HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-21; City Council; 13041; Rancho Carrillo Village OCIT” OF CARLSBAD - AGEN
AB # ~~o‘i/ TITLE:
3 CT 93-()8/pm 93-07 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0” -
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the Cii Council direct the Cii
Attorney to prepare documents APPROVING the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development
Permit for Ranch0 Carrillo Village “0’ - CT 93-08/PUD 93-07.
I ITEM EXPLANATION
On January 4, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
approval with modifications (7-O) of Ranch0 Carrillo Village ‘0’ (CT 93-08/PUD 93-07) located
south of Poinsettia Lane (extension) and west of Melrose Drive (extension), in Local Facilities
Management Zone 18. No persons provided public testimony during the hearing on Village ‘0”.
On January 12, 1995, the Housing Commission reviewed the associated affordable housing
component of the project (Ranch0 Carrillo Village ‘F’ - CT 93-07/PUD 93-06/SDP 94-01) and
recommended (7-O) that the Council approve the project. The site is located in the Planned
Community (PC) Zone and is subject to the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan,
as well as Final EIR 91-04 and Hillside Development Permit 91-17 which were processed
concurrently with the Master Plan.
The project is located on a 19.3 acre site just east of the Ran&o Carrillo Park site. The
proposed subdivision consists of 51 single family lots ranging in size from 5,890 to 13,500
square feet. Access to the site will be provided via future Melrose Drive and Future Carrillo Way.
Architectural elevations and floor plans will be processed through the Delayed Architectural
Review procedure established in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. The Delayed Architectural
Review process is intended to allow the processing of a Planned Development Permit without
floor plans and elevations. Floor plans and architectural elevations are subsequently reviewed
by the Planning Commission, at which time the Planning Commission’s review is focused
specifically on architecture, without opening the tentative map up for m-evaluation and additional
conditions. Detailed design guidelines have been prepared to ensure that a quality development
is submitted during the Delayed Architectural Review process.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s lnclusionaty Housing Ordinance, 15% of the proposed
dwelling units (9 affordable units) must be provided for lower income households. The applicant
is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units off-site in a combined affordable project
in Ranch0 Carrillo Village “F”. The Site Development Plan for Village ‘F” (CT 93-07/PUD 93
08/SDP 94-01) will be reviewed and acted upon prior to review of this project. This will ensure
that all affordable housing requirements are satisfied and all incentives agreed to prior to review
and approval of this project. This project is conditioned to comply with the Affordable Housing
Agreement requirements of the Village “F” affordable housing project.
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan - MP 139(E)
which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within Local Facilities Management Zone 18. The direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR
91-04) for the Master Plan approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. Staff prepared an initial
study to analyze potential environmental impacts of the project and conducted additional project
level studies including soils contamination studies and a drainage study. These studies provide
more focused and detailed analysis. Staff determined that no additional impacts over those
1 addressed in EIR 91-04 will occur and therefore, the project is in prior compliance with Final EIR \
PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. / 3; 0 ‘f 1
91-04. The recommended and applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been
incorporated into the project design or are included as conditions of approval for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT
As discussed in the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan, all major capital facilities will be
provided within this Zone, concurrent with development. A financing plan that comprehensively
addresses the provision of public facilities has been submitted for staff review, but as yet, not
presented to City Council for action. The financing plan will establish the precise mechanism
for financing all necessary facilities for Zone 18. The developer intends to privately finance the
construction of the affordable units and is requesting no financial assistance from the City at this
time.
I.?.‘
The action before the Council will have no direct fiscal impact on the City. The uttimate
development of the Ran&o Carrillo Master Plan area, including village “o”, will have a variety
of fiscal impacts on the City including costs and revenues. The financing mechanism for all
capital improvements will be determined by the Zone 18 financing plan. No determination of
: --thespecificcosts and benefits has been made at this time.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675 and 3676
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 4, 1995
4. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated January 4, 1995.
EXHBlTl
,
n
City of Gd8bd 5
CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGE “0” I CT 930OWPUD 93-07
h -
EXHIBIT2
1 II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3675 I
A RESOLUTION OF THE P LANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACJ? MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AND DEVELOP 51 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, WEST OF
MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION AND SOUTH OF
POINSE’ITIA LANE EXTENSION IN THE SOUTHERN
PORTION OF THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
CASE NO: CT 93-08
10
11
12
13
14
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 south, range 4 west, and a
portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 south, range 3 west,
San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
15
16
I WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 17 II
18 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of November,
19 1994, the 30th day of November, 1994 and 4th day of January 1995, hold a duly noticed
20 public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
21 1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering ah testimony
22 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
23
24
25
26
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
27 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CI’ 93-08, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. The project is consistent with the City’s Generai Plan since the proposed density of
3.9 dus/acre for Village “0” is within the density range specified for the Village and
the open space area has been provided as indicated on the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Pian.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
3. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
a. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City
Council finds that Sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition,
the Planning Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed
on the final map that building permits may not be issued for the project
unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and
building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains
available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of I
the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as
they apply to sewer service for this project.
b. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
C. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and
payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public fkilities will be
available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
4. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since 1
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General j Plan.
5. Based on the “Initial Study” prepared for this project the Planning Commission
determines that the project is within the scope of EIR 91-04 on file in the Planning
Department, and there are no additional significant adverse environmental impacts
associated with the project, therefore, no further environmental review of this project
is required. Ail feasible mitigation measures ldentiikl in EIR 91-04 have been
incorporated into or Imposed as conditions on the project.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
h A
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued
availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the
project.
Village “0” exceeds the growth control point of the RLM designation of 3.2 du/acre,
with a density of 3.9 du/acre. The increase in density is consistent with the Growth
Management Ordinance based on the following:
a)
b)
d)
The Ranch0 Caniiio Master Plan permits a density in Village “0” of up to
3.9 du/acre as the maximum number of units allowed by the Master Plan;
1,816, is below the 2,091 units allocated to Zone 18 by the approved LF’MP.
That the project will provide sufficient public faciiities for the density in
excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City’s public
facility plans will not be adversely impacted.
That there are sufficient Villages within the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan
approved at densities below the control point to cover the units in Village “0
above the control point so that approval will not result in exceeding the
quadrant limit.
That ail necessary public facilities required by this chapter will be
constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need
for them created by this development and in compliance with adopted City
standards.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
The Tentative Tract Map satisfies all requirements of Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code (except as may be modified for affordable housing incentives) and
the State Subdivision Map Act.
The proposed subdivision implements the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan MP 139(E)
for Village “0” including product type and density, in compliance with the approved
hliiside development permit; the design criteria; the setbacks from Meirose Drive;
the Special Park Design criteria; open space and trail requirements; and Master
Plan infrastructure requirements.
The proposed project’s design and density of the development portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the area, because the Tentative Tract Map meets all City
standards and the proposed residential densities are consistent with the General Plan
PC RI30 NO. 3675 -3- @
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
and the Carriiio Ranch Master Pian. ‘Ihe surrounding villages and adjacent ~
properties are either existing residential development or are planned for residential j
development, therefore, the proposed residential development would be compatible /
with the area. j
Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or iqJurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, because the Tentative Tract Map for Village “0” meets all required City
standards and ordinances, ail public facilities and services will be provided and
adequate setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby community park, multiple
family residential and single family residential uses and Meirose Drive have been
incorporated into the project design.
The proJect’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the proJect and does not dominate the proJect, because the iocai streets within the
subdivision would be curvilinear and follow the naturai contour. They would also
be 51-60 feet wide with curb, gutter, and 5’ utility easement and sidewalks provided
on one side only for single loaded streets and on both sides for double loaded streets,
and will connect via Carriiio Way to Meirose Drive, which is designated as a 126 foot
wide prime arterial in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
That the proJect is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the
Inciusionary Housing Ordinance as the developer has been conditioned to enter into
an Affordable Housing Agreement to provide and deed restrict dwelling units as
affordable to lower-income households. .
The 9.0 affordable housing units required for this proJect under Chapter 2185 of the
Carisbad Municipal Code will be provided pursuant to SDP 94-01, Resolution No.
3682.
That the proJect is consistent with the City’s landscape policies as it has been
conditioned to comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual.
That the design and improvement of the tentative map as conditioned, satisfies ail /
requirements of any applicable specific plans, Title 20 and 21 of the Carisbad 1
Municipal Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious
public health problems.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with ’
easements of record or easements established by court Judgement, acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision. In this connection, the City Council has approved, via the Carriiio
Ranch Parks Agreement, alternate easements for access or for use that will be
provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired
by the public.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,
19. That subject to the exceptions contained in Section 6674.4 of the State Government /
Code, the property is not subJect to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land i
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) and the parcels resulting from the (
subdivision would be too small to sustain agricultural use according to the /
provisions of Section 6647.4 of the State Government Code. !
20. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive
or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision.
Planning Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Approval is granted Ear CT 93-08, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “J”, dated September
7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this proJect, Exhibit “E”,
Architectural Data Sheet, shall be revised to reflect all applicable requirements of
the approved Village “0” Design Guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file
in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions, and approved by the Planning Director or City
Engineer.
Approval of CI’ 93-08 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 93-07 and SDP 94
01. CT 93-0s is approved subject to all conditions of approval of PUD 93=07/HDP
91=17/EIR 91-04 and SDP 94-01, Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3676,3506,
3503, and 3682, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning
Department.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the 1
Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map shall
reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be submitted to ;
the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or ’
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500’ scale mylar of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director j
prior to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets :
within and adjacent to the project. / I
This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be ’
approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer
service is available to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer
determines that seeker facilities are available at the time of application for such-sewer
permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be
placed on the final map.
This approvai shall be null and void if the property subJect to this approval is not
annexed to the City of Carisbad CPD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Additionally, annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grad&, building,
or other permit. (Deadline could be extended for good cause as determined by the
City Manager).
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2,
1991) and as amended from time’to time, and any development fees established by
the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other
ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system of facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities
fee dated July 13, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
Prior to final map, the developer shall record the approved parks agreement. The
applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Can-Rio Ranch Parks
Agreement. Park land shall be dedicated in accordance with the Parks Agreement.
Further, prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within Lots l-10
of this tentative map, shall prepare and record a notice in a manner meeting the
approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney that this property is subject
to noise, lighting and glare, and general activity impacts from the nearby Can-iiio
Ranch Community Park site.
AR grading within the Special Design Park District shall be periodically watered to
control dust.
Access and utilities to the Carriiio Ranch Community Park site shall be available
at all times including during construction as approved by the City Engineer and Fire
Marshal. The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that
utilities remain available to the park site at ail times during development unless
prior approval is secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be
provided during all phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the
Community Services Director.
Water shall be provided by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
‘This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 5,1991, I
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
The following note shall be placed on the Final Map. “Prior to issuance of a building
permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the property owner shall pay a
one-time special development tax in accordance with the City Council Resolution No.
91-39”.
4
PC RESO NO. 3675 4%
- -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid
this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project
without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land use
designation for this development is Residential Low-Medium (RLM). The density
permitted for this proJect is 33 dwelling units per acre.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the General
Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of
these parcels must also include all parcels under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code”.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a Notice of Restriction
placed on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of
Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract Map by Resolution No. 3675 on the real
property owned by the declarant. Said notice of restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions
of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the
notice of restriction. Said deed restrictions may be modified or terminated only with
the approval of the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the
City of Carlsbad whichever has final decision authority for this project.
To seryice this development the proJect shall provide bus stop facilities on Meirose
Drive at locations subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District
(NO), if such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a minimum
include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench
and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the basic
architectural theme of the proJect and said design shall be subject to the approval
of the Planning Director and North County Transit District
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21.
22.
23.
24.
-
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced, legible version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing.
As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant shall include
a reduced, legible version of the Village “0” Design Guidelines on a 24” x 36”
biueiine drawing.
Prior to recordation of any final map, issuance of grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the following shall be met: (1) The deeding of an acceptable
school site to the San Marcos Unified School District if it is determined that a
school site is warrant&, and, (2) A financing plan approved by San Marcos Unified
School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school
facilities in Zone 18. As provided for in the Zone 18 LPMP, if any reimbursement
and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement,/financing plan shall
provide a mechanism to do so.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
S~eciflc Onsite Conditions:
25.
26.
27.
28.
At the time of recordation of final map, an open space easement shall be recorded
over Lot 52 and portions of Lots 1-14 (which are slopes). Any encroachment or
development on this easement, including but not limited to fences, wails, decks,
storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways, and landscaping other than approved as
part of this proJect as shown on Exhibits “A” - “J” shall be prohibited.
Ail open space areas, slopes, and landscaped areas shall be maintained as outlined ,
on the Landscape Maintenance Exhibit “H”. I
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name /
pol& subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
Elevations and floor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the Delayed
Architectural Review standards established in the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan, and
shall comply with the Village “0” Design Guidelines as shown on Exhibit “P”. After /
reviewing these plans and determining that they are in conformance with the j
approved Design Guidelines, staffwill present the floor plans and architecture to the
Planning Commission. per the process described in Title 21.45.160. Prior to or
concurrent with the delayed architecturai review process, the applicant shall decide
whether Lots 6 and 49 will be restricted so as not to permit construction of a
dwelling unit (in order to comply with the building separation requirements of Section 21.45.090(5) of the Carisbad Municipal Code). If it is determined that Lots
6 and 49 will not be developed, prior to final map, an open space easement shall be
recorded on these lots. If these lots are retained as open space, the Lots shall be
\’ PC RESO NO. 3675 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
29.
30.
31.
32.
C -
improved with landscaping and other amenities as approved by the Planning
DirectoF.
The applicant shall construct the rectv&on vehicle storage facility on Lot 104 in
conformance with Exhibit “L”. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for
review and approvai by the Pianning Director, an agreement which wiN establish the
timing and phasing of construction of the Recreational Vehicle storage facility. At
minimum, 1,020 square feet of Recreational Vehicle storage space shall be available
prior to occupancy of the first unit within Village “0” as approved by the Planning
Director.
Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall implement the special Park
Design District standards as outlined in the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Plan and the
specific design standards as outlined in the Village “0” Design Guidelines (Exhibit
“F).
All fences and wails for this proJect shall be in substantial conformance with the
fencing and wall details as well as the approved locations for each as shown on the
Landscape Concept details, Exhibits “G’ and “J”. Noise wails adJacent to Meirose
Drive on Lot 52 shall be required for noise attenuation. Ail required fencing and/or
wails shall be constructed by the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy on a unit-by-unit basis.
Prior to final map, the applicant shall establish Master and Village homeowner’s
associations and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&&
shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items
shall be included in the CC&k
(A)
(B)
(C)
0)
0
No private development shall be permitted within open space Lot 52 or within
open space easement areas on Lots 1-14 inclusive.
1 I
The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual owners of
property may replace original fencing on their property, however, such
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall design for
the proJect as graphically shown on Exhibit “J”. The replacement of any
fences or wails within this proJect must be consistent with one of the fencing
or wall design types as shown in the Master Plan.
Common ownership and maintenance of Open Space Lot 52. I
AR open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and shall be maintained
as indicated on Exhibit “H”.
Subsequent additions to homes by individual homeowners, must be
architecturally compatible with existing structures as well as the surrounding
PC RESO NO. 3675 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(F) Master Homeownds Association maintenance of the Recreational Vehicle
Storage lot (Lot 104).
33. Prior to approval of the F’inai map, the applicant shall dedicate Lot 52 to the
Homeowner’s Association as permanent open space. This stipulation shall be
included in the CC&Rs.
34. Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts must comply with the Design guidelines
for this project pursuant to Exhibit “P”.
Landscane
35.
36.
37.
38.
42.
. . . .
. . . .
The applicant shall prepare a detailed lanclscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of grading
or building plans, whichever occurs first.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the
Planning Department.
Ail landscaping shall comply with the landscape requirements of the Carriiio Ranch
Master Plan and the City‘s Landscape Manual.
The deveioper shall include top-soil preservation and rollback and redisking on
cut/fill slopes and open space areas proposed for native revegetation to ensure
stability and growth subJect to the approval of the City Engineer and Planning
Director. The top-soil shall be stockpiled on-site and protected against erosion to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
AU landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
Ail building pad and street areas of Village “0” that are graded under HDP 91-17
and remain vacant or undeveloped for a period of more than 6 months after the
grading operation is completed shall be seeded to reduce erosion and visual impacts.
If grading is phased, the six months time period shall start at the completion of each
individual grading phase.
PC PESO NO. 3675 -lO-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Simrs and Identification
43. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or address shall contrast to their background &or.
44. Any signs proposed for this deitelopment shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
45. Ail signage shall be designed in conformance with the Ranch0 Carriiio Master Pian.
Signage shall be located in conformance with Exhibit “I” Landscape Concept Pian,
unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Environmental
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
This proJect shall comply with ail conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit “I”)
which are required as part of Environmental Impact Report for the Ranch0 Carriiio
Master Plan EIR 91-04, certified by City Council on July 27,1993.
Prior to occupancy of the first unit of Village “0”, the revegetation/iandscape plan
for the southern portion of Lot 52 shall be implemented as shown on Exhibit “F as
approved by the monitoring biologist.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, a detailed
soils contamination report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review
and approvai by the City Engineer. The detailed soils contamination report shall
include a soils contamination remediation plan. If remediation is determined to be
unnecessary, the report shall so indicate.
Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct noise
attenuation wails consistent with the noise study prepared by Recon dated June 2,
1992, and as shown on Exhibits “A” - “D”, and “G”, dated September 7,1994, on file
in the Pianning Department. Noise mitigation measures shall comply with Pianning
Department Policy 17 or other adopted City noise policy in place at the time of
building permit.
Prior to final map the applicant shall submit a detailed noise study addressing
necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Village “0”. Prior to issuance of
building permit: (1) the interior noise ieveis shall be mitigated to 45 dBA CNEL
when openings to the exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings are
required to be closed to meet the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be
provided, and, (3) ail useabie exterior space above the first floor shall be mitigated
to the adopted City standard.
PC KEZSO NO. 3675 -ll-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within the boundaries of
this tentative map shaii prepare and record a notice in a manner meeting the
approvai of the Pianning Director and the City Attorney that this property is subject
to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Paiomar Airport,
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in ail sales and or rentai
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs
shall be approved by the’Pianning Director.
Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to riparian habitat and threatened/endangered
plant species will be mitigated under the review and supervision of the California
Department of Fish and Game, the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers and any other
applicable resource agency. The mitigation plan must be approved by the involved
resource agencies prior to the recordation of final map or issuance of grading
permit. Grading plans shall reflect the resource agencies review and approval. If
modifications are required by the agencies, the applicant may be required to apply
for an amendment to this Tentative Map and/or Planned Development Permit or
apply for new discretionary permits.
Ail outdoor lighting shall be directed away from open space areas where the
potential to disturb wildlife exists.
Prior to approval of the final map, the appiicant/deveioper shall be required: (1) to I
consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the
impact of the project on the coastai California gnatcatcher and; be issued any
permits required by the USFWS.
Open Space Lot 52 as depicted on Exhibits “A” - “J” shall be retained as permanent
open space. A portion of this open space lot shall be maintained in a natural state,
restored to a naturaiized area or buffer area- Disturbance of natural habitat is
limited as provided in EIR 91-04.
Prior to grading, the applicant shall retain the services of a quaiiiied biologist to be
on-site when sutwying and staking of native habitat impact areas occurs. The
biologist is to ensure that the limits of grading are flagged or otherwise marked to
assure that impacts form grading and construction do not exceed those approved as
part of the proJect.
Grading of natural habitats should not occur during the nesting season. Ail grading
within 500 feet of coastai California gnatcatcher-occupied habitat and within 200 feet
of riparian habitat occupied by the least Reii’s vireo and/or the willow flycatcher should be restricted to the period betweeu September 1 and February 15. Prior to
grading permit the applicant shall conduct least Bell’s vireo and flycatcher surveys
of potential habitat.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -120
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
58. All grading wlthln the special Design Park District shall& perlodlcally watered to
control dust.
59. Prior to issuance of any grading permits for village ‘0”) the applicant shall show
evidence to the City Engineer of a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers.
