HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-07-23; City Council; 13752; Rancho Carrillo Village E-
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB# ,3, ? 5 2 TITLE:
I RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E” MTG. 7123196 , CT 95-06/PUD 95-04
DEPT. PLN w I RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT City Council Resolution No.~ ~-~6jAPPROVlNG CT 95-06 and
PUD 95-04 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and the Housing
Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On April 17, 1996, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the Ranch0
Carrillo Village E project located south of Palomar Airport Road between future Melrose Drive and
the City’s eastern boundary in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area and the Local Facilities
Management Zone 18. The Planning Commission approved (7-O) SDP 95-12 and recommended
approval (7-O) of CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04 to reserve 20 affordable housing units for low income
households and to allow the subdivision and grading of the 16.6 acre parcel. No public testimony
was given by citizens at the hearing.
The discretionary actions to be decided by the City Council include a Tentative Map and
Planned Development Permit to subdivide the parcel into 1 15 residential lots containing 104
duplex units, 2 common recreation lots, and 9 private streets. To satisfy the project’s 15%
inclusionary housing requirement of 16 units, the Planning Commission approved a site
development plan which designates and reserves a total of 20 of the proposed two and three
bedroom duplex units onsite as affordable. Four of these units will satisfy the three bedroom
requirement for future Villages J and K. Approval of the site development plan is contingent
upon Council approval of the entire project.
The project is subject to and in compliance with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and Certified
EIR, Ranch0 Carrillo Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17), the Subdivision Ordinance
(Chapter 20 of the CMC), Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the CMC), the
lnclusionary and Affordable Housing Ordinances (Chapters 21.85 and 21.53.120 of the
CMC), and the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The subject parcel has not been annexed to the City’s CFD No. 1; therefore, a condition requiring
the annexation within 60 days of project approval is included in the attached Resolution.
In compliance with the Permit Streamlining Act, this project should be heard by the final decision
makers by August 3, 1996. The Housing Commission is scheduled to review this application at its
meeting July 11, 1996, which is during the agenda bill review process time-frame. A verbal
report will be given at the Council meeting reporting the action of the Housing Commission.
I
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Additional environmental impacts beyond those analyzed and mitigated by the Ranch0 Carrillo
Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04) would not result from implementation of the project;
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO .
therefore, this project qualifies as subsequent development to both the Ranch0 Carrillo EIR
91-04 and the City’s updated General Plan Master EIR. The Planning Director issued a Notice
of Prior Environmental Compliance on March 25, 1996, and the applicable mitigation
measures of EIR 91-04 are included as conditions of approval for this project.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
II Local Facilities Zone I 18
II Local Facilities Management Plan I 18
II Growth Control Point I 11.5 DU/ACRE
II Net Density I 6.8
Special Facilities CFD NO. 1
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts will result from the project since it is consistent with the Zone 18 Local
Facilities Management Plan. All necessary major capital facilities will be provided concurrent
with development and funded by the developer of the project. A financing plan that
comprehensively addresses the provisions of public facilities within the facility zone has been
approved by the City Council.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 9wd63
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3919, 3920, and 3921
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1996
5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes dated April 17, 1996
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 I- .
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 96-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO 115 LO
DUPLEX UNITS INCLUDING 20 AFFORDABLE
THREE BEDROOM UNITS ALL ON
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR
ROAD BETWEEN FUTURE MELROSE D
CITY’S EASTERN BOUNDARY IN THE P-C
ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO
held a duly noticed
public hearing to consider a Tentativ
95-04) for project development on anning Commission
1996, the Housing Commission
held a duly noticed public he r the project and adopted Housing Commission
Resolution No. e City Council that it be approved; and
he City C ncil of th City of Carlsbad, on the
u
day of
a public he ‘ng t consider the recommendations and heard all
or opposed to CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04.
ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
ation. of the Planning Commission for the approval of the
Tentative Map (CT 95-06) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the
Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 39 19, on file
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for
Planned Development Permit (PUD 95-04) is approved an
conditions of the Planning Commission contained
Resolution No. 3920, on file
reference, are the findings and c
That the recommendations of the Housing Co
project is approved and that the findings of the
Housing Commission Resolution No. ,
incorporated herein by reference, are the finding
n for the approval of the
ing Commission contained in
with the City Clerk and
This actions is final the date this resoluti
provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carls
Judicial Review” shall apply:
dopted by the City Council. The
icipal Code, “Time Limits for
“The time within which judici iew of this decision must be sought
is governed by Code of Ci ocedure, Section 1094.6, which has
been made applicable in th of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal
Code Chapter 1.16. Any
review must be filed i i
petition or other paper seeking judicial
the appropriate court not later than the
nineteenth day followi& the date on which this decision becomes
final; however, if witl$n ten days after the decision becomes final a
request for the record’of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover
the estimated cost or’preparation of such record, the time within which
such petition may’be filed in court is extended to not later than the
thirtieth day foll+ving the date on which the record is either personally
delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has
one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the
proceedingskhall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200
Carlsbad V&age Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.”
Condition:
i
1. This appr x al shall be null and void if the property subject to this approval is
not anne d ed to the City of Carlsbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval.
Additioually, annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading,
buildiug or other permit. (Deadline could be extended for good cause as
ined by the City Manager.)
-2- A
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED
of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the -daYOf ,
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
g of the City Council
following vote, to
ABSTAIN:
/
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L.
-3-
EXHIBIT 2
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
CT 95=06/PUD 95=04/SDP 95-l 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3919
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 115 LOTS INCLUDING 104
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 9 PRIVATE STREET LOTS AND 2
COMMON RECREATION LOTS AND 104 MULTI-FAMILY
DUPLEX UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD BETWEEN
FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE AND THE CITY’S EASTERN
BOUNDARY WITHIN THE RANCH0 CARRILLO
MASTER PLAN BOUNDARIES.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE E
CASE NO: CT 95-06
WHEREAS, UDC Homes has filed a verified application for certain property
to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
and a portion of Certificate of Compliance File/Page 87-385114
recorded July 9,1987 all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative
Tract Map as provided by Chapter 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of April, 1996,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
4 That the above recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tentative Tract, CT 95-06, based
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision
as conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan,
any applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and
the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in
that it is a residential, medium-high density, multi-family subdivision designed in
accordance with the Subdivision and Planned Development Ordinances and in
compliance with the recommendations of the required technical studies for soils and
drainage, as well as provide all public improvements necessary to serve the demand
generated by the development.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General
Plan and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since
the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed, in that the project is consistent with multi-family development
designated for Village E by the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and the mass grading
plan approved by Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision
in that the project has been designed and structured such that there are no conflicts
with any established easements.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive
or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the area’s
dominant western wind patterns/solar radiation patterns will allow utilization of
natural heating and cooling opportunities.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing
proposed by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those
housing needs against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and
environmental resources.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish OI
PC RJZSO NO. 3919 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
wildlife or their habitat, in that all applicable biological mitigation measures required
by Final EIR 91-04 have been incorporated into the project and/or added to the
project as conditions of approval.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of
existing California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the
sewer and drainage requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and EIR 91-04
have been considered and appropriate sewer and drainage facilities have been
designed and will be secured. In addition to City Engineering Standards and
compliance with the City’s Master Sewer and Drainage Plans, National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to prevent any
discharge violations.
10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for Ranch0
Carrillo Village E, is in conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan,
based on the following:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
. . . .
Land Use - The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan Residential
Medium High (RMH) land use designation since the proposed density of 6.8
du/acre is below the density range of 8 - 15 du/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below
the growth control point of 11.5 du/ac.
Circulation - The project is conditioned to complete all necessary onsite and
offsite roadway improvements prior to occupancy of any unit in each phase.
Additionally, all roadway improvements to serve the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan must be guaranteed and substantially completed prior to occupancy of
units in Village E.
Noise - The project provides mitigation to reduce noise levels to 60 dBA
within the usable yard area of lots abutting Palomar Airport Road, and the
project is conditioned to require compliance with the 45 dBA interior noise
standard.
Housing - That the project is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the Housing
Element of the General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as the
Developer has been conditioned to enter into an Affordable Housing
Agreement to provide and deed restrict 20 dwelling units as affordable to
lower-income households. The project also includes six affordable three
bedroom duplex condominium units to satisfy the three bedroom unit
requirement for UDC Homes in Villages E, J, and K.
Open Space and Conservation - The project is consistent with the Rancho
Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 LFMP in that 186 acres of performance
standard open space will be provided throughout the Master Plan.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
f. Public safety - In accordance with the Ranch0 Cart-No mass grading plan
(HDP 91-17) and the Village E grading plan and final soils report, all
unacceptable soil conditions shall be mitigated to facilitate construction.
Standard engineering grading conditions will be required for all requisite
grading.
11. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will not be
approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve
the project. In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note shall be
placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued for the
project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is available,
and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains
available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the
Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they
apply to sewer service for this project.
b. Statutory School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities
in the San Marcos Unified School District. In accordance with the Zone 18
LFMP special conditions for schools, the project is conditioned to require
that the school site is deeded to the San Marcos Unified School District and
that a financing agreement is approved by the San Marcos Unified School
District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school
facilities in Zone 18 prior to final map recordation or grading or building
permits, whichever occurs first.
C. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
d. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
e. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and
payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be
available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
12. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued
availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the
project.
PC FLESO NO. 3919 -4-
1
. E
?
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part
of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
14. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this Subsequent
Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
15. The Planning Commission finds that:
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidelines
15168(c)(2) and (e), and 15183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) and
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04);
C. there were EIR’s certified in connection with the prior 1994 General Plan
Update and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as
significant in the prior EIR’s;
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR under
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
16. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 which are appropriate to
this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
17. MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significant and
adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding
considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those
effects, no additional environmental document is required.
18. The project, as designed, implements certain objectives and mitigation measures
established by the General Plan Master EIR to reduce cumulative air quality and
circulation impacts as applicable to a residential project of this scale. These include:
providing links to public sidewalk systems that connect with transportation
corridors, and future schools, parks, and trail systems; providing for safe pedestrian
and bicycle movements within the project; and designing the project to accommodate
pedestrian spaces as well as proposed parking areas and building locations.
19.
20.
The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April, 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant
shall record a notice concerning aircraft noise.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by City
Council Resolution No. 90-384.
-
PC RESO NO. 3919 -5-
I\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the
project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to
the impact caused by the project.
Planniw Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Tentative Tract
Map for the multi-family lot subdivision project entitled “Rancho Carrillo Village E”.
(Exhibits “A-V” on file in the Planning Department and incorporated by this
reference, dated April 17, 1996), subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is
authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to make all corrections
and modifications to the approved Documents, as necessary to make them internally
consistent and conform to City Council’s final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed
development substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment
to this approval.
Approval of CT 95-06 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 95-04 and SDP 95-
12. CT 95-06 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 3919,3920, and 3921 dated April 17,1996.
The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the
Tentative Map/Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body. The
Tentative Map/Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The
Map/Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to
building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
The final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of
such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July
28, 1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time, and any
development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth
management system or Facilities and Improvement Plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s
agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated September 5, 1995, a copy of which
is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are
not paid, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval
for this project will be void.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are
required as part of the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
PC RESO NO. 3919 -6-
\?,
1
2
f
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
. . . .
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including
but not limited to the following:
a.
b.
C.
d.
Prior to recordation of a final map within Zone 18, a parks agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and Zone 18 property owners shall be entered
into;
All future development in Zone 18 will be required to construct any future Zone 18 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan
and revised Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer;
Prior to recordation of final map, the Zone 18 developers shall receive City
Council approval of a comprehensive financing plan guaranteeing the
construction of circulation improvements including Palomar Airport Road,
Melrose Drive, and El Fuerte.
Prior to recordation of any final map, the designated school site shall be deeded to the San Marcos Unified School District and a financing agreement
shall be approved by San Marcos Unified School District guaranteeing the
construction of the necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 18. As
provided for in the Zone 18 LFMP, if any reimbursement and/or school fee
credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall provide a
mechanism to do so.
The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance
with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s Landscape Manual.
The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director
prior to the approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever
occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on
the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accompanied
by the project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
Slope trees adjacent to Street B shall be minimum 15 gallon in size along the entire
slope.
The Developer shall provide proof of payment of statutory school fees to mitigate
conditions of overcrowding as part of the building permit application. The amount
of these fees shall be determined by the fee schedule in effect at the time of building
permit application.
