HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-21; City Council; 13040; Rancho Carrillo Village L, M, N, Q, RCl+ OF CARLSBAD - AGEt+‘& BILL 44 -
AB # l76kio TITLE:
MTG. 2121195
DEPT. PLN ti
RANCH0 CARRKLO VILLAGE n L”,=M”;N’,*Q*,
“R”, and “T” - CT 93-04
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the Cii Council direct the City
Attorney to prepare documents APPROVlNG the Tentative Tract Map for Ranch0 Carrillo Villages l L”;Mn,“N*,“Q’;R” and “T’ - CT 93-04.
ITEM EXPLANATlON
On January 4, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
approval with modifications (7-O) of Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “L’,“M”,‘N’,‘Q”,‘R” and “T” (CT 93-04),
located south of Poinsettia Lane (extension) and east and west of Melrose Drive (extension), in
Local Facilities Management Zone 18. No persons provided public testimony during the hearing
on Villages “C,‘M”,‘N’,“Q”,“R” and ‘T”. On January 12, 1995, the Housing Commission reviewed
the associated affordable housing component of the project (Ranch0 Carrillo Village ‘F” - CT 93-
07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01) and recommended (7-O) that the Council approve the project. The
site is located in the Planned Community (PC) Zone and is subject to the requirements of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, as well as Final EIR 91-04 and Hillside Development Permit 91-17
which were processed concurrently with the Master Plan.
The project is located on a 267.7 acre site surrounding the Ran&o Carrillo Park site. The
project consists of 288 single family residential lots ranging in size from 7,566 to 46,140 square
feet, 2 multiple family residential lots, 1 community services lot, 1 recreational facilities lot, 1 day
care facilities lot, 1 recreational vehicle storage lot and 18 open space lots. Architecture and
floor plans were not submitted for the standard lot subdivision of Villages l M*,*Q*, and ‘R”,
however, detailed design guidelines have been prepared to ensure that a quality development
is submitted by the developer. Future discretionary actions will be required of Villages “L”,“N”
and “T” (SDP, PUD, CP, etc.); the floor plans and architecture will be reviewed during the normal
discretionary review process of these Villages. The project contains several of the Master Plan
facilities including the community services lot, day care lot and recreational vehicle storage lot.
The project will also preserve 116.7 acres of open space, the majorii which will be preserved
in a natural state. The project also features segments of the Ciiide and Master Plan trail
systems.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the proposed
dwelling units (88.76 affordable units) must be provided for lower income households. The
applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units off-site in a combined affordable
project in Ranch0 Carrillo Village ‘F’. The Site Development Plan for Village “F’ (CT 93-07/PUD
93-06/SDP 94-01) will be reviewed and acted upon by Council prior to review of this project.
This will ensure that all affordable housing requirements are satisfied and all incentives agreed
to prior to review and approval of this project. This project is conditioned to comply with the
Affordable Housing Agreement requirements of the Village ‘F” affordable housing project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan - MP 139(E)
which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within Local Facilities Management Zone 18. The direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR
91-04) for the Master Plan approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. Staff prepared an initial
study to analyze potential environmental impacts of the project and conducted additional project
level studies including soils contamination studies and a drainage study. These studies provide ’
c-4 m
PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO -/3.oyo
more focused and detailed analysis. Staff determined that no additional impacts over those
addressed in EIR 91-04 will occur and therefore, the project is in prior compliance with Final EIR
91-04. The recommended and applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been
incorporated into the project design or are included as conditions of approval for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT
As discussed in the Zone 18 Local Facilitiis Management Plan, all major capital facilities will be
provided within this Zone, concurrent with development. A financing plan that comprehensively
addresses the provision of public facilities has been submitted for staff review, but as yet, not
presented to City Council for action. The-financing plan will establish the precise mechanism
for financing all necessary facilities for Zone 18. The developer intends to privately finance the
construction of the affordable units and is requesting no financial assistance from the City at this
time.
The action before the Council will have no direct fiscal impact on the Ciiy. The uttimate
development of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area, including Villages “L”,“M”,“N”,“Q”,‘R’ and
1 “T”, will have a variety of fiscal impacts on the City including additional costs and revenues. The
funding mechanism for all capital improvements will be determined by the Zone 18 financing
plan. No determination of the specifii costs and benefits has been made at this time.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3708 and 3707
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 4, 1995
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated January 4, 1995.
c *
El
. 4
City d Chbd
CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGE “L, M, 4 Q, R, T” 1 CT 93-04 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3706
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE
AND DEVELOP 6 LARGE PARCELS INTO 288 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, TWO MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, EIGHTEEN OPEN SPACE LOTS, ONE
COMMUNITY SERVICES LOT, ONE RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES LOT, ONE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE
LOT AND ONE DAY CARE LOT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
OF THE CITY, WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION,
EAST OF EL FUERTE EXTENSION AND SOUTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE EXTENSION IN THE SOUTHERN
PORTION OF THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “NH, “Q”, “R” & ,‘T
CASE NO: CT 93-04
WHEREAS, a verifie4l application for certain property to wit:
Portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West,
San Bernardino Meridian Base according to official Plat thereof,
City of Carl&ad, County of San Diego, State of California.
has been filed with the City of Carl&ad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21
of the Carl&ad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of November, 1994,
the 30th day of November, 1994, and on the 4th day of January 1995, hold a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carl&ad as follows: ez
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
,* / A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. I
J3 That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
RECOlWMENDS APPROVAL of CT 93-04, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
j
FlXdiD*:
1. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the proposed densities, as
noted below, are within the density ranges specified for Vies “L”, %I”, “N”, “Q*,
‘3” & “TW and the open space areas have been provided as indicated on the Land
Use Element of the General Plan and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
VILLAGE G.P.
LAND USE
VILLAGE ‘L” RH
VILLAGE “M” RLM/oS
VILLAGE “N” RMH/os
G.P.
RANGE
au
o-4
o-4
4-8
3.2 67 2.07
11.5 119* 11.44
3.2 176 2.75
3.2 45 3.02
6 19(If not comm. 5.9
this time for these villages, only one lot for each VUIage will be created by this tentative map.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed.
3. The.project is consistent with all City public fxility policies and ordinances since:
a. the Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council
finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the P-g
Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map
that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer j
determines that sewer setice is available, and building cannot occur within the
project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is
satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan
have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approvaL
PC RESO. NO. 3706 2 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
4.
5.
6.
. . . .
C.
,
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an approprh
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan.
Rased on the “Initial Study” prepared for this project the Planning Commission determines that the project is within the scope of EIR 91-04 on file in the Phuming Department, and there are no additional significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the project, therefore, no further environmental review of this project is required. All feasible mitigation measures identified in EIR 91-04 have
been incorporated into or imposed as conditions of the project.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability
of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has been
conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 1%.
The Tentative Tract Map satisfies all requirements of Title 20 and 21 of the Carl&ad
Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The proposed subdivision implements the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan MP 139(E) because the proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the
Ran&o CarriRo Master Plan for Villages “L’, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T” including
product type and density, compliance with the approved Hillside Development
Permit, and compliance with open space and trap requirements. In addition,
Villages “M”, “Q” and “R” comply with design criteria, setbacks, Special Park Design
criteria, and the implementing zone standards (R-l, single ftiy).
The pmposed project’s design and density of the development portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the area, because the Tentative Tract Map meets all City standards
and the proposed residential densities are consistent with the General Plan and the
Ran&o Carrillo Master Plan. The surrounding villages and adjacent properties are
either e-g residential development, phumed for residential development, or are planned for residential support facilities such as day care, recreational vehicle
storage, and recreational Mlities, therefore, the proposed residential development would be compatible with the area.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 3 k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
1%.
. ,
suChuse~ndbedetrimentaltotbebealth,safetyorgenreralwelfareofpersons residing or working In the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, hecause the Tentative Tract Map for Villages “L”, ‘%I?, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T” meetsallrequiredCitystamkds and ordinances, all public facilities aud services
will he provided and adequate setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby
community park, multiple family residential and single family residential uses and
Melrose Drive have ken incorporated into the project design.
The project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with the project and does not dominate the project, because the local streets within the subdivision would be curvikar and follow the natural contour. They would also
be 47-60 feet wide with curb and gutter. A 5’ utility easement will be provided on one or two sides of the street depending on whether units front onto the street segment. Sidewalks wiU be provided on one side only for single loaded streets and
streets without residential units fronting onto them, and on both sides for double
loaded streets.
That the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Phut and the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as the developer has been conditioned to enter into
an Affordable Housing Agreement to provide and deed restrict dwelling units as
tiordable to lower-income households.
The 88.76 affordable housing units requhed for this project under Chapter 2U5 of I
the Carlsbad Municipal Code will be provided in Village “F pursuan t to SDP 94-01,
Resolution No. 3682.
That the project is consistent with the City? landscape policies as it has been ( conditioned to comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual.
That the design and improvement of the tentative map as conditioned, satisfies all
requirements of Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State i
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems. I
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgement, acquired by the public at huge, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. ht this co~ection, the City council has approved, via the Carrillo Ranch Parks Agreement, alternate easements for access or for use that will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.
That subject to the exceptions contained in Section 6674.4 of the State Government Code, the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuan ttotheLand Conservation Act of 1965 (WiRiamson Act) and the parcels resulting from the subdivision would be too small to sustain agricultural use according to the provisions of Section 6647.4 of the State Government Code.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for Mu-e passive
or natural heating or cooling opportunitie3 in the subdivision.
Planning conditioIlq :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Approval is granted for CT 9344, as shown on Exhibits ‘A” - “JJ”, dated November 16,1994, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development
i
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions, and
approved by the Planning Director or City Engineer.
Approval of CT 93-04 is contingent upon approval of SDP 9441. CT 93-04 is granted
contingent upon the approval of all conditions of approval of HDP 91-17/EIR 91-04 and SDP 94-01, Planning Co mmission Resolution Nos. 3506,3503, and 3682, incorporated
herein by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the
Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map shah reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shah be submitted to the City
Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement plan
submittal, whichever occurs f&t.
A 500’ scale mylar of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within and
adjacent to the project.
This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be !
approved unless the City Council fmds at the time of such approval that sewer service is I
available to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the District Rngineer determines
that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and
will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shah be placed on the
fkal map.
This approval shall be null and void if the property subject to this approval is not
annexed to the City of Carlsbad CFJI No. 1 within 60 days of the approval. Additionally, annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading, building,
or other permit. @adline could be extended for good cause as determined by the
City Manager).
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public
facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and
as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2 1.90 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to
implement a growth management system of facilities and improvement plan and to fulfii
the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated July 13,1993, a copy of
PC RESO. NO. 3706 5 ‘b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
which is on file with the City Clerk and is inco~rated by this reference. If the fees are
not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this
project will be void.
9. Access and utilities to the Carrillo Ranch Community Park site shall be available at
all times hxludhq &n=ing construction as approved by the City Engineer and Fire Marshal. The project shall ensure to the satisfactioa of the City Engineer that
utilities remain available to the park site at all times during development unless
prior approval is secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be
provided during all phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Couunuuity Services Director.
10. Water shall be provided by the C&l&ad Municipal Water District.
11. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 5, 1991,
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future amendments
to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
12. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project
are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
I 13. The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision and I
final mylar of this development submitted to the City: I
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management 1
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot exceed /
the Growth control Point except as provided by Chapter 2 1.90. The laud use designations for this development are Residential Low-Medium (RLM), Residential j
Medium (RM), Residential Medium-high (RMH), Residential High (RH), and Open ! Space (OS). The densities permitted for this project are as noted below.
VILLAGE ‘R”
PC RESO. NO. 3706 6 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
this time for the viUrylq only one lot for each Village will be created by tbis tentative map.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the General Plan
and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of these
parcels must also include all parcels under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the
Carlsbad Municipal code”.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit them shall be a Notice of Restriction placed
on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director notifying
all interested parties and su-rs in interest that the City of Carl&ad has issued a
Tentative Tract Map by Resolution No. 3706 on the real property owned by the de&rant.
Said notice of restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing
complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or
restrictions specified for inclusion in the notice of restriction. Said deed restrictions may
be modified or terminated only with the approval of the Planning Director, Planning
Commission or City Council of the City of Carl&ad whichever has final decision
authority for this project.
To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities on Meh=ose Drive at locations subject to the satislaction of the North County Transit District (NCTD), lf such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a minimum
include a bench, fke from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench i and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract tirn the basic j architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the approval j
of the Plan&g Director and North County Transit District.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfktion of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not I
be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shah include a /
reduced, legible. version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36” blueline / drawing. 1
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shah include a 1
reduced, legible version of the Villages “M”, “Q” & “R” Design Guidelines on a 24” x
36” blueline drawing.
Prior to recordatlon of any f!hml map, issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the following shall be meti (1) The deeding of an acceptable school site to the San Marcos Unified School District ifit is determined that a school site is warranted; and, (2) A financing plan approved by San Marcos Unifkd School
PC RESO. NO. 3706 7 \o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school facilities in
Zone 18. As provided for in the Zone 18 LF’MP, if any reimbursement and/or school
fee credits are to be give& the school agreemen@nanchrg plan shall provide a
mechanism to do so.
21. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all o@r applicable City ordinanm in effect at time of building permit
issuance.
suecific onsite condiitions:
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name policy
subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval. ,
Elevations aud floor plans will be submitted in compliance with the Ranch0 Carriho /
Master Plan, and will comply with the Villages “M”, “Q” & “R” Design Guidelines /
as shown on Exhibit “QQ”.
The applicant shall construct the recreation vehicle storage facility on Lot 104, iu /
conformance with Exhibit “LL”. Prior to final map, the applicant shah submit for j review and approval by the Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the I timing and phasing of construction of the Recreational Vehicle storage facility. All perimeter landscaping and screenwaUs shah be constructed with the Drst phase of development. A sign program shall be submitted for review and approval with the improvement plans for the RV storage fWlity. Prior to occupancy of the first unit ; / of any Vihage, at minimum, 10,060 square feet of Recreational Vehicle storage space j
shall he available for Villages “L”, ‘M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T”, unless determined
otherwise in the RV Storage Agreement.
i
At the time of recordation of final map, an open space easement shall be recorded over portions of Lots 21-31,34-36,112-114,11&124,141-160,26iS272,275-276,283-
285 and 29&2% (which are in slopes) adjacent to public roadways as requh-ed by
the Ran&o CarriRo Master Plan. Any encroachment or development, including but
not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways, and
landscaping other than approved as part of this project as shown on Exhibits “A” -
“JJ” shall be prohibited.
All open space areas, slopes, and landscaped areas shall be maintained as outlined
on the Landscape Maintenance Exhibit “DD”.
The applicant shall implement the special Park Design District standards as outlined
in the Rancho Carrlllo Master Plan and the specific design standards as outlined in
the Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines (Exhibit “QQ”).
All fences and walls for this project shall be in substantial conformanc ewiththe fencing and wail details as well as the approved locations for each as shown on the
Landscape Concept details, Exhibits “FF’” and “00”. All required fencing and/or
PC RESO. NO. 3706 8 \’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29.
30.
31.
. . . .
wallsshaUbeconstructedbythedeveloperpriortothe kutanceofacertikateof occupancy on a unit-by-unit basis.
Prior to final map, the applicant shall establish a master and vi.Uage homeowuez’s
assodtions and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CGQRs shall
be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items shall be
included in the CC&Rs:
(A) No private development shall be permitted on Lot 106 (Recreational Facilities Lot) or within open space Lots 107 - 111,161-163,209-211,237,239,241, and 309-311 or within open space easement areas on portions of Lots 21-31,34-36, 112114,118-124,141-160,266272,275-276,283-285 and 290-296 inchuive.
The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual owners of property may replace original fencing on their property, however, such
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall design for
the project as graphically showu on Exhibit “FF’. The replacement of any fences or walls within this project must be consistent with one of the fencing
or wall design types as shown in the Master Plan.
Common Ownership of the Recreational Facilities Lot 106 by either
designated Villages or by the Master Homeowners Association and common ownership by the Master Homeowners Association of open space Lots 107 -
111,161-163, 209-211,237,239, 241, and 309-311.
All open space and landscaped areas shag be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and shah be maintained
as indicated on Exhibit “DD”. Both ViRage and Master Homeowners’
Association CC&Rs shall address landscape maintenance pursuant to Exhibit
“DD”.
Subsequent additions to homes by individual homeowners, including the
construction of a second dwelling unit, must be architecturally compatible
with existiug structures as well as with the surrounding are8.
Master Homeowner’s Association maintenance of the Recreational Vehicle
Storage Lot (Lot 104).
Prior to final map, Lots 4,5,10 and 102 of Village “Q”, shall be deed restricted as siugle story homes only.
The applicant shall provide 20% of aI units withhr each of Villages “M”, “Q” and
“R” with two-car facade garages. The Village “M”, “Q”, and “R” design guidelines
(Exhibit “QQ”) shah be revised to reflect this condition.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 9 \&
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
. . . .
-
prior to approval of the Final map, the applicant shall dedicate Lots 107 - 111,161- :
163, 209-211, 237, 239, 241, and 309-311 to the Homeowners’ Association as
permanent open space. This stipulation shall be included in the CC&Rs.
)
I
Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts for Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R” must ;
comply with the Design Guidelines for this project pursuant to Exhibit “QQ”. i
The project shall be phased in accordance with Exhibits “AA” - “JJ”, unless an / alternate phasing program is approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carl&ad for a trail easement shall
be made on the map for the trails shown on the Tentative Map within open space
Lot 109 and 111. If the City of Carl&ad accepts dedication of the trail easements,
the City shall assume responsibility for &enance and liability. If the City of
Carlsbad does not accept liabiity and maintenance responsibility for the Citywide
trail system prior to recordation of the flual map, the applicant will not be required to coustruct the trails. Trails shall he designated in conformance with the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Recreational Vehicle Storage design (Lot 104) shall be in substantial conformance
with Exhibit “LL”.
The proposed retaining wall, at the southwest corner of Streets Q-A and Q-D shall
be in substantial conformance with Exhibit “00”, unless an alternate design is
approved by the Planning Director.
The applicant shall install enhanced paving and landscaping at the intersection of Melrose Drive and Carrillo Way and Carrillo Way and Street Q-K as shown on
Exhibit “PP”, unless an alternate design is approved by the City Engineer, Planning Director and Community Services Director. The improvement plans shall be approved with this enhanced paving.
A 2kour security guard shall be permitted on the Recreational Vehicle storage Lot
104 for the protection of the stored vehicles. A Recreational Vehicle may be used
on the lot by the security guard, to provide shelter and provide for the essential ’
needsoftheguarcL
The applicant shall process a Phmed Development Permit (PUD) and/or other
discretionary application(s) for Villages “L” aud “N”.
The applicant shall process a Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Recreational Facilities Lot 106, Day Care Lot 105 and Community Facilities Lot 103. All
development of these lots shall comply with the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
13 PC RESO. NO. 3706 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 4
42. As provided for in the approved Parks agreement, the applicant shaIl provide a 32’ wicle~weatherrtccess~dwithintbeparlrtoterminateatthetraditsonalentryof the park site (caretakers cottage/bridge).
43. Prior to final map, the approved Parks agreement shall be recorded. The applicant
shall comply with all of the requirements of the approved Carrillo Ranch Parks
Agreement. Park land shall be dedicated as outlined in the approved Parks
agreement- Further, prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of
building permits, whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within
Lots l-13,63-64, and 98-102 of this tentative map, shall prepare and record a notice in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney that this property is subject to noise, lightig and glare, and general activity impacts from the nearby Carrillo Ranch Community Park site.
44. AU grading within the special design park district shall be peritically watered to control dust.
Landscaw
45. The applitit shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading or
building plans, whichever occurs first.
46. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to confom~ with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
47. All landscapbg shall comply with the hmdscape requirements of the Ran&o Carrillo
Master Plan and the City’s Landscape Manual.
48. The developer shall include top-soil preservation and rollback and redisking on
cut/fUl slopes and open space areas proposed for native revegetation to ensure stability and growth subject to the approval of the City Engineer aud Planning Director. The top-soil shall be stockpiled on-site and protected against erosion to the /
satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director. /
49. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from
weeds, trash, and debris.
50. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code.
51. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
52. All building pads and street areas of Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T” that are graded under HDP 91-17 and remain vacant or undeveloped for a period of more
PC RESO. NO. 3706 11 \J(
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
tban~monthsaftertbegradingoperationiscompletedshallbeseededtoreduce erosion and visual hnpacts. If grading is phased, the six months thne period shall start at the completion of each individual grading phase.
Sians and Identification
53. E3uilding identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and existing buildings
so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road, color of identification and/or
address shall contrast to their background color.
54. Any signs propod for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to Mallation of such signs.
55. AU &page shall he designed in conformance with the Ran&o Carrillo Master Plan.
Signage shall be located in conformance with Exhibit “AA” Landscape Concept Plan, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Envh-omnental
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit “I”) which are requhed as part of Environmental Impact Report for the Ranch0 Carrillo : Master Plan EIR 91-04, certiiled by City Council on July 27,1993.
Prior to occupancy of the iirst unit of Villages “L’, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T” the
revegetation/landscape plan shall be implemented as showu on Exhibit “AA” as
approved by the monitoring biologist.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, a detailed soils contamination report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The detailed soils contamination report shall
include a soils contamination remediation plan. If remediation is determined to be
Muii!cessary, the report shall so hltlicate.
