HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-13; City Council; 13773; Village Master Plan & Design ManualCITY COUNCIL
AND
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -AGENDA BILL,m
AB# L.. 3 ‘7 3 _. TITLE: DEPT. HD.
Approval of required modifications to the new Village
MTG. 8/13/96 Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual for Coastal CITY Am.&
Commission Certification.
DEPT. H/RED CITY MGR.
rD m . m 4 \ co
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission ADOPT Resolution No. A80 AMENDING the
Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual to make it consistent with the Coastal
Commission’s suggested modifications, in order to obtain certification of the document by the
California Coastal Commission.
2. That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No.jUS-,371 ACCEPTING the suggested
modifications proposed for the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual in order to
obtain certification of the document by the California Coastal Commission and AMENDING Title 21,
Chapter 21.35, Section 21.35020 to reflect the suggested modifications to the Village Master Plan
and Design Manual as approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On November 21, 1995, the City Council took action to approve the new Village Master Plan and Design
Manual, Policies and Procedures Manual and the implementing ordinance(s). The new documents
together with the revised ordinances and the existing Carlsbad Redevelopment Plan represent the Local
Coastal Program for the Village Redevelopment Area. On January 12, 1996, these documents became
effective for all areas of the Village which are located outside the Coastal Zone. For all properties within
the Village and also located within the Coastal Zone, the subject documents are not effective until
certified by the California Coastal Commission.
An application for approval of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and related documents was
submitted to the California Coastal Commission at the end of January, 1996. The Coastal Commission
took action on the documents at their April 11, 1996 meeting in Carmel. The Commission approved the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual with some proposed modifications. The implementing
documents which include revisions to Chapters 2.24, 2.26, 21.35, 21.41 and 21.81 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code and the new Housing and Redevelopment Commission Policies and Procedures Manual
were approved as submitted by the City of Carlsbad. The City of Carlsbad will be required to make a
slight revision only to Chapter 21.35 to add the resolution number approving the proposed modifications
to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, if approved by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission and City Council.
The modifications proposed to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual in order to obtain certification
of the document from the California Coastal Commission are identified generally below. The details of
the actual language modifications to be made within the new Manual are outlined in the Resolution of
Certification provided by the California Coastal Commission. This resolution is attached to this report as
Exhibit 3. The following represents a summary of the suggested modifications approved by the Coastal
Commission:
I. Eliminate references to “Timeshares” as an eligible land use within Land Use District 9.
The Coastal Commission does not believe that timeshares encourage public access to the coast.
They are a low priority and the Coastal Commission is trying to discourage them.
B
2. Add alternate lanquaoe to land use narrative for transportation corridor which indicates that
commercial and retail businesses, mixed use proiects or residential proiects shall not be allowed
without completion of a Master Plan and approval bv the Coastal Commission.
The Coastal Commission was not completely convinced that the City gave full consideration to the
types of future transportation related uses which may be desired within the Transportation Corridor.
The Commission is not opposed to non-transportation related uses being developed within the
Corridor, they simply would like a Master Plan of uses to be prepared and approved by the Coastal
Commission prior to any future development within this area. The Master Plan would allow the
Coastal Commission to more fully understand the mix of uses proposed by the City of Carlsbad
within the Corridor.
3. Clarifv lannuane related to the location of sidewalk tables and chairs on the public sidewalks and the
installation of enclosures around those tables and chairs.
The Coastal Commission wants to ensure that pedestrians will not be required to “meander” on the
sidewalk. Therefore, they want more specific language which requires a clear, unobstructed linear
paved sidewalk area. The Commission also wants clarifying language for the installation of
enclosures which may be placed around the sidewalk tables and chairs, including their permanent
attachment to the city sidewalk.
4. Additional information required before the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program can be implemented for all
properties west of the AT&SF Railroad Right-of-Wav.
The Coastal Commission is concerned that no “potential sites” have yet been identified for public ,
parking near the coast/beach access. Also, they are not yet convinced that an appropriate fee has
been established for the program to allow for construction of public parking. Therefore, the
Commission’s modifications will not allow for implementation of the In-Lieu Fee Program for any
properties within the Coastal Zone which are west of the railroad tracks until the City of Carlsbad
has additional information on the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program. This modification will require an
amendment to the Local Coastal Program, Village segment at a later date in order to implement the
program for the subject properties.
