HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-08-09; City Council; 12822; Seapointe Resort Amendment of the General Plan and the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program GPA 93-04 ZC 93-05 LCPA 93-04b .
4
4 cd
u a
g
a a
4-1 0
Lo u g 5 c) 0
a,
!4 (0
a
5
M a
0 .u L
$;
Q
4-12
00
I-I 0%
au
$0 *z 5 gz "::
B$
u
030 ab
E aJ+ u -4 .I4 0 F
05 gu"
** ma z g 0
d
8
\\ mQ \d a2 a
2 3
BILL 973 '
AB # 1gi822 TITLE: DEP'
CITY MTG, 8/9/94
DEPTa L COASTAL PROGRAM - GPA 93-04/ZC 93-051LCPA 93-04 CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I.
Clm OF CARLSBAD - AGEgA
SEAPOINTE RESORT - AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN AND THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct thc
Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Negative Declaration, GPA 93-04, ZC '
and LCPA 93-04.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On May 18, 1994, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommc
approval (7-0) of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Local Coastal Prc
Amendment. These amendments propose change in the allowed land use of a 2.35 acre s<
of an 8.02 acre parcel from office to tourist serving commercial.
It is the applicant's intent to follow approval of the land use change with a request for apprc
a 78 unit timeshare resort.
Concerns have been raised by La Costa Downs lot owners to the south regarding the pl
development of the site which the Planning Commission indicated should be considered (
project review. Support of the land use change has been submitted in the form of a form
signed by several Village merchants and a separate letter from the Carlsbad Convention and V
Bureau.
Please see the attached staff report to the Planning Commission for additional details regardir
proposed amendments.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Since the proposed action is legislative and involves no site specific development, no ac
environmental impacts are anticipated. However, assessment of the site indicates that ther
not be any adverse impacts associated with the anticipated development of the site. Therefor
Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on March 22, 1994, in accordance wit
California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT
Typically uses allowed within an office zone provide revenue to the City in the form of prc
tax and business license tax. Uses typical of a tourist serving commercial zone, generate prc
tax, business license, transient occupancy tax and possibly some sales tax. Thus, there
potential for greater tax revenue by the tourist commercial land use. The cost of services for
an office or commercial tourist land use are assumed to be equivalent. Approval of the lar
change will not create additional fiscal burden to the City.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS
This action will not have impacts on residential density, provision of public facilities, or other
concerning Growth Management.
e e V
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. /g, 82 2 i
- EXHIBITS
I. Location Map
2.
3.
4.
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 366 I : 3662; 3663; & 3664
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 18, 1994
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 18, I994
h
EXt
I
\
\ ‘\ \ \ \
‘I
’>
1% \
\ \
‘I I
\ \ \ \ \ \
4
City of Cd8hl
I
SEAPOINTE RESORT
J
I
.*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3 I
15 I* 1
16
17
EXHlB 0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3661
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY (
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEN
ZONE CODE CHANGE AND LOCAL COASTAL, PROGRA
AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF TI
GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM FROM OFFICE 1
TRAVEL SERVICE COMMERCIAL AND THE ZONING OF T€
PROPERTY FROM OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL TOURIST.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT
CASE NO:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of May, 1'
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted
and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission consj
I factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
GPA 93-04/ZC 93-WLCPA 93-04
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning COI
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
18
19
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative De i ,I
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the f
findings: I
Filldin-:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prc
have a significant impact on the environment.
The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental
The streets will be improved to an adequate size to handle traffic generatt proposed use.
There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be sig
impacted by this project.
2.
3.
'
4.
W
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e
5. The change of use will not have any impact on the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of May, 19'
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Betz, Erwin, Hi Schlehuber & Welshons.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMl
ATTEST:
\
Planning Director
I I
~
PC RES0 NO. 3661 -2-
/I
*
AMENDED NEGATlVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: East of the intersection of Anacapa Road and Carlsb,
Boulevard.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An 78 unit, three story timeshare resort with undergroui
parking located on 8.02 acres of land. Associated with t
application is a request for a General Plan Amendment, 20
Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change tl
land use of a 2.35 acre portion of the site from Office to Trav
Services Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map ar
Local Coastal Program Land Use Map and from Office
Commercial-Tourist on the Zoning Map.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described proje
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality A
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of sa
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration rhat rhe project will not have a significai
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subjecr project. Justification for th
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plannir
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from tk
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department withj
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in tl
Planning Department at (61 9) 438-1 16 1, extension 4448.
DATED: MARCH 22, 1994
Planning Director
CASE NO: GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04
CT 93-10/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/
HDP 93-10
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT
PUBLISH DATE: MARCH 22, 1994
CW vd
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad. California 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1 I€
e
Y ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART [I
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04/CT 93-10/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/1
DATE: Marc1
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: SeaDointe Resort
2. APPLICANT: Conrinenial Commercial Corporarion c/o Timorhy Stripe and David
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5050 Avenida Encinas. Suite 2
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 431-8500
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: August 20, 1993
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 78 unit, three story timeshare resort with undergroun
located on 8.02 acres of land. Associated with the application is a request for a Ge
Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Promam Amendment to change the li
a 2.35 acre portion of the site from Office to Travel Services Commercial on the Ge
Land Use Map and Local Coastal Proaram Land Use Map and from Office to Commerc
on the Zoning Map.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City c
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the en
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed I
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Env
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
+
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in rhe following pages in the form of a checklist, Th
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will
to indicate this determination.
An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any as
project may cause a simificant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for i
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can 1
insimificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and '
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the f
DLSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
:c
0 0
* PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
YES YES I"\
(s1g) (lnslg)
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
-
2.
- - unique physical features?
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
- - -
4.
- - -
5.
-
6.
-
7.
- -
8.
- -
9.
- -
- - 10.
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object? > - -
-2-
0 0
w BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES f\
(%I (Inslg)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)? - - -
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? - -
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects? -
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? - -
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES Nl
(SKI (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? - X -
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? - -
-3-
a m . HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES P
191 Result in [he need for new or modified sewer .
(=g) (Ins@
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? -
- 20. Increase existing noise levels? -
X - 21.
22.
- Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
- -
23.
-
24. - -
- - 25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to rnoior
vehicies, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
- -
27.
-
- 28.
29.
- - -
30. - - -
31.
- X -
32. - - -
-4-
a e
.I MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES N
(s1g) (ins 1 g>
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory. - -
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
T - -
35.
E - - -
36.
X either directly or indirectly? -
-5-
e e
DrSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
P hvsic a1 Environment
There are no known conditions on the site that would expose the project to geologic hazards c
Grading proposed for the project will be in accordance with standard grading principals and prac
include erosion control and compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Syster
standards.
Although the site is near the Pacific Ocean, it is not contiguous and development of the proper
directly effect beach sand or modify a channel of free flowing waters.
The project is a commercial residential timeshare and the typical operation of such uses does nc
change to air flow, movement, or temperature and does not consume great quantities of natural
fuel or energy. The project will be required to obtain gas and/or electric service from San Dieg
Electric and will be charged the appropriate service fees.
Biological Environment
The site is currently in a disturbed state as a result of previous grading and agriculture. There are
sensitive species of plants or animals within the area of development on the site. There is also nl
that there will be adverse impacts to the biological environment offsite as a result of this develo]
Human Environment
The project proposal to develop a timeshare includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change,
Coastal Program Amendment. The requested change is from Office (0) to Travel Services Comme
change it is anticipated that activity on the site will change from daytime, 8:OO a.m. to 5:OO p.m., tc
Future traffic patterns may change from heavy peaks in the morning and evening hours for an of
a more even flow throughout the day and mid-day on Saturdays when guests are checking in anc
timeshare.
Parking for the proposed use will be provided in an onsite garage and existing and future street imp
will adequately serve circulation needs.
All of the utility services required by this development will be provided by standard meth(
development would introduce new levels of noise and light into the area. However, those levels ar
not considered significant. A California State campground is located cross the street and may be
during the evening hours by ambient light. Mitigation for the potential impact could be shit
landscaping.
Although the sight is visibly prominent from Carlsbad Boulevard, construction of a building wirhin
limits will not be an adverse visual impact because views of the sire are from a distance 10 the
predominantly from a higher elevation. The combination of height and distance allow the reside
east of Interstate 5 horizon views of the Pacific Ocean.
The change will have some effecr on the distribution of traffic and the hours of activity on the site
-6-
Q @
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
f) alternate sites for the proposed project, and
g) no project alternative.
e) development at some future time rather rhan now,
Analysis of the proposed project indicates that there will not be any adverse effects to the en’
Phasing or redesign will not contribute to a reduction of impacts when no significant impacts
identified.
