HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-21; City Council; 13039; Rancho Carrillo Villages F, G, and PCIT” OF CARLSBAD - AGEN
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F,“G”.and “P” -
CT 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
I RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council direct the City
Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development
Permit, and Site Development Plan for Ranch0 Carrillo Villages ‘F”,“G”,and “P” - CT 93-07/PUD
93-06, and SDP 94-01.
ITEM EXPLANATION
On January 4,1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
approval with modifications (7-O) of Ranch0 Carrillo Villages l F*,“G”, and “P” (CT 93-07/PUD 93-
06, and SDP 94-01) located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Melrose Drive (future),
in Local Facilities Management Zone 18. No persons other than the applicant and his
representative provided public testimony during the hearing. On January 12, 1995, the Housing
Commission reviewed the associated affordable housing component of the project (Ranch0
Carrillo Village “F” - CT 9307/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01) and recommended (7-O) that the Council
approve the project. The site is located in the Planned Community (PC) Zone and is subject to
the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, as well as Final EIR 91-04 and Hillside
Development Permit 91-17 which were processed concurrently with the Master Plan.
The proposed subdivision consists of 117 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and 1 multi-
family lot with a potential of 120 dwelling units. Access to the site will be provided via future
Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road. Architectural elevations and floor plans will be
processed through the Delayed Architectural Review procedure established in the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan. The Delayed Architectural Review process is intended to allow the
processing of a Planned Development Permit without floor plans and elevations. Floor plans
and architectural elevations are subsequently reviewed by the Planning Commission, at which
time the Planning Commission’s review is focused specifically on architecture, without opening
the tentative map up for re-evaluation and additional conditions. Detailed design guidelines have
been prepared to ensure that a quality development is submitted during the Delayed
Architectural Review process.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the proposed
dwelling units must be provided for lower income households. The applicant is proposing to
provide those affordable dwelling units in a combined affordable project in Ranch0 Carrillo
Village “F”.
I
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan - MP 139(E)
which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within Local Facilities Management Zone 18. The direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR
91-04) for the Master Plan approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. Staff prepared an initial
study to analyze potential environmental impacts of the project and conducted additional project
level studies including soils contamination studies and a drainage study. These studies provide
more focused ‘and detailed analysis. Staff determined that no additional impacts over those
addressed in EIR 91-04 will occur and therefore, the project is in prior compliance with Final EIR
h -
PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. / 3; 0 3 9
91-04. The recommended and applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been
incorporated into the project design or are included as conditions of approval for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT
‘As discussed inthe Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan, all major capital facilities will be
provided within this Zone, concurrent with development. A financing plan that comprehensively
addresses the provision of public facilities has been submitted for staff review, but as yet, not
presented to City Council for action. The financing plan will establish the precise mechanism
for financing all necessary facilities for Zone 18. The developer intends to privately finance the
construction of the affordable units and is requesting no financial assistance from the City at this
time.
The action before the Council will have no direct fiscal impact on the City. The ultimate
development of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area will have a variety of fiscal impacts on the
City including costs and revenues. The financing mechanism for all capital improvements will
be determined by the Zone 18 financing plan. No determination of the specific costs and
benefits has been made at this time.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3686, 3681, and 3682
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 4, 1995
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated January 4, 1995.
EXl-UWT 1
CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGES “F”,“G”, & ‘9”’ I CT 93$;;;f’o~=/ - 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h “r.
EXHBIT 2 !
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Il;o. 3680
A RESOLUTION OF THE P LANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CT 93-07, ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF /
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF FUTURE
MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F”,
“G”, AND .P”
CASE NO: CT 93-07
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 16th day of November, 1994, the 30th day of November, 1994, and
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tract CT 93-07, based on the
following findings:
FIndinns:
1. The proposed map and its design and improvements are consistent with the existing
General Plan, the Ranch0 Canillo Master Plan (MP 139(E)), and with applicable
A-
on the 4th day of January, 1995, hold a public hearing on property described as: /
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range
3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony /
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all ’
factors relating to CT 93-07.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning i
1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
provisions of Title 21, to include but not be limited to, Chapters 21.06,2138,21.44,
21.45,21.53,21JO, and 2195. I
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development as 1
exhibited via a review of the ezisting General Plan and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. ;
Findings were not made pursuant to Section 21081.(c) of the Public Resources Code
that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation
measures of project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.
The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems as
anaiyzed in the Certiiied Environmentai Impact Report (EIR 91-04).
The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgement, acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
In this connection the City Council has approved via the Carrillo Ranch Parks
Agreement alternate easements for access or for use that will be provided and that
these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.
All requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met through
the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
(EIR 91-04). Ail feasible mitigation identified in EIR 91-04 will be undertaken in
this project as designed and conditioned.
The proposed map meets and performs all of the requirements and conditions of
Title 20 and the Subdivision Map Act as all necessary design, dedication,
improvements, and agreements necessary to actualize such performance have been
met or been conditioned to be met via this resolution.
The project is not a conversion of residential real property to condominium,
community apartments or stock cooperatives.
The- property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 so there is no necessity to make a determination of ability
to sustain agricultural use according to the provisions of Section 66474.4 of the State
Government Code nor to determine exception status.
The proposed tentative map complies with all requirements of Hillside Development I
Permit 91-17 and therefore with all requirements of the hillside development
regulations, Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General
Plan.
As designed and conditioned, this project is in prior compliance with Pinai EIR 91-
04, and would not create any additional significant environmental impacts.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -2- 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
16.
17.
- -
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued
availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the
project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
The Tentative Tract Map satisfies all requirements of Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code (except as may be modified for affordable housing incentives) and
the State Subdivision Map Act.
The proposed subdivision implements the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan MP 139(E).
The proposed project’s design and density of the development portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the area, because the Tentative Tract Map meets all City
standards and the proposed residential densities are consistent with the General Plan
and the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan. The surrounding villages and adjacent
properties are either existing residential development or are planned for residential
development, therefore, the proposed residential development would be compatible
with the area.
Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or generai welfare of persons i
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the )
vicinity, because the Tentative Tract Map (CT 93-07) meets all required City
standards and ordinances, all public facilities and services will be provided and
adequate setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby community park, multiple i
family residential and single family residential uses and Melrose Drive have been
incorporated into the project design.
/
The project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project, because the local streets within the
subdivision would be curvilinear and follow the natural contour.
/
I
The affordable housing units required for this project under Chapter 21.85 of the j
Carisbad Municipal Code will be provided pursuant to SDP 94-01, Planning ; Commission Resolution No. 3682.
Each local agency shall consider the effixt of actions adopted pursuant to the
Subdivision Map Act on the housing needs of the region in which the locai
jurisdiction is situated and balance these needs against the public service needs of
its residents and available fiscai and environmental resources. As the project is
consistent with the City’s adopted housing element which has been reviewed and
PC RESO NO. 3680 -3- b
1
2
.3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22.
23.
-. -
approved pursuant to state law by the state, as well as this jurisdiction, to ensure the consideration of regional housing needs, and is consistent with R&ho Carrillo
Master Plan and the Locai Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 which considers
public service needs and available flscai and environmental resources, the project is
in conformance with the requirement of the Subdivision Map Act.
The design of the lot sizes and configuration permits orientation of structures in an
east-west alignment for southern exposure thereby providing for passive or natural
heating opportunities. This design also permits orientation of structures to take
advantage of prevailing breezes to provide a passive or natural cooling opportunity.
All approvals of permits required by Title 21 have been given or issued for this map
or will be given concurrently with this permit. The project site has an approved
Master Plan, and Hillside Development Permit. A Planned Development Permit and
a Site Development Plan are being processed concurrently.
PlanninP Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Approval is granted for CT 93-07, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “S”, dated September
7,1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this project the architectural
data sheets shall be revised to reflect all applicable requirements of the approved
Village Design Guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted
in these conditions, and approved by the Planning Director or City Engineer.
Approval of CT 93-07 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 93-06 and SDP 94-
01.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar copy of the
Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map shall
reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be submitted to
the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500’ scale mylar of the subdivision shah be submitted to the Planning Director I
prior to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets
within and adjacent to the project.
j
I
This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be
approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer
service is available to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer
permits and will continue to be available until time of “cupancy. This note shall be
placed on the final map.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -4- I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
- -
This approval shall be null and void if the property subject to this approval is not 1
annexed to the City of Carisbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the approvai.
Additionaily, annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading, building,
or other permit. (Deadline could be extended for good cause as determined by the
City Manager).
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2,
1991) and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by
the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other
ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system of facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfiIl the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities
fee dated July 13, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilities remain
available to the park site at ail times during development unless prior approval is
secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be provided during ail
phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Services
Director.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 5,1991,
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits. I
Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by
the Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and phasing of
I
j
construction of the Recreational Vehicle storage facility.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereoE, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this- project are challenged this approval shaIl be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid
this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project
without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a Notice of Restriction !
placed on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of i
Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract Map on the real property owned by the j
declarant. Said notice of restriction shall note the property description, location of
the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as
any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the notice of restriction. Said
deed restrictions may be modified or terminated only with the approval of the
PC REZSO NO. 3680
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
A
Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Carlsbad
whichever has final decision authority for this project.
To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities on Melrose
Drive at locations subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District ;
(NCT’D), if such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a minimum :
include-a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench
and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the basic
architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the approval of
the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced, legible version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing.
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced, legible version of the Village “I?‘, “G”, and “P” Design Guidelines on a 24” I
x 36” blueline drawing.
Prior to recordation of any final map, issuance of grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the following shall be met: (1) The deeding of an acceptable
school site to the San Marcos Unified School District if it is determined that a
school site is warrant&, and, (2) A financing plan approved by San Marcos Unified
School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school
facilities in Zone 18. As provided for in the Zone 18 LFMP, if any reimbursement
and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall
provide a mechanism to do so.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building /
permit issuance. I
Suecific Onsite Conditions:
21. Ail open space areas, slopes, and landscaped areas shall be maintained as outlined
on the Landscape Maintenance Exhibit.
22. The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -6- 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
-
23. Elevations and fioor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the delayed i
arehitecturai revievv standards established in the Ranch0 Can-Rio Master Plan, and
shall comply with the Village T, “G”, and “P” Design Guidelines. After reviewing
these plans and determining that they are in conformance with the approved Design 1
Guidelines, staff will present the floor plans and architecture to the Pianning j
Commission per the process described in Title 21.45.160. Prior to or concurrent :
with the delayed architecturai review process, the applicant shall decide whether Lot
51 will be restricted so as not to permit construction of a dwelling unit (in order to
comply with the building separation requirements of Section 21.45.090(5) of the
Carisbad Municipal Code). If it is determined that Lot 51 will not be developed an
open space easement shall be recorded on the lot. If the lot is to be retained as open
space, the lot shall be improved with landscaping as approved by the Planning
Director.
24.
25.
Ail fences and wails for this project shall be in substantial conformance with the
fencing and wail details as weii as the approved locations for each as shown on the
Landscape Concept details. Ail required fencing and/or walls shall be constructed
by the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on a unit-by-unit
basis.
Prior to final map, the applicant shall establish Master and Village homeowner’s
associations and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs
shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items
shall be included in the CC&Rx
(A) No private development shall be permitted within open space lots or within
open space easement areas.
(W The CC&Rs shall include provisions speciijing that individual owners of
property may replace original fencing on their property, however, such
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall design for
the project. The replacement of any fences or wails within this project must
be consistent with one of the fencing or wall design types as shown in the :
Master Pian.
(Cl Ail open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and shall be
maintained.
(W Master Homeowner’s Association maintenance of the Recreational Vehicle
Storage Lot.
09 No parking is allowed within the courtyard area.
26. Elevations, fioor plans, and building layouts must comply with the Design guidelines
for this project pursuant to the approved exhibits and design guidelines.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -7- tb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Landscauez
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading
or building plans, whichever occurs first.
I
,
All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the
Planning Department
Ail landscaping shall comply with the landscape requirements of the Carrillo Ranch
Master Plan and the City’s Landscape Guidelines Manual.
The developer shall include topsoil preservation and rollback and redisking on
cut/fill slopes and open space areas proposed for native revegetation to ensure
stability and growth subject to the approval of the City Engineer and Planning
Director. The top-soil shall be stockpiled on-site and protected against erosion to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
All building pad and street areas of Villages “F’, “G”, and T” that are graded under
HDP 91-17 and remain vacant or undeveioped for a period of more than 6 months
after the grading operation is completed shall be seeded to reduce erosion and visual \
impacts. If grading is phased, the six months time period shall start at the ~
completion of each individual grading phase.
Signs and Identitlcatlon:
35. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and existing /
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of ’
identification and/or address shall contrast to their background color.
36. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in I
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
37. Ail signage shall be designed in co&ormance with the Ranch0 Carrlllo Master Plan.
Signage shall be located in conformance wlth the Landscape Concept Plan.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -8- E’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Environment
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
This proJect shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached mitigation monitoring report and reporting program (Exhibit
“l”), which are required as part of Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho
Carrilio Master Plan EIR 91-04, certiikd by City Council on July 27,1993. ;
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, a detailed
soils contamination report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review
and approval by the City Engineer. The detailed soils contamination report shall
include a soils contamination remediation plan. If remediation is determined to be
unnecessary, the report shall so indicate.
Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct noise
attenuation walls consistent with the noise study prepared by Recon dated June 2,
1992, on file in the Planning Department. Noise mitigation measures shall comply
with Planning Department Policy 17 or other adopted City noise policy in place at
the time of building permit,
Prior to flnai map the applicant shall submit a detailed noise study addressing
necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Village “P” and “P”. Prior to
issuance of building permit: (1) the interior noise levels shall be mitigated to 45
dBA CNEL when openings to the exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings
are required to be closed to meet the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be 1
provided; and, (3) all useable exterior space above the first floor shall be mitigated
to the adopted City standard.
/
I I
Prior to the record&ion of the final map or the issuance of building permits, i
whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of
this tentative map shall prepare and record a notice that this property is subject to /
overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport
in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney.
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and or rental /
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs
shall be approved by the Planning Director.
i I
Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to sensitive and signlflcant habitat will be ’
mitigated under the review and supervision of the California Department of Fish and I
Game, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and any other applicable resource agency.
The mitigation plan must be approved by the involved resource agencies prior to the
recordation of final map. Grading plans shall reflect the resource agencies review
and approval. If modifications are required by the agencies, the applicant may be
required to apply for an amendment to this Tentative Map and/or Planned
Development Permit or apply for new discretionary permits.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -9- t3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Ail outdoor lighting shall be directed away from open space areas where the :
potential to disturb wildlife exists. I
I Prior to approval of the flnai map, the applicant/developer shall be required: (1) to j
consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the j
impact of the project on the coastal California gnatcatcher and; be issued any
permits required by the USFWS.
Prior to grading, the applicant shall retain the services of a qualiiled biologist to be
on-site when surveying and staking of native habitat impact areas occurs. The
biologist is to ensure that the limits of grading are flagged or otherwise marked to
assure that impacts form grading and construction do not exceed those approved as
part of the project.
Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall show evidence to the
City Engineer of a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or final map, whichever occurs first, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval to the City Engineer a Blparian
Mitigation Plan. The Biparian Mitigation Plan may include participation in the
City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the
satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et.
seq. of the California Fish and Game code and Section 404 of the Federal Clean
Water Act. If such plan includes on-site mitigation the applicant shall submit for
revlew and approval by the Planning Director a data recovery program for SDI-
4691B if disturbed by the mitigation plan.
Paieontolonv:
a.
b.
co
Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to /
issuance of a grading permit. /
A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some
of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect j
matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. The ’
Paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during
the grading process.
The paleontologist shall he allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage
artifacts,
PC RESO NO. 3680 -lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
d. Ail fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with
a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History
Museum.
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading
activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
Affordable Housings
50. This project must comply with all requirements of SDP 94-01 in the provision of
affordable housing units.
51. This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required inclusionary units
shall be constructed concurrent with the project market rate units, unless both the
final decision making authority of the City and the developer agree, within an
Affordable Housing Agreement, to an alternate schedule and/or location for
development. Any request for locational modification of mordable Housing Units
granted standards modifications shall be presented to the Planning Commission per
the process described in Title 21.45.160, for a major amendment.
52. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units,
the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to
provide and deed restrict 15% of the total number of dwelling units as affordable to !
lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units. The Affordable /
Housing Agreement shall be required to be submitted by the applicant to the City.
The agreement shall be approved by the Community Development Director based
~
;
on a recommendation from the Planning Director and Director of Housing and /
Redevelopment, and completed and recorded as a deed restriction on those
individual lots or units of the project which are designated for the location of low-
income affordable units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding to ah i
future owners and successors in interest.
(e) The tenure of affordability (useful IiE of the dwelling units);
(f) Incentives (i.e. density increases, standards modifications, and financial
resources) provided by the City;
(I9 Rules and procedures for setting rents, sales prices, and marketing of dwelling
units;
(h) Terms and conditions governing the initial sale and resale of for-sale
inclusionary units; and
PC RESO NO. 3680 -ll- \Jc
The-Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to include, but not be limited
to, the following:
/
) (a) The number of inclusionary lower-income dwelling units; I (b) The units sizes (square footage) and the number of bedrooms per inclusionaxy ’
dwelling unit;
(c) The location of the inclusionary units;
(d) The schedule for production of the inclusionary units;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
,
(i) An administration, monitoring, and management plan.
EnainesrilrP Conditions:
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
This project is located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. All development
design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of
the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
All concrete terrace drams shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility
shall be placed in the CC&Rs.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. If any final map is
recorded for this project prior to the tentative map expiration date, then the
expiration date of the conditionally apppved tentative map shall be extended in
accordance with Section 66452.6(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. If a final map has
not been recorded, an extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension
shah be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In approving an
extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing
conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shah defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map
Act.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City
Council Resolution No. 91-39.
Prior to fInal map approval, the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits
required.
PC RESO NO:3680 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City
harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the
final map or issuance of any grading permit for this project.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City codes and standards.
Upon completion of any phased or project specific grading, the applicant shall ensure
that an “as-graded” geologic plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall
clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic
corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour map
which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shall, be signed by
both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist.. The plan shall be prepared on
a 24” x 36” mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limiti of the subdivision
unless an agreement to grade is executed by the developer and the owners of the
affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the agreement to grade, no
grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either amend the
tentative map or change the plan so grading will not occur outside the project site
in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project
to prevent ofkite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in
accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chapter 11.06.
Rain gutters must be provided on structures located on lots with less than a 5 R
setback from the perimeter of the structure to the lot flowline, in accordance with
City Standard GS-15 to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage course or
street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided or installed prior to, or concurrent with any grading as may be required by
the City Engineer.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
PC RESO NO. 3680 -13- \k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be made by a certifkate on the Anal map for this project or by separate
document. Au land so offered shall be granted to the City free and cl&r of all liens
and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are
not required to be rededicated.
71. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions
are located ofkite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient
title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title
or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
72. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the
site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District
No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
73. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National’ Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. Said plans shall include, but not
be limited to the follow@, which shall be included in the project’s CC&k
k The homeowner’s association shall coordinate the use of the City’s established /
program to assist residents with the removal and proper disposal of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertllizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirements as
prescribed in their respective containers.
c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface
improvements.
74. Prior to flnai map approval, the subdivider shall provide for sight distance corridors
at ail street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record
the following statement in the project’s CC&l&
“No structnre, fence, wail, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches
above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area
identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards.
The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition.’
PC RESO NO. 3680 -14- ?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
The above statement shall be placed on a non-mapping &ta sheet on the flnai map.
In accordance with the Ranch0 Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR),
grading of natural habitat should not occur during the nesting season of any
endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of coastal California gnatcatcher
occupied habitat and wlthin 200’ of riparian habitat, occupied by least Bell’s vireo
and willow flycatcher, should be restricted to the period between September 1 and
February 15 of any given year.
Prior to approval of the final map, drainage outfall end treatments for any dralnage
outlets where a direct access road for maintenance purposes is not provided, shall
be designed and incorporated into the grading/improvement plans for the project.
These end treatments shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from
obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consist of a modified outlet headwall
consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or
radially designed rip-rap, as a method of preventing vegetatlon growth directly in
front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to approval of the Anal map, a Certiilcate of Compliance and Adjustment Plat
No. 444 shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Englneer may require
an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evaiuation
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recommended
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements as required in the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)
for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These
improvements unless otherwise modiiled by the ilnai decision-making body, shall be
substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
A. Melrose Drive - Alna Road to Palomar Airport Road
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arterial
standards.
. Construction of a median and two lanes in each direction and
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
B. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial
standards.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -1s \”
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
l Construction of full maor arterial standards from the intersection
with Meirose Avenue to the entrance to Village “J” and the school site.
C. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width.
. Construction of one lane in each direction Born the southerly
boundary of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village “I’“.
D. Sewer Facilities. includingz
. 12” main in Melrose Drive
. 12” main in, or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
. North La Costa Lift Station
E. Water Facilities, lnciudingz
. A portion of the proposed potable 244nch main in the future
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
. The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast comer of
Zone 18.
. The proposed potable 304nch transmission line in the proposed
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
. A portion of the proposed reclaimed a-inch maln in the proposed
alignment of Meirose Avenue.
. The proposed reclaimed 384nch main in the proposed alignment of El
Fuerte within Zone 18.
. The proposed potable 12” main Born Melrose to El Fuerte through
sewice Area E.
F. Drainage Facilities. including
. Proposed box culvert under Melrose Drive.
PC FtESO NO. 3680 -16- 1%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
l Detention basins, channei and flood control improvements as
necessary to mitigate for erosion and protect on site Master Plan and
off site downstream properties from significant impacts.
