HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-06-03; City Council; 14189; SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION GPA 96-04 | ZC 96-05 | LCPA 96-11SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96-11
DEPT.HD. A
CITY ATTY. c - -
CITYMGR G
I f PAGE 2 OF AGENDA 9 ' ILL NO. J L(: 1 89 0
EXHl B I TS :
1.
2. City Council Resolution 9 7 - Y 3 1
3. Location Map
4.
5.
6.
City Council Ordinance No. N3-407
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4075, 4076, 4077 and 4078
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated March 19, 1997
Excerpts from Planning Commission minutes, dated March 19, 1997.
I , I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v 0
RESOLUTION NO. 97-471
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSElAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE
DECLMTION, AN ADDENDUM TO MASTER EIR 93-01,
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA 96-04, ZONE CHANGE
ZC 96-05 AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT
LCPA 96-1 1.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
CASE NO.: GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96- 1 1
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby r
follows:
WHEREAS, on March 19, 1997, the Carlsbad Planning Commission hc
noticed public hearing to consider a Negative Declaration and addendum to Master E
for the General Plan Amendment (GPA 96-04), Zone Change (ZC 96-05), and Lou
Program Amendment (LCPA 96-1 1) all relating to the Seapointe Resort Expansion
conclusion of the hearing the Commission adopted Resolutions No. 4075, 4076, 4077
recommending the Negative Declaration GPA 96-04, ZC 96-05, and LCPA 96-1 1 be
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 24th
of June , 1997 held a public hearing to consider the Cor
recommendations and hear all persons interested in or opposed to the Negative Decla
addendum to Master EIR 93-01 for the General Plan Amendment (GPA 96-04), Zor
(ZC 96-05), and Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 96-1 1) relating to the
Resort Expansion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEARBY RESOLVED by the City Cou
City of Carlsbad, California as follows: ,
1. That 1 he above recitations are true and correct.
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v e
2. That the City Council adopts and incorporates the findings of
Commission Resolutions Nos. 4075, 4076, 4077, and 4078 approving the Seapoin
Expansion Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment (GPA 96-04), Zone Changc
OS), and Local Coastal Program Amendme; (LCPA 96-1 1).
a) Independent Judgement: The City Council finds that the Declaration and addendim to the Master EIR reflects the City Council’s independent Ju
b) Location and Custodian of Record of Proceedings. PL
Public Resources Code section 2 108 1.6(d), all the materials that constitute the admi
record in this proceeding are in the custody of and can be found in the offices of the C
and the Director of Plarlning in the City of Carlsbad. The administrative record incluc
not limited to: the Negative Declaration, addendum to Master EIR 93-01 and :
comments thereon received during the public review period and responses thereto
proceedings of the Planning Commission and the City Council thereon.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall be effective upon its
except as to the General Plan Amendment, which shall be effective thirty (30) days fol
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of tl
Carlsbad on the 24th day of June 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
2 5+ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0 Exhibit 1
ORDINANCE NO. NS-407
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSB AD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2 1,
CHAPTER 21.05, SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CAIUSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING
MAP, TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 96-05, FROM 0 TO
C-T ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ISLAND WAY AND SURFSIDE
LANE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
CASE NO.: ZC 96-05
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follo
SECTION I: That Title 21, Chapter 21.05, Section 21.05.030 of the
Municipal Code, being the Zoning Map, is amended to reflect a zone change from 0
shown on that portion of the map marked “Exhibit ZC 96-05,’, attached hereto and mi
hereof by this reference.
SECTION 11: That the findings of the Planning Commission as se
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4077 constitutes the findings of the City Council
The Council further finds that this action is consisten SECTION 111:
Land Use Element of the Carlsbad General Plan.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty day:
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and caur
published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsb
fifteen days after its adoption. Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance sh
effective until approved by the California Coastal Commission.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Car
Council on the 24th day of June 1997, and thereafter.
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of tl
Carlsbad on the day of 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AB STArN :
CLAUSE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL) 4
-2-
CRrllDI I 0 0
-
EXISTING: 0
PROPOSED: C-
SEAPOINTE, RESORT EXPANSION
ZC 96-05
0 0 EX
SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
GPA 96-04ZC 96-05/LCPA 96-1 I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHl 0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4075
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND AN
ADDENDUM TO MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ZONE CHANGE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
FROM OFFICE TO TRAVEL SERVICE COMMERCIAL AND
THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM OFFICE TO
COMMERCIAL TOURIST.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
REPORT EIR 93-01 FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT,
CASE NO.: GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96-1 1
WHEREAS, Grand Pacific Resorts, “Developer”, has filed a verified a]
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kristopher and Elizabeth
“Owner”, described as
That portion of Lot 2, Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of
Carlsbacl, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the Official Plat thereof, bounded on the west by the easterly
line of tlhe land described in Deed to the State of California
recorded October 4, 1951, in Book 4253, Page 578 of Official
Records as Document No. 121143, bounded on the east by the
westerly line of that parcel of land conveyed in Deed to
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, recorded
January 29, 1946 as Document No. 9749, in Book 2031, Page
277 of Official Records; bounded on the south by the northerly
line of La Costa Downs, Unit No. 1 according to Map thereof
No. 2013, and bounded on the north by the north line of the
south 60 acres of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the southeast quarter of
the southeast quarter of Section 20 and Lot 4 and the
southwest quarter of southwest quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, excepting from said Lots 1 and 2, and portions
thereof, inow or herebefore lying below the mean high tide line
of the Pacific Ocean
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad certified EIR 93-01 on September 6,l
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
WHEREAS, the addendum to EIR 93-01 as described in the attache
"EIR 93-01 addendum #1" indicates that the EIR 93-01 project description is amende(
the requested land use change will not alter impacts as described and mitigated by E.
caused by development of the subject sites; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of March l!
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by t
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered a
relating to the addendum[ to EIR 93-0 1 and the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the addendum tc
01, the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit EIR 93-01 addendum
dated March 19, 1997, "ND" dated January 27, 1997, and "PII" dated Ja
1997, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findir
Findings:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project mi
significant impact on the environment.
The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmental analysis.
The streets have been improved to an adequate size to handle trafic generatc
proposed use.
There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
by this project.
The change of Land Use will not have any impact on the environment.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PC RES0 NO. 4075 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 ::
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m 0
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of March 199
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, H
Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
; N LSEN, Chairperson
CAFUSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HWZMIP~ER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4075 -3-
EIR 93-01 ad e 0 Ma1
ADDENDUM TO MEIR
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A request has been made to change the General Plan Land Use designation of a .5 acre parcel
land from Office to TravelKecreation Commercial. The effect is a change to the EIR 93-1
project description to include the potential development of the .5 acre piece as Travelmecreatir
Commercial versus Office.
CHANGE IN IMPACTS
There will be no change in impacts. The proposed land use, TravelRecreation Commercial u
have the same development standards as the original land use designation. The developme
potential of the site will not be increased nor will it be decreased by virtue of the land u
change.
The use of the property will be slightly altered in that as a TravelRecreation Commercial site tl
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) will be reduced from that of an office development. The net effe
will be a reduction in impacts because there will be less traffic impacts on surrounding roads ai
intersections and subsequently an incremental decrease in the cumulative contribution to i
quality.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Address/Location: Northeast comer of Island Way and Surfside Lane, City
Carlsbad, County of San Diego.
Change General Plan and Local Coastal Program Land Use frc
Office to TraveVRecreation Commercial and the zoni
dlesignation from Office to Commercial-Tourist.
Project Description:
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described projc
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act a
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on 1
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in 1
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Dec!laration with supportive documents is on file in the Planni
Department. 2075 Las Palmas Drive. Carlsbad. California 92009. Comments from the public i
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within thirty (30) dz
of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planni
Department at (619) 438-1 161, extension 4448.
