Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-10-11; City Council; 12904; Seapointe ResortpTY OF CARLSBAD - AG-IDA BILL AB # Id; 9c3 Y TITLE: MTG. 10/W% SEAPOINTE RESORT - CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/HDP 93-lo/ DEPT. PLN # CUP 9344/SDP 94-04 RECOMMENDED ACTION: DEPYHD: a CITY ATTY CITY MGR. - Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Negative Declaration, CT 93-10, CP 93-07, HDP 93-10, CUP 93-04 and SDP 94-04. ITEM EXPLANATION On August 17, 1994, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval (6-O) of the Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Hillside Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Plan. The project is a 78 unit timeshare resort within five buildings, an underground parking lot for 99 cars, adult and children’s pools, club house and gym, passive open space courtyards and active play sand area. The buildings have habitable space up to 45 feet which must specifically be approved by the City Council through a Site Development Plan (SDP). The four findings required to approve the SDP can be made and are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3694. Access to the site will be provided via a new signalized intersection at Carlsbad Boulevard and Descanso Boulevard. This same intersection will provide improved pedestrian access from properties east of Carlsbad Boulevard to the Carlsbad State Beach. The project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and implements the policies of the General Plan and the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program. Please see the attached staff report to the Planning Commission for additional details regarding the proposed development. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Assessment of the site indicates that there will not be any adverse impacts associated with the development of the site. Therefore, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on March 22, 1994, which was amended twice and reissued in its final form August 10, 1994 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed timeshare resort is anticipated to generate property tax from higher property tialues, sales tax from increased tourism, business license tax, and a small amount of transit Dccupancy tax. The cost of services is anticipated to be less than the total revenue generated my the use, this resulting in a net tax dollar gain for the City. GROW-I-H MANAGEMENT STATUS The project includes commercial units and will therefore not have impacts related to residential densities. All public facilities associated with the proposal will be provided concurrent with jevelopment. . ,’ ’ e PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 16-t; 9 0 ‘/ I h EXHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 3690, 3691, 3701, 3692, 3693, and 3694 3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 17, 1994 4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 17, 1994. - EXHIBIT 1 SEAPOINTE RESORT City of CarMad 1 CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/ CUP 93004/HDP 93-10, SDP 94-04 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P T EXHBIT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3690 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A TENTATIVE MAP, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEVELOP A 78 UNIT TIMESHARE HOTEL ON A 2.35 ACRE PORTION OF AN 8.02 ACRE SITE EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93W/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of August, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the second amended Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the second amended Negative Declaration according to Exhibit “ND”, amended August 10, 1994, and “PII”, amended August 8, 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: Findinns: 1. That the second amended Negative Declaration was proposed consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant impact on the environment. 3. + The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis. . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2c 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. 5. The streets are adequate in size to handle trafYic generated by the proposed project. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly impacted by this project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pknning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin. ABSTAIN: None. CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. I$!LZMIidER PLANNING DIRECTOR 4 PC RESO NO. 3690 -2- SECOND AMENDED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: East of the intersection of Anacapa Road and Carlsbad Boulevard. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 78 unit, three story timeshare resort with underground parking located on 8.02 acres of land. Associated with the application is a two lot tract map for condominium purposes, a condominium permit, a conditional use permit, a hillside development permit, a request for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use of a 2.35 acre portion of the site from office to Travel Services Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and Local Coastal Program Land Use Map and from Office to Commercial-Tourist on the Zoning Map. No impacts have been identified and no mitigation will be required. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, an Amended Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. The Negative Declaration was first amended on March 22, 1994, to correct a typographical error within one of the case file numbers. The correction had no effect on the project, did not create new impacts or require mitigation. The second amendment to the Negative Declaration includes the disclosure that the project includes a Site Development Plan; that there is additional discussion of the project within the Part II; that the inclusion of the Site Development Plan does not create changes to the project; that there are no new impacts; and that there are no required mitigation measures. A copy of the Second Amended Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (619) 438-l 161, extension 4448. DATED: MARCH 18,1994 FIRST AMENDED: MARCH 22,1994 SECOND AMENDED: AUGUST 10, 1994 fi CASE NO: GPA 93-04/ZC 93-O!YLCPA 93-04 CT 93-lO/CP 93-07KUP 93-04/SDP 94-04/HDP 93-10 CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CW:vd 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-l 576 - (619) 436-l 161 @ . IL- - J3WIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. GPA 93-04/ZC 93-OS/LCPA 93-04/CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/SDP 94-04/HDP 93-10 DATE: March 10. 1994/Amended Awust 8. 1994 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Seanointe Resort 2. APPLICANT: Continental Commercial Corooration c/o Timothy Stripe and David Brown 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5050 Avenida Encinas. Suite 200 Carlsbad. CA 92008 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Aunust 20. 1993 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 78 unit, three story timeshare resort with underground Parking located on 8.02 acres of land. Associated with the apulication is a two lot tract map for condominium purposes, a condominium permit. a conditional use oermit, a hillside development Permit. a request for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change. and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use of a 2.35 acre portion of the site from office to Travel Services Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and Local Coastal Program Land Use Map and from Office to Commercial-Tourist on the Zoning Map. No impacts have been identified and no mitigation ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-sig” and “YES-insig” respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. big) Result in unstable e&h conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any ‘bay, inlet or lake? Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? YES (insig) NO x x x x x x x x x x x -2- . . - BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. big> (insig) Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plzkrts)? Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HUMANENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES big) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? x 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? NO x x x x x NO x -3- . HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. YES (insig) x NO <Sk> Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? Increase existing noise levels? Produce new light or glare? Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Generate substantial additional traffic? Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x x x x x x x x x x - x -4- - MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES big) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively con- siderable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? NO x x x x -5- \’ - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Phvsical Environment There are no known conditions on the site that would expose the project to geologic hazards of any sort. Grading proposed for the project is subject to the Hillside Development Ordinance and will be in accordance with standard grading principals and practice which include erosion control and compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards. There is no development proposed within slopes greater than 40% or within slopes greater than 25% which also have sensitive resources.. The site will be developed primarily through export of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of earth. Although the site is near the Pacific Ocean, it is not contiguous and development of the property will not directly effect beach sand or modify a channel of free flowing waters. The project is a commercial residential timeshare and the typical operation of such uses does not create a change to air flow, movement, or temperature and does not consume great quantities of natural resources, fuel or energy. The project will be required to obtain gas and/or electric service from San Diego Gas and Electric. and will be charged the appropriate service fees. Biological Environment The site is currently in a disturbed state as a result of previous grading and agriculture. There are no’known sensitive species of plants or animals within the area of development on the site. There is also no evidence that there will be adverse impacts to the biological environment offsite as a result of this development. Human Environment The ‘project proposal to develop a timeshare includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment. The requested change is from Office (0) to Travel Services Commercial (TS). The change will have some effect on the distribution of traffic and the hours of activity on the site. With the change it is anticipated that activity on the site will change from daytime, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to 24 hours. Future traffic patterns may change from heavy peaks in the morning and evening hours for an office use to a more even flow throughout the day and mid-day on Saturdays when guests are checking in and out for a timeshare. Adequate parking for the proposed use will be provided in an onsite underground garage at a ratio greater than that required by the Zone Code (Title 21). 94 parking spaces are required and 99 are provided. Other timeshare developments have been approved with the same parking standard and operate successfully within the city. The combination of existing and future street improvements will adequately serve circulation needs. Anacapa Road from the project entrance to Descanso Boulevard and Descanso Boulevard between Anacapa Road and Carlsbad Boulevard.will have the design capability of accommodating 10,000 ADT. The project is not anticipated to generate more than approximately 624 ADT. The unsignalized intersection of Anacapa Road and Descanso Boulevard will not have enough traffic to assess a Level of Service (LOS) and the signalized intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Descanso Boulevard will operate at a LOS of “A”. All of the utility services required by this development will be provided by standard methods. The development will introduce insignificant levels of noise and light into the area. In addition, the project will -6- P- have a standard condition to design exterior lighting to be shielded so as not to encroach onto adjoining properties. Therefore, the California State campground located across the street will not be impacted during the evening hours by ambient light. Noise generated by occupants of the project will be no different than the noise that can be generated by occupants of the adjacent uses. For this reason, noise is not considered a impact. No special “use” conditions need be applied to the project to ensure compatibility. The sight is visually prominent from Carlsbad Boulevard. Through a Site Development Plan the height of the project may reach an overall height.of 55 feet. As proposed the building does not exceed 45 feet at the highest point. Construction of a building within the height limits at this location will not be an adverse visual impact because views of the site are from a distance to the east and predominantly from a higher elevation. The combination of height and distance allow the residents to the east of Interstate 5 horizon views of the Pacific Ocean. Those properties adjacent to the south and the north will not have views of the ocean to the west impaired by the project. The project is also located a sufficient distance to the east of Carlsbad Boulevard that it will not dominate the vistas from the corridor. The subdivision of the property through the Tentative Map and the Condominium Permit will have no physical effect on the property. An analysis of alternatives to the proposed project is not required for this Negative Declaration because no impacts have been identified. -7- - DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) x On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Ap 8; /e?