HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-08-15; City Council; 13281; Child care in the industrial areas0. n .*
*d g FI- om VaJ aJFI
nN 0
5bn rlc rd -4 a)k As
nU u
uw ha
0s WG :2
SG Ll(d
ala
ikl4 -urn
uu mu m os ua G u -4
3 .rl
ZG
rl u -4
sm ma, Elm os L) aJ m$4
.rl v aJa
w .rl a rlrl rd -rl
VL) ss
ai4
0” ‘5
52
U
4 aa
rd
uv 0 -4
0 wm WVJ (dcd u mm aJ as am
-4 -4 NU3
!-I Oh cu u .rl 14 rd -4
rlcd P
-rl -4 Llrl El sa utd 06
LA
o\ \ cv
\ 4
m
.F P 0
L)
01 aJL 5 -4
cG -4 g
aJv
2 .a
L)
MU
u aL) dal -4 rl CW UaJ
c $4
OaJ 0 Ud urd
)
w Ut GARLSBAD - AGWA BILL ..
I K
AB # /3 87 TITLE:
MTG,e
~
DEPT,
CHILD CARE IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS CITY l
DEPT. CITY I
AB # /3 87 TITLE:
MTG,e
~
DEPT,
CHILD CARE IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS CITY l
DEPT. CITY I
I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept the staff report stating the need to Mer study the safety, health, economic and lil
issues associated with child care uses in industrial and manufacturing zones. Authorize
to employ a qualified consultant to study and report the extent to which these issues s
influence Carlsbad’s Child Care Ordinance,
k .$ UW ITEM EXPLANATION:
BACKGROUND @ u
&l&l 0
bow ca .a $4
)-I al 4 aJ1 $5
$ (d
a 5: -4 ma (110 aJu V ow FI%
The city’s draft child care ordinance recognizes a need for child care facilities close to da:
population centers, including industrial zones. However, during the development (
ordinance, it was also recognized that indiscriminate intermix of child care and industry
raise potential safety conflicts. This frnding was based on the potential for accidental re
of hazardous materials in the industrial zones, and risk of exposure of children to their ha
effects. After additional research, it was found that under very limited conditions, a
certain locations, child care could operate in the industrial zones with a reasonable expec
of safety.
aJLi .”, m I While’evaluating an applicant’s tentative proposal to install a corporate child care facilit: ‘p - + $ manufacturing area, the Planning and Fire Departments discovered additional land use aJu W2
*d h opposition to the concept of siting child care uses in industrial zones.
related to the mix of child care and industry, which were not addressed during the develq
u u
El .z of the city’s child care ordinance. It is now apparent that economic and liability issues s
also be evaluated since, in several Northern California cities, industry itself has 7
om
a
aa -d
h h ’’ I SUMMARY OF NON-SAFETY ISSUES
cd a a,- urd aaJ .rl (d v$4
m crl -4 rd -4
rl$4 -4 u L)m cs
OG sa
u .rl k 0
a ti
6 z 3 2
While certain segments of industry welcome convenient child care, or actually provide
their own employees, others perceive it as an unreasonable risk. The latter oppose il
potential source of liability should they experience a release of hazardous materials as a
of a handling or process accident. It is stas concern that the presence of child c:
Carlsbad’s industrial and manufacturing areas could be viewed negatively by bio-medic;
pharmaceutical firms contemplating a Carlsbad location, since they are generally users of s
array of hazardous materials. The issues are discussed in further detail in the attached E 1.
FEASIBILITY STUDY
Staff requests that Council authorize further study of the safety, economic and liability
prior to installation of a child care ordinance, or approval of child care uses in indust]
manufacturing zones. Staff suggests that the study be conducted by a qualified consultar
~ that it be commissioned to obtain satisfactory resolution of the following concerns: v
I
m lb
PAGE TWO AGENDA BILL NO. /3dR’
1. Can child care facilities operate in the industrial and manufacturing zones 4
city with a reasonable expectation of safety?