VILLAGES “F. “G’. AND “P” - SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
the developer shall submit proof to the City Engineer that a “Notice of Intention” was submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and receive approval
from the City Engineer of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Paiomar Airport Road, Melrose Drive, and
P-B/G-B Street shall be waived on the final map.
This project is specifically approved as three (3) units for recordation purposes. All
public facilities needed to serve each unit, in accordance with City Standards and
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, shall be guaranteed for construction prior
to recording of a ilnai map for this project.
Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall provide an acceptable means for
maintaining the private easements within Village “F and ail of the private
improvements located therein. The costs of such maintenance shall be distributed
in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within Village T”.
Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included within the CC&Rs,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issued
for the remainder parcei until it is further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of
Title 20 of the Carisbad Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on a separate
non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map,
in zkcordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install or agree to install and
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, all improvements shown on the
tentative map and necessary to service the proposed villages including, but not
limited to:
1. Vlllwe “F On-Site Imnrovements
k Village “F Frontage Improvements to Palomar Airport Road,
including:
. No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane . Eastbound bicycle lane
PC RESO NO. 3680 -17- 2-O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side) I I . Stnxt iight standards (south side) . Landscape raised median . Community theme wail (south side)
. Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain
reimbursement for one-half of the raised median ha&cape/landscape
improvements from the fronting property owners on the north side of
Palomar Airport Road.
B. Half street plus 12 B. improvements to P-B Street Along the Village
“F Frontage terminating at the Village “F entrance, including:
. Two vehicular travel lanes (36’ width)
. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (one side)
. Street light standards (one side)
. Ail utilities generally placed beneath the required trawl lanes.
C. All public storm drainage faclllties necessary to convey drainage to an
approved drainage course.
D. All sewer and water facilities required to service the Village.
Villape “F Off-Site Imurovements
k Village “P” Frontage Improvements to Palomar Airport Road,
including:
. No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane . Eastbound bicycle lane . Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side) . Street light standards (south side) . Landscape raised median . Community theme wall (south side) . Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall . Ail utilities generally placed beneath the required travei lanes.
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain I
reimbursement for one-half of the raised median ha&cape/landscape
improvements from the fronting property owners on the north side of
Paiomar Airport Road.
B. Temporary emergency access improvements, off-site through
Village “E”, including:
PC RESO NO. 3680 !J -18-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
,-
. Two vehicular travel lane asphalt/concrete pavement (28 minimum
width).
I . Temporary emergency access easement must be obtalned to facllltate /
this emergency access construction and use.
. This emergency access shall be gated to the satisfaction of the Fire
Marshal and City Engineer.
If this temporary easement cannot be obtained, then off-site improvements
will have to be constructed to facilitate emergency and/or public access in
accordance with all applicable City Standards and to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
c. Full improvements to Vlllage “E* “B” Street and “I” Street from the
Village “F Project Boundary to Palomar Airport Road. Sidewalk may
be limited to one side on an interim condition.
D. A fully actuated trafilc signal at the intersection of “I” Street with
Palomar Airport Road.
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain
proportionate share reimbursement for the above trafi’lc signal from
benefitting property owners to the north and south of Paiomar Airport Road.
PHASE II
1.
2.
Villape “P” On-Site Imurovements
k Ail public streets within the Phase II boundary including all sewer,
water, and storm drains.
B. Pedestrian/bicycle trail improvements, including:
. D/G surface (8’ minimum width)
Villwe “P” Off-Site imnrovements
k Full improvements to G-B Street from the Vlllage “P” project boundary :
to Carrillo Way.
B. Full improvements to Carrlllo Way from “G-B” Street to Melrose
Drive. Sidewalk may be limited to one side only on an interim basis.
In accordance with the City’s culde-sac standard, improvements A and B
above shall be required only if complete construction of village “P” occurs as
a single phase of development. If Village “P” is only constructed to a
PC RESO NO. 3680 -19- a”
'1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
maximum of 50 units at a l200 ft. maximum distance then improvements A /
and B above can be deferred until such time as the remainder of the phase
is completed.
c.
.
.
.
D.
.
.
.
PHASE III
Remaining improvements to P-B Street, along the Village “F
frontage, from the ~liage “F entrance westeriy to the project
boundary, including:
I2 ft. of roadvvay pavement (Totai 48 ft. width)
Curb, gutter and sidewalk (one side)
Street Light Standards (one side)
Pull improvements to P-B Street, along the Village “F
frontage, from the Village “F entrance easterly to the
Village “F boundary, including:
Two vehicular travel lanes (48’ width)
Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (both sides)
Street light standards (both sides)
1. Villape “c” on-site imnrovements
k
B.
.
c.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PC RESON0.3680 -2o-
All public streets within the Phase III boundary including all sewer,
water, and storm drains.
Pedestrian/bicycie trail improvements, including:
D/G surface (8’ minimum width)
Frontage improvements to Meirose Drive, including:
No. 3 northbound vehicular travel lane
Northbound bicycle lane
Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (east side)
Street light standards (east side)
Landscape raised median
Landscape area between sidewalk and east right-of-way line
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
-
,
2. Villapc “G’ off-site imnrovements
A. Pull improvements to Carrillo Way from Village boundary to Melrose
Drive. Sidewalk may be limited to one side on an interim basis.
Ail conditioned improvements must be specifically shown on the Conforming
Tentative Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
A copy of ail of the above improvement conditions shall be placed on a non-mapping
data sheet on the finai map in accordance with the provisions of Section 66434.2 of
the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within
eighteen (18) months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such
other time as provided in said agreement.
The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structural section
of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City, and the
standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval
of the final map for this project.
Prior to approval of the final map for Villages “F or “P”, the developer shall
reimburse the City for the proportionate share of frontage cost of constructing half
street improvements on City Project No. 3166, Palomar Airport Road. Said
reimbursement shall be less the non-discretionary funds designated for the frontage
construction as determined by the City Engineer and Pinance Director.
Prior to final map approval, the owner of the property on behalf of itself and ail of ’
its successors in interest shall execute and record a notice of disclosure and a hold
harmless agreement on Village “G” noticing any future owners of the presence of a
mitigated geologic haxard and indemnify the City of Carisbad, agents, officers, and
employees from any action that may arise through any subsequent geologic failure,
!
;
ground water seepage, or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur
on or adjacent to Village “G”, due to its construction, operation, or maintenance. A
notice to this effect and a reference to the recorded document shall be included on
a non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
Prior to final map approval, public open space easements shall be placed on the
conforming tentative map on slopes adjacent to all public roadways to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and in conformance with the Ranch0 Carrillo
Villages “F, “G” & “P” Landscape and Maintenance Responsibility exhibit.
Fire Conditions:
92. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted
to and approved by the Fire Department.
PC RESO NO. 3680
a+
-21-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
- -
Additional onsite public hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval of access,
driveways and general traffic circulation.
An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall
have posted “No Parking/Fire Lane” pursuant to Section 17.04.020, Carlsbad
Mimicipal Code.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the
City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clearance plan
to the Fire Department for approval.
Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted
to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to the Fire
Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following criteria:
* 400’ scale * Photo reduction on mylar * At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the
map (not a separate vicinity map) * Maps shall include the following information:
Street centerlines
Street names
Fire hydrant locations
Fire suppression areas shall be provided as shown on Exhibit “N”, attached to the
!5taffrepolta
Carisbad MuniciDal Water District Cdndltions:
103. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall be
evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
PC RESO NO. 3680 -22-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
104.
105.
106.
The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the
City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to
preparation of the wafer system improvement plans.
The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The developer
shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capaciq charge which will be
collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of
application for water service and will continue to be available until time of
-PaV*
107. Sequentially, the developers engineer shall do the following:
8, Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection
requiremeuts.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department for processing and approval.
1
I
Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and j
approval of the preliminary system layout usage (G.P.M. - D.D.U.) plan for
potable, reclaimed and sewer ‘systems prior to the preparation of
improvement plans.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
- -
PC RESO NO. 3680 -23-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at ‘a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th of January, 1995, by the
following vote, to wit
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Envin,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABsENTi None.
ABSTAINt None.
WI&SHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3680 -24
EXHIBIT 1
Ranch0 Carriilo Master Pian I-
Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
A. Agriculture
/‘. j ,
~mpacf. Possible soil contamination from agricuhural chemicals formerly used or stored on the site.
Mitigation. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigation recommendations, if necessary, to City Planning Department and 7~ my Health Depammt. 2) bfitigation to be made a condition of tentative maps approved under the Master Plan. 3) Report on completed remediation to be submitted to City Planning Department and County Health Department upon completion.
Master PZan ImpZementation. A soils report for the property owned by Continental Homes and
the property being dedicated for park purposes has been received by the Planning Department. Any mitigation required for soils contamination Wicated by this report will be remedied prior to issuance of a grading permit. Impacts may occur if additional pesticide concentrations and/or
hazardous waste mamials or containers are found during development, in which case the referenced mitigation would be applicable. Soils reports for other properties within the Master Plan will be required with the submittal of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2) Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Completion of construction of each
tentative map subdivision.
Responsible Pa@. 1) City Planning and Enginazing Deparrmcnts.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approW without ncccsary conditions. 2) No final
maps, building or grading pmnits issued until mmediation report submitted.
Impact. Possible conflict between earlier stages of Master Plan deveiopment and continued .
d 1 1 agricultural use of other portions of the site, including agricultural chemical use, irrigation runoff, and odor.
Mitigation. Each tentative map must provide a list of performance and impact criteria specified
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffering, to ensure the phasing development is compatible with continued agricultural use.
Afaster Pfan Impkmentation. There wiI1 be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consistent with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use. 9
-
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map undo the Master Plan. 2)
Approval of each tentative map under the Master PIan. 3) Consmztion of each tentative map
subdivision.
ResponsibZe Porrp. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departmans.
Sanction& 1) No tentative maps to be approved without nccessaq a~~~ditions. 3) hpe%tion of construction by grading inspectors. No building permits issued until performance criteria are
implemented.
B. Biology
GenemZ Note. To ensure the implementation of all mitigation for mtiai impacts to biological resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior to
approval of each tentative map, as appropriate, show evidence to the City Planning Department that a qualified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor all relevant mitigation, assure compliance with mitigation requirements, superhe impicmcntation of mitigation, and file a
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upon completion of major
components of biological mitigation requir~mcnts.
Impact. Implementation of the Master Plan will directly impact wetlands on-site and, by
construction of a sewer line in the right of way for CakIlo Way to the west, off-site.
Mitigafion. The applicant for the project shall either restore and arhance riparian habitat at an appropriate area ratio to impacts or shall participate in a city-wide mitigation program through
the City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the
City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and
Game Code and.Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act.
Master Plan Implementation. No mitigation required for offkite under sewer alignment
currently proposed by applicant north of Carrillo Way alignment. Such alignment has no
wetland impacts.
Cite&points. Approval of the fint tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- or off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Pam. City Planning and Enginexring Departmats, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Sanctions. No grading map under the Master Plan.
-
Impact. If the project is not reconfigured to substantiaIly avoid populations of San Diego
thommint and thread-leaved brodiaea, development will signikantiy impact those species.
Mitigation. To partially mitigate impacts, the mitigation pians for San Diego thommint and thread-leaved brodiaea shall be implemented, modified as specified in the EIR and after review
and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of appnnral of tentative maps under the Master Plan.
To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accompiiskd prior to construction resulting
in impacts.
Master Plun Implementalion. Wages T and U have been xeconfigured to avoid impact to
thotimint. Village G has been reconfigured to mini&e impacts to Brodiaea.
Clteckpoints. 1) Submittai of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps. 3) Prior to construction causing impacts.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps for Village G without acceptable mitigation
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact. Potential for future disturbance of open space areas.
Mtigation. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open $ace, biological mitigation
areas, buffer areas,. ‘and naturalbed areas to avoid disturbance of the natural habitats as a
condition of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. J) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Patty. 1) City Planning and Engineering Dcpartmcnts.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without depiction of acceptable open space easements and condition to dedicate consexvation easements over natural open space.
Impact. Possible predation or disturbance of Caiifomia -hers or other sensitive wildlife
species by future residents or domestic pets.
Masfet Ptun Implementation. No approval of Tentative Maps for afktcd Villages without
mitigation condition, if any, required by California Department of F& and Game or U.S.
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
f ./’ 7 (2 ‘2 Mitigation. As determined by above refennced agency.
Checkpoinfs. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
ResponsiZde Party. 1) City Planning and Engkring Departments.
Sanitions. 1) No Tentative Map approved without mitigation, if any, imposed by referenced
lead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant areas by non-native landscaping species.
Mitigatz’on. As a component of the landscaping plans for affected Villages, revegetation plan for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be pqared by a qualified biologist, and landsraping plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by tk biologist.
Clreckpoinfs. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Completion of landscaping and revegetation.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and E@cering Departments, consulting biologist.
Sunctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without satisfactory landscaping and revegetation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat arcas during grading and construction.
,i Mitigafion. The consulting biologist shall supen& surveying and staking of native habitat areas
and monitor pOrading and construction.
- -
% , ,,$ .i i ’
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Report by consuhingb~ologist.
Responsible Pmy. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting biologist.
Sunctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper mitigation condition. 2) No
issuance of building or occupancy permits until consulting biologist’s report is submitted to the
Planning Department.
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and
construction.
. I c: -. _ Mitigation. Due to conflicting biologist’s opinions regarding mitigation, finai mitigation plan, , if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fish and Wife and/or California Department of Fish and
Game, aS appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or construction in restricted area, if any.
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
,;& q I/. Mitigation. Outdoor Iighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoinfs. 1) Atiproval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement plan checks. 3) Construction of improvements near conservation casement areas with report to Planning
Department by consulting biologist.
-
Responsible Party. 1) City manning and Go$neaing v 2) Consulting biologist
Sanctions. 1) NO appirwai of tentative map without &@ioa amditions. 2) No approval of grading or improvement plans without proper miti&x~ specified. 3) NO issuance of
building or occupancy permits without properly accomplisi& mitigation.
Impuct. Potential for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat areas f&n erosion and sedimentation
from the project.
Mitigation. S~IE hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Checkpoints. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Responsible Party. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. Set hydrology and water quality mitigation.
C. Cultural Resources
Impact. Possible vandalism due to increased human pms,cae to archaeological site SDI-
12,740B.
f+’ , \
‘U Mitigation. The site shall be capped with fabric, soil, and vegetation as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained
by the tentative map- applicant.
Master Plan Implementarfon. This site! is locatai cm site to be daiicated to City of Carisbad
for parkland. The capping of this site will be the respokbiiity of the City of Carlsbad.
Geckpoinfs. 1) Submittal of development plans for park site. 2) Approval of such plans. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Departmknt upon completion
of work and prior to commencement of development of park site.
Responsible Prutg. 1) City Planning and Eng&&ng wts. 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting archaeologist, City planning and Engineering Departments.
-
Sanctions. 1) No approval of site development plan without mitigation-plan. 2) No grading
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consuIting archaeologist is submitted to City Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4691B.
Mtigation. A data recovery program as specified in the EIR must be required as a condition
of the tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentative map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Master Plan Implementation. Mitigation of this site will not be required unless this area is disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeologist
submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any moradig for
construction affecting the site.
Responsible Pam. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
Impuct. Direct impacts of development on archaeelogical site SDIQ687.
Mirigation. Capping of the site as specified in the EIR as a condition of any tentative map
affecting the site. Work must be sumsed by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentative
map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any grading or amstrn&on affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submit&xi to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or axwuction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting archaeologist.
Sanctions. 1) SubmittaI of tentative map sot complae without mitigation plan. 2) No approval of tentative map without mitigation pk. 3) No building pamits to be iss& until
mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submit&i to City planning Departments.
Impact. Encroachment of proposai development of t&c Master Plan on the rural, “early
Glifomia” setting of the Leo Carrillo historic site. ,-. , q, i Mitigation. Establishment and impIementation of a spazial design district as required under
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation matitaing and reporting program.
Checkpoints. See Land Use Compatibility sectian.
Responsible Party. See Land Use Compatibility section.
Sanctions. See Land Use Compatibifity section.
i
'2 !
D. Paleontological Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant fnssils, especWy in the Santiago and Lusardi
Formation, by grading and construction.
Mitigafion. Monitoring of grading by a paleeatoIogist, with recovery and curation of any significant fossils discovered, as specified in the ElR. Monitoring is to be performed under the direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by the applicant for each tentative map.
Clreckpoinfs. 1) ApprovaI of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting paleontologist
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineekng Departments. 2) Consulting
paleontologist.
35
-
Sanctions. 1) Approval of tentative map not complete without mitigation-pian. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting paleontologist is submitted to City Planning Department.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
Impact. Major drainage facility design wiil be required to avoid potential advert effects of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
Mitigation. As a condition of approval each tentative map, the applicant shall submit a hydrology analysis addressing required flood atknuation, runoff flow reduction/siltation, and proper sizing of drainage fkilities.
Marter Plan Intplementati~n. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tentative map.
Responsible Parry. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of approval.
Impact. Major drainage facilities will have to be constructed to avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
r’ 7 -’ ,- - Masfer Plan hnpie~entation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The final decision-making body shall approve a Financing Plan addressing the
source and use of funds for the construction of all required drainage ftities prior to recording
the first Final Map or the issuance of the fint grading or building permit, ‘whichever is first.
Checkpoints. Recording of first final map or issuance of Grst grading or building permit. each tentative map.
Responsible Pam. City Engineering Depertmcnt.
Sanctions. No recording of final map or issuana of grading or building permit without
Financing Plan guarantee for construction of required drainage facilities.
hpact. Potential erosive or flooding damage to structures in L#, CasriUo Ranch Park due to nmoff from the developed site eMahg tbt dminagc south of the pk. -r
Mitigation. An hydroiogy analysis for the dmiuage south of the park shall be submitted with
the applicable tentative map or prior to issuance of advapeed gr&ing pexmit for hklro~e
Avenue, and an appropriate drainage system shall be required prior to the issuance of the kt
grading permit affecting the area and constructed concurrat with the grading of the affected area.
Clrec&?oinZs. 1) Approval of applicable tentative maps. 2) kwauce of first grading permit.
Responsible Party. 1) Engineering Department. 2) Engincairtg Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper drainage system shown. 2) NO
iisuance of building permits until drainage system implementi.
3’
C h
H+dogy Md Waer Quaii$ 10
Impact. Installation of the proposed storm drain buween ViUagcs R aad T in Open Space Area 13 would disturb sensitive biologicai ruoumesintheopenspacearea
Mitigation. The storm drain sha,U be rdocated to run south from Village Q to connect to a storm
dram in either El Fuene Street or Choriho Street. L
I- \ Martor Plan Implementafi&a, ‘Ibis storm drain has been rehxated inm areas that will be graded as a
part of the development of Villages Q and R wherever possible to avoid sarsitive habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of ten&e map for Villages Q and R inciudii the storm drain. 2) Approval of Village Q and R temative map. 3) Completion of storm dram construction.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Engineahg Departmm~ 2) City Engineering Department. 3) City
Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map mt aomplete without showing storm drain in proper location. 2) No approval of tentative map without storm drain shown in proper iocation. 3) NO issuance of building permits for temarive map until storm dram properiy constructed.
Impact. Potential for increased on-sire erosion aml increased sedimentation downstream when ground
surface is disturbed during grading ami constru&n.
,/’ Miiigofion. An Erosion and Sedimmation Controi Plan must be prepared for each development I’
!
..- -, submittal, approved by the City Engineer, and impiemented during construction. . L’ Checkpoints. Approval of any ,Mig or improvement pian in the Master PIan area.
Responsible Patties. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits witbout Erosion and Sediion Control Plan approved by the City Engineer.
Impact. Potential impacts of urban pollutants from the deveioped site afktion water quality in Batiquitos Lagoon.
Miiigation. Discharge of runoff from developed areas into naturalised channds and public education information distributed to property ownas,
Master Plan Impkmentbtion. A deraiiai Hydrological Study must be approved prior to issuance of a grading permit for the grading nw to construct the Ciiation Element Roadways.
Clieckpoints. 1) Approval of appiicable tentative maps. 2) Completion of construction of drainage
channels. 3) Close of escrow to proputy owners.
Responsible Part&s. 1) City Engineering Dcppmraz 2) City Engheuiug Ilymmt.
3) Developers
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without proper design of n&f drainage facilities. 2) No issuance of building permits uniess runoff draimge facilities property constructed.
Impact. Potential for grease, oil, and other traffic-&ted pollutants f&n paved surfaces to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff.
Mitigatidn. Best management practices shall be anpioyai to prevent urban poUutanr,s from entering City waterways in compliance with National Pollutant Dhharge Elimination System municipal stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in the h4asta Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Deparanea~
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits without Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ph approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impact. Geologic conditions potentially unsuitabie fix development on the site without remediation in&de soils unsuitable for load-bearing or with base settkment pot&al, old landslide areas and
ciaystone beds, and high-groundwater in alluvial soils.
Mitigation. Remedial grading will be needed to esaMis& firm footings br struuures and fills and to
correct adverse settlement and alluvial soils OVCI sha5ow groundwater. A soils engineer and engineering geologist s&ii be retained by each termtive map applicant to review detailed grading pians, prepare a.detailed soil and geologic investigrion, monitor construaion, and assure compliance with the l ,aster Plan geologic investigation and the City Grading Ordii.
Checkpoints. 1) Submiaai of each tentative mq. 2) Approval of each tenta& map and issuance of grading permit. 3) Completion of coastru&a
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineer@ DeolmneJn, 2) City Engine&ng Department. 3) Consulting soils engbeer and engineaing gatlogis& C&y Engheer.
Sancfions. 1) Tentative map submittal not complete without detailed soil and geologic investigation 2) No tentative map approval without soil and geologic investigation and appropriate conditions. 3) No issuance of building permits,without evidaxc of proper mitigation.
