Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-10-12; City Council; 12436; COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT REVISIONS TO ADD TWO NEW POLICIES TO THE MELLO II SEGMENT- LCPA 91-01A- EVANS POINT> COASI'AL PROGRAM AMENDMENT REVISIONS a MTG. 10/12/93 TO ADD TWO NEW POLIQES TO THE MELLO 11 AB # &!,qcgb TITLE: 4 DEPT. PLN SEGMENT - LCPA 91-01(A) - EVANS POINT DEP' CITy CITI 8 3 Cu OF CARLSBAD - AGEWA BILL /'' RECOMMENDED ACTION: If Council concurs, both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending t City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 43-69& , APPROVING revisions to LCPA 93 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ITEM EXPLANATION On August 18, 1993 the Planning Commission conducted a public he& recommended approval (6-1) of two new poIicies to be added to the text of the 1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program. Cornmissioner Erwin voted agai policies. The two policies were proposed by the Coastal Commission staff as a I the City's filing of a Local Coastal Plan Amendment (LCPA) to amend the Land I for the Evan's Point project. The LCPA for the Evans Point project, approved by the City Council on April 1 and the Planning Commission on February 19,1992, involved the redesignation ( acres on the southwesterly side of El Camino Red from Planned Community Medium Density Residential (RLM) on 68.7 acres and Open Space (OS) on 59. Also approved was a zone change from Limited Control (L-C) to One- Family Re: (R-1) and Open Space (0-S). The Coastal Commission adopted the two policic they approved the amendment to the Land Use Map. Before the amendment req become effectively certified, the Executive Director of the California Coastal Con must determine that implementation of the approved amendment will be consisti the Coastal Commission's certification order. This is necessary as the amendment amendment revisions as he objected to the State forcing the City to accept t was certified with suggested modifications. The two new policies adopted by the Coastal Commission which are recommei adoption by the City are as follows: 1) Under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area", a new policy #3-7 shall 1 to read: Wetlands and riparian resources outside the lagoon ecosystems protected and preserved. No direct impacts may be allowed except z 0 F 0 a J G z 3 0 0 electrical lines). There must be no feasible less environmentally-d alternative to the proposed disturbance; any allowable disturbance performed in the least environmentally-damaging manner. Open space dt of sensitive resource areas is required. Mitigation ratios for any temporary disturbance or permanent displaci identified resources shall be detedned in consultation with the C Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Apl mitigation ratios shall be determined based on site specific information j the quality of the habitat being disturbed or destroyed and surroun( conditions. 0 @ PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. /g! VL?~ * 2) Under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Policy #3-8 shall be to read: Buffer zones of 100 feet in width shall be maintained around all id€ wetland areas and 50 feet in width shall be maintained around all id€ riparian areas, unless the applicant demonstrates that a buffer of lesser wid protect the identified resources, based on site-specific information. information shall include, but is not limited to, the type and size development and/or proposed mitigation (such as planting of vegetation construction of fencing) which will also achieve the purpose of the buffe buffer shall be measured landward from the delineated resource. The Cal Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Servic be consulted in such buffer determinations. Buffer zones shall be prc through the execution of open space easements and passive recreational u restricted to the upper half of the buffer zone. City staff was unsuccessful in persuading the Coastal Commission to revise Polic to allow greater flexibility. Staffs concern is that the policy as currently written rl small isolated wetland or riparian areas of poor quality to be preserved. Such are; limited habitat value and are often associated with drainage improvements. Staff t that the policies should be accepted at this time so as to not preclude several I from going forward in the Mello 11 Segment. Should implementation of the policy 1 examples supporting City staffs position there will then be justification for the 1 Commission to consider approving a Local Coastal Plan Amendment to revise the George Wimpey Incorporated the applicant for the Evan's Point project submitted dated August 17, 1993 expressing concerns with Policy #3-7 in relation t Tentative Map. The letter is included in the attachments. ENVIRONMENTAL. REVIEW The proposed revisions have been determined to be exempt from CEQA pursi Section 21080 (b)(16) as it is a project undertaken by a local agency to implemen or regulation imposed by a state agency, board, or commission under a c regulatory program pursuant to Section 21080.5. FISCAL WACIT There will be no fiscal impact from the approval of the Local Coastal P Amendment Revisions. EXHIBITS I. 2. 3. 4. 5. City Council Resolution No. 9 3 -3q;g Planning Commission Resolution No. 3532 Letter dated August 17, 1993, from George Whpey, Inc. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 18, 1993 Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 18, 1993 4 L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXH 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 93-292 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE MELLO I1 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO ACCEPT THE SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS CERTIFIED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION. CASE NAME: EVANS POINT CASE NO: LCPA 91-01 (A) WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Coastal Program, General Plan, and zoning designatio1 properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992 the California ( Commission certified an amendment to the Land Use M( implementation program of the Mello I1 segment of the Coastal Program with two suggested modifications; WHEREAS, before the original amendment reque become effectively certified, the Executive Director California Coastal Commission must receive documentation tl City has accepted the suggested modifications; and WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 12th OCTOBER , 1993, hold a duly noticed public heal prescribed by law to consider the proposed suggested modifit to the text of the Mello I1 segment of the Local Coastal shown on Exhibit "LCPA 91-01(A)'l, dated August 18, 1993, a hereto, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cou the City of Carlsbad as follows: I 1 ,2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 1. That the above recitations are correct. 2. That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the City Council APPROVES LCPA 91-01(A), based ( following finding: Findinas : 1. That those findings adopted by the Planing Commiss. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3532 are applicable ai incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the - day of OCTOBER , 1993, by the following vote, t AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Finnila NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Nygaard ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clhk (SEAL) 2 I Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTlON NO. 3532 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE MELLO I1 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO ACCEPT THE SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS CERTIFIED BY THE CALIFORNLA COASTAL COMMISSION. CASE NAME: EVANS POINT CASE NO: LCPA 91-014A) WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coast; General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal 2 conformance; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992 the California Coastal < certified an amendment to the Land Use Map and implementation program c I1 segment of the Local Coastal Program with two suggested modifications; WHEREAS, before the original amendment request can becomc certified, the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission rn documentation that the City has accepted the suggested modifications; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of Au hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider th suggested modifications to the text of the Mello I1 segment of the Local Coasl shown on Exhibit 91-01(A), dated August 18, 1993, attached hereto, and; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con! testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said ( considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment. .... I1 b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines require a six week public rei for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning ( of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. At the end of the State mandated six week review period, start 26, 1993, and ending on July 8, 1993, staff shall present 1 Council a summary of the comments received. C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea Commission recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 91-0l(A), as Exhibit ”LCPA 91-0l(A)”, dated August 18, 1993, attached made a part hereof based on the following findings: Findinns: 1. The proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendment is consistent with all policies of the Mello I1 segment of the Local Coastal Program. The proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Lo Program to accept the suggested modifications certified by the Califor Commission is required in order for the Executive Director of the Califor Commission to effectively cerhfy the Local Coastal Program Amendmen for the Evans Point Project to bring the designations of the Local Coast; General Plan and Zoning Map into confomance. 2. ***. .... .... .... .... .... ..** PC RES0 NO. 3532 -2- I ., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 e 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tl Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 18th day of August, 19 following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Betz, Noble, Savary & Hall. NOES: Commissioner Erwin. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. AA BAILEY NOB E, Chairpersor CARLSBAD PLANNING Cob! ATTEST: MICHAEL J. H~LZMI~~ER Planning Director ~ 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ PC RES0 NO. 3532 -3- - 6 0 EXHIBIT "LCPA 91-01 AUGUST 18,1993 SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS: Mello I1 Segment Land Use Plan 1. On page 18, under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Policy I shall be add to read: Wetlands and riparian resources outside the laj except for the expansion of existing circulation element roads identified in certified LCP and those direct impacts associated with installation of utilities I water, sewer, and electrical lines). There must be no feasible less environment damaging alternative to the proposed disturbance; any allowable disturbance I be performed in the least environmentally damaging manner. Open s dedication of sensitive resource areas is required. Mitigation ratios for any temporary disturbance or permanent displacemer identified resources shall be determined in consultation with the Califc Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Approp mitigation ratios shall be determined based on site specific information includinl quality of the habitat being disturbed or destroyed and surrounding site condib On page 18, under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Policy i shall be added to read: Buffer zones of 100 feet in width shall be mainta around all identified wetland areas and 50 feet in width shall be maintained an all identified riparian areas, unless the applicant demonstrates that a buffer of 1( width will protect the identified resources, based on site-specific information. ; information shall include, but is not limited to, the type and size of the develop] and/or proposed mitigations (such as planting of vegetation or the constructic fencing) which will also achieve the purposes of the buffer. The buffer sha measured landward from the delineated resource. The California Departmei Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall be cons1 in such buffer determinations. Buffer zones shall be protected through execution of open space easements and passive recreational uses are restricted t upper half of the buffer zone. ecosystems shall be protected and preserved, No direct impacts may be all0 2. D LBAF a E W m 4D GEORGE WIMPEY INC ,, ..-. TC'I~.VtL~hlYfUKI~L~LITC $>, 5~~Dli".~OCAlIFUK\1~L5h'~ I.'.? 21- TZ.IPhOhE 611 520 80l!(j + \('(IwILC 1,:9 rj3 003~ August 17, 1993 Michael Holzmiller P 1 a n n i ng D ire ct o r City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: LCPA 91-01(A) - Evans Poi~t Dear Mr. Holzmiller, This letter is written to express our concern to the Planning Commission for the he on the above item which is currently scheduled to be heard on Wednesday, Augu: 1993. Briefly, the reasam for this request are: 1) the potential for the current pr design to be out of conformance with proposed Poiicy 3-7 due to a recent we delineation; 2) our opposition to this policy based on its inflexibility; and 3) if the lang were adopted, the City will likely lobby the Coastal staff for changes at a later requiring this language to be overturned. These reasons are further explained be - Wetland Delineation A riparian area occurs on site which will be impacted by the required widening Camjno Real along the project frontage. The residential development within tbe pr has been designed to avoid all riparian irngacts as identified in the EIR for the prc However, the federal Clean Water Act Section 404 requires that a pewbit be obt2 from the Army Corp of Engineers for the wetland impacts due to El Camino widening. This permit requires that a formal wetfand delineation be submitted, bast vegetation, soils and hydrology, Recently, we completed this study which desigr approximately two acres of wetlands beyond the area mapped by the ElR consu The additionaf wetland area will be impacted by 4 to 6 residential lots. There although the prqect was originally designed to avoid wetland impacts, it has just rec been determined that it will now be in conflict with proposed Policy 3-7 wbrch only al impacts from construction of Circulation Element roads. I--, <-<- -- -- / '.I >Xi' ,iiI '3dl!I?I i?$:? ,]&:,7$ It. :. .. -. --_ --- * 0 - Policy 3-7 Inflexible The wording of Policy 3-7 only allows for impacts to wetrands as a iesult of the expzn of a Circulation Element road and those impacts from instaliaticn of utilities (Le. se wata and electrical). This la~guage does not allow for rjther types of impacts which typically even allowed by the U.S. Army Corp: U.S. Fish anc! LZ;rICiife Service; Califmia Department of Fish and Game, all of whom tiscally review prciects on 3 c by-case basis and Often albw some impacts if adeqcate rnitigaiion is proposed addition, the policy wouid riot even allow !he construction of future Circulation Eier roads such as Cannon Road or Kelly Drive. The pc!icy needs more flexibility for case case review with input from those agencies specially charged wi!h wildlife protectic Pwious Staff Position Last November, at the CoastzI CQmmissiQr: hearing during which Policf 3-7 was ado1 Carisbad staff spoke against adoption of the proposed paticy and in favo: of more fle language, arguing that Policy 3-7 is to9 restrictive. Furthermore, it is our understar that if Policy 3-7 is adopted by the Carlsbad Pisrrining Commission at ?his time, the staff will recommend changes through the impfementing ordinances fcr the !