HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-03-08; City Council; 12616; Mariners PointCl’ -- v
OF CARLSBAD - AGEI\-A BILL Y 1 0 440
SDP 91-11
3ECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission, Housing Commission, and staff are recommending that the
City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING CT 91-12, and
SDP 91-11.
IYIEM EXPLANATION
On November 17, 1993, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and
recommended approval (6-O) of the Mariners Point project, located east of Paseo de1
Norte and north of Camino de las Ondas in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
On January 13, 1994 the Housing Commission reviewed the affordable housing
components of the project and recommended unanimously (8-O) that the City Council
approve the project.
The project is located on a 68 acre parcel directly north of Camino de las Ondas. Access
to the property would be provided by future Hidden Valley Road (non-loaded collector
road), future Alga Road (major road), and Camino de las Ondas (non-loaded collector
road). The project would consist of 186 single-family homes on individual lots that range
in size from 7,500 to 21,670 square feet and 176 two and three-story apartment units
that range in size from 650 to 1,100 square feet. The project would feature
contemporary architecture with tile roofs, and a central recreation facility with a pool,
spa, and club house. There would also be laundry rooms and a future children’s play
area.
Per the requirements of the City’s recently adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15%
of the proposed dwelling units (55 affordable units), must be provided for lower income
households. The developer is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units as
rental units within the apartment portion of the project.
Subsequent to Planning Commission action on the project, the applicant decided to
explore the possibility of making all of the apartments (176 units) affordable to lower
income households. The Housing Commission unanimously approved a recommendation
to the City Council to approve the affordable housing project containing 176 apartment
units to be affordable to lower income households for a period of at least fifty-five (55)
years. Within the application, the applicant indicated a need for financial assistance for
the subject affordable housing project. However, the Housing Commission’s
recommendation does not include support for any financial assistance from the City for
the project at this time. The Housing Commission expressed a desire for staff to work
closely with the applicant to develop an appropriate financing plan for the project.
Recommendation for project development approval was granted by the Housing
Commission with the condition that the required ratio of income restricted units be
constructed concurrent with the project’s market rate units. Following Council approval
of the proposed project and prior to the first final map approval, the applicant must enter
into a Affordable Housing Agreement with the City.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. /c?.; b 1 b
To adequately mitigate impacts to school facilities and per the requirements of the
recently adopted Zone 20 Specific Plan the Planning Department is recommending that
the following condition be added to the Tentative Map:
‘Prior to the approval of any final map or the issuance of any permits within the
Zone 20 Specific Plan the applicant for the final map or permit shall submit
evidence to the City that impacts to school facilities have been mitigated in
conformance with the City’s Growth Management Plan to the extent permitted by
applicable state law for legislative acts. If the mitigation involves a financing
scheme such as a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District which is inconsistent
with the City’s Growth Management Plan including City Council Policy Statement
No. 38, the developer shall submit disclosure documents for approval by the City
Manager and City Attorney which shall disclose to future owners in the project,
to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax and that the school
district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing district. At a minimum
the project CC&R’s shall require maximum disclosure and signed statements for
disclosures upon transfer of residential property”.
More detailed information is included in the attached staff report to the Planning
Commission and the Housing Commission. Six citizens gave public testimony to the
Planning Commission. Their major concerns included: (1) impacts to school facilities and
appropriate mitigation; (2) additional traffic and noise impacts to the surrounding
community; (3) access to the existing agricultural parcels to the east, and ; (4) the siting
of high density affordable housing in the neighborhood. The project has been conditioned
to require a mitigation agreement with the school district prior to final map approval.
Condition No. 62 of Planning Commission Resolution 3557 requires that to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, continued access must be maintained to agricultural
properties in the area. To mitigate traffic impacts to the area, Camino de las Ondas
would be extended to the east, widened to it’s ultimate width and provided with
sidewalks and underground utilities. Alga Road would also be extended north of
Poinsettia Lane to connect with Camino de las Ondas within the project’s boundary. This
would provide a secondary access out of the neighborhood for local residents ultimately
traveling west towards Interstate 5. Eventually Alga Road and Hidden Valley Road would
extend all the way to Palomar Airport Road thus providing additional access for residents
traveling north from the area. The apartment portion of the project would contain 348
on-site parking spaces, and the bulk, scale, and architecture of the buildings is compatible
with the existing apartments and condominiums located to the south and west. The
apartment buildings would have textured stucco exteriors, tile roofs, varied roof lines,
architectural accent features, and varied building facades.
ENVIRONMENTAL, REVIEW
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203)
which covers the 640 acre Zone 20 planning area. The direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts from the future development of the Zone 20 planning area have
been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 90-03) for the specific
plan. Additional project level studies have been conducted including soils investigation,
, - 4
PAGE 3 OF AGENDA BILL NO. I$; b /h
biological analysis, and a traffic study. These studies provide more focused and detailed
project level analysis and indicate that additional environmental impacts beyond what was
analyzed in Final EIR 90-03 would not result from implementation of the project. This
project is in prior compliance with Final EIR 90-03 and would not create any additional
significant environmental impacts. The recommended and applicable mitigation measures
of Final EIR 90-03 would be included as conditions of approval for this project.
FISCAL, IMPACT
As discussed in the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan, all major capital facilities
will be funded by the developer of this project. A financing plan that comprehensively
addresses the provision of public facilities within the facility zone has been approved by
the City Council, With respect to the affordable dwelling units located within the project
the applicant would apply for tax credits from the California Tax Credit Allocation
Corm-r&tee to help finance the project. In addition, the applicant is requesting local
financial assistance in the amount of $3,600,000.00 to help subsidize the cost of
providing affordable units however, the Housing Commission is not supporting any
subsidy at this time.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
II Facilities Zone I - I 20 II II Local Facilities Management Plan I I - 20 II II Growth Control Point I - I 3.2 & 6 DU/ACRE II II Net Density I - I 5.4 DU/ACRE II II Special Facilities I - I C.F.D. NO. 1 II
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556, 3557, & 3558
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 17, 1993
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 17, 1993
5. Housing Commission Staff Report, dated January 13, 1994
6. Housing Commission Resolution No. 94-001
7
EXHIBIT 1
MARINERS POINT
A
CT 9%12/SDP 9%111 HDP 91-25 Y
-. EXHIBIT 2 .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3556
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO DEVELOP 186
SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 176 APARTMENT UNITS ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS.
CASE NAME: MARINERS POINT
CASE NO: CT 91-12
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 12 South, range 4
west’ San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego,
State of California, according to the official plat.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of November,
1993, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
~ factors relating to the Tentative Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 91-12, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
. . . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
-
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan since the
overall proposed density of 5.4 dus/acre is within the density range of 4-8 dus/acre
specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and
is at or below the growth control point of 6.
2. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
3. The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Final
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
adverse environmental impacts.
4. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
5. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
6. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified School District.
7.
8.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
9. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1e
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1.
2.
3.
4.
. . . .
The project complies with all requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land use since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the general
plan.
The project is consistent with all policies of the Mello II Local Coastal Program.
The tentative map satisfies all requirements of the Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act.
General Planninz Conditions:
Recommendation of approval is granted for CT 91-l 1, as shown on Exhibits “A” -
“OO”, dated November 17, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may
be required as part of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express conditions that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement
plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated
November 26, 1991, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -3-
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
. . . .
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid,
this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project
without the conditions complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
Approval of CT 91-12 is granted subject to the approval of SDP 91-11, HDP 91-25,
SP-203, and Final EIR 90-03.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map
shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map,
or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500’ scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within
and adjacent to the project.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land
use designation for this development is RM and RLM. The Growth Control Point
for these designations are 6 and 3.2 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the general
plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of
these parcels must also include all parcels under the general plan and Chapter 21.90
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code”.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -4-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
. . .
Prior to approval of the Enal map, the applicant shall receive approval of a Coastal
Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission that substantially
conforms to this approval. U the approval is substantially different, an amendment
to CT 91-12 shall be required.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R’s shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval.
The CC&R’s shall include provisions specifying the Homeowner% Association
maintenance responsibility for all natural open space and slope maintenance
easements, and offsite manufactured slopes shown on the approved tentative map
and landscape plan (CT 91-12), which is on file in the Planning Department.
The developer shall provide a minimum of 25% of the single-family lots with
adequate sideyard area for recreational vehicle storage pursuant to City Standards.
The CC&R’s shall prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles in the required front
yard setback. Adjustments in the plotting of units as illustrated on the approved site
plan will be allowed in final Engineering to accommodate this requirement.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule
in effect at the time of building permit application.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a Notice of Restriction
placed on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of
Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Map, Site Development Plan, and Hillside
Development Permit by Resolutions No.‘s 3556, 3557, and 3558 on the real
property owned by the declarant. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions
of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the
Notice of Restriction. Said Notice of Restriction may be modified or terminated only
with the approval of the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council
of the City of Carlsbad whichever has final decision authority for this project.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction
of the Directors of Planning and Building.
In Area “c’ all visitor parking spaces shall be striped a different color than the
assigned resident parking spaces and shall be clearly marked as may be approved
by the Planning Director prior to occupancy of individual units.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Trash receptacle areas in Unit “C” shall be enclosed by a six foot high masonry wall
with gates pursuant to City standards. The enclosure shall be of similar colons
and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
For Area “c’ an exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for
Planning Director approval prior to issuance of building permits. All lighting shall
be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or
property-
The applicant shall submit a wall and fencing plan subject to Planning Director
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit detailed building
elevations and floor plans of the recreational buildings subject to approval by the
Planning Director.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first, the applicant shall establish, a process to notify, to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director and City Attorney, all owners, users and tenants of this project
that a community park site is located near this project to the northwest.
Prior to approval of the final map, the owner proposing a future neighborhood
commercial development of overlay designated property shah obtain Planning
Director approval of a program to disclose the potential commercial use to future
owners of the surrounding properties.
To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations
subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall
at a minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop
sign. The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from
the basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
PC PESO NO. 3556 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29. This project shall comply with the requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP
203).
Affordable Housing Conditions:
30.
31.
32.
This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required ratio of income
restricted units shall be constructed concurrent with the project’s market rate units.
The project shall construct housing units affordable to persons and families of lower
income and comply with all the requirements of the Affordable Housing Plan of the
Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203).
Prior to final map approval, an Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to
be submitted by the applicant to the City, approved by the Planning Director and
Director of Housing and Redevelopment, and completed and recorded as a deed
restriction on those units of the project which are designated for the location of
low-income affordable units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding
to all future owners and successors in interest. The Affordable Housing Agreement,
for which the inclusionary housing requirement will be satisfied through new
construction of inclusionary units on-site, shall establish, but not be limited to, the
following:
F
The number of inclusionary dwelling units proposed;
The unit size(s) (square footage) of the inclusionary units and
the number of bedrooms per inclusionary dwelling units;
:
The proposed location of the inclusionary units;
Tenure of affordability for inclusionary units (30 years minimum);
F.-
Schedule for production of the dwelling units;
Incentives and/or financial assistance provided by the City;
$5 Where applicable, terms and conditions establishing rules and
procedures for qualifying tenants, setting rental rates, filling
vacancies, and operating and maintaining units for affordable
inclusionary dwelling units;
h. Standards modifications granted by the City.
Sign Conditions:
33. Prior to occupancy of any of the apartment units, the applicant shall construct a
directory sign at the entrance to the project. The design of this sign shall be
approved by the Planning Director.
34. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
35. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Landscape Conditions:
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading
or building permits, whichever occurs first.
Ail landscaping shall comply with the Landscape Requirements of the Zone 20
Specific Plan (SP 230).
Prior to approval of the building permits, all manufactured offsite slopes created by
this project shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and
shall include at a minimum, landscaping to control erosion and to provide visual
screening of the slopes.
To provide play areas for children (in Area “C”), prior to approval of the final
landscape plan the development shah: (1) provide on the Landscape Plan flat turf
areas (minim um area - 100 square feet) between buildings, slopes, and parking
areas when feasible; and (2) two “tot lot” areas dispersed within the site.
Prior to approval of the fInal map, the applicant shall establish a 10 foot landscape
easement along the project’s street frontage on both sides of Camino de las Ondas
and along the east side of Hidden Valley Road as shown on the tentative map.
These planting easements shall be planted by the applicant per the landscape
requirements of .the Zone 20 Specific Plan prior to occupancy of individual units.
All building pad and street areas that are graded and remain vacant or undeveloped
for a period of more than 6 months after the grading operation is completed shall
be seeded to reduce erosion and visual impacts. If grading is phased, the six month
time period shall start at the completion of each individual grading phase.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along
all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The
trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall
promote water conservation.
The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessive
litter and/or too large relative to the lot size.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons. One (1) gallon shrub sizes may be used
if it is deemed to be more beneficial for the long term survivability of the plants as
determined by the Planning Director.
The number of trees in the project shall be equal to or greater than the number of
residential units.
Twenty percent (20%) of the trees in the project shall be 24” box or greater.
Environmental Mitination Conditions:
55. To offset the conversion of non-prime agricultural land to urban land uses per the
requirements of the Mello II Local Coastal Program the applicant shall implement
one of the following three mitigation options prior to approval of the final map:
a.
b.
Preserve prime agricultural property within the Coastal Zone
consistent with sections 30241 and 30242, or cluster new
development consistent with Section 30250, of the Coastal Act; or
~Illustrate that continued or renewed agricultural use is not feasible per
the guidelines of Mitigation Option 2 of the Local Coastal Program;
or
PC RESO NO. 3556 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
56.
57.
58.
C. Provide payment of an agricultural mitigation fee, the amount of
which is $lO,OOO.OO for each converted acre.
Compliance with APCD Rules 51 (The “Nuisance” Rule), 52 (Particulate Matter),
and 54 (Dust and Fumes) of the Air Quality Chapter would effectively mitigate dust
impacts generated during grading operations. A note shah be placed on the grading
permit stipulating that the following measures shah be required to achieve
compliance with these rules, and reduce construction-related air pollutants:
a.
b.
d.
e.
h.
The watering of all surfaces being graded and haul routes shall be
required during dry weather conditions.
AU unpaved areas shall be revegetated according to approved
landscape plans as soon as possible after grading.
All construction-related traffic shall be restricted to routes that are
dust-controlled, and reduced speed limits shall be maintained for all
haul and construction vehicles.
All construction activities shall be limited during periods of high
winds.
All heavy-duty, diesel-powered construction equipment shall be
operated according to manufacturers suggested operating instruction
(with the fuel-injection timing retarded to recommended levels for
NO, emissions, but which would not result in excessive visible smoke
emissions) in order to control pollutant emissions.
Construction equipment shall be subject to regularly scheduled
maintenance/tune-ups, and be turned off when not being utilized to
avoid excessive idling emissions.
