HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-05-20; City Council; 14177; Legoland Carlsbad SDP 96-14/CDP 96-161
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Community Directional Signage Program must be submitted and receive Planning
Director approval prior to the issuance of any sign permits.
Enaineerinp:
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
. . .
The developer/property owner shall comply with the requirements of the City’s
anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally
established by the City, prior to the issuance of any building permit.
The developer/property owner shall, prior to the issuance of building permits,
provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements within the
project boundaries and all private: streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights,
traffic control and traffk control signage, storm drain facilities, sewer facilities,
water facilities, fire service facilities, reclaimed water facilities, landscaping and
irrigation facilities and pollution control facilities associated with the storm drain
system located therein. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included
with all assignments or sale of property subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
These facilities are to be maintained by the developer/property owner for the life of
the project.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the developer/property owner for the
life of the project. An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in all assignments or sale of property and on any finish
grading plans, improvement plans and site plans associated with the building
permit. The facilities are to be maintained by the developer/property owner for the
life of the project.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer/property owner shall provide for sight distance corridors at all
street/driveway intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards for the life of
the project and shall place the following statement on the improvement, finish
grading, landscape and building permit plans in addition to any maintenance
documents:
“No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches
above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the
area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City
Standard Public Street Design Criteria; Section 8.B.3. The underlying
property owner shall maintain this condition.”
PC RESO NO. 4083 -lO-
9. . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable pad within the project, the
developer/property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax (Community
Facilities District #l) in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 91-39 and 93-341.
The developer/property owner shah pay all current fees and deposits required.
The developer/property owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding
the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to the issuance
of any finish grading permit or building permit whichever occurs first.
The subject property is within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 9501
(Carlsbad Ranch). Any subdivision of the property will require a segregation of
assessment. It is estimated that an assessment lien will be placed on the property
after June 3, 1997, and if not paid in full, the first payment will be due December
1997 with the County tax hill.
The developer/property owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic
failure prior to the issuance of a building permit or finish grading permit whichever
occurs first.
Based upon a review of the finish grading plan and finish grading quantities shown
on the site development plan, a finish grading permit for this project is required.
The grading for this project is defined as the finish grading required for the purpose
of this project. The finish grading shall be done as a construction change to the
rough grading plans for Carlsbad Ranch Unit 3, City drawing number DWG 333-
2Y. The plans shall be done at 40 scale or better to provide the necessary detail. A
separate Grading Plan Approval Letter shall be provided and the finish grading
shall not be permitted until all items associated with the finish grading plan are
provided. The finish grading plan shall be a minimum of two phases. Additional
phasing may be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer and Planning
Director.
The first phase of finish grading construction change shall include the outer park
(perimeter slopes and the parking lot), LEG0 Drive and the service and
Administration Cluster. This phase shall include the design for the parking lot and
drainage system.
The second phase of the finish grading construction change shall include the inner
park clusters and expansion areas. The finish grading plan shall show the finish
grading for the major building structures that require pad certification in the
building permit process or as may be required to provide building height
verification by the Planning Department in the building permit process. All other
finish grading required for minor structures, out-buildings, pathways and
landscaping will be shown on the building permit site plan and will not require a
grading permit or pad certification. Finish grading as required to revise the existing
grading plan to the elevations approved with the site development shall be permitted
PC RESO NO. 4083 -1 l- /7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
with the approval of the Planning Director and the City Engineer. All inner park
drainage not identified on the site development plan is private and will not be
planchecked or inspected by the City.
Plancheck, permit and inspection fees shall be paid by the developer. The finish
grading plancheck and permit fees for each phase shall be the difference between
the overall plancheck and permit fees for City drawing number DWG 333-2Y and
those previously paid. The improvement plancheck and inspection fees for the
parking lot, private drainage system in the outer park, the public utilities and the
private portion of LEG0 Drive shall be the difference of the overall project fees and
those previously paid, Appropriate securities shall be required.
39. The developer/property owner shall provide for the design and finish grading of a
drainage system that shall ensure that runoff resulting from lo-year frequency storms of
6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, is equal to or less than the
runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing developed
conditions now and forever prior to the issuance of the first building permit. The
developer/property owner shall analyze the 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations to
determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results.
40. The developer shall submit proof that a Notice of Intention has been submitted to the
State Water Resources Control Board.
41. The developer, upon completion of finish grading, shall ensure that an “as-graded”
geologic plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the
geology as exposed by the finish grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as
actually constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre
and post site finish grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24” x 36” mylar or similar
drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
42. No finish grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the project
unless a finish grading or slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected
properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the finish grading or slope
easement no finish grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer must either
amend the site development plan or modify the plans so finish grading will not occur
outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved site
development plan as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. The top of
slope west of LEG0 Drive between Planning Area 2, the Research and Development
lots, and Lot 18 and 19 (LEG0 Drive and LEGOLAND Carlsbad) meanders off and
on property that the project developer/property owner do not have legal title to.
The developer shall negotiate, execute and record with the adjacent property
owner(s) a private drainage and maintenance easement which is required between
the property owners. A recorded copy of the easement is required prior to the
issuance of the finish grading permit for the finish grading of the outer park. The
easement wording shall include maintenance and irrigation provisions to the
PC RESO NO. 4083 -12- /8
1
2
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall show the easement location
on all associated finish grading, improvement, landscape and building permit plans.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
43. The developer shall install or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as
provided by law desiltation/detention/urban pollutant basin(s) of a type and a size and at
location(s) as approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall enter into a basin
maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond satisfactory to the City Engineer
prior to the approval of finish grading or building permit whichever occurs first for this
project. Each basin shall be serviced by an all-weather access/maintenance road. The
basin maintenance agreement for the construction of the project will be included in
the grading and erosion control agreement. After the construction period, the
permanent facilities will be maintained in a functional manner for the life of the
project.
44. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or
installed prior to or concurrent with any finish grading or building permit as may be
required by the City Engineer and be maintained for the life of the project.
45. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the site development plan. The
offer shall be made prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land
so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and
without cost to the City. Streets and easements that are already public are not required
to be rededicated.
46. The following dedications are required prior to issuance of any building permit for this
project:
a. Right-of-way for Hidden Valley Road from Palomar Airport Road to Lot 18
northern property line as shown on the tentative map for Carlsbad Tract CT
94-09.
b. Easement for public utilities within LEG0 Drive from Lot 18 northern
property line to utilities intersection with Armada Drive as shown on the
tentative map for CT 94-09.
47. The developer shall apply for and obtain from Carlshad Municipal Water District a
quitclaim for the existing 20 foot water pipeline easement file number 83959 prior to
the issuance of any building permit that crosses the easement.
48. The developer/property owner shall apply for and obtain release of the stockpile
agreement prior to the issuance of any building permit within the inner park with
the exception of the service and administration cluster.
26
II . . .
27
28 PC RESO NO. 4083 -13- /“)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
.20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
49. The developer/property owner shall prepare and obtain:
a. Approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that
addresses the day to day activities of the park and shall comply with the
City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit. The developer/property owner shall implement SWPPP to
provide best management practices as referenced in the “California Storm
Water Best Management Practices Handbook” to reduce surface pollutants
to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas ‘and the storm
drain system. The SWPPP and associated improvements shall be prepared
and submitted for approval by the City Engineer in the following phases:
1. Phase I of the SWPPP shall include the Outer Park and the parking
lot. Approval of the SWPPP shall be obtained prior to the issuance of
the finish grading permit for the Outer Park and the parking lot.
2. Phase II of the SWPPP shall include the Service and Administration
cluster. Approval of the amendments to the SWPPP shall be obtained
prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the cluster.
3. Phase III of the SWPPP shall include the remaining clusters in the
Inner Park/attraction areas. Approval of the amendment shall be
obtained prior to the issuance of the first building permit issued
within the Inner Park/attraction areas.
h. The requirements of said SWPPP shall be followed and implemented
throughout the life of the project. The SWPPP may be amended to comply
with adopted City standards from time to time as necessary following the
approval of the SWPPP. All future amendments shall be approved by the
City Engineer.
C. The SWPPP shall include, hut not he limited to addressing, the following:
1. The developer, all owners, operators and tenants shall coordinate efforts
to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and
properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products.
2. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other
such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into
storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of
pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such
chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City
requirements as prescribed in their respective containers.
PC RESO NO. 4083 -14- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be used to eliminate or reduce
surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and
surface improvements.
4. A section specifically addressing the daily wash down operation and
trash collection system.
5. Collection and use of data to maintain water quality for all the water
features, and the treatment of water prior to discharge into the storm
drain system. A discharge permit from the Regional Water Quality
Board may be required for the water features that drain into the
storm drain system.
6. The use of dry cleanup measures shall he implemented where feasible.
7. General BMPs to include at a minimum: training, education,
housekeeping practices, preventative maintenance, spill prevention
and control.
A
50. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City Standards, the
developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided
by law, improvements shown on the site development plan and the following
improvements:
a.
b.
Public utilities in LEG0 Drive south of the roundabout.
The backbone on-site drainage system shall be designed to public works
standards with the exception that the use of PVC pipe will be permitted
below the parking lot and within the inner park. RCP is required only
within the NPDES/desiltation basin located adjacent to Palomar Airport
Road. Plancheck and inspection fees will be required and securities shall be
posted.
Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 24 months of approval of the
secured improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
51. If the Developer/Owner of CT 94-09 does not construct the following in accordance
with City standards and the Conditions of Approval for Carlsbad Ranch CT 94-09,
the work may be done by the Developer, prior to opening date of the park to the
public or the opening date may be extended:
a. Cannon Road full improvements to major arterial standards from Car
Country Drive to LEG0 Drive.
b. Traffic signal at Cannon Road and LEG0 Drive.
PC RESO NO. 4083 -15- 22)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C.
d.
e.
f.
g*
h.
i.
LEG0 Drive full improvements from Cannon Road through and including
the roundabout as shown on the tentative map for Carlsbad Tract (CT) 94-
09.
Full median improvements, sidewalks, landscaping and street lighting on the
north side of Palomar Airport Road from Armada Drive to Hidden Valley
Road.
Conversion of overhead electric to underground along Palomar Airport
Road, from Armada Drive to Hidden Valley Road.
Palomar Airport Road/Hidden Valley Road intersection, including median
reconfiguration and new traffic signal.
Hidden Valley Road full improvements from Palomar Airport Road to Lot
18 northern property line as shown on the tentative map for CT 94-09.
Public utilities in Armada Drive from optional emergency access at LEG0
Drive to Palomar Airport Road as shown on the tentative map for CT 94-09.
All. public water lines deemed necessary by the Water District Engineer to
serve Lot 18 as shown on Exhibits 1-157.
52. The following improvements are required by the Environmental Impact Report 94-
01 and shall be constructed prior to the opening of LEGOLAND Carlsbad to the
public:
a. Cannon Road/I-5 interchange ramp widening and signalization. The City
has entered into a Cooperative Agreement with CalTrans dated January 8,
1997. If CalTrans does not finance and construct the improvements in
accordance with the Cooperative Agreement, the work may be done by the
developer prior to the opening date of the park to the public or the opening
date may be extended.
b. The Cannon Road widening from Paseo De1 Norte to Car Country Drive to
major arterial standards. The City has agreed to perform these
improvements and has scheduled the project in the City Capital
Improvement Program. If the City does not finance and construct the
improvements in accordance with the Capital Improvement Program, the
work may be done by the developer, prior to the opening date of the park to
the public or the opening date may be extended.
53. Except as provided below, the developer shall install street lights along the private street
frontage (LEG0 Drive from the roundabout to the Parking Control Booths) in
conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards. As allowed by the Specific Plan SP
PC RESO NO. 4083 -16- d?a
207(A), the nonstandard street lighting proposed on LEG0 Drive on Lot 18 and 19
of CT 94-09 Unit 2 and 3 is approved subject to the following:
a. The portion of LEG0 Drive from the public portion to the parking control
booths must meet City Standards for lumination.
b. The developer/property owner shall prepare a street light report by an
appropriate qualified professional to verify that the light on the street and
associated pathway will be equal to or greater than the light provided by
standard street lights for a street with an industrial design classification.
7
8
C. Review and verification of the report shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for acceptance prior to the approval of the LEG0 drive improvement plans.
If City needs additional funds for review of the report the Developer shall
9
II
pay the cost.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
;20
21
22
23
24
54. The developer shall design the private portion of LEG0 Drive (Lot 18 and 19) to the
Parking Control booths to conform to the City of Carlshad Standards to the
minimum structural sections of a collector street. The Developer shall pay for the
standard improvement plancheck and inspection fees and the improvements bonded
for prior to issuance of any building permit except the Service and Administration
cluster for this project. The pathway located near LEG0 Drive is private and will
be privately maintained. The pathway will be indicated on the landscape plans and
not on the improvement plans.
55. The developer/property owner shall design the structural section for the access aisles
with a minimum traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to truck
access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. The
structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-
value soil test information and approved by the City as part of the building site plan
review.
56. The developer/property owner shall design and incorporate into the finish
grading/improvement plans for the project drainage outfall end treatments for any
drainage outlets where a direct access road for maintenance purposes is not provided.
These end treatments shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from
obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consist of a modified outlet headwall
consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or
radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of preventing
vegetation growth directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the Community
Services Director and the City Engineer.
25 57,
26
27
Construction access for the project will not be permitted through the LEG0 Drive
roundabout. Construction access for Lot 18 and 19 shall be through Lot 5 CT 94-
09. The Developer shall provide the City Engineer with a copy of the agreement
between the developer/property owner and the property owner of Lot 5 to allow this
28
/I PC RESO NO. 4083 -17- 233
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
.20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
58.
59.
Fire:
60.
61.
62.
access prior to the approval of any finish grading plans, improvement plans,
construction changes or building permits for the project. The developer may desire
access off Hidden Valley Road. The City Engineer may allow access after the
construction of a fully actuated signal at the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and
Palomar Airport Road including the loop detectors in Hidden Valley Road.
The developer/property owner shall provide the traffic index, structural section
requirement and turning radius of the proposed trash collection system within the
service and administration cluster parking lot. The parking lot shall be designed to
adequately handle all vehicles associated with the trash collection system prior to
the issuance of the building permit for the Service and Administration cluster.
Phasing of the construction of the parking lot and the inner park clusters will be
permitted with the approval of the Planning Director and the City Engineer.
Prior to issuance of building permit, the Developer shall obtain Fire Department approval
of an Emergency Response Plan. The plan shall state the manner in which site
management will respond to emergent events such as fires, medical emergencies,
earthquakes, etc. The plan will specifically describe:
a. The manner by which the exact location of the emergency will be determined and
communicated to municipal emergency responders.
b. How site emergency staff will interface with City emergency responders.
C Method of transportation of municipal emergency responders from the site
perimeter to the emergency scene.
d. Level of emergency medical service to be provided on site by the applicant.
e. The manner in which patrons will be protected, evacuated, relocated or directed
during such emergencies.
Developer shall submit a plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing water mains and fire hydrants. The plan shall
include off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
Developer shall provide and maintain during construction an all weather,
unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles. When in the opinion of
the Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or
other reasons, he may in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations
cease until the condition is corrected.
PC RESO NO. 4083 -18- ad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
63.
64.
65.
66.
Required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational to the
locations where combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a “Knox”,
key-operated emergency entry device. Developer shall contact the Fire Prevention
Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation.
