HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-28; City Council; 12758; SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES - LCPA 93-05h,
D y.A
92
2
6
ia dh
z 0 5 a 6 z 3
o 0
CBY OF CARLSBAD - AGEQA BILL
DEP AB # ’’! ’ 5g TITLE: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATFGY MTG. 6/28/94 OBJECTIVES - LCFA 93-05 CIT\
DEPT .+%!” PLN CITI
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council
Resolution Nos. 9Y-i 80 and ?Ygl&! , APPROVING the Negative Declaration and LC
as recommended by the Planning Commission,
ITEM EXPLANATION
On May 4,1994, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
(7-0) of the Shoreline Preservation Strategy Objectives Local Coastal Plan Amendme
amendment proposes to add text to all six segments of the City‘s Local Coastal Plan pert
the preservation of the region’s rapidly eroding shoreline. The Shoreline Preservation ! were approved by SANDAG’s Shoreline Preservation Committee and the Board of Direcl objectives, as proposed for adoption, are:
Manage the region’s shoreline to provide environmental quality, recreation and protection.
Develop and carry out a cost-effective combination of shoreline management ta
will have a positive impact on the region’s economy.
0
o Support the equitable allocation of any shorehe management costs throughout tl
and among state and federal sources.
After review, these Shoreline Preservation Strategy Objectives were found to be consisten
goals of the California Coastal Act and Carlsbad‘s Local Coastal Program.
ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW
Since the proposed action is purely legislative and involves no site specific development, n
environmental impacts are anticipated. Therefore the Planning Director issued a
Declaration on February 10,1994, in accordance with the California Environmental Qt
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed strategy objectives do not obligate the City to incur any financial respon
this time. The proposed objectives do state that Carlsbad will support the equitable all(
costs throughout regional, state and federal sources. Any shoreline preservation I
paddpatlon in spec& preservadon programs wl.l return to the City Council for deten
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
This administrative action involves no physical development and has no impact on r density, public facilities, or other items concerning Growth Management.
EXHIBITS
1.
2.
3.
4.
City Council Resolution Nos. ?q- 183 & ?qe 1 bl
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3638 and 3639
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 4, 1994
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 4, 1994
c
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1o
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a 0
RESOLUTION NO, -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE INCORPORATION OF SHORE1 PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES INTO THE U
COASTAL PROGRAM.
CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
CASE NO: LCPA 93-05
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 4, 191
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cons
Negative Declaration for Local Coastal Program LCPA 93-
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 3638, recommenc
the City Council that they be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determine
LCPA 93-05 will not have a significant impact on the envii
and the City Council has concurred and a Negative Declarat
issued and approved in satisfaction of the requirements
City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1:
the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 28th
JUNE , 1994, hold a duly noticed public heal
prescribed by law to consider the proposed Negative Decla
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cou
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and COT
*'*
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
2. That the findings and conditions of the P1
Commission in Resolution No. 3638 constitute the findings
City Council in this matter.
3. That the Negative Declaration is approved as
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3638 on file with th
Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.
4. This action is final the date this resolut
adopted by the City Council. The provisions of Chapter 1
the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial E
shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this de must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Proc Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code C
1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking jl review must be filed in the appropriate court no1
that the nineteenth day following the date on whit
decision becomes final; however, if within te after the decision becomes final a request f record of the deposit in an amount sufficient required deposit in an amount sufficient to COT estimated cost of preparation of such record, tl within which such petition may be filed in cc extended to not later than the thirtieth day fo the date on which the record is either per! delivered or mailed to the party, or his attoi record, if he has one, A written request f preparation of the record of the proceedings sk filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92(
***
***
'**
...
...
.**
*.*
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 e
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the -
day of JUNE , 1994, by the following vote, t
AYES: Council Members Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnil
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Lewis
ABSTAIN :
ATTEST:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
3
I
I .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
I’
12
13
l4
l5
I‘
17
l8
I’
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 94-181
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO AMEND
THE TEXT OF THE MELLO I, MELLO 11, AGUA HEDI( LAGOON, WEST BATIQUITOS LAGOON, EAST BATIQU: LAGOON, AND VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA SEGMENTS THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO INCORPORATE SHORE1 PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES.
CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY
OBJECTIVES
CASE NO: LCPA 93-05
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 4, 1Qf
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cc
Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 93-05 and adopted P1
Commission Resolution No. 3639, recommending to the City C
that they be approved: and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 28th
JUNE , 1994, hold a duly noticed public hear
prescribed by law to consider the proposed suggested modific
to the text of all segments of the Local Coastal Program SI
Exhibit WPA 93005~5 dated May 4, 1994, attached hereto,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all 1
ldesiring to be heard, the City Council considered all
2o
21
22
23
24
z5
26
27
28
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Coui
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and cor
2. That the findings and conditions of the P
Commission in Resolution No. 3639 constitute the findings
City Council in this matter.
3. That the Local Coastal Program Amendment (L
05) is approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolut
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 a
3639 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated here
reference.
4. This action is final the date this resolut
adopted by the City Council. The provisions of Chapter 1
the Carlsbad Municipal Code, ''Time Limits for Judicial R
shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this de
must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Proc
Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable
City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code C
1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking ju
review must be filed in the appropriate court not that the nineteenth day following the date on whic decision becomes final; however, if within te.
after the decision becomes final a request fc record of the deposit in an amount sufficient
required deposit in an amount sufficient to cov estimated cost of preparation of such record, tl- within which such petition may be filed in co
extended to not later than the thirtieth day fol
the date on which the record is either pen delivered or mailed to the party, or his attor record, if he has one. A written request f preparation of the record of the proceedings SF filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92(
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the -
day of JUNE , 1994, by the following vote, 1
AYES: Council Members Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnil
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Lewis
ABSTAIN :
i
ATTEST:
l)&P 62LzaL-h ALETHA L. RAUTENKRAlVZ, City ClFrk
2
Exhi1 0 0
i May 4,
LCPA 93-05
SHORFLINE PRESERVATION STRATEGIES
LCP POLICY REVTSIONS
MELLO I
2. STANDARD PACIFIC
Policy 3 - Drainage, Erosion Control
A site specific report prepared by a qualified professional shall be required to prod
necessary mitigation for increased runoff and sedimentation. The report shall be :
to the requirements of the Model Erosion Control Ordinance contained in the Apper
the June 1980 Carlsbad Master Drainage Plan and the additional requirements con
herein. Such mitigation shall become an element of the project and shall be installel
to initial grading, At a minimum, such mitigation shall require construction
improvements shown in the Master Drainage Plan between the project site and the ~
(including the debris basin), restriction of grading activities to the months of April tl
September, revegetation of all graded areas immediately after grading, and mechanj
permanent maintenance if the City declines to accept the responsibility. Construc
drainage improvements may be through the formation of an assessment district of tl
any similar arrangement that allots costs among the various landowners in an eq
manner.
