HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-14; City Council; 12737; 1994-95 OPERATING BUDGET & TO BUILDOUT CIP BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGETI! , , - , j. - Cw OF CARLSBAD - AGE A BILL .5&+ {-g w P"
.I
t' xh DEPT TITLE: AB # 4 9 3 9 +=,
MTG, 6/14/94
CITY BUILDOUT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
CITY 1994-95 OPERATING BUDGET AND 1994-95 TO
,I DEPT. FiN k I I I i" ~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
a F rd
ITEM EXPLANATION: %
Accept report. Set public hearing for June 21, 1994.
n -
- $ u x a, F
a a i!
g
*rl U
u
a) P
U 0
U
The ~QI~J prgpgsed budget fQr 1994-95 is $lZ!9 million with operating expenditurc
budgeted at $71.9 million, a decrease of $4.5 million or 5.9% from the current 19934
budget. Operating revenues total $71.6 million. Capital expenditures are budgeted at $! million, with an estimated revenue of $49.9 million for 1994-95.
The General Fund portion of the budget contains $37.8 million in recommended expenc
tures and are down $1.6 million from the current 1993-94 budget. Projected Gene1
Fund revenues for 1994-95 total $37.8 million resulting in a budget which is balanced wi
current revenues. Revenue projections show an increase of .6% or $245,000 over tl
current 1993-94 projected receipts.
U k 0. Qi- a,o\ b\
UN 4
w\ cdQ U rnC
a) 0
&bn uc
Wb -4
ocd a) CIS 0
*rl u u .d bd OP a3
a a
0 au a, ?b -rl a, a)@ uu E8
The relatively flat revenue forecasts for 1994-95 have resulted in the need to redul planned expenditures. With few exceptions, the proposed budget contains similar servil
levels as those of 1993-94. Services reduced in the 1994-95 budget include closing tl Swim Complex for two weeks in December, eliminating certain recreation programs, a1 a reduced library book budget. A total of three vacant positions have been eliminatc
from the budget as a result of reorganizing and streamlining the Community Servic Department and Fire Department, and 14.25 positions are unfunded, The recommendr
General Fund budget contains a $333,000 contingency account.
The Water District revenues and expenses are balanced at $12.5 million. Water rat
charged by the Metropolitan Water District and County Water Authority will increase July and are reflected in the 1993-94 budget. As a result, staff will be recommending
increase in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District rates. The projected revenues from t
increase have been included in the estimated revenues for the District. The Sanitati
Enterprise has a proposed budget of $4.6 million, which is identical to the current 1993-
budget. Revenues for the Sanitation fund are estimated at $4.7 million and do not inch a recommendation for a rate increase.
da, *rl d ZU The Redevelopment operations budget totals $637,000, down $64,000 from the currc
budget. Payment on Redevelopment bonds of $1.1 million is also included, as well =tu
vu3 oa) $105,000 for Low and Moderate Income Housing.
z 0 F 0 a
$ z 3
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) outlines approximately 160 future projer
scheduled for construction from 1994-95 through buildout at a total cost of over $5
million. The CIP for fiscal year 1994-95 totals $51 million, an increase of $25 million 01
last year's CIP. Projected revenues also increased significantly and total $51 million
0 0
e 0
‘t .\
PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. /A, 33 ‘2
1 .
the 1994-95 program. Revenues and expenses include $30 million in funding from tl
Port of Los Angeles for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement project. Other major projec
programmed for 1994-95 include improvements to the Poinsettia and 1-5 interchanc
widening of Rancho Santa Fe and Olivenhain roads, and the Maerkle Dam Lining projec
One of the City Council’s goals is to annually evaluate fees and charges for services
conjunction with the budget. Staff has reviewed all fee schedules and is recommendil
several changes the Council may wish to consider.
1, There are two new fees proposed: 1) The Community Facilities District
Annexation fee at $480, a development related fee, and 2) a code-3 ambulance
charge at $25, a general fee. Also included in the fee schedule are recommen-
dations to increase three general City fees which include: 1) insurance fee for
video tape rental from $50 to $.75, 2) fingerprinting fees from $5 to $10, and
$44 per hour for a Police Officer and $56 per hour for a Sergeant response.
In addition, the Recreation department is recommending altering some rental
rates for use of City facilities as identified in the Proposed Fee Schedule for
General City Fees and Charges, Schedule A.
3) the per hour rates charged for Police second response calls which will be
2. Staff also recommends that the City Council raise fees which are required by
ordinance to be increased annually based on the. Engineering News Record
(ENR) construction cost index. This application applies to both the Traffic
Impact Fee (TIF) and the Sewer Connection fees. Applying the ENR to the TIF
results in an increase of $1 per average daily trip to the new rate of $84 per
average daily trip for those outside the Community Facilities District No. 1 (CFD)
and $54 for those in the CFD. The Sewer Connection fee increases by $39 per
Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) to $1,806 per EDU.
3, It is also recommended that the Carlsbad Municipal Water District Board
increase the water rates as Metropolitan Water District has raised its charges
assessed for the water Carlsbad buys. The proposal includes an increase of
$.03, or 1.8%, on the per unit charge, as well as an increase to the stand-by
charge of between $55 and $5.40, depending upon the size of the meter used.
Increase in the water rate discussed above will yield approximately $400,000 in additiol
revenue. It is expected that the effect on revenues for the other proposed changes \
be minimal.
Council will have the opportunity to review the 1994-95 Operating and Capital Improi ment Program Budgets as well as the Fees and Charges for Services at the first w(
session on June 14, 1994. City staff will be making presentations and be available
answer questions. A public hearing is scheduled for the meeting of June 21 , 1994 wh
the Council will receive input from interested citizens and groups wishing to comment
the proposed budget.
c e
PAGE THREE OF AGENDA BILL NO. la/ ‘733 a .
EXHIBITS
1. 1994-95 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets.
2. Fee Schedule - Development Related Fees, General City Fees and Chargt
Development Related Water District Fees, and General Water District Fees a1 Charges.
0 0 EXHIBIT 1 -
~
a
*
June 14,1994
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Manager
1994-95 PRELIMINARY BUDGET
I am pleased to submit to you the 1994-95 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgc
for the City which total $122.9 million. Revenues for 1994-95 are projected at $121.5 millic
General Fund revenues total $37.8 million with expenditures scheduled to match the revenuj
at $37.8 million. The budget message which follows will focus on operating revenuc
expenditures, and important issues facing the City in the forthcoming 1994-95 fiscal ye;
basic core of City services. This should not diminish the importance of the other operating func
as they too contribute to the array of services available within Carlsbad. The Capital Budget
featured later in the budget document, in the section entitled Capital Improvement Program.
is mentioned at several points within this letter in order to provide perspective to the City’s enti
1994-95 budget.
Overview
As the City of Carlsbad entered the 1990’s, budgeting and planning for programs became mc
challenging each year. The trial has been to match expenditures with a continuously declinil
revenue base. Not only has the weak economy played a part in reducing the City’s norma
growth-oriented revenue stream, but the State of California has persistently looked to cities fl
help in balancing their budget. The past three years included preparing mid-year budge
resulting in an increased focus on the budget dilemma. The result is a constant exercise
balancing expenditures with slipping revenues. As we enter 1994-95, we are faced with the isst
of flat revenues in a climate of increasing expenses, and so begins a fifth year of budg
reductions and adjustments to service levels. In order to add perspective to the current year,
is interesting to look back at the causes and effects that have led to our current position.
The following table provides an outline of the revenue trends that have impacted recent budge1
It shows the original revenue estimates, and the amounts that have been lost both to the Sta .budget as’ well as the recessionary economy. In all years, reductions were made to tt
expenditure side of the budget to match the declining revenues, resulting in a gradual erosic
of service levels and fund balances over time.
Discussion is focused on the General Fund as it contains discretionary revenues that fund tl
0 0 .
* -. HISTORY OF REVENUE LOSSES
(in millions)
I! I I I I I
REVISED REVENUE ESTIMATE $38.7 I $39.6 I $38.3 I $37.9 I $37.1
The City first faced budget reductions in 1990-91 due to the recession. As a cautionary mo
the City implemented a hiring freeze, deferred several major infrastructure projects and turn1
to departments to identify funds that would not be spent during the year. In 1991-92, both t
recession and State budget affected Carlsbad’s revenues. Budgetary adjustments includl
unfunding fourteen (14) .positions and deferring capital outlay spending and maintenan
programs. Additionally, the City took advantage of one time saving opportunities by reducil
the budgeted accounts for the Hosp Grove debt payment and for the Golf Course ann1
payment. Several service level reductions were also contained in the budget and includl
reducing operational hours at the three community centers and the swim complex.
The beginning of 1992-93 was filled with uncertainty as the State threatened to take away lo(
revenues, yet did not adopt a formal budget until late summer. As a result the City budgeted tt
times in 1992-93, once at the onset of the year, and again after learning the magnitude of ti
State impact. Ultimately, forty-two (42) vacant positions were eliminated, and five (5) positio were unfunded. The City also turned to fund balances from other accounts in order to off$
General Fund expenses where possible. Service level impacts included reduced litter contr less irrigation and fertilizing of park areas, reduced tennis court lighting, elimination of t‘
Neighborhood Watch Newsletter, and a curtailed street sweeping schedule.
As in the prior year, the City adopted the 1993-94 budget not knowing exactly what impacts t
State’s budget balancing would have on Carlsbad. The budget was revised in November, 19
once the loss to the State was known and the effects of the recession again became evider
During 1993-94, twelve (I 2) positions were unfunded and one additional position was eliminate
The City continued to utilize available fund balances wherever possible to ease impacts on tt General Fund.
As we enter fiscal year 1994-95, Carlsbad faces another year of difficult budget decisior
Adding to the complexity of balancing the budget is the consideration of what next year, 1995-9
will bring. The City has utilized most fund balances to its advantage. Many programs whic have been deferred or funded elsewhere will need to be absorbed by the General Fund.
addition, no salary adjustments, other than the required step increases, have been given sin1
January of 1992 to any City staff. With only slow growth projected for revenues in tl
foreseeable future, balancing the budget will continue to be a challenge in the years to comt
0 0
\.
* Budqetaw Policies -
An analysis of the City’s fiscal position for 1994-95 indicated that revenues would be flat ar
expenditures would again need to be reduced. In addition, the State’s 1993-94 budget actio1
continued to have an effect on Carlsbad. A one-time payment of $400,000 was made to the Ci
in 1993-94 to offset property taxes taken by the State. As this was only a one-time payment, tt
allowances have been made in this budget for any reductions which may occur when the Sta
adopts their 1994-95 budget.
In developing the 1994-95 budget, a base budget, which excluded any amounts carried over fro
previous years, was established for each department with the direction to reduce the bottom lil
total by I .5%. In order to arrive at this goal, departments prepared their budgets within tl
following guidelines:
c No new positions, programs or services.
b Budgets were required to absorb increases due to step increases and other inflationary
1994-95 budget had tu absorb this loss of revenue. It is also important to note that I
increases.
b Increased costs were required to be offset by reductions elsewhere such that the
bottom line would be 1.5% less than the 1993-94 base budget amount.
b Capital outlay needs could be addressed within the budget request.
b Wherever possible, maintain existing service levels.
b After budgets were submitted, the Finance Department reallocated assessments for
Data Processing, Vehicle Maintenance, Vehicle Replacement, Worker’s Compensation
* and Liability Insurance Self Insurance Funds. This approach excluded these costs from
the base budget calculation, as costs to some departments varied significantly.
The use of these guidelines resulted in a recommended 1994-95 Operating Budget of $37
million, a decrease of $300,000 from the budget adopted in November 1993. The proposf
1994-95 budget includes the elimination of three positions, and the unfunding of a total
fourteen and one-quarter (14.25) positions. The Council Contingency account is budgeted
only $333,000 down from between $1 million to $2 million in pre-recessionary years. Th account is available to the City Council to address unanticipated emergencies or unforsef
program needs.
Revenue
The following table shows the total operating and capital revenues the City anticipates receivir
for 1993-94, as well as those estimated for 1994-95.
0 0
z REVENUE SUMMARY
BY FUNCTION
7 (In Millions) -
PROJECTED I/.,
F UNO 93-94
$0.2 0.5% GENERAL FUND $37.6
94-95 E DIFFERENCE %CHANGE $37.8 F
Sf ECWL REVENUE .
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
6.7
17.7
6.4
$0.3 4.5%
$0.5 28%
$0.4 6.3%
REDEVELOPMENT I .8
TOTAL OPERATING $70.2 &. $1.4 2m
j! .; $0.0 0.Ph 1 . 8
.................................................... :: ............................. ...........................
CAPITAL $21.8 $49.9 $28.1 128.9%
GRAND TOTAL $92.0 $1 21.5 $29.5 32.1%
Revenue estimates indicate that the City will receive a total of $1 21.5 million, a 32.1 % increa over the current year projections. The majority of the increase can be attributed to the capi
funds which contain an increase of $28.1 million over the projected 1993-94 revenues and v be discussed in the Capital Improvement Program section. Operating revenues are estimatl
at $71.6 million for 1994-95 which is $1.4 million greater that those projected for 1993-94.
General Fund revenues are of particular interest as these resources fund basic City services su as Police, Fire, Library, Street Maintenance and Park and Recreation .programs. These revenu also provide a representative picture of the local economy, The table below shows
summarized outlook for the major General Fund revenues.
Although property tax losses to the State totaled $2.5 million over the past two years, this sour
of revenue continues to provide the largest single source of income for the City. The $1.
million projection for 1994-95 represents 30% of the total General Fund revenue. It is anticipat
that the 1994-95 property tax revenues will increase by 1.8% over 1993-94 estimates which is jl
under the legal limit of the 2% increase in assessed values as provided within Proposition 1:
Twenty-eight percent of the City's'total revenues are generated by sales tax which is the seco
largest source of funds. Sales taxes are estimated at $1 0.6 million for 1994-95, an increase
1 % or $1 00,000 over the projected 1993-94 receipts. It is anticipated that consumer spendil will remain relatively flat in 1994-95.
SIGNIFICANT REVENUES TO THE GENERAL FUND
(In Millions)
PROJECTED 3 ESTIMATED
1993-94 g DIFFERENCE % CHANGE 1994-95
PROPERTY TAX $11.1
SALES TAX 10.5
$ $0.2 1.84 $11.3
! ($0.1) -0.8c 12.9 OTHER GENERAL FUND 13.0
;: $0.0 0.0: 3.0 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 3.0
.$ $0.1 1 .o: . 106 f
E TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $37.6 1 $37.8 B $0.2 0.5: ............................................................. :: .................................... .................................
0 0 *
Y The last significant General Fund revenue is the Transient Occupancy Tax which is estimated - $3 million for 1994-95. Based on historical performance of this revenue, the projection equa
the amount expected to be received in 1993-94. It is anticipated that the slow economy will kee tourism and room rates at present levels.
Other 1994-95 revenue projections which show differences from the 1993-94 estimates incluc franchise tax revenues. ,These revenues are anticipated to total $1.2 million for 1994-95 i
increase of 9% or $1 00,000 over 1993-94. This increase is due primarily to the change in the t: rate from 3% to 5% for Daniels Cablevision during 1993-94.
Development within Carlsbad is expected to continue at its sluggish pace resulting in an increa:
of only $100,000 (6%) in estimated 1994-95 revenue for all the development related source
Development related revenue includes planning fees, engineering fees, building department fee construction permits and the license tax on new construction.
There are two revenues which are projected to decrease from 1993-94 levels. First, vehicle in-lic fees are expected to drop by $425,000, or 15%. This loss was anticipated as the 1993-94 Sta
is down by $120,000, or 6.7%. This is due to a lower fund balance which results as the Gener
Fund pays off the parking bonds and funds the golf course for 1993-94 and 1994-95.
Special Revenue Fund revenues total $7 million which is $300,000, or 4.5% greater than tho! projected for 1993-94. The types of functions supported within Special Revenue Funds incluc programs funded by grants such as Section 8 Housing Assistance, Maintenance Assessme Districts, and Gas Tax Street Maintenance. The Special Revenue Fund accounting for most the increase in this category is the Section 8 Housing program with revenues up $320,000, (
11 % over 1993-94 projections. This is due to full year funding of thirty additional rental units
Enterprise Fund revenue for 1994-95 is projected at $1 8.2 million, an increase of $500,000, ( 2.8% over 1993-94 estimates. Enterprise Funds are similar to a business in that rates a, charged to support the operations which supply the service. Examples of Carlsbad Enterprist include the Water District, Sanitation Services, and Solid Waste Management.
Water District revenues show an increase of 3.2%, or $387,000, which reflects a proposed ra
budget provided for a one time payment within this revenue stream, Second, interest reveni
increase spread between the per unit charge and the stand-by charge. The increase would fur
higher charges assessed by the Metropolitan Water District for the water Carlsbad purchases fl
sale to users. Water usage rates are recommended to increase by $.03 per unit, combined wi an increase to the stand-by charge of anywhere from $.55 to $5.40 depending on the size of tt installed meter. Sanitation Enterprise revenues at $4.7 million are not expected to increase
1994-95; rates will remain stable.
Internal Service Funds show an estimated revenue of $6.8 million for 1994-95, an increase
$400,000, or 6.3% over 1993-94 projections. Internal Service Funds provide services within tt
City itself and include programs such as the self insurance funds for Workers Compensation ar Liability Insurance, as well as Data Processing and Vehicle Maintenance. Departments pay fl services provided by these funds. The Internal Service Fund demonstrating the largest reven[ increase is the Liability Self-Insurance fund, up $1 98,000 or 23%, which is necessary to mainta
adequate reserves that were utilized during 1993-94. Vehicle Replacement rates were decreasc
by $102,000, or 9.6%, as the City instituted a broader criteria for replacing vehicles. Revenut
4 e
c
Y for Vehicle Maintenance show an estimated increase of $1 14,000, or 9%. It is estimated that tt - increase will place the fund balance in a positive position at the end of 1994-95.
Redevelopment revenues are estimated at 1993-94 levels of $1.8 million. The tax increment I
property values has not exhibited any signs of growth over the past three years, and is expect
to perform similarly in 1994-95.
Expenditures
The combined 1994-95 budget totals $122.9 million and is broken down as shown belc
Budgeted operating expenditures for 1994-95 total $71.9 million which represents a decrease
$4.5 million, or 5.9% from the current 1993-94 budget, while capital expenditures are up $3(
million, or 153.7%.
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
( In Millions)
BUDGET
FUND 93-94
i; BUDGET i DIFFERENCE %CHANGE 94-95
GENERAL FUND $39.4 ($1 3) -4.1% '
SPECIAL REVENUE 9.1 7.1
18.2 ENTERPRISE 18.5
3 ($2.0) -22.0%
z ' ($4.5) -5.9% $71.9 TOTAL $76.4
8 ($0.2) - 10.0% 1.8 REDEVELOPMENT 2.0
($0.4) -5.4% .... INTERNAL SERVICE 7.4
$ ($0.3) -1.696
CAPITAL
$37.8 :
70 p
$2(),. $30.9 153.7% .* g . $51 ()
1:s
GRAND TOTAL $96.51 $1229 I $264 27.4% .............................. ............................ ............................ .........................
The General Fund shows a $1.6 million, or 4.1 % decrease from the current 1993-94 budget
the 1994-95 budget. Balancing the 1994-95 General Fund budget entailed the use of varic
strategies which are profiled below.
b Fourteen and one quarter (14.25) positions are not funded, an increase of eight
(8) positions over 1993-94 levels. The unfunded positions are vacant and
represent no layoffs of existing staff. The four newly unfunded positions include
threequarters of a Police Captain, one-half of a Records Supervisor, one Librarian
in Reference, and a Management Analyst in the Fire Department. It is estimated
that unfunding these four positions will save approximately $1 87,000. Four of the
unfunded positions represent a change to contracted services and monies once
used for the positions have been transferred to an operating account. There are
no immediate cost savings, however it is anticipated that in future years
economies will result.
b Three vacant positions have been eliminated from the work force, and include the
Utilities and Maintenance Director, Assistant Utilities and Maintenance Director and
e e
w one Flre gaff allon Chlef. Both the Utilities and Maintenance Department and Fire - Department have reorganized in order to maintain a more streamlined operation.
The prior year budget unfunded the Assistant Utilities and Maintenance Director,
therefore the two remaining eliminated positions result in a savings of approxi-
mately $200,000.
b A new employment category of a pro-rated three-quarter time employee has been
added as another option to increase efficiency while controlling expenditures. As
a result, the City has included a total of seven three-quarter time positions. In order to add these positions, departments reduced their part time budgets by an
equivalent amount.
b This is the third year that alternate funding sources have been used to support
some former General Fund programs. Police Asset Forfeiture funds are
supporting the DARE and Juvenile Diversion programs and major street
maintenance and repair programs are supported through the Gas Tax. The
support of these programs through other funds saves the General Fund
approximately $1.4 million. In the future, it may be necessary to consider the
“‘General Fund as a source for funding these programs once again.
b No payment to the Golf Course fund has been included in the General Fund
budget. Rather, a transfer from the General fund balance is planned which will
make up for the missed payment in 1993-94 as well as the 1994-95 payment.
b The budget includes an $800,000 appropriation from fund balance.which will be
used to pay off the Parking Authority bonds. This results in a savings of $1 45,000 annually.
b Capital outlay expenses totaling approximately $1 00,000 have been funded within
the budget.
While the preceding strategies apply on a City-wide basis, there are measurable service lev
reductions which occur at the program level. In general, most programs anticipate extendc
response times to accomplish tasks as less staff and resources are available. Specific progra
service level reductions within the proposed budget include closing the Swim Complex for tvr
weeks in December, and eliminating certain recreation programs such as the Easter egg hur
Halloween carnival and coastal clean up. The water account in the park maintenance progra has been reduced again which will affect the appearance of park areas. The library Med
Services Program will eliminate photographic assistance to other departments as the st:
position is rotated to the reference service desk to fill in for a newly unfunded Librarian. TI
Library book budget has been reduced by 10% and will affect adult circulating and referenc
materials.
Although the Library will implement several service level reductions as noted above, this progra
has absorbed the costs of the Centro de lnformacion program into its budget plan. This is
grant funded program which was scheduled to last for five years. . The middle of 19944
represents the termination of the receipt of the grant funds, at which time General Funds will t
used to continue the program. Full year funding for the Centro de lnformacion will need to t
absorbed in the 1995-96 budget, at an additional cost of approximately $30,000.
e e
rr Special Revenue Funds, show a decrease in anticipated spending of approximately $2.1 millio,
or 23% of which two programs contribute to the reduction. First, Police Asset Forfeitul
spending has declined due to one time spending which occurred in 1993-94. Second, Gas R spending is projected to decline in order to balance its expenditures with projected revenues
The Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District budget contains an increase of $47,000, (
6.9%, and is due to anticipated one time expenses associated with upgrading street light fixturc
from SDG&E. Through staff efforts and communications with the Public Utilities Commissio
costs for non-peak use energy were reduced. The Tree Maintenance Assessment District budg
has decreased by $16,000, or 2.8%, and is the result of a reduced assessment for the s(
insurance liability payment. Service levels are anticipated to remain the same during 1994-9
The Median Maintenance Assessment District budget is nearly identical to that of 1993-94
$274,000. Staff has indicated that this level of spending will affect the appearance of medial
as additional mileage has been added, yet the budget remains the same. A low fund balanc
does not provide the option of using "saved" funds. Staff is presently ,reviewing service level
delivery requirements and the appropriate assessments. It appears as if a rate increase for tt
Tree and Median Maintenance Assessment Districts may be recommended within the 1995-!
budget.