DATED: JANUARY 27,1997
CASE NO: GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96-1 1
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
PUBLISH DATE: JANUARY 27, 1997
MICHAEL J. HOYZMIEER
Planning Director
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (61 9) 438-11 61 - FAX (61 9) 438-08
b 6
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNNG DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 9(
DATE: January 15,l
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
CASE NAME: Seauointe Resort Exuansion
APPLICANT: Grand Pacific Resorts c/o Timothy Stripe and David Brown
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5050 Avenida Encinas. Suite
Carlsbad, California 920108; (619) 43 1-8500
DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: November 15,1996
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request to change the land use of an approximately !4 acre P:
of land from Office to Travel Services Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map
Local Coastal Program ILand Use Map and from Office to Commercial-Tourist on the 20
Map.
4.
5.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Im
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
6
0 Land Use and Planning TransportatiodCirculation 0 Public Services
0 Population and Housing
c] Geological Problems 0 Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
0 Water 0 Hazards 0 Cultural Resources
c] Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation
0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systen
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
1 Rev. 03/28/96
DETERMINATION. c -6
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
IXi I find that the propssed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigal
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATI
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, anc
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, bu
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an ear
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigat
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negat
Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentiz
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Negative Declarat
pursuant to applicable :standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to t
earlier Negative Declariition, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impoi
upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared
0
5
0
c I/@iIq Date 1
rl zzl.1q-
Planning -& Director’s Si&ature Date
2 Rev. 03/28/96
. ENVIRONMENTAL I AT2 6
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the C
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a signific
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the follow
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and hun
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with informatioi
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negal
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
0 A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following e:
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced informat
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved.
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to.
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significanl Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adop
general standards and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporati
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” tc
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and 1
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce t
effect to a less than significant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
effect is significant.
Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially signific:
effect on the environment, but &I potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzl
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicak
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigat
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed up‘
the proposed project, and none of the.circumstances requiring a supplement to
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the pri
environmental documertt have been incorporated into this project, then no addition
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily requirl
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier El
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement (
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence th
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
3 Rev. 03/28/96
. k c, e
a If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant,
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporal
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and incluc
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect
not been discussed or imitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards,
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less t
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not red
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect,
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially signific
effect to below a level of significance.
e
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular atteni
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determi
significant.
b
4 Rev. 03/28/96
? * e
Potentially Potentially Less Than NI
Significant Significant Significan Imp
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Impact Unless t Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s):
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resource; or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)?
0 0 0 E
0 0 0 E
0 0 o E 0 0 o E
0 cl o E
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
0 o E
0 0 E
0 0 0 E
111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Woiild the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
i)
d a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0 €x o 0 0 lx 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 [XI 0 111 [xi 0 0 o E
0 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 ffi 0 0 0 IXI
0 0 0 IXI o 0 0 IXI
0 0 0 w
0 0 0 IXI
-.
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
Unique geologic or physical features?
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or prope:rty to water related hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
5 Rev. 03/28/96
Potentidly otentially Less Than N
Significant Significant Significan Imp
Unless t Impact
’ Issues (and Supporting Info n Sources). 6 m4
Impact
Mitigation Incorporated cl 0 o E
0 0 0 (E
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
i)
0 0 o E 0 0 0 (E 0 0 0 €i Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
4
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
0 0 0 E
cl 0 0 IEi 0 0 E
0 0 0 IEi
VI. TRAN SPORTATION/CIRCUL,4TXON. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety kom design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capaciDj on-site or off-site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
0 0 0 E c3 !x
0 0 Ix 0 0 0 Ix 0 0 0 €x 0 0 0 Ix
0 0 0 Ix
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds?
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (eg marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
0 0 c3 Ix
0 0 0 [x] 0 0 0 €3
cl 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 Ix1
a)
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
Conflict with adopted energ:y conservation plans? 0 0 0 Ix1 a)
6 Rev. 03/28/96
Potential1 Potentially Less Than b
Significant Significant Significan Iml
Unless t Impact
g Issues (and Supporting Info n Sources). y3 r4.
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated a cl 0 €
0 CI 0 E
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of avairability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
0 '0 0 Iz
0 0 0 E
cl 0 O E
0 0 0 €2
fl 0 o E(
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but riot limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of thy health hazard or potential health hazards?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards?
e) Increase fire hazard in aneas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 €3 o 0 0 €%
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following ,weas:
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental service:;?
0 0 0 Ix 0 0 0 Ix 0 0 Ix 0 0 0 ix 0 0 0 lx
a) Fire protection?
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
0 0 0 IXI o 0 El €3 0 0 IXI
0 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 w o 0 0 €3 0 cl 0 Ixl
facilities?
.
7 Rev. 03/28/96
potentially otentially Less Than NI
Significant Significant Significan Imp
Unless t Impact
a Issues (and Supporting Infoman !$ources). 6
impact
Mitigation
Incorporated XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
0 cl o E CI 0 E 0 0 0 E
0 0 o E 0 0 0 E 0 0 o E 0 E
0 0 o E
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway?
b) Nave a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect?
c) Create light or glare?
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have the potentid to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic c:ultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area?
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
0 0 0 €3
0 0 Ixi
0 0 0 El
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
o 0 0 IXI b)
0 0 0 (x1 c)
8 Rev. 03/28/96
' Xvn. EARLIERANAL A. &
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEI
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negai
declaration.
following on attached sheets:
a)
Section II 5063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify
Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are availa
for review.
Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above check
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursu
to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigat
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated
refined from thle earlier document and the extent to which they address s
specific conditions for the project.
b)
L1
c)
4
9 Rev. 03/28/96
I DISCUSSION OF ENV LK EvmuAmN c
Physical Environment
The requested land use changes will not have a direct environmental effect. However, it
anticipated that there will be development subsequent to the land use changes.
There are no known conditions on the site that would expose future development to geolog
hazards of any sort. Grading proposed will be in accordance with standard grading princip;
and practice which include erosion control and compliance with the National Pollutant Discha
Elimination System (NPDES) standards.
Although the site is near the Pacific Ocean, it is not contiguous and development of the propel
will not directly effect beach sand or modify a channel of fiee flowing waters.
Future development will not create a change to air flow, movement, or temperature and may n
consume great quantities of natural resources, fuel or energy. Future development will
required to obtain gas andor electric service fiom San Diego Gas and Electric and will
charged the appropriate service fees.
Biological Environment
The site is currently in a disturbled state as a result of previous grading and agriculture. There a:
no known sensitive species of plants or animals within the area of potential development of tl
site. There is also no evidence that there will be adverse impacts to the biological environmei
offsite as a result of development
Human Environment
The change will have some effect on the distribution of traffic and the hours of activity on th
site. With the change it is antiicipated that activity on the site will change from daytime, 8:O
a.m. to 5:OO p.m., to 24 hours. Future trafic patterns may change from heavy peaks in th
morning and evening hours for an office use to a more even flow throughout the day.
All of the utility services required by development will be provided by standard method:
Development would introduce new levels of noise and light into the area. However, those level
are typically not considered significant. A California State campground is located across th
street and may be impacted during the evening hours by ambient light. Mitigation for th
potential impact could be shielding and landscaping.
Although the sight is visible prominent fiom Carlsbad Boulevard, construction of a buildin<
within the height limits will not be an adverse visual impact because views of the site are from
distance to the east and predominantly from a higher elevation. The combination of height an1
distance allow the residents to the east of Interstate 5 horizon view of the Pacific Ocean.
Analysis of ViabIe Alternatives to the Proposed Proiect Such As:
Phased development of the project;
6
a.
b. Alternate site designs;
10 Rev. 03/28/96
C. Alternate -, &! e of development; &
d.
e.
f.
g. No project alternative.
Alternate uses fi3r the site;
Development at some future time rather than now;
Alternate sites fbr the proposed project; and
Analysis of the proposed project indicates that there will not be any adverse effects to
environment. Phasing or redesign will not contribute to a reduction of impacts when
significant impacts have been identified.