The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -7- \3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
14. In accordance with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, prior to final map, the
applicant shall establish both a Master and Village homeowner’s association with corresponding covenants, conditions and restriction (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items shall be
included in the CC&Rs for each association as indicated:
Master HOA
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
Master Homeowner’s Association maintenance of the Recreational Vehicle
Storage Lot (Lot 104 of CT 93-04).
The CC&Rs shall prohibit the storage or parking of recreational vehicles
within any of the Villages except in approved RV storage areas.
The Master Association shall control the operation and maintenance of the recreation vehicle storage area, entry signs, common slopes and other
common features as identified in the Master Plan.
The provision of the Master CC&Rs shall be binding to the provisions of the
CC&Rs for the Village Associations and may not conflict. Slope areas within
individual villages shall be maintained by the Master Association if exposed
to major streets. The developer shall submit a master maintenance plan
showing all areas to be maintained by the Master Association to be approved
by the City Engineer prior to any final map approval.
Provisions for the maintenance of slopes within the open space easement on
Lots 40-58.
Village HOA
a. No private development shall be permitted within open space Lots A&B or
within open space easement areas on Lots 40-58 inclusive.
b. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual owners of
property may replace original fencing on their property, however, such changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall design for
the project as graphically shown on Exhibit “F”. The replacement of any
fences or walls within this project must be consistent with one of the fencing
or wall design types as shown in the Master Plan.
C. Provisions for HOA maintenance of open space Lots A&B.
d. All open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and shall be maintained as indicated on Exhibit “E”.
PC RFBO NO. 3919 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
e. Provisions for the maintenance of the slopes within the open space and
maintenance easement on Lots 6,7, and 21 through 30.
f. Ventilation systems are provided and should be maintained in units which
would exceed the City’s 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard with open
windows.
Signs and Identification:
15. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or address shall contrast to their background color.
16. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
17. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
Signage shall be located in conformance with Exhibit “F” Landscape Concept Details
unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Environmental:
18. The Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all
mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR 91-04 that are found by this
resolution to be feasible. The Developer shall also implement, or cause the
implementation of, the attached Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR 91-04 Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit “X”) certified by the City Council on
July 27, 1993.
19. The Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the project Site with the
project as described in the Final EIR 91-04, except as modified by this resolution.
20. Paleontology:
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to issuance of a grading permit;
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some
of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect
matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. The
paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the
grading process;
PC RESO NO. 3919 -9- P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C.
d.
e.
The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage
artifacts;
Ah fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History
Museum;
Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities
of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
21. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct the community
theme/noise attenuation walls shown on Exhibit “E”, Landscape Concept Plan, dated
April 17, 1996 in accordance with the addendum to the “Acoustical Analysis for
Ranch0 Carrillo Village E” dated February 14,1996.
22. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall submit a detailed noise
study addressing necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Village “E”. Prior
to issuance of building permits the following mitigation shall be ensured: (1) the
interior noise levels shall be mitigated to 45 dBA CNEL when openings to the
exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings are required to be closed to meet
the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be provided; (3) the Developer shall
prepare and record a Notice of Restriction for those lots requiring openings (e.g.,
windows, doors, vents, etc.) to be closed and mechanical ventilation to be provided
in order to satisfy the City’s, 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard, (4) units
requiring openings to be closed and mechanical ventilation to be provided in order
to satisfy the City’s 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard shall be identified in the
sales offke prior to the sale of any units; and (5) all useable exterior space above the
first floor shall be mitigated to the adopted City standard.
23. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that
this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing
Transportation Corridor (Palomar Airport Road), in a form meeting the approval of
the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #l on file in the Planning
Department).
24. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that
this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from
McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director
and the City Attorney (see Noise, Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
25. The Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs
shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the
Planning Department).
PC RESO NO. 3919 -lO- \v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26. Prior to final map approval or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first,
the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Preliminary Site
Assessment (pp 39-40) dated December 1993 performed by GEOCON Environmental
Consultants which include the performance of additional laboratory tests to confirm
that the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) of DDT, DDE, and
Toxaphene does not exceed the values promulgated by Title 22 if soils will be
exported from the site. A report detailing the results of the remediation program,
if necessary, shall be submitted to the City.
27. Prior to approval of the final map, the Developer shall be required: (1) to consult
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the impact of
the project on the Coastal California Gnatcatcher; and (2) obtain any permits
required by the USFWS. The issuance of a permit by the USFWS for the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan mass grading project would satisfy this requirement.
Housing:
28. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units,
the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to
provide and deed restrict twenty two-bedroom and three-bedroom dwelling units
(units on Lots 3, 4, 23, 24, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 69, 70, 85, 86, 95, 96, 99,
and 100) as identified on Exhibit “A” dated April 17, 1996 as affordable to lower-
income households for the useful life of the dwelling units, in accordance with the
requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The draft Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Director
not later than thirty (30) days after final map submittal. The recorded Affordable
Housing Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.
29. The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent with the
project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City
and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate
schedule for development.
30. The Developer shall dedicate on the final map, an open space easement to the City
and landscape maintenance easement to the Master Homeowner’s Association for
those portions of lots 40 through 58 which are in slopes in their entirety to prohibit
any encroachment or development, including but not limited to fences, walls, decks,
storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways, and landscaping, other than that approved
as part of landscape plan as shown on Exhibit “E” and a landscaped open space and
maintenance easement to the Village E Homeowner’s Association on Lots 6, 7, and
21 through 30.
31. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are
required as part of the approved PUD 95-04 and SDP 95-12 as contained in
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3920 and 3921.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -ll- \I
1
. 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
32. To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities on Palomar
Airport Road at locations subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit
District (NCTD), if such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a
minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign.
The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as not to detract from the
basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
33. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the
Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and phasing of
construction for the recreational Vehicle Storage facility. Prior to occupancy of the
first unit within Village “E”, at minimum, 2,080 square feet of recreational vehicle
storage space shall be provided on Lot 104 of Village “Q” unless an on-site
temporary recreational vehicle storage facility has been approved by the Planning
Director.
34. The buildings shall comply with UBC Sections 503.2 and 709.4 (1994 ed. UBC).
35. The buildings shall comply with the latest edition of the Model Codes adopted by the
City of Carlsbad at the time plans are submitted for building permits.
General:
36. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of
the Zonmg Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of
building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
37. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
38. The Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
39. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping
and recreational facilities.
Landscape:
40. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the
Planning Department.
. . . .
PC RESO NO. 3919 -12-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Entineeriw Conditions:
General:
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
This project is located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. AI1 development
design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with SDG&E, Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility
shall be placed in the CC&IX%.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map
Act.
Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage
course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors at all street intersections in
accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following statement in
the project’s CC&R’s:
“NO structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30
inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach
within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance
with City Standard Public Street Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The
underlying property owner shall maintain this condition.”
The above statement shall be placed on a non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -13- 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.- _-
49. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the
requirements of the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such
a program is formally established by the City.
Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering conditions,
upon the approval of the proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to approval
of a final map.
Fees and Agreements:
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
The owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic failure.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 91-39.
The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City
harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the
site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District
No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
Grading:
55. Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic
plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24” x 36” mylar or similar
drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
56. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision
unless a grading or slope easement or an agreement to grade is executed by the
developer and the owners of the affected properties. If the developer is unable to
obtain the grading or slope easement or agreement to grade, no grading permit will
be issued. In that case the developer must either amend the tentative map or modify
the plans so grading will not occur outside the project site, in a manner which
substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City
Engineer and Planning Director.
57. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
PC RESO NO. 3919 -14- P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
58. In accordance with the Ranch0 Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR),
grading of natural habitat should not occur during the nesting season of any
endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of Coastal California Gnatcatcher
occupied habitat and within 200’ of riparian habitat, occupied by Least Bell’s Vireo
and Willow Flycatcher, should be restricted to the period between September 1 and
February 15 of any given year.
Dedication and Improvements:
59. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided or installed prior to, or concurrent with any grading as may be required by
the City Engineer.
60. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project or by separate
document. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are
not required to be rededicated.
61. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer. Said plans shall include, but not be limited to notifying perspective
owners and tenants of the following:
a. All homeowners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirements as
prescribed in their respective containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface
improvements.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -15-
%-\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
62. Drainage outfall end treatments for any drainage outlets where a direct access road
for maintenance purposes is not provided, shall be designed and incorporated into
the grading/improvement plans for the project. These end treatments shall be
designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe outfall.
Designs could consist of a modified outlet headwall consisting of an extended
concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed rip-rap,
or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of preventing vegetation growth
directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
63. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer may require
an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evaluation
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recommended
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
64. The following improvements as required in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP)
and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These improvements unless otherwise modified
by the final decision making body shall be substantially completed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit within the entire
project.
a. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime arterial
standards. . Construction of a median and two lanes in each direction and
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial
standards. . Construction of full major arterial standards from the intersection with
Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village J and the school site.
C. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width. . Construction of one lane in each direction from the southerly boundary
of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village T.
d. Sewer Facilities. including
. 12” main in Melrose Drive . 12” main in, or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane . Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A
PC RESO NO. 3919 -16- aa-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e.
. Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C . Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D . Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F . Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G . North La Costa Lift Station
Water Facilities, including:
. A portion of the proposed potable 24-inch main in the future
alignment of Melrose Avenue. . The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast corner of
Zone 18. . The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the proposed
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18. . A portion of the proposed reclaimed S-inch main in the proposed
alignment of Melrose Avenue. . The proposed reclaimed 3%inch main in the proposed alignment of El
Fuerte within Zone 18. . The proposed potable 12” main from Melrose to El Fuerte through
service Area E.
f. Drainape Facilities, including:
. Proposed double 5’ x 5’ box culvert under Melrose Drive. . Detention basins, channel and flood control improvements necessary
to mitigate for erosion and protect on site Master Plan and off site
downstream properties from significant impacts.
Village “E” - Snecific Conditions:
General:
Note:
65.
66.
Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering conditions,
upon the approval of the proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to approval
of a final map.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private
easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights,
storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs
of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties
within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included
with the CC&R’s subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
This project is specifically approved as one (1) unit for recordation purposes. All
public facilities needed to serve this unit, in accordance with City Standards and to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer, shall be guaranteed for construction.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -17- 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
67. An adjustment plat shall be processed aligning the westerly property line with the
proposed centerline of Street “I” along the project frontage from Palomar Airport
Road to the southerly right of way line of proposed Street “B”.
Grading:
68. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
the developer shall submit proof to the City Engineer that a “Notice of Intention” was submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and receive approval
from the City Engineer of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
Dedication and Improvements:
69. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Palomar Airport Road and Street “I” (except
Lot “D”, Street “A”) and Street “B” shall be waived on the final map.
70. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City Standards
the developer shall install or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as
provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and necessary to service
the proposed project including, but not limited to:
Village “E” Frontage Improvements:
71. Palomar Airport Road frontage improvements, including:
. No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane . Eastbound bicycle lane . Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side) . Street light standards (south side) . Landscape raised median . Community theme wall (south side) . Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain reimbursement
for one-half of the raised median hardscape/landscape improvements from the
fronting property owners on the north side of Palomar Airport Road.
72. Street “I” frontage improvements from Palomar Airport Road to the Village “E”
entrance, including:
. Two vehicular travel lanes (48’ curb-to-curb width) . Curb and gutter (both sides) . Street light standards (both sides) . Sidewalk (east side only) . All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -18- 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
73. Street “I” frontage improvements from the Village “E” entrance to Street “B”,
including:
. Two vehicular travel lanes (at one-half street plus 12’) (36’ curb-to-curb width) . Curb and gutter (east side only) . Asphalt/Concrete Berm (west side only) . Street light standards (east side only) . Sidewalk (east side only) . All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
74. Street “B” frontage improvements from Street “I” to the easterly property line,
including:
. Two vehicular travel lanes (at one-half street plus 12’) (36’ curb-to-curb width) . Curb and gutter (north side only) . Asphalt/Concrete Berm (south side only) . Street light standards (north side only) . Sidewalk (north side only) . All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
75. All public storm drainage facilities necessary to convey drainage to an approved
drainage course.
76. All sewer and water facilities required to service the project.
Village “E” Off-Site Improvements:
77. Temporary Emergency Access Improvements, Off-Site through Village “F’, including:
. Two vehicular travel lane asphalt/concrete pavement (28’ minimum width). . Temporary emergency access easement must be obtained to facilitate this
emergency access construction and use. . This emergency access shall be gated to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal
and City Engineer at Palomar Airport Road.
If this temporary easement cannot be obtained, then off-site improvements will have
to be constructed to facilitate emergency and/or public access in accordance with all
applicable City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
78. A fully actuated trafftc signal at the intersection of “I” Street with Palomar Airport
Road.
