HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-07; City Council; 12719; 1994 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM4
a 1994 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
Adopt ResWIiQfl No; 7 Y- / Y~&lpl'OVifllJ the consulfant agreement for the 1994
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The City of Carisbad Growth Management Plan requires that the performance stanc
circulation be met at all times as growth occurs. The standard states that "h segment or intersection in the Zone nor any Circulation Element road segn
intersection out of the Zone which is impacted by development in the Zone s
projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak hours, nor Service Level D
peak hours. Impacted is defined by 20 percent or more of the traffic generated Local Facilities Management Zone using the road segment or intersection."
In 1 993, the Engineering Department staff completed the consultant selection proce
selected JHK & Associates as the most qualified firm to conduct the annual C
Management Traffic Monitoring Program. The consultant agreement approved by tt
Council June 15, 1993 authorized the services of JHK & Associates to be utilized 1
1994 and 1995 annual Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program.
Staff is recommending that the agreement with JHK & Associates be approved to I
the consultant to obtain traffic data for the 1994 Growth Management Plan '
Monitoring Report. Counts will be obtained in 1994 during the summer months of Ju, August. Traffic volumes will continue to be monitored through subsequent monil
programs as each individual development project is approved in Carlsbad. This monii
program is a planning study with no environmental review required and is exempt I
CEQA regulations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of services under the consultant agreement with JHK & Associates is $44
Funding is available in the Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program (Prl
Account No. 31 0-820-1 840-331 6) using Traffic Impact Fees.
tsdl 3 0 Dz a
1, Traffic Count Locations.
2. Resolution No. 7 4-1 ?q approving the consultant agreement for the 1994 Grc
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program,
3. Consultant agreement with JHK & Associates. 5
6
F e, 4
z 3 8 0
0 0
CIM OF OCEANSIDE
NOT TO SCAL
-INTERSECTION COUNTS
m-MID-BLOCK COUNTS
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
I.x
l2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 94-144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CllY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR THE
1994 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANTRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of Carlsbad solicited F
Qualifications from consulting traffic engineering firms to perform the traffic monitorir
of the Growth Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the firm of JHK & Associates was selected as the most qualified
the work; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad hereby finds it necessai
and in the public interest to award the consultant agreement to JHK & Associates oi
California to provide services for said project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has previously collected Traffic Impact Fees
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City (
California, as follows:
1, That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the consultant fee of $44,014 will be charged to the Growth Mana
Traffic Monitoring Program (Project Account No. 31 0-820-1 840-331 6).
3. That the consultant agreement with JHK & Associates is hereby apprc
Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreemei
the Mayor’s signature of said agreement, the City Clerk is further authorized and (
Ill
Ill
Ill
/It
I
1
2 I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
forward a copy of said agreement and this resolution to JHK & Associates,
Steven A. Smith, Vice President, JHK & Associates, 8989 Rio San Diego Drive, Suit1
Diego, California, 921 08.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad C
held on the 7th day of JUNE , 1994 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnil
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
... W" CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk (SEAL)
EXHlBl e 0
c AGREEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
1994 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day
, 19-, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a munic
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and JHK & ASSOCIATES, herein:
referred to as "Consultant".
RECITALS
City requires the services of a traffic engineering consultant to provide
necessary traffic counting, intersection and roadway mid-block capacity calculations 4
report writing services for preparation of the 1994 Growth Management Plan Tri
Monitoring Program; and Consuttant possesses the necessary skills and qualification
provide the services required by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual coven:
contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS
Consultant shall complete the 1994 Growth Management Pian Traffic Monitoi
Program in accordance with the provisions of its proposal to the City of Carlsbad, da
April 20, 1994, and attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
Rev. 1 l/S
0 a
1 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS
The City shall provide all relevant data at its disposal relative to the prop:
study and assist in coordination and obtaining additional data from other agencies
allow the expeditious completion of the scope of services outlined in Exhibit "A".
