HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-09-14; City Council; 12392; Aviara Site Development Plans48 # -,a,
flTGm g/14/93
DEPT. PLN
CIT?F CARLSBAD - AGENC- BILL L-77
TITLE: AVLARASlTEDFWFLOPMENTPLANS
- MP 177(I)
3ECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Council concurs both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City
Council ADOPT Resolution No. 93459 , APPROVING MP 177(I).
On April 21, 1993 the Planning Commission approved (7-O) an amendment to the Aviara
Master Plan (MP 177(I)), which would change the processing requirements for some of the residential subdivisions within Aviara. Currently, the master plan requires a site development
plan to be processed for each neighborhood prior to issuance of building permits. The purpose
of the site development plan is to assure that the Master Plan’s development standards and
design guidelines are followed. It was originally envisioned that the site development plans
would accompany the tentative tract maps during project review. If the neighborhood
contained more than 50 units, then the tract map and site development plan would be
approved simultaneously by the City Council.
Due to the changing development climate, however, many of the single family neighborhoods
within Aviara have already been subdivided, without proposing building elevations and
locations. Even though all that remains to be reviewed are the building architecture and
location on the lots, the current Aviara Master Plan requires the site development plan to be
reviewed and approved by the City Council. Since the development standards and design
criteria for these neighborhoods have already been established through the master plan text,
the only level of review involves verification of conformance with these standards and criteria.
The applicant, Aviara Land Associates, requested this master plan amendment to allow the
Planning Commission approval authority on site development plans with 50 or more units, if
the neighborhood has already been subdivided and has approved development standards and
design criteria. In other areas of the City, the Planning Commission has the authority to verify
conformance to development standards on previously subdivided developments. Previous
examples of this architectural review are the Pavoreal subdivision, adjacent to Plaza Paseo Real, and the Arroyo La Costa Master Plan area. Both of these developments involve
residential subdivisions over 50 units. Once the subdivision receives City Council approval,
the authority for architectural review falls upon the Planning Commission. No subsequent
architectural review on the Council level is required.
Approval of this master plan amendment would establish consistency between the Aviara
Master Plan and the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The proposed amendment would also alleviate
an extra step in the discretionary review process without sacrificing quality project evaluation
or the opportunity for a public hearing. The Planning Commission and staff are, therefore,
recommending approval of MP 177(I).
,-
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA’BLL NO -a. 1 39%
J!3JvIRoNMElvrALREvlEw
Since this request proposes to only slightly alter the discretionary approval process for
residential subdivisions with more than 50 units, the Planning Director has determined that the project is a minor alteration of a land use limitation and is therefore exempt from
environmental review per Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
FISCAL IMPACT
No changes to the existing Site Development Plan fee are proposed. Allowing the Planning
Commission decision-making authority reduces the need for agenda bill preparation and City
Council review time. No adverse fiscal impacts will occur due to this action.
1. City Council Resolution No. 9 3 - 25s
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 7 and April 21, 1993
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated April 21, 1993
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT (MP 177(I)) TO ALLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE THE FINAL DECISION-MAKING BODY FOR RESIDENTIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITH 50 OR MORE UNITS, WITHIN THE AVIARA MASTER PLAN. CASE NAME: AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 CASE NO:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on April 21, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider an amendment to the Aviara Master Plan (MP-177(I)); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
the 14th day of September I 1993, held a duly advertised
public hearing to consider said amendment and at that time
received the recommendations, objections, protests, comments of
all persons interested in or opposed to MP-177(I); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
20 That the revised text for the Aviara Master Plan (MP
177(I)) is approved according to Exhibit "X8', dated April 7, 1993,
attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512 and hereby
incorporated by reference, and that the findings and conditions of
the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3512, on file in the Planning Department and made
a part hereof by reference are the findings and conditions of the
City Council.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the
14th day of September I 1993, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard and Finnila
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
1 ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RA&ENKRANZ, City Clerk
~ (SEAL)
-2-
.1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EmBIT 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3512
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT TO
ALLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE THE FINAL
DECISION-MAKING BODY FOR RESIDENTIAL SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITH 50 OR MORE UNITS.
CASE NAME: AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CASE NO: MP 177(I)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been fled with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 7th day of April, 1993, and on the 21st day of April, 1993,
~ consider said request;
I WHEREAS, at said meeting, said Commission considered all factors relating
~ to MP 177(I).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A> That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the meeting, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of MP 177(I), according to Exhibit ‘X’ attached,
dated April 7, 1993, and incorporated by reference, based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinzs:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the Aviara Master Plan
(MP 177).