4
11 Rev. 03/28/96
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
f
0 0
m,NNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4076
A RES01,UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM OFFICE TO
TRAVELRECREATION COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLYLOCATEDONTHENORTHEASTCORNEROF
ISLAND WAY AND SURFSIDE LANE.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
CASE NO: GPA 96-04
WHEREAS, Grand Pacific Resorts, “Developer” ,has filed a verified apl
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kristopher and Elizabeth
“Owner”,. described as
That portion of Lot 2, Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the Official Plat thereof, bounded on the west by the easterly
line of the land described in Deed to the State of California
recorded October 4, 1951, in Book 4253, Page 578 of Official
Records as Document No. 121143, bounded on the east by the
westerly line of that parcel of land conveyed in Deed to
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, recorded
January 29, 1946 as Document No. 9749, in Book 2031, Page
277 of Official Records; bounded on the south by the northerly
line of La Costa Downs, Unit No. 1 according to Map thereof
No. 2013, and bounded on the north by the north line of the
south 60 acres of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the southeast quarter of
the southieast quarter of Section 20 and Lot 4 and the
southwest quarter of southwest quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, excepting from said Lots 1 and 2, and portions
thereof, now or herebefore lying below the mean high tide line
of the Pacific Ocean
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Gener
Amendment as shown on Exhibit “A” dated March 19, 1997, on file in the Carlsbad P
Department (General Plan Amendment GPA 96-04) as provided in Chapter 21.52
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of March 1
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tl
and arguments, if any, 0.F all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of General Pian Amendment, GPA 9
change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Office &
Commercial to TraveVRecreation Commercial , as shown on Exhibii
dated March 19, 1997. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or
Developer to make, all necessary corrections and modifications to the ap
document(s), as necessary, to make them internally consistent and in COI
with final action on the project, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1.
2.
The proposed land use is similar in intensity to the existing land use.
The nearby Encina Wastewater Treatment Facility has successfully taken !
reduce by-product odors.
There are sufficient buffers surrounding the project site to accommoda
impactive development.
The South Carlsbad State Beach campground is similar to the proposed use
both encourage visitors to the California coast.
A hotel generates less daily traffic than an office and therefore will have :
impact on adjacent roadways and intersections.
Potential impacts to adjacent properties caused by future development of the s
noise, visual quality and light can be mitigated through design.
The proposed land use will support the local tourist trade.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
PC RES0 NO. 4076 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
8. Development of the site as travel services commercial is not anticipated
significant impacts to the area.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of March 199
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, HI
Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT None
ABSTAIN: None =*- R ERT NIELSEN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZM~LER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4076 -3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 o
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4077
A RES01,UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM OFFICE TO
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ISLAND WAY
AND SUlWSIDE LANE.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
COMMERCIAL-TOURIST ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
CASENO: ZC 96-05
WHEREAS, Grand Pacific Resorts, “Developer”, has filed a verified ay
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kristopher and Elizabeth
“Owner”, described as
That portion of Lot 2, Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, Sam Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the Official Plat thereof, bounded on the west by the easterly
line of the land described in Deed to the State of California
recorded October 4, 1951, in Book 4253, Page 578 of Official
Records :as Document No. 121143, bounded on the east by the
westerly line of that parcel of land conveyed in Deed to
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, recorded
January 29, 1946 as Document No. 9749, in Book 2031, Page
277 of Official Records; bounded on the south by the northerly
line of La Costa Downs, Unit No. 1 according to Map thereof
No. 2013, and bounded on the north by the north line of the
south 60 acres of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the southeast quarter of
the southeast quarter of Section 20 and Lot 4 and the
southwest quarter of southwest quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, excepting from said Lots 1 and 2, and portions
thereof, now or herebefore lying below the mean high tide line
of the Pacific Ocean
(“the Property”); arrd
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as sl
Exhibit “B“ dated Marclh 19, 1997, on file in the Planning Department, (Zone Change
05) as provided by Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
z
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of March l!
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
and arguments, if any, 01' all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cor
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Zone Change, ZC 96-05, based
following findings:
Findings:
1. That the proposeld Zone Change from Office to Commercial-Tourist is consist
the goals and po11,cies of the various elements of the General Plan, in that approv
Zone Change will promote the use of Carlsbad's coastal resources by both r
and visitors.
That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Z
mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan LC
Element, in that the General Plan designation for the site is Travel/Rec
Commercial.
The proposed land use is similar in intensity to the existing land use.
The nearby Encina Wastewater Treatment Facility has successfully taken
reduce by-product odors.
There are sufficient buffers surrounding the project site to accommoda
impactive development.
The South Carlsbad State Beach campground is similar to the proposed use
both encourage visitors to the California coast.
A hotel generates less daily traffic than an office and therefore will have
impact on adjacent roadways and intersections.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
PC RES0 NO. 4077 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
8. Potential impacts to adjacent properties caused by future development of the
noise, visual quality and light can be mitigated through design.
The proposed land use will support the local tourist trade. Development oft
travel services commercial is not anticipated to create significant impacts to t1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 19th day of March 1997, by the j
vote, to wit:
9.
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, H
Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
N
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
-a MICHAEL J. HOLZMLLER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4077 -3-
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4078
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE
DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM,
GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF ISLAND WAY AND SURFSIDE LANE.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
CASE NO: LCPA 96-1 1
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal
General Program, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conf
and
WHEREAS, Grand Pacific Resorts, “Developer”, has filed a verified ar
for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property o
Kristopher and Elizabeth Schulte, “Owner”, described as
That portion of Lot 2, Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of
Carlsbadl, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the Official Plat thereof, bounded on the west by the easterly
line of the land described in Deed to the State of California
recorded October 4, 1951, in Book 4253, Page 578 of Official
Records as Document No. 121143, bounded on the east by the
westerly line of that parcel of land conveyed in Deed to
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, recorded
January 29, 1946 as Document No. 9749, in Book 2031, Page
277 of OFficial Records; bounded on the south by the northerly
line of La Costa Downs, Unit No. 1 according to Map thereof
No. 2013, and bounded on the north by the north line of the
south 60 acres of Lots 1,2 and 3 and the southeast quarter of
the southeast quarter of Section 20 and Lot 4 and the
southwest quarter of southwest quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, $an Bernardino Base and
Meridian, excepting from said Lots 1 and 2, and portions
thereof, now or herebefore lying below the mean high tide line
of the Pacific Ocean
(“the Property”); and
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Io
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a 0
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Loca
Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit “A” dated March 19, 1997 as provided
Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.
14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Admi
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of March 1‘
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tl
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review F
any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on Jar
1997, and ending on March 10, 1997, staff shall present to the City C
summary of the comments received.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LCPA 96-11 based on the following 1
C)
Findings:
1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment is consistent with all a]
policies of the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program, in
project will not affect agriculture, shoreline, coastal bluffs, or coastal acces
within any of the coastal overlay zones; and is in conformity with the publj
and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, in that the p
located east of the first public roadway and will not affect public ac
recreation.
PC RES0 NO. 4078 -2-
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
18 l7
1 g
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 I)
2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Loca
Program is required to bring the Local Coastal Program into conformance
General Plan amid Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed land use will encourage use of the nearby South Carlsbad State
Amendment of the LCP will not deny existing residents or visitors of the gent
enjoyment of views or access to the Pacific Ocean and coastal lands.
The proposed land use will promote the goal of development of hoteVmote1 w
Seapointe Carlsbad Study area.
3.
4.
5.
PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 19th day of March 1997, by the fi
vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, Hc
Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT. None
ABSTAIN: None
R BE TNI LSEN, Chairperson \ w
CARLSBAD PLANNINlG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. H~ZMIL&R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4078 -3-
EXI- *e City of CARLSBAD Planning Departme 8 t
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIOE
Item~o. @
Application complete date: January 15, 1997
Project Planner: Christer Westman 1 Project Engineer: Ken Quon
P.C. AGENDA OF: March 19,1997
SUBJECT: GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96-1 1 - SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
An amendment to the General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use maps
change the designations from Office to Travel RecreationlCommercial and t'
Zoning Map frorn Ofice to Commercial-Tourist on a .5 acre parcel located on t
northeast corner of Island Way and Surfside Lane in Local Facilities Manageme
Zone 22.