3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
The work under this contract will begin within ten (10) days after receipi
notification to proceed by the City and be completed within one hundred eighty (1
days of that date. Extensions of time may be granted if requested by the Consultant i
agreed to in writing by the City Engineer. The City Engineer will give allowance
documented and substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused t
lack of foresight on the part of the Consultant, or delays caused by City inaction or 01
agencies' lack of timely action.
4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONSULTANT
The total shall not exceed the fee payable according to Paragraph 6, "Paymen
Fees," and shall be $44,014. No other compensation for services will be allowed exc
those items covered by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 8, "Changes in Wc
5. DURATION OF CONTRACT
This agreement shall extend for a period of one hundred eighty (1 80) days fi
date thereof. The contract may be extended for one (1) additional one (1) year peri
or parts thereof, based upon satisfactory performance and the City's needs.
2 Rev. 11/!
e e
a 6. PAYMENT OF FEES
Upon completion of the I994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoi
Program, the Consultant shall submit an invoice to the City Engineer. Progress payrr
shall be based on the estimated percentage of completion of each phase or task
presented in the proposed cost estimate. The City will forward payment to the Consut
within thirty (30) days.
7. FINAL SUBMISSIONS
Within fourteen (14) days of completion and approval of the draft 1994 Grc
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program, the Consuttant shall deliver to the City
following items:
1. Ten (10) final report copies, bound in a three-ring binder of
1994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program.
2. Original final report copy (unbound) of the 1994 Grc
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program.
8. CHANGES IN WORK
If, in the course of the contract, changes seem merited by the Consultant or the (
and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change in the condit
of the contract is warranted, the Consuttant or the City may request a change in conti
Such changes shall be processed by the City in the following manner: A letter outli
the required changes shall be forwarded to the Ci by Consultant to inform them o
proposed changes along with a statement of estimated changes in charges or
schedule. A supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved b!
3 Rev. 111
a 0
n City according to the procedures described in Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.28.1
Such supplemefltal agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portii
of the agreement.
9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The Consultant warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any comp
or person, other a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure
agreement, and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or pers
other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of
agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to ar
this agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement p
or consideration, or otherwise recover, the kill amount of such fee, commiss
percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent fee.
10. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
The Consultant shall comply with the state and federal laws regarc
nondiscrimination.
11. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
In the event of the Consultant’s failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the worl
provided for in this contract, the City may terminate this contract for nonperformanu
notifying the Consultant by certified mail of the termination of the Consultant.
Rev. 11/! 4
0 0
? Consukant, thereupon, has five (5) working days to deliver said documents owned by
City and all work in progress to the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall mak
determination of fact based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentagc
work which the Consultant has performed which is usable and of worth to the Cit
having the contract completed. Based upon that finding as reported to the City Mana!
the Manager shall determine the final payment of the contract.
12. DISPUTES
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work under this agreemc
the following procedure shall be used to resolve any question of fact or interpretation
otherwise settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they becc
identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating under the provisions of
contract, shall be reduced to writing by the principal of the Consultant or the (
Engineer. A copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both par
involved along with recommended methods of resolution which would be of benefi
both parties. The City Engineer or principal receiving the letter shall reply to the IC
along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) days. If the resolu
thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the dispute s
be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the office of the (
Manager. The City Council may then opt to consider the directed solution to
problem. In such cases, the action of the Ci Council shall be binding upon the par
involved, although nothing in this procedure shal prohibit the parties seeking remec
available to them at law.
5 Rev. 1 l/S
e
13. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) di
written notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or termination, uy:
request of the CQ, the Consultant shall assemble the work product and put Sam€
order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to City. In the even!
termination, the Consultant shall be paid for work performed to the termination d;
however, the total shall not exceed the lump sum fee payable under paragraph 4. -
City shall make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and
compensation to be made.