-7-
e e
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significanr effect on the environment, and a
DECLARATION will be prepared.
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, b environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjun
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review i!
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
- 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an at1
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be propose
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRO
IMPACT REPORT is required.
hYv&ir\-h - Signature
4@=- Planning Dire?€& u--
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES [IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-8-
e m
A'PLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [ HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDlTION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
CW.vd
-9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
zr
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3662
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM OFFICE TO
TRAVEL SERVICES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AT ANACAPA.
CASE NAME: SWOINTE RESORT
CASE NO: GPA 93-04
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the GE
designation for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit "A", dated May
attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Commiss
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of 1
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said reqi
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said C
considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning C
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the C
recommends APPROVAL of GPA 93-04, based on the following fi
subject to the following conditions.
Findings:
1.
2.
The proposed land use is similar in intensity to the existing land use.
The nearby En& Wastewater Treatment Facility has successfully talc
reduce by-product odors.
...
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
1'7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 a
3. There are suf€icient buffers surrounding the project site to accomma
impactive development.
The South Carlsbad State Beach campground is similar to the proposed 1
both encourage visitors to the California coast.
A hotel generates less daily traffic than an office and therefore will ha1
impact on adjacent roadways and intersections.
Potential impacts to adjacent properties caused by future development t
like noise, visual quality and light can be mitigated through design.
The proposed land use will support the local tourist trade.
Development of the site as mvd services commercial is not antiapata
significant impacts to the area.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of thc
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of May,
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Betz, Erwin, H
Schlehuber & Welshons.
None. NOES:
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
\
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 3662 2
I
d
9
EXHBC
May 18
EXtStlEJC 0
PROPOSED TS
City of Cart&
GPA 93-04
LCPA 934 SEAPOINTE RESORT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
I*
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
m
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3663
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM OFFICE TO TRAVEL
SERVICES COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE EAST OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AT
ANACAPA.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT
CASE NO: ZC 93-05
WHEREAS, a verified application for certah property, to wit:
A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township
12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian,
California, according to official plat thereof.
in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, as shown on Exhibit "B", dated May
attached and incorporated herein and referred to the Planning Commission; anc
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by 1
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of May, 1
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; an(
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
and arguments, if any, of dl persons desiring to be heard, said Commission corn
factors relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Co
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cc
recommends APPROVAL of ZC 93-05, based on the following fin(
Findinns:
1. The pmposedlanduse is similar in intensity to the eKisting land use.
2. The nearby Ench Wastewater Treatment Facility has successfdy take
reduce by-product odors.
II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
a e
3. There are SufIEicient buffen surrounding the project site to accomo impactive development.
The South Carlsbad State Beach campground is similar to the proposed I
both encourage visitors to the California coast.
A hotel generates less daily traffic than an office and thedore will hat
impact on adjacent roadways and intersections.
Potential impacts to adjacent properties caused by future development c
like noise, visual quality and light can be mitigated through design.
The proposed land use will support the local tourist trade,
Development of the Site as travel services commd is not antiapated
significant impacts to the area.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of May, 19
following vote, to wit:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Betz, Em Hal
Schlehuber & Welshons.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
Ph.nhg Director
PC RES0 NO. 3663 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3664
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOW
COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON
THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, GENERAL PLAN, AND
ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY
LOCATED EAST OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AT ANACAPA.
CASE NAME: SWOINTE RESORT
CASE NO: LCPA 93-04
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coa
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zo
conformance;
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Loci
Program designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit "A", d
18, 1994, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for ar
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Co&ssion did on the 18th day of M
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the propc
~
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Coastal Program Amendments shown on Exhibit ''A'', and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consic
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Cc
considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week pub1
period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cc
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
I,
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
a e
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
At the end of the State mandated six week review period, startir
1, 1994, and ending on May 13, 1994, staff shall present tc
Council a summary of the comments received.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the G
recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 93-04 as shown on Exhibit "A", I
18, 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on the
C)
findings:
FiIldillp:
1. The proposed land use will encourage use of the nearby South Carl!
Beach.
The proposed amendment wiU bring the u=P into conformance with I Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
Amendment of the LCP will not deny exkting residents or Visitors of tl
area enjoyment of views or access to the Pacific Ocean and coastal lan
The proposed land use will promote the goal of development of hoteVm(
the Seapointe Carlsbad Study area.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 18th day of May, 1994, by the
vote, to wit:
AYES:
2.
3.
4.
Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Betz, Erwin, Ha
Schlehuber & Welshons. I I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None. 5 Y, Chairperso PEGGY
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 3664 -2-
0 EXHIE
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
STAFF PLANNER CHNSTER WESTMI
a
STAFF REPORT 0
DATE: MAY 18,1994
TO! PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBTECT: GPA 93434/ZC 93-05A.CPA 93434 - SEAPONE RESORT An amendmc
to the General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use maps to change i
designations from Office to Travel Services Commercial and the Zoning M
from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a 2.35 acre portion of an 8.02 ac
parcel located northeast of the intersection of hacapa Drive and Carlsb
Boulevard in Local Facilities Management Zone 22.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 36
REC0MMEM)ING APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration and ADOPT Pld
Commission Resolutions Nos. 3662,3663, and 3664 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL oft
General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment.
II. PROJECX DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The site is located to the east of Carlsbad Boulevard at the intersection of (Ponto) Anaca
Drive. Total acreage is 8.02 but the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change a
Local Coastal Program Amendment as well as the subsequent and related developme
applications (tract map, hillside development permit, condominium permit and conditior
use permit) are submitted for only a 2.35 acre segment of the site. The segment und
consideration for development is vacant, has been previously used for agriculture and h
a General Plan and a Zoning designation of Office (0). The remaining portion of the si
has a General Plan and Zoning designation of Open Space (OS) and will remain as 0
The Mello I1 segment land use designations of the Coastal Program are consistent with t Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning.
The project site was analyzed within a larger study, Seapointe Carlsbad, in 1986
determine appropriate land uses for an approximate 340 acre area. The stuc
recommended that the property, P3a (project site), be designated as Residential Mediu
High (RMH) with an alternative of Office (0). The rationale for RMH was that
residential designation would create a solid block of housing from Poinsettia Lane to ju
south of Palomar Airport Road. However, acknowledging the existence of the En&
Wastewater Treatment Plant to the northeast and its primarily nocturnal odor impacts, i
alternative land use of Office was recommended.
@
0 w GPA 93-04/ZC 93-O5/LCPA 93-04 - SEAPOINTE RESORT
MAY 18,1994
PAGE 2
The City chose to adopt the alternative land use of Office because of its proximity to
treatment facility. The "0" designation was considered more appropriate than residen
because daytime odor impacts from the treatment plant are less and an office is u
primarily during the daytime. Also, because there are exceptional view opportunities,
General Plan Amendment, extensive work has been done on the Encina Wastews
Treatment Facility to inhibit the release of odors into the surrounding area.
The study included a short discussion of the site as a visitor or recreation oriented locati
The study stated that because the site is located away from the Palomar Airport Road i
Poinsettia Lane freeway intersections, it is less competitive as visitor or recreation semi
However, the view was noted as desirable for office or residential.
The applicants intention is to follow favorable land use decisions at City Council i
Coastal Commission with development plans for a 78 unit timeshare resort.
location was considered to be prime for view offices. Since the adoption of the Seapoi
m. ANMYSIS
Issues
1) Is the proposed Travel Services land use comparable with the existing Office 1i
use?
Is the proposed land use compatible with surrounding land uses?
Is the proposal consistent with the policies of the Local Coastal Program?
Will the proposal impact the Zone 22 Local Facilities Plan?
2)
3)
4)
DISCUSSION
The proposal is to amend the Site's General Plan designation from Office to Travel Sem
Commercial.
Goals of the General Plan Land Use Element include: 1) the generation of comer
enterprises that support local industries, population and tourist trade, and
encouragement of development only in those areas which can best support a changt
land use without impact.
The proposed use is directly associated with the tourist trade and as seen in the follow
discussion, it can reasonably be anticipated that development of the site will not crc
significant impacts.
2)
USE
78 unit timeshare
63,500 sq. ft. office
RATE ADT
08 / unit 624
20 / 1000 sq. ft. 1270
USE
78 unit hoteytimeshare
63,500 sq. ft. office
EDU RATE EDU GPD RATE GPD
.6 / unit 46.8 x 220 192%
1 / 1800 sq. ft 35.3 x 220 7,766
W GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04 - SEAPOINTE RESORT
MAY 18, 1994
PAGE 4
How the property will be used is another factor to consider. The site would change fi
daytime office use, to 24 hours for a timeshare. A 24 hour site occupancy could resuli
evening noise and light generation. Guest room lights will be on during hours that
office building would typically be dark. Televisions or radios may be used during evening hours while an office would typically be unoccupied by workers and wo
therefor be silent. However, custodial services for an office may be provided dux
evening hours and would require that lights be on. An office or a timeshare may h
security lighting which could be on from dusk till dawn.