Summarv of Modifications
The modifications suggested by the Coastal Commission staff are quite moderate when considering the
wide variety of issues addressed within the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual. These
modifications result in changes primarily to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual only. A technical
revision must be made to Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code in order to fully implement the
modified Village Master Plan and Design Manual; this revision simply notes the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission resolution number approving the modifications. Staff is recommending that
the City Council accept the required modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and
then formally acknowledge receipt of the Coastal Commission’s Resolution of Certification. As soon as
the modifications are made to the Manual, a report will be made back to the Coastal Commission and
final certification will be provided by the Commission. The City will then be able to implement the new
Village Master Plan and Design Manual within the Coastal Zone of the Village. The replacement pages
reflecting the proposed modifications for the Manual are attached as Exhibit 4 for your ready reference.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Other than staff time required to modify the appropriate documents, there is no new fiscal impact on the
City of Carlsbad related to the recommended actions.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. a80 approving modifications required to
the new Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual (dated January, 1996) in order to
obtain certification from the California Coastal Commission and acknowledging receipt of the
Coastal Commission’s resolution of certification.
City Council Ordinance No. -MS -.3 7 /
Correspondence from the California Coastal Commission regarding certification of the new Village
Master Plan and Design Manual.
Staff Report on Modified Pages from new Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2 8 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TO
AMEND THE CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL TO BRING IT
INTO CONFORMITY WITH COASTAL COMMISSION SUGGESTED
MODIFICATIONS.
CASE NAME: VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL
CASE NO: LCPA 9510/l-%B
WHEREAS, on December 12, 1995, the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission took action to approve the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual
for the Village Redevelopment Area , and on January 23, 1996, the City Council took
action to submit an application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program for the
Village Redevelopment Segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Zone (and for all
properties located within the Village Redevelopment Project Area) with the California
Coastal Commission , including review, approval and certification of the Village
Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual; and
WHEREAS, said verified application was reviewed by the California Coastal
Commission and approved, with suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission has forwarded and the City of
Carlsbad acknowledges receipt of the Commission’s resolution of certification,
including any suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission accepts and agrees
to those modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual as
suggested by the California Coastal Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, together with the
City Council, held a public hearing to hear and consider all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard on said modifications and the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC Reso. No 280
Page 2
Housing and Redevelopment Commission considered all factors relating to said
modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That this approved resolution shall serve as the record of formal action
taken by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission to approve the
modifications to the Village Master Plan ‘and Design Manual as suggested
by the California Coastal Commission in their resolution of certification
dated April 23, 1996.
C) The Village Master Plan and Design Manual, being the attachment to the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 271 is hereby
amended to read as follows:
1. Page 2-25 is revised to eliminate the reference to timeshares
after the word “hotels” in the Land Use Chart in Chapter 2, as
shown in the attached replacement page number 2-25.
2. Page 2-26 is revised to add “Timeshares” as a Land Use
Category, on the land use chart, and permit them, on a
provisional basis, in Land Use Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4. The
land use chart reflects that Timeshares shall be a prohibited
use in Land Use Districts, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, as shown in the
attached replacement page number 2-26.
3. Page 2-32 is revised to eliminate the following language: “The
following uses may be provisionally permitted: Commercial
and Retail Businesses, Mixed Use Projects and Residential
Projects. All provisional uses will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis.” This language shall be replaced with: “Any other
use, including commercial and retail businesses, mixed use
projects or residential projects, shall not be permitted without
the completion of a Master Plan for the Transportation
Corridor which would need to be reviewed and approved by
the California Coastal Commission as a Local Coastal Program
Amendment,” as shown in the attached replacement page
number 2-32.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
HRC Reso. No 280
Page 3
4. Page 2-60 is revised to eliminate the following language for
Location and Development Criteria No. 4: “A clear area of at
least five feet in width must be maintained for pedestrian use
over the entire length of the sidewalk in front of the business. ”
This language shall be replaced with: “A clear area of at least
five feet in width of linear paved sidewalk, free of all
obstructions, must be maintained to allow adequate pedestrian
movement on the sidewalk in front of the business,” as shown
on the attached replacement page number 2-60.