60. Prior to issuance of any grading permits or final map, whichever occurs first, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Director a data
recovery program for SDl-9846.
61. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or flnal map, whichever occurs lirst, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval to the City Engineer a Blparlan
Mitigation plan. The Blparian Mitigation Plan may include participation in the
Cfty’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitlgatlon. shall be accomplished to the
satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et.
seq. of the California Fish and Game code and Section 404 of the Federal Clean
Water Act. If such plan includes on-site mitigation the applicant shall submit for
revlew and approval by the Planning Director a data recovery program for SDl-
4691B if disturbed by the mitigation plan.
62. Paleontology:
8. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the i
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to ;
issuance of a grading permit. ! /
b. A qualil’led paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections 1
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some /
of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect 1
matrix sampl-es for laboratory processing through fine s&ens. The
Paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during
the grading process.
The paleontologlst shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluatlon and, if necessary, salvage
artifact&
c.
d.
e.
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3675
All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with
a research interest in the materials, such as the San Dlego Natural History
Museum. ,
Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologlst and the grading
actlvltles of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
t’g
-13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Affordable Housing
63.
64.
65.
This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required inclusionary units shall be constructed concurrent with the project market rate units, unless both the
final decision making authority of the City and the developer agree, wlthln an
AfTordable Housing Agreement, to an alternate schedule for development.
Prior to the approval of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict 9.0 dwelling units as
affordable to lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units. The
Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to be submitted by the Applicant
to the City. The agreement shall be approved by the Community Development Director and Director of Housing and Redevelopment. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding to all future owners and successors in interest.
Prior to final map approval, an Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted
by the applicant to the City, approved by the Planning Director and Director of
Housing and Redevelopment, and completed and recorded as a deed restriction on
those individual lots or units of the project which are designated for the location of
low-income affordable units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding 1
to all future owners and successors in interest. I
The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to include but not be limited 1
to just, the following:
(a) @)
(9 (4 60 (0
(s)
@I
The number of inclusionary lower-income dwelling units;
The unit sizes (square footage) and the number of bedrooms per
inclusionary dwelling unit;
The location of the inclusionary units; The schedule for production of the inclusionary units; The tenure of affordability (useful life of the dwelling unit); Incentives (i.e. density increases, standards modifications, and financial resources) provided by the City; Rules and procedures for setting rents, sales prices, and marketing of dwelling un&; Terms and conditions governing the initial sale and resale of for-sale inclusionary units; and 0) An administration, monitoring, and management plan.
EnPlneerinn Condltlong:
66. The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
67. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually
PC RESO NO. 3675
\’
-14-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
-
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility
shall be placed in the CC&Rs.
This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on a separate non-
mapplng data sheet of the dinal map.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of Clty Council approval unless a final map is recorded. If any final map is
recorded for this project prior to the tentative map expiration date, then the
expiration date of the condltlonally approved tentative map shall be extended in
accordance with Section 66452.6(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. If a final map has
not been recorded for this project, then an extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City
Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemni~ and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act.
Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits
required.
Prior to final map approval or issuance of any grading permit, the owner of the
subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to flnal map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City codes and standards.
Upon completion of any phased and/or pro)ect specific grading, the applicant shall
ensure that an ‘as-graded” geologic plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shall be signed by
both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on
a 24” x 36” mylar or similar drafting film and shaIl become a permanent record.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
Prior to final map approval, the owner of the property on behalf of itself and all of ’
its successors in interest shall execute and record a notice of disclosure aud a hold
harmless agreement on village “0” notlclng any future owners of the presence of a
mltlgated geologic hazard and lndemnlly the City of Carlsbad, agents, officers, and
employees from any action that may arise through any subsequent geologic failure,
ground water seepage, or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur
on or adjacent to village “O”, due’to its construction, operation, or maintenance. A
notice to this effect and a reference to the recorded document shall be included on
a non-mapping data sheet of the flnal map.
No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision
unless an agreement to grade is executed by the developer and the owners of the
affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the agreement to grade, no
grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either amend the
tentative map or change the plan so grading will not occur outside the project site
in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in
accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chapter 11.06.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading as may be required by
the city Engineer.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certlflcate on the flnal map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Melrose Drive and Carrlllo Way shall be waived on the final map.
Some improvements shown on the tentatlve map and/or required by these conditions
are located oflkite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title
or interest The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This conditional approval is null and void if title to said property
PC RESO NO. 3675 -16-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
.1
is not obtained, unless the City Engineer and Planning Director make findings of
substantial conformance without construction of said improvements.
83. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
84. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. Said plans shall include, but not be
limited to the following, which shall be included in the project’s CC!&Rs:
A. The homeowners association shall coordinate the use of the City’s established
program to assist residents with the removal and proper disposal of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
B. Tozlc chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor 011,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertllizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirements as
prescribed in their respective containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface
improvements.
85. Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall provide for sight distance corridors i
at all street intersections in accordance with Englneerlng Standards and shall record i
the following statement in the project’s CC&k
“No structure, fence, wail, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over
30 inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to
encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor
in accordance with City Standards. The underlying property
owner shall malntaln this condition.”
This statement shall also be placed on a non-mapping data sheet on the final map.
86. In accordance with the Ranch0 Carrlllo Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR),
grading of natural habitat should not occur during the nesting season of any
endangered avlan species. All grading within 500’ of coastal California gnatcatcher
occupied habitat and within 200’ or &arian habitat, occupied by least J3ell’s vireo
a-0 PC RESO NO. 3675 -17-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
and willow flycatcher, shall be restricted to the period between September 1 and ’
February 15 of any given year.
Prior to final map approval, dralnage outfall end treatments, for drainage outlets in
areas where a direct access road for maintenance purposes has not been provided,
shall be designed and incorporated into the grading/improvement plans for the
project. These end treatments shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation growth
from obstructing the pipe outfail. Designs may consist of a modified outlet headwall
consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or
radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of
preventing vegetatlon growth directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Prior to final map approval, a Certificate of Compliance and Adjustment Piat No.
444 shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer may require
an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evaluation
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recommended
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to submittal of a grading plan for the project, the applicant shall submit and !
receive approval from the City Engineer for a phased grading map cleariy detailing
the limits and quantities of grading for this project. I
Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements, as required in the :
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)
for Zone 18, shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These !
improvements, unless otherwise modified by the final, decision-making body, shall be /
substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy ~
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
A. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road ! I
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prlme arterial
standards.
l Construction of a median and two lanes in each direction and j
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. /
/ B. Poinsettia Lane - Meirose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary /
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial
standards. 0 Construction of full maor arterial standards from the lntersectlon
with Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village “J” and the school site.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -18-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
92.
c. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 1%
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way wldth.
0 Construction of one lane in each direction from the southerly
boundary of the Master Pian to the entrance to village “I”.
D. Sewer Facllltles, lncludlngz
l 12” main in Melrose Drive
l 12” maln in, or adjacent to Polnsettla Lane
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A 0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
0 Bueua/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
l Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
0 a BuenaISan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
l North La Costa Lift Station
E. Water Facllltles, including:
a A portion of the proposed potable 244nch maln in the future
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
0 The proposed pressure redudng statlon at the southeast comer of
Zone 18.
l The proposed potable 30+xh transmission line in the proposed
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
l A portion of the proposed reclaimed 84nch main in the proposed
alignment of Meirose Avenue.
l The proposed reclaimed 384nch main in the proposed alignment of El
Fuerte within Zone 18. 0 The proposed potable 12” main from Melrose to El Fuerte through
service Area E.
F. Drainage Fadlltles, including:
0 Proposed box culvert under Melrose Drive.
l Detentlon basins, channel and fiood control improvements as
necessary to mitlgate for erosion and protect on site Master Plan and
off site downstream properties from significant impacts.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map,
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the
tentative map and necessary to service the project, including but not limited to:
k Frontage improvements to Melrose Drive, including:
a-> PC RESO NO. 3675 -19-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 No. 3 southbound through lane
0 Southbound bicyde lane
0 Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
0 Street light standards a Landscape raised median
l Landscape area between sidewalk and west right-of-way line
B. A fully actuated traffic signal at the interwxtlon of Melrose Drlve and
Carrlllo Way.
c. Full width street improvements of Carrlllo Way, between Melrose Drive and
“Q-I” Street.
D. A secondary access to comply with City standards including dedication,
grading, 28 foot width of pavement, and any necessaq utilities to be placed
below the pavement.
A copy of all of the above improvement conditions shall be placed on a non-mapping
data sheet on the final map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as provided in
said agreement.
93. Ail conditioned improvements must be specifically shown on the conforming tentative
map exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Fire Conditions:
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
Additional onsite public hydrants are required. /
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts / :
location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval of access, ! driveways and general traffic circulation. /
An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall
have posted Wo Parking/Fire Lane” pursuant to Section 17.04.020, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
2
PC RFGO NO. 3675 -2o-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h
101.
102.
103.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the I
City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush ciearance plan
to the Fire Department for approval.
Plans and/or -cations for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to the Fire Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following criteria:
* 400’ scale * Photo reduction on mylar * At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the
map (not a separate vicinity map) * Maps shall include the following information: Street centerhnes
Street names
Fire hydrant locations
104. Fire suppression arew shall be provided as shown on Exhibit “F”.
105. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall be
evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
106. The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to preparation of the water system improvement plans.
107. The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The developer shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
108. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of application for water service and will continue to be available until time of
-Pam%
109. Sequentially, the developers engineer shall do the following:
Carisbad Municiuai Water ‘District Conditions:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements.
PC RESO NO. 3675 -2l-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department for processing and approval.
C. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the preliminary system layout usage (G.P.M. - D.D.U.) plan for
potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation of improvement
plans.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of January, 1995, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATIEST:
PLANNING DIRECI’OR
PC RESO NO. 3675 -22-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3676
A RESOLUTION OF THE P LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES TO DEVELOP 51 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT OF THE CITY, WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE EXTENSION, IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
CASE NO: PUD 93-07
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 south, range 4 west, and a
portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 south, range 3 west, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of November,
1994, the 30th day of November, 1994 and on the 4th day of January, 1995 hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of the Village “0” Design Guidelines (Exhibit “P”),
on file in the Planning Department. 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,
on file in the Planning Department.
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission j recommends APPROVAL, of PUD 93-07 based on the following findings and / subject to the following conditions: /
Pindines:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the Ranch0 Carrlllo Master plan, the General Plan, and
all applicable adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies as
demonstrated by the project’s consistency wlth all provisions of these documents.
The proposed single family residences at the site location are necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well- being of the neighborhood and the community because the area is designated for residential low medium and residential medium high uses in the General Plan and development is necessary to continue the balance of land uses in the City.
Such single family residential use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity since the project meets all required City standards and ordinances, all public facilities and services shall be provided and adequate setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby community park, multiple family
residential and single family residential uses and Melrose Drive have been incorporated into the project design.
The proposed planned development will meet all of the minimum development
standards and design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.090 and 21.45080 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code, and will be designed in accordance with the concepts
contained in the Design Guidelines Manual as demonstrated by features such as 510
60 foot wide public skeets, adequate guest and recreational vehicle parking, and a
spacious and accessible common recreation area.
The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural topography of the site by providing a variety of setbacks, varying roof line orientations, and landscaping to screen structures as well as enhance slopes.
The proposed project maintains and enhances natural resources on the site through
the preservation of over 1.6 acres of coastal sage and chaparral habitat on the site.
The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site will
be compatible with proposed surrounding development and would not create a
disharmonious or disruptive element to the neighborhood because the proposed single family residential units at a low-medium density range are similar to those
proposed in neighboring areas such as that proposed in Vlllages “M”, “Q” and “R”
PC RESO NO. 3676 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and the proposed residential uses will be designed compatible with the Carrillo 1
Ranch Communlty Park to the north. I
8. The proposed project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well- 1
integrated with the project and does not dominate the project as demonstrated by its I
conformity to all City standards and the development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance as shown ,on the site plan exhibits.
Planning Condltlons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Approval is granted for PUD 93-07, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “J”, dated September
7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this project, Exhibit “En,
Architectural Data Sheet, shall be revised to reflect all applicable requirements of
the approved Village “0” Design guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
Approval of PUD 93-07 is granted subject to the approval of CT 93-08 and SDP 94
01. PUD 93-07 is approved subject to all conditions of approval of CT 93-08, IIDP
91-17, EIR 91-04 and SDP 94-01, Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675,3506,
3503, and 3682, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning
Department.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 13,1993,
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
Elevations, floor plans and building layouts shall be submitted in compliance with
the delayed architectural review standards established in the Carrlllo Ranch Master
Plan, and shall comply with the Village “0” Design Guidelines as shown on
Attachment ‘P”. After revlewlng these plans and determining that they are in
conformance with the approved village “0” Design Guidelines, staff shall present the
floor plans and architecture to the Planning Commission pursuant to the process described in Title 21.45.160.
Prior to occupancy of the first unit within Village ‘On, the eastern 38 acres of Lot j
52 shall be developed as a recreation/open space area wlth amenities as outlined in
the Village “0” Design Guidelines (Attachment T”). This shall include development
of the community trail linkage through Lot 52. Open Space Lot 52, as depicted on
Exhibits “C* - “D”, shall be retained as permanent open space as dedicated in
easement as required pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675. The
‘LB
PC RESO NO. 3676 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
8.
9.
,
southern portion of Lot 52 shall be maintained in a natural state by the Village “0”
Homeowner’s Association. Disturbance of natural habitat shall be avoided.
The floor plans and elevations submitted during the Delayed Architectural Review process shall implement the special Park Design District standards as outlined in
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and the Village “0” Design Guidelines (Attachment
“P”).
The floor plans submitted during the Delayed Architectural Review process shall
indicate compliance with Planned Development Ordinance storage requirements
pursuant to Carlsbad Municipai Code Section 21.45.090(i).
Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the
Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and phasing of construction for the Recreational Vehicle storage facility. Prior to occupancy of the
first unit within Village “0”, at minimum, 1,020 square feet of recreational vehicle
storage space shall be provided on Lot 104 of Village “Q”, unless an on-site
temporary recreational vehicle storage facility has been approved by the Planning
Director.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of January
1995, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Ewin, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD P&G COMMISSION
PUNNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 3676 -4
-. - -
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program -
Exberrl
A. Agriculture
Impacf. Possible soil contamination from agkukal chemicals formerly used or stored on the site.
Mitigation. I) Submittal of soils report with mitigation recommendations, if neassary, to City Planning Department and 7, uxy Health Dqarbxmt. 2) Mitigation to be made a condition of
tentative maps approved under the Master Plan. 3) Report QI completed remediation to be
submitted to City Planning Department and County Health Department upon completion.
Master Plan Xmpiemmtation. A soils report for the propaty owned by Continental Homes and
the property being dedicated for park purposes has bar! raze+& by the Planning Department.
Any mitigation required for soils contaminah Wcated by this report will be remedied prior
to issuance of a grading permk Impacts may occ4~ if additional pesticide concentrations and/or hazardous waste makals or containas axe fkmd during development, in which case the referenced mitigation would be apphable. Soils reports. for other proper&s within the Mastcr Plan will be required with the submittal of tmtathe maps.
checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master PIan. 2)
Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Completion of construction of each tentative map subdhjsion.
Responsible Partp. 1) City Planning and &g&ring Departments.
Sunctions. 1) -No tentative maps to be approW without nccusaq conditions. 2) No find maps, building or grading permits issued until raudiation report submittal.
fmpact. Possible conflict between earlier sfag~ of Master Plan development and continued agricultural use of other portions of the site, including agricultural chemical USC, irrigation runoff, and odor.
Mirigtztiun. Each tentative map must pnwide a list of @&mance and impact criteria specified
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffaing, to ensure the phasing development is
compatible with continued agricultunl use.
Afusfet Plan Impkmentation.’ TheR Will be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consistent with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use. 3O
checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each ta~tative subdivision map Mda the Master Plan. 2) Approval of eacfi tentative map under the h4aster Plan. 3) Caubuetica of eaffi tentative map subdivision. -
Responsible Putty. 1) City Planning and bgineaing Deparmrems.
Sunctions. 1) No tentatiie maps to be ?pprqnd without nemsaq anrutitiwts. 3) ~SpcctiOn
of construction by grading inspectors. No buildihg permits issued until perkmancc criteria art implemented.
B. Biology
Genemi iVoze. To c&e the impicmentation of all mitigarion for potaltial impacts to biological resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior to
approval of each tentative map, as appmpriate, show evidence to the Clty Planning Department
that a qualified consulting biologist has been &cd to monitor all relevant mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, supekse implementation of mitigation, and tile a
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upon completion of major
components of biological mitigation reqkments.
Impact. Implementation of the Master PIan will directly impact wetlands on-site and, by
construction of a sewer line in the right Of way for Carrillo Way to the west, off-site.
Miiigation. The applicant for the project shall either restore and a&ance riparian habitat at an
appropriate area ratio to impacts or shall participate in a city-wide mitigation program through the City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requkunents of Section MOO es seq. of the California Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Federal Clean Waur Act.
Master Plan Impieme~n, No mitigation required for off&e under sewer alignment
currently proposed by applicant north of Cakllo Way alignment. Such alignment has nq
wetland impacts.
checkpoints. Approval of the Rrst tentative map or grading permit afkting wetlands on- or
off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Pllrip, City Planning and E@maing w California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Sanctions. No grading map uhder the Master Plan.
3’
Impact. If%; project. in not reconfigured to substantia~y avoid pc@atkns of San WQ
thornmint and thread-leaved bmdiaea, development will s@ifianq impact those species=
Mitigazim. To partially mitigate impacts, the mi@im plans for San Diego thornmint i
thread-leaved brodiaea shall be implemented, mod&d as specified in the EIR and after review
3
..3 and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of appmal of tamive maps under the Master Plan.
i To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accomphskxl prior to construction resulting
in impacts.
Master Pi&a Impletnentatih. Vies T and U have been reconfigured to avoid impact to
thornmint. Village G has been rcamfigurai to minimize impro to Brodiaea.
Clleckpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tatative maps. 3) Prior to
construction causing impacts.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineekg Departmarts. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consultmg biologisr
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps for Vii G without acceptable mitigation
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact. Potential for future disturbance of open space areas:
Mtigation. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open space, biological mitigation
areas, buffer areas,’ and natural&i areas to avoid disturbance of the natural habitats as a
condition of tentative maps.
checkpoints. !) Approval of ta-Native maps.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning’ and Engineering Depaaments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without depiction of acceptable open space
easements and condition to dcdkatc conseNation easements over natural open space.
h
cc .‘{; ’
-- c. -6
Impact. Possible prakion or disturbance of Caikmia gwcatchers or other sensitive wildlife species by fkture residents or domestic pe& - .
Master Plan Impkmentation. No appmval dTumtive Maps for affect& Vies without mitigation condition, if any, required by Califomia Department of F& and Game or U.S.
Department of Fish and Wiidlife.
Mitigation. As determined by above rekmced agency.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Partp. 1) City Planning and Ez@ering Departments.
S&ions. 1) No Tentative Map approved withart mitigation, if any, imposed by rcfmccd lead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant iillcu by non-native landscaping species.
Mtigatim. As a component of the Ian- pians for af&cted Villages, revegetation plan
for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be m by a quaSifiai biologist, and lanming plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by the bioiogist.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Completion of landscaping and rcvegetation.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Enginming Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps witbout satisfactory landscaping and rcvegetation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habiat peas during grading and construction.
.i
Y
Mitigrrtion. The consulting biologist shall m surveying and staking of native habitat areas
j and monitor grading and construction.
Checkpoints 1) Appmai of tentative maps. 2) Report by amsulting biologisL
Responsible ponjr. 1) City Planning and Engineerhg Departments. 2) Consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 0.’ No approval of tentative map without proper mitigation condition. 2) No
issuance of building or occupancy permits until consulting biologist’s report is submitted to the
Planning Department.
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and
construction.
Mtigation. Due to conflicting biologist’s opinions qarding mitigation, final mitigation plan, if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or Cdifomh Department of Fish and
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Enwring Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or comtruction in nsaicti area, if any.