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain proportionate
share reimbursement for the above traffic signal from benefitting property owners
to the north and south of Palomar Airport Road.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -19-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
A list of the above improvements shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the
final map in accordance with the provisions of Section 66434.2 of the Subdivision
Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within eighteen (18)
months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as
provided in said agreement.
79. The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structural section
of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City, and the
standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval
of the final map for this project.
80. The developer shall reimburse the City for the proportionate share of frontage cost
of constructing half street improvements on City Project No. 3166, Palomar Airport
Road. Said reimbursement shall be less the non-discretionary funds designated for
the frontage construction as determined by the City Engineer and Finance Director.
Final Map Notes:
81. Notes to the following effects shall be placed on the final map as non-mapping data:
a. All improvements are private and are to be privately maintained with the
exception of the following:
I:;
Palomar Airport Road
Street “I”
(3) Street “B”
b. This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be
issued for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the
provisions of Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Geotechnical Caution:
(1) The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors
in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of
Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any geological failure,
ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that
may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
82. The Developer shall provide the following note on the final map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
“Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth
Management Control Point for each General Plan land use
PC RESO NO. 3919 -2o- w
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
designation. Development cannot exceed the Growth Control Point
except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land use designation for
this development is RMH. The Growth Control Point for this
designation is 11.5 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
Village E’s 15.2 developable acres were used to calculate the intensity of development
under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or
resubdivision of Village E must also include Village E’s 15.2 developable acres under
the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.”
83. The following note shall be placed on the Final Map: “Prior to issuance of a building
permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the Developer shall pay a one-
time special development tax in accordance with the City Council Resolution No. 91-
39."
General:
84. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance
of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of
occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein gra,nted; institute and
prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages
for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in
interest by the City’s approval of this Resolution.
Code Reminder:
NOTE: The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including
but not limited to the following:
85. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project
to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in
accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer.
86. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions
are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient
title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title
or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
Fees:
87. The Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
.final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
88. The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
PC RESO NO. 3919 -21- 97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Fire Conditions:
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
* 94.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall
be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire
Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other
reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations
cease until the condition is corrected.
All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational before
combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
Prior to final inspection, all security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be
equipped with a “Knox”, key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall
contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to
installation.
Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain fire department
approval of a wildland fuel management plan. The plan shall clearly indicate
methods proposed to mitigate and manage fire risk associated with native vegetation
growing within 60 feet of structures. The plan shall reflect the standards presented
in the fire suppression element of the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines
Manual.
Prior to occupancy of buildings, all wildland fuel mitigation activities must be
complete, and the condition of all vegetation within 60 feet of structures found to be
in conformance with an approved wildland fuel management plan.
The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following
requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements
and at least two existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict
street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names.
Water Conditions:
95. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can
be met.
96. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San
Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of
application for meter installation.
97. Sequentially, the Developer’s Engineer shall do the following:
PC RESO NO. 3919 -22- ti
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
98.
99.
100.
101.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection
requirements. Also obtain G.P.M. demand for domestic and irrigational
needs from appropriate parties.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department for processing and approval.
C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement
plans, a meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review,
comment and approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e. -
GPM - EDU).
This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available
at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to
be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map.
The developer shall be required to adhere to all conditions of the water and sewer
analysis on file at Carlsbad Municipal Water District Engineering Department (file
# reference CMWD 86-502).
The developer shall install minimum 8” DIA waterlines in streets A, B, C, D, E, F,
G, H, I and Palomar Airport Road. Exact sizes shall be established via a Village “E”
analysis.
This village must provide all offsite water, sewer and reclaimed systems to be
completely independent of other proposed developments.
PC RESO NO. 3919 -23-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of April,
1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen,
Noble, Savaxy and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
Al-TEST: L
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3919 -24-
- - h
RSUdOCarrilloWm Environmental Impact Report fixmmt
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
A. Agriculture
Impacr. Possible soil contamination from B chemicals f&m&y used or stored on the site.
Mtigdon. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigah ~~~~mma~daths, if naxssary, to City Planning Department MU 1xsy Health Deptmak 2) Mitigation to be made a condition of tentative maps approved under the h4astcr Plan. 3) Report Q\ compkted remaliation to be submitted to City Planning Dqartment and County Health Dqrtment upon completion.
Masrer P&n Implrmenufion. A soils rqort fort& propaty wna! by Continental Homes and the property being dedicated for park purposes has been cleccivrd by the Planning Department . Any mitigation required for soiis amtaminahn idicaul by this report will be remedied prior
to issuance of a grading permk Impacts may axur if additionrl pesticide concentrations and/or
hazardous waste mater& m conpincn axe famd during deveiopmm& in which cate the referenced mitigation would be apphable. Soils reports for other proput& within the Master
Plan will be required with the submiti of tndve maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tamive subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2) Approval of each tentative map under the m Plan. 3) Completion of construction of each
tentative map subdiv@ion.
Responsibk Pa*. 1) City Planning and En-g Deptma~ts.
GJZC~~O~S. 1) NO tentative maps to be appmad without nacsary conditions. 2) No final
maps, building or grading permits isued until radiation report submittal.
Impact. Possible adkt between cariier stags of Master Plaa devdopmaa and continued
A * *’ a ricult~~ral use of other portions of the sire, including agriahual chemical use, irrigation &off and odor * .
Mkigariun. Each teatative mq must provide a lid of perfonrwcc and impact criteria specified
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffaing, to ensure the phasing development is
compatible with continuai agxicuitural ufc.
hfmtr Plan *mphmentudan,\ There will be no impact if appkant(s) indicates that consistent
with its practice since 1991, it intcndt t0 &ndcm farm use. 3\
ClltckpoinM. 1) Submid of each ~tative subdivision mrp \mda the ti Plan. 2)
Approval of e&h ter&m map under the bMcr Ph. 3) m of eacfi ta~cative map
subdivision. _
Responsible Pm. 1) City Planning lad a-g w
Sanctions. 1) NO tata& maps to be! tppnrwd without nsecssy aditiOnS. 3) hspectioa of construction by grading inspectors. NO bug permits issad until prformana chria m implemented.
B. Biology
Geneml Nors. To ens& the implcmenption of ail mitigatia for e impacts to biological resources, the appiicant for each tentative map PiopoJed under th Mvocr Plan shall prior to
approval of each tentative map, as appm, show evidence to the City Planning Department
that a qualified consulting biologist has ka! stained to monitor lil tekvant mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, supen& impianmti of mitigation, and file a
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Dirstor upa~ completion of major
components of biological mitigation xquknents.
Impact. Implcmtntation of the Master Plan win directly imprt wetiands on-site and, by construction of a sewer line in the right of way fat Carxillo Way to tk R%, off-site.
Aftigatiun. The appiicant for the project shall dt&r restwe and a&awe riparian habitat at an
appropriate ana ratio to impacts or shail participate in a city-wide mitig&n program through the City’s Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shail be accomplirbed to the satisfaction of the
City and in accordance with the rcquimmts of Saztiou 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and
GameCodeandSection404oftheFedcnl~WafcrAb.
ilfaszer P&n Tmpknwtadon, No mitigation nquired for of&ire under sewer alignment currently proposed by appiicant north of Curillo Way alignmart. Such aiignment has no
wetland impact.
Checkpoints. Appnm,l of the first tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- or off-site under the Mvrcr Plan.
Responsible Pw. City Planning and &gin&g Dqutmea& Caiiknia Department Oi Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of En-
Sanctions. No grzujing q uhder the Master Ph.
3
.’ 5
i
Impact. If-& pmje. ij not wf’igurd to ~tially lvojd populations of San Diw
thommint and thread-leaved bmdiaca, develop- wiR zigaifiantty impact those speciet.
Mitigation. To partially mitigate impacts, the digatiar phw fbr San Diego thornmint and thread-leaved brodiaea shall be impkmentcd, mod&d as sp&ied in the EIR and after m&w
and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of qpmml of mm&be maps under the Master Pb.
To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accomplished prior to construction resulting
in impacts.
Master Plan Implemerotiors, Wages T and U have kn mnfigud to avoid impact to
thornmint. Village G has ken reumfigura! to minimire m OD Brodiaea.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittai of tmtative maps. 2) Approval of tmtive maps. 3) Prior to
construction causing impacts.
Responsible Patzy. 1) City Planning and Engin- Bts. 2) City Planning abd Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engine&g Deparments, consulting biologisr
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps for Vii G without acceptable mitigation
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact. Potential for future distuhnce of open space areas
w I I i-: Mftigation. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open space, biological mitigation areas, buffer areas,. ‘and naturalizai areas u) avoid distu&we of the natural habitats as a
condition of tentative maps.
Clteckpoinrs. 1) Approval of taUative maps.
Responsible Pw. 1) City planning’ and Engineering Dqwtmeata.
Sanctions. 1) No apprwal of tentative maps without dqictia of acceptable open space easements and condition to dedic?oc amsc~tioa -tSCmrtWtlEiloperrSpCC.
.
fmpurt. Possible p&&n or disturbance of C&fomh wm or otha sensitive wildlife species by kture residents or domestic pas. - .-
Master Phn Impiemen~n. No apprwll d Ttatarivt Maps foa aikt& IWages witbout
mitigation condition, if any, nquiral by CNixnia Bt of Fish and Game or U.S.
Department of F& and Wildlife.
c ./t ‘;; (2 rMitiga&n. As determined by above refhmcsd ageacy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative aups.
Responsibk Portp. 1) City Planning and Fnrirrraifig Deparrment~.
hcrions. 1) No Tentative Map approval withat &igation, if any, imposed by referenced
lead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant PIUS hy non-native Ianming species.
&fiZigatibn. As a component of the landscapkg plans for affwtui Vii, vegetation pian
for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be m by a qualifial bioiogist, and landscaping plans for tentative maps shall be reviewa by the biohgis
flfsc@oinfs. 1) Approval of tenutivc nqs. 2) Completion of 1yldsc?ping and revegetahon.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning and Eqhring Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps witht s&factory h&aping and rwegctation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat a during grading and construction.
q. 1 dftigation. The consulting biologist sh&l suphse surveying and staking of native habitat areas
Ij and monitor grading and construction.
CI
%, yi ’
. ~rckpoinu. 1) Appvai of @Native maps. 2) Report by cowking biologist.
hponsibh pdrtl. 1) City PIarming and Enginering Depairrmaut. 2) Cansulting biologist.
Sanctions. q. No qprovai of tentative map without ppcr mitigation conditioa. 2) NO
issuance of building or ocqancy permiu until amsuiting bioiogist’s report is submittal to the Planning Department.
c
7
c: -. ,
;r, ‘!
I,
Impact, Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and
constnxtion.
Mitigahn. Due to conflicting biologist’s opinions regzding mitigation, final mitigation plan,
if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fti and wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Patty. 1) City Planning and En-g Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or constxwtion in restrim area, if any.
Impacr. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
Mitigution. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away
from conservation casement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Abproval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improveman pian check. 3)
Construction of improvements near conseMtia casemat areas with rzport to Planning
Department bi consulting biologist.
Responsi& +y. 1) city Pbahq lad Eq-uing Dcplrtmenb. 2) Consulting biologin.
hzctibns. lj No a@ of tauuive map without m axuiiticms. 2) No approv4
of grading of irnprovmrcnt pbs without prope miciptioa sp&M. 3) NO iuuvlcc of
building or occuplnq pcrmio witbut pqxrly aocom mitigation.
Impact. Potential for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat areaa from erosion and sedimcntarion
from the project.
Mitigation. See hydroiogy and water quality mitigatk
checkpoints. See hydrology and water qdty ~f&@on.
Responsible Party. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydrology and water quality mitigatia8.
C. Culturd Resounm
Impact. Possible vand&sm due to increasal human presence to archaeological site SDI- 12,740B. ., \ I ’ hfih’grztion. ne siu shall be capped with f&tic, sojl, and vqctation as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supavisal by a qualified archaeologist mained
by the tentative map appkaut.
MMW P&n ImplemenHon. ‘I’lh site is located 011 site to be dedicated to City of Cartsbad
for parkland. The capping of this site wilf be the rrrponribility of the city of Cadsbad.
Checkpoints. 1) Suhittd of development piant for pa& site. 2) Approval of such pians. 3) Report by con&ing ar&a~&& submitted to City Planning Department upon completion
of work and prior to can matcanent of devciopmax of park site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and E@dq wts. 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting atcbado~st, City planning a& E@ering Departments.
samtions. 1) No apprwal of site deveiopment ph witbout mitigation $an. 2) No grading permits to be-issued until mitigation report by canarlting archaeologist is s&mined to City
Planning D-t.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on arcMogiai site SDH691B.