I. RECOMMENDATIOIj
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 40;
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration and addendum to EIR 93-01 ar
ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4076, 4077 and 4078 RECOMMENDIN1
APPROVAL of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Progra
Amendment based on the finding and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
This application is a request for approval of a General Pan Amendment, Zone Change, and LOC
Coastal Program Amendment for a vacant .5 acre parcel located at the northeast comer t
Surfside Lane and Island Way. The existing land use designation is Office. The requested lar.
uses are Travel Services/ Commercial and Commercial-Tourist. The applicant will subm
development applications for the addition of 17 timeshare units on the property if the requeste
land use changes are approved.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The site is located to the east of Surfside Lane at the intersection of Island Way. The site undc
consideration is vacant, has been previously used for agriculture, is currently used occasionally fc
parking, and has a General Plan and a Zoning designation of Office (0). The Mello I1 segment lan
use designations of the Coastal Program are consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning
The project site was analyzed within a larger study, Seapointe Carlsbad, in 1986 to determin
appropriate land uses for an approximate 340 acre area. The study recommended that the propertj
P3a (project site), be designated as Residential Medium High (RMH) with an alternative of Offic
(0). The rationale for RMH was that a residential designation would create a solid block c
housing from Poinsettia Lane to just south of Palomar Airport Road. However, acknowledging th
existence of the Encina Wastewater Treatment Plant to the northeast and its primarily noctum:
odor impacts, an alternative land use of Office was recommended.
Q
GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LC 9 A 36-1 1 - SEAF'OINTE RESORT EXP flt SION
MARCH 19,1997
PAGE 2
The City chose to adopt the alternative land use of Office because of its proximity to the treatmt
facility. The "0" designation was considered more appropriate than residential because daytii
odor impacts from the treatment plant are less and an office is used primarily during the daytin
Also, because there are exceptional view opportunities, the location was considered to be prime
view offices. Since the adoption of the Seapointe General Plan Amendment, extensive work I:
been done on the Encina Wastewater Treatment Facility to inhibit the release of odors into t
surrounding area.
The study included a short discussion of the site as a visitor or recreation oriented location. T
study stated that because the site is located away from the Palomar Airport Road and Poinset
Lane freeway intersections, it is less competitive as visitor or recreation serving. However, t
view was noted as desirable for office or residential.
In May 1994, the City approved a similar request for the property immediately to the north. TI
site has been developed as the Seapointe Resort. The applicant's intention is to follow favorat.
land use decisions at City Council and Coastal Commission with development plans for t
expansion of the Seapointe timeshare resort by 17 units.
IV. ANALYSIS
Issues:
1) Is the proposed Travel Services land use comparable with the existing Office lar
use?
Is the proposed land use compatible with surrounding land uses?
Is the proposal consistent with the policies of the Local Coastal Program?
Will the proposal impact the Zone 22 Local Facilities Plan?
2)
3)
4)
The proposal is to amend the Site's General Plan designation from Office to Travel Service
Commercial.
Goals of the General Plan Land Use Element include: 1) the generation of commercial enterprisc
that support local industries, population and tourist trade, and 2) the encouragement (
development only in those areas which can best support a change in land use without impact.
The proposed use is directly associated with the tourist trade and as seen in the followin
discussion, it can reasonably be anticipated that development of the site will not create significar
impacts.
Existinn vs. Proposed
A comparison of office development versus timeshare development shows that they have som
potentially similar physical characteristics. Both uses are allowed up to 35 feet or 45 feet in heigl:
USE
17 unit timeshare expansion
9,000 sq. ft. office
RATE ADT
08 I unit 136
180 20 / 1000 sq. ft.
USE EDU RATE
17 unit hotel/timeshare .6 / unit
9,000 sq. ft. office 1 / 1800 sq. ft.
EDU GPD RATE GPD
10.2 x 220 2,244
5 x 220 1,100
T GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LC P A 96-1 1 - SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPA R SION
MARCH 19,1997
PAGE 4
How the property will be used is another factor to consider. The site would change from daytir
office use, to 24 hours for a timeshare. A 24 hour site occupancy could result in evening noise a
light generation. Guest room lights will be on during hours that an office building would typical
be dark. Televisions or radios may be used during the evening hours while an office wou
typically be unoccupied by workers and would therefor be silent. However, custodial services f
an office may be provided during evening hours and would require that lights be on. An office 01
timeshare may have security lighting which could be on from dusk till dawn.
A timeshare could have very similar physical characteristics as an office. However, trafl
generation and peak hour intersection impacts created by a timeshare are less than an off(
assuming they are equal in size.
Compatibility with Surrounding, Uses and Zones
The property located immediately to the west is City-owned land containing a stretch of Carlsb
Boulevard right-of-way. Directly west of Carlsbad Boulevard is the northern end of the SOL
Carlsbad State Beach campground. Property to the north is the Seapointe Resort and directly to t
south is a vacant residential subdivision, La Costa Downs, and the Lanikai Mobilehome Park. E:
of the site is the NCTD railroad right-of-way and vacant land zoned for OfficeiPlanned Industrial.
The proposed Commercial-Tourist (C-T) land use is in many ways compatible with existi
surrounding uses.
The state beach campground and the proposed timeshare are similar in that both are intended
attract visitors to the California coast. The length of stay and number of guests per timeshare w
or campground space could reasonably be the same. Access to both sites are separate and w
therefor not conflict. The hours of activity for either site can also be expected to reasonably be t
same. Carlsbad Boulevard acts as a buffer between the two uses, however, exterior lighting fro
the project site may intrude into the northernmost camp sites.
The residential properties directly to the south, La Costa Downs and Lanikai Mobilehome Park, 1
nature of their locations and shared point of access to Carlsbad Boulevard have the great(
potential for a concern of compatibility with the proposed land use.
Lots within the La Costa Downs subdivision begin approximately 70 feet south of the project s
and this transitional distance does provide some buffer. However, depending on the nature of&
neighboring uses, distance alone may not be adequate. Primary concerns raised by La Co:
Downs lot owners are: the physical presence, height and bulk, of a multi story building; potent
loss of ocean views; potential traffic related impacts and general compatibility with t
surrounding area. Preliminary design studies of the subsequent 17 unit expansion illustrate tl
there will not be significant compatibility impacts to the La Costa Downs subdivision.
Maximum allowable height within the proposed C-T Zone is 45 feet (if approved by the C
Council) and the maximum height allowed in the La Costa Downs Specific Plan is 25 fe
Although there is the potential for a 20 foot height differential between developments on the ti
sites, the distance between sites will provide the greatest amount of relief. This is because
GPA 96-041ZC 96-05LC P N 96-1 1 - SEAPOINTE RESORT EXP a SION
MARCH 19,1997
PAGE 5
addition to the width of Island Way, development on the project site as well as any fit1
residential development within La Costa Downs will be required to incorporate setbacks. 1
setbacks could add another 20 feet of separation between structures. The design of development
the project site will be additional opportunities for the creation of a transition from the project s
to the La Costa Downs subdivision. Natural light or air to the La Costa Downs will not be reduc
or denied as a result of development of the project site.
Development of the site in any form has the potential for impairing views directly to the north fro
the southerly properties. However, the focus of the views in the area is the Pacific Ocean which li
to the west. Those properties to the south which have views of the ocean will therefore not
impacted by development of the project site. In addition, the City has not adopted a vi<
preservation ordinance which guarantees existing views. Views from the industrial/offi
properties directly east will be obstructed to some degree by any development which lies to t
west.
The proposed timeshare use of the property has the potential for creating noise and/or light duri
evening hours that may not be present with an office use. However, projects can be designed
locate noise sources away from sensitive receptors, regulated to limit hours of exterior noi
production and designed to shield light sources. To date, there have been no complaints register(
against the existing timesharehotel regarding noise and light intrusion on surrounding properties.
The applicant has submitted development applications for permit approval of an additional 17 uni
for the exiting timeshare resort. The review of those applications will include the implementatic
of measures which will create a reasonable transition between properties with differing land uses.
Local Coastal Program
The project site is within the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program and
designated as Office. Discussion of the appropriateness of the proposed Local Coastal Progra
Amendment (LCPA) is nearly the same as the General Plan discussion. The LCPA is require
because the LCP and the City's General Plan must be consistent.
The LCP encourages lateral access to the beach (Policy 7-3), visual access (Policies 7-13 & 8-1
and the inclusion of a limited amount of hotel/motel within the study area (Policy 6-5).