Private roads and driveways which serve as required access for emergency service
vehicles shall be posted as fire lanes in accordance with the requirements of section
17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm system, fire hydrants, automatic fire sprinkler
systems and other fire protection systems shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval prior to construction. All buildings shall be sprinklered.
Water:
67. The LEGOLAND project shall use reclaimed water for irrigation purposes only in those
locations shown on the approved reclaimed water use area map (Exhibits 5 and 6)
68. The developer shall design, construct, install and permanently maintain either a
separate looping fireflow pipeline system from the potable water system or an
integrated system combining the potable water system with the building sprinkler
system, to the satisfaction of the District Engineer and Fire Marshal.
69. The developer shall design, construct, install and permanently maintain the entire
private potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system of the park
to Carlsbad Municipal Water District Standards for the required capacity,
pressure, and flow demand. The Developer shall engage a licensed Civil Engineer to
submit supporting calculations and plans for the private potable water and
reclaimed water system to the District Engineer prior to the approval of the public
water system. The design shall consider a system that facilitates the recycled water
shut down test. The developer shall engage the services of an appropriately
qualified person to certify to the District Engineer that the system has been installed
to the required specifications prior to occupancy of Inner Park guest facilities.
70. The developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
meter installation.
71. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at
PC RESO NO. 4083 -19-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
.20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be
available until time of occupancy.
72. The private sewer system, potable water system and reclaimed water system shall be the
responsibility of the developer for maintenance and operation as shown on the approved
exhibits for the life of the project.
General:
73. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms; the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Site Development Plan.
Standard Code Reminders:
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This approval shall become null and void if a building permit is not issued for this project
within 3 years from the date of project approval as specified in Section 3.1.2.8 of
Development Agreement 94-01.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements
pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in
substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Community Development and Planning.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Any signs proposed for the Outer Park shall, at a minimum, be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and the Carlshad Ranch Specific Plan
PC RESO NO. 4083 -2o- ah
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
81.
82.
and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of
such signs. Inner Park signage shall not he subject to City review unless such signs
exceed 20 feet in height.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and be approved by the City Engineer.
LEGOLAND will have both a potable water distribution system and a recycled water
distribution system. As a result a “Recycled Water Shut Down Test” is required. This
test will require shutting down the potable water distribution system. The test time
period may take a week to complete.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of April 1997 , by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, Heineman,
Monroy, Noble, Savary, Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:’ None
f /: -‘. ROB&& NIELSV airperson -
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOfZMILtiR
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4083 -21-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4084
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
CDP 96-16 FOR A LEGOLAND THEME PARR WHICH
INCLUDES THEME PARR ATTRACTIONS, RETAIL, FOOD
AND BEVERAGE SERVICE, ASSOCIATED SUPPORT
FACILITIES, AND PARKING ON 129 ACRES GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD EAST OF FUTURE ARMADA DRIVE AND WEST OF
FUTURE HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
CASE NO.: CDP 96-16
WHEREAS, LEGOLAND Carlshad, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by LEGOLAND Carlsbad,
Inc., “Owner”, described as
Lots 18 and 19 of Carlsbad Tract 94-09 of Carlsbad Ranch
Units 2 & 3
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “1’‘-“ 157” dated April 16, 1997, on tile in the
Planning Department, CDP 96-16 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of April 1997, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to CDP 96-16.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B)
Findinps:
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Coastal Development Permit CDP 96-16,
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal
Program and all applicable policies in that the project is in compliance with the
relevant policies of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, The
Carlshad Ranch Specific Plan which serves as partial implementation for the Mello
II Segment for the project site, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
2. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3
of the Coastal Act in that pedestrian walkway connections to the Carlsbad Ranch
Trail System have been provided and no existing public accessways affect the
project site.
3. The project complies with the requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone as the project site has been approved for grading pursuant to the
Master Tentative Map (CT 94-09) for Carlsbad Ranch. The conversion of
agricultural land to the proposed use has been previously approved through the
City of Carlshad and California Coastal Commission approval of the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan and related permit. The project has been conditioned to pay the
agricultural conversion mitigation fee prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The area at the northeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive
subject to a Coastal Deed Restriction is being preserved and a 50 foot buffer
provided around its perimeter. Drainage improvements will be constructed
including detention basins so that there is no increase in the peak runoff rate from
the developed site over the greatest discharge expected from the existing
undeveloped site as a result of a lo-year frequency storm. Drainage facilities to
remove pollutants from site runoff are also provided. The time limitations on
grading in the Coastal Zone have been applied as a condition of this permit.
Conditions:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the Coastal
Development Permit for the project entitled CDP 96-16 (Exhibits “1’‘-“157” dated April
16, 1997, on file in the Planning Department and incorporated by this reference, subject
to the conditions herein set forth). Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require
Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Coastal Development
Permit document(s), as necessary, to make them internally consistent and in conformity
with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the
PC RESO NO. 4084 -2- 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
,20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
approved Exhibits. Any proposed development substantially different from this approval,
shall require an amendment to this approval.
Approval of CDP 96-16 is granted subject to the approval of SDP 96-14. CDP 96-16 is
subject to all conditions contained in the Planning Commission Resolution for SDP 96-
14.
All grading activity shall be prohibited between October 1st and April 1st of any
year, or as otherwise allowed by the Mello II Local Coastal Plan.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation
Fee shall be paid by the developer for approximately 93.35 acres as required by the
Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of April 1997, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, Heineman,
Monroy, Noble, Savary, Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
/ / i
ROB&@ v anperson
CAR&BAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4084 -3-
The City of CARLSBAD Planning Department EXHIW
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 4 0
.
Application complete date: January 16, 1997
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 16, 1997 Project Planner: Don Neu
Project Engineer: Sherri Howard
SUBJECT: SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD - Request for a
recommendation of approval of a Site Development Plan and Coastal
Development Permit for a LEGOLAND Theme Park which includes theme park
attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated support facilities, and
parking on approximately 129 acres located east of future Armada Drive and west
of future Hidden Valley Road on the north side of Palomar Airport Road within
Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan in the Coastal Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4083 and 4084,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of SDP 96-14 and CDP 96-l 6, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
These applications propose developing Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
with a LEGOLAND theme park. The project site is scheduled to be mass graded in April 1997
as part of Units 2 and 3 of the Carlsbad Ranch Master Tentative Map (CT 94-09). The proposed
land use was approved by the City Council on January 9, 1996, as part of the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan Amendment (SP 207(A)) and Development Agreement (DA 94-01). The Site
Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit applications are required for the City to
determine that the design of the project complies with all City standards including the
, requirements of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management
Plan, and the Local Coastal Program.
The project was analyzed in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR (EIR
94-01) and no new environmental impacts or changed circumstances have been identified for this
project. Screening of the perimeter of the site, particularly the parking area and service area, has
been accomplished by the use of heavily landscaped setbacks, fencing/walls, and changes in
grade. The proposed project is in compliance with all applicable plans, ordinances, standards and
policies.
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan requires that the City Council make the final decision to
approve or disapprove the Site Development Plan. The City Council is also required to make the
final determination on the Coastal Development Permit pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code
SDP 96-14/GDP 96- 16 - LEWLAND CAIUSBAD
. APRIL 16,1997
Section 21.201.120(B) since the City Council was given final approval authority on the Site
Development Plan application.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a site
development plan and coastal development permit for the LEGOLAND Carlsbad Theme Park
proposed for the north side of Palomar Airport Road, east of future Armada Drive and west of
future Hidden Valley Road. The project site is Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan. Planning Area 4 when combined with the private section of LEG0 Drive equals
approximately 129 acres. LEGOLAND Carlsbad as proposed is primarily an outdoor
experience. Attractions are placed in landscaped settings themed to the attraction.
Approximately 47.5 percent of the total project area or 61 acres will be landscaped. Interior
attractions and “dark rides” are relatively few. For planning purposes the project is separated
into an Outer Park and Inner Park. The acreage for these two areas is as follows:
Outer Park:
LEG0 Drive and perimeter setbacks:
Parking lots:
Future parking expansion:
21 acres
43 acres
10 acres
Inner Park:
Attraction areas (developed with the first phase):
Future expansion areas:
Service and Administration:
35 acres
15 acres
5 acres
Total Park Area: 129 acres
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the
“Inner Park”), and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the “Outer Park”). The
project includes approximately 100 structures of various types for the provision of administration
and service, guest support, retail and various attractions such as rides, play areas and displays on
the initial development area of the inner park. Three areas have been reserved for expansion of
the Inner Park. Development of the future Inner Park expansion areas and the future parking
expansion area will require the approval of a Site Development Plan Amendment by the Planning
Commission. This requirement is contained in Section VI.B.4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan. Approximately 187,813 square feet of building area is included in the current development
proposal. Facilities and development elements which are part of LEGOLAND include
approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues, 4 restaurants in addition to various stands
and carts, 4 main retail shops plus various stands and carts, heavy landscaping, a 90,000 square
foot lagoon, a paved parking area for a minimum of 4,160 vehicles to accommodate guests,
employees, buses, and recreational vehicles, and a parking expansion area that will accommodate
an additional 1,150 parking spaces.
rc-
. .
SDP 96-14/GDP 96- 16 - LEGuLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
PAGE 3
The nine themed areas of the Inner Park include The Beginning, DUPLO Village, The Ridge,
Funtown, The Garden, Castle Hill, Miniland, The Lagoon, and the Imagination Center. The
Service and Administration Area is also located within the Inner Park area. A description of each
of the nine themed areas is provided in Attachment “A” to this report.
General Plan, Zoning & Existing Land Use for the Site and Adjacent Property
The following table lists the general plan, zoning and existing land use for the site and adjacent
properties:
Site
North
East
West
GENERAL PLAN ZONING
T-R C-T-Q
OS & T-R O-S & C-T-Q
PI&OS L-C & P-M-Q
OS&PI O-S & P-M
O/PI, T-R/C, & OS O-Q/P-M-Q,
C-T-Q/C-2-Q. & O-S
l!XFXINGLANDUsE
Vacant
Agriculture &
CMWD Water Tank
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant & Agriculture
General Plan Land Use Categories: T-R (Travel/Recreation Commercial), OS (Open Space), PI
(Planned Industrial), C (Community Commercial)
Zoning Categories: C-T (Commercial Tourist), O-S (Open Space), L-C (Limited Control), P-M
(Planned Industrial), C-2 (General Commercial), Q (Qualified Development Overlay Zone).
Site Description
The project site is currently vacant. Historically part of this area has been utilized for agriculture.
Mass grading of the site was approved as part of the Master Tentative Map for the Carlsbad
Ranch (CT 94-09). Grading is scheduled to begin in April 1997. The only vegetation on-site
determined to be sensitive exists in a Coastal Deed Restriction Area adjacent to Palomar Airport
, Road, east of future Armada Drive. The area is to be preserved and will include a 50 foot
riparian area buffer as required by Policy 3-8 of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal
Program.
Prior Actions
On January 9, 1996, the City Council approved the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment
(SP 207(A)) and related applications including a development agreement (DA 94-01). The
project site is designated as Planning Area 4 (LEGOLAND Carlsbad) in the Specific Plan. The
plan allows for the development of LEGOLAND Carlsbad and lists the uses permitted within the
park. The Planning Commission, in addition to recommending approval to the City Council of
the Specific Plan Amendment on December 6, 1995, approved the master tentative map (CT 94-
09) for Carlsbad Ranch. The master tentative map creates Lot 18 with an area of 128.32 acres
which is the site of the proposed project and Lot 19 the private section of LEG0 Drive which
33
SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16 - LECioLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
PAGE 4
provides access to LEGOLAND. The approval of the Final Map, grading plans, and
improvement plans for the master tentative map provided the approval for grading of the site and
the construction of the infrastructure to serve the project. Approval of the development
agreement vested the proposed use.
Applicable Regulations
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards as analyzed
within the following section of this staff report:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
IV.
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(A));
Travel/Recreation Commercial (T-R) General Plan Land Use Designation;
Commercial - Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-T-Q);
Site Development Plan findings required by the Qualified Development Overlay Zone -
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.06, Section 21.06.020 ;
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport;
Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.203;
Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 13); and
ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. Therefore, this section will
cover the project’s compliance with each of the regulations listed above in the order in which
they are presented.
A. CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan establishes the permitted uses for the site as well as the
development standards and design guidelines. The project plans comply with the requirements
of the specific plan. The permitted uses for the project site include an entrance facility; toll
“plaza”; retail shops; restaurants; service buildings associated with park activities; business and
administration offices related to park activities;- indoor and outdoor facilities related to
entertainment and education, but not including high speed thrill rides (those rides typically
oriented towards the teenage and young adult audience) for children; water features; lakes;
landscaped areas; guest services and facilities; parking; and other related uses. The uses
proposed for the site are within the list of permitted uses.
-
2. I, SDP 96- 14/GDP 96- 16 - LELJLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 5
The development standards of the specific plan have also been complied with as demonstrated in
the following table:
Northeast Boundary of the
Hidden Valley Rd. - 20 ft.
Northeast Boundary T 40 ft. +
Hidden Valley Rd. - 3 1 ft. +
Northeast Boundary of the Northeast Boundary - 35 ft. -t
Northeast Boundary of the Northeast Boundary - N/A
Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600
Bus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 160
Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 622
Bus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4237
Overflow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5310
Overflow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
’ A number of the required overflow parking spaces will be provided as fully improved spaces with the first phase
of development.
I
35-
-
4. 1. SDP 96-14/GDP 96- 16 - LEGtiLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
PAGE 6
Design Guidelines
The specific plan also contains guidelines applicable to the project site. The guidelines address
building orientation, access, architectural character, building materials, and landscaping. The
project design complies with the design guidelines of the specific plan.
B. & C. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the site were adopted concurrently with
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan to achieve consistency. The TravelRecreation Commercial
(T-R) General Plan Land Use Designation provides for the use as the category addresses
commercial uses that provide for visitor attractions and commercial uses. The specific plan
implements the General Plan on the project site and includes required circulation improvements
and provisions for alternative modes of transportation such as public bus, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities. Zoning for the site is Commercial - Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-
T-Q). The specific plan list of uses modifies the permitted uses allowed for the site. The Q-
Overlay designation on the zoning map requires the approval of a site development plan. This is
consistent with the specific plan which was established with the requirement that each site
require approval of a site development plan.
D. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS REOUIRED BY THE O-OVERLAY
ZONE
The Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q-Overlay) which is part of the zoning designation
for the property requires that a site development plan be approved for the proposed use prior to
the issuance of any building per&it. Four findings are required by the Q-Overlay Zone. The
required findings with justification for each are contained in the Planning Commission resolution
for the project. This section surnmarizes the necessary findings and support for each.
The requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings as the
project design complies with the requirements of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan as
demonstrated in Section “A” of this report. Significant building and landscape setbacks around
’ the perimeter of the site as well as the location of the Inner Park at the northern portion of the site
and the Outer Park which includes parking and vehicle circulation areas on the southern part of
the site provides adequate buffers between the proposed use and planned adjacent uses. The site
is also adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use as all applicable code requirements
have been met as well as the landscaping of approximately 47.5 percent of the total site area, the
provision of all required parking as well as a parking expansion area on site, and building
coverage is proposed at approximately 3 percent. Approximately 5.3 percent of the parking area
will be landscaped while a minimum of 3 percent is required. The parking lot is divided into
cells separated by 28 to 30 foot wide landscape areas which run in an east/west direction. The
central pedestrian spine in the parking lot is 80 feet wide with a significant area devoted to
landscaping.