5. Pages 2-60 and 2-61 are revised to replace the following
statement as Location and Development Criteria No. 5: “If
installed, all fixtures, barriers, railings, landscaping or
combination thereof shall be in place when the cafe is in
operation and shall be stationary or permanent, fixed to the
sidewalk and contiguous to define the cafe boundary and may
be removed when the cafe is closed”; all remaining Location
and Development Criteria, following this new No. 5, and
including the previous No. 5, shall be renumbered accordingly,
as shown on the attached replacement pages number 2-60 and
2-61.
6. Page 3-7 is revised to eliminate the following language under
the section entitled Parking Requirements: “District is located
within Zone 1 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which
means that properties within the District may be allowed to
meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a
fee. ” This language shall be replaced with the
following: “District is located within Zone 1 of the In-Lieu Fee
Parking Program which means that properties east of the
AT&SF Railroad Right-of-Way within the District may be
allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement
by paying a fee, ” as shown on the attached replacement page
number 3-7.
7. Page 3-17 is revised to eliminate the following language under
the section entitled Parking Requirements: “District is located
within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which
means that properties within the District may be allowed to
meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a
fee. ” This language shall be replaced with the
following: “District is located within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee
Parking Program which means that properties east of the
AT&SF Railroad Right-of-Way within the District may be
allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement
by paying a fee. ” The following paragraph shall also be added
‘L.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC Reso. No 280
Page 4
to the subject section: “The In-Lieu Fee parking program shall
only be permitted in the remaining redevelopment area west of
the railroad right-of-way when it can be demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the California Coastal Commission that 1) a
bonafide fee has been established to implement such a program;
2) specific sites have been identified where parking facilities
will be constructed; and 3) detailed criteria and procedures
have been established for the annual assessment of
parking utilization subject to the completion of a parking study
or other technical information,” as shown on the attached
replacement page number 3- 17.
8. Page 3-22 is revised to eliminate the reference to timeshares
from the following paragraph to read as follows: “The
boundaries of District 9 are shown in the map provided in
Figure 14. District 9 will continue to provide a wide mix of
uses with an emphasis upon facilities, goods and services to
tourists and regional visitors traveling along the coast. High
quality hotels, restaurants and retail shops will be emphasized,”
as shown on the attached replacement page number 3-22.
9. Page 3-23 is revised to delete the following paragraph from the
section entitled Parking Requirements: “District is located
within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which
means that properties within the District may be allowed to
meet a portion of their on-site parking requirements by paying
a fee”. The deleted paragraph shall be replaced with the
following paragraph: “Properties within this District will noJ be
allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirements
by paying an in-lieu fee until the City/Redevelopment Agency
can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the California Coastal
Commission that 1) a bonafide fee has been established to
implement such a program; 2) specific sites have been
identified where parking facilities will be constructed; and 3)
detailed criteria and procedures have been established for the
annual assessment of parking utilization subject to the
completion of a parking study or other technical information. A
local coastal program amendment must be approved by the
Coastal Commission before the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program
may be implemented within this District,” as shown on the
attached replacement page number 3-23.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC Reso. No 280
Page 5
10. Page 6-1 is revised to add a statement that the Parking In-Lieu
Fee Program will be effective for all properties east of the
railroad right-of-way. The following paragraph under the
section entitled Minimum Parking Requirements is revised to
read as follows: “The parking standards for on-site parking for
the properties located within the Village Redevelopment Area
are set forth in the charts which follow this page. The
requirements set forth within the following charts reflect the
shared trip and high turnover characteristics of parking in a
neighborhood-oriented commercial district, such as the Village
Redevelopment Area. The applicant for a project or a land use
change shall be required to satisfy the on-site parking
requirements as set forth within this Chapter. The applicant
may satisfy the parking obligation by providing the parking on-
site or by receiving approval to implement one of the options
, noted in the “Parking Options” section of this Chapter,
provided, however, that the in-lieu fee option shall only be
permitted for those properties located east of the AT&SF
Railroad Right-of-Way,” as shown on the attached replacement
page number 6-l.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
HRC Reso. No 280
Page 6
11. Page 6-5 is revised to add implementing language for the
Parking In-Lieu Fee Program. The following paragraph which
serves as No. 3 under the Parking Options section is revised to
read as follows: “In-Lieu Fee may be paid toward maintenance
of existing or development of future, public parking facilities
for properties in areas of the Village Redevelopment Area
which are located east of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way. An
in lieu fee parking program shall only be permitted in the
remaining redevelopment area west of the railroad right-of-way
when it can be demonstrated that 1) a bonafide fee has been
established to implement such a program; 2) specific sites have
been identified where parking facilities will be constructed;
and, 3) detailed criteria and procedures have been established
for the annual assessment of parking utilization subject to the
completion of a parking study or other technical information.