Prior to ilnal map the applicant shall submit a detailed noise study addressing
uecessary interior noise mitigation measures for Villages “M”, “Q” & “R”. A detailed
noise study shall be submitted with the submittal of the Site Development Plau or
other discretionary permit application for Villages “L” and “N”. Prior to issuance
of building permits for Villages “L “, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T”: (1) the interior noise
levels shall be mitigated to 45 dRA CNEL when openings to the exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings are required to be closed to meet the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be provided, and, (3) all useable exterior space
above the first floor shall be mitigated to the adopted City standard.
Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs fir& the owner of record of the property within the bo~daries
PC RESO. NO. 3706 12 \s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
ofthistentativemapsballpreparesndrecordanoticethattbispropertyissubject
to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClelhu+Palomar Airport
in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney.
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and or rental
of&es associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs
shall be approved by the Phnming Director.
Consistent with EIR 91+t, impacts to riparian habitat and threatened/endangered
plant species will be mitigated under the review and supervision of the CalZornia Department of Pisb and Game, the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers and any other
applicable resource agency. The mitigation plan must be approved by the involved
resource agencies prior to the record&ion of final map or issuance of grading
permit. Grading plans shag reflect the resource agencies review and approval. If
modifications are required by the agencies, the applicant may be required to apply
for an amendment to this Tentative Map or apply for new discretionary permits.
All outdoor lighting shall be dire&d away from open space areas where the
potential to disturb wildlife exists.
Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/developer shall be requiredz (1) to
consult with the United States Pish and Wildlife Service (USPWS) regarding the
impact of the project on the coastal California gnatcatcher and; be issued any /
permits required by the USIQVS.
Open Space Lots 107-111,161-163,209-211,237,239,241, and 309-311 as depicted :
on Exhibits ‘AA” - “JJ” shall be ret&ted as permanent open space. These open
space lots shall be maintained in a natural state, restored to a naturahzed area or
buffer area pursuant to the Master Plan and EIB 91-04. Disturbance of natural ’
habitat is limited as provided in EIR 91-04.
Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the ’
Planning Director, a plan approved by U.S. Pi& and Wildlife Service/ California
Department of P&h and Game to mitigate possible impacts to wildlire species by ;
outdoor lighting and possible impacts by future residential or domestic pets as may i
be deemed appropriate by the agencies. /
Prior to grading, the applicant shall retain the services of a qualified biologist to be ~
on-site when surveying and staking of native habitat impact areas occurs. The ;
biologist is to ensure that the limits of grading are Bagged or otherwise marked to ~
assure that impacts from grading and construction do not exceed those approved as
part of the project The biologist shall monitor all grading and construction.
Prior to issuance of any grading permits or final map, whichever occurs first, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Director a data
recovery program or other appropriate mitigation for SDi-4691B, SDi-4687, and SDC 9fH6. This recovery or other approved mitigation program shall be consistent with
the recommendations of EIR 91-04. Also, the applicant shall provide a protective
PC RESO. NO. 3706 13 \b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
68.
69.
70.
. . . .
-
cap consisting of fabric, soil and vegetation over SD&12,740B as required in EIE 91-
04.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or final map, whichever occurs fir& the
applicant shall submit for review. aud approval to the City Engineer a Biparian
Mitigation Plan. The Eiparian MUgation Plan may include participation in the
City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the
satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et.
seq. of the Calliornia Fish and Game code and Section 404 of the Federal Clean
Water Act. If such plan inchdes o&te mitigation the applicant shag submit for
review and approval by the Planning Director a data recovery program for SDi-
4691B if disturbed by the mitigation plan.
Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit a letter from the agency approving the
required riparian mitigation plan for this project that all necessary permits have
been obtained. If such riparian mitigation plan includes on-site mitigation, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Director a data
recovery program for SDi-4691B if this site is disturbed by the mitigation plan.
Paleontology:
a
b.
6
d,
e.
Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to I
ptXfOI-lll a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to ’
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to
issuance of a grading permit
A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections j
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of
the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix
/
I
samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. The Paleontologist :
shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading
process.
The paleohtologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation at.14 if necessary, salvage
artifact&
All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History
MuSeurn.
Any conflicts regard@ the role of the paleontologist and the grading
activitia of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Affordable Housing
71.
72.
73.
. . . .
This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required inclusionary units shah
be constructed concurrent with the project market rate units, unless stated otherwise in
the approved Affordable Housing Agreement.
Prior to the approval of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an Affordable
Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict 88.76 dwelling units
as affordable to lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units.
The Affordable Housing Agreement shag be required to be submitted by the
Applicant to the City. The agreement shall be approved by the Planning Director
and Director of Housing and Redevelopment. The Fordable Housing Agreement
shall be binding to all future owners and successors in interest The Fordable
Housing Agreement shag address the unresolved parking requirements of the
proposed 15 3bedroom dwelling units. Depending upon the nature of that resolution
an amendment per 21.45.160 (protocol definition for amending phmued
developments) may be appropriate at the discretion of the Planning Director. The
Housing Agreement shall also address how the total Affordable Housing
Requirements of 118.05 units for Villages “F’, “G”, “L”, “M”, “N”, “0”, ‘P”, “Q”, “R”
& “‘P’ will be achieved, as only 116 affordable units are provided in Village T”.
prior to fmal map approval, an Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted by the
applicant to the City, approved by the Community Development Director and Director of
Housing and Redevelopment, and completed and recorded concurrent with record&ion
of that final map as a deed restriction on,those individual lots or units of the project
which are designated for the location of low-income affordable units or as may be
approved by the Afibrdable Housing Agreement. The Affordable Housing Agreement
shall be binding to all future owners and successors in interest.
The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to include but not be limited to just,
the following:
(a) (b)
(cl
@I
Cd
(0
w
Q
(i)
The number of inclusionary lower-income dwelling units;
The unit sizes (square footage) and the number of bedrooms per
inclusionary dwelling unit;
The location of the inclusionary units;
The schedule for production of the inclusionary units;
The tenure of affordability (useful life of the dwelling unit);
Incentives (i.e. density increases, standards modifications, and financial
resources) provided by the City;
Rules and procedures for setting rents, sales prices, and marketing of
dwelling units;
Terms and conditions governing the initial sale and resale of for-sale
inchsionary units; and
An admiktmtion, monitoring, and management plan.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
,
Emzineerin~ Condition :
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
This project is located within the Ran&o Carrillo Master Plan. All development design
shall comply with the requirements of that plan
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the
respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E,, Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
This project is specifically approved as seven (7) units for the purposes of recording. All
public f&lities required to seme each unit and meet City standards shall be
guaranteed for construction prior to recording of a final map for that unit.
If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if on
commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned
lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be
placed in the CC&&.
This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shah be issued for the
remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of Title 20 of the 1
Carl&ad Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on a separate non-mapping data
sheet of the final map.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date /
of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. If any fInal map is recorded (
for this project prior to the tentative map expiration date, then the expiration date
of the conditionally approved tentative map shall be extended in accordance with
Section 66452.6(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. If a final map has not been recorded
for this pro@t, then an extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension
shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In approving an
extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing
conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carl&ad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents,
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the Planning Commission or City tigineer which has been brought against the City within
the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City
Council Resolution No. 91-39.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
84. Prior to Enal map approval, the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits
required.
85. Prior to ffnal map approval or issuance of any grading permit, the owner of the
subject property shah execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage
across the adjacent property.
86. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, the
developer shall submit proof that a Notice of Intention has been submitted to the State
Water Resources CMrol Board.
87. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City codes and standards.
88. Upon completion of any phased and/or project specific grading for Villages “L” and
“Q”, the applicant shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic plan is submitted to the City
Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading
operation, all geologic corm&e measures asactuallyconstructedandmustbebasedon
a contour map which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shah be
signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be
prepared on a 24’ x 36” mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent /
record.
89. Prior to the affected 6nal map approval, the owner of the property on behalf of itself
and all of its successors in interest shall execute and record a notice of disclosure and
a hold harmless agreement on Villages “L” and “Q” noticing any future owners of the
presence of a mitigated geologic hazard and indemnify the City of Carlsbad, agents,
offkers, and employees from any action that may arise through any subsequent
geologic failure, ground water seepage, or land subsidence and subsequent damage
that may occur on or adjacent to Villages “L” and “Q“, due to its construction, I
operation, or maintenance. A notice to this effect and a reference to the recorded
document shag be inch&d on a non-mapping data sheet of the respective final map.
90.
91.
No grading for private improvements &all occur outside the limits of the subdivision /
unless an agreement to grade is executed by the developer and the owners of the i
affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the agreement to grade, no ;
grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative ’
map or change the plan so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner
which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City
Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
2-O PC RESO. NO. 3706 17
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
.9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
Construction trafEc shall not be allowed ingres8 or egress on Unicornio or Red
wing.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with the catlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chapter 11.06.
The developer shall construct desihation/detention/urban pollutant basin(s) of a type and
a size and at location(s) as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall enter into
a basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond satisfactory to the City
Engineer prior to the approval of grading, building permit, or final map, whichever occurs
fvst for this project. Each basin shall be serviced by an all-weather access/maintenance
red.
Rain gutters must be provided on structures located on lots with less than a 5 ft.
setback from the perimeter of the str@ure to tbe lot flowline, in accordance with
City Standard GS -15, to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage course or street
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided /
or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading as may be required by the City
Engineer.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shah ;
be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shah be j
granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances
and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be ’
rededicated.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Melrose Drive shall be waived on the final map
except for access points to Village ‘L” and Vie “N”, or other designated access
points as approved by the City Engineer.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or
interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest.
The applicant shall confofm to Section 20.16.095 of the Carl&ad Municipal Code.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give
written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan
into the existing City of Carl&d Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 on a
form provided by the City.
The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Ehmination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
PC RESO. NO. 3706 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to M map approval. Said plans shall include, but not be limited to
the following, which shall be included in the project’s CC&Rsz
A. The homeowner% tasmcWon shall coordinate the use of the City’s established
program to assist residents with the removal and proper disposal of toxic and
lllmmhs waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon corn-s such as gasoline, motor oil,
audifheze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fhtids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirements as
prescribed in their resp&ive containers.
C. Best Management practices shall be used to ehminate or reduce surface
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface
improvements.
Master Plan lmurovements
102. Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall provide for sight distance corridors
at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shag record
the following statement in the project”s CC&Rs:
“No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches
above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area
identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards.
The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition.”
This statement shall also be placed on a non-mapping data sheet on the final map.
103. In accordance with the Ran&o CarriUo Final Environmental Impact Report (FED&
grading of natural habitat shall not occur during the nesting season of any
endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of coastal California gnatcatcher
occupied habitat and within 200’ or riparian habitat, occupied by least Bell’s vireo
and willow flycatcher, shall be restricted to the period between September 1 and
February 15 of any given year.
104. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer may require
an engineering eval~tion of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evaluation
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recommended
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
. . . .
PC RESO. NO. 3706 “b-= 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
105. Prior to fbl map approval, drabmge outfixll end treatments, for drainage outlets in
areas where a direct access road for maintenance purposes has not been provided,
shall be designed and incorporated into the gradin~provement plans for the
project. These end treatments shag be designed to prevent vegetation growth from
obstmctlng the pipe outfall. Designs may consist of a modikd outlet headwall
consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or
radially designed riprap, or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of
preventing vegetation growth directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
106. Prior to flual map approval, a Certifkak of Compliance and Adjustment Plat No.
444 shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
107. Prior to submittal of a grading plan for the project, the applicant shall submit and
receive approval from the City Engineer for a phased grading map clearly detailing
the limits and quantities of grading for this project.
108. Prior to final map approval, the following improvements, as required in the Ran&o
Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 18, shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These
improvements, unless otherwise mod&d by the final decision-making body, shall be
substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
A. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road
l Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arterial 1 standards. I
0 Construction of a median and two lanes in each direction and 1 intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. /
B. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary I
l Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial 1
standards. I
l Constru&on of full major arterial standards from the intersection i
with Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village “J” and the school site.
C. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18 I
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width. a Construction of one lane in each direction from the southerly
boundary of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village “T”.
D. Sewer Facilities, including:
l Sewer main in Melrose Drive
l Sewer main in or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
l Buena/!!San’Marcos Trunk (BSMTJ 1, Section A
PC RESO. NO. 3706 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
109.
110.
. . . .
C -
,
l Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C a Buena/&n Marcos Tnmk (BSMT) 1, Section D 0 BuenajSanMarcosTrunk(BSMT)1,SectionF 0 Buena/San Matzos Trunk (B!JMT) 1, Section G
l North La Costa Lift Station
E. Water Facilities, including:
0 A portion of the proposed potable 24-inch main in the future
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
l The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast corner of
zone 1%. 0 The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the proposed
alignment of El E”uerte within Zone 18. 0 A portion of the proposed reclaimed g-inch main in the proposed
alignmeut of Melrose Avenue.
l The proposed reclaimed 3Wnch main in the proposed alignment of El
Fuerte within Zone 18.
l The proposed potable 12’ main from Melrose to El Fuerte through
service Area E.
F. Drainage Facilities, including:
l Proposed box culvert under Melrose Drive. 0 Detention basins, channel and flood control improvements as necessary /
to mitigate for erosion and protect downstream on site Master Plan i
and off site downstream properties from siguificant impacts.
An all-weather access road from a paved public right-of-way shall be constructed to
drainage and utility improvements in accordance with the following parameters and
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
O%- 6% gradesmayconsistofalninimumof6*decomposedgrsnite
6%.14% gradesshallconsistofa minimum 4" asphalt concrete over 4” /
of decomposed granite I
14% - 20% grades shall consist of a minimum 4” portland cement concrete /
over 4” of decomposed granite
Prior to final map approval, public open space easements shall be placed on
the conforming tentative map on slopes adjacent to all public roadways to the I
satisfaction of the City Engineer and in conformance wlththeRancho
Carrlllo Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” and “T” Landscape and Maiutenance
Responsibility exhibit.
PC RFSO. NO. 3706 21 A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Phm 1.2.3. and 4 Immovemen&
111. Plans, specik@ns, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map,
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall in&all, or agree to install and
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the
tentative map and the following improvements:
A. All streets shall be public streets and shall be constructed in accordance with
City Standards and the Eancho Carrillo Master Plan.
B. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing and
striping plans.
C. Melrose Drive shall be improved from Poinsettia Lane south along the project
frontage to include the following improvements:
0 No. 3 southbound through lane
0 Southbound bicycle lane
0 Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
0 street lighting a Raisedlandscapedmedlan
0 Landscape area between sidewalk and west right+f-way line ;
0 All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lane and I
sidewalk
D. A fblly actuated traffic signal shall be iustalled at the intersection of Melrose ’
Drive and Carrillo Way. I
E. Prior to occupancy of the 5lst unit or prior to occupancy of any unit located
1200 or greater from the intersection of Melrose Drive and Carrillo Way,
1
j
secondary access shall be provided to the project by installing roadway I
improvements to connect with the existing terminus of El Fuerte Street at the /
southerly boundary of the project. All roadway improvements, including the
extension of El Fuerte Street, shall be constructed to full width and shall
include pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and drainage
improvements in accordance with City standards and to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
F. The developer shall submit to the City, for approval, a detailed cost estimate
and shall 6nancially guarantee or bond, as approved by the City and in an
amount equal to the detailed cost estimate, for the street improvements to El
Fuerte Street between “Q-A” Street and the northern boundary of the
development. Thedetailedcostestimateshallbesignedandsealedbya
registered civil engineer.
. . . .
. PC RESO. NO. 3706 22 a-5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
112. Prior to tinal map approval of Phase 4, the developer shall submit proof that an
interagency agreement has been executed between the Carlsbad Mticipal Water
District and the Leucadia County Water District that identifies the sewer
responsibilities of each agency for the Phase 4 area and allows Phase 4 to convey
sewage through the Leucadia County Water District sewer system.
Phase 5 Imm-ovemenQ
113. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shag be
prepared to the sat&&&on of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map,
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install and
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the
tentative map aud the following improvements:
A. All streets shall be public streets and shall be constructed in accordance with
City Standards and the Ban&o Carrillo Master Plan.
B. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing and
striping plans.
C. Melrose Drive shag be improved along the project frontage to include the
following improvements:
0 Connection to the existing street improvements to the south and any
No. 3 southbound through lane
Southbound bicycle lane
Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
street lliwu
Baisedlandscapedmedian
Landscape area between sidewalk and west right+f-way line
All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lane and
sidewalk
transition to the north
Phases 6 and 7 Immwements
114. Plans, spe&kations, and supporting documents for all public improvements shag be
prepared to the satisktion of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map,
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install and
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the
tentative map and the following improvements:
A. All streets shall be public streets and shaB be constructed in accordance with
City Standards and the Ban&o Carrillo Master Plan.
B. All street improvement plans shall include separate trafIic signing and
striping Ph=
d-f PC RESO. NO. 3706 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c. Melrose Drive shall be improved along the project frontage to include the i
following improvemen&
0 No. 3 northbound througb lane
0 Northbound bicycle lane
l Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
0 -linMtnil 0 Rllisedlandscapedmed.lan 0 Landscape area between sidewalk and east rightdf-way liue
0 All utllltles generally placed beneath the required travel lane and
sidewalk
0 Counection to the existing street improvements to the south aud any
transitiontotbenorth
115. A copy of all of the above improvement conditious shall be placed on a &-mapping
data sheet on the Hal map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision
Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of
approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as provided in
said agreement.
116. Prior to final map approval of Phase 7, the developer shall obtain emergency access
rights from the County of San Diego for the gated emergency access area to connect 1
this project to Redwing Street.
117. All improvements required by these conditions must be specifically shown on the ’
couforming tentative map exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
F’ire Conditionq:
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to
and approved by the Fire Department.
Ad&tional onsite public hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fiie Department for approval of access,
driveways and general traffic circulation.
An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to
combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have
posted “No Parking/Fire Lane” pursuant to Section 17.04.020, Carl&ad Municipal Code.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 24 a-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
125. Brush clearance shall be maintained accordmg to the specifications contained in the City
of Carl&ad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clearance plan to the Fire
i
Department for approval.
126. Plans and/or specificatians for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the
Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
127. Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to the Fire
Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following criteria:
* 400’ scale * Photo reduction on mylar * At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the map
(not a sepamte vicinity map) * Maps shall include the following information:
Street centerlines
street names
Fire hydrant locations
128. Fire suppression areas shall be provided as shown on Exhibit “BB”.
Carlsbad Municl~al Water District Conditionq:
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
. . . .
The entire potable and non-potable water ,system/systems for subject project shah be
evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic, landscaping
and fire flow demands are met. /
The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the City
Fire Marshal and review the prehminary water system layout, prior to preparation of the
water system improvement plans.
The ,developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility charge
which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The developer shall pay
a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will be collected at issuance
of application for meter ins&G&ion
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be i
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of
application for water service and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
Sequentially, the developers engineer shall do the following:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements.
PC RESO. NO. 3706 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
b.
C.
Prepare a c&fed reclaimed water use area map.& submit to the Planning ;
lhpartment for prowsing and approval.
Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and approval
of the preliminaq system layout usage (G.P.M. - D.D.U.) plan for potable,
reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation of improvement plans.
134. Prior to final map the applicant shall finalbe the deannexatlon of the southwest
comer of Village “Q” (24 L&s) to the Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) or provide au alternate means to provlde water and sewer to these lots as may be
approved by the City Engineer and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Comkission of the City of Carl&ad, California, held on the 4th day of January, 1995, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compaq Erwin, Monroy,
Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. . ?!fLhii&
KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
All-EST: .
MICHAEL J.
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO. NO. 3706 26
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3707
A RESOLUTION OF THE P LANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR VILLAGES “M”, “Q”, & “R” OF THE
RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAS T QUADRANT OF THE
CITY, WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION, EAST
OF EL FUERTE EXTENSION IN THE SOUTHERN
PORTION OF THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “M”,
“Q”, & “R” DESIGN GUIDELINES
CASE NO.: CT 93-04
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12
South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian
Base according to Official Plat thereof, City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan establishes that Design
Guidelines may be prepared for villages of the master plan; and
WHEREAS, the Design Guidelines prepared for Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R” are
in conformance with the General Plan, Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and City ordinances;
and
WHEREAS, the Design Guidelines implement the intent of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of November,
1994, the 30th day of November, 1994 and on the 4th day of January, 1995 hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
3O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
factors relating to the Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are ‘true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design
Guidelines, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Pindines:
1. The Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines are consistent with the General Plan,
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and all applicable City ordinances.
2. The Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines will ensure that quality developments
are submitted within these villages by addressing design issues including the unit
mix, plotting of units, setbacks, architecture, garage design, accessory structures,
walls and fences, signage, special park design park district, and second dwelling
units.
3. The Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines will ensure that the proposed project
is compatible with the surrounding and future land uses since the design guidelines
specify architectural design, unit mix, and setbacks.
4. The Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines provide for specific sensitive design
criteria within the Special Park Design District consistent with the Master Plan.
Conditions:
1. Elevations and floor plans for Villages “M”, Q”, & “R” will be submitted in
compliance with the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan.
2. Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts for Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R” must
comply with the Design Guidelines for these villages pursuant to Exhibit “QQ”.
3. The applicant will implement the special Park Design District standards of the Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines (Exhibit “QQ”).
PC RESO NO. 3707
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the i
I
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of January, )
1995, by the foknving vote, to witz
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Envin,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAINz Non&
KIM WEdHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBADPLANNIN G COMMISSION
ATTEST
MICHAEL J. HOLZ&ER
PLANNING DIRECT’OR
PC RESO NO. 3707
Ranch0 CarriNo Master Plan .,
Environmental Impact report
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
EXHBCT I
A. Agriculture
1;. i .