SDP 96- 14KDP 96- 16 - LEOLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
PAGE 7
All features necessary to adjust the use to existing and permitted ii.tture uses will be provided.
Screen walls, berming and landscaping are proposed to screen service areas for the park.
Adequate vehicle circulation has been provided to accommodate vehicle, truck, recreational
vehicle and bus turning movements on-site. In addition, a service road has been provided around
the perimeter of the Inner Park for operational needs. Several access points have been provided
to the service road for emergency vehicles. Pedestrian connections to the overall pedestrian
circulation system of the Carlsbad Ranch have been provided.
The planned street system is adequate to handle all traffic generated by the use. The proposed use
is consistent with the use analyzed in the circulation analysis prepared for Program EIR 94-01 for
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. Visitors will be directed by signage to reach the park using
Cannon Road to LEG0 Drive. The private section of LEG0 Drive south of the roundabout will
contain four lanes and toll plaza structures with a total of six windows. An analysis has been
prepared for the proposed private section of LEG0 Drive by KAIQJ Associates, a firm
specializing in transportation planning, traffic engineering, and parking studies which completed
the traffic analysis for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR and the Zone
13 Local Facilities Management Plan. The analysis concluded that a total of 5,695’ feet of
queuing will be needed to accommodate the anticipated conditions along LEG0 Drive during
summer weekend conditions. The proposed design of LEG0 Drive utilizing reversible lanes will
function with 3 inbound lanes and one outbound lane during the peak inbound period. The
proposed design will provide a total of 7,3 10 feet of queuing area therefore, all vehicles will be
off the public streets. A meandering sidewalk set within landscaping is proposed on the east side
of LEG0 Drive.
E. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR MCCLELLAN - PALOMAR
AIRPORT
The project site is located within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan - Palomar Airport.
Areas of the project site are within the 60 and 65 CNEL noise contours. The site is
approximately 4,900 feet west of the airport. The airport land use plan identifies the use as being
compatible with the noise levels for the site. The project was sent to SANDAG staff and the
Palomar Airport Manager for review. SANDAG staff reiterated their comments on the Carlsbad
’ Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(A)) in which they determined the LEGOLAND use to be consistent
with the airport land use plan.
F. MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
As designed, the proposed project is consistent with the relevant policies of the Mello II Segment
of the Local Coastal Program, The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan which serves as partial
implementation for the Mello II Segment for the project site, and the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone (Zoning Ordinance Section 21.203). The project site has been previously
disturbed by agricultural activity and is approved for grading. No steep slopes or native
vegetation exist on-site with the exception of the riparian vegetation which is located within a
coastal commission deed restriction area at the northeast comer of Palomar Airport Road and
Armada Drive. The riparian vegetation will be preserved and include a 50 foot buffer as required
by Policy 3-8 of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The project will not have
2 7
-8 ,/
SDP 96- 14KDP 96- 16 - LEGULAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
drainage impacts on coastal resources as the project includes a detention basin within the 140
foot landscape setback from Palomar Airport Road. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System facilities to separate oil and other contaminants from site runoff will be constructed.
Additional project grading will be conditioned to comply with the grading provisions of the
Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone which prohibits grading between October 1st and
April 1st.
G. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE (LFMP - ZONE 13)
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 13 in the northwest
quadrant. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the
adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY
City Administration
Library
Wastewater Treatment
Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Onen Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution Svstem
IMPACTS I tIonmmmwIIHsrm~
N/A Yes
N/A
524 EDU
Yes
Yes
$.4O/sq. ft. Yes
Basin C
6,630 ADT - Avg. Fri.
10,680 ADT - Avg. Sun.
Yes
Yes
Station 4 Yes
N/A
-Payment of non-residential
school fee at bldg. permit
issuance
524 EDU
61.486 - 69.516 GPD.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project was analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 94-01)
certified for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applications on January 9,
1996, by the City Council. A statement of Overriding Consideration was adopted for cumulative
impacts to air quality, agriculture, and traffic which cannot be fully mitigated. The cumulative
impacts are regional in nature and occur in areas outside the jurisdiction of the City. Mitigation
measures required for the grading plan and final map for Master Tentative Map CT 94-09 have
been applied. Mitigation measures incorporated into this site development plan include adequate
on-site circulation to reduce vehicle queuing, provision of a shuttle to major rail transit centers,
bicycle parking facilities, showers for bicycling employees’ use, pedestrian connections to the
site, review by the Police Department of security plans for the project, use of reclaimed water for
landscape watering, preparation of a solid waste management plan for City review and approval
and implementation of that plan, and circulation system improvements necessary for the project
such as the I-S/Cannon Road interchange improvements. As a result, the environmental analysis
SDP 96- 14/GDP 96- 16 - LEGdLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16,1997
PAGE 9
for the site development plan included an Initial Study (Environmental Impact Assessment Form
- Part II) focusing on any changes from approved plans and the project contemplated in the EIR
to what is proposed with this site development plan. No additional significant adverse impacts
were identified in the initial study for this project, therefore, no further environmental review is
required. A Notice of Prior Compliance was prepared for the project and published in the North
County Times Newspaper. A Notice of Determination will be filed upon the final action being
taken on the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4083
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4084
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Disclosure Form
Prior Environmental Compliance
Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II
Exhibit “A” - Project Description (Revised 3/5/97)
Reduced Site Plan Exhibit
Exhibits “1” - “ 157” dated April 16,1997.
DN:bk
3 9
** I. BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
A
CASE NO: SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
APPLICANT: LEGOLAND Carlsbad. Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit for
a LEGOLAND Theme Park which includes theme park attractions, retail, food and beverage
service. associated support facilities, and parking on approximately 129 acres located east of
future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden Valley Road on the north side of Palomar
Air-nor-t Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Units2&3.
Lots 18 and 19 of Carlsbad Tract 94-09 of Carlsbad Ranch
APN: 21 l-022-10, 11,16 & 212-041-05 Acres: 129 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: T-R (Travel/Recreation Commercial)
Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A
Existing Zone: C-T-Q Proposed Zone: C-T-Q
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning
Site C-T-Q ’
North O-S & C-T-Q
South L-C & P-M-Q
East O-S & P-M
West O-Q/P-M-Q,
C-T-Q/C-2-Q, & O-S
Land Use
Vacant
Agriculture &
CMWD Water Tank
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant & Agriculture
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 524 EDUs
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: December 17, 1996
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
0 Negative Declaration, issued
cl Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
ixl Other, Prior Compliance with EIR 94-01 certified January 9,1996
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND Carlsbad-
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 13 GENERAL PLAN: T-R
ZONING: C-T-Q
DEVELOPER’S NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad, Inc.
ADDRESS: 5600 Avenida Encinas, Suite 130, Carlsbad. CA 92008
PHONE NO.: 438-5570 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 21 l-022-10,1 1.16 & 212-041-05
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 129 acres, 187,813 so. ft.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Spring 1999
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
” I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided =
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDUs
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD =
N/A
N/A
524 EDU
$.4O/sq. ft.
N/A
C
6,630 August Friday
10.680 August Sunday
4
N/A
Non-res. school fee
133&5H
61,486 - 69,516
The project is not proposing any dwelling units thereby not impacting the Growth
Management Dwelling unit allowance.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANTSS7;4~~M~~OFDISCLOSUREORCERTAINOWMRSHIPMTERESTSON~APPLICATIONS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACnON ON THE PART OF THE CrrY COUNCIL OR ANY
APPOfNTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(Please print)
The following information must be disclosed:
. 1. Aonlican t
List the names and addrers of ;i rrsons having a financial interest in the application. LE&ot&w ctw Is ad b .
5GOO AV~~iidtRF,nch&*1’30
dsbAd. Ch q%o@i
3 I. Owner
having any ownership interest in the properrv involved.
Gdsbd a-f&. 13ahtk, lur tr
Ob ALlCKrcia lalcid WI 30 rkbad CA- 9200 0
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names
and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10 % of the shares in the corporation or owning
ership interest in the partnenhip.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (I) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or
- as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
DISCLOS.FRiM 2/96 PiGE 1 of 2
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-l 576 - (619) 438-1161qq @
Disclosure Statement @er) Page f
5. Have you had more than $250.00 .worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commiss’ons, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes- No d If yes, please indicate person(s)
PCKO~ is defined a~ “Any individual. firm, mpartaership, joint VC~WC, association, sotid dub, fraternal organktion,
corporation, estate, trust. receiver, syndicate, this and any other munty, city and county, city mtmicipahty, district or other
political subdivision or any other group or combinatioa acting as a unit.”
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
Signature of 6wner;date
g!aJ~ huff mTow?d
CBWwQ Ca&aA , (nc.
Print or we name of owner
DISCLOSJRM 2I96
Signarur’e of appiicant/date
5uGNO &WE MAost=‘h,
lAii?WM CRr[Shd, lnt.
Print or type name of applicant
. . . . , -c. .._...
-. _ r ^ I.-.
y..-.. , * .-
i. - ._ _ ‘.
PJAGE i 0f 2
4-3
- - ____-___- .- . --.e.. . . . . . . . . ___-- ---_
Please Take Notice:
The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the
project described below have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional
environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed.
Project Title: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
Project Location: East of future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden
Valley Road on the north side of Palomar Airport Road
Project Description: A Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit
for a 129 acre LEGOLAND. The project includes theme park
attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated
support facilities, and parking.
Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las
Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited.
Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of
date of publication.
DATED: FEBRUARY 4, 1997
CASE NO: SDP 96-14KDP 96-l 6
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
PUBLISH DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1997
Micii~EL J. HOLZM~LLER
Planning Director
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-l 576 - (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-0894
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: SDP 96- 14/GDP 96- 16
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
2. APPLICANT: LEGOLAND Carlsbad. Inc.
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPICANT: 5600 Avenida Encinas. Suite 130,
Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 438-5570
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 19, 1996
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTON: A Site Develoument Plan and Coastal Develonment Permit for a 129
acre LEGOLAND located east of future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden Valley Road
on the north side of Palomar Airnort Road. The proiect includes theme Dark attractions, retail,
food and beverage service, associated support facilities, and uarkingz
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
q Land Use and Planning
17 Population and Housing
0 Geological Problems
El Water
q Transportation/Circulation q Public Services
0 Biological Resources q Utilities & Service Systems
0 Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
El Hazards IXI Cultural Resources
q Air Quality Cl Noise q Recreation
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Rev. 03/28/96 43-
.I . .
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
Cl
cl
cl
cl
lxl
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative
declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier environmental impact
report (EIR) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
yr, Planner Signature
A- 30-97
Date
Date
2 Rev. 03/28/96 4%
- -
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
a A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No ‘Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
l “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
l “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
a “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant. ’
l Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but fl potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
0 When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
0 A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
3 Rev. 03/28/96 //7
0 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
l An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
* determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
4 Rev. 03/28/96 48
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
4
b)
cl
4
e)
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source k+(s): (1; pg. 5.7-l through 5.7-18)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? (1; pg.5.4-5 through 5.4-13, 5.7-l through 5.7-
18, and 5.12-I through 5.12-7)
Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(1; pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses? (1; pg. 5.1-I through 5.1-16)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (1; 5.7-l through 5.7-18)
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (1; pg. 7-l through 7-4)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)? (I; pg. 7-8 and 7-
9) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (1; pg. 7-8 and 7-9)
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
a)
b)
c)
d)
e>
0
9)
h)
9
expose people to potential impacts involving:
Fault rupture? (I; Appendix A)
Seismic ground shaking? (1; Appendix A)
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (I;
Appendix A)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (I; Appendix A)
Landslides or mudflows? (1; Appendix A)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or till? (1;
Appendix A and pg. 5.12-6 and 5.12-7)
Subsidence of the land? (I; Appendix A)
Expansive soils? (I; Appendix A)
Unique geologic or physical features? (1; Appendix A)
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff! (1; pg. 5.12-l
through 5.12-7)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (1; Appendix A)
Potentially
significant
Impact
cl
Cl
Cl
El
cl
cl
0
cl
Cl
cl
Cl
cl
Cl
cl
cl
cl
cl
Cl
Cl
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Cl
0
cl
0
Cl
0
Cl
Cl
Cl
cl
Cl
cl
cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
0
Cl
Less Than
Significan t Impact
Cl
Cl
cl
cl
0
cl
Cl
cl
cl
Cl
Cl
cl
cl
0
cl
cl
cl
cl
Cl
No Impact
lxl
Ix1
IXI
cl
El
El
El
lx
El
IXI
5 Rev. 03128196 44
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
d
4
e)
0
g>
h)
0
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (I; pg. 5.12-I through 5.12-7)
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (I; pg. 5.12-l through 5.12-7)
Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (I; pg. 5.9-13 through 5.9-22 and 5.12-I
through 5.12-7)
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (I;
pg. 5.12-I through 5.12-7)
Impacts to groundwater quality? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through
5.12-7)
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? (I; pg.
5.9-13 through 5.9-22)
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (I; pg. 5.2- 1
through 5.2-S)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (I; pg. 5.2-l)
5.2-4, 5.2-6, and 5.2-7)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (1; Appendix A)
d) Create objectionable odors? (1; Appendix A)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
a)
b)
c>
4
4
0
g)
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (I; pg.
5.5-l through 5.5-30)
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)? (I; pg. 5.5-l through 5.5-30)
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
(I; pg. 5.5-l through 5.5-30 and 5.9-l through 5.9-4)
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (1; pg.
5.5-25 and 5.5-26)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (I;
Appendix A)
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (1; pg.
5.7-16)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (1; pg. 5.7-l
through 5.7- 18)
Potentially Significant Impact
cl
Cl
cl
0
0
0
cl
lxl
Cl
0
Cl
IXI
Cl
Cl
0
0
Cl
Cl
Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Cl
Cl
0
0
0
0
cl
cl
Cl
cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Less Than Significan t Impact
cl
Cl
Cl
0
Cl
0
0
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
cl
cl
cl
Cl
0
Cl
Cl
No Impact
lxl
lxl
lx
El
El
lxl
lzl
cl
ixJ
IXI
lxl
Cl
IXI
lxl
IXI
Ia
[XI
El
6 Rev. 03/28/96 &y-o
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
4
b)
c>
4
e>
VIII.
a)
b)
cl
in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (I; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (1; pg.
5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (1; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-
13) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
(1; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (I; pg. 5.4-l
through 5.4- 13)
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (I;
Appendix A)
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (1; Appendix A)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (1; Appendix A)
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
b)
c)
4
d
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)? (I; pg.‘5.6-1 through 5.6-7)
Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (1; 5.9-l through 5.9-4)
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards? (I; pg. 5.6-l through 5.6-7)
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (1; pg. 5.6- 1 through 5.6-7)
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (I; pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (I; pg. 5.8-l through
5.8-7)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (I; pg. 5.8-l
through 5.8-7)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? (1; pg. 5.9-l and 5.9-2)
b) Police protection? (1; pg. 5.9-2 through 5.9-4)
c) Schools? (1; pg. 5.9-7 through 5.9-13)
Potentially Significant Impact
cl
0
Cl
Cl
Cl
cl
Cl
cl
Cl
0.
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
q
Cl cl Cl
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
0
Cl
Cl
cl
cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
cl
Cl
[XI
0
cl
Cl
Cl
IXI
Cl
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
cl
0
0
cl
cl
0
cl
0
cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
0
Cl
cl
Cl
0
0
No
Impact
El
El
Ix1
Ix1
[XI
/xl
Ix1
lxl
IXI
[XI
El
cl
El
tz
IXI
IXI
0
txl
7 Rev. 03128196 5-l
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
d>
d
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (1;
pg. 5.7-2,5.7-3, and 5.7-16)
Other governmental services? (1; pg. 5.7-2 and 5.7-16)
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
a>
b)
c)
4
e>
0
8)
XIII.