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
;z, q I/ Mtigution. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement plan checks. 3) Construction of improvements near conservatia easement areas with report to Planning
Department by consulting biologist.
-
ReqponsibZe Puny. 1) City wand agineaing Degprmpmn 2) C&ulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) NO approval of tadve map dbut mit&iUh dti(HlS- 2) NO approval
of grading QT .imptovement pllr~ witbut proper mitigtioa specified- 3) No xss~~ce of
building or occupancy permits without properly m mitigation.
Impact. Potential for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat m from erosion and sedimentation
from the project.
M&i&don. Set hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Checkpoints. See hydrology and water quality mit.@tion.
Responsible Parry. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydrology and water Qualiry mitigation.
C. Cultural ResowaS
Impact. Possible vandalism due to increased human present to archaeological site SDI- 12,740B. . . \ I ’ ‘V Mitigation. The sig shall be capped with Fabric, soil, and- veguation as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qullified archaeologist retained
by the tentative map- applicant.
Master Plan htpkmett&oa This site is le on site to be dedicated to City of Carlsbad
for parkland. The capping of this sits will be the fqonsibility of the City of Carfsbad.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of dcveiopment plans for park site. 2) Approval of such pes.
3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Deparaent upon completion
of work and prior to commencement of development of park site.
Responsible Party. 1) City PIaaning and E&ne&g Dqa~meats. 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting archaeologist, City planning and Eaghcdg Departments.
,
Sanctions. 1) No approval of site development pbo widmt mitigaticm &IL 2) No gmding
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City Planning Depwtment.
Impact. Direct impacts of deveiopment on arch&ogial site SDI4691B.
Mitigution. A data recovery program as speeifiai in the E3R must be required as a condition
of the tentative map including the site. Work must be supavised by a qualified archaeologist
retained by the tentative map applicant and completed prior to any construction a&zing the site.
( , . ,:I- Muster Plan Implementation. Mitigation of this site wiIl not be required unless this area is
disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon com$etion of work and prior to any grading for construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archauhgial site SDI-4687.
Mitigution. Capping of the site as specified in the EIR as a condition of any tentative map
affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentative
map applicant and completed prior to any construction tie&g the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative map. 3) Report by consulting archae&ogist submitt to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any gtading or cons&w& af&ting the site.
clteckpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Deparnncnt upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or collltnrtioll affecting the site.
Responsible Pmty. 1) City Planning and Engineuing Departments. 2) Consulting archaeologist.
- -
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of ta~tative map a~ comply without mkigation pian. 2) No
approval of tentative map without n&i- pk. 3) No building pax&s to be issued until
mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submittal to City pianning Departments;
Impact. Encroachment of proposal develq of the Master Plan on the Nni, “euly California” setting of the Leo Canillo historic sik ,*. :A
Ligation. Establishment and implementation of a s@at design disttict as required under
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation nmitaing and qxwting program.
Checkpoints. See Land Use Compatibility saztim.
Responsible Pam. See L&d Use Compatibility sect&~.
Sanctions. Sa Land Use Compatibility sect&
D. Paleontoiogicd Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant frmitl, cqeciafly in the Santiago and Lusardi
Formation, by grading and consauction.
Mitigation. Monitoring of grading by a paiux~to@ist, witb rawery and curation of any significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EIR. Monitoring is to be performed under the
direction of a qualified paieontologist retained by the applicant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Akroval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting paleontologist
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Pdrty. 1) City Planning and Engin&ng Depanments. 2) Consulting paleontologist.
E \
Soncrions. 1) Approval of tentative map not annpkte without mitigark’pka~~. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting pakontologisr is submitted to City Planning Department.
-
E. Hydrology and Water Quaiity
Impact. Major drainage facility design will be squired to avoid potential adverse effects of
erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the deveioped site:
Mitigation. As a condition of apprwal each tentative map, the appiicant shail submit a hydrology anaiysis addressing nquiraI flood atknuation, runoff fiow reduction/si&ation, and proper sizing of drainage kilitiu.
Master Ph Implementation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tenfative map.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map am&ion of appfwal.
Impact. Major drainage facilities will have to be constructed to avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
r’ . . ..’ F ;3- Master Plan Impiementation. Applicant may submit one hydrology anaiysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The finai decision-making body shall approve a Financing Plan addressing the source and use of funds for the amsuu&m of ail required drainage fkilitics prior to recording
the first FinaI Map or the ksuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever is first.
C%eckpoint& Recording of frnt final map Q issuance of first grading or buiIding permit. each
tentative map.
Responsible Pm. City Engineering kpmtmart.
Sanctions. No recording of final map or issuana of grading or building permit without Financing Plan guarantee for consmaim of nquired drainage facilities.
1
. . 9
hpact. Potential erosive or flooding damage to SrWures inLeoC&lloRanch Parkdueto
runoffEromthedevdopedsite~~medrainagesouthof~pnt I’
Mitigation. An hydrology analysis for the drainqe south of the p&s sUl be submitted with
the applicable tentative map or pkr to issuiwx of &mxd grading pamit for Meirose
Avenue,and~-appropriatediainagesysbmstullbenqtlirsdpriorootheissuanceofttre~
grading permit affecting the area and - con~withthegzadingoftheaffaed area.
Ckckpoints. 1) Approval of appliable tentative maps. 2) Issuaxe of fkst grading ptrmit.
Responsible Party. 1) Enginaring Department, 2) Engin&ng Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper dminage system shown. 2) NO
issuance of building permits until d&age system implemented.
h
HvdioLogand Ww Qualie 10
Impuct. Instdhtioa of the proposui storm drain bawea~ villagea R aml T in Open Space Area 13
would disturb sensitive biotogical resmxsintheopenspacearca
Mtigution. The storm drain shaU be rdoated to tun south from ViUage Q to connect to a storm dram in either El Fuerte Street or ChorGto Stna. L
I- \ Master Plan Implementatidn. This stam drain has h relocated into w that will be graded as a part of the development of Villages Q atul R whemra possible to avoid satsidve habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tent&e map for Villages Q and R in&iii the storm drain. 2) Approval of Village Q and R tentah map. 3) conlplaion of storm drain construction.
Responsible Put&s. 1) City Eng&xring Dcpamneat 2) City Engineering Department. 3) City Engineering Department.
Sanrtions. I) Submittal of tentative map not compic# without showing storm drain in proper location. 2) No approval of tentative map widunat storm drain shown in proper location. 3) NO
issuance of building permits for tuturive map until storm drain prop&y constructed.
Impact. Potential for increased on-site erosion ami increased sediment&n downstream when ground
surface is disturbed during grading ami constr@on.
I’ Mitigahn. An Erosion and S&ma&on Comrol Plan must he preparai for each development , ..-
1.
, submittal, approved by the City Engineer, and implemented during coastructioa.
I ’ Chrckpointt. Approval of any g&ii or imptwut~~ plan in the h4aster Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering DepumKnt,
Sunriions. No approval of any g4ng permits without Erosion and Saiiion Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
Impuct. Potential impacts of u&au poiluaats from the developed site a&ctioo water quality in Batiquitos Lagoon.
Mitigation. Discharge of runoff from deveioped areas into naturali chaands and public education
information distributed to propetty owaar.
Master Plan ImpiementWh. A dtmiied Hydrologica! Study rrms~ be appmW prior to issuance of a
grading permit for the grading ~ICWSP~]~ to anumtct the Ciation Eiunaa Roadways.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of appkabie tentative maps. 2) Complesion of construction of drainage
channels. 3) Close of escrow to pmperty owners.
-
Responsible ?art&s. I) City Engineering e 2) City Ettgineehg D~~SUMU. 3) Developers
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without proper design of runoff drahage facilities. 2) No issuance of building permits unless runoff hiaage facilii properi m.
fmptacf. Potential for grease, oil, and other trafk-rrhocd pollutants from pavefl surf&es to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff.
Mtigutiqn. Best mauagement practices shall be uqhyed to prevent urban polhats from entering
City waterways in compliance with National Poll- Dii Elimination System muuicipal
_* c ‘I -.. stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or impmvemaat plauintbeMasterPlanam.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Depum~m.
Suncrions. No approval of any grading permits without Erosion and Sedhnntion Control Phn
approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impact. Geologic conditions potentially unsuit&le fG devdopmmt on thee site without remediation in&de soils unsuitable for load-bearing or with Werse setdement potahl, old landslide areas and ciaystone beds, and liigh-groundwater in alluviai soils.
Mitigafion. Remedial grading wiil be peedcd to crablish firm fbotings tot sauaures and fills and to
correct adverse settlement and alluvial soils over sbaibw ground-. A soils engineer and
engineering gwIogist shall be reainai by crch taxWe map applicant to review detailed grading plans, prepare a daaiial soil and gmlogk iwesigrction, monitor constntuhn, and assure compliance with the Master Plan gadoglc investigation Ipd the Cii Grading Ordhce.
Checkpoints. 1) Suhittal of &I taWve mq. 2) Approval of eadt tauath map and issuance of grading permit. 3) colnplesion of wpstrpQjoh
Responsible Patties. 1) City Engineeriag Deprimrar 2) City Eng&aing Department. 3) Consulting soils engineer and eagineehg gad- City Engheer.
Scurcfions. 1) Tentative map submittal not amplclb without detailed soil and gmlogic investigation 2) No tentative map app~~al without soil lad gaAogic investigation amI qmprlau conditions. 3) No issuance of buiIding pamits without evidence of popa mitigation. I
-
Air Qua@’ 12
6. Air Quality .
Impcrcr. Potential for significant direct impacts to regional air quaiity due to increases in pollutant emissions caused by project traffic.
Miiigatim. Implementation of Master Ran - indudiug bike lanea and pedestrian t&s, and
requirement for applicants for hure tent&e mps to work with North County Transit District to
provide bus routes and stops u approprirt.
Chrc&poh&. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Appmval of tamive maps.
Responsible Pamu. 1) City Planning md Engineering Depprmcw. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
SoWions. 1) Submittal of tentative maps not complete without appropriate mitigation measures. 2) No approval of tentxive maps without application conditions.
H. Land Use
hpact. Development of the Master Plaa would encroach OQ the ‘earIy California’ sating of Carrillo
Ranch Park. ‘including the dimination of the northern entry 00 the ranch compound.
Mitiption. A Special Park Design District shall be established for devdopment sutnnmding the park,
including special controls on setbacks, Iandsaping, amI a&&cam4 details and an entry through the park through Village S. The design distria mxiards will be included in the h4aster Plan and subsequent tentative maps will be evahuzed for conformance by the Planning Commission.
Checkpoints.. 1) Approval of the Masta Plan. 2) Approval of tentative maps that include part of
the design distria.
Responsible Pads. I) City Planning Dep- 2) Cii lhaing Dqaranent.
Sanedons. 1) NoppwrloftbeM?slrrPllpwithoraesoblirhmentofrpulrdesi~disaiaand deveiopment standards. 2) No appro~I of tent&e maps antmining part of the design distria
without setting forth dia devdopmm smdards.
@act. The City of C&b& has no miew authority over Village S, which ‘is in the park design district, if it is devdopaI as a school site by the San Marcoa Unified Sdmol Distria.
\
Lund use 13
Mtigation. -Agramclltwitfitheschool~ondesi~ncrmAarkL~buttk enforced by the Planning Commissina Waboot revk of ail devdqmm within the design district, it is not within the power of the Led Agency to asm that possible impms are mitigated or avoided.
\.
i, '1,. Checkpoints. No Lead Agency ck&poias w&au agreeam with the sdmol disuia.
RespodZe Parties. Responsibility HIM mitigaha is within the auhity uf amtIm jurisdiction and
not the City of C&bad.
SMcffonr. None avaiIable to the C&y of Car&d rmda pesca cirnrmspnas.
hpacr. Dedication of the open space link at the south- corna of the property, where the link crosses from one zone to an adjacent ownership, is nat assured unde the proposed Master Plan.
Midgation. Assure continuance of the open space I’mlt as part of the Master PI&.
‘: \ ;a
t-
Muter PIan Itnpkwwution. Cadsbd’s Opat Spxe Advisory appmed the open space link proposed by the Master Plan at their February 1993 meeting.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of Master Plan. 2) Apprwai of tentative map induding Village T.
Responsibte Pamks. Planning Departma~.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without apea space link.
I \ \ Y-
Impact. Applicants for the Master Plan must obtain a letter from the Slol Marcos Unified School
Distria accepting the site proposed by appiicants as poesible schooi site area in compiiance with the Zone 18 Local Facilities Managana~ Plan.
A@ufion. Agreement with the Saa Wrcos Unified School Diia as part of Master Plan approval.
Checkpoints. Approval of Masta Ph.
Szncrions. No approvaJ of Maser Plan without lonemar with the school district that compiies with the Zone 18 Local Facilities Mamgemmt Plan.
Viid Aesthetia/Gmding 14
I. Visual Aesthetics/Grading
hnpuct. Grading proposed by the Master Plan reqpita Wings justiqinl grading volumes to be approved by the Planning Dir and City Engineer xuxdiag to the Hillside Development Ordinance.
Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed gmbg vdmea prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsiblu Pa-s. Planning Dir aad City E@ueu.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the rap&d findings.
Irnpacf. Proposed grading for the Mastu PIan would exceed Hillside Devdopment Ordinance allowances for slope height and axroachment into 40 pacm slopa w&out specified findings by the decision making body.
Mtigation. Approval of Wigs for the proposed grading concurra# with approval of the Master
PIaIL
Checkpoints. Approval bf the Master Plan.
Responsible Pam& Decision maUg Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required findiigs.
Impuct. Potential impxts of Master EIaa development on the visualIy sensitive Card10 Ranch Park
site, including Village S, 0, and Q.
Mtigahn. Appllabie teat&e maps OD indicate an acqtabie detailed landscape pian to reduce
potential impacts. Impiemap Special Park Design Diia ncommcndai in EIR Land Use section.
Checkpoirus. 1) Submittal of appliie tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Pa&s. 1) City Phming Departmezu. 2) Ciy Pluming Dqmtmcm.
Sunuions. 1) Tent&a- suba&& TV completewi&cmtdaailed landsqeplan. 2) No approval of tentative map withqt appropriate detailed la&cape plm.
-
ytirl Aazheria/Grading 15
Impad. Potentially significant impact Of reaeaiond v&i& sr0-e in Open Space Area 13 on views
from existing residences,
-.- I \
Mitigation. Detailed landscape plau as part of taWve map for Vii@ Q 4 R to effectively
1 screen views of recreational vehicle storage.
CheckpoWs. 1) Submittal of tent&ve map Wudii mnal vehii storage. 2) Approval of tentative map including recre&nai v&de saxage.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning Deprrmpem. 2) Cii Planning Dqartment.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tmtative map not cqhe without appropth land=@ng plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map without appropriate ladscqing plaa
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of noise kriers over six feer in height.
Mitigufion. Detailed landscaping plan for temtive maps to provide e cover, texture, and
variation of vegetation to scream walls.
,’ / 2 s Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of any tentative ntq showing noise &iers over six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map showing noise brria3 over six far in he&&t.
Responsible Pads. 1) City Planning and Engineuing Departmen& 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Submikl of applicable tent&e maps not complete wit&t appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of appliie tentative maps without appmpriate landscaping plan.
J, Cixtutation
ImpocL Iheintltntaionof~~Airport~mdEl~Rd’rprojcctcdtoh?vealevclof suviceFktheyerP2OOOaftaaoonpeakhoar. Noadd&&~tothisintersectionare cunently proposed in the LFMP.
Mitigatim. The Ci will amtime to amitor trdic to datrmias cc&mum with LFMP standard
and to identify and implement improvements mxssaytorneathestamid.
checkpozhts. consmtctioa of improvanaxs.
ResponsiMe Pads. City Engiherhg ment.
~up~l~esrhaia/~ 16
Sandions. Neisuance of building pet&s if Growth w stauda& for traffic levds of senfice are not met.
Impodt Spacing of the first intersection on Pakar Aii Rod is 200 feet closer than City standards allow.
Mtigation. Tentative maps shall comply with Cii LDd aiii and intersection spacing standards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5 ‘2-a Master plan Impiementadorr. TIM location shown on the pmposed Master Plan has not been revised
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval of tentative maps.
Respondie Pads. City Engineering Deparawnt.
Sandions. No approval of tentative maps that do not comply with City road alignment and intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the Cii En*.
Impact. As proposed, deveiopment of the Master Plan ti nqoin trafk signals at P&mar
Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Morose Ava&enttanw to Villages H, 0, and L.
4 3 Mirig ation. J,
Condition tentah maps to consuuct the necesq signais aud improvemtks, or
determine the need for signals in traftk studier for tamthe maps.
Checkpoinrs. 1) sub&ml of applicable tentative aups. 2) Approvai of applicable tentative maps.
Responsibte Padies. 1) City Engineering Dcptraacat. 2) City Engheehg Department.
Sancririns. 1) No apptwal of teamtive maps witbout applkable conditions.
ImpacL certinrevishu aftheintcm;rlc~nsyraePdescrii#dintheEIRm?ybcpreftrable
. /’ for environmeatal or &c&tory reasona.
‘\ , 3 M&g&n. Traffic studier fin applicable tan&e maps s&II deterthe in consultation with City staff
whether specified changes in the circulation piutan &o&i k impI& as conditions of appiicable
tentative maps.
Master Pfan Implemendon. Revisions to ttm hha h citcpiation ami proposed tentative maps
have already been made to addrms the recoins oft$e EIR ad approved by the City
Engineer.
Checkpoin&- 1) Appmd of tcmnjv~ maps.
Responsiblr Portlrr I) City Planning and Engbahg Deptnmrmr. 2) City n&g aud Engineering Deputmesr.
Sanctions. 1) No appnml of tentathe maps with qpiii au&ions. .
K. Noise
Impad. Certain areas ldjacem to major ro&s in the Master Ph area umld experience future traffic
noise in excess of the City standa& of 60 dBA CNEL
Mirigarion. T~~~lsbowlpptoprira~~~~SpecifkdintfieEIRoraCitg
\r / .i standardstoattenuatenoise. IfgradiigshowninthsMasterPhfOrdwdopmentinareasof excessive unattenuatcd noise is modified by tent&~ mqr, the malihth sbail be reviewed by the City Engineer and a sew acoustical study s&all ba @rmed tnd appq&e mitigation i.mpiema~@ if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall h dm qtioa of w a reduction in height of barriersovctsixfeacowlcstthvlsixfcctto~visPrlirnrampg:~pgliCy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approvai of tmtative maps. 2) m of- ittpOVUnW6.
Responsible Portirr. 1) City Planning aad EagitAq w 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval witbout proper barrias as a condithn. 2) No issuauce of subsequa
permits.
Impact. Second floors of some residential units m to Chdath EIanent roadways could experience interior aoka levds in access of the 45 dBA CNEL Sdard.
Mitigdiolz m &H&W mppt shill be &oum @ have d&g~~ 6a moiti-st~ry residencti next u)
Circulation Eiema% n&ways which would adhe &ajor &a tevals of 45 dBA CNEL or las for second or hi* storh AcaustM studier to deawuamcoa@=mayberequiredbythecity Engineer.
Checkpoints. 1) Appmwl of tenwiva maps. 2) Imp&on ofaaawaed improvements.
Responsilile Patties. 1) Cii Planning ad E@waiag DcppapcaL 2) Buiidiig Dep-
Sanctions. 1) Noapprowlwitbmpcoperbarrias~raco&im. 2) Noisswaceofsubsequcm
permits. 1
- -
I, ’
l-
L. Public Facilities and S&vises
Impact lhereisapotaWiot&eLFMPpmhamzsamhdfbfpaxkhciWSto~acadcd
dependingonthetimiagofdev~opmeot?nd~starrafahafhinrrptrkl?pdinrJty~I)itaier
4.
Mi!igtztion. Prior to the recordation of any Mimi mq umk tb bfma Ph, suffxient parkhurl shall
be dedicated within Zone 18.
Checkpoints. Recordation of first final map ppda tk Moran Ph.
Responsi&fe Pads. City Planning, Engine&g, md W 1Dd Rea&on Departments.
Sdwticw. No recorduioa of fmai m;q, withora ddicdoa of&i&a packlad within Park Diict
4.