3. OCCIDENTAL LAND, INC.
Policy 2 - Drainage, Erosion Control
In the event of commercial and/or residential development pursuant to a
Development Permit, a &e specific report prepared by a qualified professional :
required to provide the necessary mitigation for increased runoff and sedimentatic
repovt shall be subjec .II) o the requirements of .the Mode il) dosion Control Ordm
contained in the Appendix to the June 1980 Carlsbad Master Drainage Plan anc
additional requirements contained herein. Such mitigation shall become an element c
project and shall be installed prior to initial grading. At a minimum, such mitigation
require construction of all improvements shown in the Master Drainage Plan betwee:
project site and the lagoon, restriction of grading activities to the months of April thr
September, revegetation of all graded areas immediately after grading, and mechanisi
permanent maintenance if the City declines to accept the responsibility. The c
drainage improvements shall be reimbursable to Occidental by use of assessment dis,
development agreements or other appropriate means acceptable to the City.
4. RANCHO LA COSTA
Policy 3: Drainage and Erosion Control
7) (e) All areas disturbed by grading, but not completed during the consti
with temporary or permanent (in the case of finished slopes) erosion '
measures and. native vegetation. The use of temporary erosion control me
such as berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagging, filtered inlets, debris basins
traps, shall be utilized in conjunction with plantings to minimize soil loss fr
construction site. Said planting shall be accomplished under the supervisi
licensed landscaped architect and shall consist of seeding, mulching, fertilizat
irrigation adequate to provide 90 percent coverage within 90 days. plan ti^
be repeated, if the required level of coverage is not established. This requ
shall apply to all disturbed soils, including stockpiles.
period, including graded pads, shall be planted and stabihed prior to Octo'
2
. .. ...
a 0
mu0 ri
4. GEOLOGIC, FLOODPLAIN, ANb !%6mLb!E WAEu) w
Policy 4-1 Coastal Erosion
E. Redona1 Shoreline Preservation
AGUA HEDTONDA IAGOON LAND USE PINU
4. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Policies
3
e
WEST BATTQUITOS JAGOON/SAMMIS PROPERTIES
3. Grading and Erosion Control
F, The developer must provide for the long-term maintenance of &-a improvements and erosion control devices.
Note: The Batiquitos Educational Park Master Plan provides additional SF
standards which relate to grading - see standards for individual area
General Grading Guidelines.
EAST BATIOUITOS LAGOON/HUNT PROPERTIES
D. Grading and Erosion Control
g. 5) All areas disturbed by grading, but not completed durin,
construction period, including graded pads, shall be plantec
stabilized prior to October lst'with temporary or permanent (
case of finished slopes) erosion control measures and j
vegetation. The use of temporary erosion control measures, SI
berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagpg, filtered inlets, debris 1
and silt traps, shall be utilized in conjunction with plantir
minimize soil loss from the construction site. Said planting s):
accomplished under the supervision of a licensed landscape arc
and shall consist of seeding, mulching, fertilization and irri;
adequate to provide 90% coverage within 90 days. Planting sk
repeated, if the required level of coverage is not established.
requirement shall apply to all disturbed soils, including stockp
4
Manage the region's shoreline to provide environmentai quality,
recreation and property protection.
ation of shmefine
VIIJAGE REDEVE1,OPMENT AREA
11.
The implementation of the Village Redevelopment Plan and the comprehensive
improvement of the urban core of the Carlsbad planning area are the primary objectives
of the Design Manual. The intent of the Village Design manual is to provide general design
guidelines and regulations.
The document should provide an understanding of the "type" and "quality" of development
being sought by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Redevelopment Agency).
It should be viewed as providing guidance and parameters rather than strict standards.
The primary responsibility for applying and interpreting the guidelines contained herein
rests with the Design Review Board and with the Cornmission which retains ultimate
authority and responsibility for application. The Design Review Board shall consist of
highly qualified persons with an interest in the field of urban design and a member from
the City staff shall be appointed to advise associated proposals as they relate to the Village
Design Manual and intent of this plan.
OBJECTIVES OF THE DESIGN MANUAL
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3638
A RESOLUTION OF THE PM"ING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATrVE DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO ADD SHORELINE
PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES TO ALL SEGMENTS
OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM.
CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY
OBJECTIVES.
CASE NO: LCPA 93-05
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 4th day of May,
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, E
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering a
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submiti
and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission co
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning (
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, tE
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative 1
according to Exhibit "ND", dated February 10,1994, and "PII", dai
27, 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on th
findings and subject to the following conditions:
FilldillES:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the I
have a significant impact on the environment.
There is no site-specific developm proposed with thts Loca cc
Amendment, therefore no site related impacts will occur.
2.
*...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
a 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of May, 15
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Schlehuber, B
Welshons, Erwin & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMl
ATTEST:
- MICHAEL J. HOLZM'I~LER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
19 l8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
PC RES0 NO. 3638 -2-
NEGATlVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: In the coastal areas within the City of Carlsbad, CC
of San Diego.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Incorporation of recently adopted SANDAG shoi
preservation strategy objectives into all segments of the 1 Local Coastal Program.
The City of Cadsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described pi
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Qualit
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of
review, a Conditional Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not h
sigdicant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject prc
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plar
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments fro^
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department w
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in
Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4499.