Mitigation. A data recovery program as specified in tk EJR must be required at a condition
of the tentative map including the site. Work mpls be supavhd by a qualified archaeologist
retained by the tentative map appiicant and compel priar to any construction affecting the site.
Ma&f Plan Implementation. Mitigation of this site will not be required unless this area is
disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeologist
submitted to City Planning Department qxm compkzioa of work and prior to any @onding for
consauction affecting the site.
Responsible Pw. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by cansuiting archaeoiogist is submitted to City .
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaa11ogiaI site SDI-4687.
Mitig&on. Capping of the site as specified in the EtR as a condition of any kntative map
4 affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a quaiiM archaeologist retained by the tentative
r * / map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of appiicabie tentative map. 2) Appvai of appiicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting adaaAogist submiaal tn City Planning Department upon
completion of work and pxior UI any gxading or amsmxth affkcdag the site,
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Apprwai of applicabb tentative
map. 3) Report by consuIting arcblogist submiti to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grxling or amsuwth affecting the site.
Responsible m. 1) city Phaing and Engin&ng Departments. 2) Consulting archeologist.
31
Smcnims. 1) Submittal of tahve map pb CwnQler without mitigkon plan. 2) No
appr0valofuntativemaptithtmitigah* 3) N~buil&gpamitst~behaiiuued
mitigation repon by consulting archaeohgist is shtitrai to City phming Dcpaztmeno.
Impact. Encrr&whment of proposai d&w of the Mana Plan on the rural, ‘ariy
- ) California” setting of the h Ciwillo histo& Jir t-4
Mitigutfon. Establishment and implemcnrrtioa of a spazial design district as quixed under
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigarion rwihng and reporting m.
Checkpoints. Sa Land Use Compatibility m.
Responsible Party. Sa L&d Use Compatibility secth.
Sanctions. Sa Land Use CompatibiIity saz!ia~
D. Paleontologicd Resources
Impact. Potential desvuction of significant fmdtl, erpecizlty in the Santiago and Lusardi Formation, by grading and construction.
‘3 &iitig&on. Monitoring of grading by a ~t&ght, with ruovay and curarioa of any significant fossils discovend, as specified in tk EIR. Ahnitoring is to be performed under the
direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by t&e a@icant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting pahntologist
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Pmy. 1) City Planning awl Engincahg Deporrments. 2) Consulting
pakon toiogist.
Swactions. 1) Approval of tentative map ax annpkze without miw pfa% 2) No building
perrniu to be issued until mitigation nporr by consulting paleonuk@s~ is submitted to City Planning Deparunent,
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
Impact. Major drainage facility deign will be qGxd to avoid pot&al a&ate &C~S of
erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding fWn the denloped site.
Mitigatht. As a condition of approvli ach rntative map, the appiicant shall submit a hydrology analysis addressing required flood Uacnuation, runoff flow reduction/siltation, and
!E \ proper sizing of drainage facilities.
Master Plan Implementation. Applicant may atbmit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tenlafive map.
Responsible Patty. 1) City Engineering Deputment, 2) City Engine&g Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of appmai.
Impact. Major drainage facilities wilI have do be axwtructcd UJ avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developai site.
7. ‘.
F $ Master Plan Implement&on. Appkant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The final decision-making body sInI approve a Fimncing Plan addressing the
source and use of finds for the cuwwioa of ail required dminage facilities prior to recording
the first Final Map or the kuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever is first.
Cllrckpoints. Recding of tint Gml map Q ismance of fast gxadiag or building permit. each
tentative map.
Responsible Party. City Engheuing Dqann~~
Sandihns. No recording of tlnd map a issuam of gladiag or building permit without
Pinancing Plan guarantee for txnmctimof~d~ef
hpllcz. Potent& erosive or flooding damage to m inLeoC&bRanchParkdueto
~nofffromthedevelopedsiteaeringtk~soahdtkpak ’
f 3 the appkable tcnotivc map a prior rp ‘haam OfamzdgdingpnnitfaM~ . *-’ Avenue, and Xn ~~syro#n~berrq\riredptkmtk~ceof~efira
grading permit afkting the area and amstrwW co~withdregrading0ftheaffccted
area.
checkpoints. 1) Approval of appiiable tcnfative maps. 2) b&mm of first @inO m
Responsible Pa-. 1) Engineering Deputma~t. 2) En-g wt-
Sanctions. 1) No appmvai of tmtative map witbout prow cbaimge syslm ShOm 2) No
issuance of building permits until dknge systaa impiemenk4.
fmpact. Insahioa of the proposed stam drain baweut Vii R ti T h Open Space Area 13
would disturb seasitivc biological cuoarcuiothtopepsplaucr
Migaioon. T?M storm dnin hshrll k rdocad to mn south from Village Q to connect co a storm
L drain in either El Fueno Street or anxlito h
E \ Muster Ph Implementadon. tbir SoDem drai8 has bcrn rdocatd iaaD licks that will be graded as a part of the development of Villages Q ad R wkwer possible to laid sasitive habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of ta&w map foe viny Q and R includii the storm drain. 2)
Approval of Village Q and R tenc&e mq. 3) Coqhtioa of storm dnia coasmxhon.
Responsible Pumks. 1) City Engirwing &partmm 2) Cii Engixteamg Deparunent. 3) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tern&e mq IXX armplcte without showiag storm draia in proper
location. 2) No approval of tentative mtp witbut storm drain shown in pqer location. 3) NO issuance of building permits for tent&e map urxil storm dmin properly consmxted.
Impuct. Potential for increasai on-she awioa iad iaaeassd saiiin downstresn when ground
surface is disturbed during grading aai consuuuion.
Mtigation. An Erosion and Saiiin Coned Plan must be prrpybd for &I development submiaal, approved by the City Engia~, and imglanentec4 during cmsauaioo.
Checkpoints. Approval of any g&&g or iaq~~ealmt plan in the Masts Plan are&
Responsible Parties. City Engineer@ Dcpumwat.
Sunuions. No approval of my g&bg pan& without Erosion ti Wiion Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
ImpuCr. Putdal impacts of urb polhnts from the developal site &feuioo water quality in Batiquitos Lagoon.
c/ c Mitigation. Discharge of ruaoff &ma developed areas inm nammkul cbarmds arm4 public education
information distributed to propay ~WWCS.
Musterl%~nImpkmen~dorr, Ad~HydmIofialStndyuuncbeappmvalpri~~to issuanceofa grading permit fix the grafhg v to amtmu the Ciin Ehma Roadways.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable taxah maps. 2) Complaioa of construction of drainage
channels. 3) close of esQow to propay OWOLIS.
Responsible +rrrda 1) City Engimuing Dcppnnra. 2) City Engine&g Depmmt. 3) Developers
Sunuiuns. 1) No appmval of tentative maps wirbara propa deaiga of nmff dtahge facilities. 2) No issuance of building pm&s unks runoff draimge 6cilit.h propaiy amtnmal.
Impact. Potential for grease, oil, axi o&a t&k& p&ants hnn pIved sur6ces to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff.
Mtigation. Best mmagemeat pncrices shall be employed to prevent tximt poUuaats fsom entering
City watuways in comphce with National PoUrpm Dischge Elitnimioa System municipal
stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or imp- phainthcMasraPIaauc2
ResponszHe Pa&es. city Engineering Dqatmmk
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits withart Erosion aad SedimezWoa Control Phn
approved by tie City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impcrcr. Geologic co&ions potentially msuidh for dmfeiopfnent on the site without remediation
include soils unsuitable for lo&buring or with &vme settlement potahl, old landslide areas and
claystone beds, and tiigh-grouadwater in ahiai Ms.
Mitigurion. Remedii gding wiU be ae&4 to a&iii firm fm fat smcaues and fills and to
wrrect adverse satlaacnt and ahid soils ova shdkw gnmdwata. A soils engiaea and
engineering geologist shall be raained by crrb rmraive map applicant to review da&d grading plans, prepare a detailal soil aml mlogic invatiortioa, monitor conmmion, aad assure compliance with the Master Plan gmlogic hstigatioa ;rad the C&y Grading Otdinam.
C7wcApoink. 1) Sukictd of aa& teaarhe aq. 2) Appwd of each ttamin mrp and issuance of
grading permit. 3) Cmphtifm of coastmakm
Responsi&Ie Pads. 1) Cii Enghmhg Depama 2) City Enghwhg Depamnea. 3) Consulting soils enginw md a@mhg m&g& City Eaginm.
Skutuions. 1) Timmiw map submimi a% aomplae without daaikd soil @ gologic investigation
2) Notentativenmpqpcovaiwithout~~gahgicimmtigationamiqpmphe cooditioas. 3)
No issuance .of buildii pemits,whhout evidem of m mitigatioe
Air Qllaiify 12
6. Air Quality *
Impoe. Potential for signjfiaat direct impacts to regioaai air @icy due OD increases in poIlutaat
ernissioas caused by project MC.
Mitig4bon. Implemeatation of Master P!aa atastuu iadud& bike Iaaes md pedestrian trails, and
requirement for applicants fat Mure tent&e rmpstoworkwithNorthCounyTransitDisuictu~
provide bus routes and stops as appropritc.
Checkpohts. 1) Submittal of ttautiva v 2) Apprwd of tamive maps.
ResponszW Patties. 1) City Maaaing rad Eagiaeering Dcptmnew. 2) City fiaaaing and Engineering Dep~rments.
hutions. 1) Submiti of tentative mqr mt complete without approp&e mitigation measures. 2) No approval of tentative maps without qpliuticm coaditiom.
H. Land Use
Impact. Development of the Masta PIa wuld encmrh 00 dm ‘early Cdifornia’ sating of Carrillo
Ranch Park. including the dimination of the aorthezn q a~ do ranch compouad.
Mitigafion. A Special Park Desiga Disaict s&ail be csobl’&uI for deve@nneat sumnmding the park,
iixiuding special coauols on setbacks, Msapiig, amI arch&mA details aad an eauy through the park through Village S. ‘TIM design diict sam&ds will be inch&t ia the Master Plaa and
subsequent tentative maps will be evalwai tbr co&tmance by the Plaaaiag Commissioa.
Chckpoin& 1) @prod of the Mastm Plan. 2) Apprwd of tent&e aups dm include part of the design district.
Ruponsibld Pada 1) City PIinning Dcptrmwn. 2) w Plaaning Dcptnmcat
Sanctions. 1) No~oftbeMIIDI~WidY)Ut~0fa~d~igndinriaand deveiopment swdudr. 2) No m of tamthe rmpr anmining pm of the design disuict
without setting forth district devhpmas stmkds.
Inrpad. TheCiryofcIlrlsbd~aonviswtahorityovsr~~S,tllrhichirin~p~dcsi~ district, if it is devdaped PI a school sick by the spl Marcoe Upifiai SchooI Disuia.
‘I
.
-
Mbigation, Agreanentwiththascbooldi%xiawduipsmld%dsis~butcaanotk enforced by the Planning Commiukm. Widrorr review of ail Qnlopmapt whbiu the deign district, it is not within the powa of the Led Agmcy to amre th8 possible m m midgad or avoidd.
\
j .Y/ Checkpain&. No Lead Agatcy ch&poim wirborr rgamm rirh &e school district.
RespondZe Pads. . ..’ Respoasibiiity fiw a&g&a ir wi&n ti m of tier jurisdiction and not the City of Carkbad.
Sanui~ns. None available to the Gty of Cari&& ti pcseat drepmrpa#s.
fmpod. Dedication of the open space link at the SolllhwcA c0ew1 oftbe propetty, where the link crosses from one zone to an adjacaa oumrsbip, is 901 mured umig the pmposat Master Plaa
Mtigation. Assure continuance of the opca space link as part of the h4asta Plan.
Master Plan ImpiemenU2ion. Carisbds Opuh splcc Mvisocy qprwai the qtn space link proposed by the Master Plan at their February 1993 m@ng. .
Checkpoittts. 1) Approval of Masa Plaa. 2) Appvai of tamive map including Village T.
Responsible Partiu. Planning Dcptirmm.
Srmctions. No approval of Master Raa without opea spwr lii
Impad. Applicants for the M4tta Plan rrmft obtain a l~mr froar tht Sa hkos Unified School District accepting the site propod by qpkaacs as ptxsibie s&o1 site area in compliance with the
Zone I8 Local Facilities Mamganan I%.
Mtigtion, Agr~ with the San Whoa Uaifid !kbool D-c% as part of Master Plan approval.