Impact. Possible soil contamination from agriculhxal chemicals formerly used or stored on the site.
MitigaZion. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigatkm reconunen&tions, if necessary, to City
Planning Department and 7, ~~r.ty Health Departmart. 2) Mitigation to be made a condition of
tentative maps approved under the Master plan, 3) Report on completed remediation to be
submitted to City Planning Department and County Health Department upon completion.
Master Pfan Implementation. A soils report for the property owned by Continental Homes and
the property being dedicated for park purposes has been received by the Planning Department.
Any mitigation required for soils contamination indicated by this report will be remedied prior
to issuance of a grading permit. Impacts may occur if additional pesticide concentrations and/or
hazardous waste materials or containers are found during development, in which case the
referenced mitigation would be applicable. Soii reports for other properties within the Master
Plan will be required with the submittal of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2) Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Completion of construction of each
tentative map subdivision.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engkring Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approW without necessq conditions. 2) No final
maps, building or grading pmnits issued until ranediation report submitted.
Impact. Possible conflict between earlier stages of Master Plan development and continued
A , *LL agricultural use of other portions of the site, including agricultural chemical use, irrigation
runoff, and odor.
Mifigafion. Each tentative map must provide a list of paformance and impact criteria specified
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffering, to ensure the phasing development is compatible with continued agricultural use.
Maszef P&n ~m&mdafion.’ There will be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consistent with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use.
-
,
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map undo the Master Plan. 2) Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Corwuction of each tentative map subdivision.
ResponsibZe Patty. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments-
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approved without necessary conditions. 3) Inspection of construction by grading inspectors. No building permits issued uutil performance criteria are implemented.
B. Biology
Gene& Note. To ensure the implementation of all mitigation for potential impacts to biological
1, ?
resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior to -2 approval of each tentative map, as appropriate, show evidence to the City Planning Department
that a qualified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor all relevant mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, supenk implementation of mitigation, and file a report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upou completion of major
components of biological mitigation requirements.
Impact. Implementation of the Master Plan will directly impact wetlands on-site and, by
construction of a sewer line in the right of way for Carrillo Way to the west, off-site.
Mitigcrtion. The applicant for the project shall either restore and enhance xiparian habitat at an
appropriate area ratio to impacts or shall participate in a city-wide mitigation program through
the City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Fe&al Clean Water Act.
Master Plan Implementation. No mitigation required for offkite u&r sewer alignment
currently proposed by appiicant north of Carrillo Way alignma& Such alignment has no
wetland impacts.
Checkpoints. Approval of the fvst tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- or off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Parig. City Planning and Engineering Departments, Califomia Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Sanctions. No grading map under the Master Plan.
h A
Impact. If the project is not reconfigured to substantiaily avoid populations of San Diego
thommint and thread-leaved brodiaea, development wiU significantiy impact those species.
Mitigution. To partially mitigate impacts, the mitigation pIarts for San Diego thornmint and
thread-leaved brodiaea shall be impkmented, modified as specified in the EIR and after review
and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of approvai of tentative maps under the Master Plan. To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accompiished prior to construction resulting
in impacts.
Master Plan Implementation. Wages T and U have been reconfigured to avoid impact to
thornmint. Village G has been reconfigured to minimize impacts to Brodiaea.
CTteckpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps. 3) Prior to construction causing impacts.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps for Wage G without acceptable mitigation
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact. Potential for future disturbance of open space areas:
Mfigution. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open space, biological mitigation
areas, buffer areas,‘ ‘and naturalized areas to avoid disturbance of the natural habitats as a
condition of tentative maps.
checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning’ and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of temtive maps without depiction of acceptable open space
cements and condition to dedicate conservation easements over naturaI open space.
35
-
Impact. Possible predation or disturbance of California gnatcatchers or other sensitive tildlife
species by future residents or domestic pets.
Master P&n Impkmetttatiion. No approval of &native Maps for affected Villages without
mitigation condition, if any, required by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Mitigation. As determined by above rekenced agency.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engkring Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No Tentative Map approved without mitigation, if any, imposed by referenced
lead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant areas by non-native landscaping species.
-- c.
-c
Mitigation. As a component of the landscaping plans for affected Villages, revegetation plan for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be prrpand by a qualified biologist, and landscaping plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by the biologist.
Chckpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Compktion of landscaping and revegetation.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning and Engkring Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without satisfactory landscaping and revegetation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat arcas during grading and construction.
.i
,? ’
Mitigation. The consuiting biologist shall supervise surveying and staking of native habitat areas
j and monitor grading and construction.
-.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Report by consulting ~biologist.
Responsible Patty. 1) City Planning and.Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper mitigation condition. 2) NO
issuance of building or occupancy permits until consulting bioiogist’s report is submitted to the
Planning Department.
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and construction.
-, ? 6: -. _ Mitigation. Due to conflicting biologist’s opinions regarding mitigation, finai mitigation plan, , if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fish and Wife and/or California Department of Fish and
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or construction in restricted area, if any.
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
Miiigrzrion. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away
from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Atiproval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement plan checks. 3)
Construction of improvements near conservation easement areas with report to Planning Department by consulting biologist.
- -
Responsible Pa-. 1) City mg and Rt@Mg v 2) .Consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without &@ioa conditions. 2) No approval
of grading or improvement plans without proper mitig&on spa5ed. 3) NO issuance of
building or occupancy permits without properiy accomph&d mitigation.
Impact. Potential for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat areas from erosion and sedimentation
from the project.
Mitigation. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Checkpoints. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Responsible Party. Set hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydroiogy and water quality mitigation.
C. Cultural Resources
Impact. Possible vandalism due to increased human presence to archaeological site SDI- 12,740B.
Mitigation. The site &tR be capped with fabric, soil, and vegetation as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained
by the tentative map- applicant.
Master Plan Implementation. This site is located on site to be dedicated to City of Carisbad
for parkland. The capping of this site will be the responsibility of the City of Carlsbad.
Checkpoints. i) Submittal of development plans for park site. 2) Approval of such plans. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon completion
of work and prior to commencement of development of park site.
Responsible Pcutg. 1) City Planning and Engineaing Departments. 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting archaeologist, City planning and Engineering Departments.
-
Sanctions. 1) No approval of site development plan witbout mitigation plan. 2) No grading
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City Planning Department.
Impact. ,Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4691B.
Mitigation. A data recovery prog&~ as specified in the EJR must be required as a condition
of the tentative map inciudiig the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist
retained by the tentative map appiicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
‘l- c‘. -i Master lplan Implementation. Mitigation of this site will not be required unless this area is
disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeologist
submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any grading for
construction affecting the site.
ResponsibZe Party. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building permits to be issued until mitigation report by consuiting archaeologist is submitted to City Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of deveiopment on archahgicai site SDI-4687.
Mitigation. Capping of the site as specified in the EIR as a condition of any tentative map
affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentative
map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or constmction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting arctilogist submitted to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or construuion affecting the site.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning and Engineexing Departments. 2) Consulting archaeologist.
h
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentafive map not ampiuc without mitigation plan. 2) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 3) No building pamits to be issued until
mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City planning Departments.
Impact. Encroachment of proposed development of tire Master Plan on the rumI, “early
!A California” setting of the Leo Carrillo historic site. ;+.
. Mitigation. Establishment and implementation of a special design district as required under
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
Clreckpoints. See Land Use Compatibility section.
Responsible Party. See L&d Use Compatibility sectia.
Sanctions. See Land Use Compatibility sectk~
D. Paleontologicd Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant fonils, especially in the Santiago and Lusardi
Formation, by grading and construction.
Mitigation. Monitoring of grading by a pakx~toIogist, with recovery and curation of any
significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EIR. Monitoring is to be performed under the
direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by the applicant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting paleontologist upon completion of grading.
Responsible Pqty. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting
paleontologist.
-
. \ .c
F’ 7 ..’ ,- /-
Sunctions. 1) Approval of tentative map not aqkte witbut mitigation pIan. 2) No building permits to be issued until mitigation report by ~sulting palecmtoiog& is submitted to City Planning Department.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
Impact. Major drainage facility design wilI be xcquired to avoid potential adverse effects of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from ‘tie deveioped site.
Mitigation. As a condition of approval each tentative map, the applicant shall submit a hydrology anaiysis addressing squired flood attenuation, runoff flow reduction/siltation, and proper sizing of drainage facilities.
Master Plan ImpZementati~n. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tentative map.
ResponsibZe Party. 1) City Engineering kpartment. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of apprwai.
Impact. Major drainage faciiities will have to be constmctcd to avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
Master Plan Implefnentation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The final decision-making body shall approve a Financing Plan addressing the
source and use of funds for the construction of ail required drainage facilities prior to recording the first Final Map or the issuance of the fkt grading or building permit, .whichever is first.
Clleckpoints, Recording of first final map or issuance of first grading or building permit. each
tentative map.
Responsible Party. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No recording of final map or issuana of grading or building permit without Financing Plan guarantee for consauction of required drainage facilities.
I
.
Impact. Potential erosive or flooding damage to structures in Leo Carrillo Ranch Park due to runoff from the deveioped site enteTing the d&age south of the pt&- I
ikWigaticm. An hydrology analysis for the draiqe south of tk park shail be submitted with the applicabre tentative map or prior to issuance of &maxf grading permit for Melrose
Avenue, and an appropriate drainage system shall be requir4 prior to the issuance of the first
grading permit affecting the area and constructed con- with the grading of the affected area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable ttntative maps. 2) Isswnce of first grading permit.
Responsible Patty. 1) Engineering Department. 2) Engine&g Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper &ainage system shown. 2) NO
issuance of building permits until d&age system impiemented.
IL?ydrv& ad Water Quality 10
Impuct. Installation of the proposed storm drain betwear Villages R ami T in Open Space Area 13 would disturb sensitive biological ~~WXIXS in the open space area.
Mitigution. The storm drain shall be reiocared to run south from Village Q to connect to a storm
drain in either El Fuerte Street or ChorRto Street. . L
E \ Muszer Plan Implrmentutiiwt. This SOITB draia has been relocated into areas that will be graded as a part of the development of Villages Q and R wherever possible to avoid sensitive habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tent&e map for villages Q and R ir&ding the storm drain. 2)
Approval of Village Q and R tmmtive map. 3) Completion of storm drain construction.
Responsibh Paties. 1) City Engine&g Departma& 2) City Engineering Department. 3) City Engineering Department.
Sunctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not complete without showing storm drain in proper
location. 2) No approval of tentative map without storm drain shown in proper location. 3) No issuance of building permits for tentat& map t&l storm drain properly constructed.
Zmpuct. Potential for increased on-site erosion and increased saiiiion downstream when ground
surface is disturbed during grading axl constru&n.
I’ Mitigufion. An Erosion and Sedii n Co~i Plan must be prepared for each development I . -
1 .
, submittal, approved by the City Engineer, and implemented during construction.
\ ’ Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Pads. City Engincuing Department.
Soncrions. No approval of any grading permits witbout Erosion and Sediion Control Plan approved by the City Engineer.
Impucf. Potential impacts of urban p&tarns from the developed site affection water quality in Batiquitos Lagoon.
Mitigation. Discharge of runoff from developed areas into nannalii channels and public education information distributed to property ~WWK.
Muster Plun Implementutiun. A daaiied Hydrological Study must he approved prior to issuance of a grading permit for the grading necmpp to construct the Circulation Element Roadways.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tenutive maps. 2) Completion of construction of drainage channels. 3) Close of escrow to propaty owners.
H’atdW~erQ~ II
Responsible Paties. 1) City Engineering Dcptranar 2) City ~ngineuing went. 3) Developers
Sunctiorq. 1) No approval of tentative maps withart proper design of rnmff drainage facilities. 2) No issuance of building permits unless m&f d&age fkcilities property amstntcted.
Impud. Potential for grease, oil, and other trafk-rdared poilutants f&n paved surfkces to reach Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff. . .
Mitigution. Best management practices sbail be empioyed to prevent urban poihrtants from entering City waterways in compliance with National Poll- Discharge Biimination System municipal stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement pian in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Purtics. City Engineering Deparrmpt
S4ncrions. No approval of any grading permits witbcmt Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plzr approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impucf. Geologic conditions potentially unsuitable fat development on the site without remediation include soils unsuitable for load-bearing or with dvae settiement potential, old landslide areas and claystone beds, and liigh-groundwater in allwiai soila.
Mtigu!ion. Remedial grading will be needed to esablish firm footings br stmctures and fills and to correct adverse settlement and alluvial soiis over shallow groundwater. A soils engineer and engineering geologist shall be retained by each tent&e map applicant to review detailed grading plans, prepare a detailed soil and geologic investigation, monitor constrnaion, and assure compliance with the Master Plan geologic investigation and the Cii Grading Ordinance.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittai of each tentative rmp. 2) Approval of each tentaM map and issuance of grading permit. 3) Cmtpietion of construction.
Responsible Pudes. 1) City Engineering w 2) City Engineaing Department. 3) Consulting soils engineer and engineering geolq& City Engineer.
s0nction.s. 1) Tentative map submittai a~ complete without detailed soil and geologic investigation 2) No tentative map approval without soil md geologk investigation and appropriate conditions. 3) No issuance of building permits without evidence of proper mitigation. 1
-
Air Quuliry 12
G. Air QuaIity
Impud. Potential for significant direct impacts to regional air quality due to increases in pollutant emissions caused by project uafF~c.
Mii’igution. Implementation of Master Ilan measures including bike lanes and pedestrian trails, and requirement for applicants for future tentative maps to work with North County Transit District to
provide bus routes and stops as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsi3Ze Pubes. 1) City Planning and Engineering Depamneao. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Soarions. 1) Submittal of tentative maps it complae without appropriate mitigation measures. 2) No approval of tentative maps without application conditions.
H. Land Use
lmpud. Development of the Master Plan wuuld encroach on the ‘early California” setting of CarriIlo Ranch Park, including the elimination of the northern entry tn the ranch compound.
Mifigution. A Special Park Design District shall be establisha for development surrounding the park, including special controls on setbacks, landscaping, and ar&heaural details and an entry through the park through Village S. ‘The design diet standards will be included in the Master Plan and subsequent tentative maps will be evaluated for conformance by the Planning Commission.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of the Masta Plan. 2) AppnmI of tentative maps that include part of the design district.
ResponsWe Puttia. 1) City Planning Department. 2) Cii Planning Department.
Suncfiuns. 1) No approvd of the Masta plan without establishment of a park design district and development standards. 2) No approvaI of ternative maps containing part of the design district
without setting forth dia developmm standah
Impuct. The City of Carisbad has no review authority over Village S, which is in the park design district, if it is developal aa a school site by the San Marcos Unified School District.
1
A
LaJd use‘ 13
Mirigation. Agreement with the school district 011 desigu stat&& is etrounged, but cannot be enforced by the Planning Commission. Without review of al1 devdopmept within the design district,
it is not within the power of the Lead Agenq to assure that possible impacts are mitigated or avoided.
\
‘7 i, /.’ %heckphts. No Lead Agency ch&poims without agmemem with the school district.
ResponsibZe Pads. Responsibility for m@tion is withiu the rothority of another jurisdiction and not the City of Carlsbad.
s0llcfion.r. None available to the City of Carisbad utuier present cirnmwances.
Impact. Dedication of the open space lint at the southwest cotna oft@ property, where the link
crosses from one zone to an adjacent ownership, is not assured under the proposed Master Plan.
Mitigation. Assure continuance of the open space iii as part of the Masts Plan.
,‘: \ ;*
k-
Mawr PIan Impiemcntaticm. Cadsbad’s Open Spre Advisory approved the open space link
proposed by the Master Plan at their February 1993 meeting.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of Master Plan. 2) Approval of tentative map including Village T.
Responsilde Pa&es. Planning Dv.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan wirhout opca space link.
Impacf. Applicants for the MS~K Plan must obtain a letter from the San Marcos Unified School
, District accepting the site proposed by apphnts as possible school site area in compiiance with the
I Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plau.
. \ ! Mitigation. Agreement with the San h4arcos Unified Schooi Distria as part of Master Plan approval.
Checkpoints. Appcovai of Master Ph.
Respotuibie Part&s. Planr~@ Dq-
&ncfrkns. No approvai of Master Plan without agnemea with the school district that complies with the Zone 18 Local Facilities Managemmt Pk.
-
,.
Ktsmaf AesrheridGrading 14
%.- ’
I. Visual Aesthetics/Grading
Impact. Grading proposed by the Master Plan requires fixhgs justifyiug gtading volumes to be approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer accordhq to the Hillside Development Ordiice.
Mitigation. Approval of findiigs for the proposed grading volumes prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
ResponsibZe Patties. Planning Director and City Eqiueer.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required findings.
Impact. Proposed grading for the Master Plan would exceed Hillside Development Ordinance
allowances for slope height and encroachment into 40 percent slopes without specified findings by the decision making body.
I’j. 2- Mitigarion. Approval of findings for the proposed grading concurrem with approval of the Master p*an .
Checkpoints. Approval of the Master Ph.
Responsible Pads. Decision making Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required finditlgs.
Impact. Potential impacts of Master plan development on the visually sensitive Carrillo Ranch Park
site, including Villages S, 0, atui Q.
Mitigation. Appkattle ta&w maps to indicate an acceptable detailed landscape plan to reduce
potential impacts. hnplw Special Park Design District recommended in EIR Land Use section.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittai of applicabIe tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Pads. 1) Cii Planning Department. 2) City Planing Department.
Sa~&ons. 1) Temative map submid not complete without detailed lam&ape plan. 2) No approval of tentative map withoq appropriate detailed landscape plan.
- -
,,
Wmd AahetidGmiing 15
Impact. Potentially significant impact Of reaational v&i& storage in Open Space Ana 13 021 views
from existing residences,
Mtigadon. Detailed landscape plan as part of teumtive map for View Q and R to effectively screen views of recreational vehicle storage.
Chec&points. 1) Submittal of tent&e map hhtdhg ruxwtionai vehide storage. 2) Approval of tentative map including recreationaI vehicle stomge.
Responsible Paties. 1) City Planning Departme& 2) City Planning Department.
Sandions. 1) Submittal of teaative map rW compke without approprhe laudscaping plan. 2) NO approval of tentative map without appropriate hisaping plan.
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of wise Brriers over six f&t in height.
Mitigufion. Detailed landscaping plan for tent&e maps to provide &qua@ WVK, texture, and
variation of vegetation to screen walls.
,’ / I !z Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of any tentative mpp sh&ng misc barriers over six feet in height. 2) Approval of any tentative map showing noise barks over six feet in h6ght.
Responstile Patties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanerions. 1) Submittal of applicable tentah map6 not complete witbout appropriate landscaping plan. 2) NO approval of appiicable tentative maps without appropriate &dscapiig plan.
J. CiKulation
.x,- \ J
Impd. The intendon of Paiomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is projected to have a level of service F in the yerr 2000 aftexmon peak hour. No Wnaj improve to this intersection are
currently proposed in the LFMP.
Mtigatibn. The City will continue to monitor trafiic to daamine conformance with LFMP standard and to identify and implement imptuvements occesurytomeathesta&rd.
Checkpoints. Constructhn of improvements.
Responsihle Pads. City Engikrhg Qepattmem..
-.
~cbrnl Aesthaia/&dag 16
Sanctions. No issuance of building permits if Growth &aqemem smxlards for traffic levds of service are not met.
Impacts. Spacing of the first intersection on Palomar Airport Rod is 200 feet closer than City
standards allow.
Mifigudon. Tentative maps shall comply with city rod alignment and intersection spacing standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
5 .Le.
Master PIon ImplemenWon. The Iocation shown on the proposed Master Plan has not been revised
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval’ of tentative maps.
Responsible Patties. City Engineering Departmem.
Sanctbns. No approval of tentative maps that do not comply with City road alignment and intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the City En*.
Impact. As proposed, development of the Master Plan wmdd require t&Tic signals at Palomar
Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Wrose Aveme/v to Villages H, 0, and L.
d Jj, 3 Mitigcrron. Condition tentative maps to construct the necastry signaia and improvements, or
determine the need for signals in traffic studies for ten&ve maps.
checkpoints. 1) submittal of applicabk tentative rmps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
ResponsilUe Patties. 1) City Engineering Deplrtmmr 2) City Engineering Department.
Scmdions. I) No approval of tentative maps without appli~k conditions.
Impacf. Cerrain revisioxts of the internal ciradatba systan &&bat in the EIR may be preferable
for environmental or &cuktoq reasons.
M&igatzbn. Traffic studies for applicable tent&ve maps shall duermine in consultation with City staff whether specified changes in the circulation paptern should be impkmarted as conditions of applicable
tentative maps.
Master Pftzn Implementatiba. Revisions to the Mzstcr P¶att Circulation and proposed tentative maps
have already been made to address the recommendations of the EIR and approved by the City
Engineer.
Circularion 17
Checkpoints. 1) Appnml of tentative maps.
Responsible Pwd&s. 1) City Planning and Engine&g Dqartmak 2) City Planning and Engineering Deparuua~.
Soncfions. 1) No approvai of tentative maps witbop iqplicable anmiihs. .
\. f’ .\
K. Noise
Impad. Certain areas adjacent to major roads in the hkter Plan area could experience future trafiic noise in excess of the City stat&t& of 60 dBA CNEL.
