needs. 6. PAYMENT OF FEES Payment of fees shall be within thirty (30) days after approval of the pro< estimates by the City Engineer. Progress payment shall be based on the estin percentage of completion of each phase or task as presented in the proposed estimate. 7. FfNAL SUBMlSSlONS Within fourteen (14) days of completion and approval of the draft 1993 G Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program, the Consultant shall deliver to the Ci following items: 1. Ten (1 0) final report copies bound in a three-ring binder of the 1993 G Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program. 2. Original final report copy (unbound) of the 1993 Growth Managemer Traffic Monitoring Program. Rev. 6, 3 0 0 c 8. CHANGES IN WORK If, in the course of the contract, changes seem merited by the Consultant or the ( and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change in the conditi of the contract is warranted, the Consultant or the City may request a change in contr Such changes shall be processed by the City in the following manner: A letter outlit the required changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant to inform them 01 proposed changes along with a statement of estimated changes in charges or schedule. A supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved bl City according to the procedures described in Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.20. Such supplemental agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected port of the agreement. 9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The Consultant warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any comr or person, other a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure agreement, and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or per other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making o agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to a this agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement I or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commis percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent fee. 4 Rev. 6/1 0 0 10. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE The Consultant shall comply with the state and federal laws regarc nondiscrimination. 11. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT In the event of the Consultant’s failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the worl provided for in this contract, the City may terminate this contract for nonperforrnancc notifying the Consultant by certified mail of the termination of the Consultant. Consultant, thereupon, has five (5) working days to deliver said documents owned by City and all work in progress to the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall maC determination of fact based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentag work which the Consultant has performed which is usable and of worth to the Cil having the contract completed. Based upon that finding as reported to the City Mana the Manager shall determine the final payment of the contract. 12. DISPUTES If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work under this agreerr the following procedure shall be used to resolve any question of fact or interpretatior otherwise settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they becl identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating under the provisions of contract, shall be reduced to writing by the principal of the Consultant or the Engineer. A copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both pa involved along with recommended methods of resolution which would be of bene both parties. The City Engineer or principal receiving the letter shall reply to the I1 5 Rev. 6/1 0 0 along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (IO) days. If the resoli thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the dispute : be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the Office of the Manager. The City Council may then opt to consider the directed solution to problem. In such cases, the action of the City Council shall be binding upon the pa involved, although nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking reme available to them at law. 13. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) written notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or termination, I request of the City, the Consultant shall assemble the work product and put san order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to City. In the eve termination, the Consultant shall be paid for work performed to the termination ( however, the total shall not exceed the lump sum fee payable under paragraph 4. City shall make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed an( compensation to be made. 14. STATUS OF THE CONSULTANT The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in Consultant’s way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Consultant’s independent calling not as an employee of the City. Consultant shall be under control of the City only i 6 Rev. 6/‘ 0 0 the result to be accomplished, but shall consult with the City as provided for in request for proposal. The Consultant is an independent contractor of the City. The payment made to Consultant pursuant to the contract shall be the full and complete compensation to w the Consultant is entitled. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withhold on behalf of the Consultant. The City shall not be required to pay any wori compensation insurance on behalf of the Consultant. The Consultant agrees to inden the City for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, or worl compensation payment which the City may be required to make on behalf of Consultant or any employee of the Consultant for work done under this agreemeni The Consultant shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements, including, but not lin to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors consultants that are included in this agreement. 15. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform ti applicable requirements of law: federal, state and local. Consultant shall provic necessary supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approv necessary. The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any other agencies. 7 Rev. 611 e e 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and specifications as herein reqL are the property of the City, whether the work for which they are made be execute not. In the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans, specificatil drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. Consultant I have the right to make one (1) copy of the plans for his/her records. 17. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS The Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the I pursuant to this contract shall be vested in City and hereby agrees to relinquish all cl to such copyrights in favor of City. 18. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The City, its officers, and employees shall not be liable for any claims, liabi penalties, fines, or any damage to goods, properties, or effects of any person what nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, any intentional or negl acts, errors or omissions of Consultant or Consultant’s agents, employee: representatives. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and save free and harmle: City and its officers and employees against any of the foregoing claims, liab penalties or fines, including liabilities or claims by reason of alleged defects in any and specifications, and any cost, expense or attorney’s fees which are incurred k City on account of any of the foregoing. 8 Rev. 6/ 0 e 19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT The Consultant shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies ( thereunder without the prior written consent of the City. 20. SUBCONTRACTING If the Consultant shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under contract by the Consultant, Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the i and omissions of Consultant’s subcontractor and of the persons either directl) indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for the acts and omission persons directly employed by consultant. Nothing contained in this contract shall cr( any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant and the City. Consultant shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontract0 the terms of this contract applicable to Consultant’s work unless specifically noted tc contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by the City. 211. PROHIBITED INTEREST No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the Cii negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making, acceptin! approving of this agreement, shall become directly or indirectly interested persona this contract or in any part thereof. No officer or employee of the City who is autho in such capacity and on behalf of the City to exercise any executive, supervisor similar functions in connection with the performance of this contract shall become dir or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part thereof. 9 Rev. 6/1 0 0 22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of the ( either before, during or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modify ar the terms or obligations herein contained nor entitle the Consultant to any additi payment whatsoever under the terms of this contract. 23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless Agreement," all te conditions, and provisions hereof shall insure to and shall bind each of the parties he and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assi 24. EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first written at; 25. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The consultant shall not file a conflict of interest statement with the city clc accordance with the requirements of the City off Carlsbad conflict of interest code. disclosure categories shall be categories N/A . 26. INSURANCE The Consultant shall obtain and maintain policies of general liability insur automobile liability insurance, and a combined policy of worker's compensatioi employers liability insurance from an insurance company authorized to do business 10 Rev. 6 0 e State of California which meets the requirements of City Council Resolution No. 91 in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each, unle lower amount is approved by the City Attorney or the City Manager. This insurance be in force during the life of this agreement and shall not be canceled without thirty days prior written notice to the City sent by certified mail. .... .... .... .... .._. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 11 Rev. 6/1 0 e The City shall be named as an additional insured on these policies. The Cons shall furnish certificates of insurance to the City before commencement of work. Executed by Consultant this 27d day of CONSULTANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California JHK AND ASSOCIATES (name of Consultant) Y 1 By: By: (sign here) ATEST: 57bm A, s-4754 (print name here) &?ral;,k- H&Z- f%+&7+- Y (title and organization of signatory) ALETHA L. RAU~ENKRANZ City Clerk (Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by CONSULTANT must be attache (President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sig corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution CE by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that offi bind the corporation.) APPROVED AS TO FORM: RONALD R. BALL City Attorney 5Y LQL Deputy City Attorney Q ,/L '73, 1 12 Rev. 61 a e The City shall be named as an additional insured on these policies. The Consult2 shall furnish certificates of insurance to the City before commencement of work. Executed by Consultant this 27fi day of , 19' / CONSULTANT: JHK AND ASSOCIATES CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California (name of Consultant) By: By: ATTEST: 5-7bv& if+< s-44 &m&- Ma yF&+ (print name here) Y (title and organization of signatory) ALETMA L. RAU~ENKWNZ City Clerk (Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by CONSULTANT must be attached.) (President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign 1 corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certifir by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer bind the corporation.) APPROVED AS TO FORM: RONALD R. BALL -_ - 8 y ' 0"/7%5?A in and forddid &2/7y-? Stak, personally E t- /$&p.e/J , a Notary Public personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) idare subscribed to the within instrument and ackno n hislherltheir e entity upon , L/m u 511 o/l (This area for official seal) May 6,1993 . RECEIVE~; p- i Cm OF CARLSBAO -RING DEPARTVE" 0 0 * * hk & asmcixes 4 Mr. Robert T, Johnson, Jr, May 6, 1993 Page 2 Task I - Project Orientation and Coordination The initial task of the project is to become familiar with the study area and introduc JHK personnel to City staff. A project orientation meeting will be held to discus coordination of intersection counts with mid-block counts, At this meeting count schedull both intersection and mid-block locations will be submitted. Count schedules wi coordinated with local construction activities and detours in order to obtain unbiased re Count locations and times will not be changed without the City's prior approval. Task I1 - Data Collection Data collection will be performed at 37 intersections (Exhibit 1) and 25 mid-I locations (Exhibit 2). A temporary employment agency will be used to process payro temporary personnel needed to complete the data collection for the intersections, Engine students from local universities will act as data counters, and JHK will instruct temp personnel on the proper data collection techniques. The data will be collected for the same periods identified in previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs and consist of three hours for both the morning and evening peak periods. The data collection w supervised by JHK staff. Field sketches will be drawn of intersection geometrics, and i geometrics will be used as input for ICU analysis. The data will then be reviewed for acci and directional discrepancies. Similar to the last four years, JHK will also collect data at unsignalized location: order to better determine unsignalized intersection LOS values, JHK will conduct delay sti during the peak hour volume counts. This data will help verify recently established procec covering unsignalized intersection LOS calculations. Mid-block counts will be performed according to the current standards determine previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs. Two consecutive 24- counts will be performed using dual tube set ups. These counts should be completed within weeks. Intersection tun movement counts will be performed in conjunction with nearby 1 block counts. JHK will coordinate the placement of the counters with City staff and monitox review the data collection at these mid-block locations. With JHK staff responsible for portion of Task II many potential discrepancies will be avoided. Task In - Data Reduction To meet time constraints for the delivery of the draft 1993 Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Program in late September, the data reduction will need to be efficie timed with the data collection. The data reduction for the intersections will conform to format of the previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs with incorporated changes. This data wilI be reviewed and checked for directional errors and i errors. In addition, the ICU