Chekpo~. Appmvd of MastaPlaa
Sun&&s. NoapproMiof~~~~~~scbool~uthltoompiieswith the Zone 18 Local Facilities Mw Play
-
.:. __ V&ml Authuia/Grading 14
-
L Visual Aesthetics/Gzading
Impuct. Grading proposal by the MMa Plan re#fa Wings just@hg grading volumes to be
q. _ \ ~prowd by the Pluming Dimtw rad City Enginea xuxdiag to the Wllside Development Ordii.
Mitigadon. Approval of Andigs fat the proposed m M prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Masta Ph.
Responsible Par&s. Planning Director and City w.
Sumions. No approval of the Masta Plan without the rquired hdings.
Impaa. Proposed grading br the Muta Plan would aceal Hiilsids Devdopment Ordinance allowances for slope height and cacroacbmax into 40 pacar sloper rithan specified findings by the
decision making body.
/f J 2- Mitigation. Approval of tladq fix the proposed Greg camcmea with approval of the Masta
Phil.
Checkpoints. Approval of the hhta Ph.
Responsible Ptmfa. De&ion makbg Body.
Sanerions. No approval of the Masta Plan without the reqaind fbdiigs.
Impact. PotaM imprcrr of lb&ta Pha devdopmtat oa the visually sensitive Carrillo Ranch Park site, including Viiagu S, 0, rpd Q.
Mih’gorion. Appliabio taatin mps to indiate a accep&le daaW la&ape plan to reduce ,c ,*- , potential impacts. Isuplceet SpwiaI Pnt De&m Dii remmw~M UIRLdUseseaioa. \
Chrckpoin~. 1) Sub&al of wlhble tentative w. 2) Apprwd of appliuble taxative maps.
Responsible Pads. 1) Cisy Phming DQ- 2) ~plraninlDc9lrrmcm.
Su~~eths. 1) Taxaciwmq~sutm~W wt axnplctb#ithoa~~~ plan. 2) No appmvd of tentative map ricbap appropriate detaiiai la&cape plan.
W ArahriuXmding IS
fnrpwt. Potentidly rignifha impact of ~oJv&i&~~inopCnSpafzAra13onviews
from existing residences,
Mbi~ation. Detailed laadscqe plan as part ofoepclei*c mq for Village Q tad R to effectively screen views of recreaicmal vchie songs
Chrckpointr. 1) Submittal of ta&ve mtp hh&g rureatbarl vtbide storage. 2) Approval of
tcmtive map including ~OaI vdlicic saxage.
Responsible PaJtbs. 1) City Phairq Dcprraacnt. 2) City PIann@ DepartmezB.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tazaciva mtp m annph witboa appqch 1-h Plm. 2) No
approval of tentative mp without appfopw -iIIg plra
hpuct. Potentill significant visual ‘hnpact of aoise Brrias over six fm in height.
Migufion. Detail4 la&aping plan for tm&ve mqs tn provide &qtnte aver, texture, and variation of vegetiuion to scream walls.
,’ I 2 s Checkpoints. 1) Submiml of any tentah mp &owing oob bmkts aw six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map s&wing noise bnica avc~ six fka in height.
Responsible Parties. 1) Cii Planning and bgkring Dqmmem. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departmenu.
Suncfions. 1) Submital of rppliublc tahve v not compkw with8 appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of appiiabie tentative mqts uithouc appm Wscqing plan.
J. Chulation
Impa* ~incncaionof~A~~radEl~RCJbPIOjCCtCdtOhiVea]CVClof
servicsFinrhrysrr2OWlitaaooapuk!xx No&di&&impnnnamrtotbiskaseaionare
.A,’ I*\ currentiy pqmsd in the LFMP.
J Mtiga&n. The City will anRimletolxmitnftnmetodaaminsco~ with LFMP stand&
andtoidu#ifyaadimpkaeat~mssarytomcathesumbrd.
che*intr. coararrctioa of’blpmvewas.
Raponsibk Pads. city Eqikq bcpawa,
-
.I
Sanctions. *issuace 0fbuildigpamimifGfowthhbgmmstamtad~~lCWbof
service afr mt ma.
fmpuefs. spacing of the Ant intefsectiotl on Pabtna Ailpat Rord is 200 f&t doser thaa City standards allow.
M~gtdion. Tentative nups &ail comply with Cii n#d dii ad iutasection spacing standards
to the satisfaction of the Cii Eagineer. . 5 ‘2.
MonrrPfanfmpfmetirr Ih~loationshoumomtbepmOoredh4amrPlanhasnotbcarrevised
and has been approved by the Cii Engineer.
Chedpoints. Approval of tamtive maps.
RespotuaWe Pa&s. City En#neaing Deptrarwar
Sondions. No approval of tentative maps that do mt aqiy with City cord Jignment aul
intenection spacing to the satisfaction of the Cii Enginea
Impact. As proposed, devdoptneat of the M;raa Ph mAI qaim traffic signals at Paloam Airport Road/access rod to Village E and t Mehe Avmdm to Villages H, 0, and L.
/:: 3 JP Mitigation. Condition mutative maps to construct the mmary signals md impmvenAtS, or
duamine the seal tbr signals in tnfflc mdicr for waive aups.
checkpoints. 1) submimi of appiicabte tenmive mqr. 2) Appmd of applicable mtative maps.
Responsibk Put&s. 1) City Engineering Depmw 2) City Enginkag Depamcm.
Sian&ions. 1) No tQpwri oftamtive maps without appfitable comlitious.
frnm Cedamirioaroftheintaaal~~~in~EIRmaybepref~ie
I /‘. ‘.\ . \-t
for awiro~ or &a&my fusom.
d M&Qahn. Traffic smdiu for appiicablr tamiva mrpr rbJt dummim in co8suitation with City staff whether specifti cimga *ia the circulation p~oerrr si~~&k imphmed as comiitions of applkabbm
tentative maps.
MdsterpIonf~emaddh RevisiomtofheMma~Ch&ioaaudpfoposedtcntltinmaps hmatr~ybaa~a,~~encommarAatrnsof~EIRmdrOprovcdbytheCi~
Engineer.
I- ’ .i
chrc&po~l) Appmlat-maps.-
Respo&- l)Chy~~~Dcptremrar-2) wnrnninga Engineering Depammm.
Sancdbnr. 1) Noqprovaloftad~~rirbapp(~~
K. Noise
fmpucr. cerr;lin?rradjrcm~o~~~intL~plrtmcapid~cace~prffic
noisciaexcessoftIuCiismadxds0f6OdBACNa
hf&igation. Tbnutivemspssballsbowrppropritr~batrieurspscifbdintheEIRottoCitf
standsrds to attenwmmiso. Ifgr%iingslKnmintbehlrarrPl%bPrdevdopmaxinarwsof excessive unarternutd misc is modifid by tmtatiw maps, the lpDdiAcItiolll shall be reviewd by he
City Engineer and a cmw acuuscicai study shall k @haed ad qpmprim mitigation impi~ if indicated. Taxasive mqstppliamsshrllbrv,~aprionof~r~u~oninhciOhtd buri~ovusirfcaoomicuthrarixfcam~vbPJ~pr~policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Appmd oftenthe maps. 2) m Otmmmuui improvuneno.
Responsible PaHes. 1) City Planing and B Dsprrrpepr 2) WW=U DcpUtIlW.
tinctiom. 1) Noappmdwbutpmpabrrriar,rrcoodhiPr 2) NoirsPrnceofsubv
pmmits.
fmpaa. Second floocs of some fddential units m to ckalda Eltnrup roadways add
expericnctiPscrior~I~La~of~4S~CNEL~
MtigUdO& PmOard~~~l~SbOIlIhm~bDC~ti~~rfe5~~~llCXtU)
CirculPioo~~~rrhifihwouldrhirniPPaiorooirrhvJIoilSdBAC~orlcstfor
secondorhigwsaxiu Aamuialsmdium -~qkrrquirdbytiCic)t Engineer.
Checkpo~. 1) AppmvaMtwn%ive~ 2) lmp$tmd-bnprovemans.
Respond&&- 1)CItyPhmingaad~~1)~D~ ’
Scuredont. 1) No~widmttproperbrrirrr~aandbk. t) m isswceofm-
permitt. I
- -
.
L. PubIic Fadities and Sewices
L i frnm. TbreirapotddfbrtheLFMP~sfaukdibr*6dli&tDkexcsdd
depcndinOonthe~ofdavslopwPrrd~~afadcabP131L1)~~CiY~Di~
4.
M&gatioa Priortotherecordationofaaythrlmqdutb~HIp, sufffcieatp~radshall be dedicated within Zone 18.
Chrckpoinfs. Reco&tioaof&stfindmlprpdathsMaoerpIa.
Respodbli PM&S. City Plans&g, Eqhahg, ObPsks rpd Ikmkn~ Deputmeats.
Sanmbnt. No recordrtioa of find mq widwff ddiatim ofd!kh puulpd ~thin Park Dii
4.
fmpoct TheLFMP~rmMcestrPdtrd~lhrrauaml~iPZOMlabCd~bdtOrbeSIlr
Marcos Uniffed School diia (SMUSD) sd drt a m pha be approvd by the SMUSD prior
to recocdation of any tIaal map or issuawof~~or~pamitinZom18.
0 1” . Mirigation. Cotnpbce with the Zom 18 qimm
Checkpoints. 1) Recor&ioaofthofhtfimimpamkthe~Plaa 2) hmnceofaay gradingorbuildiigpamitinrheMmerPha~
Respode Pads. Chy Pluming Aad Eqiwiq Dqaman.
Sonuiwu. NoFiimq,~dwitbutLFW~beiqm&
Impact. Smagagaamioaamidexceedacrprea a$&yif~~meatoccuKiatbe MilStUPhUMlibru#5.
Mtl;Ha Impi- lmsaru~iatheLEI#Pbormy~mapsaasblg~potcairl
impact to be rtdiizai.
ckk+nfr. 1) sldarimloftmc%ive mtpaib2aB. 2) ~oftenutiwmapssubmicrrrl
after 200s.
ResponsihPutda. 1) City~aaahgand&ghwingDcprtnwar. 2) CityPhmingand
En8iaeuingDcguawacr.
-
M. SoIid Waste Disposal
M&g&n. Appliantsk~~~hIk~AIPIblhildCLLY)IIStrPtCIfll
means of feasible solid wasa disposal are availMu
Checkpob& 1) Approvaioftamfivermps~tbsibtu~~
Responsible Pattim. 1) City Planning ad M w
Simsions. 1) No approval of waive maps wirhop llrrnnmrira of misting disposal apaciq.
50
1
. 2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3920
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 115 LOT PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH 104 DUPLEX UNITS ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD BETWEEN FUTURE
MELROSE DRIVE AND THE CITY’S EASTERN
BOUNDARY.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
CASE NO: PUD 95-04
WHEREAS, UDC HOMES has filed a verified application for certain property
to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Mefidian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
and a portion of Certificate of Compliance File/Page 87-385114
recorded July 9,1987 all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of April, 1996,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Planned Unit Development, PUD 95-04,
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: %J
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinps:
1. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the General Plan, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and
all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the multi-
family medium high density residential project implements the designated General
Plan and Master Plan land use and incorporates all required development standards
and design criteria specified by the Planned Development Ordinance.
2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide
a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community, in that the multi-family development will
contribute to the balance of housing types in the City.
3. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements
in the vicinity, in that the project is conditioned to comply with the Zone 18 Local
Facilities Management Plan ensuring that the necessary public facilities and
infrastructure will be provided concurrent with demand and that grading will be in
accordance with the provisions of the Grading Ordinance and the recommendations of the geotechnical analysis.
4. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45090, the design criteria set forth in Section
21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the
Design Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides the necessary private street
widths, conveniently located common recreation areas, adequate resident and guest
parking, setbacks, and landscaping.
5. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on
the site, in that the project grading is consistent with the approved Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17, and units will provide
variation in architecture and roof colors as well as landscaping and uniform fencing
on HOA maintained slopes to screen structures from surrounding roadways.
6. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site
is compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the project is consistent with the
development approved for Village E by the approved Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
Village E abuts Palomar Airport Road to the north and is surrounded by other
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan villages designated for multi-family development.
7. That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated
with the project and does not dominate the project, in that its circular road design
will provide automobile and pedestrian access to each of the duplex units and common recreation areas as well as satisfy guest parking requirements in proximity
PC RESO NO. 3920 $2 -2-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8. The Planning Commission finds that:
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidelines
15168(c)(2) and (e), and 15183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) and
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04).