Mitigation. Tentative maps shall show appropriate mke barrias ?t speciM in the EIR or to City
standards to attenuate noise. If grading shown in rhh Masta Plan for development in areas of
excessive unattenuated noise is modified by tentatiw maps, the modificath~ shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and a new acoustical study shall be p&xmai lad appq&te mitigation implemented if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall have the option of rqu&ng a reduction in height of barriers over six fea to m less than six feet to e visuai intpw% pa City policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) hpecthn of anntnactai improvements.
Responsible Puds. 1) City Plan&g and Et&wing Depm 2) City Engineering Department.
Sandions. 1) No approval without proper barks as a condii 2) No issuance of subsequa permits.
Impact. Second floats of some residential units d;mr to Cii Element roadways could
experience interior misc levds in excess of the 45 dEA CNEL stat&&
Mz?igutibn. Prqosed tent&e maps shall be siunvm to have designs for multi-story residences next to Circulation Eknmt tuadways which would achieve b&or misc levels of 45 dBA CNEL or less for
second or higher smrk Acoustical studies to - co@ance may be required by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of teaasivc maps. 2) @&on of m improvements.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Phming and Enghuhg w 2) Building Departmeut.
Sandzbns. 1) No approval without proper barrias as a conditim. 2) No issuance of subsequent permits. 1
L,’
L. Pubiic Facilities and Services
Impad. Thereisapotentialfor~eLFMP~~fi)tptft:faciiitieStobeexceeded depending on the timing of development and the status of other fidure p&and in C3y Park Dii
4.
Mitigation. Prior to the record&n of any Thai mq ur& the hhsta Plan, sufficient parklatxi shall be dedicated within Zone 18.
Checkpoints. Recordation of first ihi map uaia the hater Plau.
ResponsihZe Patties. City Planning, Eugineering, rad Pa&s ami Recrathn Departmeuts.
Scmczions. No recordation of final map w&au Wcation of suf&ieut parkland within Park Diet
4.
Impact. The LFMP performance standard requh tk a school site in Zone 18 be deeded to the San Marcos Unified School district (SMUSD) aad that a finat&g pian be approved by the SMUSD prior to recordation of any final map or issuance of auy grading oc tmilding pamit in Zone 18.
1 L . Mitigufibn. Compliance with the Zone 18 N
Checkpoints. 1) Recordation of the first fiml map uxk the Master Plan. 2) Issuance of any grading or building permit in the Master Plan area.
ResponsiHe Pads. City Planning And Engineahg Dcplrtmcplrr.
Sanctions. No Fii map recordal without LFMP rcq~imneat bting met.
Impact. Sewage gent&on could exceed tmmenc cap&y if residential development occurs in the
Master Plan - a%u 2OQS.
Mitigation, hplemeut measmsspeclBediatheLFMPforaaymmativemapscausingthepotential impact to be reaked.
Checkpoints. 1) Submitnl of tentative maps after 200!3. 2) Apprtml of tentative maps submitted
after 2005.
Respodle Pads. 1) City +uning ami Eugkeriug Depxtmam. 2) City Planning and Engineering Deparanenu.
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps aft= 2005 rirbom aariirinm requiring conformance with
LFMP requircmatts.
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Impact. Depending on regional planning fbr thk CIlarcjra aftnndfin qt@hty, there is a potemLi for solid waste generated from the Masts Plan area to arral disport capacity.
Mitigation. Applicants for tentative maps pmgosal i Ute h&st~ Plan m shall demonstrate that means of feasible solid waste disposal are avail&k
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps for the Master Plan ara.
ResponSaie Pads. 1) City Planning and Engkaiq z)eprrmr#lm.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps withy derpymsatian of existhg disposal capacity.
.
1 :
-; Y
-
EXHBlT 3
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 22. 1994 - 90 Dav Extension
PROJECT PLANNERTERESA WOODS
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECI? CT 93-04 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L”. “M”. ‘IN”. “0”. “R” & ‘7”’ -
Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 6 large parcels
into 288 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet), two
multiple family residential lots, one Community Services lot, one Recreational
Facilities lot, one Day Care facilities lot, one Recreational Vehicle Storage lot
and 18 open space lots on a 267.7 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane (formerly Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and east
of El Fuerte extension, in the PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan
Zone 18.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3706 and
3707 recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-04 and the Village “M”, “Q” and “R” Design
Guidelines based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at its meeting November 16,1994,
and continued to November 30,1994 to allow the applicant time to respond to certain issues
raised by the Commission. It was subsequently continued to January 4, 1995.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo dated January 4, 1995 with proposed revisions to Resolutions
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3706
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3707
4. Exhibit “I” as referred to in Condition No. 56 in Resolution No. 3706
5. Staff Report dated November 30, 1994
6. Staff Report dated November 16, 1994, with attachments.
JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJEC;T: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTION NO. 3704 OF CT 93-04 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES
“L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” AND ‘T”
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3706
Findings:
5. Based on the “Initial Study” prepared for this project the Planning Commission
determines that the project is within the scope of EIR 91-04 on file in the Planning
Department, and there are no additionai signiikant adverse environmental impacts
associated with the project, therefore, no further environmental review of this project
is required. Ail feasible mitigation measures identified in EIR 91-04 wiii-be
Planning Conditions:
9. The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilities remain
available to the park site at ail times during development unless prior approval is
secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be provided during ail
phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation
Director.
56.
61.
This project shall comply with alI conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit “I”)
which are required...
Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to riparian habitat and threatened/endangered
plant species will be mitigated under the review and supervision of the California
Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Corp of Army Engineers and any other
applicable resource agency. The mitigation plan must be approved by the involved
resource agencies prior to the recordation of final map or issuance of grading
permit. Grading plans shall reflect the resource agencies review and approval. If
c -. -.
CT 9344 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” AND “T”
JANUARY 4, 1995
modifications ## required by the agencies # ::~~~~~ 8 the applicant ~~~~ apply for an . ..A.......... ..rz . . ..k+A..:: . :.. . XI. . . . . . ..?L . : :.: amendment to this Tentative Map or apply for new discretionary permits.
EnPineerinn Conditions:
108. Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements as required in the
Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan (MP) and Locai Faciiities Management Plan (LFMP)
for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These <.:.>:.:.>: . . . ..+...>y.yA..... >v+.q.v. improvements, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, shall be .:.:.:c:.:.~<.~.~.:.:i.:.*.:.L.~.~~ . . . . >.<.>.A.<.< _...........,... .r . . . . . . . . . . . . z ..,.............. x . . . . . I..Gx .,... . ..>.x> . . . . <..?. , A. .__ ._ t.>.r...e . . . . ~~~~.~~~~.!~.~~~~~.~~~...~~.~ .............l >A!.!.. . ..<.A.> _... s... .< substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECI’z
I.
-
APPLICAl’lON COMPLETE DATE:
March 22.1994 - 90-dav extension
Staff Planner: Teresa Woods &Q
STAFF REPORT 0 3
NOVEMBER 30, 1994
PUNNING COMMISSION
PUNNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93-04 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L”, “M”. “N”. “0”. “R” & ‘7”’ -
Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 6 large parcels into 288 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet), two
multiple family residential lots, one Community Services lot, one Recreational
Facilities lot, one Day Care facilities lot, one Recreational Vehicle Storage lot
and 18 open space lots on a 267.7 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane
(formerly CarriIIo Way) extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and east
of El Fuerte extension, in the PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan
Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Pktnning Commission CONTINUE this item to January 4, 1995.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Staff is recommending continuance of this item to allow the applicant and staff adequate
time to respond to the issues raised on a companion project by the Planning Commission
at the meeting of November 16, 1994.
-
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 22. 1994 - 90 Dav Extension
PROJECI’ PLANNER:TERESA WOODS
STAFF REPORT 0 4
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1994
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECI’Z CT 93-04 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L”, %I”, “N”. “0”. “R” & “T” -
Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 6 large parcels
into 288 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet), two
multiple family residential lots, one Community Services lot, one Recreational
Facilities lot, one Day Care facilities lot, one Recreational Vehicle Storage lot
and 18 open space lots on a 267.7 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane
(formerly Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and east
of El Fuerte extension, in the PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan
Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3706 and
3707 recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-04 and the Village “M”, “Q” and “R” Design
Guidelines based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 6 large parcels
into 288 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square foot), 2 multiple family
residential lots, 1 community services lot, 1 recreational facilities lot, 1 day care facilities lot,
1 recreational vehicle storage lot and 18 open space lots on a 267.7 acre site located south
of Poinsettia Lane (formerly Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and
east of El Fuerte extension. The site is undeveloped and contains native and disturbed
habitat. The property is located in the Planned Community Zone (PC) zone, and is subject
to the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan as well as Final Environmental
Impact Report 91-04 and Hillside Development Permit 91-17 which were processed
concurrently with the Master Plan. The project is also subject to the requirements of the
RLM (Residential Low-Medium), RM (Residential Medium), RMH (Residential Medium-
High), RH (Residential High), and OS (Open Space) General Plan Land Use Designations.
9 -
c-r 93-04 - RANCH0 cARRILLo
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “I’”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 2
h
*
,
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. The
purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the entire Ranch0
Carrillo site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. For planning
purposes, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is divided into Villages “A” - “T” (see Exhibit
“RR”). The Master Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land use in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, requirements, and the
methods by which the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan will be implemented.
As part of the second stage of developing the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the applicant
is proposing to subdivide 6 of the original 15 lots of the Master Plan (Villages ‘IL”, “M”, “N”,
‘IQ”, “R” & ‘y”) into 288 single family lots, 2 multiple family lots, 1 community services lot,
1 day care lot, 1 recreational vehicle storage lot, 1 recreational facilities lot and 18 open
space lots. Most of the lots will be subdivided for residential development, however, a few
lots will be subdivided for uses to serve the entire Master Plan area including recreational
vehicle storage, day care, and community service uses. With this tentative map only one lot
each will be created for Villages “L”, “N” and “T”. As noted in the table below, future
discretionary actions are required for these villages. As such, detailed development issues
(e.g. architecture, setbacks, building height, building materials and compliance with special
Master Plan design conditions) will not be addressed until a specific development is
proposed within the Village. The following table summarizes the processes required for the
development of each village proposed to be subdivided under th% tentative map.
e fmnmun
-
CT 93-04 - FuNcHo CARREL0
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “NW, “Q”, “R” & “I’”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 3
Design Guidelines have been developed for Villages “M”, “Q” and “R” as no additional
discretionary actions will be required to develop the single family lots of these villages. The
design guidelines address such items as building envelopes, setbacks, architecture, roof line
treatment, and parking. At the time of building permit application floor plans and
elevations for Village “M”, “Q”, and “R* will be -submitted to staff for review to ensure
compliance with Design Guidelines.
As noted in the table above, additional discretionary actions (Site Development
Plan/Planned Development Permit) are required for Villages “L”, “NW and “T” and for Lots
105 and 106. The architectural elevations and floor plans for these lots will be submitted
for review and action by the Planning Commission with the subsequent required
discretionary action.
Villages “L”, “M”, “NW, “Q”, “R” & T” are located in the south portion of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan. This portion of the Master Plan area consists of rolling hillsides which
will be graded for development as approved under HDP 91-17. As shown on Exhibits “A’ -
“JJ”, Villages “L” and “N” will be developed in the future with multiple family residences.
Village ‘T’ will be developed in the future with a community service use such as a church,
or boys and girls club. Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R” will be developed with individual single
family lots ranging in size from 7,560 to 46,140 square feet. Villages “M”, “Q”, and “R” are
designed as standard lot single family neighborhoods (7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size) that .
will be marketed to the move-up buyer. There would be an active and passive recreation
facility located on Lot 106 containing a variety of recreational amenities. As conditioned,
the 2.0 acre Recreational Facility (on Lot 106) will be approved under a separate site
development plan and will be constructed prior to occupancy of the 144th unit (50% of the
units) within Villages “M”, “Q”, and “R”.
Final EIR 91-04 addressed the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. EIR 91-04 concluded that significant but mitigable impacts
would occur due to project implementation. This project, as designed and conditioned, will
comply with EIR 91-04. Grading for this project was approved under HDP 91-17. As
proposed, this project is consistent with HDP 91-17. No additional grading is proposed as
part of this project.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15%
(or 88.76 dwelling units) of the 591.76 base dwelling units must be provided for lower
income households. The 503 market rate dwelling units include 288 single-family units in
Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R”, plus an additional 215 potential multiple family units in Villages
“L” and “N”. The applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units off-site
in a combined affordable project in Village “F”. A combined affordable project is a separate
residential development site which, under contract, must provide some or all of the required
Inclusionary units associated with the development at an alternative site or sites. The Site
em -
cr 93-04 - RANcHo CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “NW, “Q”, ‘R” & “I”’
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 4
Development Plan for Village “F” (SDP 94-01) will be reviewed and acted upon prior to
consideration of this project. This will ensure that all affordable housing requirements are
satisfied and all incentives agreed to prior to action on this project. This project is
conditioned to enter into and comply with the Affordable Housing Agreement as referenced
in SDP 94-01.
.
III. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
RLM (Residential Low-Medium), RM (Residential Medium), RMH
(Residential Medium-High), RH (Residential High), and OS (Open Space)
General Plan Land Use Designations.
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan MP 139(E).
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.85, “Inclusionary Housing”.
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20, “Subdivision Ordinance”; and the
California Subdivision Map Act.
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.90, “Growth Management
Ordinance” (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18).
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19, ‘Environmental Protection Procedures”;
and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
k GENERAL PIAN
Planning Issue
Is the Tentative Tract Map consistent with the General Plan?
DISCUSSION
When the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was recently approved, it was determined to be
consistent with the land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. The proposed
subdivision of land is consistent with the densities established in the Master Plan and,
therefore, those permitted in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The proposed
project is also consistent with the Housing Element by ensuring that 15% (or 88.76 dus) of
the total 591.76 base units will be provided off-site in Village “F” of the Master Plan (see
Exhibit ‘INN”). In addition, the project is consistent with the Open Space and Conservation
cr 93-04 - RANCH0 CARREL0
VILLAGES ‘I”, “M’, “N”, “Q”, “R” & 7”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 5
Element by preserving the open space areas and trail segments specified in the Master Plan
(see Exhibit “MM”). To prevent redundancy, all of these issues are addressed in detail later
in this report under the Master Plan discussion.
.
B. CARRILLO RANCH MASTER PLAN
Planning Issue
Does the proposed development comply with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
requirements?
DISCUSSION
The proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan for Villages “L”, a M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “T” including product type and density,
compliance with the approved Hillside Development Permit, and compliance with open
space and trail requirements. In addition Villages “M”, “Q” and “R” comply with design
criteria, setbacks, Special Park Design criteria, and the implementing zone standards (R-l,
single family).
As discussed on page 2, Villages “L”, “N” and 7”’ will consist of a single lot each, the
development of which will be processed under a future discretionary action such as a site
development plan or planned development permit. As the specific project to be developed
within these villages is unknown at this time, detailed design issues cannot be addressed.
Therefore, the majority of the discussion below focuses on Villages “M”, “Q”, and “R” which
will not undergo any further discretionary review.
a. Proposed densities are consistent with those allowed in the Master Plan and by the
General Plan as illustrated in the table below.
VILLAGE Z”+
VILLAGE “M”
VILLAGE ‘TV’*
VILLAGE ‘0
VILLAGE “R” RWS
G.P.
IAND USE
I RH
RMHIOS
RLMfOS
G.P. -
DENSITY
RANGE
8-15
CONTROL
POINT t
I 19
3.2
UNITS UNITS/ACRE
PROPOSED
% 18.8
67 2.07
*
CT 93-04 - RANcHo CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “IT”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 6
*villages “L” and “N’ reflect number of units permitted under the Master Plan. No development is proposed at this time for these villages, only one lot for each Village will be created by this tentative map.
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved Hillside Development HDP
91-17 approved concurrent with the Master Plan in that lot elevations are consistent
with the approved grading elevations. No additional grading is proposed as part of
this project.
C. Although c&y the lots for Villages “L”, “N” and T” will be subdivided at this time,
these lots are consistent with the Master Plan in that as conditioned, adequate access
to these lots will be provided consistent with City Standards, adequate erosion control
and drainage will be provided and all utility services will be available to the lots.
d. The development of this tentative map will occur in 7 Phases as summarized below:
VlLLAGE DEVELO- PEASE
village ‘L” Phase 6
Village ‘M” Phase 7
Village 74” Phase 5
Village ‘Q” Phases 1,2 and 4
(Day awe, community facilities, and RV storage lots to be developed in
Phase 1)
Village ‘R” Phase 3
Village T Phase 1
e. The timing and guarantee for providing the day care, recreational vehicle storage and
community service uses are provided by the Master Plan and by conditions of this
tentative map. The following table summarizes this information:
e 1.
CT 93-04 - RANcHo CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & ‘T”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 7
-
ded in Phase I grading.
ative map establish day care
Fuerte or street Q-A. If not
purchased within 3 years for
community services use the area
reverts to RM density residential
f. Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, ‘R”, & “T” comply with the general design criteria for
development within the Master Plan area as follows:
i.
ii.
. . . III.
iv.
Where possible, lots in Villages “M “, “Q” and “R” have been oriented to take
advantage of views of Carrillo Ranch Community Park and designated open
space areas as well as to take advantage of natural cooling and heating
opportunities;
Noise will not impact residential uses within Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R” above
the 60 dBA CNEL standard. A detailed noise study will be required for
Villages “L” and “NW during the subsequent discretionary review required
under the Master Plan and any necessary noise mitigation will be required
as part of that project design. In addition, as conditioned, all noise will be
mitigated, as necessary, to 45 dBA CNEL interior pursuant to City noise
@cY;
Village “M” will provide for emergency access from Redwing Drive as
approved by City Council during the review of the Master Plan.
Lots l-10,95-102 and 133 of Village “Q” are located within the Special Park Design District identified in the Master Plan. The Master Plan established
the Special Park Design District to protect the historic context and feeling of
the Carrillo Ranch Community Park site. Developments located within this
special district are not to clash with the. existing architecture and landscape of
the Carrillo Ranch Community Park. To ensure compatibility of future
1 - -
CT 93-04 - RANCH0 CARREL0
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & ‘T”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 8
development of Village “Q” with the park site, special design criteria have
been included in the Villages “M”, ’ Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines (see Exhibit
“QQ). The guidelines require quality design, single story units on Lots 4,5,
10 and 102, and screening and’landscaping to ensure continued compatibility
with the Carrillo Ranch Community Park,
V. As conditioned, open space easements will be placed on slopes adjacent to
public roadways as required pursuant to the Master Plan; and
vi. Panhandle lots have been permitted in Villages “M” and “Q” as allowed in the
Master Plan (pursuant to R-l zoning requirements). The panhandle lots are
Lots 308 and 309 in Village “M” and Lots 34 and 35 in Village ‘Q”. The
panhandle lots created will not adversely impact the ability to provide full
public street access to other properties of the Master Plan or adjacent
properties. Further, the panhandle design reduces the amount of grading
necessary to provide the units, resulting in a decrease in impacts to nearby
sensitive habitats.
The proposed open space adjacent to and within Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” and
‘T” is consistent with the Master Plan and General Plan in that designated areas of
habitat, wildlife corridors, slopes, trails and recreation areas have been set aside.
Gpen space within the proposed project has been designated on 18 separate open
space lots which preserve approximately 116.7 acres. The dedication of these open
space areas will be phased in with the development of the associated village. Larger
open space areas will be maintained by the Master Homeowners’ Association and
smaller areas relating to each individual village will be maintained by that particular
Village Homeowners’ Association.
h. The proposed Village “M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines ensure that future
development will be attractive, and sensitive to views from the Carrillo Ranch Park
site. The guidelines assure the provision of a variety of building materials,
architectural accent features, articulated wall and roof planes, roof heights, building
mass, and building street setbacks. The project is conditioned to provide an
architectural theme consistent with the Master Plan requirements and the Village
I‘M”, “Q”, & “R” Design Guidelines. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that
whichever style or combination of styles is used in the Villages, that they will be
compatible with the surrounding villages and the structures within the Carrillo Ranch
Park. The surrounding area is undeveloped to the north and west and is developed
with residential uses to the south and east. The future Carrillo Ranch Park site
would be located north of Village “Q”. As conditioned, the proposed development
of Villages “L”, “M”, “NW, “Q”, “R” & “T” will be compatible with the existing and
future development of the area. As approved in the Carrillo Ranch Parks
c-r 93-04 - RANcHo CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & 7”’
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 9
Agreement, a special street design has been developed for Carrillo Way and Street
Q-K (see Exhibit “PP”). Th e project has been conditioned to provide access to the
Park pursuant to the Carrillo Ranch Parks Agreement.
i. The Carrillo Ranch Master Plan designates the Single Family Residential (R-l) Zone
of the City’s Zoning Ordinance as the implementing zone for development standards
in Villages “M”, “Q”, & “R”. The proposed project in Villages “M”, “Q”, 8z “R” would
comply with the standards of the R-l Zone as follows:
I LOT SIZE 1 790 sq. ft. 1 7300 sq. ft. I
I- I I I LOT WIDTH 60 feet
REAR YARDS 2 X required side
60 feet
2 X required side
LOT COVERAGE
FRONT YARD SF?I’BACK
4O%IllZL
20 feet
40%
20 feet
STREET SIDE YARD SmACK 10 feet 10 feet
SIDE YARD SETBACK 10% of Lot Width (S-feet min.) 10% of Lot Width (5 ft. min.)
I BUILDING HEIGHT I 30 feet I 30 feet
i To ensure that quality developments are submitted for Villages “M”, “Q” and “R”,
detailed design guidelines have been prepared. The following table depicts the
primary issues covered in the Villages “M”, “Q” & “R” Design Guidelines.