-oca1 Co Plan which will be developed in the very near future. Therefcre, thjs policy is one will be adopted on an interim basis, necessitating kter negotiaticns with Coastal Adoption of the policy at this time is contradictory to the City's p:evioasly stated objer We would hope that the City would maintain a consistent position with ty~e policy an wait to fight the battle later. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Should you halie my quesi please feel free to contact me at 556-8000 Sincerely, &[&j .3 Robert W. L .ng Vice President cc: Gary Wayne Eon Neu __,___ :-:-,--. -- -. .- - -!;~ - - . -- --- _- ..._ __.- ---_--. ._.. .._ -_. - -- .. _-- --- STAFP Q LANNER: DONNEU 0 w STAFT REPORT DATE: AUGUST 18,1993 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: LCPA 91-01 [A) - EVANS POINT - Request for a recommendation of apprc Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastd Program restricting the type of imp that can be allowed to wetlands and riparian resources and an additic policy establishing buffer zones for wetland and riparian areas as appro by the California Coastal Commission. of Local Coastal Program Amendment Revisions to add a new policy to I. RECOMMENDATloN That the Planning Commission ADOPT Plannhg Commission Resolution No. 3! RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, of revisions to LCPA 91-Ol(A) based on the findings ( subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJEm DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Staff is requesting a recommendation of approval for two new policies to be added to Mello TI Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The two policies were proposed by Coastal Commission staff as a result of the City's filing of a Local Coastal Plan Amen& (LCPA) to amend the Land Use Map for the Evans Point project. The LCPA for the Et Point project involved the redesignation of 128.1 acres on the southwesterly side o Camino Red from Planned Community to Low-Medium Density Residential (RLM) on t acres and Open Space (OS) on 59.4 acres. Also approved was a zone change from (Limited Control) to R-1 (One-Family Residential) and 0-S (Open Space). The Coa Commission adopted the two policies when they approved the amendment to the Land Map. Before the amendment request can become effectively certified, the Execu Director of the California Coastal Commission must determine that implementation of approved amendment will be consistent with the Coastal Commission's certification on This is necessary because the amendment request was certified with sugge: modifications. The two new policies adopted by the Coastal Commission which are being suggested adoption by the City are as follows: @ U 0 0 LCPA 91-01(A) EVANS POINT AUGUST 18,1993 PAGE 2 1) Under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area", a new policy #3-7 shall be ad to read: Wetlands and riparian resources outside the lagoon ecosystems shall protected and preserved. No direct impacts may be allowed except for expansion of existing circulation element roads identified in the certifield LCP those direct impacts associated with installation of utilities (i.e.7 water, sewer, electrical lines). There must be no feasible less environmentally-damaz alternative to the proposed disturbance; any allowable disturbance must performed in the least environmentally-damaging manner. Open space dedicai of sensitive resource areas is required. Mitigation ratios for any temporary disturbance or permanent displacemen identified resources shall be determined in consultation with the Calif0 Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Appropr mitigation ratios shall be determined based on site specific information including quality of the habitat being disturbed or destroyed and surrounding site conditic Under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Policy #3-8 shall be ad to read: Buffer zones of 100 feet in width shall be maintained around all identi wetland areas and 50 feet in width shall be maintained around all identified ripa areas, unless the applicant demonstrates that a buffer of lesser width will pro the identified resources, based on site-specific information. Such information s include, but is not limited to, the type and size of the development and/or propc mitigation (such as planting of vegetation or the construction of fencing) which also achieve the purposes of the buffer. The buffer shall be measured landv from the delineated resource. The CalifoAa Department of Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall be consulted in such lx determinations. Buffer zones shall be protected through the execution of open SI easements and passive recreational uses are restricted to the upper half of the bi zone. 2) City staff requested and received two continuances from the Coastal Commission Staff i receiving the staff report containing the proposed modifications with the original lanp for the two new policies. City staff did not object to the language for Policy # Revisions to Policy #3-7 were requested. A meeting was held with Coastal staff to dis the proposed policies and it was agreed that City staff would submit revised languagt Policy #3-7. As originally proposed Policy #3-7 dowed no direct impacts to wetlands riparian resources outside the lagoon ecosystems. It also fixed the mitigation ratios for temporary or permanent disturbance at 4:l for wetlands and 3:l for riparian resour( The policy was revised to allow disturbances for the expansion of existing circula elements roads identified in the certified LCP and direct impacts associated with installation of utilities. Set mitigation ratios were deleted and left to a determination n in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish Wildlife Service. The ratios are to be based on site specific information including quality of the habitat being disturbed or destroyed and surrounding site conditions. 0 0 LCPA 91-01(A) EVANS POINT AUGUST 18, 1993 PAGE 3 staff attended the Coastal Commission Hearing and requested that Policy #3-7 be amei to allow other impacts if permissible pursuant to Section 1600-1603 of the California and Game Code. Flexibility was needed to prevent confiicts between the proposed po and existing policies of the LCP. The Coastal Commission on the recommendation of staff denied the Citfs request. It will be necessary to work with the policy to see if 1 are any problems in implementing it as it has been adopted by the Coastal Commis: III. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the City accept the inclusion of the proposed policies into the Mello I1 Seg of the LCPA finding that they are necessary to provide adequate protectio wetland and riparian resources outside the lagoon ecosystems? DISCUSSION The suggested modifications to the City's Local Coastal Program Amendment 91 -01 inc adding two new policies to the Melo I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Plan. Policy requires the protection and preservation of wetlands and riparian resources outsid lagoon ecosystems. The LCP did not contain any policies addressing these resources u they are in the vicinity of a lagoon. In practice, the California Department of Fisl Game and the US. Fish and Wildlife Service are consulted if disturbance of these reso is proposed to determine if a permit is needed from those agencies and what mitigatioi be required if a temporary disturbance or permanent displacement is allowed. Policy requires buffer zones to be maintained around all identified wetland and riparian i The buffer zones are also reviewed by these wildlife agencies. Inclusion of the two policies mentioned above in the LCP will provide protection of we and riparian areas. The policies codify what is required by the wildlife age] Acceptance of the policies is necessary for the Evans Point Local Coastal Plan Amend to be certified. Protection of wetlands and riparian resources outside the k ecosystems will be assured by the adoption of these two policies. Should Policy prove to be too restrictive resulting in the preservation of isolated wetlands and rip resources, staff will then have additional justification to attempt to persuade the CI Commission that this policy should be altered. Iv. E"MENTALREvlEw The proposed revisions have been determined to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sc 21080 (b)(16) as it is a project undertaken by a local agency to implement a n regulation imposed by a state agency, board, or commission under a certified rep program pursuant to Section 21080.5. ? 0 LCPA 91-01(A) EVANS OlNT AUGUST 18,1993 PAGE 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3532 Carlsbad Local Coastal Programs Segment Boundary Map Letter dated January 12, 1993 from the California Coastal Commission. DN:lh:vd June 21, 1993 EVANS POINT LCPA 914 P€TE w 0 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION -SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 921W1725 (619) 521-8036 January 12, 1993 Don Neu City of Carl sbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Certification of Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-92 Dear Mr. Neu, On November 17, 1992, the California Coastal Commission approved the above-identified amendment request. In its action, the Commission approv amendments to the Agua Hedionda and Mello I/East Batiquitos segments as submitted. Regarding the Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan, a 1.12 acre parcel the northern shore of Agua Hedionda lagoon, commonly known as part of "Whitey's Landing", was approved to be redesignated from Recreational Commercial to Low-Medium Density Residential. Regarding the Mello I/East Batiquitos Lagoon LCP, an amendment to the Aviara Master Plan was approvec redefine building height in Planning Areas 13 and 28 to provide consistent with recent municipal code amendments. The Commission also approved an amendment to the certified Mello I1 segment subject to two suggested southwesterly side of El Camino Real, commonly known as "Evans Point", frc Planned Community to Low-Medium Density Residential and Open Space; also approved was a zone change from L-C (Limited Control) to R-1 and Open Spa( this property. The adopted suggested modifications are attached. Before the amendment request can become effectively certified, the Execut Director must determine that implementation of the approved amendment wil consistent with the Commission's certification order. This is necessary because the amendment request was certified with suggested modifications. In order for the Executive Director to make this determination, the local government must formally acknowledge receipt of the Commission's resolutic certification, including any terms or suggested modifications; accept and agree to those terms and modifications; and take any formal action which . required to satisfy them, such as rezonings or other ordinance revisions. the amendment resulted in a change to the certified local coastal program area of jurisdiction, the local government must also submit a resolution modifications. This amendment involved the redesignation of 128 acres on 0 e Don Neu January 12, 1993 Page 2 agreeing to issue coastal development permits in conformance with the certified LCP for that area. As soon as the necessary documentation is received in this office, and accepted, the Executive Director will report his/her determination to the Commission at its next regularly scheduled public hearing. If you have ar questions about the Commission's action or this final certification procec please contact our office. Thank you and the other staff members who work on this planning effort. We remain available to assist you and your staff any way possible to continue the successful implementation of the local coastal program, Sincerely, 71. A Deborah N. Lee Assistant District Director (81 03A) 0 0 Don Neu January 12, 1993 Page 3 SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS Mello I1 Segment Land Use Plan 7. On page 78, under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Policy #3-7 shall be added to read: outside the lagoon ecosystems shall be protected and preserved. No d- impacts may be allowed except for the expansion of existing circulatic element roads identified in the certified LCP and those direct impact: associated with installation of utilities (i.e., water, sewer, and electrical lines). There must be no feasible less envi ronmental ly-damaging alternative to the proposed disturbance; any allowable disturbance must be performed in the least environmentally-damaging manner. Open space dedication of sensitive resource areas is requi red. Mitigation ratios for any temporary disturbance or permanent displacen of identified resources shall be determined in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Appropriate mitigation ratios shall be determined based on 5 specific information including the quality of the habitat being distur or destroyed and surrounding site conditions. 2. On page 18, under "Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas", a new Wetlands and riparian resources Policy #3-8 shall be added to read: Buffer zones of 100 feet in width shall be maintained around all identified wetland areas and 50 feet in width shall be maintained around all identified riparian areas, unless applicant demonstrates that a buffer of lesser width will protect the identified resources, based on site-specific information. Such information shall include, but is not limited to, the type and size of development and/or proposed mitigations (such as planting of vegetatio the construction of fencing) which will also achieve the purposes of t buffer. The buffer shall be measured landward from the delineated resource. The California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall be consulted in such buffer determinations. Buffer zones shall be protected through the execution open space easements and passive recreational uses are restricted to t upper half of the buffer zone. 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION August 1 a, 1993 PAGE 15 abplan. A trash transfer station would require a full EIR but other uses might be subject to a neg decbration. The next public hearing will be the difficult one, and the City won't spend a lot of mc e site is appropriate. With that in mind, he can support staffs rmmmi is consistent with the General Plan. with many of Commissioner Schlehuber's comments. He hopes thi the form of an option or subject to certain events occurring so that i d it was unsuccessful, the City would have the option of extricating ed that she read and researched for'hours on end and really strug( the findings and staff's &planation. Treating this strictly as the resolution reads, and not dealin! concept, Le. reading each ding and dealing with staffs analysis, she feels there are too many Even with the testimony, she '".., having trouble supporting the findings of consistency. Based on cannot support staff's recomme dation. Commissioner Hall stated that evehne needs to understand that this is Step #1 in a very lengtt The Commission's scope tonight is to'%$ve a basic understanding that the City wants to purchg property for a public