4
b)
cl
XIV.
a)
b)
c>
4
e)
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas? (1; Appendix A)
Communications systems? (I; Appendix A)
Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (1; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
Sewer or septic tanks? (I; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
Storm water drainage? (I; pg. 5.12-l through 5.12-7)
Solid waste disposal? (I; pg. 5. IO- 1 through 5.1 O-5)
Local or regional water supplies? (1; pg. 5.9-13
through 5.9-22)
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (1; pg. 5.11- 1
througtl5.1 l-7)
Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (I; pg.
5.1 l-l through 5.1 l-7)
Create light or glare? (I; Appendix A)
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
Disturb paleontological resources? (1; pg. 5.3- 1
through 5.3-8)
Disturb archaeological resources? (1; pg. 5.3-l through
5.3-8)
Affect historical resources? (I; pg. 5.3- 1 through 5.3-8)
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (1; pg. 5.3-
1 through 5.3-8)
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (I; pg. 5.3-l through 5.3-8)
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (1; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (I; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
cl
cl
0
cl
cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0 q IXI Ix1
0
cl
0
lzl
[xl
0 0
0
0
0
Less Than Signitican
t Impact
0
0
0
0
cl
0
cl
0
0
cl
0
0
0
0
0
Cl
0
0
cl
No Impact
lxl
Ix1
Ix1
IXJ
El
IXI
El
0
0
IXI
lxl
[XI
0
0
lx
IXI
q
lxl
Ix1
8 Rev. 03128196 A-3
C
II I.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
XVI.
a)
b)
cl
XVII.
Significant Significant Signitican Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the cl Ix1 0 0
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (XI 0 0 0
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, 0 IXI 0 0
either directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the
following on attached sheets:
a> Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available
for review.
W Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
4 Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated,“ describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-
specific conditions for the project.
9 Rev. 03128196
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
LEGOLAND Carlsbad is proposed for Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
Planning area 4 contains approximately 129 acres and the proposed land use of a LEGOLAND
Park was established in the specific plan in addition to the development agreement approved by
the City Council. LEGOLAND Carlsbad as proposed is primarily an outdoor experience.
Attractions are placed in landscaped settings themed to the attraction. Interior attractions and
“dark rides” are relatively few. For planning purposes the project is separated into an Outer Park
and Inner Park. The acreage for these two areas is approximately as follows:
Outer Park:
LEG0 Drive and perimeter setbacks:
Parking lots:
Future parking expansion:
21 acres
43 acres
10 acres
Inner Park:
Attraction areas (developed with the first phase):
Future expansion areas:
Service and Administration:
35 acres
15 acres
5 acres
Total Park Area: 129 acres
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the
“Inner Park”), and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the “Outer Park”). The
project will include approximately 100 structures of various types for the provision of
administration and service, guest support, retail and various attractions such as rides, play areas
and displays on the initial development area of the inner park. As listed above areas will be
reserved for future expansion. Approximately 164,000 square feet of building area is included in
the current development proposal. Facilities and development elements which are part of
LEGOLAND include approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues, 4 restaurants in
addition to various stands and carts, 4 main retail shops plus various stands and carts, heavy
landscaping, a 90,000 square foot lagoon, a paved parking area for a minimum of 4,160 vehicles
to accommodate guests, employees, buses, and recreational vehicles, and a parking expansion
j area that will accommodate an additional 1,150 parking spaces.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed project was evaluated in the “Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Final
Program Environmental Impact Report, dated November 1995 (EIR 94-Ol).” EIR 94-01
evaluates the environmental effects of the development and operation of: The Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan; improvements to the I-S/Cannon Road Interchange; and the development of a 24.2
acre parcel immediately adjacent to the northern boundary of the specific plan site. The Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan is a planning document which will guide the development of a 447.40 acre
area through the provision of a comprehensive set of guidelines, regulations, and implementation
programs. The proposed land uses for the Specific Plan include office, research and
development, related light manufacturing, commercial, hotel, destination resort, golf course,
10 Rev. 03/28/96
agriculture, a vocational school campus, and LEGOLAND Carlsbad. The 24.2 acre parcel
adjacent to the northern boundary is proposed as a continuation of the Specific Plan golf course.
EIR 94-01 analyzed the following environmental issue areas: Agricultural Resources, Air
Quality, Archaeological and Paleontological Resources, Biological Resources,
Traffic/Circulation, Hazardous Waste/Pesticide Residue, Land Use Compatibility; Noise, Public
Services and Utilities, Solid Waste, Visual Aesthetics/Grading, and Water Quality. The Initial
Study prepared for the Specific Plan Amendment is contained in Appendix A of EIR 94-01 and
analyzed additional issues which were determined not to have a significant environmental
impact. EIR 94-01 was certified by the Carlsbad City Council on January 9, 1996. At that time
Candidate Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation and
Monitoring Program were approved. All mitigation measures applicable to the LEGOLAND
Carlsbad project proposed for Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch have been incorporated
into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project.
References to the applicable section of EIR 94-01 are provided next to each item on this
environmental impact assessment form. A brief explanation is provided in the following section
for each item checked as having a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant
unless mitigation incorporated”:
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING
4 Agricultural Resources
The project site includes approximately 93.35 acres that were approved for tentative
cancellation of a Williamson Act Land Conservation Contract. The analysis in EIR 94-
01 concluded that no mitigation measures are necessary as project impacts will be
reduced to a level less than significant through the payment of fees consistent with the
coastal program, the preservation of 53 acres within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
area, and through the implementation of policies contained in the specific plan.
The EIR analysis concluded that the conversion of the existing agricultural lands on the
Carlsbad Ranch and cumulative areas to urban uses will result in a significant incremental
impact to agricultural resources. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted
for this cumulative impact.
V. AIR QUALITY
Air Quality
No significant impacts as a result of construction activity are anticipated. Implementation
of the air quality mitigation measures will lessen long-term operation air quality impacts
to a level less than significant. It was concluded in the analysis for EIR 94-01 that the
development anticipated under the proposed specific plan amendment together with the
development of other related projects will have a significant and unavoidable cumulative
impact on the region’s air quality. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted
for this cumulative impact.
11 I- Rev. 03/28/96 3 5
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
4 Increased Vehicle Trips
A series of circulation system improvements are required as part of the development of
the Carlsbad Ranch property. With the implementation of the improvements identified in
EIR 94-01 all of the analyzed intersections and street segments are projected to operate at
acceptable levels of service. It was determined that the Carlsbad Ranch project in
conjunction with cumulative build-out forecasts, will result in a significant cumulative
impact to the I-5 freeway and SR-78. A statement of overriding considerations was
adopted for this cumulative impact.
IX. HAZARDS
4 Exposure to existing sources of potential health hazards
Evidence of surface staining and possible pesticide contamination was observed at
several locations on the project site. Although no significant levels of soil contamination
from pesticides or herbicides were detected during soil testing in 1989 and 1995, the
potential for undetected contamination does exist due to the fact that the project site has
been historically used for agricultural production. Exposure of persons to unremediated
soils is a potential impact. Implementation of mitigation measures listed in EIR 94-01
will reduce this potential impact to less than significant. The mitigation measures
require soil monitoring and remediation of any affected soils during site development.
These mitigation measures will be implemented during the mass grading for Tentative
Map 94-09.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES
b) Police protection
The EIR analysis concluded that the conversion of an agricultural area to an urban area
which will attract visitors will require additional law enforcement and crime prevention
services. The potential increase in demand on police services is a significant impact.
This demand for police protection will be reduced through implementation of a
mitigation measure requiring security measures to be incorporated into the proposed
developments. The applicant has prepared the first phase of a security plan which has
been submitted to the Carlsbad Police Department for review and approval.
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
f-l Solid waste disposal
The generation of additional solid waste is a potentially significant impact. The
mitigation measure identified in EIR 94-01 which has been applied to the project will
reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. The mitigation measure requires the
submittal of a solid waste management plan to address the project’s needs for recycling
facilities and diversion programs/measures which can be implemented.
12 Rev. 03/28/96 Serb
!a Local or regional water supplies
The project will require the construction of onsite water lines. The impacts from buildout
of the Carlsbad Ranch project to water supplies is potentially significant. Implementation
of the mitigation measures contained in EIR 94-01 will reduce impacts to a level of less
than significant. The mitigation includes utilizing reclaimed water for landscaping on the
project site. The LEGOLAND project will not have impacts which would cause the EIR
94-O 1 established threshold for determining significance of water supply/reclaimed water
to be exceeded.
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Paleontological resources
Areas of the Carlsbad Ranch contain geologic formations with a high potential for
yielding significant paleontological resources. Mitigation measures requiring a
paleontological monitor are required for the project and will be implemented during the
mass grading for Tentative Map 94-09.
W Archaeological resources
A data recovery program has been completed for sites which will be impacted by the
grading of the LEGOLAND Planning Area. Mitigation measures requiring an
archaeologist to monitor the grading operation are required and will be implemented
during the mass grading for Tentative Map 94-09.
SOURCE DOCUMENTS - (NOTE: All source documents are on file in the Planning Department
located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, Phone (6 19) 43% 1161)
1. “Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Final Program Environmental Impact Report, City
of Carlsbad, November 1995.”
13 Rev. 03/28/96
EXHli3lT “A”
Project Description (revised 315197):
The focus of LEGOLAND Carlsbad will be on the provision of fun and creative, educational experiences
for children in the age group 2 through 13 and their families. The planning and design is based on the
following goals:
l
Establish the child as the focal point
Provide for family interaction and fun
Facilitate participation and creativity
Create a worid of learning
Develop themed areas corresponding to LEG0 brands
Create a “park within a park
Provide comfort and quality for guests and staff
Provide environmental sensitivity including designing with nature, energy conservation, reuse and
recycling Create synergy with the local community and environment
LEGOLAND Carlsbad is primarily an outdoor experience. Attractions are placed in landscaped settings
themed to the attraction. Interior attractions and “dark rides” are relatively few. Special emphasis is
placed in developing as much interactivity into the attractions as possible - all designed to entertain and
educate young guests by actively involving them in the attractions.
Basic project statistics:
Acreage (approximate):
l Outer Park:
LEG0 Drive and perimeter landscape setbacks:
Parking Lots:
Future parking expansion:
l Inner Park:
Attraction Areas (developed with the first phase):
Future expansion areas (to be mulch-covered in the interim):
Service & Administration:
Total Park Area:
Rides, Shows and Attractions*: . approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues
facilities and development elements:
21 acres
43 acres
10 acres
35 acres
15 acres
5 acres
129 acres
l 187,813 square feet of buildings (1st Phase: allowable construction at buildout per Specific Plan is
425,750 s.f.)
architecture: one- and (2/3 scale) two-story facades with theming on attraction buildings and
associated structures (associated structures include queue shade structures, and open shade/shelter
structures, and various stands)
l 4 restaurants, plus various stands and carts
l 4 main retail shops, plus various stands and carts
l heavy landscaping, including a 90,000 square-foot lagoon
l parking for 5344 vehicles, including future expansion . screened “back-of-house” structures (Plant rooms, maintenance sheds, utility structures/enclosures)
l Administration and Services area designed to accommodate views from future offsite areas
58
.-
.‘ *r
l New infrastructure (utiiity corridors, LEG0 Drive)
All structures are within the heights proposed for LEGOLAND in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
The Site:
The site is of rolling terrain which varies about thirty feet inside the park. The terrain inside the park is
used to contain vistas within the park to enhance the experience of having “left the real world behind.”
Landscape is much more integral to the concept of a LEGOIAND than in other theme parks. The “Guest
Experience” is paramount in LEGOIAND, and the orientation toward children ages 2 to 12 is felt to be
greatly aided by the use of plantings. Per the Specific Plan, landscaping around the park perimeters is
used to screen views into the park from adjacent development to the west
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the ‘Inner Park”),
and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the “Outer Park”).
Inner Park:
Themed areas:
The Beginning
DUPLO Village
The Ridge
Funtown
The Garden
Castle Hill
Miniland
The Lagoon
Imagination Center
Service and Administration Area
Outer Park:
Lego Drive
Parking Toll Booths
Guest Parking Lot
Employee Parking Lot
Perimeter Landscape
Following are more detailed descriptions of the above areas:
Inner Park
The Beginning:
All guests enter the Inner Park through The Beginning. Facilities include:
l entry plaza
l ticket kiosks and turnstiles
l guest services (information, group sales, stroller rentals, ATM’s, lost and found, first aid, lockers, rest
rooms, etc.)
l retail shop
. food carts
0 retail carts
3-9
l seasonal exhibit
0 the “marketplace”
l LEG0 “stop and wonders” (humorous LEG0 model exhibits)
l plaza overlooking The Lagoon
The Lagoon:
As guests pass through the Beginning, one of their first and most dramatic views will be of The Lagoon.
The Lagoon is the dominant landscape feature in the park and will help to give the guest a point of
reference and orientation as well as a beautiful amenity. The Family Boat Ride in the lagoon takes guests
on a “world tour.” Around the shoreline will be famous scenes from around the world depicted in LEG0
bricks. Several themed pedestrian bridges cross the lagoon. Waterfalls and weirs add drama to the
scene. The Lagoon will appear to flow into various clusters and attractions, such the Safari Ride, Miniland
Harbor and Boating School.
DUPLO Village:
DUPLO Village is designed as the Imaginary Garden of the Child with themed elements, patterned after
the DUPLO brand of toys that are designed for the youngest age group. The attractions in this area
include:
l Safari Ride: a tour through the wilds of Africa where the lifelike animals are made of LEG0 bricks.
l Fairy Tale Brook: Guest float along a stream in “leaf’ boats. Scenes from popular fairy tales are
depicted in LEG0 bricks.
l Waterworks: Interactive LEG0 sculptures & water features.
l DUPLO Play Town: a fun area of play featuring a maze, train, and other features for young children.
l Magic Theater: A “behind the scenes” look at a magic show.
l Outdoor Show: a small amphitheater for live shows.
l Puppet show cart
l DUPLO Retail Shop
l Pasta Patch Restaurant: freshly-prepared food on real dinnerware
l Food and retail carts
Funtown:
A town setting provides an environment where children can role play and imagine they are doing such
grown-up things as driving a car. piloting a helicopter, going on an explorer’s expedition, or skippering a
boat. The most “architectural” of the clusters, Funtown has themed building facades set around a city
“parkette”, or town square. Components include:
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Driving School: children learn the rules of the road and receive a LEG0 driver’s license
Mini Driving School: driving school for the younger child
Boating School: learn to skipper a boat
Helicopters: fly up in the air and sneak a look into the Robin’s nests
Fire Engine Show: a live show around a fire engine
Explorers Institute: go on an expedition to ancient Egypt, the North Pole, and the jungles of Africa.
EGO Factory Tour: learn how LEG0 bricks are made
EGO Play Pavillion: fun with LEG0
Trafficjam: a fun and zany traffic jam
Cool Cafe: the coolest Cafe in town, dude
City Parkette Feature
Brick Brothers Retail Shop
March& Restaurant (incl. staff canteen): the parks largest restaurant, with freshly-prepared food
Baby Cafe Center
l Food stands & carts
l Retail carts
l Rest rooms
The Ridge:
The Ridge is a prominent topographic feature in the park and provides a beautiful landscaped backdrop to
the lagoon. Located atop the ridge is a large outdoor maze where guests must find their way to the
reward in the center. The ridge is a “passive” cluster that provides a pleasant break between the active
clusters. Lush landscaping and interesting earth sculpture are featured here. Food and retail carts are
located along the main pathways.