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Y 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for MP 177(I), as shown in Exhibit “Xc’, dated March 17, 1993,
I attached.
2. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of approval of
the master plan amendment.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 21st day of April, 1993, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairman Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm,
Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall.
None.
None.
None.
BAILEY NOB@, Ch&$erson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOaMILtiR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3512 -2-
Ei?cHlBlTT
APRIL 7,1993
SECTION m(B)(2) of the Aviara Master Plan MP 177 cLmnt.ly reads as follows:
“AU site development plans and tentative subdivision maps shah be reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council with the exception that residential’ Planning
Areas which include less than 50 dwelling units shall be reviewed solely by the
Plankng Commission unless appealed. A site development plan shall not be
approved unless the decision making bodies determine that the individual plan is
consistent with the concepts, goals and standards described in this Master Plan and
all applicable City policies and laws.”
SECl-ION m(B)(2) is recommqded to be amended to read as follows:
“All site development plans and tentative subdivisions maps which include 50 or
more dwelling units shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City
Council, with the exception that residential Planning Areas which include 50 or
more dwelling units that have an approved tentative subdivision map shall be
reviewed solely by the Planning Commission unless appealed. AU residential site
development plans and tentative subdivision maps which include less than 50
dwelling units shall be reviewed solely by the Planning Commission unless appealed.
A site development plan shall not be approved unless the decision making bodies
determine that the individual plan is consistent with the concepts, goals and
standards described in this Master Plan and all applicable City policies and laws.”
- EXtWT 3
REPORT
APPLICHr’ION COMPLETE DATE: FEBRUARY 3. 1993 PROJECT PLANNER: MIKE GRIM
DATE: APRIL 7,1993
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: MP 177m - AVIARA SITE DJWELOPMENT PLANS - Request for a Master Plan text amendment to allow the Planning Commission to approve Site Development Plans for residential developments with 50 or more units in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512, recommending WPROVAL of MP 177(I), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECI DESCRWTION AND BACKGROUND
The Aviara Master Plan, approved by the City Council on December 8, 1987, covers the hills and valleys above Batiquitos Lagoon and affords many scenic views of and from the property. As a result of the sensitive habitat and the high visibility of ,the project, strict development standards and design criteria were incorporated into the master plan text. To ensure that future development conformed with these strict standards, discretionary review of the architectural design and building location was made a requirement for all planning areas. For standard lot single-family neighborhoods and commercial developments (except for the custom lot developments in Planning Areas 13 and 28) a site development
plan is required prior to issuance of any building permits. For all multi-family residential subdivisions, a planned unit development permit is needed. While development of the custom lots CILI? be approved by the Planning Director on an individual basis, the site planned unit development permits must be approved by the same that approved the subdivision of the planning area, (i.e. by the
for less than 50 dwelling units and by the City Council for 50 or more dwelling units). This processing requirement is the subject of the proposed master plan amendment.
Aviara Land Associates is requesting that the Planning Commission be given authority to be the decision-making body for all residential site development plans, regardless of the number of dwelling units. The issue has arisen because the standard lot single family
MP 177(I) - AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
APRIL 7,1993 PAGE 2
neighborhoods in Phase II have been subdivided and all that remains to be reviewed is the architecture and siting of the proposed homes. The applicant states that the additional level of discretionary review, and the extra 30 to 60 days of processing time associated with it,
are unnecessary since the development standards and design criteria for the planning areas have already been established by the City Council.
Since the time of approval of the master plan, the Planning Commission has been involved in the review of building elevations and locations for subdivided developments through the processing of site development plans. Some recent examples include Pavoreal (formerly
Viewpoint, CT 8534/SDP 90-6) which involved a 90 unit single family subdivision where
the subdivision was approved by the City Council, however the architectural elevations and
building locations were approved by the Planning Commission. The Atroyo La Costa
Master Plan (MP 149(E)) requires that all subsequent residential development of the
neighborhoods be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission through a site development plan. Since the development standards and design criteria for the residential neighborhoods are established, the site development plan merely verifies conformance with those standards and criteria and, therefore, approval authority was given to the Planning Commission.