Enterprise Funds, as a group, show a budget decrease of $300,000, or 1.6%, due mainly to
reduction in the Water District's budget. However, a more meaningful comparison can be ma(
. between the 1993-94 estimated expenditures of $1 1.7 million and the 1994-95 budget of $1 2
million, an increase of 6.8% or $800,000. The majority of this increase is related to the cost
purchasing water for sale to consumers.
Internal-- Service Funds show a decrease of approximately $300,000, or 4.1 %. The large
decrease is in liability self insurance, down $300,000, due to a large loss experienced in 1993-9
A decrease of $278,000, or 23%, in the Vehicle Replacement fund is due to an unusually his
budget in 1993-94. This occurred as the City began purchasing replacement vehicles which hz
been deferred in prior years due-to budget cuts. The budget for this fund normally fluctuatc
according to the vehicles proposed for replacement in any given year.
The budget for Workers Compensation Self Insurance is equal to that of 1993-94. In additio
an operating transfer to the General Fund of $250,000 has been budgeted. This action \n
reduce the Worker's Compensation fund balance which is higher than necessary and help
offset Worker's Compensation expenses in the General Fund.
The Redevelopment Agency budget has decreased for 1994-95 by $200,000. The decrease
the result of reduced Miscellaneous Professional Services in the operations portion of tt
program due to funds that were carried over into the 1993-94 budget year. Debt servic
payments have also been reduced as a result of the refunding of the bonds in 1993-94.
Summary
While 1994-95 represents a challenging year financially, the City will strive to maintain the quali
and variety of services which have come to be expected by the residents and businesses
Carlsbad. The proposed budget for 1994-95 projects a slow economy resulting in a minim
increase to the forecasted revenues. Carlsbad's budget still relies upon alternate fundir
sources to insure that services continue to be available to the citizens, although sometimes reduced levels. These methods of balancing budgets are becoming exhausted and will n
0 e
necessarify be avallable In future yeara. In addition, the City hao taken advantage opportunities that have presented themselves by reorganizing departments to operate mo
efficiently. Without these alternate funding sources or stronger revenue growth in the future,
will be necessary to reevaluate the City's ability to offer all of its current programs within
limited financial resources.
It is also important for the City and community alike to be aware of the impact that the Statc
budget balancing actions may have upon the City's revenue base. The State continues to fa1
shortfalls in its revenues and may be back again this year with legislation which further reduc
our revenues. While the Governor has not proposed any reductions to cities in his latest budc
proposal, the Legislature will have their own proposals which may adversely impact citic
Carlsbad is still very much "at risk" for budget reductions in the current and future years.
In this difficult budget year the cooperation of all departments and City staff was critical
creating a successful operating plan. This document is a reflection of the dedication. and effol
of these members of Team Carlsbad. Their support is critical to the City's ultimate success. V
offer them all our thanks for a job well done. This example of teamwork will be repeated in tl
months and years to come as the State of California and economic conditions continue
challenge,'the fiscalstrength of the City of Carlsbad.
0 e CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1993-94
UNRESERVED PROJECTED
BALANCE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE
FUND JULY 1,1993 REVENUES EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS JUNE30,1994 1 GENERAL FUND i;; 9,764,IV 37,665,000 37,691,490 (293,550) 9,384,137 ....................... .....................................................................................................
I SPECIAL REVENUE
i.. ............. i .......................................... ............................... ................................ ................................. ................. i ..................................................................................................... ; .............................. ::: POLICE ASSET FORFEITURE
HOUSING - SECTION 8
MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE
GAS TAX
TREE MAINTENANCE
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING
BUENA VISTA CRK CHNL MM
STATE GRANTS (LIBRARY)
SENIOR NUTRITION
CDBG - ENTITLEMENT
CMMT'Y FACILITY DlSTR #1 ADMlN
1,928,881
118,483
118,640
3,077,212
31 6,920
57,387
774,914
251,811
269,722
0
60,472
20,000
2w000
2,898,000
6olOOO
95,000
1,180,000
572,140
255,000
692,000
108,000
=,000
193,000
90,000 ,
106,000
197,820
2,900,000
16,000
1 13,000
1,472,900
567,396
286,410
553,701
58,300
351,500
183,197
103,873
125.1 90
1,931,061
116,483
44,000
100,640
2,784,312
321,664
25,977
91 3,213
. 301,511
183,222
9,803
p 46,599
-.
81 0
2,890,833 12,122,000 11,682,865
RECLAIMED WATER (90,390) 808,700 695,315
SEWER OPERATIONS 1,278,193 4,661,900 4,298,544
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 58,452 86,999 138,874
1 INTERNAL SERVICE :. WORKER.sC*MP SELF.,NSOR ................. ............................................................................................................................................................. ..............................................................................
1,320,298 771,600 776,536
LIABILIlY SELF INSUR
HEALTH INSURANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
DATA PROCESSINQ
1,891,231 857,000 1,244,804
1,386,395 1,805,000 1,950,000
(37,578) 1,240,000 1,245,500
3,016,356 1,066,000 932,287
518.727 710,000 752,285
3,329,968
22,995
1,641,549
5,578
1,315,362
1,503,427
1,241,395
(43,0781
3,150,069
476,442
i REDEVELOPMENT
OPERATIONS
8 .:~~:-,::.:i::::i::::~;::~~~~:;~:::..~::..::~.,~~~~~:~:~:::~~~~:..: 51,226 93,750 724,320 624,000 44,656
DEBT SERVICE 993,600 1,338,000 526,170 (75,000) 1,730,430
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG 2,338,669 397,500 82,519 2,653,650
TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS $32,374,631 $70,276,590 , $69,670,796 -,eo 923,851 17%
TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS $69,907,611 $21,837,950 $20,137,604 ($255,450) $71,352,507
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $102,282,242 $92,114,540 $89,808,400 $0 $95,204,245
e a
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
a PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1994-95
PROJECTED PROJECTED
BALANCE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE
FUND JULY 1,1994 REVENUES EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS JUNE 30,1995
; 9,384,137 37,850,000 37,839,818 (1,200,000) 8,194,319 *ppropr~a~onfrom~un~~a~~ce .. .................................... :....:....:...... ... ................................................................................. ......... :.:
(~,OoO)
7,394,319
[SPECIAL REVENUE .~LlcEAss~FoRFEi~RE ....................................................................... :..,. ...................................................................... :::
HOUSING - SECTION 8
MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE
GAS TAX
TREE MAINTENANCE
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING
BUENA VISTACRK CHNLMNT
STATE GRANTS (LIBRARY)
SENIOR NUTRITION
CDBG - ENTITLEMENT
CMMT'Y FACILITY DlSTR #l ADMlN
&RISE 1.:. wAfE#.*pERkti.oNs
RECLAIMED WATER
SEWER OPERATIONS
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
............................................................................... .......................................... ................................................................................................................... ...................................
1,931,061
1 16,483
w000
100,640
2,784,312
321,664
25,977
91 3,213
3013 1
183,222
9,803
46,599
81 0
21 0,000
3,218,000
95,000
1,210,000
572,140
255,000
682,000
108,000
205,000
193,000
131 ,ooO
107,000
3,329,968 12,509,000
22,995 958,OOO
1,641,549 4,661,900
5.578 71 ,000
~,=
3,194,786
19,000
146,500
1,243,500
=,-
274,360
724,736
10,150
246,100
196,906
132,170
107.000
1,940,481
139,697
25,000
49,140
2,750,812
334,965
6,617
870,477
399,361.
142'1 22
5,897
*- 45,429
81 0
12,491,400 (50,000) 3,297,568
1,010,400 (29,4051
4,574,600 (50,000) 1,678,849
104,271 (27,693;
I INTERNAL SERVICE c wo'R~~sc~MP.~E~F,.~~~~ ......................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................ ......I....... I_. .. .................
LIABILITY SELF INSUR
HEALTH INSURANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
DATA PROCESSINQ
I REDEVELOPMENT li ..................................... .......................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... % ................................................................. OPERATIONS
DEBT SERVICE
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG
1,315,362
1,503,427
1,241,395
(43.078)
3,150,069
476,442
44,656
1,730,430
2,653,650
787,600
1,055,400
1,805,000
1,353,600
964,100
772,600
96,000
1,338,000
397,500
1,096,900
1.003.300
1,950,000
1,299,900
~1~
754,000
636,900
1,052,340
105,000
1,006,062
1,555,527
1,096,395
10,622
3,173,669
(=WJO) 275,042
528,300 32,056
(528,300) 1,487,790
2,946,150
~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 1 TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS $33,235,875 $71,605,840 $71,913,956 ($1,5M,000) $29,807,759
TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS $71,352,507 $49,899,235 $50,972,237 $1,520,000 $71,799,505
1993-94 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ($32.31 4.566
$39.484.93 I ..
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $104,588,382 $121,505,075 $122,886,193 $0 $101,607,264
0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
1 BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1991 -92 TO 1994-95
%INCR (
1993-94 (at 3130194)
$ 94-95 BUDGET DEPARTMENT ACTUALS ACTUALS EXPENDITURES BUDGET
(? 93-94,
1991 -92 1992-93 ESTIMATED 1993-94 8 TO 1994-95
1 GENERAL FUND ......................................... 3 $$
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CITY COUNCIL 154,639 153,747 $165,948 $167,401
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
651,018 679,476 754,600 756,220
16,141 20,878 31,480 32,680
CITY A'ITORNEY 394,801 362,318 358,605 421,269
FINANCE
CITY TREASURER
1,005,644 860,207 990,993 1,032.633
76,475 71 ,I 01 82,410 101,400
PURCHASING
HUMAN RESOURCES
RESEARCH OFFICE
374,035 329,101 353,427 358,709
777,916 579,733 694,946 799,505
285,919 159,883 0 0
INFORMATION SYSTEMS 374,002 359,784 386,653 395,053
RISK MANAGEMENT 193,145 177,219 0 0
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMEFCT 4,303,735 3,753,447 3,819,062 4,064,870
168,100 j$
756,clO() 8
4,- $
464,Ooo
5 101,200
g 999,100
8
348 8oo ;.
720,300 3 OB
389- E
og
, :I
, .j:
. 3,987,800 :
0.1
-0.1
25.
10.
-3.:
-0.:
-2.
-9.
-<
-1.
-1.
PUBLIC SAFETY is
POLICE 9,046,665 8,591,028 8,847,473 8,909,521
!{ -2.' 15,515,710 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 15,647,116 15,341,749 1571 4,374 15,848,156
$ -2.1 6,739,659 FIRE 6,600,451 6,750,721 6,866,901 6,938,635
z -1 .. 8,776,051
.:.: ~
:.:. ~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
;:;
3
$:
COMMUNITY DEVEL ADMlN 488,583 458,761 586,433 602,833 $ -I.! 591,117
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 121,071 124.941 1 58,712 241,939
$ - 13. 779,788 ' BUILDING INSPECTON 827,222 762,082 729,843 896,703
HISTORIC PRESERV COMM 4,215 3,448 2,000 3,550
E -28. 74,599 GROWTH MANAGEMENT 105,860 98,945 102,791 104,291
$ -3. 1,878,805 PUNNING 2.1 09,879 1,807,556 1,818,698 1,952,126
8 -5. 2,969,444 ENGINEERING 3,601,763 3,374,023 2,969,528 3,151,325
:$ St.! #,Oo ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 18,403 31,597 31,597
g -7.1 223,544
3,500 $ -1.
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7,258,593 6,648,159 6,399,602 6,984,364
.... ~
6568797 ?! -5, I s :I< .... ~
LIBRARY/CULTURE u.
LIBRARY 2,473,398 2,316,029 2,451,220 2,460,876 2 436 950 6; -02
CULTURALART'S PROGRAM 258,194 229,842 233,980 241,870 233,050 : -3.1
SISTER CITY PROGRAM 18,674 8,993 10,250 10,993 10,m $ -7.:
TOTAL LIBRARY/CULTURE 2,750,266 2,554,864 2,695,450 2,713,739 2,680,200 $$ :x ~ -1 .: .... -
......in..._. ......................... . _.,....... A*. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
I BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1991 -92 TO 1994-95
%INCR (
1993-94 (at 3130194) ;; 93-94
1991 -92 1992-93 . ESTIMATED 1993-94 1994-95 3 TO
DEPARTMENT ACTUALS ACTUALS EXPENDITURES BUDGET # 94-95 BUDGET
COMMUNIN SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN 904,130 793.905 728,602 747,515 iiij :!, - 1 5 629,037
PARK MAINTENANCE
RECREATION
1,630,142 1,379,713 1,531,390 1,563,728
1,550,525 b$ -2 1,695,071 1,535,487 1,581,724 1,596,052
1,477,386 $ -5
SENIOR PROGRAMS 235,536 21 7,793 249,175 252,942
STREET MAINTENANCE 2,4OO,6 18 1,781,753 1,348,586 1,424,542
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1.1 32,069 1,130,429 1,195,781 1,395,018
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAIM 331,871
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVCIES 8,329,437
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
COMMUNITY PROMOTION 194,634
BEACH PARKING 18,000
COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS 80,530
HIRING CEMER 65,000
HOSP GROVE PAYMENT 305,970
275,924 279,684 378,219 343,619 $
7,115,004 6,914,942 7,358,016 7,064,371 z
~
y5
246,205 205,000 261,604 202,000 2 3
36,000 39,700 39,668
g 36,000 $
75,000 75,000 75,000 75000 i$
735,051 794,520 813,600 812,500 $
76,498 77,500 80,000 80,000 2
-9
-3
-2;
-z
(
(
4
GOLF COURSE
LEASES
AUDIT
329,800 565,200 0 0
21 0,000 130,500 87,000 87,000
33,875 41,275 56,800 68,255
PROPERTY TAX ADMIN FEE 165,828 161,975 180,000
ANIMAL REGULATION CONTRACT 82,037 168,224 112,000 125,000 E
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 23,742 26,008 21 ,000 29,400
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUThllSC 156,806 297,468 389,400 389,400 0 :: x
STREET LIGHTCOSTS (CIPI) 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000
TREE MAINT COSTS (CIPI) 81,297 66,140 66,140 66,140
BOND SERVICES 10.21 5 15,783 16,000 18,400 17,300 8
.;:::I ~'
185,000 g
23000 $j
28,000 ;il
66,140 2
1,689,940 $ TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 1,785,734 2,669.327 2,148,060 2,250,789
-8
1'
-2
(
(
(
-!
-2
SUBTOTALGENERAL FUND 40,074,881 38,082,550 . 37,691,490 39,227,934 1 37,506,818 1' ; - *
CONTINGENCIES 0 0 0 166,436 1 333000 ,pa 8 .:. -
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 40.074.881 38,082,550 37.69f,490 39,394,370 w:! . , . . . . . . - ................................................... -
APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BAL
GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND
800,000
38,639,818
9
e 0
CIM OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1991 -92 TO 1994-95
%INCR (
1993-94 (at 3130194) i)i 93-94
1991 -92 1992-93 ESTIMATED 1993-94 3 TO 1994-95
DEPARTMENT ACTUALS ACNALS EXPENDITURES BUDGET i 94-95 BUDGET 1 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS b: ..WLlc.~.AssET'FoRFEl.~RE ................. .................................................... .................................................................................. ................................................................. 342,002 392,997 197,820 794,445 Z -74 200,580
HOUSING SECTION 8 2,114,752 2,529,978 2,900,000 2,916,832
146,500 AUDIO VISUAL INSURANCE 58,232 49,411 11 3,000 123,601
g -68 19,000 MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL 16,000 60,000
2 9 3,194,786
3 :;:: -2 558839 I TREE MAINTENANCE 478,796 536,165 567,396 574,746
3 -54 1,243,500 GAS TAX 140,004 220,477 1,472,900 2,710,082
$ 18
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE 204,577 236,802
STREET LIGHTING 568,039 591,575
BUENA VISTA CRK CHNL MNT 6,447 198,105
STATE GRANTS (LIBRARY) 155,051 286,593
SENIOR NUTRITION 172,518 180,403
CDBG ENTITLEMENT 55,852 67,197
286,410 274,103
553,701 678,232
58,300 289,496
351,500 310,881
183,197 183,531
103,873 102,032
274,360
724,736
10,150
246,100
196,906
132,170
:A
3
$<
C
E
-9E
-x
- -1
2s
CMMT'Y FACILITY DlSTR #1 ADMIN 42,931 168,920 125,190 127,924 107,000 $ -I( I ENTERPRISE FUNDS 18 1 :.~.:::~,:::~.::~:::~:::~:::~::~::::.:~.::::::::::::::::,::::::~.;::~::::~~.~:::2~~~~~.:~::::~~:~::~:::~:::~,::: x
WATER OPERATIONS 9,715,797 10,008,242 11,682,865 12,782,372 12,491,400 $ -2
RECLAIMED WATER
SANITATION OPERATIONS
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT I INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS/$ '.::woRKERscoMpsELFl:Nsu~NcE
W C Operating Transfer Out
LIABILITY SELF INSURANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHlCLE REPLACEMENT
DATA PROCESSING s i:::~~~~l~~~i~
DEBT SERVICE
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNQ
0
4,059,425
100,134
706,408
603,308
1,650,116
1,217,610
729,905
744,614
650,934
1,663,859
98,113
683,007
4,028,391
153,722
639,500
1,183,895
1,824,547
1,227,137
485,124
~,QQo
753,104
1,619,643
81,437
695,315
4,298,544
138,874
776,536
1,244,804
1,950,000
1,245,500
932,287
752,285
724,320
526,170
823 9
917,160
4,541,461
223,826
846,836
1,291,052
1,950,000
1,320,520
1,218,568
752,145
700,715
1,187,050
124,290
1,010,400 8 4,574,600
8
ill
$$ 104,271 33
846900. ,
1,003,300
$ 250,(-Joo
.i.
;
1,299,900 #
1950000 3 I , 2:
940,500 %
754,000 i$
636,900
$$ 1o5J)@)
3
1,052,340
i$ $
1(
(
-5:
(
-2
I -
-2
-
-1
-1
1 TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS $66,354,305 $66,897,922 $69,670,796 $76,396,270 $72,713,956 -
a 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED AS % DIFFERENCE
qNENUES REVENUE REVENUE OF FY 93-94 ' 1993-94 TO
REVENUE SOURCE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95 I GENERAL FUND 1i.i
TAXES
.... .\. ./\. ./.. .. .... ...\. ..\ .. ........... ..... . .. ..... ;:.. i... ..... i... .. ..: .... .. .,:. .,.;..,:.:. : ..:. .:: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPERTY TAX $12,585,000 $1 1,100,000 $1 1,300,000 1 .ao% 200,000
SALES TAX 9.168,ooo 1 0,5Oo,o0O 10,6Oo,o0O 0.95% 100,ooo
TRANSIEM TAX
FRANCHISE TAX
3,099,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 0.00% 0
=woo 1,l 00,000 1,200,000 9.09% 100,000
TRANSFER TAX 184,000 190,000 190,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL TAXES 26,026,000 25,890,000 26,~,000 1.54% 4oa000
LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS =,000 300,000 =e000 0.00% D.
BUSINESS LICENSES 1,071 ,000 1 ,000,000 1 ,000,000 0.00% 0
LICENSE TAX-CONSTRUCTION 143,000 50,000 50,000 0.00% 0
OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS 276,000 300,000 a7000 0.00% 1- 0
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 1,724,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 0.00% 0
STATE SUBVENTIONS
VEHICLE IN-LIEU 2,432,000 2,775,000 2,350,000 - 15.32% (425,000)
OTHER 270,000 280,000 3oo,000 7,14% 20,OOO
TOTAL STATE SUBVENTIONS 2,702,000 3,055,000 2,650,000 - 1 3.26% (405,000]
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
PLANNING FEES 603,000 -9000 =woo 25.00% 100,000
BUILDING DEPT. FEES 205,000 200,000 200,000 0.00% 0
ENGINEERING FEES 551 ,000 6@A000 600,000 0.00% 0
AMBULANCE FEES 273,000 280,000 3w000 7.1 4% 20,000
RECREATION FEES 697,000 800,000 8oWoo 0.00% 0
OTHER CHARGES OR FEES =,000 400,000 400,000 0.0096 0
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,857,000 2,680,000 2,800,000 4.48% 120,000
FINES AND FORFEITURES 232,000 230,000 230,000 0.00% 0
INTEREST 2,094,000 1,800,000 1,680,000 -6.67% (120,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL CHARGES 2,101 ,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0.00% 0
OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 1,973,000 300,000 550,000 83.33% 250,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 39,709,000 37,605,000 37,850,000 0.65% 245,000
e 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED AS % DIFFERENCE
REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE OF FY 93-94 1993-94 TO
REVENUE SOURCE 1W-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95 1 Sf ECfAL REVENUE FUNDS .......... . ..... . ..................... , ..:. .: .........., .; ....; ..,...,...,.,.... ............... .//.. ... i .... i...... :: _. ::. .:..; ............:.. '.'.:'.::::::::::""'" ..........; ............................................................................................................................................................. :::::::::5):.:.':.:.: . . . . . , .
POLICE ASSET FORFEITURE
ASSET FORFEITURES 327,479 140,000 150,000 7.1 4% 10,000
INTEREST ' 104,600 60,000 a000 0.00% 0
TOTAL 432,079 200,ooo 210,000 5.00% 10,ooo
HOUSING - SECTION 8
INTEREST 7,170 8,000 8,m 0.00% 0
FEDERAL GRANT 2,432,798 2,890,000 3,210,000 11.07% 320,000
OTHER 70,764 121 ,000 190,000 57.02% m000
TOTAL 2,510,732 2,898,000 3,218,000 11.04% =,m
MOBILE H-
TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 0 60.- 0 - 100.00% (WOOO)
TOTAL 0 6o.m 0 -1 00.00% (s0,oOo)
!.