VILLAGE “M”, “Q” & “R”
DESIGN GUIDELINES ISSUES
II ISSUE I COMMENT
Unit Mix A minimum of 3 floor plans with a minimum of 2 front
building treatments per floor plan shall be provided (15%
l-story min.).
Plotting of Units
Setbacks
No floor plan shall be plotted more than 60 % of total units
on a street; no 2 units with same facades closer than 200 feet on the same side of the street; and units may not utilize entire building envelope.
Front - 20’ minimum
Side - 10% of Lot Width (5’ minimum) Rear - 2 X required side
121
CT 93-04 - RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q’, “R” & ‘T”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 10
-
Architecture
munity Park. Also,
must be determined to be in substantial conformance with
* The applicant has proposed 100% three car garages. Staff does not support this design request.
See item “h” below for a discussion of this issue.
k. The applicant has proposed that 100% of the garages in Villages “M”, “Q”, and “R”
be three-car garages. Staff does not support this request as three-car garages,
especially when oriented toward the street, make the structures look massive. Three-
car garages also dominate the building design of a home and could overshadow the
unit design as viewed from the street. Staff recommends that 20% of the garages be
two-car facade garages. This type of garage would create one tandem space plus one
standard space permitting the storage of a three car garage while maintaining a two
car facade as viewed from the street. Providing a mix of two and three car garages
would create more openness in the front yards, provide a greater variety in unit
design, and would create the need for less paving within the front yards. This project
has been conditioned to provide 20% two car garages.
1. As provided for in the Master Plan, a recreational vehicle (RV) storage facility will
be provided for on Lot 104 to meet the needs of the entire Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan area (see Exhibit “LL”). As conditioned, the applicant must provide the
cr 93-04 - RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & T’
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 11
required RV parking to accommodate the needs of this development prior to
occupancy of the first unit within Villages “L “, “M”, “N”, “Q”, and “R”. Prior to finaI
map the applicant must also submit a RV storage agreement for review and approval
by the Planning Director which will outline the phasing of construction of the RV
facility. The RV storage facility wiU be 3.5 acres in size and contain approximately
142 RV parking spaces. The RV facility wiII be screened by a masonry waII along
the north and along a portion of the west side of the facility. Heavy landscaping will
be provided along the north and west sides of the site. In addition, landscaping will
be provided around the south and east sides of the facility and landscaping will also
be provided inside of the parking area. The trees used to screen the RV facility wiU
include tall evergreen trees (e.g. Canary Island Pine) and canopy trees (e.g. Coast
Live Oak). As conditioned, the RV Storage Facility wi.U be maintained by the
Master Homeowner’s Association.
C. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 21. CHAPTER 21.85 “INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING”
Villages “M”, “Q” & “R” would contain a total of 288 single family residential units and
Villages ‘IL” and “N” would potentiaUy contain 215 multifamily units. Within Villages “L”,
“M”, “N”, “Q” and “R”, 15% of the base units (88.76 dus) must be designated as affordable
to low-income residents. The applicant is proposing to provide the required affordable units
off-site in a combined affordable development as permitted pursuant to Section 21.85110
(Inclusionary Housing Ordiiance) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The applicant is
proposing to develop Village “F” (SDP 94-01) as the combined affordable development to
satisfy their Inclusionary requirements. Village “F” is owned by the applicant (See Exhibit
“NN”, Reduced Village “F” Site Plan) and would include 116 units. SDP 94-01 will be acted
upon prior to review and action on this project. As proposed, Village “F” may not contain
the necessary three bedroom units (approximateIy 12 three bedroom units required)
required under the Inclusionary Ordinance, as parking design for three bedroom units has
not been worked out. SDP 94-01 is conditioned to ensure that all affordable requirements
are satisfied and this project wiU be conditioned to compIy with SDP 94-01. As discussed
on page 4, this project is also conditioned to assure that 15% of the approved base units of
Villages ‘IF”, “G”, “L”, “M”, ‘*NW, “0”, “P”, “Q”, “R” & “‘I” are provided for lower income
households.
D. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCJWITLE 20
Engheming Issue
Does CT 93-08 comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance?
cr 93-04 - RANcHo CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & ‘?I’”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 12
DISCUSSION
As conditioned, the proposed Tentative Map would comply with all the requirements of the
City’s Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. The project is conditioned to provide adequate
erosion control, and drainage. All required public street improvements including curb,
gutter, and sidewalk would be provided along public streets. Streets have been designed
to City standards and will consist of a curb-to-curb paved width of 47 to 60 feet with curb
and gutter. A 5’ wide utility easement will be provided on one or two sides of the street
depending on whether units are fronting out onto the street segment. Sidewalks will be
provided on one side only for single-loaded streets or streets without residential units
fronting onto them, and will be provided on both sides for double-loaded streets. This
project has been conditioned to provide required secondary access to each village as well
as conditioned to guarantee construction of Melrose Drive, Poinsettia Lane and El Fuerte
Streets (See Exhibit “RR”).
Sewer service to Villages “L”, ’ M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “I’” will be provided by a public sewer
line that will tie into a 12” sewer main to be installed for the entire Ranch0 Carrillo
development. The sewer line will drain by gravity flow in a westerly direction through the
northern portion of Village “Q”, where it will join the 12” sewer main. This sewer main will
connect with an offsite pump station, which will pump sewage to the existing Buena/San
Marcos Interceptor system (See Exhibit “SS”). To maintain gravity flow, sewer service to
the southeastern portion of Village “Q” will be provided by the Leucadia County Water
District. A condition is imposed on this project so that prior to final map approval of this
project phase, an agreement must be executed between the Leucadia County Water District
and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District that identifies the sewer responsibilities of each
agency in this area and that allows sewage conveyance through the Leucadia County Water
District sewer system. Water will be provided to Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & ‘?I’”
from a trunk line of the water main on Melrose Drive. A reclaimed water line will also be
installed on Melrose Drive, and will be tapped for irrigation of the slope areas within the
project. Surface drainage will be conveyed by standard curb and gutter that will drain to an
underground storm drain system. The underground storm drain system will discharge into
a check dam system to be located on the west side of Carrillo Way in Village “Q”. In turn,
this check dam system will connect to the major drainage outlet planned for the Ranch0
Carrillo development.
Grading for this project was approved under Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17)
which was approved for this site as part of the Master Plan. No additional grading is
proposed as part of this project. The approved grading plan consists of a comprehensive
7-phase grading operation. Phase I will complete a majority of the grading required within
the entire Master Plan area. The remaining approved phases of grading will primarily be
limited to site specific grading of the villages. The geotechnical report for this site stated
that no soil or geologic conditions observed or noted would preclude the development of
this project, provided the recommendations of the report are followed.
* -
CT 93-04 - RANCH0 cARRILLo
VILIAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & ‘T”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 13
E. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is located within LocaI Facilities Management Plan Zone 18 in the
southeast Quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and
compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
PARKS
288 EDU
2.0 acres
Yes
Yes
DRAINAGE I Yes
CIRCULATION
FIRE
OPEN SPACE
2,880 ADT Yes
Yes
Open Space provided at Master Plan Yes
level With approximately 116.7 acres
of open space, this development is
consistent with G.M.
SCHOOLS SMUSD Yes
SEWER COLLJXT’ION SYSTEM 288 EDU Yes
WATER DISTRIBirTION
I
Yes
SYSTEM
The project is at or below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance for Villages “L”,
“M”, ‘IN”, “Q”, “R”, & “T” as shown in the Land Use Element Summary Table on page 5.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/TITLE 19 AND CEOA
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 CarriIIo Master Plan MP
139(E) which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within LocaI Facilities Management Zone 18.
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of
the Ranch0 CarriIlo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 91-04) for the Master Plan. Staff prepared an initial study to analyze
potential environmental impacts of the project and conducted additional project level studies
including soils contamination studies and a drainage study. These studies provide more
focused and detailed analysis and indicate that additional environmental impacts beyond
those which were analyzed in the Final EIR 91-04 would not result from implementation of
A
a 93-04 - RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGES “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q”, “R” & “I’”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 14
the project. Staff determined based on the initial study and the information contained in
the additional studies, that no additional impacts over those addressed in EIR 91-04 will
occur. The project is in prior compliance with Final EIR 91-04 and would not create any
additional significant environmental impacts. The recommended and applicable mitigation
measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been incorporated into the project design or would be
included as conditions of approval for this project.
Iv. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project: (1) is consistent with the General Plan; (2) complies with the Ranch0
CarriUo Master Plan; (3) complies with the subdivision ordinance; (4) is in conformance with
Growth Management; and (5) will not significantly impact the environment, therefore, staff
recommends approval of m 93-04.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3706
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3707
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Exhibit “KK” Reduced Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Exhibit (8 l/2” x 11”)
Reduced Exhibits (8 l/2” x 11”)
Exhibit ‘ILL” Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility
Exhibit “MM” Master Plan Open Space
Exhibit “NN” Reduced (8 l/2” x 11”) Village “F” Site Plan
Exhibit “00” Streets Q-D & Q-A Retaining Wall Design
Exhibit “PP” Carrillo Way and Street Q-K Special Street Design
Exhibit “QQ” Villages “M”, “Q” & “R” Design Guidelines
Exhibit “RR” Circulation
Exhibit “SS” Sewer Lines
Full size Exhibits “A”, - “JJ”, dated November 16, 1994.
Odober 1% 1994
Tw.Aul
n
city of Chhl
CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGE “k, M, N, Q, R, T” 1 CT 93-04 +’
* - BACKGROUND DATA SHEET -
CASE NO: CT 93-04
CASE NAME: Carrillo Ranch VillaPes L. M, N. 0, R & T
APPLICANT: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Reouest for annroval of a Tentative Tract Man to subdivide 6 lots into 288 single
familv residential lots (minimum 7.500 scmare feet). two multinle family residential lots. one communitv services
lot. one recreational vehicle storaee lot and 18 ouen snace lots on a 267.7 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane
(formerly Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and east of El Fuerte extension.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Sections 18 & 19 T12 R3W
APN: 215-030-09: 215-031-04: 222-012-01.02: 222-01 l-06: 222-010-02 (Portion)
(Accessor’s Parcel Number)
Acres: 267.7 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 311!288
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
LandUseDesignation RLM/RM/RMH/RH/OS
Density Allowed Villages M. 0. R -3.2. Village T -6. Village N -11.5. Village L -19
Density Proposed Villaee M-2.07IVillaee O-2.75/Villaee R-3.02/ViUaee T-5.91ViUaee N-1.44/Vilhwe L -18.8
Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on C&bad’s Zoning Requirements)
zoning
Site PC
North PC
South R-l/RDM
San DiePo County
west PCYLC
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Park/School/Single Family Residential
MuhiDle Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Familv Residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District SMUSD Water District CMWD/LCWD Sewer District CMWD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 288
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated March 24. 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative Declaration, issued
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated q*
X Other, Prior Comuliance Final EIR 9 l-04 TWwtlh
3‘EN’; %f: L:I?f rw: CmSBF)D -; s-25-93 ll:llQq ;
vILwy;E T, Q, R, N, L, M
ONtOSuRE STA~MEM
AP%CAN3 tmmE?e OF oISclO8uAl3 OF CCrnAIN Owtm&ib INTWE~TS ON A& A)euCAJyONS WHCH WIU REQUIRI D!~C~~NMV ACllON ON Th# ?MT OP Tl=tI CITY CO&JNCtL OR ANY A?CQI~~
aOMO, COMMtSSlON OR COMM~#.
TM ?ollOwing lnformatiorr must bo direlosod:
List tha names and rddrr$$@S of rli PwW h-g a Ik\urcirl WfUt in fi@ aPPlduMa Cbntimtal Hanes
2.
3.
12636 High Bluff Drive
suite 300 ---
San Ulego, CA 92130
list the nrme8 md addro$84$0~ 3 potson haviq any ewnW@ intofost in the properry involved.
c/o co-
San Diego, CA -92130
If my pwron Idmunad pwruvvt to (1) or (2) 8bova Ir a owpoatm of putrlushi~, ri$t th8 nuro:
8ddfruor at r# indMduW WHY mom mul I 0% of the slwm in #a corporation 01 wing uly pm. intofort in tbo paftmM@
3isdotwo Wttemecrt ’
;l”,-2%93 11: lE!af ; 61ac”-qg& 519 438 a43;# ‘:
pa04 2
Have you had mot@ tMn S2$0 tinh of hWw~ ttm$wad with my mafnbW of Civ strtf. Scar:: Commirsiens. CommNar m4 Council with the past Wo rn011ttW
Yor - No & If yes, pM$N indiuta perSOn
I Peoan 13 ddtnad y: %tty ind)uicUll, fim, oomip joia valtum, aaacWh& Jcra club, fratwnu
I or$anunrcn, corpuorkrr, mat., trtw mmvu, syfwk8s, this ma uy anu cebmy, my mu caumy. Gay / i mun~ipahty, district of Wa political suW!wsion, 01 uy anu gfo~ of carnbinaton u2inQ aa 8 c * *
(NCTf; Attach oddho, )’ %I pIgor 83 noc4wQ.)
Signram q &&ntidat8
Pancho Cariillo, Inc.
Print or typo nanW d Wt?W
Con-M Hems
Pm M typa nuna of rppll-
/c
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Develonment Annlication>
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Carrillo Ranch Villages ‘IL”. “MI’. “N”. “0”. “R” & “T” - CT 93-04
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 18 GENERAL PLAN: RLM/RM/RMH/RH/OS
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPERS NAME: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
ADDRESS: 12636 Hieh Bluff Drive. Suite 300. San Diego. CA 92130
PHONE NO: J619179W580 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 215-03~091215-031-04~22-012-01.02~22-01 l-06/222-010-02 (PotI-
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 267.7 acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A
A.
B.
City Administrative Facilities:
Library:
Demand in Square Footage =
Demand in Square Footage =
1,001.25 so. ft
534 .%I. ft.
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
Park:
Drainage:
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation:
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire:
Open Space:
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staffj
Sewer:
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water:
Demand in Acreage =
Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
Demand in ADTs =
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided -
Demand in EDUs - 288
Identify Sub Basin - N/A
Demand in GPD -
2.0 acres
N/A
San Marcos
2.880
Nos.2.5&6
116.7 acres
N/A
63.360
L. lWzv&lh The project is 66 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
TrumAnol = f a--=
J :z t ===, 8 I { -gzy z a -m$ &j -m a - : -%z = :w:: : =‘= r . =--ZE :===:r : &!t! 2 w -=
115 A= 3 D :7
3 l :
0 :
: :
0 L . .
I
t
-. -
.A I :. 5 -
I: .-
I; / P ;:" :* . . .
-1. '. T-5 - . i *. 8 .-,
N.-e . . .
- ._
. . .
: . ,. a*,.
.x
. _ 5.8
: !. a.:..
:l$!j 'm-J SCK
RANCH0 MASTER PLAN VILLAGES
m-w -Iv* .
EXHIBIT “KK”
1 _ e--*
Attachmt 8 / 7
/” ,/
/” ./
*’ / l *
/
/L.J’
7
--W-W- J+y ,
I I
I
;_
I’
/’
e-0 I (’
I r---
.-H -0’ %Z?
1 “l,- --c-r _
COMPOSlTE SHEET1 OF2
i 1, -.y l ,y---= 7 \ 6 I wvrola m=m I A\
VILLAGE \ ,’ ‘,
VlLuQm M,O, d R COMPOSITE
SHEET 2 OF 2
N
‘COMPOSITE
TENTATIVE MAP
N
75 .- f
SHEET 1 OF 2 B - d
,e . . .
45,
-* ’ ‘.L .-- ‘/ 1 :._. \ \
COMPOSITE TENTATIVE MAP s ’
SHEET 2 OF 2
F si 8 . . UI E f u 2
- -e- -.
kz!’ ..s=- - - ==II =+--2_zv -- _- I.“”
pszes~k 1
----“- I_---- ---- .- ----YY-=- -a---- -----a I_^__. -- I_- --a- --w __ -.- I_--- --a -a -a- -- ---- .-.-- ~- -. -- -~. -- --. --.:=L. --_ ---.a-.. I__----- -- -.- ----- -- - ~. ---
r-=%3+ -2% -.---a .r -=;I=, -- we-- =---------
•ycc--~
c-w- =--, --- --- --m---
m-- ~-~ -s=zI=zzz
---“..F- 7 ---- -
Qp=s~
‘,‘---.
-,‘, -.!zrL”-.”
-7-- -w--w
~~=z.&..=
z---- =L ---
r,-z, -EG-- m -I ..-. ---- ----- -,---E=.
x--z- -m--- --w--m a---- ----- --w-v ---.- -- - ---- --I- -.---. ---a-
I . . . .-
----.-EG.. x;z -LT.. ------ ---- ..- -,2Y.. =L - ---. - --- -.-z - =;- a-- -- _I-. -- me-- ~-- --_~--a- ----I ----- -“- -- -- -- ~- --- .-.- .~ --. --- .-*
= -- -- zzs!!!!~ _IYzIz=Tz ” =-zzFL-- ---- - ,,--.zzL=- --- - ------” ---- ------ = - --z-- I --w-.--w I -- --~ z- -L- -.- x--r I---- --...-A ---. -. - --- .- I --..-.-- WV --- .~ ~--a - .--- ----- ------- -- -’ --- .-- - -.--- ----.-- ---.--.-.--- .~_~... ~~-.- -~...-. I- -^ --..
pj-iz- c =- -+ gz”- -, .--- c s -- E .~ == CL =- =- .- -
I I t --- ‘-mm ----
--WY. -. _--- --.... --- ---_. -. --- .- . -.- -. r&w
q-y?-F&- ,-- ZL-- a- .--- =?&z..z-TEY ==- .-.-- --.
= z -- a--- zm E L zrr, F-Z-. z-m
G I-
E SC
s m-e GL.
== ==
E--t- 1-
=- r=,‘-, =,, -- =”
a-- --- a--
G.-
gg--
woe --- ‘-” --... --- -a- --... Z-L .I-=. --^ a-- I- --- -.-.. e-e -- z”.: -- --._
53
I.-- -* ~~~~zsz SC--- ------ Z” ~‘- I.I EC-= ,- .zcz .- - z= = _=_. c =- =- --- gz-- -- --. mm”-- .- - zzz. a-- --- LZ... s.-
Tg$s+=~~~
---..- -..:=a -- -~
1 &-.---
I
N---z?=7 -m--w _I--- w-e--
I-
./--.
u-.-“--7 .-v-e --- -.--- ~-.--.“szz~s I-------“- -
1 ,~~C~z??
=: zr --.-. -z. -- .~~ -- --LX zr- ----.. .- -,‘- - -- ---~~ ~._
j$@J-~~Lz~.
--Z.l ‘--mm “- --me
-z ‘- &”
z --:-= ~~- -m---m --- -- =- _-==. --.-.. --a ------- ;--- ZT-=r- v---- ---- a--- ---- --- --- y.e..e
---- .---=r - --- --= . -.---- ---- ----- .--.- WJA
etg..---” F -e-- p- RANCHO
-.-I- w A LA . ,,., ,...,.-,,
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
SHEET1 OF2
P
CONTlNENXHT HOMES SOUTH LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN --.---.--*I--mI.- -I-
SHEET 2 OF 2 --- 83-
LEGEND
kl
ap”sP-E” A .@m-bm,. ,e-- 2.-us-a#vaQ Rhg
*‘.904Wla: A’.- -.meuyhkrdlnla~* 0-w-Y-w
0 c !iJz!icF-- ~#U-H.O* .--Lea )r*kYIChbmpHoA
NOTES:
i ‘I I 1 I I 1
I i i i \ I i 1 i
N I i
. t c 2
., i
LANDSCAPE MAlNTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY SHEET 1 OF 2
R A N C. CONTINt
I I - I . I
. . , .
CONllNENTAL HOMES SOUTH
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY -
Pr0pU.d undu Ihe suprbfslon ol Robul L wnkins~ R.U SHEET2OF2 rw.My4.1994 R.v.Apll20.1984 ,,W “..a .n *ana in 1mn
9 f f i P
. . 1
! 1 H! .4 .I - ,- m----L- -- ‘== /+ce
:Y
i-]-i
-“-pun8
CITY OF CARLSSAO FIRE sEcnoMs
m----..-
---- v----e ------- .C--
FIRE SUPPRESSION
-.
RANCH0 t
rn
PLAN SHEET 1 OF 2 e I
----I
-------- -- ---w-e- -----I-.--
FIRE Sdi%iii~&l” -L---L... -CT= SHEET 2 OF 2
llKameAra~Noscl
MELXOSE AVENUE AND cARRI[Lu) WAY P-A= “RANCH0 CARRmLa” THEME
R A N C H 0 I VC I 5 f
VILLAGE ENTRY NoScab
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT ‘b’ f
z
Yrok n. 199) RN. m 15. mm DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 2 0
5
Natural Resource Fence NOS&O
villageFalcemsah WLUGE WU AND FENCES
PRIMARY COMMUNITY MONUMENT’m.,,
Q
CONTINENTAL HOMES SOUT)! -EDGES AND ENTRIES LANDSCAPE CONCEPT DETAILS
SHEET 2 OF 2 fif2oocg rw. July 25. 199, rw.My4.1Qs4
6’ hi# adid wad \ \\
camlnunl(v~.w~ ‘\\\
EXI-WT “LL” ” Recreational Vehicle
Storage Area : -: :.: .,::~;y.’ ..,, :y:,., ;; : I;‘,,,. . . .