The Garden:
Another of the “passive” clusters, this area features the Garden Restaurant with an outdoor dining terrace
overlooking the lagoon and Miniland. Other features of the Garden cluster are Lombard Walk (a curvy
walkway down the hill), Hopscotch Walk, food carts, retail carts and rest moms.
Castle Hill:
This cluster is themed after the “Castle” LEG0 toy line. Medieval images of kings & queens, knights and
Robin Hood are used. The attractions include:
. Castle Sensory Coaster : not a high speed thrill ride, but a coaster to delight all your senses
. Dungeon Maze: make your way down through the dungeon and watch out for the dragon!
. Breath Taker more kid-powered fun
. Robin Hood Tree and Rope Climb: the ultimate jungle gym
. Horse Ride: hop on your horse for some medieval jousting
. Gem Wash: try your luck at panning for gemstones
. Enchanted Walk: stroll through the forest full of wild creatures
. Royal Pavilion
. EGO Play
. Castle Inn Food Court
. Food Stands and Carts
. Retail Carts
Miniland: Miniland is the heart and soul of LEGOLAND and is its best known attraction. This area
illustrates the creative uses of LEG0 bricks with miniature scale models of famous buildings, landmarks
and scenes from around America. The Miniland models are alive with movement and sound. Miniland is
arranged in mini-clusters, each themed after a particular American region:
l New York
l Washington D.C.
l New Orleans
0 California
l Harbor, New England
An indoor minicluster around the “space” theme has been incorporated within the miniland plantroom
facility. Outslde, a model maker takes questions and answers from guests. The ovetiook plaza has
dramatic views of miniland from above. Miniland includes food and retail carts, as well as expansion
areas for future models.
Imagination Center:
This cluster emphasizes learning and exploration. Children and adults can participate in building activities
with LEG0 products. Expert LEG0 staff are available to work with the participants. Attractions and
components include:
l EGO Workshops: LEG0 workshops are places where children and adults are involved in fun and
creative play with LEG0 building projects and classes, most with an educational emphasis.
l LEG0 Experience Show: The audience is treated to an interactive, humorous show in a 4,696 s.f.
theater building.
l Fami/y Boat Ride: the queue and boat launch facility is located in the Imagination Center cluster. See
“Lagoon” cluster for description.
l Construction Site: a LEG0 construction site with interactive construction equipment & vehicles
l Imagination Cafe
l School Picnic Area
l Corporate Picnic Area (later in First Phase)
l Retail stands and carts
l Food stands and carts
l Restrooms
Inner Park Infrastructure buildings:
Throughout the park there are various support buildings for electrical, mechanical, water and control
systems. These are designed to be as inconspicuous as possible through a combination of placement,
landscape and/or earthwork concealment. Should one of these structures be so situated that it cannot be
minimited with such strategies, it will be themed in concert with its cluster.
Future Inner Park Expansion Areas
The LEGOLAND site has been planned to allow for future growth. Expansion areas have been set aside
to accommodate future attraction development and parking lot expansion. The expansion areas will be
mass graded during the initial park construction and temporary berming and landscaping installed to
screen the expansion areas from the first phase of development.
Service and Administration Area
Service, maintenance and administration functions are grouped together at the eastern end of the park.
Access to the park for all deliveries and other service needs will be from Hidden Valley Road and
processed through the Service and Administration area. Components include:
l Administration Building: 25,537 s.f.. one story, tilt-up construction. Management offices, meeting
rooms, employee training facilities and dressing areas.
l Maintenance & Storage Building: approx. 20.516 s.f. single story with mezzanine, tilt-up construction.
Flexible, multi-use facility, loading dock.
. Gardening Shed & Yard & Paint Booth
l Refuse Collection Area: trash compactors, recyclable materials separation & storage, equipment wash
down areas.
l Outdoor Storage yard
l Utilities: Primary electrical switch gear 8 meters, emergency electrical generators, and connections to
natural gas, reclaimed water, fire flow and potable water.
Outer Park
The Outer park includes the main entry road (LEG0 Drive), the guest and employee parking lots, and
landscape setbacks around the park perimeter boundary. Specifics of these areas are listed below:
l LEG0 Drive approx. 1500 lineal feet, four lanes. Privately owned and maintained by LEGOlAND
from the southern end of the roundabout, to the parking lot. LEG0 Drive is heavily landscaped to
provide a pleasant entry experience to the park and screen adjacent land uses. LEG0 “Welcome
Letters” are a special feature along the road.
l Parking Kiosks: Guests will purchase parking passes at the toll kiosks located at the end of LEG0
Drive before entering the parking lot. Parking attendants will direct parking during peak hours.
l Parking lot: approx. 43 acres in the first phase, with an additional 10 acres for future expansion.
Lighted and landscaped. Parking statistics are as follows:
Required bv Specific Plan Provided
Phase 1 Guest parking*: 3,500 spaces (min.) 3555
Employee parking: 600 spaces 622
Bus parking: 60 spaces 60
Future parking expansion: 1,150 soaces 1.107
(Wcludes autos, RVs and handicapped spaces) 5,310 5,344
The parking area is divided by a series of hedgrerows and a center spine into what have been referred to
as “outdoor rooms”. The hedgerows, in addition to offering a user-friendly conceptual organizing element
to this large lot, offer screening of the parking lot superior to the normal shopping-center landscape, and
are also used to absorb a good deal of the grade change across the site. Parking is also enhanced by the
use of the large “rooms” in that a speed-parking procedure will be used to handle the large inflow of
parking at opening. Speed-parking is familiar to those who have visited any of Southern California’s
theme parks, consisting of personnel directing vehicles to spaces in order by use of hand signals and
traffic-cone-defined aisles which are shifted as the lot fills.
The northeast quadrant of the main lot is for bus and RV parking, with access from both LEG0 Drive and
from Hidden Valley Road.
l Landscape setbacks are required by the City around the perimeter boundary of the park. These
setbacks will be landscaped to screen adjacent land uses and public roads. The setbacks vary from
20’ wide at Hidden Valley Road to 140’ wide along Palomar Airport Road. Storm water detention
basins and pollution control basins are within the Palomar Airport Road setback, as required. .
Park-wide Svstems
Automated security systems will be located throughout the park utilizing fiber-optic transmission and
central closed circuit lV monitoring at critical areas. See the Security Planning section.
Communication systems for point-of-sale and other communication needs will be installed.
Utilities: Primary and secondary utility corridors and distribution systems will run throughout the park.
Sewer, storm drainage, fire flow, potable and reclaimed water, electrical and natural gas utilities will be
developed. 12 kva is the primary electrical service. Reclaimed water will be utilized from the City’s
municipal system for landscape irrigation.
b3
\
\
\
1
* ,,\\ -. FeEaczF A
: ’ ‘1 ~~~~-~~-----------~~~~~-~---J----~. i F.-.-..r -_ / -. / / lvlll~mo~ ‘. -WT..nl Lmzz:- -\ 3+$J -. YU. .-- c ‘\
SITE PLAN b4 McGraw/Baldwin Architects
EXHIBIT 6
4. SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD - Request for a recommendation of approval
of a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit for a LEGOLAND Theme Park
which includes theme park attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated support
facilities, and perking on approximately 129 acres located east of future Armada Drive and west of
future Hidden Valley Road within Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan in the
Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
Project Planner, Don Neu, began with a brief slide presentation of some of the significant components of
the project and to show the compliance with various City standards that are applicable to this site. He
pointed out that the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan permits this proposed use, subject to the approval of a
Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit.
Referring to prior actions, Mr. Neu stated that on January 9, 1996, the City Council approved the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan Amendment (SP 207(A)) and related applications including a development
P
0 I ’ PLANNING c0~~1ssioN ‘April 16,1997 Page 4
agreement (DA 94-01). There was also an Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified for the
entire Carlsbad Ranch project, a part of which is LEGOLAND and finally, the approval of the Carlsbad
Ranch Master Tentative Map.
Mr. Neu outlined the proposed uses which include theme park attractions, retail sales, food and beverage
service, associated support facilities, parking areas, and a significant amount of landscaping. He
explained that for planning purposes, the project is divided into two areas; the Outer Park, (which consists
of 74 acres and includes LEG0 Drive, perimeter setbacks, parking lots, and future parking expansion) and
the Inner Park (which consists of 55 acres and includes attraction areas, future attraction expansion
areas, and Service and Administration). Mr. Neu stated that approximately 61 acres will be landscaped to
compliment the specific attractions and noted that “interior” (or otherwise called “dark” ) rides will be very
few. He also indicated that the facilities and development elements include approximately 25 rides and
attractions, 8 show venues, 4 restaurants in addition to various stands and carts, 4 main retail shops plus
various stands and carts, heavy landscaping, a 90,000 square foot lagoon, a paved parking area for a
minimum of 4,160 vehicles to accommodate guests, employees, buses, and recreational vehicles, and a
parking expansion area that will accommodate an additional 1,150 parking spaces. Mr. Neu described the
site as currently vacant and no agricultural operations are present on the property.
Mr. Neu stated that the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan contains the development standards for this use
and specifies they the uses are permitted, subject to the approval of the Site Development Plan and
Coastal Development Permit, and further stated that the staff report includes a list of development
standards and the design guidelines that apply to the site and how the project complies with the standards
and guidelines.
Regarding the Site Development Plan findings, Mr. Neu showed a list of the four major findings and
indicated that staff is recommending that those findings can be made. He pointed out some of the
justifications for the four findings include: the significant building and landscape setbacks; the significant
landscaping on the overall site (approximately 47X%); the provision of parking in excess of the required
4,160 paved spaces; the provision of the required parking expansion areas; the very minimal building
coverage (at 3%); and the landscaping of the parking area (just over 5% whereas the Plan only requires
3%). The perimeter has been screened sufficiently with screen walls, berming and landscaping
(particularly in the service area), adequate vehicle circulation has been provided, and a service road is
proposed around the perimeter of the Inner Park to accommodate operational needs as well as
emergency vehicle access. Mr. Neu also pointed out that staff found that the planned street system is
adequate to handle the traffic generated by the use, with the required circulation improvements identified
in the Carlsbad Ranch EIR, that the proposed design of LEG0 Drive (the primary entrance to the park)
includes a four lane(reversible) road system, and that the design provides sufficient queuing area on the
main access way to allow all vehicles waiting to enter the park, to stack off the public roadway.
Regarding the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Mr. Neu stated that the project falls within the 60 to 65
CNEL noise contours and the proposed land use is a compatible use with the Airport Land Use Plan at the
projected noise levels.
With regard to the Coastal Development Permit, Mr. Neu stated that staff recommends that the Planning
Commission approve the Coastal Permit in that this design is consistent with the relevant policies of the
Mello II Segment of the Coastal Plan as well as the implementing ordinances and the riparian vegetation
will be preserved by including a 50 foot buffer as required by Policy 3-8 of the Mello II Segment. There will
be significant drainage facilities, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System facilities and the project
grading has been conditioned to comply with the grading provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone which prohibits grading between October 1st and April 1st.
The project site is within the Local Facilities Management Zone 13 and Mr. Neu stated that staff has found
this project to be in compliance with all performance standards.
MINUTES bb
- -8 , P~INNING coM~lssloN April 16,1997 Page 5
In regard to the Environmental Review, the project was analyzed in EIR 94-01 which was certified in
January 1996, by the City Council which also adopted a “Statement of Overriding Consideration” for
cumulative impacts to air quality, agriculture, and traffic which cannot be fully mitigated. These impacts,
however, occur in areas outside the jurisdiction of the City. Mr. Neu further stated that mitigation
measures required for the grading plan and final map for the Master Tentative Map CT 94-09 have been
applied. An Initial study was prepared to determine if the project had changed from the project analyzed in
the EIR. The project has not been found to have changed from the project analyzed in the EIR, therefore,
staff prepared a Notice of Prior Compliance which was published in the newspaper. Mr. Neu concluded
his presentation by stating staffs recommendation that the Commission adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No. 4083 and 4084, recommending approval of SDP 96-14 and CDP 96-16.
With regard to the seventeen questions that were raised at the Workshop, held on April 2, 1997, Mr. Neu
provided the Commission with the written answers to those questions (see attached) and proceeded to go
over each one.
Commissioner Monroy asked who will be in charge of the safety issues regarding the rides and
amusements.
Mr. Neu replied that there is a state agency that will review the amusement rides, in terms of their
compliance with structural safety codes.
Commissioner Monroy then queried whether or not the Commission is dealing (other than in concept) with
the inner facilities.
Mr. Neu responded that essentially what has been looked at in the Inner Park, is compliance with the
height standards, maximum building square footage, etc.
Commissioner Savary requested more information regarding the safety measures for the lagoon; what
precautions will be taken for children falling overboard.
Mr. Neu stated that it is his understanding that in any areas where guests are likely to be in close proximity
to the lagoon (at a viewing place), there will be railings and on the lagoon family boat ride, there will be
park personnel on each boat that will be trained in lifesaving, i.e. lifeguards. Also, he continued, the edge
of the lagoon slopes very gradually and at it’s deepest point, is 8 feet deep. It is not at all like a swimming
pool where there is an immediate drop off.
Commissioner Noble asked if one of the state agencies mentioned earlier is OSHA, and was answered
affirmatively.
Commissioner Welshons asked for an explanation or clarification of the following:
1. Page 5, Condition 1 - the sentence in bold type, beginning with Modifications to the types and
locations . . .
Mr. Neu’s response was that if there should be a need for minor changes, modifications, etc., they could
be done with the approval of the Planning Director and without having to amend the Site Development
Plan.
2. Page 9, Condition 23(d) - Is staff satisfied that this provision is adequate to preserve the air quality
of the area by providing shuttles to the local major rail centers and other local transportation
centers?
Mr. Neu responded by stating that this condition is part of an overall air quality mitigation plan and since
the opening of the park is projected to be over 2 years away, staff felt it would be prudent to fill in the
details as the project gets closer to the opening. By doing this it will be easier to see exactly what will be
MINUTES lb7
17 I INNING cowvm3ioN April 16,1997 Page 6
needed at that time.
3. Page 11, Condition 34 - question directed to Mr. Rudolf - Should there be a reference to the
authority requiring these fees and deposits?
Mr. Rudolf stated that the condition is a catchall standard one, and advised that there is nothing missing.
4. Page 12, Condition 38, last paragraph, last sentence - Appropriate securities shall be required.
- Is this a reference to the usual bonding?
Mr. Rudolf responded affirmatively. He stated that he feels it is a “shorthand” way for staff to refer back to
the detailed provisions in Title 20 relating to the engineer’s authority regarding type, amount and release of
security.
5. Page 16, Condition #52(a), line 4 - Please explain the use of the word “may” as in . . .the work
may be done by the developer prior. . .
Commissioner Noble interjected, stating that he had spoken with Attorney Nick Banche earlier in the day,
regarding the same “condition” and that Mr. Banche will be answering that question later in the meeting.
Mr. Rudolf explained that it is intended to say that “in our view, this requirement arises out of the EIR to be
performed as a condition of this project. However, somebody else is responsible for satisfying this
particular condition”. It is intended to put everyone “on notice” that it must be completed or the opening
date may be extended. By doing this, it gives the developer the ability, the legal authority, and the
opportunity to “leap into the breach” if the other arrangements are not carried through.