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE
INTEREST 6,237 5,000 5,000 0.00% 0
INSURANCE FEES 75,642 ~,000 90,m 0.00% 0
TOTAL 81,879 =,000 95,000 0.00% 0
GAS TAX
GAS TAX REVENUES 1,094,331 1,100,000 1,130,000 2.73% 30,m
INTEREST 200,058 80,m 80,ooo 0.00% 0
TOTAL 1,294,389 1,180,000 1,210,000 2.54% =,000
TREE MAINTENANCE
INTEREST 19,040 6,o@J 6,o@J 0.00% 0
TREE MAINTENANCE FEES 513,733 woo0 5oo,oo0 0.00% 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 66,140 66,140 66,140 0.00% a
TOTAL 598,973 572,140 572,140 0.00% 0
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
INTEREST 2,759 0 0 0.00% ,O
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE FEES 246,652 255,000 255,000 0.00% 0
MlSC REIMBURSEMENT 4,596
TOTAL 254,007 255,000 255,000 0.00% 0
0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED, AS % DIFFERENCE
REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE OF N 93-94 1993-94 TO
REVENUE SOURCE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95
STREET LIGHTING
INTEREST 43,943 =,000 20,000 0.00% 0-
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 57,000 60,000 50,000 - 16.67% (1 0,000)
STREET LIGHTING FEES 605,689 610,000 610,000 0.00% 0
MlSC REIMBURSEMENT 13,156 2,000 2,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL 71 9,788 692,000 682,000 -1.45% (10,000)
BUENA VISTA CREEK CHNL MAIM
INTEREST 18,007 8,000 8,000 0.00% 0
BUENA VISTA FEES 100,407 100,000 100,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL 1 18.41 4 108,000 108,000 0.00% 0
-<
STATE GRANTS
INTEREST
GRANTS
TOTAL
14,200 15,000 5,000 -66.67% (1 0,000)
199,042 250,000 ~,OOo -20.00% (50,000)
21 3,242 =,000 2tx000 -22.64% (so,000)
SENIOR NUTRITION
GRANTS 105,871 103,000 103,000 0.00% 0
DONATIONS
TOTAL
74,533 gQ000 w000 0.00% 0
180,404 193,000 193,000 0.00% 0
CDBG ENTITLEMENT
GRANT REVENUE 66,000 90.000 110,000 22.22% m,m
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0 0 21 ,000 100.00% 21 ,000
TOTAL 66,000 90,000 131 ,000 100.00% 41 ,000
CMMT'Y FACILITIES DlSTR #1
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 106,000 106,000 107,000 0.94% 1 ,000
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 6,575,907 6,654,140 .6,965,140 4.67% 31 0,000
e 0
CIM OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
REVENUE SOURCE
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED AS 96 DIFF€E€NCE
REVENUES R~VENUE REVENUE OF FY 93-94 1993-94 TO
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95 I ENTERPRISE FUNDS I:::.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A;:;: . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ .:....:..: .../ ...:.. ....... ... ....... .:.. ....................................................................
WATER OPERATIONS
WATER SALES 7,787,667 9,700,000 9,900,000 2.06% 2w000
READY TO SERVE CHARGES 1,588,044 1,753,000 1,973,000 12.55% =x000
NEW ACCOUNTCHARGES 44,596 70,500 50,000 -29.08% (20,500)
BACK-FLOW PROGRAM FEES 1,020 46,000 46,000 0.00% 0
PENALTY FEES 116,485 239,000 2w000 - 12.55% (30Jw
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 283,546 180,000 185,000 2.78% 5,000
ENGINEERING & PLAN CHECK FEES . 77,478 27,000 66,000 144.44% 39,m
CONNECTION FEES 60,898 =,000 45,000 - 19.64% (1 1 ,000)
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
157,986 50.500 35000 -30.69% (1 5,560)
10,117,720 12,122,000 12,509,000 3.1 9% 387,000
RECLAIMED WATER
WATER SALES 522,100 6oWoo 750,000 25.00% 150,000
READY-TO-SERVE CHARGE 0 8,OOo 8,OOo 0,0096 0
RECLAIMED WATER CREDITS 75,794 m,000 200,000 0.00% 0
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES (5,277) 0 0 0.00% 0
MISCELLANEOUS RElMB EXPEND 0 700 0 -1 00.00% V00)
TOTAL 592,617 808,700 =,000 18.46% 149,300
SANITATION OPERATIONS
SERVICE CHARGES 4,370,993 4,400,000 4,400,000 0.00% 0
LATERAL CONNECTIONS 11,897 2,500 2,500 0.00% 0
PRE-TREATMENT CHARGES 57,273 65,000 65,m 0.00% 0
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 209,716 194,Ooo 194,000 0.00% 0
MISCELLANEOUS 28.1 45 400 400 0.0096 0
TOTAL 4,678,024 4,661,900 4,661,900 0.00% 0
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
INTEREST 830 3,000 1 ,000 -66.67% (2m0)
GRANTS 58,524 15,000 0 - 100.00% (1 5.000)
RECYCLING FEE
TOTAL
67,558 68,000 70,000 2.94% 2,000
126,912 =,o@J 71 ,OOO - 17.44% (1 5,0001
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 15,515,273 17,678,600 18,199,900 2.95% 521,300
0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
REVENUE SOURCE
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED AS % DIFFERENCE
RNENU ES REVENUE REVENUE OF N 93-94 1993-94 TO
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95 1 INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS
:::?:.:... .......................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................... .................................................................................... .........................................................................................................
WORKERS' COMP SELF-INSURANCE
INTEREST 103,365 a000 80,000 0.00% 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 623,013 61 1,600 627,600 2.62% 16,000
OTHER 49,652 80,000 80,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL i76,030 771,600 787,600 2.07% 16,000
LIABILITY SELF-INSURANCE
INTEREST 144,520 75,000 75,000 0.00% 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 829,348 767,000 =,400 25.87% 198,400
OTHER
TOTAL
15,000 15,000 0.00% -a
973,868 857,000 1,055,400 23.1 5% 198,400
1, HEALTH INSURANCE
INTEREST 101,846 65,000 =,OOo 0.00% 0
INTERDEPAFTMENTAL 1 ,moa7 1,400,000 1,400,000 0.00% 0
REIMBURSEMENTS 325,767 340,000 3wxQ 0.00% 0
TOTAL ' 1,905,700 1,805,000 1,805,000 0.00% 0
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
INTERDEPA!=lTblENTAL 1,251,777 1,220,000 1,333,600 9.31 % 1 13,600
MISCELLANEOUS 48,966 20,000 20,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL 1,300,743 1,240,000 . 1,353,600 9.16% 113,600
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 920,628 921 ,ooo 81 3,100 -11.06% (1 01,900,
INTEREST 163,549 120,000 120,000 0.00% 0
SALE OF PROPERTY 28,776 25,Ooo 25,Ooo 0.00% 0
TOTAL 1,112,953 1,066,000 964,100 -9.56% (1 01,900
DATA PROCESSING
INTEREST 30,412 20,000 20,000 0.00% 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 453,742 690.000 752,600 9.07% 62,600
MISCELLANEOUS 16,310
TOTAL 500,464 710,000 i72,600 8.82% =.m
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 6,569,758 6,449,600 6,738,300 4.48% 288,70(:
0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
REVENUE SOURCE
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED AS % DIFFERENCE
REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE OF FY 93-94 1993-94 TO
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 PROJECTED 1994-95 I REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS\;! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .
OPERATIONS
RENTAL INCOME 29,800 37,200 =,500 6.18% 2,300
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 24,546 19,950 19,900 -0.25% (50)
MISCELLANEOUS 15,545 36,600 36,600 0.00% 0
TOTAL 69,891 93,750 96,m 2.40% 2,250
DEBT SERVICE
TAX INCREMENT 1,322,061 1,300,000 1,300,000 0.00% 0
INTEREST & WRTFOLIO SERVICES 121.51 5 38,000 38,000 0.00% 0
TOTAL 1,443,576 1,338,000 1,338,000 0.00% U
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG
I- TAX INCREMENT 330,515 323,000 323,000 0.00% 0
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 125,715 74,500 74,500 0.00% 0
MISCELLANEOUS 40,995 0 0 0.00% 0
TOTAL 497,225 397,500 397,500 0.00% 0
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS 2.01 0,692 1,829,250 1,831.500 0.1 2% 2,250
I TOTAL OPERATING $70,380,630 $70,216,590 $71,584,840 1.95% $1,368,250
0 e
CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER * 1993-94 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 1 1
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL 1 1 0
CITY MANAGER 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1 1
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR 1 1
ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER 1 1
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
SECRETARY TO C. MANAGER 1 1
SECRETARY II 2 2
TOTAL CITY MANAGER 8 8 0
-< <
ADMINISTRATION
INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK 1 1 I.
MINUTES CLERK 1 1
SECRETARY II 1 1
STENO CLERK II 1 1
WORD PROCESSING OPERATOR II 1 1
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 6 6 0
DATA PROCESSING
DATA PROCESSING MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAMMEWANALYST 1 1
PROGRAMMEWOPERATOR 1 1
MICRO COMPUTER SPECIALIST 1 1
TOTAL DATA PROCESSING 4 4 0
TOTAL JNFORMATION SYSTEMS 10 10 0
y.::;ffy .. ~ , :. , I >y$q;$$<..fl<y< .? . ..'. .. 'x....:., ' ." E'' :.. .. .. An.,, , ~,:~~~ ,,,: N~ , &>>.y...:v&,> ...+*&$$!$A
CITY AlTORNEY
ASSISTANT ClTYAlTORNEY
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
SECRETARY TO C. AlTORNW
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
SECRETARY II 1 1
TOTAL CrrY AlTORNEY 5 5 0
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ACCOUNTANT
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
ACCOUNTCLERK II
ACCOUNTING OFFICE ASSISTANT
AUDITOR
TREASURERS ASSISTANT
1
1
1
4
2
2
1
1
0.75
1
1
1
4
2
2
1
1
0.75
SECRETARY I1 1 1
TOTAL FINANCE 14.75 14.75 0
0 0
CllVOF CARLSEAD PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
1993-94 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
RISK MANAGER 1 1
SECRETARY II 1 1
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2 2 0
::eu .,. . . . . . ; , ,, . . ,:,,;: . . . . . . . . ,: . . . . . . ... . . .. ...................................................... ,
PURCHASING OFFICER 1 1
SECRETARY I
BUYER
1 1
2 2
MESSENGER 1 1
TOTAL PURCHASING 5 5 0
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR COMPENSATION &BENEFITS MGR
EMPLOYMENT SERVICES MANAGER
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT
SECRETARY II
I I 1 1 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 1
1 1
-_
CLERK TYPIST II 1 1
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 7 7 0
~~~~~.~~~,~~::.:~.~~~.~,,.'. +:<:,.,,&.2::::? .,:,;:.; .,.,,.,,
ADMINISTRATION
POLICE CHIEF
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SECRETARY II
SECRETARY I
POLICE CAPTAIN
POLICE LIEUTENANT
POLICE SERGEANT
SENIOR POLICE OFFICER
POLICE OFFICER
COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR
RECORDS SUPERVISOR
COMMUNICATION OPERATOR II
COMMUNICATION OPERATOR I
POLICE RECORDS CLERK II
PR0GRA"ERlOPERATOR
CRIME PREVENT TECH
~.~:~~~~:.:.~;:.:.:.:.~~..~~:~~~~~~~~~~~
1
0
1
1
3
2. 5
10
21
41
1
1
13
0
5
1
1
1
1 1
0 -1
1
3
2
5
10
21
41
1
1
12 -1
1 1
5
1
1
POLICE SERVlCES AIDE 1 1
TOTAL POLICE 108 108 0
I 0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFEATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
1993-94 (UNDER)
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
FIRE CHIEF 1 1
DIVISION CHIEF
FIRE BAlTALION CHIEF
FIRE CAPTAIN
FIRE CAPTAIN SPECIALIST
FIRE ENGINEER
FIRE FIGHTER
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SECRETARY I1
SECRETARY I
PARAMEDIC-FIRE FIGHTER
0
4
18
4
18
9
21
0
1
1
FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER I1 3
TOTAL FIRE 80
2 2
3 -1
18
1 -3
18
9
21
1 1
1
1
3
79 -1
--
PRINC BUtlDlNG INSPECTOR 1 1
BUILDING INSPECTOR I1 5 5
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 0 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I 2 1 -1
BUILDING TECHNICLAN ll 1 1
WORD PROCESSOR II 0 1 1
I-
PERMIT CLERK 2 1 -1
TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTION 11 11 0 u
COMMUNITY DEVEL DIRECTOR 1 1
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGER
SECRETARY II
1 1
1 1
1 1
RECEPTIONIST/CASHIER 1 1
TOTAL COMM DEV ADMINIST 5 5 0
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEM COORD 1 1
TOTAL GEOGRAPHIC INFOAMATION 1 1 0
CITY ENGINEER 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
PRINCIPALCIVIL ENGINEER
PRINCIPALCONSTRUCTON INSPECTOR SR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
SR ENGINEERING INSPECTOFWD
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT
SECRETARY II '
1
1
4
1
2
2
4
9.5
2
6
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
4
2
6
1
1
1
10 0.5
WORD PROCESS OPERATOR II 4 4
TOTALADMlNlSTRATlON 40.5 41 0.5
e 0
CllYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFCATION
REQUEST
OVER
1993-94 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER 0.5 0
TOTAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
-0.5
1.5 1 -0.5
.:.. Zff.#&<.:.w.,:w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. ,. . I . . . . . . . . . .,...... ,._, :.:.:~~.:.:.:~~.:~.:.:~ . . ............................................... . , ,,,,, ,, , ,, , , ,.~~,~~::.~.~;~::~~~~~~;~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I.. ' . PU\NNlN- 1 1
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SENIOR PLANNER
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
ASSISTANT PLANNER
PLANNING TECHNICIAN I
PLANNING TECHNICIAN ll
GRAPHIC TECHNICIAN
SECRETARY II .
1
1
2
4
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
5
2
1
1
1
1
-<
WORD PROCESS OPERATOR II 3 3
TOTAL PLANNING 23 23 0 I.
LIBRARY DIRECTOR 1 1
ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR 1 1
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
SECRETARY II 1 1
GRAPHIC ARTIST 1 1
ACCOUNTCLERK II 1 1
SENIOR CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR 1 1
LIBRARY ASSISTANT II 8 8
LIBRAW ASSISTANT I 3.5 3.5
SENIOR LIBRARIAN 6 6
LIBRARIAN II 5 4
LIBRARIAN I 0 1
MEDIA SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
CLERK TYPIST II 1 1
LIBRARY SERVICES SPECIALIST 1 1
TOTAL LIBRARY 32.5 32.5 0
-1
1
ARTS MANAGER 1 1
COMMUNITY ARTS COORDINATOR 1 1
SECRETAFW II 1 1
TOTAL CULTUWU. ARTS 3 3 0
0 0
CI'TYOF CARLSBAD PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
1993-94 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DIR
MANAGER OF RESEARCH &ANALYSIS
SPECIAL PROJECTS MANAGER
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
PARK DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
SECRETARY II
SECRETARY I
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1 1
0 -1
0 -1
0 -1
0 -1
1 1
1
1
2
1
CLERK TYPIST II 2 2
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 11 9 -2
PARK MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERINTENDENT
PARK SUPERVISOR
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER 111
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER II
1 1
1 1
5 5
10.75 10.75
-A
I.
PARK MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 1 1
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 18.75 18.75 0
TREE MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERVISOR
TREE TRIMMER LEADWORKER
0.5 0.5
2 2
TREE TRIMMER II 3 3
TOTAL TREE MAINTENANCE 5.5 5.5 0
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERVISOR 0.5 0.5
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER 11 1 1
TOTAL MEDIAN MAINTENANCE 1.5 1.5 0
RECREATION
CLERK TYPIST
RECREATION SPECIALIST I
RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
RECREATION SUPERVISOR II
RECREATION SUPERVISOR I
INSTRUCTDNAL CLASS COORDINATOR
ADULT SPORTS COORDINATDN
YOUTH SPORTS/SPECIAL NEWS COORD
AQUATlC SUPERVISOR
POOL COORDINATOR
TOTAL RECREATION
3 3
1 1
1 1
3 3
2 2
0.75 0.75
0.75 0.75
0.75 0.75
1 1
0.75 0.75
14 14 0
SENIOR PROGRAM
SENIOR COORDINATOR
SECRETARY I
1 1
1 1
SITE MANAGER 1 1
TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAM 3 3 0
a e
CINOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CIASSIFCATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
* 1993-94 (UNDER)
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
STREET MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE SUPT 1 1
STREET MAINTENANCE SUPERV
STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER 111
STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER II
2 2
6 6
11 11
MAINTENANCE WORKER I TOTAL STREJ3 MAINTENANGE 2; zi 0
STREET LIGHTING
ELECT OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SUPERVISOR
ELECTRICIAN II
ELECTRICIAN I
1 0
0 1
1 2
1 0
-1
1'
1
-1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II 1 1
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING 4 4 0 -*
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINT SUPT 1 1
BUILDING MAIM SUPERV 1 1
SENIOR BUILDING MAlNT WORKER 1 1
BUILDING MAINTWORKER II 2 2
CUSTODIAN II 1 1
CUSTODIAN 9 9
TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15 15 0
I.
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0.75 0.75 TOTAL SOLID WASTE 0.75 0.75 0
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
FLEET SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC SUPERVISOR 1 1
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II 3 3
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 0 -1
TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 6 6 0
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 102.5 100.5 -2
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSINO & REDEVELOPMENT DIR
SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
HOUSING PROGRAM MANAGER
HOUSING SPECIALIST I
SECRETARY II
SECRETARY I
CLERK TYPIST II
TOTAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
1 1
2 2
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
CLERK TYPIST II 1 1
TOTAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 10 10 0
1 1
10 10 0
0 0
CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
* 1993-94
NUMBER
ALLOCATED '@&q&&Q Mip& mJy& - d$:z: L? ..,,...,,. >,,* ,..,.,,.,,.,, *..,a ,.... 1:: ,,,,,~,,~,,, u,., , , . ,, ., , , , .,,, , , ., , .,W.YL.Y;J i.'.'.'i.'.~.~.'i..,
WATER OPERATIONS
GENERAL MANAGER 1
DISTRICT ENGINEER 1
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER 1
OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 1
WATER MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 2
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1
ASSOCRTE ENGINEER 3
CONSTRUCTK)N/MAINT SUPERVISOR 1
CONSTRUCTION/MAINT WORKER II 1
ENGINEERING OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1
OPERATIONS OFFICE ASSISTANT ll 1
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR 1
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1
ACCOUNT CLERK I 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 111 1
ENGINEERING SECRETARY 1
EQUIPMENTOPERATOR 1
FACILITY MAIM LEADWORKER 1
METER SERVICES WORKER I 2 METER SERVICES WORKER II 2
METER SERVICES WORKER 111 1
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROLTECH 1
RECEPTIONIST 1
RECEPTIONIST/CASHIER 1
SECRETARY II 1
SERVICE COORDINATOR 1
SR CONSTRUCTION/MAINT WORKER 1
SR SYSTEMS OPERATOR 1
STOREKEEPER 1
WATER CONSERVATION SPECIALIST 1
SYSTEMS OPERATOR II 4
VALVE TECHNICIAN 1
SR VALVE TECHNICIAN 1
TOTAL CMWD ADMINISTRATION 44
CONSTRUCTDN/MAINT WORKER I 2
1994-95
BUDGET
1
1
1
1
2
1. 3
1
2
1
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
43
REQUEST
OVER
(UNDER)
1993-94
ALLOCATED
"
I-
-1
-1
RECLAIMED WATER
ENGINEEWNG TECHNICIAN II 1 1
TOTAL CMWD - RECLAIMED WATER 1 1 0
e e
CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1993-94 AND 1994-95
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
1993-94 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1994-95 1993-94
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
SANITATION
MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
SANITATION SUPERVISOR
METER READEWREPAIRER II METER SERVICE WORKER II
UTILITY MAIM WORKER II
UTILITY MAIM WORKER 111
UTILITY SYSTEM OPERATOR II unm SYSTEM OPERATOR HI
1 1
0 0
2 2 0
3 3
2 2
1 1
1 1
RECEPTIONIST/CASHIER 0 1 1
TOTAL CMWD - SANITATION 11 12 1
TOTAL CMWD 56 56 0
523.75 -3 -I
I-
~~~~~~-~.~~~~~~~ - #
PURCHASING 0.50 0.50 0.00
HUMAN RESOURCES
RISK MANAGEMENT
ENGINEERING
LIBRARY
PARWREUMEDIAN MAINT
RECREATION/AQUATICS
SENIORS
0.00 0.07. 0.07
0.00 0.50 0.50
0.25 1 .00 0.75
35.41 34.71 -0.70
2.90 3.00 0.1 0
29.61 28.31 -1.30
5.25 5.25 0.00
BUILDING MAINTENANCE 0.00 0.30 0.30
* NOTE: 1993-94 allocated personnel have been restated to reflect the newly created trhee-quarter
time position.
0 e
1994-95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction
The City of Carlsbad Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning document whic
incorporates the current budget for capital projects with future planned revenues ar
expenditures. The 1994-95 Capital Improvement Program totals $51 million, an increa!
of $25 million over the 1993-94 adopted budget of $26.4 million. Projected revenues f
the i994-95 program total $40.9 million and are up by $28.1 million .from the 1993-!
estimates. The increase is due primarily to funds the City will receive from the Port of LC
Angeles for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project.
Weak economic conditions continue to prevail and are most evident in revenuc
generated by the construction industry. Current year revenues collected as the result
new residential and commercial/industriaI development are nearly identical to 1993-1
projections. In the 1994-95 budget, projects continue to be built in phases over sevel
years while some are deferred to future years. This report and the accompanying C
documents reflect the actions taken to address the issue of funding availability weight
against the demand for facilities, and the City’s ability to assume operational costs f
new facilities.
As the City continues to monitor growth in conjunction with revenues, the correlatic
between the amount of funds that can be spent on projects and the amount of grow
has become apparent. If development subsides, revenues also decline. Lower revenul
in turn impact project schedules which were established using the growth manageme
standards as guidelines. Again this year, pending development projects were evaluatt
to determine what revenues might be generated for the capital budget. Interwoven in
this formula are fiscal constraints which have become important to the scheduling
projects. Previously, the City chose to build facilities to meet maximum populatic
expectations. The philosophy has shifted to one where phasing of projects will mo
closely match the incremental growth demands while still meeting the growth manag
ment standards. Further, in cases where facility availability fails to meet grow
management standards, developers may be required to finance design and constructic
costs. The growth management system used by the City needs to be viewed wi
flexibility, as well as other external issues, including the general economy.
Revenue
Revenues for Capital Projects from now until buildout total $502 million and may I
segregated into three major categories: 1) fees generated by development in Carlsba
2) Community Facilities District special taxes, and 3) other sources including grants, bo1
issues, depreciation replacement reserves, and letters of credit, The pie chart on tl
following page provides an overview of the estimated revenues which are projected
support the CIP projects.