Planning Director
DATED: FEBRUARY 10, 1994
CASE NO: LCPA 93-05
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994
SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 (619) 438-1 '
0 0
ENvlRO"TAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. LCPA 93-05
DATE: JANUARY 2;
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
2. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT; 2075 LAS PALMAS DM
CARLSBAD. CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
4. DATE EM FORM PART I SUBMITTED: SEPTEMBER 9.1994
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: INCORPORATION OF RECENTLY ADOPTED SANDAG ;
PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES INTO ALL
OF THE CITY'S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the ex
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears h the following pages in the form of a chec
project and provides the Ciry with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to
Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that th
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "b
checked to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City detennines that there is substantial evidence that any a!
project may cause a sinnificant effect on the environment. The project may qualifj for
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can
insinnificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
DlSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined s;g&cmt.
checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by t4
0 e
PHYSICAL m0"T
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
big) (ins i g)
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
- -
2.
unique physical features? - -
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
- -
4.
- -
5.
ambient air quality? - -
6. Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
-
7. - -
8. - -
9. - -
- -
- -
-2-
e e
BIOLOGICAL EMrIROMMENT
YES YES WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
(si& (insig)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic - - plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
- -
14.
- -
- -
16.
- -
HuMANENvrRoNMENT
YES YES WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: (si@ (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? - -
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fie, emergency or other
public services? - -
-3-
0 m
HuMANENVlRoNMENT
*
YES YES
(insig)
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
(SI3
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? - -
- - 20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
- -
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? -
human population of an area? - -
for additional housing? - -
23. Substantially alter the density of the
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
- - 25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
- -
27.
movement of people and/or goods?
- - 28.
29. . Increase traffic hazards to motor
AIter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
- - vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
- -
- -
- -
4-
0 *
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
YES (insig) YES
(sip)
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially. degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
of California history or prehistory. - -
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) - -
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.) - -
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? - -
-5-
0 0
DECUSSION OF ENWRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment would incorporate the shoreline prr
strategies, recently adopted by the San Diego Association of Governments, into the various
of Carlsbad's LCP. The proposed amendment would revise the text to add certain policy st
however no revisions to either the land use map or the implementing programs are propos
shoreline preservation program that involves physical changes to the coastal environmer
reviewed on a project-by-project basis. Since this LCP Amendment does not condone any
physical development, no site-specific adverse impacts to the environment will result.
*
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT:
No grading or earth moving is proposed with this purely administrative action and any s
shoreline preservation projects will undergo subsequent environmental review. No unstabl
conditions or increase in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards will res1
Since no site-specific development is proposed with this amendment, no changes
topography or unique physical features of the coastline is proposed and no adverse impac
result.
While one of the shoreline preservation measures could include erosion control, no s projects are proposed with this administrative action and any presenration project will be re
to undergo subsequent environmental review. No adverse effects due to the erosion o
either on or off site, will occur due to this amendment.
The shoreline preservation strategies, once implemented, may affect the deposition of beach
However, no specific projects are being proposed at this the and all preservation projec
be reviewed for potential environmental impacts prior to approval or implementation.
amendment does not, in and of itself, result in any changes to the deposition of beach sa
the modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, in
lake.
No substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality will occur as a result of this ament
since the project is purely administrative and any related development must undergo subse
environmental review.
NO substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature will result because
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
amendment since no site-spec& development is proposed.
7. The implementing programs of the shoreline presemation strategy may involve a change
course of marine waters, however since none of the implementing programs have
determined, then no site-specific effects will occur due to this amendment.
This purely administrative action does not propose any effects on the quantity or quality of s'
water, ground water or the public water supply since no site-specific development is invo
8.
-6-
a a
9. No substantial increase in the usage of, or the depletion of, any natural resource, fuel, or Will OCCU because this action does not propose any physical development or energ: programs.
10. see nine above.
11. Since no site-specific development is proposed with this Local Coastal Plan Amendm
significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, or object will be alte
to this action.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
12. No physical development is involved with the adoption of the preservation strategies, th
the proposed administrative action will neither affect the diversity of species, habitat or n
of species of plants or animals, nor will it introduce any new species of plants or animals
area, nor will it result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing plant specie!
migration or movement of animals.
13. see 12 above.
14. As no site-specific development is proposed with this project, no reduction in the am(
acreage of any agricultural crop or adverse affect to prime, unique or other farmland of:
local importance will result.
15. See 12 above.
16. See 12 above.
HUMANmoNMENT:
No alteration to any present or proposed land uses within the Coastal Zone is proposed H
amendment, therefore no adverse impacts to such will occur.
18. The proposed amendment does not condone any development, therefore the project v
substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public servicc
19. No site-specific development is proposed with this amendment, therefore no increase or alt
of existing sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems are necessary-
20. Since no site-specific development is proposed with this action, no increase in existing nois1
or light and glare will result.
17.
21. See 21 above.
22. The proposed LCP amendment will not condone any physical development and not invol
risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances.
-7-
e e
23.
*
No development will result from the adoption of these shoreline preservation strategies tk the proposal will not substantially alter the density of the human population of the Coast;
affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing.
24. See 23 above.
25. There will be no increase to traffic generation, impact to existing transportation syst
alteration of present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods as a I
this purely administrative action since no site-specific development is proposed.
26. The project does not involve any physical improvements therefore no effects 10 existing
facilities or the demand for parking supply will occu.
27. See 25 above.
28. Since the proposed action does not include any alteration of the physical environment, a
not include any language that restricts transportation, no alteration to waterborne, rai
traffic will occur.
No physical development is proposed with this project. As a result, no increase in thc
hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclist or pedestrians will arise.
Since no physical development or improvements are proposed and no restrictions to transpc
are included in the proposed amendment, no interference with emergency response p
emergency evacuation plans will ensue due to this LCP amendment.
As the project is solely administrative in nature, it will not cause any obstruction of an]
vista or the creation of an aesthetically offensive public view.
No physical alteration of the Coastal Zone is proposed with this action, therefore no effecl
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities will eventuate.
As detailed in the above responses, the proposed amendment does not have the poter
substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantidy reduce the habitat of a
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, tl
to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Cal
history or prehistory.
34. The shoreline preservation strategies will hopefully allow the development of environm
sound protection devices that will spawn long-term environmental advantages, howe
adverse environmental impacts, either now or at some later date, are expected from this
administrative action.
Since no specific development proposals are included in the strategies, no evaluation of cum
effects can be made, -however each shoreline presematioWprotection development will UI
subsequent environmental review to evaluate potential cumulative impacts.
