HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-17; City Council; 13817; PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - CATEGORICAL SELECTION OF SKATEBOARD COMMITTEE.
$4 0 h 8
a, 5
h P
a, a cd E3
01 P
2 ;
v1 U
u 2
F -4 0 a a cd
0) 5
a al U z
a d cd
d
crl I a a
4
g
g *ri U 1 4 0 rn 2
a
u Q)
a
a 0
cd
4
*rl L) d 1
U 0
5 F
a u
A. 0 z 3 0 0
I wr unnL3Dmw - do
AB # ~‘7 RE: PARKS & REcREATloN CO~MlssloN DEPT. HI MTG.S-/~- 9 6 CITY AT RECOMMENDATION/ CATEGORICAL
DEPT. ciw MG SELECTION OF SKATEBOARD COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the City Council concurs, adopt Resolution No. approving both the categorical
selection for representation to a Skateboard Committee as recommended by the Parks
Recreation Commission and the individual appointment to those categories as selected
96”
the Mayor.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On August 6, 1996 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-274 which referred the
issue of a Skateboard Committee to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The
Commission was requested to recommend the categorical selection of the committee
representation. The Mayor would then select individuals representative of each catego
serve on the Skateboard Committee.
During initial discussions of the August 6, 1996 meeting, the Council had discussed the
formation of a nine-member committee. However, the Council concluded in proposing i
seven-member committee in an effort to minimize the potential for unwieldy committee
proceedings.
At the August 19, 1996 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission heard public in] and discussed, at length, the Council’s request. As a result of Council direction for the
Committee to make recommendations through the Parks and Recreation Commission, i
was the general consensus of the Commission that the issue of a skateboard committec
could best be facilitated and produce effective results if proceedings were organized si1
to other subcommittees of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Typically, Commissi
subcommittees are facilitated by a minimum of two (2) Commissioners who work
cooperatively with other committee members and rely on, and direct staff to provide
pertinent information. and assistance.
Therefore, in an effort to more effectively facilitate the committee and maximize commu
input, the Commission unanimously recommended (7-0) that a Skateboard Committee I
composed of nine (9) members in the following manner.
3-
1-
1-
1-
1-
2-
3-
1-
1-
1-
1-
2-
School aged skateboard riders
(at least one of which should be Jr. High School)
Professional rider
Mother a father of rider(s)
Representative of a local business
Citizen at Large
Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission
(with one Alternate)*
‘If the Council concurs with the selection of a nine-member committee, the
Commission respectfully recommended (7-0) that Commissioners Julie Baker ar
Gary Cox be appointed to serve on the committee with Seth Schulberg as an
alternate.
0 0
AB# - /3/ 816)
Page 2
As outlined in Resolution No. 96-274, it is the Commission’s understanding that the
Committee’s task is to make recommendations regarding the suitable location(s), desigr
estimated costs for construction and maintenance of a City-owned skateboard facility.
Furthermore, as also outlined in Resolution No. 96-274, based upon information obtainc
by City staff from other existing municipal skateboard facilities, and upon the
recommendation of the City Attorney, the following guidelines will be placed upon the
committee recommendation, they are:
0 The facility will be unsupervised
The facility will have “low hazard” props
No specific fee will be charged for facility use
The facility will be located in a high visibility area
The facility will have conspicuously posted signs
requiring the mandatory use of safety equipment
With the concurrence of Council, the nine (9) member committee will present their findir
to the Parks and Recreation Commission. A final report and recommendation will then I
presented to the City Council for consideration in determining whether to approve the
construction of a City-owned skateboard facility.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to conduct committee proceedings will be negligible. Appropriate find
may require visitation to other municipal skateboard facilities. Transportation can be
provided utilizing City vehicles and requires minimum expense.
EXHIBITS:
1. Resolution No. ?b - 3 I/
2. City Council Agenda Bill #I 3,767 (August 6, 1996)
(I 0 e,
/I .