3”
Air Qua&q 12
G. Air Quality h
Impact. Potential for significant direct impacts to regionai air qnaiity due to increases in pollutant
emissions caused by project traf@.
4 \ Mitigation. Implementation of Master Plan measures induding bike lanes and pedestrian trails, and
L. requirement for appiicants for future tentative maps to work with North County Transit District to
provide bus routes and stops es approp&e.
CheCkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approvai of tentative maps.
Responstife Patties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departmenta. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Submittai of tentative maps ~MX complete without appropriate mitigation measures. 2) No approval of tentative maps without application condiiom.
!, \ \.
H. Land Use
Impacf. Development of the Master Plan would encroach on the ‘early California” serting of Carrillo
Ranch Park, including the eiimination of the northern entry m the ranch compound.
Mitigation. A Special Park Design Diict shall be establ’uhed for development surrounding the park,
including special controls on setbacks, landxapiig, and a&itecmral details and an entry through the
park through Village S. lhe design diict standards will be included in the Master Plan and subsequent tentative maps will be evaluated for conformance by the Planning Commission.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of the Master Plan. 2) Apptwd of tentative maps that include part of
the design district.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Planning Department. 2) Cii Phuming Department.
San&w. 1) No apprwpi of the Master PIan without establishment of a park design district and development standards. 2) No approvaI of tentative mapa containing part of the design district without setting forth dia developmcd star&da.
Impact. The City of Carisbad has no review anthority over Village S, which is in the park design district, if it is developed aa a school site by the San Marcoa Unified School District. 1
-
Lad use 13
Mitigation. Agreement with the school disuict on deign srauda& is eaanmged, but cannot be enforced by the Planning Commission. Withoyt r&ew of all devdopmem within the design district, it is not within the power of the Lead Agency to assure that possible impacts are mitigated or avoided.
\ 1 I- Checkpoints. No Lead Agency cbeckpoims without ?&r#mcm with the school district.
Responsibk Paties. Responsibility for mitig&n is within tbe tirity of another jurisdiction and
not the City of Carlsbad.
Sandionr. None available to the City of Carl&ad u&r present circumsmmx
Intpod. Dedication of the open space link at the southwest corner of the property, where the link crosses from one zone to an adjacent owner&p, is not assured under the proposed Master PIan.
Mifigation. Assure continuance of the open space link as part of the Masta Plan.
.I:
\ ;*
t-
Master Plan Implementation. Cadsbad’s Open Space Advisory approved the open space link
proposed by the Master Plan at their Febnury 1993 meeting.
Chrc&poin!s. 1) Approval of Master Pfau. 2) Approval of tentative map including Village T.
Responsible Purrics. Planning Departmem.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without opar space link.
Impucf. Applicants for the Masta Plan must obtain a letter from the San Marcos Unified School District accepting the site proposed by applicauts as possible school site area in compliance with the
I Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plau.
\- \ \ Mitigtzzion. Agreement with the San Marcos Unified Schooi Diict as part of Master Plan approval.
Chtckpoints. Approval of Master PIm,
Responsible Puiies. Platmiug Dep?rmncat
Son&~. No approval of Master Plan without agreement with the schooi district that complies with the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
Viid AmheridGrading 14
I. Visual Aesthetics/Grading c
Impact. Grading proposed by the Master Plan requires tindings justitj4ng ,4ing vohxmes to be
approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer according to the Hillside Development Ordinance.
‘Mitigation. Approval of findiigs for the proposed grading volumes prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsible Patties. Planning Director and City Engineer.
Sanerions. No approval of the Masta Plan without the required findings.
Impacf. Proposed grading for the Masta Plan would exceed Hillside Development Ordinance
allowances for slope height and encroachment into 40 percent siopes without specified findings by the
decision making body.
Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed grading concurrem witb approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of the Master Plan.
Responsible Pa&es. ~Decisiin making Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Masta Plan without the required findings.
Impact. Potential impacts of Master Plan development on the visually sensitive Carrillo Ranch Park
site, including Villages S, 0, atmd Q.
Mih’gution. Appiicable mtatiw maps to indicate au accepab1e detailed landscape plan to reduce
potential impacts. Implement Special Park Design District recommended in EIR’Land Use section.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of appiicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Planning Department. 2) City Phmhg Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative nnp submittal not complete without detailed landscape plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map wit&n+t appropriate detailed landscape plan.
V&d Aarhekt/Gding . 15
Impact. Potentially significant impact of recre&nai vehide storage in Open Space Area 13 on views
from existing residences..
Mitigufi2n. Detailed landscape plan as part of omtative map for Village Q and R to effective1y screen views of recreationai v&de storage.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative map h&t&g maeational vehide storage. 2) Approval of tentative map including recreationai vehide stomge.
Responsible Pa&s. 1) City Planning Departramt. 2) City Plantring Department.
Sundions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not amtpke without appropriate landscaping plan. 2) No approval of tentative map without appropriate Wsaping plan.
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of noise barriers over six fea in height.
Mtigafion. Detailed landscaping plan for tenuuive maps to provide adquate cover, texture, and
,’
,I 5
variation of vegetation to screen wails.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of any tentative mq showing misc barriers over six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map showing noise barriers ova six feet in height.
Responsiblr Panics. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sandions. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative maps not complete witboot appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of applicable tentative maps without appropriate landscaping plan.
,x,- J
J. Cimilation
\
ImpucI. The -on of Palomar Airport Road aud El Camino Real is projected to have a level of service F in the year 2000 af&ermon peak hour. No &ditiod improvanents to thii intersection are
currently proposed in the LFMP.
Mitigufion. The Cii will coutiuue to monitor traf& to determine confimnauce with LFMP standard
and to identify and implement improvements v to meet the star&d.
Checkpoints. Construction of impfovanents.
Responsible Paties. City Eng&ering Department.
- -
Vuuai Aestheria/Gmdiag 16
Sandions. No issuance of buiiding permits if Growth w stamkds, for traffic leveis of
service are not met.
fmpacfs. Spacing of the t?rst intersection on Palomar Airport Road is 200 feet closer than City
standards allow.
Mitigatiin. Tentative maps shall comply with City rod alignment and intersection spacing standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. .
5 L- Master Pkn Impkmentatk. The location shown on the proposed Master Plan has not been revised
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval of tentative maps.
Respondle Parties. City Engineering Deparmunt.
Sanctions. No approval of temative maps that do not comply with City road alignment and
intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the Cii Engineer.
Impucr. As proposed, deveiopment of the Master Ran would require traffic signals at Palomar Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Melrose Atram!- to Villages H, 0, and L.
/ /. 3 .J ’ Mitigufitwz. Conditiontentative maps to construct the necessq signals and improvements, or determine the need for signals in traffic studies for tentab maps.
Checkpoints. 1) submittal of applicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
ResponsibZe Pa&es. 1) City Engineering Deg~twm. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sancrions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without applicable conditions.
Impud. Certain revisions of the internal circulation sysam dewibed in the EIR may be preferable
/ /‘. \i
for environmental or fziratiatoxy reasons.
-J., Mitigation. Traffic studies for applicable tcntrjve maps ShJl duermiue in consultation with City staff
whether specified changes in the circulation patcrn shouid k implemmted as conditions of applicable
tentative maps.
Master Plan Impkmentatioa. Revisions to the Master Plan Ciiarion and proposed tentative maps
have already been made to add&s the recommendations of the EIR and approved by the City
Engineer.
Circularion 17
Checkpoinfs. 1) Appnmi of tentative maps.
Responsible Portirs. 1) Cl Planning and Engine&g Deparumns. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departmans.
Sunctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps witbop qplicable c4Mitions.
K Noise
Imp&t. Certain areas adjaceat to major roads in the hIaster Plan ara could experience future traflic noise in excess of the City standa& of 60 dBA CNEL.
hftigation. Tent&e maps shall show appropriate misc bafrias as specSed in the EIR or to City
d- / .\ standards to attenuate wise. If grading shown in the h&s&r Plau for development in areas of
excessive unattenuated noise is modified by temative maps, the rmdifkatiom shall be reviewed by the
City Engineer and a IKW acousticaI study shall he @otmed ad appn@t& mitigation implemented
if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall have tk aption of tequu&g a reduction in height of barriers over six feet to m leas than six feet to rakevisual m per City policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) @e&n of unntntctai improvements.
ResponsiZde Parties. I) City Platming and Eng&amg Deppapans. 2) City Engineering
Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval without proper barriers as a condii 2) No issuance of subsequent
permits.
Impoct. Second floors of some residential uttlts @zatt to Cll Element roadways could
experience interior noise leveia in excess of the 45 dBA CNEL stand&
Mitigufion. Propo& tentatk maps shall be sknvn to have designs fktr multi-story residences next to
Circulation Ekncnt roadways which would achieve imaior noise Ieveis of 45 d.BA CNEL or less for second or higher storia. Acoustical studies to m co@ianee may be required by the City Engineer.
Checkpoinfs. 1) Appmai of mtative maps. 2) bpeaion of amtmc@ improvements.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Plpnning and Engine&g w 2) Building Department.
Sanctions. 1) No appmval without proper barrias s a cot&inn. 2) NO issuance of subsequent permits. j
Pa& Facilities and Servicu 18
L. \
<
L. Public Facilities and Services
Impad; There is a potential fix the LPMP pafhmxe snndard fk park facilities to be exceeded depending on the timing of development and the status of other hmre parkland iu City Park Diict 4.
Mifigadion. Prior to the rccordation of any BmI map unde the Masta plan, sutflcient parkland shall be dedicated within Zone 18.
Chhckpoints. Recordation of first final map uude the Master Plau.
Responsibk Padies. City Planning, Eagheaiug~ lad Packs aud Recrath Deparunents.
Suncfions. No recordation of fti map withaat dedication of suff@ient parklaud within Park Diict 4.
Impact. The LFMP performance standard rqtires tb% a school site in Zone 18 be deeded to the San
Marcos Unified School district (SMUSD) and tbrt a hnciug phm be approved by the SMUSD prior
to recordation of aay final map or issuance of auy gradiug or hilding permit iu Zone 18.
Mitigrrtion. Compliauce with the Zone 18 nqoinmea.
Checkpoints. 1) Recordation of the tht ftru snap w&r the Master Plan. 2) Issuance of any
grading or building permit in the Master Plan area.
ResponsNe Pads. City Planning And Engineer@ Depammts.
Sanctions. No Final map recorded witht LFMP req~imnem bdag me(.
ImpucZ. sewage geaezation could exceed tretrmead cap&y if residd development occurs in the
Master Plaa arro after 200%
Mirigrrtion. Implemeut measures specified in the LPMP for auy tentath maps causing the potential
impact to be realized.
Checkpdnfs. 1) Submittal of tentative maps after 2005. 2) ApprcW of tentative maps submitted after 2005.
Responsi& Pe. 1) City planning and Engineering Dqrauuns. 2) City Planning and Engineering Departmenu.
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps afta 2006 wi&ut a&i&x @ring conformance with
LFMP requirements.
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Impact. Depending on regional phning for thi expmim oflamll%l a@% t&e b a Pot& for solid waste generated from the Master Plan area to awd dispod c@+
Mitigation. Applicants for tentative maps proposed in the Masta Plan area shall demonstrate that means of feaSible solid waste disposal are available.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps for the hdasta plan area
Responsibte Pads. 1) City Planning and hgiu&~ Depucmezler.
Suncrions. 1) No approval of tentative maps witbaa dam~nstrath of existing disposal capacity.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
-
/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3681
A RESOLUTION OF THE P LANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PUD 93-06 AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,
EAST OF FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F’,
“G”, AND “P CASE NO: PUD 93-06
~ WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Car&bad
I and referred to the Planning Commission; and
I WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
1 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
I Commission did, on the 16th day of November, 1994, the 30th day of November, 1994, and
on January 4,1995, did hold a public hearing on property described as:
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range
3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to PUD 93-06.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF PUD 93-06, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
C) That the Design Guidelines for Villages ‘I?‘, “G”, and “P” are hereby recommended
for adoption.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Findinng:
1. The granting of this permit wiii not adverseiy affect and will be consistent with the
Municipal Code, the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all
adopted plans of the city and other governmental agencies. The generai plan land
use for the project is a combination of open space and residential uses which the
planned development accurately reflects. The project is compatible with the assigned
residential densities for its respective residential land use classifications. The
planned development permit is in specific accord with the master plan for the project
as modified by the requirements of the certified Environmental Impact Report
regarding input from other governmental agencies.
2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community. A community is a society of people having
common rights and privileges, the district in which they live, and suggests a common
possession or enjoyment. The use proposed is residential which is an essential
stabiiizing element for any generai long-term well-being for a neighborhood. This
is the ordinary result of the allocation of home ownership which this project
presupposes, and this project is necessary and desirable to accomplish this act. The
location for this use is reflected in the existing Generai Plan and Master Plan for
the site, which was amended by action of the City Council in 1993 at public hearing
upon hearing and considering ail testimony of ail persons desiring to be heard and
i
I
considering ail factors relating to those discretionary actions. The purpose of the ’
Master Plan was to provide for the orderly development of the property while
preserving the environmental resources of the area. The plan is divided into
residential villages and open space areas. The planned development permit
accurately refiects those respective areas.
3. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity. On the contrary the project as part and parcel of the Master Plan will /
provide major infrastructure and public improvements that will enhance the general
welfare of the vicinity. The Master Plan project is tasked with providing a
connection of Melrose Drive from Alga Road to Paiomar Airport Road, the provision ’
of a school site, and the dedication of 16.4 acres of park land adjacent to the existing
10.5 acre park site, ail of which will serve to improve the general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity. Ail improvements will be constructed to meet ail
applicable federal, state, and iocai health and safety criteria.
4. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090 as modified by the site development plan
(SDP 94-01) per Section 2153.120 and 21.06.
5. The proposed planned development meets all of the design criteria set forth in
Section 21.45.080 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained
in the design guidelines manual as indicated through the following analysis. The
PC RESO NO. 3681 -2- kq
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
,I
design critetia for planned deveiopments set forth in Section 21.45080 includes the
foiiowingz
(A) The overall plan shall be comprehensive, imaginative and innovative
embracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships as indicated
in the design guidelines manuai, and shall conform to adopted plans of ail
governmental agencies for the area in which the proposed development is
located. As noted previously under the Master Plan section of the staff report
the planned development is in conformance with that document. This
planned development incorporates a number of’ the suggested design
techniques. The building setbacks have been varied which helps create an
attractive rhythmical skeetwape by undulating the otherwfse monotonous
plane of the building facade Within the multi-family portion of the planned
development the units have been oriented and turned in a variety of ways
which will avoid the monotony of linear building patterns and create a feeling
of diversity and interest The clustering of units creates more open space
without reducing the project’s overall density.
(B) The plan shall provide for adequate usable open space, circulation, off-street
parking, recreational facilities and other pertinent amenities. Buildings,
st~ctwes and facilities in the parcel shall be well-integrated, oriented and
related to the topographic and natural landscape features of the site, as
indicated in the design guidelines manual. As part of the Master Plan, 250
acres are identified as open space. The multi-family component of the
planned development includes muitipie recreation areas, while the single
family has one centraiized location. As indicated in the staff reports
discussion of the project’s conformance with Title 20 the parcels proposed
have been oriented and related to the topographic and natural features of the
site thereby allowing the structures proposed to do the same. The number of
off-street parking spaces meets the requirements of the parking ordinance.
Circulation is more fully discussed in the following sections.
(C) The proposed development shall be compatible with existing and planned
. surrounding land uses and with circulation patterns and open space on
adjoining properties. It shall not constitute a disruptive element to the !
neighborhood or community. As part of the Master Plan this planned 1
development was designed in concert with the goals iterated here. The /
circulation patterns and open space are an integrai part and coordinated with
the adjacent properties both within and without the Master Plan as indicated ;
through a review of the Master Plan document.
(D) The internai street system shall not be a dominant feature in the overall
design, rather it should be designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles
without creating a disruptive influence on the activity and function of any
common areas and facilities as indicated in the design guidelines manual.
The most desirable street system, according to the manual, is designed to
provide access to individual units from private or iocai streets. The iocai
PC RESO NO. 3681 -3- !5*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
streets feed into collector streets which, in turn, feed into secondary and
major arteriais. The planned deveiopment proposed accomplishes this
objective. The street system has been designed to not only be functional, but
also to be visually attractive and integrated with the project. Curvilinear
streets help create a more interesting and varied street scene and they
functionally control traffic by discouraging speeding. Curvilinear streets can
also provide interesting vistas while driving through a project. The streets
have been designed to follow the natural contours of the hillside which the
design manual points out is highly desirable.
(E) Common areas and recreational faciiities shall be located so as to be readily
accessible to the occupants of the dwelling units and shall be well-related to
any common open spaces provided, as indicated in the design guidelines
manual. As noted previously the multi-family portion of the planned
development has multiple recreational open space areas which allows the
relationship required by the design manual. The Master Plan deleted the
requirement for common recreational facilities for Village “G” due to the lot
sizes exceeding 7,500 square feet Village “P”, although essentially a standard
single family development with lots ranging in size from 6,000 to 16,?340
square f-t, with an average lot size of 8,000 square feet, has the city wide
trail system adjoining its southern and eastern boundaries within a huge
open space lot, as well as a common recreation lot on its northern end
thereby providing multiple opportunities for recreation.
(F’) Architecturai harmony within the development and within the neighborbood
and community shall be obtained so far as practicable, and has been via the
overriding Master Plan document. The Master Plan recognizes the existing
and unique Southern California vernacular community character. The
architectural styies deemed appropriate for the site include California
Mediterranean, California Ranch, Eariy Caiifornia/Monterey, Spanish
Colonial, Spanish Eclectic, Prairie, Mission, and Craftsman.
The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topo&raphy of the site as the project conforms to the grading previously approved
via the Master Plan and the Hillside Development Permit which mimicked the native
condition. Roth the circulation system and the building envelope placement reflect
contour and curviilnear grading.
The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the site ’
per the requirements of the adopted Master Plan and the previously certified
Environmental Impact Report for that Master Pian, which retains approximately
36% or 250 acres in open space.
The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood as determined through the application of the
planned community standards and the Master Pian process.
PC RESO NO. 3681 -4-
- -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
1. Approval is granted for PUD 93-06, as shown on Exhibits “A” through “S”, dated
September 7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this project the
architectural data sheets shall be revised to reflect ail applicable requirements of the
approved Design Guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless othetise noted
in these conditions.
2. Approval of PUD 93-06 is granted subject to approval of CI’ 93-07 and SDP 94-01.
PUD 93-06 is approved subject to all conditions of approval of CT 93-07, SDP 94-01,
MP 139(E), EIR 91-04, and HDP 91-17, incorporated herein by reference and on file
in the Planning Department.
3. Unless specifically allowed via the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan or SDP 94-01 no
development modifications to the development standards of Section 21.45090 shall
be permitted.
4.
5.
The number of dweiiing units in a planned development shall not exceed the density
permitted by the Master Plan without amendment of said document.
Ail units adjacent to Paiomar Airport Road shall maintain as a minimum a fifty foot
setback.
6.
7.
8.
Corner lots shall have a ten foot side yard setback from the street
Ail building setbacks from open parking areas shall not be less than five feet and
will be screened from adjacent residences.
Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular SaFety and sufficient to minimixe
security problems shall be provided.
9. There &ail be separate utility systems for each unit.
The proposed project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well
integrated with the project and does not dominate the project when compared to and
as identified within the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan. Piease see the discussion
under SD above.
As ail open parking spaces are on the street there is no requirement to screen them
from the public right of way.
All requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met through
the Certiiied Environmentai Impact Report for the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan
(EIR 91-04). Ail feasible mitigation identified in EIR 91-04 will be undertaken in
this project as designed and conditioned.
Pianninx Conditions:
PC RESO NO. 3681 -5 A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
11.
12.
!kqkrate storage space of three hundred ninety two cubic f& shaii be provided for
each unit. This space shall be separateiy enclosed for each unit, meet building code
requirements, and be conveniently accessible to the outdoors. Garages facing
directiy on a private driveway that have less than a twenty foot setback shall be
equipped with an automatic garage door opener.
Centraiized refuse-pickup areas may be required.
No individual antennas shall be permitted. Each project shall have a master
antenna and/or cable television hookup. Individual satellite television antennas are
permitted subject to the provisions of Chapter 21.53 of the Carisbad Municipal
Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a reguIar meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th of January, 1995, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Erwin,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAINz None.
KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD P LANNING COMMISSION
ATI-ESTZ
MICHAEL J~OLZlk&LER
PLANNING DIRECI’OR
-7- PC RESO NO. 3681
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NG. 3682
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIN G COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SDP 94-01 ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF FUTURE
MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “F”
CASE No: SDP 94-01
WHEREAS, a verified application has been fiIed with the City of Carlsbad
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Comrirission did, on the 16th day of November, the 38th day of November, 1994 and on the
4th day of January, 1995, hold a public hearing on property described as:
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering ail testimony
and arguments, if any, of a.U persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered aII
factors relating to SDP 94-01.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning ’
I Commission of the City of Carlsbad as foIknvs:
4
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF SDP 94-01, based on the following findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein:
Findings:
1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental setting, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the
general plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specificahy permitted
t?“(
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
in the area which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the
site, surroundings or traffic circulation since the project is in conformance with the
adopted Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan for which a Final Environmental Impact
Report was certified on July 27,1993. On that date the City Council also adopted
a Generai Plan Amendment which reflects the land uses of the Master Plan. The
contents of the Master Pian include graphic plans of the proposed development,
location of the various land uses, an integrated open space program, processing
protocol for planned developments, the location of and provision for public facilities,
the location of the circulation system, phasing of development, constrained lands,
and grading. The City Council with its review and approval of that Master Plan
incorporated herein by reference found the following facts to exist:
8.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g*
The proposed deveiopment as described by the Master Plan is consistent with
the provisions of the generai plan and any applicable specific plans.