36. No adverse impacts to human beings, either directly or indirectly will result because
administrative action.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
35.
-8-
0 0
ANALYSIS OF VTABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
a) No physical development is proposed with this LCP amendment therefore no ph,
possible.
No site designs are proposed with this purely administrative action, theref
alternates exist.
The scale of development has yet to be ascertained, since this action is solely
purpose of setting objectives. The magnitude of future shoreline prese
improvements is not yet determined.
No sites have been identified, therefore no alternate uses or sites can be discus
No development is proposed with this amendment, therefore all development ass
With the proposed objectives and strategies will occur in some future time rath now.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f) See "d" above.
g) The project is an amendment that seeks to explore potential shoreline presentatic
The no project alternative would ignore the existing shoreline erosion proble
providing an environmental advantage.
-9-
a 0
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and DECLARATION will be prepared.
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a sigruficant effect on the environment
environmental effecrs of the proposed project have already been considered in conj
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review
- I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the envhnme
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be prepa
- 1 find the proposed project MAY have a sipficant effect on the environment, and an EMF
IMPACT REPORT is required.
Signature- -, a-2-7 ?
Date
j,:p q- J *i$UUA*, &, *7
at Planning Direct&
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE]
-10-
@ 0
, APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REMEWED THE ABOVE MIXGATING MEASURE5
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-11-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3639
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WBD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL,
COASTAL PROGRAM TO AMEND THE TEXT OF ALL
SEGMENTS OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO
INCORPORATE THE SHORELINE PRESERVATION
STRATEGY OBJECTIVES RECENTLY ADOPTED BY SANDAG.
CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION
STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
CASE NO: LCPA 93-05
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coast:
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Z
conformance; and
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to LO<
Program text for aIl segments, as shown in Exhibit "X", dated May 4, 1994, at
incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 4th day of May,
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the proposed
modifications to the text of all segments of the Local Coastal Program shown
'X", dated May 4, 1994, attached hereto, and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Cc
considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines require a six week public revj
for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
3.6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning (
of the ciry of Carlsbad, as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
At the end of the State mandated six week review period,
January 7, 1994, and ending on February 22, 1994, staff shal
the City Council a sumrnary of the comments received.
That based on the evidence presented at the public he;
Commission recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 93-05, as show “X‘, dated May 4, 1994, attached hereto and made a part here
the following findings:
C)
Flndinns:
I. The proposed ~ocal coastal pr~gnam Amendment is CoIlSistent with 1
the California Coastal Act because it will facilitate the permanent prote
state’s natural and scenic resources and preclude the deterioration and
of the sandy areas in the coastal zone.
The proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment is consistent with t
the Mdo I, Mello II, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, West Batiquitos La
Batiquitos Lagoon, and Vige Redevelopment Area segments of carlr
2.
Coastalprogram.
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3639 -2-
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tE
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th day of May, 1994, by thc
vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Schlehuber, B Welshons, Erwin & Hall,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
Planning Director
I
PC RES0 NO. 3639 -3-
Exhibit
May 4, 1
0 0
LCPA 93-05
SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGIES
LCP POLICY €IEWSIONS
mo I
2. STANDARD PACIFIC
policy 3 - Drainage, Erosion Control
A site specific report prepared by a qualified professional shall be required to provide
necessary mitigation for increased runoff and sedimentation. The report shall be sul
to the requirements of the Model Erosion Control Ordinance contained in the Append.
the June 1980 Carlsbad Master Drainage Plan and the additional requirements conta: herein. Such mitigation shall become an element sf the project and shall be installed r
to initial grading. At a minimum, such mitigation shall require construction ol
improvements shown in the Master Drainage Plan between the project site and the lag
(including the debris basin), restriction of grading activities to the months of April thrc
September, revegetation of all graded areas immediately after grading, and mechanisn
permanent maintenance if the City declines to accept the responsibility. Constructio
drainage improvements may be through the formation of an assessment district of thrc
any similar arrangement that allots costs among the various landowners in an equit
manner.
3. OCCIDENTAL LAND, INC.
Policy 2 - Drainage, Erosion Control
In the event of commercial and/or residentid development pursuant to a Cos
Development Permit, a site specific report prepared by a qualified professional shal
required to provide the necessary mitigation for increased runoff and sedimentation.
0 0 report shall be subject to the requirements of the Model Erosion Control Ordin
contained in the Appendix to the June 1980 Carlsbad Master Drainage Plan and
additional requirements contained herein. Such mitigation shall become an element o
project and shall be installed prior to initial grading. At a minim- such mitigation
require construction of all improvements shown in the Master Drainage Plan betweei
project site and the lagoon, restriction of grading activities to the months of April thr~
September, revegetation of all graded areas immediately after grading, and mechanisi
permanent maintenance if the City declines to accept the responsibility. The o
drainage improvements shall be reimbursable to Occidental by use of assessment dist
development agreements or other appropriate means acceptable to the City.
4. RANCHO LA COSTA
Policy 3: Drainage and Erosion Control
7) . (e) All areas disturbed by grading, but not completed during the construc
period, including graded pads, shall be planted and stabilized prior to Ocrobe.
with temporary or permanent (in the case of finished slopes) erosion co:
measures and native vegetation. The use of temporary erosion control measi
such as berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagging, filtered inlets, debris basins an1
traps, shall be utilized in conjunction with plantings to minimize soil loss fron
construction site. Said planting shall be accomplished under the supervision
licensed landscaped architect and shall consist of seeding, mulching, fertilizatior
irrigation adequate to provide 90 percent coverage within 90 days. Planting
be repeated,' if the required level of coverage is not established. This require]
shall apply to all disturbed soils, including stockpiles.
2
0 0
WEST BATZQUlTOS LAGOON/SAMMIS PROPERTIES
3. Grading and Erosion Control
F. The developer must provide for the long-term maintenance of dr&
improvements and erosion control devices.
Note: The Batiquitos Educational Park Master Plan provides additional spe
standards which relate to grading - see standards for individual areas
General Grading Guidelines.