8 _. $
5 .-
5 b 8
0 a:
n, .:::,...j : :.~,.,:~:::,:~ 7 :::,.~:::. !.:$;.~,:,. :j;.::c:
/
/ i
l ,i
3’
:s... :.:j,;
a
;jj
i .
_F
I--$j I/ ----Ja -5 I/ ..r --- q f ‘-6 I .I ,:a / /G-t 1 I --- .’
L 5
4
I I
I -I - 1 .,i;;; ”
I
I
I3
f
a., -sib
? =fii
.;G((l’ . . n E!aiQ I . .a . - ;‘b ., 1 11.’ JJ 11 ml
. (3 : 2 8 : i=
I!! 7 a 3-I n. a w u a
Ii a 3 a 6 4 0 b co I- w
W
CL
+
co
.
* .
h
PLANT PALETTE
Community Park Entry ZONE 1
* From the Primpry Community Entry at Mdrow and Curi/lo Way to the Community Pa&
Entry Drive. 7% Io~&c+w and sinwtscape will draw the visitor into the park wing a
ran&o theme reftected with tfm park.
l Trees: 15 gal. ml .n.
Prlmzuy:
Phoenix canariensis .......................................... Canary Island Palm
Small Accent Tree:
Nerlum oleander (std.) ........................................ Tree Oleander
Eriobotrya deflexa (aitemate) ............................. Bronze Loquat
Cailistemon viminaiis (aitemate) ....................... Weeping Bottlebrush
Street Tree:
Eucaiyptus ficifoiia ............................................. Red-flowering Gum
Jacaranda mimosifoiia ....................................... Jacaranda
SuppotWope Tree:
Tristania conferta ................................................ Brisbane Box
Eucalyptus spp. (alternate) ................................ Eucalyptus
l Ornamental Shrubs: 5 gal. min.
Agave attenuata .................................................. Agave
Aloe arborescens ................................................ Tree Aloe
Streiizia reginae ................................................... Bird of Paradise
Bou~ainviiiee spp ............................................... Bougainvillea
Hibiscus spp ........................................................ Hibiscus
Phormium ternax ................................................. New Zealand Fhx
Aloe striata ........................................................... Aloe
l Hand-Planted Groundcover: WO.C Flats
Pelargonium peltatum ......................................... Ivy Geranium
Tracheiospermum Jasminoides ......................... Star Jasmine
Annual cover
Turf (soddeq
October 25,7923 c:IcarrillrJP~ldsc.chp paga 7 d
kcVlSED PER
PLANNING COMMISSION
l/4/95 .., ,I
VILLAGES&&Q&R
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. lNTRODUCTION
Villages M, Q & R are located in the southern portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. These villages are being developed as standard R-l subdivisions with minimum
7,500 square foot lots. The average lot size in these villages is approximately 12,066 square feet. All lots will have or exceed the minimum width of 60 feet.
Villages Q & R terrace down the hillside to take advantage of views into the valley. Many of the streets in these villages are single loaded to reduce grading impacts. Development in Viiges Q & R shall be designed to be sensitive to the hillside terrain.
Wherever possible units shall be plotted to provide the maximum possible setback from
the tops of slopes, both native and manmade.
Village M is located in the southeastern portion of the Master Plan and the lots have been designed to take advantage of views into the valley wherever possible.
2. UNIT MIX (For Each Village)
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of ~WW&XY plans 2 5
Number of one-story plans 1 3
Number of front elevations per floor plan 2 4
Maximum building heights
v'iBizgesiU,QdtR-lksi#mGuhielinu 1 J-w 14 1w
Thedeveloperofthesevillagesshallattempttoprovideatleast15%of~eunitsineach Village as one story units. These units shall be evenly distributed through out each Village. Lots 212 to 236 on the portion of Carrillo Way west of the interse&on of street R-A in Viie Q may be developed with all two story units similar to the product type in Village 0 at the option of the developer. If the applicant demonstrates that due to the market at the time of development it is not be possible to finance one story units, these villages may be developed with all two story units, as permitted under section 13 of these guidelines.
3. PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Villages M, Q & R. Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual elevation is plotted for more than 60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front elevations shall be plotted closer than 200 feet of each other on the same side of the street. Units may be plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the requirements of Villages M, Q and R Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots may not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the ability to construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall building coverage does not exceed 4096 of the lot area.
The matrix included as exhibit A of these guidelines shall be attached to the plot plan for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase and
the overall project complies with the 96 requirements of Sections 2(Unit Mix),
3(Plotting), 5 B&C(Arch.itecture) and ll(Lot Drains) of these guidelines. This matrix may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and elevations for this tentative map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
Front
Rear
20’ minimum
Twice the required side yard (up to a maximum of 20 feet) All units above slope3 overlooking native vegetation shall be setback a minimum of 60’ from the native vegetation unless a
lesser setback is approved by the Planning Director and Fire Ibhdall. A lesser setback may be allowed for units overlooking native vegetation if the vegetation is thinned and periodically maintained by the Homeowner’s Association.
yges M, Q & R -Ddgn GukWnes 2 Jmw 14 IHf
,*
10% of the lot width (up to a maximum of 10 fti). Per section
21.10.04Oa(2) (R-l Zone) of the carlsbad Municipal Code, some
of the lots may have one side yard setback reduced to five feet. theoppositesideyardsetbackhasbeenincrea&,asanoffsetting setback, a minimum distance equal to the reduction.
. . .
Native Vegetation All units above slopes ovcx looking native vegetation shall be setback a minimum of 60’ from native vegetation unless a lesser
setback is approved by the Planning Director and Fire Mar&all. A lesser setback may be allowed for units overlooking native
vegetation if the vegetation is thinned and periodically maintained by the Homeowners Association.
Note: Building envelope edges may adjust out prior to building permits if a retaining wall of up to 3’ height (as allowed by the Master Plan) is added to the slope as long as 5’ minimum separation is provided between the toe of any slope and the unit.
The rear edge of building envelopes can expand out if a small (3’ max.) retair@ wall is approved to hold back the toe of slope to produce a minimum 20’ use&e rear yard.
5. ARC-
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan:
Spanish c010niial Revival CraftsfTUUl
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie Spanish Eclectic CaMomia Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village M, Q & R, they shall be compatible with the adjacent villages.
B. Twenty-five percent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shallbeaminimumdepthof3feet. Theunitsqwlifyingunderthe25% shallbe distributed throughout the project. This guideline is to ensure some building
relief on the front and sides of each unit.
l~i~gdf,~~~-~k~ig1b~1dddi~8~ 3 J--J7 a 19s
4'
f
C.
‘, .,
At least 40% of the units in this project shall have at least three separate building
planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The minimum depth between the f&es of the forward-most plane and the rear plane
on the front elevation shall be minimum of 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum
of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit under this section.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in pamgraph C for front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the rear elevation shall be a minimum of three feet.
The design of the unit exteriors shall be-varied to create variety and interest within the Villages. The following materials may be used on the front exteriors
to create this variety: brick or brick veneer, wood trim, stucco and stone.
A maximum of three chimneys shall be permitted on any one residence.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the units within these villages
Twenty-five percent of exterior openings,doors/windows, shall be recessed or projected a minimum of hvo inches and shall be with vinyl, wood or colored aluminum frames (no mill finishes).
GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20’ between the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
Different window types/material shall be limited to three per house. Any one
elevation shall have a predominant window treatment. Any variation will be to
upgrade to develop focus.
Roofs shall have a variety of slopes which should be complimentary to the adjacent slopes.
6.
C. Thnecatgarageunitsshallbeamixofunitswiththraseparateonecargarage doors all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car garage door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12”. Driveways serving three car garages shall have a minimum width of 24’ at the
back of sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at the
entrance to the garage.
bUages M, Q & R - &sign Guidcllrcr 4 JQ-WY 14 m
, ,*
D. Garage doors. shall be designed to set into the walls rather than being flush with exterior walls.
E. 20% of all u&s within each of Villages M, Q and R shall contain two-car facade garages.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(l)@) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-1 Zone).
8. WALLS ANDFENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Viies M, Q & R Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the villages and provide directional information. All
signage will be developed in accordance with the Villages M, Q & R Landscape Exhibit. The exact location of these signs will be determined prior to final map approval. Signage
shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
10. SENSITIVE LOTS
A. Lots 1 - 10,95-102 8c 133 in Village Q are located within the boundaries of the Special Park Design District established by the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. The
unit architecture shall be compatible to existing park building styles. Edge landscaping shall buffer 70% of the new development once it has matured.
B. ~4,5,10&102inVillageQshallbelimitedtoonestoryunitsandscreened with landscaping to reduce their impact on the Ranch0 Carrillo Community Park.
C. ~266to268inVillageMandlots34&35inVillageQarebeingdeveloped as panhandle lots. The buildable portion of these lots shall have a minimum area of 8,000 square feet. Each of these lots shall have three non-tandem parking
spaces* Landscaping and fencing shall be provided to screen the adjacent residences from light and glare from the parking provided on these lots.
vilfages M, Q & R - Design Guidelines 5 J-w 141W
sq
_- - -- -- s
,I
.I
11. LOTDRAINS
privatelotdains~approvedforlotsfrontingonstcepstreets. Lotdrainsallowpad I. elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drams shall be limited as follows:
12. R-l ZONE
All development in Vies M,Q,& R shall be in conformance with the requirements of
Chapter 21.10 (R-l Zone) of the Carl&ad Municipal Code.
13. SECOND UNITS
Up to 50% of the lots in Villages M, Q & R may be developed with second dwelling units as defined under section 21.04.303 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All second units shall be developed in conformance with the requirements of section 21.10.015(c)(3)
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and the Village M, Q
& R Design Guidelines. The developer of Village M, Q & R has the option to develop the second units concurrently with the primary units. If the developer chooses this option to fulfill a portion of his inclusionary requirement, the second units shall be processed
pursuant to the requirements of Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
14. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is considered a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project; Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the requirements of Section 21.10.015 of the Cad&ad Municipal Code.
vU&ges hi, Q h R - LYesig~~ GuUMnes 6 J-w 14 lm
a .z P E
a
al m Z 8 f n
1
-0
E
2 n
u , 0
5 R
al m E 8 t n u
8
2 a
m
;I zamoc $SSSl hhhE $58: 0001 CCGi
s ii 5
5 P
0
L 0 ‘t P
0 M .- X ‘C
z
E Y) .-
FE \o\ hi
5 z
- c
no rcclo
. .; “;;““. ‘pwjj~<~ ~~~~~~~~
.,._,,/.,..... ~:...;.:::.~.~.~;.:s.~~..~.:.~...~~.:.?: . ...%.. ., .A.. . . . . . . . ..A..... ,,. .
;71 PmpomdFadlltW
Dddlng F~it!iea
lol I iwp088duitStatlon ,
,.._,: ,y,: ‘.“.‘. ‘:: ‘i ._.. 1::::.5~y.
t ::.: . ..‘.....,..~ . . . . . . . ~~~~~~I s- we B
P ‘j
DRAFT
.I
wcoMMlssloN January 4,1995 PAGE 10
@bhom opened the pubtk testimony and issued the invitatbn to spa&.
m desiring b addrsss the Commtssbn on this topic, Chairman Wafshons dosed and offered the applicant an opportunity far a closfng statemant.
conditioned. ed hi rennarks by stated that he hopes the Commission wfff approve th
Chairman Wstshons he item for discussion among the Commission members
Commissioner Nielsen i replied that if the entire aibwsd to have th widths, they would domfn 8 and ha monotonous.
The applicant, Mr. Chambars, corn t he understands t r garages are required br
aesthetics; however it will not preci te three cars. He hopes to
provide tandem bays where two cars will one of the doors. Ms. Woods stated
that this design woutd be accsptabfe to s
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the tandem replied No. The appfkant must prov doors may be 40 ft. deep in order to be 20 ft. deep to accommodate only one vehk
iusbnary housing only. Ms. Woods . garage. The dspth behind one of the The depth behind the second door would
Commissioner Niaben inquired if the ga in the building square footage.
Ms. Woods replied Yss. If a tandem ga could not exceed 3,500 s.f.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how f the units will ba p&mitt tandem garages. Ms.
Woods replied that the ordina two covered standard es for each unit. Each of the
units in Village “0” will have es, two of which may be tandem.
Commissiinsr Compaa s at he can support the staff rscommsndatbn.
by Commissbnar Nobfe, and duly
iutbn Nos. 3675 and 3676, rscom
7 based on the findings and sub#ct to the conditions con
modifkatbns contained in addendum dated January
January 4,199S whkh was included in the packet.
3. CT 93-04 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “L.” “M: “N.” l .’ “R: AND 7” - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdfvidsd six large par&s into 288 singb family residentfaf lots
(minimum 7,500 s.1.). two mutffpfe family rssidenftat lots, one Community Servkes bt, one Recreational Faciiitbs bt, one Day Care facitii lot, one Racreatbnaf Vehkfe Storage lot, and 1 i opm space bfs on a 267.7 apre site bcatad south of Poinsettia Lane (fctrmsrfy Caniib Way) extension, wsst of Melrose Avenue extansbn, and east of El Fuerte extensbn, in m PC zone, in Locat Faciiitbs Management plan Zone 18.
Tsrri Woods, Ass&ate Planner, reviewed the background of me rsqusat and stated that CT 93-04 is a iD 4
request for approval of a Tsntattve Tract Map to subdivide six large parcets into 280 single family lots, two
PLANNING COMMISSION January I,1995
.,‘s PAGE 11
muWe fm kcr, one community servbea lot, one recreatbn tacilitlea lot, one day care lot, one RV StOrwO bt, ud 18 open spolce lots on a 267.7 xre site. Villagea I,” “M,” “N,” l Q,” ‘R,’ and T are
g0fWfally bCa8d on the east and wide side of the Melrose Drive extension and south of Poiw b, in
the southern poftbn of the Rancho Carrilb Master Plan.
Ms. Woods stated that Villages “M,” ‘0,’ and “R” are.designed as standard bt single family neigh with lots ranging in size from 7,580 s.t. to 48,140 s.t. Villagee “L” and “N’ are multiple family bM and only the lots will be created with this Tentative Map. Village “T” is the community services lot and will only be created ‘with tie Tentative Map. In addition, 18 open space lots will be created to preserve 118.7 acre6 as open space,
Ms. Woods showed slides of the bcatbn of the various villagee. She ako showed how Village “0” fits into the southern portion of the map. She stated that me Commission will see some of the villages again, hut not all of them. Villages “t” and “N” are me multi-family lots. This Tentative Map will create the bt and the Commission will see them again for another discretionary actbn, depending on whether they will be sales or rental units. Villages “M,’ “0,” and “R” are single-family, standard bt subdivisions. This map creates the 288 single-family lots. The Commission will not see these villages again. Lot #lo4 is the RV storage facility lot. This Tentative Map creates the lot. As conditioned and designed, the RV storage facility is in place and designed and the Commission will not see this bt again. The day care site on Lot
#105 and the recreational facilities bt on #108 both require a Site Oevetopment Plan to be processed in the future so they will come back to the Commissbn as part of the SOP process. Village “T,” which is the
community services lot, will house something along the lines of a church, so it will come back to the
Commission as part of the SOP process,
Ms. Woods reptied that this project is consistent with the general plan and the required open space is being set aside pursuant to me master plan. The project is also consistent with the master plan. The general plan estabtishes uses and densities and the project is in conformance with the densities allowed by the general plan and the master plan. The project is in conformance with the Hillside Development Permit. Villages “M,” “Q,” and “R” are consistent with the general design criteria of the master plan, including view preservation, setbacks from Melrose, and noise mitigation. No noise mitigation measures or harriers are required along Melrose Orive or Poinsettia Lane for Villages “M,” “Q,” and “R.” Villages “Ma and “Q”
contain panhandle lots and are being allowed in an effort to limit the amount of grading, to reduce impacts
on nattve habitat areas. All panhandle lots have been designed in accordance with the panhandle section
of the R-l ordinance. Emergency access has been provided only at Redwing Drive, pursuant to Council
action on the master plan. Village “Q” complies with me special park conditions required by the master plan. In addition, four of the lots have been designated specifically for single-story units. 15% of this project will be single story.
Ms. Woods repfled that tfte project is consistent with all open space requirements and all nv infrastructure improvementas, tacitiiee, and services, will be provided similar to that which was discussed on Village “w previous@ That includes all access (Melrose or Poinsettia Lane) and sew81 service.
This project wiil be mad in seven phases. Phase I includes a portbn of Village “Q” as wall as the day care community facility, the RV storage Site, and me community services site. Portions of Village “Q” will also be devebped in Phases II and IV. Village “R’ will be devebped in Phase Ill; Village “N” in : Phase V; Village f'~tv in Phase VI; and Village “M’ in Phase VII. Villagecl “M,” “Q,” and “R” are being designed as single-family standard bt neighborhoode. They are being designed in compliance with all the R-l standards. Staff has established design guidelines to ensure compatibility with the neighborhood. The applicant has requested that all garage be approved as three-car facade garagw. Staff ti not support this request and has recommended mat 20% of the garagee be two-car facade garagea. ThL would create more openness in the front, provide for more design flexibility, incrm the landaq#ng along the street, and break up the design of the architecture. The two-car facade garages were discussed in Village ‘0” and me same would apply to rnw villages.
c
PLANNING COMMISSION January 4.1996
.I
PAGE 12
MS. Wooda staM that the design guid8Iines aIso cov8r acc~~soty structur8s. f-, drainag8, the park design district, second dwdling units, and the minor mcdifkWons. She discussed the d8sign ot the AV storage facility and stated that there will be lush landscaping along El Fuerte and a masonry w8il about halfway down El Fuerte, moving south from Street “Q-A.” At that point, the wall st8p$ back and b a chain link fenC8 which is imrisible due t0 th8 tree& The nearest hom0S Sit 130 ft. above the RV Storage site, about 660 ft. away. Those homeown8rs Would be a8 to SW the tape Of th8 ‘&i&S, 8v8n though extensive landscaping will be provided.
Ms. Woods stated that m8 proj8ct is ConSktCmt with all cod8s and ordinances and no additional environmental impacts are anticipated. Staff recomm8nds approval.
Chairman Welshons inquired if m8 applicant has received m8 addendum. Ms. Woods replied Yes.
Commissioner Erwin inquired why Exhibit QQ is being added on m8 addendum. Ms. Woods replied that it was not actually necessary and COUICI be del8ted.
Commissioner Erwin stated that th8 word “Carlsbad” needs to b8 capitalizsd on page 3 of Exhibit QQ.
Commissioner Erwin inquired why all stre8ts do not need to be 60 ft. wide. Mr. Muon replied that all streets, with th8 exception of cul-de-sacs, will be 60 ft. wide. The ordinance allows cul-de-sacs to be less than 60 ft. dU8 to the topography and to ensure a good design.
Commissioner Nielsen inquired if this is approved tonight, will m8 Commission haV8 an OppOrtunity to review Villages “M,” “Q,” and 7” again. Ms. Woods replied that the Commission will not see them again if they ace built as they are being proposed.
Commissioner NMs8n inquired what will happen it the applicant decides to build second dw8lling units.
Ms. Woods replied that the Commission would have no reason to review the designs unless the second dwelling units will b8 used as part of th8 inclusion@ housing requiremerrt. In that case, the Village “F
SDP requires Planning Commission approval.
cOmmiSSiOn8r Nielsen inquired if that means th8 density can be increas@ by 50% as long as the second dwelling unit is not used to fulfill th8 affordable housing quota. Ms. Woods replied that is correct.
Chairman Wekhons invited the applicant to speak.
Chris Chambers, Contin8ntal Homes, 12636 High Bluff Drive, San Dbgo, addressed the Commission and Slated that h8 agrws with m8 statl recommendation with one exceptiOn. H8 Would like p8rmiSSiOrI for
three-car garagee, due to th8 large lot size. The market is becoming very insistent on three-car garages.
He stated mat m8 RV bt aWofrns to the master plan and has not changed since m8 master plan was approved. He has spoken with residents adjacent to Village “IT and due to their recommendation, h8 has
agreed to construct Lot WI1 as a single-story unit it, by me time, this go8s to City Council, a compromise has not been worked out to help buffer the views. He was just alerted to their concerns during the holidays and th8y are trying to work out a compromise at this time.
Chairman Welshons inquired if the appikmt wanta a condiin tOr Lot #2Ol or if he m8r8ly wants t0 g0 on
record that it an alternative solution is not reached by th8 time this goe6 to City Council, th8 unit will b8
single-story. Mr. Chambers replied that he is just wants to go on record. He is confident that an
agreement will b8 finalised by m8 time this got36 to me City Council.
C0mmissioner Erwin inquired if m8 adjacent pperty own8rs h8v8 m4 opWn of making m0 determination. Mr. Chamb8rs replied mat they will make the determination. Ii they don7 like me propowl he makee, h8 has promised mat th8 unit will be singl840ry. H0w8Ver, he wantis t0 continue exploring alternatives that will COmpl8tely Mode their WWS of m8 bt3 in Village “R” . 2
-
PLANNING CGMMISSIGN January 4,t995 ,, PAGE 13
Commisdorm~inquka)~~applicentwan~l10036mrwdoor~~wmurs80K. &Chant&s replied mat is comet
CommissionerEmlninqui~H~~icanthasanyproblemwith~EnhibitOQorrttw~ sheet. Mr. Chambers replied that h8 ha no probiem.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if m8 appltcanrs original concerns with m8 conditions would carry ov8r to
this hearing. Mr. Chambers repIi8d Yea.
Commissioner Compas inquired how much of a probi8m would be created by having 20% of the garages as two-door. Mr. Chambers replied mat it makes me home harder to sell. Buyers currently are insisting
on three car garages. In his experience with move-up projects, three-car garages are a major issue.