A timeshare could have very similar physical characteristics as an office. However, tra
generation and peak hour intersection impacts created by a timeshare are less than
office, assuming they are equal in size.
ComDatibility with surround in^ Uses and Zones
The property located immediately to the west is City-owned land containing a stretcl
Anacapa Road, the terminus of an existing bridge over Carlsbad Boulevard, and
associated entrance and exit ramps. The future elimination of this bridge and ra
development potential. Directly west of the ramp structure is Carlsbad Boulevard and
northern end of the South Carlsbad State Beach campground. Property to the nortl
open space and the Solamar Mobilehome Park. Directly to the south is a vacant l/z a
office parcel, immediately south of that is a vacant residential subdivision, La Costa Dov
and the Lanikai Mobilehome Park. East of the site is the NCTD railroad right-of-way i
vacant land zoned for Office/Planned Industrial.
The proposed Commercial-Tourist (C-T) land use is in many ways compatible with exist
surrounding uses.
The state beach campground and the proposed timeshare are similar in that both
intended to attract visitors to the California coast. The length of stay and number of gut
per timeshare unit or campground space could reasonably be the same. Access to b
sites are separate and will therefor not conflict. The hours of activity for either site
also be expected to reasonably be the same. Carlsbad Boulevard acts as a buffer betw
the two uses, however, exterior lighting from the project site may intrude into
northernmost camp sites.
The project parcel is divided into two zones. The southerly 2.35 acres is zoned as Of
and the northern 5.67 acres zoned as Open Space. The Open Space zone acts as a bu
between the Solamar Mobilehome Park and the project site. Because of the dista
between the two, there are few, if any, issues of compatibility. Traffic access to either
is separate, excessive levels of noise are not anticipated from either use and neither 1
use will deprive the other of natural light or air. Exterior light on the project site I
intrude on the southernmost residential units of Solamar and vice versa.
structure would result in an excess City-owned parcel of approximately 2.3 acres
W GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04 - SEAPOXNTE RESORT
MAY 18,1994
PAGE 5
The residential properties directly to the south, La Costa Downs and Lanikai Mobilehoi
Park, by nature of their location and shared point of access to Carlsbad Boulevard have i
greatest potential for a concern of compatibility with the proposed land use.
Lots within the La Costa Downs subdivision begin approximately 120 to 170 feet south
the project site and this transitional distance does provide some buffer. Howev
depending on the nature of two neighboring uses, distance alone may not be adequa
Primary concerns raised by La Costa Downs lot owners are: the physical presence, heij
and bulk, of a multi story building; potential loss of ocean views; potential traffic relai
impacts and general compatibility with the surrounding area.
Maximum allowable height within the proposed C-T Zone is 45 feet (if approved by i
City Council) and the maximum height allowed in the La Costa Downs Specific Plan is
on the two sites, the distance between sites will provide the greatest amount of relief. T
is because in addition to the width of Descanso and the Yz acre office parcel, developmc
on the project site as well as any future residential development within La Costa Dov
will be required to incorporate setbacks. The setbacks could add another 20 feet
separation between structures. The design of development on the project site and mc
importantly the design of development on the interceding vacant ?h acre office parcel \
be additional opportunities for the creation of a transition from the project site to the
Costa Downs subdivision. Natural light or air to the La Costa Downs will not be reduc
or denied as a result of development of the project site.
Development of the site in any form has the potential for impairing views directly to
north from the southerly properties. However, the focus of the views in the area k
Pacific Ocean which lies to the west. Those properties to the south which have views
the ocean will therefore not be impacted by development of the project site. In additii
the City has not adopted a view preservation ordinance which guarantees existing vie1
by any development which lies to the west.
Based on the SANDAG generation rates it can be assumed that a timeshare will have fei
ADT. But the design for circulation of vehicles, and to a greater degree of pedestria
becomes critical. If the site is to accommodate a tourist serving use then access to
beach from the site for the pedestrian is imperative. In order to accommodate this, si
has been considering a relocation of the access to the project site and La Costa Do=
Descanso. In turn, the bridge and existing access at Anacapa would be removed.
signalized intersection at Descanso would provide safe pedestrian access to the west s
of Carlsbad Boulevard and the beach and would also segregate La Costa Downs trafl?c fr
development to fhe north. Wai Mobilehome Park access to Carlsbad Boulevard wo
ultimately be segregated and provided further south at a separate signalized intersecti
This same approach to Carlsbad Boulevard access is recommended in the Seapoi
Carlsbad Study.
feet. Although there is the potential for a 20 foot height differential between developme
Views from the industrial/office properties directly east will be obstructed to some deg
W
GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04 - SEAPOINTE RESORT
MAY 18,1994
PAGE 6
The proposed timeshare use of the property has the potential for creating noise and
light during evening hours that may not be present with an office use. However, projc
can be designed to locate noise sources away from sensitive receptors, regulated to li
hours of exterior noise production and designed to shield light sources.
The applicant has submitted development applications for permit approval of a timesh
resort. The review of those applications will include the implementation of measi
which will create a reasonable transition between properties with differing land uses.
issues within this staff report and minutes of this public hearing may provide direction
the design of any future development.
Local Coastal Prom
The project site is within the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program
is designated as Office. Discussion of the appropriateness of the proposed Local Coa
Program Amendment (LCPA) is nearly the same as the General Plan discussion. The L(
is required because the LCP and the City's General Plan must be consistent.
The LCP encourages lateral access to the beach (Policy 7-3), visual access (Policies 7
& 8-l), and the inclusion of a limited amount of hoteVmote1 within the study area (Po
addition, because it is not appropriate to condition the zone change, discussion of
6-5).
Consistent with the intent of the LCP, access to the beach is considered a priority if
land use change is to be granted. Development of the site should include a design:
pedestrian crossing of Carlsbad Boulevard. Future development should also be reason;
sensitive to views of the ocean and coast line. The goal of providing hoteVmote1 wii
the Coastal Zone can be achieved through implementation of the proposal.
Growth Management
The proposed General Plan amendment will result in a reduction of the Average D
Traffic (ADT) and will not require that existing or planned facilities be increased. Becs
no new conditions will be required within the Local Facilities Management Plan (LFI
an amendment to the plan has not been required. Notice of a land use change within
LFMP would be provided administratively through an addendum sheet within the z
plan.
SUMMARY
With sensitive design, the proposed land use can be compatible with the surrounding 1
uses. During design of a specific project, consideration should be given to the limita
of noise and light onto adjacent properties during evening hours as well as a transi
between adjacent properties.
m w GPA 93-04/ZC 93-O5/LCPA 93-04 - SEAPOINTE RESORT
MAY 18, 1994
PAGE 7
N. ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW
An environmental analysis of the proposed project was conducted and no significi
adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration was issued by the Plann
Dkec tor.
ATTACHMENTS
impacts were identified, Specifically the change of land use was assessed as not having
0
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Location Map
6. Background Data Sheet
7. Disclosure Statement
8.
April 20, 1994 CW:vd:lh
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3661
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3662
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3663
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3664
Exhibit "C", dated May 18, 1994.
1
I 4
City of CarIda
,
L GPA Q3-04/ZC ! LCPA 93-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT
BACKGROUND DATA SHEE~ e
CASE NO: GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04
CASE NAME: Seapointe Resort
APPLICANT: Continental Commercial Corporation
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Amendment to the General Plan and Local Coastal Prozr:
land use maps from Office to Travel Services Commercial and the Zoning Map from Off
to Commercial-Tourist on property located east of Carlsbad Boulevard at Anacapa.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township
South, RanRe 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, COUI
of San Dieqo, State of California, according to Official Plat thereof.
APN: 214-010-01 Acres 8.02 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 78 units
(Assessor's Parcel Number)
Land Use Designation Office
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A
Existing Zone Office Proposed Zone Commercial-Tourist
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoni
Requirements)
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Zoning Land Use
Site Office Office - vacant
North Open Space Open Space - vacant
South Office Off' ice - vacant
East Transportation
West Open Space Open Space - vacant
Corridor
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsb;
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) N/A
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Aug-ust 12, 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued March 22, 1994
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other,
cw
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
_.-
:;;L,C-;\T;'S ,--*--iiz, 2 I n < =.~,NT CF CiSCLCSURE OF CEKAiN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON AU APPUCATlONS WHICH WILI - ';L.-i i ,b~x~! A.CT;ON CN ;:x PAK CF THE cam cour:cIL OR ANY APPOIMED BOARO. COMMISSION OR COMM~I -. ^^^-.^
,.." .",\ .... - * ,,..