14. STATUS OF THE CONSULTANT
The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in Consultant’s c
way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Consultant’s independent calling, i
not as an employee of the City. Consultant shall be under control of the City only a!
the result to be accomplished, but shall consult with the City as provided for in
request for proposal.
The Consultant is an independent contractor of the City. The payment made to
Consultant pursuant to the contract shall be the full and complete compensation to wt
the Consultant is entitled. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withholdii
on behalf of the Consultant. The City shall not be required to pay any work
compensation insurance on behalf of the Consultant. The Consultant agrees to indem
the City for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, or work
6 Rev. 1 I/$
0 0
L compensation payment which the City may be required to make on behalf 01
Consuttant or any employee of the Consultant for work done under this agreement.
The Consultant shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform i
Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements, including, but not limi
to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors i
consultants that are included in this agreement.
15. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to
applicable requirements of law: federal, state and local. Consultant shall providt
necessary supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approvz
necessary.
The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any other agencies.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and specifications as herein requ
are the property of the City, whether the work for which they are made be executec
not. In the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans, specificatic
drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. Consuitant z
have the right to make one (1) copy of the plans for hisher records.
Rev. 1 I/! 7
0 0
* 17. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS
The Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of
work pursuant to this contract shall be vested in City and hereby agrees to relinquist
claims to such copyrights in favor of City.
18. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
The Ci, its officers, and employees shall not be liable for any claims, liabilil
penalties, fines, or any damage to goods, properties, or effects of any person whate
nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, any intentional or neglis
acts, errors or omissions of Consultant or Consultant’s agents, employees,
representatives. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and save free and harmless
City and its officers and employees against any of the foregoing claims, liabili
penalties or fines, including liabilities or claims by reason of alleged defects in any pl
and specifications, and any cost, expense or attorney’s fees which are incurred by
City on account of any of the foregoing.
19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
The Consultant shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies
thereunder without the prior written consent of the City.
20. SUBCONTRACTING
If the Consultant shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under
contract by the Consultant, Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the
8 Rev. 1 l/
e e
. and omissions of Consultant’s subcontractor and of the persons either directly
indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for the acts and omission:
persons directly employed by consultant. Nothing contained in this contract shall cre
any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant and the City. -
Consultant shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontracta
the terms of this contract applicable to Consultant’s work unless specifically noted to
contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by the City.
21. PROHIBITED INTEREST
No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the CiQ
negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making, accepting
approving of this agreement, shall become directly or indirectly interested personall
this contract or in any part thereof. No officer or employee of the City who is authori
in such capacity and on behatf of the City to exercise any executive, supervisory
similar functions in connection with the performance of this contract shall become dire
or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part thereof.
22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION
No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of the (
either before, during or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modify an
the terms or obligations herein contained nor entitle the Consultant to any additic
payment whatsoever under the terms of this contract.
9 Rev. 11/!
e e
.. 23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless Agreement," all tet
conditions, and provisions hereof shall insure to and shall bind each of the parties her
and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assic
24. EFFECTIVE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first written ab(
25. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Consultant shall file a conflict of interest statement with the city clerl
accordance with the requirements of the Crty's conflict of interest code. The disclo3
category shall be categories: A, B, C-1 and C-2 (Investment and Real Property), Dl
F, H-1 and H-3 (Personal Income), H-2 (Business Entity Income), and G (Busin
Position).
26. INSURANCE
The Consultant shall obtain and maintain policies of general liability insurai
automobile liability insurance, and a combined policy of worker's compensation i
employers liability insurance from an insurance company authorized to do business in
State of California which meets the requirements of City Council Resolution No. 91-
in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($l,OOO,OOO) each, unle:
lower amount is approved by the City Attorney or the City Manager. This insurance SI
Rev. 111: 10
e a
be in force during the life of this agreement and shall not be canceled without thirty (
days prior written notice to the City sent by certified mail. .