Ail necessary public faciiities can be provided concurrent with need and
adequate provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the
capital improvement program applicable to the subject property.
The residential and open space portions of the community will constitute an
environment of sustained desirabiiity and stability, and that it will be in
harmony with or provide compatible variety to the character of the
surrounding area, and that the sites proposed for public faciiities, such as
schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated
population and appear acceptable to the public authorities having jurisdiction
thereof.
In the case of institutional, recreational, and other similar nonresidential
uses, such development will be proposed, and surrounding areas are protected
from any adverse effects from such development.
The streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to cany
the anticipated traffic thereon.
The area surrounding the development is or can be planned and zoned in
coordination and substantial compatibility with the development.
Appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse environmental
impact as noted in the adopted environmental impact report for the project
As the site development plan is the impiementing discretionary action for the attainment ’
of affordable housing the application is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element.
2. That the site for the intended use as designed and conditioned is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the use, since the affordable site is designated for muiti-
family use by the Generai Plan and Master Plan while the market rate sites are
designated for singie family, the grading for the site produces net usable area
sufficient for the number of units proposed to be within the density range
appropriate for their respective General Plan Land Use designations, and because
a review of the Master Pian indicates a substantial conformance between the project
and the plan.
3. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
PC RESO NO. 3682 -2 54
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
-
neighborhood will be provided and maintained per the requirements of the adopted
Master Pian and as additionally conditioned through the approval of the tentative
tract map, planned development permit, and site development plan.
That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use as indicated in the Ranch0 Carriiio Master
Plan, Pinai Environmental Impact Report for the Master Plan, and the tentative
tract map as reviewed and conditioned per the policies of the City of Carisbad’s
Engineering Department.
All requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met through
the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Ranch0 Caniiio Master Plan
(EIR 91-04). Ail feasible mitigation identified in EIR 91-04 will be undertaken in
this project as designed and conditioned.
Planning Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Approval is granted for SDP 94-01, as shown on Exhibit “A” (the minimum lineal
dimension of a patio shall be six feet) of CI’ 93-07/IWD 93-06, dated January 4,
1995, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the
as approved by the Planning Commission. The site development plan shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The site development plan copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map,
or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2,
1991) and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by
the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other
ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities
fee dated June 15, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 5,1991,
incorporated herein and on iile in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units,
the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to
PC RESO NO. 3682 -3- !5Q
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
-
provide and deed restrict 15% of the totai dweiling units constructed as af’fordabie
to lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereat imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5; If any such condition is determined to be invalid
this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project
without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
Approval of SDP 94-01 is granted subject to the approval of CI 93-07 and PUD 93-
06. SDP 94-07 is approved subject to all conditions of approval of CI’ 93-07, PUD
93-06, HDP 91-17, MP 139E and EIR 91-04 incorporated herein by reference and
on file in the Planning Department.
If individual dMiing unit pick up is not allowed, trash receptacle areas shall be
enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards.
Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure
shall be of similar colon and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director.
All visitor parking spaces shall be striped a different color than the assigned resident
parking spaces and shall be clearly marked as may be approved by the Planning
Director.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning
Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any
impacts on adjacent homes or property.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading
or building plans, whichever occurs first. The plan shall identify the required active
common recreationai facilities.
A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy of any building.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
PC RESO NO. 3682 4 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
23.
24.
25.
Prior to occupancy of any units, the applicant shall construct a directory sign at the
entrance to the project. The design of this sign shall be approved by the Planning
Director.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable
Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
This approval shall be null and void if the property subject to it is not annexed to
the City of Carisbad CPD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval. Additionaiiy,
annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading, building, or other
permit. Deadline could be extended for good cause as determined by the City
Manager.
Ail conditions of the current Carriiio Ranch Parks Agreement (City Council
Resolution 94-161, June 14, 1994) are incorporated herein by reference.
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shall include j
a reduced, legible version of the tillage “P” Design Guidelines on a 24’ x 36” biueiine
drawing.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the following shall be met: (1) The deeding of an acceptable
school site to the San Marcos Unified School District if it is determined that a
school site is warranted; and, (2) A financing plan approved by San Marcos Unified
School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school
facilities in Zone 1% As provided for in the Zone 18 LIMP, if any reimbursement
and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall
provide a mechanism to do so.
This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required inciusionary units
shall be constructed concurrent with the project market rate units, unless both the
final decision making authority of the City and the developer agree, within an
Atfordable Housing Agreement, to an alternate schedule and/or location for
development. If an alternate location is chosen for affordable units granted standards modifications, such request shall be presented to the Planning
Commission per the process described in Title 21.45160.
Prior to the approval of the final map (CI’ 93-07), the applicant shall enter into an
Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict. the
appropriate number of dwelling units as affordable to lower-income households for
the useful life of the structure. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required
PC RESO NO. 3682 -5 5%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26. The Affordable Housing Agreement &ail be required to include the following:
,-”
h
to be submitted by the applicant to the City. The yt shall be approved by
the Planning Director and Director of Housing and Redevelopment. The Affordable
Housing Agreement shall be binding to ail future owners and successors in interest.
& The number of inciusionary lower-income dwelling units,
b. The unit sizes (square footage) and the number of bedrooms per inciusionary
dweiiing unit;
i
The location of the inciusionary units;
The schedule for production of the inciusionary units,
e. The tenure of affordability (30 year minimum);
f. The sales price(s) of the inciusionary units (not to exceed allowable housing
expenses for the target income households).
Fire Conditions:
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted
to and approved by the Fire Department.
Additional onsite public hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed, and existing hydrants.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval of access,
driveways and general traffic circulation.
)
An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains, and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All private driveways (roadway with a width less than 32 feet) shall be kept clear of
parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted “No Parking/Fire Lane” pursuant
to Section 17.04.020, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the
City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clearance plan
to the Fire Department for approval.
Prior to the approval of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to the
Fire Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following
criteria: 400’ scale, photo reduction on mylar, minimum two existing streets and/or
intersections shah be referenced on the map (not a separate vicinity map), and maps
shall include the following information: street centerlines, street names, and fire
hydrant locations.
PC RESO NO. 3682 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
36. Fire suppression areas shall be provided as shown on the-Villages “F”, “G”, and “P”
Fire Suppression Pian, approved by the Fire Department on March 18,199q and included as Exhibit “N” to the staff repor&.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commissi on of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th of January, 1995, by the
following vote, to wit
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Erwin,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAINz None.
KIM WEbHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLAkNINd COMMISSION
P-G DIRECI’OR
PC RESO NO. 3682 -7-
EXHBIT 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
JANUARY 4, 1995
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93-07 / PUD 93-06 / SDP 94-01. RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F”,
“G” & “P” - A request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit
Development, and Site Development Plan for 117 single family lots, 5 open
space lots, and 1 multi-family lot for Villages “F”, “G”, and “P” of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan on a 125 acre parcel zoned P-C (Planned Community)
located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of the future Melrose Drive
within the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
I. RECOMMENDATION
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 4. 1994
STAFF PLANNER: BRIAN HUNTER
0 7 STAFF REPORT
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3680,3681,
and 3682, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 93-07, PUD 93-06, and SDP 94-01,
respectively, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. ITEM EXPLANATION
This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at its meeting November 16,1994,
and continued to November 30,1994 to allow the applicant time to respond to certain issues
raised by the Commission. It was subsequently continued to January 4, 1995.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo dated January 4, 1995 with proposed revisions
2. Revised Staff Report dated January 4, 1995, with attachments.
- -
DATE: JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: DESIGN MODIFICATIONS TO CT 93=07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01. RANCH0
CARRILLO VILLAGES “F, “G”, & “P”
The attached staff report reflects the following design modifications for the project reviewed
by the Planning Commission at the November 16,1994 meeting.
1. Standard modification requests for Villages “G”, “0”, and “P” have been deleted.
Village “P” has been conditioned to meet the separation requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance either through additional side yard setbacks or by deleting
a dwelling unit. Maximum lot coverage in Village “G” has been revised to 40%. At,
least 15% of the units in Villages “G” and “P” shall be one story. All garages facing
the street in Villages “G” and “P” shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the right
of way.
2. Village “F” now contains 120 dwelling units, as opposed to the original 116. The
product type is a six-plex courtyard rather than four-plex non courtyard design. No
tandem parking is proposed. The standard modifications proposed are requests for
a reduced minimum dimension for patios from 10’ to 6’ similar to the original
proposal; parking for the 672 square foot single bedroom unit (24 units) to be
provided by a one car garage measuring 12’ by 20,’ and one open assigned parking
space located adjacent to the unit; and discrete reduced driveway widths in three
locations measuring from 24’ to 28’.
The design guidelines and resolutions have also been amended to reflect these changes.
BHdnl
Demmber 13.1994
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
-
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 4. 1994
STAFF PLANNER: BRIAN BUNTER
REVISED STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 4, 1995
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93-07 / PUD 93-06 I SDP 94-01- RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F’,
“G” & “P” - A request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit
Development, and Site Development Plan for 117 single family lots, 5 open space
lots, and 1 multi-family lot for Villages “F’, “G”, and “P” of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan on a 125 acre parcel zoned P-C (Planned Community) located south
of Palomar Airport Road and east of the future Melrose Drive within the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3680,3681, aud
3682, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CI’ 9347, PUD 93-06, and SDP 94-01, respectively,
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project is a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, CT 9347, to subdivide a 125 acre
parcel into 117 single family lots comprising Villages “G” and “PI, 1 multi family lot labeled
Village “F”, and 5 open space lots. A Planned Development Permit, PUD 93-06, is required for
Village “F” to pravide a method to approve separate ownership of units within multiple unit
buildings. Villages “G” and “P” are also part of the permit as they propose a flexibility in design
while providing for essential development standards. A Site Development Plan is required for
affordable development that is proposing a modification of standards.
The project property is zoned P-C, Planned community, and has General Plan Land Use
designations of RLM, Residential Low Medium Density, RMI-I, Residential Medium High
Density, and OS, Open Space.
CT 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
lWWH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “‘F”, “G”, AND “P” JANUARY 4,1995 PAGE 2
The existing Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was approved by the City Council of the City of
Carl&ad on July 27, 1993. The purpose of that Master Plan is to provide for the orderly
development of the property while preserving the environmental resources of the ares. For
planning purposes, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is divided into residential villages and open
space areas. The Master Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, requirements, and the method
by which the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan will be implemented.
The Ranch0 Catrillo Master Plan allows Tentative Tract Maps with Planned Unit Development
Permits to be processed without floor plans and elevations, requiring instead design guidelines
to be adopted as part of the discretionary action; a process known as Delayed Architectural
Review. This concept was approved as part of an acknowledgement that the market demand for
this project could be years away due to a variety of factors, and such requirements as floor plans
and elevations are essentially determined at the time of construction by the market.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan states that the design guidelines that are approved with the
Tentative Tract Maps may address, if appropriate, such things as building envelopes, setbacks
from slopes, building separations, the Small Lot Architectural Guidelines, compliance with the
Hillside Architectural Guidelines, and the mixture of one and two story units. These guidelines
work within the larger framework of the Master Plan’s general community development standards
and the site specific design criteria established within the village and open space development
standards. The specific design guidelines for the individual villages are discussed within the
analysis section of this report and are included in their entirety as an attachment.
Village “F” consists of 120 multi-family ownership units adjacent to Palomar Airport Road on
an 11.4 acre parcel and is being designed as an inclusionary housing project to comply with the
requirements of the City of Carl&ad’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance which requires that 15%
of any project’s proposed dwelling units be provided for lower income households. Village “F
is considered a combined project that satisfies the inclusionary requirements of other villages.
Village “F’ will be developed with a mixture of two story townhome units and carriage units over
the private garages. The townhomes will range in size from approximately 980 to 12 14 square
feet. The carriage units will be approximately 672 square feet.
Village “G” consists of 39 single family lots in the eastern portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan. The lots range in size from 8,200 to 26,560 square feet with an average lot size of 11,870
square feet. Village W has been designed between two important native habitats. The majority
of the village’s streets are single loaded in order to minim& development impacts to these
resources. The Master Plan further recognizes the need to protect the sensitive plant species
located adjacent to the development by allowing reduced front, rear, and sideyard setbacks to be
determined at the time of tentative map approval. It also recognizes that the essential standard
R-l 7,500 square foot minimum single family lot nature of this village precludes the need for
CT 9347/PUD 9346/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES v, ‘G”, AND “P” JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 3
common recreational facilities required of planned developments typically associated with small
lot or multi-family projects.
Village “P” consists of 78 single family lots located adjacent to the east and south of Village “F.
The lots range in size from 6,000 to 16,840 square feet, with an average lot size of 8,390 square
feet.
Section 21.53.120 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code specifies that for affordable housing projects,
the City may allow less restrictive development standards than would normally apply through the
processing of a Site Development Plan The primary purpose for allowing development standards
modifications for affordable housing projects is to reduce the total subsidy (affordability gap)
which would otherwise be required for the development of affordable housing. The modification
of development standards reduces the affordability gap through: (1) the actual development cost
savings associated with the reduced development standard(s) and (2) the achievement of
additional (density bonus) dwelling units on a project site. No density bonus dwelling units are
being requested at this time. ‘Ihe Site Development Plan (SDP 94-01) is required due to standard
modifications requests for Village “F.
HI. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans and ordinances:
A. Carl&ad General Plan
B. Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan - MP 139(E)
C. Carl&ad Municipal Code, Titles 19, 20, and 21 (Environmental Protection Procedures,
Subdivision Ordinance, and Planning Grdinance, respectively)
A. General Plan
LAND USE ELEMENT
The property has RLM Residential Low Medium (Villages “G” and “P”), RMH Residential
Medium High (Village “F) and OS Gpen Space (Villages “G” and “F) General Plan Land Use
Designations. These land uses would have provided the opportunity for 272 dwelling units per
the General Plan as analyzed by the Master Plan, however only 237 dwelling units are real&d;
the lost units being divided between Villages “F’ and “G”. Even with this adjustment the product
type and density range still remains consistent with what is required by the General Plan Land
Use Element as indicated through the following analysis.
CI’ 93-07/PUD 93-06,ISDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRlLLO WLLAGES “F, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,1995
PAGE 4
VILLAGE LANDUSE PRODUCTTYPE APPROVEDMASI’ER
(dwellingunits/acre) (single ar multi- PLAN DENSlTY
density ranges family) (dwelling units/acre)
‘F RMH P-15) Multi 11.4
Single
Single
3.2
3.3
PROPOSEDTENTATIVE
MAPDENSITY
(dwelling units/acre)
HOUSING ELEMENT
Consistent with Policy 3.6a of the Housing Element which requires that “A minimum of fifeen
percent (15%) of all units approved for any master plan community or residential specific plan
shall be affordable to lower income households” Village “F has been designated a potential
combined affordable site within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. This means that all or part of
Village “F will be affordable to lower income households and will meet the affordable housing
requirements for some of the other villages within the Master Plan. The site proposes 120
dwelling units. The 15% requirement for the Villages proposed by Continental Homes tentative
maps would be 118.65 (791 x .15) dwelling units. This number assumes all Villages are built
to their maximum yield. If these Villages are not approved at the maximum density allowed by
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the number of required affordable units would be less.
OPEN SPACE
The General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element is reflected in the Open Space required
of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. A General Plan Amendment was processed with the Master
Plan to map this concurrence. Approximately 250 acres or 36% of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan consists of Open Space. The Master Plan provides greenway corridors and private
community trails as well as the opportunity for the Citywide Trail System. The discretionary
actions under consideration are consistent with the Master Plan and therefore consistent with the
Open Space and Conservation Element.
FE-J B. R -MP1 9
A review of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan indicates a general consistency or substantial
conformance between the proposed discretionary actions and that document with respect to laud
use, development review process, general community development standards, grading (concurrent
with Master Plan processing, a Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-17, was approved), open
space, public facilities and infktructure plan, and village and open space development standards.
The only exception is associated with a redesign of Village “G” at the behest of the
environmental responsible and trustee agencies which is consistent with the mitigation imposed
by the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04) for the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
CT 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARREL0 VILLAGES “F, ‘G”, AND T” JANUARY 4,1995
certified by the City Council on July 27, 1993. ‘I’he redesign essentially shifts the southern
developable portion of Village “G” to the east thereby lessening the impact on the native Valley
Needlegrass Grassland habitat and the Thread-Leaved Brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) that resides
there. Brodiaea fllifolia is a state listed endangered plant by the California Department of Fish
and Game.
As noted previously, the Ranch0 C&l10 Master Plan allows reductions in front, side, and rear
yard setbacks for Village “G” due to these same environmental constraints as well as the Diegan
Coastal Sage Scrub and Southern Mixed Chaparral which surround the Village. Per the Master
Plan the setbacks are to be determined at time of tentative map approval. The front yard setbacks
vary from 20’ to 31’, the side yard setbacks are 10% of the lot width and the maximum lot
coverage is 40% in keeping with the standard R-l nature of the development, and the usable rear
Yard minimum is 15’. Staff’s analysis indicates these setbacks are in keeping with the intent and
wording of the Master Plan
As it is the Master Plan which allows the Delayed Architectural Review, the process is discussed
as part of this section. Before obtaining a building permit the applicant shall submit floor plans
and architectural elevations for staff to review to ensure compliance with these guidelines. After
reviewing these plans and determinin g that they are in conformance with the design guidelines
that were approved as part of the Tentative Map, as well as the larger framework of the Master
Plan’s standards, staff shall present the floor plans and the architecture to the Planning
Commission per Carl&ad Municipal Code Section 21.45.160 which identifies processing protocol
for amendments to Planned Developments.
If the Planning Commission considers the plans to be in compliance, with these guidelines the
ff oor plans and architectural elevations may be approved by Planning Commission Resolution and
made part of the original City Council approval without the necessity of a public hearing. The
Planning Commission’s review shall focus on architecture only, the previously approved Tentative
Map shall not be opened for review and no new conditions shall be added to the Tentative Map.
If the Planning Commission determines that the plans are not in compliance with the guidelines
it shall set the matter for public hearing as an application for an amendment to a planned
development permit. An application for an amendment of a planned development permit for
which a hearing is required shall be processed, heard, and determined in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 21.45 applicable to the adoption of a planned development permit.
Chapter 3 Section “B” of the Master Plan states that “All proposed tentative maps must conform
to and implement the Master Plan.” Chapter 5 Section “E” states ‘Phase I will include grading
for Melrose, Carrillo Way (Poinsettia Lane) and El Fuerte.” That section further states “the
proposed Phase I grading, though extensive, is a benefit for the commencement of development
of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Area.” Chapter 7 Item 5a. states “Prior to occupancy of the
frost unit within the Master Plan, the following improvements, unless otherwise modified by the
CT 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VlLUGES T”, ‘G”, AND *P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 6
final decision-making body, shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.” Those
improvements include Melrose Avenue, Carrillo Way (Poinsettia Lane) and El Fuerte within the
entire Master Plan boundary. Therefore, to implement the Master Plan, appropriate conditions
have been and will be included with all tentative maps to construct the necessary infrastructure
from which the Master Plan area will benefit.
Ranch0 Carrillo currently does not have any accessible sewer facilities, therefore major off-site
sewer line construction is required per Chapter 7, Item 4 of the Master Plan. This construction
will occur across adjacent property ownership which will involve negotiation between the
property owners (Fieldstone, Bressi, and Continental Homes) and the Carl&ad Municipal Water
District (CMWD).
Two off-site sewer alignments have been prom by the different property owners at this time;
within the future Poinsettia Lane roadway bed and immediately adjacent to the existing sewer
alignments. The Master Plan and its Environmental Impact Report solely analyzed the impact
of the alignment immediately adjacent to the existing sewer alignments as this project has no
growth management induced need to construct offsite future Poinsettia Lane. If the roadway bed
alignment is to be considered additional environmental review will be required. Currently, the
property owners do not agree on which alignment to utilixe. Discussions have been progressing
with CMWD regarding this item. However a final sewer alignment has not been made at this
time. CMWD may have to initiate condemnation proceedings depending on the alignment
chosen. The tentative map will be conditioned so that the map cannot final until such time as
sewer is made available to the project.
Various soil conditions exist on the site, from landslides to undocumented fills associated with
agricultural operations. In their existing condition, these soils are unacceptable for development
purposes. In accordance with the project mass grading plan approved via the master plan and
hillside development permit previously issued and subsequent village development grading plans,
all unacceptable soil conditions shall be mitigated to facilitate future project construction.
Standard engineering grading conditions have been placed on the project to require all requisite
grading. -
The major drainage issue associated with this project is the mitigation of on-site runoff so as not
to adversely affect on site and off site downsbeam properties. The project drainage study addressed this issue by evaluating four different mitigation methods. Three of the methods will
reduce peak runoff to pm-development conditions. The City Engineer has determined that
additional analysis shall be conducted at the plan check stage of the project with the final
mitigation method being selected by the City Engineer, prior to any development within Ranch0
ChdlO.
CT 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARREL0 VILLAGES T”, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,1995
C. Carl&ad Mu&i4 Code
TITLE 19 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTFCTION PROCEDURE
Section IV of this report details the comprehensive environmental review that this project has
undergone.
TITLE 20 SUBDMSION ORDINANCE
It must be found that the design and improvement of the tentative map as conditioned, satisfies
all requirements of any applicable specific plans, Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems.
As discussed in Section IRA and IIIE3, the project is in conformance with the General Plan and
the Master Plan. Conformance with Title 21 is discussed later within this report.
As conditioned, the tentative tract maps meets all procedures and requirements of the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. The guarantee of all necessary public facilities and
infkstmcture improvements, to include but not be limited to, circulation, drainage, sewer, water,
and utilities is a condition of the map.