Impuct. TheLFMPperfonnvlcc~~thrtarchodsiteioZonel8bedadcdtotheSm
Marcos Unified Scimol distria (SMUSD) ird du a finmcins pha be approval by the SMUSD prior
to recordation of any final map or isslmce0frplrgradingorbpiIdinopamitiu20ne 18.
Mitigution. Compliance with the Zone 18 rapimm.
Checkpoints. 1) Rumlation of the first final mq wk the Abster Ph. 2) Issuance of any
grading or building pamit in the Master Plan aca.
Respodle Parties. City Planning Ami Engbaing Depamam.
Sanaions. No .Fti map recmlai widmut LFMP qukam~ being met.
Impact. Sawaga w could exceed trmnaa apaciyifmidahldevelop~occussinthe
Master plan ara aik 2OOS.
Mtigacibna Inlpiaaalt m s@fkdiathcLFMPforaaytmativemapsauingtbe~ impact to be realized.
checkpoints. 1) SubmitrpIof telmtbe aquaita2UE 2) Appmvdofteatativemapssubmit6d after 2005.
Respond& Pads. 1) Ciq vatming and B&mring Dqmmmas. 2) City Planning and Engineering Depmmmts.
A
Siz~~ciiont Noappmvdoftmtativemapsafbu)obrirhatmUiomnqpiriao~afornatnce~ LFMPrequh 3. -
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Miiigatbn. Applicaats for taativemapsptopocedithe~Plmrmshrlld~~~
means of feasible solid waste disposal are awllaMe.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of mtative snaps fa th8 btez Pha area.
Responsible Pad&. 1) City Planning and Eqhaiug Dcprrtmcnr.
Sanczionr. 1) No appmnl of tentative maps witboa &mmstMm of &sting disposal e.
.
1 :
EXtWT 3
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 15, 1994 - 90 Dav Extension
PROJECT PLANNERTERESA WOODS
!3TAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECI’Z
I.
JANUARY 4, 1995
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93=08/PUD 93-07 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0” - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675, and
3676, recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-08 and PUD 93-07, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. ITEM EXPLANATION
This matter was considered by the Plamring Commission at its meeting November 16,1994,
and continued to November 30,1994 to allow the applicant time to respond to certain issues
raised by the Commission. It was subsequently continued to January 4,1995.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo dated January 4, 1995 with proposed revisions to Resolutions
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676 4. Exhibit “I” as referred to in Condition 46 of Resolution No. 3675
5. Staff Report dated November 30, 1994
6. Staff Report dated November 16, 1994, with attachments.
JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTION NOS. 3675 AND 3676, CT 9-os/puD 93-07 - RANCH0
CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
At the November 16, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, the following issues were raised
by the members of the Planning Commission regarding CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - Ranch0
Carrillo Village “0”:
1. 2. Lack of single story units. The requested affordable housing standards modification to reduce the minimum front
yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet.
3. Potential 50% lot coverage.
4. Minimum 10 foot building separation between more than 10 two-story units in a row.
In response to these comments, the applicant has agreed to provide the following: a minimum
of 15% of the units as single story; a minimum 20’ front yard setbacks, and, to comply with
the building separation requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance (Section
21.45.090(5) of the C&bad Municipal Code). The Village “0” Design Guidelines (attached)
have been revised to reflect these standards.
The following findings and conditions must be amended based on the revised design.
RESOLUTION NO. 3675
Finding:
43T Delete Finding # 13 as no standards modifications are requested for Village “0”. TBa(
5. Based on the “Initial Study” prepared for this project the Planning Commission determines that the project is within the scope of EIR 91-04 on file in the
Planning Department, and tire are no additional significant adverse
environmental impacts associated with the project, therefore, no further
environmental review of this project is required.. All feasible mitigation measures
CT 93-oSIpUD 93-07 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
JANUARY 4, 1995
identified in EIR 91-04
Planninn conditiolq:
1. Approval is granted for CT 93-O& as shown on Exhibits “A” - “J”, dated September .~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ~, 7,py&$ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :,:.:,~,:,:,.~.,““‘““““‘.......C.r .)’ >.j.<. . . . . . . ..+.<...~... :...::nl ..<*.x.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::::::,:.:-:.:.:.:,:,:.:,:,:.:,:,:.:,:.:,, .,“_:,~~~~~~~~,:~~,~ ,; _” :; : I,:~~~~~;~;~;.:~~:~,~:~:i ,, :I l’.‘.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.~~.:.:.:.:.:::~.~:::...~:~~ ,V,,L,I, ,_,,,,,,,,,,,, y ,., ,,, ,, ,, ,, t ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .:.:.. . . ..A.. A.. ..v.. ..A. . . ..A........ I n.. v . . . . . . . . ..A..... r+.. ..A c .A.. v.. ..A..... >A . . . . ,. A.. ._...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.. . ..A ,A incorporated by reference and on fde in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions, and approved by the Planning Director or City
Engineer.
11. The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilities
remain available to the park site at all times during development unless prior
approval is secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be provided
during all phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Parks and
Recreation Director.
28. Elevations and floor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the Delayed Elevations and floor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the Delayed
Architectural Review standards established in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, Architectural Review standards established in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan,
and shall comply with the Village “0” Design Guidelines as shown on Exhibit “P”. and shall comply with the Village “0” Design Guidelines as shown on Exhibit “P”.
After reviewing these plans and determining that they are in conformance with After reviewing these plans and determining that they are in conformance with
the approved design guidelines, staff will present the floor plans and architecture the approved design guidelines, staff will present the floor plans and architecture
to the Planning Commission per the urocess described in Title 21.45160. to the Planning Commission per the process described in Title 21.45160. .ci ..~ :.... . . . ) .ci ..~ :.... . . . ) @!B@&%& . .., . ..< < ..,., , < ,A*,,**>* q&Y ~x.‘~.*x*;<F,y// +Y &s ~,~~,~ ..,.. ~ ~~~.. ~~ ..,,” p/P.*) . :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::.:r+:x.:.:.:.:::b....: j.y$ .p:.:<+>.~.&$ .x.:~jz+h*y ,.yy..p:.:.~.q;:.:.:.:.y.wj~ a. s;:<.p$k<. : x3.y ,>. ,>, :,., . . ,.... . ,\. ;.,:, ;, :, $$ .,, j, : : : :~~.~..~:,~..~~~.~,~ s . . . . . . I“ ,.... ~ ‘.~ _ c ,.,.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ti3:$p...$,&:~ ;: f’ “““““:+wq ?+$Y>&?& : .x&g ?&.>;: ‘y:.::;;;.. ,,’ ‘.,’ 2%. 4 .+: ~.~.~~.,~.~~~~.:.:~~,:‘:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~.:~.~~~~,~ y.q.%, ..~:~~~~~~~~~~~~?~*~~~:~~:~~~.~..~.~~~~~~~~~,~~~~.~~.~~.~... ~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . . . . . ..: :. . . _...A ;...:; . . . . . .I.? . ..>J.> . . . . 1.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . : . . . . 3 b+.:.:... .gj+ a.. :.:.q.&>:~,:~:.:.:~j:jjj.y _ y .,,. :,+, .,‘.,A. -,.x,.< .,..I.. q.b ,. ,.< ,.. . . . . ,> . . *., ..., ,.A .,&I ,.A.,. y .,.. . ..>..” y $3. .A :: .+ 3 . . . . . . .A~. ,. * :.(,. .,. y.*&..x ,,( ~a. .% . ,~ ..p,. , .. ,_ ,, .rq.y/. Y. ., . )’ .~,..~. j.#> , ..n.. ,..&>.+:.. . . .A. : ,.,..,.,.A yA....y.,” A< >.$(,,v n.... w.. ..:q.&..& ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j.. >.. .* ,\ ” :.:i:~:~~:~:~:~~~~~:~~~~::~~~~~~.~~~~~~’. .:px..*.. .,.,.,_ .<.:.-..+&x ..,. ~ _ . : ‘r.‘.‘...‘.‘.‘.‘.:.:~.:.:.‘.‘... ‘.. . ,. . . . . *‘., . . ...> . . . . . A. . . . . . ..: . . . . . . . . ..: . . .r:w+<:. s ~.~.x~~.x:x~~~~..~~..~.~ ,_ . ., ,,. ~.&:.:.> ..,. :.:.:.:.:.:.~..~~.~~.~~ ,... _ , . .~, . ,.~~.,x.,r~~j~~.....~.:.~s~ . . . . . . . . ,.,,#.< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :. . I . . . . . . . . . :_ .A_ :.,, , ..,% ..,..,...i . . . ..A. ,: .A..,. ., . . . . ..A %...h .,.,.. > A.,....,.. s,.. . ..,L>.<>.L., A., ;:.,:...x$ ,.,,A.,. > A,.. r.,..?.,,..>.r . . . . . I>...,: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?I
46. This project shall comply with aU conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit “I”)
CT 93-08/PUD 93m - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
JANUARY 4, 1995
52. Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to riparian habitat and
threatene~endangered plant species will be mitigated under the review and
supervision of the California Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers and any other applicable resource agency. The mitigation plan must
be approved by the involved resource agencies prior to the recordation of final
map or issuance of grading permit. Grading plans shall reflect the resource
agencies review and approval. If modifications #& required by the agencies are . . . . -the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~~ ~ . . . ~ ~~ .c.~ . ..., ..#. yE’ applicant ~,~~~~~ apply for an amendment to this Tentative Map ..v: ..,.A k.,. ~*~.~.~.:.~~~.~u,. .., < .A.. d.%..>.X...>.?.Q A., and/or Phumed Development Permit or apply for new discretionary permits.
65. Delete as redundant with condition #63.
87. In accordance with the Ran&o Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR), grading of natural habitat shaE ~##@@# not occur during the nesting
season of any endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of coastal
California gnatcatcher occupied habitat and within 200’ or riparian habitat,
occupied by least Bell’s vireo and willow flycatcher, shah be restricted to the
period between September 1 and February 15 of any given year.
which are required...
Engineering Conditions:
92. Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements as required in the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan
(LFMP) for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to the satisfwtion of the City Engineer. These hpmvemen~ . , wy...<I . . . . . . . (~~,: 9 .~,~~,~~,~~~~~.~~~~ ,...... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.. ,.. ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~1$.2..>> . . . . ?v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,......A %2., . . . . > . . . . y.. . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . > A.,...... :<.AA.b...? . . . . . . . . . . :: . . . . :: . . . . k..< .,.... ~.~..c...,......:...: .A < . . . . . . . . . . @##$ shall be substantmlly completed to the sattsfaction of the City Engineer
prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
RESOLUTION NO. 3676
Findill~
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the General Plan,
and all applicable adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies as
demonstrated by the project’s consistency with all provisions of these documents
4. The proposed planned development will meet all of the minimum development
-
CI’ 9348jWD 9347 - RANCH0 CARRlLLO VILLAGE “0”
JANUARY 4,1995
standards and design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.090 and 21.45.080 of the . . . . Carl&ad Municipal Code C and will be designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design Guidelines
Manual as demonstrated by features such as 51do foot wide public streets,
adequate guest and recreational vehicle parking, and a spacious and accessible
common recreation m
PhlUlillQ Condition:
2.
407
’ TWnd
Approval is granted for PUD 93-07, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “J”, dated :. . :y .+)y.x, y yyq.p~ y&q.. ~ ~ , ,p.....;%7.y,&.fpy*p.
September 7,1994 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,.,,., ,,, ~ . . . . 3;.. ::; :. d, ,...:. *,,,rs.P4... .x:., . . . . . . <c& <‘:,.I,.:“- ‘.yj, ., x: .$.. .,., .~. ..,+. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E .,.....,..........,.,...,..,Y, (.,....... XI<< .,.,........,..... % ::i:%~~~:jj$:~~ ‘.~‘.‘.‘.....,.A . . . . . >, I!<< _,_ .:>,, . ..,. :~~(‘,v.“.,.,,$.. A.,.. >,.. ’ ‘, /PI ~ ::...‘:~j,.,. ., . b :,, % c..>.. . ,, ,,, .<.:c.<<,.> t.. >..n, *SF, y<y.y<.j.;.r . . . . . , , 8.. ,<>.~::x.~,$.~&<r~ . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~‘.~~~~~~~ reference
: : : ‘:” ‘. “‘“r’.‘,‘.‘.~.~.~..~.:.. . . . ;I:.~:~.~.~.~.j~.~!..,..:.j~,:.~.:.~~.~.~.:.,~. .,.,.j,,~~.,~~.;.~~.~.~~~.~j~..~~S... ,.. . . . . j&. j..) .,.,.... ~.W.&.~~.+~ . . . . and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as
shown unless otherwise noted in these conditionk
Delete condition # 10 as no standards modifications are requested in Village “0”.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECTz
I.
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
March 15. 1994 - 90-dav extension
Staff Planner: Ter&a Woods @@
STAFF REPORT 0 2
NOVEMBER 30,1994
PL&NNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93-08IPUD 93-07 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0” - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission CONTINUE this item to January 4, 1995.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Staff is recommending continuance of this item to allow the applicant and staff adequate
time to respond to the issues raised on a companion project by the Planning Commission
at the meeting of November 16, 1994.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
- -
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 15. 1994 - 90 Dav Extension
PROJECT PLANNER.TERESA WOODS
& I&
STAFF REPORT 0 3 ._
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0” - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675, and
3676, recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-08 and PUD 93-07, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit
to create 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet) and 1 open space lot
on a 19.3 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane (Carrillo Way) extension and west of
Melrose Drive extension. The parcel is undeveloped and contains native and disturbed
habitat. It is located in the Planned Community Zone (PC), and is subject to the
requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan as well as Final Environmental Impact
Report 91-04 and Hillside Development Permit 91-17 which were processed concurrently
with the Master Plan. Village “0” is also subject to the requirements of Residential Low
Medium (RIM) and Open Space (OS) General Plan designations.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. The
purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the entire Ranch0
Carrillo site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. For planning
purposes, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is divided into Villages “A” - “T”. The Master
Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land use in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, requirements, and the method by which the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan will be implemented.
e -
cr 93-OWPUD 93-07
-
RANCH0 CARREL0 VILLAGE ‘0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 2
The Ranch0 Canillo Master Plan permits Tentative Tract Maps with Planned Unit
Developments to be processed without floor plans and elevations. Instead design guidelines
are required to be adopted as part of the discretionary action through a process called
Delayed Architectural Review (DAR). The DAR process was intended to focus Planning
Commission review specifically on project architecture without opening the tentative map
up for re-evaluation and additional conditions. The design guidelines developed as part of
the DAR process may address such areas as building envelopes, setbacks from slopes,
building separation, and compliance with small lot architectural guidelines. Floor plans and
elevations must be submitted to staff for review prior to building permit. After reviewing
the plans and dete rmining their compliance with the approved design guidelines, the floor
plans and architectural elevations must be presented to the Planning Commission pursuant
to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.45.160. Section 21.45.160 provides that should the
Planning Commission consider the amendment (approval of design guidelines) minor in
nature, it may be approved without the necessity for a public hearing. If the Planning
Commission determines that the amendment is major, a public hearing is required.
As shown on Exhibits “A” - “P”, the proposed project contains individual single family lots
ranging in size from 5,690 to 13,500 square feet. Village “0” is designed as a two story
neighborhood (although a one story component may be provided) intended to be marketed
to first-time home buyers and first-time move-up buyers. Pursuant to the Delayed
Architectural Review procedures, the applicant has not submitted floor plans or elevations ’
for units. However, detailed design guidelines have been prepared for this Village to ensure
that architectural concerns are addressed. There is a central active and passive recreation
facility containing turf, benches and a combination of play equipment, as provided for in the
Village “0” Design Guidelines to serve the entire project. The recreation area is located
on the eastern portion of the site, between Melrose Drive and Street O-B and will be
approximately .28 acres in size.
Final EIR 91-04 addressed the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. EIR 91-04 concluded that significant but mitigable impacts
would occur due to project implementation. This project, as designed and conditioned, is
consistent with and implements the mitigation requirements of EIR 91-04. Grading for this
project was approved under HDP 91-17. As proposed, this project is consistent with HDP
91-17. No additional grading is proposed as part of this project.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15%
of the base dwelling units (60.0 x .15 = 9.0 affordable units) must be provided for lower
income households. The applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units
off-site in a combined affordable project in Village “F”. A combined affordable project is
a separate residential development site which, under contract, must provide at an alternative
site or sites, some or all of the required inclusionary units associated with the development.
The Site Development Plan for Village “F” (SDP 94-01) will be reviewed and acted upon
prior to review of this project. This will ensure that all affordable housing requirements are
.m -
CT 93-08/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARIULLO VILLAGE “0 NOVEMBER 16,1994 PAGE 3
,
satisfied and all incentives agreed to prior to review and approval of this project. This
project would be conditioned to comply with the Affordable Housing Agreement
requirement of the Village “F“ Site Development Plan (SDP 94-01). As part of the
affordable housing incentives package submitted as part of SDP 94-01, the applicant has
requested reduced development standards for Village “0”. In particular, the applicant has
requested to reduce the front yard setback from 20 to 15 feet and has requested that the
building separation for more than 10 two-story units in a row be reduced from 20 to 10 feet.
As discussed in Section F, Inclusionary Housing, both requests are supported by the Housing
Committee. The reduced standards requested must be approved as part of the affordable
housing incentives package of the Village “F* Site Development Plan and are further
discussed in Section E, pa8e 11.
.
III. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
RLM General Plan Land Use Designation.
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan MP 139(E).
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.45, “Planned Development”.
City Council Policy 44 for Small Lot Single Family Homes.
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.85, “Inclusionary Housing”.
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20, “Subdivision Ordinance”; and the
California Subdivision Map Act.
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.90, “Growth Management
Ordinance” (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18).
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19, Environmental Protection Procedures”;
and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A. GENERAL PLAN
Planning Issue
Is the Tentative Tract Map consistent with the General Plan?
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 4
DISCUSSION .
The Tentative Tract map is consistent with the City’s General Plan including the Land Use,
Housing and Open Space and Conservation Elements as noted below.
LAND USE ELEMENT
The property is designated as RLM (Residential Low-Medium) and OS (Open Space) in
the General Plan. The RLM Land Use Designation allows the development of single-family
homes within a density range from 0 to 4 dus/acre with a 3.2 dus/acre growth control point.
The proposed project would contain 51 units at a density of 3.9 d&acre. Although Growth
Management would normally permit only 41 units on this site, pursuant to the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan, Chapter 2, Section E.l, Village “0” may be developed with up to 51
dwelling units at a density of 3.9 dus/acre. This is within the density range of the RLM
General Plan designation. The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan notes that the greater density
is acceptable because the maximum number of units allowed by the Master Plan, 1,816, is
below the 2,091 residential units allocated to Zone 18 by its approved Local Facilities
Management Plan. These densities were approved as part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan MP 139(E). This project is therefore consistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan.
HOUSING ELEMENT
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan requires that affordable housing be provided within the
Master Plan area. Villages “C”, “E” and “F” are designated as potential affordable sites
which may be utilized by other Villages in meeting their affordable housing requirements.
To fulfil1 this requirement, the applicant is proposing to provide 15 percent of the total 60.0
inclusionary base units (9.0 affordable units) in a combined affordable housing project in
Village “F”. Village “F”, which is being processed concurrently with this project as Site
Development Plan SDP 94-01, will be reviewed and acted upon prior to review and action
on Village “0”. The provision of affordable units is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the
Housing Element which states that, “A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of all units
approved for any master plan community or residential specific plan shall be affordable to
lower income-households”. The 9.0 affordable units required for Village “0” are shown on
the Village “F”, Conceptual Site Development Plan (Exhibit “N”). See Section E,
Inclusionary Housing below, for a more detailed discussion of the affordable housing
proposed by this project.