% Date LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -8- - &‘ERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) - On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effecr on the environment, and a NEGATWE DECLARATION will be prepared. - I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared. - [ find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declararion will be proposed. - t find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REFORT is required. (k\iti& \)4J&wn Signature LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE1 A-ITACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLEl -8- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature CW:vd -9- . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 PLANNING COMMISSION RJZSOLUTION NO. 3691 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TWO LOT TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: CT 93-10 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof; has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a two lot tract map for condominium purposes as provided by Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of August, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all i I I factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) B) That the above recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of the two lot Tract Map for condominium purposes, CT 93-10, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Findinm 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The two lot tract map for condominium purposes is consistent with the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Title 21 and that all approvals and permits required by Title 21 shall be granted concurrently with subdivision approval. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad School District. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. As designed, the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a second amended Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August lo,1994 and is recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on August 17, 1994. In recommending approval of this second amended Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment and determined that the second amended Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Title 19, Environmental Protection Procedures of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22. \a PC RESO NO. 3691 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 '1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 C 10. The subdivision has been designed to take advantage of prevailing onshore winds throughout westerly orientation which in turn provides for natural cooling opportunities. 11. ‘Ihe approval of the subdivision will not effect the housing needs of the community because it is for commercial purposes and will therefore not detract from the availability of public services or available fiscal or environmental resources. Conditions: PbIlillgZ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Approval is granted for a two lot tract map for condo purposes, CT 93-10, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “E”, dated August 17,1994, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the map as approved by the City Council. The map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. This project is also approved. under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated August 12, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may be required as part of the Zone 22 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. . \4 PC RESO NO. 3691 -3- . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 . 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. C - If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading or building plans, whichever occurs first. The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy of any building. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. The project shall provide onsite bus stop facilities as necessary at a location subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District. Said facility shall at a minimum include a shelter, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The shelter and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the PC RESO NO. 3691 -4- . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18. A Coastal Development Permit is required and shall be granted for the project prior tathe issuance of grading permits. 19. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include a reduced version of the approving resolutions on a 24” x 36” blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. tf the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department. 21. . . Chamlmk fencing or another barrier acceptable to the Planning Director shall be provided along the eastern property frontage. 22. Disclosure of the Encha Wastewater Treatment Facility and the four month maximum continuous occupancy of any unit by the same person(s) shall be provided to all potential purchasers of timeshare units. 23. The street adjacent to the project shall be named Anacapa Street. 24. A baker designed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director which will prevent pedestrians from accessing the bridge over Carlsbad Boulevard shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to building occupancy. - basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District. 25. Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map. 26. The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies.regarding services to the project. 27. The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell Telephone, and Cable TV authorities. 28. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)92) Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3’ tic RESO NO. 3691 -5- . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 91-39. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall pay the current local drainage area fee or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with Master Drainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineer. Prior to final map approval the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits required. Prior to final map approval, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the Master Drainage Plan Update. Prior to final map approval, the owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, the developer shall submit proof that a Notice of Intention has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City Codes and standards. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. PC RESO NO. 3691 -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 39. The developer shall exercise spetial care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chapter 11 .O6. 40. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 41. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall underground all existing overhead utilities within the subdivision boundary. 42. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Carl&ad Boulevard shall be waived on the final map. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Documents and plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the fmal map, issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. These documents shall incorporate the following: An ongoing program shall be established to remove dirt, litter, and other debris from the surface of private streets and recreational areas by street sweeping or other means. 43. i. ii. . . . lll. 44. a. PC RESO NO. 3691 Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives and other fluids shall not be discharged into any public or private street, or into any storm drain or stormwater conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. Best management practices shall be utilized to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants while maintaining or repairing landscaping and surface improvements. Plans,.specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall instaJ1, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements: Full width street improvements to Anacapa Road (Ponto Drive) along the project frontage. Improvements shall include curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt 3-5 -7- . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 45. - , paving, street lights, and installation of a cul-de-sac bulb at the northern end 1 of An&pa R&d. b. Storm drain, sewer, and water lines, as shown on the tentative map. C. An at-grade signalized intersection with Carl&ad Boulevard at the southern boundary of the project as shown on the tentative map and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These improvements shall include the following: . The road connecting Anacapa Road with Carlsbad Boulevard shall have a 60’ right-of-way width and a 40’ paved width. Sidewalk shall be provided on the north side. . The ramps on the south and west sides of the bridge shall be barricaded to traffic. The northbound entrance ramp may remain open to traffic. . The vertical alignment on Carl&ad Boulevard shall be adjusted by grading, repaving, and associated road improvements to match the new intersection and in accordance with City standards. A list of the above improvements shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. These improvements shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. Carlsbad Municiti Water District: 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. The entire potable and non-potable water system for subject project shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic, landscaping and fire flow demands are met. The developer% engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to preparation of the water system improvement plans. The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The developer shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of application for water service and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. a. Concurrent with development, the developer shall install a portion of the public sewer system per City and District approved improvement plans TA+ PC RESO NO. 3691 -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 51. b. a. b. C. entitled “La Costa Downs, SP-201, P.D. 414, City Dwg. No. 331-8, CMWD 89-C.294.” A private pump system shall be provided to meet the demand flows of the new structure as determined by the District. Concurrent with development, the developer shall install a portion of the public water system as per City and District approved improvement plans of la Costa Downs as described in Condition 47a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer must meet all of the requirements as set forth by the Fire Marshal. Concurrent with development, the developer shall install a 10” water line and pressure regulating station ‘loop” system from Solamar Estates southerly to the La Costa Downs System. The 10” loop system is per the District’s approved Water Master Plan. Therefore, the District will enter into an reimbursement agreement with the developer and will payback the developer the District’s fair share of construction costs. Police Demrtment: 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. Aisle, passageways, and recesses related to and within the complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least twenty-five one hundredths (.25) footcandles at the ground level during the hours of darkness. ParkingareasshaUeillumilla ted with an intensity of at least one (1) footcandle at the ground level during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant covers. The exterior landscaping should be kept at a minimal height and fUll.ness giving police, security services and the gtineral public surveillance capabilities of the area. Shrubs shall be low profile. Trees shall not be planted where as to provide access to the roof and balconies. Trees and shrubs shall be pruned away from lighting. Fences shall be of the see-through variety for the purpose of surveillance. Trees should be pruned away from fences so as to not provide access over the fence. Thick foliage at the fence line impairs yard visibility and conceals a breach in the fence. Security plants can be used to deter access into areas. All wooden doors in the complex shall be of solid core coilstruction with a minimum thickness of one and three fourths (13/4) inches. AU doors shall be equipped with a single cylinder deadbolt lock, PC RESO NO. 3691 -9- c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. . . . . . . . . - All entry and exit doors shall be arranged so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except for doors requiring a fire protection rating which prohibits them, such view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees. Mounting height shall not exceed fifty-four inches from the floor. It is m recommended to place glass panels within forty inches of a locking device. Sliding Doors - Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top and bottom. The bottom track shall be so designed that the door cannot be lifted from the track when the door is in the locked position. The door shall also be equipped with security hardware such as a pin. French doors shall be equipped with a single cylinder deadbolt lock. Double Doors - The inactive leaf of a double door shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of fiveeights (S/8) inch into the head and threshold of the door fkame. Single Cylinder Deadbolt - Deadbolt locks shall be installed on all access doors. The cylinder shall have a five pin tumbler, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws. Deadbolt shall have a minimum protection of one-inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attacks. The dead-bolt shall have an embedment of at least three- fourths inch into the strike plate area. Strike Plate and dead-bolt are to be installed with wood screws that are three inches in length. Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with nonremovable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Aluminum sliding windows shall be equipped with security hardware that prevents the window from being lifted out when the window is in the locked position. Double Hung and Crank windows shall be equipped with security hardware. Louvered windows are not recommended. Key access shall be required to all amenities. There shall be no common attic/crawl space between units. PC RESO NO.3691 -lO- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - communitv services: 73. Channel maintenance for the Encina Creek intended path shall be required to adequately assure positive drainage and alleviate backwater problem at Encinas Treatment Plant. Maintenance shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. 74. The storm drain system at the northerly side of Anacapa Road shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Bllildin~ 75. 76. &: 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. The project shall comply with the latest disabled access building regulations in effect at the time of building permit application. The project shall comply with the current codes and ordinances of the City in effect at the time of building permit application. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shah submit complete building plans which shah be approved at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. The applicant shall install additional onsite public water mains and fire hydrants to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. The applicant shah submit a site plan to the Fire Department, which depicts location of required, proposed and existing public water mains and C-e hydrants. The plan shall include offsite fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project and shah be reviewed and approved at the discretion of the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to building permit issuance, a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal. An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shah be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease until the condition is corrected. All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational before combustible building materials are located on the construction site. All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shah be equipped with a “Knox”, key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation. c2 PC RESO NO.3691 -11- , . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. - Private roads and driveways which serve as required access for emergency service ; vehicles shall be posted as-&e lanes in accordaGe with the requireme& df section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Plans and/or -cations for fire akum systems, fire hydrants, automatic fire sprinkler systems and other fire protection systems shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in buildings having an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet. The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements and at least two &sting intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names. A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street indicating the addresses of the buildings onsite. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin. ABSTAIN: None. CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: h4IcI-m~ J. IWLZMI~LER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3691 -12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 78 UNIT CONDOMINIUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: CP 93-07 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof; has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Condominium Permit as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of August, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Condominium Permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. Bl That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of the Condominium Permit, CP 93-07, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findims: The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the code, the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies; ,4 2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community; 3. Sgch use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity; 4. The proposed condominium meets all of the minimum development standards of the underlying zone. Conditions: 1. This recommendation for approval is subject to the approval of CT 93-10 and all of the conditions found in Planning Commission Resolution Number 3691. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. NOES: None. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Erwin. None. ,~ CARLSBAD PLkNING COMMISSION ATTEST: I PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3701 -2- 1 2 2 4 fi Y 6 7 E 9 IC 11 12 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNMGCOMMISSIONRJ5OLUTIONNO.3692 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A 78 UNIT TIMESHARE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: CUP 93-04 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use Permit as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of August, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 93-04. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Conditional Use permit, CUP 93-04, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: . . . . 3’ . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Findings: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. That the requested use is desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. The project has been designed to accommodate conversion to a standard hotel if such action is necessary; A management and maintenance plan on file with the Planning Department has been prepared and is part of the Conditional Use Permit; The project site is located in reasonable proximity to the Carlsbad State Beach and therefore can financially and geographically function as a successful timeshare project and; The proposal will not be disruptive to existing or future uses in the surrounding neighborhood. Exclusive use of occupancy of any timeshare unit is limited to four months. The proposal does not include the use of reduced standards. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for CUP 93-04, as shown on Exhibit(s) “.I” - “T”, dated August 17, 1994, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.. 2. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of 10 years. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, 3> PC PESO NO. 3692 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 4. 5. 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 10 years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the .expiration date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. If the property owner/owners’ address changes from that which is shown on the conditional use permit application, a notice of a change of address shall be reported, in writing, to the Planning Department within 30 days. Prior to the issuance of CUP 93-04 there shall be a Notice of Restriction placed on the Deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Conditional Use Permit by Resolution No. 3692 on the real property owned by the declarant. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The restrictions referred to in said notice may be modified or terminated only with the approval of the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Carlsbad whichever has final decision authority for this project. The maximum lime increment for rearrent exclusive use of occupancy of any timeshare unit shall be four months. A note indicating this requirement shall be placed on the hal map. This approval is granted only in association with the development of the timeshare resort as approved under CT 93-10. PC RESO NO. 3692 -3- 1 . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 A PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. None. Commissioner Erwin. None. PEGGY&&.&Y, Chairperson/ CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3692 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3693 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: HDP 93-10 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof, has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Hillside Development Permit as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of August, 1994, consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Hillside Development Permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Hillside Development Permit, HDP 93-10, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. Hillside Conditions have been properly identified and are located at the northerly edge of the project development area; 3”; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 13 .14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Undevelopable areas have been identified as the open space designated lands north of the development area with slopes greater than 40%; The development proposal and all applicable development approvals and permits are consistent with the intent, purpose and requirements of the Hillside Ordinance; No development will occur in the Open Space designated lands north of the development area, slopes which are greater than 40%; or other land which is undevelopable as defined in section 21.53.230; Project design, including the use of retaining walls minim&s the disturbance of hillside lands; The project substantia.l.ly conforms to the intent and concepts of the hillside development guidelines manual. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for HDP 93-10, as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “I”, dated August 17, 1994, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. This approval is granted only in association with the development of the timeshare resort as approved under CT’ 93-10 and CUP 93-04. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3693 3L -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3694 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 94-04 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR A TIMESHARE RESORT UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 45 FEET INCLUDING ARCHITECTURE PROJECTIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND PONTO (ANACAPA) ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22. CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT CASE NO: SDP 94-04 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development Plan as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of August, 1994, consider said request on property described as: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. 19 I WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to SDP 94-04. 20 21 22 23 24 of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 25 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 26 27 B> That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Site Development Plan, SDP 94-04, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 1. That the building does not contain more than three levels; 2. Setbacks have been provided beyond the minimum ratio of one foot per every one horizontal f-t of vertical construction beyond 35 feet; 3. The building has been conditioned to conform with the requirements of Section 18.04.170 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; 4. No part of the building exceeds 45 feet in height, including architectural projections. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for SDP 94-04, as shown on Exhibit(s) “S’ - “T”, dated August 17, 1994, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. This approval is granted only in association with the development of the timeshare resort as approved under CI’ 93-10 and CUP 93-04. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin. ABSTAIN: None. CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOkkMILI%R PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3694 -2- . A APPLICATIuN COMPLETE DATE: EXHIBIT 3 JULY 29, 1994 STAFF REPORT 0 3 DATE: AUGUST 17, 1994 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CI’ 93-10 / CP 93-07 / CUP 93-04 / HDP 93-10 / SDP 94-04 - SJ2APOINTE RESORT - Recommending approval of the second amended Negative Declaration and a two lot tract map for condominium purposes, a condominium permit, a conditional use permit, hillside development permit and a site development plan for a 45 foot high, 78 unit timeshare resort on 2.35 acres of an 8.02 acre site, in the commercial-tourist zone generally located east of the intersection of Ponto (Anacapa) Road and Carlsbad Boulevard and within Local Facilities Management Zone 22. I. REXOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 3690, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the second amended Negative Declaration and ADOPT Resolution Nos. 3691, 3701, 3692, 3693 and 3694, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 93-10, CP 93-07, CUP 93-04, HDP 93-10, and SDP 94-04. II. PROJECI- DEXRIPTI ON AND BACKGROUND The site is located east of Carlsbad Boulevard at the intersection of Ponto (Anacapa) Road. Total lot area is 8.02 acres, however, only a 2.35 acre portion will be used for development. The project is a three story timeshare resort with 78 units, a level of underground parking for 99 cars, club house, children’s pool and adult swimming pool and whirlpool. Access to the project from Carlsbad Boulevard is via a signalized intersection at Descanso which will be constructed as a condition of approval. No retail or restaurant use is associated with the timeshare ,resort. A Zone Code Amendment (ZCA 93-07) was approved by the City Council in June of 1994 which included timeshare hotels as a conditionally permitted use within the Commercial- Tourist Zone. Subsequently, a General Plan Amendment (GPA 93-04), Zone Change (ZC 93-05) and Local Coastal Program Amendment (93-06) was approved by the City Council changing the 2.35 acre Office portion of the project area to Travel Services Commercial and C . CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 2 . Commercial-Tourist (C-T). With these amendments, a timeshare resort is permitted within the C-T Zone by Conditional Use Permit. The property is vacant, has been used in the past for agricultural production, but currently accommodates no activity. The developable portion of the property slopes downward in a north and northeasterly direction and varies from approximately 66 to 52 feet above sea level. Existing access is via on and off ramps from Carlsbad Boulevard at Ponto (Anacapa) Road and a bridge over the northbound lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard. The bridge and ramps will be removed from service with implementation of the project. The property immediately south is approximately ‘/2 acre, vacant and zoned Office. South of that parcel is a vacant unimproved subdivision of approximately twenty-nine 4,500 square foot residential lots. An additional 11 lots are owned by the North San Diego County Transit Development Board. Lanikai Lane Mobile Home Park is further south and Solamar Mobile Home Park is about 1,000 feet north of the project construction area. East of the project site is the North County Transit District railroad right-of-way and further east is vacant industrial and office property. Carlsbad Boulevard is to the west as is the northern end of the Carlsbad State Beach campground. III. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ANALYSIS Is the proposed use consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? Does the project conform to the development standards of the Commercial-Tourist Zone? Can the findings be made for a Site Development Plan allowing the structure to have a height of 45 feet? Can the proposed use be conditioned to ensure compatibility with adjacent and surrounding land uses? Does the proposed grading conform to the standards of the hillside ordinance? Is the Tentative Map in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance? General Plan and Zoning General Plan Travel Service (TS) uses are those considered to serve business and industrial areas as well as the travelling public. The uses should be accessible to inter-regional traffic but need not have direct roadway access if they can be easily identified. Two important 8 - - CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-10/%X 94-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 3 factors to consider are maintaining a functional street system through access control and preventing detrimental effects on or by adjacent land uses. Access to the site will be via a signalized intersection at Descanso and Carlsbad Boulevards. The new intersection will be an improvement to the existing Ponto Bridge access which will increase the capabilities of moving traffic through the intersection with minimal effect to Carlsbad Boulevard. Movement of traffic into and out of the timeshare resort will be regulated through this intersection and will be segregated from the flow of traffic for properties south of Descanso Boulevard. This configuration will largely eliminate the potential traffic conflicts between the future La Costa Downs development and Seapointe Resort. Project review identified potential impacts on adjacent properties which include noise, light, visual (view blockage), and traffic. As mentioned above, the circulation access and control created by the project will minimize traffic impacts. Noise and light impacts will not be significant since there will be an onsite operations management program and review and approval of an exterior lighting plan is a standard City condition for projects like this. Generally significant views will not be impaired by the project. The project is located far enough and low enough in relation to the residential developments to the east of the freeway that there will be no blockage. The properties located north and south of the project have views which are oriented toward the west, and those views will not be affected. The intent and purpose of the Commercial-Tourist (C-T) zone is to provide certain types of commercial business near transportation ,centers, recreation areas, or in close proximity to highways and freeways used by inter-regional traffic. Locationally the project site fulfills the intent of the C-T zone. The North County Transit District commuter rail station near Poinsettia is close by and South Carlsbad State Beach is across Carlsbad Boulevard to the west. Carlsbad Boulevard is designated as a major arterial and is designed to carry inter-regional traffic. There are elements of the proposed use which can be considered in evaluating compatibility with the existing surrounding uses. The project will be an attractor of visitors to the beach, similar to the camp ground, and is quasi-residential in nature. The use of the site will be on a 24 hour basis, similar to the surrounding properties, because people will be staying overnight. A community, although partially transient in nature, will be created by the interaction of the timeshare residents, the camp ground residents and those local permanent residents as they enjoy their common use of the beach. Project Design The project is designed with an underground garage and three levels of timeshare units. The units are housed in five buildings offset from each other and connected by exterior +\ . CT 93-1o/CP 93-07/CuP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 SEAPOINTERESORT AUGUST17,1994 covered walkways. The offset creates three courtyards which will be landscaped with varying themes: The building design incorporates split-face masonry, stained redwood, integral color plaster, painted metal railings and chimney flues, and asphalt shingles. The colors of these elements are proposed in earth tones. Some variation in roof line will be seen from the west through the use of alternating flat and gabled roofs with clerestory windows. The dominant building element as seen from the east is a redwood lattice used on the first and second unit levels. Cut-outs in the lattice help create depth through the play of shadow and light. All of the units and the common facilities, which include two pools and a clubhouse, are oriented toward the west to take advantage of available ocean views. As noted above, operation of the proposed facility will not have significant negative impacts on the surrounding uses nor will the facility be significantly affected by surrounding uses. Onsite lighting will be designed, and plans approved by the Planning Director, to minimize overspill onto adjacent lots and excessive noise will be regulated by the management of the timeshare hotel. No special use conditions have therefore been included in the resolutions of approval. Physical compatibility of the project with the surrounding uses is enhanced by the proposed circulation system which segregates project traffic from the future La Costa Downs subdivision to the south, the buffering provided on the north by an extensive open space lot, the transition from single story structures within the Lanikai Mobile Home Park to two story structures within the future La Costa Downs subdivision to the project’s proposed three story development, and the presence of Carlsbad Boulevard and the rail right-of-way on the west and east respectively. Development Standards The site is subject to the development standards of the C-T zone (21.29). The following TABLE I identifies the height and setback requirements of the C-T section of the zoning ordinance. L - CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CuP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 5 TABLE I Development Standards Title 21 Standard Maximum Height (21.29.060) 45 feet* Minimum Setbacks: (21.29.060(b) Front 10 feet* Side 10 feeta Side 10 feetrr * Subject to Site Development Plan o One foot required for every foot of building height over 35 feet. Proposed 45 feet 20+ feet lO+ feet 10 feet As seen in the table, the proposed project falls within the height and setback limits which are subject to City Council approval. Site Development Plan The C-T zone allows habitable building height up to 35 feet. However, through a Site Development Plan, the City Council may approve a habitable building height of up to 45 feet if four findings can be made. The project as designed has habitable space which reaches 45 feet in height and is therefore subject to the City Council findings for a Site Development Plan. They are: 1) The building does not contain more than three levels; 2) All required setbacks shall be increased at a ratio of one horizontal foot for every one foot of vertical construction beyond 35 feet. Also, the additional setback area will be maintained as landscaped open space; 3) The building conforms to the requirements of Section 18.04.170 (Building Codes and Regulations) which describes how to provide fire protection to habitable structures over 35 but under 55 feet in height; and 4) The allowed height protrusions as described in Section 21.46.020 (Yards) do not exceed 45 feet. 1) The project has been designed with underground parking as defined in 21.04.370 (Definitions). Because underground parking is not considered a “story” (21.04.33) the building is defined as having three levels. 2) Within The C-T zone buildings which are 35 feet in height or less have no building setback requirement. However, clerestory and screening elements of this proposal reach 45 feet above grade. Because Section 21.29.060 requires one additional foot of setback for every foot of building height over 35 feet, setbacks of 10 feet are required for the proposal. The minimum setback provided is 10 feet, however, the majority of the project has a greater than minimum setback from property line. + CT 93-lo/CP 93-07/&P 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 9404 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 6 3) The proposal is conditioned to comply with the requirements of Section 18.04.170. 4) No part of the building is over 45 feet in height. Conditional Use Permit The project use, timeshare, is allowed within the C-T zone through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, the intent of the CUP is to guarantee compatibility with the surrounding land uses. The project has been designed to fit within the developable area of the site and complies with all of the applicable development standards. Operation of the timeshare will not have adverse effects on the adjacent properties. The anticipated noise created onsite will be no different than noise created by the campground and mobile home parks. Lighting within the project is designed to limit overspill. The location is appropriate for a timeshare because the tourist orientation has been established by the campground and the close proximity to the ocean. Parking The Parking Ordinance [21.44.020( lo)] requires a minimum of 1.2 spaces per unit subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The following table compares the parking required and provided. TABLE II Parking Requirement for 78 timeshare units regulatory source ratio required provided 21.44.010(10) 1.2 per unit 94 spaces 99 spaces There are other timeshare hotels within the City that were designed with the same parking standard and are operating successfully. Staff has determined that there are no special circumstances which could require additional parking onsite and therefore, Staff recommends that the 99 spaces provided is adequate to meet the need. Access Access to the project site and the adjacent southerly properties will be provided via a new signalized intersection at Descanso and Carlsbad Boulevards in lieu of the Ponto Bridge. This new at-grade intersection will accommodate north and southbound access to these properties and will also provide signalized pedestrian access to the west side of the boulevard and the beach. A4 . CT 93-10,‘~ 93-07/CuP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 7 Project and non-project traffic will separate at the Descanso Boulevard and Ponto (Anacapa) Road intersection. Traffic associated with the timeshare and vacant */J acre office parcel will use the north and west legs of the intersection and traffic associated with the La Costa Downs will use the east, south and west legs of the intersection. Traffic volumes generated by the project will be relatively small. San Diego Association of,Govemments (SANDAG) average daily traffic (ADT) generation rates for a resort hotel are 8 per room. The proposed 78 units would therefore equate to 624 ADT. These trips are calculated for a 24 hour period and are assumed to be weighted during daytime hours at full occupancy. The effects of the new intersection at Descanso are not considered to be negative since the projected cumulative ADT generated by the proposal, future development of the l/2 acre parcel and La Costa Downs is 1150 and falls within the capacity limits the street’s design which is capacity up to 10,000 ADT. The anticipated volume of traffic generated by the project and adjacent properties at buildout will not warrant a signal at the Descanso Boulevard/Anacapa Road intersection. The Carlsbad Boulevard/Descanso Boulevard intersection will operate at a level of service (LOS) which is the lowest rating. Hillside Ordinance Hillside conditions were identified and the northernmost edge of the project development area is subject to the Hillside Ordinance because it includes slopes which are greater than 15%. However, project