The State Subdivision Map Act requires the following findings must be made prior to granting
the entitlement of subdivision of property. Each local agency shall consider the effect of actions
adopted pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act on the housing needs of the region in which the
local jurisdiction is situated and balance these needs against the public service needs of its
residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. As the project, as previously
discussed is consistent with the City’s adopted housing element which has been reviewed and
approved pursuant to state law by state agencies, as well as this jurisdiction, to ensure the
consideration of regional housing needs, the project is in conformance with this requirement of
the State Subdivision Map Act.
Further the Subdivision Map Act requires that the design of a subdivision for which a tentative
map is required shall provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities. In providing for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the design of a subdivision, consideration shall he given to local climate, to contour, to
configuration of the parcel to be divided, and to other design and improvement requirements, and
such provision shall not result in reducing allowable densities or the percentage of a lot which
may be occupied by a building or structure under applicable planning and zoning in force at the
time the tentative map is filed. “Feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a successful
manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors. Review of the proposed subdivision reveals the design of the lot sizes
and configuration permits orientation of structures in an east-west alignment for southern
exposure thereby providing for passive or natural heating opportunities. The design of the lot
Cl’ 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRLLO VILLAGES T’, %“, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 8
sizes and configuration also permits orientation of structures to take advantage of prevailing
breezes to provide a passive or natural cooling opportunity.
The Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council for this project indicates that
there are no potential significant health hazards created through the development of the Master
Plan area of which this tentative map is an integral part.
A finding is required that the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not
conflict with the easements of record or easements established by court judgement, acquired by
the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this
connection, the City Council may approve a map if they find that alternate easements for access
or for use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. The City Council has made such determination and carried out such
requirement via the Carrillo Ranch Parks Agreement which was adopted by City Council
Resolution 94-161 on June 14, 1994.
It must be found that subject to the exceptions contained in Section 66474.4 of the State
Government Code, the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuan t to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act). There is no such contract upon the subject property.
Finally per Section 20.12.091(a) of the Carl&ad Municipal Code the Planning Commission or
City Council shall not approve or conditionally approve a tentative map unless they fmd that all
approvals and permits required by Title 21 for the project have been given or issued. Approval
or conditional approval of a map may be given concurrently with any approval or permit required
by Title 21. As noted previously the project site has an approved Master Plan (MP 139(E)) and
Hillside Development Permit (HDP 9 1-17). The other permits required by Title 2 1 include the
Planned Development Permit and Site Development Plan which are being processed concurrently
with the subdivision.
TITLE 21 ZONING ORDINANCE
21.38 P-C, Planned Community
Prior to approval for any permits for developments on property zoned P-C, planned community,
a master plan of development must be approved by the city council in accord with the provisions
of this chapter. A master plan when approved by ordinance shall establish the regulations for
the development of the planned community within the P-C zone, and the regulations shall become
a part thereof. The Ranch0 Canillo Master Plan (MP 139(E)) approved by ordinance of the City
Council on July 27, 1993 regulates the permit process for development of this property.
As noted in Section mB of the sta@ report the project complies with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan (MP 139(E)).
-
CT 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES 7, ‘G”, AND “p”
JANUARY 4,1995
PAGE 9
-
CHAPIER 21.45 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan designates the Carl&ad Municipal Code, Titles 20 and 21 as
the implementing ordinances for the Master Plan in any area where the Master Plan is silent.
Planned Development Permits are required in order to allow flexibility in design while providing
for the essential development standards. The project, as designed and conditioned, is consistent
with the Planned Development ordinance as mod&d by the Site Development Plan, the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan, and all other applicable ordinances. The findings of fact required to
approve a project under the Planned Development Ordinance can be made as summa&& below:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
As discussed in this staff report, the project is consistent with the General Plan, the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed use at this location was determined to be necessary and desirable to the
long term general well-being of the neighborhood and community via General Plan and
Master Plan Amendment by the City Council on July 27, 1993.
Similarly such use was determined to not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity.
The proposed planned development does meet all of the minimum development standards
set forth in Se&on 21.45.096as modified by Section 21.53, as identified-within this staff
report and further chuifkd within the design guidelines for Villages “F, “G”, and “P”
attached and incorporated herein by reference. In granting a planned development permit
the decision-making body may modify any development standards of the underlying zone
(Section 21.45.072(b)). VILLAGE ‘F DESIGN GUIDELINES SYNOI’8IS
Townhomes will range in size from approximately 980 to 1,2 14 square feet.
The carriage units will be approximately 672 square feet. Thirteen of the units
are identified as 3 bedroom units, 83 are 2 bedroom units and 24 are 1
-
Cl’ 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F, “G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,1995
PAGE 10
if determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved
VILLAGE ‘G”
DESIGN GUIDELINES
SYNOPSIS
Plotting of Units No floor plan shall be plotted more than 60% of total units on a
street; no 2 units with same facades closer than 200 feet on the
color schemes
-
CT 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRLLO VILLAGES T, “G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,1995
PAGE 11
Minimum 20’ by 20’ IL-car garages with doors offset a minimum of
3”. 3-w garages offset minimum 12” and mix of 3 one car doors
or 1 twocardoorand 1 onecardoor.
VILLAGE ‘P”
DESIGN GUIDELINES
e facades closer than 100 feet on the
samesideofthestreet; units may not utilize the entire building
Pront - 20’ minimum
Rear - 15’ minimum
Side - 5’ minimum, 10’ minimum for comer lots
When more than 10 in a row, 20’ between 2 story, 15’ between 1
ry maximum sue
.--
Cl’ 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES 1;“, “GI, AND T”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 12
-
Accessory structures
Walls and Fences
Signage
Permitted similar to R-l zone unless fire suppression area prohibit&&r&s location.
Per Village “P” Landscape exhibit.
Village identSication and directional information.
II Second Dwelling Units I 10% of lots may be developed with second dwelling units. I Minor modifications Ailows a change to five or less or these provisions per Planning
Director approval if determined to be in substantial conformance
with the approved project.
Section 2 1.45.090 speaks to the development standards required of planned development
applications. These include;
00 Density. The number of dwelling units in a planned development shall not exceed
the density permitted by the underlying zone. Please see the General Plan Land
Use section of this report.
(b) setbacks.
(1) Arterials. All units adjacent to any Prime Arterial maintain as a minimum
a fifty foot setback
(2) Front yard. Villages ‘TY and “P”; all garages maintain a minimum 20
setback from the right of way. Village “F’; all garages have a 5’ setback
from the private driveway. In this case all garages are equipped with
automatic garage door openers.
(3) Comer Lots. Comer lots have a ten foot side yard setback from the street.
(4) All setbacks are measured from the property line, or in the case where
individual property lines are not present, at the edge of the street curb or
sidewalk whichever is closest to the structure to the subject setback
(5) Distance between structures. Village “F”; 15’ minimum with no more than
three structures in a row. Village “G”; property line setback of 10% of lot
width. Village “P”; 10 feet unless more than ten structures in a row, than
20’ for 2 story structures, and 15’ for distance between 2 story and 1 story
stmctures.
(cl Resident Parking. All units must have at least two full sized covered residential
parking spaces. For Villages “G” and “P” this requirement will be met via a
minimum two car or greater garage. Please see discussion under 21.53 Site
Development Plan for Village “F”.
-
CT 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F, “G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,1995
PAGE 13
Cd)
(e)
0
(lo.
(h)
(0
0’)
Q
0)
(ml
09
Visitor Parking. 5 spaces for the first 10 units, plus 1 space for each 4 dwelling
units above 10 or fraction thereof. Village “F proposes 120 dwelling units which
would require 33 guest spaces whereas 58 are provided. Both Village “G” and “P”
are detached single family projects in which the loaded sections of the pavement
width would allow parking on both sides of the street. A conservative
interpretation of the ordinance would require 13 spaces for Village “G” and 22
spaces for Village “P”, both of which can easily be accommodated.
All building setbacks from open parking areas are not less than five feet and will
be screened from adjacent residences by landscaping subject to the approval of the
planning director.
As all open parking areas are on or adjacent to public and private streets there is
no requirement to screen them from the public right of way.
Recreational Space. 200 square feet per unit is required. All of the single family
homes have minimum dimensioned 15 feet by 15 feet yards. The remaining 97
multi-family requires and provides 24,000 square feet of recreational space.
Streets. With the exception of Village “F*, all streets within the project are public.
Please see the discussion under 21.53 Site Development Plan for Village “F’S
streets.
Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety and sufficient to minim&
security problems will be provided.
There will be separate utility systems for each unit.
A Recreational vehicle storage site has been provided as part of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan
Separate storage space of three hundred ninety two cubic feet will be provided for
each unit. This space shall be separately enclosed for each unit, meet building
code requirements, and be conveniently accessible to the outdoors.
Central&d refuse-pickup areas may be required.
No individual antennas will be permitted. Each project will have a master antenna
and/or cable television hookup. Individual satellite television antennas are
permitted subject to the provisions of Chapter 21.53 of the Carl&ad Municipal
Code.
Cl’ 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4.1995
PAGE 14
The proposed planned development meets all of the design criteria set forth in Section
21.45080 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the design
guidelines manual when compared to and as identified in the design guidelines for
Villages “F”, “G”, and “P“, as well as, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
The Planned Development ordinance requires a dual review: 1) the actual enabling
ordinance with the mandatory development standards and design criteria (2 1.45080 and
2 1.45 090), and 2) the Design Guidelines Manual (21.45075). The manual is not
intended to dictate one rigid set of design techniques, but instead, to demonstrate basic
elements of design which can be expanded and modified to fit the particular needs of a
project. The Design Guidelines Manual is divided into six separate sections; grading,
circulation, recreation, building relationships, architecture, and landscaping.
The design criteria for planned developments set forth in Section 21.45.080 includes the
following:
00 “The overall plan shall be comprehensive, imaginative and innovative, embracing
land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships as indicated in the design
guidelines manual, and shall conform to adopted plans of all governmental
agencies for the area in which the proposed development is located.” As noted
previously under the Master Plan section of this report the planned development
is in conformance with that document. This planned development incorporates a
number of the suggested design techniques. The building setbacks have been
varied which helps create an attractive rhythmical streetscape by undulating the
otherwise monotonous plane of building facade. Within the multi-family portion
of the planned development the units have been oriented and turned in a variety
of ways which will avoid the monotony of linear building patterns and create a
feeling of diversity and interest. The clustering of units creates more open space
without reducing the project’s overall density.
(b) “The plan shall provide for adequate usable open space, circulation, off-street
parking, recreational facilities and other pertinent amenities. Buildings, structures
and facilities in the parcel shall be well-integrated, oriented and related to the
topographic and natural landscape features of the site, as indicated in the design
guidelines manual.” As part of the Master Plan, 250 acres are identified as open
space. The multi-family component of the planned development includes multiple
recreation areas, while the single family has one centrahzed location. As indicated
in the discussion of the project’s conformance with Title 20 the parcels proposed
have oriented and related to the topographic and natural features of the site
thereby allowing the structures proposed to do the same. Off street parking and
circulation are discussed later in this report.
CT 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “I=, “G”, AND “p”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 15
,I
(cl “The proposed development shall be compatible with existing and planned
surrounding land uses and with circulation patterns and open space on adjoining
properties. It shall not constitute a disruptive element to the neighborhood or
community.w As part of the Master Plan this planned development was designed
in concert with the goals iterated here.
(4 “The internal street system shall not be a dominant feature in the overall design,
rather it should be designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles without
creating a disruptive influence on the activity and function of any common areas
and facilities as indicated in the design guidelines manual.” The most desirable
street system, according to the manual, is designed to provide access to individual
units from private or local streets. The local streets feed into collector streets
which, in turn, feed into secondary and major arterials. The planned development
proposed accomplishes this objective. The street system has been designed to not
only be functional, but also to be visually attractive and integrated with the
project. Curvihnear streets help create a more interesting and varied street scene
and they functionally control traffic by discouraging speeding. Curvilinear streets
can also provide interesting vistas while driving through a project. The streets
have been designed to follow the natural contours of the hillside which the design
manual points out is highly desirable.
(4 “Common areas and recreational facilities shall be located so as to be readily
accessible to the occupants of the dwelling units and shall be well-related to any
common open spaces provided, as indicated in the design guidelines manual.” As
noted previously the multi-family portion of the planned development has multiple
recreational open space areas which allows the relationship required by the design
manual. The Master Plan deleted the requirement for common recreational
facilities for Village “G’ as noted previously. Village “P”, although essentially a
standard single family development with lots ranging in size from 6,000 to 16,840
square feet, with an average lot size of over 8,000 square feet has the city wide
trail system adjoining its southern and eastern boundaries within a large open
space lot, as well as a recreation lot on its northern end thereby providing multiple
oppoxtunities for recreation.
“Architectural harmony within the development and within the neighborhood and
community shall be obtained so far as practicable.” This has been accomplished
via the overriding Master Plan document. The Master Plan recognizes the existing
and unique Southern California vernacular community character. The architectural
styles deemed appropriate for the site include California Mediterranean, California
Ranch, Early California/Monterey, Spanish Colonial, Spanish Eclectic, Prairie,
Mission, and Cmftsman.
- -
CT 9347/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES T”, %“, AND 7”’
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 16
(6) The propo~I project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site when compared to and as identified within the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan, the Hillside Development Permit for that Master Plan, the tentative map, and
the design guidelines for the villages. The circulation system and the building envelope
placement reflect contour and curvihnesr grading.
(7) The proposed project, as part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and Final Environmental
Impact Report for that Master Plan which retains approximately 36% or 250 acres in open
space, maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the site.
03) The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood when compared to and as identified within the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the General Plan of the City of Carl&ad, and the individual
design guidelines for the villages.
(9) The proposed project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated
with the project and does not dominate the project when compared to and as identified
within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. Please see the discussion under 5D above.
CHAPTER 21.53 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Carl&ad Municipal Code section 21.53.120 requires a Site Development Plan for any multi-
family residential apartment development having more than 4 dwelling units or an affordable
housing project of any size. The Site Development Plan shall be processed pursuant to Chapter
21.06 (Qualified Development Overlay Zone) of this code, as well as requiring a finding that the
project is in conformity with the General Plan and adopted policies and goals of the City, and
it would have no detrimental effect on public health, safety, and welfare. The Site Development
Plan is also the discretionary action which allows consideration of the standards modifications
which are being requested.
Further it should be noted that State Planning, Zoning, and Development Law (Section
65589.5(d)) requires one or more of the following findings, based upon substantial evidence, be
made if an affordable housing project is to be denied,
4 That the City has adopted a housing element pursuant to state law and this project is not
needed for the City to meet its share of the regional housing need of low income housing.
B) That the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health or
safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the impact
without rendering the development unaffordable to low and moderate income households.
CT 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES ‘F, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 17
Cl
W
El
F)
That the denial of the project or imposition of conditions is required in order to comply
with state or federal law, and there is no feasible method to comply without rendering the
development urn&fordable to low and moderate income households.
That the approval of the project would increase the concentration of lower income
households in a neighborhood that already has a disproportionately high number of lower
income households and there is no feasible method of approving the development at a
different site, without rendering the development unaffordable to low and moderate
income households.
That the project is proposed on land zoned for agriculture or resource preservation which
is surrounded on at least two sides by land being used for agriculture or resource
preservation purposes, or which does not have adequate water or wastewater facilities to
serve the project.
That the project is inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation for the
property as specified in the Land Use Element that existed on the date the application was
deemed complete.
As noted previously Village “F has been designated a potential affordable site with the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan. The site proposes 120 dwelling units. The present affordable housing
production requirement for the applicant’s (Continental Homes) market rate unit impact is 119
(118.65) units as noted in the Housing Element section of this report. At this time the applicant
is proposing that all of the 120 dwelling units be affordable. Further a condition has been added
to ensure that the number of inclusionary units supplied will at a minimum equal the number
required.
The criteria for reviewing affordable housing standards modifications requests include not only
the findings of fact required by Sections 21.06 and 21.53, but also includes a procedural review
by the City’s staff Housing Committee, comprised of select Engineering, Housing and
Redevelopment, and Planning Department staff, as well as a project pro-forma to be reviewed
by the Housing and Redevelopment Department. The pro-forma review indicates the necessity
of the standards modificatioIls to lessen the total required subsidy for the development of the
project including market-rate and affordable units.
The applicant is requesting the following standards modifications with staffs response to those
requests immediately following each:
VILLAGE “F”:
1. Allow for a modification to the requirements of Section 2 1.45.09O(h)( 1) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code to allow 24’ and 28’ wide private driveways to serve this project. The
A
Cl’ 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES ‘F, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 18
project is generally served by 32’ wide private street. However the southern terminum
of F-C street south serving three units is proposed at 24’, while both the western terminus
of Street F-E serving one unit and the northern terminus of Street F-D serving six units
are proposed at 28’ widths. Further the courtyard design requires a vehicle to traverse
from the 32’ width street to the courtyard. The width of the driveway at that traverse is
proposed at 24’. As this is the area that includes the sidewalk and parkway, and is
typically non parked, sta.lT supports this modification for the additional landscaping
opportunity it will provide to buffer the courtyard from the street. The consensus
recommendation from the staff Housing Committee, which reviewed this design at its
meeting of January 4, 1995, is to support this request.
2. Allow for a modification to the requirements of Section 21.45.090(g)(6) of the Carl&ad
Municipal Code to permit some of the townhome units to have a patio with a minimum
dimension of 6’. Staff supports this request as presently balcony’s may have a minimum
dimension of less than 10’ and the open space amenity provided is analogous.
3. Allow for a modification to the requirements of Section 2144.130 to allow a garage to
have less than a 20’ x 20’ dimension. Allow for a garaged interior dimension of 12’ x 20’
and an open assigned parking space to meet the parking space requirement of Section 21.45.090(c) for the 672 square foot one bedroom units (24 units).
The City’s Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance allows a 640 square foot dwelling to meet
its parking requirement through one covered or uncovered space. This project proposes
units that are only 32 square feet larger than what is allowed by the Second Dwelling Unit
Ordinance, but will provide an assigned uncovered space and a full sized one car garage.
Additionally the typical concern expressed for multi family projects regarding adequate
parking is ameliorated by the proposal to provide guest spaces totalling 175% (58) of that
requirement (33). As such due to the size of the unit and the number of parking spaces
available the staff Housing Committee was able to support this request for standard
modification.
CHAPTER 21.85 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
The Inclusionary Housing Grdinance implements the incltionary objectives of the Housing
Element, and at a minimum, the project would be required to provide a number not less than
15% of all residential units as affordable to lower income households. The project proposes 284
dwelling units within the Continental Homes Villages before the Planning Commission for
consideration total 791, therefore, 15% of those units would yield a minimum requirement to
provide 118.65 housing units affordable to lower income households. The applicant is proposing
to meet the affordable housing requirement of the project within Village “F. 13 of the 120 units
would be three bedroom
C
CT 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES T”, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 19
If approved, the project would be conditioned to require an Affordable Housing Agreement that
would be submitted for review and approved by the City prior to Final Map approval. The
Affordable Housing Agreement is a legally binding agreement between the applicant and the City
which provides the specific detail regarding the implementation of the affordable housing
requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and subsequent conformance with the City’s
Housing Element.
CHAPTER 21.90 GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18 in the
Southeast Quadrant. The impacts created by this development on public facilities and compliance
with the adopted performance standards are summarked as follows:
FACILITY 1 IMPACTS t COMPLIANCE
CITY ADMINISTRATION
LIBRARY
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
825 square feet
440 square feet
237 EDUs
YeS
YeS
YtX
PARKS
DRAINAGE
1.65 Acres YeS
Potential Yt?S
CIRCULATION
OPEN SPACE
2130 ADT YeS
Station Nas. 2,5, and 6 YeS
YeS
SCHWLS SMUSD YeS
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 237 EDUs YeS
WATER I 52,140 GPD I YeS
The project is 35 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance for the
property.
CHAPTER 21.95 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
No property with a slope of fifteen percent or more and an elevation differential greater than
fifteen feet shall be developed unless a hillside development permit has been issued. The Hillside
Development Permit (HDP 91-17) for the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, with which this project
is in substantial conformance, was issued July 27,1993. Therefore, Village “F”, “G”, and “P” are
being developed in accordance with HDP 91-17.
Cl’ 93M/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01
RANCH0 CARRlLLO VILLAGES “P”, ‘G”, AND “P”
JANUARY 4,199s
PAGE 20
Iv*. ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of the development of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan have been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04).
The recommended mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been included as conditions of
approval for this project. Additional project level studies have been conducted including soils
contamination and drainage studies. These studies provide more focused and detailed project
level analysis and indicate that additional environmental impacts beyond what was analyzed in
Final ElR 91-04 would not result from the implementation of the project. The initial study
revealed no new impacts not addressed in the Environmental Impact Report. Therefore there is
no requirement for additional or modification to existing mitigation. This project is in prior
compliance with Final EIR 91-04 and would not create any additional significant environmental
impactS.
V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project is in compliance with the Carl&ad General Plan, the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan, and Carl&ad Municipal Code, Titles 19, 20, and 21 as described previously.
Considering this concurrence staff recommends approval of CT 93-07, PUD 93-06, and SDP 94-
01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained within their respective
resolutions.
A’ITACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3680
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3681
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3682
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impact Assessm ent Form
Design Guidelines Village “F
Design Guidelines Village “G”
Design Guidelines Viige “P”
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A” - “S”, dated January 4, 1995.
Bxm ocT0BER 17.199)
-
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 93-07/PUD 93-061SDP 94-01 _I
CASE NAME: Ranch0 CaniiIo Viiiaees “F”. “G”. and “P”
APPLICANT: Continental Homes
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 237 Dwehine Units
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Section 24. TOWM~~D 12 South. Range 4 West and
Portion of Sections 18 and 19. TOWIE~~D 12 South. Range 3 West.