0 0
FUNDING SOURCES
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1994-95 TO BUILDOUT
TRANSNET
REPLACEMENT
PUBLIC FACILITY
$56.3 11%
$49.9 10% SWER $23.3 5% TWFFIC IMPACT
$55.9 1 1%
FEE
Tot81 Revenues = $502.2 Million
Approximately 44% of all CIP revenues are received as a result of development, and E
dependent upon assumptions made about the City’s growth in dwelling units a
commercial/industrial square feet each year. These revenues include the Public ,Faciliti
Fee (PFF), Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), Park-In-Lieu (PIL), Planned Local Drainage (PL
Fees, Water Major Facility Fees, and Sewer Connection revenues. Community Faciliti
District revenues occupy 24% of the total with resources coming in as a result of projc
scheduling and development in the City. The remaining 32% of revenues are related
the receipt of grants, the County sales tax program (Transnet), San Diego Gas & Eled
funding, sewer and water replacement funds, and other miscellaneous sources.
Growth AssumDtions
Several assumptions about the rate and type of growth were made in order to project 1
revenues which rely upon development. Growth assumptions were compiled using i
projections used in the Growth Management Program, which continue to change alo
with the economic climate. Residential and non-residential development information w
: compiled by the Planning and Engineering Departments, while the Finance Departmc
overlaid the economic forecast.
This year residential and non-residential growth projections have been reduced frc
earlier estimates to refled the rate of growth anticipated in a weak economy. T
following table shows the number of residential units used for projecting the 1994-95 C
revenues. The total number of residential units projected at buildout is 54,000, H
approximately 25,000 remaining to be built from this point forward. Projections for squ:
feet of non-residential construction are also listed in the table on the following page.
0 e
r
1994 - 95 CIP Growth Assumptions
Residential Non-Residential
Year Units Sa. Feet
04-95
509 434,000 98-99
443 250,000 97-98
242 250 ,OOO 96-97
198 140,OOO 95 - 96
I30 130,OOO
Years 5 - 10 *
Total Future
752 682,000 Years 11 - 2030
702 531,000
24,584 21,591,000
* Figures shown reflect averages for these time periods.
The line chart below further demonstrates the growth and development patterns wh
have occurred and are projected for Carlsbad. As can be seen, the development ra
fell dramatically in 1987-88, due to the implementation of the Growth Management P
and have continued to decline since that point. Permits issued for fiscal year 1993.
total 168 residential units through June I. Conservative growth estimates project I
residential units in 1994-95.
RATE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Permits Issued
UNITS
2500
............ YEARS 1 TO 5 OF CIP' '
................
..............................
............
87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 98
FISCAL YEAR .- DWELLING UNITS
Revenue projections for developing fees were made using the growth assumptio
identified on the previous page and show similar weaknesses. This continues to res
in changes to project scheduling that occur as development remains low.
Calculation of Future Fees
The mix of attached and detached residential units is assumed to be 25% and 7:
respectively. This is a change from the ratio applied in the past and reflects t
0 0
anticipated mix of residential development shown in current plans for each Local Facilitil
Management Zone. The building permit valuation used for computing public facilities fe
was $89,500 per attached dwelling unit, and $153,000 per detached dwelling unit. TI
mix of commercial and industrial is assumed to be 40% and 60% respectively, with f
commercial category including office development. A blended building permit valuatil
of $38 per square foot of construction was used to calculate non-residential puk
facilities fees,
In order to calculate estimated revenues for the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), the number
average daily trips was computed for each type of use. An attached dwelling unit w
assigned eight trips per day, and a detached unit ten trips per day, based on data us
in developing the TIF. Each residential trip was valued at the current TIF fee of $83. TI
trips-per-day value for. commercial/industrial was averaged at 17 trips per 1,000 squz feet of development. The volume of trips generated by commercial/industriaI develo
ment can vary widely depending on the ultimate land use. The value of each cornrnt
cial/industrial trip was established at the current TIF fee of $33.
This is the fourth year that the Community Facilities District No. 1 (CFD No. 1) fundi1
mechanism has been incorporated into the CIP. The implementation of CFD No. 1
1991 has reduced the total amount of PFF and TIF revenues projected, as some projec
previously funded from these sources will now be funded through the CFD. A secor
Community Facilities District to fund Rancho Santa Fe and Olivenhain Roads is includc
in the 1994-95 CIP. CFD No. 2 has not yet been formally established, however an interi
fee program is in place.
Expenditures
The 1994-95 to, buildout CIP outlines approximately 160 future projects at- a total cost
over $500 million. The pie chart shown on the following page indicates that the large
segment of expenditures is for street expenditures at $120.7 million or 24% of the tot:
Included are the construction and widening of arterials and roadways as well as tk
widening of some existing streets. Examples include the widening of La Costa Avenu
Rancho Santa Fe and Olivenhain roads, and reconstruction of the south-bound Carlsbz
Boulevard bridge over the Batiquitos Lagoon. Interchange improvements at Poinsetl
Boulevard and La Costa Avenue totaling $1 3.5 million are scheduled for the next fol
years.
The second largest category is for parks at $99 million or 20% of the total planned capil
expenditures. Park projects include development of acreage within all quadrants
Carlsbad as well as Veteran’s Memorial Park. Major park projects include Poinsettia Par
the Golf Course, Larwin Park, Alga Norte Park, and community parks in the Northwe:
and Southwest Quadrants.
0 e
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Allocation 1994 -95 to Buildout
PARKS LOAN 8 REPAYMENTS
. $30.2 6%
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
1-5 INTERCHANGES
$135 3% WATE
$49.7 10% $la 7 24%
Total CIP to Bulldout = t500.8 Million
Civic Projects represent the third highest level of expenditures at $85.7 million and incluc
such projects as the South Carlsbad Library, new City Hall, and the Batiquitos Lagoc
project. Sewer projects total $78.4 million and include the repayment of bonds for th
expansion of the Encina Wastewater Facility, the construction of the Vista Carlsbad trun
line, and parallel ocean outfall. Water projects total $49.7 million, 10% of the total, an
include Maerkle Dam lining and cover, reclaimed and potable pipelines, and repaymer
of debt for water projects. Interfund loans and scheduled repayments total $30 millio
and include repayment of Alta Mira land purchase, Vista Carlsbad sewer trunk line, an(
various water projects. The smallest expenditure category for projects is traffic sional$ at $3.4 million or 1 %. Specific timing and cost estimates for projects are identified in th
table immediately following the narrative.
Specific phasing of projects is reliant upon fund availability as well as efforts taken tc
meet established growth management standards for facilities. Wherever recommendec
project scheduling changes occurred, they were based upon a thorough review of thl
Growth Management Plan, in unison with revenue projections. In, order to balance thc
first five years of the CIP with projected revenues, selected park and street projects haw
been phased and deferred. Altered projects were funded by either TIF, PFF, or CFD, anc
expenditures are timed to match anticipated revenues. Following is a discussion of thosc
projects and other issues.
b South Carlsbad Library - Funding for the new library in south Carlsbad is availabk
utilizing Community Facilities District No. 1 revenues. However, construction of the
library is now postponed to 1996-97 due to inadequate operating fund projections
for the next few years. The Cole library will be remodeled upon completion of the
south Carlsbad library.
b Golf Course - The City continues to explore feasible alternative sites for a municipal
golf course. The previous site at Lake Calavera faced significant environmental
constraints and is no longer under consideration as a golf course site. Funding
the golf course continues, with $1.2 million general fund reserve payment
scheduled for N 1994-95.
0 0
b Streets - Several major street projects were deferred in the 1994-95 CIP: Cann
Road and Hidden Valley Road to Faraday moved from 1995-96 to 1999-20(
design of Carlsbad Boulevard medians will begin but construction is deferred
1999-2004. Improvement of the El Camino Real medians moved from 1998-2C
to 2004+.
p Poinsettia Park - Funds for the first phase of Poinsettia Park were appropriated
the 1992-93 CIP, however declining operating revenues delayed the proje
Construction of phase I is now scheduled for mid-1995 with the remaining phas
built in 1999+. The first phase of Poinsettia Park will include two ballfields, o
soccer field, a tot lot, restroom facilities, and a parking lot.
1994-95 Proiects
The 1994-95 CIP identifies 35 projects which are budgeted at $51 million. These projec
are categorized as shown below. Appropriations of $32 million for on-going capii
projects remaining unspent at the end of FY 1993-94 will be added to the new 1994-!
CIP appropriations. A sum of $83 million will then comprise the 1994-95 total C
appropriation.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1994-95 PROJECTS BY MAJOR CATEGORY
CIVIC (INCLUDES EATlQUlTOS LAGOON S30MlL)
$309 61%
1-5 INTERCHANGES
$18 4%
TREET PROJECTS $53 10% QO SEwER 4% -OTHER WATER $19 4% $9 1 18%
Tc4.l "06 CIP = $51 Yfllion
Civic Proiects
Civic projects occupy 61 % of the total 1994-95 expenditures at $30.9 million. The mos
significant project scheduled for 1994-95 is the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement project
This $30 million project includes dredging of the lagoon to achieve full tidal flushing anc
the construction of nesting areas for various species of birds. The Port of Los Angele5
is funding the project as mitigation for recent. construction at the Los Angeles Port.
Additional funding for the Financial Information System is also budgeted for 1994-95. Thc
0 0
System will replace and enhance existing software and computer equipment for citywic
information processing.
1-5 lnterchanqes
The interchange at Poinsettia and 1-5 is scheduled for a $1.8 million appropriation in 199
95 using Community Facilities District No. 1 funds, In 1995-96, an additions\ appropri,
tion of $3 million for this project is planned, bringing the project total cost to $9.2 millio
Street Proiects
Street construction activities total $5.3 million, 10% of the total 1994-95 CIP. The large
appropriation for a street project is for Rancho Santa Fe and Olivenhain Roads at $1.
million, utilizing planned Community Facilities District No. 2 funds. As housing units ar
built in this area, developers will fund the project which is scheduled for construction j
phases. Other street appropriations include south-bound Carlsbad Boulevard bridge i
Batiquitos Lagoon, design work for Cannon Road 1-5 to Faraday, and various street an
sidewalk upgrades. .Also included are the San Diego Gas & Electric undergrounding (
utilities scheduled for next year.
Parks, Traffic Signals, Loans
The Other category in the pie chart includes park projects, traffic signals, and loan:
Several existing parks received appropriations to bring the City into compliance with thr
Americans with Disabilities Act. The Federal law requires City facilities, includin!
playgrounds, to be accessible to all persons. The construction of ballfields at Aviar:
Oaks School will also commence this year.
One traffic signal, located at Alga Road and El Fuerte, is scheduled for construction ner
year. Included in the other category is an interfund water loan for the D Reservoir an(
Maerkle Dam projects.
Water Proiects
Water appropriations of $9.1 million comprise 18% of the 1994-95 CIP funding. Thc
Maerkle Dam Lining project will receive its final scheduled appropriation with $7 million
in funds. This project, in conjunction with the D Reservoir project which was funded lasl
year, will need to be built through the issuance of bonds and interfund water loans.
Sufficient funds are not available to complete these projects on a pay as you go basis,
Sewer Proiects
Sewer funding of $2 million reflects Carlsbad’s share of funding the Encina Wastewater
Treatment Facility capital improvements, including funds to repay the debt for the Phase
IV Expansion. Funding for sewer access hole rehabilitation and sewer line replacement programs are also included.
0
Unfunded Proiects
The City has identified $1 1.7 million in projects for which there is currently no source
funding. These projects are listed at the end of the Current and Future (1994-95 Buildout) Projects schedule. Several traffic signals were added this year as a result oft’
Traffic Signal Safety study. As funding becomes available, a project may move.into t,
Capital Improvement Program.
Summarv
While many projects continue to be deferred due to lack of available funds, significa
progress has been made on the traffic circulation projects started in 1992-93 and 199
94. The I-5/Palomar Airport road interchange was completed, as was the final phase Streetscape along Carlsbad Village Drive. The realignment and widening of Palom Airport Road east of El Camino Real is scheduled for completion in late 1994.
Review of the CIP finds that all projects identified in the 1993-94 CIP continue to t: ..included in: ,4994-95.. For the past few years, there have been some significant projet scheduling changes as the effects of the slow economy are felt on Carlsbad’s revenli stream. Lack of funds has caused the City to rethink how it can accomplish its capitl projects. Generally the philosophy has been to build quality capital facilities which me€ and at times exceed, growth management standards whenever economically beneficia
This philosophy worked when growth and related revenues were substantial. Practice
such as phasing projects over a period of years, and timing projects when funds ar
available, have now been implemented. The City will continue to provide quality capit1 facilities which meet the needs of Carlsbad’s citizens. The 1994-95 CIP reflects thes
approaches.
0 0
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Growth Management Plan was developed and voted into law by the citizens
Carlsbad in 1986. The plan was established in an effort to regulate development witt
the City by linking residential, commercial, and industrial. development directly to t
standards for the availability of public services and facilities. Standards for facilities :
applied within the City as a whole, within the City's four quadrants, and in the Cit
twenty-five community or growth management zones.
The Growth Management Plan has established precise standards, as adopted by the C
Council for eleven public facilities. Standards must be met at all times as growth OCCL
Facilities for which standards have been established are as follows:
- City Administrative - Wastewater Treatment - Circulation - Fire
- Water Distribution
- Schools
- Library - Parks - Drainage - Open Space - Sewer Collection
The Plan requires that appropriate public facilities be available, in conformance"with '
adopted performance standards, as development occurs. Unless each of the ele\
public facility standards have been met, no new development can occur. Previou:
facilities were scheduled to meet maximum population expectations. Now projects
phased to more closely match incremental growth demands.
The Growth Management Program impacts both the Operating Budget and the Cap
Improvement Program. As the Program was being developed, very little construct
occurred which resulted in reductions in both operating and capital development rela
revenues. Revenues can be expected to recover as standards are met and reasona
levels of development begin to occur. The Growth Management Plan directly affects
Operating and Capital Budgets by requiring the .construction of facilities to m
standards and the subsequent operation of those facilities. Facilities such as commul
centers, parks, and fire stations have been constructed under this program.
The Capital Improvement Program has been designed to specifically address arc
where facilities do not comply with the adopted performance standards. With
adoption of the 1994-95 CIP, compliance with the Growth Management Plan is assur
0 0
CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 1600 (AB 1600)
In 1987'the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) which set far
the process a city or county must follow to establish developer fees to finance pub
facilities. This legislation applies to fees established, increased, or imposed on or aft
January I, I 989, the effective date of the law. AB 1600 contains four general requir
ments:
b A "nexus" or connection must be established between a development project
class of project and the public improvement being financed with the fee. All I
1600 fees adopted by the City have met the nexus test. For example, Traf
Impact, Bridge and Thoroughfare District and Drainage Sewer Benefit Area Fe
were all established under AB 1600.
b The fee must be segregated from the General Fund. Carlsbad segregates
capital funds not only from the General Fund but each classification of fee as wc
b Fees collected by a city or county must be spent or committed to a project witl
a five year period. Funds are viewed to be committed if they are programmed
be spent on a specific project(s). If the money is not spent, findings must
made describing the continuing need for that money each fiscal year after the fi
years has expired. The City of Carlsbad commits the revenues from these fe
through its Capital Improvement Program budget. This budget, which is adopt
by the City Council, sets forth the City's Capital expenditure program from t
current year to projected build out of the City. The expenditure plan is updat
annually as part of the City's budget process.
b Refunds must be made only if the City cannot make the required findings. At tl
time no refunds are due because the City's Capital Improvement Program comrr
all AB 1600 fees to projects to be constructed both in the current year and in 1
future.
L
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1993-94
JULY 1,1993
UNRESERVED
FUND BALANCE
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 2,885,102
PUBLIC ART 308,821
GOLF COURSE 1,9 1 2,703
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 8,866,809
ZONE 5 PARK FEE 1,622,130
PILAREA 1 NW 1,633,746
PIL AREA 2 NE 477,989
PIL AREA 3 SW 193,720
PI1 AREA 4 SE 703,097
LElTERS OF CREDIT 0
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 2,688,447
TRANSNET/LOCAL 424,284
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 1,369,822
TRANSNET/BIKE (27,162)
TRANSNET/STP 0
TDA 126,299
STATE GRANTS 14,988
COUNTYGRANTS' 1,031,449
ENCINA/NO CO TRANSIT 0
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 1,726,946
CFD #1 8,009,872
CFD #2 0
CDBG 0
FEDERAL GRANTS 0
SDGE 0
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G 2,887,256
SEWER BONDS 0
SWER CONNECTION I 1 ,I 77,719
SEWER REPLACEMENT 3,098,500
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER (506,314)
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 5,936,929
WATER - REPLACEMENT 8,596,527
REDEV-LOW & MOD 0
TAX INCREMENT BOND 2,742,254
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON 0
OTHER 2,005,678
[TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 69,907,611
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED CAPITAL DEBT SERVICE
REVENUES EXPENDITURES &OTHER
891,450 563,011 0
20,000 1 18,000 0
100,000 25,785 0
900,000 961,793 0
50,000 0 0
55,000 0 0
10,000 0 0
5,000 0 0
15,000 0 0
0 0 0
225,000 772,031 0
130,000 21,668 0
15,000 592,252 0
371,000 343,337 0
167,000 0 0
480,000 387,302 0
985,300 914,495 0
195,000 399,773 0
622,000 78,716 0
25,000 158,498 0
2,600,000 1,663,379 1 28,000
1,490,500 84,314 0
1,500,000 1,011,391 0
0 9,100 0
0 0 0
290,000 0 0
0 0 0
605,000 61,632 I ,I 10,700
1,135,000 89,066 0
515,000 1,562,639 0
750,000 1 , 1 99,679 1,284,100
2,720,000 1,801,335 244,590
2,540,700 1,199,592 0
2,430,000 2,198,121 0
0 0 0
0 1,153,305 0
21,837,950 17,370,214 2,767,390
JUNE 30,
FUND PROJEC
TRANSFERS BALAN
293,550 3,5c
0 21
0 1 ,9z
0 8,8(
0 1,6i
0 1,6t
0 4t
0 l!
0 71
0
0 2,11
0 5:
0 7s
0
0 1t
0 2:
0 z
0 8:
0 51
0 13s
0 8,8'
0 1,4(
0 4z
0
0
0 3,li
0
0 10,6.
0 4,11
1,225,000 (3:
0 4,2(
(1,225,000) 8,Ok
0 1,31
(549,000) 2,4:
0
0 8:
(255,450) 71,3!
' CITY OF CARLSBAD @
CAPITAL FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1994-95
JULY 1,1994
PROJECTED
FUND BALANCE
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST 3,507,091
PUBLIC ART 21 0,821
GOLF COURSE 1,986,918
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 8,805,016
ZONE 5 PARK FEE I ,672,130
PlLAREA1 NW 1,688,746
PILAREA 2 NE 487,989
PIL AREA 3 SW 198,720
PIL AREA 4 SE 718,097
LElTERS OF CREDIT 0
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 2,141,416
TRANSNET/LOCAL 532,616
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 792,570
TRANSNET/BIKE 50 1
TRANSNET/STP 167,000
TDA 21 8,997
STATE GRANTS 85,793
COUNTY GRANTS 826,676
ENCIWNO CO TRANSIT 543,284
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 1,593,448
CFD #1 8,818,493
CFD &2 I ,406,186
CDBG 488,609
FEDERAL GRANTS (911 00)
SDGE 0
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G 3,177,256
SEWER BONDS 0
SEWER CONNECTION 10,610,387
SEWER REPLACEMENT 4,144,434
WATER-RECLAIM WATER (328,953)
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 4,203,150
WATER - REPLACEMENT 8,045,602
REDEV-LOW &MOD 1,341,108
TAX INCREMENT BOND 2,425,133
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON 0
OTHER 852,373 [ TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 71,352,507
1SS3 - 94
ESTIMATED CONTINUING
REVENUES APPROPRIATION
0 2,989,354
5,005 121,220
0 467,647
414,387 5,359,262
52,000 0
9,630 0
0 0
66,413 0
17,903 0
0 0
104,417 1,576,119
700,000 1,105,249
300,000 1,061,910
0 0
0 0
178,000 336,398
193,416 254,642
182,326 0
207,000 543,284
0 1,384,865
3,107,000 2,837,265
885,000 147,306
0 485,874
2,200,000 189,848
900,000 0
26,031 21 9,959
0 0
1 79,934 275,625
1,100,000 222,883
1,885,000 1,384,078
5,118,773 4,680,484
2,050,000 2,830,512
0 800,408
0 2,188,001
30,000,000 0
17,000 852,373
49,899,235 32,314,566
NEW
APPROP.
500,450
0
0
535,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
344,000
1 20,000
0
0
0
60,000
0
0
207,000
0
1,833,000
1,500,380
0
2,000,000
900,000
0
0
1,477,410
557,000
0
4,595,297
6,005,700
0
0
30,000,000
337,000
50,972,237
1994 - 95 (1) JU
APPROPR. TRANSFERS 1
3,489,804 0
121,220 0
467,647 1,200,000
5,894,262 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,920,119 0
1,225,249 0
1,061,910 0
0 0
0 0
396,398 0
254,642 0
0 0
750,284 0
1,384,865 0
4,670,265 0
1,647,686 0
485,874 0
2,189,848 0
900,000 0
21 9,959 0
0 0
1,753,035 0
779,883 0
1,384,078 0
9,275,781 0
8,836,212 0
800,408 0
2,188,001 0
30,000,000 0
1 ,I 89,373 320,000
83,286,803 1,520,000
TOTAL C I P FUND Pf
(1) 1994-95 NEW CIP APPROPRIATIONS PLUS 1993-94 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.
@ CITY OF CARLSBAD @
CAPITAL FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1994-95
1991 -92 1992-93 1993-94 (1) 1994-95 (1)
FUND
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST.
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PILAREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL ARE4 3 SW
PIL ARE4 4 SE
LElTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTYGRANTS
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDGE
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDEV-LOW & MOD
TAX 1NCREMENT BOND
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON
ACTUAL
REVENUES
264,651
17,108
60,537
81 1,215
62,279
251,782
41,408
43,970
188,020
0
382,443
42,737
1,172,549
0
0
26,578
267,615
208,370
0
1,000,011
. 2,753,788
0
313,479
0
0
670,163
0
1,011,319
0
0
989,437
1,840,177
53,512
138,070
0
ACTUAL
REVENUES
374,271
16,999
643,566
885,943
25,820
47,247
37,559
75,016
90,736
0
244,478
42,844
2,257,794
0
0
37,073
85,690
217,138
0
160,985
2,993,587
0
122,924
0
0
164,536
0
918,603
0
0
1,025,568
2,345,586
0
84,974
0
ESTIMATED
REVENUE
1,185,000
20,000
1 00,000
900,000
50,000
55,000
10,000
5,000
15,000
0
225,000
130,000
15,000
371,000
167,000
480,000
985,300
195,000
622,000
25,000
2,600,000
1,490,500
1,500,000
0
0
290,000
0
605,000
1,135,000
1,740,000
750,000
1,495,000
2,540,700
1,881,000
0
ESTIMATED
REVENUE
0
5,005
1,200,000
414,387
52,000
9,630
0
66,413
17,903
0
104,417
700,000
300,000
0
0
178,000
193,416
182,326
207,000
0
3,107,000
885,000
0
2,200,000
900,000
26,031
0
179,934
1,100,000
1,885,000
5,118,773
2,050,000
0
0
30,000,000
OTHER 0 0 0 337,000 I TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 12,611,218 12,898,937 21,582,500 51,419,235 I
(1) INCLUDES INTERFUND LOANS OR TRANSFERS.
@ CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL FUNDS
DETAIL REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR FY 1994-95
-
DEVELOPER
FUND OR
LOAN OR ' DEPRECIATION
FUND FEES TAXES GRANTS OTHER BOND ISSUE TRANSFER
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST.
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PILAREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PILAREA 3 SW
PILAREA 4 SE
LE'ITERS OF CREDIT
414,387
52,000
9,630
0
66,413
17,903
0
5,005
1,200,000
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 104.417
TRANSNET/LOCAL 700,000
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 300,000
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP
TDA 178,000
STATE GRANTS 193,416
COUNTY GRANTS 182,326
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT 207,000
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #I 756,400 1,700,600 650,000
CFD #2 885,000
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS 2,200,000
SDGE 900,000
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G 26,031
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION 179,934
SEWER REPLACEMENT I ,100,000
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER 1,885,000
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 41 8,773 4,700,000
WATER - REPLACEMENT 750,000 1,300,000
REDEV-LOW &MOD
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATIQUITOS LAGOON 30,000,000
OTHER 17,000 320,000
[TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 2,930,888 3,450,600 3,403,742 31,124,000 6,585,000 3,925,005
c
' CITY OF CARLSBAD (D
CAPITAL FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
* I991 - 1992 TO 1994- I995
FUND
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST.
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LElTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNEVLOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENCINA/NO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDEV-LOW &MOD
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
OTHER I TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS
1991 -92
ACTUAL
384,613
29,811
147,850
1,549,523
0
0
0
4,976
3,253
0
173,543
9,420
931,761
0
0
26,578
381,271
0
0
360,829
871,035
0
313,479
0
0
58,294
0
1,614,083
0
73,855
2,668,093
988,416
678,450
568,045
0
0
1 1,837,178
1992-93
ACTUAL
472,030
1 5,740
11,647
1,549,809
0
0
0
0
0
0
313,938
583,659
895,513
27,162
0
31,397
36,762
118
0
199,426
2,296,414
0
122,924
0
0
0
0
431,628
0
405,732
568,860
861,091
68,681
163,180
0
307,627
9,363,338
Ir 1993-94 1994-95 1994-
1993-94 (1) CONTINUING NEW TOTAL
ESTIMATED
121,220 0 I: 1 18,000
2,989,354 500,450 3,41 563,011
APPROPR. APPROPR. APPROPF
25,785 467,647 0 4(
961,793 5,359,262 535,000 5,8!
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
772,031
343,337
1,061,910 0 1 ,Of 592,252
1,105,249 120,000 1,2: 21,668
1,576,119 344,000 1,9:
0 0
0 0 0
387,302 336,398 60,000 3!
914,495 254,642 0 2:
399,773 0 0
78,716 543,284 207,000 7:
158,498 1,384,865 0 1,31
1,663,379 2,837,265 1,833,000 4,61
84,314 147,306 1,500,380 1,6~
I ,011,391 485,874 0 4t
9,100
0
21 9,959 0 2' 0
0 900,000 9f 0
189,848 2,000,000 2,11
0 0
61,632
89,066
275,625 1,477,410 1,7!
32,314,566 50,972.237 83,2E 17,370,214
852,373 337,000 1,1e 1,153,305
0 30,000,000 30,OC 0
2,188,001 0 2,l e 2,198,121
800,408 0 8C 1,199,592
2,830,512 6,005,700 8,8: 1,801,335
4,680,484 4,595,297 9,2 1 ,I 99,679
1,384,078 0 1,31 1,562,639
222,883 557,000 7;
(1) 1993-94 ESTIMATED AMOUNT INCLUDES ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ENCUMBRANCES.
cn L ri, <W 5$
ga
$E
52
ZO
zg 2.d- k% 5:
sz 3z 20 02 bs Ri G5
ar
rll
t-3
a+
na
0
@ @ q """""""""" 88 83-
m 66
Tj -""""""""" 88 8 g
2i 88 r 0- g 8 2 z si q "-""""""""_ 8 8- 8 sr' r 8 d
"? h
r q """"" 8 9 8 83 - - - - - - - -
g- g- h-
: ? Ljmz q """""""""" 8 88 8 : $ !q 8 N-
r r q -"--""""""" 8 8 8 m- z m N q - - - - - - - """""_ 8 '8 !T 83 8 8' 8 N $sisi$ g 0- m
$g q8q 8-t3 zi a~g8,bs-Z sgq- $88-8-5 88O 8- 3 80 f 53g3-?Jgss gg3!3
p SiE r 0) h 2m- ass m
i au 2 r
p 8 'e g 8- 8- ?. 8 8,
B N. 3- t g vil gb-8-O g O
h Lo
B N
e-
0- N " r .- rq m
82 ~~-8-~g~~~88-~~-~-~-~-~~-~~-~~-~~-g~~~~-~-8~~-~~-~-~~-~~~
ed 5 U
8 333328: 80
uw U W 22
12 ~~-~~~g$~E~~-~ glnLONLohbh NtNO &~8-m%-%&-$"Nbma 100oom~r0 r N 8 w 8- S g NOUI - z r
P$~P88PPP85~~8eee~8~~~~~~~~~~+~+~~am~m- g$5gU$f338U:sfjU$$$ U aaOaUaa~a~~~~~m~~~~ tfa tf mmmmm naaaa
au 2 1 v
33 3 gg
U &j z E zzg &n Q 0 g EEEgg&; $55 gy $$$zbEs; kike uq =5! !2c
~~22~mrna~ 5 PFPP %s 8D.l 2 03
osssGQc3~d t--zzP26kL 9 2 c J EEEE66gg 6&J$85g5gm dza: zs3 wqQda ggzc:
50222$aL3dr ~~~~uu~www~~~~=~~~~~~~a~~z~~ Y-==ns4yg$8 ~auuLLu oooo,=~~3YYYY~~90~~5:z~~o~ 'gnyq8811: 04Az"JJJA**** 0~ ~~zzrzm'~~~8888~~~~~~~~~~~~~ =ssssaaaa3>>>~>>>499s~~~rI-~ I,,IIII JOmZ n0=%i54 ++aiiv" zBgggsgr e~~~~en4nLL~L~sss9sss~~~~~~~~~~ +cgg~aaaa o~~~~d~:39no'a3~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~Z~u~~~ ~~~~~UUmrnmrnrn180~3
55
gg
ww LI
b I-
J
uua c
Ogo"33 I4 00 0OcFFU" ZSSI
ZZZZFjZWW rJlv)Ww-~~-
2wnan~~z~~,a u~FsFF~>aarnaaIs ~~ooooaazz~zz88~$~ou~'~~~~~~ i=7~~~u88~~~? ~rrg~~~-'~~~ aaaa osS~aawwmmm~~6~~~~~~~
$91 SYSEp3gf mmmmm ~NNID~~~~NPOIDN~D~NIO~~ mmmmmmmmm Pmmmm hPPPP ooa mmmmm 8a8a8$888&kisaa lnlnmln mKG53 a mmmmm
1 ++ x*
5 m
4:
.4 zz &R $4
ji m
$i E
ZL = 2;
a- aJ kg 88 -
cn N8 np $4
I-3 20 "Ti Wn %P 8s Y$
>m Bo = n+ 2: zz %
2-4 28 I-0, Qi$ nQ, a a= w
OW nu 8,d i? $P
5: 65 ZE 4 9
-
m r - *w a
v)
E
COD JLL U
U. 3
O
2
ki
E 3
I I
" !2sg i m- %
Lo a- Lo
" 88 8-g 0-
m m
"
0
"
0
"
0
" 8- 8. g g
rr
" -ijJ. ~0
8- 8- 89 8 8
V-rrCO .- .- 8888%
:sss
v) 8, fB OwEmdfP -
Egdg"E EEa0 0 $wtgg
w$!@ma g6pg; aaazpg Z5gBra kCaa sspzzti wmgg!G nzS$,$,i$
I- zz
aiifzg zui+-t
e e
"""_""""_ 9 8- sg 8- g 8 gg 8 a 0- u
Y)Nt.N 8- gE- 6 d 8 m- f I 5i t
0U)V)m
h- 9 9 rc s! rNrr m- N NC
"" - "" 8 E
"_" g- 5 8 87
a- " h- Zi $3 0)m
m- -N
"""~""""_ 8 9 w
"""""""_ 8 8 d
- _. "- """-"" 8 9 0 a
""""-""" 8 $ z- ""-"""""_
0 0 0- 8 8 I? # z-
s 8 a- 8 H 5- 88
W ? tl E Q E#- h-
P
m v 0 m u? m.? 8 8 m m- 2 R r
W h
00 om $5 g8.ggEg-g QQ8-gu38!3ggo88 88qpgg$% $-C g%I 8G2 5s 2 4 $ 2- ;- " a$rn@i N N- 99:
r:: a0 I I IOU
mu e;;gyrgg tttt%ZG83k$j$j $8 3;;
I?
88%E%Ez
aauzo pJ"'0 ana oltij"7aS8 A" $,E - a a
- - Y + I=
z a
IT 9 s 2 E 5 kfi3 -9 si25 $3 F ; %'$ $g; 533
OBE $$St gat pP31 zzi+a 3 .#E %ios erg Egg I- nc: 30
sf;\ !5 LZ 1s az 2
is32 $$$ azlzgagz 2L8g a
229 !?b$Q$$ =="" hLzz31 0qlwBgg&:on e$$\
=i; 8ZEYYY I I g:p $~2"~SELl~~I
YY FC Rka za 5 !$
Warn 7;;
~8.888~zmo9~aa 23~22~44 2~s
q;i 19$$))g~~d$cpp~ (n3 $zgZ!t(naa za$8koo l-44 c-3 y
hnmc ~Y",$z~~~~~~~ >a~?z ~YZB~~YY az-N
3w ~~~#a~~, YEZS~ ~aae+~zz 3w-
Z~~~~~~#aag~~ mae; oak:
$21 w In ON wm N (c d P NN UJUJ w wx 0 m m m %% 5 m s m
38
a hh mm
@
- 5 +g 8, i, 8J,8,8"8J
- - - - - - - -
Gig ZN
8- 8 gs-ggnii m m "rrm-g
"
E8 88 8 &y 8 - - - - - - - - -
2% Y?
8- 2 z m- h. (D. N r
q 8
Pg
ij i Y@
8 8- 0
w
8
8
$x! 8
- - - - - - - - -
" - - - - - - - - - ern
N & m IC'
Ug
8 G s& 3; 'p%
z n F Lo 9
5g ;y $2 Y$ E$ s EP Ep tG 8 0- N- 9 sua v
a4 g3 rc ta 4: 2 F
5:
QCT $m?A-@ i:gi-838"-8iu8E8 22 fppssa "p-r-gqpZ~-b-m- $:-N-g-N4z-$z- mcuSig$ !E 6P; l-
9a 05 a :5 =! a $5 &s w 0 z G5
- - - - - - - - -
r m
- 88
LI)P
z
E
- - - - - - - - -
P'F m
NO
I-3 z N.
- - - - - - - - -
xiz
a& 9
- - m IC 6
0 N
9
Lo. 0 m m.
m P 0
-0
N
no ; ij 2 r
N
wooou ocuLL~LLulL~-guLLLL Wooom LcJUcJ gzykqkk&q2>kkk - 8
v)
3 LL
0
Y
yy g g W gszz
-
" -
$E t$$
5:
3 g~~g-~:~&lpb = ZII
v) :9EgqpPwE z:,u .,!$#Z El x$$
%$$E B 3 v)=Cn;
2H+3s q@85~pas>~,~,~, +b-w=g 'ih"8a854 5 +866 ~rrG86h~l7pz#,p p I-~~~~~##~E~~~~~Y v5&zgs
E
p4kh p22~gb~b~$~gcDcQz
Z$$$$ 8.pz3szgg$3pragaRz v)
z P
b 322 rfkJQgsj'!2= c z€Lro= I aw=f
uluzmww 8 53 a $!$$$$Psas=cmzs% ~000 I I z OOwg22 Eh9
I I
yI I I I UJ s s?j%%%.9erepgg& av-r
(h
- 8- j 8.1 8-7 -
l9 i%ssg$
gi! 88 83 $5 t 9
99 8 87
88 if$!! 7-7-
EZ 8-i 8- $8- d e$? m-
8% g8 k-8- 50 rc-
g88g e- ui E- 8 Nm%- "
82
$ci"(Dc
-""
rLD "_ -
"_
rl- "_"
" r
-""
r
-""
I63 mh g 8- 8
N b c! ss "
r
0
P m r 8
ii 2
8=888ggg
" N
g"gggg#p
Nr cN"=R
zzzzz-Jzzz ZZZZZ~ZZZ 55858E555 srrr3Esar WlIll~WII
k
B 2
3
E!
3= 4t? I g2 8; aggat ErEpO6 $62 Lomzzz 524 I,sEjsl!dl?j
zz-rwy>E=zu
asqqzig -rwl-g p 623V3EhEP
2 8 8
EE z 3 $W
$0 CI
g5ow2
quan-rwrawm
i$ 21 h ii fjfjfjfj 2 or- (D
IL m mmmm m mm 0 27
v) I- 3;
gQ E$
QF I-3 ZO Wn 2-r w- >z
g0
zg $4 :8 3; sz %? 90 4 kg ck! 65
aI-
na
0
e
"" 7 p 8 8gj! 0 000- 8. 8-. 8 8- :
5 m G6-0
I - - - -Ill
?$ I
!!!? E gg3-g 8- 8888
%? 5 8 88
mY
!im .-e:
""" "a
uj
%%g.&$gggg$ Q gx8-3-gggg8-g 8 s m 8 gg m .&at.
om zs 2 m ZG "M $p g: 8 N. N8 85
$R$$j3 Fg ?. 8 8 88 5%
2 8g Y!
e 8 E 8-8 ;?
E G $8 YF
8. 8 88-
5 m G gg YE
8 8 83 Z?
$ P
e gg-
_"
""" "6 2lL m
r
""
c 8- P
r
3-10 """
N
r-m
$8 k!: me a sqt -- o? 9 " mm
'N 9 m ma-cog
ZZ-r-IZ-r-J-rZ zzaazaaaz 88rnrngeerng z$z2;2$$$ .
IJYcn"IJYom'""IJYm
9 3 L
(Ih
"""""""
00 00 0 00 0 9 9 4 sl; 8 $3 : 8% o, m- mr
"" 8H8 2- g- $ &- 8383-1 T i ""_
mN zzg 58 0 m- N- d "- !3
""""""" 8 8
8 8
N! 8
8 g
-""""""
E
r w-
"""""""
""""""_
"""_"""_ F! 9
R
6 "- E %a m r-. 0 m m~ m 259.z
mrom E-&kG - 5- 5 NPm
8 mr- PP
om *- m
88?M N- m- 0- N. 9 9
$9. v--
ggg98-g9g8-ggggggg~ggg~~~g~-~~ ~~~~$~~~~~~g5~~9~:~~~~~~~~~ N!
F ni mrmr
P~P~PBBPP~PBPB~PP~P~P~P~B~~ IyIysIIIryrsrIyrIy~yIyIyIy~
BB ua B B a U
an a2uuu BBB W
0 IJY E $22 a 2
F 59 2 wz zcd Y 0 &;;5s ++5
a ;p$&%E;$8 o+IJYt-og %F$&U 0 Vzzv/ Q5 SiZ1V i52+5P I- 3 IJYw+-l-az $&
Ep+li!guzPsE: LTzzzz9 ~lllgg~uz~z y3)"I"ogZ "dgi 3265m
g@%S#gw'%$ WWWWWWW5 9992gggggg,,,,,0"~ """"sggggsnes
L3WSZ25 Za3azoop%i aNNNNNN-z ~~~~~~z~~~99~~~~~~~~W IJY%#S233
E
3
h3SIW
no
Waaaag P 33 y
W U
z
aZZ z z lgi
a
a o$$ g - uzww 299 P P 228
@ ego 825%;
~~p~~~~a~~~g ~~~~~> oEzz5;5g#a~ IZWWh
$91 I I
~0~~yun,,~~~ 0.8:!8~0~~q~~~~~g$999--==~waa" IJJJ ~&~~~yp~~~~~ apppp$$dymmms ,,EEEEE=wwli
W
a ozz<
####% +zaao &o nzyv
I gr,a
u<~v/u+ouu~o I-~~~ZZZOZ
.-.arno.i~.acr,#?2 Z$$88HBsZ%%%S888888 wwwwwgoor: uu=c=o,, ooaooowwK
$ n/ m M Egg N r- W m : r- g wwmm Pmma
m 8Wr: r- kr-r-h 0-kr.
a m a z AWWW &%:8W%
(I)
ZL au a-
UP
g:
ac kb Bg $5
g0
zg <A E%
>a
a+
a=
0, na ax a+ 3z 50 02 8s c: Gg 6
a a
7 3 m m- 7 $I$ ---"""" ""_ Q !- !$ 88 9rc m- %Si6 9 (9
7 8 Zb $8 -
E 8 ""_ ""_
&$
;?
Fl- N 8 &ZR N- N YE
2 m 8 886 ;e
"? $!
2 8 8 m- u Kg$
cn %+,owrcN mN~~8~~~h""m~X~~N~-S"rcg~~~~~ F)PW N. " N. r - rN .- a? -.
$8 88 am 8- : In 8 $ rc 9 0- 0- +. lcN &$ s E 8 s 8s
8 m OP $"leg- "
a 3i 8 3 $ 5 8
$ $ m -3zg z k d w- N. g 8- 8 8. $i
IO 3 ZS% N- N q ;?
5 8 8- 3 q a? 8 SRM 9 0, y?
q
"
w s 0 a 00 ?w-w 33 NlcN
mr - -- 0) m-
v-
-"" _"""
IC W
" 0- 9
-N
""" ""_ 8 " 868
m N- me? N .
0- cn 0)- ra
0 OmN
rn --- -""""
-N
"""
0 ""_ "
0 9 5ZG
0- 9 9
-N --- """"_ ?% 8s 8 N W LDmNP
-0)
[E ?. 8 6- 8- m *m rcm m rc
NV
NVJ .Nm 0)0) 2s 77 0-
r m
vu 20 OLD mN -rN mmm
mm m m
r m m.
a~oomooo~momoooooooorcoomoo~~~~ oamorcoooomo~o
~OWhhW~OWdd~OdO~NWd~WOOW +~s~~so~s~~oomssEs~3~~~so~~~s~~s~~s~~~~~
2Nm W
~000cOUcc00c000ooonu~n~o~~~ Irrrgrs~grs~rnu~ru~~~~~~~~~
~~332 a a uu U 3333: : E EEEE
a na 2 ww n W
a z uuuu
=I (I] I
""_ 8 ME88 g $ g- E- $ E- -""
""_
""_ 8 s
""_ 8 si
""_
""_ 8 m- 2
8- Q 8%
gg8-gggggg8
Pa*L"rr8 moomg$EgE
kk!&kkkkk!kk agj ~aaa~aa
%
F Z
$2 FF ml% U mw 8% Y
2 =zw !E :g FZtg FFUl $3 pz $E22
P z 44pggg;Epe: !$$Q.
6 I(00
0 522 00 2~gzg8+api~ zmo9 034 UZYE
8ru ~xZLoo+a
H OOQ
Ul++
@ 522 oooou,ww~~~ *"~lf:;$EZz5$p :%EE lszu' 8
~O~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~lIllt~~"~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~$~aaQH~ +~VaZZu$Za+++gv ~lgozztxmm, ~ruuu"~~ffa
4
3wLJ33gEEE zmzz aaa~ I ISIOC~S~~E bba aJl+aa a88ad$ggdz$zzlss~~~
gFsgoaonn <aa~<~szzoooor33aa~ az~~~~~~o===~~~~~~~~~~~au88~ ~qqq~gc~n~-ww--~- $@~~~uuu~ooo ++ssSs=FFgg~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~~~~~~~
r 2 I ! 33 22
8
0 a I?
EP n 5H 86
awww Zrn22&283L LEE: rnrjQm
2aaaaa85588
Jssa Bg$s
%mw;gggg
W<aaaa-~zzz OQQOU~ZZZZ
LLIIIIIIIIII LUUUUc2UUQUU EEEEEEE3EE Stt%Y%%t%YY I-EEEEEEEEEE I $21 $8 g$ mm E$ rcm Rwa8b PP 0. ommmm mm
2 zi, SY '0 g
ZR
$d
E 2.
RF l-3 20 wa
$2
EO Rl-
-I -1- a* :8 5:
YZ 20 02 &$ E: q
na
mt- 43
0
m qB :- mu) CP 1- r 1j "_"""_ 8 i! i- 88 z 9 9
W
~-----""_III 'i!
D "YE? Fs 9 z- rC "- S8-8 83 8- 8 8 888 2- d vzg d -
"8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
0 $i? E
om 37 8
C z F Uj
8 sy
z r YE
8 ip
8 -""""_
Yi Lo- -2 Ki
r m
- - - - - - - - - - - -
"""""
NW 8 8
d 9 0. Lo * m
.-ln al -"" """_
3: z 8 s
EZ
""CCC~"-CC~PC~C~~~z~ 2
~~~:~~8-~~~~~8~8~8~~8~8~88~ apgggzmorom ggg6m-Zdm-d6tn-d6d
6 !2 8 iq
6 8 w. 8 !$ 0
!io
m- to c- y r CC h
7
on: 8 2 8
o
kk?kkkkkkkklLkkkLkk uuu
aanaana aaanaanaaa~~~~
0 4 U I
E2
a >z
Z W E x !?Ek 9 f OWSS sg2
% !3 24 :8$; w-l+
9 &$sag Ns0,r-"~"Euu@2 roggo~waP09 ouv
!?I "~~~~~~~~~~E.r~rr~~J~~
t~~~gggg8aggoOwzzzz~55 aamm ssgg ~855dddd~~85~~~8888~~s~~
n: 0
azzZE 3 u500FWg~~ swozua 2 ; 9yq;g g $::z;g$?