RESOLUTION NO. 9 6 - 3 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NINE (9) MEMBER
COMMITTEE TO STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING A CITY OWNED SKATEBOARD FACILITY, TO INCLUDE
FACILITY LOCATION, DESIGN, ESTIMATED COST FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR A CITY OWNED
SKATEBAORD FACILITY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, desires to 1
7 committee to study and evaluate the feasibility of a City owned skateboard fac
8
9
10
11
12 Skateboard Committee; and
13 WHEREAS, based upon information obtained by City staff from other t
I.4 municipal skateboard facilities and the recommendation of the City Attorn
15 following guidelines will be placed on the committee’s recommendations: ThE
16
response to a demonstrated demand for such a facility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has referred the issue to the Parks and Rea
Commission to recommend the categorical selection for representation
17 /I will be unsupervised by the City, it will have only “low hazard” props, there wi
I.8 1 specific fee charged for the use of the facility, it will be in a high visibility locatio1
19 1 will have conspicuously posted a mandatory requirement for wearing safety eql
2o 11 and
21 /I WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission has made recommel
22 I1 to the City council regarding the categorical selection of committee represent?
Skateboard Committee; and
23
24
25
Commissions categorical selection; and 26
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Parks and Rt
27
28
WHEREAS, the Mayor has selected individuals to fill the G
representation and serve on the Skateboard Committee, I1
/I e 0
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the C
2 // Carlsbad, California, the following:
3
4
5
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the categorical and individual Committee make up sh;
6 I( composed of the following:
7 CATAGORIES INDlVlDUALS
8
9
(3) - School aged skateboard riders MAYOR TO APPOINT MEMBEI
(at least one of which should be Jr. High School)
10 ll
I.1 I1
I.2 // (1) - Professional rider
13 (1 ) - Mother X father of rider(s)
14
15 I/ (I) - Representative of a local business
16
(2) - Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission 17
(1 ) - Citizen at Large
181; . .
(with one Alternate)*
19 11 I 3. That the Committee shall make its recommendations to the City
20
21 through the Parks and Recreation Commission and, thereafter be dissolved.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
!I 0 0
1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City CI
2 11 of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of sEPT. , 1996, I
3 11 following vote to wit:
4
5 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Finnila, Hall
611 NoES: None 7
8
ABSENT: None
9 II
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 1
ATTEST:
I/
lI
/I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I/ II
-. 0 f P ,/, CITY OF CARLSBAD - AG NDA BILL ti
'i.
AB# 13: 7 L? 3 DEPT. 'HD. - - TITLE REFERRING THE ISSUE OF THE FORMATION OF A
SKATEBOARD COMMIITEE TO STUDY AND MAKE
MTG. 8- 6 H Th' RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FEASIBLE SITES,
DESIGNS, AND ESTIMATED COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CITY Am. {
CITY MGR. : MAINTENANCE FOR A CITY OWNED SKATEBOARD FACILITY DEPT. MAYOR
-
F I I
a
Q) a
E (d
E
v) cd
.3 b N .. I a QI
;
G 0 .I+ c,
rl s
0
v) 3
a
U Q)
a 0 fu cd
I+ .rl 0 c
0 3
u
t 0 = 2
s
- .- 0 t 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 56- dq q referring the issue of the formation of a coo
study feasible sites and designs for a City-owned skateboard facility to the F
Recreation Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The Council determined at its meeting of July 9, 1996, that the Resolution addrc
proposed formation of a skateboard committee should be revised to refer it first to
and Recreation Commission. That Resolution has been revised and is includ
Council's consideration.
A skateboard committee was first formed in 1991, to study issues relating to ska
including the feasibility of a privately funded skateboard park in Carlsbad. T~
skateboard committee was formed in 1992 and charged with reviewing si
skateboarding was allowed and prohibited in the City, and identifying possible sites
skateboarders throughout the City. The committee recommended that staff be
explore the feasibility of several sites in Carlsbad for establishment of a low hz facility, At the city Council meeting, however, staff was directed to pursue le
diminish the liability exposure to the City, so the site review recommended by the
was not conducted.