I: ll b4 L !..* 1 ri I..Y -.-..-:2 .C-/,Vj
r,iqp I.L.2 2 0 r3, d an. must be disciosed: .. ._..
... .
r- _..> . .~ _.
._
!d!l,~a and addresses o all pers g a financial interest in the application, J* Li 3 i i;-12 r-.- r-. r -. :> ,. .' ,? - q- i" , <::-3
-/( i .,%<.7-,' !2/,Lc(,i'y a**d /IY?;@J,
,$/7,A&,?&'(iA d~~~Q.vl@/) t J,, -i #$ $:q@q *-".--? ie
I
.... .
L.s 212 1xi::2s and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property in J7 ,h I cl I '?& T-&-.-&s& r)ah (he I
:--- . "7, kT 1;, L
--i.. / $< " ,- .&>,,)aq c -2HL2aLL
'I -e,, -,,.*.. c _. Ii cJdY yzlz,w: identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list
I zil. isdividuais owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning
llcy
-- i cs t7L <;.. I .4C,e=es, +d cr PC s 42(./7
1 DO71 ..
LI / -
:f &y ->.---.l
r2 - ~, E > ,~ ,.: __ '. u4' .I!~ person serving as otficer or director of the non-profit organization or as trust1
,-,J a-3 tT:,Ct
,d~s~:-;i idsntified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, lis1
-,?"'A..c'c" p; *v
b: .l!C i_ .
FPJiiCW13 8/90
2,275 -2s .Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 * (619'1 438
". _---
e .- m ~'
+
:+YS YCU had nore,than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of Ci
Cc;;r,z-issicns, CsAiEzes and Council within the past twelve months?
X.:' I ,.; .." q - X3 A/' if yes. please indica?e person(s)
I-___.
-- s??cn I: dc!ii,od 3: 'Any individuai. firm. copamenh~D. join7 verrturr. urociabon. social club. fratrfnd organization. corporation
:oia:ver. synCi;a!e. !hia and any cmer county. c.y and C0u.W. Ctq rnunlcpalrry. dirmct of 0th~ political rubdivlrton. of my GI
:s.-,?cl;le;i;n eciirg 2s a unt'
--. -
:*,:OTZ: - k',:ac;i addiricnaf ?ages as necessary.)
Signature of applicamldate
CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL CORPORA^ -
?n- ,lia~ or rj~~ nalnn of owner Print or type name of appiicant
~.. .
-.,-.. - is p-k,,~c,Wv> 13 8/N
Q e EXHIBIT
PLANNING COMMISSION May 18,1994 PAGE 7
ner Welshons inquired how many units would need to convert and how many lots are err
PUD standards.
Commissioner Hall in
applicant on this item.
if the City is the applicant. Ms. Blackburn replied that there is an outsid(
they were.
addressed the Commission and stated that t
ix lots will be developed is to back down on 1
in the front yard. Ms. Blackburn replied yes.
VOTE: 6-1
ABSTAIN: None
and Local Coastal Program land use maps to change the designations from Office to Travel Se
Commercial and the Zoning Map from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a 2.35 acre portion of i
8.02 acre parcel in Local Facilities Management Zone 21.
Christer Westrnan, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and Stated that the Sit6
current zoning and a general plan land use of office and open space. It is the office portion of the site
is under consideration for the designations of commercial tourist and travel service. As background, i
1986 the Seapointe land use study was done for approximately 340 acres which included properties a
MINUTE!
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION May 18,1994 PAGE 8
Carlsbad Boulevard from Poinsettia to Palomar Airport Road. The study recommended an RMH designation (1 1.5 dulac) for this site. However, because of the Encina facility to the east, an altern;
land use of Office was adopted. The Encina facility has undergone significant improvement since 1
and odors have been controlled to a much greater degree. The improvement in odor control elimin
previous issue of land use compatibility.
Another positive quality of the site which supports a tourist oriented use is its location. The state
off of Carlsbad Boulevard, which is a major arterial serving inter-regional traffic. By comparison, tr
trips generated by a hotel will be about half that of an office building, if they are the same size. Thi:
anticipated reduction in daily trips will have a positive effect on surrounding intersections and road
segments. However, under the same comparison scenario, water and sewer services would be incr
but no change in the facilities as identified in the Zone 22 facilities plan would be necessary. lmpac
associated with any development of the site are not expected to be significant and can be address@
through the Site Development Plan process.
The applicant has submitted a CT, SDP, CP, HDP, and CUP which will be brought before the Planr
Commission if the land use amendments are granted. Special concerns of the Commission can be
incorporated into staff's review. For the record, Mr. Westman submitted letters addressed to staff fr
owners in La Costa Downs identifying concerns with the proposed use and development of the site.
concerns were discussed in the staff report. Also, letters in support of the zone change were submii
Village merchants and the Carlsbad Tourism Board. Staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Welshons inquired if it is the Commission's responsibility tonight to make the finding
change the zoning in the general plan, rather than discussing building heights, access, egress. Mr.
Westman replied yes, that the issue is land use determination--whether or not commercial tourist :
travel service are appropriate uses for the site.
Chairman Savary opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, representin
applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that he concurs with the staff recommendation. H
that the staff presentation adequately addressed the land use issues. There are many office sites in
Carlsbad and many of them are currently sitting vacant. However, there are not a lot of sites in clos
proximity to the beach which lend themselves to commercial uses. He is currently working with staf
five different discretionary permits and if this land use determination is approved, he hopes to be ba
a project sometime in July. He introduced Dave Brown of Continental Commercial Corporation, his
The other principal, Tim Stripe, is out of town and could not attend tonight. Mr. Howes stated that
Continental Commercial Corporation is a sister corporation to Shell-Winners Circle. Shell-Winners
is a local Carlsbad company which employs over 450 persons. Shell-Winners Circle has been invo
development of successful timeshare projects in Coronado, San Clemente, Oceanside, Del Mar, ant
Carlsbad. In Carlsbad, they developed the Carlsbad Inn project in downtown Carlsbad. The Seapo
Resort being proposed will be about one-third the size of the Carlsbad Inn project. It will have no
restaurant, bar, or any other commercial use. They are only proposing 78 timeshare units at this tir
Stated that this is not a speculative use because the applicant has a proven track record to develop i:
successful timeshare project at this site. He requested an opportunity to respond to the public testin
David S. Brown, Continental Commercial Corp., 5050 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he and Tim Stripe are the owners of Continental Commercial Corp. Th have built six timeshare projects in 12 years. All have been successful. It is their only business and
carefully build one project at a time to ensure success. They have studied the proposed site very ca
and are confident it will be as successful as their other projects. He would be happy to answer any
questions.
campground property is southwest, the beach is directly west, and access to the site can be made d
MINUT
0 0
I- PLANNING COMMISSION May 10,1994 PAGE 9
Marty Montgomery, 1855 Lotus Court, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he owr
Commission and City Council two and a half years ago to process an assessment district for the
improvements at La Costa Downs. Those improvements are now through plan check and are awail
City Engineer's signature. He is not necessarily opposed to the Seapointe Resort project because h
the use could be compatible to the single family residences at La Costa Downs. However, he is con
about the access requirements which are part of the zone change amendment. The current access
across the Ponto bridge but the Seapointe Resort project is proposing access from Descanso Boule!
which is triggered by the ZCA being discussed. He would like the access explored so that it is not ir
conflict with the La Costa Downs residential development. He hopes that access to the project coulc
moved a little further north.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired where he thinks the access should rightly be. Mr. Montgomery
that it should probably be across the Ponto bridge. Both Anacapa Road and Francisca Road were
originally cul-de-sacs. In the future, the Lanakai Mobile Home Park will take access to the south. -
remaining lots and Seapointe could easily take access from the bridge. It would be better than havi
of the traffic pass by the residential project because it will all back up at the traffic signal.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how Mr. Montgomery would access the beach if the new access were
created. Mr. Montgomery replied that it would have been across the bridge. He proposed a pedestr
crossing there going to the beach but it wasn't met with great fanfare. He reiterated that he likes the
project but is concerned only about the access which is being triggered by the general plan amendn
Richard Donahue, 4964 David Way, San Bernardino, California, addressed the Commission and st;
that he purchased his lots in La Costa Downs in 1984. His biggest concern with the Seapointe Resc
the access. What most people don't know, and he just found out today, is that the reason the acces
Resort has been changed is because a deal has been struck between Continental Commercial and 1 of Carlsbad. They have agreed to provide a traffic signal if the street is moved, which would release
2-1 /2 acres of land that they could purchase and develop adjacent to their project. He produced a I
from the City Engineer to the City Manager dated March 23, 1994 and a letter from Continental
Commercial to Lloyd Hubbs dated April 26, 1994 substantiating the fact that a deal was under
consideration. He thought it was interesting that this information had not been revealed to the publi.
newspaper or anywhere else. Mr. Donahue is not against the Seapointe Resort project but feels ther
some serious problems which need to be worked out.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if he understood it correctly, that if this applicant installs a signal at
Descanso, then the area to the north would be sold to them which could then be developed. Mr. Do
replied that the memo from the City Engineer alludes to that arrangement. However, it is his
understanding that any City property being sold must be disclosed to the public before it can be solc
What really bothered him is that when he met with Messrs. Westman, Hauser, and Quon, they denic
knowledge of a probable sale when they were in possession of the letters which discussed the matte
doesn't know what to make of it.