Consistent with the intent of the LCP, access to the beach is considered a priority if the land u:
change is to be granted. The proposal of a timesharehotel will generate a greater use of the beac
than the existing office designation. Future development should also be reasonably sensitive 1
views of the ocean and coast line. The goal of providing hotel/motel within the Coastal Zone ca
be achieved through implementation of the proposal.
Growth Management
The proposed General Plan amendment will result in a reduction of the Average Daily Traffi
(ADT) and will not require that existing or planned facilities be increased. Because no ne1
conditions will be required within the Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) an amendment t
’ GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LC a 96-1 1 - SEAPOINTE RESORT EXP dlt SON
MARCH 19,1997
PAGE 6
the plan has not been required. Notice of a land use change within the LFMP would be provid
administratively through an addendum sheet within the zone plan.
With sensitive design, the proposed land use can be compatible with the surrounding land us(
During design of a specific project, consideration should be given to the limitation of noise a
light onto adjacent properties during evening hours as well as a transition between adjace
properties.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An environmental analysis of the proposed project was conducted and no significant impacts we
identified. Specifically the change of land use was assessed as not having an adverse impact on t
environment and a negative declaration was issued by the Planning Director. An addendum h
been included to the Master Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan, EIR 93-01, whil
amends the project description to include this property as TravelEecreation Commercial vers
Office. A brief discussion that the land use change does not have associated impacts is included.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Location Map
6. Background Data Sheet
7. Disclosure Statement
8. Addendum dated March 19,1997
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4075
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4076
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4077
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4078
Exhibit “A”-“B” dated March 19, 1997.
CW bk
0 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET e
CASE NO: GPA 96-04/ZC 93-05LCPA 93-04
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
APPLICANT: Continental Commercial Corporation
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Amendment to the General Plan and Local Coastal Progra
land use maps from Office to Travel Services Commercial and the Zoning Map from Office
Commercial-Tourist on property located east of Carlsbad Boulevard at Anacapa.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20. TownsE
12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County
San Diego, State of California, according to Official Plat thereof.
APN: 214-010-01 Acres: 8.02 Proposed No. of LotsAJnits: 78 units
h
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Office
Density Allowed: NIA Density Proposed: NIA
Existing Zone: Office Proposed Zone: Commercial-Tourist
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s ZoniI
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site Office Office - vacant
North Open Space Open Space - vacant
South Office Office - vacant
East Transportation Corridor
West Open Space Open Space - vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad - Equivalent PFF
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): NIA
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: August 12, 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Ix)
0 Other,
Negative Declaration, issued March 22, 1994
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
- e City of Ckrlsba
0-
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENTOFDISCLOSURE OR CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALLAPP
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCl
APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMIlTEE
(Please Print)
The following infonnation must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the applica
Grand Pacific Resorts
5050 Avenida Encinas
Suite 200
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2. Owner
List the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the propel
Kristopher & Elizabeth Sbhulte
Schulte Insurance Acrencv
937 1st Ave., Ste. 701
Encinitas. CA 92024
-
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, lis
and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporatio
any partnership interest in the partnership.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a ti
names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit orgz
as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
DISCLOS.FRM 'T /q(j PAC-
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1 576 - 16 19) 438-1 161 - FAX (61 9) 438-0
:A 0 0 Disclosure Statement
5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member I
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No - If yes, please indicate person(s)
- Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal covoration, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, di
political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
\
pm&&L,* - //-69,G
Signadre of'Ownerldate
Kristopher Schulte Tdv r S+r/pe
Print or type name of owner Print or &e name of applicant
-%\&I 9 SJ....&//-4476 SignaBurb-ot Owner/date
Elizabeth Schulte
name of owner
DISCL OS. FRM 2/96 PAGE
II EIR 93-01 ad
Mar a 0
ADDENDUM TO MEIR
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A request has been made to change the General Plan Land Use designation of a .5 acre parcel
land from Office to TravelIRecreation Commercial. The effect is a change to the EIR 934
project description to include the potential development of the .5 acre piece as TraveVRecreatic
Commercial versus Office.
CHANGE IN IMPACTS
There will be no change in impacts. The proposed land use, TraveURecreation Commercial wj
have the same development standards as the original land use designation. The developme
potential of the site will not be increased nor will it be decreased by virtue of the land u:
change.
The use of the property will be slightly altered in that as a TravelRecreation Commercial site t€
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) will be reduced from that of an office development. The net effe
will be a reduction in impacts because there will be less traffic impacts on surrounding roads ar
intersections and subsequently an incremental decrease in the cumulative contribution to a
quality.
E a e
EXISTING: 0
PROPOSED: T-R
SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
GPA 96-04lLCPA 96-1 I
E 0 e
C- PROPOSED:
SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
ZC 96-05
EXHII
Page 0 PLANNING COMMISSION 0 March 19,1997
2. GPA 96-041zC 96451LCPA 96-11 - SEAPOINTE RESORT EXTENSION - An amendment to tt General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use maps to change the designations from Offic
to Travel Recreation/CommerciaI and the Zoning Map from Office to Commercial-Tourist on a .
acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Island Way and Surfside Lane in Local Facilitie
Management Zone 22.
Chairperson Nielsen announced to the applicant, Commissioners and the public that this item, if approvec
will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration.
Project Planner Christer Westman stated that the City has received a request, from the applicant, fc
approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment for a .
acre parcel immediately adjacent to the Seapointe Resort. The site is currently vacant and withoL
vegetation. The request is to change the land use designation from Office to Travel ServiceslCommerciz
and Commercial-Tourist. He pointed out that the action(s) requested at this meeting are the samc
action(s) taken by the Planning Commission and City Council when the larger Seapointe project was bein!
considered. The site is bordered on the north by a CommerciaVTourist site and on the south by i
residential community (La Costa Downs). Mr. Westman stated that the land use designation should bc
changed because of the close proximity of a residential area. Because the site is close to the beach anc
the Coastal Program is designed to encourage beach use, the land use change would be appropriate.
Regarding traffic, Mr. Westman explained that, according to SANDAG, a hotel project generates les!
traffic than an office project.
Project Planner Westman described what is considered to be a slightly unique situation, in that it is the
Seapointe property owners who are requesting the change and who have also indicated that if a land USE
change is approved, they will follow-up with applications for a 17 unit expansion of the Seapointe Resort.
In addition, Mr. Westman pointed out that with the 17 unit expansion, the access to the site and parkins
could be accommodated with an underground parking garage which would not require any type of access
onto Island Way or Surfside Lane. Mr. Westman concluded his presentation by stating that staff is
recommending approval of this item.
Chairperson Nielsen invited the applicant to step to the podium.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 2386 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, representing Seapointe Resort
concurred with the staff report and urged the approval by the Commission.
Commissioner Noble asked Mr. Howes what percentage of the sales can be attributed to purchases by
local residents.
Mr. Howes deferred to Mr. Tim Stripe.
Tim Stripe 5050 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, responded by stating that the percentage in the City of
Carlsbad is quite probably under 10%.
Commissioner Noble stated that his reason for asking is related to traffic and that with 10% or less, he
doesn’t feel there would be a traffic problem.
Commissioner Heineman asked Mr. Howes why the parcel in question was not incorporated into the
original building.
Mr. Howes stated that his client did not own the property and because the owner was not interested in
selling, he was unable to buy it at that time.
Chairperson Nielsen asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to testify and seeing no one,
closed the Public Testimony and opened Commission discussion. .
Page 0 March 19,1997 PLANNING COMMISSION 0
Assistant Planning Director Wayne stated that upon review of the resolution, the following phras
(underlined & bold) must be added to complete the Action:
Page 2, Line 11 -
Page 2, Line 16 -
Page 2, Line 17 -
ACTION:
. . . relating to the addendum to EIR 93-01 & the Negative Declaration.
. . . of the addendum to EIR 93-01 of the Negative Declaration . , .
. . . Exhibit "EIR 93-01, addendum to MElR dated 3-19-97" and "ND" date?
Motion by Commissioner Noble, and duly seconded, adopt Planning Commissic
Resolution No. 4075, recommending approval of a Negative Declaration ai
addendum to EIR 93-01, and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 407
4077, and 4078, recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zor
Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment, including the corrections maL
by the Assistant Planning Director, based on the findings and subject to tt
conditions contained therein.