will also be reviewed and verified for operational consistency. The data reduction for mid-block locations will be reviewed by JHK to ensure directional distribution and peak hour data are accurate. The format will conform to the n block summary configuration of the 1990, 1991, and 1992 Growth Management Plans. r format included a tabular and graphical summary of the mid-block data, 0 0 * . hk k asmcixcs -J Mr. Robert T. Johnson, Jr. May 6,1993 Page 3 Task IV - Final Report Preparation The Final Report will be prepared similar to the previous Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Programs. Eleven copies will be provided, ten punched and in thret binders and one unbound copy. The fist draft submittal by JHK will be September 27, with approximately four weeks for City staff review and comment. Task JJ' IICM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis (Optional) The development of the 1985 HCM software for capacity analysis at signa intersections has started the slow process of unifying capacity analysis techniques, Alth current application has been occasionally questioned, the method of including phasing, pe green time, and stop time delay has been recognized as the most complete analysis availab is the opinion of JHK that the conversion to the use of HCM intersection capacity analysis continue as the program is continually refined by Mc'rrans. With this in mind, JHK offers V as an optional task. Task V will consist of the analysis of all intersections that test at lev service C or worse under the ICU procedure by utilizing HCM analysis for that period. Lev Service C was chosen as the threshold for this task based upon work completed in Chula ' where levels of service cornparisms between the two analysis procedures revealed that € was generally one level of service worse than ICU. That is LOS C in the ICU analysis c possibly be LOS D under HCM analysis. Field estimates will be made concerning signal tin grades, progression and other characteristics. These characteristics will be incorporated into HCM analysis. The City would need to provide JHK with current signal timing charts fo critical locations. The analysis would be performed and summarized apart from the ' Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program and would be provided to the City letter report format, Task V has been included in the proposal on a per intersection basis to a for the correct number of intersections to be analyzed. JHK is pleased to be considered for the 1993 Growth Management Plan Tr: Monitoring Program. Our previous work with the City staff will make the coordination operation of the 1993 program more efficient. We look forward to again working with you any questions arise please contact me or Mr. Brian Shields. Sincerely, JHK'& Associates Md/f77 /?? William R. Reilly, P.E Executive Vice President BCS/lh 3230015P13-5/6/93 - a .L g n m zgu .f a.2 e! "! c'! e. o^ eF cn Qco a 0.2 ;;; 2.5 m c'00 d eo0 F mc' d QP4 -64 64 64m 64 64 \D 64 0 rn .z h eh r( m eo v) oc' \D COP4 m E Se 64 v3 ?& fff m L5 % ax 22 - w L 0 0000 \D ea -0 i-- \Dm \A00 WQ 00 64- w3 Wc-4 64 \D 00, a! 00, L", e, Efi 64 $4 W 2 4 2 2 13 z 0 gg 2 v1 b 0 L -3 a0 -00 Q om mc' 2 22 r\l E &* SJ= + EEL% k!i 4w p:EG -E u FW *-.E 2 W w* v1 g r( z*, = Ek2 wa2 ; usu zg3 Egg -4 E u W u7 PJ 0 52 zz eo 00 \ m 252 \D 2m 0 d .- EbEa ym 0 isu- "5 PJ coco .i e- O W SF \D 4 $5 p: c9 4 c9 m IJ EL 4 0 E4 0 * c. z t n n a E ew PC .I E E .P f .m 2 ces a =3 s ?-$ .2 G 2k 52 dm tm '2 8 -a 6; 1-4 .x -9 Q)u "c3L 3OO aez $?-$< .?! bPCa bclm E bcl bg g kZeV 0 Y n v1 .I 0 Q)o x El CIY a u .I a4 u .I .I uc I a, n .I Azo tlu, O8 4 tjg zt $4 2 $4 $3 3 "E% E e;=*;; ,o *t;z CA 0.c uoa CA Ir( "cd& >sz 73 Kg g '3 w GSS '3 CA 2 83 ; s b .z .Z%U -E - 55 .q E ZL"& 2 3% A4 2.2 q0 3.1 $ OXL f,P ap 5 35 a2 E S-.Z a n -f 0L gsz 2 2 e% - *.g 3'" 0 ,m.5 %$< 2s -0cg +..) .- .m 8GZ -.s 0 2 g2 plQ rl EO != 2'2 eS.5 8 < 2.5 3 0 -* b) uo c u 53% F2 *3%cE CT .= c: z"osg CA z .. Q) Y * c e 0 0 Exhibit I REQUESTED INTERSECTION COUNT LOCATIONS IN 1993 Location Count Number In tersection/Location El Camino Real and Marron Road El Camino Real and Carlsbad Village Drive El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue El Camino Real and College Boulevard El Camino Real and Alga Road El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue El Camino Real and Olivenhain Road Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard Carlsbad Boulevard and Grand Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard and Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road Carlsbad Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane Rancho Santa Fe Road and Melrose Drive Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Meadows Drive Rancho Santa Fe Road and Questhaven Road Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue Rancho Santa Fe Road and Olivenhain RoadCamino Alvaro Carlsbad Village Drive and State Street Carlsbad Village Drive and Hxding Street Carlsbad Village Drive and Pi0 Pic0 Drive Poinsettia Lane and Batiquitos Drive Poinsettia Lane and Paseo Del Norte Poinsettia Lane and Avenida Encinas Tamarack Avenue and Pi0 Pic0 Drive Alga Road and El Fuerte Street Grand Avenue and State Street Grand Avenue and Jefferson Street College Boulevard and Faraday Avenue I-S/Carlsbad Village Drive Southbound Ramp 1-5/Carlsbad Village Drive Northbound Ramp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 I-S/Cannon Road Southbound Ramp 33 I-5/Cannon Road Northbound Ramp 34 I-S/Poinsettia Lane Southbound Ramp 35 I-S/Poinsettia Lane Northbound Ramp 36 37 18 I-S/La Costa Avenue Southbound Ramp I-S/La Costa Avenue Northbound Ramp a . 