development is primarily within an area that has slopes less than 15%. There is no restriction to the development of the 15 - 40% slopes along the northernmost edge because they do not contain sensitive plant species and they do not encroach into the designated open space. Discussion of Findings The project design includes a retaining wall along the northernmost edge. The western half of the wall is 2 feet high and will be visible from the project side (south). The eastern half of the wall varies towards the east from 0 to 6 feet in height and is visible from the north. The retaining wall visible from the north is the result of a six foot fill necessary to establish a consistent basement floor at a grade of 54 feet above sea level. This same grade is established at the opposite comer of the building (southwest) by excavating ten feet. The grading concept is consistent with the intent of the Hillside Ordinance which acknowledges that fill as well as cut within slope is necessary for the development of properties which slope. The use of the retaining wall at this location is reasonably within the intent of the Hillside Ordinance. The wall eliminates the need to “chase” grade and thereby minimizes grading and preserves the adjacent existing slope. Project landscaping along the northerly retaining wall will also provide visual transition from the existing slopes to the building which is consistent with the Hillside Development Guidelines. -15 CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CuP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 . SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 8 Tentative Mao The Tentative Map creates two lots. One lot will be the northerly Open Space portion of the site and the second will be developed as the 78 unit airspace condominium. The map has been processed consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and Carlsbad Title 20, the Subdivision Ordinance. As noted previously, the project design as well as the Tentative Map comply with the General Plan and all applicable specific plans. The site is physically suitable for the project and the project complies with all the requirements of hillside development regulations. None of the property is subject to a Williamson Act contract nor does the property meet the requirements of Section 66474.4 of the State Government Code for definition as sustainable agricultural land. In addition, the map has been conditioned to provide all of the infrastructure and service needs necessary to accommodate the timeshare development in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan. The necessary improvements will be provided either through actual construction or an in-lieu fee and those improvements will not conflict with public access easements nor cause serious health problems. As noted below, the project complies with all of the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Coastal Develonment Permit The site is within the Mello II segment of the Coastal Zone and will require a Coastal Development Permit. . The project land use IS consistent with the policies: encouraging lateral access to the beach (Policy 7-3), visual access (Policies 7-13 and 8-l), and the inclusion of a limited amount of hotel/motel within the study area (Policy 6-S). Consistent with the intent of the LCP, access to the beach is considered a priority. Development of the site shall include a designated pedestrian crossing of Carlsbad Boulevard. The development is also sensitive to views of the ocean and coast line. The buildings have been sited away from Carlsbad Boulevard and are located a sufficient distance away from the residential developments east of the freeway so as not to impact vistas. The goal of providing hotel/motel within the Coastal Zone is achieved through implementation of the proposal. ENVTRONMENTAL REYIEW Development is proposed solely within disturbed lands and there is no evidence of sensitive species. No significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the proposed development and a second amended Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on March 22, 1994. bib . CT 93-1O/Cp 93-07/CUP 9%04/HDP 93-IO/SDP 94-04 SEAPOINTE RESORT AUGUST 17, 1994 PAGE 9 The Negative Declaration was first amended on March 22,1994, to correct a typographical error within one of the case file numbers. The correction had no effect on the project, did not create new impacts or require mitigation. The second amendment to the Negative Declaration includes the disclosure that the project includes a Site Development Plan;’ that there is additional discussion of the project within the Part II; that the inclusion of the Site Development Plan does not create changes to the project; that there are no new impacts; and that there are no required mitigation measures. V. SUMMARY The proposed timeshare hotel is a use which is permitted in the C-T zone with a conditional use permit. The project complies with the development standards of the zone which includes the requirement of City Council approval for the building height. No significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3690 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3691 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3701 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3692 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3693 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3694 Location Map Disclosure Statement Background Data Sheet Local Facilities Impact Assessment Exhibits “A” - “T”, dated August 17, 1994. CW:lh:vd June 30, 1994 - DISCLOSURESTATEMENT APPLICANTS STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN oV’!NERSHlP I-ESTS ON ALL APPUCAnONS WHICH WIU REQUIRE I DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE Cm COU%tL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARO. COMMI~ION OR C~MMi-KEE. I I (Please Prmt) The following information must be disclosed: r‘ . ..- ..I d* . . L-d -. I-3 c4 - ,--? .-._.*. 1 1. Amlicant g a financial interest in the application. 2. Owner d addresses of I persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ant addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partner%; 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust. list the names ant addresses of any person sewing as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. FRMOoo13 II/90 k!3 2075 Las Palmas Drove - Car&bad. Callfornra 92009-4859 * (61 Cri 436-l 161 Qiscfosure Statement (Over) Page 2 5. $250 worth Of business transacted with any member of City staff, Eoarcc, atid Council within the past twelve months? please indicate person(s) m IS drfinod ~8: ‘Any indiwdual. firm. copuUw8h~O. loim Vontur~. association. go&al club. f?Uwnaf oqutnat~on. coroorwon. oatsto trust. rKmv8f. ryndwato. Thea and any other counfy. ctly and COUP, City fWnlclp&tty. di8tnd of OthW pditical aubdtvwon. or my otnrr grouo of combwwtlon l tmg 88 l umt.’ (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) Si nature of Owner/date &ER DANlELb Print or type name of owner CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL CORPORATION Print or type name of applicant FRMooo13 8/90 . - BACKGROUND DATA SHEET- CASE NO: CT 94-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 CASE NAME: Seanointe Resort APPLICANT: Continental Commercial REQUEST AND-LOCATION: 78 unit timeshare resort hotel located east of Carlsbad Boulevard at Ponto (Anancapa) Road. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2 infractional Section 20. Township 12 south, range 4 ‘west. San Bernardino base and meridian, in the Citv of Carlsbad, in the Countv of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. APN: 214-010-01 Acres 8.02 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 2 lots/78 units (Assessor’s Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation OS/TS Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A Existing Zone OS/CT Proposed Zone OS/CT Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zonirig Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site OS/CT OS/TS - Vacant North RMHP RHM/Solamar Mobilehome Park South 0 Office/Vacant East TC TC/RR right-of-way West OS Beach PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 78 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated August 12. 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT x Negative Declaration, issued March 18. 1994. amended March 22. 1994 & second amendment August 10. 1994 - Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, CW:vd , - -- CITY OF CARJSBAD GROWTHhdANAGEMENTPROGRAM LCXXJaFACILITIESIMPACI'SASSESShdENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: [ LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 22 GENERAL PLAN: OS/TS ZONING: Open Snace/Commercial/Tourist DEVELOPER’S NAME: Continental Commercial Corporation ADDRESS: 5050 Avenida Encinas PHONE NO: (619) 431-8500 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 214-010-01 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 8.02 Acres ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: : . B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Ctty Adnumstratrve Facmtles: Demand u-t Square Footage = N/A Library: Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = N/A N/A N/A N/A -!!?A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADTs = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Open Space: Acreage Provided - Schools: 624 ADT 4 w/i 5 minutes 6.37 Fee (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demand in EDUs - Identify Sub Basin - 78 N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD - 17.160 4’ PLANNING COMMISSION August 17, 1994 PAGE S Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded to .3702 and 3703, approving SDP ubject to the conditions contained in staff memo dated August 17,19 VOTE: = 5-l 9, and Welshons NOES: Commissioner Monroy ABSTAIN: None For the record, Commissioner of EMF. that he voted No du ainty regarding the effects 3. 993-r Recommending approval of a Negative Declaration and a 2 tot tract map for condominium purposes, a condominium permit, a conditional use permit, and hillside development permit for a 78 unit timeshare resort on 8.02 acres of land in a commercial-tourist zone generally located east of the intersection of Ponto (Anacapa) Road and Cartsbad Boulevard and within Local Facilities Management Zone 22. Christer Westman, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the site is located east of Carl&ad Boulevard at the Ponto Bridge. He then showed some slides of the site and adjoining acreage. Mr. Westman stated that me project is a 78 unit timeshare development within fiie buildings. Associated with it is an underground garage for 99 cars. It includes pools for both adults and children, a clubhouse, a gym facility, and passive open areas. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Travel Services Commercial zone. The primary uses in this zone are hotels, motets, and restaurants. The proposed building has habitable space up to 45 ft. This height may be approved by the City Council with a Site Development Plan (SDP). In order to approve that SDP, four findings must be made: (1) It can contain no more than three levels. In this case, there is an underground garage which is excluded. There are three levels above ground. (2) The setbadrs must be increased 1 ft. for every foot over me typical height limit which, in this case, would be 35 ft. for habitable space. me applicant is requesting 45 ft. through me SDP. They are required to increase all se&a&s by 10 ft. In CT zones there are no setback requirements but, in this case, m8r8 8r8 setbacks provided along the rear and side of 10 ft. There is 20+ ft. along the front of the w so it exceeds the minimum requirement of 10 ft. (3) The project must also cornpJy with me building codes. It would have b comply in order for the City to issue building permits for m8 pro@ct. (4) The maximum habitable space is 45 ft. This project mwb$ that requirement. Mr. Westrnan stated that parking has been provided in the underground garage at a ratfo of 1.2 spaces per unit. tt meets me minimum parking requirement of 94 spaces with a couple of extra w, for a total of 99 spaces. Access to the site will ultimately be provided by a new interwct&n with Carlsbad Boulevard at Descanso. He turned the time over to Engineering to discuss the access Issue. PLANNING CCMMISSIGN August 17, 1994 PAGE 6 Sob Wojcik, Principaf Civil Engineer, used the sideboard exhibits and described the various alternatives which were available. The adjacent La Costa Downs subdivision has requested that the intersection be moved further north. However, after careful consideration and meetings with other pmpefly owners in the area, staff determined that it would cost an additional $143,500 to relocate the intersection farther north. Staff is in the preliminary stagee of realigning Carl&ad Boulevard in the future and the intemectfon improvements will need to be redone after the realignment. It was determined that it would not be cost effective to spend an additional $143,500 at this time, considering the fact that the intersection will only have to be redone. Christer Westman resumed his staff report and stated that the tentative map is consistent with me Map Act and the project has been conditioned to provide the necessary infrastructure. The site is also in the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and will be required to get a coastal permit. The project is located a sufficient distance from Carlsbad Boulevard and Interstate 5 so that it doss not impact views of the ocean on either of these corridors. The project would implement goals within the LCP providing tourist facilities in’ the coastal zone and safe pedestrian access from the east side of Carl&ad Boulevard to the beach. No significant impacts were identified during the environmental review. As a result, a Negative Oeclaration has