AYES: Nielsen, Noble, Heineman, Savary, Monroy, Welshons, and Compas
NOES: None
A BSTA I N : None
VOTE: 7-0
Chairperson Nielsen closed the Public Hearing.
I PROOF OF PUBLIOI)ON
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principai clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171 349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 1721 71 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
May23, 1997
f certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at California, this 23rd day Oceanside
of my, 1997
-___ __---- ______
,0
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space i& the County Clerks Filin
Proof of Publication of
Not ice of Public Hearing ......................
......................
you have any questions regarding this matter, ease call Christer Westman in the Planning epartment, at (619) 438-1161, ext. 4448.
cant: Grand Pacific Resorts LSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SEAPOINTE RESC
GPA 9604RC 96 I49695 May 23,1997
* 0 0
SEAPOINTE RESORT EXPANSION
GPA 96-04lZC 96-05lLCPA 96-1 I
I) il)
(Form A)
-
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached arc the materials necessary for you to notice
GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05/LCPA 96-11 - Seapointe Resort Expansion
for a public hearing before the City Council.
?lease notice the item for the council meeting of First Availablt .
Thank you.
- Assistant City Man-- Date *
-
p6
0 0
c3cnOl-3
cn Egg E?&%
znm HHH nuww
mm WZW\ runmu
6 OHm> ozoc
++:;
%W
zg E3
cn td
m
N 0 0
__
).
--a--..* - 0 -- -a
KRISTOPHER SCHULTE WILLIAM F & ADORNA TRAX JAMES W PORTER
2930 AVOCADO PT 5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS 20 5050 AVENIDA ENC:
DEL MAR CA 92014 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 920(
NICHOLAS S AICHELE JOHN G BACHI" CHARLES S DICKIE
5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS 20 1545 WILSHIRE BLVD 700 5350 E BROADWAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 LONG BEACH CA 9(
RICHARD T DONAHUE JOHN G BACHMAN RICHARD T DONAHU
4964 DAVID WAY SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 SAN BERNARDINO C
1545 WILSHIRE BLVD 700 4964 DAVID WAY
MARIE L STANTON RICHARD T DONAHUE JEFFREY S MCCABE
1438 PACIFIC ST 4964 DAVID WAY 267 LA VETA AVE
REDLANDS CA 92373 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 ENCINITAS CA 92
ANNE ALSOP-VERRIPS CAMPBELL THOMAS W SALLY S CELORIE
PO BOX 3472 2603 WAGON WHEEL RD PO BOX 2748
FLORENCE OR 97439 OXNARD CA 93030 RANCHO SANTA FE
MARJORIE R EDWARDS LESLIF L DEVLIN PATRICIA M TARTA
PO BOX 1905 1131 AMETHYST AVE 56 MONARCH BAY
RANCHO SANTA FE C 92067 MENTONE CA 92359 SOUTH LAGUNA BEA
TOMMY B WHITE MARTELL B MONTGOMERY ROBERT H BARELMA
6910 SANDCASTLE DR 1855 LOTUS CT 1967 N HIGHWAY 1
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92
P S T ASSCS JEFFREY S MCCABE CANNON
5150 E PACIFIC COAST HM 267 LA VETA AVE 3937 GAFFNEY CT
LONG BEACH CA 90804 ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGO CA 92
JEFFREY S MCCABE MARTELL B MONTGOMERY TOMMY B WHITE
267 LA VETA AVE 1855 LOTUS CT 6910 SANDCASTLE
ENCINITAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92C
ROBERT H BARELMA" THEODORE T VALLAS
1967 N HIGHWAY 101 246 5TH ST
ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN, EGO
S?% PUM;: TE OF C
/
ENClNlTAS SCHOOL DIS- CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
801 PINE AVE 1 CIVIC CENTER DR 101 SO RANCHO SANTA
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
0 a
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST
SAN DlEGUlTO SCHOOL DlST
701 ENClNlTAS BLVD 1960 LA COSTA AVE 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA CNTY WATER DlST 0 LIVEN H A I N WATER D I S
VALLEClTOS WATER DlST SD COUNTY PLANNING CITY OF ENClNlTAS
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD SUITE B 505 S VULCAN AVE
SANMARCOS CA 92069 5201 RUFFIN RD ENClNlTAS CA 92024
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF SAN MARCOS CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
1 CIVIC CENTER DR 300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG
SUITE 50 SUITE B SUITE 800
330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 921 24-1 331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
400 B STREET
LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123
91 50 CHESAPEAKE DR
CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MU N IC I PAL Wy& / _-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING D -
%
GPA 96-04lZC 96-05lL
_j____
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT SEAPOINTE RESORT E:
PROJECT PLANNER LABELS QlfmLgfl WShR,d
* 0 e
SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY)
WELLS FARGO PLAZA
SUITE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LABELS - 5 163
LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCIES)
APPENDIX A (PER COASTAL COMMISSION)
RESORT EXPANSION
GPA 96-04/ZC 96-05LCPA 96-1 1 - SEAPOINT
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROOM 700 1400 TENTH STREET
110 WEST A STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARC
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AF,
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
350 McALLISTER STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICI.
STEVE SHAFFER, AGRlCULTURE RES
ROOM 100
1220 N STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
’
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY
WILLIAM G. BRENNAN ROOM 5504
DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPECIAL COUNCIL
SUITE 2450 SACRAMENTO CA 95814
980 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1120 N STREET
DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS RESOURCES AGENCY
TIM VASQUEZ, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
2829 SAN JUAN ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
RM 1311
14 1 6 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
0 0
COASTAL CONSERVANCY AIR RESOURCES BOARD
ANNE GERAGHTY, MANAGER SUITE 1100
GENERAL PROJECTS SECTION 1330 BROADWAY
PO BOX 2815
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
OAKLAND CA 94612
ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CHUCK NAJARIAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISI(
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
DON LOLLOCK, CHIEF
15 16 NINTH STREET RM 1206-20
14 16 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR
LONGBEACH CA 90802
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIROMENTAL (
14 16 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
350 GOLDEN SHORE Rh4 1516-2
6
SOUTHERN REGION
JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE
SAND DIEGO CA 92108
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATI(
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILL TRAVIS
30 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 95814
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS PO BOX 100
SUITE 1005 SACARAMENTO CA 95801
100 HOWE AVE
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOA
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
P e 0
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SUITE B
9771 CALAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 630 SANSOME STREET
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ROBERT L. ERWIN, DIRECTOR
SUITE 1037
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ATTN: GARY FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION
RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST IRWRIN HOFFMANN
SUITE 102 SUITE F
2 12 1 -C SECOND STREET 194 W MAIN STREET
DAWS CA 95616 WOODLAND CA 95695
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL
L McGILVRAY
1825 CONNECTICUT AVENUE WASHINGTON DC 2006
WASHINGTON DC 20235
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QU
CHAIRMAN
722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST
6
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
BRIGADIER GENERAL PATRICK KELLY
RM 1216 TECHNICAL ENGINEERING BRANCE
630 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
RICHARD L FRASER
630 SANSOME STREET
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDING OFFICER, WESTERN DIVISION
ROBERT FORSYTH, DIRECTOR
PO BOX 727 LOSANGELES CA 90053
SANBRUNO CA 94066
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER
PO BOX 271 1
c e e
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL 1
DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER
SAN DIEGO CA 92132
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
JOHN B. MARTIN, REGIONAL DIRECTOR
SUITE 21 0
1450 MARIA LANE
WALNUT CREEK CA 94596-5368
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MOLLY BRANDT, DIRECTOR
OPERARIONAL PLANNING ROOM 1316
525 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
PHILLIP LAMMI, CHIEF
630 SANSOME STREET
U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
BOB BARNEY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIRECTOR
2800 COTTAGE WAY SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO CA 95825 901 MARKET STREET
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
6
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