The City shall be named as an additional insured on these policies. The Consul
shall furnish certificates of insurance to the City before commencement of work.
Executed by Consultant this 5+ day of &Y 11
(
CONSULTANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal
JHK & ASSOCIATES
(name of Consultant)
By: & m.u
s+@v@k A. &7jJP(,
(sign here)
AlTEST:
(print name here)
(title an organization of signatory) ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
via peih+. ~#jc c kI oGte+e
(eL,cfrryJ SH k fAJ-rocJ.r 743
Ajc8Jf: k8-6 City Clerk
Jfeue- T. LOA,
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by CONSULTANT must be attached
(President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign
by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officf
bind the corporation.)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution cert
’ RONALD R. BALL
+&-hg City Attorney
BY h 2J2. L
Deputy City Attorney
Rev. 11/ 11 6/dVV
5
C
ss.:
1 before me, -- SIILLV , 2L r\lc-l,D13t+L --- 1
, a notar
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ??\ qC@ 5 lac
On MHII 5;, 1qqiJ
<'- personally appeared >I tr'eI\r tc SM\Ttt -
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of sat1
evidence) to be the personts) whose name(s) is/are subscrib
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/t
cuted the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), an1 his/her/their signatureb) on the instrument the person(s
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, exec1
instrument.
- h Not& Pubh c
WlTNESSmy n apcjTeal.2 Q-
Notarial Seal
ASN 1-1 -91
e e j hk & associates
Apd 20, 1994
Mr. Robert T. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
City Traffic Engineer
Engineering Department APR 2 1 19% 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009- 1576 ENGlNEERlNG
D EP A RTM ENT
Subject:
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Ex.ECZMD
1994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program (JHK 9521)
As requested, JHK & Associates (JHK) has developed a Scope of Services and
estimate summary to complete the 1994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Prog
This estimate is based on the actual cost incurred by JHK to complete the last five Gr
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs. The project cost reports for this previous 1
allowed JHK to better determine accurate budgets for each of the following items included ir
proposal:
0 Manhour Estimates for Professional and Support Staff
Direct Costs for Temporary Employees e
e Mileage and Printing
Based on our prior experience in completing these studies since 1989, the total esti
to provide the services described in this proposal is $44,014 (see Table 1).
For this project, Steve Smith, P.E. will serve as the Responsible Officer and lea(
Executive Review Team. He will help ensure that the project team consistently maintains
levels of quality control. Mr Brian Shields, P.E. will serve as the Project Director and wi
responsible for overall project management and production scheduling. His experience
traffic operations, capacity analysis, and the four most recent growth management reports fc
City of Carlsbad will be useful in developing the final report. Mr. Shields, a registered t~
and civil engineer, will also sign and seal the final report. In addition, Mr. Erik Ruehr
ensure that the report addresses any future planning issues relevant to the City. Also, Mr.
Thornton will coordinate and supervise data collection and reduction efforts. His h
involvement in the preparation of previous growth management plan traffic monitoring prog
will be invaluable for the 1994 program,
EXHIBIT "A"
8989 Rio San Diego Drive Suite 335
Can nlPon raiifnrnia 911nR 0 (619) 795-7148 0 FAX 1619) 295-2797
e e j hk & associates
April 20, 1994
Mr. Ruben T. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
Engineering Department
RECZWH)
City Traffic Engineer
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009- 1576 ENGlNEERING
0 EP ARTM ENT
Subject:
Dear Mr. Johnson:
APR 2 1 1994
1994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program (JHK 9521)
As requested, JHK & Associates (JHK) has developed a Scope of Services and
estimate summary to complete the 1994 Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Prol
This estimate is based on the actual cost incurred by JHK to complete the last five GI
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs. The project cost reports for this previous
allowed JHK to better determine accurate budgets for each of the following items included ii
proposal:
Manhour Estimates for Professional and Support Staff
Direct Costs for Temporary Employees 0
Mileage and Printing
Based on our prior experience in completing these studies since 1989, the total estj
to provide the services described in this proposal is $44,014 (see Table 1).