The application of architectural coating and cut-back asphalt shall
adhere to APCD Rules 67.0 and 67.7, to effectively control other
construction-related emissions of air pollutants.
The Engineering Department shall monitor for compliance during all
grading operations of the project.
The Homeowners Association and apartment project owner shall obtain and
distribute to owners and tenants annual information from Cahrans and North
County Transit regarding the availability of public transportation, ride-sharing, and
transportation pooling services in the area. This information shall also be provided
in the sales and rental offices of the project. A condition so stating this shall also
be placed in the Cc&R’s for the project.
The applicant shall provide the following noise mitigation measures to comply with
the current Noise Policy:
a. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct a
six foot high noise attenuation wall on the top of the slope along lots
PC RESO NO. 3556 -lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
59.
60.
61.
b.
C.
d.
adjacent to the west side of Alga Road per the requirements of the
project’s noise study dated May 29, 1992 and as shown on the
Landscape Concept Plan for the project, which is on file in the
Planning Department. The said wall shall be faced with stucco to be
compatible with proposed development, and have masonry pilasters
and offsets with landscape screening to reduce visual impacts along
Alga Road.
To obtain an interior noise level of 45 CNEL, the windows and doors
in homes on Lots 3 through 7 must be closed, therefore, a “windows
closed” condition is applicable and a mechanical ventilation system
with fresh air provisions in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code and Planning Department Policy No. 17 is required.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the applicant shall prepare and record a notice
that this property may be subject to impacts from a proposed or
existing transportation corridor (see Noise, Form #l on file in the
Planning Department) and overflight, sight, and sound of aimraft
operating from Palomar Airport (see Noise, Form #2 on file in the
Planning Department). The notice shall be prepared in a manner
meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales
and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The
number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning
Director (see Noise, Form #3 on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to approval of a grading permit a detailed soils testing and analysis report
shall be prepared by registered soils engineer and submitted to the Planning
Department and County Health Department for review and approval. The report
shall identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any potentially
significant public health impacts if hazardous pesticides or other chemicals are
detected at high concentrations in the soil.
Prior to occupancy of individual units a solid wall or fence, and landscaped
windbreaks shall be installed along the perimeter of any future developable area
that abuts property under “open field” cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance
effects of adjacent pesticide spraying and dust generation from farm vehicles and
operations.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of a building permit, which ever
occurs first, a minimum 25-foot wide open space easement shall be provided
between “open field” agricultural operations and the adjacent lot lines of future
developable areas on-site. This buffer area may be located on the adjacent
agricultural property.
PCRJZSON0.3556 -ll-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
62. Prior to approval of a final map or issuance of a building permit, which ever occurs
first, an infrastructure improvement plan shall be submitted to the Planning and
Engineering Departments for review and approval by the Planning Director and City
Engineer. This plan shall illustrate the temporary road connections required to
maintain continued access to adjacent agricultura.l properties that could be impacted
by future roadway improvements.
63. Drainage water from buildings, streets, parking lots, and landscaped areas within
the project shah be disposed of through stormdrains or otherwise in a manner that
will avoid any runoff onto agricultural areas whether planted or fallow. All runoff,
agricultural and urban, shall conform with the National Pollution Discharge and
Elimination System Permit requirements pursuant to San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board Order No. 9042, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 90-
235.
64. Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first, the applicant shall notify, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City
Attorney, all owners, users and tenants of this project that this area is subject to
dust, pesticides, and odors associated with adjacent agricultural operations, and that
the owners, users, and tenants occupy this area at their on risk.
65. Paleontology:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be
retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the
grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil
resources. A copy of the paleontologist’s report shall be provided to
the Planning Director prior to issuance of a grading permit.
A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic
inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the
small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it
may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing
through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make periodic reports
to the Planning Director during the grading process.
The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the
area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if
necessary, salvage artifacts.
All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution
with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego
Natural History Museum.
Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading
activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3556 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the project shah comply with the City of
Carlsbad’s standards for solid waste management.
All grading shall comply with the recommendations of Leighton and Associates
Incorporated in the Geotechnical Fngineering Investigation and Geologic
Reconnaissance dated August 31, 1992, and on file in the Planning Department.
To reduce the visual impacts of the project, a percentage of homes along the
north/south trending and gently sloping ridgeline shall be one-story in height and
have varying roof lines.
All structures and roofs within the project shall be earth tone in color. Prior to
issuance of the first building permit the applicant shall submit to the Planning
Department a sample color board depicting the proposed earth tones subject to the
approval of the Planning Director.
To reduce the visual impacts of manufactured slopes and roadway cuts, all cut and
fill slopes shall be landform-graded, contoured, and heavily screened by landscaping
in conformance with Specific Plan 203. All planted slopes shall be watered with a
complete irrigation system using low precipitation-rate sprinkler heads to stabilize
exposed slopes and curtail visual impacts associated with possible erosion.
Prior to approval of a final map, improvement plans shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department showing locations and sizing of reclaimed and or urban
runoff diversion facilities, in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Water District
requirements and the phasing schedule provided in the Zone 20 LFMP. Reclaimed
water facilities shall be constructed in all major roadways within the project.
Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall be required: (1) to consult with U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) regarding the impact of the project on the Coastal
California Gnatcatcher; and (2) be issued any permits required by the FWS.
Engineering Conditions:
73. The alignments, tangents and horkontal radii of the streets in this project are
specifically approved as shown on the tentative map.
74. In order to meet the cul-de-sac standard, no building permits shall be issued for any
lot on Street “L” unless a secondary access to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
has been provided.
75. Lot 1, Unit A shall be reserved on the final map for access to properties easterly
from this project unless a particular access has been sufficiently identitkl to the
. . . .
PC RESO NO.3556 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
. . . .
-
satisfaction of the City Engineer. In that event an offer of dedication for the
particular access shah be made on the tinal map.
The drainage system shah be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from lo-year
frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are
equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration
under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shah
be analyzed to determined the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish
the desired results prior to tinal map approval, issuance of building or grading
permit whichever occurs first. This condition may be met if the Applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that adequate downstream flow
capacity and detention/retention capacity already exists or will exist after upgrades
have been guaranteed.
H this project is required to provide an onsite detention/retention basin as per the
condition to require reduction of peak flows from a 10 year storm to predeveloped
conditions, the south east portion of Lot 191, Unit C shall be resemed for this
purpose as is shown on the tentative map. In that event this portion of Lot 191
shall not be developed with structures as shown on the Site Development Plan, SDP
91-11.
No building permits for more dwelling units in Unit “C’ than the number of dwelling
units that will generate 500 ADT shall be issued unless secondary access to Unit “C
has been guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Only the number of
dwelling units that will generate no more than 500 ADT within Unit “c’ shall be
occupied, until secondary access has been provided.
Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
This project is approved specificahy as three Units for the purposes of recording.
Lots shall be numbered consecutively through the three recording units.
If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -14-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
. . . .
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant, Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision
Map Act.
The applicant shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the
final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with
Master Drainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City
Engineer.
Prior to approval of the final map, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the Master Drainage
Plan Update.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a Hold Harmless Agreement
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map
for this project.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City Codes and standards.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued.
In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative map or change the slope
so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially
conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and
Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all
PC RESO NO. 3556 -15
P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
-.
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care ‘during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chapter 11.06.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided or installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be
required by the City Engineer.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
The applicant shall underground all existing overhead utilities within the subdivision
boundary prior to issuance of building permits.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Camino de las Ondas and Alga Road (except
Lot 1 as shown) shall be waived on the final map.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This conditional approval is null and void if title to
said property is not obtained, unless the City Engineer and Planning Director make
findings of substantial conformance without construction of said improvements.
The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map, issuance of grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first.
The following note shall be placed on the Enal map:
“Prior to issuance of a building permit for any lot within the
subdivision, the property owner shall pay a one-time special
development tax in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 91-39.”
PC RESO NO. 3556 -16-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
101. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final
map in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install
and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
A traffk actuated signal at the intersection of Alga Road and Can&o
de las Ondas shall be designed and guaranteed for future construction.
Construction shall be at the direction of the City Engineer.
A storm dram approximately 600 feet in length running offsite
westerly along Camino de las Ondas to connect to the existing 36 inch
line near Seascape Drive. The City Engineer may approve an alternate
that provides sufficient downstream capacity to meet the needs for
handling drainage from this project.
Alga Road between the subdivision boundary and Poinsettia Lane
shall be constructed with full major arterial width grading in a 102
foot right-of-way, two inside lanes, full median curbing, all needed
storm drain facilities and all utilities that will be beneath the paved
roadway sections. The City Engineer may accept an alternate
proposal that fulfihs the need to provide this vital roadway link that
the residents of this project will use. This condition may be met by
another developer based on which developer wishes to proceed first.
All or a portion of these improvements may be eligible for
reimbursement under the Zone 20 LFMP Finance Plan
Alga Road within the subdivision boundaries shall be constructed with
full public improvements to major arterial standards based on a right-
of-way width 102 feet.
Hidden Valley Road within the subdivision boundaries shall have half
street improvements plus 12 feet of paving. An offsite portion of
Hidden Valley Road from Camino de las Ondas to the subdivision
boundary shah be constructed for two lanes of travel. This offsite
portion of Hidden Valley Road is required in order to meet the cul-de-
sac policy for Unit “C’of this subdivision. AU or portions of these
Hidden Valley Road improvements may be met by a City project
pursuant to a reimbursement agreement between the developer and
the City.
Upgrade the detention/retention basin located near Poinsettia Lane
and Batiquitos Drive on Lot 71, CT 73-24, Map No. 79%. The
upgrade shall result in an increase in the volume retained and/or an
increase in time of retention to the satisfaction of the City Fngineer.
. . . .
The City Rngineer may approve an alternate proposal that meets the
retention needs.
PC PESO NO. 3556 -17-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A note to this effect shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final map per
the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed
above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Fire Conditions:
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
. . . .
Additional on-site public water mains and fire hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
The plan should include offsite fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
Applicant shall submit a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways and
traffic circulation for Fire Department approval.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles
shah be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the
Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or
other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction
operations cease until the condition is corrected.
AU required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational
before combustible brtikhng materials are located on the construction site.
All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a
“Knox”, key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire
Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation.
Native vegetation which presents a fhe hazard to structures shall be modified or
removed in accordance with the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad
Landscape Guidelines Manual. Applicant shah submit a Fire Suppression plan to the
Fire Department for approval.
An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all buildings having
an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet, if required by the Fire
Department.
The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following
requirements: A400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements
and at least two existing intersections or streets. The map shah also clearly depict
street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names.
PC RESO NO.3556 -18-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Water District Conditions:
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
. . . .
The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposks plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The developer
shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
Sequentially, the developer% Engineer shall do the following:
a.
b.
C.
Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection
requirements.
Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the
Planning Department for processing and approval.
Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment
and approval of the preliminary system layout usage (G-P-M. - E-D-U.)
plan for potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation
of improvement plans.
This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving
the development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are
available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will
continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall .be placed on the
final map.
Developer shall be responsible for the following systems/lines:
A) Potable Svstems:
1. ONSITE CONDITIONS: (Units A & B)
a. Install 8" water mains in Streets “c’, “F”, “G”, “H”, “I”, “.I”, “IC’,
“L”, (Note that “L” Street main must be looped to new 12” high
pressure main) and Camino De Las Ondas from Street “H” to
College Boulevard.
b. Install 12” water mains in Street TT, College Boulevard (Alga
Road) boundary to boundary, Camino De Las Ondas from
College Boulevard northeasterly to its termination, and Hidden
Valley Road boundary to boundary.
PC RESO NO. 3556 -19.
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Install fire hydrants and gate valves per attached District
approved map.
2. OFFSITE CONDITIONS:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
Install 12" water main (High Pressure) along the southerly
boundary from Street 7-L” easterly approximately 460 feet to
the existing 12” high pressure line. This new main will be
parallel to existing W/16" steel low pressure main. Additional
right-of-way easement may be required. Also, the relocation
of this existing 18"/16" main may be required because of
possible grading conflicts.
The existing high and low pressure mains along the southerly
lot lines of Lots 67, 66,65 & 56 could or will have conflicts
with grading. These issues must be discussed with District
Engineer prior to preparation of mylar improvement plans.
Install approximately 220 feet of temporary 12" high pressure
main in future College Boulevard from the existing 12" high
pressure AC-P. main northwesterly to the easterly boundary
line. (This main will require an offsite easement).
Install 12" low pressure main in Hidden Valley Road from
Camino De La Ondas to the westerly boundary line. This will
take place when Hidden Valley Road is improved. Also, the
District has a 20 foot wide easement located along the westerly
boundary of which 5.00 foot is located in your subdivision.
Arrangements must be made with District prior to any grading
and/or construction in this easement. Obviously the existing
6” main will be removed/abandoned and the easement
quitclaimed when the Hidden Valley Road main is constructed
but in the meantime arrangement must still be made.
All offsite mains shall require easements and all weather vehicular
access roads.
3. UNIT “c’ Conditions (MULTI-FAMILY)
The Developer shall process preliminary potable layout plans through
the Fire Marshal and District Engineer at which time all potable
conditions/requirements shall be set.
B) Reclaimed Systems:
1. Install 12" line in College Boulevard (Alga Road) from
Poinsettia Lane to north property line.
2. Install lines to adequately serve Unit “c’.
PC RESO NO.3556 -2o-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Install system to Service all open space and slopes as
determined by District Engineer.
Sewer Svstems:
1.
2.
Pursuant to local facilities management plan Zone 20, install
8” local trunk line in Hidden Valley Road from West property
he to San Marcos Interceptor line (gravity). Install 12” trunk line (VBT2 per Zone 20) in Laurel Tree Drive
(or College Boulevard).
Any temporary sewer service alternates must be approved by the District Engineer.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of November, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
Welshons, Savary & Erwin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Comissioner Hall.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOBCE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISStON
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOEZMILER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3556 -21-
Betz,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
PLiNNINGCOMMISSIONRESOLUTIONNO.3557
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 91-11
FOR 186 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 176 APARTMENT UNITS
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS.
CASE NAME: MARINERS POINT
CASE NO: SDP 91-l 1
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 17th day of November, 1993, consider said request on property
described as:
Southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 12 south, range 4 west
San Bemadino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the official plat.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to SDP 91-11.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of SDP 91-l 1, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2%
Findims:
1.
2.
3.
That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the
general plan, will not be detrimental to &sting uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, because the project is
consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan. The project would not
have a significant impact on the environment and is in compliance with mitigation
requirements of Final EIR 90-03. The proposed residential land uses are compatible
in scale, architecture, and building materials with the multi-family residential
development to the south. Public street improvements would be provided to
accommodate traflk generated by the project and the project must comply with all
the circulation and public facility requirements of Local Facilities Management Plan
Zone 20.