The broader program must be first reviewed and approved by
the Coastal Commission as a separate LCP amendment for
areas of the Village west of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way.
(See Page 6-6 for full description of the Agency’s proposed In-
Lieu Fee Program for the Village Redevelopment Area), ” as
shown on the attached replacement page number 6-5.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Special meeting of the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the
13th day of August , 1996 by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Hall and Finnila
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
w ’ Chairman
SECkltTARY TO THE COMMISSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C -
ORDINANCE NO. NS - 3 7 1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF
COASTAL COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF CERTIFICATION,
ACCEPTING THE COASTAL COMMISSION’S SUGGESTED
MODIFICATIONS TO LCPA 95-10 AND AMENDING SECTION ~
21.35.020 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO
TAKE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE LOCAL COASTAL
PROGRAM AMENDMENT 95-10.
CASE NAME: VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUA
CASE NO: LCPA 9510/l-96B
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1996, the City Council took action to subn
application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program (LCPA 9510) for t
Village Redevelopment Segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Zone, and for al
properties located within the Village Redevelopment Project Area, to the Califc
Coastal Commission , including review, approval and certification of the Villag
Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission on December 12, 1995; and
WHEREAS, said verified application was reviewed by the California Cl
Commission and approved, with suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission has forwarded and the
Carlsbad acknowledges receipt of the Commission’s resolution of certification d
April 23, 1996, including suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, together with the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, held a public hearin, 0 to hear and consider all testi
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard on said modifications
City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Commission considered all facto
relating to said modifications to the Village Master f’lan and Design Manual.
. .
J
t an
.e
ma
astal
Yity of
ted
iony
nd the
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 '
27
28
-
Ordinance No. NS-371
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California,
does ordain as follows:
Section I. The City Council does hereby ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of the
California Coastal Commission’s resolution of certification, dated April 23,
1996, approving the City’s Local Coastal Program Amendment 95-10 with
suggested modifications.
Section II. The City Council ACCEPTS the suggested modifications proposed
by the California Coastal Commission in its conditional approval of LCPA 95-
10.
Section III. That Title 2 1, Chapter 2 1.35, Section 2 1.35.020 is amended to
read as follows:
“The Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan as adopted by
Carlsbad City Council Ordinance No. 9591 and the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual as adopted by Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment
Commission Resolution No. 271, and modified by Carfsbad Housing and
Redevelopmenr Commission Resolution No.280, are hereby adopted by
reference and incorporated into this chapter. ”
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it
to be published at least once in a local newspaper of general circulation within fifteen
days after its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council on the 13th day of August , 1996, and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad on the day of , 1996 by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Approved as to form and legality
Ronald R. Ball, City Auorney
ATTEST:
CLhlJI)ll: A. LEWIS, Mayor
AleCha I,. Ik~utcttlw;~r~z, City Clerk
EXHIBIT 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY Pm WILSON, Gowmor
CALIFORNIA’ COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGG COAST AREA
3111 CAMNO ML RIO NORTH, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 521-8036
April 23, 1996
City of Carlsbad
Deborah K. Fountain
2965 Roosevelt Street - Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389
Re: City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 1-96B/Village
Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual
Dear Ms. Fountain,
On April 11, 1996, the California Coastal Commission approved the above-
described amendment request. In its action, the Commission approved, with
suggested modifications, the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design
Manual which consisted of a comprehensive updated Land Use Plan component for
the Carlsbad Village area. The adopted suggested modifications are attached
for your reference. In addition, the Commission also approved the
Implementation Plan amendment consisting of revisions to Chapters 2.24, 2.26,
21.35, 21.41 and 21.81 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to assure consistency
with the newly proposed Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual.
Before the amendment request can become effectively certified, the Executive
Director must determine that implementation of the approved amendment will be
consistent with the Commission's certification order. This is necessary
because the amendment request was certified with suggested modifications or
the amendment was originally transmitted to the Commission with a request that
it not become effective until it was re-adopted by the local government after
the Commission's review.
In order for the Executive Director to make this determination, the local
government must formally acknowledge receipt of the Commission's resolution of
certification, including any terms or suggested modifications; accept and
agree to those terms and modifications, and take any formal action which is
required to satisfy them, such as rezonings or other ordinance revisions.