Another area where the Planning Commission is the decision-making body for site development plans is in the QualXed Development Overlay (Q) Zone. The Q overlay is placed on a property that needs special attention with regard to development. It requires discretionary approval for all development because of special circumstances. Even though these special circumstances may necessitate review far beyond mere architectural style or building location, the Planning Commission still has decision making authority for site development plans in the Q zone.
In the case of Aviara, the development standards and design criteria for all planning areas have been reviewed and approved by the City Council. In addition, those single family
subdivisions with 50 or more units within Phase II have received tentative maps from the City Council. The only task remaining is the review of the proposed homes’ conformance
with these Council established development provisions. Since the Planning Commission
has been reviewing site development plans of similar and more complex natures elsewhere, it seems that &$ng the Commission decision making authority for large site developments plans in Aviara b warranted.
1. Is the proposed master plan text amendment.consistent with the intent of the Aviara Master Plan (MP 177)?
2. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code?
MP 177(I) - AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS . APEUL 7,1993 . PAGE 3
DISCUSSION
1. ConsistencvwiththeMasterPlan
One of the goals of the Aviara Master Plan states that “no person shall use or develop any property covered by this Master Plan in a manner which is contrary to the standards and guidelines of the Master Plan as established by the City Council.” Most of the single family neighborhoods in Aviara have already been subdivided and have established development standards. As required throughout the City, the subdivisions for neighborhoods with over 50 units have been reviewed and approved by the City Council. All development standards and design criteria for the residential neighborhoods have also been established by the City
Council through adoption of the master plan. The subsequent review and approval of
residential site development plans for these neighborhoods involves only the verification of the plan’s conformance with the established development standards and design criteria, and the approved tract map. As discussed above, verikation of conformance to established development standards should be adequately accomplished by the Planning Commission without need for City Council review. As long as the standards and guidelines approved by the City Council are upheld by staff and the Planning Commission, the proposed master plan amendment will maintain consistency with this goal of the Aviara Master Plan.
2. consist- with ChaDtff 21.06 of the Carl&ad MuniciDal Code
The portion of the Zoning Ordinance addressing site development plans is contained in Chapter 21.06, Q Qualified Development Overlay Zone. The similarities between the intents of the Aviara Master Plan and the Q zone are apparent. Section 21.06.015(4) states examples of situations that are considered unique circumstances under which a qualified development zone could be applied. Included in this Jist is property to be developed as hillside development or other physically sensitive areas. This example accurately describes the hillside and biological constraints of the Aviara Master Plan.
One area where the provisions of the Aviara Master Plan and the Q zone differ is in
processing requirements for a site development plan. According to Section 21.06.080, the Planning Commission is the final decision making body for site development plans. A development su&acent to Aviara provides a recent example of this procedure. Now named
Pavoreal, the ‘$1p tmit single family development was subdivided through CT 85-34,
approved by WcptY Council on June 20, 1989. When the homes were designed, they were reviewed with regard to applicable development standards and design criteria through SDP 90-06, and approved by the Planning Commission on November 7, 1990. The building locations, elevations, and floor plans were not required to be approved by the City
coulx!il.
Considering that site development plans for residential subdivisions with 50 or more units can be approved by the Planning Commission in all areas of the City except for Aviara, the
k
. MP 177(I) - AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS APRIL 7,1993 PAGE 4
proposed master plan amendment would provide additional consistency with the provisions of Chapter 21.06, the Qualified Development Overlay Zone.
Iv. ENvIRoNMENTALREvIEw
Since this request proposes to only slightly alter the discretionary approval process for residential subdivisions with more than 50 units, the Planning Director has determined that the project is a minor alteration of a land use limitation and is therefore exempt from environmental review per Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of
Exemption will be fled upon project determination.
SUMMARY
Given that the proposed master plan amendment is consistent with the intent of the Aviara
Master Plan (MP 177) and with the provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, staff recommends approval of MP 177(I).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512 2. Disclosure Statement
MG:lhnrd
March 191993
5
DISCLOSL'RESTATEMENT RECENED
APPL;cANTs STA I :. --WE&T CF ClSCLO8URE OF CEirralN OWNEilSHlP INTEilESTS ON ALL APP!J&&~ &L#& ~~~~~~~
OISCPETONAZY ACTiCN CN T’% PAX CF Td Cl- COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED SOAPO.
1
!