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use, because the project site is fairly geometric in shape, the topography is gently
sloping, and the grading and development to accommodate streets and building pads
would conform to all required City ordinances as illustrated on the attached
exhibits. The proposed 176 apartment units would be accommodated on the level
building pad areas of the lc I without encroaching into the manufactured slopes
located along the eastern portion of the site.
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use. to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained for the following reasons:
The project would be conditioned to provide a solid wall or fence, and landscaped
windbreaks along the perimeter of any future developable area that abuts property
under “open field” cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance effects of adjacent
pesticide spraying and dust generation from farm operations.
Single-family Residential Area:
a.
b.
Standard front, side and rear setbacks are provided for each home,
and all homes have three-car garages for offstreet parking.
The front yards of all the lots would be provided with 3 street trees
of varying sizes, a special 10 foot planting easement is provided along
the entire northern property line, a 10 foot planting easement is
provided on both sides of Camino del as Ondas, and the 50 foot
setback along Alga Road would be land form graded and heavily
landscaped.
PC RESO NO. 3557 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. An average 3 foot reduction in lot width for a single-family lot would
not preclude the placement of a home on the lot, would not constrain
access to the lot, nor substantially reduce the physical separation of
the homes when viewed from the public street. The Zoning
Ordinance currently designates 60 feet as the lot width for R-1-7500
single-family lots. All the lots in Unit “A” would still maintain a
minimum of 10,000 square feet of lot area, therefore, the modification
of the lot width standard for purposes of providing affordable housing
would not have a detrimental effect on public health., safety and
welfare.
Multi-Family Residential Area:
a. The bulk and scale of the proposed two and three-story apartment
buildings would be compatible with the existing and surrounding
residential development to the south. The proposed multi-family
residential land use would provide an appropriate transition between
the proposed single-family land use to the east and the future
community park land use to the northwest. A 20 to 25 foot building
setback along Hidden Valley Road and a 20 to 35 foot setback along
Camino de las Ondas would provide an adequate bulTer between this
project and the public streets.
The building pads for the apartments would be 20 feet lower in
elevation than the single-family homes to the east. The single-family
homes are adequately set back a distance of approximately 27 to 40
feet from the top of the slope that separates the two land uses. In the
area of the apartment site where the apartments are only
approximately 5 to 10 feet below the grade elevation of the homes to
the east, there would be a public street separating the two residential
land uses. These slope separations and setbacks are adequate to
buffer the two land uses in terms of noise and visual aesthetics.
b. The design of the project would assure a unique mix of residential
development, and enhance the aesthetic quality of the area as follows:
i. The street setbacks would be landscaped with a combination
of trees and shrubs to partially screen the residential str~~ctures
from the public streets.
. . . .
ii. The building elevations would have textured stucco exteriors
and tile roofs, varied roof lines, architectural accent features
and building forms, and varied building facades.
PCRESON0.3557 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
. . . Ill. The dwelling units would be orientated at various angles along
the driveway to provide an enclosure of space between the
buildings and to provide more visual interest when the project
is viewed from the public streets.
4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use for the following reasons:
Single-Family Residential Area:
All the local, collector, and major streets within this area would be constructed to
full public street width standards, have underground utilities, and contain public
sidewalks.
Multi-Family Residential Area:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
The project would provide adequate onsite parking (348 parking
spaces) and circulation to serve the needs of the residents and their
guests, and it would not impact the availability of offsite street
parking.
Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the
project’s street frontages to serve the project.
The proposed 30 foot wide central private driveway would be
adequate to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turn
movements, and emergency access. The City’s Parking Ordinance
requires a minimum standard width of 24 feet for a two-way traffic
aisle containing ninety degree parking on both sides. A 24 foot
driveway aisle provides adequate separation and distance for vehicles
backing out of parking spaces and adequate separation for two-way
trafk (12 feet per travel lane).
An internal pedestrian circulation system, that is separated from the
driveways, would be provided and it would allow sufkient and safe
access to the recreation facility and adjacent public streets.
Adequate emergency access is provided by the central 30 foot wide
private driveway that leads from Hidden Vahey Road to Camino de las
Ondas. The 30 foot wide driveway is wide enough to accommodate
emergency vehicles, and the project would be conditioned to prohibit
parallel parking along this central access way. The project has been
reviewed and approved by the Fire Department.
5. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
PC RESO NO. 3557 4
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The project provides affordable housing units that will be available to low income
households.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of approval for GT 91-12 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3556 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through this
reference.
2. Approval for SDP 91-l 1, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “CO”, dated November 3,1993,
incorporated by reference and on fle in the Planning Department. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading
and/or development substantially different from this approval as determined by the
Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit.
PC PESO NO. 3557 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1C
11
12
12
Y
1t
1C
17
1E
1s
2c
23
2:
21
2!
2!
2t
2:
2t
c
i
i
r
I
1
b
L
2
3
1
5
5
I
3
3. Approval of SDP 91-11 is subject to approval of CT 91-12 and HDP 91-25.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of November, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
Welshons, Savary & Erwin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Hall.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Y MICHAEL J. HOLZMILtiR
PM’JNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3557
Betz,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3558
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR 186 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND
176 APARTMENT UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND NORTH OF
CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS.
CASE NAME: MARINERS POINT
CASE NO: HDP 91-25
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 17th day of November, 1993, consider said request on property
described as:
Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12 south, Range 4 west
San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the official plat.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to HDP 91-25.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES HDP 91-25, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
PC RESO NO. 3558 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly
identified because the site’s hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have
been identified on a slope constraints exhibit.
That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
permits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual for the following reasons:
a. All manufactured cut and Eli slopes are land form/contour graded and
do not exceed a height of 30 feet.
b. The project’s cut/fill grading volumes of 8,915 cubic yds. per graded
acre falls within the “potentially acceptable range” of 8,000 - 10,000
cubic yds./acre. Included in these volumes is 43,200 cubic yds. of
grading for Alga Road which is a circulation element roadway. When
Alga Road is subtracted out of the grading calculations, the project’s
grading volumes are reduced to 8,481 cubic yds. per graded acre and
are still within the “potentially acceptable range”.
Based on engineering requirements to meet specific fixed vertical and
horizontal alignments for proposed Alga Road and the extension of
Camino de las Ondas, which is a non-loaded collector road traversing
across the entire project, the Planning Director and City Engineer
approve the proposed grading volumes.
C. Landscaping in conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan would be
provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in visually screening the
slopes erosion and to reduce erosion.
d. All structures and roofs within the project would be earth tone in
color to reduce visual impacts.
e. A percentage of the homes along the north/south trending and gently
sloping ridgeline would be one-story in height and all homes would
have varying roof lines.
f. Homes are setback from the top of manufactured slopes from a range
of 17 to 50 feet.
That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this code
PC RESO NO. 3558 2
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
because all undevelopable areas have been identified and no development or grading
would occur in the areas containing 25 to 45%+ slopes. The project contains no
wetland areas, riparian or woodland habitats, floodways, major power transmission
easements, beaches, or permanent bodies of water.
4. That the project design and lot configuration minim&s disturbance of hillside lands
because the proposed grading would create building pads that are terraced for views
and step down the slope. A majority of the local streets and manufactured slopes
are cmving and are aligned to follow the north/south trending contours. The street
alignments and curving land form graded slopes would reduce visual impacts created
by the grading and help simulate the natural slope conditions.
5. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
6. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
7. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
8. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified District.
9.
10.
11.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
PC RESO NO. 3558 3
.
1
2
2
4
c: c
6
‘i
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
23.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
1. All conditions of approval for CT 91-12 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3556 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through this
reference.
2. Approval for HDP 91-25, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “OO”, dated November 17,
1993, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department,
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any
proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit.
3. Approval of HDP 91-25 is subject to approval of CT 91-12 and SDP 91-11.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of November, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
Welshons, Savary & Erwin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Hall.
ABSTAIN: None.
BAILEY NOBfE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. WLZMIWER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3558 4
Betz,
EXHIBIT 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
APPLlir. A ION COMPLETE DATE:
JULY 8. 1992
STAFF PLANNER: JEFF GIBSON
a
STAFF REPORT 0 3
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25 - MARINERS POINT - Request for
recommendation of approval for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development
Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and construct 186 single-
family homes, and 176 - one, two, and three bedroom apartment units, all
on property generally located east of Paseo de1 Norte, and north of Camino
de las Ondas in the RDM-Q Zone and R-1-10,000-Q Zone in Local Facilities
Management Plan Zone 20.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3556, and
3557, recommending APPROVAL of CT 91-12, SDP 91-11, and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3558 APPROVING HDP 91-25, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJEfX DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting recommendation of approval for a Tentative Tract Map, Site
Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and construct 186 single-
family homes and 176 - one, two, and three bedroom apartment units on a gradually
sloping and rectangular lot located east of Paseo de1 Norte and directly north of Camino
de las Ondas. The parcel is located in the Coastal Zone, totals 68 gross acres, is
undeveloped, and mostly contains disturbed grassland habitat as a direct result of past
agricultural usage of the site.
The property has a split zoning and General Plan Land Use designation. The property is
located in the Residential Density-Multiple Zone with the Qualified Overlay Zone (RD-M-Q)
and in the One-Family Residential Zone with the Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-10,000-Q).
The General Plan Land Use designation is Residential Medium (RM) and Residential
Medium Low (RLM). In addition, the project is subject to the requirements of the Zone
20 Specific Plan (SP 203) and Final Environmental Impact Report 90-3.
CT 91-12/SDP 91-l l/HDb 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
As shown on Exhibits “A” - “OO”, the proposed project would consist of one and two story
single-family homes with three-car attached garages located on individual lots ranging in
size from 7,500 to 21,670 square feet. In the western portion of the project site on an 8.7
acre lot there would be two and three story apartment buildings containing one, two, and
three bedroom units all developed around a central 30 foot wide driveway and central
parking courts. Along the central 30 foot wide driveway that leads to future Hidden Valley
Road and Camino de las Ondas there would be a variety of resident and guest parking
spaces, trash enclosures, and one large active corm-non recreation complex containing a
swimming pool, clubhouse, and restroom facility. The project would contain additional flat
grassy common passive recreation areas between buildings, parking areas and slopes. The
apartment buildings would contain one, two, and three bedroom units that range in size
from 797 to 1,219 square feet.
Per the requirements of the City’s recently adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15%
of the proposed dwelling units (55 affordable units) must be provided for lower income
households. The applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units within
the apartment portion of the project. The project would be conditioned to require an
Affordable Housing Agreement that would be submitted for review and approval by the
City prior to Final Map approval.
The project would feature contemporary architecture consisting of tile roofs with varying
roof lines, and stucco exteriors. The surrounding neighborhood is developed with two-
story multi-family residences to the south, and vacant land to the east, north and west.
The future Poinsettia Community Park would be located approximately 100 feet to the
northwest across future Hidden Valley Road.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans, and ordinances:
A. Carlsbad General Plan: Land Use Element - (Residential Medium Low (RLM)
and Residential Medium (RM) Land Use Designations); Open Space
Element; and Housing Element;
B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (Specific Plan 203);
C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21;
1. Chapter 21.53, Section 2153.120 - Site Development Plan -
“Affordable Housing”;
2. Chapter 21.95, Hillside Development Regulations;
3. Chapter 21.85, Inclusionary Housing.
-
CT 91-12/SDP 91-11/r& 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 3
D. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20, Subdivision Ordinance; and the California
Subdivision Map Act;
E. Mello II Local Coastal Program;
F. Growth Management (Local Facilities Management Zone 20);
G. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19, Environmental Protection Procedures; and
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A. GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
The property has a Residential Medium (RM) and Residential Medium Low (RLM) General
Plan Land use Designation. The RM designation allows the development of low density
apartment or condominium developments that range in density from 4 to 8 dus/acre with
a 6 dus/acre growth management control point. The RLM designation allows single-family
homes that range in density from 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre with a 3.2 dus/acre growth
control point. The project contains a combination of apartments and single-family homes
and therefore, is consistent with the land use designations of the General Plan.
OPEN SPACE AhiD CONSERVATION ELEMENT
The property contains no existing or approved General Plan open space, conceptual open
space and greenways, or any planned trail system links per the open space exhibits found
in the City’s Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan. In addition, the
Zone 20 Specific Plan designates open space in the. very northeastern comer of the
property. The project would preserve the steep coastal sage covered slopes located in this
portion of the project in protected open space.
The project would not preclude or negatively affect the attainment of any of the open space
action priorities designated in the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management
Plan for Zone 20, therefore, the project is consistent with the Open Space and Conservation
Element of the General Plan.
HOUSING ELEMENT
All residential development within the Zone 20 Specific Plan is required to include a
percentage of housing units affordable to persons and families of lower income. Consistent
with the policies and programs of the Housing Element and subsequent to the affordable
housing requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan the project would provide 15% or 55
apartment units available and affordable to lower income households. In addition, and
consistent with Housing Element Policy 3.2 the project would provide at least 10% of the
lower income units with three or more bedrooms.
-
CT 91-12/SDP 91-11/i-L 91-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 4
B. ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 203‘2
The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant
properties within Zone 20 to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities
and community amenities for the future residents of the planning area. This project meets
the goals and objectives of the specific plan for the following reason:
1. The project conforms to all aspects of the General Plan and applicable City
ordinances, regulations and policies.
2. As conditioned the project provides coordination between surrounding developments
through the provision of roadway connections with properties to the north, east and
south.
3. The residential land uses are compatible with the existing multi-family residential
land use to the south.
4. The project does not preclude the provision of an integrated open space and trail
system within the planning area.
5. The project provides an attractive, well buffered, and landscaped circulation system
that safely and aesthetically provides for the needs of automobiles, cyclists,
pedestrians and adjacent land uses.
6. The provision of a combination of single-family lots ranging in size from 7,500 to
over 10,000 square feet and apartment units available to low income households
that would be located close to a 42 acre City park and adjacent to a collector street
creates a well planned, yet diversified community.
7. The project is located within the Commercial Overlay Zone and would provide a
small commercial area on the east side of future Alga Road. This site may be
developed for commercial uses subject to a future Site Development Plan approved
by the Planning Commission. If access to the neighboring property to the east is
required in this location the site may only be large enough to accommodate a small
Recreational Vehicle Storage area.
8. ’ To achieve densities conducive to the provision of affordable housing in Area “C”,
the project transfers density from Areas “A” and “B” to Area “C”. The specific plan
allows one area to be developed at a higher density than would normally be
allowed, subject to the remaining area being developed at a lower density for
purposes of affordable housing. The density transfer is allowed only if the overall
density of the area does not exceed the total number of housing units allowed under
the Growth Management Ordinance.