As soon as the necessary documentation is received in this office, and
accepted, the Executive Director will report his/her determination to the
Commission at its next regularly scheduled public hearing. If you have any
questions about the Commission's action or this final certification procedure,
please contact our office. Thank you and the other staff members who worked
Deborah Fountain
April 23, 1996
Page 2
on this planning effort. We remain available to assist you and your staff in
any way possible to continue the successful implementation of the local
coastal program.
Deborah N. Lee
Assistant District Director
DNL:lo(1057A)
cc: Chuck Damm
Gary Wayne
CITY OF CARLSBAD LCP AMENDMFNT NO. l-96B VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL
SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS
ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
APRIL 11. 1996
1) On page 2-25, under Chapter 2 - Land Uses, the reference to Timeshares
after the word "Hotels" shall be struck in its entirety.
2) On page 2-26, under Chapter 2 - Land Uses, in the Land Use Table in
the column under "Land Uses", "Timeshares" shall be inserted after
'Shoe/Garment Repair" and before "Travel Agent". The Land Use Table shall
also indicate that timeshares are a prohibited use in Land Use District 9.
3) On page 2-32, under Chapter 2 - Land Uses, for Transportation
Corridor, the following language shall be revised to read as follows:
Anv other use. includinq commercial and retail businesses. mixed use
proiects or residential proiects. shall not be permitted without the
completion of a master plan for the transportation corridor which would
need to be reviewed and approved bv the Coastal Commission as a local
coastal proaram amendment.
4) On page 2-60, of Chapter 2 - Land Uses, under Location and Development
Criteria, the language shall be revised to read as follows:
3. Tables should be placed a minimum of two feet from the curb to
allow adequate space for the opening of vehicle doors.
4. A clear area of at least five feet in width of linear paved . sidewalk. free of all obst uct o s, must be maintained fdflfiddC$iWid dtCIdJLtltnCICdt~tC,ld~~~~~df,~~~,~~d~~~l~ to al low adequate pedestrian
movement on the sidewalk in front of the business.
L If installed. all fixtures. barriers. railinqs. landscapina or
combination thereof shall be in place when the cafe is in operation and . shall be stat ona v o r pe rmanent. fixed to the sidewalk and contiquous to
define the care bound& and mav be removed when the cafe is closed.
[each of the subsequent policies (#s 5 - 11) for location and development
criteria shall be re-numbered accordingly]
Carlsbad LCPA l-968
Adopted Modifications
Page 2
5) On page 3-7, under Parking Requirements for District 1, the following
language shall be revised to read as follows:
District is located within Zone 1 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which
means that properties east of the AT&SF railroad riqht-of-way within the
District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement
by paying a fee.
17 6) On page 3-,X, under Parking Requirements for District 6, the following
language shall be revised to read as follows:
District is located within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which
means that properties east of the AT&SF railroad riaht-of-wav within the
District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement
by paying a fee.
7) On page 3-22, under Chapter 3 - Development Standards for District 9,
the following language shall be revised to read as follows:
The boundaries of District 9 are shown in the map provided in Figure 14.
District 9 will continue to, provide a wide mix of uses with an emphasis upon
facilities, goods and services to tourists and regional visitors travelling
along the coast. High quality hotels, t~~Cld~~fCl~CI~dC~t~dl/tddd~~~~~d~~~
restaurants and retail shops .will be emphasized.
Additional institutional uses such as schools, professional care facilities
and churches will be discouraged within this area. Those institutional uses
which currently exist will be allowed to remain with legislative approval of a
Master Plan for the use and related site(s).
8) On page 3-23, under Parking Requirements for District 9, the following
language shall be revised to read as follows:
0idt~ittl~dllbt~tLdl~~t~id/Zd~d~2ldflt~dl~~~~i~dfFddlP~tK~d~lPtd~t~~~~~it~ WW!lf~dfl~ Properties within the District may m be allowed to meet a
portion of their on-site parking requirements by paying aD in-lieu fee.