For this project, Steve Smith, P.E. will serve as the Responsible Officer and leal
Executive Review Team. He will help ensure that the project team consistently maintains
levels of quality control. Mr Brian Shields, P.E. will serve as the Project Director and w
responsible for overall project management and production scheduling. His experience
traffic operations, capacity analysis, and the four most recent growth management reports fc
City of Carlsbad will be useful in developing the final report. Mr. Shields, a registered t
and civil engineer, will also sign and seal the find report. In addition, Mr. Erik Rueh
ensure that the report addresses any future planning issues relevant to the City. Also, Mr.
Thomton will coordinate and supervise data collection and reduction efforts. His f
involvement in the preparation of previous growth management plan traffic monitoring prog
will be invaluable for the 1994 program.
EXHIBIT "A"
8989 Rio San Diego Drive Suite 335
San Diego. California 92108 (619) 295-2248 FAX (619) 295-2393
e e
L hk & associarcs * -1
Mr. Robert T. Johnson, Jr.
April 20, 1994
Page 2
The following is a description of the scope of work by task.
Task I - Project Orientation and Coordination
The initial task of the project is to become famhr with rhe study area and introduce
JHK personnel to City staff. A project orientation meeting will be held to discuss
coordination of intersection counts with mid-block counts. At this meeting count schedules
both intersection and mid-block locations will be submitted. Count schedules will be coordin:
with local construction activities and detours in order to obtain unbiased results. Count locatj
and times will not be changed without the City’s prior approval.
Task II - Data Collection
Data collection will be performed at 47 intersections (Exhibit 1) and 27 mid-bl
locations (Exhibit 2). A temporary employment agency will be used to process payroll
temporary personnel needed to complete the data collection for the intersections. Enginee:
students from local universities will act as data counters, and JHK will instruct tempol
personnel on the proper data collection techniques. The data will be collected for the same t
periods identified in previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs and
be supervised by JHK staff. Field sketches will be drawn of intersection geomemcs, and tt
geometrics will be used as input for ICU analysis. The data will then be reviewed for accui
and directional discrepancies.
Similar to the last five years, JHK will also collect data at unsignalized locations.
order to better determine unsignalized intersection LOS values, JHK will conduct delay stul
covering unsignalized intersection LOS calculations.
during the peak hour volume counts. This data will help verify recently established procedi
Mid-block counts will be performed according to the current standards determine(
previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs. Two consecutive 244
counts will be performed using dual tube set ups. These counts should be completed within
weeks. Intersection turn movement counts will be performed in conjunction with nearby r
block counts. JHK will coordinate the placement of the counters with City staff and monitor
review the data collection at these mid-block locations. With JHK staff responsible for
portion of Task II many potential discrepancies will be avoided.
0 e
‘hk & asswiatcs - -1
Mr. Robert T. Johnson, Jr.
April 20, 1994
Page 3
Task III - Data Reduction
To meet time constraints for the delivery of the draft 1994 Growth Management
Traffic Monitoring Program report in late September, the data reduction will need t(
efficiently timed with the data collection. The data reduction for the intersections will coni
to the format of the previous Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Programs witt
incorporated changes. This data will be reviewed and checked for directional errors and i
errors, In addition, the ICU will also be reviewed and verified for operational consistency
The data reduction for mid-block locations will be reviewed by JHK to ensure
directional distribution and peak hour data are accurate. The format will conform to the
block summary configuration of the 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993 Growth Management P
This format included a tabular and graphical summary of the mid-block data. An ADT t
analysis graph will also be provided for any mid-block locations with four years or more u
of data.
Task IV - Final Report Preparation
The Final Report will be prepared similar to the previous Growth Management
Traffic Monitoring Programs. Eleven copies will be provided, ten punched and in three
binders and one unbound copy. The first draft submittal by JHK will be September 21,
with approximately four weeks for City staff review and comment.