6. Page 20, Condition #75 - This approval shall become null and void . . . - Is it from the date of
Project Approval or from the date of Site Development Plan Approval?
Mr. Rudolf explained that it is meant to say that the Site Development Plan is the project and it is this
approval. He further explained that the three year clock starts to run at the time of this approval, and the
authority for it is the development agreement.
7. Page 21, Condition #82 - LEGOLAND will have both a potable water distribution system . . Is
that a statement or a condition?
Mr. Rudolf stated that it is a standard Code reminder. It is a significant requirement imposed by state law
(among many other state requirements), and staff wanted to make sure that it was not forgotten because if
omitted, there could be serious consequences.
Commissioner Heineman stated that on Page 15, Condition #51 refers to the Developer/Owner (on the
first line) and the Developer (on the third line), and asked that Mr. Rudolf clarify those usages.
Mr. Rudolf explained that the Owner is different from the Developer and the owner (in this particular
instance) might have the prior duty to perform the improvements.
Mr. Neu further explained that the first part of the sentence is referring to the Owner/Developer of the
Tentative Map who, at that time, was the Carltas Co. Basically, the subdivision map was approved
subject to the improvements being completed. At this time, Mr. Neu stated that staff is presuming that
those improvements will be completed by that organization and if they are not, then this developer
(LEGOLAND Carlsbad) has the opportunity to complete them.
Commissioner Heineman asked if this condition could be made more clear by changing the wording
Developer/Owner to something else.
b8 MINUTES
x* ,I PLANNING COMMISSION April 16,1997
-
Page 7
Mr. Rudolf stated that it could be, but preferred that it not.
Commissioner Compas inquired as to who (or what body) would have the authority to approve major
changes to any one or more of the nine “theme areas”?
Mr. Neu stated that if an entire “theme area” were to be changed, that it would be the Planning
Commission that would have approval authority.
Commissioner Savary then asked if the Planning Commission will also be reviewing Phase II of the
project.
Mr. Neu responded by pointing out that the Specific Plan for Phase I, calls for the Commission to make a
recommendation to the City Council. Further, should the Site Plan be approved, any amendments (which
would include the expansion area proposals) would come back to the Commission for consideration and
final action,
Commissioners Welshons and Heineman suggested that “housekeeping” be done on the following:
1. Page 2, Finding 1, Line 13 - detailed description of the plans . . . plans should be changed to
plan’s
2. Page 3, Finding 4, Line 1 - street systems serving the proposed use is . . . is should be changed
to are.
By consensus, further “housekeeping” was postponed to a later time, perhaps during a workshop.
Svend Madsen, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, briefly described the LEGOLAND parks in Europe and
how they will compare with LEGOLAND Carlsbad.
Todd Bennett, Project Manager and Landscape Architect, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, presented an
abbreviated slide show of what can be expected at LEGOLAND Carlsbad for the Outer Park.
Karl Karcher, Windsor, England, presented several positive aspects of LEGOLAND as follows:
1. LEG0 does not think of themselves as builders of “amusement parks”. Rather, they
prefer their parks to be considered places where families can go for “intelligent play”.
2. Their parks should not be compared to Disneyland, as they are designed on a
considerably smaller scale. Everything is geared for children, right down to the size of the
buildings.
3. The attractions in their parks are more “interactive” meaning that they want their guests to
actively participate in the operation of the rides, etc., (such as driving the boats and
driving the cars).
4. The focus is on “natural fun” and the natural landscaping throughout the park contributes
to that focus.
5. LEGOLAND will never be a “superlative”, in terms of rides, etc. There will never be huge,
terrifying rides, there will be passive rides and activities. Again, interaction is the key.
6. There is “age balance” in the design of the park and its attractions. There are separate
attractions for the aged 3-6, 6-9, 9 -12 and up.
7. The parks have, and always will be, family oriented.
MINUTES 0
-
.4 ,n PLANNING COMMISSION April 16,1997 . Page 8
8. There are classrooms in the park that can be used by area schools for educational field
trips.
9. Last, but not least, there will be great food! A Swiss company, currently catering in
Canada, will be operating the food concession in the park. In addition to Hot Dogs and
Hamburgers, this company prepares fresh, healthy, and very delicious foods served in a
variety of settings.
Attorney Nick Banche, representing LEGOLAND Carlsbad, addressed Commissioner Welshons’ question
regarding Page 16, Condition 52(a), explained that the off-site public facility improvements must be
completed before the park can open. This is a condition precedent. There can be no possibility of traffic
jams because the public facilities are not completed to facilitate the opening. Mr. Banche stated that he
has spoken to a number of people regarding this condition and is completely satisfied that the funds are in
place, the plans have been drawn ‘and the City Manager has assured him that of all of the things LEG0
has to worry about, the timely completion of the public facilities to facilitate the opening, in not an area of
legitimate concern.
Commissioner Noble asked Mr. Banche for assurances that there will be no shortage of parking spaces,
particularly when they first open, since it is understood that the parking area(s) will be completed in
phases.
Mr. Banche firmly stated that they have prepared, planned, and are ready to install more parking than is
required by the City and he assured the Commission that LEG0 will not return to ask for a reduction in
parking nor will the City get anything less than what they have proposed overall. However, he continued,
the cost of building this park is running between $130,000,000 and $150,000,000 and they really cannot
say what the cash flow is going to be. They really don’t know how much money they have to come up
with and therefore he cannot say that LEG0 will not return and seek a “right to phase”.
Commissioner Welshons queried Mr. Banche about whether alcohol will be served in the park.
Mr. Banche stated in accordance with the City Ordinance, alcohol will only be served in connection with a
bonafide restaurant and there will be no other outlets (such as stands, stalls, etc.,) for the sale of any
manner of alcohol.
Commissioner Welshons asked if guests will be allowed to bring their own food into the park.
Mr. Banche referred that question to Mr. Karl Karcher who responded by stating that although they will not
encourage guests to bring their own food, they will not discourage the practice and also will not inspect
bags, baskets, etc., coming into the park.
Commissioner Welshons asked if there will be promotional literature or some type of communication with
buses and RV’s to instruct them to use Hidden Valley Road as the access to parking, before finding out
that they cannot reach their designated parking area from the toll booths.
Mr. Banche stated that since this is such a monumental undertaking and the first LEGOLAND in the
United States, he has been assured (and he assured the Commission) that LEG0 will do everything
necessary to operate successfully, by publicizing all aspects including the subject of Commissioner
Welshons inquiry.
Commissioner Compas asked if the park would be visible from Palomar Airport Road.
Mr. Banche stated that because of the landscaping, setback requirements, berming, etc., the park will not
be visible from Palomar Airport Road.
MINUTES ‘7D
. . ’ PLANNING COMMISSION April 16,1997 Page 9
Commissioner Compas, with regard to the guests arriving by various means of public transportation
(buses, shuttles, etc.) asked what safety provisions have been made for pedestrians crossing the road
from the drop-off point to the entrance to the park.
Mr. Banche stated that; 1) the pedestrian crosswalk will be a different color, 2) there will be clear signage
to guide the pedestrians, 3) the road narrows down to two lanes at that crossing, to minimize the conflict.
He added that if they have not provided enough safety and a problem develops, they will remedy the
problem immediately.
Commissioner Compas asked Mr. Banche to confirm that shuttle service will be provided.
Mr. Banche replied that he is unsure exactly who will be operating or providing the shuttle service, but
there will be a shuttle service regardless of who the provider or operator is.
Commissioner Compas asked what the three “key” attractions will be.
Mr. Banche stated that he had asked Mr. Karcher that question and was told that they can vary from day
to day. He added that the favorite attraction (in the European parks), on a consistent basis, is Miniland
and they expect it to be as popular here.
Commissioner Compas asked what experience the Wtndsor park has had with repeat guests.
Mr. Banche stated that he had recently been shown a video, on Windsor, and the reports were “glowing”.
In some cases it was the second or third time that families had returned to the park. They reported that
the experience had been spectacular and especially the food (that Mr. Karcher spoke of earlier). The food
was compared to another park in England and found to be far superior.
Commissioner Compas asked for a definition of the eight “show” areas in the park.
Mr. Karcher stated that they are for the presentation of small stage shows, such as the “Castle Show”,
which will have three actors “acting” out different scenes at different times. There will also be a “Fire
Station Show” as well as similar shows in other areas.
Commissioner Compas inquired as to the “accident” experience in the other two parks,
Christine Kerr, formerly the Operations Director in Windsor, now a member of the US Team, 5600 Avenida
Encinas, Carlsbad, stated that their experience in Windsor was that the kind of “accidents” they see are
children falling, tripping, etc., in their exuberance and enthusiasm to enjoy the facility.
Commissioner Compas asked Mr. Karcher what his three major concerns are regarding the LEGOLAND
park.
Mr. Banche stated that he had been given to understand that they might get questions along those lines
and have given them very serious consideration. The #l concern is the timely completion of the off-site
public facilities by the agencies required to complete them. The #2 concern is the acceptance of their
concept by the American audience. In this competitive arena, they hope they are able to compete and
wouldn’t be spending in excess of $130,000,000 if they thought they could not compete. The #3 concern
is the continued improvement of the California economy without inflation.
Commissioner Compas stated that Mr. Banche’s answer to his question might also answer his next
question which was going to be, “What do you consider to be the top three critical factors for achieving
success, for LEGOLAND and for Carlsbad?”
.- I T . PLANNING cow~tissioN April 16,1997 Page 10
In essence, Mr. Banche agreed that he had answered both questions with one answer. In addition, Mr.
Banche pointed out that although there are those who would continue to call Carlsbad “a village”, Carlsbad
has not been a “village” for quite a long time. With the advent of this “World Class” facility, Carlsbad will
have a lot of appeal to a lot of different people and will continue the trail of excellence that the City has
pursued.
Commissioner Heineman, regarding traffic, asked how the pedestrian traffic will be able to negotiate
across four lanes of traffic on LEG0 Drive.
Traffic Engineer, Pat Gibson, representing Kaku Associates, Santa Monica; explained the movement of
the traffic in the “drop-off” area, the dedicated left lane before the protected left turn pocket, and also the
fact that those lanes can be reversible. In the event that traffic is unusually heavy, signs and cones (as
well as human control) will be utilized. He further stated that during the majority of the day, that will not be
a difficult turn, particularly because of the dedicated left turn lane.
Chairperson Nielsen opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Mr. John White, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, representing the Carltas Company, the master
developer of the Carlsbad Ranch, stated his company’s support for the LEG0 Site Development Plan.
They feel that LEG0 has addressed all of the significant issues that were of concern to the public and the
citizens of Carlsbad. Mr. White labeled LEGOLAND as a cornerstone for the Carlsbad Ranch Mixed Use
Project and encouraged the Commission to approve the Site Development Plan and the Coastal
Development Permit for LEGOLAND.
Renata Mulray, representing Bexen Press of California, PO Box 1865, Carlsbad, stated their opposition to
the use of reclaimed water in a place where there will be an abundance of children. She stated that their
concern is a health and safety issue regarding the fact that reclaimed water is sewer water and is
dangerous and they firmly contend that only potable water should be used throughout the park. She
further stated that her organization is concerned with the potential “backed-up” traffic on Cannon Road at
the railroad tracks and feels that there will be a very dangerous situation.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Nielsen closed the public testimony and opened
Commission discussion.
Commissioner Compas requested that staff answer Ms. Mulray’s questions.
Mr. Neu stated that the requirement for the use of reclaimed water (used throughout the City) is a
measure aimed at reducing the demand for potable water. In all cases of landscape plans, the County
Health Department reviews the plans to determine the appropriate places for the use of reclaimed water,
relative to human contact, as in the case of LEGOLAND. He further explained that there are areas in the
park where potable water will be used for landscaping (such as in Miniland) where guests will touch the
plants.
Associate Engineer, Sherri Howard explained that potable water will be used anywhere where there might
be water spots (such as on the models) as well as on all of the areas washed down daily, (such as
sidewalks, benches, etc.).
Commissioner Heineman asked if, in fact, reclaimed water is sewer water.
Ms. Howard stated that it is waste water (which comes from the sewer system) that has been adequately
treated with chlorine and other treatments before it is used.
Mr. Neu addressed Ms. Mulray’s concern regarding traffic by pointing out that the railroad is on the west
side of Interstate 5 and in all of the traffic studies that have been done, Kaku Associates and staff have
looked at where the projected vehicles are expected to come from and the majority are expected to come
MINUTES 72
- ., ,* PLANNING COMMISSION April 16,1997 Page 11
from northbound or southbound Interstate 5 and will be nowhere near the railroad tracks unless there are
a few who will come from Carlsbad Boulevard. Also, Mr. Neu pointed out that there is ample queuing area
and toll booths to avoid any unusual stacking and blocking of public roadways.
Commissioner Heineman offered that the four lane entrance on LEG0 Drive will be 7,310 feet and asked if
that is the queuing area Mr. Neu was referring to, and was answered affirmatively.
Regarding the issue of phasing, Commissioner Monroy stated that there is no phasing included in what
the Commission is being asked to approve.
Mr. Neu stated that the current documents before the Commission are structured so that the 4160 parking
spaces are required to be paved, striped and fully constructed, prior to occupancy of the park. He further
explained that unless that requirement. is somehow modified by the Commission or the City Council, that is
the way the park is expected to be constructed before granting occupancy.
Commissioner Welshons, referring to one of the slides shown earlier in the evening and the banners
shown in the picture, and quoted Condition #80, Page 20, “Any signs proposed for the Outer Park shall,
at a minimum, be designed in conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such
signs. Inner Park signage shall not be subject to City review unless such signs exceed 20 feet in
height”, asked if banners are included in the City’s Sign Ordinance.
Mr. Neu stated that there was a separate signage section for the LEGOLAND Park, within the Specific
Plan, because it is rather unusual compared to the other uses in the City. There are provisions for this
type of signage, including graphics which includes banners on the parking lot and LEG0 Drive light
fixtures. He also stated that the emphasis is to review those for compliance with the Specific Plan.
Commissioner Noble stated that, to his knowledge, he is the only Commissioner who has visited
LEGOLAND in Billund, Denmark, and that everything he has seen here merely reinforces what he
experienced during his visit in Denmark. He referred to it as being an outstanding and desirable project,
clean, fun, has an enthusiastic and relaxed atmosphere and the food is, indeed, excellent. As for any
problems regarding traffic on Cannon Road, Commissioner Noble stated that he sees no reason for any
undue concern.
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
Motion by Commissioner Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 4083 and No. 4084, recommending approval of
SDP 96-14 and CDP 96-16, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein, and including the housekeeping corrections previously
mentioned.
7-o
Nielsen, Noble, Heineman, Savary, Monroy, Welshons, and Compas
None
73
-
(Form A)
TO: C1T.Y CLERK’S OFFICE
.A
FROM t PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materfals necessary for you to notfde SDP 96-14/GDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD
for a public hearing before the Clty Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of First Available Hearing
Thank you.
Assistant City flan Date
t;f 0
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 200
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NO
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-l 725
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY BRD
STE B
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-l 331
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 BST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST CITY OF CARLSBAD
3150 CHESAPEAKE DR PROJECT PLANNER
SAN DIEGO CA 92123 DON NEU
CA DEPT OF FISH 81 GAME
STE 50
330 GOLDENSHORE DR
LONG BEACH CA 90802
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CITY OF CARLSBAD
WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT ENGINEERING DEPT
, -
: CARLSBAD RANCH CO.
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS
#lOO CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4446
CARLSBAD RANCH CO.
CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I
CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I
TY OF CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I CITY OF CARLSBAD
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS
#130 CARLSBAD CA 92008-4446
z3gz+F08 OF CARLSBAD CY
A 92008
CARLSBAD RANCH CO. 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS #lOO CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4446
CARLSBAD RANCH CO.
HOLDING I
CARLSBAD RANCH CO. CITY OF CAR BAD
%9li$!&OO8
CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I CITY OF CARLSBAD 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS
#130 CARLSBAD CA 92008-4446 :~92008
_ C B RANCH ENTERPRISES CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I RICHARD c ROBERT KELLY
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 2770 SUNNY CREEK RD.
#lOO #130 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7134
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4446 CARLSBAD CA 92008-A4446
RANCH ENTERPRISES CARLSBAD RANCH CO. CARLSBAD ESTATE HOLDING I NCINAS 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS #lOO 92008-4446 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4446
GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE 1600 STEWART STREET SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
CARLSBAD RANCH CO. THE PRICE CO. P.O. BOX 97077 KIRKLAND, WA 98083-9777
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CARLBUS ASSOCIATES L P MUSIC MERCHANTS 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS PO BOX 2329 .#lOO RANCH0 SANTA FE, CA 92067- CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2329
PRICE ENTERPRISES, INC. 4649 MORENA BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92117-3650
CARLSBAD RANCH CO. CITY OF CARLSBAD 5600 AVENIDA E INAS ;;Uio8w4446 E-2008
RICHARD & PATRICIA KELLY 2770 SUNNY CREEK RD. CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7134
COSTA REAL zzJk$gg
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
TRICT PAL
M P CALIFORNIA L L C 650 S. CHERRY ST. SUITE 435
DENVER, CO 80222-1806
OF CARLSBAD
- LEG0 MAILING LABLES AHLES, STEVE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST
INTERESTED PARTIES LIST (2/96) PO BOX 682 ANDREW HAMILTON
H:\ADMIN\LABELS\LEGO MAILING CARDIFF CA 92007
LABELS 2
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
MAPADLER, ALICE ALFREDOS DOS ALLEN, JANE
6905 PEAR TREE DR 6030 PASEO DEL NORTE 5525 VICTORIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3939 CARLSBAD CA .92008 RIVERSIDE CA 92506
ALEXANDER, GERRI
PO BOX 1396
BORREGO SPRINGS CA 92008
ALVAREZ, JESS AMEIGEIRAS, PAIGE
1220 STRATFORD LANE 4320 STANFORD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALTMAN, JANE --I ANDERSON, JULIE ANDERSON, ANGELICA
2387 TERRAZA GUITARA 6913 BLUE ORCHID LN 3075 BLENKARNE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008
AMERICAN OCCUPATIONAL MED ANSPACH, KAREN AOM
SUITE A 2343 TERRAZA GUITARA ROBERT CLIFFORD
5810 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-6624 581OA EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92069 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANDRE, JEANEl-l-E ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AVE RESIDENCE
7303 LINDEN TERRACE REGULATORY BRANCH 868 MARIGOLD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009 10845 RANCH0 BERNARD0 RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-3822
SAN DIEGO CA 92127
ARMSTRONG, RUSSELL BAJADA, LARRY BAKER, LARRY
4006 SIERRA MORENA AVE 4461 GLADSTONE CT 614 NAVIGATOR CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009
AYCOCK RESIDENCE
1721 BONITA LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-l 147
BARNES, TOM
7304 AZALEA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BASMADJIAN, EDWARD
6559 CAMINO DEL PARQUE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARNES, BARBARA BEHRHORST, JACQUELINE BELKO, WILLIAM 7128 LANTANA TERRACE 2696 WATERBURY WAY 2005 PINTORESCO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARSLBAD CA 92009
BEAVER, JANE
6677A PASEO DEL NORTE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BELL FAMILY PARTNERS
PO BOX 151
ANAHEIM CA 92815
BELLINGTON, JIM
7447 BATIQUITOS DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VI I>
.- BELL, STEPHEN
PO BOX 2125
BEAUMONT CA 92223
BENTLEY, DAVID
SUITE 221
3573 EAST SUNRISE DR
TUCSON AZ 85718
BERGMAN, CARL
2677 REGENT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BILLADO, MARIJON
4021 ARCADIA WAY
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
BORNEMANN RESIDENCE
1620 BIT-TERN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BOWEN, J.T.
4060 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRETZLAFF, R:L.
7787 PALENQUE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BROWNING, MONICA
6855 VIA VERANO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BURNS, ELLEN
6837 WATERCOURSE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
REFERENCE DEPARTMENT
1250 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CAdLSBAD CA 92008
BENTSON, KRISTINA
SUITE 530
4275 EXECUTIVE SQUARE
LA JOLIA CA 92037
BEYER RESIDENCE
1854 TULE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-5138
BLEHA, PAT’
3209 FOSCA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BOSCO, JOSEPH
2128 SUBIDA TERRACE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BOYLAN, KAREN
3213 VIA PESCADO
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRODSK;, EDWARD
PO BOX 768
PALM SPRINGS CA 92263
BRUCKNER, LESLIE
SUITE 307
1325 VALLEY VIEW RD
GLENDALE CA 91202-l 737
CALABRESE, DALE
1012 HOME AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT
801 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSON, SHIRLEY
2842 HILLSBORO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BERG, BOB
PO BOX 4024
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
BIDDLE, VONNA
1442 SWEETBRIAR CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BOHLIM, JUDY
.5140 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOVAY, JULIE
2577 REGENT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRAVENDER, JOANNA
3952 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BROWN, ALICE
5157 SHORE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRUSSEAU, SCOT-T
SUITE 350
5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CALSBEEK, JERRY
4647 E WASHINGTON BLVD
COMMERCE CA 90040
CARLSBAD ARTS OFFICE
CARLSON, BEATRICE
3390 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A-
.* .I
CARLTAS
SUITE 100
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHAN, CLAUDE
PO BOX 1604 1726 BLACKBIRD CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92018-1605 CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHANG, JAMES
MIEKO, BANDAI
4520 SALISBURY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHRISTENSEN, CHRIS & KAY
4026 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHRISTOPH, C
1852 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHUNN, SUSAN
6835 CARNATION DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
PLANNING DIRECTOR
300 N COAST HIGHWAY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
. CLARK, BOB
PO BOX 230566
ENCINITAS CA 92023
CLARK, VIOLET CLARKE, SHERI CONROY RESIDENCE
4740 BIRCHWOOD CIR 811 WINDWARD LN 3334 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008
COOMBS RESIDENCE CORTE, NORA COURTNEY, MIKE
1010 DAISY CT 2507 LA GOLONDRINA ST 5217 LOS ROBLES DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009-4319 CARLSBAD CA 92008
CPS PRINTING
CHRIS SOMMER
2304 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DACOSTA, DAVID DAINTY, JOAN
2922 VIA IPANEMA SUITE 100
CARLSBAD CA 92009 7030 AVE ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAME RESIDENCE
7726 PALACIO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DE JONG, ERIC DEBAUN, LESTER
1308 PINE AVE 3450 CORVALLIS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
DEFREITAS, GENE
3425 COVALLIS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUHAMEL, LOUISE
7772 PENDON CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DYCHE, JAMES
2566 S CENTRAL AVE
FLAGLER BEACH FL 32136
DEWHURST, DON
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DOYLE, MARK
4525 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUNBAR, R
5257 SHORE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DOMINGUEZ, BILL
4378 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4203
DRESSELHAUS, PATRICIA
2359 PI0 PICO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUVICK, RICHARD
APT C
7335 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
- EDGEMON, CRIAG EARNEST, ROBERT
1212 HYMElTUS AVE 7016 SNAPDRAGON DR
ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ELECTRA-MEDIA EDWARDS, BRUCE
PO BOX 3023 3445 RIDGECREST DR
MANHAlTAN BCH CA 90266 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2031
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL ELMENDORF, FRED
DISTRICT 7121 MANZANITA
101 S RANCH0 SANTA FE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009
ENCINITAS CA 92024
ENRIGHT, MICHAEL
72 FREMONT PL
LOS ANGELES CA 90005
ENG RESIDENCE
6809 BRIARWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FEARY, MAUREEN EPSTEIN, JACKIE
2150 SUNSET BLVD 3965 HIGHLAND DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92103 CARLSBAD CA 92008
FIRST NATIONAL BANK FELTON,-RP
JOE SIMMONS 4803 NEBLINA DR
2365 MARRON RD CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FORD, SANYA
3322 PIRAGUA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7841
FOLAND, JUDY
7555 ROMERIA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FOUR-SHER DEVELOPMENT FORMA
SUITE 202 SUITE 250
990 HIGHLAND DR 8910 UNIVERSITY CTR LN
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 SAN DIEGO CA 92122
FRIENDS OF CARRILLO RANCH FOX, AW
2622 EL AGUILA LN 2454 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
GALLUP, DOLORES FULLER, MARGARET
2725 LYONS CT 4550 LA PORTALADA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
EATON, N
SUITE 108A - 347
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EIDELSON, LAURA
13144 JANElTA PL
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
ENCINA WASTEWATER
AUTHORITY
6200 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ENGELHARD, WILLARD
3484 DON LORENZO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ESCOBEDO, OFELIA
3292 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FIKES, JC
2371 BUENA VISTA CIRCLE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-I 604
FORBESS, DONNA
7086 PRIMENTEL LANE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FOUR SEASONS RESORT
SUITE 109
2796 LOKER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FRENCH, GORDON
2913 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
GAFFNEY, JEFFREY
7038 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
.I ,.
-GASCOGNE, MELANIE
2620 MALLORCA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEE RESIDENCE
2727 SPOKANE WY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GILMORE, RUBY
2617 FIRE MTN DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-6164
GALLUP, TOM
2725 LYONS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2127
GAlTl RESIDENCE
1407 SANTIAGO DR
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
GERHARD, ANDREW
7008 ESTRELL4 DE MAR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARDNER RESIDENCE
3450 WOODLAND WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GAUKELS RESIDENCE
6964 SANDCASTLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GILlASPIE, ROBIN
813 CAMINITO DEL SOL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GORDON, JOHN
7110 AZALEA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GIROUX, JOHN GllTELSON RESIDENCE
SUITE A68-320 6563 VIA BARONA
800 GRAND AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRIMM, MAXINE GOULD, MACK GREENWALD, MARILYN
2535 CORTE CASITAS 3320 CADENCIA ST 2000 TUSTIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009-5816 CARLSBAD CA 92009-7808 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
GRUBB & ELLIS CO.
SUITE 100
1921 PALOMAR OAKS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HAMLIN, ROBERT
4543 CHANCERY COURT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HART PROPERTIES
SUITE 201
4760 MURPHY CYN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
HAVENS RESIDENCE
2139 ARCHDALE ST
RIVERSIDE CA 92506
HEINZE, KIMBERLY
APT C
7349 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRINGLE, PAUL GROSSE, MARY
2705 VIA JUANITA WY 5850 SUNNY CREEK RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-8351 CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRUBBS RESIDENCE HALLORAN, JOSEPH
3257 GARFIELD ST 2805 FOREST VIEW WY
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
HANSEN, DARIAN HARLOW RESIDENCE
3296 AVENIDA ANACAPA SUITE D
CARLSBAD CA 92009 7523 JEREZ CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARTMAN RESIDENCE
6744 CAMINO DEL PRADO
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3311
HARVEY, DIANA
SUITE 108A252
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2999
HAWTHORNE RENT IT SERVICE
PAUL HAWTHORNE
530 ANDREASEN DR
ESCONDIDO CA 92029
HAWTHORNE, J.T.
PO BOX 708
SAN DIEGO CA 92112-4125
HENRISH CARMEN, SUSAN
2739 BANNER
DEARBORN Ml 48124
- HERTEL, JOSEPH
SUITE 307
5030 CAMINO DE LA SIESTA
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
HENDERSON, JACK
7408 IANTANA TERRACE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HILL RESIDENCE
3221 CALLE VALLARTA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HIGGINS, MICHAEL
87 NORTH RAYMOND
PASADENA CA 91103
HILL, JACK
4264 SKYLINE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HIRSCHORN, GERALD
7320 MUSLO LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HILL, BERNICE
2984 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HILLMAN PROPERTIES
SUITE 206
2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOPKINS, ANNA
3020 BLENKARNE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOENIGMAN RESIDENCE
2207 RECODO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOODY, REGINA
9454 JONES ST
OMAHA NE 68114
HOUSER RESIDENCE
6703 ANTILOPE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HORTON RESIDENCE
SUITE 104-255
7040 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOSSEINZADEH, DAN
3 HUGHES
IRVINE CA 92718
HUGHES, N
4815 VIGILANT WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HUBER, GENE
6407 EL PAT0 CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HUEBNER, PETER
3461 CORVALLIS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS
33012 CALLE AVIADOR
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA
92675
HUMPHREY, J
2824 HIGHLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HUMPHREYS, MARY
2604 VIA BOCAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008-I 381
INDRIERI, DOROTHY
4992 VIA MARTA
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYNAN, LYNDA
26432 BODEGA LN
MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
HYNES, TIM
4613 BUCKINGHAM LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
IT’S ABOUT TIME
72840 HWY 111
PALM DESERT CA 92260
IREMONGER, VERA
SUITE 206
4572 VIA MARINA
MARINA DEL REY CA 90292
ISLAND GIRL
2603B EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHNSON RESIDENCE
5031 TIERRA DEL OR0
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JACOBS, RICHARD
2726 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2125
JOHNSON, STANWOOD
7209 LINDEN TERRACE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
II ,.
. JOHNSON, CONNIE JOHNSON, EDMOND JOHNSON RESIDENCE
1749 FOREST AVE 3211 IBSEN ST 3344 CAMINO CORONADO
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN DIEGO CA 92106-1434 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JONES, GWEN JONES RESIDENCE JONES, RICCI
3515 HIGHLAND DR 6721 RUSSELIA CT 3620 AZURE CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2527 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008
KEARNS, MARY KAPIN, HERB & DOROTHY
809 WINDCREST DR 6729 OLEANDER WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATICK, SALLY
4179 HIGHLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KELM RESIDENCE.
7319 E ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KELLEY, KENNETH
6538 CAMINO DEL PARQUE
CARLSBAD CA 92009-2465
KELLY RESIDENCE
6728 LUCIERNAGA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KIESNER RESIDENCE KENDALL, BARBARA KENT, ALAN
7925 AVENIDA DIESTRO 7103 LANTANA TERR 6438 LA GARZA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 920094318
KINKO’S COPY CENTER
JENNIFER ROBERTSON
1921 W SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
KIM RESIDENCE KIMBLER, JUDY
7633 RUSTIC0 DR 23458 ALTISMA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7919 CARLSBAD CA 92009
KNEPPER, DONALD KITZMILLER, JR
7247 ESFERA STREET 1488 WINDY MTN RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7818 WESTIAKE VILLAGE CA 91362
KOLDEN, JOHN R.