Mr. Donahue turned copies of the letters over to the Commission for the record.
Commissioner Schlehuber read both letters and believes they only discuss a proposal under conside
that they do not say with a certainty that the bridge will be removed. He doesn't feel that staff
misrepresented the matter because it was only a proposal and no deal had been consummated.
Robert Barelmann, 1967 No. Highway 101, Leucadia, addressed the Commission and stated that he
owns lots in La Costa Downs and would like to see this item continued because of the things which I
been brought up tonight. He believes that the applicant may be planning a timeshare only at this tin
he is reasonably sure that there is an option for a restaurant down the line somewhere. The main dl
in La Costa Downs, just south of the project site. Specific Plan 201 was approved by the Planning
MlNUTl
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION May 18,1994 PAGE 10
criteria for the timeshare is beach access, however he believes there are other alternatives to remoi
bridge. He would like to see the bridge remain, with a pedestrian crossing to the beach. When the Costa Downs Specific Plan was approved, it was 50 pages long and there were 25 pages of deeds
disclosures which they are required to do, i.e. noise, rail, odor, airport, to name a few. Nowhere do
mention a signal at Descanso. He feels that is an impact to the single family homes which will be t
La Costa Downs. They are already impacted by the North County Rail station which will soon be b
to mention the trash transfer facility. Mr. Barelmann thinks that an EIR needs to be done because t
are many unmitigable impacts which have not been addressed. In addition to being concerned abc
access, he is concerned about zoning compatibility, the grade of the site which is 41-45 ft. above n<
grade, parking, and conflict of interest. He, along with others, have tried on many occasions to see
compromise with the applicant but they won't budge. Mr. Barelmann thinks a compromise is neede
Tommy B. White, 691 0 Sandcastle Dr., Carlsbad, turned in a request to speak but was unable to st the meeting. He requested that his opposition to the project be recorded in the Minutes.
Susan Beckmann, 3372 Donna Dr., Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that she reprt
29 downtown merchants who are in favor of the proposed Seapointe Resort but could not attend th
meeting due to a scheduling conflict with a Chamber of Commerce meeting. The merchants beliec
proposed site is good for commercial tourist development and that this location will enhance the mi
commercial growth in the City. A copy of the letter containing the 29 signatures is on file in the Plai
Department.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, was given an opportunity for rebuttal. He stated that it !
that the biggest concern seems to be the location of the access. The access being required by staff
project is in conformance with the recommendations of the Seapointe Carlsbad general plan study '
approved in 1985. The study recommends moving the overpass at Anacapa, realign Carlsbad Bou
and sell the City property offset costs. It also recommends realigning Anacapa to serve as commor
to La Costa Downs and property to the north. The existing bridge is approximately 40 years old an(
soon be in need of serious retrofitting. The City does not want to be in the business of repairing brk
The access being requested by the City would probably be requested regardless of the use of the
Seapointe site. The idea is to produce a safe intersection to be used by both Seapointe and La Cos Downs. AS it is now, they have to walk down the street and attempt to cross Carlsbad Boulevard w gets quite busy in the summer. He assured the Commission that no "deal" has been made. There 1
recommendation in the study to vacate that right-of-way. His client has only had some preliminaq
discussions with staff about that issue. He knows that any sale must go all the way to the City Cour
that happens, his clients will need to come back again with another general plan amendment and dl
plan. At this time it is purely speculative. He closed by saying that the building being proposed is if
conformance with the City's height standards which the Commission will see when the plans come 1
in July.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Savary (
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Schlehuber inquired if the site had passed the smell test. Christer Westman replied
had spoken with Betty Meyer of the Encina plant who advised him that they get very few complaints
odor since the improvements have been done.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he had read the correspondence between Continental Commercial
Lloyd Hubbs and it appears to him that it is only a preliminary discussion about the right-of-way prc
comes forward.
However, he does hope that staff will give some serious consideration to access before the formal pi
MINUT
e I)
PLANNING COMMISSION May 1 e, 1994 PAGE 11
Chairman Savary requested Engineering to address the circulation issues which had been brought I public testimony. Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, replied that circulation is being reviewed wit1
tentative map and condominium permit being applied for. The City has made a proposal to the devi
for a signalized intersection at Descanso but it is still in the review stages. All comments made toni!
regarding access will be taken into consideration. If the Commission wishes to make any
recommendations, staff would welcome them.
Commissioner Noble inquired if Carlsbad has the authority to tear down a state bridge. Mr. Wojcik r
Motion was made by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, to adopt Plan
Commission Resolution No. 3661, recommending approval of the Negative Decla
and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3662, 3663, and 3664, recomm
approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Prog
Amendment.
Chairman Savary, Commissioners Betz, Erwin, Hall, Noble, Schlehuber and Welt
that the Ponto bridge is not a state bridge. It is owned by the City of Carlsbad in fee title.
ACTION:
VOTE: 7-0
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
community service.
ADJOURNMENT:
Respectfully submitted,
GARY E. WAYNE
Assistant Planning Director
BETTY BUCKNER
Minutes Clerk
MINUTE
CKRISBO CALIFORNIA
May 17, 1994
Ms Pegqy Savary
Car lsbad Planhing Canniss ion
c/o Carlsbad Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 32003
Dear Ms. Savary:
It has come to my attention that the Carlsbad Planning Commission Is
considerinq a zoning change to property located near CarfsDad Boulevard between Palomar Airport Road. and Psinsettia.
'I o f f ice '' to '4 tour i s n\ comer c i a 1 . 'I
I certainly would support this change,
touxists coming into the area from the Carlsbad Inn and other properties,
can say that tourism attracts a mast beneficia! type of business to our
community; relatively grosperous families corning to enjoy the climate and
activities. A good deal of our 6owntown merchants' trade comos from this
of visitor.
Additionally, the Carlsbad Inn has been a good neighbor and has rraintainec
quality property.
property with which they are associated.
Chafrperson
The change would Se from
Beinq personally aware of the man1
I am sue the same standards will prevail at any new
&JJ
Steve Link
Manager
Carisbad Convention & Visitors Bureau P.O. Box 1246 Carhbad, CA 92018-1248 - (619) 434-6093
Uivision of rlie Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce
Q
May 17, 1994
Ms. Pe,ggy Savary
Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
c/o Carlsbad Planning Department
1075 Las Palmas Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: General Plan Amendment for Scapointe Resort
* Dear Ms. Savary:
We are merchants in the City of Carlsbad, and we want to e,xpress OUT SUPPOJ
the applicant’s proposal to create more Travel Services Cunimercial space in the Ci
Crtrlsbad.
We are familiar with the applicant’s location overlooking the ocean bet\
Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and we believe it is a good site for commercial to
dcvelopmcnt. We feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the mail
cotnmercial growth in the City of Carlsbad.
We, the undersigned, are unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission me
bccause of a scheduling conflict With the Chamber of Commerce meeting, but we w;
to S]~OW our support for the proposed General Plan Amendment.
-a - - ./A’
fiA&%J A?