bean issued by the Planning Director. Mr. Westman directed the Commission’s attention to staff memo dated August 17.1994 which adds a new condition to Resolution No. 3691 to require disclosure to timeshare purchasers regarding the adjacent Encina Wastewater Treatment Facility. The staff memo also revises Conditions #47 and #46 to be more specific. These revisions were requested by the Carl&ad Water District. Staff feels that the prefect complies with the development standards of the zone, including the requirements needed for City Council approval of the buiMing height. No significant adverse impacts have been identified and staff recommends approval. Commissioner Compas requested staff to review once again how people who stay at the resort will get to the beach. Mr. Wojcik replied that residents would walk down the sidewalk to the signalited intersection at Car&bad Boulevard and Descanso. At that point, they may cross Carfsbad Boulevard in a pedestrian crossing. There is a gate into the campground and a set of stairs to me beach or, if they wish, they may use a dirt footpath at the north edge of the campground which travels down the bluff to the beach. Commissioner Compas inquired if the access road could be aligned at a 45 degree angle, which would be less costly, and still solve the problem. Mr. Wojcik replied that the 45 degree angle would be tine for people entering the project. However, if you are exiting the project at that point, it would require a 136 degree turn. City standards require no more than an 11 degree offset at an intersection. Chairman Savary inquirti if the light at Oescanso governs both north and south traffk. Mr. Wojcik replied Yes, although the signal will probably have to be relocated when Carlsbad Soulevard is realigned. Commissioner Welshons inquired what will prevent pedestrians from walking through the barricades on the bridge. Mr. Wojdk raplied there is no prevention. If they choose mat method, they wouM have to go through two sets of barricades and then run across me southbound traffic lanes. The management of the timeshare plan to advise patrons of a safe way to reach me beach. Commissioner Welshons inquired about school fees. Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that Cartsbad Unified School District collects fees from all commercial act&ities. The rate is a little lower for commercial. Commissioner Welshons inquired if there will be some type of shelter covering the bus sWp bench. Mr. ’ Westman replied that it has not yet been determined if a bus stop will definitely be required. That decision will be made by North County Transit District. The condition could be amended to include shelter if a bus stop is required. -0 PLANNING CCMMISSIGN August 17,1994 PAGE 7 Commissioner Webhons inquired about the one time special development tax. Mr. Wcjcik replied mat is the Meflo-Rcoe fee. Commissioner Welshons inquired where the crank windows will be located in the structufea. Mr. Westman replied that tfte requirement comes from the police department. It has been included as a crime prevention measure. Commissioner Welshons hopes there will not be crank windows because she has seen accidents hm. Commissioner Compas inquired about Finding #9 and how four month exclusive occupancy provision will be enforced. Mr. Westman rep4ied that it would be by deed restriction placed on the final map. That condition is a requirement of the CUP zoning ordinance. It was intended to keep timeshare projects as a transient use. The timeshare developer would be required to place this note on the map before it is finaled. Commissioner Welshons inquired if a condition could be added requiring disclosure that the maximum stay is four months. Mr. Westman replied that this could be done. Commissioner Nielsen referred to the parking standard o? 1.2 parking spaces per unit and inquired if scmeone with a two bedroom unit might be likely to have two vehicles. Mr. Westman replied that this is a standard in the ordinance and there is no distinction between the size of the unit. When the standard was established, he believes there were studies done to determine what the most appropriate parking ratio should be. Commissioner Monroy inquired if the City has a policy to encourage and facilitate use of the commuter rail system. He has been thinking about the possibility of access to the rail station somewhere near the Seapointe Resort. Mr. Westman replied that the General Plan enccurages alternate modes of transportation. No consideration was given to a pedestrian access at this project; however, the developer has stated that they pran to provide shuttle service to me rail station and the shopping at Poinsettia. Chairman &iVar’y invited m8 applicant to speak. Mike Howe& Hofman Planning Associates, 2366 Faraday Avenue, Car&ad, addressed the Commission and stated that there is wide spread support in the community for the Se%pinte Rescrt project. He turned in 42 signed letters from Carl&ad merchants who feel me project will be very gocd for their businesses. In response to Commissioner Welshons’ question, he stated that there will be no crank windows at the resort. Regarding the parking issue, Mr. Howes stated mat me project is parked according to the City standard and there is also convenient on-street parking along Anacapa Road. He agrees with the staff recommendation and feels the project will be an asset to Carfsbad. He requested the opportunity to respond to any public testimony. Tim Stripe, Ccntfnental Ccmmerciaf Corporation, 6060 Avenida Encinas,‘Cartsbad, addressed the Commission and gave a a slide presentation about their wmpany and some of me other projects which they have devefcpd. Commissioner Monrcy inquired how many jobs me resort will create. Mr. Stripe replied that it should result in 30-36 jobs. Approximately 2/3 of me jcb would be in me salary range of $2g,OW or lees; the remaining l/3 would be over s20,ooo. Commissioner Monroy fee& that the project is excellent although he is corrccrmed mat the low safarfer3 may generate a number of affcrd&le home4 requiremen& fcf the City. Ha feels that businesses with bw-paying jobspraceaburd~onthe~d%vek9ers~ocreatbadfwdablehousing. Commissioner Nielsen inquired about me mix of me units. Mr. Wayne replied that there will be 30 two bedroom units and me remainder will be one bedroom. There are no studio units. Mr. Stripe added that PLANNING CGMMISSIGN August 17, 1994 PAGE 8 the typical resident of a timeshare unit is a family, who generally arrive in one vehicle. The 1.2 parking ratio is fairly consistent throughout California and has worked well at all of their other projects. Commissioner Nielsen inquired if any of theother projects are as isolated at this one. Mr. Stripe replied that Lake Tahoe &td Squaw Valley are fairly isolated. Commissioner Nielsen inquired how many projects are built without food setvice. Mr. Stripe replied that most projects do not have food service. commissioner Nielsen inquired how Jim Watson is involved in the venture. Mr. Stripe replied that he is a limited partner. Commissioner Welshons inquired about the size of the swimming pool. Mike Howes replied that the pool is 68 ft., side to side. Commissioner Welshons would like to see the pool increased to 75 ft. Mr. Stripe replied that the pool is used as a family play area and people generally do not swim laps at this type of facility. There may not be room to increase the size of the pool. Commissioner Welshons inquired why asphalt roofing material was selected. Mr. Stripe replied that it provides a larger range of wlors and it is approximately the same price as other roofing materials. Commissioner Welshons inquired if mere was any effort made to try and design the project at a 35 ft. height. Mr. Stripe replied that it would not work on this site. Mr. Howes added that the buildings are 36 ft. high in front but they follow me contour of the slopes in the rear, making them taller from that side. Rob Coffey, an architect with LPA, 4350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, addressed the Commission and Stated that asphalt shingles were selected to match the “beach bungalow” style of buifding they were trying to create. They normally have a lot of wood and natural colors to blend in with the scenery and the other structures in that area. Commissioner Welshons inquired about me chain link fencing akng the east.ern frontage. Mr. Coffey replied that it was added to prevent danger or access to me railroad right-of-way. They have triad to integrate the chain link fencmg into the landscape. Commissioner Welshons inquired if there are any exhibits of m8 signage which will be used. Mr. Coffey replied No, because no consideration has been given yet to signs. Commissioner Welshons inquired why the project would not fit within the 35 ft. height limit. Mr. Coffey replied mat they had orfginally started with a 90 unit project. Even by reducing the project to 78 units, they needed the extra height. Chairman Savary opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak. Robert Barelmann, 1967 No. Highway 101, Leucadia, addressed the Commission and stated that he is one of the property owners at La Costa Downs. He had several concerns, as follows, which were mm answered by the applicant and staff. * He likes the idea of access from the cul-de-sac to the northbound lanea of Carl&tad Boulevard. Unfortunately, the accasa looks like it is difficult to ffnd. He woufd like to see it given more prominence. Mike Howee replied mat mat mere is a driveway and ramp. If more prominence is needed, that woufd have to be a staff decision. Mr. Wojcik replied mat me dasign could be changed, if it i& the wish of the Commission. h PLANNING COMMISSION * August 17,1994 PAGE 9 He is concern8d about m8 beach access and the bridge. He feds that a non-functional bridge will be an attractive nui$artce. Mike Howes replied that they could build a f8nc8 across the bridge to keep pedestrians away. Staff wncurr8rxe would be needed. Mr. Wojcik replied mat staff has already recommended barrters to prevent people from crossing the bridge. The int8nt is for pedestrians to use the signalized ihtersection. A fence could be constructed across the bridge, if mat is m8 wish of the Commission. . He is concerned about overflow parking on Anacapa. He hopes the parking will not wind down all the way to La Costa Downs. Mike Howes replied that Anacapa is a long street and hedoes not bekeve that parking from the resort would ever go as far as La Costa Downs. * He is concerned about the height of the project and would like to know the exact height of the south west corner. Bob Coffey replied that the height is 35 ft. in front and 40 ft. in the rear. There is only one point in the project which actually reaches 45 ft. The height variations are due to the natural gradation of the site. There being no Other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Savary declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members. Commissioner Welshons requested staff to discuss me parking along Anacapa. Mr. Wojcik replied that the street is 40 ft. wide and would provide off-street parking for 25-30 cars. Commissioner Welshons doesn’t like the idea of the street name changing from Anacapa to Ponto. She would like to see it all named the same. Commissioner Monroy would be in favor of a fence across the bridge because of the potential liability issue. Commissioner Nielsen inquired why it is not possible for pedestrians to cross the bridge going to the beach. Mr. Wojcik replied that they would have to cross two lanes of traffii without any traffii aids. Commissioner Niets8n inquired if the bridge is going to stay mare. Mr. Wojcik replied that it will be removed when Cartsbad Boulevard is realigned. Commissioner Nielsen doesn’t mink the project is very attractive; ha hopes this is an optical illusion. Commissioner Welshons thinks m8 name of the street should be Anacapa for wnsist8ncy. She would like to se8 shelter provided if m8 m8 bus stop is built. She would like a condition requiring notification to potential purchasers mat mere is a four monm occupancy limit. Finalfy, she would like me pool to b8 enlarged to 75 ft. David Brown, ContMental Commercial Corporation, 5050 Avenida Encinas, Carl&ad, requested permission to re6pond to the pool issue. He stated mat in his experience, there is a greater need for deck chair spac8 man pool.ua8. Becauw the spac8 is limited around m8 pool, it may b8 necessary to scale back the pool in order to accommodate more peopI8 in deck chairs. He seldom ~88s paople in their owner-guest group who swim laps. Commissioner Compas woufd like to see a condition added requiring a prev8ntfve fence to b8 installed across the bridge. Mr. Wayne stated that he would like to add some darifbtion for plan check purposes. (1) Staff would recomm8nd that any pedestrian barrkade be designed to the satisfaction of me Planning Director. (2) With regard to the bus stop facilities, it is staffs understanding that both the design and the need for 5 PLANNING COMMISSION August 17,1994 PAGE 10 busstop facilities are controlled by NCTD. Staff would recommend that the condition be modified to require a shelter, but if NCTD de&&e they don’t want a shelter. the City would be bound by that decision. Commissioner W&bns responded mat she would only like to see me minimum standard raised to include a shelter, pending approval by NCTD. Commissioner Noble stated that he can support the project. He is not in favor of increasing,the size of the pool. He feels that the developer needs to make the pool work for his guests. Commissioner Monroy stated that he would vote for the prefect. His biggest reservation is that it will generate a need for affordable housing units which someone else will have to provide. ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3690 recommending approval of the second amended Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution Nos. 3691,3701, 3692,3693, and 3694, recommending approval of CT 93-10, CP 93-07, CUP 93-04, HDP 93-10, and SDP 94-04, with the following additions: (1) inclusion of the errata sheet dated August 17,1994 which revises Conditions #47 and #48 and adds a new condition requiring disclosure of the Encina Plant: (2) that the name of Anacapa be used the entire length of the street; (3) that a condition be added requiring a shelter should a bus stop be built: (4) that a condition be added requiring the owner to disclose a four month occupancy limit to potential purchasers; and (5) that an adequate pedestrian deterrent to the bridge be wnstructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. VOTE: 6-O AYES: Chairman Savary, Commissioners Compaq Monroy, Nielsen, NoMe, and Welshons NOES: None ABSTAIN: None DE0 ITEMS AN0 REPORTS: Assistant Planning Director, stated that the Workshop has been postponed and r 1994 at the Carfsbad Water District Conference Room on El Camino Re Chairman Sava ted mat Commissioners respond to staff no later than attend the CCAPA orkshop in San Cletnente. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion, the Regular urned at 752 p.m. Rw=tW submitted, GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRllTEN MINUTES ARE APPRO . PROOF OF PUBLICATION - (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Blade-Citizen a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified fo the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial circulation in Bonsall, Fallbrook, Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, Count! of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudge< a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30.1989. case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 30,: 1994 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OceansideCalifornia, this. 3 0 day of .Sept. 1994 BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising 1722 South Hill Street P.O. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054 (619) 433-7333 This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Motice"of Public .Hearing - - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CT 930lO/CP 9397/C!UP 93=4/HDP 93=10/SDP 94-4 SEAPOINTE RESORT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, October 11, 1994, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration, and an application for a Tentative Map I Condominium Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and a Site Development Plan to develop a 78 unit timeshare resort on 2.35 acres -of land, which is zoned Commercial-Tourist, and is generally located east of the intersection of Ponto (Anacapa) Drive and Car&bad Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 22, and more particularly described as: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4448. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and/or Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing. APPLICANT: Continental Commercial C PUBLISH: September 30, 1994 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 17,1994, to consider recommending approval of a Negative Declaration and a 78 lot tract map for condominium purposes, a condominium permit, a conditional use permit and hillside development permit for a 78 unit timeshare resort on 2.35 acres of land in a commercial- tourist zone on property generally located east of the intersection of Ponto (Anacapa) Road and Carlsbad Boulevard and within Local Facilities Management Zone 22 and more particularly described as: Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after August 11,1994. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4448. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit and/or Site Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT PUBLISH: AUGUST 5, 1994 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice CT 93-lO/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-lo/SDP 94-04 - Seapointe Resort for a public hearing before the City Council. Please notice the item for the council meeting of . Thank you. Assistant City Man- September 13, 1994 Oate CT93-1 O/CP 93-07/CUP 93-04/HDP 93-IO/SDP 94-04 - SEAPOINTE RESORT SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING 5201 RUFFIN RD STE “B” SAN DIEGO CA 92 123 CALIF’DEPT OF FISH & GAME 330G0mm~H0RE#50 LONG BEACH CA 90802 Citv of Carlsbad _- ___- 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, California 92008-l 989 Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent of Schools Carlsbad.Unified School Dist. 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 -- -_---. u- .--... .j -9 - I s.amis ‘cmsam Assoc~ '7922 FIT=' 'iR!tTNE CA 92714 RICFXW T DONAHUE 4964 DAVID WAY SAN aERNARDIN0 CA 92404 MCWIN cz 6102 AmIDA ENCiNAS 3 CARLSBAD CA 922c 3- WIL;LIAM E HEAD PO BOX 207 OCEANSIDE CA 92049 MADELYNSHUJLEY 6498 EAST ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRANK & SALLY CLARK5 201 EASY PL T) CmSBAD CA 92?C3- RICHARD T SIMMONS BAUER FAMILY TRUST 10-l 521 W KXEPP AVE ,nILLERTON CA 92632 EAMES FAMILY TRUST 11-O 203 EASY PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 204 EASY PL T) CAEUSBAD CA gpc 3 a d *. EDWIN A JANKOWSKY 6490 EASY ST _- CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARILYN E JOHNSON 6492 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA: 92009 JACK J CUL,P 6614 0 CEANVIEW DR CARLSBAD CA 92cc3- KATHERIm F KIkH BERNICE E STEAD 6502 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92ccs BAKER FAMILY TRUST 07-O 1314 MONTE= ST REDLANDS CA 92373 6500 EASY ST T.1 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ELIZABETH H LEWIS 6506 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 GERTRUDE L POLLARD 6507 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92cc3 FE&THELMAMELLOTT 6504 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHARON L BOKEMPER . 119 ARMSLEY SQ ONTARIO CA 91762 LEONA E PLEICK 6510 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92CCf SCIARRA FAMILY TRUST OF 2300 CHARNWOOD AVE ALHAMBRACA 91803 -tiLLIiM J.&D 6515 EASY ST CARLSBAD CA 92003 soR.ENsEN FAMIL; .Tis. -. ;- .- 6508 FRIENDLY PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 , VIVIAN I WING 6513 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA .92009 MARION & ADELLE FAGAN. - 1639 E PUENTE AVE WEST COVINA CA 91791 --- '_ WATSON TRUST 09-17-92 6702 DARYN DR WEST HILLS CA 91307 VITO & DONNA.NIGRO 1112 IDLEWOOD RD GLENDALECA - 91202. :. . . . _. i JOAN Ii Loos 6521 EASY ST T1 CARLSBAD CA 92009 HAROLDR EVA& 6519 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~ JOHN D GLUCS 6520 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 .- ’ c~93-,olcP931,7/e~~~q3-ct~ . . f’i j/Q p tq3 .,6/j op 9+ .g- “:~~..::qv.~~~ - 7 75’ - i- _._ .__ _ ..‘.._ .:. -.‘Y’.- __ .-’ . - .-..,- Lzc.i..t:y :. .’ .’ . . . : . I’.-: -‘.Y.,‘-. .’ - ..;+z>;:;: :A& 1’ ~~~~;:i-:- .y, .:.+.. ;. .::: :::fg$j$& ‘... . . .’ .. ., i ~.;.~~;“,..~~*~~~ .,‘. ‘: .‘. : . . . __ ,. r - .‘-)==’ - ‘7” -.-,4-‘-y cl LT,1-: - b.-‘, ::dzL &TX M1I:d DR * ~.?SCLAmS cx 9 2373 MIICxxz4 F ItIzmE 6523 EASY ST T) cAR.$saAD CA 32009 ROBERT & E;XINE BmEy RAYMOND SCHWEIGF3.R" 5525 EASY ST T) 6526 EASY ST T) cmuam CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 32009 JltcES F & XERLE BEEBY S'S29 EASY ST T) cw.Lsam cx 92009 DONALD E HAUSEN 195 PALOMAR AIRZOR" RD 3'324 -EY ST CARLSBAD CA --*a- 2 L - 'd J 'MNK & THERESA RCSXI 6527 EASY ST T) cumam CA 92cz5 NXTr-?? CAS cAmNo 6533 =yAsY ST T) CARLSBm CA m-e-- YL*-5 CARLSBAD CA 92009 :KE,LY FAMILY -TRUST 06-2 1034 RIDGE HETGZTS DR FALLBROOK CA 92028 IVAN T GREEN 6535 EASY ST cmxam cA FRZD & SAl&Ziii WXLXZ Tl 6536 EASY ST T) c.wuam CA 42009 ?2;':5 G C WO~DWARIJ 6537 EASY ST T) cmmam CA 92009 HOMER M iNDERSEN 6538 EASY ST T) cmxam cA 92009 SI'IMMONS JAMES R F?ZI,:* 6602 EASY ST T) cmxam CA 92’ - : -a- GENE F & JANE &JXIEX 1181 N CRESCENT RIDGE R FALLBROOK CA 92028 ALCIA M EATON 6607 EASY ST T) cimsam c... MAXYL TURNER 6606 EASY ST T) czmsam cA 92009 It 92#‘^ 2 ” ‘d d RICHARD D MANXING 6608 EASY ST T) cmsam CA 92009 DOROiHY C MENG 6610 EASY ST T) cimsam CA PHILIP E FULLERTON- 6609 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 92009 _ - - 92009 92cc3 . . JACOB J WIESINGER" '-- 825 BONITA AVE SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 JENNIEE WARNER 6612 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA BRUCE H RATCLIFF 6613 EASY ST T) cmuam CA 92003 ..-_ _. DOMENICA R DITURI --- 195 PALOMAR AIRPORT R.b CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOUIS H GAR&+T 6618 EASY ST T) cmuzam CA JAMES T ANDERSON 6616 EASY ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 TOMMY B-WHITE 6910 SANDCASTLE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 EDWIN M MONTGOMERY ROBERT H BARELMANN 476 DELAGE CT 1967 N EIWY 101 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024 . . . . . . . . . 6 ,. _; __. ;y,.: .., .’ ::’ _, : .‘.’ ‘: ‘..Z :. : ‘_‘. :. _ _:.:, .’ _ .:, -_, . .. -:.‘-I . .: -. ..’ .’ . I.: . . -I- - '-r'~s--' s ,xc=JGE - ,:-:c,MAs . & .!Q&?.Y rlwcr- 25 7 u .ETX Xj'E j 3 j7 GX?FNEY CT '7"' --(L.-a \IITAs CA 92024 s.L\J 3~~2~ CA 32130 * . XITCH DANIZLKXRISTINA 643'1 FRIZXDLY PL T) Cxnsa~D CA 92009 Lz,cEzJ & STASE LUGx?zLLI 3330 E CALIFOR~A aLm PASADENA CA 91107 FZUX J & ROSE CIRTLLO R,'CEARD I JONES 5454 FRIEXDLY PL 6196 FRIZNDLY PL T) zxm5am CA 92009 cxLSam CA 92009 JCSZpH J TXOMPSON ZWJlEY Z HASTRUP 5531 FRIENDLY PL 6502 FRIENDLY PL T) cxxsam CA a 92009 _ musam cA 92009 CALVIN L SEOEMMER 6504 FRIEANDLY PL T) CxxmaAD CA 92009 LESTER & BEFENE VELl4A.X 6507 FRIENDLY~ PL T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 ZNXY &MARYAMEEN - 12811 cEiAp=U DR X.RXX GROVE CA 92640 ;ERTRPJJD POWERS '320 FRIZNDLY PL T) 3xxmam CA 92009 EOWARD z KUNEMAN OSOS FRIENDLY PL T) cxuam cA 92009 SOItFNSEN FAMILY TRUST 0 6508 FRIENDLY PL 12 criRLsaAD cA 92009 FRANK&SALLY-C== 201 EASY PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 SALLY S CELORIE PO BOX 2748 RANCH0 SANTA FE C 92067 . . e.--- 3kAMIN & MARY HOLGUIN- _ _ _.-. DAVID K STOCKTON VITO & GIOVANNA NITTI 195 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD 32373 TRES LAGOS ST 1951 W MOUNTAIN ST 3zsaAD CA 92009 MENTONE CA 92359 GLENDALE CA 9'2CI _ _-se- GL-C&T-E~ERPRISES I' FLORA P MILLER ._-__ .-. TXUS-'L DOOLITTLE 15 CARDIFF 6498 OCEANVIEW DR T) 6514 NE 171ST PL 'JGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 cARLsam CA 92009 BOTHELL WA 98011 3tx-L .Y ‘w-c 5450 'RZrnLY ?L 7. CXS;aAD CA 42.;. - .- XCXEZ RE’VOCA3LE TXST : 5493 FRIENDLY PT, c--Sam CA c-,-p= *L-1- 3iRG. i0Bii~L.k~~ 3 1 cc.,- 5498 FRIENDLY PL T!--.- muam CA 32Pr z “-d CXEC-31 UM.BERT3&KA?:-' 7: 3268 VAL'ZNOOD CIR T'=xousAND OAKS CA 5135, 3ZRNiCE MAESTAS 5Sa6 FRIENDLY ?L T: CAmsam CA 52cc: XOBERT V & BE":-: TX;? 6309 ?RIENDLY PL Tl CARLSBAD CA AI-.-- Y / i' b 1 XCGINITY DbROTSY LIVZ_\iG O'S18 FRIENDLY PL T) CARLSBAD CA 92Ocl" COHN W MCCONNELL 246 E EDGEHILL RD SAN BERNARDINO CA 92464 -. -.. A _’ - L L E ST&Q.&E‘,' C-EZAX A GTEaTNK 3315 ti REIWA AVE 6506 CC"#IZW DR 71 ~OwrJEY CA 90240 CAZS;;XI CA 32009 XILLIAM KNECm ADRIAN E STEC'KLING 6510 OC"cANt“TEW DR T) 6512 OCEANVIEW DR T) c..LsaAD CA 92009 cxusam CA 92009 RICB.!. 0 GOODWIN LS238 FRIEANDS ST PACIFIC PALISADES 90272 :KENNETH J CLAYPOOL 6522 OC"miEW DR cu.uaAD CA 92009 - XAXINE L HOUSE tSS28 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 YAMAMOTO FAMILY TRUST 1 1201 VIA LA JOLLA SANCLEMENTE CA 92672 STEPP-CUL,P TRUST 02102- 5614 OCFSLNVIEW DR ZARLSBAD CA 92009 JACK &'N~&-CULP 6614 OCEANVIEW DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 B A PROPERT?& INC DEPT 4242 333 S HOPE ST*LOS 90071 .- _ - . _ JEANNETTE‘R‘SCOLLARD . - _ 2070 CALETA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 _. _ -- -.- _ - - a BUEL FAl4ILY TRUST OS-22 6Sia OCcmIEW DR cm&a;ID CA 92009 DEDERICX FAMILY TRUST 0 6524 0C"sANvIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 AUDREY J STMLEY 6530 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 DOROTEY S GRAVES 6538 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN & HELEN BRAJXOVICH 6608 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 WRIGET FAMILY TRUST ll- 6616 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 _ _ _ _ - - - ROBERT H BARELMANN 1967 N HWY 101 ENCINITAS CA 92024 ~CS’;r-TTe&&14L(.I;‘,/ w---c- . xur - 3 119 XESX,OX 'LX ?ASA.DENA CA Q"^' d-e" S-EAN A CL4IG 6514 OCEEIEW DR CAXSBAD CA 9iOC 3 LLOYD M & DONNA AD&% 6520 OCEAiNVIEW DR T! CARLSBAD CA 92005 ANTHONY & GI-LDA BARCNZ 6526 OCEAXVISW DR '?) C-ARLSBAD CA 4iOCS FRENCH FAMILY TRUST 04- 6532 OCEANVIEW DR CARLSBAD CA 9iCC5 ADAMS FRANK J&JCAN 3 LI 6602 OCEANVIEW DR T1 cAi?ISBAD CA 9iOCs FRANCIS ihA&?TZ 2844 WILSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RONALD H b&&AN 6618 OCEANVIEW DR T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 MART&L B MONTG&RY 1855 LOTUS CT CARLSBAD CA 92005 --a.-. -_ ._e_ EDWIN M MONTGOMERY _._____ ._ TIMOTHY C & V GIBBY 476 DELAGE CT 476 DELAGE CT ENCINITRS CA 92024 ; ENCINITAS CA 92024 ___..' I -. . . : ‘:‘. ..’ .‘,.:.:‘..... . .’ . ‘: -: . ::*;y - : . ..a ,.:,. 1 ..I ,.. . I ‘, : , ‘- .’ :::. :.,_ .:. -:. : 1,:. .., , --L .:.. ” 4 .: . . .’ : . ‘: . ..’ .. -. . . . ” .. .I :.:-;.:.:. -, :..-I ..... .,‘.:.. . : -5 ‘: _ ._ .’ : ..: _. “‘.;....’ _, .: : ‘._ ‘... ‘_ . .- *; . . :: . ,_, .:.:. .::- .’ . . . ,_,. .‘. , ‘,...’ . . - . ,: __. . . . . . . .. -:. _:. : . _. . . . . . : ?CZNUJ ‘? T$S:TSR - TXCV-AS ? SC .WITA .JfzANE - -.n 7 ,“A sh 2RSEZE 32 T! 195 ?.~ZMAR AiR?CRT m ~.iiLS2As CA 923c9 C.A.RLS2AD CA 92009 1 _ 2CNALD J WILLIAMS 204'SEA BREEZE DR T) CARLSBAD CA g200g ) C?lARLES S DICKIE: JOHN G t ALICE 5350 E BROADWAY X2NG BEACEI CA 90803 MARIE L STANTON RICZARD T DONAHl 1438 PACIFIC ST EDLANDS CA 92373 - y924*4 LMARJ'ORIE R EDWARDS PO BOX 1905 FSNCXO SANTA FE C 92067 *** 135 Printed *** Prepared for: GEORGE ORDAY Attention: ORDAY.CONSULTANTS LESLiE LDEVLIN 1131 AMETXYST AVE MENTONZ CA 92359 SAMMIS CARtSBADkSOCIA 17922 FITCH TRVINE CA 92714 JILLSAM E HEAD ?O BOX 207 3CEANSIDE CA 92049 BAUER FAiiILY TRUST 10-l 521 W KNEPP AVE FULLERTON CA 92632 _.I. RICRARD T DONAHUE --- .