9) On page 6-l of Chapter 6 - Parking Program, under Minimum Parking
Requirements, the language shall be revised to read as follows:
The parking standards for on-site parking for the properties located
within the Village Redevelopment Area are set forth in the charts which
follow this page. The requirements set forth within the following charts
reflect the shared trip and high turnover characteristics of parking in a
neighborhood-oriented commercial district, such as the Village
Redevelopment Area. The applicant for a project or a land use change
shall be required to satisfy the on-site parking requirements as set forth
within this Chapter. The applicant may satisfy the parking obligation by
Carlsbad LCPA l-968 Adopted Modifications
Page 3
providing the parking on-site or by receiving approval to implement one of the options noted in the "Parking Options" section of this Chapterl,
provided. however. that the in-lieu fee option shall onlv be Dermitted for those properties located east of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way.
10) On page 6-5 of Chapter 6 - Parking Program, Parking Option #3, shall be revised to read as follows:
3. In-Lieu Fee may be paid toward maintenance of existing or development of future, public parking facilities onlv for those a eas of the Village Redevelopment Area that are located east of the AT&SFrrailroad
riaht-of-wav; An in lieu fee parkina proaram shall onlv be permitted in the remainina redevelopment a ea est of the railroad right-of-wav when it
can be demonstrated that a boiafiie fee has been established to implement
such a p oaram. specific sites have been identified where parkinq facilitiis will be constructed and detailed c 'te 'a and procedures have been established for the annual assessment of'bariina utilization subject to the completion of a parkina study or other technical information. The broader oroaram must be first reviewed and approved bv the Coastal Commission as a eparate LCP amendment for areas est of the AT&SF railroad riaht-o:-wav (See Page 6-6 for full deycription of the Agency's proposed In-Lieu Fee Program for the Village Redevelopment Area)
(1062A)
t6
EXHIBIT 4
June 3, 1996
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
MODIFICATIONS TO THE NEW VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN
MANUAL
Attached are the pages of the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual (which was
originally approved in November, 1995) which have been modified to reflect the changes
approved by the California Coastal Commission at their meeting on April 11, 1996. These
changes must be made to the document in order to obtain certification from the Coastal
Commission. The Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency is unable to implement the subject
Manual within the coastal zone of the Village Redevelopment Area until it has been formally
certified by the Coastal Commission. Therefore, staff is recommending that the City Council
and Housing and Redevelopment Commission approve the modifications outlined in the
correspondence from the Coastal Commission dated April 23, 1996. The requested
modifications have been made to the appropriate pages of the Manual and the final copies of
those pages are attached for review and approval.
Modifications have been made to pages 2-25, 2-26, 2-32, 2-60, 2-61, 3-7, 3-17, 3-22, 3-23,
6-1, and 6-5 of the previously approved Village Master Plan and Design Manual. These
modified pages, if approved, will replace the pages which were included in the original
document as approved in November, 1995. The following provides a summary of the
changes:
1. Pages 2-25 and 2-26 were modified to reflect the Coastal Commission’s desire to
restrict the further development of timeshares in Land Use District 9 of the Village
Redevelopment Area. With the proposed modifications, timeshares become a “not
permitted use” in Land Use District 9 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
Staff does not believe that this modification will have a detrimental impact on
development in the Village Area. Therefore, staff recommends approval.
2. Page 2-32 was modified to reflect the Coastal Commission’s desire to restrict
development in the Transportation Corridor to transportation-related uses only until
the City/Redevelopment Agency completes a Master Plan for the Corridor. With the
proposed modifications, a Local Coastal Program amendment will be required at a
later date following approval of a Master Plan to change the permitted land uses in
the Transportation Corridor to include commercial and retail businesses, mixed use
projects or residential projects.
17
-
Master Plan Modifications
Page 2
June 3, 1996
Staff believes that a Master Plan is a desirable document for future development of
the Transportation Corridor. This modification reflects the investment of much more
time in processing of a future amendment and additional consultation with the Coastal
Commission. However, the requirement will not be detrimental to future development
and therefore is supported by staff.
3. Pages 2-60 and 2-61 were modified to reflect the Coastal Commission’s desire for
more clarifying language on the placement of tables and chairs on the public
sidewalks and the installation of enclosures to be placed around the tables and chairs.
The modifications simply clarify that 5 feet of linear paved sidewalk, free of all
obstructions must be maintained in placing the tables and chairs on the sidewalks.
Also, the Commission wanted the enclosures, if installed, to be stationary or
permanent, fixed to the sidewalk and contiguous to define the boundary of the outdoor
area.