EAST BATIQUITOS LAGOON/HUNT PROPERTIES
D. Grading and Erosion Control
g. 5) All areas disturbed by grading, but not completed during
construction period, including gaded pads, shall be planted
stabilized prior to October 1st with temporary or permanent (in
case of finished slopes) erosion control measures and nz
vegetation. The use of temporary erosion control measures, SUC
berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagging, fltered inlets, debris ba and silt traps, shall be utilized in conjunction with planting
minimize soil loss from the construction site. Said planting shal
accomplished under the supervision of a licensed landscape archi
and shall consist of seeding, mulching, fertilization and irriga
adequate to provide 90% coverage within 90 days. Planting shal
repeated, if the required level of coverage is not established. '
requirement shall apply to all disturbed soils, including stockpile
4
VIJJAGE REDEWELOPMENT AREA
11. OBJECTIVES OF THE DESIGN MANUAL
The implementation of the Village Redevelopment Plan and the compreher
improvement of the urban core of the Carlsbad planning area are the primary objec
of the Design Manual. The intent of the Village Design manual is to provide general dc
guidelines and regulations.
The document should provide an understanding of the "type" and "quality" of develop1
being sought by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Redevelopment Age1
It should be viewed as providing guidance and parameters rather than strict standar
The primary responsibility for applying and interpreting the guidelines contained hc
rests with the Design Review Board and with the Commission which retains dth
authority and responsibility for application. The Design Review Board shall consii
highly qualified persons with an interest in the field of urban design and a member 1
the City staff shall be appointed to advise associated proposals as they relate to the Vi]
Design Manual and intent of this plan.
5
e APPLICATwN COM3LETE DAT
SEPTEMBER 16, 1993
STAFF PLANNER: MICHAEL C
e
STA€T REPORT 0
DATE: MAY 4, 1994
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEF"l2TMENT
SUBJECT: LCPA 93-05 - SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIV
Request for a recommendation of approval of a Negative Declaration a
tzxt amendment to the Local Coastal Program, adding shoreline presem
strategy objectives to the Mello I, Mello 11, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, '
Batiquitos Lagoon, East Batiquitos Lagoon, and Village Redevelopment,
segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the P1-g Commission ADOKT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration and ADOPT Plan
Commission Resolution No. 3639, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of LCPA 93-05, base
the findings contained therein.
II. PROJECX DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This Local Coastal Program Amendment proposes to add several shoreline preserva
strategy objectives to the various segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program.
preservation strategy evolved from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' Coast of Califa
Study which documented the current shoreline erosion problems and projected fu
beach loss and property damage. After review of the coastal study, the Shoreline Ero
Committee for the San Diego Associations of Governments (SANDAG) drafted the Short
Preservation Strategy. The SANDAG Board of Dkector's adopted this strategy on July 1993. The purpose of the strategy is to provide an official regional policy on shore
management which will position local jurisdictions and SANDAG to take maxin
advantage of state and federal fimding, and other opportunities for implementing act
@
t * LCPA 93-05 - SHORELIL L: PRESERVATION STRATEGY OB~~CILVES
MAY 4, 1994
PAGE 2
The Shoreline Preservation Strategy has several components. It proposes an exter beach building and maintenance program for those areas in the region with cri
shoreline erosion problems. The Strategy also includes recommendations on the finan and implementation of the beach building program, More generally, the Strategy coni
objective statements that define the intent and purpose of the Strategy. These object
detailed below, constitute the Local Coastal Program (LCP) additions proposed with
LCP amendment. The objectives, as proposed for adoption, are:
e Manage the region's shoreline to provide environmental quality, recrea
Develop and carry out a cost-effective combination of shoreline manager
e Support the equitable allocation of any shoreline management (
and property protection.
0
tactics that will have a positive impact on the region's economy.
throughout the region, and among state and federal sources.
m. ANALYSIS
1. Is the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment consistent with the goals oi
California Coastal Act?
Is the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment in harmony with the goals oj
various segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program?
2.
DISCUSSION
1.
One of the goals of the California Coastal Act are to "protect, maintain, and where feasi
enhance and restore the overall quality of the coastal zone environment and its natural
artificial resources." Another goal states the desire to "...maximize public recreatic opportunities in the coastal zone consistent with sound resources conservation principle
The proposed Shoreline Preservation Strategy Objectives are consistent with these g
since they propose to preserve and enhance, where possible, the existing or previo
sandy beach areas along San Diego County's coastline. Replenishment or maintenanc
beach sand reduces coastal bluff erosion and allows for increased recreational use of
coastal zone. Therefore, the proposed text amendments to the various Carlsbad 1
segments supports the goals of the California Coastal Act, as contained in Section 3000
Division 20 of the Public Resources Code.
Consistency with the California Coastal Act
h 0 LCPA 93-05 - SHORE N1: PRESERVATION STRAEGY OBJECllVES
MAY 4,1994
PAGE 3
2. Consistencv with the sepents of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program
Each segment in the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program contains text regarding erc
control and/or the treatment of geologic hazards. Since the proposed Shor
Preservation Strategy Objectives will, upon implementation, preserve or restore sand t
beach areas, this action will eventually serve to protect the coastal bluffs from !
induced erosion. As with the Coastal Act, the various LCP segments also contain p
statements regarding the preservation of recreational opportunities. By adding sand tl
beaches, and preserving coastal bluffs, the safe recreational opportunities along the co
zone are enhanced. The proposed LCP text amendments are, therefore, consistent wit
goals and policies of the various segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program.
nr. ENWRONMENTALREVlEW
After review of the proposed Local Coastal Program text amendments, it was detern that no adverse environmental impacts will result and, therefore, the Planning Directo,
issued a Negative Declaration on February 10, 1994.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3638
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3639.
MG:lh
FEBRUARY 17,1994
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION May 4, 1994 PAGE 3
Commissioner Welshons referred to the bottom of page 2 of the staff report and stated that part of
sentence appears to be missing. Mr. Grim replied that this sentence fragment should not
an oversight and should be scratched. Staff was going to add a statement that Coscan 0
had given a little extra on this development. The separations required for the Master PI
single and two-story buildings, which don't really relate to the property lines. Cos
L
five years ago. With tt
e a totally different con!
The emphasis today is on valu ery prevalent five years ago. Tt
e better siting, better rear yard areas, an on's approval of the revised architectural $
ommissioners have questions they would I
Of what they would like in the way of architecture and
away from some of the glamour and ornate architectu
distance between buildings. He requested the Co
Mr. GIeed stated that the architect is in the audi
ask him.