Task V - HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis (Optional)
The development of the 1985 HCM software for capacity analysis at signa
intersections has started the slow process of unifying capacity analysis techniques. Althc
current application has been occasionally questioned, the method of including phasing, pel
green time, and stop time delay has been recognized as the most complete analysis availa
It is the opinion of JHK that the conversion to the use of HCM intersection capacity analysis
continue as the program is continually refined by McTrans. With this in mind, JHK offers
V as an optional task. Task V will consist of the analysis of all intersections that test at
of service C or worse under the ICU procedure by utilizing HCM analysis for that period. I
of Service C was chosen as the threshold for this task based upon work completed in Chula ’
where levels of service comparisons between the two analysis procedures revealed that HCM
generally one level of service worse than ICU. That is LOS C in the ICU analysis could pos
be LOS D under HCM analysis. Field estimates will be made concerning signal timing, gr
progression and other characteristics. These characteristics will be incorporated into each E
analysis. The City would need to provide JHK with current signal timing charts for the cr
Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program and would be provided to the City in a let1
locations. The analysis would be performed and summarized apart from the 1994 Gr
.. e e - *hk & associates
9 -1
Mr. Robert T. Johnson, Jr.
April 20, 1994
Page 4
report format. Task V has been included in the proposal on a per intersection basis to allow
the correct number of intersections to be analyzed.
JMK is pleased to bc considered for the 1994 Growth Management Plan Trs
Monitoring Program. Our previous work with the City staff will make the coordination
operation of the 1994 program more efficient. We look forward to again working with you
any questions arise please contact me or Mr. Brian Shields.
Sincerely,
JHK & ASSOCIATES - Q. *
Steven A. Smith, P.E.
Vice President
SAS:cb
a:\carls94.ltr
L
IC
m 0 d cr, 0
CI Q h w3 -* #3
* 23 rr, \o
w3 w3 3: =?. I 0- 2. 2- E3 #3
2 W G
.f: g 2% 8 E sr z ss
g
BE
gzg I
c)
9 o\
v
*e cr,
Z8W PJv am *- 0. g g$
v1
fff si
h w3 n~ tff w
3
0 go
o\ ;* s v! p- *! "Z tfftff tff bw3
0 00 0 d 00 0
49
L. u
d
z 0 E
Ud
44
#3 p
E
kea E
3
5
-3 a0 -2 \o\o \o m 5% PJ 22 CI 2 \o
0
-J $ST b e4 % G?
5 gq w E 'B cn 85 s1
ow< 3 264 <oz zq $& E 3
.-. 22
ea ag:,
c)
\o 0 0 24 d G Os 2 h I Q 2
0 0 PJ 22 2 d o\ -9 Q e5 &E
I Q
I P,
0 I=
0
4
4
u
.-. d d .- n
a k w
T!
C c 0 .- n
0
cd
CC Urn .2 0
3 4
8 E .- c1
cd -: 3
>* s
C C 0 0
0
Y
Y 3 .- 26 * cz a Y .-
8g 5 ,3 ,E IU ij -5 I -.I .- +g =Ug z rd &
%-To cdL0 55; cda * %a cdcd %& (QP)
- 5
0.tj 0 HZ
c.
E? 358 c-a~ c-n~ c c-n c-d g c-3:
.- cB g z zg .2 2
.s 2
ZY 94
45 G$
>
c-
E
.e .9
L.
4 sg 5 '3 zz z '5 .E 5 z<
-$
>g
85 c- .< 2% .41 - 5
.- 58 3s ;I: .- zs
$3
3: $z 3s 2 '2 2%
-s
v1 .- - .e m
Y'
-
a .e Ob
utd
us - Fg u,
00 d '02 2s -3 c
22 %%
3 .E 3:: %& $3
$ +g .z 2
.s 4
$g
?
mu7
n2
; 5
.-
.. 9
D e e EXHIBIT 1 c
* REQUESTED INTERSECTION COUNT LOCATIONS IN 1994
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
g.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. 19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38. I-Sflamarack Avenue Southbound Ramp
39. I-Sflamarack Avenue Northbound Ramp
40. I-S/Cannon Road Southbound Ramp
41. I-S/Cannon Road Northbound Ramp
42.