Staff finds the modifications to the Sidewalk Cafe standards to be acceptable. The
modifications are consistent with the City’s intent related to the regulation of the
placement of the sidewalk tables and chairs and the installation of the enclosures.
Therefore, staff is supportive of the modifications.
4. Pages 3-7 and 3-17 were revised to reflect the Coastal Commission’s desire to limit
the implementation of the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for all properties west of the
railroad right-of-way until additional work can be completed on the parking utilization
study and the fee analysis/establishment.
Although the modifications required by the Coastal Commission do present a problem
for interim development proposed within the areas of the Village located west of the
railroad right-of-way, staff does not believe that the modifications present a long term
problem for these properties within the Village Area. The Redevelopment Agency will
complete the necessary studies and reports and then submit them to the Coastal
Commission for review and approval.
Coastal Commission staff has indicated that they are not opposed to Parking In-Lieu
Fee Programs. They simply want to review more detailed information on the fee,
parking utilization near the coast, and the development of future public parking lots
prior to giving final approval for implementation of the program. Although a Local
Coastal Program Amendment will still be required to modify the Village Master Plan
and Design Manual again to allow implementation of the Parking In-Lieu Fee
Program west of the railroad at a later date, staff recommends approval of the
modifications in order to obtain certification of the document.
- -
Master Plan Modifications
Page 3
June 3, 1996
5. Page 3-22 was modified to eliminate the reference to timeshares, as a desired use,
within Land Use District 9 of the Village Area.
As mentioned previously, staff supports this modification.
6. Pages 3-23, 6-l and 6-5 were also revised to reflect the Coastal Commission’s desire
to limit the implementation of the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for all properties west
of the railroad right-of-way until additional work can be completed on the parking
utilization study and the fee analysis/establishment.
As indicated under #4 above, staff recommends approval of these modifications
related to the In-Lieu Fee Program.
Staff is currently working on preparation of a final, “clean” copy of the Village Master Plan
and Design Manual. If the above modifications are approved by the City Council and
Housing and Redevelopment Commission, they will be incorporated into the final product for
printing purposes. Once the final copies of the “clean” Village Master Plan are printed, they
will be distributed to the City Council and appropriate staff members for full implementation
throughout the Village Redevelopment Area, including the coastal zone. Copies of the
Manual will be available to the general public through the Housing and Redevelopment
Department.
gl ?I
B I
g
0 a
0 x
0 0
0 n
Q *
0 *
x *
x *
x .
-
f 0
i
-
.
-
l
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
0
-
x
-
X
-
0
-
E 5
ii # 4 E 8 A 9 , :
l 0
l 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
0 0
x x
x x
0 0
-
t;’ . .
0
II
0 II
0
0
-
.
0 -
0
*
-
*
L -
> _-
- 3
I 2 f c
E
jj : b ,b Q s. 2 ,o
- 0 - * - * - * - * - * -
q
-
q
-
*
-
0 0 0 - L - * 0 * ” I .-
.
.
. - . - .
. - .
.
.
- .
.
.
.
. - *
”
*
.
i
?
i
9 m
-
I
I
0
0
x
-
0
I
* -
0 -
-
0
*
0 -
0 -
”
I
I
I
0
r i P I f i
- 0 - . - . - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - * - ” -
0
0 -
0
0
”
I
1 -
”
” -
0
*
* - 0
*
”
* -
q
0
-
l
.
-
.
.
.
0
*
-
*
0
-
-n@ sum 0 -. =: d -. 8
P
.
gsv +. 0 g.?j
v 8 @ e. . . . . c . .
E ”
2 a 8 F;’ er
i
E-
5 VI . . L
it % W =;’
E+
. 8 W
P E.
#
a
PPClflC Ocrrn
27
-
w EI R . . ul 6 g v a
ti!‘d 2. g- E i;’ k’ g6 3’ ,g . CD
.
w
Fi 0
-.