-
CT 91-12/SDP ti'l-ll/nDk- 91-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
The project is located in Planning Area “A” of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and complies with
the required “Special Design Criteria” as follows:
1. An average 50 foot setback from Alga Road would be provided.
2. Noise mitigation measures for homes impacted by traffic noise from Alga Road
would be provided.
3. Enhanced landscaping would be provided along Camino de las Ondas and Alga
Road, and on the manufactured slopes between the terraced building pads.
4. The building elevations for the single-family homes and apartment buildings would
have a variety of materials, architectural accent features, articulated wall and roof
planes, varying roof heights and building massing, building street setbacks, and
curvilinear streets are provided.
The Zone 20 Specific Plan also designates the Residential Density-Multiple Zone with the
Qualified Development Overlay Zone (RD-M-Q) and the R-l One-Family Residential Zone
with the Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-10,000-Q) of the City’s Zoning
Ordinance as the implementing zones for development standards in the project.
The proposed project would comply with the standards of the R-l, RD-M, and Qualified
Development Overlay Zones as follows:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-l)/CHAPTER 21 .lO
REQUIRED PROPOSED
I LOT SIZE I 10,000 SQ. FT. I 10,000 SQ. FT.
LOTCOVERAGE 40% MAX. 39% MAX.
FRONT YARD SETBACK 20 FEET 20 FEET
STREET SIDE YARD
SETBACK
10 FEET lo-FEET
SIDE YARD SETBACK S-10 FEET 5-10 FEET
REAR YARD SETBACK lo-20 FEET 20-90 FEET
BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FEET 18-24 FEET
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/nb 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE ZONE @D-M)/ CHAPTER 21.24
REQUIRED PROPOSED
LOT SIZE 7,500 SQ. FT. 7,500 S. F. & 8.4 ACRES
LOT COVERAGE 60% MAX. 19%
FRONT YARD SETBACK lo-20 FEET 21-35 FEET
STREET SIDE YARD S-10 FEET 15-30 FEET
SETBACK
SIDE YARD SETBACK 5 FEET 40-50 FEET
REAR YARD SETBACK 10 FEET 15 FEET
BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 32-35 FEET & ,
QUALIFIED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (Q)/ CHAPTER 21.06
The zoning for the property includes the Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q),
therefore, before the Planning Commission recommends approval of the project to the City
Council, Title 21, Chapter 21.06, Section 21.06.020(b) requires the Planning Commission
to make the following findings:
1. ‘That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the
General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation”.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan as
explained in Sections A and B of this report. The project would not have a
significant impact on the environment as discussed in Section G of this report. The
proposed residential land uses are compatible in scale, architecture, and building
materials with the multi-family residential development to the south. Public street
improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic generated by the project
and the project must comply with all the circulation and public facility requirements
of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
2. “That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use”
The project site is rectangular in shape, the topography is gently sloping, and the
grading and development to accommodate streets and building pads would conform
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/~Dk 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 7
to all required City ordinances as illustrated on the attached exhibits. The proposed
176 apartment units would be accommodated on the level building pad areas of the
lot without encroaching into the manufactured slopes located along the eastern
portion of the site.
3. ‘That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained”.
The project would be conditioned to provide a solid wall or fence, and landscaped
windbreaks along the perimeter of any future developable area that abuts property
under “open field” cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance effects of adjacent
pesticide spraying and dust generation from farm operations.
Single-family Residential Area:
a. Standard front, side and rear setbacks would be provided for each home, and
all homes would have three-car garages to satisfy offstreet parking
requirements.
b. The front yards of all the lots would be landscaped with 3 street trees of
varying sizes, a 10 foot planting easement is provided on both sides of
Camino de las Ondas, and the 50 foot setback along Alga Road would be
landform graded and heavily landscaped.
Multi-Family Residential Area:
a. The bulk and scale of the proposed two and three-story apartment buildings
would be compatible with the existing and surrounding residential
development to the south. The proposed multi-family residential land use
would provide an appropriate transition between the proposed single-family
land use to the east and the future community park land use to the
northwest. A 20 to 25 foot building setback along future Hidden Valley
Road and a 20 to 35 foot setback along Camino de las Ondas would provide
an adequate buffer between this project and the public streets.
The building pads for the apartments would be 20 feet lower in elevation
than the single-family homes to the east. The single-family homes would be
adequately setback a distance of approximately 27 to 40 feet from the top of
the slope that separates the two land uses. In the area of the apartment site
where the apartments are only approximately 5 to 10 feet below the grade
elevation of the homes to the east, there would be a public street separating
the two residential land uses. These slope separations and setbacks are
adequate to buffer the two land uses in terms of noise and visual aesthetics.
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDk 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 8
b. The design of the project would assure a unique mix of residential
development, and enhance the aesthetic quality of the area as follows:
i. The street setbacks would be landscaped with a combination of trees
and shrubs to partially screen the residential structures from the
public streets.
ii. The building elevations would have textured stucco exteriors and tile
roofs, varied roof lines, architectural accent features and building
forms, and varied building facades.
,.. 111. The dwelling units would be orientated at various angles along the
driveway to provide an enclosure of space between the buildings and
to provide more visual interest when the project is viewed from the
public streets.
4. “That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use”.
Single-Family Residential Area:
All the local, collector, and major streets, both within and offsite from this area,
would be constructed to City standards, have underground utilities, and contain
public sidewalks.
Multi-Family Residential Area:
a. The project would provide adequate onsite parking (348 parking spaces) and
circulation to serve the needs of the residents and their guests, and it would
not impact the availability of offsite street parking.
b. Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the project’s street
frontages to serve the project.
C. The proposed 30 foot wide central private driveway would be adequate to
provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turn movements, and
emergency access. The City’s Parking Ordinance requires a minimum
standard width of 24 feet for a two-way traffic aisle containing ninety degree
parking on both sides. A 24 foot driveway aisle provides adequate separation
and distance for vehicles backing out of parking spaces and adequate
separation for two-way traffic (12 feet per travel lane).
d. An internal pedestrian circulation system that is separated from the
driveways would be provided and it would allow sufficient and safe access
to the recreation facility and adjacent public streets.
-
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDk 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
e. Adequate access for emergency vehicles is provided by the central 30 foot
wide private driveway that leads from Hidden Valley Road to Camino de las
Ondas. The 30 foot wide driveway is wide enough to accommodate
emergency vehicles, and the project would be conditioned to prohibit parallel
parking along this central access way. The project has been reviewed and
approved by the Fire Department.
C. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 21:
1. CHAPTER21.53, SECTION 21.53.120, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN -“AFFORDABLE
HOUSING”
The Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.53.120 requires a Site Development Plan for any
multi-family residential apartment development having more than 4 dwelling units or an
affordable housing proiect of any size.
This project would have 362 residential units of which 55 of those units must be
designated as affordable to lower income households. Lots within the proposed single-
family R-1-10000 portion (Unit “A”) of the project do not meet the Zoning Ordinance’s 75
foot lot width standard for R-1-10,000 lots. An overall lot width average of 72 feet would
be maintained in Unit “A”. A lot width ranging from 70 to 75 feet is adequate to
accommodate a home and still maintain -side yard setbacks that meet the ordinance. This
reduction in lot width for a portion of Unit “A” allows approximately 9 additional single-
family units to be developed which reduces the financial burden to provide affordable units
elsewhere in the project. In order to provide affordable housing in this project the
applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that
this standard be waived under Section 21.53.120(c) Development Standards. A Site
Development Plan for an affordable housing project may allow less restrictive development
standards than specified in the zone code or underlying zone if the project is in
conformance with the General Plan and would not have a detrimental effect on public
health, safety and welfare.
Before the Planning Commission recommends approval of the project to the City Council,
Title 21 of the Municipal Code under Section 21.53.120(c) requires that the following
finding be made:
“That the project is in conformity with the General Plan and adopted policies and goals of
the City, and it would have no detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare”.
See the Section B of this report entitled Qualified Development Qverlav Zone tQ] for
additional findings of fact that also apply to this finding requirement of the code. An
average 3 foot reduction in lot width for a single-family lot would not preclude the
placement of a home on the lot, would not constrain access to the lot, nor substantially
reduce the physical separation of the homes when viewed from the public street. The
Zoning Ordinance currently designates 60 feet as the lot width for R-1-7500 single-family
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/nDk- 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 10
lots. All the lots in Unit “A” would still maintain a minimum of 10,000 square feet of lot
area.
2. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS/CHAPTER 21.95
The project site contains slopes of 15% or greater and an elevation differential greater than
15 feet, therefore, a Hillside Development Permit is required. Before the Planning
Commission approves the Hillside Development Per-n-tit, Title 21, Chapter 21.95, Section
21.95.030 requires that the Planning Commission make the following findings:
1. ‘That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly
identified”.
The site’s hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have been identified on
Constraints Exhibit “JJ” dated, November 17, 1993.
2. ‘That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
pennits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual”.
a. All manufactured cut and fill slopes are landform/contour graded and do not
exceed a height of 30 feet.
b. The project’s cut/fill grading volumes of 8,915 cubic yards per graded acre
falls within the “potentially acceptable range” of 8,000 - 10,000 cubic
yards/acre. Included in these volumes is 43,200 cubic yards of grading for
Alga Road which is a circulation element roadway. When grading for Alga
Road is subtracted out of the grading calculations, the project’s grading
volumes are reduced to 8,481 cubic yards per graded acre and are still within
the “potentially acceptable range”.
Based on engineering standards and requirements to meet specific fixed
vertical and horizontal alignments for proposed Alga Road and the extension
of Camino de las Ondas, which is a non-loaded collector road traversing
across the entire project, the Planning Director and City Engineer recommend
approval of the proposed grading volumes.
C. Landscaping in conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan would be
provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in visually screening the slopes
and to reduce erosion.
d. All structures and roofs within the project would be earth tone in color to
reduce visual impacts.
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/tiDi 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
e. A percentage of the homes along the north/south trending and gently sloping
ridgeline would be one-story in height and all homes would have varying
roof lines.
f. Homes are setback from the top of manufactured slopes from a range of 17
to 50 feet.
3. ‘That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this code”.
All undevelopable areas have been identified and no development or grading would
occur in the areas containing 25 to 45%+ slopes. The project contains no wetland
areas, riparian or woodland habitats, floodways, major power transmission
easements, beaches, or permanent bodies of water.
4. ‘That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside
lands”.
The proposed grading would create building pads that are terraced for views and
step down the slope. A majority of the local streets and manufactured slopes are
curving and are aligned to follow the north/south trending contours. The street
alignments and curving landform graded slopes would reduce visual impacts created
by the grading and help simulate the natural slope conditions.
3. INCLUSIONARYHOUSING ORDtNANCE,CHAPTER21.85:
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance implements the inclusionary objectives of the Housing
Element (Objective 3.6), and at a minimum, the project would be required to provide not
less than 15% of all proposed residential units affordable to lower income households. The
project proposes 362 dwelling units, therefore, 15% of those units would yield a minimum
requirement to provide 55 housing units affordable lo lower income households. The
applicant is proposing to meet the affordable housing requirement of the project within the
apartment portion of the site plan. Six (10% min.) of the affordable apartment units
would be three-bedroom and contain 1,219 square feet to accommodate larger families.
The project would be conditioned to require an Affordable Housing Agreement that would
be submitted .for review and approval by the City prior to Final Map approval. The
Affordable Housing Agreemknt is a legally binding agreement between the applicant and
the City which provides the specific details regarding the implementation of the affordable
housing requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and subsequent conformance with the
City’s Housing Element.
,-
CT 91-12/SDP 91-l l/ riDl 31-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is, located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 in the
Southwest Quadrant. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and
compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY IMPACTS
CITY ADMINISTRATION 1262 Sq. Ft.
LIBRARY 673 Sq. Ft.
WASTE WATER TREATMENT 362 EDU
PARKS 2.52 Acres
DRAINAGE N/A
CIRCULATION 2926 ADT
FIRE Station # 4
OPEN SPACE 10.1 Acres
SCHOOLS CUSD
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 362 EDU
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 72,640 GPD
COMPLIANCE WITH
STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The project is 3.4 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance
for the property.
E. SUBDMSION ORDINANCE/ TITLE 20
The proposed tentative map would comply with all the requirements of the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. Adequate drainage and sewer would be provided within
the proposed public streets. The project’s drainage and sewer systems would flow south
into existing systems and towards Batiquitos Lagoon. Grading quantities would consist of
625,000 cubic yards of cut and fill that would be balanced onsite, thus eliminating the
impacts associated with export or importation of soil.
The project’s proposed streets are adequate to handle its circulation needs as conditioned.
Street “L” as shown on the tentative map will not meet cul-de-sac standards. A condition
of approval has been added to ensure that the project comply with the Final EIR 90-03 and
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 requirements for meeting cul-de-sac standards
and for the phasing of improvements for Alga Road. The applicant’s proposal to comply
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/nDI 31-25 - MARINERS POlNT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 13
with the cul-de-sac standard involves the use of a 20 foot drainage easement with grades
up to 20% that leads from the end of “L” Street to Camino De Las Ondas. That proposal
would also serve to circumvent the EIR and facility plan conditions for phasing of Alga
Road. The Engineering Department does not find that alternative acceptable.
As conditioned the project would provide the following public street improvements:
1. A traffic actuated signal at the intersection of Alga Road and Camino de las Ondas
shall be designed and guaranteed for future construction.
2. Alga Road between the subdivision boundary and Poinsettia Lane shall be
constructed with two inside lanes, full median curbing, all needed storm drain
facilities and all utilities that will be beneath the paved roadway sections. The City
Engineer may accept an alternate proposal that fulfills the need to provide this vital
roadway link that the residents of this project will use. This condition may be met
by another developer based on which developer wishes to proceed first.
3. Alga Road within the subdivision boundaries shall be constructed with full public
improvements to major arterial standards based on a right-of-way width 102 feet.
4. Hidden Valley Road within the subdivision boundaries shall have half street
improvements plus 12 feet of paving. An offsite portion of Hidden Valley Road from
Camino de las Ondas to the subdivision boundary shall be constructed for two lanes
of travel. This offsite portion of Hidden Valley Road is required in order to meet
the cul-de-sac policy for Unit “C’of this subdivision.
F. MELLO II LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
The project is located in the Mello II Segment of the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP)
and complies with the plan as follows:
1. All grading avoids steep coastal sage covered slopes in the very northeastern comer
of the property per the requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay
Zone. The project would be conditioned to provide adequate drainage, siltation,
and erosion control facilities as part of the approved grading permit. The grading
operation would be limited to the summer construction season, April 1 to October
1.