(P/ease Pmt)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
Ljst,the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited PartnershiD 11 Yalomar Airport Rd. Suite Lob
Carlsbad, CA 920139
2. Owner
List the names and addrekes of all persons having any ownership kerest in the property involved. Republic Development Co., corporation a California corporation 450 Nemort Center Drive 180 N. Riverview Drive
Cxlite ZtlA *
CA 92660 92808
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ant
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any parinershi:
interest in the partnership. . l<fl tlexplv+ a.D+P~ lh-‘V@J e 304 Nemort Beach. CA 92660
4. If any person identhd pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit ofganization or a trust, list the names ant
ad.dresses Of-any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiar.
Of th8 trust. .- .
N/A
FRM3OOli 8/90
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (819) 438-l 16 1
.. .
Disclosure Statement
.
:er)
Page 2
Have you had more than 5250 worth Of business transacted with any member of City staff, Bcarcj
ommittees and Council within the past twelve months?
If yes, please indicate person(s)
Person IS drfinod u: ‘Any individual. firm. copWnerrhip. lointvrnturr. usoeiatioo. rocid club. fratrrnrl or~~n,r~tlon, cor;orrtlon, ,sta(m tlUlt.
roc~w~f. ryndicatr, thlr and my otkar couny. Cq and couny. city municlpaflty. dirvld or other poli&al $ubd&r&on. or any other
combanattoo rctmg IS l unrt’ ;roup or
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
Owner:
Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
BY: q; ~;;~~awa.re
I BY: - ! A
4, L. Clc~ v ICC President
By:
Date: January 22, 1993
a BY: Republic Development Co., a
D. L. Cl~cc President
--$I. - Ted L.. Hoover/Assistant Secretary
Date: January 22, 1993
Applicant:
Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
D. L. bn&~ce”Prcsident
By: rw Ted L. Hoo&Assistant Secretary
DUe:January 22, 1993
By: 9zA A* clhvyu + Ted L. Hoover/Assistant Secretary
Date: January 22, 1993
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJEcr:
STAFF RRPORT
APRIL 21,1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MP 177fD - AVIARA SITE DEIVFUPMENT PLANS - Request for a Master Plan text amendment to allow the Planning Commission to approve Site Development Plans for residential developments with 50 or more units in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
I. RECOMMENDATION
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
FEBRUARY 3.1993
PROJECT PLANNER: MIKE GRIM
0 2
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512, recommending APPROVAL of MP 177(I), based on the Emdings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. BACKGROUND
This item was scheduled to be heard on April 7, 1993, and was continued to April 21, 1993 to allow for additional noticing.
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3512 2. Staff Report dated April 7, 1993, with attachments.
ExmlT4
CORRECTED
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1993 PAGE 11
issioner Erwin asked the City Attorney if the Planning Commission can send the letter to the San
oi D.istrict or if it is something that the City Council should send. Karen Hirata, Deputy City
lied that since the action being taken is on a group of decisions on which the Commission
ecommendation, with final decision being made by the City Council, the appropriate thing to
mmend to the City Council that they send the letter.
Minute Motion
by Commissioner Erwin, and duly seconded, that the City Council
his proposed letter regarding noise impacts to both the San Marcos
d the State Board of Education, with an inclusion requesting that they
king in the western section of the parking lot, to be used for
t shared parking not be used because of possible danger to
students.
VOTE: 2-4-l
AYES: Commissioners Erwin and
NOES: Chairman Noble, Commissio lehuber, SchBUnh Hall, and Welshons
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Savary
Chairman Noble acknowledged the amount of work whit
and stated that it makes everyone’s job much easier. He tha
to this Master Plan by everyone involved
e who assisted in the work.
The Planning Commission recessed at 7:30 p.m. and reconvened at 7:40 p.m.
Commissioner Savary returned to the Council Chambers.
\ Chairman Noble acknowledged the presence of Council Member Stanton sitting in the galle
2. MP 177(l) - AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - Request for a Master Plan text amendment to
allow the Planning Commission to approve Site Development Plans for residential developments with
50 or more units in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
Michael Grim, Assistant Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is
requesting an amendment to change the Master Plan requirements for residential subdivisions. Currently,
according to Section 3.8 of the Master Plan, any residential subdivision with 50 or more units must have
the building elevations and locations of those elevations approved by the City Council, regardless of
whether or not the map has already gone through and been approved as a tentative map, or whether the
development standards and design criteria have already been written into the Master Plan. The request
tonight is to allow the Planning Commission decision-making authority for those subdivisions that have
already been subdivided and approved by the City Council, and for those planning areas that have already
had development standards and design criteria approved by the City Council. Some examples of this
authority that the Planning Commission already has in every other part of the City (except for Aviara)
would be the Pavoreal subdivision which was originally approved as a go-unit residential subdivision.