--*& .f, q, a- . ’ Busitless
n.h~lhY.CCP;Itl4~h\Ln
0 m
1 - I Si nature /?#;e Dm7
&ips (If++ 4?d
Printed Name
Busgess
- Printed Name0
Q,
Ru siiiess
LI &,
& .e
Signatu re
bLoL /qMJ -&t4-/L
Printed Name s Busi ss
U.MAY C,T:SK1.PLNhMD
a
Signature
/(PA AAxf
flu +--f /o BBR 1
)g&#$!&t / ’7’
Printed Name
Business
- ,
BAk2- F z
Printed Name
BusinessJ
/ Signature
% 6W7 %ST4 c Printed Name
*{BUG CPk P
Business
n’L4AY.C~h’IU,rLh’AMD
0 0
%
h
bltz 7p
Business
Sigfiature -
I e6 2dAr)cS BW/&<
&!if&,> &3md
Printed Name
Business
DmQ-, Signature
hie Dm
Printed Name *&-e SZ &+;aI/p
Business 1- L
R:~!A’~-CESKI.PL?UMJA~
0 W
1
II // 3; eAWmioq Business
fl .-
*/fl7&&?C) -
( Signature
&l/l BArnA7 .z,& 4
Printed Name
d, *2,’ PAi. Pkf/
Bu sines
bu!n n WbLI
Printed Name
CWTF,LG (\XmL€ pi-
Business
A:MAY~LXU’~J~D
0
L../ Signature f- L .-~,
- /'$flfiL A- LAf&-
Printed Name
Business
- r D,, I, -- / /' ,/7-i4LE. /g i% G-Rv
Sf nature (fA;]d- /k'M4
d%;/kJ ,/ //& //.>;&3,Q (
Printed Name
, /' I
Business
0 2- 3, C& i
Signature
Act-tnflb % C?-iLO.'l
C%+RLL&3 5 &L'Jk c:c+
Printed Name
Business
D k4A?'iCESU191--~D
0
.I
Pria ted Name
&/,H'& 14-
dusiness
:9AARF--&&y Signature 2
-/ .. r-f &- &3&-? 7 OA&
Printed Name c
/7
eAL a.
BusineU
B.HAY 0L'Kl"LYhMI)
m
I 2 atute
I\ 3- QRce Printed Name
LiMI/JWL ClP
Busin&
GWEP,NL E -7=z&A3 -7-~
fimd- L-do- K-3F;1L-S/
Printed Name
A
Business \
c'--
\A
\
Ah\? MAPIF t\A\l\ 7 ,T~Q -. Printed Name
\ G, *
I_ Business
A MAY OLYUIHMD
0 m
I
Si&ture
Printed Name
.cy w ART-\ dl
d.S.6 .1
Business
(&& ~ -/Lh*& -
Signature
w hL& / GNf -)(?IL'.w+
cH2-LdJ - JkwezR:
Printed Name
Business
Business t
B MAY'OI.NR1 f"A3fD
e m
r -
'1 -1 X&(, p IC/ 5L-L 6T-r ? Signature i
tTANIKA DESIGNS
~OWL FrnONM Printed Name 2969 state 3k C!d.ihad,CA 99008 (618) 729*1840
Business
<.----.e -* r. 13) --. . : +- --
rt;- CG,.l'r c- &?&-- jL*,fi,L /- ) - ._ - Sighatire' " '
Printed Ifhe
BUSiGcsS
f? ,A0 / & A. GiA[l, - $4
/*.
7 [7--, /.
' ?f Ld 2 ./' . fl G ',$ &?~2;crh--~7$//1 (,
('
{(---A* ,6-7..0,.
ignature JAd& bflb,'
dr,& @ Ici c/.;.. Printed Name
Business
8WAY GFNRIPINA\f 17
e Bb
Signature
Printed Name
Business
Signature
Printed Name
Business
* >-
--emgnature < y ;y
6,hk ;hmJnA-- rir
1.y /7/J Printed Name
I Business
O:MAr\CI,NICl PINAhW
C e a
, /d- $2-4
- G*/, 5. LaF/cfl-NO
1
Pr&ted Name
&mpf r N am/=^-
Busiaess
Signature
Printed Name
Business
Signature
Printed Ndme
Business
B.MAI'GIL\~~2~~A\L\ID
0 L-'Y't' * - 'l!.Ql!AJ!
March 238 1994
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
VIA: Community Development Director
PROPOSED DISPOSAL OF EXCESS CITY PROPERTY TO CONTINENTAL COMMERC
CORPORATION
The Continental Commercial Corporation has submitted for a General Plan Amendmc
Zone Change and Tentative Map to develop an 86 unit time share project immedia
west of Carlsbad Boulevard at the Anacapa Road overpass. During the review proce!
was determined that the City has title to approximately 2.5 acres of property which c(
be developed once the overpass is taken out of service and an alternate acces
provided to Carlsbad Boulevard. The developer was notified that the property is potenti
available for development and they have expressed an interest in acquiring the propc
for incorporation into their project.
The developer is preparing a preliminary concept plan to determine the developrr
potential for the excess land. In addition, the developer is having his engineei
Carlsbad Boulevard frontage improvements. When this work is complete, the develc
will submit a proposal on the purchase of the property.
Once the proposal has been submitted, it is our intention to meet with you,
Community Development Director, Planning Director and Financial Management Dire(
to review the proposal and to determine the appropriate process to finalize the !
assuming the basic terms are acceptable.
consultant prepare a cost estimate for removal of the bridge and construction of
City Engineer
c: Financial Management Director
Planning Director
-, .
0 0
v) 0 0 E
GQ ox a
-
-
-
cn
&"TAL COMMERCIAL cORF&XON
cxusm,cA 91008
.< 1 .A 4v1cBCQJi
4 c. crty,
SOMAy&NIDA~cp(~~~~
FAX (4l9) (619) 431.8500 43lm FOR THE INFORMAT - ?JfJ)$& 6 THE. CIM COUN'
A) f TO THE GI?'f wf~ Apd26, 1994
t
$,
,
r;? P: I$?! Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
city engineer
Cl"Y OF CARISBAD r ' ,-, 2075 Las patm Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009
Re: Seapinte Resort Project Excess Right-of-way
Dear Lloyd:
proposal concerning:
.* *, . %,':*?
The City Engineering and Planning Departments have requested that we prepare
. Installation o€ an at-grade Litersection at bescanso Road and carlsbad Bodwa
+
.
*
Closing of Anacapa Road north of Descanso Road;
Removal of the Ponto Bridge and the northbound on and off ramps;
Conveyance of the excess right-of-way to Conthental Commercial Cozlporat developer of the adjacent Seapinre Resort project, in exchange for CCC's provil
the above off-site improvements.
.w
BACKGROW
Continental Commercial Corporation ("CCC"), which is owned by Tim Stripe and Di
Brown, are the contract purchasers of a 9-acre parccl of property on which the Scapointe Re
timeShUc pmiect is pmpoW, A tentative map application, zone chsrige sppliation, gen plan amendment and other related permit applications have been filed fot the southerly 2.28 a1 of the parcel, for development of a 74-unit timeshare resort.
The Carlsbad Engineering and Planning Departments have requested that CCC prepare
proposd, under which CCC would install an at-grade intersection at z)escanso Road and Carla
Boulevard with full traffic Signals and pedestrian crosswalks, rc-grade north and/or southbo
Carlsbad Boulevard to accommodate the inter.wtion, remove the Ponto Xdge over
C:\wp\u\EIz1BBs .426
,
c 0 0
northbound lane of Carlsbad Boulevard, and remove the northbound 6fl and off WpS td Ponto Bridge. This new at-grade intwsection.would rcndet Adacapa Rad adjgcent t0 CCI
property, along with a narrow strip of Cityawned right-of-way between Carlfibad Boule~ard i Anacapa Road, as cxcws right-of-way property.
Staff has indicated that the City would consider selling the exes right-of-way to CCC 1 would be created by the completion of the improvements listed above. We have ban told 1
the cos& of these dgflicant off-.Site irnprnvments will be discounted agaiftst the vdue of excess right-of-way creatcd by the improvements.
CESS m&F-WAX
The exccss right-of-way created by vacating Anampa Rad, removing the Ponto BnIdge
removing the fiahbufid on md off ramps is shown an Exhibit "A," "IC CX~ right.Df.' is generally described as follows:
West boundary: Boulevard.
East boundary: The west property line of CCC's property.
, 10 feet from the existing pavement of northbound CarlS
.
n Southboundary: DescansoRoad,
. North boundary: Approximately the point where the Ponto Btidge now htm
Carlsbad Boulevtud,
The size of the excess right-of-way is 2.6 acm gross, or 2.3 acres net if a public cul
sac is required at the north termination of Anacapa Road.
OWNERSW
The City of Carhbad owns the excess right-of-way land area in fee simple pursuant Ormt Deed from Jessie Schuyler to the State of California recorded in 1933 in the San D County Public Records. Ownership WBS transfd to the City of Carlsbad via a &e blanket conveyances and resolutions which will be provided to the City.