OPEN SPACE
The Open Space and Conservation Element requires that open space be provided for in the
area near Village “0” for habitat/wildlife corridor/active recreational purposes. As proposed,
Village “0” will provide for a greenway corridor along the southern portion of the project,
c -
CT 93-08/FwD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRLLO VILLAGE “0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 5
Lot 52 (see Exhibit “M”, Master Plan Open Space). The Element further encourages private
community trails to connect neighborhoods with the Citywide Trail System. As proposed,
Village “0” will provide approximately 5.7 acres of open space on Lot 52. The southern
portion of this lot is required to be set aside as natural open space with the remainder
containing active and passive recreational amenities. These active/passive recreational
amenities will include a tot lot as well as a community trail which will connect to Trail
Segment 34 of the Citywide Trail System. Village “0’ will set aside the southeast portion
of the site as open space as required pursuant to the Master Plan and as mapped on the
General Plan Land Use Map. The project is therefore, consistent with the Open Space and
Conservation Element of the General Plan and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan as it
pertains to open space. Timing of installation and the responsibility for maintenance of
open space areas and trails are summarized in the Village “0” Open Space Compliance
Table on page 6.
.
B. RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN
Planning Issue
Does the proposed development comply with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
requirements?
DISCUSSION
The proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan for Village “0” including product type and density; the approved Hillside
Development Permit; design criteria; setbacks from Melrose Drive; Special Park Design criteria; open space and trail requirements; and Master Plan infrastructure requirements as
follows:
a. As allowed in the Master Plan, the proposed development is for single family,
detached units with a density of 3.9 dus/acre. Although this density exceeds the
growth control point of 3.2 dus/acre, this is allowed in the Master Plan. The small
lot single family residential development would be compatible with the surrounding
neighborhoods which are planned for both single family and multiple family
residential development. The smaller lots, intended for first time home buyers and
first time move-up buyers will provide a diversity of housing opportunities within the
Master Plan area.
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved Hillside Development
permit (HDP 91-17) approved concurrent with the Master Plan in that lot elevations
are consistent with the approved grading elevations. No additional grading is
proposed as part of this project.
-
CT 93ayPuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 6
C. Village “0” complies with the general design criteria for development within the
Master Plan area as follows:
i. Where possible, units of Village “0” have been oriented to take advantage of
views of Carrillo Ranch Community Park and the designated open space area
located on the southern portion of the village;
ii. Units have been located a minimum of SO-feet from Melrose Drive;
. . . la A 6’ high noise wall will be placed along the northeasterly portion of the site,
adjacent to Melrose Drive, to ensure that noise is attenuated to 60 dBA
CNEL exterior pursuant to City policy. In addition, all units will be mitigated,
as necessary, to 45 dBA CNEL interior pursuant to City noise policy; and
iv. Lots 1 - 14 of Village “0” are located within the Special Park Design District
identified in the Master Plan. The Master Plan established the Special Park
Design District to protect the historic context and feeling of the Carrillo
Ranch Community Park site. Developments located within this special district
are not to clash with the existing architecture and landscape of the Carrillo
Ranch Community Park. To ensure compatibility of future development of
Village “0” with the park site, special design criteria have been included in
the Village “0” Design Guidelines (see page 7 of Exhibit “P”). The guidelines
require proper design, screening and landscaping to ensure continued
compatibility with the Carrillo Ranch Community Park.
d. Consistent with the Master Plan, Lot 52 of Village “0” is a 5.7 acre open space lot
which has been set-aside for habitat/wildlife corridor/active recreational purposes.
Approximately 28 acres of this lot will be developed as a recreational area tot lot.
A community trail, running north/south within Lot 52 will connect to the Citywide
Trail system just west of Melrose Drive on the north side of Carrillo Way. The
southern portion of Lot 52 will remain in natural open space. The natural open
space of Lot 52 will connect to a larger east/west open space corridor required
pursuant to the Master Plan (see Exhibit “M”, Master Plan Open Space). The table
below depicts when, how, and what type of open space will be provided for in Village UO”:
VILLAGE “0”
OPEN SPACE COMPLIANCE
11 NATURAL OS 11 Par of Lot 52 1 Por of Lot 52 I Prior to occupancy of 1st unit I Village HOA II
-
cr 93-08mJD 93-07
MIWHO CARRILLO VILLAGE ‘0
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 7
,
e. The proposed Village “0” Design Guidelines ensure that the development will be attractive,
sensitive to views from the Carrillo Ranch Park site, and contain a variety of materials,
architectural accent features, articulated wall and roof planes, roof heights, building mass,
and building street setbacks. The project is conditioned to provide an architectural theme
consistent with the Master Plan requirements and the Village “0” Design Guidelines to
ensure that whichever style or combination of styles is used in the Village, is compatible with
the surrounding villages and the structures within the Carrillo Ranch Park. The surrounding
area is undeveloped and is planned for multifamily and standard single family residential
development. The future Carrillo Ranch Park site would be located northwest of the project
site.
f. There are several infrastructure improvements required pursuant to the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan. To gain access to the site, major roadway infrastructure improvements are
necessary to serve Village “0”. This will include the construction of Melrose Drive and
Poinsettia Lane to a minimum number of lanes necessary to serve this project. An
assessment district is currently in the formation process by Ranch0 Carrillo property owners
for Melrose Drive. This project is conditioned to ensure adequate access is provided to the
site and to ensure an emergency/secondary access is available prior to occupancy of any unit
within Village “0”.
Further, sewer facilities are not currently accessible to the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
area. Therefore, major off-site sewer line construction is required. As conditioned
occupancy of units cannot occur until sewer service is made available to the project.
C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE/CHAPTER 21.45
Planning Issue
Does the proposed Planned Development Permit comply with all the requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance?
- e -
cr 9348mJD 93-07
RANCH0 CARREL0 VILLAGE ‘0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 8
DISCUSSION
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan designates Carlsbad Municipal Code, Titles 20 and 21 as the
implementing ordinances for the Master Plan. The Master Plan further requires any Village with
a Tentative Tract Map creating lots averaging less than 7,500 square feet in size to process a
Planned Development Permit pursuant to Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Village
“0” proposes minimum 5,000 square foot lots, and, therefore, a Planned Development Permit is
being processed. The project, as designed and conditioned, is consistent with the Planned
Development Ordinance, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and all other applicable ordinances.
The findings required to approve a project under the Planned Development Ordinance can be
made as summarized below.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Village “0” is designed for single family residential development on smaller lots (minimum 5,000
square feet). The development of Village “0” with this type of residential product would provide
a balance and mix of residential land uses within this portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
As conditioned, the proposed project complies with the minimum development standards set forth
in the Design Guidelines Manual and the Planned Development ordinance, except as modified for
affordable housing incentives as discussed below in Item E, Inclusionary Housing. The Tentative
Tract Map is consistent with the approved Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17) approved
as part of the Master Plan. As approved under HDP 91-17, the manufactured slopes would be
contour-graded and landscaped. The streets are curvilinear and follow the natural slope. The
following table is a summary of how the project complies with the development standards of the
Planned Development Ordinance. A more detailed discussion of important issues follows this table.
SIDE YARD SETBACK
BUILDING HEIGHI’ 30 ft.
PUBLIC STREET 60 ft. (reductions for single
WIDTH loaded streets & c&de-sacs
may be permitted)
PARKING - RESIDENT: 102 covered spaces
GUEST 16 spaces
RV STORAGE 20 sq. ft. per unit (1,020 sq. ft.
required)
10% of lot width (5 ft. min.)
10 ft. minimum*
VILLAGE “0”
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
30 ft. maximum
102 covered spaces
158 on-street spaces (approx)
Min. 1,020 sq. ft. in the RV storage lot in Village “Q”
c
cr 93-08/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRIUO VILLAGE ‘0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 9
STORAGE SPACE 4Wcu.ft.perunit
.j,.:..: : ;:: .., ,. : ,,/ : ,.,.,.,.,. ::, ..:: :. . ..>> >...: :. :.,.. : .,.: . . .: .:., ,.: ,.,.: ., ., .: . . :,,,:.:. >,.:.:(.:: : :.,: . . . . . :.:.:: :...‘.h..‘.-.. :: .’ : ::.:. .A.. ,.,: ,.,.,.: .,.. :.: .:, ::.:.j. .,.,.,.,._. ~::.‘:.‘:~~‘:~::.‘:~-~ : .j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . :.:: . . ,. : .: ::-;9::: . . . . . . . . . . . ..j ..:,.::,:..:. . . 2.: -mm;.!:i’:: ,. ,..:.;..: : : . . . ..:. :. ,. :.:; : :jy.::;3:ii . . . .: iiil.ilj:i::‘:‘ijs~.~~~~ . . . . .:....,. .: .: .
To be provided in Z-car garage, ensured during
delayed arditectural review
RECREATION SPACE
i. Setbacks The project is proposing a reduction in front yard setbacks from 20 feet to 15 feet.
The applicant has requested this reduction in standards as part of the affordable
housing incentive package (See Item E, below for a more detailed discussion of
affordable housing issues). The 15-foot front yard plus 5 foot utility easement would
still provide 20-feet inside of the sidewalk for parking in the driveway so vehicles will
not hang over onto the street. Although the ordinance requires a 20 foot minimum
front yard along public streets, the ordinance does permits 15 foot front yards on
private streets. This reduction in standards would not adversely impact the public,
health and safety and would not adversely impact the overall design of the project
The reduced setbacks would not reduce potential natural heating or cooling
opportunities. By permitting the variation in front yards, the project will have the
opportunity to create larger rear yards which may be desirable for many young
families. See Item E, below, for a more thorough discussion of affordable housing
incentives and rationales.
All of the homes adjacent to Melrose Drive (Prime Arterial) are set back from the
roadway a minimum of 50 feet as required pursuant to the Master Plan.
ii. Building Senaration
When there are more than 10 two-story units in a row, a minimum 20 foot building
separation is required between all units. The applicant has requested a reduction of
this standard under their affordable housing incentives. If approved, the minimum
building separation will be 10 feet. See Item E, below, for a more thorough
discussion of affordable housing incentives and rationales.
. . . lu. RV Storage
A minimum of 1,020 square feet of recreational vehicle (RV) storage space is
required for this project. The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan designated Lot 104
adjacent to Village “Q” as the RV storage facility for the Master Plan. Lot 104 is
approximately 3.5 acres in size and is proposed to be improved with approximately
142 RV parking spaces (see Exhiiit ‘La, Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility). This
project would be conditioned to process a RV storage agreement to ensure phasing
of construction of the facility occurs concurrent with need. As conditioned, prior to
Cl’ 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCH0 CARREL0 VILLAGE “0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 10
occupancy of any unit within Village “O”, adequate RV storage space must be
provided.
FACILITIES AND SERVICES
All required facilities and services will be available concurrent with need and will meet all
City standards. The Tentative Tract Map for Village “0” is designed with a 50 foot setback
from Melrose Drive and a portion of the site has been preserved as permanent open space.
Drainage facilities would be provided concurrent with development of Village “0” to reduce
erosion and flooding. All manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and
to visually screen the slopes and the associated development. The local streets within the
subdivision would be curvilinear and follow the natural contour. Streets O-A and a portion
of O-C would have a 60 foot wide right-of-way with curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides
of the streets, and streets O-B and O-C would have a 51 foot right-of-way and would be
single loaded with sidewalks on the developed side of the street only. Streets would connect
to Melrose Drive (via Carrillo Way) which is designated as a 126 foot wide prune arterial
in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
DELAYED ARCHITECTURAIi REVIEW
The proposed tentative tract map meets all City standards, except as may be modified for
affordable housing incentives. As allowed in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the applicant
has elected to process the floor plans and elevations for Village “0” through a “Delayed
Architectural Review’ (DAR) process as discussed above on page 2. To ensure that a
quality development is submitted during the DAR process, detailed design guidelines have
been prepared for Village “0”. The following table depicts the primary issues covered in
the Village “0” Design Guidelines.
VILLAGE “0”
DESIGN GUIDELINES ISSUES
Unit Mix A minimum of 3 floor plans with a minimum of 3 front building treatments
per floor plan shall be provided.
Plotting of Units No floor plan shall be plotted more than 60% of total units on a street; no
2 units with same facades closer than 100 feet on the same side of the street;
and units may not utilize entire building envelope.
Setbacks Melrose - 50’ minimum
Front - 15’ minimum with 15-25’ range
Rear - 15’ minimum with 20’ average
Side - 5’ minimum (10 min. corner lots)
Maximum Unit Size l-story 2,300 sq. ft.; 2story 3,500 sq. ft.
“- I, -
CT 93-os/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRHLO VILIAGE “0
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 11
;,g&$ i j: f$;,; j ~~:,l~~j.~;ii’~:.i
.‘.‘. : i ,, :::..:.::.:. ,:.I:.: >:: ,.....,. >,..> :.I::
Architecture
Garages
Accessory Structures
Walls and Fences
Signage
Planned Development
Ordinance
Common Recreation
Area
Park Design District
Sensitive Lots
Second Dwelling Units
Minor Modifications
Architectural style per Master Plan; compliance with small lot guidelines; 2
chimneys max.; min. 3 color schemes; and, use of a variety of front elevation
building materials.
At minimum, 85% of required garages shall be 2-tar garages, min. 20’ by u)‘,
and, garage doors set into walls.
Permitted as allowed by Section 21.10.050(1)(D).
Per Village “On Landscape Concept Details, Exhibit “J”.
Per Chapter 21.41 of CMC and as provided for in Master Plan.
Required compliance with Planned Development Ordinance, except as may
be modified for affordable housing incentives.
.2I3 acre site shall have turf, benches, one combination play equipment system
and two or three stand-alone play equipment per list.
Requires screening, landscaping and architecture compatible with Carrillo
Ranch Community Park
Allows up to 10% of lots to be developed with second dwelling units per
Section 21.10.015 of the CMC unless a higher percentage is approved under
a density bonus. Second dwelling.units shall require an amendment to the
PUD pursuant to Section 21.45.160 of the CMC.
Allows up to 5 cumulative changes to guidelines as a minor amendment
subject to Planning Director approval. (Second dwelling units shall require an
amendment to the PUD.)
D. CITY COUNCIL POLICY FOR SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
This City Council policy provides guidelines to encourage the quality development of small-
lot (less than 7,500 square feet) single-family projects. The intent of the guidelines is to
ensure that the homes have building articulation on all four sides and not appear as “row”
housing. They are primarily designed to apply to projects where there is a predominance
of two-story units. The Small Lot Guidelines have been incorporated into the Village “0”
Design Guidelines (see Exhibit “P”). This project will be required to comply with the
guiuiv;bnes during the delayed architectural review process as discussed in Item C (g)(i)
.
(I -
CT 934wPuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRLLO VILLAGE “0”
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 12
E. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 21. CHAPTER 21.85 “INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING”
As discussed on page 4, the applicant is required to provide 9.0 affordable housing units
which will be constructed as part of a combined affordable development on Village “F”. To
meet the affordable requirements, the applicant is requesting a reduction in development
standards. As proposed, Village “0” does not meet the Planned Development ordinance’s
20 foot front yard setback requirement (15 foot front yards are proposed), nor the required
20 foot building separation for more than ten two-story units in a row requirement (10 feet
minimum proposed). The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend
to the City Council that these standards be waived as allowed by Section 21.53.120. The
applicant has submitted a request for on and off-site incentives to make the project
economically feasible under SDP 94-01. The applicant has explained that the reduced front
yard setback incentive would allow the creation of larger rear yards which will help in the
marketing of the units. The monetary benefit from permitting more than ten two-story units
in a row being less than 20 feet apart would be equal to the profit on two units. The affordable housing incentives package included as part of SDP 94-01 has been reviewed and
approved by the Housing Committee and will be reviewed and acted upon by the Planning
Commission prior to the commission’s review and action on this project.
F. SUBDMSION ORDINANCE/TITLE 20
Engineering Issue
Does CT 93-08 comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance?
DISCUSSION
As conditioned, the proposed Tentative Map would comply with all the requirements of the
City’s Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. The project is conditioned to provide adequate
erosion control, and drainage. All required public street improvements including curb,
gutter, and sidewalk would be provided along all public streets. Streets have been designed
to City standards and will consist of a curb-to-curb paved width of either 40’ or 36’ with
curb, gutter, and a 5’ wide utility easement on each side. Sidewalks will be provided on one
side only for single loaded streets, and provided on both sides for double loaded streets.
Primary access to the lots would be provided on Street O-A from Carrillo Way. A second street intersection with Carrillo Way, at the south end of the site, will serve as an additional
access point to the project.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan identifies several planned streets to be included in the
adjacent Village “Q” that will also serve as access to Village “0”. It is likely that the
planned street improvements for Village ‘Q,, will be constructed prior to the development
of this project, however, as a “stand-alone” project, the tentative map requires the
c -4
CT 93-os/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 c ARRILLO VILLAGE ‘0”
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 13
identification of a second access point outside of the proposed access on Carrillo Way via
Melrose Drive. A condition will be placed on this project to identify and delineate a second
access point on the conformed tentative map exhibit.
Sewer service to Village “0” will be provided by a public sewer line that will tie into a 12”
sewer main to be installed for the entire Ranch0 Carrillo development. The sewer line will
drain by gravity flow in a westerly direction through the northern portion of Village “Q”,
where it will join the 12” sewer main. This sewer main will connect with an offsite pump
station, which will pump sewage to the existing Buena/San Marcos Interceptor system (See
Exhibit 5s”). Water will be provided to Village “0” from a trunk line of the water main
on Melrose Drive. The trunk line will enter the development through an easement located
at the northern end of the project. A reclaimed water line will also be installed on Melrose
Drive, and will be tapped for irrigation of the slope areas in Village “0”. Surface drainage
will be conveyed by standard curb and gutter that drains to an underground storm drain
system. The underground storm drain system will discharge into a check dam system to be
located on the west side of Carrillo Way in Village “Q”. In turn, this check dam system will
connect to the major drainage outlet planned for the Ranch0 Carrillo development.
Grading for this project was approved under Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17)
which was approved for this site as part of the Master Plan. No additional grading is
proposed as part of this project. The approved grading plan consists of a comprehensive
7-phase grading operation. Phase I will complete a majority of the grading required within
the entire Master Plan area. The remaining approved phases of grading will be limited to
site specific grading of the villages. The geotechnical report for Village “0” stated that no
soil or geologic conditions observed or noted would preclude the development of this
project, provided the recommendations of the report are followed.
G. GROWI’H MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18 in the
southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and
compliance with the adopted- performa&e standards are summarized as follows: -
CITY ADMINISTRATION
LIBRARY
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
177 sq. ft.
95 sq. ft.
51 EDU
Yes
Yes
Yes
PARKS
DRAINAGE
.35 acres
N/A
Yes
Yes
CIRCULATION
FIRE
510 ADT
Station Nos. 2,5, & 6
c
cr 93-os/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARREL.0 VILLAGE “0
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 14
OPEN SPACE
SCHOOLS
Master plan Compliance 5.7 acres
SMUSD
YeS
YtXl
SEWER COLLECl-ION
SYSTEM
51 EDU Yes
WATER DI!3TRIBUTION SYSTEM 11,220 GPD Yes
H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWIITI’LE 19 AND CEOA
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan MP
139(E) which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 91-04) for the Master Plan approved by City Council on July 27,1993.
Staff prepared an initial study to analyze potential environmental impacts of the project and
conducted additional project level studies including soils contamination studies and a
drainage study. These studies provide more focused and detailed analysis. Staff determined
that no additional impacts over those addressed in EIR 91-04 will occur and therefore, the
project is in prior compliance with Final EIR 91-04, The recommended and applicable
mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been incorporated into the project design or
are included as conditions of approval for this project.
IV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project: (1) is consistent with the General Plan; (2) complies with the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan; (3) complies with the subdivision ordinance; (4) complies with the
Planned Development Ordinance with the exception of front yard setbacks and building
separation requirements which have been reduced as an affordable housing incentive; (5)
is in conformance with Growth Management; and (6) will not significantly impact the
environment, therefore, staff recommends approval of CT 93-08/PUD 93-07.
CT 93-08/PuD 93-07
RANCH0 CARRLLLO VILLAGE “0
NOVEMBER 16,1994
PAGE 15
ATI’ACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Reduced Exhibits (8 l/2” x 11”)
Exhibit “K” Recreation Area Exhibit
Exhibit “L” Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility
Exhibit “M” Master Plan Open Space
Exhibit “N” Reduced (8 l/2” x 11”) Village “F” Site Plan
Exhibit “0” Reduced Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Exhibit (8 l/2” x 11”)
Exhibit “P” Village “0” Design Guidelines
Full size Exhibits “A” - “J”, dated September 7, 1994.