43.
44. I-Woinsettia Lane Southbound Ramp
45. I-5Poinsettia Lane Northbound Ramp
46.
47.
El Camino Real and Carlsbad Village Drive
El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue
El Camino Real and College Boulevard
El Camino Real and Faraday Avenue
El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real and Camino Vida Roble
El Camino Real and Alga Road E1 Camino Red and La Costa Avenue
El Camino Real and Levante Street
El Camino Real and Olivenhain Road
Palomar Airport Road and Avenida Encinas
Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte
Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road and Camino Vida Roble
Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte Street
Palomar Airport Road and Business Park Drive
Carlsbad Boulevard and Grand Avenue
Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue
Carlsbad Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane
Rancho Santa Fe Road and Melrose Drive
Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Meadows Drive
Rancho Santa Fe Road and Questhaven Road
Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue
Rancho Santa Fe Road and Olivenhain Road/Camino Alvaro
Carlsbad Village Drive and State Street
Carlsbad Village Drive and Jefferson Street
Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street
Poinsettia Lane and Batiquitos Drive
Poinsettia Lane and Paseo Del Norte
Poinsettia Lane and Avenida Encinas
Tamarack Avenue and Carlsbad Village Drive
Alga Road and El Fuerte Street
Grand Avenue and State Street
Grand Avenue and Jefferson Street
I-5/Carlsbad Village Drive Southbound Ramp
I-Xarlsbad Village Drive Northbound Ramp
I-SPalomar Airport Road Southbound Ramp
I-5Palomar Airport Road Northbound Ramp
I-S/La Costa Avenue Southbound Ramp
I-S/La Costa Avenue Northbound Ramp
e
" EXHIBIT 2
9 e
8
REQUESTED MTD-BLOCK COUNT LOCATIONS IN 1994
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Palomar Airport Road between Yarrow Drive and El Camino Real
Palomar Airport Road between Paseo Del Norte and College Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and El Fuerte Street
Palomar Airport Road east of future Melrose Drive
El Camino Real between Marron Road and Plaza Drive
El Camino Real between Kelly Drive and Tamarack Avenue
El Carpino Real between Faraday Avenue and Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real between Alga Road and La Costa Avenue
El Camino Real between La Costa Avenue and Levante Street
El Camino Real between Levante Street and Olivenhain Road
Carlsbad Boulevard between Mountain View Drive and State Street
Carlsbad Boulevard between Cannon Road and Cerezo Drive
Carlsbad Boulevard between La Costa Avenue and Poinsettia Lane
Olivenhain Road between El Camino Real and Amargosa Drive
La Costa Avenue between Pireaus Street and Saxony Road
La Costa Avenue between Cadencia Street and Romeria Street
Rancho Santa Fe Road between Melrose Drive and La Costa Meadows Drive
Rancho Santa Fe Road between Questhaven Road and Cadencia Street
Rancho Santa Fe Road between Olivenhain Road and Avenida La Posta
Carlsbad Village Drive between Victoria Avenue and Pontiac Drive
Poinsettia Lane between Paseo Del Norte and Batiquitos Drive
Tamarack Avenue between El Camino Real and Portalada Drive
Paseo Del Norte between Poinsettia Lane and Camino De Las Ondas
Paseo Del Norte between Camino Del Parque (north) and Palomar Airport Road
Paseo Del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and Car Country Drive
College Boulevard between Palomar Airport Road and Aston Avenue
13. Carlsbad Boulevard between Poinsettia Lane and Palomar Airport Road