-. 4964 DAVID WAY SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 MADELYNSHANLEY- -. 6498 EAST ST T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 EAMES FAMILY TRUST 11-O 203 EASY PL CAKSBAD CA 92009 3CLGiAs MCCLLi 203 SEA BREEZE DR 7) cxusam CA c-*9- 1LYLZ JOEN G & ALICS 2ACl%?.x 1545 WILSHIRE BLVD 70C LOS MGELES CA 90017 RICEWRD T DONtim 4964 DAVID WAY SAN BERNARDINO CA 32G::L JTFFREY S MCWE 267 LA VETA AVE ENCINITAS CA 92'?21 SAMMIS CARLSBA MCWIN CORP 6102 AVE?lIDA ENCINAS 5 CARLSBAD CA 92003 FIiANx br SALLY CLARIS 201 EASY PL T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD T SIMMONS 204 EASY PL T) CARLSBAD CA 92009 _.-_ _._. e-.---w ..-. EDWIti'A JANKOWSKY -- .-- _ -- MAkLYN E JOHNSON JACK J CULP 6490 EASY ST 6492 EASY ST T) 6614 OCEANVIEW DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ---.. -. _ _, , _ __ -. .-___._.o--. . -.---. i .T I(‘-- _-. ---- -.- .- ___., i ~-- -.- - ---A---- ---. _ _ ntinental Commercial: Corp 1 : 50 Avenida Encinas ;I Hofman Planning Assoc Ste 200 rlsbad CA, 92008 j 2386 Faraday Ave Ste 120 ' Carlsbad, CA 92008 . . -. ---- - - . -. --. .__ - -. ---- . - -.- -.- -- . -. .--.. --. __ i . - ---- -- -- -__ . _.- - . - .- -..--_- __ _. -- -. -. -. - --- -- --. -- . - -: .- -.--- -- ---.---___ -_-___ -_. . -. - - - . . - - -- . . - . . -- -- -- “25 _. . VLI., ,y 1 :nqt uIc ~ulouUp&U~‘~~~U~ I ‘0?‘10-8:4’ i 1U; 12 ,T ,, , :: + i uY48a~uBti-, , LACOSTA RES0RT AND SPA DARRELL SRahrPeR ~~WOlNO ~WIJII Peggr Ilawwy c- CABtrssADPLANMNGCOMMl88XON do Carlahad Plafdq Depwtfnent 2076 Lw Patmarr Drive Garbbad, CA 92008 1 um L) resort opeFator in t-he C&y of Carlabad and want ta erprsrrs ;nqy mppmt fbr the sppliumt’a gwqxxd to develop a 78 unit time&we pzqjact near the htaraection of Dcwuwo Rd. md Owlsbad Blvd. I am tknllfar with the propmd grdectb foe&ion overhkhg the ocean b&men Poitmttia md P&mar Airport Ftd., and bebva it h a pad t&e for a ti&&m prr+ct. f fecl that the epplicmt’o choice of location t3zlbm8 the tLkum@d coxnmd $mdh ia the city of carls~. chmtr at time8herr rermtr enhance the btuinem d the lccal mmchmtr, In Nay of thb year, w due signed B letter h wqmrt althe Qenercrl Ph Amendment/Zone Chfmge and Local CoaW Plan Amendment to ohmge the lana U&I de&gruthu which would m&e it posdble to chvhp a cimcahare prqject at this locath~ At your Miy 18 meetin& the carnmiatim unanlmouuly qGtzcy changea to the land use dmign&no of thir, r&e. At that time, the app!kunt oxnmmuon they would be retunrlng in the nmr future with a developmer& propoe& fm 8 tbahbxv prqkct. We wouldnow like to urge the Plaunhq CawmEsaion to approve the thehare prclject bedng prqmed at thin location, I, the Wed, am unal& to attend tonibt’r Phnhg ccxrrYlPIeslon meethg, but wanted to ahcnv my support fbr the propmad Cunditional UIM Permit and~Tcnrat&a Map fei’ th-6 ~aj@t. COSTA OSL MAR ROAD CAWCAD. CAmowh 9mlY 619438-91i1 PAX 61943$mM / - . Allgmt 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savaly (‘hairpcrson C :A RLSESAE-! PWNTNO COMI~~~SSXCV~ c/o Carlsbnd fllanning Dep~~eat; 2075 lss Palmns Dr, Cat&bad, CL,4 92009 RE: Sxpoiate Rs50rt milr ,Ms. Savnry; I am a mcrotmt in the City of Carlsbad, ancl want to express my support for tlrs ;~pplicant’s proposal ta deVclop a 78 unit t.hwlsare project, ncax We iatcrscction of I~WWWJ Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd, I am familiar with the propascd projcot’s location ovslrlao~~ing the ocean betven i’~h:xtti~ and Paiomar &xpr>rt Rd., and b6licve It is a good site for a timeshare projccr. I feel that the applicant’s choice of loCation eabances the nan~,ged commcr&l growth in the City of Caskbad. Guests at ti~ureshitre r~orts enhance the business of the 1~11 nl~~~rcli~nt.5 In M;Iy of this year, many of US signed a bttcr ia support of th0 Gcncaal PIN-I Anwxh~~e~d/Zoxc Change and Local Ccsastal Plan Anlcndmcnt to change tbc lclnd USC tlkgnations which would make it possible to develop A ticshare project at this lcxa~ion. At your May 18th me&g, the co;damisslo~~ ~~anh~usly n,pprovcd the proposed changes to the Iand use designations of thh Sit& At that time, the applicant infwmd the: c hlmissioti they WJUM bo returning In the near future with a devclopmcnt propcml for a tinmshare project. We would now like to urge thhe Pluming Cotnn~issioll to apprm~e t11e timcshsrro pxoject being proposed at this loca&on. I, ihe undcrsigncd, am uml>Ie ta attend tonQgM’s Phnning Conrmis~~on meeting, but wmlcd to show my support for the pxoposcd Conditioxtai Use Permit and Tsatative MR/> for the project. hw Yours sge 1 t +-+-+ %%hQ-JS ,,_, P&ted Nams: 2lAw c24+-GJ0 l&$&L __,, ,_ m-d--.--- - . Busin e55 A August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. <ZI-“S- AA Signature Printed Name &/J/Y> & f)c-*irJy .u. Business . August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Signature Printed Name 7abiL 9c(ILz d-r G&w Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, L?aMYEU& 5ti6&NA/ Printed Name DLh&A #r/L-r Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Signature /&hLiJ L h4 Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours/ sincerely, : /- , ; / y ./i.& I i;i”-- /’ , _. , ,,.I, ----- Signa6ure \ ! I /“f/L, IL,/ . / J.,-,’ r \: :,-, iz, j j<;-,‘.? 7 Printed Name LI , J\ . 4 .“‘/‘,;, .< Business -- : .-: ; F- 7, 9.,¶,7rnC.GWPI Iv -2 em August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a Ietter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Printed Name August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Printed &me 5Ab-)/ Business ’ ’ I - ? aUG-13-94 TUE 82 :46 CCIRLSBFID. DANISH.BAKERY 619 i-29 2446 August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savaqy Chairperson CARW’BAD I’U.NNING COMMISSION do Carlsbad Rlandng Deparmeat 2075 IAS Palmas IX, CatNmd, CA 92009 RI% Seapointe Resort DCRI’ Ms, Savary: I am it merchant in the city of Carlsbad, and waat to exorasa 1x1~ supp~~rl fur tllc dppkmt’s proposa1 to d8VelOp a 78 unit tifnesl~are project near th0 intersec[;on of Ihswso Rd. awl Cadsbad IHvcI. I am faamifiar with the proposed project’s twatioa overlooking tha wean betwcn Poiwttia aucl Pltlwlar AirpW RcL, and beIiavc it i4 a good site far A timeshare projeot. I fedi that the applktnt’n choice of lwafion enhnnces ths mstiagcd comnwrcitil growtlr ir,~ the City of Carisbad. Guests et rimsshare resorts enban- the busiuess al! tk local tncrchm I$. In May of this ysar, ttlaw of us signed a letter in support of tire GCIlernl ~au AmtiudnwNZone Change and Local Convtal Plan &ncndmeut to chnnge the !wd 11s~ dosignatlatts which would make it possible f~ develop a timoahnro project at this lo&on, At yaw May 18th mocltbg, tha comnieeion unanhoua~ approved the proposed chnllges lc, the IfwI us8 desigwbtione Of this sita, At that lime, Lta applbant iafornred the thm~ission they would bo toturning in the near fufut~ with a devcXapmeut proyosal form a timeshare project. We would now like ta ufge tht! Plan&& Comu\ission to approve tha timeshare prajoot being proposed at this bcatb. II, the unde@t\cd, am unable to attsnd tonight’s Planning Commissioti meetbg, bo t wanted to show my guppbrt for tie yro~6Mt Cotiditioncrt Usa P&mit and %itutive Map few the projWt. August 17, 1994 . Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. f , Signature ~~\l\T , lQ,/J (- JygZrn$ Ri;$ i ‘, Business August 17, 1994 . Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Signature ^ du /dfldV f/c /G%cE/4#& Printed Name August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, - Signature Printed Name CArwid7 f,Lhq e uoc %F Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, &wJ L LiLLi Signature G&&L A;jb’ti %+/i[L!G Printed Name Bushiness - August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Signature i.L+.\ l!.“u& -j-y 1\! c- pD4’ d Printed Name Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. ---.-your , * rely, se/ - ,/’ w -c Signature 17 7 tg /H/c/I+ ti f sd c Printed Name i c L L I ’ * Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. I Yours sincerely, \ ” Signature t (?!& \ &)$& Printed Name Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, , Printed Name cm\ qsq-LJaQ3 Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, G?CL@!s,, Signature Printed Name c ,?+K,Lk - I b:] q Lx-- LL !.TV , Business i I : 1 h August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, 2 i c o./iq & .(;L/z& Signature ,_r-. // J’ I C’ --- r I,“J-c- \ 7) *7ys*& i T’z -c Printed Name \ ..- ’ - /t I /f ;-&* +f; (,j,& ( ‘I Business I c 9’ - August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours siqcer& I Signature Printed Name d/&&c+ /yy(iT,L L-hLt Business h August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. s + 7+aaSHflG~ Printed Name LEtl64Riw? Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, c Az su&& Signature c u lJ L- zl-b’,“, i&c Printed Name P i,,:!i &g(&J I Business i - August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. / Business / August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend to wanted to show my support for the proposed for the project. lanning Commission meeting, but 1 Use Permit and Tentative Map l$ig&tu re niL%J lbss Printed Name Mb&L gcb&g *tie Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, lb 2rPRtEEI Printed Name sfi$& cpoco&~75 Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Signature ~LhQMA A/ J~ORH~X/ Printed Name c6h(. /It-t Cktz,/L Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, /) ~Ldddv.wa?~L E Printed Name z-e CI& m7fkj Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad. CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, &A hx2q Printed Name 1 (&JkFTg&s Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Signature v Business Il.*rTclcch-ml PI w 9vT August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yourz/$ncerely, n ” Business 2 August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, 2sa-L+&&& &A-$) Signature v Dw tlK)A y/%la. Printed Name August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincere1 Signature m\a3 Lc)lLUAp~ Printed Name %%2~~ risy-3 JlL< Businez n ..,-T.7.m. .,w ., Cm C August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Id sLR4t c---b Rrs L3 0 Printed Name Op, &i&CT- Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Printed Name Pt!zw-s bGu4- Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. (J Signature >A mbrma nc Printed Name . Business - August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Signature Printed Name kkw! Pm & Business August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sjncerely, ! j .,‘- ,j& &J& ;‘/- d ,LJ j&J Signature P L.. J-‘-c /iv /g- F&5,&, Printed Name Business C August 17, 1994 . Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, Printed Name \/ l@e@= Business n.rrrr*r.-.m.m.,cDT August 17, 1994 I Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. -r r-, Business August 17, 1994 I Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, * riIuQ> .> Sign r c&q&B@ August 17, 1994 L Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Pahnas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Prinfed Name 0. Business ’ August 17, 1994 . Ms. Peggy Savary Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Car&bad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. Yours sincerely, . 1 I P.01 August 17, 1994 I --. Ms. Peggy Savary Chairpersoa CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Catlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicant’s proposal to develop a 78 unit tie&are project near the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site for a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed commercial growth in the City of Car&ad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the business of the local merchants. In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which would make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the praposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near future with a development proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commission meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project. . . ..lmcl*xQ.n Y cm . . I P.02 - August 17, 1994 Ms. Peggy Savary Cha~rSOn CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Carlsbad Pl arming Department 2075 Las Pabrlas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Seapointe Resort Dear Ms. Savary: I am a merchant in the City of Carlsbad, and want to express my support for the applicaut’s proposal to develop a 78 unit timeshare project uear the intersection of Descanso Rd. and Carlsbad Blvd. 1 am famihar with the proposed project’s location overlooking the ocean between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Rd., and believe it is a good site fox a timeshare project. I feel that the applicant’s choice of location enhances the managed conuxrercial growth in the City of Carlsbad. Guests at timeshare resorts enhance the busiuess of the local merchants. - In May of this year, many of us signed a letter in support of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change and Local Coastal Plan Amendment to change the land use designations which woufd make it possible to develop a timeshare project at this location. At your May 18th meeting, the commission unanimously approved the proposed changes to the land use designations of this site. At that time, the applicant informed the Commission they would be returning in the near filture with a deveIopmcnt proposal for a timeshare project. We would now like to urge the Planning Commission to approve the timeshare project being proposed at this location. I, the undersigned, am unable to attend tonight’s Planning Commissio~t meeting, but wanted to show my support for the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map for the project Yours sincerely, (jARIYNd iy. 18 &%5-7- Printed Name R.lllwxsnrwvI n UPrn