C. there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior 1994 General Plan
and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as
significant in the prior EIR’s;
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR under
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist;
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 which are appropriate to
this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significant and
adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding
considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those
effects, no additional environmental document is required.
The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April, 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant
shall record a notice concerning aircraft noise.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by City
Council Resolution No. 90-384.
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the
project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to
the impact caused by the project.
to the individual units.
Conditions:
1. Approval of PUD 95-04 is granted subject to the approval of CT 95-06 and SDP 95
12. PUD 9504 is subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 3919 for the
‘Tentative Tract Map, CT 95-06.
PC RESO NO. 3920 -3- Gj2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are
required as part of the approved CT 9506 and SDP 95-12, as contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No(s) 3919 and 3921.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of April,
1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen,
Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL I. PR~LZPS~~LLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3920 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3921
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 95-12 FOR 20
AFFORDABLE TWO AND THREE BEDROOM UNITS IN
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE E ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD BETWEEN FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE
AND THE CITY’S EASTERN BOUNDARIES
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE E
CASE NO: SDP 95-12
WHEREAS, UDC HOMES has filed a verified application with the City of
Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site
Development Permit approval as shown on Exhibits “A - P’ dated April 17,1996 on file in
the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference (“SDP 95-12”),
as provided by Chapter 21.53 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 17th day of April, 1996, consider said request on property described
as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
and a portion of Certificate of Compliance File/Page 87-385114
recorded July 9,1987 all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to SDP 95-12.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. &
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES Site Development Permit, SDP 95-12, based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinps:
1. All findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3919 and 3920 for
CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04 are incorporated herein by reference.
2. That the requested use is a) properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, b) is consistent with the various elements and objectives of
the General Plan, c) will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and d) will not
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that:
a) The affordable units are consistent with the City’s Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance) due to proximity to
Palomar Airport Road, a prime arterial roadway, and within 0 - 2 miles of
three major industrial centers offering employment opportunities. All public
facilities, including the construction of Street “I” and Melrose Drive as well
as the necessary infrastructure to serve the project and the necessary environmental mitigation will be provided,
b) The 20 affordable units in Village E are located within the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan area. In accordance with Policy 3.6.a of the Housing Element
requiring that 15% of all units approved for any master plan community shall
be affordable to lower income households, the 20 affordable units will exceed
the total number of affordable units required in Village E (15.6 units).
Village E will provide 6 three bedroom units; 4 of the three bedroom units
will satisfy the three bedroom unit requirements of future Ranch0 Carrillo
Villages J and K.
c,d) The affordable units will not adversely impact the site, traffic circulation or
be detrimental to the surrounding market rate units in Village E since the
affordable units: 1) are disbursed throughout -the project; 2) provide the
same amenities, parking, and architecture as the market rate units; 3) do not
require a density increase or standard modifications; and 4) are integrated
into the project which is designed in accordance with City standards to avoid
circulation impacts. The project is conditioned to construct or improve the
roadways required to provide access to Village E as well as the internal street
system providing access to all of the units.
3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use, in that since the units are integrated into the multi-family planned unit
development which meets or exceeds all development standards and design criteria
specified by the Planned Development and Subdivision Ordinances as determined
by Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3919 and 3920 dated April 17, 1996.
PC RESO NO. 3921 -2- 4@
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to
adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will
be provided and maintained, in that the 20 affordable units are part of the Planned
Unit Development which will provide all of the necessary setbacks, common and
private recreation areas, fences and landscaping required by the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan and Planned Development Ordinance. The affordable units will not be
distinguishable from the surrounding Village E market rate units except that some
of the affordable units are single story.
5. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use, in that ingress and egress to and from the
project will be provided by a non-loaded public street (Street “I”) designated by the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan to intersect with Palomar Airport Road and the
required improvements to the internal and external circulation system required for
the project will ensure that all roadways conform to City Standards and operate at
acceptable levels in accordance with Growth Management standards for road
segments and intersections.
Conditions:
1.
2.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
Approval of SDP 95-12 is granted subject to the approval of CT 95-06 and PUD 95-
04. SDP 95-12 is subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 3919 for the
Tentative Tract Map, CT 95-06.
The project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are
required as part of the approved CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04 as contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No(s) 3919 and 3920.
PC RESO NO. 3921 -3-
-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 1
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of April,
1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen,
Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
I * ti&L
WILLIAM COMPAS, Ch&person
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
Al-TEST:
MICHAEL J. HdLZkiLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 3921 -4-
EXHIBIT 4 .d llie cii .I carlsbd lwng Department & A REPORT TO TIIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 2 0
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 17, 1996
Application complete date: November 4, 1995
Project Planner: Anne Hysong
Project Engineer: Mike Shirey
SUBJECT: CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SDP 95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E” -
Request for a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development Permit and
Site Development Plan to subdivide a 16.6 acre parcel into 115 lots with 104
duplex units including 20 affordable two and three bedroom units on property
generally located south of Palomar Airport Road between future Melrose and
the City’s eastern boundary, in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities
Management Zone 18.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3919, 3920,
and 3921, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 95-06, PUD 95-04 and SDP 95-12 based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesting’ approval of various permits to subdivide and develop the 16.6
acre site into 115 lots containing 104 duplex units, two common recreation lots, and private
streets. Twenty of the two and three-bedroom units will be reserved as affordable units.
Sixteen of these units will satisfy Village E’s inclusionary housing requirement, and the four
remaining three-bedroom units will satisfy the three-bedroom requirement for Villages J and
K. As designed and conditioned, the project is in compliance with the General Plan,
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, Ranch0 Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report, Ranch0
Carrillo Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17), the Subdivision Ordinance, and the
Planned Development Ordinance.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The proposed subdivision, which is located in the P-C Zone and within the boundaries of
the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan, is designated by the General Plan for Residential Medium
High (8-15 dwelling units/acre) density.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. The
purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the Ranch0 Carrillo
site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. Grading for the entire
Master Plan area was approved under Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-17. For
Planning purposes, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is divided into Villages “A” - “T”. The
Master Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04&-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
. provides general development and design standards, requirements, and the method by which
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan will be implemented.
The 16.6 acre parcel is identified by the Master Plan as Village “E”. The site abuts Palomar
Airport Road to the north and consists of gently to moderately sloping hillside terrain which
rises from approximately 410 feet to 493 feet in elevation to form a knoll in the center of
the property. The site has been previously cleared for agricultural use and currently
contains non-native tall grasses and coastal chaparral in the undisturbed areas adjacent to
a gravel road which provides access to the site along its eastern boundary. No direct
impacts to protected biological resources were identified within the Village E boundaries.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan specifies that a maximum of 174 multi-family dwelling
units may be developed within Village E. A portion of this village is also designated by the
Master Plan as a potential location for the provision of on-site affordable housing. Due to
anticipated noise impacts from Palomar Airport Road, significant grading was approved by
HDP 91-17 for Village E in an effort to improve the areas livability by lowering the pad
elevation a minimum of 20’ to 25’ below Palomar Airport Road. The Master Plan specifies
the following special design criteria for Village “E” to avoid noise and visual impacts to the
site from Palomar Airport Road:
1. Exterior and interior noise levels to be mitigated to 60 CNEL and 45 dBA
respectively in accordance with the General Plan Noise Element policies; and
2. Landscape screening of the units along Palomar Airport Road.
As shown on Exhibit “A-V”, the project consists of 104 attached one and two-story duplex
units, each on small lots with private yards and two car garages. The two story units all have
single story elements on each side which reduce the bulk of the attached structures. The
mediterranean architectural style consisting of stucco and tile roofs in 5 color schemes will
provide variation through the use of recessed second stories and a variation in facade and
window treatments. The proposed units range in size from 881 square feet to 1,595 square
feet, and lots will range in size from 2,776 square feet to 11,803 square feet. The proposed
grading design, which will create a building pad that drops in elevation from north to south
by approximately 13’ and is approximately 25’ below Palomar Airport Road, is consistent
with the approved Master Plan grading design. The subdivision consists of a circular street
design with curvilinear 36’ wide private streets that provide on-street guest parking on both
sides. The project includes two common active and passive recreation areas consisting of
a tot lot, a basketball half-court and lawn area located near the entrance to the project, and
landscaped slopes that provide buffers along the northern and southern boundaries of the
project. In accordance with the approved Master Plan internal circulation system, access to
the project would be provided from Palomar Airport Road by Street “I” which is the first
street intersecting Palomar Airport Road east of Melrose Drive. A temporary emergency
secondary access is proposed along the project’s eastern boundary through Village F which
will continue north to Palomar Airport Road.
CT 9506/PUD 9504&95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
Pursuant to the City’s adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the base dwelling
units must be provided for lower income households. Although the Village “E” inclusionary
housing requirement is 15.6 units (104 x .15 = 15.6 affordable units), twenty two-bedroom
and three-bedroom units are proposed as affordable units to satisfy this project’s
requirement, as well as the three bedroom requirement for Villages J and K.
The project is subject to the following land use plans, policies, and programs and zoning
regulations:
A. General Plan
B. Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP-139E)
C. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance)
D. Inclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 and 21.53 of the Zoning Ordinance)
E. Growth Management Ordinance
F. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC))
Iv. ANALYSIS
The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The Village “E” project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the
General Plan. Particularly relevant to the proposed multi-family project abutting a prime
circulation arterial roadway are the Land Use, Circulation, Noise, and Housing Elements
of the General Plan.
Element
Land Use RMH (8-15 Dwelling Units/Acre)
Use Ch&fkation, Goal, Proposed Ldknd Use And/or
Objective OF Program Improvements
GCP (11.5 Dwelling Units/Acre)
Urban, medium high density
residential development
Project is multi-family residential at
a density of 6.8 dwelling units/acre.
Compliance
Yes
1
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SIi-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
Element Use Classification, Goal, Proposed Land Use And/or Compliance
Objective or Program Improvements
Encourage the provision of low Project includes 20 affordable two Yes
income dwelling units to meet the and three bedroom units.
objectives of the Housing
Element.
Housing
Ensure that all hillside The proposed grading design is Yes
development is designed to consistent with the approved Hillside
preserve the visual quality of the Development Permit HDP 91-17 for
pre-existing topography. the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan.
Permit the approval of The project is conditioned to Yes
discretionary actions and the construct/install all public facilities
development of land only after necessary to serve the subdivision.
adequate provision has been Citywide and quadrant wide public
made for public facilities and facilities are adequate to satisfy the
services in accordance with the additional demand; therefore the
Growth Management public project is consistent with the Zone
facility standards. 18 LFMP.
Ensure that master planned Project includes 20 affordable two Yes
communities and all qualified and three bedroom condominium
subdivisions provide a range of units.
housing for all economic income
ranges. A minimum of 15% of all
units approved in master plan
communities shall be affordable
to lower income households.
Circulation Require new development to Project is conditioned to complete Yes
construct all roadways necessary all necessary street improvements
to development prior to or prior to occupancy of any unit in
concurrent with need. each phase.
Use street design standards as Standards variance has been granted
guidelines for what is reasonable to allow Street “I” intersection
and desirable. Allow variations to spacing reduction from 2600’ to
occur in accordance with 2400’ which is based upon approved
established City policy regarding Ranch0 Carrillo circulation plan, the
engineering standards variances. provision of a traffic signal at the
Street “I” intersection, and to
facilitate grading for Street “I”. A
standards variance was also granted
for a greater than ninety degrees
roadway centerline angle design for
on-site private street knuckles and a
decrease in the onsite cul-de-sac
radii from the standard 38’ to 32’ to
facilitate a preferable site design.
_-
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SDI:-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
Element
Noise
Use Classification, Go&
Objective or Program
60 dBA CNEL is the exterior
noise level and 45 dBA CNEL is
the interior noise level to which
all residential units should be
mitigated.
Proposed Land Use And/or Compliance
Improvements
Project provides mitigation to Yes reduce noise levels to 60 dBA within
the usable yard area of lots abutting
Palomar Airport Road, and the
project is conditioned to require
compliance with the 45 dBA interior
noise standard.
B. Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
As described below, Village “E” complies with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan General
Community Development Standards and Village “E” requirements including: a) product
type and density, b) approved Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-17, c) design criteria,
and d) Master Plan infrastructure requirements.
al
b)
/’
4
The Master Plan designates Village “E” for multi-family development with a
density range of 8-15 dwelling units/acre. The proposed project consists of 104 attached duplex units at a density of 6.8 dwelling units/acre which is
consistent with the Master Plan.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Hillside Development Permit
(HDP 91-17) approved concurrent with the Master Plan in that the
subdivision grading design is consistent with the approved mass grading
design.