LOWER COLORADO REGION
PO BOX 427
BOULDER CITY CO 89005 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94 102
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND UR
DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONA
450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
BIUAN O’NEILL, SUPERINTENDENT
BUILDING 20 1 FORT MASON
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 2800 COTTAGE WAY
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
JOHN H. TURNER
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MID-PACIFIC REGION
c 0 0
DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENI
REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK
11 11 2ND STREET
CRESCENT CITY CA 9553 1
SUPEIUNTENDENT
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
1901 SPINNAKER DRIVE DRAWER N
SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
RONALD M. JAEGER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
JAMES MCKEVITT. FIELD SUPERVIS(
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
SUITE 200 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATI(
3 1 1 1 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
WESTERN REGION
PO BOX 92007
LOSANGELES CA 90009
<
CATHERINE ENBERG
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION &
URBAN STUDIES
RM 105
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
COM.DEV DEPARTMENT PO BOX 1338
505 S. VULCAN AVE CARLSBAD CA 9201€
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
' TABATA FARMS ~:\AD$IN\LABELS\LCP e
INTERESTED PARTIES
UPDATED 11-96
OLBVENHAI N M .W. D. KENNETH E SULZER
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 SUITE B IST INT'L PLAZA, SUI
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124 SAN DIEGO CA 921C
GUY MOORE JR JAN SOBEL
REGIONAL WATER QUAL. BD
1966 OLiVENHAlN ROAD EXECUTIVE OFFICER SANDAG - EXEC DIRE
401 BSTREET
CRAIG ADAMS
SIERRA CLUB 6503 EL CAMINO REAL CHAMBER OF COMM
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER CARLSBAD CA 92009 PO BOX I605
3820 RAY CARLSBAD CA 9200
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LESLIE ESPOSlTO CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON BILL McLEAN
1893 AMELFl DRIVE 12142 ARGYLE DRIVE c/o LAKESHORE GAR
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 LOSALAMITOS CA 90702 7201 AVENIDA ENClN
CARLSBAD CA 9200
LANlKAl LANE PARK JOHN LAMB SPIERS ENTERPRISE
SHARP; SPACE 3 1446 DEVLIN DRIVE DWIGHT SPIERS
6550 PONTO DRIVE LOSANGELES CA 90069 SUITE 139
CARLSBAD CA 92008 23 CORPORATE PLA;
NEWPORT BEACH C
KIM SElBkY MARY GRIGGS SUPERVISOR BILL H(
SAN DEEGO GAS & ELECTRIC STATE LANDS COMMlSSSlON ATTN ART DANELL
PO BOX 1831 SUITE 100 SOUTH COUNTY OF SD, ROC
SAN DlEGO CA 92112 100 HOWE AVE 1600 PACIFIC HlGHW
SAN DIEGO CA 921C SACRA'MENTO CA 95825-8202
PERRY A LAMB SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEE ANDERSON
890 MERE POINT ROAD PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT
BRUNSWICK MAINE 0401 1 JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5 5200 EL CAMINO REP
5201 RUFFIN ROAD CARLSBAD CA 9200
SAN DlEGO CA 92123
CRA PRESIDENT
RICHARD RETECKI ANTHONY BONS FLOYD ASHBY
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
SUITE 1100 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 9202,
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
DALEIDONNA SCHREIBER MR/MRS MICHAEL CARDOSA CARLENE TlMM
7'163 ARGONAURB WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 PO BOX 1831
11 24 BLUE SAGE 41 6 LA COSTA AVE
6491 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO GAS & ELI
SAN DlEGO CA 92112
- --_-- --
0 0 Pa ________________--______________________--------------------------------
Owner Name Site Address Phone# Parcel ______________-__-______________________--------------------------------
SCHULTE,KRISTOPHER & E DESCANSCO BLVD*CARLSBA 214-010-03 CITY OF CARLSBAD *CARLSBAD CA 214-010-08
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-010-09
NORTH S D COUNTY TRANS *CARLSBAD CA 214-010-10
NORTH S D COUNTY TRANS LA COSTA BLVD*CARLSBAD 214-010-11
CITY OF CARLSBAD LA COSTA BLVD*CARLSBAD 214-010-12
TRAX,WILLIAM F & ADORN 6400 PONTO DR*CARLSBAD 2 14 - 010 - 13
PORTER,JAMES W & DEBOR OLD HIGHWAY 101"CARLSB 214-010-14
AICHELE,NICHOLAS S & J PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-021-01
BACHMAN,JOHN G TR & AL PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-021-02
DICKIE,CHARLES S & VIR "CARLSBAD CA 214-021-03
DONAHUE,RICHARD T & MA ANACAPA RD*CARLSBAD CA 214-021-04
BACHMAN,JOHN G TR & AL PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-021-08
BACHMAN,JOHN G TR & AL PONTO DR*CARLSB@ CA 214-021-09
DONAHUE,RICHARD T & MA *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-01
DONAHUE,RICHARD T & MA ANACAPA RD*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-02
STANTON, MARIE L PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-03
DONAHUE,RICHARD T & MA *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-04
DONAHUE,RICHARD T & MA *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-06
MCCABE,JEFFREY S "CARLSBAD CA 214-022-08
ALSOP-VERRIPS,ANNE *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-10
CAMPBELL THOMAS W LIVI PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-11
CELORIE, SALLY S MIMULUS*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-15
EDWARDS,MARJORIE R TR *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-17
DEVLIN, LESLIE L *CARLSBAD CA 214-022-18
TARTAGLIA,PATRICIA M "CARLSBAD CA 214-022-25
WHITE , TOMMY B FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-022-26
MONTGOMERY,MARTELL B & FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-022-27
BARELMA",ROBERT H & M FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-022-28
P S T ASSCS PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-29
MCCABE,JEFFREY S FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-022-30
CANNON FAMILY TRUST 12 FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214 - 022 -3 1
MCCABE,JEFFREY S PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 214-022-32
MONTGOMERY,MARTELL B & PONTO DR*CARLSBAD CA 2 14 - 022 - 33
WHITE, TOMMY B FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-023-02
BARELMA",ROBERT H & M FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-023-10
CITY OF CARLSBAD ALAMO RD*CARLSBAD CA 2 14 - 031- 03
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-031-09
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-031-10
CITY OF CARLSBAD ALAMO RD*CARLSBAD CA 214-031-11
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-031-12
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-033-01
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-034-01
CITY OF CARLSBAD AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-035-01
VALLAS,THEODORE T TR FRANCISCAN RD*CARLSBAD 214-150-09
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (P AVENIDA ENCINAS*CARLSB 214-150-19
THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARAJ!
Copyright (C)1997 Dataquick Information Systems
+
ENCINITAS SCHOOL Dl: CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
801 PINEAVE 1 CIVIC CENTER DR 101 SO RANCHO SANT
CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
0
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST
0
SAN DlEGUlTO SCHOOL DlST OLIVENHAIN WATER Dl
701 ENClNlTAS BLVD 1960 LA COSTA AVE 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA CNTY WATER DlST
VALLECITOS WATER DlST SD COUNTY PLANNING CITY OF ENClNlTAS
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD SUITE B 505 S VULCAN AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92069 5201 RUFFIN RD ENClNlTAS CA 92024
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF SAN MARCOS CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
1 CIVIC CENTER DR 300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG
SUITE 50 SUITE B SUITE 800
330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 400BSTREET
LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 921 24-1 331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123
91 50 CHESAPEAKE DR
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPT COMMUNITY SERVICES MU N IC I PAL WATER D I S’
PROJECT PLANNER
TABATA FARMS
CARLSBAD CA 920 18
e CITY OF ENCINITAS
COM.DEV. DEPARTMENT PO BOX 1338
505 S. VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
REGIONAL WATER QUAL. BD
WAD~~INLABELSLCP 0
INTERESTED PARTIES
UPDATED 11-96
OLlVENHAl N M. W.D.
ENCINITAS CA 92024 SUITE B 1ST INT’L PLAZA, SUI’ 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92124 SAN DIEGO CA 9210
CRAIG ADAMS GUY MOORE JR JAN SOBEL
SIERRA CLUB 6503 EL CAMINO REAL CHAMBER OF COMME
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER CARLSBAD CA 92009 PO BOX 1605
3820 RAY CARLSBAD CA 9200E SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LESLIE ESPOSITO CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON BILL McLEAN
1893 AMELFI DRIVE 12142 ARGYLE DRIVE c/o LAKESHORE GAR1
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 LOSALAMITOS CA 90702 7201 AVENIDA ENClNi
CARLSBAD CA 92005
LANIKAI LANE PARK JOHN LAMB SPIERS ENTERPRISE!