APN: 221-010-18: 221-012-08 Acres 125.6
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Reposed No. of Lots/Units 284 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation OS. RLM. RMH
Density Allowed 272 du Density Proposed 237 du
Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached
Requirements)
zoning
Site PC
for information on CarIsbadk Zoning
Land Use
Vacant
North PM
south PC
City of San Marcos
West PC
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District San Marcos Unified Water District Carl&ad Sewer District Carl&ad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 237
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated June 15. 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative De&ration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Julv 27.1993 X
Other,
BHw&ul
DISCLOSURESTATEMENT
APPUCANl-S STAlZhiEM OF OlSCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP MERESTS oNAuAPPucAnoNswHtcHwluREaumE
OJSCRl3lONARY ACTION ON THE PM OF THE cTr/ COUNCL OR ANY APPOWED BokRo, CO MMSSON OR COMhWTEE
(Please Pfintj
The following information must be disclose&- -
1. ArMcant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the appkation. Continental Homes .
12636 High Bluff Drive Suite 300 San Dieno. CA 92130
2. Owner
. List the names and addresses of all Raxho Carrillo, I~C.
per&s having any ownership interest in the ProPertY invoked.
C/o Continental Homes
12636 Him or,, .s+p ‘~QD San Diego, CA 9mO
3. .H any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names an
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnershi
interest in the partnership. I
4. If any person identiffed pursuant to (11 or (2) above is a non-Profit orgmization or a trust, IIst the names an
addresses of any person senring as officer or director of the non-profit organizatfon or as trustee or beneficiar
of the trust s
!
FRMooo13 8/90’
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 920094859 ** (619) 438-l 181
. .
Dfscfosure Statement
fovar)
Pago 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, 60;
_ Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - No z If yes, please indicate person(s)
Person ir dd&wd LL ‘Amy indvidd Mm. copmWwmhip+ joimtvuiluro. auaciti. mcid dub. fmtWd OfgdZ8tkfk eOfWdort. mstata tn~*
. ~*~ndiuU.mkuduryocMIcouny.utyudcouncy.clLymmiaoYiy.dirmaoraawpdi(lulruMivirion.or~o(nr~rouOo,
-@tiO6lrcdng-~lBlk* I
Ranch0 Carrillo, Inc. Continental Homes
PrinWtyprfl8fllOd- PfbUOtypr-d-
.
. . . : .
t ! / . . FRM 13 4191
. . .
Page2of2
535
-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH tiNAGEMENT PROGRAM ”
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “F. “G”. & “P” - CT 93-07/PUD 93Xl6/SDP 94-01
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 18 GENERAL PLAN: OS. RLM. RMH ZONING: pC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Continental Homes
ADDRESS: 12636 Hiph Bluff Drive. Suite 300. San Diepo. CA 92 130
PHONE NO: (619) 793-2580 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 221-010-18.221-012-08
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 237 du
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Unknown > 2 years
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS -
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulationr Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
825
440
237
1.65
D
2.130
G. Fiie: Served by Fii Station No. =
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided -
I. Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD -
L. The project is 35 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
2. 5. 6
250
SMUSD
237
52.140
BIixda
3’1
. i -
VILLAGE F
DESIGN GUIDELINFS
1. INTRODUCTION
Village F consists of 120 multi-family ownership units in the northern portion of the
Pancho Carrlllo Master Plan. Village F is being designed and developed as an
inclusionary housing project to comply with Continental Homes’ inclusionary housing requirements. A sufficient number of the units within Village F will be sold to
households that meet the City of Carlsbad’s definition of Low Income to satisfy
Continental Homes’ Inclusionary Housing requirement.
2. UNITMIX
Village F will be developed with a mixture of two story townhome units and carriage units over the private garages. The townhome units will ‘range in size from
approximately 980 square feet to 1214 square feet. The carriage units will be
approximately 670 square feet in size. Thirteen of the units in Village F may be
developed with three bedroom units to comply with the requirements of Policy 3.2 of
Carlsbad’s Housing Element. A greater number of three bedroom units may be developed if approved as a part of the Housing Agreement between the applicant and the City. -
3. PLOTTING
The buildings in Village F shall be plotted as shown on the site plan approved as a part of the Site Development Plan for Village F.
bescgn Gwdelines - Viikizge F 1 lkcember 19, 1994
8’
-
4. SETBACKS
Palomar Airport
Road
Public Streets
Private Driveways
5. ARCHITECTURE
All units shall maintain a 50’ minimum setback from the Palomar Airport Road
All units shall maintain a 20’ setback from Streets P-B & P-E.
All units shall maintain a 5’ setback from the private driveways.
A. The architectural theme of this project shah be selected from one or more of the following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival CrdtSnlaIl California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village F, it shall be compatible with the surrounding Villages.
B. The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
C. The following materials may be used in the elevations of these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, wood siding, brick or brick veneer, wood trim, stucco
and stone.
D. Slopes adjacent to Village P and Streets P-B & P-E shall be heavily landscaped
to provide an adequate visual buffer between Village F and Village P.
6. GARAGES
A. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls rather than being flush with exterior walls.
hgn Guithliaes - Villuge F 2 hxmber a 1994
3%
,I
7. WALLSANDFENCES
Walls and faces shall be provided in conformance with the development standards of
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
8. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to ident@ the Village and provide directional information. All signage will be developed in accordance with the sign program of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan. The exact location of these signs will be determined prior to final map
approval. Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
9. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A change to five or less of these guidelines is considered a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project.
beqnGuhielines-V&geF 3 December 19, 1994
09
ExH8fr9
VILLAGE G
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village G consists of 39 lots in the eastern portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP-139E). The lots range in size from 8,200 to 26,560 square feet, with an average lot size of 11,820 square feet.
Village G responds to a sensitive site by carefully winding itself between two important native habitats (Brodiaea and Coastal Sage Scrub). The majority of the Village’s streets are single-loaded in order to minim& development impacts, and gently curved in order to respond to the natural topography. These considerations have produced a Village
which will have the appearance of a standard R-l Subdivision. Due to this, the need for
Planned Development standards for small lot architecture and streetscape considerations are greatly reduced. The following standards are proposed in lieu of strict compliance with Planned Development standards.
2. UNITMIX
This project-shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8 Number of two-story units 2 5 Number of one-story units 1 3
Number of front elevations per floor plan 2 4
Maximum building heights e-storv home 18 feet Two-story home 28 feet
v’ii?hzge G Design Guidelines 1 December 22, 1994
-
3. PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
Architectural Data Exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village G. Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more than
60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front facades
shall be plotted closer than 200 feet of each other on the same street. Units may be
plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the
requirements of the Village G Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots may
not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the ability to
construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall building coverage
does not exceed W& 40% of the area of the lot. Room additions or accessory structures
that are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these guidelines shall be attached to the plot plan
for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase and
the overall project complies with the 96 requirements of Sections 3(Plotting), 5 B,C &
D(Architecture) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these guidelines. This matrix may be modified
subject to approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and elevations for this
tentative map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
Section VllLB.7 of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan provides for the flexibility to modify
front, rear and side yard setbacks in Village G due to its isolation and the surrounding
sensitive native habitats.
Front
In accordance with Section 21.45.080(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad Zoning
Ordinance, the front yard setback shall be 20 feet, however the front
yard setback may be varied to a 15 foot average with a 10 foot
minimum to the livable portion of the unit or to garages turned 90
degrees from the street.
?-‘alhge G lkstgn Guidelines 2 December 22, 1994
Rear
Side
,*
All units shall have a minimum 15’ deep, flat usable rear yard.-
Standard R-l side yard setbacks per Section 21.10.040 (R-l Zone) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code shall be allowed for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
5. ARCHITECTURE
Section VIII.C.7.d of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan permits
reduced setbacks due to the isolation of Village G and to allow
development to pull away from areas occupied by sensitive plant
species.
All of the lots in this Village exceed 7,500 square feet in area.
All lots on Street G-C exceed 60’ width at the midpoint of the lot.
The majority (75%) of the lots on Street G-C meet standard R-l
Subdivision width requirements (60 feet). The remaining lots on
this street have a minimum lot width of 55’ at the front yard
setback.
Street G-C is curvilinear in nature, so the total length is never
viewed from one vantage point.
Street G-C has homes only on one side, so it will look very open.
There is a break in the streetscape provided by the trail access.
The units are divided roughly in half by the trail access between
lot 20 and lot 21. There are 10 lots on one side, and then 14 lots
on the other, more curving side.
The front yard setbacks will be varied.
Every third unit shall have a cluster of 15 gallon trees in the front
yard to create an overall average of one street tree for every 30’
of lot frontage.
There will be horizontal as well as vertical changes in the location
of the units along Street G-C to create further diversity.
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the
following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village G, it shall be
compatible with the adjacent Villages. Architectural styles are described in the
&Uage G Dmgn Guidelines 3 DEcembcr22, 1994
e
-
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, General Community Development Standards pages
31-35.
Twenty-five percent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge
shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 25 96 shall be
distributed throughout the project. This guideline is to ensure some building
relief on the front and sides of each unit.
At least 40% of the units in this project shall have at least three separate building
planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches
and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The
minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane
on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft.
to receive credit under this section.
Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph C for front
elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the
rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
The predominant roof framing for each floor plan shall exhibit directional variety
to the other floor plans.
The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
Village.
A maximum of three chimneys shall be permitted on any one residence.
Where possible, front yard setbacks shall be varied from 15-25 feet in depth.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the units
within this Village.
Twenty-five percent of exterior openings,doors/windows, shall be recessed or
projected a minimum of ‘two inches and shall be with wood or colored aluminum
frames (no mill finishes).
Different window types/material shall be limited to two or three per house. Any
one elevation shall have a predominant window treatment. Any variation will be
to upgrade to develop focus.
When both two and three-car garages are used, they shall be mixed throughout
the Village.
‘viuagc G Design Guiddines 4 Dccembcr 22, 1994
-
6.
,a
M. At least 15% of the units in this Village shall be one story.
GARAGES
A.
B.
C.
All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of s 20’ between
the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
Three car garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage
doors all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car
garage door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12”.
Driveways serving three car garages shall have a minimum width of 24’ at the
back of sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at the
entrance to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3 inches rather
than being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone), unless maintaining an adequate fire separation
from natural areas prohibits their construction or further restricts their location.
Accessory structures constructed in conformance with this standards shall not require an
amendment to the Planned Development Permit for this project.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village G Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All
signage will be developed in accordance with the Village G Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
kYlage G Design Guidelines 5 December 22, 1994
4*
10. LOT DRAINS
Private lot drams are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks
from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be limited
as follows:
street Maximum 96 of Lots
<2.5% 50%
~2.5 - 5% 75%
<5 - 7.5% 90%
57.5 - 12%. 100%
11. SECOND UNITS
Up to 50% of the lots in Village G may be developed with second dwelling units. All
second units shall be developed in conformance with the requirements of the Second
Unit Ordinance, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and the Village G Design Guidelines.
The developer of Village G has the option to develop the second units concurrently with
the primary units. The units may be approved as part of the Minor Planned
Development Permit that approves the floor plans and architecture for Village G.
12. MINOR MODIPICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is considered
a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each
change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project.
Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the requirements of Section
21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Vdlage G Desqp Guidelines 6 December 22, 1994
.5
a .= P .- 5 W
m
c; Famoc *sss: co---, anan 0’0’0’2 $.s$G
-
EXHBIT l0
VILLAGE P
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village P consists of 78 units in the northern portion of the Pancho Carrillo Master Plan
(MP 139E). The lots range in size from 6,000 to 16,480 square feet, with an average
lot size of 8,390 square feet.
2. UNITMIX
This project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation
treatments per floor plan i 4
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sq.ft.
Two Story Units - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq. ft.
3. PLOTTING -
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
Architectural Exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village P. Plotting shall
alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more than 60% of the
total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front facades shall be
plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street. Units may be plotted in
phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the requirements of
the Village P Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots may not utilize the
entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the ability to construct a room
addition within this envelope, as long as the overall building coverage does not exceed
piaasc P Lkszgn Guidelines 1 December 22, 1994
4
50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory structures that are within the building
envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit for this
project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these guidelines shall be attached to the plot plan
for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase
and the overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3(Plotting), 5 D, E, F, & G(Architecture) and lO(Lot Drams) of these guidelines. The matrix may
be modified subject to approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and
elevations for this tentative map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
Palomar Airport
Road
Front
Rear
Side
All units shall maintain a 50’ minimum setback from the Palomar
Airport Road
In accordance with Section 21.49.080(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad
Zoning Ordinance, the front yard setback shall be 20 feet,
however the front yard setback may be varied to a 15 foot
average with a 10 foot minimum to the livable portion of the
unit or to garages turned 90 degrees from the street.
All units shall have a minimum 15’ deep, flat usable rear yard.
5’ minimum
10’ minimum for comer lots from street ROW and large slopes
(Per grading ordinance) Building separation should range from 10’
- 20’, as shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit.
village P Lksign Guidelines 2 December 22, 1994
h%
-
Building Separation All units in Village P shall comply with the building
separation requirements of the Planned Development
Ordinance, Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
21.45.090(5). If the applicant decides to develop all of
the lots along Street P-E with two story homes, without
a 20’ building separation, then 10 or fewer lots in a row
shall be constructed. In such case Lot 51 shall be
restricted so as not to permit the construction of a
dwelling unit. The applicant shall decide whether Lot
51 will be a developable lot prior to approval of Piial
fiP*
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the
following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan:
adage P Lkszgn Guidelines 3 Dtcember 22, 1994
(3%
Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village P, it shall be
compatible with the surrounding Villages as determined by the Planning Director.
Architectural styles are described in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, General
Community Development Standards pages 31-35.
B. When three or more 2 story units are in a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at
least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth
of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit ( this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling
to a single story element).
C. When three 2 story units are in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least
one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not
less than 5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single
story unit shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the
unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed type roofs falling to a single story
element).
D. Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge
shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33% shall be
distributed throughout the project.
E. At least 40% of the units in this project shall have at least three separate building
planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches
and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The
minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane
on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft.
to receive credit under this section.
F. Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph E for front
elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the
rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
G. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have one side elevation where there
are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a minimum
of 7 feet.
mge P Design GuideUnes 4 Lkcember 22,1994
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
P.
Q*
,I
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be
recessed or projected a minimum of 2” and shall be with wood or colored
aluminum window frames (no mill finishes).
The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to
one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
village.
Front yard setbacks shall be varied from 15-25 feet in depth where it will not
adversely impact rear yards, slopes or the overall design of the project as
determined by the Planning Director.
A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any one residence.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the units
within this village.
Windows shall be placed to maximize privacy. Windows shall be located so that
they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible
landscaping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
At least 3 different roof colors shall be used in this project.
A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations of
these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer, wood trim,
stucco and stone.
At least 15% of the units in this Village shall be one story.
6. GARAGES
A.
B.
All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20’ between the
face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 15% of the units in this village shall have three door garages.
Units with three car garages shall be distributed through out the project. Three
car garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage doors
all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car garage
door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12”. Driveways
kLlage P Dcsrgn Guidelines 5 December 22, 1994
serving three car garages shall have a minimum width of 24’ at the back of
sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at the entrance
to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3 inches rather
than being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code, unless maintaining an adequate fire separation from natural
areas prohibits their construction or further restricts their location. Accessory structures
constructed in conformance with this standard shall not require an amendment to the
Planned Development Permit for this project.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village P Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All signage will be developed in accordance with the Village P Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
10. LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks
from tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be limited
as follows:
Street Maximum 46 of Lots
<2.5% 50% <2.5 - 5% 75%
<5 - 7.5% 90%
s7.5 - 12% 100%
village P Dtstgn Guidelines 6 December 22, 1994
\O1)-
,I
11. SECOND UNITS
Up to 10% of the lots in Village P may be developed with second dwelling units. A
greater number of second dwelling units may be allowed if approved under a Density
Bonus to be approved as a part of the Housing Agreement (required pursuant to SDP 94-
01) between the applicant and the City. All second units shall be developed in
conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance, the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan and the Village P Design Guidelines. The developer of Village P
has the option to develop the second units concurrently with the primary units. If the
developer chooses this option to fulfill a portion of his inclusionary requirement a
separate permit will not be required for the second units. The units shall be approved
as part of the Minor Planned Development Permit that approves the floor plans and
architecture for Village P.
12. MINOR MODIFICATXONS
A change to five or less of these provisions may be deemed a minor modification.
However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the
approved project. Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the requirements
of Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
%Uizge P lkngn Guidelhes 7 December 22, 1994
9 3
0 8l m = .- > I
z .- g a- 8
s .- il P c .t: 3 ii 5 .- E E 8 b K ‘E
%
7
I :
I
i
1 i :
i
7 c
. . . . ..:.:.:. .:.:.:.
>:.:. . . . . . . ::_.:: :.::::
. . . . . . .
_... . . . . .$,:.;. .::>::. .::::::. .:.:.:.. :::>. :.I:.;. . .:.:.:.: ::;:;:c _L..... :...... 4 :E B . . ..i.
sl-3i . .._. .:i-. :.:.:.: -
.:.:. :.. i... : . . :... ::;: .: :. ,.,:: ::. ::. :.::: :./ ..:.y .::::.’ ..:i . . . ..:: .A... : .: -:.: : ::;:;:. .::: j.
. . ..i. . . ..i ::;:j .:.:.: i.... ii.: . . . ..: :.:.:.. . . . . . . . . . . . .A.. :.:.:... ..:.:.;. :.:.:.: . . . . . . . :z:- .:.:... . . . i
..:.... :: .A. _.::.. g$ ::>; :.:.:.:. :;:$;:I ;:c.;;
~
..i..: ::::i. ..:.... ..:... .:.:<.: :.:+ ::‘:::: is;: i . . . . . . .:.:.:.: .s
3
-
a 0: jam00 L q.j.#$ 1.m LLLLLLL b 2 : 5
2 P s 8 ‘E P z ‘C *- B E 2 s E z cp 2 s 2 E 2 m u) .- x ‘C t;i E UI *- cc . . 0, z 2
- -
EXHBIT 11
i
I y . . .z - ,a 2.. 0 i z
:
NING COMMISSION
ON: Motion was made by Commissioner Monroy, and duly seconded, to ad
n Resolution No. 3674 recommending approval of
d subject to the conditions contained therein, with omes be restricted to a maximum of 46%. me Plannr f where the 30 ft. high homes will be located.
mmissioners Erwin, Ni
ABSTAIN: None
VOTE: 5-2
ly seconded, to adopt Planning oval of MP 177(J), based on the o the conditions contained
ners Compas, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble, and n Welshons, Commissioner Erwin
CONTINUED PUBUC HEARING:
1. CT 9%07/PUD 9%WSDP 94-01 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “F,” “G” 8 “P” - A request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development, and Site Development Plan for 117
single family lots, 5 open space lots, and 1 multi-family lot for Villages “F,” “G,” and “P” of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan on a 125 acre parcel zoned P-C (Planned Community) located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of future Melrose Drive within the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
Brian Hunter, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that this is a continued public hearing. The proposed project was heard previously on November 16 and 30, 1994. The project is a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map CT 93-07 to subdivide a 125 acre parcel into 117 single family lots comprising Villages “G” and “P,” one multi-family lot. labeled Village “F,” and five open space lots. A Planned Unit Development Permit is required for Village “F to provide a method to approve separate ownership of units within multiple buildings. Villages “G” and “P” are also part of the PUD as they
propose single family development which does not meet all of the standards for an R-l subdivision. ASite
Development Plan is required for affordable development that is proposing a modification of standards.
Mr. Hunter stated that when the project was presented previously, the applicant was requesting standards modifications in Villages “F,” “G,” “P,” and “0.” As of this time, the standards modification request for
Villages “G.” “0,” and “Pa have been deleted. Village “Pa has been conditioned to meet the separation
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance through either increased side yard setbacks or by deleting a dwelling unit. Maximum lot coverage in Village “G” is now conditioned to be 40%. At least 15% of the units in Villages “G” and “P” will be one-story and all garages facing the street in Villages “G” and “P” shall have a minimum 20 ft. setback from the right-of-way.
Mr. Hunter reviewed each change on the errata sheet to the staff report dated January 4,1996. He stated that Village “F will contain the affordable housing units for the Ran&o Carrillo development. The number of units in Village “F had been increased from 116 to 120 dwelling units. He then reviewed in detail the standards modifications being requested on Village “F which are as follows: (1) reduced minimum
, PLANNING CGMMISSlGN January 4,1995 PAGE 5
dimension of patbe from 10 ft. to 6 ft.; (2) parking for the one-bedroom units to be provided by a one-car garage and one open assigned parking space located adjacent to the unit; and (3) reduced driveway widths in three locations.
Chairman Welshons inquired if the errata sheet had been presented to the applicant. Yes; that it had been faxed to him earlier in the day. Mr. Hunter replied
Commissioner Monroy referred to Item #5 on the errata sheet and inquired if a time limit had been given to the developer. Mr. Hunter replied No. Village “F will be built as the first phase. After it has been built, any changes to the remaining villages must be processed as a major amendment and would have to come back before the Planning Commission for approval.
Commissioner Erwin is concerned how changes would be presented to the Commission. A possible scenario would be if the applicant requested using second dwelling units as affordable housing in place of some of the units in Village “F.” Gary Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, replied that once the Commission approves Village “F as a 100% affordable housing project, if the applicant later on requests to substitute second dwelling units in the other villages, the Commission doesn’t have to approve that request. It would behoove the applicant to make all their changes before Village “F has been constructed.
Commissioner Erwin’s concern is the standards modifications. He doesn’t want to see the standards
modified in Village “F and then have the applicant come back later substituting in second dwelling units to meet the affordable requirement. If second dwelling units are used to meet the affordable quota, then units
in Village “F” should not be allowed to have a modification of the standards. In effect, he doesn’t want to see substandard units able to be sold at market rates. Mr. Wayne replied that is why staff is requesting all future changes to be processed as a major amendment, so the Planning Commission can make that
decision.