Commissioner Savary inquired if m8 apptiit feels mere will be any monotony with three-car garages. Mr. Chambers rep&d that m8 street scene will not be straight str88ts with thre8-car garages. Some of m8
single-bay doors will be ottset to avoid monotony.
Commissioner Savary inquired if some of m8 garages will be side-loaded. Mr. Chambers replied No, but there would be some doors offset by a wall.
Chairman Welshons opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
There being no persons desiring to address m8 Commission on this topic, Chairman Weishons declared the puMic testimony closed and offered the applicant an opportunity for a closing statement.
Mr. Chambers concluded his remarks by requesting approval of the project, per his comm8nts.
Chairman Welshons opened m8 item for discussion among the ~mmission members.
Chairman Welshons requested staff to respond to m8 applicant9 request for three-car garages. Ms.
Woods replied that the design guidelines require three-car garage8 to be offset. A lot of homes have
three-car garages. Some projects in Carl&ad have been built with 103% three-car garages and
complaints have been received about th8 monotony.
Chairman Welshons inquired it the third door could be turned sideways. Ma. Woods repfied No. That ia
why staff has proposed a twxUoor facade with an ability to park three cars.
Commissioner Monroy inquired how much offset is needed. Ms. Woods replied one ft.
Commissioner Monroy inquired if m8 third door could be offset by 6 ft. Ms. Woods repIi8d mat it would b8
hard to design b8cauwa all thre8 cars would us8 th8 same driveway.
Commissiorrn Erwin mi* w8 should leave in m8 20% two-door requirement as proposed by staff.
Commissioner Cornpea agre8a with Commissioner Erwin.
c” -
PLANNING CGMMIBSON January 4,1998 PAGE 14
Am Matbn was made by Commissiiner NleIsen, and duty seconded, to adopt Planning Commiseii Resolution Nos. 3708 and 3707, recommending approval of CT 93-04 and the Village “M,” “Q,” and ‘R’ Design Guidelines, based on the findings and subject to m8 Conditions contained therein, including m8 modifbatkrw contained in addendum dated January 4.1995, deleting m8 corr8ctbn to Exhibit QQ; staff memo dated January 4, 1998; and m8 capitalizatbn of the word Qrlsbad” on page 3 of Exhibit CG. VOTE: 7-o
AYES: Chairman W&hone, Commissioners Compas, Erwin, Monroy, Nietsen, Noble, and
Savaty
NOES: Non8
ABSTAIN: None
.
.
Wayne, Assistant Planning Director, passed out design guidelines for small bt subdivisbns w of the new Commiss@ters did not receive when they were appointed. He also passed ding a Planning Commission workshop and the establishment of subcommi
if Mr. Wayne had any information to Share on the
will report at th8 next meeting.
Commissioner Erwin wcu 88 a future agenda item with an u 8 Batiquitoa Lagoon Enhancement project.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, m8 Regular meeting ot journed at 850 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director
BETTY BUCKNER Minutes Clerk
Hofman Planning
Associates
Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis
February 16, 1995
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
RE: CITY COUNCIL HEARINGS FOR CONTINFNTAL HOMES TENTATIVE MAPS
CT 93-4 Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q” & “T”
CT 93-8/PUD 93-7 Ranch0 Carrillo Village “0”
CT 93-7/PUD 93-6/SDP 94-l Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “F” , “G” & “P”
Honorable Mayor Lewis
This letter is written on behalf of Continental Homes who respectively requests a continuance
of the above described applications from the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting to the
March 7, 1995 meeting. Continental Homes is making this request for the following
reasons:
1. A minor issue has recently arisen relating to the impacts of the project on five
homes located adjacent to the southern boundary of Village Q. These
homeowners would like us to look at providing a better landscaping buffer
between our project and their homes. A two week continuance would allow
us to meet with these homeowners to try and resolve any issues they may
have. Our site planner has looked at this issue and has indicated that our
project could provide more buffering to these people without the need for
major modifications to our plan.
2. Due to the holiday on February 20, 1995 we will have insufficient time to
adequately prepare our presentation for the hearing.
3. Due to prior scheduling conflicts the principals of Continental Homes will be
unable to attend the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting.
2386 Faraday Avenue l Suite 120 l Carlsbad l CA 92008 l (619) 438-1465 l Fax: (619) 438-2443
k. -
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to call me if you have any
questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Mike Howes
cc Ray Pachett
Marty Orenyak
Michael Holzmiller
Chris Chambers
Wi 11 iam Daugherty
2600 La Golondrina
Representing the Audubon Society
Dear Mayor and Council,
As you can see from these photographs, during periods of heavy rain,
the Carrillo valley becomes flooded behind the earthen dam located at
the west end of the development. Flooding occurs even though there is
no paving to prevent water from being absorbed into the ground. This
is due to the terrain which slopes toward the valley from the north,
east and south. The vast amount of pavement associated with this
development should increase storm water runoff by a factor of ten or
more.
As the Audubon Society has stated previously, we do not concur with
-$ the proposed storm water containment approach. We believe the check
and diversion dam, and retention basin design approach to be wholly
inadequate to contain, or control the huge amount of water and pollu-
tants that will pour into the valley from Palomar Airport Road, Mel-
rose, El Fuerte, Poinsettia and the local streets which will cross
and surround the stream bed.
The Valley is a watershed for the Batiquitos lagoon. As such, the
water quality is of great importance to the wildlife of the lagoon and
along the watercourse of the creek.
We do not believe that the heavy metals, hydrocarbons and other toxics
and pollutants associated with heavily traveled highways can be con-
trolled without the inclusion of concrete channel and sump containment
systems around the perimeter of the riparian habitat. This system
would capture the initial, highly contaminated, runoff from the roads.
Such a system would greatly reduce heavy metal contamination of the
water table and the high levels of hydrocarbons which normally collect
on the surface of the water, eventually leaching out along the stream-
bed or flow out into the lagoon. Periodic sump cleanout and toxic
materials disposal must also be considered in the design and future
costs of the storm drain system.
However, if you approve the developer’s proposed method of storm water
containment, Audubon recommends that toxic monitoring of storm drain . ..-- .-__
effluent be a requirement levied upon the developer and a bond be
posted to assure that remedial construction may be accomplished if
flood and pollution control measures prove inadequate. I would not
like to have Carlsbad taxpayers liable for any failure of the City
to impose adequate flood and nonpoint source pollution control provi-
sions upon developers.
Audubon further recommends that because of the number of endangered
and threatened species on the site, that approval of the development
be withheld until the regional and local habitat management plans have
been approved.
SOCIETY
P.O. BOX 4BO OCEANSIDE, CA 92049-0480
February 17, 1995 J
Carlsbad City Council
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ref: Pub1 ic Hearing
1 . CT 93-4 - Ranch0 Carri 1 lo Vi 1 lages ‘IL”, “M”, ‘IN”, ‘IQ”,
“R”, & “T” 2. CT 93-7/PUO 93-6/SDP 94-1, Ranch0 Carri 1 lo Vi 1 lages ‘IF”,
“G”, & “P” 3. CT 93-8/PUD 93-7, Ranch0 Carri 1 lo Vi 1 lage “0”
Dear Mayor and Council,
As you are aware, during periods of heavy rain, the entire Carrillo
valley becomes flooded behind the earthen dam at the west end of the
valley. The flooding occurs even though there is no paving to prevent
water from being absorbed into the ground and keep it from percolating
down into the water table. This is due to the terrain which slopes
toward the valley from the north, east and south. The vast amount of
pavement associated with this development should increase storm water
runoff by a factor of ten or more.
As the Audubon Society has stated previously, we do not concur with
the proposed storm drain, water containment, approach. We believe the
check dam, diversion dam, and retention basin design to be wholly in-
adequate to contain, or control the vast amount of water and pollu-
tants that will pour into the valley from Palomar Airport Road, Mel- rose, El Fuerte, Poinsettia and the local roads which will cross and
surround the stream bed. The Valley is a watershed for the Batiquitos
1 agoon. As such, the water quality is of great importance to the wild-
life of the lagoon and along the watercourse of the creek.
We do not believe that the heavy metals, hydrocarbons and other toxics
and pollutants associated with heavily traveled highways can be con-
trolled without the inclusion of concrete channel and sump containment
systems to capture the initial, highly contaminated, runoff from the
roads. This system would preclude heavy metal contamination of the
water table and reduce high levels of hydrocarbons which normally form
on the surface of the water, eventually leaching out along the stream-
bed or flow out into the lagoon. Periodic sump cleanout and toxic ma-
terials disposal must also be considered in the design of the storm
drain system.
Consequent1 y, if the proposed method of storm water containment is
approved, Audubon recommends that toxic monitoring of storm drain ef-
fluent be a requirement levied upon the developer and a bond be posted
to assure that remedial construction may be accomplished if flood and
pollution control measures prove inadequate. I would not like to have
Carlsbad taxpayers liable for any failure of the city to impose ade-
quate flood and nonpoint source pollution control provisions upon
developments.
Sincerely,
cc: Gail Kobetich, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Phil Oshida, Chief, Wetlands Section, EPA
Cal. Michal Robinson, District Engr., USA Corps of Engineers
Bill Tippits, Field Supervisor, Department of Fish & Game
February 17? 1995
Mayor Bub Lewis:
I am writing to express my objection to an item in the
Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “L,M,N,Q,R,T” Plan. Specifically
the Recreational Vehicle Storage lot.
To my knowledge the R.V. storage lot was moved from the
original location, midway down El Fuerte to the bottom of El
Fuerte, where another street will be intersecting. This
storage lot is approximately two acres in size.
Those of us who live on the canyon rim above El Fuerte do nat
want their view degraded with a vehicle storage lot. After
all, we naid lot premiums when we purchased our homes in
order to obtain a view of something other than a storage
area.
We can all appreciate the city’s attempt to remove R.V.s from
our streets, they are eyesores and need to be parked
elsewhere. It would seem the correct location for a storage
lot is in an area zoned for industry, not residential.
The developer of this tract seems to agree. He has pushed
this storage lot to the far edge of his property, attempting
to cause the minimum impact on the properties he would like
to sell. But, he put it in our “backyard”, and that is not
right!
Perhaps amending the code that requires the developer to
provide R.V. storage may be a solution. Why must the storage
lot be in the developing parcel. Could they be reouired to
provide space in an area more suited for storage than a
residential community?
I will not be able to attend the meeting February 21. Thank
you for reading my letter. I trust YOU will consider nur
objection to the storage site and find an alternative that
will be more considerate of the effected home owners. ,~/TgL$gg7g’ q lrn Weathe d ford
,.;'6403 El Pato Ct.
L/ Carlsbad. CA 92009
cc: Julie Ann Nvgaard
Ann Ku1 chin
Ramona Finnila
Matt Hall
February 20. 1995
Carlsbad City Council Carlsbad, California
re: Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
From: Homeowners Meadowridge, Carlsbad, Ca.
The homeowners of La Costa Meadowridge, in particular those on Avenida Christina are concerned about the potential loss of their northern "view" by the proposed development of the Ranch0 Carrillo property by Continental Homes as described in plans of February 11, 1995.
Of particular concern is the proposed height of those units planned for Ranch0 Carrillo Villages "R" and "N" which appear to be located directly North of the Meadowridge units on Avenida Christina.
Based on the contour maps of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan of March 11, 1992, the difference between the level of Avenida Christina and the proposed grade level of the roadways in Village "N" is on 20-25 feet. If this is a correct reading of the plot plans, the planned units of Village "N" would significantly hinder and probably
obstruct the previously undisturbed "view" of those units of La Costa Meadowridge located on Avenida Christina.
The undersigned homeowners of La Costa Meadowridge request that grade levels of Ranch0 Carrillo Villages "R" and "N" be adjusted to prevent their intrusion into the "view" of the units of Meadowridge. To state this request more simply, we the undersigned
do not want our "patio views" of Echo Carrillo Villages.
blocked by the roofs and buildings
We would like to be heard on this matter at the City Council
Meeting on February 21, 1995 and authorize Thomas Fitzgerald to
speak on our behalf.
-NAME r, h ADD&ES\! n i
:t c +4
t ..f’ . . . . . . . ..-..- __
‘8: CI 3 ** 2 P uf
i
-
r --
b
-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 93-4 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES "L", "M" , @IN", "0" "RIB &"T"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 21, 1995, to consider an application for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 6 large parcels into 288 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet), two multiple family residential lots, one Community Services lot, one Recreational Facilities lot, one Day Care facilities lot, one Recreational Vehicle Storage lot, and 18 open space lots on a 267.7 acre site on property generally located south of the Poinsettia Lane (previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of the Melrose Drive extension, and east of the El Fuerte extension, in the PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18, and more particularly described as:
Portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Terri Woods, in the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, extension 4447.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Continental Homes PUBLISH: February 11, 1995
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
-9- A
n
1 RANCH0 CARRLLO VlLLAGES..“k, lU$& Q F?,-y 1 CT 93-04
.
I
.
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(Form A)
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notlde
CT 93-04 - Ranch0 Carrillo Villages "L", "M", "N", "Q", "R" and "T"
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
Assistant City Man--
January 31, 1995
Oate
. .
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carisbad will.hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00
p.m. on Wednesday, November 16,1994, to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Tract
Map to subdivide 6 large parcels into 266 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square
feet), two multiple family residential lots, one Community Services lot, one Recreational Facilities
lot, one Day Care facilities lot, one Recreational Vehicle Storage lot and 16 open space lots on
a 267.7 acre site on property generally located south of Poinsettia Lane (previously Carrillo Way)
extension, west of Melrose Avenue extension and east of El Fuerte extension, in the PC zone, in
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 16 and more particularly described as:
Portion of Sections 16 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino
Meridian Base according to Official Plat thereof, City of Carisbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after November 10, 1994. If you have
any questions, please call Terri Woods in the Planning Department at (619) 436-l 161, ext. 4447.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 93-04
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO ‘L”, “M”, “N”, ‘Q”, “R” & ‘T
PUBLISH: NOVEMBER 4,1994
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
Tlwd
4
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES "1; N; 0, I?,-T" CT 93-04
i
&ELS
f
SECURITY PAC NTL BANK PO BOX 90610 PASADENA CA 91109
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LIMITED 438 CAMINO DEL RIO 1128 SAN DIEGO CA 92108
MICHAEL&ANN BEAUCHEMIN 2606 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&CATHERINE DAUGHERTY 2600 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&MARY AMSTUTZ 13169 AUTUMN HILL LN HERNDON VA 22071
HARRY&LINDA MC DEVITT 6404 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GRANT&JANET DUNLAP 6401 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GENEtINGER HUBER 6407 EL PAT0 CT ,CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASS C/O THE FIELDSTONE CO 14 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
LA COSTA HOTEL&SPA CORP 2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETER&JENNIFER SARA 2604 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES C SHIELDS II C/O EADS COREL 2532 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS&JOANNE PARADISE 2526 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLYN MUNDY TRUST 6402.EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD,CA 92009
JAMES&PAMELA WEATHERFORD 6403 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERTdtRENE VANHORNE 6409 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
PONDEROSACOUNTRYHMOWNRS 23382 MILL CREEK DR Xl20 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653
ARNOLD&HOLLY MICHELS 2602 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DADE&ALYSSA MYRES 2530 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALVIN&DIANE PIERCE 6406 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDWARD&MAUREEN MOWRY 6400 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ED&LYNN SPENCER TRUST 6405 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAELCCHRISTINNA HALL 6411 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
, C h
tiELS
JULIA TESCHLER 6413 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&VALSA STEPHEN 2510 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEON&FLORENCE GREENBERG 2629 OBELISCO PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&ANN HILL 2517 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN&CINDA COE 6417 LA PALOMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBfTERRIE PURDY 2612 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&BARBARA OERUM 2618 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
S FROSTROM 61 G GIBSON 2624 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
XENNETH&WINONA TAIT 2625 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
L?ROPERTY OWNERS
JAMES&KIMBERLY GRANT 2514 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL GITTLEMAN 2508 LA GOLONbRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS&LENORE HENDRICKSON 2502 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT&MONICA KLATT 6415 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
S BROSTOFF & T WHITE 2608 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTdtCARMELA MCNIFF 2614 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
FERNANDO&LYDIA MONROY PO BOX 2442 DEL MAR CA 92074
FRANKLLENORE CARR 2626 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ST
WM&GRACIELh EWASKIW 2623 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
WERNER&DORIS MARKUS 2512 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&KAREN WILL 2506 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
H G & MAUDIE STEVENS 2500 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETHGTHRESIA MAY 6414 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREYCPAMMY GLICKMAN 2610 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAWRENCE&ROSE FIRSTEN 2616 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREGORY KUSNER 2622 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENT ANDERSON 2627 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAN&CAROLINE COOPER 2621 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 2
,
LAB'ELS
DALE&ELSIE GARDETTO 2619 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
WE&CAROL HORSCHEL 2613 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY&JAN GRELL 2607 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN CUTLER 2601 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 .
ROBT ETHERTON
ST
ST-
ST
ST
FRANK&RUTH ETHERTON 11506 25TH ST NE LAKE STEVENS WA 98258
MICHAEL FARR KATHLEEN KENNEDY 2712 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNdrNONA GRIFFITH 2718 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC&LUCILLE OLSON 7089 MURILLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
W FELBER 61 L VOSS 6430 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
..ROPERTY OWNERS
MEL&PHYLLIS LEVIN 2286 BOCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARRY&MARTHA GRACE 2611 LA GOLONDRINA ST. CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL&SALLY RINGWOOD 2665 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
R DUGGAN & J SAROFF 505 SABAL'LAKE DR YlOl
LONGWOOD FL 32779
BRIAN&MARY MCKEON 2708 LA GOLONDRINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&BARBARA RUECXL 2714 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
BLADELINA GALINDO 2720 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN SWOPE 6426 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PHUC HUU TRUONG MY-DUNG THI NGUYEN 6432 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
DENNISGARLENE SHERREITT 2615 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HAROLD&MARJORIE GOLDEN 2609 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS&KATHLEEN EVANS 2603 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&IRMA CAMPBELL 2704 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD&LYNN KILLION 3694 COPPER CREST RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
MICHAEL&JANET PUCCIO 2716 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIKHAIL&ELLEN ALAKA 2722 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KARLE JOHNSON 6428 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN&JANET CARRO 6428 EL PERICO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 3
.
rSUhLS
-
ZROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
ALSEHILA XHANIJOW 2713 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETER&XARIN BRAEMER 2719 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARSHALL&LAUREN CLOW 2703 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA .92009
BRIAN&YONG FENLON 2816 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&MICHELLE LEWIS III 2828 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL HOFFER RONNA WEBB 2840 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
BETTILOO OLSEN 2715 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY&CYNTHIA CESENA 2721 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNCRIXI BAGLEY 2701 LA GOLODRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&DALYS STEVENSON 2820 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMdrBARBARA HESS 2832 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALTERS TRUST 2844 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&MICHELLE MONTROY 2717 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA BARRON 2314 RUE ADRIANE LA JOLLA CA 92037
CLARENCE&MARY BOYD 2812 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&LYNN BRADLEY 2824 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENT&SHARON LARSEN 2836 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GOSHTASB HAMSAYEM JOHN&BETTY BRUCE ROBERT&BRIDGET WUESTE PARIZAD BAGHEGOULESTANI 2902 CACATUA ST 2849 ESTURION ST 2445 LA AMATISTA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92014
JXbBARBARA RYAN JERRY&GLENDA GRIFFIN DAVID&HAZEL HORWITZ 2841 ESTURION ST 2833 ESTURION ST 2825 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 4
JOB NUMBER 12004C ZLABELS PROPERTY OWNERS
NEIL&DIANE OPENSHAW 2819 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRANK&FRANCES MESSANO 2813 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&ADELE LAPADULA 2809 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
OMAR ORR DAVID&DONNA ORR 2805 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD&SALLY TADLOCX 2801 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DWIGHT&DONNA JOHNSON 6327 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THEO&VIRGINIA ERLER 6319 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA '92009
MICHAEL SALOUR LVG TRST 6311 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHL&JENNIFER STEIDLEY 6303 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
TERRY&MARGARITA HOLT 1464 9TH ST MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
ROY&DANA PRICE 6312 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&DIANNE HURT 2802 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD&KATHLEEN BLOX 2806 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLENLLORI FISHMAN 2810 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DIANE BERRY 2814 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLEN SPOUSTA 2818 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMESbtEMIXO HINXLEY 2822 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&JULIA GUTHRIE 2826 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
J&FREDERICA ROSENFIELD 2830 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEONORA REPP 2834 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRIS&CYNTHIA PHILLIPS 2840 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
HERMAN&ADELINE WADLEY 2844 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
NEIL&ANITA TIPPLE 2848 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
BEHZAD&JALEN SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT DOUGHERTY 2858 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARTHUR&JOAN MARXOVITS 3002 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN&SHEILA TREBBIN 3006 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 5
h
* LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
CECIL&LYDIA DUNCAN DAVID&TERRY SITTNER 3010 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL GOFORTH PO BOX 3104 CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARJORIE XAHN 3014 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLAN&BARBARAHARRIMAN' WM&EVELYN BUSTER. GERCPATRICIA MACALUSO 719 DAKOTA TRL 781 SW BAYPOINTE CIR 3020 UNICORN10 ST FRANKLIN LAKES NJ 07417 PALM CITY FL 34990 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ESCH FAMILY TRUST 3022 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
SATISHtPADMINI XADABA 3024 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHAS&PATRICIA OSTERHOUT 3028 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILBUR&LIDA STEPHENS J MEROD t M OBERLANDER C&N GRAZIOLI & L GRAZIOLI 2939 CACATUA ST 2933 CACATUA ST C/O GRAZIOLI CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 PO BOX 3333-186 ENCINITAS CA 92024
DOM&MARIANNE CANDELA HYUNG&YOUNG YANG ENGEL FAMILY TRUST 2921 CACATUA ST 2915 CACATUA ST 2909 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA CORTINA FRANXLMILLICENT SARVARY W&IRENE DJOBADZE 2903 CACATUA ST 1232 MONCADO DR 4200 PARXSIDE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 GLENDALE CA 91207 CARLSBAD CA 92008
VERNONfBERNICE PLANE 2914 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&JENN POPPLETON 2920 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&JULIA XLAERICH RUBY XEWLEY 2928 CACATUA ST 1736 CATALPA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
COLE FAMILY TRUST NEIL&SUSAN RAPPAPORT 3454 E FLORENCE AVE 3102 UNICORN10 ST , HUNTINGTON PX CA 90255 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DON&JANET MAYHUE 298 GREENWOOD PL BONITA CA 91902
RICHARD&ANNE SPOONER 2936 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&KAREN FORINO 3106 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 6
tiELS
ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST 3110 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS&JUDITH CATTELL 6573 BIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&LOUISE MC BREEN 5960 N HUMINGBIRD PARADISE VLY AZ 85253
ROBTMARGARET SCHERNER 6559 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA -92009'
VERN&WANDA MARTIN 12521 SAFFORD ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92640
H&JUNE ZIMMERMAN 1220 SHERIDAN RD WILMETTE IL 60091
XULJIS FAMILY TRUST 6541 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
AXEL XORNMARION PLACE 6516 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&SHARON NEMMERS 2304 DUNSTAN ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054
r'ROPERTY OWNERS
MLEE&JAC COTTERMAN 6571 VIA .BARONA. CARLSBAD CA 92009
BEN&BETTY SIGLER 6563 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALEX&MAYA ZELITSXY 6557 VIA BORONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JERRY&ALICE FARROW PO BOX 9000-137 CARLSBAD CA 92018
JAMES&DOROTHY OHARA 6545 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACQUELINE BURNS 6539 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALDdrORA RENALDI PO BOX 9926 SOUTHLAXETAHOE CA
JOB NUMBER 11348
FRANK&ALICE FREDA 6575 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&JANICE BALOG 6567 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARL&JOYCE HILL 6561 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERICA M FREDERICK 6555 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHLGCYNTHIA XOOPSEN 6549 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&IRENE RUBEN 8900 KEYSTONE ST 1066 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46240
MARILYN STOVER 6512 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLAIRE FITZPATRICK TRUST 1732 CATALPA RD 95731 CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&CAROL XURZEJA ANNE DHUNJISHAW 6520 VIA BARONA 6524 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 7
-
*LABELS .