2. The project contains vacant non-prime agricultural land containing Class III and IV
soils and is located in the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Site II). The Mello II
LCP requires mitigation when non-prime coastal agricultural land is converted to
urban land uses. The project would be conditioned to comply with one of the three
LCP mitigation options provided when projects are located in. Site II: (1) “Prime
Land Exchange”; (2) “Determination of Agricultural Feasibility”; and (3)
“Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee”.
. CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/Hbr 91-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PAGE 14
G. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/ TITLE 19 AND CEOA
The project site is located within the boundaries of Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203) which
covers the 640 acre Zone 20 planning area. The direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts from the future development of the Zone 20 planning area have
been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 90-03) for the specific plan.
The recommended mitigation measures of Final EIR 90-03 would be included as conditions
of approval for this project. These studies provide more focused and detailed project level
analysis and indicate that additional environmental impacts beyond what was analyzed in
Final EIR 90-03 would not result from implementation of the project. This project is in
prior compliance with Final EIR 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
environmental impacts.
Iv. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project: (1) is consistent with the General Plan; (2) complies with the Zone
20 Specific Plan; (3) meets the requirements of Titles 20 and 21; (4) findings for the Site
Development Plan can be made under Section 21.06.020 and 21.53.120; (5) complies with
the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program; (6) is in conformance with Growth
Management; and (7) is in compliance with the mitigation requirements of Final EIR 90-
03, and will not significantly impact the environment, therefore, staff recommends approval
of CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25.
A’ITACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3557
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3558
4. Location Map
5. Background Data Sheet
6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
7. Disclosure Form
8. Reduced Exhibits
9. Full size Exhibits “8’-“OO”, dated November 17, 1993.
JG:km:lh:vd
September 20, 1993
-
BACKGROUND DATA SHEEl
CASE NO: CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25
CASE NAME: Mariners Point
APPLICANT: Bramalea California Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 186 single-far& homes and 176 apartment units
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Southeast Quarter of Section 21. Township 12 south, Range 4 west San
Bernardino Meridian, in the Countv of San Diego, State of California. according to the official plat.
APN: 214-140-08 Acres 68 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 187 Lots & 176 Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation Residential Medium and Residential Medium Low
Density Allowed 3.2 & 6 Dus/Acre Density Proposed 5.4
Existing Zone RD-M-Q & R-1-10.000-Q Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements) Zoning Land Use
Site RD-M-Q & R-1-10.000-Q Vacant
North RD-M-Q & R-1-10.000-Q Vacant
South RD-M Multi-familv
East LC Agricultural
West PC Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 362 EDU
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated November 26, 1991
Sewer District Carlsbad
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated November 9, 1993 (Final EIR 90-03)
Other, JG:lh
--
CITY OF CARISBAD
GROWTH MANAGE&lENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Mariners Point - CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: RM/RLM ZONING:RD-M-Q/R-1-10.000-Q
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Bramalea California Inc.
ADDRESS: 100 Bavview Circle, Suite 2000, Newport Beach, CA 92660
PHONE NO: (714) 509-4600 ASSESSOR5 PARCEL NO: 214-140-08
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 68 Acres/362 UNITS
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 1262
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 673
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 362
Park: Demand in Acreage = 2.52
Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin = N/A
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
Schools:
2962
NO. 4
10.1
CUSD
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
362
N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD - 72,640
The project is 3.4 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.,
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
A?PLICAIKT’S STATEMEFUT OF XCLOS’JRE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH &ILL GEC~,FE
;ISCAE~IONAAY ACTICN ON :irE PAF(T OF THE C;Ty COLINCIL. OR ANY APPOlN-rED BOARD, CO&,MlSSjON 0~ CCMM~EE
‘P iease Prm)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. ArMcant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Bramalea California, Inc. One Park Plaza, Suite 1100
lrvine, LA Y.2114
2. Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownershi
Bramalea California, Inc. One Par R interest in the pro erty involved. Plaza, Suite 1 00 P lrvlne, LA 92114
3. If any person identified pursuant-ta-(-lj=q--@)-abo ration or partnership, list the names ant
ing more than 10% o the corporation or owning any pannershtp
One Queen Street East, Suite 2300
Toronto, Ontario Canada P%C-249
.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust. N/A
FRMOOO13 8/W
2075 Las Palmas Drive l Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-l 161
.-
(Over)
Disclosure Statement Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Scar=:
Commlsslons, Csmmittees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - - No x If yes, please indicate person(s)
Der~on rs d&nod as ‘Any mdivrdurl. firm. copartnsrshlp. jornt vontwa. urocistion. social club, frarornal orgamzatlon. corporrf~on. estaw :r,st I
1ete1~8r. syndicrtr, this and any other counry. clfy wd county. cq muf%clpal@y. dl$Irlct or other polR~al 1ubdWllOn. or any 01ner groin 3, I
comblnakon actmg ad l unit’
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) LLce
Nbveii%er 25, l&u
Bramalea California, Inc.
Print or type name of owner
Pres ident x
/"
ignature Of ajbplicant/date Jack
I November 25, 1991
Bramalea California, Inc.
Print or type name of applicant
Re 'imer , Vice
President
FRh4ocxI13 8/90
BRAMALEA CALIFORNIAa JNC,
CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY
I, Bruce J. Varker, Assistant Secretary of Bramalea California, Inc., hereby c&ties that the following persons
have been duly elected and/or appointed to the position(s) set opposite their respective names and further certify
that said elections and/or appointments are in full force and effect.
DIRJXTOR
Peter B. Pen-in
OFFJCEJtS
Peter B. Perrin
Bruce J. Varker
Bruce Abbey
Tim McGinnis
Stewart D. Davidson
Robert B. Farrell
Jack Reimer
Michael F. Wintemute
Charles Simon
- President
- Executive Vice-President,
Fiance and Administration and Assistant Secretary
- Senior Vice-President
- Senior Vice-President
- Vice-President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Ofticer)
- Vice-President
- Vice-President, Land Development
- Vice-President and Corporate Controller
- Secretary
,4U’J”JlORJZED SIGNJNG OFFJCEJtS
Randall J. Tipping
Pegi DiRienzo
David Meadows
David Lopez
- Authorized Signing Officer
- Carl execute and deliver all tax returns and related
documents together with an Officer
- Authorized Signing Officer - can execute and deliver all documents together with
an Authorized Signing Officer or above
- Authorized Signing Officer
- can ex,ecute and deliver ah documents together with
an Officer of Director
- Authorized Signing Officer - can execute and deliver all documents together with
an Authorized Signing Officer or above
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the corporate seal of Bramalea
California, Inc.
DATED this
Bruce Jebarker, Assistant Secretary
_ , -’
_ /---
.--’ /’ .L *. /-- A’ /’ ,’
. -
!
1
!f f .., ; . j p ; i rt? . : I- ii
i h*
! ,‘jY i
i i 0
:, : . .
:-i ! $8 . .
arm =
LJJ 3 -1’ -
d b
-.
-t
t +
!-
-
t
I? 17 i; I=
lb j 3 f = 5 I
; i
2 fi .- f x _= 5
N
r
, {,‘.y; . :: ; .,,y”;. .ie 33 *z “‘, \
_I I
: ;
>;-;
; ‘ ..,I ‘: i. .
: _
N
X
j ,- 4 t t ! 5 = : 2 z
i I
m
b
z
W c b 6 r/l - c3 = 0 d w 0 c- L4 -
” x
I+
ii ii
f
i ,. z ? s ‘i
I
/
/
I
/ /
I
/
, /
0
ci
Z -
d
z
0” ul m
G u
d w,
a
c
<
d a
-
C
T-
L
e
t
-
,_._ EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 1993 PAGE 11
ioner Erwin inquired if the additional finding which Commissioner Schlehuber is suggesting
acceptable to the City. Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney, replied that it would be acceptable.
n stated that he supports the staff recommendation but he thinks the office space
use by Rally’s, the lube, and car wash personnel.
made by Commissioner Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
n Resolution No. 3569 approving the Negative Declaration issued by the
irector, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3570 and 3571,
-01 and CUP 93-01, based on the findings and subject to the
d therein, with the following changes: (1) the addition of findings as
mo dated November 17, 1993 with a change in the wording for
the new condition hall be abated consistent with the
requirements of a nting the LCP which set a time limit for
conformance with LCP.“; (2) the addition of a new finding
to state that under Chapter 50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
Commercial-Tourist Zone, t ommission finds that the three (3) automobile
service stations immediately e site do not provide lube services or full
service car washes. Lube services an ervice car washes are part of the uses
permitted by Chapter 21.29.050 and service stations that exist.“; (3) the
addition of a finding that the fluores g is an attention-getting device
which is prohibited by the sign ordinance; ondition which states that the
canopies as shown in Exhibit F shall be replace oated canopies consistent
with the building exterior subject to approval of rector; and (5) a change
to Condition #32 to state that offices within the car was re are restricted to onsite
uses by personnel of the car wash, restaurant, and the lu
VOTE: 5-l
NOES: Commissioner Welshons
ABSTAIN: None
CT 91-l 2/SDP 9-l 1 /HDP 91-25 - MARINERS POINT - Request for recommendation of approval
for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and
construct 186 single-family homes, and 176 - one, two, and three bedroom apartment units, all on
property generally located east of Paseo del Norte, and north of Camino de las Ondas in the RDM-Q
Zone and R-l -10,000-Q Zone in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
Chairman Noble advised the applicant that he had the right to be heard before a full Commission. He was
asked if he wished to be heard tonight or granted a continuance. The applicant indicated that he wished to
proceed.
Jeff Gibson, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the applicant is
requesting to subdivide and construct 186 single family homes on lots ranging in size from 7,500 to
21,670 s.f. and to construct 176 apartment units. The project is located on Camino de las Ondas, east of
Paseo del Norte. The property is approximately 68 acres in size. The lot is currently undeveloped and
mostly contains disturbed grassland habitat. Access to the project would be provided by future Hidden
Valley Road and Camino de las Ondas, which would be extended east to meet future Alga Road. In
addition, Alga Road would be extended through the project and connect with Poinsettia Lane to the south.
Camino de las Ondas would be widened to 40 ft. of pavement and would have curb, gutter, and sidewalk
on both sides. The Alga Road connection to the existing Poinsettia Lane to the south would also provide
additional access to the project.
Mr. Gibson stated that the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance requires that 55 affordable dwelling units
must be provided for low income households. Those affordable units will be located within the apartment
MINUTES w’
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 1993 PAGE 12
portion of the project. The apartment units are located in the area of the project in which the zoning allows
multi-family residential development. They will be located close to the future Poinsettia Park and two
non-loaded collector roads. The future Hidden Valley Road would eventually connect with Palomar
Airport Road to the north and Camino de las Ondas would connect to Alga Road to the east. This planned
roadway network can adequately handle the additional traffic generated by the project.
The proposed multi-family land use is compatible with the existing multi-family developments located in
the neighborhoods directly south, including condominium townhome and apartment-type developments.
The apartment portion of the project would meet all City adopted plans, policies, and standards, including
the City’s height and parking ordinances. To appropriately fit into the existing community, the apartment
buildings would be designed with pink tile roofs, varied roof lines, textured stucco exteriors, architectural
accent features, and a variety of building facades. Using an architectural rendering, he reviewed the
features of the project. The proposed project complies with all City ordinances and requirements and staff
recommends approval.
Commissioner Welshons inquired who would maintain the landscaping behind the homes where they back
up to one another. Mr. Gibson replied that this open space area would be maintained by the homeowner’s
association.
Commissioner Welshons inquired how the gardener would access that open space area behind the homes.
Mr. Gibson replied that if the homeowner puts up a fence, he must provide a gate for access. The
homeowner’s association would be required to pay for and install the irrigation system.
Commissioner Welshons inquired where the pedestrian trail leads to that is located in the corner between
the single family units and the apartment project. Mr. Gibson replied that this trail will be used as
pedestrian access to the City park which will be located on Hidden Valley Road.
Commissioner Welshons inquired if this project will create access problems for existing homes in the area.
Mr. Gibson replied that the homes are currently accessed by a driveway easement similar to what they are
now using. The project should not create any access problem for the existing homeowners.
Commissioner Savary inquired who will be responsible for the maintenance and care of the apartment
project. Mr. Gibson replied that the multi-family units will be located on one large lot which has one
owner. The owner will be responsible for maintaining the slopes.
Commissioner Savary inquired where this project would be located in relation to Costa do Sol. Mr. Gibson
replied that Costa do Sol is located directly west of this project. Costa do Sol is a condominium
development whereas here there will be affordable units located within the apartment project.
Commissioner Erwin requested staff to indicate where the buildings pads are being reduced by 3 ft. Mr.
Gibson replied that there is split zoning on the property. The zone line travels down J Street. The land
east of J Street is considered R-l -10,000 zoning. Of the 37 lots in that area, 15 would have reduced lot
widths but would still range between 70-75 ft. (75 ft. being the required minimum width). The reduced lot
widths will provide additional single family units which will help offset the costs for the affordable housing.
Commissioner Erwin inquired why densities were increased in the single family units and not the
apartment project. Mr. Gibson replied that densities in the apartment complex were also increased.
Commissioner Erwin requested staff to comment on the letter from Aviara which states that they feel other
developments in this area should pay their fair share towards the new Poinsettia/l-5 interchange. Bob
Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, replied that the agreement regarding the Poinsettia interchange was
voluntary on Hillman’s part. They were not required to do this and their signed agreement does not
include any other property owners.
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17,1993 PAGE 13
Commissioner Welshons noted that H Street was stubbed to the south and she inquired what was
happening to the north. Mr. Wojcik replied that H Street was stubbed south to serve the existing resident.
There are no existing homes to the north which is why H Street was not extended north. There is a
condition to extend Alga south to Poinsettia for additional circulation for that area. Mr. Wojcik noted that
there is a project in process to the north which will be gaining access off Alga Road and Hidden Valley
Road. However, this project is being proposed as a gatecl community. If we required a street be extended
north from this project to that one, it would be gated. The developer to the north stated that he would
prefer not to have another gate to deal with.
Commissioner Welshons requested staff to review the cul-de-sac policy, which Mr. Wojcik did.
Commissioner Welshons’inquired about the fee referred to in Condition #lOO as a special development tax.
Mr. Wojcik replied that Condition #lOO refers to the CFD. The fee for Alga and Poinsettia is not included in
the CFD.
Commissioner Welshons inquired why H Street or some other street is not going to connect with
Poinsettia. Mr. Wojcik replied that it can’t connect because of the intersection distance which needs
1,200 ft. spacing.
Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Dorian Johnson, Vice President of Bramalea California, applicant, addressed the Commission and stated
that he agrees with the staff report and conditions of approval. He has seen the errata sheet and agrees
with it also. Mr. Johnson stated that he believes Alga Road is an important connection and his company
will be contributing to Alga Road as part of the CFD which is being established. He doesn’t believe that the
implementation or bonding requirement for the Alga Road extension should be a requirement of the entire
project, although it is necessary to meet the cul-de-sac requirement for a part of the project. Mr. Johnson
would like to see that particular condition drafted so that the acquisition of the right-of-way and the
necessary bonding for Alga Road will be required for those units necessary to meet the cul-de-sac policy.
He stated that he has worked very closely with the property owner to the north for access purposes. At one
time, there was access to the north, but in the course of working with staff and the other developer, it has
been eliminated. Regarding the landscaping on the slope behind the homes, there will be no grass or need
for heavy equipment. Nonetheless, they plan to provide an access approximately every 300 ft.
Commissioner Welshons requested more information on the homeowner’s association. Mr. Johnson
replied that there will be a homeowner’s association for the single family detached homes to take care of
the landscaping. Separate and apart from that association, will be the ownership and management of the
multi-family affordable project. They will be responsible for the maintenance of their area. They will not
be responsible for maintenance of the common slopes behind a particular unit further up the hill. That will
be under the authority of the association for the single family homes.
Commissioner Welshons inquired if these are two different entities. She would also like to know if the
single family people can use the recreation center. Mr. Johnson replied that the recreation center is for the-
sole use of the apartment project.
Commissioner Welshons inquired about the small pocket park. She cannot envision people crossing
Camino de las Ondas to go to this park. Mr. Johnson replied that this is a difficult corner. It is not large
enough for a lot and it won’t be an active park. It will probably be more of a landscape amenity.
Commissioner Welshons stated that even though there are community parks here and there, people still
like having a tot lot close by. Mr. Johnson replied that perhaps when the property to the south develops,
there may be an opportunity to expand that corner and develop it.
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 1993 PAGE 14
Commissioner Erwin noted that there are no individuals named on the disclosure statement. Mr. Johnson
replied that Bramalea California is a public corporation. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bramalea Ltd.,
which is a Canadian corporation. There are no single individuals owning more than 10%.
Arto Nuutinen, 4920 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, representing Bowie, Arneson, Kadi, Wiles &
Giannone, attorneys for Carlsbad Unified School District, addressed the Commission and stated that
correspondence has previously been forwarded to the Commission regarding school impacts. The school
district is requesting that any future City Council action be conditioned upon mitigation of these identified
impacts. He requested that this correspondence be included with this application. Mr. Nuutinen stated that
the school district is projecting a shortfall of $1 ,113,OOO to meet the school facilities costs for the Mariner’s
Point development. He requested that the Commission condition this application upon execution of
appropriate mitigation agreements with the school district providing for full mitigation of school facilities
impacts from buildout of this project prior to any action by the City Council. He stated that the school
district is in the process of developing agreements with the various developers within Zone 20, including
this applicant, which are expected to be entered into sometime in the future.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the school district is asking that this be incorporated into this application
package tonight. Mr. Nuutinen replied that this is correct and that when the package is forwarded to the
City Council they will have an opportunity to address these school impacts.
Terence W. Pomeroy, 6847 Batiquitos Drive, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he is
representing himself. He is a concerned resident of the Las Playas development and he is worried about
the additional traffic which will be traveling along Batiquitos Drive as a result of this development. There
are many children in his development. He is very concerned about the high density of this project. He
moved here to get away from a congested city to the north. He has lived here six years and is concerned
about the heavy influx of development which is moving into Carlsbad. He would like to see the density of
this development reduced. He understands that the schools are overloaded now and this will only make it
worse. Every Carlsbad resident will have their property taxes increased just to pay for new schools to
accommodate the new residents.
Chairman Noble advised Mr. Pomeroy that he believes everyone who ever moved to Carlsbad did so
because of the rural nature of the area. He moved here many years ago and now he, too, feels hemmed
in. Density increases are being required in order to provide affordable housing. Even with the high
densities, Carlsbad still has a cap on the densities in each zone.
Commissioner Schlehuber advised Mr. Pomeroy that Proposition 13 protects property owners from having
their property taxes increase more than 2% per year. There is always a shortage of tax revenues but we
will have a 2% annual tax increase regardless of whether this development is built or not.
Jeannie Hough, 6820 Briar-wood, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that she is concerned
about the size of the development. The street she lives on, Briar-wood, is a private street. She inquired
how the City can prevent motorists from traveling down this private street. Her greatest concern is traffic
but she is also concerned about the additional noise. Ms. Hough is also concerned that affordable housing
will be so close to the single family homes. She doesn’t think people will want to live next to affordable
housing. If they don’t sell the homes because of the affordable housing, what will happen to them. Will
they stand vacant? She would like to know who will be living in the affordable housing and how the
tenants will be screened.
Commissioner Erwin advised Ms. Hough that the people living in the affordable housing might be her
children.
Chairman Noble commented that it will also be secretaries, teachers, and other professionals with incomes
of less that $43,000 a year. We are required to provide this housing for people. There will be many first
time buyers. He thinks she would be surprised to see who will live there.
MINUTES 4
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 1993 PAGE 15
Mrs. Hough would also like to know how it will be possible to maintain the privacy of Briarwood and
Alderwood.
Howard Hough, 6820 Briarwood, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that his major concern
is also traffic. He calculates that this development will generate 800 additional cars traveling to and fro
each day. It looks to him like they will all be coming down Camino de las Ondas to Batiquitos Drive. He
thinks the Commission should seriously consider the additional traffic this development will generate.
Ronald McKinney, 6525 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he lives to
the east of Alga Road. It appears to him that he will be landlocked because Alga Road is blocking the
existing access to his property.
Paul Klukas, the Planner for Aviara, 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission
and stated that he is in favor of the Mariner’s Point development. However, his biggest concern is the
$1 million which Aviara fronted to the City which is allowing this project to go forward. Mr. Klukas stated
that the agreement to fund the Poinsettia/l-5 interchange was not voluntary. It was a requirement for the
Aviara project approval. Now this project is going forward and is getting off scat free. Development in
Zone 9 and Zone 20 is moving forward. He feels these developers should be paying their fair share of the
Poinsettia interchange. Aviara thought they would be reimbursed in September 1993 and now it looks as
though they might not get their money until September of 1996. He would like a condition placed on this
project requiring them to pay their fair share.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Noble declared
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Dorian Johnson, Vice President of Bramalea California, applicant, was given an opportunity for rebuttal.
He stated that he looks forward to working with the school district regarding the school impacts. He know
that the City Council is working on this situation and he thinks it will be resolved soon. Regarding density,
he stated that Bramalea has not requested any density bonus on this development; it is consistent with the
general plan. Regarding the Aviara request, he stated that Bramalea plans to pay their fair share under
the City’s CFD and during that time frame. This affects all of Zone 20 and not just this specific project.
Regarding traffic, he is sure that staff will respond to those comments.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the improvements for Poinsettia/l-5 are a requirement for this project. Mr.
Wojcik replied that they are only a requirement as far as the CFD is concerned.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if Poinsettia must be improved before Aviara can develop their property. Mr.
Wojcik replied no. Poinsettia is not a failing point at this time.
Jeff Gibson, Associate Planner, responded to the access comment by Mr. McKinney. Condition #62 States
that prior to final map, an infrastructure plan must be submitted to the City. At the end of Alga Road, there
is an access connection which will allow traffic to flow further to the east. Access will be maintained for
those properties to the east of La Costa Boulevard, although it is a dirt access road.
Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, responded to Mr. Pomeroy’s comment regarding the traffic which will
be diverted to Batiquitos Drive. As part of the review process, a traffic report was done on all of Zone 20 to
make sure there would be no failures. Regarding Mr. Hough’s comment about the traffic coming down
Briarwood, which is a private road, Mr. Wojcik stated that traffic will take the route of least resistance. He
doesn’t think Briarwood will be impacted. If Briarwood is, in fact, a private street, the homeowner’s
association can take measures to restrict access. Regarding the comments from Aviara, Mr. Wojcik stated
that he has discussed the reimbursement with Jim Elliott, Finance Director, and the City will be working on
a reimbursement agreement with Aviara. Any reimbursement is a policy issue and not just something
which should be conditioned on projects.
MINUTES 4
PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 1993 PAGE 16
Commissioner Welshons inquired if there will ever be a traffic signal where Camino de las Ondas intersects
with Paseo del Norte. Mr. Wojcik replied that there will be a light but it should be taken care of with the
park.
Mr. Gibson reminded the Commission that the apartment portion of this project will not be entirely
affordable. There will be 55 affordable units out of 176. Qualifying for low income would be 80% of the
median County income. This would calculate to approximately $30,000 a year for a family of three. The
monthly income for one of these restricted units would be approximately $700 a month. These units are
for working people and $700 a month is a substantial amount. The quality of this multi-family project will
be similar to many condominium projects that staff has reviewed recently.
Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, responded to the comments by the school district and the letter
that was received today. In regards to the CEQA issue, he stated that staff does not necessarily agree with
the assumptions used in the finding of inadequacy of school facilities. The school district even admitted in
their letter that there are alternative sources of funding which have not been tapped. As with the LFMP for
Zone 24, the City is working on a compromise for a school facilities condition. Staff does not agree with
the school district contention that the CEQA document is inadequate.
Commissioner Erwin stated that the project meets our standards, although he has a problem with the
setbacks. In the last project, there was only one unit with side setbacks of less than 20 ft. In this project
there is approximately 100 such spots and it still meets our standards. He believes that the standards are
defective. Commissioner Erwin is also concerned about the lack of carports in the multi-family project.
Again, he feels that is a deficiency on our part not to require carports or garages for the multi-family units.
Nevertheless, he will support it.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolution Nos. 3556 and 3557, recommending approval of CT 91-l 2,
SDP 91-l 1, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3558, approving HDP
91-25, based on the findings and subject tq the conditions contained therein, including
the five changes set forth in staff memo dated November 17, 1993.
VOTE: 6-O
AYES: Chairman Noble, Commissioners Betz, Erwin, Savary, Schlehuber and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Regular meeting of November 17, 1993 was adjourned at 9:42 p.m.
BETTY BUCKNER
Minutes Clerk
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
MINUTES +
EXHVT 5 NB-ITEM 1
APPLICATION DATE: 12/29/93
STAFF PERSON: Evan Becker a-
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1994
TO: HOUSING COMMISSION
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT/MASTER PLAN - MARINER’S
POINT -
Request for recommendation of approval of a proposed 176 unit Affordable
Housing Project known as Mariner’s Point Apartments. The project is part of the
development for Tentative Tract Map # 91- 12 and SDP #91- 11.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Housing Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 94-001 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of the development of the proposed 176 multifamily unit affordable housing project
known as Mariner’s Point Apartments with no commitment at this time to providing the
requested financial assistance for the project.
II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
On November 17, 1993, Bramalea California, Inc. received a recommendation from the
Planning Commission for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan and
Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and construct 186 single-family homes and 176 one,
two and three bedroom apartment units. The project is subject to the Inclusionary Housing
Requirement which means that the applicant/developer would be required to provide a minimum
of 55 units of housing affordable to low income households.
The applicant’s affordable housing proposal indicates that all 176 of the apartment units will be
restricted to lower income households at 40%, 50% and 60% of the county median. Therefore,
the applicant’s actual inclusionary housing requirement is only 28 units. If the proposal is
approved by the City Council, the applicant will exceed the project’s affordable housing
obligation by 148 units; there will be excess affordable housing units available to either the City
or other private developers.
In addition, the project is required to provide at least 10% of lower income units in three (3)
bedrooms. The applicant is proposing that 30% (or 54 total) of the affordable units be 3
bedroom units.
13
MARINER’S POINT APARTMENTS
HOUSING COMMISSION - l/13/94
PAGE 2
III. APPLICANT/DEVELOPER TEAM INFORMATION
The development team for the proposed affordable housing project is as follows:
Annlicant: Bramalea California, Inc.
Develoner: American Housing Producers
Architect: Dorms Architects
Engineer(s): Hunsaker and Associates (Civil)
Iv. AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION
The project will be located on the north side of the intersection of Camino De Las Ondas and
Alderwood Road, approximately l/2 mile east of Paseo De Norte in Specific Zone Area 20. The
parcel number for the property is 214-140-42.
The project will provide 176 garden style apartments which will include 48 l-bedroom units
(approx. 650 sq.ft. each), 74 2-bedroom units (approx. 950 sq.ft. each) and 54 3-bedroom units
(approx. 1100 sq.ft. each).
Special amenities of the project will include a clubhouse, pool and spa, playground with tot lot
equipment, outside family areas with BBQs and picnic tables, patios and laundry rooms.
The design and quality of the affordable housing project will be consistent with that of the
proposed market rate product. The applicant has attached a portfolio of the developer’s,
American Housing Producers, most recent development activity in the affordable housing market
for information of the Housing Commission.
V. TERMS OF AFFORDABILITY
The applicant has proposed that the units remain affordable for 55 years for families at the
following income levels:
0 37 (21%) of the units will be affordable to households at 40% of the county median;
0 52 (30%) of the units will be affordable to households at 50% of the county median; and,
l 87 (49%) of the .units will be affordable to households at 60% of the county median.
-
MARINER’S POINT APARTMENTS
HOUSING COMMISSION - l/13/94
PAGE 3
The following chart provides a breakdown of bedroom sizes by income levels:
Bedroom Size 40% of median 50% of median
1 10 14
2 15 22
3 12 16
Total 37 52’
60% of median
24
37
26
87
The applicant intends to begin construction on the units in October, 1994 and complete
construction by October, 1995. Construction of the affordable housing units will commence in
the initial phase of construction for the single family homes.
VI. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
The applicant will apply for tax credits from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee.
In addition, the applicant is requesting local financial assistance in the amount of $3,600,000 in
return for the additional 148 units of excess affordable housing within the subject project.
At this time, staff is not making a recommendation to commit financial assistance to the
proposed affordable housing project. Staff will continue to work with the applicant/developer
to determine the level of financial participation that can be provided by the City of Carlsbad.
It is staff’s preference to have private developers collaborate on their own in such a manner that
“Combined Projects” result in a source of outside equity needed in order to allow an affordable
project or more affordable units to be feasible. Participation in Combined Projects will be
governed by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance which requires the City to be a party to an
Affordable Housing Agreement. The agreement will include provisions related to the purchase
and sale of credits for the purpose of satisfying an inclusionary obligation through a Combined
Project. In this way, the City will be approving the transactions but will not own or collect funds
for the credits; the transaction will occur between two private developers.