* BACKGROUND DATA SHEET /c
CASE NO: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
CASE NAME: Canillo Ranch Village “0
APPLICANT: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for annroval of a Tentative Tract MaD and Planned
DeveloDment Permit to include fiftv-one single familv residential lots (minimum 5.000 souare feet)
and one onen space lot on a 19.3 acre site nenerallv located south of Poinsettia Lane (nreviously
Carrillo Wav) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Section 19 T12 R3W
APN: 222-010-02 (Portion)
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Acres: 19.3 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 52/51
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RLM/OS
Density Allowed 3.9 (Master Plan) Density Proposed 3.9
Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
zoning Land Use
Site PC Single Familv Residential
North PC Park/SchooVSingleFamilvResidential
south PC Multiule Familv Residential
East PC Single Familv Residential
West PC Single Familv Residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District SMUSD Water District CMWIYLCWD Sewer District CMWD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 51
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Julv 13.1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative Declaration, issued
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
X Other, Prior Comnhance Final EIR 91-04
‘lW:vd
REv.7/91
SENT s\i. - ,’ ‘;I?’ OF C~LSB~,~ i< s-25-93 11:11kM ; of --;,sm-g~;5
vILT;pGEO
~WXOSURE STAfEME,NT
I
I
APPL;CANTS S?AT%lE?#? OP OlSct’%UfiE OP CtmAlN OWNlRSHlP INl’&RESTS ON A& APPuC~nohis WHtCH WtU AEQLIIRR DtScRt?flO~V ACTION CN ThQ PM OF WE CfTV COUNClL OR ANY #PcIN~~
I aOMO, COMMISSION OR CoMMm#.
Ihs8 Pm)
The following rnfotmation must &e direloud:
1.
List the names md rddto8w of ai! potam having 8 flnancirl intanst in th& applicationB
CbkirentalW
12636 High Bluff Drive
Yulte xl0
2.
List I!‘!@ nrme8 w?d sddrrrrM o? all patson$ hiving uly ownonhip intefwt in the ptoporZy invblked.
Ranch0 Carrillo, Inc. m c/o Continental-
suite 300
San Dieso, CA - 92130
3.
4.
If MY WfSOn idMfhd pUrouM^; t0 (1) 61 (2) &OVO is a wporatkn 01 pmrwshig, Ibt ttw rime: ~ddt@~m 01 rll indlvidW owning MO thm I m of the ahum in ttm corporatkn or owning any pm. intam: in the putmmllip.
.
If Uy p8non idanWd pumuvnt to (1) ~(2) abova 18 a non-pmfll organl&on or I thrlt, Iht the nuT addmu ol any pwrorr saving u 03ku 01 dirocm of tfw non+r&t organimtton w u trustoa or her
dtnatrua
SENT W:c I TY ID,= C~?RLSBQD -; S-25-93 11: 15,~~ ;
Oisclowe S2at8rMH ’
6194m+ 619 438 ;3443;# 7
pago 2
5. Have you had TOM tn~ S2!$0 .w~nh of ~W&WU tr~~~ad with MY mmbOf Ot City Wf. &a;:
Commbaions. Committees and Council within UIO paa twWo montha?
Yer - NO 2 tf ydS, pl9Or4 indicate person($)
Person ia defined u: Wry ind)uidua, Rfm, OapMmthip, joint wnture, ruoCtaziort, $&al dub, fraternal organunion, corporotm, wc8t0, trua foc8ivvw, 8yndm0, m md any atlw v, city md Tmty. crry
municipalii, districi Of Qhar c#mic8l $r;WwSiOn, # IMy C?tIW gloUp W CBfTWUttofl U!inQ U 8 L ”
(NOTC; AttW’t addl!iOn$l P~QIS QS MC$S~~.)
Ran&o Carrillo, XIII-Z.
Pfint of typa n8nw ot 0wnW
continental Hones
Pelt of typa wna of rppkmt
a
ClTYOFcARLsBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ”
LOCALFA- lMPACl’SASSESSMENTFORIvl
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Carrillo Ranch Village “0” - CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 18 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
ADDRESS: 12636 High Bhrff Drive, Suite 300. San Dieno. CA 92130
PHONE NO: (619) 793-2580 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 222-010-02 (Portion)
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 19.3 acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation:
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Demand in ADTs =
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD -
The project is 10 units above the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
.3S acres
N/A
N/A
510
Nos. 2.58~6
5.7
N/A
51
N/A
11.200
1 I 6 I 6 3, 1 56
41 ._- -
c) a a,
0
I 9 0
Lu u 0
<
Z a
!i
a
( ;:
w
- ‘
EXiiiWT “W
&$..ci:; i’:::j:.;:+.z<?: ,;::x ,:;+: j ,::>:, 35,:; $+$j,:+ :T:::“i!: :;s::;y.: ‘:. :.: ,:. .: :/ :,. ., ,., . . . . . .,
.
t-
I .
I
I
4
I
-i L
3e
j I . . . . ul _... -n 0” ..,
Dill
9* f
! “fi
lb ci
,c’: 3 as.1
5u 3 .. Ef. ;
& 5 -.
t P Q)
i5 . .
EXHlBlT “N”
c-* : -
EXHIBIT “K”
Fa’R ancho Carrillo Master Plan W Village “0)’
Play Equipment Options
MODEL EQUIPTMENT
Comblnatlon Play Equlptmont Systomr
600-548 -S” Horizontal Ladder, 90’ Crawl Tuba, S’lube Slide, Spiral
Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide, Spiral Slide
600-0069 Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam, 2’~6’
Wide Slide, 8’ Single Slide
137-4 chain Net climber, iire Climber, cunmd Tube slide, _ Don MiPs HorizontaI Ladder, 3 Platforms
137-7 Open Super Slide, Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, 2
Belmont PktformS
139-2 l/2 Ttibe, 112 Open Curved @de, Chain Net Climbs, Madison HortzontaJ Ladder, Wooden Suspension Bridge, Tka Climber,
Balance Beam, 2 Ptatforms
140-l Tuba Slide, Open Slide, ‘Tire Swing, Hortzontal Ladder, LakefIeld Access Ramp, 2 Platfmr
1391 l/2 Tube, 112 Open Slide, Chain Net Climber, Wooden Oakvillo Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balanca Beam, Horizontal
Ladder, 3 PlatMw
Stand-Alone Play Equiptmant
PIatform seesaw
8'Slide
B'ckular slide -
7’ Climber
Spring Platform
Wood Swings -
Tire Swing
Tot Sand Box
WoodParawBaf8
WoodHorizorhll&der
spfingMates
Notes:
AREA
48.X53’
33'x58
33x3s
27x' 28'
4Sx31'
53X40
44'x39'
lYx2T
12x4
wfl=@JM
6'dia
w-w
lfdia.
(structure)
2o'x24
29x24'
25x30
12x12
18*x2+
24x2s
7x7
6'dia.
(structure)
AGES #
4-12 36
3% -26
2-10 30
2% 20
3-10 40
3-10
2-10
4s
30
3%
.
4
B
.
3-12
4-12
4-12
2%
s
M
3%
m
4
3
3
8
s / s
1
s
l Play equipbnent for t& bts shall consist of one (1) Combination Play Equiptment System .
from the above list, and two (2) or three (3) ofti Stand-AJone Play Equiptmwt.
l Modd numbers referto Pkywofkl Systems and Chikhn’s Playground, Inc. models. Others
. may be subsMuM if appfowd.
JN 12004G - June to, 1993 B ’
RECREATION AREA TABULATION
REQUIRED: 51 units x 200 s. f. per unit =
10,200 at! of private and common recreaticn
PROVIDED: 12,Oob s.f. common hot tot) . . 51.000 s. f. &%a te (rear yards, approximately 20’ x 50’ each)=
63,000 s.f. TOTAL PFCR-ATION RFCWIRFMF s 8\
. V&GE o - RANcHK;) CARMLO
MB3 . .JN fzLx140
c-
f
- i
EXHMT W’
,*
‘1 i i i : I .
I i I
I i i I ! .
I i
.>:.:.-:.::.:.:;-- . . .:; ,.. *. ‘;~yg~::,:.:.:. j~.,~:‘:~.~j ;lj&&‘:gy:: .J$..&:.:., . . . . 3::p . . j ,’ ‘: ‘: ;..:. ., .:;::.:
. L
-
1:
I i .
c
,. Y
I -
i
- I
LL--, &
::: .I. : -_.- 8
7-p- _._
j
g
.
v =!I
d 21;
z of E! . OQ. . 3 8 0
* EXilBlT “0”
R ‘A N C ‘4 0
REVISED PER
PLANNIk COMMISSION
l/4/95
VILLAGE 0
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village 0 consists of 51 residential and 1 open space lots in the southern portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139E). The lots range in size from 5,690 to 13,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 7,859 square feet.
2. UNITMIX&SIZ.E
The project shill include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation treatments per floor plan 3 4
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sqft. (including the area of a second dwelliug unit)
Two Story Unit3 - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq.R (inchling the area of a
second dwelling unit)
mge 0 LItsign Guide&# 1
l
3. PLOTTING
~unitrshallbeplottedwithintheprescribedbuildingenvelopeasshownonthe architecmral data exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village 0. Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more than 60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front facades shah be plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street. Units may be plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the requirements of the Village 0 Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots may not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the
ability to construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall building coverage does not exceed 50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory structures that are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these conditions shah be attached to the plot. plan for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase and the overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3 (Plotting), 5 D, E, & G (Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these guidelines. This matrix may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and elevations for this tentative map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
MelroSe All unit$ shall maintain a 50’ minimum setback from Melrose ROW
Front In accordance with Section 21.45.090(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. S
All units shall have a minimum 15’ deep, flat usable rear yard.
Side 5’ minimum 10’ minimum for comer lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance). Building separation should range from 10’ - 20’ as shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit.
hrrogr 0 Lkdgm GuhWines 2 Jv 1% Iw SQ
,,
Building separation All units in Village 0 shall comply with the building separation requirements of the Planned DeveIopmaU Ordinance, Carl&ad
Municipal Code Section 21.45.090(5). If the applicant decides to develop all of the lots along Streets O-B & O-C with two story units, without a 20’ building separation, then 10 or fewer
unitsinarowshallbeumstructed. InsuchacaseLots6&49
shallberestrictedsoasndtoperrnittheconstnrctionofa
dwelling unit. The applicant shall decide whether Lots 6 8c 49 will be developable lots prior to approval of Final Map.
5. ARC-
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival CdlSW CaMornia Mission Bungalow Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Viie 0, it shall be compatible with the surrounding Villages and the structures within Carrillo Ranch Park as determined by the Planning Director. Archi&tural styles are
described in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master PI& General Community
Development Standards page3 31-35.
B. Whenthreeormore2storyunitsareinarowsituatedlessthan15feetapart,
at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a
depth of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single story element).
C. When three 2 story units in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story units shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this in not intended to preclude long shed type roofs falling to a single story element).
village 0 Design GuUdines 3 Jarurorl 14 I995
'a'
E-
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
,’ I
Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the paheter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline, the single story
edge shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33%
shall be distributed throughout the project.
Atleast50%oftheunitsinthisprojectshallhaveatleastfoursepamte building planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inched and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows
and roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane
and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet/ A plane must be a
minimum of 30 square feet to receive credit under this section.
Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph E for front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planea
on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
At least 50% of the units in this project shall have one side elevation where
there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7 feet.
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recesxd or projected a minimum of 2” and shall be with wood or colored aluminum window frames (no mill finished).
The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the village.
A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any on residence.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the
units within this village.
Windows shall be phased to maximum privacy. Windows shall be located so that they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible la&aping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
At least three different roof colors shall be used on this project. :
A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations of these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer, wood trim, stucco and stone.
piuagr Oh&n Gui&iYms 4
_-.-.-- .---- --
m- -
I ; ,
P. Atlcast15%oftheunitsinViieOshallbeonestory.
-. ._ 6. GARAGES
A. AII garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
B. Allgarag~thatfaceontothestnetshallprovideaminimumof20’~~ the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 15% of the units in this village shall have three door garages.
Units with three car garages shall be distributed throughout the project. Three cargarageunitsshallbeamixofunitswiththreeseparateonecargarage doorsallonthe~planeandunitswithatwocargaragedoarandaonecar
garage door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12”. Driveways serving three car garages shall have a maximum width of 24’ at the back of the sidewalk and have a curvilhcar side flaring to its greatest width at the entrance to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3” rat& than being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(l)@) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone). Accessory structures constructed in conformance with this standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit for this project unless the lot coverage as provided for in these guidelines would be exceeded.
8. WALLSANDFEJKES
Wails and fenas shall be provided as shown by the Village 0 Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be prwided to identify-the Village and provide directional information. All
Signage will be developed in acco&nce with the Village 0 Landscape Exhibit. The exact location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of ‘the first building permit. Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.’
mge 0 Design Gu&Wnes 5 J-q 129 1993
8”
..‘,‘.
10 LCYTDRAINS
privattbtdrairuareapprovedforlotsfrontingonsteep~. Lotdfainsallowpad elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and
setbacks from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be limited as follows:
.
StEt Maximum%ofLots
~2.5% 50% ~2.5 - 5% 75% x5 - 7.5% 90% 17.5 - 12% 100%
11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
All development in Village 0 shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 21.45 (Planned Development Ordiwwx) of the Carl&ad Municipal code, except as may be
mod&d for the approved affordable housing incentives package for the combined affordable housing site.
12. COMMON RECREATION AREA
The common passive recreational area between Melrose Avenue and Street O-B shall
have turf, benches and one combination plan\y equipment system and two or three of
the stand alone play equipment from the following list:
Combination Play Equipment Systems
600-548 ‘3” Horizontal Ladder, 90 degree Crawl Tube, 5” Tube Slide, Spiral Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide,
Spiral Slide
Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam,
2’x6’ Wide Slide, 8’ Single Slide
1374 Don Mill3 Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, Curved Tube Slide,
Horizontal Ladder, 3 Platforms
137-7 Belmont Open Super Slide, Chain Net climber, Tire Climber, 2 Platiorms :
139-2 Madison l/2 Tube, l/2 Open Curved Slide, Chain Net Climk,
Balance Beam, Two Platforms
t”urcrg Olkdgn GuUMnes 6 Jonwy 1% 1~# so
I-
140-l Lakefield
_’ , ,
Tube Slide, Open Slide, Tire Swing, Horizontal Ladder, Access Ramp, Two Platforms
139-l oah& Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balance Beam,
Horizontal Ladder, Three Platiorms
Note: Model numbers refer to Playworld Systems and Children’s Playground, Inc. Models. Others may be substituted if approved.
Stand-Alone Equipment
Platiorm seesaw WoodParallelBats 6’ Slide Wood Horizontal Ladder
8’ Circular Slide spring Mates
7’ Climber Whirl
spring Platform Tot Sand Box
wcwd swings Tire Swing
13. sENslTlvE LOTS
Lots 1-14
A. Lots l-14 are located within the boundaries of the Special Parks Design District established by the Pancho Carrillo Master Plan. These units shall be
designed and screened so that they are compatible with the existing buildings and vegetation within the Pancho Carrillo Community Park Where possible,
units shall be plotted to provide the maximum possible setback from the tops
of slopes.
B. Final Landscape Plans submitted for building plan check shall ensure that
special attention is given to the selection of the plant species selected for the landscaping of these lots, qecially the slopes adjacent to Carrillo Way. No
more than a maximum of 30% of each unit on lots 1-14 should be visible from
the historical building compound at a point five years after the initial planting.
Fast growing alders and/or eucalyptus in combination with California live oaks
will be planted on the slopes to screen these units from the park site.
7 Jaw 14 m
\I
_~_.___ _ * *- - l
14. SECOND ulnm
Up to 10% of the lots in Village 0 may be developed with second dwelling units. A greater number of second dwelling units may be allowed if approved under a Density Bonus to be approved as a part of the Housing Agreement (required pursuant to SDP 94-01) between the applicant and the City. All second units shall be developed pursuant to Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and processed in conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit ordinance, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and the Vie 0 Design Guidelines.
The developer of Village 0 has the option to develop the second units concurrently with the primary units. TheunitsmaybeapprovedaspaRoftheMinorPlanned Development Permit that approves the floor plans and architecture for Vie 0 as
long as they are processed consistent with Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
15. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is considered a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project. Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the
requirements of Section 21.10.015 of the Carl&d Municipal Code.
mge 0 Lksign Guhiebs 8 Ja-w 4 1~3
6V
EXl%K 4
January 4,1995
look af Village “F again if the applicant decides to dssignate wnd dwefllng
can SupQort the staff recommendation. The law require6 15% 0
eat must he signed which is a contract to ensure co
units, rnw would be required to pay appropriate fess
Commissioner Envtn that the appkant solved the front
and #52.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he wou He thinks it shouid be understood that if this
standards.
ACTION: Motbn was made
elling units used as second dwelling units. lage “F must meet all of the minimum
Welshons, Commissioners Compas, Erwin, Man
2. CT 93-08/PUO 93-07 - RANCH0 CAARILLO VILLAGE “0” - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Devebpment Permit to include 51 single family residentfal lots (minimum 5,000 s.f.), and one open space bt on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane (previously Carritb Way) extsnsbn, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Ptan Zone 18.
Teni Woods, Aswx&te Planner, rwlewed me background of the request and reminded everyone mat a
portion of Village ‘0” was discus& at the hearing on November l&1994. The discussion dealt
exclusively wlth smdafds mdlfbatbns under me Site Development Plan for affordable housing. In her
presentation shewilf be making comments on items which have heen modified as a result of tfte prevbus
discussbn.
Ms. Woods stated that Rancho Carrtlb Village “0” is a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and
Planned Development Permit to include 51 single family residential lots and one open space bt on a
19.3 acre site. The project is located west of Melrose extension and s0um of Poinsettia Lane extension, in
the southern portion of the Rancho Carrilb Mastsv Plan. The 51 individual single family lots would range insizefrom5,690s.f.to13,500s.f. ~mod~ed,putsuanttooommcHllsat~pr~hearing,~ project is being designed as aone and two-story neighbortrood. A minimum of 15% Of the unltlr would be designed as single story. A .28 acre active/passive recreation area is being incfuded in the 5.7 acre open
space bt in the project. This will be designed as a tot bt and me design guideflnee set up the amenitise which will be provided in that tot bt. As prevbusfy dbnl#rarl, this PUO will process architectural
eleVatbnS and floor plans through the delayed architectural review procses. 0
PLANNING COMMISSION : , January 4,1995 PAGE 9
~.W~drowrd~of~layoutofvill~‘o”andvle~of~~,totbt,anb~recreatkrr
areas. me pmject a, designed is consist~t with me general plan, RLM, and open space m The open spaa requlmd purwant to the master plan and me general plan have been provbed in me i.7 acre bt #52. The pmfect is alao consistent with me Rancho Carrilb Master Plan in that it is the ap9roptiate use and densily set out in the master plan. It is consistent with the Hillside Development Permit whkh was approvedaspartofthemasterplan. ltalsocom9l~withaliofthegerwKal~ign~~assa~in the master plan, including view preservatbn and the 50 ft. minimum setbacks from Melrose Drive. it complies with the noise mitigation requirement whkh is 60 d8A CNEL. To mitigate noise, a 6 ft. high noise wall will he placed parallel to Metrose Orive at me east end of Village “0” beginning at the intersection of Carrilb Way and running north approximately 250 ft. along Melrose Drive. The project has been designed in accordance with the special park design district requirements in the master plan, including ail landscaping abng Lots #l through #lo, which are most visible. The project is consistent with all open space requirements, including me provision of a Village trail (not a citywide trail) into the tot bt area. The project also provides for the infrastructure, improvements, facilities, and services, including all access streets (Melrose Olive and Poinsettia Lane) built out to the nv widths to provide access to this project, as weii as sswer, whkh is not currently available to this site.
Ms. Woods stated that Village “0” is a Planned Unit Development and, as such, staff must make certain recommendations to ensure that it complies with the PUO ordinance. As modified, the project will comply
with ail standards of the PUO ordinance, including the bt size, front yard setbacks, and side yard setbacks.