2. What, if any, measures must be taken to mitigate the risk of exposure of ch
to releases of hazardous materials?
3. Identify any long term health risks associated with the chronic expost
children to the industrial emissions of Carlsbad‘s industrial and manufac
zones.
4. Assuming child care can operate in industrial areas with a reasonable expec
of safety, what steps can or should be taken to negate the liability conce~
prospective industrial tenants?
5. Will allowing child care facilities to locate in the industrial areas place Ca
in a disadvantaged position in competing for target industrial users su
biomedical firms?
6. Are there specific locational and land use criteria which can be utilized in
to address the safety, liability and economic issues associated with allowing
care in the industrial areas?
FISCAL IMPACT
Several consultants contacted by staff estimate the duration of the study to be 90 to 120
at a cost of $15,000 to $20,000. Staff recommends that Council contingency funds be UI
finance the study. Staff is not requesting approval of a consulting contract at this time. Sf
consultants have been contacted who indicate the cost range of the study as stated above.
will return to Council at a later date to seek approval for a consulting contract and authoril
to utilize contingency funds to finance the agreement.
EXHIBITS
1. Exhibit A, Memorandum from the Fire Marshal to the Fire Chief dated May 9, 1
m Y
Memorandum
Exhibit
May 9, 1995
TO: FIRE CHIEF
FROM: Fire Marshal
CHILD CARE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
Planning and Fire Staff are working together to evaluate the impact of locating child cai
facilities in the industrial areas of the city. We are collecting information from othl
California cities, industry and regulatory agencies that have found reason to eithl
support or oppose the concept. This report attempts only to frame a number of issut
that are emerging from the research. Recommendations as to position or mitigatir
measures will be offered in a subsequent report.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Department has developed a draft Child Care Ordinance and is intereste
in taking it forward for review by the Planning Commission. This would culminate fib
to six years of work by City Staff, the Child Care Task Force and Child Care Commissiol
Coincidentally, Callaway Golf Inc., intends to install a child care facility on its Ruthetfor
Road Campus for the benefit of its employees. Resistance on the part of the applical
to conform to the standards of the draft ordinance has created a need to revisit tt-
matter, and an opportunity to gain from the perspective of cities that now have son
experience with the issues.
Draft ordinance
The draft ordinance recognizes the demand for child care in all areas of the City, an
proposes means by which it can be accomplished. The areas most restricted are thos
that have been zoned to accommodate industrial use. In those areas, child care us
is permitted in an area along College Drive on the western perimeter of the industril
park. It was reasoned that the prevailing winds at this location would afford greatt
protection from exposure to hazardous materials releases. This was a reluctat
compromise, offered to meet the perceived needs of industry, citizens and child car
providers. Our original position was to prohibit child care uses in the zone. Yo furtht
compromise, it was found that a child care facility located within a building in whic
parents were present, solved the problem of evacuation of children during a
emergency. Parents could assume immediate custody of their children as opposed ti
relying upon the child care staff to evacuate them.
m lb
CHILD CARE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
May 9, 1995
Page 2
Tentative proposal
The tentative proposal before us conforms to neither of these compromises, since
would provide facilities for children of parents who are employed in several buildings (
a campus. Furthermore the location proposed is close to the eastern border of tl
industrial park, downwind from present and future industrial sites.
The .applicant has proposed extraordinary mitigation measures which may be viabl
However our recent research has uncovered information from other jurisdictions ar
agencies which has not been addressed by the applicant. Much of this information w:
not available during the development of our draft ordinance, but 'It merits evailuation
assure that all stakeholder sentiments are heard.
DISCUSSION:
Social demands
The perception of the need for child care facilities in or nearby the work place hz
generated some interest on the part of industry to provide such facilities as support fc
the work force. Proponents claim that facilities for infants, preschool and sick childrel
enhance employee and organizational performance. They also claim that employe€
child, and avoid the use of sick leave to care for a child during illness.