When it came back later, the Planning Commission had the authority to approve the building elevations
and locations. Another example of the Planning Commission approving building elevations is under the
Q overlay Zone. Regardless of the size of the project, a Site Development Plan with a Q overlay that has
already been subdivided, can be approved by the Planning Commission. Staff has reviewed this text
amendment and feels that the level of review which staff and the Commission would perform on a
pre-subdivided area within Aviara, with development standards already established, is adequate and they
recommend approval.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1993 PAGE 12
Commissioner Erwin stated that it seems inappropriate for the Planning Commission to be voting to extend
their purvue. He inquired if the City Council had requested the Commission to make this decision or if it is
just standard procedure for this to come before the Commission before it goes to Council. Mr. Grim replied
that it is just standard procedure. The Planning Commission must make a recommendation to the City
Council.
Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Paul Klukas, the Planner with Aviara, 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that they agree with the staff recommendation. They have found that, over the
years, the most thorough review of architectural design criteria really occurs at the Planning staff and
Planning Commission level. By requiring a further hearing at the City Council level, it is not only time
consuming but redundant. He urged the Commission to support the staff recommendation.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noble declared
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Schlehuber, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3512, recommending approval of MP 177(l), based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 7-O
AYES: Chairman Noble, Commissioners Erwin, Hall, Savary, Schlehuber, Schramm, and
Welshons
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
e space, and amend
required to comply with all
the background of the request and stated that this item was heard by
t was continued due to the lateness of the hour. The discussion on
rtable structures. As proposed, habitable accessory structures would be
zone applicable to placement of a dwelling unit on the
was originally heard requested that detached
ft. interior side and rear setbacks. The code presently
f concern was the proposed building
The code presently allows a
. in the R-l zone. The proposed ordinance
the lot’s building setbacks. Staff is
proposing a change in an attempt to address some of
meeting. The proposed change is as follows:
on’s concerns voiced at the previous
“(iii) (c) Building height shall not exceed 14 ft. if a minimum roof
provided, or 10 ft. if less than a 3:12 roof pitch is provided.”
ee to twelve (3:12) is
This proposed change would address building height, which seemed to cause the m
previous meeting. This change would maintain the proposed 14 ft. height if a greater
is maintained and would reduce the height to 10 ft. if the pitch was less than 3:12. Staff reco
approval with this change.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AVIARA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
MP-177(I)
NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, September 14, 1993, to consider
a request for a Master Plan text amendment to allow the Planning Commission to *
approve Site Development Plans for residential developments with 50 or more units
in Local Facilities Management Zone 19, and more particularly described as:
All of the property covered by CT 85-35, Map Nos. 12409, 12410, 12411, 12412, and 12413, filed June 29, 1989, in the Office of the County Recorder, and by CT 89-37, Map No. 12967, filed September, 16,
1992, in the Office of the County Recorder, and by CT 90-15, Map Nos.
12969, 12970, 12971, 12972, filed September 17, 1992 in the Office of
the County Recorder, and a portion of the southeastcorner of Section
22 and a portion of Section 27.of Township 12 South, Range 4 West, of
the San Bernardino Meridian, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Mike Grim in the
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4499.
If you challenge the Master Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates PUBLISH: September 2, 1993
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 21, 1993, to consider approval of a request
for a Master Plan text amendment to allow the Planning Commission to approve Site
Development Plans for residential developments with 50 or more units in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19 and more particularly described as:
All of the property covered by CT 8535, Map No’s. 12409, 12410, 12411,
12412, and 12413, filed June 29,1989 in the Office of the County Recorder,
and by CT 89-37, Map No. 12967, filed September 16,1992 in the Office of
the County Recorder, and by CT 90-15, Map No’s. 12969, 12970, 12971;
12972, filed September 17,1992 in the Office of the Coun
a portion of the southeast comer of Section 22 and- a portro
of Township 12 South, Range 4 West of the San Bemadino
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
-
+
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after April 15, 1993. If you
have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext.
4499.
If you challenge the Master Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: MP 177(I)
CASE NAME: AVIARA StTE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
PUBLISH: APRIL 8, 1993
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
MG:km