facility. A transfer Qation has been named as one of the possible uses. Th beneficial sometime in the future. Tonight 'H., h is voting strictly on the land aCqUiSitiOn and not thi a transfer station. He will support the resolutih as it is written. Vice-chairman Savary stated that she is inclined \t q,support the resolution, with the firm undersi that any plan which comes along for the site will be &viewed in great detail. Motion was made by Commissioner Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Planr Commission Resolution No. 3533, apprawing the Negative Declaration issued Planning Director and adopt Planning Comqission Resolution No. 3534 apprc PCD/GPC 93-02, based on the findings and>ubject to the conditions contain Vice-Chairperson Savary, Commissioners Erwin \Hall, and Schlehuber support staff's recommendation of consistency. \ to stand on its own merit, on its own day, , e thinks the City should purchase the property and ii \\ ACTION: VOTE: 4-2-1 \!e AYES: NOES: Commissioners Betz and Welshons \ ABSTAIN: Chairman Noble \* 1 \ \\ ACTION: A Minute Motion was made by Vice-Chairperson Savary,''and duly secondec Minutes of this meeting, and all public comments, be attache&.to the Agenda 1 the City Council considers purchase of the site, so they will kno how everyor meeting feels about it. Vice-Chairperson Savary, Commissioners Betz, Erwin, Hall, Schiehuby and \\ "\ \ VOTE: 6-0-1 AYES: NOES: None ABSTAIN: Chairman Noble Chairman Noble returned to the room and resumed his duties as Chairman. 3. LCPA 91 -01 (A) - EVANS POINT - Request for a recommendation of approval of Local C Program Amendment Revisions to add a new policy to the Mello I1 Segment of the Local C Program restricting the type of impacts that can be allowed to wetlands and riparian resou an additional policy establishing buffer zones for wetland and riparian areas as approved t California Coastal Commission. - MIN . 0 e PLANNING COMMISSION August I a, i 993 PAGE 16 Don Neu, Senior Planner; reviewed the background of the request and stated that the Commissic recall some time back acting on the Evans Point project. It was a 128 acre site off El Camino Re across from the Rancho Carlsbad mobile home park. The property is located within the Mello II I the Local Coastal Program (LCP). As part of those actions, the Commission and Council approv General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, and an LCP Amendment in addition to a tentative m related permits. Following the City approvals, the City then applied to the California Coastal Con to amend the coastal land use map to maintain consistency with the recently approved City of C; map changes. At the time, the Coastal staff recommended a modification which contained two r policies to be added to the entire Mello I1 segment of the LCP. The Mello II segment takes up thc area of the City within the coastal zone. The two policies which were proposed at that time came about because there was no coastal pel submitted for the project. As a result, the Coastal staff had some concerns about riparian resoui chose to add them as policies for the entire LCP. The City had concerns about the policy languz was drafted because it contained some specific mitigation ratios which were arbitrary and did nc the habitat quality on any particular site. City staff went through a period of negotiation with the staff, requested a couple of continuances for Coastal Commission hearings, and ultimately got c what the City thought was a reasonable policy, although there was not 1 OOo/o agreement. At this . Coastal Commission has adopted these two policies as modifications to the Evans Point amend1 The status of the project is that until the City accepts these modifications, the Coastal Commissir officially recognize the map change for the Evans Point project. The only remaining area of con Policy #3-7 which addresses what is allowed for wetland and riparian impacts. The Coastal sta of our concern; however, they have applied it to subsequent projects and the only way we can n headway is to bring forward some actual examples of how implementation of the policy creates I preservation situations. Essentially, the City’s view is to preserve the large inter-connected habi and not small, isolated pockets which don’t have a high quality habitat in terms of a connected s In order to have the Evans Point project continue with final mapping and grading plan approval, ultimately getting a coastal development permit, the City has been asked to accept these two mc which staff is recommending be done at this time, with the understanding that staff will continue a more workable solution to the City’s habitat goals. The Commissioners were given a letter fro1 Wimpy, Inc., the Evans Point applicant, and a revised letter which was handed out this evening. Commissioner Welshons inquired if it wouid be better to not approve the resolution tonight in or speed up staff‘s efforts of going back to the Coastal Commission to show them how this could bi approached in a different manner. Mr. Neu replied that the Coastal Commission has been appl: policies on other projects. At this point, staff thinks they may have reached a stalemate with the Commission because the Coastal Commission doesn’t seem to be receptive to a revision to the anything, staff feels that the policy is very conservative and will result in additional environment protection beyond what the City feels is reasonable. The only way to address it would be to con present examples in an amendment process. Staff is not suggesting that development be allow wetland area if it is connected to a larger system. The only exception would be a very Small are doesn’t have much habitat value. Commissioner Savary referred to paragraph one, page 2, of Mr. Lang’s letter dated August 17, states that, “In addition, the policy would not even allow the construction of future Circulation El roads such as Cannon Road or Kelly Drive.” She inquired if that was a Correct statement. . this policy, as it is applicable to subsequent projects, and pursue it further with the Coastal COmI MI - . e 0 PLANNING COMMISSION August 18, 1993 PAGE 17 Mr. Neu replied no. Staff was successful in convincing the Coastal Commission to provide an al for Circulation Element roadways. They specifically recognize roads like Cannon where a lot of been done. Commissioner Savary inquired if that is included in Item #1 of the Mello \I segment Land Use PI: Neu replied to the affirmative, and that it is Stated as such in Policy #3-7 which the Coastal Coir formulated. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, commented that sometimes not even circulation road can be no other feasible alternative that is less environmentally damaging. In the case of La Co: Avenue, or El Camino Real, the road is there. There is no other feasible alternative to widen the planned width except wetlands. In the case of Cannon Road, however, the road does not exist. just put a road in the wetland area, however, it must cross the wetlands to get to El Camino Rea must then devise an alternative which contains the least environmental impacts. The Public Rek Code has specific language as to what is allowed in the wetlands. Only minor fills are allowed fc utilities. Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if the Commission takes Mr. Lang's position and does not gc with the recommendation, what does it do to the rest of the City's projects. He realizes that the ( pressed this as far as it can go. He inquired if the Coastal Commission can take away the City's as it relates to coastal policy. Mr. Neu replied that the Coastal Commission had taken the positic time for accepting this modification had passed. The following project which came in was the Ci Ranch project and they reapplied the same policy. Staff feels that in order for any of the project! to go forward and amend the land use map, that policy will affect them. Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if this means that we don't have any alternatives. Mr. Neu r( this is staffs feeling. The Coastal Commission is basically dictating that the City accept the palic various projects will go nowhere. Commissioner Betz inquired if we do vote for this, and down the road an applicant can't make a work, what would prevent the environmental people from not allowing it if the Commission' has i Mr. Neu replied that staff is not suggesting that wetlands be impacted all over the City. Staff's n objection was that riparian areas are created as a result of man-made development. If a roadm needs to go through, the policy would restrict the project design and preserve the habitat that h: developed in a drainage area. That is where staff and the Coastal Commission differ in their.idt not suggesting that an applicant be given the ability to go in and alter a large riparian area with developable uses for something other than a roadway or utility. Commissioner Schlehuber inqu'ired if this means that staff is against it but we are doing it becaL state ordered it. Mr. Neu replied that this would be a fair assessment. Mr. Wayne added that stl gone on record protesting it and the Coastal Commission is aware that we will return with the e\r concrete example would be Carlsbad Ranch where there is a little drainage facility which was Cr they widened Palomar Road. It just so happened that a bird dropped some willow seeds and no three willow trees sitting next to the highway. In the Carlsbad Ranch development, that was to t It had to be completely redesigned based on Policy #)3-7. If staff says no to Policy #3-7, they VI saying no to all of the amendments which have been approved, because that invalidates the whi amendment. Commissioner Erwin inquired if voting in favor of it would give it more substance than if the Cor voted against it or continued it. Mr. Wayne doesn't think so because the minutes will Substantia be built through a wetland area, The City is governed by both a federal and state policy that sa) - MI1 L 8 a PLANNING COMMISSION August 18, 1993 PAGE 18 Commissioner Erwin inquired if it would be better to continue it for six months or a year to give s make its case. Mr. Wayne replied that, in that case, Evans Point will have expired. Mr. Neu repl' the other impact it would have is the potential siting of the Gemological Institute on the Carlsbad property. It.would affect their LCPA which the Commission approved through the Specific Plan, Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Lisa King, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, representir Wimpy Inc., applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that the first letter submitted by Gf Wimpy Inc. requesting the continuance be withdrawn. They now agree with staffs position and 1 to cooperate so that staff and the Coastal Commission can work out something later on which is acceptable. Their primary reason for opposing the wording in the policy is stated in their letter d August 17, 1993. Since staff is willing to work towards getting the policy changed in the future, that this would be preferable. Ms. King pointed out that the Evans Point residential project was ( designed to avoid all wetland impacts and they would have been in conformance with Policy #3- However, they recently found out that there were some wetlands which had not been mapped. E now trying to revise the design to bring it into conformance. She believes that there are extenua circumstances in the Evans Point project which would be grounds to change the amendment. S supports the staff recommendation. Commissioner Schlehuber understood staff to say that if the Commission doesn't act on this am6 Evans Point will expire and you will not be able to receive grading permits and it will also sink so projects in the City. Why da yau want to sink your praject along with other projects in the City. A replied that she feels Commissioner Schlehuber is misunderstanding the intent of the second letl George Wimpy Inc. is withdrawing their request for a continuance. The second letter only states reasons for objecting to the policy. Commissioner Erwin inquired if Ms. King's official position is in support of the staff recommenda you'll try to work it out with staff later. Ms. King replied that this is w'rrect. She feels there will b time after the City Council hearing to work it out. Their reason for withdrawing the request for a continuance is because she feels there will be time to work out the problems with staff and the C Commission. Neither do they want to cause undue burdens to other projects. There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noblc the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission membei Motion was made by commissioner Hall, and duly seconded, to adopt Plannii Commission Resolution No. 3532 recommending approval of revisions to LCP 91 -01 (A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therei VOTE; 6-1 AYES; . . Chairman Noble, Commissioners Be&, Hall, Savary, Schlehuber and Welshor NOES: Commissioner Erwin ABSTAIN: None ACTION: Commissioner Erwin requested that the record show he voted no because he doesn't like the Sti dictating ADD€] what we can do. Chairman Noble r recently changed at Camp on the Christmas in August beach activity. He stated that the regulatil leton and that only active duty personnel were allowed to make - Mlk 9 e Carlsbad SUN Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego county Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-483 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulatio published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and whicl is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and wh per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying sub6 which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the Carlsbad, County of-San Diego, State of Ca ornia, for a period exceeding onc preceding the date of public - -*. y .\-.* I tac)awi 6 UBLIC .HEARING LCPA 91-1(A) ~ EVANS POINT OOVNl>ARV MAP ber 12.1993. to consider a request for *a recommendation of approval of Local Coastal Program Amendment Revisions to add a new poltcy to the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coas- tal Program restricting the type of impacts that can be allowed to wet- lands and riparian resources and an additional policy establishing buffer zones for wetland and riparian areas as approved by the California Coas- tal Commission. ,,. *a**1.1 0 @lIIV~L9IWNl AIlb -T Carlsbad SUN Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sari Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-4850 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a Citizen Of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I iml Over the age Of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled I am Principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulat1o Published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and whicj is published for the dissemination Of local news and intelligence of a general character, and wh Per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subs which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the 1 the date of public od exceeding one notice hereinafter referred to; which the annexed been published in and entire issue of said news€ in any supplement thereof 01 sbad Village Drive. Carlsbad Cali fornta. at 6 00 P M ,3n Tuesdaq Octo- ber 12.1993 to consider a request for a recommendatron of approval of Local Coastal Program Amendment Revisions to add a new policy !O the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coas- tal Program restricting the type of impacts that can be allowed to %el- September 30 zones [or wetland and riparian areas aS approved by the Calxfornla coas- If you have any questions regard- Neu in the Planning Department at tal Commisslon ing this matter. please contact Don 438-1161 ext 4446 certify under penalty of perj regoing is true and correct. Mad, County of San Die# by you or ,>nit- blic hearing de- ce er in wriiten Iw COUNCIL 'CJ 630% S:.ptember 30 1993 , % 4, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LCPA 9l-l(AI- EVANS POINT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hc a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drik Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, to conside. request for a recommendation of approval of Local Coastal Program Amendmr Revisions to add a new policy to the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coas Program restricting the type of impacts that can be allowed to wetlands riparian resources and an additional policy establishing buffer zones for wet1 and riparian areas as approved by the California Coastal Commission. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Don Neu in P1 anni ng Department, at 438- 1161, ext . 4446. If you challenge the Local Coastal Plan Amendment Revisions in court, you ma) limited to raising only those issues raised by YOU or someone else at the put: hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: October 1, 1993 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL (Blade/Citizen) CARLSOAD LOCAL COASTAL PC~O~~A~ (Lc,) SEOMENTS BOUNDARY b\AP LC. Sl0"l"T ~MELLO I ~MELLO 11 [3AOUA HEDIONDA aEAST BATlOUlTOS LA000WIHUN' N WEST OATIOUITOS LA000NISAMMIS 4 a RLDtYgLOCYIMI ARIA * clq d Ctw EVANS POHT LC% 9WYA) Q e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LCPA 9l-I{A)- EVANS POINT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hc d public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri\ Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, to considei request for a recommendation of approval of Local Coastal Program Amendmt Revisions to add a new policy to the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coasi Program restricting the type of impacts that can be allowed to wetlands i riparian resources and an additional pol icy establishing buffer zones for wetli and riparian areas as approved by the California Coastal Commission. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Don Neu in If you challenge the Local Coastal Plan Amendment Revisions in court, you may limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the pub hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or pm"ior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: September 30, 1993 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext, 4446, (Carlsbad Sun) CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PF(OQRAM (LC.) SEQMENTS UOUNDARY MAP L~. snamnur ~MELLO I ~UELLO I1 AQUA HEDIONDA EAST BATlOUlTOS LA000NlnUN' N WEST BATIOUITOS LAQOON/S*MYIJ 4 [3 niotvlLoCuIn1 MA * CltydCubLl EVANS PONT LCPA WYA) V NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING^ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will h a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsb California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, August 18, 1993, to consider a request fo recommendation of approval of Local Coastal Program Amendment Revisions to add a n policy to the Mello 11 Segment of the Local Coastal Program restricting the type of hpa that can be allowed to wetlands and riparian resources and an additional pol establishing buffer zones for wetland and riparian areas as approved by the C&or Coastal Commission. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the put hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after August 11,1993. If y have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at 438-1161, e 44-46, If you challenge the Local Coastal Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raisi only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this not or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the put hearing. CASE FILE: LCPA 91 Ol(A) CASE NAME: EVANS POINT PUBLISH: CARLSBAD JOURNAL AUGUST 5,1993 BLADE CITIZEN AUGUST 6, 1993 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Please publish w/ 1/8 pg, display ad 2 papers: Blade & Sun Also, send copies of notice to attached list (labels). Thank you, *** e 0 ai (Form TO: CITY CLERKS OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice COASTAL PRQGRA AMENDMENT REVISIONS TO ADD TWO NEW POLICIES TO THE MELLO SEGMENT -LCPA 91-01 (A) - EVANS POINT for a public hearing before the City Counc Please notice the item for the Council meeting of 0e-C J42# h?93 / Thank you. MARTY ORENYAK SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 Assistant City Manager Date Attachments *J$) 410l'e eI't'atl\ti Ill > enc.eavor.5 l'opLllarl!\ i - h1:J~I ,11151 ,.lli 5 ti> (\I !it I( j Ij*,l! $11 j,iCii1t\ jou are able to produt c [kit LC, you want and ncc~ti Ilc.,lt h x111 another int!i\ t(liiLil ,it 'I t Man> opt:ons '3~ p)<~!\~It ~II home front Toniclit Kc, ti ~bt. taS> CANCER dun($ 21 Jult 2% I * **Pro b 1 e 111 5 a rou I1 tll \ ill il seem to besiege JOLI Mcihc \Oli\l' iiti;c ((I :vi III tout /I ii iifi \i~i~~ them Keep personal eolneiwtwns ( hai~g~ , 'r~~~L~~ll, 1 idlt{Lli til: ,t,ltf cllificliii ,I,] : III~I~ ftl and work discussions on :I (jnc3 to l)la> J)OlIC IC'i\U!i 1 l:ill~ one level Tonight Work latc end UtYlO~OC1 x$ \o\ "I I :rtl!t' <ittrltiltt~ in 111 then catch up, on neu h ti2twl ('i Ui\l l(.,lti \"(I (~OUtI cc't <t C1131,(l *' \llll <,I,( OiIt *****An existitic tie cc~uitl be clc~ci~i )i~i .I 111 (;i)lt,tll Lit hOtnc, l,ok< T(IIIIL!I~ ot~t ( !I tiitb il 7 /I iiiri( 1 i 1:,4 ! <to 1,) \, 11 ibtl :'!) < firm budget r.esolu~ion~ and .tick to v>ii ill'( L!Jl' tnaT;i\j: <alii( nc'cdt)lt I)< I' .iii(i, <.i i iii ' +I i \, LEO (July 23-XU~ 22) tht, \\a( I]:! 1):tth I kt* 1(ig1( 11, iIi,ihiiig i:>1\!1 IX\~.l. \$!ill ;* ;hll<'l>~ i ______ - __ - - Cathy"' , MONTHS FOR Hffi' rC' MENTIDU' -dL SU8.JtCT AtlCIAI '! I Ann MOWUITO NE71NG ![r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE!\ ;;I.$ the C ry C,L\J~CI/ of the City st Caiisliad wif hold a public hearing at the (;iry CO~PC,,' Cr a:nbets, 1200 CarlSbad L'!!.Zige Drive, Carlsbad. Calrfor,xi, ti; E 03 pni o:? i Lesday, Augbst 18. 4 992, to conside, the City's responses to the LocaliRegionai Consistency Checklist for Ihe Regional Growth Managen~c~nt Strategy ar?d Congestion Mar;ay&rricsrit Program If you have any questloris rt yatatng ttiis mL!iter, piease call Di:? Rimoul ln me Planning Department. at 43 3-1 1 SI , exter7s)cn &:2 i 2 If you challenge the Localil-e~ cnal Ccnsist ,fizy Chechirt>t tc!, ;4t3 %?Clc,r>&;ii Growth Management Slm+k g) xd Cor-geslio;; ~Aaringement Program i!: LJL~~T, you may be lrniiled to raisi '3 oriiy :xxt? isJ -. , rased by p~ or son~pow? 6 'st? zt APPLICANT: City of Carlstad PUBLISH: August 7, 7 992 e afq? c i/' ~$+!&)L?J d p?; e* i k ,J 3 ' J . : //I 'i.,<+ by% b?<!i~ c .x ~JC hill I't &e- p5: IC" [ J -$+ NQTiGE 16 HEREBV GIVEN th~f the City Council of the Clty of Carisbad wit! hold a public hearing &%he City CoumiJ ChanSers, 1208 Carisbad Village L),'ve, Carisbad, California, nl 6:od p.m., on Tuesday, Ocf6ber 12,1993, to consider a request for a recomnendatbn or' approval of %oai Caasal Pmgrarn Amndment Reviaians 10 add a iiew poky to tha Melb li Segment af the Local Gbasial P r0gra.m restricting the type of impacts that can be al!owad tQ wetlands inad riparian mso?irces and an addZion% poky establishjng btiffer zones far wetlad and riparian areas If you have any questions regarddir ig this matte,, plcaae cantacf Dan Neu in :he Planning Department, at 43.5 3 161, ext. 4446. 