OF PROPERTY
CCC plans to use the excess right-of-way property far construction of Phase II o
Seapohte Resort project. Phase IX would include approximately 36 timeshate units, undcrgn
C;\WPUWSS,426
c e a
parking and related mxeational amenities, The density of units in Phase II would approximately onehalf the density of Phase I. The land area of the entire Seap~inte Re
would double, from 2.28 to 4.88 acres, but the total number of units would increase by I
5095, from 74 units to 100 units.
The land we for the property wwld be the same as the adjacent SapCdnte Resort prOp therefore the proposed land we would be appropriate if the same land use is found fi apptopriate far the adjacent pard.
VAltltflE
timeshare units in this location is valued at up to $15,OOO,OO per unit, If36 timcshrue writ
built on the mccss right-of-way property, the value of the propew would be $480,OOO.00.
a point of reference, this amount per unit is approximately double the purchase price that is paying for the adjacent Sapdnte Resort property, which i5 baak.swncd folloWi foraclosure,)
The schedule attached sets forth the value of the excess right-of-way pmperty, the cc off-site improvements that will be built as part of the Seapainte Rcsart project, and $ubi mme savings to the Scapointe Rwrt prqjcct that will be gained by the closing of Amapa ’ (i&. curbs and gutters which would have been installed along Anscapa Road had it reml
The value of the exccss right-of-way is determined by tht usc of thc: prsperty, LW
OP).
Yours dncetely,
CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
David S. Brown CePresident
DSB: bj h
Attachment
r’
cer David Hauser Ken Quon Christer Westman
c:~~1ULwu889.426
c
* m
Schedule of Public ImprovcmenU
Carlsbad Boulevard Work Site preparation aad Gm&g 49,800
StQm DdgC 97,000 RoadwaylStreet ImprovmentS 228,800
co~encics . @ 15% 81.600
Utilities incrudiag Si@ m~a 156,306
Amenities aad Special Construction 12,400
Subtotal 625,900
30,000 Ponto Bridge Demolition & Removal
North and Smthbowd Ponto Bridge
On-ramp and Off-~p~ RmtMil 60.000 Total Improvements _%715.wa
0 0
PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County CteMs Filii
(201 5.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALiFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: D am over the age of eightgen years, and not a party ts or interested in the above-entitled
matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
Proof of Publication of
B lade-Cit ken
a newspap2r of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial circulation in Bonsail, Failbrook, Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, County
Of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged
a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (Set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said
Paste Clipping of Notice
SECURELY
In This Space.
in any supplement thereof on the GPA 934/LCPA 934
SEAPOINTE RE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Chy hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Drive,.Carlsbad, California, at 6.00 p m., on Tuesday, Au! consider a request for approval of a NegaQve Declaratror
amendment to the General Plan and Local Coastal PmgR to change the designatrons from Office to Travel Servlces approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to change from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a 2.35 acre portior parcel on property generally located east of Carlsbad BOL Road, and more particularly described as A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in Ractmnal Section 20, TON Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in County of San Diego, State of California, according to C
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please Ci
Westman in the Planning Department, at [619] 438-1 161, ext. 4448.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment,
Local Coastal Plan Amendment, and/or
Zone Change in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in wrtten correspondence delivered to the Chy of Carlsbad Chy Clerks Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPELLANT. Timothy Stipe BLADE-CITIZEN for Continental Commercial Coy Legal Advertising CARLSBAD CIN COUNCIL
r penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
-------o--
1722 South Hill Street Legal 40058 July 29, 1994 P.0. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054
(61 9) 433-7333
0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 0
GPA 93-4/LCPA 93-4/ZC 93-5
SEAPOINTE RESORT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hc a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dric Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m, on Tuesday, August 9, 1994, to consider request for: approval of a Negative Declaration; approval of an amendment to 1 General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use maps to change the designatic from Office to Travel Services Commercial; and approval of an amendment to 1 Zoning Map to change the designation from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a 2, acre portion of a 8.02 acre parcel on property generally located east of Carlst Boul evard at Anacapa Road, and more part i cul arly described as :
A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Christer Westman the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4448,
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General P1 an Amendment, Local Coast Plan Amendment, and/or Zone Change in court, you may be limited to raising or those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad Ci Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPELLANT: Timothy Stipe for Continental Commercial Corp. PUBLISH: July 29, 1994
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
4
city of ClrlLI
1 GPA 93-04/ZC 93-051 ILCPA 93-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hc
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsb;
California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, May 18, 1994, to consider a request for appro
of a Negative Declaration and an amendment to the General Plan and Local Coas
Program land use maps to change the designations from Office to Travel Servic
Commercial and the Zone Map from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a 2.35 acre porti
of an 8.02 acre parcel on property generally located east of Carlsbad Boulevard at Anaca
and more particularly described as:
A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 South,
Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad,
in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat
thereof.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the pub
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after May 12, 1994. If y
have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (619) 42
1161, ext. 4448.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and/
Local Coastal Program Amendment, in court, you may be limited to raising only tho
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearin
CASE FILE: GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04
CASE NAME: SWOINTE RESORT
PUBLISH: MAY 6,1994
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
CW:vd
0 al
(Form A)
-
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice -
GPA 93-04/ZC 93-05/LCPA 93-04 - Seapointe Resort
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of .
Thank you.
June 21, 1991 - Assistant City Man*- Date
-
4-* A+ &: F du-
& 7-r 3?3-4@4 ..-+!A B.J a
GPA
MAILING LIST
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST SAN DIEGUITO UNION H
801 PINE AVENUE 710 ENCINATAS BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANMARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS CA 92024
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
1290 W SAN MARCOS BLVD
ENCINITAS UNION LAFCO CMWD
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIST 1600 PACIFIC HW RM 452
101 SO RANCHO SANTE FE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92101
ENCINITAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA Cry WATER DIST VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT OLIVENHAIN MWD
1960 LA COSTA AV 788 SAN MARCOS BLVD 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 SANMARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS CA 92024
SANDAG SAN DIEGUITO WATER DIST PLANNING DIRECTOR
FIRST INTERSTATE PLAZA CITY OF SAN MARCOS
401 "B" ST #800 105 W RICHMAR AVE
SANMARCOS CA 92069 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
59 EAST D ST
ENCINITAS CA 92024
PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING DIRECTOR
CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
505 S VULCAN AV 320 N HOW ST
ENCINITAS CA 92024-3633 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92084
600 EUCALYPTUS AVENUE
PLANNING DIRECTOR CALIF COASTAL COh4MISSIi
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ATTN: RICHARDNITSOS ATTN: CHUCKDAMM
5201 RUFFIN RD 3111 CAM DEL RIO NORTH
SANDIEGO CA 92123 LONGBEACH CA 90862 SANDIEGO CA 92108-172
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
330 GOLDEN SHORE, S"J2 50
LEUCADIA SEWER DISTRICT VALLECITOS SEWER DISTRICT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
2695 MANCHESTER 788 SAN MARCOS BLVD 1400 l0TH ST RM 121
ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SACRAMENTO CA 9581
FINANCE PARKS & REC ARTS DEPARTMENT
4 COMMUNITY SERVICES
e 0
BARER FAMILY TRUST 07-0 KATHERINE F KIRSCH BERNICE E STEM
1314 MONTEREY ST 6500 EASY ST T) 6502 EASY ST T)
REDLANDS CA 92373 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
F E & THELMA MELLOTT ELIZABETH H LEWIS GERTRUDE L POL1
6504 EASY ST T) 6506 EASY ST TI 6507 EASY ST T)
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
SCIARRA FAMILY TRUST OF SHARON L BOKEMPER LEONA E PLEICK
2300 CHARNWOOD AVE 119 ARMSLEY SQ 6510 EASY ST T)
ALHAMBRA CA 91803 ONTARIO CA 91762 CARLSBAD CA
SORENSEN FAMILY TRUST 2 VIVIAN I WING WILLIAM J FOND
6508 FRIENDLY PL 6513 EASY ST T) 6515 EASY ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
MARION & ADELLE FAGAN VITO & DONNA NIGRO WATSON TRUST O!