Although staff is not eliminating the possibility that the City may need, or desire, to assist the
subject affordable housing project, staff will first encourage the applicant to work with other
local private developers/builders who also have an inclusionary housing requirement to produce
a Combined Project.
MARINER’S POINT APARTMENTS
HOUSING COMMISSION - l/13/94
PAGE 4
VII. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
It is staff’s opinion that the proforma presented by the applicant fairly presents a preliminary
project financing plan and identification of the potential subsidy requirements given the level of
affordability for the project. Staff will work with the applicant to refine the development cost
figures and the sources and uses of funds. Also, staff will indicate to the applicant/developer that
other “outside” sources of subsidy, in addition to the tax credit equity, must be explored.
V1J.I. CONSISTENCY WITH HOUSING ELEMENT AND CHAS
The proposed affordable housing project is consistent with the policies and programs of the
Housing Element and the affordable housing requirements of the approved Zone 20 Specific Plan. The applicant has proposed to provide 176 units of affordable housing which exceeds the
15 %.Inclusionary Housing Requirement for the market rate units and the number of 3 bedroom
units (30%) in the project exceeds the City’s 10% requirement.
Carlsbad’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, or CHAS, indicates that families in
the very low income category represent the greatest population of need for affordable housing.
The City’s first priority, as outlined in the CHAS, is to provide housing affordable to very low
income (50% or below of county median) renters. The applicant proposes to provide a total of
89 units affordable to households at 50% or below the county median. The applicant is ,also
proposing a satisfactory mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units at the very low income levels.
The City’s second priority related to renters, as outlined within the CHAS, is for low income
small and large families. The proposed project is consistent with the top priorities of the City
as related to new construction of affordable housing units.
IX. SUMMARY
The Mariner’sPoint Apartment Affordable Housing Project, as proposed, is consistent with the
Housing Element and meets the needs of lower income small and large families. Therefore, staff
is recommending that the Housing Commission adopt a recommendation to the City Council for
approval of the subject affordable housing project. As stated previously, staff is not
recommending any financial assistance to the project at this time. Staff may, at a later date,
return to the Housing Commission with a recommendation related to financial assistance once
the project plans have been refined in more detail with the applicant.
MARINER’S POINT APARTMENTS
HOUSING COMMISSION - l/13/94
PAGE 5
X. EXHIBITS
l- Housing Commission Resolution No. 94-001 adopting a recommendation to the City
Council to approve the Mariner’s Point Affordable Housing Apartment Project.
2- Housing Commission Review Application submitted by Bramalea California, Inc. ’
3- American Housing Producers Portfolio of recent affordable housing projects.
4- Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 17, 1993.
5- Site Development Plan for proposed Affordable Housing Project.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHlBiT 6
HOUSING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROPOSED 176
UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT KNOWN AS
MARINER’S POINT APARTMENTS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND
NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS.
APPLICANT: BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, INC.
CASE NO.: AHP 94-1 (CT91 -12 And SDP #92-l 1)
WHEREAS, an Affordable Housing Project (AHP) Application (No. 94-l)
has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad’s Housing Commission for review and
consideration;
WHEREAS, said Housing Commission did, on the 13th date of January,
1994, hold a public meeting to consider said application; and
WHEREAS, at said public meeting, upon hearing and considering all
testimony, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. That based on the information provided within the application and
testimony presented during the public meeting of the Housing
Commission on January 13, 1994, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of Affordable Housing Project (AHP) No. 94-l containing 176
apartment units to be affordable to lower income households for a period
of at least fifty-five (55) years subject to the findings and conditions
outlined herein.
3. That the Commission’s recommendation for approval of said affordable
housing project does not include support for any financial assistance for
the project at this time. Financial Assistance for the project will be
considered under separate action.
,
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
1s
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
26
FINDINGS:
1.
2.
3.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Carlsbad’s
Housing Element and Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, the
lnclusionary Housing Ordinance and the affordable housing requirements of the
approved Zone 20 Specific Plan.
The project will provide a total of 89 units affordable to renter households at
50% or below the county median which meets the number one priority as
outlined within the City of Carlsbad’s 1993-1998 Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The project will also provide 87 units affordable
to renter households at 51% to 60% of the county median which meets the
number two priority of the City of Carlsbad as outlined in the 1993-98 CHAS.
The project, therefore, has the ability to effectively serve the City’s housing
needs and priorities as expressed in the Housing Element and CHAS.
The project appears to be financially feasible based on review of the prospective
sources of subsidy and projected costs,
COhlDITIONS:
1. Recommendation of approval is granted for AHP No. 94-1, as shown on Site
Development Plan 91-l 1, dated July 24, 1992, incorporated by reference and
on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in the conditions of project
approval by the City Council.
2. Recommendation of approval is granted for AHP No. 94-l subject to the
condition that the required ratio of income restricted units shall be constructed
concurrent with the project’s market rate units.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Upon final approval of said affordable housing project and prior to final map
approval, the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with
the City of Carlsbad. The agreement shall be binding to all future owners and
successors in interest. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall include all
terms and conditions of said project approval and outline the incentives
(financial or other) to be provided by the City of Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Housing Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 13th day of
January, 1994, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: AVIS , ROMBOTIS, NOBLE, SAT0 PETERSON , WELLMAN, ESCOBEDO, SCARPELLI
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: CALVERLY, NANCY
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST:
EVAN BECKER, Housing and Redevelopment Director
0 0
.
MARCH 7,
TO:
FROM:
1994
MAYOR LEWIS COUNCIL MEMBERS
Planning Department &
MARINERS POINT - CT 91012/SDP 910ll/HDP 91-25
Upon further consideration, staff has determined that the City Council will need to take action on the Hillside Development Permit that accompanies this project. Therefore, the recommended action should be revised to read as follows:
The Planning Commission, Housing Commission, and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING HDP 91-25, as approved by the Planning Commission, and APPROVE_ CT 91-12, and SDP 91-11.
. - - - % -
.ZEF!T p’;‘:,; IT, IF y=l-=-;[ ; i- f-G-: 1: ’ Z’%-i’ I Z
9-_,-,- ( :=\-‘z.=-- Z-Z -2!3 >L$i,i;s -
.
MARCH ?,I984
TO: CI’W MANAQER
FROM: A$~~~TANT PLANNING DIRECTOR -&iw
SUBJECTi WVISED CONDITION - CT 81-12~ MARINERS POINT
cc
staffbr ecammendlng that Conditbn M. 55 of Plan&g Commksbn ReWAlon No. 355Q be amended to read QP follows:
65, To offset the conversion of non-prlmo agricultural land to urban land us498 per the tequlremsnta of the Mello II Lo4 Coastal Program (UP) the applicant ehall Implement one of the following thr 88 mftigatlon options prior to approval ef the final map:
& Preserve pftma 8grWtutal prapefty wkhln the Coastal Zone consistent with
the provislons of the Cabbad LCP; or
b. Itlurtrute that co&usd or renewed agrkubral uue b not hasible per the guideliner of Mtigatlon Optlon 2 of the Local Chstal Program; or
c. Provkb payment of an a~rlcultwtl mltigath fee, the amount of which 8hAl not be leas than $5,000 nor more than $1 O,ooO for each net owrvcrrtod BDTB. The amount of the fee ahall be determined prior to approval tithe final map and shall be consistsnt with the proWone of CarWad’ LCP,
The modlfisd wording daes not atter the intent of the original conditbn, however, it doe8 provide better canslstency with Cartsbad’s Local CoaW Program.
arb
t 2 n E 2 -A a 4 80 Ei
s !$
s 5 v) IL 6 0 Qk’ a 2 u ul
01Y4Hdb~Y W\ut-LI I lLkFi 342 Wl btb 23 '54 uy:yj
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
CTB1-12118Dp81-11MDp91-e5-~$PomcT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GtVEN that the My Council of the City of C&&ad will hdd & public hearing at the city Council Chamber& 1200 Cwbbad Wage Drive, CM&ad, ~ahrnia, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, March 8,1994, to cdder an applicatiin for a Tentative Tract Map, Situ Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permt to subdii and construct 186 single-family homes and f 70 one, two and three bedroom apartment units, all on property generally located east of Pasea Dei Nmte, and north of Camino del Ias Or@?& in the RDM-Q Zone and R-l -IO,MlO-6 Zone in Local Facititiss Managemcti Plan Zone 25, and nwrft paflkulatly ckwibed as:
Sbutheast quarlef of Swtiin 21, TowWig .
12 Stwth. Rarge 4 West, San Bernardino r
MaMan, in the County 91 San Diego, State wt California aacordii tw the U.S. Govemm%nf Survey approved OcWef 25,
1875.
If yw have any questions regwdlng this matter, phase call Jeff Gibn In the Planning
Departmnt, at 438-l 181, ext, 4455.
H you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Sle Dwelopment Ran ahdm Hilkii Devebpment PerriM in court, you may be limited tt3 raising only those issues raised by you or someww else at
the puMc hearing descritsd in this r&ii. or in wrtlten COmapondenoe deliired to the City bf
Cart!Wd City Clerk’s OUii at, or f.wbr to, the pubtii hearhg,
APPLICANT: Bramalea CWtmia, Inc, 4 kllta
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCtL I : -rolrc Pws 1 abw
LtQal44W Feb. 25,1094
“’ ‘,
‘,’ :;..
r.
SouthCoast Newspapets, Inc.
P.O. f3ax 90 l Oceantide, CA 92049
(819) 433-7333
BladeGitizen * Preview +
FAX W: 439-6659 ’
Advertising Fax #: 439-8669
Editorial Fax #: 757-2072
Composing Fax #: 439-8430
Preview Fax R: iW42617
To: _, Lee Rnaktwkranz .
No. of pages: - .‘J (Including Cover)
Chnm44nts: r.m thcr legal naticw yuu fnx~r?. the wt.&r dny te rLart g;hticat.io~ vi Friday tha 25th frW both publicnt$nns, you regun.stnd a 3x$ umnl ad. 411 copy plus map ancl logo vouid lrvt hnvn fit in the 3 x 5 and baen rondpb2.e at all: I. sumi Ltcd iL tu art. for UIU 5x6 which il; the nnrmal Ir$sl uizc ad IL-41 papc. ,,
.L aa faxing n c4py 4 tIzn
ad p1:us the ~tizc! Of a 3x5 to lhnw yor; what I ;
rnpn I q pmivns, cormnents, etc, pledse ” . . call,
,/ A : , I ‘: ~ .’
,, 1
.,,
-_ _- -- r- C-J‘ .-laJ TW.
.., ,’ :
f ‘45o
-- . --.-... .”
NOTiCE OF PUBUC HEAWN c~a1-~~pw-iitlllpal~pti-~swIM
NUUCXtSHHER&BYGtVENlhatthcCt Camt1lo(th~CItyolCMibadwl2ho#apr#k hw&g at the Cily Carm;l C~KUV&WL 1 &lo C&bad v#tasle Drive, Ctulsbml, Callforrda, at 6:~ P.M., on 1 uway. Mm 8,lQBA, to w&w an appkatbn tbr a Tewurtive Trau Map, me nevelapmeiv PMn, nn[( Hiwdd ncwnloprrwm Permit to wtrMde end asww 126 slqlc htnlly homct and 176 ono, two and thrim bwdmom apartment unH6, all on pmparty gtwwelly IIJGHI~~ wwal d Parrw Owl Nile. and nwUu1 of Camino del bs Or&s+ In Ihe RDM-Q lonr and R-l-lO,OOO4 &ne in Local Faciliiies Man;rgemerrI Plan Zone 20, and rrwre piutiiufty uctibeu as:
SoultleaslquUPrdSucliOn21.~~rsbp 12 9~41, Range 4 West, San Bernardino MeNlicm. in the Cxwy of San IX&o. Slme of calllomb rltxmlhg 10 the U.S. Govemrrm Survey awtvvecl Ouobor 22, II875
II you have any quesllorw repardinp Lois miIllef, #a# Carl Jefl GWon in ihe PlannirQ Department,a143&1161,sxt.44&.
II you challwngs the Tmtatiie Tract Map, Site Devbtopfnem Plan awor iMsM0 U~vblwnm PerTnir in uwt, you may be limited to raiairg only those 1nnl1nl; wkKl by you or .Ram akFl m the public hearing dewibed In thk notIce, or In writlen corrwpor*llce delved lu 019 cily of carbbau my aewi Office at, w wior lo, the public heM!g.
APPLICANT: FfrarrKllwa Cdiionfa, hn. 9 cd-
GAI-KSBAD CtTY CWWIL I
Lugal 4462 F&z 26,1094
j:w ‘,4 ‘t : 5; ,
I
5T:m PC, re 8u xd TP5
1 I ;,i-jy-
1..
* *“.L-’ :. ‘i.- -i-i .I i ! --i-j.-
i .1
:
.,]I j-
, .:_-.- .I , .’ ,, *
“‘--f- i
‘-------~-
.‘.‘: ._-- ---, ,.&_A
- y - .C-9 ,a .--
L-’ , -y-
- “- ‘,,.A--+
- 1 i.
- -&-L~ : ;
_... T”- ..i,+-
i _-- . ..“_. a-.:
_ I .,.....-. “,i _ ,
: / _ .C / ‘-- ._.-
., ,,.. ---., ..- _
,-.. -., . . . . .-m.-., . .
-. .-.- ---*-.
.., . . ., ,-.
--. . my-.?. i
“, ._-- :_.. --.I “______.,. .-
.---- --““A I.%-,, ,.A--
,.. . ._-..... -‘-T-F
. . ,.*sr--
- . . ___ .._,.
_“. -
. . -.
.
” . . .-
. .,.-.. ;- .,~. _ ._-. - .._,.._.-
----*L,, -I-
s - __.-.m. -. ;
. . . . . .,1( .‘. ._...- .
.‘. .I . ..-
“_. .,- I_ “,
,_, ,” .
. , .
. _ .
. . .
. . .,, ..- - ..-
. .- --. ,_.
_ . ..-. -. .
,, . -“... * _,.._
.- .
. ,.- . . .- . _ . .~
. .L _. -
.* ‘: . .,_,, .?P- - .- ., ,’ * ‘V
I , ,t ;’ : ” ,, ) (,:I .‘:f; ,( j. . .
c ” ‘$
. ’
‘I
‘.. ,
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25 - MARINERS POINT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, March 8, 1994, to consider an application for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and construct 186 single-family homes and 176 one, two and three bedroom apartment units, all on property generally located
east of Paseo De1 Norte, and north of Camino de1 las Ondas, in the RDM-Q Zone and
R-1-10,000-Q Zone in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20, and more
particularly described as:
Southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California according to the U.S. Government Survey approved October 25, 1875.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jeff Gibson in the
Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4455.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan and/or Hillside
Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or
in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Bramalea California, Inc.