Building separations will now comply either through the provision of the required separation under the code or by not having ten units in a row. In this case, two lots will he dropped in Village “0.’ Street wbths, recreation, parking, and RV storage will be provided. As mentioned earlier, the project will be pmcsewd through the delayed architectural review procedure. This means that elevations and fborplans are not
being provided at this time. In order to ensure that a quality development will he presented during the delayed architectural review, staff has included specific design guidelines for Village “0.” These design guidelines discuss unit mix, plotting, setbaclcs, and maximum unit size.
Ms. Woods stated that the amended errata sheet passed out before the meeting makes it clear that the maximum unit size of 2,300 s.f. for single story units and 3,500 s.f. for two story units will include the area of a second dwelling unit, if they are provided. It also addresses architecture and garage sizes. The
project is limited to 15% of three-car garages, therefore 65% of the project must be Mr garages. The
errata sheet also address= accessory structures, walls, signage, common recreation areas, and adds
additional requirements for the special pa& design district. The project, as designed, is in compliance with
the lnclusionary Housing Ordinance and has heen conditioned to provide nine affordable units in Village “F.” The project has been reviewed for environmental compliance in terms of direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts. It is consistent with the final EIR and no additional environmental impacts were discovered. All applicable mitigation measures have heen incorporated into the project or are
conditions of project -al. Staff recommends approval.
Chairman Webhone inquired about the proposed street width of 51-60 ft. Ken Muon, Associate Engineer replied that through streets are required to he 60 ft. wide. However, the street width requirement for cul-de-sacs ts 56 ft. and for single loaded cul-de-sacs is 51 ft.
Chairman Welshona invited the apptkant to speak
Chris Chambers, Continental Homes, 12636 High Bluff Drive, San Olego, add- the Commission and
stated that he agreecr with the stafl report and doesn’t have much to add. He would like to encourage
Commissioners to mentbn any concerns they might have prior to the close of public testimony so that he will have a chance to respond.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the applicant had seen the addendum and if it was m. Mr. Chambers replied Yes.
4
MfNUTQ
PLANNING COMMlSSlON Janbary 4,19S I PAGE 10
Chairman WeUmm opened the public testimony and issued me invitatbn to spe&
There being no parsons deuirtng to addrass the Commissbn on this topk, Chairman Wabhons declarad
the puhlk testimony ckaed and offered me applicant an opportunity for a cbslng statement.
Mr. Chambers concluded his rsmartcs by stated that he hopss the Commissiin wiH approve the probct a0 conditioned.
Chairman Wetshorts opened the item for dlscussiin among the Commission membsrs.
Commissioner Nielsen inquired why only 15% of the units would have three-car garages. Ms. Woods rsptied that if the antire dsvekpment is albwsd to have thrae-car garages, that due to the narrow bt widths, they would dominate the street scsne and be monotonous.
The appticant, Mr. Chambers, commented that he understands the two-door garages are required for aesthetics, however it will not preclude designing the garages to accommodate three cars. He hopes to
provide tandem hays where two cars will he parked in tandem behind one of the doors. Ms. Woods stated
that this design would be accsptahte to staff.
Commissiiner Erwin inquired if me tandem garages will he for inclusbnary housing only. Ms. Woods
replied No. The appIkant must provide a minimum 20 ft. x 20 ft. garage. The deplh behind one of the doors may be 40 ft. deep in order to accommodate two vehkles. The depth behind the second door would
be 20 ft. deep to accommodate only one vehicle.
Commissioner Nietsen inquired if the garage square footage is included in the building square footage.
Ms. Woods replied Yes. If a tandem garage is used, the two-story unit could not excaed 3,500 s.f.
Commissioner Erwin inquired how many of the units will he permitted to have tandem garages. Ms. Woods replied that the ordinance requires two covered standard parking spaces for each unit. Each of the units in Village “0” will have three spaces, two of which may bs tandem.
Commissbnsr Compas statad that he pan support the staff recommsndatbn.
ACTION: Motbn was made by Commissbner Noble, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning Commission Rssolutbn Noa. 3675 and 3676, recummanding approval of CT 93-06 and PUO 93-07, based on the findings and sub@ct to me conditions aNained therein, including the modifkatkns contained in addendum dated January 4,1995 and the staff
memo dated January 4,1995 which was induded in the packet.
VOTE: 7-o AYES: Chairman Wafshons, Commissioners Compas, Erwin, Monroy, Niels8n, Noble, and
savary NOiESz None ABSTAIN: None
Local Facilities M
ap to subdivide six
Hofman Planning
Associates
0 0 0
my Cwnc; /
C&y rnmv
Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis
February 16, 1995
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
RE: CITY COUNCIL HEARINGS FOR CONTINENTAL HOMES TENTATIVE MAPS
CT 93-4 Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “L”, “M”, “N”, “Q” & “T”
CT 93-8/PUD 93-7 Ranch0 Carrillo Village “0”
CT 93-7/PUD 93-6/SDP 94-l Ranch0 Carrillo Villages “F”, “G” & “P”
Honorable Mayor Lewis
This letter is written on behalf of Continental Homes who respectively requests a continuance of the above described applications from the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting to the
March 7, 1995 meeting. Continental Homes is making this request for the following
reasons:
1. A minor issue has recently arisen relating to the impacts of the project on five
homes located adjacent to the southern boundary of Village Q. These
homeowners would like us to look at providing a better landscaping buffer
between our project and their homes. A two week continuance would allow
us to meet with these homeowners to try and resolve any issues they may
have. Our site,planner has looked at this issue and has indicated that our
project could provide more buffering to these people without the need for
maj-or modifications to our plan.
2. Due to the holiday on February 20, 1995 we will have insufficient time to
adequately prepare our presentation for the hearing.
3. Due to prior scheduling conflicts the principals of Continental Homes will be
unable to attend the February 21, 1995 City Council meeting.
2386 Faraday Avenue l Suite 120 l Carlsbad l CA 92008 l (619) 438-1465 l Fax: (619) 43812443
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to call me if you have any
questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Mike Howes
cc Ray Pachett
Marty Orenyak
Michael Holzmiller
Chris Chambers
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(201 5.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Clounty of San Diego
I ;am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years,
and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled rriatter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
Blade-Cit ken
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and
published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial circulation in Bonsall, Fallbrook. Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of San Diego, State of California. under the date of June 30,1989, case number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (:;et in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Feb. 11, 1995
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Clated at Oceanside,California, this 1 7 day
c'f FEb. 1995
BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising
1722 South Hill Street P.O. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054
(6 1 9) 433-7333
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Public Hearing
Paste Clipping of Notice SECURELY
1 -i; H
u
. -
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 93=8/PUD 93-7 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE "0"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 21, 1995, to consider an application for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development to include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1 open space lot on a 19.3 acre site on property generally located south of the Poinsettia Lane (previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of the Melrose Drive extension, in the PC Zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18, and more particularly described as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, and a portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Terri Woods, in the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, extension 4447.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Unit Development in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Continental Homes PUBLISH: February 11, 1995
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
I - - -I
cl
RANCH0 CARRU.0 VlLlAG&W’ CT 93-08/PW 93-07’
NOTlCE OF PUBUC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the Cii of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Wednesday, November 16,1994, to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Development Permit to include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000
square feet), and 1 open space lot on a 19.3 acre site on property generally located south of
Poinsettia Lane (previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the PC
zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18 and more particulariy described as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 south, range 4 west, and a portion of Sections
18 and 19, Township 12 south, range 3 west, San Bernardino Meridian, City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after November 10,1994. If you have
any questions, please call Terri Woods in the Planning Department at (619) 433-l 161, ext. 4447.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Development Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior
to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “0”
PUBUSH: NOVEMBER 4,1994
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
BH?d
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notlds
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - Ranch0 Carrillo Village "0"
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
Assistant City Man--
.-
January 31, 1995 Date
JOB NUMBER 12004C
---
‘LABELS
d
PROPERTY OWNERS
SECURITY PAC NTL BANK PO BOX 90610 PASADENA CA 91109
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASS C/O THE FIELDSTONE CO 14 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LIMITED 438 CAMINO DEL RIO 112B SAN DIEGO CA 92108
PONDEROSACOUNTRYHMOWNRS 23382 MILL CREEK DR /120 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653
LA COSTA HOTEL&SPA CORP 2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARNOLD&HOLLY MICHELS 2602 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETER&JENNIFER SARA 2604 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL&ANN BEAUCHEMIN 2606 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
NM&CATHERINE DAUGHERTY 2600 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES C SHIELDS II C/O EADS COREL 2532 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DADELALYSSA MYRES 2530 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY&MARY AMSTUTZ 13169 AUTUMN HILL LN HERNDON VA 22071
DENNIS&JOANNE PARADISE 2526 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALVIN&DIANE PIERCE 6406 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY&LINDA MC DEVITT 6404 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLYN MUNDY TRUST 6402 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDWARD&MAUREEN MOWRY 6400 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GRANT&JANET DUNLAP 6401 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&PAMELA WEATHERFORD 6403 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ED&LYNN SPENCER TRUST 6405 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
GENE&INGER HUBER 6407 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERTtRENE VANHORNE 6409 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAELLCHRISTINNA HALL 6411 EL PAT0 CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
A noticehas been mal!ed to
all prooert;r o’Nner;,‘oc~:~~~nt~ ,;-*-A k---’
r -
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
JULIA TESCHLER JAMES&KIMBERLY GRANT WERNER&DORIS MARXUS 6413 EL PAT0 CT 2514 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2512 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNLVALSA STEPHEN MICHAEL GITTLEMAN MICHAEL&KAREN WILL 2510 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2508 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2506 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEON&FLORENCE GREENBERG DENNIS&LENORE HENDRICKSON' H G & MAUDIE STEVENS 2629 OBELISCO PL 2502 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2500 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&ANN HILL ROBERT&MONICA XLATT 2517 LA GOLONDRINA ST 6415 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN&CINDA COE S BROSTOFF & T WHITE 6417 LA PALOMA ST 2608 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROB&TERRIE PURDY ROBTCCARMELA MCNIFF 2612 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2614 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&BARBARA OERUM FERNANDO&LYDIA MONROY 2618 LA GOLONDRINA ST PO BOX 2442 CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92074
XENNETHGTHRESIA MAY 6414 CAYENNE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREYdrPAMMY GLICXMAN 2610 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAWRENCE&ROSE FIRSTEN 2616 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREGORY KUSNER 2622 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
S FROSTROM t G GIBSON FRANXCLENORE CARR KENT ANDERSON 2624 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2626 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2627 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
XENNETHtrWINONA TAIT WMdrGRACIELA EWASKIW DAN&CAROLINE COOPER 2625 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2623 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2621 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 2
. - . -
LABELS ZROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
DALE&ELSIE GARDETTO MEL&PHYLLIS LEVIN DENNIS&ARLENE SHERREITT 2619 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2286 BOCA ST 2615 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
WE&CAROL HORSCHEL GARRY&MARTHA GRACE 2613 LA GOLCNDRINA ST 2611 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY&JAN GRELL PAUL&SALLY RINGWOCD 2607 LA GOLCNDRINA ST 2665 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN CUTLER R DUGGAN t J SAROFF 2601 LA GOLONDRINA ST 505 SABAL LAKE DR Xl01 CARLSBAD CA 92009 LONGWOOD FL 32779
ROBT ETHERTON BRIAN&MARY MCXEON FRANK&RUTH ETHERTON 2708 LA GOLONDRINA 11506 25TH ST NE CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAKE STEVENS WA 98258
MICHAEL FARR JAMES&BARBARA RUECKL KATHLEEN KENNEDY 2714 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2712 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNbrNONA GRIFFITH BCADELINA GALINDO 2718 LA GOLONDRINA ST 2720 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC&LUCILLE OLSON JOHN SWOPE 7089 MURILLC LN 6426 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
HAROLD&MARJORIE GOLDEN 2609 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS&KATHLEEN EVANS 2603 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMLIRMA CAMPBELL 2704 LA GOLCNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD&LYNN KILLION 3694 COPPER CREST RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
MICHAEL&JANET PUCCIO 2716 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIKHAILCELLEN ALAKA 2722 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KARLE JOHNSON 6428 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
W FELBER & L VOSS 6430 CHIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PHUC HUU TRUONG MY-DUNG THI NGUYEN 6432 CXIRIQUI LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN&JANET CARRO 6428 EL PERICO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 3
. -
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS
.
ALSEHILA'KHANIJOW 2713 LA GOLGNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PETERCKARIN BRAEMER 2719 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARSHALL&LAUREN CLGW 2703 LA GOLGNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA .92009
BRIANCYONG FENLGN 2816 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&MICHELLE LEWIS III 2828 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL HOFFER RONNA WEBB 2840 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
BETTILOO OLSEN 2715 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY&CYNTHIA CESENA 2721 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNLRIKI BAGLEY 2701 LA GOLGDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN&DALYS STEVENSON 2820 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WMLBARBARA HESS 2832 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALTERS TRUST 2844 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GOSHTASB HAMSAYEH JOHN&BETTY BRUCE PARIZAD BAGHEGGULESTANI 2902 CACATUA ST 2445 LA AMATISTA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92014
JKbBARBARA RYAN JERRY&GLENDA GRIFFIN 2841 ESTURION ST 2833 ESTURION ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARL&BAD CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
JOHN&MICHELLE MONTROY 2717 LA GOLGNDRINA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA BARRON 2314 RUE ADRIANE LA JOLLA CA 92037
CLARENCE&MARY BOYD 2812 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES&LYNN BRADLEY 2824 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENT&SHARON LARSEN 2836 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT&BRIDGET WUESTE 2849 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&HAZEL HORWITZ 2825 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 4
,
-2LABELs
NEIL&DIANE OPENSHAW 2819 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
OMAR ORR DAVID&DONNA ORR 2805 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
THEO&VIRGINIA ERLER 6319 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA '92009
TERRY&MARGARITA HOLT 1464 9TH ST MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
RONALD&KATHLEEN BLOK 2806 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLEN SPOUSTA 2818 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JLFREDERICA ROSENFIELD 2830 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
HERMANdrADELINE WADLEY 2844 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 _
ROBERT DOUGHERTY 2858 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 5
PROPERTY OWNERS
FRANK&FRANCES MESSANO 2813 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD&SALLY TADLGCK 2801 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL SALOUR LVG TRST 6311 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROY&DANA PRICE 6312 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLENCLGRI FISHMAN 2810 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMESCEMIKO HINKLEY 2822 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEONORA REPP 2834 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
NEIL&ANITA TIPPLE 2848 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARTHUR&JOAN MARKOVITS 3002 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
-
JOB NUMBER 12004C
MICHAEL&ADELE LAPADULA 2809 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DWIGHT&DONNA JOHNSON 6327 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHLfJENNIFER STEIDLEY 6303 CHORLITO ST CARLSBAD CA 92609
MICHAEL&DIANNE HURT 2802 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
DIANE BERRY 2814 ESTURION CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&JULIA GUTHRIE 2826 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRIStCYNTHXA PHILLIPS 2840 ESTURION PL CARLSBAD CA 92009
BEHZADCJALEN SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN&SHEILA TREBBIN 3006 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
.
LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
CECIL&LYDIA DUNCAN DAVID&TERRY SITTNER 3010 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL GOFORTH PO BOX 3104 CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARJORIE KAHN 3014 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALLAN&BARBmHARRIMAN' WMCEVELYN BUSTER GERLPATRICIA MACALUSO 719 DAKOTA TRL 781 SW BAYPOINTE CIR 3020 UNICORN10 ST FRANKLIN LAKES NJ 07417 PALM CITY FL 34990 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ESCH FAMILY TRUST 3022 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
SATISH&PADNINI KADABA 3024 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHAS&PATRICIA OSTERHOUT 3028 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILBURLLIDA STEPHENS 2939 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
J MEROD & M OBERLANDER C&N GRAZIOLI C L GRAZIOLI 2933 CACATUA ST C/O GRAZIOLI CARLSBAD CA 92009 PO BOX 3333-186 ENCINITAS CA 92024
DOMLMARIANNE CANDELA HYUNGbtYOUNG YANG ENGEL FAMILY TRUST 2921 CACATUA ST 2915 CACATUA ST 2909 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID&PATRICIA CORTINA FRANKCMILLICENT SARVARY W&IRENE DJOBADZE 2903 CACATUA ST 1232 MONCADO DR 4200 PARXSIDE PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 GLENDALE CA 91207 CARLSBAD CA 92008
VERNON&BERNICE PLANE 2914 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&JENN POPPLETON 2920 CAPAZO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DON&JANET MAYHUE 298 GREENWOOD PL BONITA CA 91902
JAMES&JULIA KLAERICH RUBY KEWLEY RICHARD&ANNE SPOONER 2928 CACATUA ST 1736 CATALPA RD 2936 CACATUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
COLE FAMILY TRUST NEIL&SUSAN RAFPAPORT MICHAEL&KAREN FORINO 3454 E FLORENCE AVE 3102 UNICORN10 ST 3106 UNICORN10 ST HUNTINGTON PK CA 90255 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 6
-LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS
ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST 3110 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBM CA 92009
THOMAS&JUDITH CATTELL NLEEhJAC COTTERHAN 6573 BIA BARONA 6571 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
-
JOB NUMBER 11348
FRANK&ALICE FREDA 6575 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBThJANICE BALOG 6567 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBT&LOUISE MC BREEN BEN&BETTY SIGLER CARL&JOYCE HILL 5960 N HUNINGBIRD 6563 VIA BARONA 6561 VIA BARONA PARADISE VLY AZ 85253 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBTGNARGARET SCHERNER ALEX&MAYA ZELITSKY 6559 VIA BARONA 6557 VIA BORONA CARLSBM CA -92009' CAKLSBAD CA 92009
VERN&WANDA MARTIN JERRY&ALICE FARROW 12521 SAFFORD ST PO BOX 9000-137 GARDEN GROVE CA 92640 CARLSBM CA 92018
H&JUNE ZIMMERMAN JAMES&DOROTHY OHARA 1220 SHERIDAN RD 6545 VIA BARONA WILNETTE IL 60091 CARLSBM CA 92009
ERICA M FREDERICK 6555 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHLGCYNTHIA KOOPSEN 6549 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
GARY&IRENE RUBEN 8900 KEYSTONE ST 1066 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46240
KULJIS FAMILY TRUST JACQUELINE BURNS MARILYN STOVER 6541 VIA BARONA 6539 VIA BARONA 6512 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
AKEL KORNbrNARION PLACE RONALD&ORA RENALDI CLAIRE FITZPATRICK TRUST 6516 VIA BARONA PO BOX 9926 1732 CATALPA RD CARLSBM CA 92009 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CA 95731 CARLSBM CA 92009
JOHN&SHARON NEMMERS MICHAELbCAROLKURZEJA ANNE DHUNJISHAW 2304 DUNSTAN ST 6520 VIA BARONA 6524 VIA BARONA OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 7
ILABELS
. -
CARLoSfVERA ARECCO 1225 BENT OAK TRL ALTANONTE SPR FL 32714
HOWARD&JOAN MEES PO BOX 428 BONSALL CA 92003
MICHAEL&LINDA DOOLEY 6540 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
STEVEN JWYMAN AMY BOWERS 6546 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
THEODORE&LORNA JACK 6552 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
PROPERTY OWNERS
ALAN BLACKBURN 5134 BARRACUDA CT WALDORF MD 20603
ARTHURCBERNICE TILTON 6532 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIAM HANLON 6548 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
LOIE&JILL POWELL 6554 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORTHEAST SAVINGS CONS LA COSTA MCA 4250 EXECUTIVE SQU X210 C/O PACKARD&LOOMIS INC LA JOLLA CA 92037 5670 EL CANINO REAL F CARLSBM CA 92009
HJ&WANDA WARNER WN&MADELINE SLATTERY 6538 CORTE MONTECITO 6540 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
HELEN NOONAN SHEILA BARROW 6544 CORTE MONTECITO 6545 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JAMES&LYDIA CARVER GARY SCHNEIR 6541 CORTE MONTECITO 6539 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
D NEWKIRKLD KANERER 6530 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
DANIELtKRISTINE JUNG HIROSH MINURA&KIYOKO 1683 ORANGE BLOSSOM WAY ENCINITAS CA 92024
DARLENE DORSEY 6544 VIA BARONA CARLSBM CA 92009
LORETTACGERALD HOFFMANN CHRISTINE HESS 6550 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBT&CECELIA MICHELA 6556 VIA BARONA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NARY ELLEN NEWETT 6542 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
RICHARD&MARILYN TRAUB 6543 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHAEL&NARY HARRISON 6537 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
.