CARLOSCVERA ARECCO 1225 BENT OAK TRL ALTAMONTE SPR FL 32714
HOWARD&JOAN MEES PO BOX 428 BONSALL CA 9.2003 .
MICHAEL&LINDA DOOLEY 6540 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN J WYMAN AMY BOWERS 6546 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
THEODOREtLORNA JACK 6552 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORTHEAST SAVINGS CONS 4250 EXECUTIVE SQU X210 LA JOLLA CA 92037
HJ&WANDA WARNER 6538 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
HELEN NOONAN 6544 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&LYDIA CARVER 6541 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS
ALAN BLACKBURN 5134 BARRACUDA CT WALDORF MD 20603
ARTHURGBERNICE TILTON 6532 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
IA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM HANLON 6548 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOIE&JILL POWELL 6554 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LA COSTA MCA C/O PACKARD&LOOMIS INC 5670 EL CAMINO REAL F CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMCMADELINE SLATTERY 6540 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHEILA BARROW 6545 CORTE MONTECSTO CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY SCHNEIR 6539 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
DNEWKXRK&D KAMERER 6530 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIELhKRISTINE JUNG HIROSH MXMURA&XIYOKO 1683 ORANGE BLOSSOM WAY ENCINITAS CA 92024
DARLENE DORSEY 6544 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LORETTAfGERALD HOFFMANN CHRISTINE HESS 6550 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&CECELIA MICHELA 6556 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY ELLEN NEWETT 6542 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD&MARILYN TRAUB 6543 CORTE MONTECXTO CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&MARY HARRISON 6537 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 8
LABELS
EM&RACHEL FITZGERALD 6.513 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALE WEDGE JR 6518 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVENS FAMILY TRUST 6524 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLEN WATSON 6528 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
EUGENE&CHRISTINE HUMPHREY JEFFREY BRADLEY 6515 CORTE MONTECITO 6514 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN BRODSXY 6516 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETER STEVENS 6520 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
TOD&REBECCA OBENALIER 1547 PARXVIEW DR VISTA CA 92083
ROBTGJANICE BALOG 6526 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALBERT ADICXES JR LOUIS NEIHEISEL 6530 CORTE MONTECITO ANN&HERB&CARROL VONGAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 6532 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
R GREEN C C DITTMAR RAND&BARBARA SWENSON 6536 CORTE MONTECITO 5645 WHITE MOUNTAIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARTINEZ CA 94553
LAWRENCE®INA RIGGS JOSEPH&MARGARET FROST DAVID&CHERYL FALX 6537 CORTE VALDEZ 6535 CORTE VALDEZ 6539 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP JOHN&CATHY PRAAMSMA VIRGINIA BONAGURA 2584 EL CAMINO REAL 6531 CORTE VALDEZ 6533 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRANCES SCHLACX KEVIN&VALERIE SPOUSTA LEILA HEYLAND 6534 CORTE VALDEZ 6536 CORTE VALDEZ 6538 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALE DALTON 6540 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIAM&SHIRLEY MCPHAIL JOEL GOODRICH 6542 CORTE VALDEZ 6544 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 9
LABELS 2ROPBRTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
FRANXMARLA STOUDEX 1014 CHRIST1 LN FALLBROOK CA 92028
SHARON TOL 6548 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICH&JUDY SEVIER 215 S VALLEY DRIVE MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
JAMES&MARY BROWER 6552 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLINTON PETERSON PO BOX 4136 LX SAN MARCOS .CA 92069
WMtNANCY CAHOONE 6545 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
&LOOMIS INC
SBM CA 92008
CHARLES XNISLEY 6543 CORTE VALDEZ 83 CARLSBM CA '92009
GRANA FAMILY TRUST 6541 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM WEAVER JR 3104 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EMObrYOLANDA PORRO 3106 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD SIVIY 3108 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS&MARGARET FITZGERALD 3110 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
B HOOVER C M MOODY 3112 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN&KATHLEEN FULMER 3114 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORA XNIGHT 3116 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
XENNETHKOLLEEN FLOYD 1346 ORIBIA RD DEL MAR CA 92014
WILLIAM&DONNA SMITH 3120 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD&MARY RIEDEL 6502 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
R ANDERSEN & B TILT 6504 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
SALLY HOPKINS 6506 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009 .
THOMAS&LINDA HARDY 3159 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&LISA BLEVINS 3157 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
FEROL BECKER 3155 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
JOSE&DOROTHY ROCHA PO BOX 9000 CARLSBM CA 92018
TESFAYE HAILEMICHAEL 6508 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 10
JAJms - *
MARY WAITE 6510 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JESUSCIYASAKO FLCRES 1574 VILLAGE VIEW DR ENCINITAS CA 92024
DENISE DCRRICOTT 3109 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
@k&A BURR $Z& ROCXPORT CT LEUCADIA CA 92024
MARGARET WU 855 SANTA ROSITA SOLANA BCH CA 92075
JDLJAYNE LOVIG 3127 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICXY ALDRICH 3133 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RON&CHERYL WOLFE 3139 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
C FITCH&J RRAHER 22801 NORBRRT ST PERRIS CA 92370
-
AOPERTY OWMUS JOB NUMBER 12004C
NORM&DONNA DELANEY E OATESCG QUEEN 6509 VIA OSTRZL 6511 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
.STANLEY LUTY 6510 CAMINO CAPISTRANO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICIA SNYDER 3107 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLE POSLADEK 3113 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHCRONALE MCCLURE 3119 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN MADDOX 3125 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK&PAUL NOLL 3131 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD .cA 92009
SUE SALISBURY 3137 AVENIDA TCPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAUREL PLAGGE 3143 AVERIDA TCPABGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&FRANCES MARROW 3105 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARILYN HENLEY 3111 AVENIDA TCPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTLINESE SPOTTS 3117 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEOClKIl4 DOUILLARD 3123 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIELLRITA TRIST 3129 AVENIDA TCPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUISE PAUL 3-5 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
)JrtLIAM SWAFFORD 3t41 AVENIDA TCPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DoM&MARI CANDELA 2921 CACATUA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 11
2ROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
HECT&SUSANA AGUIRRE 3152 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRIS OSTERGAARD SHARON KENNEDY F&PENELOPE OSTERGAARD 3154 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3150 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
KORBER FAMILY TRUST TIM CONNETT 2240 LAGOON VIEW DR 3156 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARDIFF CA 92007 CARLSBAD CA 92009
. KERR FAMILY TRUST 833 E MARGARITA ROAD RIALTO CA 92376
PAUL MILLER PAUL MILL RALLENCT TRAVERS 26042 DANA BLUFFS E 1 NIMITZ DR D CAPSTRNO BCH CA 92624 CEIBA PR 00735
JON1 ETUE JEAN&ROS MARTIN W NEFF&K RUTHMAN 3120 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3124 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3128 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARMDOdtANA PALOMO 3132 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM WIEHL LAQUETTA MONTGOMERY 2465 PRIMROSE AVE 3140 AVENIDA OLMEDA VISTA CA 92083 CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROL NAISMITH JUDITH LAIRD 3144 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3148 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOANN MICHAEL MOHAMAD HALAWI 3154 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3158 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA .92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD SPOONER PATRICIA SNOW LYNNE SEGUINE-SPCONER 3155 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3159 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&BERNA KORETKE 3152 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
BILLIE SCHAFER 3156 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EVELYN SORENSON 3157 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 12
LABELS -. * _
.
R CISSEL&M STEVENS 3153 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CXARUNAVARMA 2659 AURALIE DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
G&JENNIFER GOTTESMAN 3141 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARL BOGDAN 3135 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY SMITH 4365 SHASTA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008
NM&ANNETTE MALONEY 3123 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
TAKAKYOKO CHICHIDA 3117 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDCJEANNETTE PASCHALL 1932 LAHOUD DR CARDIFF CA 92007
SAIEDtNORANIEH ATAIE 3105 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
,iXOPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
JAMES&DIANE PHILLIPS 2022 VISTA GRANDE DR VISTA CA 92084
DAVID&TAM1 HOCKER 3151 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREG&CLAUDIA BARNETT 3143 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EUGENE ZADRA 3137 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICH&LORRAINE YBARRA 3131 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
S GREENWALTLP GARDNER 3125 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAN&TERRI CORNELL 3119 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
R VERRY&K LACKEY 3591 WINDSPUN DRIVE HUNTNGTN BCH CA 92649
RICH&JOANNE MOFFETT 3145 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009.
H&LYNNE MARGENAU 1102 DEER RUN N PINE BLUFF AR 71603
MARK ANDRADE 3133 AVENDIA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN SALATA 3127 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92008
SIMS FAMILY TRUST SANDRAMAES 3121 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMCWENDY LANDRY 3115 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL NETTCJANET SYMONS JAMES MADERE 3109 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
R VERRYhK DAVID SPIELMAN 3103 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 13
,ROPERTY OWNERS
-
LABbLs JdB NUMBER 12004C
- . _
CHARLINE KENNEY 4910 MCCONNELL AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90066
MYLTREDA BARKER 361 WEATHERLY TRAIL GUILFORD CT 06437
BRIAN DICKTER 4515 SALISBURY ST CARLSBAD CA 92008
BETTY YABU C/O MARY WATANABE 7501 W 91ST LOS ANGELES CA 90045
MILLGJUBICA TOMICH 3071 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
LA COSTA MCA C/O ES ROSENFELD 16133 VNTRA BL 1270 ENCINO CA 91436
SELMA FROMBERG TRUST 3069 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTIN&THERESA BROWN 3067 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARYfMICHELE MAY 6549 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
LLbtRUTH NELSON 6547 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET ADELIZZI 6545 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
CPLSHARON OWEN 6543 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL MORGENLANDER LINDA MORGENLANDER 6541 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
B&JALEH SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALE CARDER 6550 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANGELO&SANDRA GALASSO 6548 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
STANELY KELTS 6546 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
CULVERLDELCRES NELSON TRUST PATRICIACCHAS CONNOLLY 1611 W MYRTLE AVE 6542 PASEO ADELANTE PHOENIX AZ 85021 CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&MICHIKO KAHL FRANK&VERA FEDERICO 1941 SUMMIT DR ESCONDIDO CA 92027
RON&SANDRA FREEMAN 3016 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 276 DELPHI CIR LOS ALTOS CA 94022
D&B GOSSETT RUTH MC MICHAEL 1940 LEUCADIA SCENIC CT LEUCADIA CA 92024
ELWCODdrLINDA HIGLEY 3018 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
TONYdrCOLLEEN AUSILIO 5437 CHERRY AVE LONG BEACH CA 90805
PAGE 14
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
PAUL CORIGLIANO NOEL WOOD ROBThMARGARET FALLON 3020 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 6934 ELLINGHAM CIR XF 3028 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALEXANDRIA VA 22310 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOALUKIKO MILLER DAVID&LAURA JOHNS SHELLIE EDMAN 247 AVENIDA ESPERANZA 3030 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3034 AVENIDA CHRISTINA OLIVENHAIN CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JULIA FISCHER NANCY SEXTON
4202 E CACTUS RD X10307 MICHAEL BARRETT PHOENIX AZ 85032 3036 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOLORES RUHLAND WILLIAM HARD BRADLEY RUHLAND 3042 AVE CRISTINA 112 3111 CALLE FUEGO CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
CYNTHIA STALHEIM KEITHCCAROLE ARMITAGE 3044 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3048 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALE&JULIE BLASIUS 3040 AVFNIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
B LOCKWOOD&K JAY 3046 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MAXINE ALLEY 3052 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARIANN BILLINGSLEY PO BOX 1897 SAN MARCOS CA 92079
STEVEN FISHER LONNA HOWARD 3054 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3058 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTtSHARON RIEDY BARBARA CASTLEBERRY DONNaKELLY DAGGETT 3056 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3060 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3064 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&KIMBERLY BROWN JERRY&ALICE FARROW SHELDON BARRETT 3062 AVENIDA CHRISTINA PO BOX 9000-137 6541 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009 _ CARLSBAD CA 92018 CARLSBAD CA 92009
WM&BETH EICHHORN MAR10LCMBARDo KARILYN MONTANTI 6543 CALLE VALPERIZO ANTON10 LOMBARD0 6547 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009 100 VIA NAVARRO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREENBRAE CA 94904
PAGE 15
LABELS .'ROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
.
JOHN QUAKENBUSH 6549 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHAS&IRMA LACKEY 6551 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEORGIA HAMILTON PO BOX 370774 MONTARA CA 94037
FRED&MAE HILDEBRAND 7502 JEREL CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
. HAZEL NETHERTON 6546 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009
RWINSRAISA DORFMAN 1159 HAVERSTON ROAD LYNDHURST OH 44124
RAULGCATHY ROJAS 6542 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&DIANA FRANKLIN 2749 VIA DE LA VALLE Xl00 DEL MAR CA 92014
RICH&GENEVIEVE BABCOCK 2533 SW MANOR HILL DR PALM CITY FL 34990
CHRISTOPHER MYERS 6537 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN TANNENBERG 6539 VIA ALCAZAR SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ANDREW&MARGIE WILSON 6541 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARBARA HAHLBOHM 6543 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
DUANEbrJANELLE GOODRICK 6545 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBTLANDREA SIEBENS 6547 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOAN PETER 6549 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&KATHRYN NEWMAN 6551 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JENSON FAMILY TRUST 6552 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANNE DEWOLFE 4170 ADMIRALTY WAY 3G MRNA DEL REY CA 90292
DOUGLAS KOSTY 6548 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD.CA 92009
J&A MARK LIVING TRUST 19400 WYANDOTTE ST 5 RESEDA CA 91335
BRENDECKE FAMILY TRUST 25795 DELTA ST MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
MARY MORRIS 6542 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
MJWUZANNE GURLEY 6540 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOCKE FAMILY TRUST . 3070 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
LINDA WEAVER 3068 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 16 .
- -
JOB NUMBER 12004C . LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS
.
MARTIN&MAXINE ALTSHULER 3066 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
EITAN&MIRIAM DRORI 6605 ALPINE WAY YAKIMA WA 98908
KEVIN&CHRISTINE CURRY 3060 CAMI.NO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHARONALTOTT' NORMAN ADLER " 3056 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHtELIZABETH BRAMAN 3054 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH LEHMER 3058 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIEL&KRISTINE JUNG RJUNG & KTINKER 1313 ORCHARD WOOD RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
ROBTdtELIZ SKIBICKI RLT 3046 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBAD CA 92009
RON&AI MINKOW 2112 ARGYLE DR PLAN0 TX 75023
MEADOWLARKCCHURCH 1832 MEADWLRK RCH RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD X2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD X2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
JOS&RAETTE STEPHENS 1009 EL VALLECITO VISTA CA 92083
STEPHEN KOTFICA VERA TAYLOR 1716 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
VA&BARBARA FISCHER 1562 HERMOSITA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MARY BURGESS 1704 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
KEN&ISABEL MAYES 1700 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
STEVEN ELLIOTT KAREN FRASER 1832 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOS&JOHN BROWER GEOLRUTH BROWER 1828 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
TERRY HENDERSON 1824'TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DE&MICHELLE GILMORE 1820 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MARK&PATRICIA MOYER 1816 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SOPHIA HAYNES LILIA OSPINA 1812 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ANGELO LICCIARDI 125 1lTH STREET DEL MAR CA 92014
LARRY GRISMER 1817 VIA GAVILAN SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ROD&MARTHA MILLER 1800 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LARRY&KAREN ROSEFELD 1803 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 17
. .
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C .LitBELS
JOHN&RACHEL SUYDAN 1807 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DONALD ECKARDT 3157 PALM CREST TER. SAN MARCOS CA 92069
B VESSAL&K NAZANIN 1830 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JON&MARILYN FOWLER 1818 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JESS GONZALES BETTYHENRY 1813 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA
KATHRYNJUDD 1831 TOWHEE'ST SAN MARCOS CA
92069
92069
RICHARD SAUERHEBER 1826 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ROBTfLORRAINE BARNES 1814 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MICHL&JANE KURTH 1819 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DAVID BRATTEN 1719 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOHN&JANICE HART 1822 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MARV&DOROTHY WEST 1810 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JAMES KILEY ELIZABETH CADELL JOAN THOMPSON 1806 REDWING ST 1744 REDWING ST 1738 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
STEVEN&PAMELA SAVAGE GREG&MERCEDES WILSON GERARD ANDERBERG 1732 REDWING ST 1726 REDWING ST RHONDA BRANT SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 1720 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
,PAUL&KATIEWHEATLAND MARY BOYLES LARRY GRISMER 1714 REDWING ST 1708 REDWING ST 1819 VIA GAVILAN SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PATRICIA VANDERBECK JAMES&ANNA BULAY 1713 REDWING ST 1719 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DON&SUSAN DENNY JAMESCLILIA STURGES LEBEDEFF FAMILY TRUST 1725 REDWING ST 1731 REDWING ST 1737 REDWING ST SAN IYARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 18
h -- .
. - LABELS . *
R&S MASON TRUST 1743 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JR&DEVINE PURDY 1827 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GEORGE HELVIN 1911 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 112B SAN DIEGO CA 92108
PROPERTY OWNERS
PHILLIP&WENDELLEN CRABTREE 1745 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
WALTER&SUSAN MOISE 1727 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CHRIS ESTRADA 1917 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
EDWIN LASERCALLAN SALONER 7638 MAR AVE LA JOLLA CA 92037
TA SABINA CT
FDIC C/O KATIE KRUSE PO BOX 7549 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658
GENTRY WIMPEY INC 9754 WHITHORN DR HOUSTON TX 77095
JOB NUMBER 12004C
CARLMARCELLA KOLATA 1823 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LTLNANCY CARLIN 1905 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GABORCILONA REH
M NAMIKAS TRUST ET AL 1551 SANTA SABINA CT SOLANA BCH CA 92075
CARRILLO RANCH0 PRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L RL 616 SAN DIEGO CA 92108
JACK E ADAMS INC J E ADAMS INC 1234 ORANGEWOOD DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
PAGE 19
-LAbELS
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 1128 SAN DIEGO CA 92128
MIKE HOWES HOFMAN PLANNING, ASSOCIATES
2386 FARADAY AVE STE 120
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C
PROPERTY OWNER
CARRILLO RANCH0 PRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L R 616 SAN DIEGO CA 92108
CHRIS CHAMBERS CONTINENTAL HOMES 12636 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
JOB NUMBER 120046
PAGE 20
GEORGE W MANNON
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
801 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING
5201 RUFFIN RD STE “B”
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITYO~
FACILITIES FOR CITY CLERK
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
1290 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S WLCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
105 W RICHMAR AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NO HILL ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
330 GOLDENSHORE #50
LONG BEACH CA 90802