10 BLUE JAY
ALISO VIEJO CA 92656
LAATSCH RESIDENCE
3219 FOSCA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LECAKES, DOREEN
3531 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KNOX, PAT
2002 PINTORESCO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAMSON, SUSAN
174 BEECHTREE DRIVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
LEE, MIMI
5924 BALFOUR CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KOHNS, ROBERT
7959 CALLE POSADA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KUBOTA, JACK
PO BOX 1095
CARLSBAD CA 92018
LEE RESIDENCE
7232 DURANGO CIRCLE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
. LEFTON, DAVID
6019 PASEO DEL NORTE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LINEHAN, DONNA
4325 SEA BRIGHT DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3627
LOCKETT, RANDY
391 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4064
LERNER, MIRIAM
3355 CONCORD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-I 361
LINNERTZ, TERRY & KAREN
3383 GARIBALDI PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOHMAN, GREG
1725 CATALPA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEW, MARILYN
7632 REPOSADO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LIVINGSTONE, RITA
302B HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LONG RESIDENCE
3270 CAMINO CORONADO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOO, DAVID LOPEZ, ROBERT
7267 SPOONBILL LN 7912 TERRAZA DISOMA
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
LORENTSEN, FRED
4866 PARK DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-38 11
LOVULLO RESIDENCE LOW, RICHARD LUTZ, ANNA
16825 BAJIO RD 3255 MCKINLEY STREET 4629 BUCKINGHAM LN
ENCINO CA 91436 ‘CARLSBAD CA 92008-I 923 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MACKEY, DORIS
4721 AMBERWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARCUS, MARY
6741 RUSSELIA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3339
MARSH, OGDEN
4306 HORIZON DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3652
MASTNY, MARCELA
1714 CATALPA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MCGEE RESIDENCE
905 POPPY LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MACLACkAN, D.D.
7035 SNAPDRAGON DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARIOS, H
7752 MADRILENA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTICH, MARGE
2657 VANCOUVER ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCDANIEL, BEVERLY
1023 DAISY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MCKAY, GINGER
908 POPPY LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MALDONADO, DAVE
6816 ZINNIA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARKETING STRATEGIES
SUITE 2D
7750 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTYNS, LEONARD
635 E LEADORA AVE
GLENDORA CA 91741
MCDONOUGH RESIDENCE
6831 MAPLE LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MCKINNON, RL
7591 DEHESA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7704
*MCNALLY, JOHN
4755 BRYCE CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS
ANNIE COPPOCK
2433 IMPALA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MENARD, RAYMOND III
4303 SIERRA MORENA
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MESKIN, HARVE
2733 LEVANTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICKLEY RESIDENCE
4835 ARGOSY LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MILLER, JIM
3107 LEVANTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIRELL, CONSTANCE
1713 CAMINO DE IA COSTA
REDONDO BCH CA 90277
MIZUNO, NATSUKO
6873 CARNATION DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MORIN, ELIZABETH
4805 KELLY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3734
MULLEN RESIDENCE
2617 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCNULTY RESIDENCE
5156 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MELILLO, NICK
3746 LONGVIEW DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MENEI RESIDENCE
734 ROGUE ISLE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MESSINA, RALPH
4620 LAPORTALADA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MILES, CD
7016 LANTANA TERRACE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MILLER, LEON
3750 NAUTICAL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MITCHELL RESIDENCE
6912 THRUSH PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MOFFAT FOR CITY COUNCIL
SUITE 9
2645 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORONG, T.M.
6747 NEPEZA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NAKAMURA, JAMES
2235 JANIS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS
2433 IMPALA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MELIANO, MIKE
PO BOX 100
SAN LUIS REY CA 92068
MERGOITH, MARY
SUITE U177
315 FIRST ST
ENCINITAS CA 92024
MICHAELSON, LEWIS
13850 DAVENPORT AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92129
MILLER, LINDA
4007 ISLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MILLIKEN, FLORENCE
4062-A GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MIZE, HAROLD
7125 SANTA BARBARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009-4630
MORGAN, JAYNA
SUITE 450
1920 MAIN ST
IRVINE CA 92714
MORROW DEVELOPMENT INC
PO BOX 9000-685
CARLSBAD CA 92018-9000
NASH, CLAUDE
2957 GREENWICH ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
- - 7, 1.
, NASH, SPENCER NAUGLER RESIDENCE NEBLElT, WILL
PO BOX 2173 4010 SUNNYHILLDR 856 BLUEBELL CT
LEUCADIA CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009
NEEDHAM RESIDENCE NEGLIA, BART
7922 CALLE SAN FELIPE 1060 WIEGAND ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN CA 92024
NEU, JOHN
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
NORRIS, KATHLEEN NORTH COUNTY TIMES NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT
2327-4 CARINGA WY COLIN HALEY DISTRICT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-6344 1722 SOUTH COAST HWY 311 S TREMONT
QCEANSIDE CA 92054 OCEANSIDE CA 92054
NOTRICA, SOLOMON NSDC ASSOC OF REALTORS O’BRIEN RESIDENCE
926 ALYSSUM RD 754 SECOND ST 4774 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92008
O’HARA, JAMES OERUM, JOHN OGASAWARA, KOICHI
6545 VIA BARONA 2618 LA GOLONDRINA ST 7509 GARDEN GROVE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009-4322 RESEDA CA 91335
OGDEN, JEAN
2634 LEVANTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OWPNICK, SUSAN
TAYLOR, DEE &JOHN
241 OLIVE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PALOMAR TEXACO
MARK CONGER
665 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PASCOE, STEPHEN
6888 SHEARWATERS DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3703
PAWLOWICZ RESIDENCE
4625 BUCKINGHAM LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6402
ORTIZ, PiARL
7361 LINDSEY AVE
PICO RIVERA CA 90660
PAKULA RESIDENCE
1804 COlTONWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009-5140
PARKER RESIDENCE
2620 ACUNA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PASHLEY, BETTY
2203 CAMEO RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAYNE, ROBERT
PO BOX 3073
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OVEBECK, TINA
7030 EL FUERTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PALMER, WILLIAM
6642 TOWHEE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PARKER, ALAN DALE
3111 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAVIA, PAT
3352 STILLWATER CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PERAINO, TONY
2105 BASSWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PESCHKE, BERNARD
812 CAMINITO DEL MAR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
. PERKINS, KENNETH
6406 CAMINO DEL PARQUE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PERLMAN, MARC
SUITE 100
10179 HUENNEKENS ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
PETERS, DEBBIE
911 ORCHID WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PElTINE, ROSE
4405 TRIESTE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PHILLIPS, C.N.
2997 VIA DE PAZ
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PLANNING SYSTEMS
SUITE 100
2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PLATT, JOSEPH
452 W 1 ITH ST
CLAREMONT CA 91711
PINES, DARRELL
2011 LEE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PLAZA CAMINO REAL
SUITE 100
2525 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
POLLAK, RICHARD
7520A JEREZ CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7440
PONSEGGI, BERNARD
6947 WHITECAP DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3747
PORTER, BARBARA
4605 DRIFTWOOD CIRCLE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3717
POWERS, ELLEN
7063 ROCKROSE TERR
%ARLSBAD CA 92009
PRI-l-l-EN, JOANNE
330 CHINQUAPIN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PROKOP, JOHN
6422 CAMINO DEL PARQUE
CARLSBAD CA 92009-2463
PURDY, iLL
3402 SANTA CLARA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PYNES, SUSAN
2746 INVERNESS DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RAICEVIC RESIDENCE
2932 AVENIDA VALERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RCD OF GREATER SAN DIEGO
PATTY MCDUFFEE
332 S JUNIPER ST
ESCONDIDO CA 92025
REAGLE, HAROLD
6731 RUSSELIA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3338
REDDING RESIDENCE
2246 JANIS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
REED, JOE
7024 ROCKROSE TERRACE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REICH, MARY
7610 PRIMAVERA WY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REIFF, OLIVIA
2211 CALLE CIDRA
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673
REISER, CHRIS
2634 HALF DOME PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RHODES, FRED
7738 LUCIA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RHODES RESIDENCE
SUITE IH
2517 NAVARRA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICKS, VIRGINIA
919 MARGUERITE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RIJ RESIDENCE
811 CAMINITO VERDE
CARSLBAD CA 92009
- RJM DESIGN GROUP
SUITE 250
27285 LAS RAMBLAS
MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
ROAMR, MICHAEL
73 SOUTH PEAK DR
LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677
ROBERTS, BARBARA
6936 DUSTY ROSE PL
CARLSAD CA 92009
ROBINSON, R.R.
2531 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROBINSON, ESTHER
4178 HIGHLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RODGERS, GEORGE
6749 RUSSELIA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROSE, D./K. LITTLE/J. LARKIN
P.O. BOX 1831
SAN DIEGO CA 92112-4150
ROGERS, CHUCK
1892 AVOCADO RD
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
ROSE RESIDENCE
1060 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROSENBAUM, WAYNE
3212 CELINDA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROYCE, ROBERT
PO BOX 6720
KETCHUM ID 83340
RUSSEL W GROSSE DEV
SUITE A
5850 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SALTZMAN, MARCIA
299 VIA SARASAN
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
AGNES ROLE-IT1
3156 VISTA WAY
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
SCALICE, ELIZABETH
5540 EL ARBOL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHAD, HERBERT
338A HACKENSACK ST
WOODRIDGE NJ 07075
SCHAREi, RANDEE
5914 SO LE DOUX RD
LOS ANGELES CA 90056
SCHESSLER, DEAN-ROSS
7525 GIBRALTAR ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7460
SCHILLING, WILLIAM
PO BOX 417
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHLONSKY, K. J.
PO BOX 2725
CARLSBAD CA 92018
SCHREIBER, DALE
7290 PONTO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCHULZ, K.R.
2648 MARMOL CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCHWEITZER, VANCE
4650 TRIESTE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SDGE
SUITE 142B
5865 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4467
SEAL RESIDENCE
2738 BERKELEY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHAH, KEN
CARLSBAD LODGE
3570 PI0 PICO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHANER, M
7204 LINDEN TERR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-4719
SHARP, CORY
SUITE K
1317 SIMPSON WAY
ESCONDIDO CA 92029
SHAW, ROBERT
13751 GLADSTONE
SYLMAR CA 91342
SHEEN, THEOPA
4734 BIRCHWOOD CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
-* I. ,rs
-SHEETS, MADELYN SHERR RESIDENCE SHOURDS, MARIA
6725 CLOVER CT 1432 SWEETBRIAR CIR 2628 MALLORCA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CALRSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
SIM RETIREMENT CENTER SIMPSON, CHRISTINE SIMUN, RV
1400 FLAME TREE LANE 7361 ALICANTE RD 1019 LONGWOOD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOS ANGELES CA 90019
SINGLETON, JOANNE SISCO, LARRY SMITH RESIDENCE
SUITE 26 SUITE 100 4465 HIGHLAND DR
20 OCEAN PARK BLVD 5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008
SANTAMONICA CA 90405 CARLSBAD CA 92008
SMOLIN, VESSI
7156 TERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SOOHOO, HENRY SOPER, LINDA
3682 HERMAN AVE 3700 TRIESTE DRIVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92104 CARLSBAD CA 92008
SPADA, FRED SPANJIAN, R.S. SPELLMAN, NEIL
4562 CAPE CODE CIRCLE 7315 EL FUERTE ST 3623 CHESHIRE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008
SPENCER, J.J. SPENCER RESIDENCE ST. AUSTIN
2588-D EL CAMINO REAL 4744 SUNBURST RD 2438 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009-5320
ST. MARIE, STEVE STALEY, HUGH STEPHAN RESIDENCE
907 ALYSSUM RD 3542 HASTINGS DR 4005 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEPHENS, ROSEMARY
4345 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEVENS, EVERElT
3619 HAVERHILL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2175
STUART RESIDENCE
3512 CELINDA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEPHENS RESIDENCE
6813 SHEARWATERS DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STILLWELL, P.
3170 FALCON DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SUCHOR, KATHLEEN
4507 ST GEORGE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2880
STEPP, JAMES T.
7107 AZALEA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STOLBERG, ROGER
2321 MARCA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92169
SUGG, WILLIAM
2010 PINRORESCO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SULLIVAN, THOMAS SUNDERLAND, SHIRLEY
803 WIINDCREST DR 6919 SANDCASTLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARSLBAD CA 92009-3733
SWANK, GERALD
1413 SWEETBRIAR CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TAYLOR, CATHERINE
2564 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TELL, DARRYL 81 KATHY
2611 HIGHLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
THOMPSON, WILLIAM
PO BOX 1601
OXNARD CA 93032
TULLOCH, BRIAN
7314 BORLA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
UNION PACIFIC
SUITE 211
2945 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VASQUEZ, ERNIE
SUITE B
2444 SACADA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VOLL, CLYDE
2938 AVENIDA THERESA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WARRICK, WILLIAM
7521 NAVIGATOR CIRCLE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUNSET SENIOR APTS
PO BOX 5498
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92674
TANICO, SHEILA TATE, NORMA
2412-A ALTISMA WAY 16455 SOUTH 15TH STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92009 PHOENIX AZ 85048
TAYLOR, LESTER TECHBILT CONST CORP
755 ALMA DR TED TCHANG
PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 PO BOX 80036
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
THE BLACKMORE CO
RONALD CLYDE
12626 HIGH BLUFF DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
THOMAS, DAVID
7318 BLACK SWAN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TOSTO RESIDENCE TROTT, KENNETH
4904 VIA AREQUIPA DEPT. OF CONSERVATION
CARLSBAD CA 92008 MS 13-71
801 K STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
TURNER, DAVID TUTTERROW, ELAINE
1024 HYMETTUS AVE 4625 TRIESTE DR
LEUCADIA CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92008
VALENTI, JOE
3491 LAWRENCE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VAN EGMOND, P.J.
6833 PEAR TREE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3937
VlLlAGE FAIRE VINZANT, MARIAN
SUITE 108A331 5234 CARLSBAD BLVD
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WADDS, ANDREA
2804 VIA MAGIA
CARLSBAD CA 92008-l 345
WARD, DALE
2209 PLAZA DE LAS FLORES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WASSEM, RAND WATKINS, DON
SUITE EB5C 3778 SKYLINE RD
101 ASH ST CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
INATT HOMES
SUITE 200
27720 JEFFERSON AVE
TEMECULA CA 92590
WHIPPLE RESIDENCE
4858 KELLY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WILLIAMS, RICHARD
2702 JACARANDA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ZIEGLER, RAYMOND
3110 VIA SOMBRA
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DONIGAN, JOE
7712 ROMERIA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KRASNER, PAUL
16439 HARLOWE LN
HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92649
LAWLER, STEVEN
3515 VALLEY ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2638
CARLSBAD VILLAGE AUTO BODY
& PAINT
3191 TYLER ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WEATHERS, STEVE
SUITE 1850
701 BST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
WILLIAMS, GARY
943 DAISY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILSON, DONALD
3110 LEVANTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ZIGRANG, DAVID
7031 COLUBINE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAN POWELL
208 SOUTH RIOS AVE
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
KRISTAL, HAROLD
3602 KINGSTON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2181
KLATCHKO & KLATCHKO
177 S CIVIC DR
PALM SPRINGS CA 92262
EASLAND, RL
3916 MARKRIDGE RD
LA CRESCENTA CA 91214
WESTFIELD CORP INC
SUITE 1200
11601 WILSHIRE BLVD
LOS ANGELES CA 90025
WILLIAMS, DON
3162 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
YOUNG, JIM
3951 PARK DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
THE BEVERIDGE FAMILY
1642 MARBELLOC DRIVE
VISTA CA 92083
DOUGLAS, LARRY
7505 BRAVA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LANDA, STEVEN
7004 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KLOSS, CARL
APT 2
2535 JEFFERSON
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RON HAINES
PALOMAR COLLEGE
1140 WEST MISSION ROAD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
A notice has been mailed 10 dl property owners/occupant8
listed herein.
Date - ‘->-,&-ci