~~s~epPP;z~~ss;E~~~~~~~~ F~~~~~~L~~~~~~~WWWW~
%g~wwww"O v~suuuu~~~~~~~~~44~~~g~ aaoggggI-urr
$e
-
E~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ I-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9499499999999999999999~ FFFFF-F.FFFFFFFFFFFF~F~F~
a
- - - - - - - -
"""_ 8 8 88 8- e m m 88 *- " mm
- - - - - - - -
"""_
- - - - - - - - 888 ggg
- - - - - - -
" 8 Ei-a "_
si $$ $63
w-
82 28 U B t e b. o? 0- Fg ; LD 3 U
m- 9 h : F 0' I 6
YUm88MUH!2!
G8 z
r= c c K
2
$8 q-$p$-g8-ggJJ$g;
;q- ZoZI-$&5G54 " + I $5 vu0 $ 0 t5$bb$; IOIC
f G r mm
~-u-~aoauta
%a 2 E F r m Z mu
uuu uuo: >
a r 8
YWWW $$$UlL
B >>>tt i? I yyyaa ZL gggpg
$222 g OOOl I
:E666 3 $::::
UO! sssgg WEi 1s~~~~ $$%$QQ -zotaooxN OOOII orqaa$80 2'12.2-
zzzz~zsssssu
t9py;;;; pF'BBBBB6 wX@"""&pppgf zzzzzi ~~~t&$$$gz~~zz~
$%++I- 00000
,orEEE p:;qFgp: 2 FFFW f35SS
~;~a~g~~mzooooo~ ma-~----u rIIrr1
~~~a~aa~auaa~a~
Kaa zzzz
a dl F! h f28 EZ N m
mm $CD$ 8 *-toe*- * m mw mm 3: mmm 8 $$$?E%
e (D
Tp """""""" 8 88 8 a 8888- - - E :8 z 2 N- r* IC gpga 9 9 9 0- 0- 9 0- 0-
" m m
-"-"""""""" -fl 8 9 82 $8 8 8 1 8 ii 88 q-
8 F
d d 9
v) L 2k? Q
%L
B;
"F I-3 20 Wn
>m
n+ 2*
zg
-It a* I-a no
nu
a+
5:
43
32 2n
UT &I- cE ag
0
q ---"-""""""__ 8 E! $ t-
r
t
-I""---""""""_ tm %P 8 Yij
8 8 d .Y 0- (0 -jjJ """""""""_ 8 d t q """""""""" 8 t- z *
T """""""""_ 8 8 9 t- 0
f3q U r b- m- ~opooogo~~o t t lo 0- a- b- m- ro '9 88k9R$ "QF 5 3%
88% g 8 $ $i R py3i fY; b 83 (9
r
oocx . qm-oo-t-----m-w-~m- 20, moPomo~om~t o)omooo OtrCP : 8
$E8 gagg$s!$sgw ICm
rn
mr y
r
8 888 56 I-: +. o, N (4 0 N.
h
GI $3-8 * E ;;
r
n-Iooo-rohom oootooo OOOh ooooLoot 000 g~8-88?~-s?s~$~88-s8-88-~~-~~88-8~~~-~8-8-8~-8-~-$88-~8$ 8~~%~-~-~~-gss~-sp.~-~~-~~-w~w~~~s~~~-~~-~-fY~~~~~~~~~
cC-m N r Nr r r Pi mt r N
+LLuI- ~FF~~B~su~~~~u~~~~~~~-~-t~a~~~~vo~~~~o I-IL Ow~cI-+++c*cJ naxhpn,n8&J&J"FF"L"
8 $E bgtt$
E E
cl n+rzup +w*xcl $!$?E
ffl 56OSLl pa ai? Z 8s- 8 FEE %m 8%
USEn
I-
a
9 2
2
Zia 5% = $ s& "8 0
3: 3 ww 0 P: v, 8 d$
gsPi 8 :: "6"92 # E53 2% pda$sb
o=ov, (50 E 5 & Smdg n 0,~StZ nsszz E:ss Q a - I I5 a: $I-d6?Y$ 5+ Z"0ngg; 48"
RZaIzzzzzzzzzz~lzzz~s~ $ ~~0~Z~~~~nggE~ a>za% ~~~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~99 F,~~8PPpppponno,pgooou~~~~=+~w~~=cl g$Egm~g%@@..~~ no r-~aFnOnnnn uuauuu
~m~cl%~~33~~~5551~~88~~zoo~+~m,~wffl<~+++++I- I I I I I I I I t I~-I-I-I-~J-~o~~~~~~ UNa mgggggg ~~~~~~~%~$~~~~%~~BEB~~~YY~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~ n~ss~"www~wwww~~~~n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~9+I-I-I-C+CCI-I-aauaaaaz>>*I-
s~syeeeeeeeee~ggggggg~~~~~~~~a'~~~~~~~~~ %%%~888888988.addd~d=d~~~~~ssY.~~~~~22~~2~
p5 2 F F 25 a: 8 3 E pYYS8
zzw* ffl u ,$3 s 5 2 FFY w n <4g z pgB88h
8 8E8 0 $
oc~OUclQ~~~~cl~~~ clclog%j
ztruz
ma%%%%%%%%9%~~r~~~~az~~~ ms-Io IZZZZZ
GO6 zgggggggggg h g 21% mmmmmmmmmmm N
m m wJ2??;5 y32 ; 886 mmmmmm mmm m %%%
0 e
v) zb
ga gE
E: 5:
g0
zg <A E% 5;
22 3z
40 u$ b$ gk2
aw
QF
'. I"=>
>a
nI-
na
U
0% E;
5288 88 8 3 b3 $8- N
?a3 g 8
y? 8 g q 8
%': 8 zg Yk ?
IC a- q+~$z~-*2R@$$g-s8& r.r.N 0- 0
EOdr;oi2dod uz?3v83-8?38Egujgz ~d
P gspp gsp 2 seggqg gg$$
8 l.-gl.-oPdl.-d E$ 33%83?3S 8'
g E- $8 ys
88 gg 8 $!
g : r 88 r. 8 YE
9 y?
a- 2 E! m 0- $h 8 88 8 "6
8 %x mrc
""""
5 m lil mt 0 9 at q
"""
my82 p2 8- 0) m
a P N- m-
r r
""""
P R
""" om
0
2
""""
: sq m
""" 8 88 9 9 8 9 8
N
""""
0 rg m-
N. z
r In
r.ror.*tm 0
2 z gtmr.9~ W- 8
(D
W "? m 6
N q r IC m
m :
;p@uu-Juyyyyy
48 g 2 -1 99999 aa'~P'8kP"~o"~
9 :: z v)
U E 9 a
U n - W 3 $2 $p mm~~krgm 9977777
IIiY pipi00000 ~~,,+,,
"U> UU,~O~O~O~ ~u~Iw333uKFFFF-n on0 aFnaaggg$gg
pLLUIJJJF&3333S~ w w.4 a y y y aaonaaa~~nonnnw Js5@q$$~wszjs~~E ~;;~~'nonyyooooo~ egdPggg99!x%%%s
oo~iYIY%%wWWWuc $sg;$;$$pgggg$
$$;z rnrngpssp
oom,p~ppscscscscsco !33$38880(JFEFEFP
rrauauo
"_
0
---
0
"_
0
"_ 8
8 0 rc c 0- g
8
88Egggg
g
388 q# *- m 4
g 0-
a- 825 m
ggz
g z- g
0 In "_
N- N "_
6 m "_ 8 a m- a m.
r r
:$bo
om z8. r N
Zg38
zsbm m- m- 8 6 8 0- -- u? 9
rN P Lo
8- f 8- p 2 0 r=q--mm2%. 0
CONIC is
rrrat-4 22222e 88828
v) I- Y z
v) sr
P= n
v)W 2s ;32 as am8 &#E
W!Ewwwwg >a:zoaao I
la
Oogmq
WZEgEEEP ~g,oooo
pBzrEZ$
b%$EEEEt!! ag.#til#sf [IOOZZ~~ i?!%t%t%F
ZLLLLL'm
3
SWV
I-zzzzs
azasssu
~aooo~
L0LDUJmI)LDIn~
ag/gpg,,,,$!$! ICrrr 988888 2 mmmmmmmmm 282222
0 0
v,
ZL ST ug g, &I= I-3 5g 5: 2m v a0 nI-
JI a* kcn
OLU nu
zg
2:
S? %? 90 o$ 3- z i& 0% '2 0
- I-+ 3*
5 m
;:
zg (by %e Y2
-
- :?
YE
- *a f;
I
%P
~ ml.
YE
- p m z
- .-!n 2': Y$
- - kb
2
ou zo 'E i3
82 p
9
U 3
I
Y
5
B
k
.Y
a
I-
a2 E
-
0
" 3 5s.
$ r
:. 8
83.
E. 8
m*
-
7.-
"
00 0 ii 0 5! 8 N- - C6 - " 9 8-
:g
g
$E.
$s 8. 8
.-F
"
rr
~
-
.-r
gg;S;Sg 8P88P ~o- 0- m- 0- m
8652 099% gar pti
F
v)
z 3 LL
n
U z w ggg ?$ 535 OLLPI" ZFZO:: pp3zF aoa+
I2 I ?jE @$9FIrn z I '4.' auY053
sg,-zu UYW wWy$ a:F:g,o 3zzm9a I-3gs:k 3=z$bLj LL8o>sm
0
"" 88RUi8-R8 o-~-ggo$g~
8 -mrc6 Lo c .-Lo-.=Fj
"_ 8 88 $ ;i
r r
"" 8 8
"_
""
-"
""
! ,
I
I
8@8@8@88 $$A8s8c2g
m LO- m l. 0- m- IQ 0- N warm
8. 0 5 2
E. 0 Lo
m 0.
8. 8
0
0
0
0
- ; 0
2
t:9QLL&OLZ Lcl)L+I-~u= zag
2 4 Q
wI z 2 Y
$2 UJ 6s; 5:
nzt 83
v) I- ne:<g.,g 8ZC z."3Qr2$sp WgE9l$QA; I 55$8"'tfl ++ms~ I5jEZ +a98~$(3+W
b'o,,Ia,,, lYh:h-U ct '+oF"g9
$pW$" Y pIL+~~$$;
U~~l 20-a
nz
ZB 8pB8a~uO-I 3P6QIup uo$
..a*
$
Lo 0) *
a l-
m
B
P 2
% h
T 3
$
z
a
*
L rn. 5 8
iq ; $3
r
7-
6 $
g
Y. 6
ij
E.
8 f
s- l-
8 5
M
c
E;
c
8
N 8
6 1 g 3
E i n. e
f 0
Y =f
i! e
U
-I
i! 0
0
-
!!!j 9
4 A:: sa YZ
v) zb 3 SY Y!j
aF Y!$ 3
F3 z
20 - wn $? 5: Y@
I n
?P = a0 8; f
zg 2 c ?l $4 pg
ag gn 3 - 0
m u
3 r s
Q!- e8 -
9 9 5 to 'E
no 8
OW
a= g i
nu sz fG p ~~~~~~~~-~~-~~~~~-~~~~-~ '= 32
~~:~~m~"w"z"""=="~ N'oj d v) 0 LD 0- 0- 0- m- Lo 0- 0- ui v)
0- 3- &
U 3;
&$ gs 0 05 z i?
0 s ;i 2
el
4P 0
yF $~S,Z Iaw~;2oao~
g zz
Us rnn~~,gw~~~-
W 0 ;i t + g:s$ +P I-ss 0, EZPU $z 3:
Oa ~gqYgsg4$"lg~~y QQC~Q~U~Z~~
I- ' F n~ nZ%~s~lamornmm~~G~~m; w8%ggI-y999xaaaa90 ! ZP! z~~~g~:<uoo64444u~
Si
a ~&w5?&2,,,,,,,,,< ~""""""mm"", ~;&j$:fg9929999222;i aaoorSomEEEEEEEEFES?
:YE z=zo om,%$
Zw-oaO9mms$aaaasn rrrrJg
Wr~~"~w"saYYYmooooY= 0 gwrng-mQ~~%%%woooo
IIIIIIIIII,
$ si1 b
n 3
0
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1'994 TO BUILDOUT
,IYEAR 1 1994-95 I
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 711 194 * REVENUE
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 517,737 0
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PILAREA3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LETTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
REDEV-LOW & MODERATE
89,601
1,519,271
3,445,754
1,672,130
1,688,746
487,989
198,720
718,097
0
565,297
(572,633)
(269,340)
50 1
167,000
(1 17,401)
(1 68,849)
826,676
0
208,583
5,981,228
1,258,880
2,735
(198,948)
0
2,957,297
0
10,334,762
3,921,551
(1,713,031)
(477,334)
5.21 5,090
540,700
237,132
0
5,005
1,200,000
414,388
52,000
9,630
0
66,413
17,903
0
104,417
700,000
300,000
0
0
178,000
193,416
182,326
207,000
0
3,107,000
885,000
0
2,200,000
900,000
26,031
0
179,934
1,100,000
1,885,000
5,118,773
2,050,000
0
0
30,000,000
OTHER 0 337,000
TOTAL 39,037.941 51.41 9,235
EXPENDITURES ENDING
500,450 17,287
0 94,606
0 2,719,271
535,000 3,325 ,I 42
0 1,724,130
0 1,698,376 0 487,989
0 265,133
0 736,000
0 0
344,000 325,714
120,000 7,367
0 30,660
0 501
0 167,000
60,000 599
0 24,567
0 1,009,002
207,000 0
0 208,583
1,833,000 7,255,228
1,500,380 643,500
0 2,735
2,000,000 1,052
900,000 0
0 2,983,328
0 0
1,477,410 9,037,286
557,000 4,464,551
0 171,969
4,595,297 46,142
6,005,700 1,259,390
0 540,700
0 237,132
30,000,000 0
337,000 0
50.972,237 39,484.939
* BALANCE INCORPORATES $32.3 MILLION FOR 1993-94 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.
' CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
,lYEAR 2 1995-96 I
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 711 195 REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 17,287 180,000 192,500 4,787
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARKFEE
PI1 AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PI1 AREA 4 SE
LElTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNETILOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNETIBIKE
TRANSNETISTP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENClNA/NO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDEV-LOW & MODERATE
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
94,606
2,719,271
3,325,142
1,724,130
1,698,376
487,989
265,133
736,000
0
325,714
7,367
30,660
501
167,000
599
24,567
1,009,002
0
208,583
7,255,228
643,500
2,735
1,052
0
2,983,328
9,037,286
4,464,551
171,969
46,142
1,259,390
540,700
237,132
0
0
1,925
14,600,000
591,032
56,000
35,310
0
66,413
32,860
250,000
142,225
100,000
0
0.
0
0
0
191,442
0
0
3,110,000
1,180,000
0
0
700,000
59,664
0
250,256
1,100,000
0
1,590,187
2,050,000
0
0
0
0
14,000,000
705,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
31 9,000
100,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,913,000
1,642,000
0
0
700,000
1,000,000
0
1,237,700
587,000
0
1,581,081
1,944,016
0
0
0
96,531
3,319,271
3,211,174
1,780,130
1,733,6%
487,989
331,545
768,859
250,000
148,939
7,367
30,660
501
167,000
599
24,567
1,200,444
0
208,583
6,452,228
181,500
2,735
1,052
0
2,042,993
0
8,049,842
4,977,551
171,969
55,248
1,365,374
540,700
237,132
0
OTHER 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 39,484.939 26,287.314 .27,921.297 37,850.955
@ CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAllABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
]YEAR 3 1996-97 1
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 7/1/96 REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 4,787 630,000 1 20,000 514,787
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LETTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACTFEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNETIHIGHWAY
TRANSNETIBIKE
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENCINA/NO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
’, TRANSNET/STP
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN’G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDEV-LOW & MODERATE
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON
OTHER
TOTAL
96,531 1,200 0
3,319,271 600,000 0
3,211,174 776,932 510,000
1,780,130 1 oo,oa, 0
1,733,686 57,780 0
487,989 0 0
331,545 66,413 0
768,859 32,860 0
250,000 2,000,000 250,000
148,939 203,649 44,000
7,367 300,000 300,000
30,660 470,000 500,000
50 1 0 0
167,000 0 0
599 0 0
24,567 0 0
1,200,444 201,014 0
0 0 0
208,583 0 0
6,452,228 1521 0,000 13,750,000
181,500 1,475,000 912,000
2,735 0 0
1,052 0 0
0 550,000 550,000
2,042,993 89,119 0
0 0 8
8,049,842 41 0,998 1,204,600
4,977,551 1,100,000 524,000
171,969 0 0
55,248 1,786,134 1,580,850
1,365,374 2,050,000 1,583,972
540,700 0 0
237,132 0 0
0 0 0
0 550,000 550,000
37,850,955 28,661,098 22,379,422
97,731
3,919,271
3,478,106
1,680 ,1 30
1,791,466
487,989
397,958
801,719
2,000,000
308,588
7,367
660
50 1
1 67,000
599
24,567
1,40 1,458
0
208,583
7,912,228
744,500
2,735
1,052
0
2,132,111
0
7,256,240
5,553,551
171,969
260,532
1,831,402
540,700
237,132
0
0
44.1 32.631
' CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
IYEAR 4 1997-98 I
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 711 /97 REVENUE EXPENDITURES
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 514,787 0 150,OOO
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LETERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNETIHIGHWAY
TRANSNETIBIKE
TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENClNA/NO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDN-LOW & MODERATE
97,731
3,919,271
3,478,106
1,880,130
1,791,466
397,958
801,719
2,000,000
308,588
7,367
660
501
167,000
487,989
599
24,567
1,401,458
0
208,583
7,912,228
744,500
2,735
1,052
0
2,132,111
0
7,256,240
5,553,551
171,969
260,532
1,831,402
540,700
1,500
600,000
1,289,996
106,575
86,670
723 88
161,700
46,200
375,000
2,317,254
2,310,000
0
0
0
0
0
21 1,065
0
0
3,850,000
1,770,000
0
0
350,000
234,100
0
675,423
1,100,000
0
2,882,034
2,050,000
0
0
0
2,477,000
0
0
0
281,000
0
2,375,000
2,054,000
2,310,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11,750,000
0
0
0
350,000
0
0
2,957,800
524,000
0
2,858,985
3,843,997
0
TAX INCREMENT BOND 237,132 0 0
BATIQUITOS LAGOON 0 0 0
OTHER 0 0 0
TOTAL 44,132,631 20.489,704 31,931,782
ENDING
364,787
99,231
4,519,271
2,291,102
1,986,705
1,878,136
560,177
278,658
847,919
0
571,842
7,367
660
501
167,000
599
24,567
1,612,523
0
208,583
12,228
2,514,500
2,735
1,052
0
2,366,211
0
4,973,863
6,129,551
171,969
283,581
37,405
540,700
237,132
0
0
32.690.553
CITY OF CARLSBAD e
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
)YEAR 5 1998-99 1
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 711 I98 REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 364,787 0 150,000 21 4,787
PUBLIC ART 99,231 1,500 0 100,731
GOLF COURSE 4,519,271 0 0 4,519,271
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 2,291,102 1,584,594 1,795,000 2,080,695
ZONE 5 PARK FEE 1,986,705 181,683 0 2,168,388
PIL AREA 1 NW 1,878,136 128,400 0 2,006,536
PIL AREA 2 NE 560,177 72,188 0 632,364
PIL AREA 3 SW 278,658 199,238 0 477,895
PIL AREA 4 SE 847,919 46,200 0 894,119
LETTERS OF CREDIT 0 0 0 0
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 571,842 403,828 544,000 431,669
TRANSNETILOCAL 7,367 700,000 700,000 7,367
TRANSNETIHIGHWAY 660 0 0 660
TRANSNET/BIKE 50 1 0 0 50 1
TRANSNET/STP 167,000 0 0 167,000
TDA 599 0 0 599
STATE GRANTS 24,567 0 0 24,567
COUNTY GRANTS 1,612,523 221,618 0 1,834,141
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT 0 0 0 0
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 208,583 0 0 208,583
CFD #1 12,228 5,395,000 0 5,407,228
CFD #2 2,514,500 2,183,000 0 4,697,500
CDBG 2,735 0 0 2,735
FEDERAL GRANTS 1,052 0 0 1,052
SDG&E 0 0 0 0
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN’G 2,366,211 295,309 0 2,661,521
SEWER BONDS 0 0 0 0
SEWER CONNECTION 4,973,863 887,152 3,894,400 1,966,615
SEWER REPLACEMENT 6,129,551 1 ,100,000 524,000 6,705,551
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER 171,969 0 0 171,969
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 283,581 2,794,656 2,078,477 999,760
WATER - REPLACEMENT 37,405 2,050,000 1,444,020 643,385
REDW-LOW & MODERATE 540,700 0 0 540,700
TAX INCREMENT BOND 237,132 0 0 237,132
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON 0 0 0 0
OTHER 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 32,690,553 18,244.364 11.1 29,897 39.805.020
' CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
I YEAR 6- 10 1999-2004
FUND
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST.