c
PROOF 6~ tWUL&Al IVN
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
I nrs spact ,j ror me County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entiiled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times Proof of Publication of
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Notice of Joint Piublic Hearing --------A----------------
--------------------------
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carl&d City C ouncil Redevelopment CornmIssion will hold a joint public hearing on Tuesday August 13 1996 and the C&bad Housing and
at 6.00 P.m.. at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village &w, &&bad:
Manual in o&r to obtain certification of the document from the California Coastal
California, to consider modifications to the Wlage Redewlopment Master Plan ad Design
Commission. - The Conmkion till consider adopting the modifications to the Village Redevelopmen
Area Village Master Plan and Design Manual (LCPA 95-10) as proposed by tb+ Qliforni, Coastal Commission on Apnl 11. 1996 Tb e C of tb@ Coastal Commission Resolution of Certification accepting the Coastal Commissiol ouncil will consider acknowledging recetp
q,MDC+d ,,.,rrli‘;,~+:^- .^ 1 cv-.- -- -- -..-I ^ : --=~--.I . ..VUIII..mu"II t" LLI-fi Y>-I", 1
21.35, Sectbn 21.35 020 of the Car&ad Munjcin.1 CAP +n ,LA AL- --_I+ allu aPPrOWq a technml revision to Chapter
+ho ,,ill.,.” hl--l--n%. . - .. -- .I
August 2, 1996
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at California, this 2nd day
of August, 1996
----~&g---- -----
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
. ..= ~~8ha’yr i-m3wr rem ano uesign Manual. ~~.-r-. ---- .” .-c‘I.zCL uw IHWlr,C?‘l,O”S t< ,
3
t
A COPY O! the proposed modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manlcal document 1s awlable at the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Office located at 2965
Roosevelt Street. Suite B. The office hours are Monday through Thursday from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm and on Friday from 8:00 am to 5:OO pm.
‘f YOU have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Debbie Fountain in the
Housing and Redevelopment Department at (619) 434-2935.
If YOU challenge the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual and/or municipal code
revision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone
ek at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to
the cii of Carl&ad City Clerk’s Office a!, or prior to, the public hearing.
WPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
ZARLSBAD Cl-l-Y COUNCIL and HOlJSlNf.? AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
lagal 47917 August 2, 1996
I . - I
NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL
LCPA 95-10
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carlsbad City Council and the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment
Commission will hold a joint public hearing on Tuesday, August 13, 1996, at 6:00 p.m., at the City Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, to consider modifications to the Village
Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual in order to obtain certification of the document from the
California Coastal Commission.
The Commission will consider adopting the modifications to the Village Redevelopment Area Village Master
Plan and Design Manual (LCPA 95-10 ) as proposed by the California Coastal Commission on April 11, 1996.
The Council will consider acknowledging receipt of the Coastal Commission Resolution of Certification,
accepting the Coastal Commission suggested modifications to LCPA 95-10, and approving a technical revision
to Chapter 21.35, Section 2 1.35.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to reflect the modifications to the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual.
A copy of the proposed modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual document is available at the
Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Office located at 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B. The office hours are
Monday through Thursday from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm and on Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Debbie Fountain in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department at (6 19) 434-293 5.
If you challenge the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual and/or municipal code revision in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH: August 2,1996
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
and
HOUSING AND RBDEVBLOPMENI’ COMMISSION
June 24, 1996
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice an amendment to the Villaae
Redevelopment Area Master Plan to accept suooested modifications from the California
Coastal Commission for certification purposes for a joint public hearing before the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission and City Council.
Please notice the item for a joint Commission/Council meeting o
Thank you.
Community Development Dih& DATE
VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission and the City
Council will consider modifications to the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual in order to
obtain certification of the document from the California Coastal Commission during a joint public hearing.
The joint public hearing of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission and the City Council is scheduled
for July 23, 1996 at 6:OOpm in the City Council Chambers located at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California. The Commission and Council will consider the modifications proposed by the California Coastal
Commission on April 11, 1996. The Commission and Council will also consider a technical revision to
Section 21.35.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to identify any changes made to the Village Master Plan
and Design Manual as a result of action taken by the Commission and Council following the subject public
hearing.
A copy of the proposed modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual document is available at
the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Office located at 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B. The office hours
are Monday through Thursday from 7:30am to 5:3Opm and on Friday from 8:OOam to 5:OOpm.
Those persons wishing to speak on the subject documents are cordially invited to attend the public hearing to
be held on July 23, 1996. Copies of the staff report on this public hearing item will be available on and after
July 19,1996. If you have any questions regarding the new documents or the public hearing, please contact
Debbie Fountain in the Housing and Redevelopment Department at 434-2935.
If you challenge the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual or implementing ordinances in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the subject public hearing
on July 23, 1996.
Case File:
LCPA 95-10
Case Name:
Village Master Plan and Design Manual
CITY OF CARLSBAD