PUBLISH: February 25, 1994
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
-.__- - I
MARINERS POINT
f-
(Form A)
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice CT 91-12/SDP 91-l l/HDP 91-25 -
MARINERS POINT for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the Council meeting of
Thank you.
MARTY ORENYAK FEBRUARY 4, 1994
Assistant City Manager Date
Attachments
(- -- l - _
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 17, 1993, to consider a request for recommendation of approval for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, and
Hillside Development Permit to subdivide and construct 186 single-family homes, and 176 -
one, two, and three bedroom apartment units, all on property generally located east of
Paseo de1 Norte, and north of Camino de las Ondas in the RDM-Q Zone and R-l -10,000-Q
Zone in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 and more particularly described as:
Southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 12 South, range 4 west San
Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State
according to the &%@$la+ flTdmp-
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invite
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after November 12, 1993. If
you have any questions, please call Jeff Gibson in the Planning Department at 438-l 161,
ext. 4455.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan and/or Hillside
Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 91-12/SDP 91-ll/HDP 91-25
CASE NAME: MARINERS POINT
PUBLISH: NOVEMBER 4, 1993
:. :
i
. ‘.. ..a’ ,., . ,. .;. ,,.. .’ ,I.,. I ;. .y,, ’ I 1 I I 1 I i. I I : ..’ r:,/ ; .’ / I I ; j
-_- .* - --+--.-
,
‘. .
. . 1
_ a.
1
;..
-
. . .
,’
: ,
’ .
_’
‘
.,
‘.
,, ‘.’
. ,
Sunbelt Planning Co, Inc
’ 8641 Firestone Blvd
* Downey CA 90241
Tabata Noboru & Evelyn Trust
P 0 Box 943
Carlsbad CA 92018
Engler William E
Star Rte 1 Box 30
Niland CA 92257
Tabata Family Trust 01-14-83
P 0 Box 1338
Carlsbad CA 92108
Thompson David B &
Karen R Revocable T.rust
P 0 Box 1487
Carlsbad CA 92108
Lincoln Seascape
c/o James Kent
Con Am Management
1764 San Diego Ave
San Diego CA 92110
Aken Joseph D
De Cresceqzo Helen
6845 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Larsen Eric C & Dawn S
6839 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Booth James C & Carol A
P 0 Box 3512
Orange CA 92665
Peterson Dorothy M
Durbeck M M Rose
683 1 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Abada Aharon
6 12 1 Romany Drive
San Diego CA 92120
Tabata Noboru & Evelyn Trust
2353 La Costa Blvd
P 0 Box 943
Carlsbad CA 92108
Engler William E
Star Rte 1, Box 30
Niland CA 92257
Tabata Noboru & Evelyn Trust P 0 Box 943
Carlsbad CA 92108
Lincoln Seascape
c/o James Kent/
Con Am Management
1764 San Diego Ave
San Diego CA 92110
Lincoln Seascape
c/o James Kent
Con Am Management 1764 San Diego Ave
San Diego CA 92110
Fry Eldon L & Cynthia H
6841 Aldexwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Rethy V. B. Living Trust 07-16-92
6837 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Fidler Judie
420 N Acacia Ave
Solana Beach CA 92075
McNatt Robert F
6827 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
* ,
. Donnelly Audrey L
* 985 Escondido Ave #llO
Vista Ca 92083
Ritter Julie
6821 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Watson Elton 0 &
Nellie M. Trust
6817 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Prentis Cynthia B. Trust
68 11 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Camou Rene J & Marian L.
6807 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Fitzpatrick Claire B. Trust 08-22-90
1732 Catalpa Road
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 920 18
Wood Jacalyn P Trust
905 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Hutter Timothy M
909 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Jude Valerie
Jude Simon & Nancy
9 15 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Labbe Patricia A
6823 Aldetwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Schneider Carol A
4 Valley Circle
Mill Valley CA 94941
Troup Cathryn H Trust
68 13 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Soper Charles N & Barbara J.
Nerra, PSC 817 Box 28
Carlsbad CA 92009
Broton Eugene F & Barbara J
6805 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Hahn Family Trust 1 l-23-92
P 0 Box 2009
Ranch0 Santa Fe CA 92037
Gannon Michael F &
Margaret R Trust
907 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Powell Tony
913 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Rivera Marta
Takarni Steve
9 17 Hawthorne Ave
Carisbad CA 92009
‘ ,
. Caroncino Joseph C
* 919 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Bokemper Sharon L
Fehlman Robert E
119 E Armsley Square
Ontario CA 91762
Heynen Rodney L & Diana L
929 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Pearson G Sidney & Joan L
935 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Dell Patricia A
939 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Stewart John F II
6861 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Cave Camille J Trust
6835 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Romaine David A & Julia R
683 1 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Molina Steven J
6827 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Urick James J &
Berry Sandra K
770 Washington Road
Pittsburgh PA 15228
Hayden Mark & Joann
929 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Alkhas Jacquelyn R
4747 Bryce Circle
Carlsbad CA 92008
Giusti Jean M
937 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Magowan Claire
P 0 Box 7451
Berkeley CA 94707
Reinoehl Shirley M
6859 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Van Egmond Peter J &
Clasina A
6833 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Sebestyen Helen E Trust
6829 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Eischen Marilyn V
6825 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
. .
. Schulz Thomas E
. Schulz Horst G & Elizabeth
6823 Pear Tree Dr
_ Carlsbad CA 92009
Ouderkirk Alice C
912 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Jones William S & Nancy B
3007 Azahar St
Carlsbad CA 92009
Stater Melba Trust
2173 Bolero Ln Vista CA 92084
Eckels George Jr Trust 07-21-90
903 Hickory ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Amstein Michael
907 Hickory Ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Disanto Norbert & Magdalena
911 Hickory Ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Holt James N & Elizabeth A
6830 Alder-wood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Grech Joseph Trust
6834 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Grogan Harry B & Cecilia E
6838 Alder-wood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Hunter Charlotte L
6821 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Reyes Luis & Joyce 9 10 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Iredale Leonard W & Joan
6762 Worsham Dr
Whittier CA 90602
Strawbridge Robert T & Marian M 902 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Mah Melanie P
90.5 Hickory Ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Cohen Philip H & Kathleen A
909 Hickory Ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Omelas Norma E
Seals Lauren M
Ramsey Norma A
913 Hickory Ct
Carlsbad CA 92009
Sanchez Rosaure
Pita Beatrice
6832 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Thompson Janet L Trust 12-1 l-92
6836 Alderwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Carpenter William H
‘e P 0 Box 1662
Oceanside CA 92051
Warren Diane L
6845 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Matthews Donald C & Elizabeth J
6841 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Wan Linda Y
6837 Batiquits Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Tortorici Liberato D & Roberta A
6833 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
McGuire William J & Mary Ann
6829 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Kraut Benjamin 8c Renee T Trust
416 Mendoza Terrace
Corona De1 Mar CA 92625
Reidt Dean 0 & Barbara M
932 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Touros David B & Donna M
18800 Still Lake Dr
Jupiter FL 33458
Fobian Stina
924 Hawthorne Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Pomeroy Terence W & Leda T
Revocable Trust
6847 Baliquitos
Carlsbad CA 92009
Klein Philip H & Baker Catherine M
14691 Danberry Circle Tustin CA 92680
Pletcher Robert A & Mikele H
6839 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Bell Angus T & Madeleine B
2107 Niblick Ter
Oceanside CA 92056
Smith Arville H & Joann R
683 1 Batiquitos Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Sprague Edward D & Diane E
Revocable Family Trust
1123 Portola St
Vista CA 92084
Michaels Vincent
Michaels Joseph
3917 Riverside Dr #9131
Burbank CA 91505
Taylor Peter F & Mary M Trust
930 Hawthorne Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Martens John D
926 Hawthorne Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Williams Doris M
6830 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
. I
Torre Frank M
,6832 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Peters Christopher D
P 0 Box 1662
Oceanside CA 92051
Stuemke John
6840 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Burnett Juliet
6861 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Tackabery Richard E & Ella A
6856 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Vergne J Pierre & Jacqueline
6803 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Booth James C & Carol A
P 0 Box 3512
Orange CA 92665
Mistry Jamshed N & Prochi J
6811 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Antonson Jonathon J & Debbie L
6817 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Linton Brian
Linton Russell K & Bemice A
6821 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Mackler Family Trust 11-14-86
(Trust A)
68 12 Watercourse Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Gene1 Gilbert T
6838 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Beardeaux Martin & Francis A
6850 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
McLaughlin Kathleen M
Johnson Betty Louise
6854 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Hassler Warren W & Peggy M
1990 Revocable Trust
6805 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Saltzman William E & Florence C
6809 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Brooks Richard 0 & Diane M
68 13 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Foster Corky R 8c
Bolton-Foster Barbara A
P 0 Box 182
Cedar City UT 84721
Miter Victor & Tatjana
6823 Maple Leaf Dr Carlsbad CA 92009
. ‘Johnson Gary Paul
, 6825 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
.
McDonough James C & Rita A
6831 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Anderson Robert & Nancy L
1929 Leucadua Scebuc Ct
Keycadua CA 92024
Tullus Osvald & Leida
6839 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Schneider Family Living Trust 12-1 l-90
11202 Lynrose Street
Arcadia CA 91006
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P OBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Soldwedel Joseph E & Pamela C
Trust 02-01-82
1309 W 20th St
Yuma AZ 85364
Hamilton Jane W.
68 16 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Oliver Joan
6820 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Olivas Gerald W & Bloom Carole S
6832 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Bach Theodore F & Rosanne A
3 Capshire Dr
Cherry Hill NJ 08003
Richards John D & Janis I
2713 Shoal Creek Circle
Plano TX 75093
Schryver Earl R & Patricia M
6837 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Gorzegno Trust 06-13-90
7177 Tern Place
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Virant Patrick J & Deborah B
68 10 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Brannigan Carolyn T
6814 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Lear Fred W & Sharon A
10520 Arbor Park Pl
San Diego CA 92131
Olivas Gerald W & Carole S
6832 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Strickland Gary L & Carol J Trust
99 Tunapuna Ln
Coronado CA 92118
. I
Loundy Donald J & Sandra l , 6836 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Morgan Anna L
6342 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Radford Henry F & Mary T
6846 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Elich Louis F & Helena
2042 Ridgeline
Vista CA 92083
Las Playas Homemowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Mitchell E Douglas
6805 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Eng S La Verne & Mary M
6809 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Tyson Lawrence W & Jean S
12 Sandbar Dr
Corona De1 Mar CA 92625
Beachler Family Trust 05-06-88
292 11 Stonecrest Road
Pales Verdes Peninsula CA 90274
Drumm David R
6823 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Wright Gary G & Elizabeth
6840 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Cerkanowicz Jerome C & Grace D
6844 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Wojcik Linda S
6848 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Seecs Mary E
Paganelli Perry M
17 10 Oneida Place
Oxnard CA 93030
Cassapakis Constantine G
6807 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Halcom Jack L & Linda T
3015 Clear-water Park Dr
Katy TX 77450
Schaub Leroy M & Dolores Y Trust
758 E Navilla Place
Covina CA 91723
Walsh Norma G Trust 08-01-90
Gonzales Joe Y
2 18 15 Ticonderoga Ln
El Toro CA 92630
Cameron Don T & Kathy L
6827 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Goad Jean-Paul A 8c Marilyn S
. 6829 Briar-wood Dr
‘P 0 Box 9030
Carlsbad CA 920 18
Curtius Michael D & Mary B
6833 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Bodas Wilma T
Bodas Leroy C
6837 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Hoover Family Trust 08-l l-89
1655 W Citracado Pky
Escondido CA 92029
Taylor Linda
22915 E Colombard Ln #3
Diamond Bar CA 91765
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Cervino Anthony C & Rita M
6802 Briarwood.Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Carrington Orin F & Jo Ann
6806 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Hough Howard A & Jeanne E
3480 Lillian St
Riverside CA 92504
Schinhofen Timothy L & Nancy T
6826 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
B&ton Jack P & Jewel M
27 13 Socorro Ln
Carlsbad CA 92009
Hoover Family Trust 08-l l-89
1655 W Citracado Pky
Escondido CA 92025
Penniston Priscilla Heam Trust 12-21-90
2 Wetstone
Irvine CA 92714
Nikolai James A & Joan L Trust
25234 Steinbeck Ave #A
Stevenson Ranch CA 91381
Barend William D & Mary J
Trust 05-l I-90 2945 Verda Ave
Escondido CA 92025
Las Playas Homeowners Assn c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Allsup Meldoy
6804 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Johnson Barbara E Trust 10-3 l-89
193 1 Hampton Ln Glendale CA 91201
Knauer Michael
216 Dickenson Ave
Newbury Park CA 91320
Ratledge Thomas L & Nancy T
6826 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
i ’ Kopitz Jeffrey S & Beverley A
, 6828 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 920092
Tipton Karen D Trust
6834 Briar-wood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Blankenship Paul R & Cheryl L
6838 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Elliott Donald E
6846 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 920 18
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
POBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Schindler Family Trust 04-26-90
648 Marsolan Ave
Solana Beach CA 92075
Aviara Land Assn
LMT Partnership
c/o Hillman Properties
450 Newport Centre Dr #304
Newport Beach CA 92660
Herbert Douglas W
6860 Pear Tree Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Livingston Steven J & Meryl
6852 Maple Leaf Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Nicholas Francisco J & Olga
- 6830 Briarwood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Brodsky Edward & Patricia
6222 E Driver Rd
Palm Springs CA 92264
Nisbet George T & Concetta
319 New York Ave
Jersey City NJ 07307
Leong AH Wai & Bong Hee
6848 Briar-wood Dr
Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P OBox 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Sarkaria Daljit S & Elaine
P 0 Box 5986
Orange CA 92613
Roesch Ronald L
2800 Neilson Way #708
Santa Monica CA 90405
Aviara Land Assn
LMT Partnership
c/o Hillman Properties
450 Newport Centre Dr #304
Newport Beach CA 92660
Caldwell Banker Relocation
27271 Las Ramblas
Mission Viejo CA 92691
Collins Karen
1629 Watson Way
Vista CA 92083
Peterman Mary
6850 Briarwood Dr
’ Carlsbad CA 92009
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
Las Playas Homeowners Assn
c/o Grg Mgmt Co
P 0 Box 1186
Carlsbad CA 92018
. * I *
c
-
FACILITYLABELS&INTPARTIES
MARINERS POINT
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST CMWD
801 PINE AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92008
ENGINEERING UTILITIES&MAINTENANCE
SANDIEGOCOUNTY
DEPTOF PLANNING
5201 RUFFIN RD,STE "B SAN DIEGO CA 92123
BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA INC. ONEPARKPLAZA STE 1100 IRVINE CA 92714