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
P IL AREA 1 NW
BEGINNING
BAL 711 I99 REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
21 4,787 1,550,000 1,500,000 264,787
100,731 15,000 0 1 15,731
4,519,271 0 0 4,519,271
2,080,695 12,302,714 14,425,000 (41,591)
2,168,388 1,178,000 700,000 2,646,388
2,006,536 874,725 2,380,000 501,261
PIL AREA 2 NE 632,364 577,500 0 1,209,SW
PIL AREA 3 SW 477,895 1,423,538 1,550,000 351,433
PIL AREA 4 SE 894,119 231,000 0 1,125,119
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 431,669 2,721,458 2,840,000 313,127
TRANSNETjLOCAL 7,367 6,300,000 6,300,000 7,367
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 660 3,100,000 3,100,000 660
TRANSNETjBlKE 501 0 0 501
1 TRANSNETjSTP 167,000 0 0 167,000
TDA 599 0 0 599
STATE GRANTS 24,567 0 0 24,567
COUNTY GRANTS 1,834,141 696,015 2,242,500 287,656
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT 0 0 0 0
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 208,583 0 0 208,583
CFD #1 5,407,228 39,600,000 43,400,000 1,607,228
' CFD#2 4,697,500 20,466,000 15,032,000 10,131,500
CDBG 2,735 0 0 2,735
LETI-ERS OF CREDIT 0 0 0 0
FEDERAL GRANTS 1,052 0 0 1,052
SDG&E 0 0 0 0
PUNNED LOCAL DRAIN'G 2,661,521 2,216,496 3,500,000 1,378 ,O 17
SEWER BONDS 0 0 0 0
SEWER CONNECTION 1,966,615 9,530,222 1 1,458,200 38,637
SEWER REPLACEMENT 6,705,551 5,500,000 6,486,000 5,719,551
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER 171,969 0 0 171,969
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 999,760 10,847,629 1 1,114,576 732,813
WATER - REPLACEMENT 643,385 7,500,000 1,713,681 6,429,704
REDEV-LOW & MODERATE 540,700 0 0 540,700
TAX INCREMENT BOND 237,132 0 0 237,132
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON 0 0 0 0
OTHER 0 5,400,000 5,400,000 0
TOTAL 39.805,020 132,030,296 133.141.957 38.693.359
' CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
12004 + 1
BEGINNING
FUND BAL 711 /2004 REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 264,787 4,500,000 0 4,764,787
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIG FAGILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LETTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
. ' TFLANSNETISTP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENCINNNO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #I
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDN-LOW & MODERATE
TAX INCREMENT BOND
BATlQUlTOS LAGOON
OTHER
TOTAL
1 15,731
4,519,271
(41,591)
2,646,388
501,261
1,209,864
351,433
1,1251 19
0
313,127
7,367
660
50 1
1 67,000
599
24,567
287,656
0
208,583
I ,Cb7,2B
10,131,500
2,735
1,052
0
1,378,017
0
38,637
5,719,551
171,969
732,813
6,429,704
540,700
237,132
0
0
38,693,359
0
0
39,314,080
7,825,194
5,309,340
5,017,031
9,068,194
1,782,916
1,687,500
17,449,141
4,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,562,000
8,033,750
0
0
0
15,847,064
0
43,951,505
10,000,000
0
22,975,744
11,800,000
0
0
0
0
0 39,071,265
10,450,000
5,790,000
6,225,000
9,400,000
2,900,000
1,687,500
17,253,000
4,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,500,000
17,339,000
0
0
0
16,225,000
0
43,576,196
9,860,000
0
19,745,007
2,162,644
0
0
0
0 0
225.1 23,458 223.1 84.61 2
1 15,731
4,519,271 201,224
21,581
20,601
1,895
19,626
8,035
0
509,268
7,367
660
50 1
1 67,000
599
24,567
287,656
0
208,583
669,228
826,250
2,735
1,052
0
1,000,081
0
413,946
5,859,551
171,969
3,963,550
16,067,060
540,700
237,132
0
0
40.632.206
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES
1994 TO BUILDOUT
GRAND TOTALS ALL YEAR
BEGINNING TOTAL TOTAL
FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 517,737 6,860,000 2,612,950 4,764,787
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LElTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
. ' .-TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ENCINA/NO CO TRANSIT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CDBG
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER BONDS
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
REDEV-LOW & MODERATE
89,601
1,519,271
3,445,754
1,672,130
1,688,746
487,989
198,720
718,097
0
565,297
(572,633)
(269,340)
501
167,000
(1 17,401)
(1 68,849)
826,676
0
208,583
5,981,228
1,258,880
2,735
(198,948)
0
2,957,297
0
10,334,762
3,921,551
(1,713,031)
5,215,090
540,700
(477,334)
26,130
17,000,000
56,273,735
9,499,451
6,501,855'
5,738,906
11,051,906
2,189,938
4,312,500
23,341,971
14,410,000
3,870,000
0
0
178,000
193,416
1,703,480
207,000
0
86,834,000
35,992,750
0
2,200.,000
2,500,000
18,767,784
0
55,885,490
21,000,000
1,885,000
47,995,157
29,550,000
0
0
14,000,000
59,518,265
1 1,150,000
8,170,000
6,225,000
11,231,000
2,900,000
4,312,500
23,398,000
13,830,000
3,600,000
0
0
60,000
0
2,242,500
207,000
0
92,146,000
36,425,380
0
2,000,000
2,500,000
20,725,000
0
65,806,306
19,062,000
0
43,554,273
18,698,030
0
1 15,731
4,519,271
201,224
21,581
20,601
1,895
19,626
8,035
0
509,268
7,367
660
50 1
167,000
599
24,567
287,656
0
208,583
669,228
826,250
2,735
1,052
0
1,000,081
0
413,946
5,859,551
171,969
3,963,550
16,067,060
540,700
TAX INCREMENT BOND 237.1 32 0 0 237,132
BATIQUITOS LAGOON 0 30,000,000 30,000,000 0
OTHER 0 6,287,000 6,287,000 0
TOTAL 39,037,941 502,255.469 500,661,204 40,632.206
,a 0 EXH
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES
JUNE 1994
Fee Description
Additional Planning Inspections (first lnsp included in plan check fee)
Adjustment Plat
Administrative Variance - Single Family
Administrative Variance - Other
Appeal - Ci Council - Single Family
Appeal - City Council - Other
Appeal - Ci Council - Ci Engineer’s Decision
Appeal - Planning Commission - Single Family
Appeal - Planning Commission - Other
Building Permit Fees (Based on state fee schedule)
Bridge &Thoroughfare - per Single Family Unit (Outside CFD)
Bridge &Thoroughfare - per Condominium Unit (Outside CFD)
Bridge &Thoroughfare - per Apartment Unit (Outside CFD)
Bridge &Thoroughfare - all other - per Avg. Daily Trip (Outside CFD)
Certificate of Compliance
Community Facilities District Annexation
Construction Change Review - Minor
Construction Change Review - Major
Coastal Development Permit - Single Family
Coastal Development Permit - Other
CUP
CUP - Amendment - Regular
CUP - Amendment - Non-Profit
CUP - Extension - Regular
CUP - Extension - non-profit
CUP - Non-Profit
DayCare Permit
DayCare Permit - Extension
Design Review - Preliminary Review - Major
Design Review - Preliminaty Review - Minor
Duplicate Tracing Fees - Final Parcel Maps - per sheet
Duplicate Tracing Fees - Final Tract Maps - per sheet
Easement or Gffer to Dedicate or Improve
EIA - All Others
EIA - Single Family
EIR - 1 through 4 Acres
EIR - Bthrough 19 Acres
EIR - 20 Acres and up
EIR - Addendum
EIR - Supplemental (Requiring a Public Hearing)
Building Plan Check - 65% of Bldg Permit
(Base + actual cost)
Encroachment Permit (Before Installation)
Encroachment Permit (After Installation)
Engineering Variance - Minor
Engineering Variance - Major
Environmental Monitoring Fee
Final Parcel Map (Minor Subdivision)
Final Tract Map (Base fee + $5 per Acre)
Fire Protection System Installation
Fire Repeated Inspection on New Construction
-
”
-
Total 1993-94
Note Fee cost
50
490 1,079
120 1,218
120 61 6
490 893
120 1,007
430 652
250 1,186
340 41 5
50
New
(1).
u -
I I I I
234
480
500
600
51 4
433
2,700
934
934
631
631
2,700
1,238
500
500
300
30
30
200
1,088
1,321
6,221
4,924
12,290
500
10,237
Proposed
Amt Fee
Fe
50
340
250
430
120
490
120
120
490
530
424
31 8
22
230
0
150
300
150
400
2,500
935
80
400
55 I 120
125
55
275
55
30
30
200
220
220
2,210
2,210
5,510
275
10,235 1 3,081 2,124
50
100
85
160
150
1,580
2,760
40 -
530
424
31 8
22.00
230
480 1
150
300
150
400
2,500
935
80
400
55
120
125
55
275
55
30
30
200
220
220
2,210
2,210
5,510
275
10,235
50
100
85
160
150
1,580
2,760
40 - cc
0
Fee Description
Fish & Game Fee - Negative Declaration
Fish &Game Fee - EIR
Future Improvement Agreements
General Plan Amendment - 1 Acre or less
General Plan Amendment - 1 to 5 Acres
General Plan Amendment - 5 Acres and up
Grading Permit
Grading Plan Check
Growth Management Fees - As established by Council
Hiliside Dev Permit - Single Family
Hillside Dev Permit - Other
Hillside Dev Permit Amendment - Single Family
Hillside Dev Permit Amendment - Other
Improvement Agreement Extension
Improvement Plan Review (Plan Check)
lnclusionaty Housing Impact Fee (per unit)
lnclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee (per market rate unit)
Information to Planning Commission - Single Family
Information to Planning Commission - Other
Inspection Overtime (On Request)
I > -0:. Improvement Construction Inspection.Fee ., , . ,
Landscape Plan Check - Same as lmpvt Plan Check
Landscape Inspection - Same, as lmpvt Construction lnsp
Local Coastal Plan - Amendment - Major
Local Coastal Plan - Amendment - Minor
Master Plan (Sase Fee + $15 per Acre)
Master Plan Pre Submit
Master Plan Amendment (Minor)
Master Plan Amendment (Major) (Base Fee + $10 per Acre)
Monumentation (Cash deposit as required)
Notice Fees - Based on Cost to Provide Notice
Oversize Load Permit - 1 trip
Oversize Load Permit - Annual
Park In-Lieu Fees
PD or Condo Revision - 4 or less
PD or Condo Revision - 5 to 50
PD or Condo Revision - 51 or more
PD Revision - Non-Res - 4 or less
PD Revision - Non-Res - 5 to 50
PD Revision - Nan-Res - 51 or more
PD or Condo - 4 or less
PD or Condo - 5 to 50
PD or Condo - 51 or more
PD - Non-Res - 4 or less
PD-Non-Res-5to50
PD - Non-Res - 51 or more
Permit Amendments Not Specifically Identified
Planned Industrial Permit
Planned Industrial Permit -Amendment
Planning Commission Determination - Single Family
Planning Commission Determination - Other
0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES
JUNE 1994
Note
0
0
(1 1
(1 1
(1 1
,(1)
I 1,275
2,218
2,650
6,047
1,028
1,126
857
791
340
1,518
1,733
0
5,531
2,642
26,533
6,249
1993-94
Amt Fee Fee
Fe 'Proposed
1,275
80 80
875 875
1,275
1,200 1,200
1,200
2,500 2,500
1,200
120
400
80
350
340
2,925
12,000
120
41 0
100
5,531
1,700
10,475
3,750
3,947 1,700
15,456 3,860
cost
15
60
(1 1
(3)
6,000 7,298 (3)
3,000 3,243 (3)
575 1,315 (3)
5,510 6,192 (3)
2,000 2,786 (3)
250 599
(3) 1,914 440
(3) 6,613 4,000
(3) 11,022 11,022
(3) 1,705
(5)
10,504 10,504 (3)
5,510 5,551 (3)
440
2,245
830 2,819
220 2,650
400 535
600
I
120
400
80
350
340
2,925
12,000
120
41 0
100
5,531
1,700
10,475
3,750
-
1,700
3,860
cost
15
60
250
2,000
5,510
575
3,000
6,000
440
4,000
11,022
440
5,510
10,504
600
400
220
830
0 0
- CITY OF CARLSBAD PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES
JUNE 1994
Fee Description
Planned Development Final Map - Major (50 or less)
Planned Development Final Map - Minor (4 or less)
Planned Developemnt Final Map - Major (51 or more)
Planned Local Drainage Fees
Precise Development Plan
Precise Development Plan - Amendment
Preliminary Review - Minor
Preliminary Plan Review (Single Family Exempt)
Public Facilities Fees - 3.5% of Bldg Permit Value (Outside CFD)
Public Facilities Fees - 1.82% of Bldg Permit Value (Inside CFD)
Public Facilities Fees Agreement
Quitclaim of Easement
Reapportionment Fees for 191 1 Act Assessment Districts - (plus $50 per parcel)
Redevelopment Permit (Minor)
. h., ,tRedevelopment Permit (Major)
Redevelopment Permit Amendment (Minor)
..
I
Note
(1 1 1
Redevelopment Permit Amendment (Major)
Research Time (By Written Request) - Per Hour
Reversion to Acreage
Right of Way Permit - Single Family
Right of Way Permit - Municipal Projects paying insp fees
Right of Way Permit - All other Non-Utili
Right of Way Permit - Utili (By Contract)
Satellite Antenna Permit
School Fees - (Set by School Districts, State Mandates Limits)
Segregation of Assessments - 2 to 3 parcels
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 21 to 35 parcels (plus $1 15 per parcel over 20)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 11 to 20 parcels (plus $1 75 per parcel over IO)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 4 to 10 parcels
(9)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 166 to 31 5 parcels (plus $20 per parcel over 165)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 116 to 165 parcels (plus $25 per parcel over 115)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 81 to 115 parcels (plus $35 per parcel over 80)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 56 to 80 parcels (plus $65 per parcel over 55)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 36 to 55 parcels (plus $85 per parcel over 35)
(6)
Segregation of Assessments - 316 to 500 parcels (plus $12 per parcel over 315)
Special Use Permit Amendments - All Other
Special Use Permit Amendment - Rood Plain
Special Use Permit - Flood Plain, Coastal High Hazard Area
Special Use Permit - Flood Plain
Special Use Permit
Site Development Plan Revision (Major)
(2) Sie Development Plan Revision (Minor)
Site Development Plan (Major)
(2) Site Development Plan (Minor)
Sign Program
Sign Permit
Sewer Lateral Installation
(1 1 Sewer Benefit Area Fees
Sewer Connection
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 701 + parcels (plus $3.50 per parcel over 700)
(9) Segregation of Assessments - 501 to 700 parcels (plus $6 per parcel over 500)
(9)
.(1)(4)
Total 1993-94
cost Fee
209
893
25
70 1,108
70
3,899 1,700
2,499 1,100
388 230
250 120
50
80 356
1,400 5,603
150 1,838
450
280 388
50
1,384 800
a0
224
90 224
90 224
35 224
500 500
a0
97 40
2,550
3,480
3,480
5,230
6,955
8,655
10,280
11,505
12,755
7 5,755
17,975
19,175
1,767
2,500
32
2,500
1 75 561
30
5,992 2,775
9,215 5,530
4,162 475
6,727
1,150 1,283
280 1,073
1,150
-350 . 300
1,208 820
1,072 225
=F Proposed
70 I
1,700
1,100
230
120
1
50
280
450
150
1,400
80
800
80
500
35
90
90
40
2,550
3,480
3,480
5,230
6,955
8,655
10,280
11,505
12,755
15,755
17,975
19,175
1,806
2,500
30
175
2,775
5,530
475
1,150
280
1,150
300
820
225
0 0 4
- CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES
JUNE 1994
Fee Description
Specific Plan Amendment (Minor)
Specific Plan Amendment (Major)
Specific Plan - Less than 5 acres
Specific Plan - 5 to 25 acres
Specific Plan - More than 25 acres
Street tight Energizing Fee
Street Name Change
Street Sign Deposits (As Required)
Street Vacation
Structure Relocation
Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 5 - 25 Units or Lots
Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 26 - 100 Units or Lots
Tentative Map Revision - No PD - 101 or more Units or Lots
Tentative Parcel Map Processing Fee
Tentative.ParcelJMap lyr Extension
Tentative Tract Map Litigation Stay - 1/4 orginal Fee
Tentative Tract Map RES - 5 - 49 Lots or Units
Tentative Tract Map RES - 50 or more Lots or Units -
$2,500 base + $IOO/lot or unit Over 5 (whichever is greater).
$7,500 base + $25/lot or unit over 50 (whichever is greater).
$2,500 base + $lOO/lot or acre over 5 (whichever is greater).
$7,500 base + $100/lot or acre over 50 (whichever is greater).
Tentative Tract Map NON-RES - 5 - 49 Lots or Units -
Tentative Tract Map NON-RES - 50 or more Lots or Units -
Tentative Tract Map Extension - 5 to 25 - half of Tent. Tract Map fee
Tentative Tract Map Extension - 25 to 100 - half of Tent. Tract Map fee
Tentative Tract Map.Extension - 101 or more - half ofTent. Tract Map fee
Traffic Impact Fee - Residnt'l Cost Per Trip (Out of CFD)
Traffic Impact Fee - Commrc'l/lndust Cost Per Trip (Out of CFD)
Traffic Impact Fee - Residnt'l Cost Per Trip (Inside CFD)
Traffic Impact Fee - Comrnrc'l/lndust Cost Per Trip (Inside CFD)
Variance (Single Family)
Variance (Other)
Water District Service Fees
Easement Document Processing and Recording (mimimum $1 50)
Major Facility Fee - Potable Water per EDU
Preliminary Potable Water, Reclaimed Water, Sewer Analysis Review
Reclaimed Water Landscape Review
Hydraulic Analysis Only
Meter Installation Fees:
1 5/8' I Fire Protection I 314'
1"
1 112"
2'
3"
4u
6"
Note
(2)
(1 1
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
I
-
"
-
Total
Amt Fee Fee cost
Fe Proposed 1993-94
4,371 1,700 1,700
12,068
13,500 13,500 22,534
5,700 5,700 21,970
1,750 1,750 35,075
6,200 6,200
339 120 1 20
490
1,150 1,150 3,987
180 180 267
490 490
4,782
1,611 1,611 1,611
2,350 2,350 6,281
1,425 1,425
365 365 365
3,413
7,472
3,413
4,033
295
374
427
83
21
54 53
34 33
84
22
1,573 280 280
1,762 575 575
150
200 200 200
200 200 200
500 500 500
2,400 2,400
1 50 150
80
420 420 420
275 275 275
150 150 150
110 110 110
65 65 65
80 80
900
2,700 2,700 2,700
1,620 1,620 1,620
900 900
i ,? :.. ',d L
{.-
a a - CITY OF CARLSBAD PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES JUNE 1994
5
Fee Description
Potable, Reclaimed and Sewer Improvement Plan Review
Under $8O,OOO - Base + 1% of Construction Costs
Between $80,000 - $200,000 - Base + .?% of Construction Costs
Between $200,000 - $500,000 - Base + .45% of Construction Costs
Between $500,000 - $800,000 - Base + .35% of Construction Costs
$800 and over - Base + Calculated on a Project Basis
Potable, Reclaimed and Sewer Standards and Specifications (Cost for each)
San Diego County Water Auth. Capacity Charge - Set by SDCWA
Service Installation Fees
1 I Water
2" Water
2" Lateral with two 1' Services
2" Lateral with three 1' Services
Fire Hydrant Lateral and Assembly
Fire Detector Lateral
Waste Water Discharge Permit
Waste Water Pretreatment:
Class I (per month)
Class II (per month)
Class 111 (per month)
Zone Change - 5 or fewer acres
Zone Change - 5.1 to 25 acres
Zone Change - 25,l or more acres
Zone Code Amendment
Note
(8)
(8)
zs," 1 Fee 1 Fee 1 A:'
1993-94 Proposed
400
800
400 400
2,250 2,250 2,250
1,400 1,400 1,400
800 800
2,800 2,- 2,800
*OI 2oI 7
800
1,000
1,500
1,750
5,000
4,500
2,532
2,675
2,ao
3.181
800
1,000 1 ,000
800
4,500 4,500
5,000 5,000
1,750 1,750
1,500 1,500
25 25
250 250
150
850 850
280 280
25 25
150
2.175 2,i75
1,150 1,150
(1) - See attached for rate table.
(2) - Minor Residential Development - Defined as - 50 or fewer units or lots, whichever is greater
Minor - Other Uses - Defined as less than 2 acres
(3) - Based on number of units or lots whichever is greater
. ' (4) - Fee Increases based on Annual Change in Engineering News Record as Established by Council by Ordinance.
(5) - Any Permit Amendment not identified assessed at 50% of original cost.
(6) - Research Fee = Minimum $25.00 based on hours to completion.
(7) - Fees set by State Statute.
(8) - Fee is a $2,500 deposit with supplemental billing to make up cost difference.
(9) - For all Assessment Districts using 191 5 Act Bonds.
,I " ._
0 e
a
Plan Inspection Fees Total
Review No. I cost Fee
Automatic Sprinkler Systems - Commercial System $80 +.751spklr 6 at 40 each $320 +.751 - Tenant Improvement 40 1 at 40 each 80
- Residentid System 40 3 at 40 each 160
Base Fee Plus Per
Grading Permit - 100 CY or less 25 - -
Grading Permit - 101 to 1,000 CY 7s 10.00 100 CY
Grading Permit - 1,001 to 10,000 CY 175 52.50 1000 cy
Grading Permit - 10,001 to 100,000 CY 700 60.00 10,000 CY
Grading Permit - 100,001 to 200,000 CY 1,300 180.00 10,000 CY
Grading Permit - 200,001 CY or more 3,100 300.00 100,000 CY
~
Base
Fee Plus
Grading Plan Check - 100 CY or less 100 -
Grading Plan Check - 101 to 1,000 CY 500 80 .OO
Grading Plan Check - 1,001 to 10,000 CY 1,300 80.00
Grading Plan Check - 10,001 to 100,000 CY 2,100 80.00
Grading Plan Check - 100,001 CY to 200,000 CY 2,900 80.00
, Grading Plan Check - 200,001 CY or more 3,700 80.00
I 1 100 CY
1000 cy
10,000 CY
10,000 CY
100,000 CY
oiii~m~n~~c=onstr~~s~o~~ln ~~::~.~,~.:~~~~~.~.~~~~~~~~~~~~::~ ;;.;:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
Cost of Improvements Fee
$0 to $250,000 5% - $250 Minimum
$250,001 to $750,000 4.5% - $12,500 Minimum
$750,001 to $2,000,000 4.0% - $33,750 Minimum
$2,000,001 to $5,000,000 3.5% - $80,000 Minimum
$5,000,001 and Over 3.0% - $175,000 Minimum
-,...
0 a
Cost of Improvements Fee
$20,000 to $50,000 5.00% - $1,200 Minimum
$1 00,000 to $250,000 3.50% - $4,000 Minimum
$500,000 to $1,000,000 2.25% - $13,750 Minimum
$0 to $20,000 6.00% - $200 Minimum
$50,000 to $100,000 4.00% - $2,500 Minimum
$250,000 to $500,000 275% - $8,750 Minimum
Over $1,000,000 1 SO% - $22,500 Minimum
(Improvement Plan Check Fees are based on the current City of San Diego unit
prices. This includes the cost of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete
paving, storm drains, etc.)
Value Fee
Quadrant Per Unit Per Acre
District 1 - NW 195,000 'Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,755
Attached (4 units or less) 1,463
Attached (5 units or more) 1,170
Mobile Home 1,034
District 2 - NE 175,000
Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575
' , Attached (4 units or less) 1,313
Attached (5 units or more) 1,050
Mobile Home 919
District 3 - SW 175,000
Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575
Attached (4 units or less) 1,313
Attached (5 units or more) 1,050
Mobile Home 91 9
District 4 - SE 175,000 Single Family Detached & Duplex 1,575
Attached (4 units or less) 1,313
Attached (5 units or more) 1,050
Mobile Home 91 9
The Park Fee ordinance establishs a method of
determining park land values in each quadrant
c
e e
:. . . .(sch$d~:l,; j : : :. . ,
Existing
Fee
Area Per Unit
1 0
2 0
3 3,808
4 1,686
5 2,658
6 200
7 2,273
8 0
9 2,878
10 1,196
11 1,630
12 4,445
13 2,858 Council will be considering revised drainage fees
as part of a new master drainage study. This study is currently
being reviewed by the Engineering Department.
- ... -
-
-
-
I
General Connection Fee All Areas $1,767
Plus Sewer Benefit Fees shown below
Current
Sewer Benefit Area Fee
Area A 279
Area B 49 1
Area C 407
Area D 785
Area F 879
Area G 76
Area H 51 4
Area I 285
Area J 982
Area K 1,981
Area L 776
Area M 38
Area E 803
.f~~,i":':l'::'~~"::..I.~~:~~~:''",~~S~he~u~~~g~~~,~~~~,~,~~i.;,i-,i,a.