There being no other persons desirin
the public testimony closed and ope e item for discussion among the Commission members.
can support the amendment
made by Commissioner Hall, and duly seconded, to find the plannec
PUBLIC HEARING:
3. LCPA 93-05 - SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES - Request for a
recommendation of approval of a Negative Declaration and a text amendment to the LWal Cc
Program, adding shoreline preservation strategy objectives to the Mello 1, Mello 11, Agua Hedic
Lagoon, West Batiquitos Lagoon, East Batiquitos Lagoon, and Village Redevelopment Area
segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program.
Michael Grim, Assistant Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that this item i!
result of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' Coast of California Study which documented the curref
shoreline erosion problems and projected future beach loss and property damage. The SANDAG
Shoreline Erosion Committee has adopted a Shoreline Preservation Strategy to try and preserve sor
the coastal bluffs. As part of this strategy, SANDAG has requested all member cities to add goals a'
objectives for shoreline preservation to their Local Coastal Programs (LCP), This will Great0 a Gohe effort amOnQ the regional cities and will also allow each city to qualify for potential state and federal
funding, should any of the programs come to fruition. The LCP amendment does not contain any sc
programs and it is merely a guidance device to say that Carlsbad will encourage shoreline protectior
MINUTI
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION May 4, 1994 PAGE 4
tactics. Any of those protection tactics will have to undergo environmental review and potential p6
through the Planning Commission and City Council. During review, staff determined that the ame
WIS COflSlS(eflt With the California Coastal Act for blufftog preservation and erosion control and it i!
consistent with all segments of the Local Coastal Program for Carlsbad. Therefore, staff recommc
approval.
Mr. Grim noted that Steve Jantz, staff representative for the Beach Erosion Committee, is in attenc
The Beach Erosion Committee has seen and approved this amendment. Steve is available for qut
any.
Chairman Savary opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Margaret Bonas, 231 Olive Avenue, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that she is CI
about the boundaries for Mello I, Mello II, and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Mr. Grim replied that h,
and Mello 11 are different LCP areas, as is Agua Hedionda. The segments don't overlap. The City
been split up into six different LCP segments so, to be consistent, this amendment has to be added
the segments. Mello I, Mello II, and Agua Hedionda are all different LCP segments which cover mc
Carlsbad's local coastal zone.
Ms. Bonas inquired if the western-most acreage, between the tracks and Carlsbad Boulevard, are
segment. Mr. Grim replied that it belongs to the Agua Hedionda segment.
Ms. Bonas stated that she understands that people who reside within a Mello-Roos area are requir
vote on it. She has not voted on it. Mr. Grim replied that the LCP segments are not tax districts; tl
were named after the same individual but LCP issues do not necessarily affect Mello-Roos taxes.
Ms. Bonas stated that she was confused because the staff report also referred to Village RedeveloF
areas also being part of the LCP. She asked staff to clarify that for her. Mr. Grim replied that the L
Redevelopment area is also its own LCP segment but, again, it has nothing to do with taxes.
Ms. Bonas would like to go on record as a private citizen, and also as a member of the Agua Hedioi
Lagoon Foundation, that she is in favor of preserving the lagoon. She has attended many meetings
throughout the state and there is considerable concern regarding preservation of wetlands. The Cc
Commission seems to be negligent because they are allowing hospitals to build on wetlands. She I
heard that the Coastal Commission is being sued by a group in Newport Beach because of that. M! Bonas doesn't want to see the wetlands in Carlsbad, or the lagoon area, denigrated any more than
already been.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Savary c
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Plannin(
Commission Resolution No. 3638, recommending approval of the Negative Deck
and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 3639, recornmending approval c
93-05, based on the findings contained therein.
VOTE: 7-0
AYES: Chairman Savary, Commissioners Beti!, Erwin, Hall, Noble, Schlehubet and Well
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
MlNUTl
Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff , Vista and Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been
following dates, to-wit:
published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the
June 14, 1994
I certify (or deciare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Oceanside California. this 14 day of June, 1992
-,
L'j /" c -.>/ / i -------------------------------------------------- /L<<&fi&"-- 52% \
7 4
LCPA 934
NOllCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of
Council Chambers, 1202 Carlsbad Village Orwe
Carisbad, California, at 6 00 PM , on Tuesday, JI 28, 1994, to consider approval of a Negative
Declaration and a request for a text amendment
Local Coastal Pmgrarn to add shoreline preserva strategy oblectives to the Mello I, Mello II, Agua Heclionda Lagoon, West Batrquhos Lagoon, and \ Recleveloprnent Area segments of the Carlsbad L Coastal Program in the Ccy of Carlsbad
If you have any questions regarding G-IS matter, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Departme 438-1 161, e% 4499
If you challenge the Negatrve Declaratron and/o Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, yo
be limted to raising only those issues raised by or mneone else at the public hearing describe
the City of Carlsbad City CIerKs Uffice at, or pri
the public hearing
APPLICANT Crty of Carlsbad CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Legal 39718 June 14, 1994
City of Carlsbad wlll hold a public hearing at the C
this notrce, or in written correspondence delive
Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349;
that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Zune 9.4, 1994
1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
14
LCPA 93.5
NOICE 1s HEREBY GIVEN that the Chy Council of tt CQ of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the ct~ Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Ullage Drive,
Cadsbad, California, at 6 00 PM I on Tuesday, Juf 28, 1994, to consider approval of a WaWe Declaration and a request for a b%t amendment t Local Coasts\ Pmgram to add shoreline PNsemab strategy OblecWes to the Mello I, Mello IIa Agua Hedionda Lagoon, west Batlquhos Lagoon, and vi Redevelopment Area segments Of the &kbad Lc Coastal Program in the CQ of Carlsbad
If YOU have any questions regarding this n-~atte~j please call Mike Grim in the Planning DePa*mer
438-1 161, ext 4499
If you challenge the Negabve Declaration andh Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, YO be llmfied to raslng only those issues raised by Dated~~~~~ar~a~ifomia, this day of _" 1
a
-----------------------------------c-----------------
or Someone else at the public hearing describe( this nmce, or in written correspondence dellve'
the CQ of Carlsbad CQ Clerk's Office at, or pn
the public heanng
APPLICANT Chy of Carlsbad CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Legal 39718 June 14, 1994
- 0
--
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
LCPA 93-5
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will h a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dri Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, June 28, 1994, to consi approval of a Negative Declaration and a request for a text amendment to Local Coastal Program to add shore1 ine preservation strategy objectives to Mello I, Mello 11, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, West Batiquitos Lagoon, and Vi11 Redevelopment Area segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program in the City Carl s bad.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mike Grim in
If you challenge the Negative Declaration and/or Local Coastal Program Amendm in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you someone else at the public hearing described in this notice or in writ correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at, or pr to, the public hearing.