PAGE 8
?
1
:LABELS
h
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
EM&RACHEL FITZGERALD 6513 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
EUGENE&CHRISTINE HUMPHREY 6515 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY BRADLEY 6514 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE WEDGE JR 6518 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN BRODSKY 6516 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
PETER STEVENS 6520 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVENS FAMILY TRUST 6524 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
TODhREBECCA OBENALIER 1547 PARKVIEW DR VISTA CA 92083
ROBTCJANICE BALOG 6526 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
GLEN WATSON 6528 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
ALBERT MICKES JR 6530 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUIS NEIHEISEL ANN&HERB&CARROL VONGAL 6532 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBAD CA 92009
R GREEN & C DITTMAR 6536 CORTE MONTECITO CARLSBM CA 92009
RAND&BARBARA SWENSON 5645 WHITE MOUNTAIN CT MARTINEZ CA 94553
LAWRENCE®INA RIGGS 6537 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
JOSEPH&MARGARET FROST 6535 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92008
DAVID&CHERYL FALK 6539 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP 2584 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBM CA 92008
JOHN&CATHY PRAAMSNA 6531 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
VIRGINIA BONAGURA 6533 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
FRANCES SCHLACK 6534 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
KEVIN&VALERIE SPOUSTA 6536 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
LEILA HEYLAND 6538 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE DALTON 6540 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIAM&SHIRLEY MCPHAIL 6542 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
JOEL GOODRICH 6544 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 9
c-*
PROPERTY OWNERS
,* -..
JOB NUKBER 12004C
#WWK&KARLA STOUDEK SHARON TOL RICH&JUDY SEVIER 1014 CHRIST1 LN 6548 CORTE VALDEZ 215 S VALLEY DRIVE FALLBRGOK CA 92028 CARLSBM CA 92009 MANHATTAN BCH CA 90266
JAMES&MARY BROWER 6552 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA 92009
CLINTON PETERSON PO BOX 4136 LK SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CHARLES KNISLEY GRANA FAMILY TRUST 6543 CORTE VALDEZ 83 6541 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBM CA '92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
w1LL1AMwEAvERJR 3104 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009
WIGNANCY CAHOONE 6545 CORTE VALDEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009
&LOOMIS INC
SBM CA 92008
EMOCYOLANDA PORRO 3106 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICHARD SIVIY THONASCNARGARET FITZGERALD B HOOVER h M MOODY 3108 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3110 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3112 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92QO9 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
ALAN&KATHLEEN FULNER NORA KNIGHT KENNETH&COLLEEN FLOYD 3114 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 3116 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 1346 ORIBIA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 DEL MAR CA 92014
WILLIAM&DONNA SMITH RICHARD&NARY RIEDEL R ANDERSEN & B TILT 3120 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 6502 VIA OSTRA 6504 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
SALLY HOPKINS THOMAS&LINDA HARDY JOHN&LISA BLEVINS 6506 VIA OSTRA 3159 AVENIDA TOPANGA 3157 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009 . CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
FEROL BECKER JOSECDORGTHY.ROCHA TESFAYE HAILEMICHAEL 3155 AVENIDA TOPANGA PO Box 9000 6508 VIA OSTRA CARL&BAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92018 CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 10
’ IRoPlmTYowmmg JOB NU?!Bmt 12004C
MARY WAITE 6510 VIA OSTRA CARLSBM CA 92009
NORMCDONNA DBLANBY 6509 VIA OSTRh CARLSBAD CA 92009
E OATESCG QUEEN 6511 VIA OSTRA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JESUSCHASAKO P'LORES 1574 VILLAGE VIEW DR ENCINITAS CA 92024
.STANLBY LUTY 6510 CANINO CAPISTRANO CARLSBM CA 92009
JOHN&FRANCES MARROW 3105 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
DENISE DORRICDTT 3109 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
PATRICIA SNYDER 3107 AVENIDA TGPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NARILYN HENLEY 3111 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
ekESA BURR fi& ROCKPORT CT L&KADIA CA 92024
CAROLE POSLADEK 3113 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBT&INESt SPOTTS 3117 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
MARGARET WU 855 SANTA ROSITA
SOLANA BCH CA 92075
GEOCKIH DOUILLARD 3123 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARlABAD CA 92009
MICHLRONALE NCCLURE 3119 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
JDCJAYNE LGVIG 3127 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
STEPHEN NMDOX 3125 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
DANIEL&RITA TRIST 3129 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSMD CA 92009
RICKY ALDRICH 3133 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
XARXLPAUL NOLL 3131 AVWIDA TOPANGA CARLtsMD CA 92009
LOUISE PAUL 3US AVMIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
RON&CHERYL WOLFlt 3139 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
SUE SALISBURY 3137 AVWIDA TOPANGA CARLSMD CA 92009
kmLIAt( swA?FoRD 3t41 AVPSIDA TOPANGA C~RLSBAD CA 92009
C FITCH&J - 22801 NORBERT ST PERRIS CA 92370
LMREL PLAGGI 3143 AVBNIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOWMRI CANDELA 2921 CACATUA CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAGE 11
. '_ LABELS
- 1.
FROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
HECTCSUSANA AGUIRRE 3152 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
CHRIS OSTERGAARD F&PENELOPE OSTERGAARD 3150 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
SHARON KENNEDY 3154 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBM CA 92009
KORBER FAMILY TRUST TIM CONNETT LA COSTA M 2240 LAGOON VIEW DR 3156 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARDIFF CA 92007 CARLSBM CA 92009
. KERR FAMILY TRUST 833 E MARGARITA ROM RIALTO CA 92376 SBM CA 92009
PAUL MILLER PAUL MILL RALLENCTTRAVERS 26042 DANA BLUFFS E 1 NIMITZ DR D CAPSTRNO BCH CA 92624 CEIBA PR 00735
JON1 ETUE JEANCROS MARTIN W NEFF&K RUTHMAN 3120 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3124 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3128 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
ARMDO&ANA PALOMO 3132 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM WIEHL LAQUETTA MONTGOMERY 2465 PRIMROSE AVE 3140 AVENIDA OLMEDA VISTA CA 92083 CARLSBM CA 92009
CAROL NAISMITH JUDITH LAIRD WMhBERNA KORETKE 3144 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3148 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3152 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
JOANN MICHAEL MOHAMAD HALAWI BILLIE SCHAFER 3154 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3158 AVENIDA OLNEDA 3156 AVENIDA OLnEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
RICHARD SPOONER PATRICIA SNOW EVELYN SORENSON LYNNE SEGUINE-SPOONER 3155 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3157 AVENIDA OLNEDA 3159 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 12
- ‘A
.
'LABELS ,ROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
R CISSELLM STEVENS JAMES&DIANE PHILLIPS 3153 AVENIDA OLMEDA 2022 VISTA GRANDE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 VISTA CA 92084
DAVID&TAN1 HOCKER 3151 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
C&ARUNAVARNA 2659 AURALIE DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
G&JENNIFER GOTTESNAN 3141 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
CARLBOGDAN 3135 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
GREG&CLAUDIA BARNETT 3143 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
EUGENE ZMRA 3137 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICH&LORRAINE YBARRA 3131 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
RICH&JOANNE MOFFETT 3145 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
HCLYNNE NARGENAU 1102 DEER RUN N PINE BLUFF AR 71603
MARKANDRADE 3133 AVENDIA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY SMITH
4365 SHASTA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008
S GREENWALTLP GARDNER SUSAN SALATA 3125 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3127 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBM CA 92008
W&¶&ANNETTE MALONEY DANfTERRI CORNELL SIMS FAMILY TRUST 3123 AVENIDA OLNEDA 3119 AVENIDA OLNEDA SANDRAMAES CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 3121 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009
TAKAKYOKO CHICHIDA R VERRY&K LACKEY KM&WENDY LANDRY 3117 AVENIDA OLMEDA 3591 WINDSPUN DRIVE 3115 AVENIDA OLHEDA CARLSBAD CA 92009 HUNTNGTN BCH CA 92649 CARLSBM CA 92009
EDdrJEANNETTE PASCHALL 1932 LAHOUD DR CARDIFF CA 92007
PAUL NETTbJANET SYHONS JAMESMMERE 3109 AVENIDA OLNEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
SAIEDCNORANIEH ATAIE 3105 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
R VERRYdrK DAVID SPIELKAN 3103 AVENIDA OLMEDA CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 13
BRIM DICKTER 4515 SALISBURY ST CARLSBM CA 92008
SELNA FROMBERG TRUST 3069 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
NARGARET MELIZZI 6545 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
B&JALEH SAMIMI 2852 ESTURION ST CARLSBM CA 92009
STANELY KELTS 6546 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
WN&MICHIKO KAHL
276 DELPHI CIR LOS ALTOS CA 94022
D&B GOSSETT RUTH MC MICHAEL 1940 LBUCADIA SCENIC CT LEUCADIA CA 92024
-
.JROPERTY OWNERS
CHARLINE KENNEY 4910 MCCONNELL AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90066
BETTY YABU C/O NARY WATANABE 7501 W 91ST LOS ANGELES CA 90045
MARTIN&THERESA BROWN 3067 CANINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
GARYLMICHELE NAY 6549 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
CP&SHARON OWEN 6543 PASEO ADELANTE CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALECARDER 6550 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
MYLTREDA BARKER 361 WEATHERLY TRAIL GUILFORD CT 06437
MILLdrJUBICA TOMICH 3071 CANINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
LA COSTA MCA C/O ES ROSENFELD 16133 VNTRA BL 1270 ENCINO CA 91436
LLCRUTH NELSON 6547 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHAEL MORGENLANDER LINDA MORGENLANDER 6541 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
ANGELGtSANDRA GALASSO 6548 PASEO MELANTE CARLSBM CA 92009
CULVERCDELGRES NELSON TRUST PATRICIACCHAS CONNOLLY 1611 W MYRTLE AVE 6542 PASEO MELANTE PHOENIX AZ 85021 CARLSBM CA 92009
FRANK&VERA FEDERICO RON&SANDRA FREEMAN 1941 SUNMIT DR 3016 AVENIDA CHRISTINA ESCONDIDO CA 92027 CARLSBM CA 92009
ELWOODCLINDA HIGLEY TDNYLCOLLEEN AUSILIO 3018 AVENIDA CHRISTINA 5437 CHERRY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 LONG BEACH CA 90805
PAGE 14
h
JOB NUMBER 12004C
.
.LABELS PROPERTY OWNERS
PAUL CORIGLIANO 3020 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
NOEL WOOD 6934 ELLINGHAN CIR XF ALEXANDRIA VA 22310
ROBTbrMARGARET FALLON 3028 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
DOALLAKIKO MILLER 247 AVENIDA ESPERANZA OLIVENHAIN CA 92024
DAVID&LAURA JOHNS 3030 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
SHELLIE EDMAN 3034 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
JULIA FISCHER 4202 E CACTUS RD 110307 PHOENIX AZ 85032
NANCY SEXTON MICHAEL BARRETT 3036 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
DALE&JULIE BLASIUS 3040 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
DOLORES RUHLAND BRADLEY RUHLAND 3111 CALLE FUEGO CARLSBM CA 92009
WILLIAM HARD 3042 AVE CRISTINA 112 CARLSBM CA 92009
B LDCKWOODLK JAY 3046 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
CYNTHIA STALHEIM 3044 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEITHtCAROLE ARNITAGE 3048 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
MAXINE ALLEY 3052 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBAD CA 92009
NARIANN BILLINGSLEY PO BOX 1897 ' SAN MARCOS CA 92079
STEVEN FISHER 3054 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
LONNA HOWARD 3058 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBT&SHARON RIEDY 3056 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
BARBARA CASTLEBERRY 3060 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
DONNCKELLY DAGGETT 3064 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009
JERRY&ALICE FARROW PO BOX 9000-137 CARLSBM CA 92018
GARY&KIMBERLY BROWN 3062 AVENIDA CHRISTINA CARLSBM CA 92009 _
SHELDGNBARRETT 6541 CALLE VALFERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
WN&BETH EICHHORN 6543 CALLE VALFERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
MAR10LGxBARDo ANTON10 LOMBARD0 100 VIA NAVARRO GREENBRAE CA 94904
KARILYN MONTANTI 6547 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 15
-ILABELS
JOHN QUAKENBUSH 6549 CALLE V?iLPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
FRED&MAE HILDEBRAND 7502 JEREL CT CARLSBM CA 92009
RAULCCATHY ROJAS 6542 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
CHRISTOPHER MYERS 6537 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
BARBARA HAHLBOHM 6543 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOAN PETER 6549 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
ANNE DEWOLFE 4170 ADMIRALTY WAY 3G MRNA DEL REY CA 90292
BRENDECKE FAMILY TRUST 25795 DELTA ST MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
PROPERTY OWNERS
CHAS&IRlJlA LACKEY 6551 CALLE VALFERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
HAZEL NETHERTON 6546 CALLE VALPERIZO CARLSBM CA 92009
DAVID&DIANA FRANKLIN 2749 VIA DE LA VALLE #lo0 DEL NAR CA 92014
JOHN TANNENBERG 6539 VIA ALCAZAR SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DUANEtJANELLE GWDRICK 6545 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHNCKATHRYN NEWKAN 6551 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
DOUGLAS KOSTY 6548 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM.CA 92009
MARY MORRIS 6542 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
LOCKE FAMILY TRUST 3070 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
JOB NUMBER 12004C
GEORGIA HAMILTON PO BOX 370774
MONTARA CA 94037
RWINLRAISA DORFNAN 1159 HAVERSTON ROM LYNDHURST OH 44124
RICH&GENEVIEVE BABCOCK 2533 SW MANOR HILL DR PALM CITY FL 34990
ANDREW&MARGIE WILSON 6541 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBAD.CA 92009
ROBTCANDREA SIEBENS 6547 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
JENSON FAMILY TRUST 6552 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
J&A KARK LIVING TRUST 19400 WYANDOTTE ST 5 RESEDA CA 91335
NJ&SUZANNE GURLEY 6540 VIA ALCAZAR CARLSBM CA 92009
LINDA HEAVER 3068 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
PAGE 16
A
. LABELS - . - *
MARTIN&MAXINE ALTSHULER 3066 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
KENNETH LEHMER 3058 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
DANIELCKRISTINE JUNG RJUNGtKTINKER 1313 ORCHARD WOOD RD ENCINITAS CA 92024
MEADOWLARKCCHURCH 1832 MEADWLRK RCH RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOSCRAETTE STEPHENS 1009 EL VALLECITO VISTA CA r92083
MARY BURGESS 1704 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOSLJOHN BROWER GEOhRUTH BROWER 1828 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
MARK&PATRICIA MOYER 1816 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LARRY GRISMER 1817 VIA GAVILAN SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PROPERTY OWNERS
EITANCMIRIAM DRORI 6605 ALPINE WAY YAKIMA WA 98908
SHARON ALTOTT' NORMAN ADLER'. 3056 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
ROBTCELIZ SKIBICKI RLT 3046 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD X2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
STEPHEN KOTFICA VERA TAYLOR 1716 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
KEN&ISABEL MAYES 1700 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
TERRY HENDERSON 1824'TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SOPHIA HAYNES LILIA OSPINA 1812 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ROD&MARTHA MILLER 1800 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JOB NUMBER 12004C
KEVIN&CHRISTINE CURRY 3060 CAMIN LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
MICHLELIZABETH BRAMAN 3054 CAMINO LIMERO CARLSBM CA 92009
RON&AI MINKOW 2112 ARGYLE DR PLAN0 TX 75023
KW REALTY GROUP C/O JENNA GROUP 2025 W BALBOA BLVD X2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
VA&BARBARA FISCHER DR 92069 1562 HERMOSITA SAN MARCOS CA
STEVEN ELLIOTT KAREN FRASER 1832 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DE&MICHELLE GILMORE 1820 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ANGELO LICCIARDI 125 1lTH STREET DEL MAR CA 92014
LARRY&KAREN ROSLPELD 1803 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 17
*
'. LABELS
h
PROPERTY OWNERS JOB NUMBER 12004C
JOHN&RACHEL SUYDM JESS GONZALES MICHL&JANE KURTH 1807 TOWHEE ST .BETTYHENRY 1819 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 1813 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DONALD ECKARDT KATHRYNJUDD DAVID BRATTEN 3157 PALM CREST TER. 1831 TOWHEE ST 1719 TOWHEE ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
B VESSALLK NAZANIN RICHARD SAUERHEBER JOHN&JANICE HART 1830 REDWING ST 1826 REDWING ST 1822 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JON&MARILYN FOWLER ROBTCLORRAINE BARNES MARVCDOROTHY WEST 1818 REDWING ST 1814 REDWING ST 1810 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JAMES KILEY ELIZABETH CADELL JOAN THOMPSON 1806 REDWING ST 1744 REDWING ST 1738 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
STEVEN&PAMELA SAVAGE GREG&MERCEDES WILSON GERARDMDERBERG 1732 REDWING'ST 1726 REDWING ST RHONDA BRMT
SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 1720 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAUL&KATIE WHEATLAND MARY BOYLES LARRY GRISMER 1714 REDWING ST 1708 REDWING ST 1819 VIA GAVILAN
SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PATRICIA VMDERBECK JAMES&ANNA BULAY 1713 REDWING ST 1719 REDWING ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
DON&SUSAN DENNY JAMESLLILIA STURGES LEBEDEFF FAMILY TRUST 1725 REDWING ST 1731 REDWING ST 1737 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
PAGE 18
-. --
:LABELs JOB NUMBER 12004C
R&S MASON TRUST 1743 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
JRLDEVINE PURDY 1827 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
I GEORGE HELVIN 1911 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
M 92658
‘4
A SABINA CT
REALTY DEALERS LTD c/o UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 112B SAN DIEGO CA 92108
PHILLIPLWENDELLEN CRABTREE CARLCMARCELLA KOLATA 1745 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069 1823 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
WALTER&SUSAN MOISE 1727 KINGLET RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CHRIS ESTRADA 1917 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
EDWIN LASERdrALLAN SALONER 7630 MAR AVE LA JOLLA CA 92037
TA SABINA CT
FDIC C/O KATIE KRUSE PO BOX 7549 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658
GENTRY WIMPEY INC 9754 WHITHORN DR HOUSTON TX 77095
LTCNANCY CARLIN 1905 REDWING ST SAN MARCOS CA 92069
GABORCILONA REH MNAMIKAS TRUST ETAL 1551 SANTA SABINA CT SOLANA BCH CA 92075
CARRILLORANCHOPRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L RL 616 SAN DIEGC CA 92108
JACK E ADAMS INC J E ADAMS INC 1234 ORANGEWOCD DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025
PAGE 19
-.
PROPERTY OWNER
.
REALTY DEALERS LTD C/O UDC HOMES LP 438 CAMINO D R 112B SAN DIEGO CA 92128
MIKE HOWES HOFMAN PLANNING. ASSOCIATES
2386 FARADAY AVE STE 120
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOB NUMBER 12004C
CARRILLO RANCH0 PRTNRS C/O WHITE&ROBINSON 591 CAMINO D L R 616 SAN DIEGO CA 92108
CHRIS CHAMBERS CONTINENTAL HOMES 12636 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
PAGE 20
FACILFFIES FOR CITY CLERK
GEORGE W MANNON CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
801 PINE AVENUE 1290 SAN MARCOS BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING
5201 RUFFIN RD STE “B”
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S WLCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
300 NO HILL ST PO BOX 1988
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF CARLSB
COMh/fdERVICES
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
105 W RICHMAR AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CALIF DEFT OF FISH & GAME
330 GOLDENSHORE #50
LONG BEACH CA 90802