1639 E PUENTE AVE 1112 IDLEWOOD RD 6702 DARYN DR
WEST COVINA CA 91791 GLENDALE CA 91202 WEST HILLS CA
HAROLD R EVANS JOHN D GLUCS JOAN M LOOS
6519 EASY ST T) 6520 EASY ST T) 6521 EASY ST T
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
DANIEL J CHALICH MICHAEL F KENNY WILLIAM A MAZZi
30821 ALTA MIRA DR 6523 EASY ST T) 6524 EASY ST
REDLANDS CA 92373 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
ROBERT & ELAINE BARRETT RAYMOND SCHWEIGHART FRANK & THERES,
6525 EASY ST T) 6526 EASY ST T) 6527 EASY ST T
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
JAMES F & MERLE BEEBY DONALD E HAUSEN NATHAN CASCARA 195 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 6533 EASY ST T 6529 EASY ST T)
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
KELLY FAMILY TRUST 06-2 IVAN T GREEN FRED & SWAN
1034 RIDGE HEIGHTS DR 6535 EASY ST T) 6536 EASY ST T
FALLBROOK CA 92028 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
@ a
G c WOODWARD HOMER M ANDERSEN SIMMONS JAMES R
6537 EASY ST T) 6538 EASY ST T) 6602 EASY ST T)
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
GENE F & JANE GAUTHIER MARY L TURNER ALCIA M EATON
1181 N CRESCENT RIDGE R 6606 EASY ST T) 6607 EASY ST T) FALLBROOK CA 92028 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
RICHARD D MANNING PHILIP E FULLERTON DOROTHY C MENG 6608 EASY ST T) 6609 EASY ST T) 6610 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
JACOB J WIESINGER JENNIE E WARNER BRUCE H RATCLIE
825 BONITA AVE 6612 EASY ST T) 6613 EASY ST T)
SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
DOMENICA R DITURI JAMES T ANDERSON LOUIS H GARRET?
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 195 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 6616 EASY ST T) 6618 EASY ST T)
TOMMY B WHITE EDWIN M MONTGOMERY ROBERT H BARELP
6910 SANDCASTLE DR 476 DELAGE CT 1967 N HWY 101
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA
JEFFREY S MCCABE THOMAS J & MARY CANNON BETTY MOEHNKE
267 LA VETA AVE 3937 GAFFNEY CT 6490 FRIENDLY E ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGO CA 92130 CARLSBAD CA
LEITCH DANIEL&CHRISTINA JOHN & STASE LUCARELLI MCNEE REVOCABLE
6491 FRIENDLY PL T) 3830 E CALIFORNIA BLVD 6493 FRIENDLY E
CARLSBAD CA 92009 PASADENA CA 91107 CARLSBAD CA
FRANK J & ROSE CIRILLO RICHARD I JONES BERG ROBERT&JEP 6494 FRIENDLY PL 6496 FRIENDLY PL T) 6498 FRIENDLY E CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
JOSEPH J THOMPSON HARVEY E HASTRUP CHIECHI UMBERTC
6501 FRIENDLY PL 6502 FRIENDLY PL T) 3268 VALEWOOD C
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOUSAND OAKS C
v a
CAL-VIN L SHOEMAKER HOWARD J KUNEMAN BERNICE MAESTAS
6504 FRIENDLY PL T) 6505 FRIElNDLY PL T) 6506 FRIENDLY P
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
LESTER & BETHENE VELMAN SORENSEN FAMILY TRUST 0 ROBERT V & BETH
6507 FRIENDLY PL T) 6508 FRIENDLY PL 12 6509 FRIENDLY P
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
HENRY & MARY AMEEN FRANK & SALLY CLARKE MCGINITY DOROTH
12811 CHAPARRAL DR 201 EASY PL 6518 FRIENDLY F
GARDEN GROVE CA 92640 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
SALLY S CELORIE JOHN W MCCONNEL GERTRAUD POWERS
PO BOX 2748 246 E EDGEHILL 6520 FRIENDLY PL T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 RANCHO SANTA FE C 92067 SAN BERNARDINO
BENJAMIN & MARY HOLGUIN DAVID K STOCKTON VITO & GIOVANN?
195 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 32373 TRES LAGOS ST 1951 W MOUNTAID
CARLSBAD CA 92009 MENTONE CA 92359 GLENDALE CA
FLORA P MILLER THEUS L DOOLIT'I
6498 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6514 NE 171ST I CARLSBAD CA 92009 BOTHELL WA
ALL-COAST ENTERPRISES I
15 CARDIFF
LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677
0 L & E STANLEY GERALD A GIEBINK HOSTERMAN FAMII
9315 LA REINA AVE 6506 OCEANVIEW DR T) 3119 MESALOA Ll
DOWNEY CA 90240 CARLSBAD CA 92009 PASADENA CA
ADRIAN E STECKLING JEAN A CRAIG
6512 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6514 OCEANVIEW
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
WILLIAM KNECHT
6510 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD 0 GOODWIN BUEL FAMILY TRUST 05-22 LLOYD M & DONNi
6518 OCEANVIEW DR 6520 OCEANVIEW 15238 FRIENDS ST PACIFIC PALISADES 90272 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
DEDERICK FAMILY TRUST 0 ANTHONY & GILD, KENNETH J CLAYPOOL
6522 OCEANVIEW DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6524 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6526 OCEANVIEW
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
-. @ a
MA~INE L HOUSE AUDREY J STRADLEY FRENCH FAMILY 7
6528 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6530 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6532 OCEANVIEW
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
YAMAMOTO FAMILY TRUST 1 DOROTHY S GRAVES ADAMS FRANK J&L
1201 VIA LA JOLLA 6538 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6602 OCEANVIEW
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
STEPP-CULP TRUST 02-02- JOHN & HELEN BRAJKOVICH FRANCIS A LANTi
6614 OCEANVIEW DR 6608 OCEANVIEW DR T) 2844 WILSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
JACK & NANCY CULP WRIGHT FAMILY TRUST 11- RONALD H CHAPMI
6614 OCEANVIEW DR 6616 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6618 OCEANVIEW
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
B A PROPERTIES INC ROBERT H BARELMANN MARTELL B MONTC
DEPT 4242 1967 N HWY 101 1855 LOTUS CT
333 S HOPE ST*LOS 90071 ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA
JEANNETTE R SCOLLARD EDWIN M MONTGOMERY TIMOTHY C & V C
2070 CALETA CT 476 DELAGE CT 476 DELAGE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA
DONALD T TESITOR THOMAS P & ANITA MEANEY DOUGLAS G MCCLU
201 SEA BREEZE DR T) 195 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 203 SEA BREEZE
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
DONALD J WILLIAMS SAMMIS CARLSBAD JOHN G & ALICE
204 SEA BREEZE DR T) 1545 WILSHIRE E!
CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOS ANGELES CA
CHARLES S DICKIE RICHARD T DONAH
5350 E BROADWAY 4964 DAVID WAY
LONG BEACH CA 90803 SAN BERNARDINO
RICHARD T DONAHUE JEFFREY S MCCAB
4964 DAVID W 267 LA VETA AVE
REDLANDS CA 92373 c DIN0 CA 92404 ENCINITAS CA
MARIE L STANTON
1438 PACIFIC ST
e a .
LESLIE L DEVLIN SAMMIS CARLSBI
17922 FI
IR K MARJORIE R EDWARDS Po BOX 1905 1131 AMETHYST AVE RANCHO SMTA FE c 92067 MENTONE CA 92359
*** 135 Printed ***
Prepared for: GEORGE ORDAY Attention: ORDAY CONSULTANTS
CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL CORP MIKE HOWES
5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS STE 200 HOW PL"JNING ASSOC CARLSBAD CA 92008 2386 FARADAY AVE STE 120
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCWIN CORP 6102 AVENIDA E
CARLSBAD CA
SMIS CARLSBAD ASSOCIA
17922 FITCH IRVINE CA 92714 Sm BEmARDINO CA 92404
RICHARD T DONAHUE 4964 DAVID WAY
MADELYN SHANLEY FRANK & SALLY
6498 EAST ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 201 EASY PL T) WILLIAM E HEAD PO BOX 207 OCEANSIDE CA 92049
EAMES FAMILY TRUST 11-0 RICHARD T 'Im
204 EASY PL T BAUER FAMILY TRUST 10-1 203 EASY PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 521 w KNEPP AVE FULLERTON CA 92632
MARILYN E JOHNSON JACK J CuLp 6614 OCEANVIE 6492 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA
EDWIN A JANKOWSKY
6490 EASY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
4.
b- Q
0 D, 2.E
0,
“Q c
02
$g
;E
D,
Do,
2. < DZ %!
ncnnrnu w ow e I3 1 PHV* P PO m wm10 bPbP(0 w3w30 am art1
04 3 a *m P-m d . m3. P* rt wmz
om3 cn ow0
- *e$%
0 lo aow mg
gg?
00 PO P UVI P m rt
-.--. - .. ~ --II
!
00 ?! G; co (D
ocno n 0 o\o fl uo g PO rt F
w d P-m am EI 3 - Ffort P- rt p, oa2s‘l-L
n *ww
3*HS
u3q loo tJ. OP-v m
VI D, C-l. - FlPl ar v, e uo P. Pl 0 mer( m P.W
N om OH
sm;I
a*
3
-c--_I__x . .