Mr. Hunter commented that the criteria for reviewing affordable housing standards modifications is similar
to any standard planning review. The modifications being requested are analyzsd for health, safety, and
welfare. With the exception of the one-car garages, the Engineering Department has reviewed these same
types of modifications on market rate units. Only 24 of the 120 units have a standards modification which
has not been seen before.
Chairman Welshons asked the City Attorney to confirm whether wording has been included to avoid the scenario Commissioner Erwin has envisioned. Mr. Wayne replied that Condition #51 gives the developer the option to go either way, but it does not grant approval to go either way.
Commissioner Erwin contends that if Village “F is developed as market rate units, they should meet the minimum standards. Mr. Wayne inquired what if it is a mix. Commissioner Erwin replied that the portion of units which are market rate should be built to minimum standards.
Commissioner Noble stated that Condition #52 states that any changes must receive Planning Commission approval. If the developer wants to make changes in Village “F,” he will have to submit new plans.
Commissioner Compas inquired if the developer is going to market the units or rent them. Mr. Hunter
replied that he will market them.
commissioner Erwin inquired if errata changes #6 and 17 are identical, just different exhibits. Mr. Hunter
replied Yes.
Commissioner ENvin referred to page 3 of Exhibit 9 and stated that it sounds as though the dwellings have not been reduced in size, only moved back. Mr. Hunter replied that is correct.
Chairman Welshons invited the applicant to speak.
PLANNING COMMISSION January 4,1996 PAGE 6
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associa&s, 2366 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Car&ad, addressed the Commission and stated that he had passed out a handout showing the modifiitions which were
previously requested in contrast to those currently being requested. He noted that the only standards modifications being requested are in Village F, which is a significant improvem8nt.
Chairman Welshons inquired if he had reviewed the errata sheet presented by staff. Mr. How8e replied Yes and that the changes are acceptable.
Chris Chambers, Continental Homes, 12636 High Bluff Drive, San Diego, addressed the Commission and Stated that since the project was reviewed in November, he has engaged a new architect who worked through the Thanksgiving holiday in order to have the new design ready for tonight’s meeting. He assured the Commission that many protections have been built into the proposed project, the major safety net being that a housing agreement must be in place. The second safety net is that when they seek financing to construct Village “F they must know in advance if the units will be market rate or affordable. Mr. Rideout has confirmed to the various agencies that this project is in conformance with all requirements of the resource agencies and also complies with the inclusionary housing ordinance. Mr. Chambers b8li8VeS he has addressed all of the issues which were identified at the November meeting.
Commissioner Compas stated that h8 appreciates the prompt and creative response to the Commission’s
concerns.
Commissioner Noble asked th8 applicant if he understands that the affordable units must remain affordable throughout the life of the unit. Mr. Chambers replied that is how the condition reads.
Commissioner Monroy was pleased to s8e the affordable housing units provided on site, rather than off site. He feels that is a big step forward.
Commissioner Emrin referred to the applicant’s objection at the last meeting regarding certain conditions
regarding Melrose and Palomar Airport Road. He inquired if those objections still stand. Mr. Chambers
replied that he assumes the record of tonight’s meeting will include those statements from the previous meeting. By reference, h8 wants to make sure those objections are included.
Commissioner Erwin is concerned about th8 reduction in standards for the inclusionary housing. He inquired if, in fact, Village “F is still planned to be affordable housing. Mr. Chambers replied that today Village “F will be the inclusionary housing Sit8 for the d8v8lOpm8nt.
Commissioner Erwin inquired what could happen that might Change that. Mr. Chambers stated that he
has looked at and-talked about utilizing the second dwelling unit ordinance as a partial solution, whereby a
second dwelling unit could count as an affordable unit. That decision would have to be made prior to
execution of the housing agreemeclt, hopefully within th8 next year. They haven’t decided as yet if this
would be a viable alternative. To his knOWledg8, it has never been tried in any master plan so there is some question about introducing that concept. Howevec, if it approv8s viable, he would come back to the Commission and ask for approval to intersperse second dwelling units throughout the market rate development as a partial solution for affordable housing. He has heard tonight that if second dwelling units are substituted in as affordable units, in order to receive approval, he would be required to fOrgO the standards modifications on the units being substituted.
Commissioner Erwin stated that any substitutions must be done prior to the start of construction. Mr.
Chambers stated that he has no problem with that commitment because that is what the housing agreement will accomplish.
Commissioner Monroy inquired if the applicant understands that should second dwelling units be added in
Village “P,” the total of both units may not exceed the square footage requirement. Mr. Chambers replied
that he understands this requirement.
PLANNING COMMISSION ,* January 4, 1995 PAGE 7
Commissioner Nielsen inquired if the applicant understands that those units designated as affordable
would have deed restrictions on them. Mr. Chambers replied that he understands they would have to b8 deed restricted if they are dedicated to satisfying the affordable housing quota. However, they could still
retain the opportunity to introduce that as a feature of the home being marketed.
Chairman W8lShOnS stated that she understands that one of the other land own8rs (UDC) did not m8et their interest payment on Saturday. This was repotted in the Orange County Register. Mr. Chambers was
unaware of that report.
Chairman Welshons inquired if Continental’s plans hinge on other developer actions, i.e. completion of
Melrose. Mr. Chambers replied Yes. Melrose is a $25 million capital works project. His project alone
Cannot support that improvement. Several deV8lOp8rS have been inVO&d on the M8lrOS8 prOjeCt.
Although it has only been a handshake agreement at this point, everyone has contributed funds to the planning phaS8.
Chairman W8lShOnS opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
There being no persons desiring to address th8 Commission on this topic, Chairman W8lShOnS declared the public testimony closed and offered the applicant an opportunity for a closing statement.
Mr. Chambers stated that he still needed clarification on the second dwelling units. Mr. Wayne quoted the
Carlsbad Municipal Code which states that “the rate for second dwelling units shall be affordable to low
income households. The monthly rental shall not exceed an amount equal to 39% of th8 gross monthly
income of low income households adjusted to 80% of the San Diego County median income.” The units
are not deed restricted but an agreement must be entered into which states that if the unit is rented, it must
meet the affordable criteria. A relative may live in the unit rent-free, however, once it is officially rented, it
must comply with the regulations. Mr. Chambers stated that he understands, and he requested th8
Commission’s approval of his project.
Chairman W8lShOnS opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if staff had been able to come up with an amendment to alleviate his fears
about the standards modification in Village “F.” Mr. Wayne replied that Condition #51 is not worded to
address his issue. Staff is not recommending that this be restricted at this time. It may be determined that
it would b8 advantageous to have a 50-50 mix and th8 Planning Commission may still Want to offer those
same incentives in lieu of financial inwntives. To lock it in today would mean that we want the standards
more than we want the affordable housing.
Chairman Welshons inquired if the Commission accepts Condition #51 as written, and the applicant requests to substitute some affordable units in Village “F with second dwelling units in another village, would it constitute a redesign and would it come back before the Commission. Mr. Wayne replied that it
may or may not. The Commission has not received elevations for Villages “G,” “P,” an “0.” If those elevations wme back with a second dwelling unit and their intention is to have the second dwelling unit meet the affordable housing requirement, then at that time they would also have to amend Village “F.” Their amendment to Village “F may be simply to say that they are amending it to be 50-50. The
standards modifications would then be dealt with on its merits.
Commissioner Nielsen inquired if the applicant decided to use second dwelling units to meet their quota, would the units have to be deed restricted. Mr. Wayne replied Yes because it would be included in the
affordable housing agreement.
Commissioner Nielsen thinks th8 applicant has don8 an exc8ll8nt job of addressing the changes which
were requasted at the last meeting. He agrees with Commissioner Erwin. He also agrees that the
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION January 4,1995 PAGE 8
Commission should look at Village “F again if th8 applicant decides to designate second dwelling units as affordable housing.
Commissioner Noble can support the staff recommendation. The law requires 15% of th8 units to be affordable. A housing agreement must be signed which is a contract to 8nsur8 compliance. If they decide not to build any affordable units, they would be required to pay appropriate fees in lieu of the units.
Commissioner Erwin commented that the applicant solved th8 front yard problem by reducing the rear yards. However, his biggest wncern is Village “F.” He would like a condition added that no construction
can bsgin until the inclusionary housing requirement has b88n satisfied. Mr. Wayne replied that no
construction can begin until a housing agreement has been signed. This is stipulated in Conditions #51 and #52.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he would like to s88 second dwelling units used as second dwelling units. He thinks it should be understood that if this wm8s back, Village “F must meet all of the minimum standards.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3680,3681, and 3662, recommending approval of CT
93-07, PUD 93-06, and SDP 94-01, respectively, based on th8 findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein, including the modifications contained in the errata
sheet dated January 4,1995. VOTE: 7-O
AYES: Chairman Welshons, Commissioners Compas, Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble, and
Savary
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Non8
mm&ion recessed at 745 p.m. and reconvened at 7:52 p.m.
Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo sion west of Melrose Drive extens the PC zone, in Local
Facilities Management
Terri Woods, Associate Planner, revt equest and reminded everyone mat a portion of Village “0” was discussed at 16,1994. The discussion dealt
exclusively with standards modification
presentation she will be making comments on i
discussion.
Ms. Woods stated that Ran&o C
designed as/siiigle story. A .28 acre actiie/passive recreation area is being included in the 5.7”aqs open
the project. This will be designed as a tot lot and th8 design guidelines set up the am * provided in that tot lot. As previously discussed, this PUD will process architectural
floor plans through the delayed architectural review process. 7 L \ i
Hofman Planning
Associates
a l 0
Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis
February 16, 1995
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
RE: CITY COUNCIL HEARINGS FOR CONTINENTAL HOMES TENTATIVE MAPS
CT 93-4 Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q” & “T”
CT 93-8/PUD 93-7 Ranch0 Carrillo Village “0”
CT 93-7/PUD 93-6/SDP 94-l Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “F”, “G” & “P”
Honorable Mayor Lewis
This letter is written on behalf of Continental Homes who respectively requests a continuance
of the above described applications from the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting to the
March 7, 1995 meeting. Continental Homes is making this request for the following
reasons:
1.
2.
3.
A minor issue has recently arisen relating to the impacts of the project on five
homes located adjacent to the southern boundary of Village Q. These
homeowners would like us to look at providing a better landscaping buffer
between our project and their homes. A two week continuance would allow
us to meet with these homeowners to try and resolve any issues they may
have. Our site planner has looked at this issue and has indicated that our project could provide more buffering to these people without the need for
major modifications to our plan.
Due to the holiday on February 20, 1995 we will have insufficient time to
adequately prepare our presentation for the hearing.
Due to prior scheduling conflicts the principals of Continental Homes will be
unable to attend the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting.
2386 Faraday Avenue l Suite 120 l Carlsbad l CA 92008 l (619) 438-1465 l Fax: (619) 438’2443
I c
*
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to call me if you have any
questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Mike Howes
cc Ray Pachett
Marty Orenyak
Michael Holzmiller
Chris Chambers
,
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of I Proof of Publication of
Blade-Citizen
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for
the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial
district with substantial circulation in Bonsall, Fallbrook, Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349: that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Feb. 11, 1995
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at OceansideCalifornia, this 13 d
of Feb. 1995
BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising 1722 South Hill Street P.O. Box 90
Oceanside, CA 92054 (6 19) 433-7333
I Public Hearing
Paste Clipping of Notice SECURELY In This Space.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 93-7/PUD 93=6/SDP 94-1
RANCH0 CARRILLG VILLAGES "F", "@I & llpll
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, February 21, 1995, to consider an application for a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development, and Site Development Plan for 117 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and 1 multi-family lot for Villages I'F", '*G", and IrPl' of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan on a 125 acre parcel zoned P-C (Planned Community) on property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of future Melrose Drive, within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18. The Site Development Plan also includes a request for standards modifications for Village 1*011 (CT 93-8/PUD 93-7) of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and more particularly described as:
Portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Brian Hunter in the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4457.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and/or Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Continental Homes PUBLISH: February 11, 1995
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
_I;- -
n
SANCHO CARRUD Vu= “F”;“@*.& ‘Le”
.
-
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carl&ad will hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carfsbad Village Drive, Carl&ad, California, at 6:00
p.m. on Wednesday, November 16,1994, to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Tract
Map, Planned Unit Development, and Site Development Plan for 117 single family lots, 5 open
” space lots, and 1 multi-family lot for Villages F ‘, ‘G”, and “Pm of the Ranch0 Canillo Master Plan
on a 125 acre parcel zoned P-C (Planned Community) on property generally located south of
Palomar Airport Road and east of future Melrose Drive within the Zone 16 Local Facilities
Management Plan. The Site Development Plan also includes a request for standards
modifications for Village ‘0” (CT 93-08/PUD 93-07) of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and more
particularly described as:
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, and
Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
Tho’se persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after November 10, 1994. If you have
any questions, please call Brian Hunter in the Planning Department at (619) 438-l 161, ext. 4457.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development, and/or Site Development
Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 93-07,‘PUD 93-06,‘SDP 94-01
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VlLLAGES ‘F”, ‘G” & ‘P”
PUBUSH: NOVEMBER 4,1994
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
.
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached arc the materials necessary for you to notlde
CT 93-07/PLJD 93-06/SDP 94-01 - Ranch0 Carrillo Villages 'IF", "G", and "P"
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
.
Thank you.
Assistant City Man--
January 31, 1995
Oate
. .
: - C
.LABELS
I -
SECURITY PAC NTL BANK PO BOX 90610 PASADENA CA 91109
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LIMITED 438 CAMINO DEL RIO 112B SAN DIEGO CA 92108
mi::
MICHAEL&ANN BEAUCHEMIN 2606 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
NM&CATHERINE DAUGHERTY 2600 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&MARY AMSTUTZ 13169 AUTUMN HILL LN HERNDON VA 22071
HARRY&LINDA MC DEVITT 6404 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GRANT&JANET DUNLAP 6401 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GENELINGER HUBER 6407 EL PAT0 CT ,CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASS C/O THE FIELDSTONE CO 14 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
PONDEROSACOUNTRYHMOWNRS 23382 MILL CREEK DR #120 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653
LA COSTA HOTEL&SPA CORP 2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETER&JENNIFER SARA 2604 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES C SHIELDS II C/O EADS COREL 2532 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS&JOANNE PARADISE 2526 LA GOLONDRINA ST eARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLYN MUNDY TRUST 6402 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD.CA 92009
JAMES&PAMELA WEATHERFORD 6403 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERTLRENE VANHORNE 6409 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARNOLD&HOLLY MICHELS - 2602 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DADELALYSSA MYRES 2530 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALVIN&DIANE PIERCE 6406 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDWARD&MAUREEN MOWRY 6400 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ED&LYNN SPENCER TRUST 6405 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAELLCHRISTINNA HALL 6411 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
A notice has been mailed to
all PrOOWy OWrl?r:;,‘cc.:~p~nts listed herein Date /L’ 2 -
Siana?
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
JULIA TESCHLER 6413 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&KIMBERLY GRANT 2514 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 .
WERNER&DORIS MARKUS 2512 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&KAREN WILL JOHN&VALSA STEPHEN 2510 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL GITTLEMAN 2508 LA GOLONbRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 2506 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEON&FLORENCE GREENBERG 2629 OBELISCO PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNISCLENORE HENDRICKSON' 2502 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
H G & MAUDIE STEVENS 2500 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
SAMES&ANN HILL 2517 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT&MONICA KLATT 6415 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETHCTHRESIA MAY 6414 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN&CINDA COE 6417 LA PALOMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
S BROSTOFF & T WHITE 2608 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY&Pm GLICKMAl$ 2610 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROB&TERRIE PURDY 2612 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&CARMELA MCNIFF 2614 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAWRENCE&ROSE FIRSTEN 2616 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&BARBARA OERUM 2618 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
FERNANDO&LYDIA MONROY PO BOX 2442 DEL MAR CA 92074
GREGORY KUSNER 2622 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
S FROSTROM t G GIBSON 2624 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
F'RANKCLENORE CARR 2626 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENT ANDERSON 2627 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMLGRACIELA EWASKIW 2623 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETHLWINONA TAIT 2625 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAN&CAROLINE COOPER 2621 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 2
I - - -
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
DALE&ELSIE GARDETTO MEL&PHYLLIS LEVIN DENNISbrARLENE SHERREITT 2619 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2286 BOCA ST 2615 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
WE&CAROL HORSCHEL GARRYLMARTHA GRACE HAROLD&MARJORIE GOLDEN 2613 LA GOLONDRINA ST- 2611 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2609 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY&JAN GRELL PAUL&SALLY RINGWOOD THOMAS&KATHLEEN EVANS 2607 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2665 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2603 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN CUTLER R DUGGAN & J SAROFF WMCIRMA CAMPBELL 2601 LA GOLONDRINA ST 505 SABAL LAKE DR #lOl 2704 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LONGWOOD FL 32779 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT ETHERTON BRIAN&MARY MCKEON FRANK&RUTH ETHERTON 2708 LA GOLONDRINA 11506 25TH ST NE CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAKE STEVENS WA 98258
MICHAEL FARR JAMES&BARBARA RUECKL KATHLEEN KENNEDY 2714 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2712 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNCNONA GRIFFITH BCADELINA GALINDO 2718 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2720 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC&LUCILLE OLSON JOHN SWOPE 7089 MURILLO LN 6426 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
W FELBER & L VOSS 6430 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PHUC HUU TRUONG MY-DUNG THI NGUYEN 6432 CHIRIQUI LaN CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD&LYNN KILLION 3694 COPPER CREST RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
MICHAEL&JANET PUCCIO 2716 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIKHAILdrELLEN ALAKA 2722 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KARLE JOHNSON 6428 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN&JANET CARRO 6428 EL PERICO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 3
. . h
LABELS
A&SEHILA KHANIJOW 2713 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETERGKARIN BRAEMER 2719 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARSHALL&LAUREN CLOW 2703 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA .92009
‘BRIANbrYONG FENLON 2816 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&MICHELLE LEWIS III 2828 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL HOFFER RONNA WEBB 2840 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS
BETTILOO OLSEN 2715 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY&CYNTHIA CESENA 2721 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNCRIKI BAGLEY 2701 LA GOLCDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNbDALYS STEVENSON 2820 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&BARBARA HESS 2832 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALTERS TRUST 2844 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GOSHTASB HAMSAYEH JOHN&BETTY BRUCE PARIZAD BAGHEGOULESTANI 2902 CACATUA ST 2445 LA AMATISTA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92014
JKdtBARBARA RYAN JERRY&GLENDA GRIFFIN 2841 ESTURION ST 2833 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
JOHN&MICHELLE MONTROY 2717 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA BARRON 2314 RUE ADRIANE LA JOLLA CA 92037
CLARENCE&MARY BOYD 2812 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&LYNN BRADLEY 2824 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENT&SHARON LARSEN 2836 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT&BRIDGET WUESTE 2849 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&HAZEL HORWITZ 2825 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 4
. .
ZLABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
NEIL&DIANE OPENSHAW 2819 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
OMAR ORR DAVID&DONNA ORR 2805 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THEO&VIRGINIA ERLER 6319 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA '92009
TERRY&MARGARITA HOLT 1464 9TH ST MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
RONALD&KATHLEEN BLGK 2806 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLEN SPOUSTA 2818 ESTURION'CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
J&FREDERICA ROSENFIELD 2830 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
HERMANLADELINE WADLEY 2844 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 .
ROBERT DOUGHERTY 2858 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 5
FRANK&FRANCES MESSANO 2813 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD&SALLY TADLCCK 2801 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL SALOUR LVG TRST 6311 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROY&DANA PRICE 6312 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLENLLGRI FISHMAN 2810 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMESLEMIKO HINKLEY 2822 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEONORA REPP 2834 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
NEIL&ANITA TIPPLE 2848 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARTHUR&JOAN MARKOVITS 3002 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&ADELE LAPADULA 2809 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DWIGHT&DONNA JOHNSON 6327 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009.
MICHLtJENNIFER STEIDLEY 6303 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&DIANNE HURT 2802 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DIANE BERRY 2814 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&JULIA GUTHRIE 2826 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRIS&CYNTHIA PHILLIPS 2840 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
BEHZADtJALEN SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN&SHEILA TREBBIN '3006 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
_ -
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
-
CECIL&LYDIA DUNCAN DAVID&TERRY SITTNER 3010 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL GOFORTH MARJORIE KAHN PO BOX 3104 3014 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLAN&BARBARAHARRIMAN' WMCEVELYN BUSTER. GERCPATRICIA MACALUSO 719 DAKOTA TRL 781 SW BAYPOINTE CIR 3020 UNICORN10 ST FRANKLIN LAKES NJ 07417 PALM CITY FL 34990 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ESCH FAMILY TRUST 3022 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
SATISHtPADMINI KADABA 3024 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHASCPATRICIA OSTERHOUT 3028 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILBURLLIDA STEPHENS J MEROD t MOBERLANDER 2939 CACATUA ST 2933 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOMdrMARIANNE CANDELA HYUNGCYOUNG YANG 2921 CACATUA ST 2915 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA CORTINA FRANK&MILLICENT SARVARY 2903 CACATUA ST 1232 MONCADC DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GLENDALE CA 91207
VERNONCBERNICE PLANE 2914 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTLJENN POPPLETON 2920 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&JULIA KLAERICH RUBY KEWLEY 2928 CACATUA ST 1736 CATALPA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
COLE FAMILY TRUST NEIL&SUSAN RAPPAPORT 3454 E FLORENCE AVE 3102 UNICORN10 ST HUNTINGTON PK CA 90255 CARLSBAD CA 92009
C&N GRAXIOLI t L GRAZIOLI C/O GRAZIOLI PO BOX 3333-186 ENCINITAS CA 92024
ENGEL FAMILY TRUST 2909 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
W&IRENE DJOBADZE I
4200 PARKSIDE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008
DON&JANET MAYHUE 298 GREENWOOD PL BONITA CA 91902
RICHARD&ANNE SPOONER 2936 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&KAREN FORINO 3106 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 6
. .