Due to its location adjacent to Palomar Airport Road, a 50’ landscape setback
is required to screen the units from the roadway and to buffer residential
units from traffic noise. The proposed landscaping within this setback area
is consistent with the Master Plan landscape guidelines. Streetscape
landscaping, community theme walls and fences, village fences, and primary
community entry monument signs at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road
and Street “I”, as well as Village entry monumentation into the project, are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan.
Exterior noise levels for units along Palomar Airport Road will exceed the
City’s standard of 60 dBA CNEL due to traffic noise without mitigation. The
6’ high community theme wall proposed along Palomar Airport Road and
Street “I” will mitigate exterior noise to acceptable levels.
The project is conditioned to require that all public facilities necessary to
serve the project are provided prior to, or concurrent with, development in
accordance with the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan. Two major
items with regard to circulation are associated with this and future Ranch0
Carrillo projects. Major roadway infrastructure must be constructed to gain
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SL&-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
PAGE 6
site access to the Master Plan area. This will include construction of Melrose
Drive to a minimum number of lanes, rather than the ultimate lane
configuration, for this arterial roadway. An assessment district is currently in
the formation process between the Ranch0 Carrillo property owners to
construct this improvement. Each tentative map for Ranch0 Carrillo will be
conditioned to construct its Melrose Drive frontage improvements, which will
add the remaining lanes so that this major roadway is constructed to full-
width, in accordance with City Standards. If the assessment district is not
formed, then each Carrillo Ranch tentative map will be conditioned to
construct Melrose Drive frontage improvements, the roadway system needed
to access the given site, and Melrose Drive as required by the Master Plan.
Without the entire street system being completed, prior to constructing any
units associated with this tentative map, emergency/secondary access issues
arise for the project. Therefore, the project will be conditioned to provide
temporary, emergency/secondary site access and associated project roadways
to facilitate a temporary access before any unit construction can occur.
C. Planned Development Ordinance
The proposed 115 lot subdivision consists of 9 private street lots, 2 recreation lots, and 104
residential lots. Residential lots range in size from 2,776 square feet to 11,803 square feet
and contain one attached duplex unit. Due to the attached product type, the project must
satisfy the Planned Development Ordinance requirements for multi-family development.
The project’s design is consistent with design criteria specified by the Planned Development
Ordinance in that it is consistent with the General Plan and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
multi-family residential land use designations for Village E and will provide the required
Circulation Element/Master Plan roadways. The proposed internal circulation pattern,
which includes 36’ wide private streets, is designed to provide direct access to individual
units which contain two car garages. The street system will provide on-street guest parking
directly in front of each unit and access to two common recreation areas. Each lot contains
a minimum of 15’ X 15’ usable private yard, and the project will include two conveniently
located common recreation areas. The proposed mediterranean architecture, which consists
of five floor plans and facade treatments to provide variation and interest, will be consistent
with approved and/or proposed development in the surrounding Ranch0 Carrillo villages.
The following table summarizes the project’s compliance with the Planned Development
Ordinance development standards:
PIANNED DEVELOPMENT 0IUMWNC.E COMPLIANCE
Standard
Lot Size (min.)
Front Yard Setback
Building Separation
Required *
Not Applicable
20 Feet
10’ Minimum
Proposed
2,776 - 11,803 square feet
20 Feet
Minimum 10 Feet
-
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SD;-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
PAGE 7
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
Standard
Building height
Private Street Width
Parking:
Resident
Guest
RV Storage
Required Proposed
30 Feet 26.5 Feet Maximum
36 Feet (parking both sides) 36 Feet (parking both sides)
2/Unit = 208 spaces 2 car garage/unit
29 spaces Onstreet parking (179 spaces)
2,080 square feet Reservation of 2,080 square feet of
RV storage. space in the Carrillo
Master Plan Recreation Vehicle
Storage Lot.
Storage Space
Recreation Space
Common Active
Private Passive
Not Applicable 2 car garage
Standard: 200 sq. ft./unit
10,400 sq. ft. (2 recreation 15,300 square feet
lots)
10,400 sq. ft. (15’ x 15’ 23,400 square feet
private yard)
D. Inclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 and 21.53 of the Zoning Ordinance)
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan requires project compliance with the City’s Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance; therefore, 15% of the total number of proposed units in Village “E”
must be affordable to low income households. Additionally, 10% of the required affordable
units must be three bedroom units. Chapter 21.53.120 of the Zoning Ordinance requires
the approval of site development plan for multi-family affordable projects. The required
findings include consistency with General Plan goals and policies, adequacy of the site and
street system, and a determination that the affordable units are compatible with surrounding
uses, and will not adversely impact the site or surrounding areas including traffic circulation.
Village “E’ is one of three villages designated as potential affordable sites which may be
used by other Ranch0 Carrillo villages in meeting their affordable requirement. Village “E”
is required by the General Plan Housing Element and Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to
provide 15% or 15.6 affordable units. As shown on Exhibit “A”, the proposed Village E
project will satisfy their inclusionary requirement through the provision of 20 duplex two and
three bedroom units onsite on designated lots dispersed throughout the subdivision. The
proposed two bedroom units are single story units identified on Exhibit “P” as Plan 4. Six
of the affordable units would be three bedroom which would satisfy Village E’s requirement
for two three-bedroom units as well as four additional three bedroom units required by
future Villages “J” and “IS’ (UDC Homes ownership). No modifications to development
standards are proposed.
-
CI’ 9506/PUD 95-04/S&-95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
PAGE 8
The proposed affordable units are properly related to the site and surroundings since Village
E is located in proximity to Palomar Airport Road and within O-2 miles of three major
industrial centers offering employment opportunities. The affordable units will be disbursed
throughout the project and will provide the same amenities, parking, and architecture as the
market rate units ensuring compatibility with the surrounding development. The site is adequate to accommodate the twenty affordable units since they are integrated into the
proposed multi-family planned unit development which meets or exceeds all development
standards and design criteria required by the Planned Development Ordinance (see Section
C above). The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on traffic circulation since
all roadways required to serve the project will be constructed or improved in accordance
with City standards concurrent with the development of Village E.
E. Growth Management Ordinance - Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18 in the City’s southwest
quadrant and is subject to the conditions of the Zone 18 LFMP. The 104 unit project is 70
units below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance of 174 units. The impacts on
public facilities created by this project and compliance with the adopted performance
standards are summarized as follows:
Standard
City Administration
I Impacts Compliance
362 square feet Yes
Library 193 square feet Yes
Waste Water Treatment 104 EDU Yes
Parks .72 acres Yes
Drainage I 600 cfs I Yes
Circulation I 832 ADT I Yes
Fire I Stations 2, 5, and 6 I Yes
Open Space
Schools
186 acres (Master Plan Performance Standard OS)
San Marcos Unified School District
Yes
Yes
Sewer Collection System 1 104 EDU I Yes
Water I 22,880 GPD I Yes
F. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the CMC)
The Carlsbad Municipal Code requires a subdivision map to be filed in accordance with
Title 20 for any subdivision project. As conditioned, the proposed tentative map is in
compliance with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance in that the lots are in accordance with the
provisions of Title 21 (Planned Development Ordinance) and all of the necessary
CT 9506/PUD 95-O. -fir 95-12 - RANCH0 CARRILLC- ILLAGE “E”
APRIL 17, 1996
PAGE 9
infrastructure improvements would be provided. The findings required by Title 20 can be
made for this project and are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3919, dated
April 17, 1996.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP-
139(E)) which regulates the entire 417.9 acre site. The direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts from the future development, including the mass grading of the
Master Plan area, have been analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-
04) certified by the City Council on July 27, 1993. Additional project level studies have
been conducted including a supplemental noise analysis and soils contamination assessment.
These studies provide more focused and detailed project level analysis and indicate that
additional environmental impacts beyond what was analyzed in Final EIR 91-04 would not
result from implementation of the project. This project qualifies as subsequent
development to both the Ranch0 Carrillo EIR and the City’s MEIR as identified in Section
21083.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, the Planning Director issued
a Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance on March 25, 1996. The recommended and
applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 are included as conditions of approval
for this project. With regard to air quality and circulation impacts, the City’s MEIR found
the cumulative impacts of the implementation of projects consistent with the General Plan
are significant and adverse due to regional factors, therefore, the City Council adopted a
statement of overriding considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and
as to those effects, no additional environmental document is required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
@ 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3919
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3920
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3921
Location Map
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance dated March 25, 1996
Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impact Assessment
Disclosure Statement
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A - V” dated April 17, 1996.
AH:kr
EXHIBIT 5
2. CT 95-OWPUD 9S-O4/SDP 95-l 2 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E” - Request for a Tentative
Tract Map, Planned Unit Development Permit and Site Development Plan to subdivide a 16.6 acre
parcel into 115 lots with 104 duplex units including 20 affordable two and three bedroom units on
property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road between future Melrose and the City’s
eastern boundary, in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
Chairman Compas announced to the applicant and the public that this item, if approved, will be forwarded
to the City Council for their consideration.
Anne Hysong, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the request and stated that the project
consists of the subdivision of a 16.6 acre parcel located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area,
located south of Palomar Airport Road, in the City’s southeast quadrant. The site, identified by the Master
Plan, is Village E and is located between future Melrose Drive and the City’s eastern boundary. The parcel
is currently vacant and consists of gently to moderately sloping hillside terrain which rises in elevation
approximately 80 ft. from south to north. It has been previously cleared for agricultural use and currently
contains non-native, tall grasses and coastal chaparral along a gravel road which provides access to the
site. The project consists of 104 residential lots with 104 two and three-bedroom duplex units, including
20 affordable two and three-bedroom units to satisfy the project’s inclusionary housing requirement. There
are two common recreation lots, a minimum of 15’ x 15’ private yard areas, and 36 ft. wide private streets
with on-street guest parking. Using a map, she described the circulation plan and stated that the project will
acquire its access from Palomar Airport Road by Street I and also from Street B to the south of the project,
which will eventually connect to Melrose Drive through Village K. The project has a circular traffic pattern.
There is an emergency secondary access located on Street E, which provides a gated access through
Village F. Prior to Village F being constructed, there will be an emergency access road 28 ft. wide which
will connect with Palomar Airport Road. The applicant is requesting approval for a tentative tract map to
subdivide the parcel, a planned development permit, and a site development plan for the affordable units.
The project is subject to and consistent with the relevant general plan policies, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan, the inclusionaty and affordable housing ordinances and requirements, and the planned development,
growth management and subdivision ordinances. In accordance with the provisions of the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan, the project will include: (1) a 50 ft. setback along Palomar Airport Road which will screen the
units from the roadway and provide noise mitigation; (2) the RV storage lot which must be constructed prior
to occupancy; (3) community theme walls and fences around the project; and (4) entry monument signs at
the entry to the project. Findings required for approval of the site development plan for the affordable units
can be made and the project meets or exceeds all development standards, as required by the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan. The affordable units are consistent in scale and design with surrounding market rate
units. The units are disbursed throughout the project and are located in proximity to Palomar Airport Road
and the industrial parks, which offer employment and transportation opportunities. The EIR analyzed
significant impacts resulting from development of the master plan area and required mitigation to reduce
those impacts. Since no additional significant impacts were identified for the project, the Planning Director
has issued a notice of prior environmental compliance. Since the findings for the necessary permits can be
made, staff recommends approval.
Ms. Hysong reviewed the contents of the errata sheet dated April 17, 1996 for the benefit of the
Commissioners.
66 MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 1998 Page 8
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the project meets or exceeds all of Carlsbad’s minimum standards. Ms. Hysong replied that it meets or exceeds all standards with regard to zoning, however, there are engineering
standards variances which staff is recommending.
Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, stated that one variance wncems the angle of the knuckle on the
cul-de-sac which actually improve the site distance. The second variance reduces the radius of the cul-de-
sac from 38 ft. to 32 ft. Fire trucks and safety vehicles can navigate a 32 ft. radius. These two variances
are being recommended as an incentive for including the affordable housing on site.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the 32 ft. radius will impact safety. Mr. Wojcik replied that the Fire
Department was contacted and they have no problem with it.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if they put it in writing. Mr. Wojcik replied no. This is the normal way it is
handled.
Commissioner Erwin would like to have the policy changed so that this acceptance is in writing. Mr. Wojcik
stated he would comply.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the Bressi Dam has any impact on this project. Mr. Wojcik replied no on
the site specific. But it is shown on the master plan so it is connected to the project. The Bressi Dam is
downstream of the master plan; however, because it is downstream, there may be impacts to the dam as a
result of runoff. The condition in the master plan relates to all tentative maps in the master plan.