PUBLISH: June 14, 1994 APPLICANT: City of Carl sbad CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
Planning Department, at 438-1161, ext. 4499.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 0
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will 1
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, CarlsI
California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, May 4, 1994, to consider a request
recommendation of approval of a Negative Declaration and a text amendment to the LC
Coastal Program, adding shoreline preservation strategy objectives to the Mello I, Mellc
Agua Hedionda Lagoon, West Batiquitos Lagoon, East Batiquitos Lagoon, and Vi11
Redevelopment Area segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program in the Ciq
Carls bad.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the pu
have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (619) 438-1'1
ext. 4499.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration and/or the Local Coastal Program Amen&
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the '
of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after April 28, 1994. If
CASE FILE: LCPA 93-05
CASE NAME: SHORELINE PRESERVATION STRATEGY OBJECTIVES
PUBLISH: BLADE-CITIZEN NORTH: APRIL 22, 1994
BLADE-CITIZEN SOUTH: APRIL 22, 1994
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
MG:vd
7 0 0
(Forn
TO: CITY CLERKS OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice SHORELINE PRESERVAT
STRATEGY OBJECTIVES - LCPA 93-05 for a public hearing before the City Cour.
Please notice the item for the Council meeting of
Thank you.
MARTY ORENYAK MAY 24, 1994
Assistant City Manager Date
Attachments
F AK OLIVER LTD e DON AGATEP
0 ,.
- LC2 INTERESTED PARTY LIST
. PRESERVATION STRATEGY GARLSBAD GA 92008 1911 SAXONY
d LCPA 93-05 (SHORELINE PO BOX 590 C/O CHRIS KOLB
0B.JEcnrVEs) ENCINITAS CA 92021
BOB ALLAN ANDERSON HORACE & MARY HORACE & MARY ANI
STANDARD-PACIFIC 2010 SHEFUDAN AVE 400 LA COSTA AVE
1731 COLGATE CR ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 9202
LAJOLLA CA 92037
ALBERT ANDERSON JR FLOYD ASHBY LARRY BAKER
2006 SPERRY AVE
PATTERSON CA 95353 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 9202
416 LA COSTA AVE 255 N WLCAN AVE
DONALD & BEVERLY BETTS BIRTCHER PACIFIC BLADE CITIZEN
2051 SHERIDAN RD ROBERT CAMFBEIL 1722 S HILL ST
ENCINITAS CA 92024 27611 LA PAZ RD OCEANSIDE CA 920
LAGUNANIGUEL CA 92677
GEORGE BOLTON ANTHONY BONS BOWEN MIGNON
6519 EL CAMINO REAL 1124 BLUE SAGE LEAGUE OF WOMEN
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANMARCOS CA 92069 2290 NOB HILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 920(
BREMERMA" BIX MARGARET BROWNLEY BW COLLINS
1547 LORING ST 4120 SKYLINE 5911 BEAUMONT
SAN DIEGO CA 92109 CARLSBAD CA 92008 LAJOLLA CA 9203;
CAL STATE COASTAL CONSERV CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRANS CARLSBAD SUN
1330 BROADWAY #1100 ATTN: KURTBARNES DONNA MEDEIRON
OAKLAND CA 94612 2829 JUAN ST 2841 LOKER AVE E
SANDIEGO CA 92110 CARLSBAD CA 920
CARLSBAD CHMBR OF COMMERCE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER BM CHRISTENSEN
PO BOX 1605 5950 EL CAMINO REAL PO BOX 188
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92C
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
MAIN LIBRARY BRANCH LIBRARY CITY CLERK
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 6949 EL WINO REAL STE 200 1200 CARLSBAD VI1
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92C
CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF SAN MARCOS CITY OF VISTA
320 N HORNE ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 SANMARCOS CA 92069 PO BOX 1988
105 W RICHMAR AVE 600 EUCALYPTUS /
VISTA CA 92084
0 0
.CITY OF ENCINITAS HAROLD CLARKE MICHAEL CORDOZA
505 S WLCAN AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024-3633 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92028
824 CAMINITO DEL REPQSO 1698 CREST DR
CHUCK DAMM WILLIAM & RUTH DEALY PRESIDENT BILL DM
CAL COASTAL COMMISSION 1282 CREST DR BAT LAGOON FOUND/
3 11 1 CAMINO DEL RIO N #200 ENCINITAS CA 92024 675 NORMANDY
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-5722 ENCINITAS CA 92024
DEPT HOUSING & CO DVPT KAREN DOCMNS cARLENE TIMM
ATTN: PERLA ESTON 410 LA COSTA AVE SDG&E
7940 WILLOW GLEN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 PO BOX 1831
LOSANGELES CA 90046 SAN DIEGO CA 9211
PAUL ECKERT - SUPERVISOR ECKMA" & LODGE CURT ELSNER
COUNTY ADMIN CENTER
1600 PACIFIC HWY CARLSBAD CA 92008 2081 SHERIDAN RD
1207 CARLSBAD VILL DR #R LAURA & JON LANDR'
SANDIEGO CA 92101 ENCINITAS CA 9202.