Carlsbad's Child care Task force conducted extensive research on the need for SUC
facilities locally, and reported that a shortage of child care facilities existed. The tas
force also reported that child care was needed in the daytime population centers, b
later found, by means of a poll of prospective users, that many parents preferred facilitit
closer to their homes than their work. According to the Manufacturers Group of Sani
Clara County, a similar poll in that area produced the same sentiments.
Zoning conflicts
It has been the position of the Fire Department that commercially zoned areas ca
accommodate child care uses because they are relatively free of hazardous materia
and processes. Conversely, child care in the industrial environment presents sorr
extraordinary conflicts which are not easily mitigated. Economic, liability, safety an
Bong term health concerns have caused planners, public safety officials and sor
embrace the idea, since it would allow them to spend time during the day with tht
industry representatives to resist the mix of uses.
Stakeholders
The decision on this matter will establish precedent that could impact a wide array (
stakeholders, including the community at large, employees of industrial firms, existin
1)
CHILD CARE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
May 9, 1995
Paqe 3
and future industrial entities, and children. Although this office has focused its conce
upon the safety aspects of the issue, the discussion should broaden to include t!
interests of all involved.
Health risk issue
According to the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD), information
available which raises concern for the effect of chronic exposure to industrial emissior
upon “Sensitive receptors” such as the elderly and children.
According to the APCD these emissions do not impose as great a risk on healthy adul
due to the ability of healthy adults to withstand the effects of the exposure, and the fal
that employees are usually working indoors, protected from the out fall.
The limited ability of children to withstand the exposure, coupled with their daily outdoc
activities creates some question as to whether or not their presence in the industri;
climate over a period of months or years might place them at risk. We are processin
information provided by APCD, and the State Air Resources Board, and will present it i
a future report.
Safety concerns
It should be recognized that industrially zoned property is set aside specifically 1
accommodate business that is not compatible with residential or commercial use: Home and commercial business owners would not likely tolerate the intrusion I
industrial uses within their neighborhoods. Furthermore, if a manufacturer usin
hazardous materials applied for permits to locate in such an area, against the wishes (
the management and/or clients of a nearby child care facility, it probably would not G
allowed due to the health and safety risk. Points of issue might be similar to those pi
forth in this report.
It is accepted that industrial operators employ hazardous materials and processe
regularly, and that occasionally an accident will occur resulting in the release c
dangerous chemicals no matter how much regulatory control is exerted. We expect fire:
explosions or transportation accidents in our business parks to occasionally result i
releases of dangerous chemical plumes. Because distance is the greatest protectio
from such a threat, the ability to warn and evacuate facilities in the path of the plume i
critical. Adult workers have the ability to respond to evacuation orders and take actio
to protect themselves from harm. Children placed in a child care facility however, woul
have to rely upon a staff, adequately sized and trained to move them to safety.
Business liability concerns
Although some large industrial employers in other cities have chosen to provide child
0 Y
GHlLD GARE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
May 9, 1995
Paqe 4
care facilities on site for the convenience of their employees, many others oppose tl
concept out of concern for heightened liability exposure. The “Public right to kno\
legislation of the last decade put into place disclosure regulations so that informc
decisions could be made on risk to the public from hazardous uses. The variol
permits and reports that must be filed by hazardous materials users create an informatic
repository, available to the public, which provides details related to the location, quali
and. quantity of hazardous, toxic and highly toxic materials. Some manufacturers are
the opinion that having complied with these regulations, and having paid the necessa
permit fees, they should be able to conduct business without the added concern for tt
risk to non-industrial uses that might intrude into industrial zones.
Manufacturers have also expressed concern that the liability associated with su(
intrusion can seriously impede their ability to expand facilities or modify processes
meet market demands. According to the Santa Clara County Manufacturers’ Grou
some have experienced difficulty obtaining adequate insurance due to the presence (
sensitive non-industrial uses nearby.