... .
Watts Fee Lumens
70
16,000 1 50
60.00 5,800
101 .oo 1 00
22,000 200
78.00 9,500
125.00
250 165.00 30,000
Above fees are the cost for energizing each street light for 18
months and includes a $1 5.00 charge per light to an SDG&E
service point.
"
e 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
GENERAL CITY FEES AND CHARGES
JUNE 1994
. ,. i
Fee Description
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement - Actual Administrative Cost
Administrative Fee for 1915 Act Bond Call
Administrative Fee - DUI
Ambulance Fees
Base Rate - Resident
Base Rate Non-Resident
Mileage Charge - per mile
Supplies Charge
Night Charge
Oxygen Charge
Code - 3 Charge
. *Appeal City Council- Miscellaneous ..
Appeal - Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Bicycle Licenses
Bicycle Licenses - Replacement or Transfer
Bond Search
Cabaret Dance Permit
City Clerk - Municipal Code Books (Cost for Each)
City Clerk - Municipal Code Supplement Service (per year)
City Clerk - Full Council Agenda Packets (per year)
City Clerk - Certification Charge (per document)
City Council Agenda Subscription - Set by City Manager - Cost per year
City Council Minutes Subscription - Set by City Manager - Cost per year
Copies - each
Criminal Justice Administration (per person)
Emergency Response Billings - DUI
Fire
Fire - Nuisance Alarm
Fire Use Permit Fees
Public Assembly
- Candles or Other Open Flame
- Assembly
Temporary. Use
- Tents
- Carnivals and Fairs
- Fireworks Display or Special Effects
Hazardous Materials and Processes
- Welding
- Compressed Gases
- Dust Production
- Combustible Fiber Use and Storage
- Flammable Finishes
- Haz-Mat Use and Storage
- Dty Cleaning
- Motor Vehicle Repair
Hazardous Installations
-
Note
(1 1
New
Total
cost
110.00
40.00 80.00
80.00
240.00
240.00
40.00
80.00
160.00
160.00
-
-Fee 1 Fee
cost cost
1993-94 Proposed
500.00 500.00 I 14.00
250.00
500.00
7.00
25.00
25.00
0.00
120.00
120.00
3.00
1 .oo
30.00
200.00
150.00
50.00 I 350.00
2.00
40.00
70.00
0.15
154.00
At Cost
110.00
40.00
80.00
80.00
240.00
240.00
40.00
80.00
160.00
160.00
14.00
250.00
500.00
7.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
120.00
120.00
3.00
1 .00
30.00
200,oo
150.00
50.00
350.00
2.00
40.00
70.00
0.1 5
154.00
At Cost
11 0.00
40.00
80.00
80.00
240.00
240.m
40.00
ao..oc
16o.N
160.N
160.00 160.00 160.N
160.00 160.00 160.N
160.00 160.00 160.0C
160.00 160.00 160.0C
I I I I
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
-
__
FC
Amt
25.0
7:
e 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
GENERAL CITY FEES AND CHARGES
JUNE 1994
Note
Amt Fee Fee cost Fee Description
Fl Proposed 1993-94 Total
- Medical Gas Dispensing System
80.00 80.00 80.00 - Tanks
80.00 80.00 80.00 - Storage
80.00 80.00 80.00 - Dispensing
80.00 80.00 80.00 - Use
Flammable and Combustible Liquids, Gases and Aerosols
160.00 160.00 160.00 - Refrigeration Equipment
240.00 240.00 240.00 - High-Piled Combustible Storage
120.00 120.00 120.00 - Combustible Storage Facility
120.00 120.00 120.00 - Industrial Ovens
160.00 160.00 160.00
Fire - Routine Fire Inspection for Business 85.00 0.00 0.00
Fire.-, Failed Businesshspection 80,OO 40,OO 40,OO
Fire - Weed Abatement (charge per parcel) 80.00 80.00 80.00
Health Practioner License Fees:
- Holistic Health Practitioner - license fee
50.00 50.00 - Appeals of the City Manager's decision
25.00 25.00 - Annual license renewal
50.00 50.00 - Investigation fee
100.00 too.00 - MassageTechnician - license fee
50.00 50.00
Librarv
Library Borrowing - Audio Visual Equipment (per item, per day) 5.00 5.00
Library Borrowing - Audio Visual Insurance fee - Per Video Tape 0.50 0.75 0.2
Library Fines (.lo per day per item) 0.1 0 0.10
Library Fines - Juvenile (.05 per day per item) 0.05 0.05
Library Fines - Video ($1 .OO per day per item) 1 .00 1 .00
Library Interlibrary Loan 0.50 0.50
Library Lost or Damaged Items:
Barcode 1 .oo 1 .oo
Library Card 1 .oo 1 .oo
!
Book or Audio Item - List Price
Videotape - 20% of list price (covered by insurance) I
Library Online Searching Fees (Actual Cost for Direct Line Charges)
Library Presearch Fee for Online Searches (Per Search)
Police
0.50 0.50 Library Book Reserve
5.00 5.00
25.00 25.00 25.00 Police - Historical Searches per month searched
5.0( 10.00 5.00 Police - Fingerprinting Fees
100.00 100.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - Businesses - During Business Hrs
50.00 50.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - All Additional Occurances
25.00 25.00 Police - False Alarm Fee - Second Occurance
50.00 50.00 50.00 Police - Copy of Accident Investigation Video Tapes
30.00 30.00 Police - Alarm Permit
j Police - Hourly Cost per Police Officer - Determined by Finance Dir At Cost At Cost
Police - Hourly Cost per Police Officer With Vehicle - Determined by Fin Dir At Cost At Cost
Police - Impounded Vehicle Administrative Charge 12.00 12.00
..".. /'
e 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
GENERAL CITY FEES AND CHARGES
JUNE 1994
Note
Sewer
15.00 15.00 Returned Check Fee
Publications - As Determined by the Ci Manager
200.00 200.00 Public Dump Permit - Fee per acre
26.L 56.00 30.00 Police - Second Call per Police Sergeant per hour
6.C 41.00 35.00 Police - Second Call per Police Officer per hour
10.00 10.00 Police - Report Fee (Free to Victim)
Amt Fee Fee cost Fee Description
Fe Proposed 1993-94 Total
Sewer Service Charges (4
Minimum Monthly Charge
1.67 Group II - Commercial - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet
13.70 13.70 Group I - Residential - (Flat Rate)
13.70 13.70
Group V - Institutions/Schools
3.51 3.51 Group IV - Commercial - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet
2.22 2.22 Group 111.- Commercial--.Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet
1.67
- Elementary School - rate per hundred cubic feet 0.31 0.31
- Junior High School - rate per hundred cubic feet 0.61 0.61
- High School - rate per hundred cubic feet 0.91 0.91
- Boarding School - rate per hundred cubic feet 4.57 4.57
- Beckman Micro Operations - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet 4.60 4.60
- Culligan - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet 1.31 1.31
- Hughes Aircraft - Minimum plus rate per hundred cubic feet 1.36 1.36
Group VI - Large Volume Users
Special City Services - Billed at Cost
Special Events - Minimum Filing Fee - One Street
100.00 100.00 (3) Special Events - Traffic Variance / Minor - 5 or fewer interesctions
25.00 25.00 (3)
Special Events - Traffic Variance / Major - 5 or fewer intersections 300.00 300,00 (3)
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Fee (AB939) 1.1 % of Basic Trash Rate
Trash Collection Fees
0.1 3 0.13
- Residential - per month
458.66 458.66 - Commercial per bin - six pick-ups per week
384.27 384.27 - Commercial per bin - five pick-ups per week
309.88 309.88 - commercial per bin - four pick-ups per week
235.49 235.49 - Commercial per bin - three pick-ups per week
161.10 161.10 - Commercial per bin - two pick-ups per week
86.71 86.71 - Commercial per bin - one pick-up per week
14.22 14.22
Parks 8 Recreation
Non-resident Fee - Instructional Classes and Daytrippers
Aaua Hedionda
10.00 10.00 Non-resident Fee - Youth Sports (per person)
3.00 3.00 Non-resident Fee - Open Play Basketball, Volleyball, Badminton
3.00 3.00
Annual Fee - Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Sailboats Over 8
35.00 35.00 ,Annual Fee - Non-Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Sailboats over 8’ - 30.00 30.00
Annual Fee - Resident -Board Sail/Boats under 8’ & Passives 15.00 15.00
Annual Fee - Non-Resident - Board/Sail Boats &Jet Skis under 8’ & Passives 17.50 17.50
7 I
0 e
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
GENERAL CITY FEES AND CHARGES
JUNE 1994
Note
Fee Description
Annual Fee - Board Sail - Additional Decal
Replacement Lagoon Permit Decal
Daily Fee - Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Over 8
Daily Fee - Non-Resident - Power Boats &Jet Skis Over 8'
Daily Fee - Resident - Passive Use &Vessels under 8'
Daily Fee - Non-Resident - Passive Use &Vessels Under 8'
Recreation and Safety Center Facility Rental Fees - See Schedule A
Senior Center Facility Rental Fees - See Schedule B
Per Admission - Youth &Teen
Per Admission - Adult - Resident
Aauatics
.: Per Admission - Adult - Non-Resident
Season Discount - Adult - Resident
Season Discount - Adult - Non-Resident
Season Discount - Family - Resident
Season Discount - Family - Non-Resident
City Classes - Beginner - Learn to Swim - Res
City Classes - Beginner - Learn to Swim - Non-Res
Ci Classes - Adult/Teen - Learn To Swim - Res
City Classes - Adulneen - Learn To Swim - Non-Res
City Classes - Parenvlnfant thru Adv Pre-School - Res
City Classes - Parentllnfant thru Adv Pre-School - Non-Res
Contract Classes - Adapted Aquatics - Res
Contract Classes - Adapted Aquatics - Non-Res
Contract Classes - Aqua X / Masters Swim (Daily Fee) - Res
Contract Classes - Aqua X / Masters Swim (Daily Fee) - Non-Res
Contract Classes - Diving,.Synchro Swim - Res
Contract Classes - Diving, Synchro Swim - Non-Res
Contract Classes - Masters Swim Workouts - Res (Monthly Fee)
Contract Classes - Masters Swim Workouts - Non-Res (Monthly Fee)
Individualized lnstr - Basic Swimming - Res (per hour)
Individualized lnstr - Basic Swimming - Non-Res (per hour)
Individualized lnstr - Advanced Instr/coaching - Res (per hour)
Individualized lnstr - Advanced Instr/coaching - Non-Res (per hour)
Rental - Exclusive Use - Commercial/Corp (Per Hr)
Rental - Exclusive Use - Community/Non-Profit (Per Hr)
Use Agreements - C.U.S.D. (per lane per hr)
Use Agreements - N.C.A. - (per lane per hr)
Staff Costs - City provided services (Life Guard / Supervision etc. - Per Hr)
Water District
Approved Backflow Tester
Backflow Preventer Charge (per month, each account)
' . 7 :'Blueprinting of Standard Size (24' x 36') Improvement Plan Sheet (Cost for eacl h)
Cross Connection License
Jumper Connection
-
"
A
Total
cost
-
-
-
1993-94 Proposed * 12,w
3.50 3.50
&O0 I I 1 .00
1.75
2.75
60.00
70.00
72.00
82.00
17.00
25.00
22.00
30.00
22.00
30.00
17.00
25.00
3.00
4.00
22.00
30.00
30.00
40.00
17.00
25.00
25.00
33.00
80.00
32.00
1.80
1.90
11.00
F<
Amt
6.00
1 .OO
1.75
2.75
60.00
70.00
72.00
82.00
17.00
25.00
22.00
30.00
22.00
30.00
17.00
25.00
3.00
4.00
22.00
30.00 1 30.00
40.00
17.00
25.00
25.00
33.00
80.00
32.00
1.80
1.90
11.00
1 cl 2q
25.00
25.00 25.00
15.00 15.00
3
0 e
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
GENERAL CITY FEES AND CHARGES
JUNE 1994
Note Fe Proposed 1993-94 Total
Fee Description
1.67 Water Use Base Rate Per Unit
25.00 25.00 Wastewater Permit Application
20.00 20.00 Potable, Reclaimed and Sewer Standards and Specifications (Cost for each)
Amt Fee Fee cost
3.0! 25.70 22.65 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 2 1/2' meter
2.4 20.80 18.35 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 2' meter
1.1( 9.30 8.20 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 1 1/2' meter
1.0. 8.75 7.75 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 1' meter
1.0 8.70 7.65 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 314' meter
1.0 8.50 7.50 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 518' meter
0.5 4.90 4.35 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per Month) Multi-Unit
2.4 20.80 18.35 Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) Fire Protection Meters
0.0 1.70
:. . . ' ..;WaterRate,-Sfaddby Charge (per month) -.? meter 27.00 30.60 3.a
Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 4' meter 33.20 37.65 4.4!
Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 6" meter 35.80 40.55 4.7!
Water Rate - Standby Charge (per month) - 8" meter 40.75 46.15
0,OI 1,51 1,48 Conservation Rate (1 -7 units of water) (cost per unit)
5.4
Water Service Fee - Door Hanger 10.00 10.00
Water SeM'ce Fee - Accounts scheduled for termination for non-payment 20.00 20.00
Water Service Fee - Same Day Turn-on (Not Scheduled for That Day) 20.00 20.00
Water Sem'ce Fee - After Hour Turn-on 60.00 60.00
Water Meter Deposit - Construction Meters 500.00 500.00
Water Meter - Construction Meter rental fee 50.00 50.00
Water Meter - Construction Meter Relocation 20.00 20.00
Water Service Fee - Per New Account - Service Turn on 25.00 25.00
(1) - Charge is cost of supplies plus additional 60%.
(2) - Nonresidential sewer rates are calculated based on flow, strength and pretreatment requirements.
, (3) - See Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 8.17.050
7-
e 0 Schedule A
c
e 0
IN ORDER TO QUALIFY AS CLASSIFICATION "B" OR "C" NON-PROFIT USER, T€
ORGANIZATION MUST MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
i
1. The organization must be registered as a not-for-profit corporation with the St;
of California, or, if not registered with the State, must have a constitution or 1
laws which clearly state that the objectives of the organization are of a non-proi
non-commercial nature.
2. The organization must be comprised of volunteers, &$ ......... 70% of w&-& :.:.: .:.:.: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .:.:.:.:.>:,:.:.:,: ...,x.;.: .+:.:.:.:.: +:.:.:::.: :$pWwmA.,.:.. '., .............................. ........... x... :.:.:.:.>:::,..:+ :.:.:. :j::.:::::::::.:.:.. .................. .*:.: ............
..................................................................................................... ~ :.:. >:.:.: ........ :.:.: ........................... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.>:.:.: ................................................ :.: .:.:.:. .................... ............................................................................. ....................................................... .......................... ............................................. ....:...
...................................................... ....... i:.:.~::::::::~:::::~::::.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ must be Carlsbad residents. ~~~~~tr~~iij~~~~~d~f :x.:.:.:.;
:... gg3@%e2gqp$x&i
3. The organization must submit the following:
a. If incorporated, submit State incorporation papers and by-laws; if n
incorporated, submit constitution and by-laws.
b. Financial verification of organization's exemption from income t:
.,(Department of the Treasury form 990 may be used.) An up-dated copy v\
be required by October 1st of each year.
c. A signed statement verifying item "2" above.
3'
FEE SCHEDULE AND CLASSIF1
REGULAR OPERATION HOURS
, HardinR/Calavera/and Stagecoach Community Centers
Monday - Friday 8:OO a.m. to 1O:OO p.m.
Saturday 8:OO a.m. to 4:OO p.m.
Safety Center Conference Rooms
Fox/Palowski Mtg. Rooms Monday - Friday 2:OO p.m. - 1O:OO p.m.
Saturday 8:OO a.m. - 5:OO p.m.
E.O.C. Mtg. Room Monday - Friday 8:OO a.m. - 1O:OO p.m. Saturday 8:OO a.m. - 5:OO p.m.
Fees are based on an hourly rate, with a two hour minimum (except ballfields). An ex1
staffing fee of $%€@ $@.#g ................ per hour is required for all recreation usages other than regul
operation hours. ................ ................
CATEGORIES
FACILITIES - A- B" c- D- E
Harding Community Center
Auditorium
Recreation Hall
Multi-Purpose Room
Kitchen
N/C $10 $15 $20 $40
N/C 10 15 20 40
N/C N/C 10 15 20
N/C N/C 5 10 15
Stagecoach/Calavera Community Centers
Gymnasium N/C 10 20 30 45
Activity Room N/C 10 15 20 40 Multi-Purpose Room N/C N/C 10 15 20
Kitchen N/C N/C 5 10 15
Safety Center
Fox Meeting Room
Palowski Meeting Room
Emergency Operating Center
N/C 7 <g# g gsw igQ 25 3jp 2 .. .. i., .. .....
N/C 7 ...... zG .. 22 ggw ...... i, ..; gfi ....... 25 gj ....... ....... ~ u
N/C 7 2.8 12 #&J '& ....... 25 i.:.:.:.:.:.: 3' 5 .............. ....... ....... ....... .......
....... ....... ................. ....... .............. .............. .:.:.:.:.:.:.: ....... ....... ....... ..;
Levante Center N/C N/C 10 15 20
Heritage Hall N/C N/C 10 15 20
Granary N/C N/C 8. 10 15
Scout House N/C N/C 8 10 15
rzum,$~@gpv,&q $&&q& cevante .... s~eV"ceriter .... Fuejrte .... M ::::;:::::?:FGr~2i
Ubpey.;, ji:::::ji:l:l: ... : ;. :.:: ;.y&:;.;,.,: ;WQfi::
................................. ....................... ...... .'.........' ......:;...~;...~.~...~.~.~.~:.~.~:.~.~:.~.~:..:.:.:~.~l..~ii..l.i;.I.i.::I..~:..;l.....l...;..;.~.~..... .I.::, ,C'i :?....A ........................................................................
> J ...... ............ ............................. i ......................... ............. ..;$K&K a;;;z& > :.:::.:::.:qp:; :.:..:..:$ ......... ........ ia:::: ... ~:::::::::::iujjj:t ... :.: ...... ................................................... Day Use Ody N/C N/C N/C 3 5
TOURNAMENTS - ($200 deposit required)
Field plus Bases N/C N/C 5 5 7
Lights N/C 7 13 13 15
Field Preparation N/C 15 15 15 15
Snack Bar N/C N/C 5 8 10
TENNIS COURT (Daily fee per court)
Carlsbad High School N/C N/C 20 30 40
Stagecoach/Calavera" N/C N/C 15 20 25
Laguna Riviera*
NOTES:
* No Tournament Play
N/C N/C 10 15 20
1. There is a two-hour minimum for the use of facilities, parks and meeting rooms, (
for ballfields which can be rented for one (1) hour. Fees will not be pro-rated fc
than one hour.
2. Day Use for the softball fields and the tennis courts is from 8:OO a.m. until da?
additional amount is charged for lights.
3. Building rentals include use of tables, chairs, P.A. and kitchen facilities
appropriate.
3/94 f3
FAclL In FEE SCHEDULE AND CLASS 10 &ATlONS ' Schedu1e B -
** SENIOR CENTER - REGULAR OPERATlON HOURS
Monday - Friday 8:OO a.m. to 300 p.m.
Fees are based on an hourly rate, with a two hour minimum.
A staffing fee of $7.00 per hour is required for all users.
SENIOR CENTER
Hourly Rates Per
CLASSIFICATION
- AB ""- CDEFJ
Auditorium
Non-Refundable Use Fee $40
N/C N/C $30 $40 $50 $65 $8
Dining Room N/C N/C $30 $40 $50 $65 $81
Non-Refundable Use Fee $40
Kitchen
(Warming)
(Full service/preparation)
Non-Refundable Use Fee $20
N/C N/C $s $10 $1 5 $20 $2: N/C N/C $15 $20 $25 $30 $3,
!
NOTES;
1. There is a two-hour minimum for the use of faciries.
2. Buiiding rentals include use of tabfes, chairs and P.A.
3. Senior Center equipment cannot be utilized outdoors.
4. - All users must pay the $7.00 per hour per 100 people staff fee.
Fees will not be pro-rated for less than one hour.
82
I 0 e
c
.5
W
w
CLASSIFICATION OF APPLICANTS AND FEES
. Each application will be reviewed by the Senior Center Coordinator or Designee
ciassified into a group depending on the type of organization and the intended
Senior Center activities have first priority for the use of the facility. The classification
listed in order of priority with classification "A" first, classification "B" second, etc. The
attempts to accommodate all groups; however, there is a limited number of facil Unfortunately, the demand exceeds the supply. For that reason, a priority system fo~
had to be established.
A. Carisbad Senior Center activities.
6. Parks and Recreation activities; City -co-sponsored activities; other departments; Carlsbad Unified School District administration autho activities.
Examples: CUSD Board of Trustees Meetings, Friends of the Libra1 Carlsbad Commission Meetings.
C. Carisbad resident (51% membership Carlsbad residents) non-l
Organizations (non-paid management): Carlsbad Homeowners Associat
Carlsbad civic and social organizations, and any Cartsbad organiz sponsoring a public forum or candidates night.
Examples: Carlsbad Rotary, La Costa Youth Organization, Carlsbad 1
League, Carisbad BOY Scouts.
D. Carlsbad resident (51% membership Carlsbad residents) non-1
organizations (paid management): Civic and social organizations.
Example: Carlsbad Boy's and Girl's Club.
E. Locally organized groups whose normal place of meeting is located it
City of Carlsbad; resident religious; resident political candidate use for raisers; non-resident not-for-profrt educational, civic and social organizati
resident private parties.
Examples: North County A.A., Y.M.C.A., resident wedding receptior
6
~ ,. e. * e 4
F. Resident commercial, business, profit making organization: non-res
i- private party activities.
T
Examples: Carlsbad Inn, non-resident weddings or receptions.
G. Non-resident commercial, business, political, profit making and reli! organizations,
Examples: Trade shows, company training, meetings, and seminars.
IN ORDER TO QUALIFY AS CLASSIFICATION "C" OR "b" NON-PROFIT USERS, ORGANIZATION MUST MEET & OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
1.
2.
3.
The organization must be registered as a not-for-profit corporation with the
of California, or, if not registered with the State, must have a constitution or by
which ctearly state that the objectives of the organization are of a non-profit,
commercial nature.
The organization must be comprised of volunteers, and 51% of its membe
must be Carlsbad residents.
The organization must submit the following:
a. If incorporated, submit State incorporation papers and by-laws; i
incorporated, submit constitution and by-laws.
b. Financial verification of organization's exemption from income
(Department of the Treasury form 990 may be used.) An updated cop
be required by October 1st of each year.
c. A signed statement verifying item "2' above.
8