-tABELS
, -
ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST 3110 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
A
PROPERTY OWNERS
I
JOB NUMBER 11348
FRANK&ALICE FREDA 6575 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009 .
THOMAS&JUDITH CATTELL 6573 BIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTLLOUISE MC BREEN 5960 N HUMINGBIRD PARADISE VLY AZ 85253
ROBTCMARGARET SCHERNER 6559 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA -92009‘
VERNCWANDA MARTIN 12521 SAFFORD ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92640
H&JUNE ZIMMERMAN 1220 SHERIDAN RD WILMETTE IL 60091.
KULJIS FAMILY TRUST 6541 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
AKEL KORNCMARION PLACE 6516 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&SHARON NEMMERS 2304 DUNSTAN ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054
MLEECJAC COTTERMAN 6571 VIA BARONA- CARLSBAD CA 92009
BEN&BETTY SIGLER 6563 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALEX&MAYA ZELITSKY 6557 VIA BORONA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JERRY&ALICE FARROW PO BOX 9000-137 CARLSBAD CA 92018
JAMES&DOROTHY OHARA 6545 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACQUELINE BURNS 6539 VIA BARONA CARLBBAD CA 92009
RONALDbORA RENALDI PO BOX 9926 SOUTHLAKE TAHOE CA
ROBTQJANICE BALOG 6567 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
' CARL&JOYCE HILL 6561 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERICA M FREDERICK 6555 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHLLCYNTHIA KOOPSEN 6549 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&IRENE RUBEN 8900 KEYSTONE ST 1066 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46240
MARILYN STOVER 6512 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLAIRE FITZPATRICK TRUST 1732 CATALPA RD 95731 CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAELCCAROL.KURZEJA ANNE DHUNJISHAW 6520 VIA BARONA 6524 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 7
--
_ LABELS
cARLos&vERA ARECCO 1225 BENT OAK TRL ALTAMONTE SPR FL 32714
HOWARD&JOAN MEES PO BOX 428 BONSALL CA 92003
MICHAEL&LINDA DOOLEY 6540 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN J WYMAN AMY BOWERS 6546 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
THEODORE&LORNA JACK 6552 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS
ALAN BLACKBURN 5134 BARRACUDA CT WALDORF MD 20603
ARTHURGBERNICE TILTON 6532 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
f!!%IA BARONA' t&~4J;&? w/p-
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM HANLON 6548 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOIE&JILL POWELL 6554 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORTHEAST SAVINGS CONS LA COSTA MCA 4250 EXECUTIVE SQU X210 C/O PACKARD&LOOMIS INC LA JOLLA CA 92037 5670 EL CAMINO REAL F CARLSBAD CA 92009
HJ&WANDA WARNER NM&MADELINE SLATTERY 6538 CORTE MONTECITO 6540 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
HELEN NOCNAN SHEILA BARROW 6544 CORTE MONTECITO 6545 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JAMES&LYDIA CARVER GARY SCHNEIR 6541 CORTE MONTECITO 6539 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
DNEWKIRK&D KAMERER 6530 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIELGKRISTINE JUNG HIROSH MIMURAdrKIYOKO 1683 ORANGE BLOSSOM WAY ENCINITAS CA 92024
DARLENE DORSEY 6544 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LORETTACGERALD HOFFMANN CHRISTINE HESS 6550 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&CECELIA MICHELA 6556 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY ELLENNEWETT 6542 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
RICIiARDLMhRILYN TRAUB 6543 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHAEL&MARY HARRISON 6537 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 8
’ .
_ LABELS
. -
EM&RACHEL FITZGERALD 6-513 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE WEDGE JR 6518 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVENS FAMILY TRUST 6524 CORTE MONTECITO CAELSBAD CA 92009
GLEN WATSON 6528 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
R GREEN t C DITTMAR 6536 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAWRENCE®INA RIGGS 6537 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP 2584 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008
FRANCES SCHLXK 6534 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE DALTON 6540 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 9
PROPERTY OWNERS
EUGENE&CHRISTINE HUMPHREY 6515 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN BRODSKY 6516 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
TODtREBECCA OBENALIER 1547 PARKVIEW DR VISTA CA 92083
ALBERT ADICKES JR 6530 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
RAND&BARBARA SWENSON 5645 WHITE MOUNTAIN CT MARTINEZ CA 94553
JOSEPH&MARGARET FROST 6535 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHN&CATHY PRAAMSMA 6531 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEVIN&VALERIE SPOUSTA 6536 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM&SHIRLEY MCPHAIL 6542 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
JEFFREY BRADLEY 6514 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
PETER STEVENS 6520 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&JANICE BALOG 6526 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUIS NEIHEISEL ANNCHERB&CARROL VONGAL 6532 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&CHERYL FALK 6539 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
VIRGINIA BONAGURA 6533 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
LEILA HEYLAND 6538 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOEL GOODRICH 6544 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
. ,
-LABELS
-
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
. .
FRANK&KARLA STOUDEK SHARON TOL 1014 CHRIST1 LN 6548 CORTE VALDEZ FALLBROOK CA 92028 CARLSBM CA 92009
JAMES&MARY BROWER 6552 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
CLINTON PETERSON PO BOX 4136 LK SAN MARCOS .CA 92069
CHARLES KNISLEY GRANA FAMILY TRUST 6543 CORTE VALDEZ 83 6541 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA '92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIANWEAVERJR 3104 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICH&JUDY SEVIER 215 S VALLEY DRIVE MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
WM&NANCY CAHOONE 6545 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
&LOOMIS INC
SBM CA 92008
ENOCYOLANDA PORRO 3106 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD SIVIY THOMAS&MARGARET FITZGERALD B HOOVER C M MOODY 3108 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3110 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3112 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA '92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN&KATHLEEN FULMER NORA KNIGHT KENNETH&COLLEEN FLOYD 3114 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3116 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 1346 ORIBIA RD CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92014
WILLIAM&DONNA SMITH RICHARD&MARY RIEDEL R ANDERSEN t B TILT 3120 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 6502 VIA OSTRA 6504 VIA OSTW4 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
SALLY HOPKINS THOMAS&LINDA HARDY JOHN&LISA BLEVINS 6506 VIA OSTRA 3159 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3157 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
FEROL BECKER 3155 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSE&DOROTHY ROCHA PO BOX 9000 CARLSBAD CA 92018
TESFAYE HAILEMICHAEL 6508 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 10
. ,
&Anna
MARY WAITE
6510 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009
JESUSCIYASAKO FLORES 1574 VILtLAGE VIEW DR ENCINITAS CA 92024
DENISE DORRICOTT 3109 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ekESA BURR fir ROCKPORT CT L&UCADIA CA 92024
NARGARETW 855 SANTA ROSITA
SOLANA BCH CA 92075
JDCJAYNE LOVIG 3127 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICKY ALDRICN 3133 AVENIDA-TCPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
RON&CHERYL WOLFN 3139 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
C FITCH&J KRANER 22801 NORBERT ST PERRIS CA 92370
-
rnPRTy ovntw
1.
JO0 NUKB= 12004C
NORM&DONNA DELANEY E OATESCG QUEEN 6509 VIA OSTRA 6511 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
,STANLEY LUTY JOHN&FRANCES MARROW 6510 CANINO CAPISTRANO 3105 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PATRICIA SNYDER 3107 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
NARILYN HENLEY 3111 AVENIDA TOPANGJi CARLSBM CA 92009
CAROLE FOSLADEK ROBTLINESE SFOTTS 3113 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3117 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHirRONALE NCCLURE CEO&KIN DOUILLARD 3119 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3123 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
STEPHEN MADDOX 3125 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIELLRITA TRIST ‘
3129 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK&PAUL NOLL 3131 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD .$A 92009
LOUISE PAUL 3L35 AVENIDA TOPANGA C-BAD CA 92009
SUE SALISBURY WZurAM SWAPFORD 3137 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3L41 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAUREL PLAGGE 3143 AVMIDA TOPAMGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
Dolt- CAWDELA 2921 CACA’TUA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 11
.
-LABELS - PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
. HECTCSUSANA AGUIRRE 3152 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
CHRIS OSTERGMRD SHARON KENNEDY F&PENELOPE OSTERGMRD 3154 AVENIDA TCPANGA 3150 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
KORBER FAMILY TRUST TIM CONNETT 2240 LAGOON VIEW DR 3156 AVENIDA TOPANGA
CARDIFF CA 92007 CARLSBM CA 92009
. KERR FAMILY TRUST 833 E MARGARITA ROM RIALTO CA 92376 SBM CA 92009
PAUL MILLER PAUL MILL RALLENtT TRAVERS 26042 DANA BLUFFS E 1 NIMITZ DR D CAPSTRNO BCH CA 92624 CEIBA PR 00735
JON1 ETUE JEANLROS MARTIN W NEFFCK RUTHMAN 3120 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3124 AVENIDA OLNEDA 3128 AVENIDA OLHEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
ARMDO&MA PALOMO 3132 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIAM WIEHL LAQUETTA MONTGOMERY 2465 PRIMROSE AVE 3140 AVENIDA OLMEDA VISTA CA 92083 CARLSBM CA 92009
CAROL NAISMITH JUDITH LAIRD WMLBERNA KORETKE 3144 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3148 AVENIDA OLHEDA 3152 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JOANN MICHAEL MOHAMM HALAWI BILLIE SCHAFER 3154 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3158 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3156 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA .92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
RICHARD SPCONER PATRICIA SNON EVELYN SORENSON LYNNE SEGUINE-SPCONER 3155 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3157 AVENIDA OLHEDA 3159 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 12
&ABELS ROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
. -
R CISSELCM STEVENS 3153 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
C&ARUNAVARMA 2659 AURALIE DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
G&JENNIFER GOTTESMAN 3141 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
CARL BOGDM 3135 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
GARY SMITH
4365 SHASTA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008
NM&ANNETTE MALONEY 3123 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&DIME PHILLIPS 2022 VISTA GRANDE DR VISTA CA 92084
GREG&CLAUDIA BARNETT 3143 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EUGENE ZMRA 3137 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICH&LORRAINE YBARRA 3131 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
S GREENWALT&P GARDNER 3125 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DMdtTERRI CORNELL 3119 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
TAKAKYOKO CHICHIDA R VERRYCK LACKEY 3117 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3591 WINDSPUN DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 HUNTNGTN BCH CA 92649
ED&JEANNETTE PASCHALL 1932 LAHOUD DR
CARDIFF CA 92007
SAIEDbrNORANIEH ATAIE R VERRYCK 3105 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
DAVID&TAN1 HOCKER 3151 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICH&JOANNE MOFFETT 3145 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
HbrLYNNE NARGENAU 1102 DEER RUN N PINE BLUFF AR 71603
NARK MDRADE 3133 AVENDIA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN SALATA 3127 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92008
SIMS FAMILY TRUST SMDRAMAES 3121 AVENIDA OLHEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
WN&WENDY LANDRY 3115 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
PAUL NETTtJMET SYNONS JAMES MADERE 3109 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
DAVID SPIELMAN 3103 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 13
- . .
-iLAB=
. .
BRIM DICKTER 4515 SALISBURY ST CARLSBM CA 92008
SELMA FROMBERG TRUST 3069 CANINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET MEL1221 6545 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
B&JALM SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBM CA 92009
STMELY KELTS 6546 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
WN&MICHIKO KAHL
276 DELPHI CIR LOS ALTOS CA 94022
D&B GOSSETT RUTH MC MICHAEL 1940 LEUCADIA SCENIC CT LEUCADIA CA 92024
?ROPERTY OWNERS
CHARLINE KENNEY 4910 MCCONNELL AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90066
BETTY YABU C/O NARY WATANABE 7501 W 91ST LOS ANGELES CA 90045
MARTIN&THERESA BROWN 3067 CANINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
GARYCMICHELE NAY 6549 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
CPLSHARON OWEN 6543 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE CARDER 6550 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
NYLTREDA BARKER 361 WEATHERLY TRAIL GUILFORD CT 06437
MILLLJUBICA TOMICH 3071 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
LA COSTA MCA C/O ES ROSENFELD 16133 VNTRA BL 1270 ENCINO CA 91436
U&RUTH NELSON 6547 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHAEL MORGENLANDER LINDA MORGENLANDER 6541 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
ANGELO&SANDRA GALASSO 6548 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
CULVERdiDELGRES NELSON TRUST PATRICIACCHAS CONNOLLY 1611 W MYRTLE AVE 6542 PASEO MELANTE PHOENIX AZ 85021 CARLSBM CA 92009
FRANK&VERA FEDERICO RON&SANDRA FREENAN 1941 SUMMIT DR 3016 AVENIDA CHRISTINA ESCONDIW CA 92027 CARLSBM CA 92009
ELWOODCLINDA HIGLEY TONYtCOLLEEN AUSILIO 3018 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 5437 CHERRY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 LONG BEACH CA 90805
PAGE 14
. *
- UBELS PROPERTY OWNERS
-
JOB NUMBER 12004C
PAUL CORIGLIMO NOEL WOOD ROBT&MARGARET FALLON 3020 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 6934 ELLINGHAM CIR XF 3028 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009 ALEXANDRIA VA 22310 CARLSBM CA 92009
DOALLAKIKO MILLER DAVID&LAURA JOHNS SHELLIE EDMAN 247 AVENIDA ESPERANZA 3030 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3034 AVENIDA CHRISTINA OLIVENHAIN CA 92024 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JULIA FISCHER NANCY SEXTON DALE&JULIE BLASIUS 4202 E CACTUS RD /lo307 MICHAEL BARRETT 3040 AVENIDA CHRISTINA PHOENIX AZ 85032 3036 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
DOLORES RUHLAND WILLIAMHARD B LOCKWOOD&K JAY BRADLEY RUHLAND 3042 AVE CRISTINA 112 3046 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3111 CALLE FUEGO CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
CYNTHIA STALHEIM KEITHCCAROLE ARNITAGE , MAXINE ALLEY 3044 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3048 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3052 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
NARIANN BILLINGSLEY STEVEN FISHER LONNA HOWARD PO BOX 1897 . 3054 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3058 AVENIDA CHRISTINA
SAN MARCOS CA 92079 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBTLSHARON RIEDY BARBARA CASTLEBERRY DONNCKELLY DAGGETT 3056 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3060 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3064 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
GARY&KIMBERLY BROWN JERRY&ALICE FARROW SHELDON BARRETT 3062 AVENIDA CHRISTINA PO BOX 9000-137 6541 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009 . CARLSBM CA 92018 CARLSBM CA 92009
WM&BETH EICHHORN MARIO LOMBARD0 KARILYN MONTMTI 6543 CALLE VALPERIZO ANTON10 LOMBARD0 6547 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009 100 VIA NAVARRO CARLSBM CA 92009 GREENBRAE CA 94904
PAGE 15
.LABELS
JOHN QUAKENBUSH 6549 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
FRED&MAE HILDEBRAND 7502 JEREL CT CARLSBM CA 92009
RAULKATHY ROJAS 6542 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92609
CHRISTOPHER MYERS 6537 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
BARBARA HAHLBOHM 6543 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
JOAN PETER 6549 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
ANNE DEWOLFE 4170 ADMIRALTY WAY 3G HRNA DEL REY CA 90292
BRENDECKE FAMILY TRUST 25795 DELTA ST MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
PROPERTY OWNERS
CHAStIRMA LACKEY 6551 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
HAZEL NETHERTON 6546 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
DAVID&DIANA FRANKLIN 2749 VIA DE LA VALLE Xl00 DEL NAR CA 92014
JOHN TANNENBERG 6539 VIA ALCAZAR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DUMECJMELLE GOODRICK 6545 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNhKATHRYN NEWMAN 6551 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
DOUGLAS KOSTY 6548 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM.CA 92009
MARY MORRIS 6542 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
LOCKE FAMILY TRUST 3070 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
GEORGIA HAMILTON PO BOX 370774 MONTARA CA 94037
RWINLRAISA DORFNAN 1159 HAVERSTON ROM LYNDHURST OH 44124
RICH&GENEVIEVE BABCOCK 2533 SW MANOR HILL DR PALM CITY FL 34990
ANDREW&MARGIE WILSON 6541 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBTCANDREA SIEBENS 6547 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
JENSON FAMILY TRUST 6552 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
J&A MARK LIVING TRUST 19400 WYANDOTTE ST 5 RESEDA CA 91335
NJ&SUZANNE GURLEY 6540 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
LINDA HEAVER 3068 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 16 .
. - * LABELS
. .
MARTIN&MAXINE ALTSHULER 3066 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
KENNETH LEHMER 3058 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
DMIELLKRISTINE JUNG RJUNGbrKTINKER 1313 ORCHARD WOOD RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
MEADOWLARK C CHURCH 1832 MEADWLRK RCH RD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOSCRAETTE STEPHENS 1009 EL VALLECITO VISTA CA 92083
MARY BURGESS 1704 KINGLET RD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOS&JOHN BROWER GEObRUTH BROWER 1828 TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MARK&PATRICIA MOYER 1816 TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LARRY GRISMER 1817 VIA GAVILAN SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PROPERTY OWNERS
EITMiMIRIAM DRORI 6605 ALPINE WAY YAKIMA WA 98908
SHARON ALTOTT NORMAN ADLER '. 3056 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBTCELIZ SKIBICKI RLT 3046 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD X2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
STEPHEN KOTFICA VERA TAYLOR 1716 RINGLET RD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
KEN&ISABEL MAYES 1700 KINGLET RD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
TERRY HENDERSON 1824'TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SOPHIA HAYNES LILIA OSPINA 1812 TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ROD&MARTHA MILLER 1800 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOB NUMBER 12004C
KEVIN&CHRIS+INE CURRY 3060 CAMIN LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHCELIZABETH BRAMAN 3054 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
RON&AI MINKOW 2112 ARGYLE DR PLAN0 TX 75023
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD #2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
VA&BARBARA FISCHER DR 92069 1562 HERMOSITA
SAN MARCOS CA
STEVEN ELLIOTT KAREN FRASER 1832 TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DE&MICHELLE GILMORE 1820 TOWHEE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ANGELO LICCIARDI 125 llT?I STREET DEL MAR CA 92014
LARRY&KAREN ROSEFELD 1803 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 17
’ .
* LABELS
-
- PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
, -
JOHN&RACHEL SUYDAB JESS, GONZALES MICHLtJANE KURTB 1807 TOWHEE ST BETTYHENRY 1819 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 1813 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DONALD ECKARDT KATHRYNJUDD DAVID BRATTEN 3157 PALM CREST TER 1831 TOWHEE ST 1719 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
B VESSAL&K NAZANIN RICHARD SAUERHEBER JOHN&JANICE HART 1830 REDWING ST 1826 REDWING ST 1822 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JON&MARILYN FOWLER ROBTCLORRAINE BARNES MARV&DOROTBY WEST 1818 REDWING ST 1814 REDWING ST 1810 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARdOS CA 92069
JAMES KILEY ELIZABETH CADELL JOAN THOMPSON 1806 REDWING ST 1744 REDWING ST 1738 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
STEVEN&PAMELA SAVAGE GREG&MERCEDES WILSON 1732 REDWING ST 1726 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAUL&KATIE WHEATLAND MARY BOYLES 1714 REDWING ST 1708 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PATRICIA VANDERBECK 1713 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DON&SUSAN DENNY JAHESLLILIA STURGES 1725 REDWING ST 1731 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GERARDANDERBERG RHONDA BRANT 1720 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LARRY GRISMER 1819 VIA GAVILAN
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JAMES&ANNA BULAY 1719 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LEBEDEFF FAMILY TRUST 1737 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 18
. .
. LABELS
R&S MASON TRUST 1743 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JR&DEVINE PURDY 1827 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GEORGE HELVIN 1911 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
A SABINA CT
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 1128
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
PROPERTY OWNERS
PHILLIPCWENDELLEN CRABTREE CARLMARCELLA KOLATA 1745 REDWING ST 1823 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SM MARCOS CA 92069
WALTER&SUSAN MOISE 1727 KINGLET RD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CHRIS ESTRADA 1917 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
EDWIN LASERLALLAN SALONER
7638 MAR AVE LA JOLLA CA 92037
TA SABINA CT
FDIC C/O KATIE KRUSE PO BOX 7549 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658
GENTRY WIMPEY INC 9754 WHITHORN DR HOUSTON TX 77095
JOB NUMBER 12004C
LTfNMCY CARLIN 1905 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GABORbrILONA REH MNANIKAS TRUSTETAL 1551 SANTA SABINA CT SOLANA BCH CA 92075
CARRILLORANCHOPRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L RL 616 SAN DIEGO CA 92108
JACK E ADAMS INC J E ADAMS INC 1234 ORANGEWOOD DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
PAGE 19
- _
1 LABELS
. -
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 112B
SAN DIEGO CA 92128
MIKE HOWES HOFMAN PLANNING, ASSOCIATES
2386 FARADAY AVE STE 120
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PROPERTY OWNER
CARRILLO RANCH0 PRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L R 616
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
CHRIS CHAMBERS CONTINENTAL HOMES 12636 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
JOB NUMBER 12004C
PAGE 20
.- FACILITIES FOR CITY CLERK
GEORGE W MANNON CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
801 PINE AVENUE 1290 SAN MARCOS BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING
5201 RUFFIN RD STE “B”
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S WLCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NO HILL ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF CARLSB
COMh/NFdERVICES
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
105 W RICHMAR AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
330 GOLDENSHORE #50
LONG BEACH CA 90802