DICK EMPEY ESPOSITO PROPERTIES LESLIE & FILOMEN
SD CO DPT PLN & LAND USE 3222 ST ALBANS DR
5201 RUFFIN RD #B-5 ROSSMOOR CA 90220 LONGBEACH CA 90
SANDIEGO CA 92123
2934 E FIRST ST
SYLVIA ESTES ROBERT FARRIS FLOWER PATCH
5 IO LA COSTA AVE 1929 ALTA VISTA DR 6491 EL WINO REI
ENCINITAS CA 92024 VISTA CA 92083 CARLSBAD CA 9200
FLOWER PEDDLER DEVON GEIS A GEISBRET
6523 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008 OLTVENHAIN CA 92024 GLENDALE CA 921C
770 RANCHO SANTA FE RD 3101 SAN GABRIEL
CYRIL & MARY GIBSON DANIEL GIRA MARY GRIGGS
12142 ARGYLE DR 964 URANIA CA STATE LANDS C(
LOSALAMITOS CA 90720 ENCINITAS CA 92024 1807 13TH ST
SACRAMENTO CA i
HUGO HANSON MANUAL HIDALGO BEN HILLEBRECHT
210 ROUNDTREE WY 6511 EL CAMINO REAL 2170 SKYLINE DR
SANRAFML CA 94903 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ESCONDIDO CA 92
BRUCE HOCHMAN HOEHN RICH HOFFMAN
2054 SHERIDAN RD C/O CHEVRON USA INC 7094 MIRAh4AF2 RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024 PO BOX 7611 SAN DIEGO CA 92'
SANFRANCISCO CA 94120
LOIS HUMPHREYS HPI
C/O AD VALOREM TAX DEPT LEUCADIA CO WTR Dl
DALLAS TX 75201 ENCINITAS CA 920%
0 a L*
J - RONALD & JUDITH HOLDEN
w 2022 SHERIDAN RD
" ENCINITAS CA 92024 2840 THANKSGIVING PO BOX 2397
HUNT PROPERTIES INC LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA ANASTASIA LAITAS
2400 THANKSGIVING TOWER COSTA DEL MAR RD MARIA & ETAL SOUGI
1601 ELM ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 PO BOX 2047
DALLAS TX 75201 ENCINITAS CA 9202
LAKESHORE GARDENS PERRY f& BARBARA LAMB JOHN LAMB
7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS 947 N LA CIENEGA BI CARLSBAD CA 92008 MERE POINT RD LOSANGELES CA 9C FLFD 3 BOX 3066
BRUNSWICK ME 04011
LANIKAI EARL LAUPPE ERIC LODGE
6550 PONTO DR STATE DEPT FISH & GAhE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 330 GOLDEN SHORE ST #50 1901 CAMINO VIDA R
LONGBEACH CA 90802 CARLSBAD CA 92001
LODGE & HELLER
WILLIAM LUJAN HERMAN & LOIS MAY EARL & MARSHA MA'
6505 EL CAMINO REA 2041 SHERIDAN RD 2021 SHERIDAN RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 9202
MB SHORES COW JOHN MCDONALD MCMURPHY CORP
PO BOX 2571 1600 PACIFIC HWY 640 GRAND
ENCINITAS CA 92024 SANDIEGO CA 92101 CARLSBAD CA 92003
ANDREW MCREYNOLDS JANE MERRILL MITSUUCHI KOICHI h
2316 CALLE CHIQUITA LAFCO 1120 S FIGUEROA
LAJOLLA CA 92037 1600 PACIFIC COAST M SANTAANA CA
SANDIEGO CA 92101
GUY MOORE JR BRIITON & DREW NI
6503 EL CAMINO REAL GRAND AVE 4444 OAKWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 LACANADA CA 910'
MICHAEL & BARBARA MURPHY 640
OLIVENHAIN MWD MIGUEL PADILIA GLEN PICKUS
1966 OLIVENHAIN RD 754 DEL RIEGO PACESETTER HOMES
ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024 4540 CAMPUS DR
NEWPORT BEACH Ci
PLANNING LAND USE SYSTEMS REDIKOP J & VAUGI-L
2155 NEWCASTLE AVE COSTA DEL MAR RD 2056 SHERIDAN RD
CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA CA 92007 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 9202
RANCHO LA COSTA INC
t. STELLA HOLLAND LARRYSALATA sm DIEGUITO WATER
SDG&E US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 59 EAST D
-?O BOX 1831 2730 LOKER AVE WEST ENCINITAS CA 92024
,SANDIEGO CA 92112 CARLSBAD CA 92008
r.
SANDAG - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WILLIAM SAVAGE EP SCHOPPE
1ST INT PLAZA PO BOX 773 3754 BALBOA DR
401 "B" STREET #800 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 OCEANSIDE CA 9205~
SANDIEO CA 92101
DALE & DONNA SCHREIBER MICHAEL & BARBARA
1457 CREST DR C/O CAROL WALKER PO BOX 2571
ENCINITAS CA 92024 237 NOWS ST ENCINITAS CA 92024
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
SD CO ARCHAEOLOG SOC INC
SIERFL4 CLUB DAVID SITTNER SOW
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER 2808 LUCIERNAGA ST 195 PALOMAR AIRPOI
3820 RAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 9200t
SANDIEGO CA 92101
DWIGHT SPIERS FRANCIS & PATRICIA STRAUSS SUN-FRESH FLORAL
SPIERS ENTERPRISES 2055 SHERIDAN RD 6515 EL WINO REA
17941 MITCHELL ST ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 9200t
IRVINE CA 92714
TABATA BROS DAVID THOMPSON THOMPSON ROSE CC
PO BOX 943 7400 BATIQUITOS DR 7040 ROSE DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 9200,
BILL THOMPSON JENNIFER TIERNEY WALDON & DELORE!
PO BOX 450
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 5555 OVERLAND AVE BUILDING 3 ENCINITAS CA 920;
DEPT OF AGR WEIGHTS & MSRS 2076 SHERIDAN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1292
FRED & UTA WESTON DANA WHITSON MRS WINTER
514 LA COSTA AVE 5051 SHORE DR KEITH BROWNELL CC
ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92008 1120 SILVERADO
LAJOLLA CA 9203;
. ,--_ r--.-Cr__-.-- _IT_____*l____m__p_.,. ____
*
*r 0 a
-
b
*
1
I
I
I nconmw e OD e Y Y PYV' I- P(D
(I] m(I] Y G3 d P. 0- P. ID DsDso amart*
Y ID09 *dP (D n< 3 a *ID P(D <
0 MS. P. rt am3: PJ GOD 0 Ms oms m om0 ro P 0 r" 00 PO
urn t-'.
[I) rt
1
P
I I
1
1
i
,i
I i