HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-07-08; City Council; 14250; Request for authority to destroy records.. r”
- F i’ 35 t.. 2 CITY OF CAR 3BAD -AGENDA BILL Lk?
AB# /4,250 - 1 I I Lt: DEPT. HD.
MTG. BY THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE CITY Am
DEPT. CA CITY MGR
7/8/97 REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO DESTROY RECORDS KEPT
~~~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 9 7- 535 authorizing the destruction of certain files.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This agenda bill is part of a continuing Record Management Program for City de
Adoption of the Resolution will complete the destruction of obsolete and unnecessar
City Attorney’s office.
Government Code section 34090 provides authority for destruction of documents th
than two years old and are no longer required. Authorization of the City Council is re
to the destruction of any documents.
The documents listed in Exhibit “A have been reviewed in accordance with the p
section 34090 of the Government Code, and meet those requirements, and the C
has consented to their destruction.
FISCAL IMPACT;
None.
EXHIBITS:
1. Resolution No.??-5(a 5
2. Exhibit “A’, list of records to be destroyed
U
0 9
E %
c 0 .- c, 8
s
- .- 0 c S
9
+
d
no,
$EW <a8 uwg iLLU 3044
ti->= ZdZ
9 0 a- on9
a>m$
OZJO zwo
aasa
aod
GO
$95
'0 tA Z-"S
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 97-525
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS KEPT BY THE
CITY ATTORNEY.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad resolves:
1. That pursuant to Section 34090 of the Government Code,
Attorney is authorized to destroy records over two years old as shown on Exhibit
2. This resolution shall not authorize the destruction of any reo
the City Attorney deems is necessary for the ongoing or current activity of the of
City Attorney.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting c
Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th day of July 1997, by tht
vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
23
24
25
26
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. MUTE
27
28
(SEAL)
0 0
EXHIBIT A
CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER
CARLSBAD OAKS BUSINESS CENTER
CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER
CAROLE’S FLOWER SHOP
CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN
CODE ENFORCEMENT 1991
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW REFORM ACT OF 1993
CONDOMINIUM PHASING
CONSTRUCTION LAW & MANAGEMENT SEMINAR
CORRESPONDENCE MISCELLANEOUS (1989,1990,1991,1992,1995)
COUNTRY STORE
COUNTY OF SAN DlEGO V. UNRUH
CULTURAL RESOURCES GUIDELINES
HARBOR DRIVE ACCESS (WINDSONG SHORES PROJECT)
HARBOR FISH RESTAURANT
HEADSTART
HIRATA, KAREN J. (PERSONAL)
HOLIDAY PARK IMPROVEMENTS
HOME CLUB
PACIFIC POINT DEVELOPMENT
PALOMAR OAKS WAYIBIRTCHER PACIFIC
PARK DRIVE AND MARINA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PERSONNEL IN RE: RULES GRIEVANCE (1991)
PERSONNEL IN RE: REINSTATEMENT OF FORMER DIRECTOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT/LEGAUDEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY (VOL. 1’2, &3)
PACKARD APPEAL (HDP 87-1(B))
PERSONNEL - EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS (GENERAL)
4
OKAY TO DESTROY
L m. k
RONALD R. BALL
City Attorney 612415 7
I
0 0
i Redevelopment (Village Area Project) (Working File 1979-1 981)
Redevelopment Carlsbad (General Correspondence 1975-1 978)
Redevelopment Carlsbad Documents (Iff9 - 1980)
Residential/ProfessiOnal Care Facilities (1 978)
Rick Engineering Senior Citizen Housing Vol. I and II
Satellite Sewer Ordinance (Proposed) 1979-1 980
School Boundaries (1 979)
School Fees - 1986 Legislation (1 987)
Senior Citizen Center: City/School District (1 988)
Septic Tank Ordinance (I 979)
Sewer Allocation First Phase (Agenda Bills, Resolutions) (1978)
Sewer Allocation First Phase (Correspondence) (1 978)
Sewer Allocation Phase I1 (thru 6/30/79)
Sewer Allocation Second Phase (7ff9-9/81)
Sewer Moratorium (1 R7-12i77)
Sewer Moratorium (Iff8 - 3/80)
Sewer Moratorium Assessment Districts
Sewer Moratorium (4/80-9/81) (Includes Lifting of Planning Moratorium),
Siege1 Brothers Agreement to Exchange
Sign Enforcement Withing Area (1985)
Singh - Oceanside Water Line Relocation (1977)
Smoking Ordinance (1 983)
Snug Harbor (Insurance Agreement Resolution) (1980)
Solicitors, Peddlers, Vendors, Canvassers (6/24/86) '
OKAY TO DESTROY 4
n L"eGzL
RONALD R. BALL 6/"4J 7 7,
City Attorney
\
* Litigation Files: 0 0
Bevilacqua v. City N45288 (Dismissal 1/10/91)
Call v. Patchett N43127 (9/7/89)
Carlsbad Highlands Investors Ltd. V. city N41438 (Judgment Dismissing 4/10/8Q)
City v. Marina Development (Growth Management Fees) (1 989)
City v. Morgan/Palomar Industrial N41292 (Final Order of Condemnation 9/90)
City v. Porter N93920 (Final Order of Condemnation 12/90)
City v. SDG&E N27679 (Franchise Fees) (Dismissed 11/9/88)
Highland Co. v. City N32292 (1/5/90)
Land Subsidence Cases
Miller v. Ford Motor Co. 613234 (Dismissed 518190)
Minor v. City N31779 (Order of Dismissal 6/13/89)
Roemer v. City N44191 (Summary Judgment 3/22/91, no appeal)
Rosenblatt v. City N39533 (Dismissed 6/8/90)
Rotchford v. City N37423 (Dismissed 9/22/88)
Ryberg v. City N49816 (Dismissed 6/25/91)
Singh v. City 4320-N (4/6/78)
Slocum v. City N50122 (Dismissed 12/2/91)
Smith v. CMWD 102107 (Settled 5/31/91)
Southern Cal. Pipe Trades v. Safeway Plumbing #79784 (Dismissal 3/1/89)
Southern Pacific Pipeline Co. v. State Board of Equalization #C688460 (3/7/90)
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City #877359 (3/7/90)
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City if810433 (3/7/90)
Southern Pacific Transportation #282416 (3/7/90)
Sprague v. City N34094 (Dismissed 4/8/91)
Sullivan v. Eyer N35546 (Dismissed 9/28/90)
Taylor v. City N42530 (City's Motion for Summary Judgment entered 12/20/89; Col
upheld lower court ruling on 3/19/91)
Texaco Refining v. City N35881 (Dismissal 1/25/90)
The Tresize Co. v. City #89401 (Dismissal 3/23/89)
Vargas v. City N45773 (Petition for Compromise of Minor's Claim; Order filed 2/4/9
Welty v, Carlsbad N44215 (BLEP)(Dismissed 11/30/89)
Windsor Projects v. City N41427 (Dismissed 2/20/91)
Yule v. City N39705 (Dismissed 3/10/89)
(Rogers- Pashby, Kooker, Davies, Ferguson, State Farm)
4
OKAY TO DESTROY
RONALD cL-2 R. BALL p*k
City Attorney &/a+/ 7 7 *