0 a . Exhibit 2 REQUESTED MID-BLOCK COUNT LOCATIONS IN 1993 Locat ion Number Segment Segment Location 1 Palomar Airport Road Yarrow Dr. and El Camino Real 2 Palomar Airport Road Paseo Del Norte and College Blvd. 3 El Camino Real Marron Rd. and Plaza Dr. 4 El Camino Real Kelly Dr. and Tamarack Ave. 5 El Camino Real College Blvd and Faraday Ave. 6 El Camino Real Alga Rd. and La Costa Ave. 7 El Camino Real La Costa Ave. and Levante St. 8 El Camino Real Levante St. and Olivenhain Rd. 9 Carlsbad Boulevard Mountain View Dr. and State St. 10 Carlsbad Boulevard Cannon Rd. and Cerezo Dr. 11 Carlsbad Boulevard Poinsettia Ln. and Palomar Airport Rd. 12 Carlsbad Boulevard La Costa Ave. and Poinsettia Ln. 13 14 15 La Costa Avenue Cadencia St. and Romeria St. 16 17 Rancho Santa Fe Road Questhaven Rd. and Cadencia St. 18 19 Carlsbad Village Drive Victoria Ave. and Pontiac Dr. 20 Poinsettia Lane Paseo Del Norte and Batiquitos Dr. 21 Alga Road El Camino Real and Manzanita Dr. 22 Tamarack Avenue El Camino Real and Portalada Dr. 23 Paseo Del None 24 Paseo Del Norte 25 Paseo Del Norte Olivenhain Road El C&no Real and Amargosa Dr. La Costa Avenue Pireaus St. and Saxony Rd. Rancho Santa Fe Road Melrose Dr. and La Costa Meadows Dr. Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Rd. and Avenida La Posta Poinsettia Ln. and Camino De Las Ondas Camino Del Parque (north) and Palomar Airport Rd. Palomar Airport Rd. and Car Country Dr. b e e e June 1,1993 TO: CITY CLERK FROM: Traffic Engineer CONTRACT WITH JHK & ASSOCIATES Attached are three (3) notarized original contracts with JHK & Associates for the 1: Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program for City of Carlsbad signature several weeks. This item is tentatively scheduled to be on the City Council agenda June 15, 1993. Also attached is the JHK & Associates Certification of Signature Author If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4394. Thank you. T- c ,-. -.I , "-# : \ ' i, /-I k. 2. &.-'" 1 p<q .?,e\ ROBERT T. JOHNSON, JR., P.E. Traffic Engineer R?J:jb c: City Engineer ? e 9 f hk & associates . -J CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY CORPORATE BY-LAW AMENDMENT ADOPTED OCTOBER 2,1981 ARTICLE III - OFFICERS Section 11. Signatory Authorization The Chairman of tile Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, any Vice President, and Chief financial OEficer of the corporation may enter into any contract or execute any instrumen the name of and on behalf (A- the corporation. (Amended 10/30/85) OFFICERS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer - Jack L. Kay President, Trar sportation Consulting Division - Morris J. Rothenberg President, Syf terns Division - Tom L. Stout Chief Operations Officer - Richard D. Worrall Senior Vice President - William R. Reilly Vice President - Owen P. Curtis Vice President - Craig C. Gardner Vice President - Barry S. Marrus Vice Presidenfliiiance and Secretary - James A. McNeill Associate Vice President - Alan Clelland Associate Vice Pxsident - Michael C. Connors Associate Vice President - William R. Loudon Associate Vice Pr&dent - Joel K. Marcuson Associate Vice Pr wdent - David P. Perkins Associate Vice President - Robert G. Rausch Associate Vice President - Steven A. Smith Associate Vice President - Louis G. Neudorff ARTICLE IV - CORPORATE RECORDS AND REPORTS - INSPECTION Section 3. Certification and Inspection of By-laws. The original or a copy of these By-laws, as amended or otherwise altered to date, certifiel by the Secretary, shall 5e open to inspection by the shareholders of the company or provided to outside parties as required by legal considerations. If required, any employee of the Company n- attest to the signaturek) of the person(s) authorized to sign contracts. I, James A. RIcNeill, Secretary of JHK & Associates, hereby certify that the foregoing true copy of the Corporate By-laws, duly and legally adopted by the Board of Directors of said corporation, at a legal meeting of the Board duly and regularly held October 2, 1981 and October 30, 1985. I further certify that said resolution has not been amended or reveked L tary: J&es A. MdrJeill d is still in full force and e ect. /' J(j/b/l // ' -6 Qakd: 3- 21 73 r/l ,d L (SE t'JJ A&-r d and CEO: Jack L. Kay __ __ _-_I -_-__- -_--__ I - __~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF AJAMEDA 1 I ss. ON May 21 , 19% bt fore me, C. Hester-Alvaw, Notary Public, personally appeared - - 0 personally known t: me OR 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personb) whose name(s) &/are subscribed to the within instrument hs/her/their authorized capacity[ies), and that by his/her/their signature[s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the Ferson[s) acted, executed the instrument J a& L. Kay and James A McNeill I and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in