Community liability concerns
The intermix of sensitive uses such as child care with industrial interests could degrac
the economic vitality of the City’s industrial zones. A company considering location
the Carlsbad industrial zone might be negatively influenced by a risk analysis indicatir
elevated liability exposure due to a diverse intermix of use in the area. One SUC
precedent might influence other similar industries, creating marketing difficulties. TI
predictable rent reductions could result in a resurgence of less desirable industrial use
creating an even less desirable climate for up scale tenants such as bio-medical ar
pharmaceutical firms. Although this chain of events could be considered extreme, ttl
concern is based upon expressed sentiments of other cities interested in the long terr stability of their job bases and revenue streams.
City liability concerns
Property set aside by the general plan for industrial use provides the owner with certai
market advantages and expectations, The marketing advantage can be degraded whe
constraints are placed upon the property for the protection of sensitive uses that woul
ordinarily not be present.
For illustrative purposes, let us assume that a child care use has been sited in E
industrial zone, its Conditional Use Permit approved because it is found to be present,
unthreatened by hazardous processes. After a period of time a seemingly innocuou
use such as an architectural firm locates next door and applies for the necessary permil
to store and use Anhydrous Ammonia, an acutely hazardous material used in blu
printing. Because the conditions of the child care CUP are now violated, should the
a lb
1.
CHILD CARE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS
May 9, 1995
Page 5
permit be revoked? Can the City deny occupancy by the architectural firm based c
the conditions of the Child Care CUP? It would seem that in either case, the interes
of one or the other property owners would be in sufficient jeopardy to provide incenth
for legal action against the City. -?"..
jq[* </&QJ'l.:J ' +"
MIKE 'SMITH
’e w
AUGUST 31 , 1995
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Senior Planner CC
VIA: Community Development Director
CLARIFICATION REGARDING AGENDA BILL ON CHILD CARE IN THE INDUSTRI
AREAS
This memo is intended to clarify the process staff is recommending to study the iss
of chiid care in the industrial areas. A three-phased procedure is proposed to addrt
the three major issue areas. The tiered approach is necessary because each step of 1
analysis is dependent upon the prior phase/s for direction. After interviewing consultan
we will be able to determine whether one consultant will be able to do all three phas
of the study, whether subconsultants will be needed or whether staff can complete t
last two phases of study. The study would occur as follows:
I. Analysis of Safety Issues
0 A consultant, with expertise in the field of hazardous materials, would asked to identify and evaluate the health and safety risks of locating ch
care in the City’s industrial areas. The analysis would also include potenl
mitigation measures which could be implemented to reduce impacts.
0 If it is determined that the health and safety risks cannot be mitigated, t
study would be concluded. If impacts can be safely mitigated, then Pha
II would begin.
II. Analysis of Economic Impacts
0 The economic impacts of locating child care in the industrial areas wou
be identified and evaluated. Issues to be addressed would incluc
increased liability, expansion constraints, and increased regulato
processes for surrounding industrial operations. Staff would also examil
the economic implications for Carlsbad with regard to liability and the lor
term ability of the City to attract desirable businesses.
Ill. Land Use Issues
0 The land use implications of locating child care in industrial areas wou
then be analyzed based on data generated from the first two phase of tl
study. Recommendations would then be presented to City Council i
consideration and inclusion in the Child Care Ordinance.
b a, e
CLARIFICATION REGARDING AGENDA BILL
AUGUST 31, 1995
PAGE TWO
ON CHILD CARE IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS
If any unmitigable issues surface during the anaiysis, staff willaspend the study t
return to Council for further direction.
A
ADR & ENNE LANDERS
ALvd
c: Marty Orenyak
Michael Holzmiller
Dennis Van der Matten
Mike Smith
Gary Wayne
Cynthia Haas