88 q~gf~yed 4y tile Caljfornia Goasla) Comrr \ish. Lbirr *14+*.4 w2~%%[$ i MUNQAUV MA) October it 199s Bvslw I FRiDA'V Garlsbad-city-of4 0-1 irarinddaud $A? 9/L2 yd h&*? <dS&- ys><s i! ?./flJ?Jy J "K&y hC&& & ,/,&7- 1 /* i f,, d AK OLIVER LTD 0 e <* ', - LCP INTERES'ITD PARTY LIST AGATEP, DON - UPDATED 8/93 PO BOX 590 C/O CHRIS KOLB CARLSBADCA 92008 1911 SAXONY * ENCINITAS CA 9202 ALLAN, BOB ALVAREZ, FRANCES ANDERSON HORACl STANDARD-PACIFIC 6491 EL WINO REAL 2010 SHERIDAN AVl 1731 COLGATE CR GWLWUCA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 LA JOUA CA 92037 ANDERSON, HORACE & MARY ANDERSON, ALBERT JR ASHBY, FLOYD 400 LA COSTA AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 PATfERSON CA 95353 ENCINITAS CA 920: 2006 SPERRY AVE 416 LA COSTA AVE BAKER, LARRY BEl'TS, DONALD & BEVERLY BIRTCHER PACIFIC 255 N WLCAN AVE 2051 SHERIDAN RD ROBERT CAMPBELL ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024 27611 LA PA2 RD LAGUNA NIGUEL Cl BLADE CITIZEN BOLTON, GEORGE BONS, ANTHONY 1722 S HILL STREET 1124 BLUE SAGE 6519 EL WINO REdu. OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CARLSBADCA 92008 SANMARCOSCA 9 BOWEN MIGNON BREMERMA" BIX BROWNLEY, WGl LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS 1547 LORING ST 4120 SKYLINE 2290 NOB HILL DR SAN DIEGO CA 92109 CARLSBADCA 92Ot CARLSBADCA 92008 BW COLLINS CAL STATE COASTAL CONSERV CALIFORNIA DEPT ( 5911 BEAUMONT 1330 BROADWAY #1100 ATI": KURTBARN LA JOLLA CA 92037 OAKLAND CA 94612 2829 JUAN ST SAN DIEGO CA 9211 CARLSBAD JOURNAL CARLSBAD CHMBR OF CARLSBAD MUNIQl STEVE DREYER EDITOR COMMERCE 5950 EL WINO RI PO BOX 248 PO BOX 1605 CARLSBADCA 920( CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBADCA 92008 CHRISTENSEN, BM CITY OF CARLSBAD CITYOFCARLSB PO BOX 188 MAIN LIBRARY CARLSBAD CA 92008 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSB CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF SAN MARC CITY CLE 320 N HORNE STREET 105 W RICHMAR A\ SAN MARCOS CA 9: / SBAD VILLAGE DR OCEANSIDE CA 92054 SBAD CA 92008 CLARKE, HAROLD 0 CITY OF ZNCINITAS 'CITY OF VISTA ' :600 EUCALYPTUS AVE 505 S. WLCAN AV 824 CAMINITO DEL R *PO BOX 1988 ENCINITAS CA 920243633 CARLSBADCA 92001 e r. >" VISTA CA 92084 COMMUNITY BANK COPLEY INTERNATIONAL COW COPLEY INTERNATIO 3233 SAN FERNANDO RD #3 LA JOLLA CA 92037 LA JOLLA CA 92037 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 C/O GL WEAVER 7817 HERSCHEL AVE 7776 IVANHOE AVE CORDOZA, MICHAEL DAMM, CHUCK DEALY, WILLJAM & R 1698 CREST DR CAL COASTAL COMMISSION 1282 CREST DR ENCINITAS CA 92028 ENCINITAS CA 92024 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO N #200 SAN DIEGO CA 92108-5722 DEAN, BILL PRESIDENT DEPT HOUSING & CO DVPT DOCKINS, KAREN BAT LAGOON FOUNDATION AlTN: PERLAESTON 410 LA COSTA AVE 675 NORMANDY 7940 WILLOW GLEN RD ENCINITAS CA 9202 ENCINITAS CA 92024 PO BOX 1831 yfl PACI PO BOX 1636 TIMM, CARLENE SDG&E SAN DIEGO CA 92112 0 CA 92101 CARLSBADCA 9200: LOS ANGELES CA 90046 ECKMA" & LODGE 1207 CARLSBAD VILl ELSNER, CURT EMPEY, DICK ESPOSITO PROPERTI LAURA & JON LANDRY 3222 ST ALBANS DR 2081 SHERIDAN RD 5201 RUFFIN RD #B-5 ROSSMOORCA 902: ENCINITAS CA 92024 SD CO DPT PLN & LAND USE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 ESPOSITO, LESLIE & FILOMENA ESTES, SYLVIA FARRIS, ROBERT 2934 E FIRST ST LONG BEACH CA 90803 ENCINlTASCA 92024 VISTACA 92083 510 LA COSTA Am 1929 ALTA VISTA DR FLOWER PATCH FLOWER PEDDLER FRANDSEN, JIM 6491 EL WINO REAL CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 6523 EL CAMINO REAL 500 WINO DE OR( ENCINITASCA 9202 GEIS, DEVON GEISBRET, A GIBSON, CYRIL & M! 3101 SAN GABRIEL 770 RANCHO SANTA FE RD 12142 ARGYLE DR OLIVENHAINCA 92024 GLENDALECA 92108 LOSAllAMrmSCA ' HANSON, HUGO GIRA, DANIEL GRIGGS, MARY 964 URANIA CA STATE LANDS COMM 210 ROUNDTREE W ENCINITAS CA 92024 1807 13TH ST SAN RAFAEL CA 94' SACRAMENTO CA 95814 HOCHMAN, BRUCE 6511 EL CAMINO REAL 2170 SKYLINE DR 2054 SHERIDAN RD WUSBADCA 92008 ESCONDIDO CA 92027 ENCINITAS CA 92024 0 0 -. .. . HIDALG0,MANUAL HILLEBRECHT, BEN HOEHN HOFFMAN, RICH HOLDEN, RONALD t? J C/O CHEVRON USA INC 7094 MIRAMAR RD #113 PO BOX 7611 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 SAN FaANcISCO CA 94120 2022 SHERIDAN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 HPI HUMPHREYS, LOIS HUNT PROPERTIES IN C/O AD VALOREM TAX DEPT 2400 THANKSGMNG ' 2840 THANKSGMNG PO BOX 2397 1601 ELM ST DALLASTX 75201 ENCINITAS CA 92024 DAUAS TX 75201 LEUCADIA CO WTR DIST LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA LAITAS, ANASTASIA LAKESHORE GARDEN COSTA DEL MAR RD MARIA & ETAL SOUGIAS 7201 AVENIDA ENCIN CARLSBADCA 92009 PO BOX 2047 CARLSBADCA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 LAMB, PERRY & BARBARA LAMB, JOHN LANIKAI RFD 3 BOX 3066 MERE POINT RD LOS ANGELES CA 90069 CARLSBAD CA 9200t BRUNSWICK ME 0401 1 947 N LA CIENEGA BLVD 6550 PONTO DR LAUPPE, EARL LODGE, ERIC LUJAN, WILLIAM STATE DEPT FISH & GAME LODGE & HELLER 330 GOLDEN SHORE ST #50 1901 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE LONG BEACH CA 90802 CARLSBAD CA 92008 6505 EL CAMINO REi CARLSBADCA 9200! MAY, HERMAN & LOIS 2041 SHERIDAN RD 2021 SHERIDAN RD PO BOX 2571 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 9202 MAY, EARL & MARSHA MB SHORES COW MCDONALD, JOHN MCMURPHY COW MCREYNOLDS, AND1 1600 PACIFIC HWY 640 GRAND 2316 CAUE CHIQUI' SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CARLSBADCA 92008 LA JOLLA CA 92037 MERRILL, JANE MITSUUCHI KOICHI MAKO MOORE, GUY JR LAFCO 1120 S FIGUEROA 6503 EL WINO RI 1600 PACIFIC COAST HWY SANT'AANA CA CARLSBADCA 92M SAN DIEGO CA 92101 MURPHY, MICHAEL & NICOL, BRITTON & DREW OLIVENHAIN MWD BARBARA 640 GRAND AVE 4444 OAKWOOD AW 1966 OLlVENHAIN : CARLSBADCA 92008 ' LACANADACA 91011 ENCINITASCA 920 PLANNING LAND U, -i PADIUA,MIGUEL - ENCINITASCA 92024 4540 CAMPUS DR CARDIFF-BY-THE-SI 0 PICKUS, GLEN 0 -. h. . I 754DELRlEGO PACESETTER HOMES INC 2155 NEWCASTLE I NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 RANCHO LA COSTA INC COSTA DEL MAR RD 2056 SHERIDAN RD SDG&E CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 PO BOX 1831 REDIKOP J & VAUGHAN S HOLLAND, STELLA SAN DIEGO CA 921 SALATA, LARRY SAN DIEGUrrO WATER SANDAG - EXECUTIV US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE DISTRICT IST INT PLAZA 2730 LOKER AVE WEST 59EASTD 401 "B" STREET #80( CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIE0 CA 9210 SAVAGE, MLUAM SCIIOPPE, EP SCHREIBER DALE & PO BOX 773 3754 BALBOA DR 1457 CREST DR RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 ENCINITASCA 9202 SD CO ARCHAEOLOG SOC INC c/o CAROL WALKER PO BOX 2571 SAN DIEGO CHAPTE 237 NOW ST ENCINITASCA 92024 3820 RAY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 SAN DIEGO CA 9210 SHORES, MICHAEL & BARBARA SIERRA CLUB SIlTNER, DAVID SKOTNICKI A J SOLAMAR 2808 LUCIERNAGA ST 2668 - - &' 195PALOMARAIRP( CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBADCA 9200 SPIERS, DWIGHT STRAUSS, FRANCIS 8c PATRICIA SUN-FRESH FLOW SPIERS ENTERPRISES 2055 SHERIDAN RD 6515 EL CAMINO RI 17941 MITCHELL ST ENCINITASCA 92024 CARISBADCA 92M IRVINE CA 92714 TABATA BROS THOMPSON, DAVID THOMPSON ROSE C PO BOX 943 7400 BATIQUITOS DR 7040 ROSE DRIVE CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBADCA 920( THOMPSON, BILL TIERNEY,JENNIFER TREDER,wILLIAM! PO BOX 450 DEPT OF AGR WEIGHTS & MSRS c0MMUNInBANK RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 2955 FLETCHER DR LOS ANGELES CA ' 5555 OVERLAND AVE. BUILDING 3 SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1292 WELTY, WALDON 8t DELORES WESTON, FRED 8t UTA WHITSON, DANA 2076 SHERIDAN RD 514 LA COSTA AVE 5051 SHORE DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITASCA 92024 CARLSBADCA 920 - ,. .. c * 0 I ' 1 wNTER,MRs ' KEITHBROWNELLCO LA JOLLA CA 92037 * 112OSILvERADO