Commissioner Noble inquired if the.reduced cul-de-sac will have any impact on visitor parking. Ms. Hysong
replied that there are 10 units around the cul-de-sac and there are five available on-street spaces. It meets
our guest parking standard of one-half space per unit. There is also tandem parking available in the
driveways.
Commissioner Nielsen inquired if the applicant elects to move the affordable housing offsite, does that
rescind the turning radius. Mr. Wojcik replied that if the affordable housing is moved offsite, staff would
reconsider the variance.
Chairman Compas invited the applicant to speak.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning, 2380 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission
and stated that he is in wncurrence with the staff recommendations and conditions, including the revisions
in the errata memo dated April 17, 1998. This project complies with all applicable ordinances and policies
except for the two minor engineering variances. He believes this project will provide a much needed
housing type. This will be the first duplex project proposed and approved in Carlsbad in this decade. The
last duplex project was The Trails in Calavera Hills in 1985. He is looking forward to coming back to the
Planning Commission in May with Villages J and K which contain single family homes. Some of the
affordable housing being provided in this Village will help to address affordable housing for those two
villages as well.
Commissioner Savary inquired how many units will have restrictions forclosed windows and doors. Mr.
Howes replied that he will not know this information until they actually evaluate and submit the building
plans. He thinks that, at the most, it will only affect a few units near Palomar Airport Road.
Commissioner Noble stated that he spoke with Mr. Howes on the telephone. The question he asked and
will ask again now is what arrangements have been made with the San Marws School District. Mr. Howes
replied that he has given a copy of the Minutes from the San Marws School Board meeting to staff which
states that they accept this as an approved school site. The Ranch0 Carrillo property owners are currently
MINUTES ti
,-
PLANNING COMMISSION April 17,lQQQ Page 9
negotiating with the San Marcos School District to come up with a financing mechanism. It is not known yet
whether this will be Mello-Roos or some other mechanism.
Chairman Compas inquired when the assessment district is expected to be established and when would
construction begin. Mr. Howes replied that they hope to start grading this site on August 1, 1996. The
grading and infrastructure will probably take at least a year. After that, the homes can be built. It would
take approximately two years before people can move into those homes.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if anyone mistakenly thinks the windows are sealed. Mr. Howes replied no.
Chairman Compas opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Commission on this topic, Chairman Compas declared
the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the Commission members.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if staff has received any comment from adjoining property owners. Ms.
Hysong replied no.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if legal notification was sent out. Ms. Hysong replied yes.
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 3919, 3920, and 3921, recommending approval of CT
95-06, PUD 95-04 and approving SDP 95-12, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein, including the changes on the errata sheet dated April 17,
1996.
VOTE: 7-o
AYES: Compas, Erwin, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble, Savary, Welshons
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
July 26, 1996
UDC HOMES, INC.
Ray Patchett
City Manager
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: UDC's Tentative Maps for Villages E, J & K of the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan
Dear Mr. Patchett:
At the City Council meeting on July 23rd, the Council continued CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SDP 95-12 for Village E to their August 20th meeting. This continuance was to allow the Carlsbad Housing Commission to review the affordable housing proposal for Villages E, J and K at their August 8th meeting.
UDC would like to formally request that the CT 95-06/PUD 95-04/SDP 95-12 for Villages J and K also be scheduled for the August 20th City Council meeting. We feel that it is important for City Council to review villages E, J and K together since part of the affordable housing for Villages J and K will be provided in Village E.
When these Tentative Maps were presented to the Planning Commission they went to separate hearings due to staff's workload. We were assured, however, that they would go together when presented to the City Council so that the Council could fully understand UDC's affordable housing proposal. We appreciate your cooperation in this.
438 Camino de1 Rio South, Suite 112B l San Diego, California 92108 l (619) 298-8070 l (619) 298-3514 FAX
.
Please feel free to call me or Mike Howes of HPA if you have any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Dennis M. Land Development Manager
cc: Mike Holzmiller Brian Hunter Anne Hysong
SEPTEMBER 4, 1996
TO: CITY MANAGER
VIA: Planning Director
FROM: Associate Planner
CT 95-06 AND CT 93-01 -RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES E, J, AND K -
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The attached Housing Commission Resolution for Ranch0 Carrillo Villages E, J and
K was not available when the Agenda Bills for the subject projects were prepared
and is not listed as an attachment. The project is scheduled for City Council
hearing on September 10, 1996. Please distribute this resolution to City Council
members during their briefings so that they will be aware of the Housing
Commission recommendation for twenty-six affordable duplex units in Village E and
20 second dwelling units in Villages J and K. At the Planning Commission public
hearings, the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan for 20
affordable duplex units in Village E and 27 second dwelling units in Villages J and
K. If the Council decides to accept the Housing Commission recommendation, the
Council will have to direct the City Attorney to return with documents which add a
condition to: 1) require the designation of six additional affordable duplex units in
Village E; 2) reduce the number of second dwelling units in Villages J and K from
27 to 20; and direct staff to process appropriate amendments to the related and
approved site development plans.
If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4477.
c: Michael Holzmiller
Brian Hunter
.
‘
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
HOUSING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT
OF TWENTY-SIX (26) TWO AND THREE BEDROOM
TOWNHOMES AND TWENTY (20) SECOND
DWELLING UNITS AFFORDABLE TO LOW
INCOME HOUSEHOLDS WITHIN THE RANCH0
CARRILLO MASTER PLAN FOR VILLAGES E, J
AND K TO SATISFY INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
REQUIREMENTS.
APPLICANT: UDC HOMES, INC
CASE NO.: AHP 9644 (CT #93-01, PUD #95-05 and SDP #95-13)
WHEREAS, an Affordable Housing Project (AI-IP) Application (No. 96-
04) has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad’s Housing Commission for review and
consideration;
WHEREAS, said Housing Commission did, on the 8th date of August,
1996, hold a public meeting to consider said application; and
WHEREAS, at said public meeting, upon hearing and considering all
testimony, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are true andcorrect.
2. That based on the information provided within the application and
testimony presented during the public meeting of the Housing
Commission on August 8, 1996, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of Affordable Housing Project @HP) No. 96-04
containing 26 affordable two and three bedroom townhomes and 20
second dwelling units to be affordable to low income (80% or below of
county median) households subject to the findings and conditions
outlined herein.
t . .
2 t
1
2
.
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
HC Resolution No. 96409
Page 2
3. That the Commission’s recommendation for approval of said affordable
housing project does not include support for any financial assistance for
the project.
FINDINGS:
1. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Carlsbad’s
Housing Element and Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, the Density Bonus Ordinance and the
affordable housing requirements of the approved Zone 20 Specific Plan.
2. The project will provide a total of 26 two and three bedroom townhomes and 20
second dwelling units (1 bedroom) affordable for rent to households at 80% or
below of the county median which meets a “medium priority” affordable
housing need as outlined within the City of Carlsbad’s approved 19952000
Consolidated Plan. The project, therefore, has the ability to effectively serve the
City’s housing needs and priorities as expressed in the Housing Element and the
Consolidated Plan.
CONDITIONS:
1.
2.
3.
. . . . .
. . . . .
Recommendation of approval is granted for AHP No. 96-04, as shown on Site
Development Plan 95-13, incorporated by reference and on file in the Housing
and Redevelopment Department. Development shall occur substantially as
shown unless otherwise noted in the conditions of project approval by the City
Council.
Recommendation of approval is granted for AHP No. 96-04 subject to the
condition that the applicant submit an acceptable schedule for construction of the
required ratio of income restricted units for inclusion in the final Affordable
Housing Agreement to be approved prior to Final Map. The schedule shall
indicate acceptable construction phasing for the affordable units in relation to
the construction of the market rate units.
For the second dwelling units, the applicant shall maintain rents at the allowable
affordable rate (based on household size) for low income households with
incomes equal to 80% or below of the county median upon lease up of units and
continuing for the full period of affordability.
.
1 I
2 .
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
HC Resolution No. 96-009
Page 3
4.
5.
6.
For the for-sale townhomes, the units must either remain affordable for their
useful life or the developer shall allow for the transfer of the initial fianancial
subsidy to another qualified household if there is a resale at a market price.
For Villages J and K, the affordable housing units must be deed restricted for
“the useful life of the project” which means a minimum of 55 years.
Upon final approval of said affordable housing project and prior to final map
approval, the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with
the City of Carlsbad. The agreement shall be binding to all future owners and
successors in interest. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall include all
terms and conditions of said project approval and outline the incentives
(financial or other), if any, to be provided by the City of Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Housing Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 8th day of
Augustl, 1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Calverley, Schlehuber, Walker, Sato, Rose, Escobedo,
Noble, Scarpelli
NOES: Wellman
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Housing Con&&ion
Am$~qg&vm.
EVAN E. BECKER Housing h Redevelopment Director
To: Ray Patchett,Lee Rautenkranz From: Michael Holzmiller Subject: Ranch0 Carrillo Village "E" L Date: 8/15/96 Time: 10:31AM
The above referenced project is scheduled for a continued public hearing on the City Council agenda of August 20, 1996. The applicant has requested that it be continued again to the Council meeting of September lo,1996 so that it can be heard together with the other two Villages that are pending Council consideration-Villages "J" and "K". All three of these Villages are tied together by their affordable housing component and that is the reason for his request. Staff has no objection to considering the three Villages at the same time and it would make the affordable housing component more understandable. Based upon this request, it would be neccessary to do the public notification for Villages "J" and "K" for the meeting of September 10, 1996.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 95-6/PUD 95-4 - CAFtRILLO RANCH VILLAGE "E"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, July 23, 1996, to consider an application for a Tentative Tract Map and a Planned Unit Development to subdivide a 16.6 acre parcel into 115 lots with 104 duplex units, including 20 affordable two and three bedroom units, on property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road between future Melrose and the City's eastern boundary, in the P-C Zone, in Local Facilities Management Zone 18, and more particularly described as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, and a portion of Certificate of Compliance File/Page 87-385114 recorded July 9, 1987, with the San Diego County Recorder.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning Department, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4477.
If YOU challenge the Tentative Map and/or Planned Unit Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Subdivision Map, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short.
APPLICANT: UDC Homes, Inc. PUBLISH: July 12, 1996
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
.
I’
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE “E”
CT 9506/PUD 95004ISDP 95-l 2
CARRILLO RANCH0 PARTNERSHIP / ’ RANCH0 CARRILLO INC
591 CAMMO DE LA REMA 616 12636 HIGH BLUFF DR #300
SAN DIEGO CA 92 108 I 1 SAN DIEGO CA 92 130
-
U D C HOMES INC
2901 N CENTRAL AVE 1100
PHOENIX AZ 85012
SCRIPPS MEMORIALS H
9888 GENESEE AVE
LA JOLLA CA 92037
ANNE HYSONG
PLANNING
THOMAS AND JANET MASS
2851 TORRY COURT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DR GEORGE W MANNON, SUPT. CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 801 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
!
~
WOODWARD VENTURES LTD
20301 SW ACACIA ST
SANTA ANA CA 92707
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, April 17,1996, to consider a request for a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit
Development Permit and Site Development Plan to subdivide a 16.6 acre parcel into 115
lots with 104 duplex units including 20 affordable two and three bedroom units on
property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road between future Melrose and
the City’s eastern boundary, in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 18
and more particularly described as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino
Mefidian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range
3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, and a portion of Certificate of
Compliance File/Page 87-385114 recorded July 9, 1987 all in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after April 11, 1996. If you
have any questions, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning Department at (619) 438-
1161, ext. 4477.
’ The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map, Site
Development Plan and/or Planned Unit Development, if approved, is established by state
law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map,
-SiteDevelopment--Plan -and/or Planned Unit Development in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior
to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 9506/&&512/PUD 95-04
CASE NAME: CARRILLO RAN>H VILLAGE “E”
PUBLISH: APRIL 4, 1996
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
AH:kr
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-l 576 - (619) 438-11610 FAX (619) 438-0894
c
-
(Form A)
TOs CSTY CLERK’S OFF ICE
FROH: PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ANNE HYSONG)
AE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the matetlals hecessary for you to notltie
CT 95-06/PUD 95-04 - RANCH0 CARRI LLO VILLAGE “E”
for a public hearing before the Clty Council.
Please notice the item for the council neeting of
. ,~~,~~. -- .’ - --
/- .r ---Y
Thank you.
Assistant Clty Man-- Date
PROOF OF PUE :ATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times Proof of Publication of
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Kit July 12, 1996
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at California, this 12th day
of July, 1996
i ?Y- an .- -------- --------------- Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This spai - s for the County Clerks Filing Stamp
Public Hearing --------L-----------------
--------------------------