SHARP; SPACE 3 1446 DEVLIN DRIVE DWIGHT SPIERS
6550 PONTO DRIVE LOSANGELES CA 90069 SUITE 139
CARLSBAD CA 92008 23 CORPORATE PLAZ
NEWPORT BEACH CE
KIM SEIBLY MARY GRIGGS SUPERVISOR BILL HC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC STATE LANDS COMMISSSION ATTN: ART DANELL
PO BOX 1831 SUITE 100 SOUTH COUNTY OF SD, ROO1 SAN DIEGO CA 921 12 100 HOWE AVE 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 SAN DIEGO CA 9210’
PERRY A LAMB SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEE ANDERSON 890 MERE POINT ROAD PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT CRA PRESIDENT
BRUNSWICK MAINE 0401 1 JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5 5200 EL CAMINO REA1
5201 RUFFIN ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
KENNETH E SULZER
1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD EXECUTIVE OFFICER SANDAG - EXEC DIRE
RICHARD RETECKI ANTHONY BONS FLOYD ASHBY
COASTAL CONSERVANCY 1124 BLUE SAGE 416 LA COSTA AVE
SUITE 1100 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 92024 1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
DALEIDONNA SCHREIBER MR/MRS MICHAEL CARDOSA CARLENE TlMM 7163 ARGONAURA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 PO BOX 1831
6491 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO GAS & ELE
SAN DIEGO CA 92112
COPIES TO:
CITY CLERK
MAIN LIBRARY
BRANCH LIBRARY
WATER DISTRICT
k e 0
SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY)
WELLS FARGO PLAZA
SUITE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LABELS - 5163
LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCIES)
APPENDIX A (PER COASTAL COMMISSION)
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROOM 700 1400 TENTH STREET
110 WEST A STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEAR(
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AF
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
350 McALLISTER STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICT
STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RES
ROOM 100
1220 N STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY
WILLIAM G. BRENNAN ROOM 5504
DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPECIAL COUNCIL
SUITE 2450 SACRAMENTO CA 95814
980 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
I120 N STREET
DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS RESOURCES AGENCY
TIM VASQUEZ, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
2829 SAN JUAN ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
Rh4 1311
14 16 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
0
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
. I% e
AIR RESOURCES BOARD
ANNE GERAGHTY, MANAGER SUITE 1100
GENERAL PROJECTS SECTION 1330 BROADWAY
PO BOX 28 15
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
OAKLAND CA 94612
ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CHUCK NAJARIAN
SACRAMENTO CA 95814 14 16 NINTH STREET
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
DON LOLLOCK, CHIEF
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVI S I01
15 16 NINTH STREET RM 1206-20
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
. MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIROMENTAL CC
14 16 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR
LONGBEACH CA 90802
350 GOLDEN SHORE RM 1516-2
SOUTHERN REGION
JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE
SAND DIEGO CA 92108 30 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATIOh
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILL TRAVIS
SAN FRANCISCO CA 95814
-
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS PO BOX 100
SUITE 1005 SACARAMENTO CA 95801
100 HOWE AVE
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARC
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
0
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ROBERT L. ERWIN, DIRECTOR
SUITE 1037
630 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11
0 . .I .
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SUITE B
9771 CALAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92 124- 1 3 3 1
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ATTN: GARY FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION
RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST IRW HOFFMANN
SUITE 102 SUITE F
2121-C SECOND STREET 194 W MAIN STREET DAVIS CA 95616 WOODLAND CA 95695
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL
L McGILVRAY
1825 CONNECTICUT AVENUE
WASHINGTON DC 20235
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUP
CHAIRMAN
722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST
WASHINGTON DC 2006
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
BRIGADIER GENERAL PATRICK KELLY
RM 1216 TECHNICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH 630 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 1 1
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
RICHARD L FRASER
630 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDING OFFICER, WESTERN DIVISION
ROBERT FORSYTH, DIRECTOR
PO BOX 727
SANBRUNO CA 94066
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER
PO BOX 271 1
LOSANGELES CA 90053
0
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL 1
DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER
SAN DIEGO CA 92132
e I' I e
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
JOHN B. MARTIN, REGIONAL DIRECTOR
SUITE 2 10
1450 MARIA LANE
WALNUT CREEK CA 94596-5368
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MOLLY BRANDT, DIRECTOR
OPERARIONAL PLANNING ROOM 1316
525 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
PHILLIP LAMMI, CHIEF
630 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 1 1
U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
BOB BARNEY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIRECTOR
2800 COTTAGE WAY SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
901 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 03
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
LOWER COLORADO REGION
PO BOX 427
BOULDER CITY CO 89005
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URB
DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONAL
450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
BRIAN O'NEILL, SUPERINTENDENT
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
BUILDING 201 FORT MASON
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94 123
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
MID-PACIFIC REGION
JOHN H. TURNER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
L
e
DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENL
REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK
11 11 2m STREET
CRESCENT CITY CA 95531
'* 4 *
SUPERINTENDENT
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
190 1 SPINNAKER DRIVE DRAWERN
SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
RONALD M. JAEGER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
JAMES MCKEVITT. FIELD SUPERVISO
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIO
WESTERN REGION
PO BOX 92007
LOSANGELES CA 90009
- - --e _- - I_ I - __ * - CIA
KRISTOPHER SCHULTE WILLIAM F & ADORNA TRAX JAMES W PORTER
2930 AVOCADO PT 5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS 20 5050 AVENIDA ENC DEL MAR CA 92014 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 920
NICHOLAS S AICHELE JOHN G BACHMAN CHARLES S DICKIE
5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS 20 1545 WILSHIRE BLVD 700 5350 E BROADWAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 LONG BEACH CA 9
RICHARD T DONAHUE JOHN G BACHMAN RICHARD T DONAHU 4964 DAVID WAY 1545 WILSHIRE BLVD 700 4964 DAVID WAY
SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 SAN BERNARDINO C
MARIE L STANTON RICHARD T DONAHUE JEFFREY S MCCABE 1438 PACIFIC ST 4964 DAVID WAY 267 LA VETA AVE REDLANDS CA 92373 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 ENCINITAS CA 92
ANNE ALSOP-VERRIPS CAMPBELL THOMAS W SALLY S CELORIE PO BOX 3472 2603 WAGON WHEEL RD PO BOX 2748 FLORENCE OR 97439 OXNARD CA 93030 RANCHO SANTA FE
MARJORIE R EDWARDS LESLIE L DEVLIN PATRICIA M TARTA PO BOX 1905 1131 AMETHYST AVE 56 MONARCH BAY RANCHO SANTA FE C 92067 MENTONE CA 92359 SOUTH LAGUNA BEA
TOMMY B WHITE MARTELL B MONTGOMERY ROBERT H BARELMA 6910 SANDCASTLE DR 1855 LOTUS CT 1967 N HIGHWAY 1 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92
P S T ASSCS JEFFREY S MCCABE CANNON 5150 E PACIFIC COAST HW
LONG BEACH CA 90804 267 LA VETA AVE 3937 GAFFNEY CT ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGO CA 92
JEFFREY S MCCABE MARTELL B MONTGOMERY TOMMY B WHITE 267 LA VETA AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 1855 LOTUS CT 6910 SANDCASTLE 1 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 9201
THEODORE T VALLAS STqTE OF CALIFORl
SAN puBL=E%Fz DIEG
ROBERT H BARELMA”
ENCINITAS CA 92024 ENCINITAS CA 92024
1967 N HIGHWAY 101 - 246 5TH ST
e * - ,-
Citv of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
;bad, California 92009-1 576
CATHERING ENBERG
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
AND URBAN STUDIES
ROOM 105
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182
A notice has been mailec ail property owners/occupi
listed her in.
Signatulje k ”/ i/,O 1
Date ky): ’:,I zj