I
~
Now, in response to a request by skateboarders to provide skateboard facilit
increasingly popular sport, the Council subcommittee is requesting the Council
issue to the Parks and Recreation Commission for its recommendations as to forr
member committee to study the feasibility of development of the first City-owned
facility in Carlsbad. The proposed committee would consist of a group of voluntec
whom would be members of the City Council), and include one elementary schoo
high school, and one high school aged rider, a professional rider, representatives
related businesses, a mother and father of riders, and a member of the Parks an(
Commission.
Upon formation, the Committee will study and recommend to the City Council thror
and Recreation Commission an appropriate site or sites for construction of a loca
facility, preferred size and design layout of the facility, and estimated cons
maintenance costs.
EXHlBl
,
e 0
Agenda Bill No. 13, 70 -7
Page 2
Based upon information obtained from cities which currently have city-owned skate
facilities, and the recommendation of the City Attorney on liability issues, the fd
guidelines and considerations will be imposed on the committee’s recommendatio
skateboard facility will be City-owned, but not supervised by City employees. No SF
will be charged, since existing state law provides that a city will lose potential imrr
does. Legislative attempts to correct this situation and to specifically add skateboard
list of hazardous recre’ational activities continue in Sacramento. It should have only IC
props. The facility should be in a highly visible location. Wearing of safety equipmE
mandatory while using the facility, and this mandate will be conspicuously posted at ai
and vigorously enforced by citations for a violation of a municipal code ordinance whi
enacted for that purpose.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the actual study is negligible. Design and construction fees will vary dep
the size of the facility, the complexity of the design, and whether or not the
incorporated into an existing park with amenities such as bathrooms, parking, fe
landscaping. An additional cost may be land acquisition, if a site other than a currel
City property or existing park is recommended.
EXHIBIT:
1. Resolution No. ’?’& -63 4 .
Y 0 0
9m mw? YS Err& 6n8
3UC3 uwg
tftgn: >iZ
goo9
OZ-JO a“sa
$0<6
6,$2 zwv)
0
601 L“0s
65 >:a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 96-274.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CllY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REFERRING THE ISSUE OF
FORMATION OF A SKATEBOARD COMMllTEE TO
STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
FEASIBLE SITES, DESIGNS, AND ESTIMATED COSTS
OWNED SKATEBOARD FACILITY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad desires to 1
OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR A CITY-
skateboard committee to study the feasibility and manner, methods, financing an(
alternatives of providing a City-owned skateboard facility for use by City reside
response to a demand for such facilities; and
WHEREAS, based upon information obtained by City staff from
existing municipal skateboard facilities and the recommendation of the City At
the following guidelines will be placed on the committee’s recommendations: The
will be unsupervised by the City, it will have only “low hazard” props, there wil’
specific fee charged,for the use of the facility, it will be in a high visibility location
will have conspicuously posted a mandatory requirement for wearing safety equil
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the matter will be referred to the Parks and Re’
Commission for recommendations as to a proposed seven-member VI
Committee whose task shall be to study and make recommendations through tt
and Recreation Commission regarding suitable locations, design, estimated (
construction and maintenance of a City-owned skateboard facility, which
I 1
~ 1
a m
1
facility. * considered by the Council in determining whether to approve the construction of I
3
4
3. That the catetories of the individuals who serve on the committe
5 // be recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission and approved
om
$Em <:os 0wg 5LLa 204" ci->g gr=
9 "a& 1 az SL%Z acr90 002 Lou, a02 cC9
00
SUJ? m>
022 -
-
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Mayor.
4. That the committee shall make its recommendations to tt
Council through the Park and Recreation Commission and, thereafter be dissolve
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of t
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 6th day of Auwst 1996,
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin and Hall
NOES: None
ABSENT: Finnila
ATTEST:
Ak%?hd$&&%
(SEAL)